Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer

Composite analysis of immunological and metabolic markers defines novel subtypes of triple negative breast cancer

Cancer biology is influenced by the tumor microenvironment, which impacts disease prognosis and therapeutic interventions. The inter-relationship of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, immune response regulators, and a glycolytic tumor environment was evaluated in a cohort of 183 largely consecutive patients with triple negative breast cancer diagnosis. High levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were associated with improved survival of triple negative breast cancer cases. However, elevated levels of PD-L1, CD163, and FOXP3 were individually associated with significantly decreased overall survival. These three determinants were significantly correlated, and could serve to differentiate the prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Interestingly, a glycolytic tumor environment, as determined by the expression of MCT4 in the tumor stroma, was associated with the immune evasive environment and poor prognosis. Clustering of all markers defined four distinct triple negative breast cancer subtypes that harbored prognostic significance in multivariate analysis. Immune and metabolic markers stratified triple negative breast cancer into subtypes that have prognostic significance and implications for therapies targeting immune checkpoints and tumor metabolism.

Checkpoint molecule expression by B and T cell lymphomas in dogs

Immunotherapies targeting checkpoint molecule programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) protein were shown to be effective for treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in people, but little is known about the expression of PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1 by canine lymphoma. Therefore, flow cytometry was used to analyse expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in canine lymphoma, using fine-needle aspirates of lymph nodes from 34 dogs with B cell lymphoma (BCL), 6 dogs with T cell lymphoma (TCL) and 11 dogs that had relapsed. Furthermore, fine-needle aspirates were obtained from 17 healthy dogs for comparison. Lastly, the impact of chemotherapy resistance on expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was assessed in vitro. These studies revealed increased expression of PD-L1 by malignant B cells compared to normal B cells. In the case of TCL, tumour cells and normal T cells both showed low to negative expression of PD-1 and PD-L1. In addition, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes from both BCL and TCL had increased expression of both PD-1 and PD-L1 expression compared to B and T cells from lymph nodes of healthy animals. In vitro, chemotherapy-resistant BCL and TCL cell lines exhibited increases in both PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, compared to non-chemotherapy selected tumour cells. These findings indicate that canine lymphomas exhibit upregulated checkpoint molecule expression, though the impact of checkpoint molecule expression on tumour biological behaviour remains unclear.

Prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in ovarian clear cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was expressed in various tumors and antibodies targeting its receptor programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) are emerging cancer therapeutics. This study was designed to evaluate the expression of PD-L1 and its correlation with clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).

METHODS

The PD-L1 expression was measured by tissue-microarray-based immunohistochemistry from 122 eligible patients diagnosed with OCCC. The associations of clinicopathologic features with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis was further performed by Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Overall, high PD-L1 expression (PD-L1(high)) was observed in 44.7% (55/123) of OCCC patients, and was strongly associated with advanced stages (p=0.020), positive ascitic fluid (p=0.016), platinum-resistant (PR) disease (p=0.045), and recurrence (p=0.038). Moreover, patients with PD-L1(high) were associated with poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.877; p=0.001) and PFS (HR=1.843; p=0.021) than those with low PD-L1 expression (PD-L1(low)). In subgroup analysis, PD-L1(high) patients experienced a poorer PFS (HR=1.926; p=0.044) and OS (HR=2.492; p=0.021) than PD-L1(low) cases among advanced stages (III-IV), but this difference was not observed in stage I-II patients. Meanwhile, PD-L1(high) was associated with poorer prognosis than PD-L1(low) in PR patients (OS, HR=2.253; p=0.037; PFS, HR=1.448; p=0.233). Multivariate analysis revealed that PD-L1(high) and advanced stages (III-IV) were adverse independent prognosticators for both PFS (HR(PD-L1)=2.0; p(PD-L1)=0.038; HR(stage)=10.2; p(stage)<0.001) and OS (HR(PD-L1)=3.0; p(PD-L1)=0.011; HR(stage)=14.3; p(stage)<0.001).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1(high) might serve as a risk factor for PFS and OS in patients with OCCC. It is possible that immunotherapy targeting PD-L1 pathway could be used in OCCC.

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PD-L1 in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on 1863 individuals

The prognostic significance of PD-L1 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) had been investigated in previous studies; however, the results remain controversial. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of the PD-L1 expression in patients with RCC. Relevant literature was identified form PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library, which compared the prognostic significance between PD-L1 expression and RCC. Hazard ratios (HRs) for survival outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for clinical parameters associated with PD-L1 were extracted from eligible studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² value. The fixed-effects model was used if there was no evidence of heterogeneity; otherwise, the random-effects model was used. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plots and Egger's regression test. A total of 1863 patients from ten eligible studies were analyzed. The results showed that PD-L1 expression is associated with poor overall survival in clear cell RCC (ccRCC) (HR = 2.76, 95%CI: 2.25-3.38, I² = 14.4%, P < 0.001) and non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC) (HR = 2.77, 95%CI: 1.62-4.72, I² = 28.8%, P < 0.001). In addition, PD-L1 expression was found to be significantly associated with primary tumor stage (OR = 1.76, 95%CI: 1.39-2.23; I² = 56.3%), regional lymph node involvement (OR = 2.10, 95%CI: 1.48-2.98; I² = 14.9%), distant metastases (OR = 2.69, 95%CI: 2.05-3.54; I² = 0.0%), nuclear grade (OR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.32-2.23; I² = 79.4%) and histologic tumor necrosis (OR = 2.25, 95%CI: 1.59-3.18; I² = 66.1%) in patients with RCC. The outcome stability was confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Both the Begg's funnel plot test (P = 0.276) and the Egger's (P = 0.388) verified that there was no publication bias within the included studies. This study suggests that PD-L1 expression is correlated with poor prognosis and advanced clinicopathological features in RCC patients.

Prognostic value of PD -L1 expression in patients with primary solid tumors

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is thought to play a critical role in immune escape by cancer, but whether PD-L1 expression can influence prognosis of patients with solid tumors is controversial. Therefore, we meta-analyzed available data on whether PD-L1 expression correlates with overall survival (OS) in such patients. PubMed, EMBASE and other databases were systematically searched for cohort or case-control studies examining the possible correlation between PD-L1 expression and OS of patients with solid tumors. OS was compared between patients positive or negative for PD-L1 expression using scatter plots, and subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor type and patient characteristics. Data from 59 studies involving 20,004 patients with solid tumors were meta-analyzed. The median percentage of tumors positive for PD-L1 was 30.1%. OS was significantly lower in PD-L1-positive patients than in PD-L1-negative patients at 1 year (P = 0.039), 3 years (P < 0.001) and 5 years (P < 0.001). The risk ratios of OS (and associated 95% confidence intervals) were 2.02 (1.56-2.60) at 1 year, 1.57 (1.34-1.83) at 3 years and 1.43 (1.24-1.64) at 5 years. Similar results were obtained in subgroup analyses based on patient ethnicity or tumor type. The available evidence suggests that PD-L1 expression negatively affects the prognosis of patients with solid tumors. PD-L1 might serve as an efficient prognostic indicator in solid tumor and may represent the important new therapeutic target.

