Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration

Enhanced external counterpulsation in the management of angina in the elderly

This study was undertaken to determine whether enhanced external counterpulsation is a safe and effective treatment for angina in octogenarians. In this prospective observational study, demographic and clinical outcome data on patients consecutively enrolled in the International EECP Patient Registry was examined. Of the 3037 patients analyzed, 249 (8%) were >/=80 years old. Octogenarians were more likely to be female and have a history of congestive heart failure (41% vs. 29%; p<0.001). They were less likely to have had previous revascularization. Fewer patients in the octogenarian group (76% vs. 84%; p<0.01) completed a course of treatment. Of those octogenarian patients who completed treatment, 76% reported a reduction in angina and quality of life improved significantly. Adverse events related to treatment were low. At 6-month follow-up, 81% reported maintenance of angina improvement. Thus, enhanced external counterpulsation is a low-risk intervention that offers octogenarians the ability to return to more normal activity and a better quality of life.

In-hospital outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions in the very elderly

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death among the elderly (> 65 years) and the very elderly (> 85 years). Little information is available regarding the outcome of very elderly patients referred for PCI in the current era of improved techniques, devices, and pharmacotherapy. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of very elderly patients > or = 85 years of age in a large, contemporary, multi-institutional PCI database. Five hospitals in the New York City metropolitan area contributed these prospectively defined data elements on consecutive patients undergoing PCI from 1 January 1998 to 1 October 1999. Of 10,847 patients, 5,341 (49%) were younger than 65 years, 3,342 (31%) were 65-74 years, 1,885 (17%) were 75-84 years, and 279 (2.6%) were at least 85 years of age. Following PCI, the very elderly developed stroke (P < 0.001) and renal failure requiring dialysis (P = 0.002) more commonly than younger patients following PCI. The very elderly had a significantly increased in-hospital mortality rate at 2.5% (P < 0.001). However, on multivariate analysis, age > or = 85 years was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 0.37-4.07). The very elderly should not be refused PCI on the basis of advanced age alone.

Assessing quality in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Quality assurance and improvement have increasingly been the focus of health care providers, third-party payers, and patients. Because cardiovascular procedures are common, easily identifiable with claims data, and account for a relatively large proportion of health care expenditures, particular attention has been paid to quality assurance in the setting of the diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization laboratory. The structure, process, and outcomes domains of quality measurement in the interventional laboratory involve the maintenance of volume standards, the availability of surgical backup, consistent tracking of procedural outcomes and complications so they can be compared with national standards, and the application of evidence-based therapy. Quality assurance i the diagnostic laboratory revolves around the clinical proficiency of the operators, the maintenance and management of catheterization laboratory equipment, and the presence of a continuous quality improvement program. The evolution of interventional equipment and techniques along with the establishment of national registries has led to a gradual improvement in the quality of percutaneous coronary intervention. Given the dynamic nature of cardiology, adaptable quality assurance and quality improvement programs will remain the foundation of successful catheterization labs.

Contrast nephropathy : an evidence-based approach to prevention

Contrast-induced nephropathy occurs in 2-10% of patients exposed to intravascular radiographic contrast agents and results in significant morbidity and mortality. Although the exact mechanism of this disorder has not been fully elucidated, contrast nephropathy is probably due to a combination of decreased renal medullary blood flow, resulting in medullary ischemia, and direct toxicity to renal tubules. Contrast nephropathy is most commonly defined as either a >25% increase or a >0.5 mg/dL rise in serum creatinine level within 48 hours of contrast medium exposure. Baseline characteristics associated with an increased risk for development of contrast nephropathy include the presence of baseline renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, volume depletion, and concomitant administration of nephrotoxic drugs. Many strategies have been investigated in an effort to prevent the occurrence of renal dysfunction following contrast media exposure. Intravenous hydration has been shown to significantly decrease the incidence of nephropathy in high-risk patients. However, trials of several prophylactic pharmacologic interventions have been mostly disappointing, including the administration of calcium channel antagonists, diuretics, dopamine, endothelin receptor antagonists and fenoldopam. The use of N-acetylcysteine has been shown in some trials to decrease the incidence of contrast nephropathy in patients with a baseline renal dysfunction, and should currently be strongly considered in this high-risk patient subgroup in addition to hydration. Our purpose is to review the contemporary literature regarding contrast-induced renal dysfunction and present an evidence-based approach for prevention of this complication.

