Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Classic Type: Response to Primary Chemotherapy and Survival Outcomes

Surgical issues and preoperative systemic therapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment approach for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, where primary disease downstaging clears improves operability. Previously unresectable disease may then be controlled by mastectomy, and some patients may even become eligible for lumpectomy. The disease downstaging benefits as well as the ability to determine chemosensitivity, have motivated expanded applications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to include selected cases of early-stage breast cancer. In this setting, many women will become improved candidates for breast conservation surgery performed via smaller-volume lumpectomies. Optimal utilization of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy approach requires special attention by the surgeon regarding diagnostic biopsies (percutaneous needle biopsies are preferred); preoperative planning (insertion of radio-opaque clips to mark tumor bed prior to completion of chemotherapy response; careful imaging to determine extent of disease); and final surgical decision-making (including comprehensive preoperative imaging to decide between lumpectomy and mastectomy).

A case of metastatic lobular breast carcinoma with detection of the primary tumor after ten years

Lobular carcinoma of the breast is known to metastasize to unusual sites such as the gastrointestinal tract, peritoneum, and gynecologic organs. We report a patient with intraperitoneal metastases from lobular carcinoma who was originally treated for an unknown primary cancer. Ten years later, a tumor was found in her left breast and the diagnosis was changed to peritoneal metastases from invasive lobular carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the metastases were high molecular weight cytokeratin (CK34betaE12) and estrogen receptor-positive, but were E-cadherin-negative. These results assisted in diagnosis. Surgeons should be aware of the characteristics of metastasis lobular carcinoma.

Immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in lobular neoplasia

The designation lobular neoplasia (LN) of the breast includes atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ. Estrogen receptors (ER) play a significant role in breast carcinogenesis. In the present study, ER-alpha and ER-beta status are evaluated in 30 breast tissue specimens from patients whose main lesion was LN. A standard immunohistochemical procedure, using monoclonal antibodies for ER-alpha and ER-beta, was applied to the lesion and the adjacent normal breast tissues, the latter serving as control. In all cases, both receptors were expressed in LN as well as in normal breast ducts and lobules. Concerning ER-alpha, the Allred score and the percentage of ER-alpha-positive cells were significantly higher in LN than in the adjacent normal breast tissue. On the contrary, regarding ER-beta, the Allred score and the percentage of ER-beta-positive cells were significantly lower in LN compared with normal adjacent breast tissue. Greater increase in the percentage of ER-alpha-positive cells was associated with a smaller reduction in the percentage of ER-beta-positive cells and vice versa (Spearman's rho = -0.5044, p = 0.001). In conclusion, upregulation of ER-alpha and downregulation of ER-beta may represent two discrete molecular events in LN pathogenesis. Of notice, a mutually limiting interaction may exist between the two events.

The relevance of circulating epithelial tumor cells (CETC) for therapy monitoring during neoadjuvant (primary systemic) chemotherapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Having demonstrated in a previous report that the response of circulating epithelial tumor cells (CETC) during the first cycles of primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy perfectly reflects the response of the tumor, in the present study the changes in cell numbers during subsequent cycles and their possible impact on the therapy's outcome were examined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 58 breast cancer patients CETC were quantified during therapy with either EC (epirubicin/ cyclophosphamid) or dose intensified E (epirubicin) followed by taxane, with or without trastuzumab, and subsequent CMF (cyclophosphamid/methorexate/ fluorouracil).

RESULTS

CETC numbers declined more than 10-fold (good response) in 65% (her2/neu-negative) and 55% (her2/neu-positive) of patients during EC, and in 60% during dose intensified E, respectively, followed by an increase of CETC in all patients. CETC remained increased, decreasing only when adding CMF. A good initial response correlated with estrogen-receptor negativity, a poor response with early distant relapse (P < 0,0001, hazard ratio = 11.91).

CONCLUSION

Response of CETC already during the first cycles of neoadjuvant treatment predicts the final response of the tumor. Hitherto unknown effects of the release of tumor cells during therapy further our understanding of tumor-blood interaction and may improve access of agents like antibodies to cells. The impact on the further course of disease remains to be evaluated.

Is Survival from Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast Different from That of Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma?