Associations of Tumor PD-1 Ligands, Immunohistochemical Studies, and Textural Features in 18F-FDG PET in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

To know tumor PD-L1 expression through IHC or the FDG-PET related radiomics, we investigated the association between programmed cell death protein 1 ligand (PD-L1) expression and immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers or textural features of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxdeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) in 53 oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer patients who were ready to undergo radiotherapy-based treatment. Differences in textural features or biomarkers between tumors with and without PD-L1 expression were tested using a Mann–Whitney U test. The predicted values for PD-L1 expression were examined using logistic regression analysis. The mean percentages of tumor PD-L1 expression were 6.2 ± 13.5. Eighteen tumors had PD-L1 expression ≥5%, whereas 30 tumors ≥1%. Using a 5% cutoff, the p16 staining percentage and the textural index of correlation were two factors associated with PD-L1 expression. The odds ratios (ORs) were 17.00 (p = 0.028) and 0.009 (p = 0.015), respectively. When dichotomizing PD-L1 at 1%, the p16 and Ki-67 staining percentages were two predictors for PD-L1 expression with ORs of 11.41 (p = 0.035) and 757.77 (p = 0.045). p16 and Ki-67 staining percentages and several PET/CT-derived textural features can provide supplemental information to determine tumor PD-L1 expression in HNCs.

Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases of triple negative breast cancer

Background

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a potential predictive biomarker of the response to anti-PD-L1/anti- programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy in multiple cancers, including triple negative breast cancer(TNBC). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether PD-L1 expression is homogenous in primary tumors(PTs) and synchronous axillary lymph node metastases(LNMs) of TNBC.

Methods

PD-L1 expression was immunohistochemically evaluated in 101 TNBC patients’ PTs and paired LNMs. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and infiltrating immune cells or node lymphocytes in the PTs and associated LNMs was scored separately and was correlated with patients’ clinical parameters and prognoses.

Results

PD-L1 expression exhibited spatial heterogeneity in both the tumor cells and the infiltrating immune cells or node lymphocytes of PTs and LNMs. The PD-L1 expression levels were significantly higher in the lymphocytes and tumor cells of the LNMs than in the PTs. PD-L1 expression was also more frequent among the LNMs. PD-L1 expression was associated with high grade and more stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes(TILs). Furthermore, the disease-free survival and overall survival were similar between the PT- negative/LNM- positive and PT- positive/LNM- positive patients, both of which exhibited worse disease-free survival(DFS) thanPT -negative/LNM -negative patients.

Conclusions

The differential expression of PD-L1 between the PTs and LNMs suggests that LNMs PD-L1 status may be used to indicate whether PD-1/PD-L1-targeted therapy would be suitable for a node-positive TNBC patient in the future.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3916-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Triple negative breast cancer - prognostic role of immune-related factors: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Treatment of breast cancer has been increasingly successful in recent years with the advent of HER2-receptor targeted treatment and endocrine treatment. However, the triple negative subgroup of breast cancer (TNBC) (estrogen-, progesterone- and HER2-receptor negative) still lacks targeted treatment options. TNBC is a type of breast cancer that often affects younger women, and generally has a worse prognosis than other types of breast cancer. Recently, the complex role of the immune system in cancer growth, elimination and metastasis has been the object of increased attention. There is hope that a more detailed understanding of the intricate roles of the constituents of the immune system, will hold potential both as prognostic or predictive markers of cancer progression, but also as treatment targets for a wide range of tumors, including TNBC. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the cellular immune microenvironment in TNBC, and to highlight areas in which TNBC may differ from other types of breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search of PubMed was made using the terms 'triple negative breast cancer' and 'tumor infiltrating lymphocytes', 'CD8', 'CD4', 'B cells', 'natural killer cells', 'macrophages', myeloid derived suppressor cells', 'dendritic cells', 'immune check point inhibitor', 'CTLA-4' and 'PD-L1'.

RESULTS

We find that whilst factors such as TILs and certain subgroups of TILs (e.g., CD8 + and regulator T-cells) have been extensively researched, none of these markers are currently applicable to routine clinical practice. Also, TNBC differs from other types of breast cancer with regards to cellular composition of the immune infiltrate and PD-L1 expression, and the prognostic significance of these.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune-related factors have the potential as both prognostic and predictive biomarkers for new treatments targeting the immune system in breast cancer. However, multivariate analyses, taking other well-known factors into account, are required to determine the true value of these biomarkers. Also, differences between TNBC and other types of breast cancer may have implications for treatment and use of immune-related factors as biomarkers.

MUC1-C Induces PD-L1 and Immune Evasion in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

The immune checkpoint ligand PD-L1 and the transmembrane mucin MUC1 are upregulated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), where they contribute to its aggressive pathogenesis. Here, we report that genetic or pharmacological targeting of the oncogenic MUC1 subunit MUC1-C is sufficient to suppress PD-L1 expression in TNBC cells. Mechanistic investigations showed that MUC1-C acted to elevate PD-L1 transcription by recruitment of MYC and NF-κB p65 to the PD-L1 promoter. In an immunocompetent model of TNBC in which Eo771/MUC1-C cells were engrafted into MUC1 transgenic mice, we showed that targeting MUC1-C associated with PD-L1 suppression, increases in tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and tumor cell killing. MUC1 expression in TNBCs also correlated inversely with CD8, CD69, and GZMB, and downregulation of these markers associated with decreased survival. Taken together, our findings show how MUC1 contributes to immune escape in TNBC, and they offer a rationale to target MUC1-C as a novel immunotherapeutic approach for TNBC treatment.Significance: These findings show how upregulation of the transmembrane mucin MUC1 contributes to immune escape in an aggressive form of breast cancer, with potential implications for a novel immunotherapeutic approach. Cancer Res; 78(1); 205-15. ©2017 AACR.

The presence of PD-1 positive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in triple negative breast cancers is associated with a favorable outcome of disease

Triple negative breast cancer patients have a poor course of disease not least because of limited treatment options however immunotherapy by targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint system is a promising strategy to improve the outcome. Here we systematically investigated the expression of PD-1 on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 on both tumor and infiltrated immune cells. Moreover, the PD-L1 gene status in tumor cells was assessed.

103 tissue microarray samples derived from triple negative breast cancer specimens were immunohistochemically stained against PD-1 and PD-L1. Dual marker fluorescence in-situ hybridization was applied to the PD-L1 gene and centromere region of chromosome 9. The disease free and overall survival rates were determined as a function of the PD-1/PD-L1 status.

A slight gain of the PD-L1 gene region was found in 55% of all samples but an elevated PD-L1/cen9 ratio was rather rare (7%). An increased gene dose is not associated with an enhanced protein expression and the PD-L1 expression only weakly correlates with the amount of immune cell infiltration. Instead, we found an association of PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells, respectively. Notably, the PD-1 expression on immune cells is associated with a favorable disease free and overall survival. PD-1 expression indicates an enhanced immunological anti-tumor activity and represents a favorable prognostic impact. A deeper understanding of factors that affect the regulation and function of the PD-1/PD-L1 system is required to establish predictive variables and to utilize the system for therapeutic intervention of triple negative breast cancer patients.

PD-L1 Expression in TNBC: A Predictive Biomarker of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has an aggressive clinical behaviour, with a poorer prognosis compared to other subtypes. Recently, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been proposed as a predictive biomarker for a better clinical outcome and pathological response (pR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in TNBC. These data confirm the role of the immune system in the neoplastic progression and in the response to therapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of 54 pre-NACT biopsies of TNBC and compared both the percentage of stromal TILs and the degree of PD-L1 expression with the extent of pR to standard NACT. A pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 35% of cases. Univariate analysis showed (i) a significant association between PD-L1 expression in ≥25% of neoplastic cells and the achievement of a pCR (p = 0.024); (ii) a significantly higher frequency of pCR in cases showing ≥50% stromal TILs (p < 0.001). However in the multivariate analysis only PD-L1 expression on tumor cells remained significantly associated with pCR (OR = 1,13; 95% CI 1,01–1,27), suggesting that the expression of this biomarker could be associated with a subpopulation of TNBC more likely to respond to chemotherapy. These data need to be confirmed by larger studies.

