Relation of serum lipoprotein(a) concentration and apolipoprotein(a) phenotype to coronary heart disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

Reduction of lipoprotein(a) following treatment with lovastatin in patients with unremitting nephrotic syndrome

Pharmocologic treatment of the hyperlipidemia associated with the nephrotic syndrome with lovastatin has been previously shown to be safe and effective. However, there is no information on the effect of lovastatin treatment on plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels in patients with the nephrotic syndrome. We administered lovastatin (40 to 80 mg/day) to 20 adult patients with unremitting nephrotic syndrome for 8 weeks to assess its effect on plasma Lp(a) and other plasma lipid concentrations. Apoprotein(a) (apo(a)) phenotype was determined in all patients. Patients were grouped according to their plasma Lp(a) levels. Those with elevated plasma Lp(a) (> or = 30 mg/dL) were placed in group I and those with normal Lp(a) levels (< 30 mg/dL) were placed in group II. Mean total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were similarly and significantly reduced in groups I and II (-35.9% and -43.3%, P < 0.0005, P < 0.0005 group I, and -31.0% and -42.0%, P < 0.02, P < 0.03 group II, respectively). The median reduction in plasma Lp(a) was -32% (P < 0.003) in nephrotic patients in group I, whereas the median decline in plasma Lp(a) levels in nephrotic patients in group II was only -8.0% (P = 0.052). The overall frequency of the high molecular weight (M(r)) apo(a) phenotype S4 was 70% in nephrotic patients. There was no correlation between plasma Lp(a) and apo(a) phenotype. Treatment with lovastatin results in a favorable response in terms of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering in patients with the nephrotic syndrome; however, plasma Lp(a) levels are uniformly and significantly reduced only in nephrotic patients with elevated baseline plasma Lp(a) concentrations. There was no correlation between plasma Lp(a) concentration and other lipid and biochemical parameters.

No association between plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations and the presence or absence of coronary atherosclerosis in African-Americans

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are associated with coronary atherosclerosis in Caucasians. Although African-Americans have a higher median plasma Lp(a) concentration than Caucasians, they do not have a greater incidence of coronary atherosclerosis. This study was performed to determine whether the plasma concentration of Lp(a) is associated with coronary atherosclerosis in African-Americans. The fasting plasma concentrations of Lp(a) and lipoproteins were measured in 140 African-American subjects (62 men, 78 women, aged 31 to 80 years) 18 +/- 16 months (mean +/- SD) after they underwent coronary angiography: 72 had angiographically normal coronary arteries and 68 had > 70% luminal diameter narrowing of one or more major epicardial coronary arteries. The groups were similar in age, sex, and other risk factors for atherosclerosis. The subjects with coronary artery disease had higher plasma concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and VLDL and LDL cholesterol (P = .04) and lower concentrations of HDL cholesterol (P = .0001) than subjects without coronary artery disease, but there was no significant difference in the plasma concentration of Lp(a). The distribution of apolipoprotein(a) alleles by size was also not significantly different between the two groups. These results suggest that the plasma concentration of Lp(a) is not an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease in African-Americans.

FH Afrikaner-3 LDL receptor mutation results in defective LDL receptors and causes a mild form of familial hypercholesterolemia

Three founder-related gene mutations (FH Afrikaner-1, -2, and -3) that affect the LDL receptor are responsible for 90% of the familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in South African Afrikaners. Patients heterozygous for the FH Afrikaner-1 (FH1) mutation, which results in receptors having approximately 20% of normal receptor activity, have significantly lower plasma cholesterol levels and milder clinical symptoms than heterozygotes with the FH Afrikaner-2 mutation, which completely abolishes LDL receptor activity. In this study we re-created the FH3 mutation (Asp154-->Asn) in exon 4 by site-directed mutagenesis and analyzed the expression of the mutant receptors in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The mutation resulted in the formation of LDL receptors that are markedly defective in their ability to bind LDL, whereas binding of apoE-containing beta-VLDL is less affected. The mutant receptors are poorly expressed on the cell surface as a result of significant degradation of receptor precursors. The plasma cholesterol levels of 31 FH3 heterozygotes were similar to FH1 heterozygotes but significantly lower than FH2 heterozygotes. The FH1 and FH3 heterozygotes also tended to be less severely affected clinically (by coronary heart disease and xanthomata) than FH2 patients. This study demonstrates that mutational heterogeneity in the LDL receptor gene influences the phenotypic expression of heterozygous FH and that severity of expression correlates with the activity of the LDL receptor measured in vitro. The results further indicate that knowledge of the specific mutation underlying FH in heterozygotes is valuable in determining the potential risk of premature atherosclerosis and should influence the clinical management of FH patients.

Lipoprotein (a) and vascular disease in diabetic patients

In order to assess the potential role of lipoprotein (a) as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus, plasma concentrations were measured in a large group (n = 500) of non-insulin-dependent (NIDDM, n = 355) and insulin-dependent (IDDM, n = 145) patients. Concentrations of lipoprotein (a) were compared in diabetic patients with (n = 153) or without (347) documented vascular disease (ischaemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease or macroangiopathy). They were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in patients with ischaemic heart disease (mean [interquartile range] 15.5 (5.0-38.0) vs 9.0 (4.5-26.0) mg/dl) or macroangiopathy (13.0 (5.0-38.0) vs 9.0 (4.0-25.0) mg/dl) compared to patients without manifestations of vascular disease. In addition, stepwise logistic regression analysis identified lipoprotein (a) levels > or = 30 mg/dl as being independently associated with the presence of cardiovascular disease. Lipoprotein (a) was an independent risk factor for ischaemic heart disease and macroangiopathy in this group of IDDM and NIDDM patients.

Thyroid hormone (fT4) reduces lipoprotein(a) plasma levels

To study the influence of thyroid hormone on Lp(a) plasma concentration we measured Lp(a), total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides and fT4 levels and determined apo(a) phenotypes in 26 patients with hyperthyroidism in a follow-up study before and after thyreostatic treatment. The pretreatment values of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, and Lp(a) were significantly reduced as compared with those of healthy controls. The reduced mean Lp(a) concentrations could not be explained by a difference of apo(a) 'size allele' frequencies between patients and controls. During thyreostatic treatment mean concentrations of TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C increased significantly. The mean Lp(a) value was not changed after 4 weeks of treatment. The individual changes of Lp(a), however, correlated significantly with those of LDL-C levels (R = 0.40, P = 0.04). Eighty-one per cent of the patients showed an increase of Lp(a) or no change of the Lp(a) level and 19% reacted with a decrease upon thyreostatic treatment. The observed lipid and lipoprotein changes were not different in patients with Graves disease or multifocal toxic goiter. The results indicate that Lp(a) plasma levels are decreased in the hyperthyroid state irrespective of the pathogenic mechanism.