Previous studies of patients with breast cancer have compared survival of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) with contradictory results. This study examines the effect of the diagnosis of IDC or ILC in conjunction with age at diagnosis, pathologic tumor size, pathologic stage, histologic grade, and lymph node status of 307 women with IDC or ILC in 1992 in the Greater Western region of Sydney in Australia. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Relative risks associated with IDC or ILC and other important prognostic factors and adjusted for each other were computed using Cox proportional hazard regression. The proportion of grade I tumors was significantly higher in ILC (41%) than in IDC (16%). Conversely, the proportion of grade III tumors was only 18% in ILC as against 41% in IDC (p = 0.020). The 10-year survival of women with IDC was 69%, compared to 84% for ILC (p = 0.073). However, the 15 percentile point difference between overall survival of IDC and ILC was markedly reduced after adjustment for nodal status. The difference was eight percentile points for node-negative patients (p = 0.361) and five percentile points for node-positive patients (p = 0.464). Age at diagnosis, tumor size, pathologic stage, and lymph node status were independent prognostic indicators for 10-year survival. There was no prognostic difference between IDC and ILC. The result shows the importance of adjusting for other important clinicopathologic characteristics before comparing the overall survival of IDC and ILC.

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy and the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard management for women who have locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer, but can be applied to all women who may require postoperative chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Disease-free survival and overall survival are equivalent between patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patients treated with the same regimen postoperatively. Preoperative chemotherapy can offer women less morbid surgical treatment by down-staging both the primary breast tumor and axillary metastases. Finally, response to chemotherapy can inform clinicians of the chemosensitivity of the tumor, and can predict long-term outcome for women who have breast cancer.

Primary systemic chemotherapy of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Invasive lobular carcinoma is the second most frequent histological type of breast cancer and its incidence is increasing. It has unique clinical, biological, and molecular features. Invasive lobular carcinoma is almost invariably positive for the oestrogen receptor and, when compared with invasive ductal carcinoma, it is typically of a lower grade. Even though invasive lobular carcinoma represents a distinct clinical entity, the same criteria used for invasive ductal carcinoma are currently applied to establish the need for primary or adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. We reviewed randomised trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy and noted that insufficient evidence is available to support or withhold use of chemotherapy in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. Thus, the benefit from systemic chemotherapy for individuals with this form of breast disease is unclear. Invasive lobular carcinoma deserves to be investigated separately in prospective clinical trials to define the best treatment and prevention strategies.

Extensive sampling changes T-staging of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of breast: a comparative study of gross versus microscopic tumor sizes

Infiltrating lobular carcinoma represents 7-10% of all invasive breast cancers. The greatest diameter of the tumors in the surgical specimens is required for an accurate T-staging. Tumors with dimension of zero cm, >0 to < or =2 cm, >2 to < or =5 cm, and >5 cm are staged as T0, T1, T2, and T3, respectively. A retrospective study on the specimens was performed on the specimens of 74 cases with infiltrating lobular carcinoma at the UCLA Medical Center from 2003 to 2005. The patients' ages ranged from 38 to 95 years. Specimens were from lumpectomy and mastectomy procedures on 36 and 38 patients, respectively. The specimens were divided in four groups according to the gross T-stages. Microscopic measurement of the tumors was carried out within each of the four groups for restaging purposes. Resizing of tumors was performed by marking the microscopic tumor extensions and compiling the measurements. In group 1, all 26 gross T0 tumors changed to T1 (69%), T2 (19%), and T3 (12%) after microscopic restaging. In group 2, 50% of the 26 gross T1 tumors became T2 (35%) and T3 (15%). In group 3, 9 (50%) of the T2 tumors changed to T3 microscopically. All 7 specimens (100%) in group 4 remained as T3. The results show that the gross measurements alone may underestimate 40-50% of the tumor T-stages. Therefore, the T-stages of the tumors with a gross size of 5 cm or less may change by microscopic resizing after an extensive sampling of the specimen.