CD274/PD-L1 gene amplification and PD-L1 protein expression are common events in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity

Immunomodulatory therapies, targeting the immune checkpoint receptor-ligand complex PD-1/PD-L1 have shown promising results in early phase clinical trials in solid malignancies, including carcinomas of the head and neck. In this context, PD-L1 protein expression has been proposed as a potentially valuable predictive marker. In the present study, expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 80 patients with predominantly HPV-negative oral squamous cell carcinomas and associated nodal metastasis. In addition, CD274/PD-L1 gene copy number status was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. PD-L1 expression was detected in 36/80 (45%) cases and concordance of PD-L1 expression in primary tumor and corresponding nodal metastasis was present in only 20/28 (72%) cases. PD-1 expression was found in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) but not in tumor cells. CD274/PD-L1 gene amplification was detected in 19% of cases, with high level PD-L1 amplification present in 12/80 (15%), and low level amplification in 3/80 (4%). Interestingly, CD274/PD-L1 gene amplification was associated with positive PD-L1 immunostaining in only 73% of cases. PD-L1 copy number status was concordant in primary tumor and associated metastases. Clinically, PD-L1 tumor immunopositivity was associated with a higher risk for nodal metastasis at diagnosis, overall tumor related death und recurrence. Based on our findings we propose to include PD-L1 copy number status in addition to protein status in screening programs for future clinical trials with immunotherapeutic strategies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis.

Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer: Current and Future Strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The breast tumor microenvironment is immunosuppressive and is increasingly recognized to play a significant role in tumorigenesis. A deeper understanding of normal and aberrant interactions between malignant and immune cells has allowed researchers to harness the immune system with novel immunotherapy strategies, many of which have shown promise in breast cancer. This review discusses the application of immunotherapy to the treatment of breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both basic science and clinical trial data are rapidly developing in the use of immunotherapy for breast cancer. The current clinical trial landscape includes therapeutic vaccines, immune checkpoint blockade, antibodies, cytokines, and adoptive cell therapy.

SUMMARY

Despite early failures, the application of immunotherapeutic strategies to the treatment of breast cancer holds promise.

Interplay between Natural Killer Cells and Anti-HER2 Antibodies: Perspectives for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy

Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) defines a subgroup of breast tumors with aggressive behavior. The addition of HER2-targeted antibodies (i.e., trastuzumab, pertuzumab) to chemotherapy significantly improves relapse-free and overall survival in patients with early-stage and advanced disease. Nonetheless, considerable proportions of patients develop resistance to treatment, highlighting the need for additional and co-adjuvant therapeutic strategies. HER2-specific antibodies can trigger natural killer (NK) cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and indirectly enhance the development of tumor-specific T cell immunity; both mechanisms contributing to their antitumor efficacy in preclinical models. Antibody-dependent NK cell activation results in the release of cytotoxic granules as well as the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IFNγ and TNFα) and chemokines. Hence, NK cell tumor suppressive functions include direct cytolytic killing of tumor cells as well as the regulation of subsequent antitumor adaptive immunity. Albeit tumors with gene expression signatures associated to the presence of cytotoxic lymphocyte infiltrates benefit from trastuzumab-based treatment, NK cell-related biomarkers of response/resistance to HER2-specific therapeutic antibodies in breast cancer patients remain elusive. Several variables, including (i) the configuration of the patient NK cell repertoire; (ii) tumor molecular features (i.e., estrogen receptor expression); (iii) concomitant therapeutic regimens (i.e., chemotherapeutic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors); and (iv) evasion mechanisms developed by progressive breast tumors, have been shown to quantitatively and qualitatively influence antibody-triggered NK cell responses. In this review, we discuss possible interventions for restoring/enhancing the therapeutic activity of HER2 therapeutic antibodies by harnessing NK cell antitumor potential through combinatorial approaches, including immune checkpoint blocking/stimulatory antibodies, cytokines and toll-like receptor agonists.

Triple negative breast cancer: Key role of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in regulating the activity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a poor prognosis, due to its aggressive behaviour and lack of effective targeted therapies. Immunocheckpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and anti-PD-ligand(L)1 agents, are in course of investigation in TNBC, used alone or in combination with other systemic or local approaches. However, the high cost of these drugs and the lack of validated predictive biomarkers support the development of strategies aimed to overcome resistance and optimize the efficacy of these approaches. Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs) derive from peripheral blood monocytes recruited into the TNBC microenvironment and, in response to several stimuli, undergo M1 (classical) or M2 (alternative) activation. In TNBC, TAMs promote tumor growth and progression by several mechanisms that include the secretion of inhibitory cytokines, the reduction of effector functions of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) and the promotion of Regulatory T cell (Treg). Interestingly, TAMs have been shown to directly and indirectly modulate PD-1/PD-L1 expression in tumor environment. On this scenario, several TAM-centered strategies have been proposed, such as the suppression of TAM recruitment, the depletion of their number, the switch of M2 TAMs into antitumor M1 phenotype and the inhibition of TAM-associated molecules. In this review, we will illustrate the activity of TAMs and associated molecules in TNBC, focusing on their role in modulating the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 and on the emerging TAM-tailored strategies for TNBC patients.

Immune Checkpoint Molecules on Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Their Association with Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Human Breast Cancer

There is an exponentially growing interest in targeting immune checkpoint molecules in breast cancer (BC), particularly in the triple-negative subtype where unmet treatment needs remain. This study was designed to analyze the expression, localization, and prognostic role of PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4, LAG3, and TIM3 in primary BC. Gene expression analysis using the METABRIC microarray dataset found that all six immune checkpoint molecules are highly expressed in basal-like and HER2-enriched compared to the other BC molecular subtypes. Flow cytometric analysis of fresh tissue homogenates from untreated primary tumors show that PD-1 is principally expressed on CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells and CTLA-4 is expressed on CD4⁺ T cells. The global proportion of PD-L1⁺, PD-L2⁺, LAG3⁺, and TIM3⁺ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) was low and detectable in only a small number of tumors. Immunohistochemically staining fixed tissues from the same tumors was employed to score TIL and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). PD-L1⁺, PD-L2⁺, LAG3⁺, and TIM3⁺ cells were detected in some TLS in a pattern that resembles secondary lymphoid organs. This observation suggests that TLS are important sites of immune activation and regulation, particularly in tumors with extensive baseline immune infiltration. Significantly improved overall survival was correlated with PD-1 expression in the HER2-enriched and PD-L1 or CTLA-4 expression in basal-like BC. PD-1 and CTLA-4 proteins were most frequently detected on TIL, which supports the correlations observed between their gene expression and improved long-term outcome in basal-like and HER2-enriched BC. PD-L1 expression by tumor or immune cells is uncommon in BC. Overall, the data presented here distinguish PD-1 as a marker of T cell activity in both the T and B cell areas of BC associated TLS. We found that immune checkpoint molecule expression parallels the extent of TIL and TLS, although there is a noteworthy amount of heterogeneity between tumors even within the same molecular subtype. These data indicate that assessing the levels of immune checkpoint molecule expression in an individual patient has important implications for the success of therapeutically targeting them in BC.