Effect of simvastatin on Lp(a) concentrations

The effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on Lp(a) concentrations is controversial, with some studies showing an increase and others showing no effect on Lp(a) concentrations. Many of these studies have been limited by small sample size and the lack of a prospective design. We evaluated the effect of four treatments: (1) placebo, (2) simvastatin 10 mg PO QPM, (3) simvastatin 20 mg PO QAM, and (4) simvastatin 20 mg PO QPM on Lp(a) concentrations in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of 24 weeks in 343 subjects in 28 clinical sites in the United States. Simvastatin was not associated with a change in Lp(a) concentrations relative to placebo. These results were not affected by controlling for race, initial Lp(a) level, or urinary albumin excretion. Simvastatin significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (10 mg PO QPM: -27.6%; 20 mg PO QAM: -28.1%; and 20 mg PO QPM: -34.3%, all p < 0.001). It was concluded that in a large, randomized, controlled trial, simvastatin does not affect Lp(a) levels but markedly lowers LDL cholesterol levels.

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Regression Study: a randomised trial of low-density-lipoprotein apheresis

Low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has the theoretical advantage over anion-exchange resins and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors of decreasing lipoprotein(a) as well as LDL. To confirm this advantage, patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and coronary artery disease were randomised to receive LDL apheresis fortnightly (with disposable dextran sulphate/cellulose columns) plus simvastatin 40 mg daily, or colestipol 20 g plus simvastatin 40 mg daily. Quantitative coronary angiography was repeated after a mean of 2.1 years in 20 patients undergoing apheresis and in 19 on combination drug therapy. Changes in serum lipoproteins were similar in both groups apart from greater lowering by apheresis of LDL cholesterol (3.2 vs 3.4 mmol/L in drug group, p = 0.03) and lipoprotein(a) (geometric means 14 vs 21 mg/dL, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in primary angiographic endpoints per patient but lesion-based and segment-based secondary endpoints were biased in favour of the drug group (change in minimum lumen diameter of lesions 0.07 vs -0.004 mm, p = 0.046; change in mean lumen diameter of segments 0.02 vs -0.06 mm, p = 0.01). None of the angiographic changes correlated with lipoprotein(a) concentrations. Per patient changes in % diameter stenosis and minimum lumen diameter in the two groups were as or more favourable than those observed in five published trials that assessed lipid-lowering drug therapy by quantitative coronary angiography. Although LDL apheresis combined with simvastatin was more effective than colestipol plus simvastatin in reducing LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a), it was less beneficial in influencing coronary atherosclerosis and should be reserved for patients unresponsive to drugs. Decreasing lipoprotein(a) seems to be unnecessary if LDL cholesterol is reduced to 3.4 mmol/L or less.

Effect of insulin treatment on serum lipoprotein(a) in non-insulin-dependent diabetes

In order to evaluate whether Lp(a), a lipoprotein that is potentially thrombogenic and atherogenic, is a potential risk factor for CAD in non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM), we compared the Lp(a) and its distribution in 145 NIDDM patients with that in 94 healthy control subjects. Furthermore, we studied the effect of insulin treatment on serum Lp(a) in 108 patients with NIDDM. Male and female NIDDM patients had similar Lp(a) concentrations to healthy controls (median value 167 mg L-1, range 15-1550 mg L-1 vs. 157 mg L-1, range 15-919 mg L-1, NS and 92, range 15-1190 mg L-1 vs. 103 mg L-1, range 15-842 mg L-1, NS). Also, the cumulative distribution of Lp(a) did not differ between the NIDDM patients and healthy subjects. Insulin treatment increased Lp(a) in diabetics with a Lp(a) concentration of less than 300 mg L-1, but this effect was not related to the concomitant improvement in metabolic control (mean change (+/- SEM) of HbA1c from 9.80 +/- 0.15 to 8.00 +/- 0.12; P < 0.001). In subjects with elevated Lp(a) concentrations (> 300 mg L-1) the Lp(a) concentration was unaffected by insulin, despite a similar improvement in glycaemic control. These results suggest that insulin may modulate the concentration of Lp(a).

The low density lipoprotein receptor is not required for normal catabolism of Lp(a) in humans

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an atherogenic lipoprotein which is similar in structure to low density lipoproteins (LDL). The role of the LDL receptor in the catabolism of Lp(a) has been controversial. We therefore investigated the in vivo catabolism of Lp(a) and LDL in five unrelated patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) who have little or no LDL receptor activity. Purified 125I-Lp(a) and 131I-LDL were simultaneously injected into the homozygous FH patients, their heterozygous FH parents when available, and control subjects. The disappearance of plasma radioactivity was followed over time. As expected, the fractional catabolic rates (FCR) of 131I-LDL were markedly decreased in the homozygous FH patients (mean LDL FCR 0.190 d-1) and somewhat decreased in the heterozygous FH parents (mean LDL FCR 0.294 d-1) compared with controls (mean LDL FCR 0.401 d-1). In contrast, the catabolism of 125I-Lp(a) was not significantly different in the homozygous FH patients (mean FCR 0.251 d-1), heterozygous FH parents (mean FCR 0.254 d-1), and control subjects (mean FCR 0.287 d-1). In summary, absence of a functional LDL receptor does not result in delayed catabolism of Lp(a), indicating that the LDL receptor is not a physiologically important route of Lp(a) catabolism in humans.

The effect of reduction of lipoprotein (a) on cellular cholesterol synthesis in non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects

This study investigates the effect of Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) on cellular cholesterol synthesis in non-diabetic (n = 7) and Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects (n = 7) with elevated levels of Lp(a) (> 20 mg/dl). N-Acetylcysteine was used to lower Lp(a) in the control subjects and their lipoproteins were re-examined after 7 days of treatment. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was isolated and separated from Lp(a) by sequential ultracentrifugation. Regulation of cellular cholesterol synthesis was assessed by measuring incorporation of [14C]acetate into mononuclear leucocytes in the presence of LDL and Lp(a). Cellular cholesterol content was determined by a fluorometric assay. Delivery of cholesterol to the cell was examined using [3H]cholesteryl oleate-labelled LDL or Lp(a). LDL (5 micrograms/ml) from non-diabetic subjects suppressed cellular cholesterol synthesis by 66.2%, while Lp(a) at a similar concentration only suppressed cholesterol synthesis by 5.8% (P < 0.001). At a concentration of 20 micrograms/ml, Lp(a) suppressed cholesterol synthesis by 31.7%. The situation was similar in the diabetic subjects. Serum LDL cholesterol in non-diabetic subjects was 4.2 +/- 0.5 mmol/l and the LDL esterified/free cholesterol ratio was 2.6 +/- 0.2. Following treatment with N-acetylcysteine, LDL cholesterol did not change, while Lp(a) decreased significantly by 24% (P < 0.05). The LDL esterified/free cholesterol ratio decreased to 2.2 +/- 0.2 (P < 0.05) and there was a significant increase in the ability of the subjects LDL to inhibit cellular cholesterol synthesis (P < 0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between plasma Lp(a) and the ability of the patients' LDL to inhibit cellular cholesterol synthesis (r = -0.68, P < 0.01). [3H]Cholesteryl-oleate-LDL (5 micrograms/ml) delivered 266 +/- 13 ng cholesteryl oleate/mg cell protein, while it took 20 micrograms of [3H]cholesteryl oleate-labelled-Lp(a) to deliver a similar concentration (315 +/- 21 ng cholesteryl oleate/mg cell protein). In conclusion it appears possible that the atherogenicity of Lp(a) may be associated with its effect on the LDL receptor which alters LDL receptor uptake, LDL composition and cellular cholesterol synthesis.