Use of immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of breast epithelial lesions

In recent years, the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast pathology has increased tremendously. It is not because the new genre of breast pathologists are less well trained than their "experienced" counterparts; it is mainly because of the demands of more accurate and precise diagnoses, identification of new entities and availability of novel antibodies. The main purpose of this review is to discuss the use of best available antibodies in diagnoses of breast epithelial lesions. The following items are discussed: assessment of invasion, IHC in papillary lesions, identification of breast tumor subtypes, IHC in proliferative breast lesions, assessment of lymphatic space invasion, diagnosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma, IHC in Paget disease, use of cytokeratins in sentinel lymph node assessment, and diagnosis of breast carcinoma at metastatic sites. Because the main focus of this review is on diagnosis, receptor studies on breast carcinoma are briefly discussed and only a few general comments are made.

Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Neoplasms

The distinction between lobular and ductal lesions of the breast is important in several circumstances. Diagnostic reproducibility of lobular versus ductal lesions, based on histology alone, is less than optimal. The proper distinction between atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ is critical for patient management. Patients who have a core biopsy of invasive lobular carcinoma often have preoperative magnetic resonance imaging to prepare the surgeon for proper margin attainment. E-cadherin, a negative membrane marker for lobular neoplasia, is useful in the distinction of lobular versus ductal neoplasia, but as a negative marker, can be difficult to interpret in particularly challenging cases. In this study, we surveyed primary and metastatic ductal lesions (62) and lobular lesions (64) of the breast to determine if P120 catenin is useful in the diagnostic distinction between lobular and ductal neoplasia. Primary breast ductal and lobular preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions were immunostained with E-cadherin and P120ctn and independently classified as ductal or lobular lesions. In addition, a wide array of carcinomas of different types were surveyed with P120ctn in tissue microarrays to ascertain whether the cytoplasmic P120ctn immunostaining pattern observed in lobular neoplasia was unique. Accurate categorization of ductal versus lobular neoplasia in the breast with P120ctn immunostaining was effective in all cases. Separation of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ from lobular neoplasia was efficient. Diagnostically, P120ctn was particularly useful in identifying early lesions of lobular neoplasia. Of the other tumors that may morphologically mimic lobular carcinoma, only the diffusely infiltrating variants of rectal and gastric carcinomas showed diffuse cytoplasmic P120ctn immunostaining. Caution should be exercised when examining tumors in metastatic sites with P120ctn, with the incorporation of an appropriate panel of immunostains.

Current Trends and Controversies over Pre-operative Chemotherapy for Women with Operable Breast Cancer

The multi-disciplinary approach, including surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and radiation therapy, has become the standard treatment for primary breast cancer patients. The indication of pre-operative chemotherapy has been extended to women with potentially operable breast cancer based on the results of large randomized studies and has become an attractive option that extends the chance of breast conservation. The clinical and pathological responses to pre-operative chemotherapy correlates with long-term outcome. The anthracycline-containing regimen is now considered the standard. Sequential administration of non-cross-resistant drugs, namely taxanes, improves local tumor response but its long-term benefit has been controversial. Prediction of response to pre-operative chemotherapy still remains a challenge. Identification of useful predictive markers and development of molecular-targeted drugs is the key to individualized therapy in the future.

Molecular classification system identifies invasive breast carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The molecular classification system categorizes invasive breast carcinomas according to their key driving biomarkers. In the current study, the authors evaluated whether response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with the molecular classification groups.

METHODS

Using immunohistochemistry, the molecular classification group (luminal-A, luminal-B, HER-2-variant, HER-2-classic, and basal phenotype) was retrospectively determined in 68 breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 28 carcinoma patients (41.2%) achieved a compete pathologic response (CPR), including 2 of 15 patients classified as having luminal-A (13.3%), 4 of 16 patients classified as having luminal-B (25.0%), 10 of 12 patients classified as having HER-2-classic (83.3%), none of the 4 patients classified as having HER-2-variant, and 12 of 21 patients classified as having basal phenotype (57.1%) neoplasms. The CPR rate among patients with the HER-2-classic and basal neoplasms was 67% (22 of 33 neoplasms), compared with 17.1% (6 of 35 neoplasms) in the non-HER-2-classic/basal combined group (P < .001). Eleven carcinomas were initially diagnosed as invasive lobular carcinomas (pleomorphic and classic), 4 of which were luminal-A, 4 of which were luminal-B, 2 of which were HER-2-classic, and 1 of which was basal. On review, only 3 of these 11 cases remained classified as classic lobular carcinoma, all of which were classified as luminal-A, and none of these patients achieved a CPR. Four of the other 8 patients achieved a CPR.