Prognostic Role of Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancer therapies that target the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway are in ongoing phase I/II clinical trials for several tumor types. However, the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer.

METHODS

We searched Medline/PubMed for eligible studies of the association between PD-L1 expression and patient survival in breast cancer published before 7 December 2015. The effect size was the hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % CIs were also extracted to evaluate associations between PD-L1 expression and patient clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

We included five studies with 7,802 total patients in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR associated high PD-L1 expression with predictors of poor-prognosis: high tumor grade, negative ER status, negative PR status, positive HER2 status and lymphovascular invasion. High PD-L1 protein expression was associated with shorter OS (HR = 3.22, 95 % CI: 1.86-5.59; P < 0.0001), shorter RFS (HR = 1.38, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.86; P = 0.03) and shorter MFS (HR = 3.33, 95 % CI: 2.30-4.82; P < 0.00001); whereas high PD-L1 mRNA expression was associated with longer OS (HR = 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.75-1.00; P = 0.05) and longer RFS (HR = 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.36-0.91; P = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS

The findings of these studies were significantly heterogeneous; the results should be interpreted cautiously.

CONCLUSION

In breast cancer, high PD-L1 protein expression appears to be a negative prognostic factor, whereas high PD-L1 mRNA expression appears to be a favorable prognostic factor.

Clinical characteristics and programmed cell death ligand-1 expression in adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma of lung

Objectives

According to the IASLC/ATS/ERS 2011 classification, there are two new conceptions of lung adenocarcinoma, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), which are very early stages of lung adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to analyze clinical features of AIS and MIA and determine the expression profile of PD-L1 in AIS and MIA.

Results

In all 274 patients, 77 were diagnosed as AIS and 197 as MIA. We accidentally found 4 patients with recurrence, which were all MIA. The median age of the patients at diagnosis was both 52 years. 71.4% were female in AIS as while as 71.1% in MIA. 36.4% patients were observed with ever symptoms in AIS and 28.9% in MIA. 12.9% and 8.6% had smoking history respectively in AIS an MIA. All AIS and MIA cases were PD-L1 negative. There was significant association between symptoms and more mild progression of nodules in chest CT before surgery.

Materials and Methods

We analyzed some clinical features of 274 patients including age, sex, smoking history, family history, surgery, EGFR mutation, ALK, ROS-1, serum CEA level et al. The expression of PD-L1 was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis in 37 specimens of MIA and 17 specimens of AIS.

Conclusions

There are no significant differences between AIS and MIA in clinical features. AIS and MIA almost do not express PD-L1 protein and without any lymph node metastasis. The surgery intervention is supposed to be as small as possible.

PD-1/PD-L1 interaction up-regulates MDR1/P-gp expression in breast cancer cells via PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immunosuppressive molecule expressed on tumor cells. By interacting with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) on T cells, it inhibits immune responses. Because PD-L1 expression on cancer cells increases their chemoresistance, we investigated the correlation between PD-L1 and multidrug resistance 1/ P-glycoprotein (MDR1/P-gp) expression in breast cancer cells. Analysis of breast cancer tissues using tissue microarrays revealed a significant correlation between PD-L1 and MDR1/P-gp protein levels. Increased expression of PD-L1 was associated with lymph node metastasis and histological tumor grade. In addition, interaction of PD-L1 with PD-1 induced phosphorylation of AKT and ERK, resulting in the activation of PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways and increased MDR1/P-gp expression in breast cancer cells. The PD-1/PD-L1 interaction also increased survival of breast cancer cells incubated with doxorubicin. These findings suggest that the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition may increase chemotherapy efficacy by inhibiting the MDR1/P-gp expression in breast cancer cells.

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of programmed death ligand-1 expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) may be a useful molecule for targeted immunotherapy. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to investigate PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and its associations with clinicopathological factors and outcomes, which may help determine whether PD-L1 expression is a useful prognostic marker.

Methods

The Medline Ovid, Cochrane, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Knowledge databases were searched for studies that evaluated the prognostic or clinicopathological significance of PD-L1 expression in patients with breast cancer, and reported at least one survival-related outcome.

Results

Six studies that included 7877 cases were selected for the analysis. Higher PD-L1 expression in all cells was related to higher histological grade and lymph node metastasis. Higher PD-L1 expression in tumor cell was related to larger tumor size, estrogen receptor negativity, progesterone receptor negativity, human epidermal growth factor type-2 positivity, and triple-negative breast cancer. PD-L1 positivity in all cells was associated with poorer disease-free survival, although it was not significantly associated with overall survival.

Conclusion

The present meta-analysis revealed that cases of breast cancer with PD-L1 positivity in all cells exhibited higher histological grades, lymph node metastasis, and poorer disease-free survival. Therefore, positive expression of PD-L1 may be a useful prognostic marker in breast cancer.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3670-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prognostic value of PD-L1 overexpression for pancreatic cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint that is often activated in cancer and plays a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of cancer. However, the clinicopathologic significance and prognostic value of PD-L1 in pancreatic cancer (PC) remains controversial. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to retrospectively evaluate the relationship between PD-L1 and PC. PubMed and other databases were searched for the clinical studies published up to March 21, 2017, to be included in the meta-analysis. Hazard ratios and their 95% CIs were calculated. Risk ratios (RRs) were extracted to assess the correlations between the clinicopathologic parameters and PD-L1 expression. Ten studies including 1,058 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that positive PD-L1 expression was correlated with a poor overall survival outcome in PC patients (hazard ratio =1.76, 95% CI: 1.43–2.17, P<0.00001). Interestingly, high PD-L1 expression was correlated with poor pathologic differentiation (RR =1.57, 95% CI: 1.25–1.98, P=0.0001) and neural invasion (RR =1.30, 95% CI: 1.03–1.64, P=0.03). However, there were no significant correlations between PD-L1 expression and other clinicopathologic characteristics. In summary, our meta-analysis implied that PD-L1 could serve as a negative predictor for the overall survival of PC patients, and high expression of PD-L1 was correlated with poor differentiation and neural invasion, indicating that anti-PD-L1 treatments should be evaluated in PC patients, especially in those who exhibit these two characteristics.

Prognostic role of programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressing tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in testicular germ cell tumors

PURPOSE

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are nearly universally curable malignancies. Nevertheless, standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy is not curative in a small subgroup of patients. Previously, we showed that PD-L1 overexpression is associated with worse prognosis in TGCTs, while tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic in different types of cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of PD-1 and PD-L1 expressing TILs in TGCTs.

RESULTS

PD-L1 positive TILs were found significantly more often in seminomas (95.9% of patients) and embryonal carcinomas (91.0%) compared to yolk sac tumors (60.0%), choriocarcinomas (54.5%) or teratomas (35.7%) (All p < 0.05). TGCTs patients with high infiltration of PD-L1 positive TILs (HS ≥ 160) had significantly better progression-free survival (HR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.09 - 0.31, p = 0.0006) and overall survival (HR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.16, p = 0.001) opposite to patients with lower expression of PD-L1 (HS < 150). PD-1 expressing TILs were not prognostic in TGCTs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgical specimens from 240 patients with primary TGCTs were included into this translational study. The PD-1 and PD-L1 expression on tumor and TILs were detected by immunohistochemistry using anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody. Scoring was performed semiquantitatively by weighted histoscore (HS) method.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic value of PD-L1 expressing TILs in TGCTs was demonstrated for the first time.