Endogenous sex hormones: impact on lipids, lipoproteins, and insulin

Estrogen use has been reported to decrease triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Estrogen use increases the secretion of large, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) and also stimulates the uptake of VLDL-C by the liver and increases the catabolism of LDL-C in the liver. Sex hormones may affect several enzymes involved in the metabolism of HDL-C and triglyceride and may also affect lipolysis. In both pre- and postmenopausal women, several studies have shown that increased glucose and insulin concentrations are associated with increased free testosterone and decreased sex hormone binding globulin. The temporal direction of this relationship in premenopausal women is not clear, however. In contrast to women, increased androgen concentrations in men do not seem to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk factors, although testosterone concentrations are associated with increased HDL-C and decreased insulin concentrations. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) appear to be associated with improved cardiovascular risk factors in men, but this connection in women is less clear.

Effectiveness of cascade filtration plasmapheresis in two patients affected by familial hypercholesterolemia

Hypercholesterolemia has been recognised as a primary risk factor for coronary heart disease. Reduction of plasma levels of total and LDL cholesterol has been shown to decrease coronary atherosclerosis. Plasmapheresis represents an useful non-pharmacological tool to treat severe hypercholesterolemias. We have evaluated the effectiveness of a system of plasmapheresis using a cascade filtration method in two young male subjects (aged 16 and 26 years) with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Both showed severe coronary atherosclerosis as determined by angiography. Procedures were performed at intervals of 7 days in each case. We observed a mean reduction of plasma levels of total cholesterol of 59.5% (range 31.0-75.5%); LDL-cholesterol, 61.6% (range 32.6-77.1%); triglycerides, 48.1%; HDL-cholesterol, 31.1%; apo A-I, 30.8%; and apo B, 57.6%. We also noted a reduction of other parameters, such as fibrinogen (49.9%) and Lp(a) (59.9%). At the end of each procedure about 8 g of cholesterol was removed from the total body pool. A decrease of total proteins (26.9%) and albumin (19.6%) was also observed, but this was completely restored before the next apheresis (1 week). These data show the effectiveness of the removal of LDL in a cascade filtration system, which obtains results not very different from other more selective methods. The lack of selectivity is not much of a problem, since it also reduces other risk factors such as Lp(a) and fibrinogen.

Lifibrol: a novel lipid-lowering drug for the therapy of hypercholesterolemia. Lifibrol Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of lifibrol on serum lipids in adult patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

These were two double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled studies. Each patient in each study had an 8-week dietary lead-in period on the American Heart Association Step I diet before administration of lifibrol or placebo. The first study consisted of active dosing of 4 weeks, and the second study had 12 weeks of active dosing. The setting for the study involved outpatients in private or university hospitals in the United States. All patients had primary hypercholesterolemia with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of > 160 mg/dl after the dietary lead-in period. There were 155 patients in the 4-week study and 336 patients in the 12-week study. In the first study, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 150, 300, 450, 600, or 900 mg lifibrol as a single daily dose for 4 weeks. In the second study, patients were randomized to receive either 150, 300, or 600 mg lifibrol for 12 weeks. Efficacy was determined by serial measurements of serum lipids either on a weekly or biweekly basis during each study.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, lifibrol reduced LDL cholesterol (> 40%, p < 0.0001) and apolipoprotein B (approximately 40%, p < 0.0001) by 4 weeks in both studies. After 6 weeks, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increased in the placebo and 150 and 300 mg lifibrol groups. In the 600 mg lifibrol group, triglycerides (approximately 25%, p < 0.001), lipoprotein (a) (approximately 30%, p < 0.001), and HDL cholesterol (approximately 5%, p < 0.002) decreased. Lifibrol reduced key sterol intermediates (e.g., lanosterol, lathosterol, beta-sitosterol, and campesterol) and increased serum bile acids, but it had no effect on urinary mevalonic acid excretion. The pharmacokinetics of lifibrol are independent of dose and are similar in men and women. Lifibrol was well tolerated. The most frequent medical event in both studies was skin rash.

CONCLUSIONS

Lifibrol is a potent lipid-lowering drug in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Limited discriminant value of lipoprotein AI, lipoprotein Lp(a) and other lipoprotein particles in patients with and without early onset ischaemic heart disease

AIMS

To assess whether the ability of lipoprotein related variables to discriminate between individuals with or without premature clinical ischaemic heart disease (IHD) was improved using data on high density lipoprotein-lipoprotein AI (HDL-LpAI) fractions, alone or in combination with data on Lp(a).

METHODS

Lipid and apolipoprotein concentrations were measured in 26 middle-aged men (mean age 50.3 years) with early onset IHD and coronary artery bypass grafting prior to sampling, and in 26 matched lipaemic and 26 normolipaemic asymptomatic controls.

RESULTS

Triglyceride and Lp(a) concentrations were higher, while HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) concentrations were lower in patients than in controls. LpAI concentrations were also lower in IHD patients and were correlated with HDL and apoA-I in both IHD and control groups. Lp(a) was not correlated with any other lipid or apolipoprotein measured in either patients or controls. Univariate discriminant function analysis showed that the proportion correctly classified as patients or controls was marginally greater using LpAI concentrations as the discriminator, which was not increased in combination with Lp(a). Serum triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, apoA-I and Lp(a) alone all had similar, but weaker, discriminant power, which increased in various combinations with LpAI.

CONCLUSIONS

LpAI particle measurement may be useful in research to define mechanisms of cardiovascular protection by HDL but the discriminating power for IHD was only marginally superior to measuring total apoA-I or Lp(a) concentrations. Little further advantage arose through combining LpAI data with other variables.

Segregation analysis of plasma lipoprotein(a) levels in pedigrees with molecularly defined familial hypercholesterolemia

The role of genetic and environmental factors in determining the variability in plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels was investigated in 220 members of 14 families with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) whose plasma Lp(a) levels were previously reported [Leitersdorf et al. (1991) J Lipid Res 32:1513-1519]. One hundred four subjects harbored a mutant low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor allele as confirmed by the identification of the specific mutations in addition to the haplotype analysis reported before. Four different mutant alleles were identified, each in a defined genetic group--Druze, Christian-Arabs, Ashkenazi, and Sepharidic Jews. Sex- and age-adjusted mean plasma Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in FH family members (34.0 mg/dl) than in non-FH family members (21.1 mg/dl). Lp(a) levels were further adjusted for lipid levels and apo(a) isoforms. A mixture of two normal distributions fitted the adjusted Lp(a) levels better than did a single normal distribution. Segregation analysis indicated that a major effect of a non-transmitted environmental factor explained the mixture of distributions in addition to polygenic loci which influenced Lp(a) levels within each distribution. The major environmental factor and the polygenic loci accounted for 45% and 20% of the adjusted Lp(a) variation, respectively. Furthermore, sex, age, lipid levels, apo(a) isoform, the major environmental effect, and the unmeasured polygenes could account for 80% of the unadjusted variation of plasma Lp(a) in these families.