Comparison of in-hospital and one-year outcomes in patients with and without diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous catheter intervention (from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry)

Extrapolation of improvements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and outcomes to patients with diabetes has not been systematically examined in clinical practice. Two waves of consecutive patients (n = 4,629) who underwent PCI from July 1997 to June 1999 enrolled in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry comprise the study population. There were 1,058 patients with treated diabetes and 3,571 patients without clinically evident diabetes. As a group, patients with diabetes tended to have more clinical, angiographic, and procedural risk factors. Although crude in-hospital mortality rates were higher in patients with diabetes (diabetics 2.3%, nondiabetics 1.3%; p = 0.02), the adjusted risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 2.66) was not significantly different. At 1 year, patients with diabetes had a significantly higher adjusted risk of mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.41) and need for repeat revascularization (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.74). There was a significant interaction between stent use and diabetic status with the need for repeat revascularization (adjusted RR in nondiabetics 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88; adjusted RR in patients with diabetes 1.20, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.65). Beta blockers at the time of hospital discharge were significantly associated with reduced mortality rates at 1 year in both groups.

Long-term clinical outcome of coronary artery stenting in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

The elderly constitute a rapidly expanding segment of our population and cardiovascular disease becomes more prevalent with increasing age. Existing data have shown that percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly are associated with an increase risk of in-hospital complications compared to younger patients. In the present study we retrospectively assessed the long-term clinical outcome of coronary artery stenting in an elderly population and compared them with the cohort of younger patients.

METHODS

The study population included 402 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who underwent coronary artery stenting; of these 69 were elderly (age > 70 years, group I) and 333 were younger (age <or= 70 years, group II). Percutaneous coronary intervention combined with stent implantation was performed using standard techniques. Clinical outcomes during follow-up (24 +/- 13 months, range 7-56 months) were obtained in all patients without major in-hospital complications. Survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models for any late clinical event were reported.

RESULTS

No difference in in-hospital complications or clinical success rate was observed between the two groups of patients. Complete revascularization was obtained more frequently in younger compared to elderly patients (P < 0.05). At 2 years, event-free survival was 62% in the elderly and 76% in younger patients (P < 0.001); this difference was mostly made-up by recurrence of angina in the elderly. Impaired left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction < 40%) was an independent predictor of late death.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery stenting is an effective therapeutic strategy in elderly with coronary artery disease and is associated with good short- and long-term results. Age per se should not preclude patients from undergoing coronary stenting.

Elderly patients have a favorable outcome after intracoronary radiation for in-stent restenosis

Intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) reduces recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) by inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation. The ability of these cells to replicate is limited with age due to changes in the telomeres. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of age on outcomes following IRT for ISR. We evaluated 1,088 patients with 6-month clinical follow-up who were enrolled in radiation trials for ISR using gamma- and beta-emitters. Patients were analyzed within and between IRT (n = 861) or placebo therapy (n = 227) in four age groups (< 55, 55-65, 66-75, > 75 years). Baseline characteristics were similar within each age group of IRT patients, except elderly patients (> 75 years) had a lower rate of diabetes (28% in patients > 75 years; P = 0.008) and a higher rate of previous CABG (59% in patients > 75 years; P < 0.001). The rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was reduced in the elderly. TLR at 6 months was 18% in patients < 55 years, 21% in 55-65 years, 12% in 66-75 years, and 10% in patients > 75 (P = 0.009). The MACE rate at 6 months was 21% in patients < 55 years, 29% in 55-65 years, 26% in 66-75 years, and 17% in patients > 75 (P = 0.03). No effect of age was seen in placebo patients. IRT-treated patients had reduced MACE compared to placebo in all age groups, driven by reduced target vessel revascularization. Age was an independent predictor of MACE at 6 months (OR = 0.8; CI = 0.70-0.93; P = 0.004). Angiographic restenosis was not clearly associated with need for TLR in patients > 75 years. In elderly patients (> 75 years) treated with IRT for ISR, the rate of TLR was significantly reduced compared to younger patients. However, this reduction in TLR was not associated with a reduction in angiographic restenosis, suggesting that TLR should not be used as a surrogate for angiographic evaluation.

Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary interventions: incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications

BACKGROUND

Stroke associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an infrequent although devastating complication. We investigated the incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of periprocedural stroke in unselected patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 9662 patients who underwent 12 407 PCIs between January 1990 and July 1999 were retrospectively studied. Stroke was diagnosed in 43 patients (0.38% of procedures). Patients with stroke were older (72+/-11 versus 64+/-11 years, P<0.001), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (42+/-12 versus 46+/-13%, P=0.04) and more diabetes (39.5% versus 27.2%, P=0.07), and experienced a higher rate of intraprocedural complications necessitating emergency use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) (23.3% versus 3.3%, P<0.001). In-hospital mortality (37.2% versus 1.1%, P<0.001) and 1-year mortality (56.1% versus 6.5%, P<0.001) were higher in patients with stroke. Compared with hemorrhagic stroke, patients with ischemic stroke had higher rate of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (57.1% versus 25%, P=0.037). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified emergency use of IABP as the strongest predictors for stroke (OR=9.6, CI 3.9 to 23.9, P<0.001), followed by prophylactic use of IABP (OR=5.1), age >80 years (OR=3.2, compared with age <50 years), and vein graft intervention (OR=2.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke associated with contemporary PCI is associated with substantial increased mortality. Elderly patients who experience intraprocedural complications necessitating the use of IABP are at particularly high risk.

Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the short- and long-term outcome of primary coronary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients older than 75 years of age.

BACKGROUND

The benefit of reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with AMI is uncertain, although elderly people account for a large proportion of deaths.

METHODS

We randomly assigned a total of 87 patients with an AMI who were older than 75 years to treatment with angioplasty or intravenous (IV) streptokinase. Clinical outcome was measured by taking the end points of death and the combination of death, reinfarction or stroke during follow-up.

RESULTS

The primary end point, a composite of death, reinfarction or stroke, at 30 days had occurred in 4 (9%) patients in the angioplasty group as compared with 12 (29%) in the thrombolysis group (p = 0.01, relative risk [RR]: 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2 to 20.0). At one year the corresponding figures were 6 (13%) and 18 (44%), respectively (p = 0.001, RR: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.7 to 18.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of patients with AMI who were older than 75 years, primary coronary angioplasty had a significant clinical benefit when compared with IV streptokinase therapy.

Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with ischemic heart disease are increasingly referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, reports of poor outcomes in the elderly have led to questions about the benefit of these strategies. We studied survival by prescribed treatment (CABG, PCI, or medical therapy) for patients in 3 age categories: <70 years, 70 to 79 years, and > or =80 years of age.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) is a clinical data collection and outcome monitoring initiative capturing all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and revascularization in the province of Alberta, Canada, since 1995. Characteristics and long-term outcomes of a cohort of >6000 elderly patients with ischemic heart disease were compared with younger patients. In 15 392 patients >70 years of age, 4-year adjusted actuarial survival rates for CABG, PCI, and medical therapy were 95.0%, 93.8%, and 90.5%, respectively. In 5198 patients 70 to 79 years of age, survival rates were 87.3%, 83.9%, and 79.1%, respectively. In 983 patients > or = 80 years of age, survival was 77.4% for CABG, 71.6% for PCI, and 60.3% for medical therapy. Absolute risk differences in comparison to medical therapy for CABG (17.0%) and PCI (11.3%) were greater for patients > or =80 years of age than for younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients paradoxically have greater absolute risk reductions associated with surgical or percutaneous revascularization than do younger patients. The combination of these results with a recent randomized trial suggests that the benefits of aggressive revascularization therapies may extend to subsets of patients in older age groups.

Aging-associated changes in vascular activity: a potential link to geriatric cardiovascular disease

Ischemic cardiovascular disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States population over the age of 65. Prior clinical studies have demonstrated that the severity of cardiovascular pathophysiology is increased in older individuals. Both in vitro and in vivo experimental studies have shown that age-associated clinical events parallel changes in vascular function. Aging is associated with systemic as well as cardiac alterations in three basic vascular regulatory functions: vascular tone, hemostasis, and vascular repair/angiogenesis. This article reviews the molecular and cellular events that may contribute to senescent cardiac pathology. Indeed, a better understanding of the biology of aging-associated vascular dysfunction is fundamental for the development of therapeutics targeted for the treatment of cardiovascular disease in older individuals.

[Unstable angina in the elderly]

Unstable angina and acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation are frequent and their prognosis is poor in the elderly. Indeed, age is the most powerful predictor of in-hospital mortality in this setting. The clinical benefit of interventional strategies, as demonstrated by FRISC II and TACTICS TIMI 18 studies, seems to be most important in this age subset. PURSUIT trial demonstrates that the efficacy of eptifibatide, a IIb/IIIa platelet receptor inhibitor, increases in elderly patients who simultaneously undergo revascularization interventions. Individual application of such treatment strategies may be difficult. Potential triggering factors of unstable angina and comorbidities have to be taken into account, and the overall management should be highly individualized in elderly patients. The aim remains to achieve appropriate myocardial revascularization, as often as possible by focusing coronary angioplasty on the culprit vessel. Coronary surgery generally should be reserved for coronary lesions which are not suitable for percutaneous revascularization. Clinical improvement is maximal in patients with severe initial presentation.

Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Since previous randomised treatment trials in coronary disease have focused on patients younger than 75 years of age, their findings might not apply to the elderly population in whom the cardiac risk profile, risk of intervention, and comorbidities are increased. We aimed to assess quality of life and outcome of elderly patients with coronary disease after medical or revascularisation therapy.