Prognostic value of B7-H3 expression in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis

Increasing evidence suggests B7-H3 is aberrantly expressed in various cancers, though its prognostic significance in solid tumors remains controversial. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to clarify the prognostic value of B7-H3 expression in human solid tumors. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched, and 28 studies involving 4623 patients were ultimately included in the analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized as effect estimates to evaluate the association between B7-H3 expression and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The pooled results showed B7-H3 was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.32–1.90; P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.05–2.65; P = 0.031), but not RFS (HR = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.89–1.53; P = 0.267). These results suggest B7-H3 is a negative predictor of OS and PFS in patients with solid tumors. B7-H3 may thus be a useful prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for human solid tumors. However, further studies will be needed to more precisely determine the prognostic value of B7 H3 expression.

Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression in Primary Angiosarcoma

Angiosarcomas are rare malignant endothelial-cell tumors of vascular or lymphatic origin, and are among the most aggressive subtypes of soft-tissue sarcomas. The prognosis is poor and treatment is challenging in many cases. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays a critical role in immune escape of tumor cells. Recent studies described that PD-L1 is widely expressed in various types of cancer, providing the basis for the development of PD1/PD-L1 antibodies as anti-cancer immunotherapy. Despite the well-known potential of PD-L1 as prognostic and predictive biomarker, only few studies described its IHC expression in cancer subtypes for the extreme difficulty in developing standard protocol with the different antibody clones available. We analyzed the IHC expression of PD-L1 on a series of angiosarcomas at different body location, showing its aberrant expression in about 66% of samples with no relation with prognosis. Our study allowed us to correctly define PD-L1 staining in angiosarcoma tumor tissues with final purpose to stratify patients for immune checkpoint inhibitors therapies.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumour cell and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes of HER2-positive breast cancer and its prognostic value

Immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 axis showed benefits in cancer. Prognostic significance of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been determined. We evaluated PD-L1 protein expression in tumour cells and TILs, PD-L1 mRNA level and various histopathologic factors including TILs using 167 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues and 39 fresh tissue of HER2-positive breast cancer. TILs level and PD-L1 expression in tumour cells and TILs were significantly correlated one another. PD-L1 positivity in tumour cells was associated with high histologic grade and high TILs level (p < 0.001, both). High PD-L1 immunoscore in TILs and high total immunoscore (in tumour cells and TILs) of PD-L1 were correlated with high histologic grade (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), absence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.012 and p = 0.007, respectively), negative hormone receptor expression (p = 0.044 and p = 0.001, respectively) and high TILs level (p < 0.001, both). High PD-L1 mRNA expression was associated with high TILs level (p < 0.001, both). PD-L1 positivity in tumour cells was associated with better disease-free survival in HR−/HER2+ breast cancer (p = 0.039). PD-L1 expression in tumour cells and TILs are significantly associated with TILs level in HER2-positive breast cancer. PD-L1 expression in tumour cells might be positive prognostic factor in HR−/HER2+ breast cancers.

Relationship Between PD-L1 Expression and Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the expression of PD-L1 (programmed death 1 ligand 1, PD-L1) and its clinical significance in breast invasive ductal carcinoma.

METHODS

Tumor samples were collected from 64 cases of breast invasive ductal carcinoma patients, and tumor adjacent normal breast tissue were obtained as normal control. The expression of PD-L1 were examined by immunohistochemical staining and real time PCR assay, its correlations with patients' clinical pathological characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

PD-L1 was found to be over-expressed in 24 of 64 (37.5%) breast invasive ductal carcinoma samples, while in 1 of 22 (4.5%) tumor adjacent normal breast tissue which indicated PD-L1 was higher expressed in breast invasive ductal carcinoma samples than the tumor adjacent normal breast tissue (P < 0.05). PD-L1 positive expression was associated with clinical pathological characteristics of TNM stage and pathology grading (P < 0.05). However, PD-L1 positive expression was not correlated with age (P > 0.05), menstruation status (P >0.05), family history of breast cancer (P > 0.05), tumor diameter (P > 0.05), lymph node metastasis (P > 0.05) and tumor location (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 may play an important role in invasive ductal carcinoma, which could be a potential indicator for advanced clinical stage and poor prognosis.

Timing of PD-1 Blockade Is Critical to Effective Combination Immunotherapy with Anti-OX40

Purpose: Antibodies specific for inhibitory checkpoints PD-1 and CTLA-4 have shown impressive results against solid tumors. This has fueled interest in novel immunotherapy combinations to affect patients who remain refractory to checkpoint blockade monotherapy. However, how to optimally combine checkpoint blockade with agents targeting T-cell costimulatory receptors, such as OX40, remains a critical question.Experimental Design: We utilized an anti-PD-1-refractory, orthotopically transplanted MMTV-PyMT mammary cancer model to investigate the antitumor effect of an agonist anti-OX40 antibody combined with anti-PD-1. As PD-1 naturally aids in immune contraction after T-cell activation, we treated mice with concurrent combination treatment versus sequentially administering anti-OX40 followed by anti-PD-1.Results: The concurrent addition of anti-PD-1 significantly attenuated the therapeutic effect of anti-OX40 alone. Combination-treated mice had considerable increases in type I and type II serum cytokines and significantly augmented expression of inhibitory receptors or exhaustion markers CTLA-4 and TIM-3 on T cells. Combination treatment increased intratumoral CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation at day 13, but at day 19, both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell proliferation was significantly reduced compared with untreated mice. In two tumor models, sequential combination of anti-OX40 followed by anti-PD-1 (but not the reverse order) resulted in significant increases in therapeutic efficacy. Against MMTV-PyMT tumors, sequential combination was dependent on both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and completely regressed tumors in approximately 30% of treated animals.Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of timing for optimized therapeutic effect with combination immunotherapies and suggest the testing of sequencing in combination immunotherapy clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6165-77. ©2017 AACRSee related commentary by Colombo, p. 5999.

PD-L1 expression correlates with VEGF and microvessel density in patients with uniformly treated classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Recent studies have reported the associations between programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or PD-L2/PD-1 pathways and pro-angiogenic genes including hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in several malignancies. However, no study has examined the relationship or prognostic implication of PD-L1, PD-L2, PD-1, VEGF expression, and microvessel density (MVD) in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients. Diagnostic tissues from 109 patients with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine-treated cHL were evaluated retrospectively by immunohistochemical analysis for PD-L1, PD-L2, PD-1, VEGF expression, and for CD31 expression as a measure of MVD. There was a positive correlation between PD-L1 and VEGF expression (P = 0.008) and additionally between PD-L2 and VEGF expression (P = 0.001). The mean MVD in tumors positive for both PD-L1 and VEGF was significantly (P = 0.022) higher than the mean MVD in tumors negative for both markers. High PD-1 expression group had lower (P = 0.019) 5-year overall survival rate than low PD-1 expression group. Multivariate analysis revealed that PD-1 was an independent prognostic factor for cHL with significance (P = 0.026). However, PD-L1, PD-L2, and VEGF expression had no prognostic impact. Our data confirmed the positive correlations between PD-L1, VEGF, or MVD. Our findings provided evidence supporting new therapeutic approaches including combinations of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 and anti-VEGF therapy in addition to the current standard regimen for cHL.