CONCLUSIONS

The molecular classification system is useful for identifying carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a CPR. In the current study, all the morphologically classic lobular carcinomas were classified as luminal-A neoplasms, which may explain the low rate of CPR reported.

Biologic markers in axillary node-negative breast cancer: differential expression in invasive ductal carcinoma versus invasive lobular carcinoma

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the differential expression of established histopathologic and biologic markers of proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in a group of axillary node-negative breast cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred twenty patients with axillary node-negative ILC and IDC who underwent surgery at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1978 and 1995 had tissue available for analysis. Of these, 206 (94%) had IDC and 14 (6%) had ILC. Estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, tumor and stromal expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, CD44, laminin-5, E-cadherin, and topoisomerase-2 were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis. HER2/neu and alpha6beta4 integrin were evaluated by in situ hybridization. The Fisher exact test was used to calculate significant differences between ILC and IDC. Median age was 59 years.

RESULTS

Invasive lobular carcinoma was more likely to occur in patients aged > 50 years. Invasive lobular carcinoma tended to be > 2 cm (50% vs. 39%), have a nuclear grade of 1/2 (100% vs. 72%), be estrogen receptor positive (93% vs. 70%), HER2/neu negative (92% vs. 68%), have high CD44 expression (31% vs. 16%), low stromal vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression (36% vs. 47%), no E-cadherin expression (0 vs. 90%), and low laminin-5 expression (15% vs. 25%), compared with IDC.

CONCLUSION

Invasive lobular carcinoma and IDC might be distinct histologic types of breast cancer with different expression of biologic markers. These differences, not all being statistically significant in this small study, might generate hypotheses to develop tailored options for future systemic therapy.

FGFR1 Emerges as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Lobular Breast Carcinomas

PURPOSE

Classic lobular carcinomas (CLC) account for 10% to 15% of all breast cancers. At the genetic level, CLCs show recurrent physical loss of chromosome16q coupled with the lack of E-cadherin (CDH1 gene) expression. However, little is known about the putative therapeutic targets for these tumors. The aim of this study was to characterize CLCs at the molecular genetic level and identify putative therapeutic targets.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We subjected 13 cases of CLC to a comprehensive molecular analysis including immunohistochemistry for E-cadherin, estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER2/neu and p53; high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH); microarray-based CGH (aCGH); and fluorescent and chromogenic in situ hybridization for CCND1 and FGFR1.

RESULTS

All cases lacked the expression of E-cadherin, p53, and HER2, and all but one case was positive for estrogen receptors. HR-CGH revealed recurrent gains on 1q and losses on 16q (both, 85%). aCGH showed a good agreement with but higher resolution and sensitivity than HR-CGH. Recurrent, high level gains at 11q13 (CCND1) and 8p12-p11.2 were identified in seven and six cases, respectively, and were validated with in situ hybridization. Examination of aCGH and the gene expression profile data of the cell lines, MDA-MB-134 and ZR-75-1, which harbor distinct gains of 8p12-p11.2, identified FGFR1 as a putative amplicon driver of 8p12-p11.2 amplification in MDA-MB-134. Inhibition of FGFR1 expression using small interfering RNA or a small-molecule chemical inhibitor showed that FGFR1 signaling contributes to the survival of MDA-MB-134 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that receptor FGFR1 inhibitors may be useful as therapeutics in a subset of CLCs.

Breast cancer treatment and ovarian failure: risk factors and emerging genetic determinants

Most premenopausal women diagnosed with primary breast cancer receive adjuvant chemotherapy, and many experience chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure (CIOF). CIOF is associated with menopausal symptoms, fertility concerns and long-term implications including bone loss. Ironically, CIOF might confer a disease-specific benefit to women whose breast cancers express hormone receptors. Risk factors of CIOF include the woman's age at the time of therapy, and the type, dose and schedule of chemotherapy. Because inherited genetic factors have an important role in determining who will experience CIOF, genetic testing has the potential to provide optimal counselling about risks and possible interventions.