Plasma lipids and lipoproteins and essential hypertension

In recent years there have been many studies demonstrating a correlation between increased arterial blood pressure and altered lipid profiles, and there has been an especially positive correlation between high cholesterol levels and blood pressure. There are differences between the various reports that are important. In our study the lipid distribution in 105 hypertensive patients with mild or moderate arterial hypertension according to WHO criteria without clinically or ultrasonographically apparent atherosclerosis was compared to the lipid distribution in 65 age-matched healthy persons. On the epidemiological level a significant, positive association was found between LDL serum levels (P < or = 0.001), Apo B serum levels (P < or = 0.001), serum triglyceride levels (P < or = 0.05) and VLDL serum levels (P < or = 0.01) and arterial hypertension. However, in contrast to recent reports, no significant difference was found between total serum cholesterol levels in normotensives and hypertensives, and there was no difference in HDL serum levels. No evidence could be found for a significant increase in lipoprotein (a) serum levels in hypertensives.

Indications for low-density lipoprotein apheresis

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis offers an additional approach to lipid lowering in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia who fail to respond adequately to diet and drug therapy. Well-defined criteria for patient selection have yet to be established for LDL apheresis. This study proposes guidelines based on whether coronary artery disease (CAD) is present and on the degree of LDL cholesterol elevation after treatment with diet and maximal drug therapy. It is reasonable to consider LDL apheresis therapy for: (1) patients with CAD and LDL cholesterol levels > 190 mg/dl; (2) patients without CAD, but at high risk for disease due to an LDL cholesterol level > 250 mg/dl, a first-degree relative with premature CAD, and the presence of > or = 1 additional risk factor. In addition, LDL apheresis is recommended for the management of all patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia due to the very high risk of CAD and the poor response to usual lipid-lowering treatments.

Plasma Lp(a) levels correlate with number, severity, and length-extension of coronary lesions in male patients undergoing coronary arteriography for clinically suspected coronary atherosclerosis

The relation between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as an independent risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis and the severity and extension of angiographically detectable coronary atherosclerotic lesions has not been systematically evaluated. In 118 male patients (54.3 +/- 7.4 years) with suspected coronary artery disease and without a history of myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angiography, the relation between plasma Lp(a) levels and other lipoproteins and the severity and extension of coronary lesions was studied. The coronary angiograms were evaluated in a blinded manner according to three scores: vessel score (0 to 3 points for 0 to 3 vessels with stenoses > or = 70%), stenosis score (0 to 32 points; number and severity of coronary stenoses or lesions), and extent score (0 to 100 points; length-extension of all coronary lesions in relation to the total coronary vessel length). The score values obtained were analyzed for correlations with age and levels of total cholesterol (6.08 +/- 1.26 mmol/L; mean +/- SD), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.04 +/- 0.33 mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (4.18 +/- 1.15 mmol/L), triglycerides (1.88 +/- 1.37 mmol/L), and Lp(a) in plasma (19.5 +/- 22.6 mg/dL). Bivariate correlation analysis resulted in positive correlations between Lp(a) and vessel score (P < .01), stenosis score (P < .01), and extent score (P < .05). With multivariate analyses, besides Lp(a) plasma level (nl), only patient age showed a significant correlation to all three scores used, whereas none of the lipid parameters correlated significantly with all three scores.

Tamoxifen and estrogen lower circulating lipoprotein(a) concentrations in healthy postmenopausal women

Data in the literature suggest that circulating levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and insulinlike growth factor I (IGF-I) respond similarly to therapy with growth hormone, estrogen, or tamoxifen. To more clearly document these relations, we designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of tamoxifen and continuous estrogen on circulating levels of Lp(a), IGF-I, and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) in healthy postmenopausal women. Both estrogen and tamoxifen decreased serum levels of IGF-I to 30% below baseline during the 3 months of treatment, while IGFBP-3 levels were unchanged. Plasma Lp(a) levels decreased to 24% below baseline after 1 month of treatment with either estrogen or tamoxifen (P < .05 for estrogen only); after 3 months Lp(a) decreased to 34% below baseline with tamoxifen therapy (P < .05) but returned to only 16% below baseline with estrogen. The correlation between Lp(a) and IGF-I was highly significant (P < .0001). We conclude that (1) tamoxifen lowers plasma Lp(a) levels in healthy postmenopausal women, (2) the suppressive effects of tamoxifen and estrogen on circulating Lp(a) concentration diverge after the first month of therapy, and (3) circulating levels of Lp(a) and IGF-I are strongly correlated with each other, an indication that they may share regulatory influences.

Lp(a) concentration and apo(a) isoform size. Relation to the presence of coronary artery disease in familial hypercholesterolemia

We studied the relation between the concentration of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in plasma, apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] phenotype, and the clinical expression of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a previously described cohort of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and an appropriate population of control subjects. The plasma concentration of Lp(a) was markedly skewed in both the FH and control populations; however, the distribution was less skewed in FH (50% greater than 300 mg/L) compared with control subjects (27% greater than 300 mg/L). Patients with FH had significantly higher median and mean log Lp(a) levels compared with control subjects. There was no difference in the level of Lp(a) between men and women in both the control and FH groups. Frequency distribution analysis of the major apo(a) isoform size for each subject showed that, in contrast to the near-normal distribution seen in control subjects, two major subpopulations were apparent in the FH cohort, based on apo(a) isoform size > 700 kD or < or = 700 kD. There was no correlation between Lp(a) plasma concentration and apo(a) isoform size in either population. FH subjects with smaller apo(a) isoforms were more likely to have a history of signs of, or symptoms of CAD than those with larger isoforms. These data illustrate that on the basis of Lp(a) plasma concentration alone, there is no significant difference between FH patients with and without signs or symptoms of CAD. In the control population the smaller apo(a) isoforms were associated with higher Lp(a) levels, whereas in the FH population both small and large apo(a) isoforms were associated with higher Lp(a) levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dyslipidemia and coronary artery disease

Genetically determined and metabolically induced disturbances in lipid metabolism, as manifested in several types of dyslipidemia, have been shown to be causally related to the development of coronary artery disease (CAD). A diversity of clinical and angiographic studies has been made to evaluate the linkage between plasma lipid-control therapy in the development of initial and recurrent cardiovascular events. The plan of treatment invariably begins with a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet before initiation of drug therapy. However, many patients have difficulty in adhering to the low-fat diet. Fortunately, metabolic studies show that foods which contain fats rich in stearic (saturated) and oleic (monounsaturated) fatty acids may be given in limited amounts to boost patients' compliance to a low-fat diet and to prevent their blood lipids from rising to abnormal levels. A bile acid sequestrant (cholestyramine or colestipol) is the first-line drug for control of hypercholesterolemia. Either gemfibrozil or gemfibrozil plus niacin is prescribed to raise high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels of CAD patients. Approval of two HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, pravastatin and simvastatin, by the FDA gives physicians the additional flexibility of employing a single or a combination drug therapy for optimal control of dyslipidemia. The association of low serum cholesterol level (< 160 mg/dl) with increase in noncardiac mortality has prompted health professionals to consider modifying the universal screening and treatment of serum cholesterol in children and young women and to use hypolipidemic drugs in patients judiciously.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Sex-specific effects