The combination of PD-L1 expression and decreased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with a poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer

This study included patients with primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who underwent resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2004 and December 2014. Among the 248 TNBCs studied, programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression was detected in 103 (41.5%) tumors, and high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were present in 118 (47.6%) tumors. PD-L1 expression correlated with high levels of TILs, but was not a prognostic factor. Patients with TILs-high tumors had better overall survival than those with TILs-low tumors (P = 0.016). There was a strong interaction between PD-L1 expression and TILs that was associated with both recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0018) and overall survival (P = 0.015). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that PD-L1-positive/TILs-low was an independent negative prognostic factor for both recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Our findings suggest that PD-L1-positive/TILs-low tumors are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with TNBC, and that it is important to focus on the combination of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and TILs present in the tumor microenvironment. These biomarkers may be useful for stratification of TNBCs and for predicting prognosis and developing novel cancer immunotherapies.

Sensitive detection of PD-L1 expression on circulating epithelial tumor cells (CETCs) could be a potential biomarker to select patients for treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in early and metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The current cancer research strongly focuses on immune therapies, where the PD-1, with its ligands plays an important role. It is known that PD-L1 is frequently up-regulated in a number of different cancers and the relevance of this pathway has been extensively studied and therapeutic approaches targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 have been developed. We used a non-invasive, real-time biopsy for determining PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in CETCs of solid cancer patients.

METHODS

CETCs were determined from blood of 128 patients suffering from breast (72), prostate (27), colorectal (18) and lung (11) cancer. The number of vital CETCs and the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 were investigated using the maintrac^® method.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expressing CETCs were detected in 94.5% of breast, 100% of prostate, 95.4% of colorectal and 82% of lung cancer patients whereas only 75% of breast cancer patients had PD-L2 positive CETCs. In the PD-L1 and PD-L2 expressing patients the cell fraction of PD-L1 positive CETCs is significantly higher than the fraction of PD-L2 positive CETCs (54.6% vs. 28.7%; p<0.001). Breast cancer patients with metastatic disease had significantly more PD-L1 positive CETCs as compared to patients without metastasis (median 75% vs. 61.1%; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 seems to be a major factor in immune evasion and is highly expressed on CETCs regardless of the type of cancer. Monitoring the frequency of PD-L1 positive CETCs could reflect individual patient's response for an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and may be a promising target of anticancer treatment.

Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer: the Emerging Role of PD-1 and PD-L1

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to summarize the data regarding PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and the results of first clinical trials with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

PD-L1 expression is heterogeneous across primary breast cancers, and is generally associated with the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the presence of poor-prognosis features such as high grade, and aggressive molecular subtypes (triple-negative (TN), basal, HER2-enriched). Early phase clinical trials using PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in combination have shown objective tumor responses and durable long-term disease control, in heavily pre-treated patients, notably in the TN subtype. Blockade of PD-1 or PD-L1 shows impressive antitumor activity in some subsets of breast cancer patients. Many clinical trials are ongoing in the metastatic and neoadjuvant setting, alone and in combination with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and/or other immune therapy. The identification of biomarkers predictive for a clinical benefit is warranted.

Application of pharmacometrics and quantitative systems pharmacology to cancer therapy: The example of luminal a breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women, and the second most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. It is a heterogeneous disease composed of multiple subtypes with distinct morphologies and clinical implications. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) is an emerging discipline bridging systems biology with pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) leveraging the systematic understanding of drugs' efficacy and toxicity. Despite numerous challenges in applying computational methodologies for QSP and mechanism-based PK/PD models to biological, physiological, and pharmacological data, bridging these disciplines has the potential to enhance our understanding of complex disease systems such as BC. In QSP/PK/PD models, various sources of data are combined including large, multi-scale experimental data such as -omics (i.e. genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics), biomarkers (circulating and bound), PK, and PD endpoints. This offers a means for a translational application from pre-clinical mathematical models to patients, bridging the bench to bedside paradigm. Not only can these models be applied to inform and advance BC drug development, but they also could aid in optimizing combination therapies and rational dosing regimens for BC patients. Here, we review the current literature pertaining to the application of QSP and pharmacometrics-based pharmacotherapy in BC including bottom-up and top-down modeling approaches. Bottom-up modeling approaches employ mechanistic signal transduction pathways to predict the behavior of a biological system. The ones that are addressed in this review include signal transduction and homeostatic feedback modeling approaches. Alternatively, top-down modeling techniques are bioinformatics reconstruction techniques that infer static connections between molecules that make up a biological network and include (1) Bayesian networks, (2) co-expression networks, and (3) module-based approaches. This review also addresses novel techniques which utilize the principles of systems biology, synthetic lethality and tumor priming, both of which are discussed in relationship to novel drug targets and existing BC therapies. By utilizing QSP approaches, clinicians may develop a platform for improved dose individualization for subpopulation of BC patients, strengthen rationale in treatment designs, and explore mechanism elucidation for improving future treatments in BC medicine.

Expression of programmed death ligand-1 predicts poor outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a potentially important tumor immunotherapy target. However, whether PD-L1 expression is associated with survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between PD-L1 expression and prognosis in NPC. The expression of PD-L1 was assessed in tumor specimens from 120 patients with NPC using immunohistochemistry. Staining was evaluated using the H-score method. The associations between PD-L1 expression and clinical characteristics and prognosis were analyzed. Overall, 78% of the patients had stage I–III and 22% had stage IV disease. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates for the entire cohort were 87.5 and 70.1%, respectively. PD-L1 expression was detected in 85 (71%) patients and was localized to the tumor cells. High tumor expression of PD-L1 (median H-score ≥5) was associated with significantly poorer OS (P=0.023) and DFS (P=0.002). Univariate analysis indicated that low PD-L1 expression was associated with better DFS compared with high PD-L1 expression (HR=0.163, 95% CI: 0.044–0.600, P=0.006 for DFS). Multivariate analysis revealed that T stage (HR=8.190, 95% CI: 1.355–18.152; P=0.023) and PD-L1 expression level (HR=0.124, 95% CI: 0.031–0.509; P=0.001) served as independent prognostic factors for DFS. In conclusion, tumor PD-L1 expression was found to be a significant prognostic factor in NPC, and high PD-L1 expression may be of prognostic value for recurrence and metastasis following conventional treatments.

PD-L1 and immune escape: insights from melanoma and other lineage-unrelated malignancies

One of the major breakthroughs in oncology in the past decade has been the research and development of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Since the discovery of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis as a key mediator in peripheral self-tolerance and the subsequent discovery of its role promoting immune escape in cancers, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has produced considerable excitement from both a scientific and therapeutic standpoint. The past decade has seen an explosion in the number of clinical trials utilizing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Notably, pathologists have played a critical role in the development of these trials, and in guiding the use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies in FDA-approved clinical settings. Analysis of tissue biopsies has been increasingly used to predict patients with which cancers are most likely to benefit from these new therapies. However, many open questions remain in a rapidly changing therapeutic and scientific landscape. In this review, we describe the basic functioning of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in normal biology, how it is coopted by cancers to promote immune escape, and then review the literature regarding the prognostic value of tumoral PD-L1 expression on its own before discussing recent therapeutic advances, and the emerging role for pathologists in predicting response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. Special attention is given to melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, malignancies that have seen the broadest applications of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapies.

The prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in patients with glioma: A meta-analysis

A large number of studies have shown that programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is abnormally expressed in gliomas. However, the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in glioma patients remains unresolved. Accordingly, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the prognostic role of high PD-L1 in patients with glioma. Electronic databases were searched to identify studies evaluating PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) in these patients. A total of 6 studies (published in 4 articles) that involved 1052 patients were included. Pooled results showed that high PD-L1 expression was associated with worse OS in glioma patients (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.02–1.65, P = 0.032). Further subgroup analysis indicated that high PD-L1 expression in glioblastoma (GBM) was also associated with worse OS (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.03–1.90, P = 0.030). Conversely, in index subgroup analysis, neither PD-L1 protein (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.97–2.10, P = 0.068) nor gene (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.83–1.74, P = 0.322) expression was significantly associated with OS. PD-L1 may represent a promising biomarker that predicts disease progression in patients with glioma or GBM. However, because of our limited sample size, further prospective or retrospective multi-centre, well-designed studies should be performed to verify this result.

PD-L1 expression in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

AIMS

To investigate the expression of the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway and the clinicopathological characteristics in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Tissue samples from patients with eCCA [n = 69; perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), 40; and distal CCA, 29] who underwent surgical resection in the period from 2007 to 2015 were evaluated for PD-1, PD-L1, CD3 and CD163 expression, and correlations with clinicopathological characteristics, including survival data, were determined. PD-L1 was found on both tumour cells of eCCA (8/69, 11.6%) and tumour-associated macrophages (21/69, 30.4%). Significant correlations of PD-L1 expression on cancer cells with venous invasion (P = 0.031) and poor differentiation of the tumour (P = 0.048) were observed. In 19 of 69 (27.5%) samples, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) expressed PD-1, whereas infiltration with CD3-positive and CD163-positive cells was found in 63 of 69 (91.3%) and 68 of 69 (98.6%) cases, respectively. The presence of fewer than five CD3-positive cells per high-power field was significantly correlated with poorer differentiation (P = 0.015) and venous invasion (P < 0.001) of CCA. PD-L1 expression was not correlated with patient survival, but PD-L1 expression on tumour cells combined with low infiltration of CD3-positive TILs was associated with an unfavourable outcome (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Only a small number of eCCA patients are PD-L1-positive, which might be important for future application of PD-1/PD-L1-targeted immune-modulating therapy in these patients. A small subgroup of eCCAs with PD-L1 expression and low lymphocytic infiltration showed more invasive growth and worse overall survival.

PD-L1 expression of the residual tumor serves as a prognostic marker in local advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

This study sought to investigate the prevalence of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its prognostic value in patients with residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for locally advanced breast cancer. A total of 309 patients considered as non-pathological complete responders (non-pCR) after NCT followed by mastectomy were selected. The expression of PD-L1 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in residual breast cancer cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry in surgical specimens. The median density was used to classify PD-L1 expression from low to high. The prognostic value of various clinicopathological factors was evaluated. The expression of PD-L1 was more commonly observed in patients with low levels of total TILs (p < 0.001), high levels of FOXP3+ TILs (p < 0.001) and low levels of CD8+ TILs (p < 0.001). This served as an independent prognostic factor for both relapse-free survival (Hazard ratio = 1.824, p = 0.013) and overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratio = 2.585, p = 0.001). High expression of PD-L1 was correlated to worse survival, which is most significantly observed in triple-negative patients. Patients classified as PD-L1-high/CD8-low exhibited relatively unfavorable survival, whereas patients with either low expression of PD-L1 or high expression of CD8 had similar outcomes. PD-L1 expression in residual tumor can be used as a prognostic marker in non-pCR patients after receiving NCT for breast cancer, which highlights the importance of immune evasion in the therapeutic vulnerability of chemoresistant cancer cells as well as the potential of anti-PD-L1 treatments in non-pCR responders.

Rationale for immunological approaches to breast cancer therapy

Despite great advances in early detection, as well as surgical resection of breast tumours, breast cancer remains the deadliest cancer for women worldwide. Moreover, its incidence is without pair, accounting for twice as many new cancer cases as the second most prevalent cancer, colorectal carcinoma. There is therefore a strong need for new therapeutic approaches to breast cancers. Immunotherapies are novel treatment modalities which aim to use immune mediators to attack cancerous cells. Recent clinical results show that these may not only mediate tumour regressions but also cures in some cases. In this review, we discuss the relevance of the immune system in the development of new carcinomas, as well as its importance in mediating cancer regression. We also dissect the known different approaches to harness the immune system to attack breast tumours. Namely, therapies using the passive transfer of either tumour-specific antibodies or cytotoxic cells have been researched and in some cases are already standard of care. Additionally, therapeutic vaccines and immune checkpoint blockade have recently demonstrated great therapeutic efficacy and have generated great excitement for the development of new treatments. Immunotherapies have the potential to generate tumour specific responses, as well as long-lasting remissions, which is why studying those approaches is crucial for the future of cancer medicine.

A radiosensitivity gene signature and PD-L1 status predict clinical outcome of patients with invasive breast carcinoma in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We investigated the link between the radiosensitivity gene signature and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status and clinical outcome in order to identify a group of patients that would possibly receive clinical benefit of radiotherapy (RT) combined with anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We validated the identified gene signature related to radiosensitivity and analyzed the PD-L1 status of invasive breast cancer in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. To validate the gene signature, 1045 patients were selected and divided into two clusters using a consensus clustering algorithm based on their radiosensitive (RS) or radioresistant (RR) designation according to their prognosis. Patients were also stratified as PD-L1-high or PD-L1-low based on the median value of CD274 mRNA expression level as surrogates of PD-L1.

RESULTS

Patents assigned to the RS group had decreased risk of recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate than patients in the RR group by univariate analysis (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.81, p=0.008) only when treated with RT. The RS group was independently associated with the PD-L1-high group, and CD274 mRNA expression was significantly higher in the RS group (p<0.001) than the RR group. In the PD-L1-high group, the RS group was associated with better RFS compared to the RR group (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.87, p=0.022) in multivariate analysis. The level of PD-L1 expression may represent the immunogenicity of tumors, and thus, we speculated that the PD-L1-high group had more immunogenic tumors, which could be more sensitive to radiation-induced immunologic cell death.

CONCLUSION

We first evaluated the predictive value of the radiosensitivity gene signature and described a relationship with this radiosensitivity gene signature and PD-L1. The radiosensitivity gene signature and PD-L1 status were important factors for prediction of the clinical outcome of RT in patients with invasive breast cancer and may be used for selecting patients who will benefit from RT combined with anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy.

PD-L1 and intratumoral immune response in breast cancer

Purpose

PD-L1 is thought to play an important role in the antitumor immune response. In this study, we investigated the expression of PD-L1 within breast tumor subsets to better define its prognostic significance.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry was performed to determine PD-L1 tumor cell expression and to enumerate CD8, CD4 and CD68 tumor-infiltrating leucocytes (TIL) in a cohort of 443 breast cancers categorized by molecular subtype.

Results

Across the entire cohort, PD-L1 tumor cell expression was observed in 73/443 (16.5%) cases and associated with known indicators of poor prognosis, including low patient age, high tumor grade, ER/PR negative status, but not with outcome. However, in the Triple Negative breast cancer subset PD-L1 was associated with better recurrence free survival (RFS) especially within the Basal-like subset (Hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.22 - 0.86, p = 0.018). Combined PD-L1/epithelial CD8 positive status was also strongly associated with better RFS and OS (Hazard ratio = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.10 - 0.71, p = 0.010 and Hazard ratio = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.11 - 0.68, p = 0.006 respectively) in the Basal-like subgroup.