Invasive ductal carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma of breast differ in response following neoadjuvant therapy with epidoxorubicin and docetaxel + G-CSF

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer treated with anthracyclines and taxanes results in high response rates, allowing breast conserving surgery (BCS) in patients primarily not suitable for this procedure. Pathological responses are important prognostic parameters for progression free and overall survival. We questioned the impact of histologic type invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) versus invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) on response to primary chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

161 patients with breast cancer received preoperative chemotherapy consisted of epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) administered in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on days 3-10 (ED + G). Pathological complete response (pCR), biological markers and type of surgery as well as progression free and overall survival were compared between IDC and ILC.

RESULTS

Out of 161 patients, 124 patients presented with IDC and 37 with ILC. Patients with ILC were less likely to have a pCR (3% vs. 20%, P < 0.009) and breast conserving surgeries (51% vs. 79%, P < 0.001). Patients with ILC tended to have oestrogen receptor positive tumors (86% vs. 52%, P < 0.0001), HER 2 negative tumors (69% vs. 84%), and lower nuclear grade (nuclear grade 3, 16% vs. 46%, P < 0.001). Patients with ILC tended to have longer time to progression (TTP) (42 months vs. 26 months) and overall survival (69 months vs. 65 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that patients with ILC achieved a lower pCR rate and ineligibility for BCS to preoperative chemotherapy, but this did not result in a survival disadvantage. Because of these results new strategies to achieve a pCR are warranted.

Postmastectomy Radiation and Survival in Older Women With Breast Cancer

Purpose

Clinical trials indicate that postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) improves survival for women age younger than 70 years with high-risk breast cancer. However, for women age 70 years or older, the benefits of PMRT are unknown. As recent evidence suggests that certain adjuvant treatments appropriate for younger women may only be marginally beneficial for older women, we sought to determine whether PMRT improves survival for older women with breast cancer.

Methods

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare data spanning 1992 to 1999, we identified 11,594 women age 70 years or older treated with mastectomy for invasive breast cancer. A proportional hazards model adjusted for clinical-pathologic covariates tested whether PMRT was associated with improved overall survival for low-risk (T1/2 N0), intermediate-risk (T1/2 N1), and high-risk (T3/4 and/or N2/3) patients.

Results

A total of 502 (7%) of 7,416 low-risk, 242 (11%) of 2,145 intermediate-risk, and 785 (38%) of 2,053 high-risk patients received PMRT. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. For low- and intermediate-risk patients, PMRT was not associated with survival. For high-risk patients, PMRT was associated with a significant improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97; P = .02). Five-year adjusted survival was 50% for patients not treated with PMRT or chemotherapy, 56% for patients treated with PMRT only, 57% for patients treated with chemotherapy only, and 59% for patients treated with both PMRT and chemotherapy.

Conclusion

PMRT is associated with improved survival for older women with high-risk breast cancer. Randomized clinical trials are urgently needed to confirm this finding and define optimal treatment strategies for this patient group.

Neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: opportunities to assess tumour response

Primary, preoperative, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was introduced in the early 1970s as part of an integrated therapeutic approach to treat inoperable locally advanced breast cancer. The approach resulted in high responses, and sufficient downstaging to allow mastectomy in some patients. In addition, a small number of pathological complete responders were reported. Gradually, the idea of preoperative chemotherapy was extended to include patients with large but operable early-stage breast cancer, with the possibility in some cases of downstaging the primary tumour to avoid mastectomy, and to allow breast-conserving surgery to be done. This approach allows the tumour to be used as a measure of treatment response in vivo. More recently, the possibility has opened up for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to provide information on the use of clinical, pathological, and molecular endpoints, which can be used as surrogate markers to predict long-term outcome in the adjuvant setting. In addition, the anatomical accessibility of the breast provides the potential for serial biopsies to investigate molecular changes during treatment.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Letrozole and Letrozole Plus Low-Dose Metronomic Oral Cyclophosphamide As Primary Systemic Treatment in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose

To investigate the activity of letrozole plus/minus oral metronomic cyclophophamide as primary systemic treatment (PST) in elderly breast cancer patients.