METHODS

In this randomised, prospective, multicentre trial, we enrolled patients aged 75 years or older with chronic angina of at least Canadian Cardiac Society class II despite at least two antianginal drugs. Patients were randomly assigned coronary angiography and revascularisation or optimised medical therapy. The primary endpoint was quality of life after 6 months, as assessed by questionnaire and the presence of major adverse cardiac events (death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or hospital admission for acute coronary syndrome with or without the need for revascularisation). Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

150 patients were assigned medical therapy and 155 invasive therapy. Two protocol violators in each group were not included in the analysis. After 6 months, angina severity decreased and measures of quality of life increased in both treatment groups; however, these improvements were significantly greater after revascularisation. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 72 (49%) of patients in the medical group and 29 (19%) in the invasive group (p<0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

Patients aged 75 years or older with angina despite standard drug therapy benefit more from revascularisation than from optimised medical therapy in terms of symptom relief and quality of life. Therefore, these patients should be offered invasive assessment despite their high risk profile followed by revascularisation if feasible.

Post-myocardial infarction risk stratification in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the use of post-myocardial infarction (MI) risk stratification in the elderly. Although expert panels have recommended risk stratification after MI, limited data are available on whether patients actually undergo suggested testing. In particular, concern has been raised that the elderly, who are at high risk for recurrent ischemia and short-term death, are not referred as often as younger patients for post-MI testing.

METHODS

We studied the records of 192,311 Medicare patients (age > or = 65 years) admitted with MI between January 1992 and November 1992. By combining Medicare part A and part B data, we created a longitudinal record of patient care within 60 days of an MI admission. We describe the pattern of post-MI testing for ischemia and left ventricular function and outcomes as a function of patient age.

RESULTS

Patients > or = 75 years of age were significantly less likely than patients 65 to 74 years of age to have either cardiac catheterization (17% vs 43%) or any test for coronary artery disease severity (24% vs 53%). They were also less likely to have a test of left ventricular function (61% vs 76%). Even after adjustment for baseline characteristics, older patients remained less likely than younger patients to have an assessment of coronary artery disease severity (odds ratio, 0.44) or left ventricular function (odds ratio, 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-MI risk stratification declines with age and falls short of recommendations in our nation's elderly. This lack of testing may result in lost opportunities for therapeutic interventions in this high-risk group.

Detection and management of concomitant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery

OBJECTIVES

No method has been established to detect and manage coronary artery disease in patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery.

METHODS

Subjects were 192 patients scheduled for elective thoracic aortic surgery. Selection criteria for coronary angiography included a history of coronary artery disease or a positive dipyridamole myocardial perfusion imaging test.

RESULTS

Four patients were inoperable due to complications associated with coronary angiography or aneurysm rupture following coronary revascularization. A total of 55 patients with coronary angiography (group A) underwent 57 thoracic aortic operations and 133 patients without coronary angiography (group B) underwent 143 similar operations. Of 13 group A patients with significant coronary stenosis, 9 underwent either preoperative percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (n = 3) or concomitant coronary artery bypass (n = 6). Perioperative myocardial infarction occurred in 3 group A patients (5%) and in 4 group B patients (1%, ns). The incidence of cardiac events--perioperative myocardial infarction or cardiac death--in group A (11%, 6/57) was higher than that in group B (3%, 4/143; p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated incomplete revascularization of major coronary arteries with significant stenosis as a risk factor for cardiac events (p = 0.0106).

CONCLUSIONS

Although dipyridamole myocardial perfusion imaging was useful, additional selection criteria for coronary angiography is needed. Complete revascularization of major coronary arteries with significant stenosis is essential to reduce postoperative cardiac events.

Database Conference January 27-30, 2000, Washington D.C.--Do existing databases answer clinical questions about geriatric cardiovascular disease and stroke?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Most randomized, controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of pharmaceutical, surgical, and device interventions for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease have excluded patients over 75 years of age. Consequently, the use of these therapies in the older population is based on extrapolation of safety and effectiveness data obtained from younger patients. However, there are many registries and observational databases that contain large amounts of data on patients 75 years of age and older, as well as on younger patients. Although conclusions from such data are limited, it is possible to define the characteristics of patients who did well and those who did poorly. The goal of this conference was to convene the principal investigators of these databases, and others in the field of geriatric cardiology, to address questions relating to the safety and effectiveness of treatment interventions for several cardiovascular conditions in the elderly. Seven committees discussed the following topics: (I) Risk Factor Modification in the Elderly; (II) Chronic Heart Failure; (III) Chronic Coronary Artery Disease: Role of Revascularization; (IV) Acute Myocardial Infarction; (V) Valve Surgery in the Elderly; (VI) Electrophysiology, Pacemaker, and Automatic Internal Cardioverter Defibrillators Databases; (VII) Carotid Endarterectomy in the Elderly. The chairs of these committees were asked to invite principal investigators of key databases in each of these areas to discuss and prepare a written statement concerning the available safety and efficacy data regarding interventions for these conditions and to identify and prioritize areas for future study. The ultimate goal is to stimulate further collaborative outcomes research in the elderly so as to place the treatment of cardiovascular disease on a more scientific basis.