The impact of apolipoprotein (apo) E polymorphism on interindividual variation in plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein levels was studied in a sample of familial hypercholesterolemic (FH) patients (147 women, 116 men) with the same mutation, a > 10-kilobase deletion of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene. Each trait was adjusted for concomitants (age, age squared, height, weight, weight squared) for each sex separately before the apoE genotypic effects were estimated. The relative contribution of concomitants to sample variability was found to be very different in women and in men. Allelic variation in the apoE gene was shown to explain a statistically significant portion of the variability in adjusted lipid traits. Moreover, the contribution of apoE polymorphism was different between sexes. In women, there was significant variability (P < .01) among apoE genotypes for total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and total and LDL apoB. In men, significant variability (P < .01) was observed among apoE genotypes in very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Women with the epsilon 3/2 genotype had significantly lower means for total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and LDL apoB than women with the epsilon 3/3 genotype (P < .05). In men, the mean VLDL cholesterol was significantly higher for the epsilon 2/2 genotype and was significantly lower for the epsilon 4/2 genotype than the mean for the epsilon 3/3 genotype (P < .05). Overall, the greatest influence was associated with the epsilon 2 allele, and the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of this allele was present only in FH women. No statistically significant apoE effect was shown on lipoprotein(a) levels in either sex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A prospective investigation of elevated lipoprotein (a) detected by electrophoresis and cardiovascular disease in women. The Framingham Heart Study

BACKGROUND

Sinking prebeta lipoprotein is a putative marker for elevated levels of lipoprotein (a). Although prospective data suggest that increased plasma lipoprotein (a) is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease in men, no prospective studies are available in women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 1968 through 1975, sinking prebeta lipoprotein was determined by paper electrophoresis in 3103 women Framingham Heart Study participants who were free of prevalent cardiovascular disease. A sinking prebeta lipoprotein band was detectable in 434 of the women (14%) studied. The median follow-up interval was approximately 12 years. Incident cardiovascular disease was associated with band presence using a proportional hazards model that included age, smoking, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, glucose intolerance, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and ECG left ventricular hypertrophy. Multivariable adjusted relative risk estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) for outcomes in the band present versus absent groups were as follows: myocardial infarction (82 events), 2.37 (1.48 to 3.81); intermittent claudication (62 events), 1.94 (1.07 to 3.50); cerebrovascular disease (83 events), 1.88 (1.12 to 3.15); total coronary heart disease (174 events), 1.61 (1.13 to 2.29); and total cardiovascular disease (305 events), 1.44 (1.09 to 1.91). A subset analysis indicated that band presence was 50.9% sensitive and 95.4% specific for detecting plasma lipoprotein (a) levels of > 30 mg/dL, the threshold value linked to increased cardiovascular disease risk in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinking prebeta lipoprotein was a valid surrogate for elevated lipoprotein (a) levels in Framingham Heart Study women. Band presence and, equivalently, elevated plasma lipoprotein (a), was a strong, independent predictor of myocardial infarction, intermittent claudication, and cerebrovascular disease. Confirmation of these findings in other longitudinal studies of women is needed.

Lipoprotein(a) as a correlate of stroke and transient ischemic attack prevalence in a biracial cohort: the ARIC Study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities

Although both mean lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration and national stroke prevalence estimates are consistently higher in American blacks than in whites, no information exists on the relationship of Lp(a) and stroke prevalence in African-Americans. Associations of Lp(a) with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are addressed in this report for 15,160 participants--4160 blacks and 11,000 whites--in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Lp(a) was measured in ARIC as its total protein component by double-antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for apo(a) detection. Self-reported stroke/TIA history was assessed as part of a standardized questionnaire, and resulted in age-adjusted stroke/TIA prevalences of 3.0% in blacks (n = 120) and 2.0% in whites (n = 222). Overall, mean Lp(a) protein levels were markedly higher for blacks than for whites (160.5 versus 81.6 micrograms/mL, respectively), and were statistically significantly higher among individuals reporting stroke/TIA history for both races (191.3 versus 159.6 micrograms/mL in blacks; 100.6 versus 81.2 micrograms/mL in whites). Multivariable logistic regression analysis for the association of Lp(a) protein with stroke/TIA status yielded a prevalence odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence intervals) of 1.17 (1.05, 1.30) overall (based on one standard deviation difference, 108.2 micrograms/mL, in Lp[a] protein). Race-specific ORs, after adjustment for the same covariates, were equivalent for blacks [OR = 1.17 (0.99, 1.39)] and whites [OR = 1.19 (1.04, 1.36)]. These data suggest that Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for stroke/TIA in both blacks and whites, and that the relative risk of stroke/TIA associated with Lp(a) protein does not vary by race.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Evidence that apolipoprotein(a) phenotype is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in men < 55 years of age

Whereas the importance of plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels as a risk factor for premature coronary artery disease (CAD) is certain, it is not clear if the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype plays an additional and independent role. To investigate the possible effect of apo(a) phenotype on premature CAD (in patients < 55 years of age), plasma Lp(a) concentrations, the apo(a) phenotypes, and their relation with many recognized CAD risk factors were examined in 96 non-diabetic male patients with angiographically defined CAD and in 83 age-matched male control subjects with no angiographic evidence of CAD. Results demonstrate that patients with premature CAD are characterized by higher Lp(a) levels (24 +/- 21 vs 17 +/- 15 mg/dl, p < 0.01) and a higher frequency of S2 phenotype (32% vs 15%, p < 0.01). Patients with an S2 phenotype exhibited significantly higher plasma Lp(a) concentrations than control subjects with the same isoform (37 +/- 22 vs 22 +/- 17 mg/dl, p < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between apo B and Lp(a) levels in patients with an S2 phenotype. In addition, patients had a low frequency of S1 and S4, and a high frequency of double-band phenotypes of apo(a). Multivariate analysis did not demonstrate an independent role for apo(a) phenotype as a risk factor for premature CAD. In conclusion, CAD patients < 55 years of age have a very different pattern of apo(a) phenotypes than subjects with no angiographic evidence of CAD; this study confirms the hypothesis that apo(a) phenotype may play an additional role in the etiology of premature CAD.