Methods

One hundred fourteen consecutive elderly women with T2-4 N0-1 and estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to primary letrozole therapy (2.5 mg daily for 6 months) or a combination of letrozole plus oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg/daily for 6 months) in an open-labeled, randomized phase II trial. Tumor response was assessed clinically, and tumor Ki67 index and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -A levels were measured before and after treatment.

Results

Overall response rate was 71.9% (95% CI, 60.0 to 83.8) in the 57 patients randomly assigned to receive primary letrozole and 87.7% (95% CI, 78.6 to 96.2) in the 57 patients randomly assigned to receive letrozole plus cyclophosphamide. The difference in activity between treatment arms was predominantly confined to patients with ductal histology. There was a significantly greater suppression of Ki67 and VEGF-A expression in the letrozole/cyclophosphamide-treated group than in the letrozole-treated group, leading to lower Ki67 and VEGF expression at post-treatment residual histology (P = .03 and P = .002, respectively).

Conclusion

Both letrozole and letrozole plus cyclophosphamide treatments appeared active as PST in elderly breast cancer patients. Metronomic scheduling of cyclophosphamide may have an antiangiogenetic effect and the combination of letrozole plus cyclophosphamide warrants testing in a randomized phase III trial.

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lobular and ductal breast carcinomas: a retrospective study on 860 patients from one institution

BACKGROUND

We compared the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic response and outcome in operable invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal breast carcinoma (IDC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We extracted from our database all patients with pure invasive lobular (n=118, 14%) or pure invasive ductal carcinomas (n=742, 86%). Their treatment included neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adapted surgery, radiotherapy and adjuvant hormonal treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with IDC, ILC presented with larger tumors (T3: 38.1% versus 21.4%, P=0.0007), more N0 nodes status (55.9% versus 43.3%, P=0.01), less inflammatory tumors (5.9% versus 11.8%, P=0.01), more hormone receptor positivity (65.5% versus 38.8%), lower histological grade (P<0.0001). Final surgery was a mastectomy in 70% of patients with ILC (34% were reoperated after initial partial mastectomy) and in 52% of IDC after 8% of reoperation (P=0.006). A pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 1% of ILC and 9% of IDC (P=0.002). The outcome at 60 months was significantly better for ILC, but histologic type was not an independent factor for survival in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

ILC appeared less responsive to chemotherapy but presented a better outcome than IDC. While new information on biological features of ILC is needed, we consider that neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive ILC may be a more adapted approach than neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: an overview and review of recent clinical trials

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is long established as part of the multi-modality management of locally advanced breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer, leading to significantly improved outcome. Numerous recent studies have compared the use of anthracycline-based NAC with adjuvant chemotherapy in earlier-stage disease, and have shown equivalent disease-free and overall survival rates with increased breast conservation rates. These studies have also shown that a pathological complete response after NAC is associated with improved long-term outcome. More recently, the taxanes have been introduced into clinical trials of NAC with increased overall and pCR rates. However, there is no evidence that the addition of taxanes to neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improves long-term disease free survival or overall survival. This paper reviews these trials, as well as trials of dose-dense and trastuzumab-containing NAC regimens. The review discusses the potential for NAC to replace prolonged adjuvant trials in the assessment of new therapeutic agents (using pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term outcome), to be used as an in vivo chemosensitivity assay to guide further treatment, and to identify molecular markers that correlate with tumour sensitivity or resistance to chemotherapeutic agents so that the treatment of patients can be individualised.