Conclusions

PD-L1 expression is associated with better patient survival in Basal-like breast cancer.

Association of PD-1.5 C/T, but Not PD-1.3 G/A, with Malignant and Benign Brain Tumors in Iranian Patients

Programmed death-1 (PD-1) negatively regulates the immune response. The aims of this study were to assess the association of two single nucleotide polymorphisms in the PD-1 gene, PD-1.5 (+7785 C/T-rs2227981) and PD-1.3 (+7146 G/A- rs11568821), with benign and malignant brain tumors. Patients with brain tumors (96 patients with benign and 56 with malignant brain tumors) and 150 healthy control individuals were included. PCR-RFLP was performed for genotyping. It was revealed that the genotype and allele frequencies of PD-1.5 C/T polymorphism were significantly different between all brain tumor patients and the control group. The frequencies of the CT genotype and T allele were higher in brain tumor patients. In contrast, the frequency of PD-1.3 G/A genotypes and alleles showed no significant difference between all brain tumor patients and controls. Patients were then divided into malignant and benign groups. The results revealed a significant difference in both patients groups compared with the controls only at PD-1.5 C/T position. Arlequin analysis showed the GC haplotype was the most frequent haplotype in the whole group of patients and controls, and the GT haplotype was significantly different between patient and control groups. In conclusion, we demonstrate that PD-1.5 C/T polymorphism, but not PD-1.3 G/A, is associated with brain tumors in Iranian patients.

Immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most common cancer as well as the first cause of death by cancer in women worldwide. Although routine treatment improves the outcome of early stage breast cancer patients, there is no effective therapy for the disseminated disease. Immunotherapy has emerged as a powerful therapeutic strategy for the treatment of many cancers. Although traditionally conceived as a non-immunogenic tumor, breast cancer is now considered a potential target for immunotherapy. Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss different immunotherapeutic strategies that are currently being tested for the treatment of breast cancer: These strategies include: (i) blockade of immunological checkpoints, (ii) antitumor vaccines, (iii) regulatory T cell blockade, (iv) adoptive T cell transfer therapy, (iv) adoptive immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, and (v) combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy. Expert opinion: A growing body of evidence indicates that immunotherapeutic strategies can benefit a larger cohort of breast cancer patients than hitherto anticipated. Since breast tumors entail multiple mechanisms to impair antitumor immunity, the immunological characterization of individual tumors and the selection of suitable combinations of chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic approaches are required to achieve significant clinical benefit in these patients.

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with higher expression levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 in early breast cancer

Background

The presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is a favourable prognostic factor in patients with early breast cancer. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 are associated with a variety of adverse features. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationships between TILs, PD-1 and PD-L1 as well as their prognostic implications in early breast cancer.

Methods

We investigated 180 patients with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent subsequent surgery for stage II–III invasive breast carcinoma between 1999 and 2007. TIL expression was classified as low or high using a previously reported scoring model. PD-1 and PD-L1 expression levels were determined by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between PD-1 expression in TILs and PD-L1 expression in cancer cells was also investigated.

Results

Higher tumour grade was significantly correlated with PD-L1 expression in tumours (p<0.0001). PD-1 and PD-L1 expression levels were associated with tumour subtype and were highest in triple-negative tumours (p<0.0001). Furthermore, expression of each of PD-1 and PD-L1 was significantly correlated with higher TIL expression and pathological complete response (pCR) (p<0.0001). PD-L1 expression in cancer cells was significantly correlated with PD-1 expression in TILs (p=0.03). The correlations between pCR and expression of each of PD-L1 and PD-1 were not significant.

Conclusion

Expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 in early breast cancer is associated with higher TIL scores and pCR; conversely, expression of these proteins correlates with poor prognostic clinicopathological factors such as tumour grade and subtype. TILs, PD-1 and PD-L1 can potentially predict the response to treatment.

Prognostic significance of PD-L1 in solid tumor: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of studies have examined the ability of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) to function as a marker for tumor prognosis. However, whether PD-L1 expression is a prognostic factor for the poor outcomes in many human cancers remains controversial. This study aims to investigate the prognostic role of PD-L1 expression through a meta-analysis update of 60 studies.

METHODS

The studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, and were assessed by further quality evaluation. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for total and stratified analyses were calculated to investigate the association between the PD-L1 expression and the overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) or progression-free survivals (PFS) of cancer patients. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also investigated.

RESULTS

The results indicated that PD-L1 overexpression can predict a poor OS (HR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.38-1.81, P <.000) and DFS/PFS (HR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.26-2.33, P = .001). Subgroup analyses showed that PD-L1 overexpression was significantly related to the poor OS in patients with breast (HR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.15-3.41, P = .014), urothelial (HR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.61-3.12, P <.000), renal (HR = 3.30, 95% CI = 2.23-4.86, P <.000), and gastric cancers (HR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.02-2.37, P = .040). Furthermore, PD-L1 overexpresion was significantly associated with poor DFS/PFS in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (HR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.21-2.46, P = .003), melanoma (HR = 3.39, 95% CI = 2.02-5.69, P <.000), and renal carcinoma, (HR = 5.04, 95% CI = 2.87-8.86, P <.000). The adverse prognostic impact of PD-L1 was observed in patients of different ethnicities.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest the correlation of PD-L1 overexpression with worse OS in patients with solid tumors. However, the correlations differed according to tumor types.

Immune checkpoint blockade: the role of PD-1-PD-L axis in lymphoid malignancies

The co-inhibitory receptor programmed cell death (PD)-1, expressed by immune effector cells, is credited with a protective role for normal tissue during immune responses, by limiting the extent of effector activation. Its presently known ligands, programmed death ligands (PD-Ls) 1 and 2, are expressed by a variety of cells including cancer cells, suggesting a role for these molecules as an immune evasion mechanism. Blocking of the PD-1-PD-L signaling axis has recently been shown to be effective and was clinically approved in relapsed/refractory tumors such as malignant melanoma and lung cancer, but also classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A plethora of trials exploring PD-1 blockade in cancer are ongoing. Here, we review the role of PD-1 signaling in lymphoid malignancies, and the latest results of trials investigating PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking agents in this group of diseases. Early phase studies proved very promising, leading to the clinical approval of a PD-1 blocking agent in Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and Phase III clinical studies are either planned or ongoing in most lymphoid malignancies.

Emerging therapies for breast cancer

HER2 and CDK4/6 are undoubted two most important biological targets for breast cancer. Anti-HER2 treatments enhance objective response and progression-free survival/disease-free survival as well as overall survival. Three CDK4/6 inhibitors consistently improve objective response and progression-free survival; however, overall survival data are waited. Optimization of chemotherapy and endocrine strategies remains an unmet need. Check point inhibitor-based immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is a promising field, especially for triple-negative breast cancer.

The mechanisms tumor cells utilize to evade the host's immune system

The immune system plays an essential role in the tumor progression; not only can it inhibit tumor growth but it can also promote tumor growth by establishing a favorable environment. Tumor cells utilize several strategies to evade the host's immune system, including expression of immunosuppressive molecules such as PD-L1, IDO and siglec-9. In addition, tumor cells not only regulate the recruitment and development of immunosuppressive forces to influence the tumor microenvironment but also shift the phenotype and function of normal immune cells from a possibly anti-tumor state to a pro-tumor state. As a result, tumor cells evade the host's immune system, leading to metastasis and/or recurrent disease.