Dyslipidemias and the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease

Dyslipidemias in patients with coronary heart disease confer a greater risk of ischemic cardiac events than comparable dyslipidemias in people free of disease. A major dyslipidemia can be diagnosed in more than 80% of patients with established premature coronary heart disease. These dyslipidemias constitute not only elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (hypercholesterolemia) but also indicate abnormalities in the metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, high-density lipoproteins, and lipoprotein(a). Clinical trials have demonstrated that therapy to lower low-density lipoprotein levels can delay angiographic progression of coronary stenoses and reduce recurrent cardiac event rates. These clinical benefits from low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering may occur as early as 6 to 12 months after initiation of therapy. Intervention strategies for dyslipidemias are directed toward lowering the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol fraction to 90 to 100 mg/dl. This approach begins with dietary modification, weight loss, smoking cessation, and aerobic exercise. Patients with hypercholesterolemia refractory to nonpharmacologic intervention require lipid-lowering agents. The choice of lipid-lowering medications is influenced by concomitant abnormalities of lipoprotein metabolism, such as hypertriglyceridemia or hypoalphalipoproteinemia. Treatment of primary dyslipidemias other than hypercholesterolemia may be warranted in the presence of other cardiac risk factors; however, a broader spectrum of clinical trial data is needed to support or refute this contention.

Lp(a) lipoprotein in cardiovascular disease

The article summarizes the increased knowledge about the enigmatic Lp(a) lipoprotein and its clinical importance over the past 20 years. The mode of inheritance, the unique features of Lp(a) composition and structure and the unusual distribution of the mainly genetically determined plasma Lp(a) levels are discussed. The main factors that can significantly change the inherited plasma Lp(a) levels are endocrine disorders and hormone treatment. It seems possible that sex hormones protect females to a large extent from the potentially deleterious effects of inherited high Lp(a) levels until menopause. The exceptionally strong independent association found in most studies between Lp(a) lipoprotein levels and atherosclerotic disorders indicates that Lp(a) is a factor of outstanding importance in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Probable pathogenetic mechanisms are reviewed. The associations found between LP(a) and insulin release, rheumatoid arthritis and renal diseases suggest that Lp(a) may be involved in immunological mechanisms. In a new hypothesis it is suggested that an autoimmune process might especially occur in individuals with inherited high Lp(a) levels and certain HLA class II genotypes, triggered by a concurrent infection.

Lipids, lipoproteins and coronary heart disease in minority populations

Despite recent advances in both prevention and treatment, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in the US. The Framingham Study was a landmark in defining CHD-related risk factors; unfortunately, very few minorities were included. A major preventable risk factor for CHD continues to be lipid abnormalities, but its association within minority populations is unclear. The few studies that have examined the association of hyperlipidemia with CHD in minorities have shown that total cholesterol was a predictor of CHD risk (e.g., black men aged 35-64). Several researchers have reported higher levels of HDL for black men and women compared to white men and women. Since HDL was shown to be inversely related to CHD, this discrepancy in HDL is hypothesized to account for the lower than expected mortality rate. Lipoprotein(a) has been identified as an independent risk factor for CHD; blacks have considerably higher levels than whites. Data also indicate the following: Hispanics have lower CVD mortality rates than the general population despite having known risk factors (e.g., obesity, diabetes, low socioeconomic status); Hispanic women have lower levels of HDL cholesterol; Native-American populations have lower prevalence of CHD associated with lower LDL-cholesterol and higher HDL-cholesterol. Understanding epidemiologic and pathophysiologic data regarding differences between various racial groups should help reduce CVD-related morbidity and mortality in minority populations.

Coronary artery disease is associated with increased lipoprotein(a) concentrations independent of the size of circulating apolipoprotein(a) isoforms

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms (identified by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [SDS-PAGE] and Western blotting) were determined in a group of 508 asymptomatic Caucasian members of the community and in 318 Caucasian patients with angiographically defined coronary artery disease (CAD). Conventional risk factors for CAD were also measured. Lp(a) concentration was almost twice as high in subjects with CAD (geometric mean, 152 mg/L [geometric SD, 10 to 1398 mg/L]) as in asymptomatic control subjects (geometric mean, 84 mg/L [geometric SD, 21 to 334 mg/L]). Asymptomatic women had higher concentrations of Lp(a) than asymptomatic men. Patients with CAD were older and were more likely to have smoked and to have a first-degree relative with premature CAD (< 55 years of age), and a higher proportion were male. Patients with CAD had higher concentrations of Lp(a) independently of the number of isoform bands expressed. When apo(a) isoforms were allocated to 1 of 10 classes on the basis of their molecular size (Rf versus apoB in SDS-PAGE), patients with CAD did not express an excess of low-molecular-mass (higher concentration) isoforms but did express a higher proportion of double-band phenotypes with fewer "null" phenotypes. The relationship between the two isoform bands in a double-band phenotype was the same in both populations. Isoform mobility was defined as a continuous variable equal to the mobility of a single isoform band (single-band phenotypes) or the mean of the two isoforms in a double-band phenotype. Two variables, isoform mobility and the number of isoform bands expressed, were used to summarize the large range of isoform patterns (at least 45) that could be identified. Isoform mobility, the number of isoform bands expressed, and the presence of CAD were the three most important independent predictors of Lp(a) concentration (descending order). Only sex and LDL cholesterol were additional independent predictors of Lp(a) concentration in step-wise regression models including a wide range of demographic factors and lipid and glycemic risk factors. We conclude that Lp(a) concentration is associated with CAD independently of the isoform pattern expressed. The apo(a) gene locus exerts a strong control over circulating Lp(a) concentration, and a better understanding of the control of expression of the apo(a) gene will be essential to understand the relationship between Lp(a) and CAD.

Microalbuminuria: prognostic and therapeutic implications in diabetes mellitus

Thirty years following the development of the first radioimmunoassay for albumin, microalbuminuria is widely acknowledged as an important predictor of overt nephropathy in patients with Type 1 diabetes and of cardiovascular mortality in Type 2 diabetes. In addition, there is accumulating evidence to suggest that diabetic patients with microalbuminuria may have more advanced retinopathy, higher blood pressure, and worse dyslipidaemia than patients with normal albumin excretion rates. Recent studies have focused on the role of intervention, principally with antihypertensive therapy and intensive glycaemic control, in reducing microalbuminuria. While successful in reducing urinary albumin excretion it remains to be established whether such therapies will be translated into a reduction in renal failure and decreased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Decreased plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) in patients with hypertriglyceridemia

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an atherogenic lipoprotein which is similar in structure to, but metabolically distinct from, LDL. Factors modulating plasma Lp(a) concentrations are poorly understood. To investigate the possible interaction of Lp(a) with triglycerides, we determined the apo(a) phenotype, Lp(a) concentration, and distribution of Lp(a) in a group of patients with triglycerides > 400 mg/dl (n = 60) compared with a control group (n = 128). Lp(a) concentrations were significantly lower in hypertriglyceridemic patients (mean +/- S.E., 13 +/- 4 mg/dl; median, 6 mg/dl; 25/75 percentile, 2-13 mg/dl) as compared with the controls (mean, 22 +/- 2 mg/dl; median, 10 mg/dl; 25/75 percentile, 7-30 mg/dl). Plasma Lp(a) concentrations in the hypertriglyceridemic patients correlated negatively with triglyceride levels (r = -0.69, P = 0.03). The difference in Lp(a) levels between patients and controls was maintained when subjects were stratified by apo(a) phenotype and type of hyperlipidemia. After subdividing the hypertriglyceridemic patients into one group with apo(a) isoforms < or = S2 and one group with apo(a) isoforms > or = S3, we found that the differences in plasma Lp(a) concentrations between patients and controls were more pronounced in the group with the lower molecular weight apo(a) isoforms. These data indicate that hypertriglyceridemia is associated with lower plasma Lp(a) concentrations and suggest that increased levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins may influence the metabolism of Lp(a).