Primary Systemic Therapy of Breast Cancer

Primary systemic therapy (PST) or neoadjuvant therapy is used in nonmetastatic breast cancer to treat systemic disease earlier, decrease tumor bulk ideally to a complete pathological response (pCR), and reduce the extent of surgery. The multitude of clinical trials using PST in breast cancer patients has not proven the fundamental hypotheses of improved overall survival and disease-free survival that drove the investigation of PST. The other potential advantages of PST, which include increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery and predicting outcome to a particular chemotherapy regimen, are also not conclusively established. We examined the published literature on PST for breast cancer and predominantly focused our review on data from large, randomized clinical trials comparing primary systemic chemotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy, different primary systemic chemotherapy regimens, primary systemic chemotherapy with hormonal therapy, and different preoperative hormonal therapies. Although the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen has not been established, a combination of four cycles of an anthracycline followed by four cycles of a taxane appears to produce the highest pCR rate (22%-31%). In patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer, concurrent use of neoadjuvant trastuzumab with an anthracycline-taxane combination has produced provocative results that require further confirmatory studies. Preoperative hormonal therapy is associated with low pCR rates and should be reserved for patients who are poor candidates for systemic chemotherapy. The optimal management of patients with residual disease after the administration of maximum neoadjuvant therapy remains to be defined. The surgical approach, including the role of sentinel node biopsy and delivery of radiation therapy after PST in breast cancer patients, is evolving. Ongoing clinical trials will help identify the subset of patients who would most benefit from the use of PST, establish the most effective PST regimen, and determine the optimal multidisciplinary approach in the management of breast cancer.

Molecular biology of breast cancer

Although Breast Cancer (BC) has been considered for many years as a single entity with a common management and treatment, it is actually a extremely heterogeneous disease which includes at least 4 or 5 very different subtypes. The first step in the recognition of the heterogeneity of BC was the demonstration of the presence of functional hormonal receptors (HR) in nearly two thirds of breast cancer specimens. This finding, which established a first classification of BC in two clear subtypes (HR-positive and HR-negative) was followed by the demonstration of many other differential features. The her2/neu gene alteration, present in nearly 20% of BC tumors, is probably the most relevant of them, but certainly not the only one. The development of new technologies and, in particular, the use of complementary DNA (cDNA) microarrays will allow us now the simultaneous analysis of thousands of genes and the establishment of new, more refined BC subtypes based on gene expression profiles/genetic fingerprints. This review discusses the practical applications of molecular analysis of BC, which can be classified in four categories: 1. Establishment of a new molecular taxonomy of breast cancer. 2. Definition of prognostic factors/prognostic indexes based on molecular/genetic peculiarities. 3. Prediction of response to diverse antitumoral treatments. 4. Identification of molecular targets that allows the development of new tailored antitumor treatments.

Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update

Neoadjuvant (primary systemic) treatment is the standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer and a standard option for primary operable disease. Because of new treatments and new understandings of breast cancer, however, recommendations published in 2003 regarding neoadjuvant treatment for operable disease required updating. Therefore, a second international panel of representatives of a number of breast cancer clinical research groups was convened in September 2004 to update these recommendations. As part of this effort, data published to date were reviewed critically and indications for neoadjuvant treatment were newly defined.

Phase II study of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine combination in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pre-treated metastatic breast cancer

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an oxaliplatin (OXA)/vinorelbine (VNB) combination in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients pre-treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients received OXA at 130 mg/m (2-h i.v.), day 1, and VNB days 1 and 8 at 24-26 mg/m repeated every 3 weeks. Forty-two patients (median age 54; 64% with liver metastasis, 67% taxane resistant/refractory and 38% anthracycline resistant/refractory) were treated. A median of 4 cycles of treatment was given per patient, with 31% receiving 6 or more. Eleven partial responses and 16 patients with stable disease (five lasting more than 4 months) in 41 eligible patients were seen, for an overall response rate of 26.8% (95% confidence interval 14.2-42.9). Median follow-up was 15.9 months (7.2-30.6), median time to progression was 3.4 months and estimated overall survival was 12.7 months (20 events). Thirty-three patients experienced (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2) grade 3-4 neutropenia (one case of febrile neutropenia) and three patients had severe constipation requiring hospitalization. Nine patients developed grade 3 OXA-specific neurotoxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. We conclude that OXA 130 mg/m (day 1) and VNB 24 mg/m (day 1 and 8) combination given every 3 weeks is effective with a good safety profile in MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Cancer lobulaire infiltrant du sein : particularités diagnostiques et évolutives

Invasive lobular carcinoma accounts for 4 to 10% of breast cancers. The clinical and radiological diagnosis is difficult to make. Its progression is slower than that of ductal cancer, and the prognostic factors are more favourable. Its metastases are more frequently located in the digestive tract and the ovaries. It is more frequently bilateral. Its prognosis is not different from that of infiltrating ductal carcinomas. The choice of therapies depends on the individual characteristics of each patient and of the biological features of each tumour. However, lobular carcinomas seem to be less responsive to chemotherapy.

