Constitutive versus activation-dependent cross-presentation of immune complexes by CD8(+) and CD8(-) dendritic cells in vivo

The immune response modifier and Toll-like receptor 7 agonist S-27609 selectively induces IL-12 and TNF-alpha production in CD11c+CD11b+CD8- dendritic cells

IL-12 and TNF-alpha production by dendritic cells (DCs) is a critical step in the initiation of local inflammation and adaptive immune responses. We show in this study that a small molecule immune response modifier that is a Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonist induces IL-12 and TNF-alpha production from murine CD11c(+)CD11b(+)CD8(-) DCs, a subset not previously known for this activity. Stimulation of these DCs through TLR7 in vivo induces significant cytokine production even 12 h after initial stimulation, as well as migration of the DC into T cell zones of the lymphoid tissue. In contrast, stimulation through TLR4 and TLR9 induced IL-12 production predominantly from CD8(+) DCs, consistent with previously published data. All TLR stimuli induced the increase in surface expression of the activation markers B7-1, B7-2, and class II in both CD8(+) and CD8(-) DCs, demonstrating that CD8(+) DCs do respond to TLR7-mediated stimuli. To date this is the only known stimuli to induce preferential cytokine production from CD8(-) DCs. Given the efficacy of TLR7 agonists as antiviral agents, the data collectively indicate that stimulation of CD8(-) DCs through TLR7 most likely plays a role in the generation of antiviral immune responses.

Relationships among murine CD11c(high) dendritic cell subsets as revealed by baseline gene expression patterns

The functional relationships and properties of different subtypes of dendritic cells (DC) remain largely undefined. To better characterize these cells, we used global gene analysis to determine gene expression patterns among murine CD11c(high) DC subsets. CD4(+), CD8alpha(+), and CD8alpha(-) CD4(-) (double negative (DN)) DC were purified from spleens of normal C57/BL6 mice and analyzed using Affymetrix microarrays. The CD4(+) and CD8alpha(+) DC subsets showed distinct basal expression profiles differing by >200 individual genes. These included known DC subset markers as well as previously unrecognized, differentially expressed CD Ags such as CD1d, CD5, CD22, and CD72. Flow cytometric analysis confirmed differential expression in nine of nine cases, thereby validating the microarray analysis. Interestingly, the microarray expression profiles for DN cells strongly resembled those of CD4(+) DC, differing from them by <25 genes. This suggests that CD4(+) and DN DC are closely related phylogenetically, whereas CD8alpha(+) DC represent a more distant lineage, supporting the historical distinction between CD8alpha(+) and CD8alpha(-) DC. However, staining patterns revealed that in contrast to CD4(+) DC, the DN subset is heterogeneous and comprises at least two subpopulations. Gene Ontology and literature mining analyses of genes expressed differentially among DC subsets indicated strong associations with immune response parameters as well as cell differentiation and signaling. Such associations offer clues to possible unique functions of the CD11c(high) DC subsets that to date have been difficult to define as rigid distinctions.

Origin, precursors and differentiation of mouse dendritic cells

Functional specialization allows defined dendritic-cell (DC) subsets to induce efficient defence mechanisms against pathogens and tumour cells, and maintain T-cell tolerance by inducing the inactivation of autoreactive T cells. A crucial question, which has important implications for both our understanding of the induction and control of immunity by DCs, as well as the use of DCs for immunotherapy, is whether the functional diversity of DCs results from the existence of developmentally independent DC subpopulations, or whether DC subsets that share a common differentiation origin acquire specific functions in response to environmental signals. This review discusses recent findings on mouse DC development.

Against the self: dendritic cells versus cancer

The role of host defense in cancer is highly variable. Although there are cases where spontaneous cures of cancer appear to be mediated by immunologic mechanisms, malignant disease generally progresses even in patients where tumor-specific immunity can be demonstrated. It is apparent that there are complex interactions between tumor cells and dendritic cells, the dominant antigen-presenting cells of the immune system. Through their inhibitory actions upon dendritic cells, tumor cells can negatively regulate priming of tumor-specific immunity. Recent work has also shown that dendritic cells have direct cytotoxic effects upon tumor cells. These interactions may impact on the efficacy of current strategies using dendritic cell-based vaccines for tumor immunotherapy.

Dendritic cells as inducers of antimicrobial immunity in vivo

Models of infection have provided important insight into the function of dendritic cells (DC) in vivo. Several microbial products induce DC maturation via Toll-like receptors, a process that is crucial for the ability of DC to initiate adaptive immune responses. Splenic DC have also been shown to produce IL-12 during infection in vivo. This DC-derived IL-12 might be important to skew T cell responses towards Th1. Microbial infections also induce changes in the DC populations of lymphoid organs, often in a subset-specific manner, manifested as an accumulation and redistribution of DC. Furthermore, data are emerging pointing at an absolute requirement of DC in priming of naïve T cells in vivo.

A subset of Toll-like receptor ligands induces cross-presentation by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are capable of cross-presenting exogenous Ag to CD8(+) CTLs. Detection of microbial products by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) leads to activation of DCs and subsequent orchestration of an adaptive immune response. We hypothesized that microbial TLR ligands could activate DCs to cross-present Ag to CTLs. Using DCs and CTLs in an in vitro cross-presentation system, we show that a subset of microbial TLR ligands, namely ligands of TLR3 (poly(inosinic-cytidylic) acid) and TLR9 (immunostimulatory CpG DNA), induces cross-presentation. In contrast to presentation of Ag to CD4(+) T cells by immature DCs, TLR-induced cross-presentation is mediated by mature DCs, is independent of endosomal acidification, and relies on cytosolic Ag processing machinery.

Transfer of eukaryotic expression plasmids to mammalian hosts by attenuated Salmonella spp

Transkingdom transfer of DNA from bacteria to other organisms, well established for bacteria, yeast and plants, was recently also extended to mammalian host cells. Attenuated intracellular bacteria or non-pathogenic bacteria equipped with adhesion and invasion properties have been demonstrated to transfer eukaryotic expression plasmids in vitro and in vivo. Here the mucosal application of attenuated Salmonella enterica spp. as DNA carrier for the induction of immune responses towards protein antigens encoded by expression plasmids, their use to complement genetic defects or deliver immunotherapeutic proteins is reviewed. Plasmid transfer has been reported for Salmonella typhimurium, S. typhi and S. choleraesuis so far but clearly other Salmonella strains should be able to transfer expression plasmids as well. Transfer of DNA is effected most likely by bacterial death within the host cell resulting from metabolic attenuation. Since these bacteria remain in the phagocytic vacuole it is unclear how the DNA from such dying bacteria is delivered to the nucleus of infected cells. Nevertheless, the efficiency that has been observed was astonishingly high, reaching close to 100% under certain conditions. Gene transfer in vivo was mainly directed towards vaccination strategies either as vaccination against infectious microorganisms or model tumors. Interestingly, in some cases tolerance against autologous antigens could be broken. In general, this type of immunization was more efficacious than either direct application of antigen, vaccination with naked DNA or using the same bacterium as a heterologous carrier expressing the antigen via a prokaryotic promoter. The ease of generating such vehicles for gene transfer combined with technology validated for mass vaccination programs and the efficacy of induction of protective immune responses makes Salmonella as carrier for mucosal DNA vaccination a highly attractive area for further research and development.

Targeting apoptotic tumor cells to Fc gamma R provides efficient and versatile vaccination against tumors by dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with tumor-associated Ags (TAAs) act as potent adjuvant that initiates antitumor immune responses in vivo. However, TAA-based DC vaccination requires prior identification of TAAs. Apoptotic tumor cells (ATCs) can be an excellent source for DC loading because their potential uncharacterized Ags would be efficiently presented to T cells without any prior characterization and isolation of these Ags. However, ATCs alone are considered to be inefficient for activating antitumor immunity, possibly because of their inability to induce DC maturation. In this study, the aim was to enhance antitumor immune response by taking advantage of ATCs that have been opsonized with IgG (ATC-immune complexes, ATC-ICs) so as to target them to FcR for IgG (FcgammaRs) on DCs. It was found that when compared with ATCs, ATC-ICs were efficiently internalized by DCs via FcgammaRs, and this process induced maturation of DCs, which was more efficient than that of ATCs. Importantly, ATC-IC loading was shown to be more efficient than ATCs alone in its capacity for inducing antitumor immunity in vivo, in terms of cytotoxic T cell induction and tumor rejection. These results show that using ATC-ICs may overcome the limitations and may enhance the immune response of current ATC-based DC vaccination therapy.

New frontiers: the 2002 FASEB Summer Research Conference in Transplant Immunology

The first Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) summer research conference on transplantation immunology was organized by Angus Thomson (University of Pittsburgh), Robert Lechler (Imperial College London), Laurence Turka (University of Pennsylvania) and Megan Sykes (Massachusetts General Hospital). Over the past four decades, patient and graft survival rates for solid organ transplant recipients have improved dramatically; however, chronic rejection and the untoward effects of potent immunosuppressive drugs continue to loom. This symposium is a testament to the importance of bringing investigators from diverse biological backgrounds together in a single forum to discuss the fundamental issues of immune biology and advance the goal of transplant-specific tolerance.