Familial lipoprotein disorders and premature coronary artery disease

Significant risk factors for premature coronary heart disease include: (1) family history, (2) elevated low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level > or = 160 mg/dl, l, (3) decreased high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level < 35 mg/dl, l, (4) cigarette smoking, (5) high blood pressure and (6) diabetes mellitus. All of these risk factors are common in patients with premature heart disease. Common familial lipid disorders associated with premature heart disease include familial lipoprotein(a) excess, familial dyslipidemia (elevated triglycerides and decreased HDL cholesterol), familial combined hyperlipidemia (elevations of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, and often decreased HDL cholesterol), familial hypoapobetalipoproteinemia (elevated apolipoprotein B levels), familial hypoalphalipoproteinemia (low HDL cholesterol levels), and familial hypercholesterolemia (elevated LDL cholesterol levels). All these disorders have been characterized using age and gender specific 90th and 10th percentile values from the normal population. The diagnosis and potential management of these disorders is reviewed.

Studies on the structure and function of the apolipoprotein(a) gene

Lp(a) is an LDL-like lipoprotein that is a major inherited risk factor for atherosclerosis. It is distinguished from Lp(a) by the addition of apolipoprotein(a). The gene structure of apolipoprotein(a) is homologous to plasminogen, and competition with plasminogen activity may account for some of the pathophysiology associated with Lp(a). Six highly related genes have now been identified, and at least four are found in close proximity in overlapping genomic clones. Studies have begun on the regulation of apolipoprotein (a) gene expression, and the human apolipoprotein(a) gene has been inserted into transgenic mice, where it leads to the development of arterial lesions.

Importance of Lp(a) lipoprotein and HLA genotypes in atherosclerosis and diabetes

Lp(a) lipoprotein [Lp(a)] was found in previous studies to be independently associated with early atherosclerosis and its sequelae. Lp(a) in vitro bound to glucosaminoglycans and was easily aggregated at physiological Ca2+ concentration, and small Lp(a) aggregates were phagocytosed by macrophages. Lp(a) was also found to be related to carbohydrate metabolism, and increased Lp(a) levels have been described in diabetic patients with clinical complications and were recently found in rheumatoid arthritis patients. In this study of nondiabetic male patients with documented CAD before 50 years of age and controls, a significant correlation was found between Lp(a) and IGF-1 levels. HLA class II DR13 (DR6) was more frequent and DR15 (DR2) was less frequent in patients than in controls. The calculated relative risk for CAD was 4.0 for DR17 (DR3), but the difference was not significant. These differences seem to be related to high Lp(a) levels. It is suggested that phagocytosis of preferably Lp(a) aggregates can induce an immunological tissue response that may contribute in the pathogenesis of Lp(a)-associated diseases and may be more prominent in combination with some inherited HLA class II haplotypes. Probably due to sex hormone effects, the association may be most pronounced in young males and in older females.

Effects of selective LDL-apheresis and pravastatin therapy on platelet function in familial hypercholesterolaemia

Platelet function was studied in 10 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia, following lipid-lowering treatment with selective LDL-apheresis and with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pravastatin. Platelet function was assessed before, and 2, 5 and 14 days after LDL-apheresis, and before and after 4 weeks of pravastatin therapy. Both treatments significantly reduced total- and LDL-cholesterol, whereas LDL-apheresis also reduced VLDL-cholesterol. Lp(a)-levels were reduced by LDL-apheresis and elevated by pravastatin treatment. Pravastatin therapy significantly enhanced platelet aggregability in vivo, as measured by ex vivo filtragometry. Plasma serotonin levels also increased. Other markers of in vivo activation of platelets, i.e. beta-thromboglobulin in plasma and urine, and 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 in urine were unaltered. Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation in vitro remained unchanged during pravastatin therapy, and the platelet volume distribution was not affected. LDL-apheresis reduced the mean platelet volume, as well as the percentage of large platelets, whereas the percentage of small platelets increased. Other measures of platelet function in vivo or in vitro were, however, unaltered following LDL-apheresis. Thus, pravastatin therapy enhances certain aspects of platelet aggregability in vivo, whereas a single treatment with selective LDL-apheresis does not consistently affect platelet aggregability during resting conditions. These results do not support the concept that reduction of LDL-cholesterol improves platelet function in hypercholesterolaemic patients, at least not in the short-term. However, the reduction of platelet volume after LDL-apheresis may be beneficial for patients receiving this therapy regularly.

Elevated serum insulin levels in patients with essential hypertension and microalbuminuria

Hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, or both have been described in patients with essential hypertension. Previous work from our laboratory has shown that in hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria, dyslipidemia and abnormal patterns in the diurnal variations of blood pressure are frequently associated. Whether hyperinsulinemia and microalbuminuria are directly related has not been determined. To test this possibility, we measured the plasma insulin response to an oral glucose load in 25 patients with or without microalbuminuria and 20 normotensive control subjects. Serum lipid profile and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure were obtained. In the hypertensive patients as a group, the plasma insulin response to glucose (evaluated as the insulin area under the curve) was significantly enhanced compared with a group of 20 normotensive healthy control subjects (46,311 +/- 3745 and 27,557 +/- 2563 pmol/L x 2 hours, P < .01). When the hypertensive patients were subdivided according to their albumin excretion rate, the microalbuminuric patients had significantly higher plasma glucose (969 +/- 45.2 versus 762 +/- 28.7 mmol/L x 2 hours, P < .01) and insulin (59,172 +/- 5964 versus 37,737 +/- 3422 pmol/L x 2 hours, P < .01) area under the curve values. In addition, a significant direct correlation was found to exist between insulin area under the curve and the urinary albumin excretion rate (r = .63, P < .001). Serum levels of lipoprotein(a) were significantly greater (P < .01) in patients with than in those without microalbuminuria and in control subjects. Furthermore, daytime diastolic blood pressure and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were greater in patients with than in those without microalbuminuria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Structure and possible biological roles of Lp(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a plasma macromolecular complex that is assembled from low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and a large hydrophilic glycoprotein, named apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], linked by a disulfide bond to apolipoprotein B-100. Apo(a) is formed by different structural domains one of which is present in multiple copies, the number of which is determined by variation in the hypervariable apo(a) gene. Sequence homology of apo(a) with plasminogen may explain the competition of Lp(a) for some physiological functions of plasminogen in the coagulation and fibrinolytic cascade in vitro. There is evidence that high plasma levels of Lp(a) may have atherogenic and/or thrombogenic potential. More work will have to be done to understand the exact role of Lp(a) in atherogenesis, to evaluate the potential synergy between Lp(a) and LDL in promoting coronary artery disease, and to assess the therapeutic benefits of a reduction of Lp(a) levels.

The inverse association of plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations with apolipoprotein(a) isoform size is not due to differences in Lp(a) catabolism but to differences in production rate

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is an atherogenic lipoprotein which is similar in structure to low density lipoproteins (LDL) but contains an additional protein called apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]). Apo(a) is highly polymorphic in size, and there is a strong inverse association between the size of the apo(a) isoform and the plasma concentration of Lp(a). We directly compared the in vivo catabolism of Lp(a) particles containing different size apo(a) isoforms to establish whether there is an effect of apo(a) isoform size on the catabolic rate of Lp(a). In the first series of studies, four normal subjects were injected with radio-labeled S1-Lp(a) and S2-Lp(a) and another four subjects were injected with radiolabeled S2-Lp(a) and S4-Lp(a). No significant differences in fractional catabolic rate were found between Lp(a) particles containing different apo(a) isoforms. To confirm that apo(a) isoform size does not influence the rate of Lp(a) catabolism, three subjects heterozygous for apo(a) were selected for preparative isolation of both Lp(a) particles. The first was a B/S3-apo(a) subject, the second a S4/S6-apo(a) subject, and the third an F/S3-apo(a) subject. From each subject, both Lp(a) particles were preparatively isolated, radiolabeled, and injected into donor subjects and normal volunteers. In all cases, the catabolic rates of the two forms of Lp(a) were not significantly different. In contrast, the allele-specific apo(a) production rates were more than twice as great for the smaller apo(a) isoforms than for the larger apo(a) isoforms. In a total of 17 studies directly comparing Lp(a) particles of different apo(a) isoform size, the mean fractional catabolic rate of the Lp(a) with smaller size apo(a) was 0.329 +/- 0.090 day-1 and of the Lp(a) with the larger size apo(a) 0.306 +/- 0.079 day-1, not significantly different. In summary, the inverse association of plasma Lp(a) concentrations with apo(a) isoform size is not due to differences in the catabolic rates of Lp(a) but rather to differences in Lp(a) production rates.

Lipoprotein(a) concentrations and phenotypes in controls and patients with hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations are known to be stable under various dietary and drug regimens. Little is known about the influence of hyperlipoproteinemia on Lp(a) levels. Therefore, we investigated Lp(a) concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] polymorphism in 147 patients with hypertriglyceridemia and in 93 patients with hypercholesterolemia and compared them with 404 subjects without hyperlipoproteinemia (controls). Despite a similar apo(a) isoform and phenotype distribution, Lp(a) concentrations differed significantly (P < .0001) between the three groups. The median Lp(a) level in control subjects was 17 mg/dL (mean, 38 mg/dL), compared with 38 mg/dL (mean, 56 mg/dL) in patients with hypercholesterolemia and 9 mg/dL (mean, 21 mg/dL) in those with hypertriglyceridemia. These differences persisted after exclusion of 61 subjects with coronary heart disease. The inverse correlation between the molecular weight of the apo(a) isoforms and the Lp(a) concentration was preserved within each group (P < .001), but for every molecular weight range studied the level of Lp(a) was always higher in patients with hypercholesterolemia and always lower in those with hypertriglyceridemia than in controls. We conclude that hypertriglyceridemia or hypercholesterolemia have profound--but divergent--influences on the concentration of Lp(a).

Apolipoprotein (a) phenotypes and lipoprotein (a) concentrations in patients with type III hyperlipoproteinaemia

OBJECTIVES

The familial lipoprotein disorder type III hyperlipoproteinaemia (HLP) carries a marked increase in the risk of accelerated and premature atherosclerosis, but there is considerable variation amongst affected individuals in their susceptibility to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Therefore, it was the aim of our study to investigate the possible influence of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] in the pathogenesis of type III HLP:

DESIGN

Apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] phenotypes and Lp(a) concentrations were determined in patients with the disease and in an appropriate control group.

SETTING

University out-patient lipid disorder clinic.

SUBJECTS

Seventy-six apoE-2 homozygous patients with type III HLP and 76 normolipidaemic and healthy age- and sex-matched controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The frequencies of different apo(a) phenotypes and their correlations with Lp(a) serum concentrations were determined in patients and controls.

RESULTS

Lp(a) concentrations were not significantly different in type III HLP patients (14.1 +/- 19.1 mg dl-1) as compared with the controls (13.3 +/- 16.2 mg dl-1; P = 0.549, NS). In addition, there was no significant difference in apo(a) phenotype frequencies amongst both groups (0.2 > P > 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the apo(a) polymorphism does not participate (to a significant extent) in the phenotypical expression of type III HLP:

Association between lipoprotein(a) and progression of coronary artery disease in middle-aged men

The association between lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with other serum lipids was evaluated in 104 patients with angiographically proven coronary atherosclerosis. Patients were randomized to either an intervention or a control group. The 12-month intervention program consisted of a low-fat diet and daily physical exercise. Patients in the control group received "usual care" by their private physician. Eighty-three patients (36 in the intervention and 47 in the control group) underwent repeat angiography after 1 year. Angiographically documented net regression was seen in 13 patients (8 in the intervention and 5 in the control group), no change was seen in 40 patients (21 in the intervention and 19 in the control group) and progression was noted in 30 patients (7 in the intervention and 23 in the control group). No correlation could be shown between Lp(a) and angiographically documented progression of the disease. In a multivariate analysis including metabolic variables, group assignment, age and smoking habits, only assignment to the intervention group (p = 0.0075) and a decrease in total cholesterol (p = 0.0167) were independently associated with the course of the disease. Patients with or without previous myocardial infarction (70 vs 34) did not differ in Lp(a) levels (median 9.15 vs 14.25 mg/dl). Patients with Lp(a) > 25 mg/dl were younger than patients with Lp(a) < or = 25 mg/dl (52 vs 55 years; p < 0.03), indicating a connection between Lp(a) and the development of premature CAD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentration and outcome of thrombolytic treatment for myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Lp(a) lipoprotein has structural homology with plasminogen and has been shown to inhibit plasminogen activation in vitro.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the serum concentration of Lp(a) lipoprotein present when streptokinase was given in acute myocardial infarction influenced the outcome as judged by electrocardiographic methods.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

Serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentration was measured in 135 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction who received streptokinase treatment. Recovery from myocardial injury was assessed by the reduction in the sum of ST segment elevation measured from the J point (STJ) in the electrocardiogram immediately before streptokinase was given compared with that three hours later.

RESULTS

The serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentrations were measured within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction and were higher than in healthy reference populations. Recovery from myocardial infarction could be assessed from the STJ in 116 patients (86% of the series). Those in whom it could not had bundle branch block, left ventricular hypertrophy, did not survive three hours, or had started intravenous nitrate treatment or some other clinical procedure before or at the time the second electrocardiogram was to be recorded. Patients with reductions in STJ after streptokinase that were > 4 mm (the median decrease) had mean (range) serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentrations of 41.0 (0.8-220) mg/dl and those with a smaller reduction in STJ had concentrations of 29.1 (1.7-151) mg/dl. The difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In this study Lp(a) lipoprotein concentration did not significantly influence the outcome of thrombolytic treatment with streptokinase.