Comparative expressed sequence hybridization reveals differential gene expression in morphological breast cancer subtypes

In this study, comparative expressed sequence hybridization (CESH) has been used to compare gene expression patterns in three morphologically different breast cancer subtypes: classic-type invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), poorly differentiated ERBB2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified (IDC-NOS), and poorly differentiated ERBB2-positive IDC-NOS. CESH allows global detection of chromosomal regions with differential gene expression in a way similar to that of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Eight cases of each breast cancer subtype were included in the study. For each subtype, two pools of four cases each were constructed. CESH was used to compare both pools within the same morphological subtype, followed by a comparison of pools belonging to different subtypes. This revealed three chromosomal regions that were differentially expressed in ductal and lobular carcinomas, including relative overexpression at 8q13-q23 and 16q22, and relative underexpression at 8p21-p22. In addition, an expression signature characterized by relative overexpression at 3q24-q26.3, 14q23-31, 17q12, and 20q12-13 was identified for ERBB2-positive IDC-NOS. In summary, CESH analysis highlights chromosomal regions of differential gene expression that are associated with morphologically defined breast cancer subtypes and suggests that regions on chromosome 8 are of interest in the discrimination between ductal and lobular carcinomas. In addition, using CESH, it was possible to identify an ERBB2 expression signature, comprising four chromosomal regions with potential significance in the aggressive behaviour of ERBB2-positive IDC-NOS.

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) systemic treatment of breast cancer

Preoperative systemic treatment (PST) is a valid option not only for advanced breast cancer stages but also for operable breast cancer. We know that disease-free and overall survival after PST are equivalent to those after adjuvant therapy. Furthermore, PST is able to improve surgical treatment by increasing the rate of breast conservation surgery, which minimises psychological distress for patients fearing mastectomy. Response to PST is a predictor of long-term outcome and gives prognostic information after a short-term interval in contrast to adjuvant trials, which do not show their results until after a 5- to 10-year follow-up. More often, endocrine non-responsive tumours demonstrate a pathological complete response (pCR). Thus, PST can change the formerly bad prognostic marker into one that indicates a favourable prognosis if pCR is achieved by PST. If PST is performed outside clinical trials, anthracycline/taxane-based regimens should be used, especially in sequential prolonged schedules. The use of aromatase inhibitors in preoperative endocrine therapy in elderly postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer yields a larger proportion of local response than tamoxifen. The duration of PST is not well established, but at least four cycles of chemotherapy should be administered and endocrine therapy needs a minimal time to show greatest benefit when given for at least 3-4 months . The concurrent use of chemotherapy and endocrine drugs did not show any benefit, even in endocrine-responsive tumours and should therefore be avoided. Sentinel node biopsy is a reasonable approach, but this technique should be reserved for experienced surgeons. PCR is the most important surrogate marker of PST, demonstrating an improved disease-free and overall survival. But even if pCR of the primary tumour is achieved, the detection of lymph node metastases is the most important prognostic factor, indicating a substantial risk of cancer recurrence. PST will lead to individualised (tailored) treatment in patients with primary breast cancer.

How do we measure a residual tumor size in histopathology (the gold standard) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Accurate reporting of the residual tumor size by pathologists after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important component of a breast cancer. Recent literature reported comparisons regarding the accuracy of clinical and radiological residual tumor size findings using the histopathology as a "gold standard". However, the histopathological methods of measuring the residual tumor size are not standardized. Most pathologists use the tumor size measured by the gross examination. We collected 32 patient samples and compared the residual tumor size by gross and microscopic pathologic examinations. Using microscopic tumor size as the gold standard, our study showed gross tumor size is overestimated in 25%, underestimated in 56% and correlated to the final microscopic tumor size in 19% of the cases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Determining accurate residual tumor size to estimate pathologic response to chemotherapy is essential. We attempted to provide guidelines for pathology reporting post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancers.