2021 Update to the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment: Answers to 10 Pivotal Issues About Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Rationale and design of interleukin-1 blockade in recently decompensated heart failure (REDHART2): a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, single center, phase 2 study

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a global leading cause of mortality despite implementation of guideline directed therapy which warrants a need for novel treatment strategies. Proof-of-concept clinical trials of anakinra, a recombinant human Interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist, have shown promising results in patients with HF.

Method

We designed a single center, randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind phase II randomized clinical trial. One hundred and two adult patients hospitalized within 2 weeks of discharge due to acute decompensated HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and systemic inflammation (high sensitivity of C-reactive protein > 2 mg/L) will be randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive anakinra or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary objective is to determine the effect of anakinra on peak oxygen consumption (VO₂) measured at cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) after 24 weeks of treatment, with placebo-corrected changes in peak VO₂ at CPX after 24 weeks (or longest available follow up). Secondary exploratory endpoints will assess the effects of anakinra on additional CPX parameters, structural and functional echocardiographic data, noninvasive hemodynamic, quality of life questionnaires, biomarkers, and HF outcomes.

Discussion

The current trial will assess the effects of IL-1 blockade with anakinra for 24 weeks on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with recent hospitalization due to acute decompensated HFrEF.

Trial registration: The trial was registered prospectively with ClinicalTrials.gov on Jan 8, 2019, identifier NCT03797001.

Clinical Considerations for Use of SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Review

Heart failure (HF) continues to increase in prevalence, representing a significant burden to healthcare systems in the USA. Despite several established HF therapies, particularly for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), rates of HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular (CV) mortality remain very high. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is an important risk factor for HF, with the two conditions often occurring concurrently. Several CV outcomes trials have shown that the sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) class of antihyperglycemic drugs reduces the risk of HF-related outcomes in patients with T2D and either established CV disease or multiple CV risk factors. Subsequently, there have been large clinical studies that have investigated the effects of SGLT2is in patients with HFrEF, with or without T2D, which have shown that both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin have significant reductions in hospitalization for HF and CV mortality. These data led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin as a novel treatment pathway for patients with HFrEF; empagliflozin has subsequently been approved for the treatment of HF regardless of ejection fraction. A clinical practice algorithm can assist cardiologists in identifying patients who may be eligible for SGLT2i treatment as well as the appropriate timeframe for initiating therapy and the parameters for patient monitoring. Given the evidence that SGLT2is are beneficial in the management of HF, specifically HFrEF, irrespective of underlying T2D, evidence-based recommendations and greater clinician familiarity can facilitate the integration of SGLT2is into general HF therapeutic management.

Sacubitril/valsartan use patterns among older adults with heart failure in clinical practice: a population-based cohort study of >25 000 Medicare beneficiaries

AIMS

Sacubitril/valsartan is strongly supported in guidelines for the management of heart failure, but suboptimal adherence and treatment non-persistence may limit the population-level benefit that this therapy might otherwise offer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries (2014-2017) initiating sacubitril/valsartan after ≥6 months of continuous enrolment. We assessed adherence as the proportion of days covered (PDC) and proportion of patients non-persistent (having no prescription available) at 180 days after initiation. We fit a multivariable negative binomial model with a count of adherent days to evaluate independent factors associated with of sacubitril/valsartan adherence. Among 27 063 new sacubitril/valsartan users, most (n = 17 663, 65%) were prescribed low-dose at 24 mg/26 mg and most (n = 19 984, 74%) were switched from prior angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) rather than being RASi treatment naïve. Median 180-day PDC was 86% (25th-75th percentiles 58-98%). Black patients, those with high comorbid disease burden (≥8 comorbidities), and patients with recent hospitalization within 30 days had fewer adherent days, while those treated with preceding ACEi/ARB had more adherent days. Thirty-four percent of patients did not have an active sacubitril/valsartan prescription at day 180. Among these, few had preceding dose down-titrations (6% among patients on 49 mg/51 mg and 9% among patients on 97 mg/103 mg) and 68% did not have a subsequent ACEi/ARB prescription. Among patients who remained persistent, dose up-titrations occurred in 29% of patients who started on 24 mg/26 mg and 27% of patients on 49 mg/51 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall adherence to sacubitril/valsartan among Medicare beneficiaries is acceptable, but is lower in Black patients, those with higher comorbidities or those who started therapy after recent hospitalization. While broad implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy is a key priority, additional focused efforts to improve adherence early after hospitalization and among at-risk patients are needed in parallel.

A multidisciplinary approach to heart failure care in the hospital: improving the patient journey

Despite advancements in care for patients with heart failure (HF), morbidity and mortality remain high. Hospitalizations and readmissions for HF have been the focus of significant attention among health care providers and payers, with an eye towards reducing health care costs. However, considerable variability exists with regard to inpatient workflows and management for patients with HF, which represents a significant opportunity to improve care. Here we provide a summary of optimal inpatient management strategies for HF, focusing on the multidisciplinary team of emergency medicine providers, admitting hospitalists, cardiovascular consultants, pharmacists, nurses, and social workers. The patient journey serves as the template for this review article, from the initial presentation in the emergency department, to decongestion and stabilization, optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy, and discharge and appropriate disposition. Lastly, this review aims not to be proscriptive but rather to provide best practices that are clinically relevant and actionable, with the goal of improving care for patients during the sentinel hospitalization for HF.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure in elderly patients (2021)

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome caused by ventricular insufficiency, which results in decreased activity tolerance and repeated hospitalization, seriously affecting quality of life, and it is the main cause of death in elderly people. In recent years, great progress has been made in the treatment of heart failure, but the prevalence, mortality, and readmission rate among elderly patients with heart failure remain high. Because elderly patients have multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors, coexistence of multiple diseases accompanied by multiple syndromes, multiple medications, and natural decline of body functions, the clinical diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and long-term management of these patients differ from those in other populations. To facilitate clinical practice and application of clinical geriatric medicine, especially among community physicians, experts from the Cardiovascular Group, Geriatrics Branch of the Chinese Medical Association have drafted this consensus to summarize the diagnosis and treatment regimens for elderly patients with chronic heart failure and provide guidance for its clinical diagnosis and treatment in China.

The discrepancies between clinical and histopathological diagnoses of cardiomyopathies in patients with stage D heart failure undergoing heart transplantation

Background

This study aimed to determine the etiology of stage-D heart failure (HF) and the prevalence and prognosis of misdiagnosed cardiomyopathy in patients undergoing heart transplantation.

Methods and results

We retrospectively reviewed 127 consecutive patients (mean age, 42 years; 90 [71%], male) from February 1994 to September 2021 admitted for heart transplant in our tertiary center. Pre-transplant clinical diagnosis was compared with post-transplant pathological diagnosis. The most common misdiagnosed cardiomyopathy was nonischemic cardiomyopathy accounting for 6% (n = 8) of all patients. Histopathological examination of explanted hearts in misdiagnosed patients revealed 2 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, 2 sarcoidosis, 1 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 1 hypersensitivity myocarditis, 1 noncompacted cardiomyopathy, and 1 ischemic cardiomyopathy. Pre-transplant cardiac MRI and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) were performed in 33 (26%) and 6 (5%) patients, respectively, with both performed in 3 (3% of patients). None of the patients undergoing both cardiac tests were misdiagnosed. During the 5-years follow-up period, 2 (25%) and 44 (37%) patients with and without pretransplant misdiagnosed cardiomyopathy died. There was no difference in survival rate between the groups (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% CI:0.11–2.93; P = 0.314).

Conclusions

The prevalence of misdiagnosed cardiomyopathy was 6% of patients with stage-D HF undergoing heart transplantation, the misdiagnosis mostly occurred in nonischemic/dilated cardiomyopathy. An accurate diagnosis of newly detected cardiomyopathy gives an opportunity for potentially reversing cardiomyopathy, including sarcoidosis or myocarditis. This strategy may minimize the need for advanced HF therapy or heart transplantation. With advances in cardiac imaging, improvements in diagnostic accuracy of the etiology of HF can improve targeting of treatment.

CE: Guideline-Directed Cardiac Devices for Patients with Heart Failure

ABSTRACT

Heart failure affects over 6.2 million adults in the United States and is expected to affect over 8 million by 2030. The U.S. one-year mortality rate is almost 30% among Medicare beneficiaries. Technological advances have produced several new cardiac devices that are available for therapy and symptom management. This article reviews current device therapies for heart failure and uses a composite case to demonstrate how bedside nurses can help patients understand treatment options related to their disease process and care for them through this experience.

Safety and effects of SGLT-2 inhibitor use among LVAD patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

SGLT-2 inhibitors have been shown to confer reduced risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure, and have also been studied preliminarily among heart transplant patients, with overall positive findings. Use of SGLT-2 inhibitors among patients with durable mechanical circulatory support has not been studied. Here we present our results from a combined retrospective cohort of LVAD patients on SGLT-2 inhibitors at two major academic centers, which showed a good safety profile but prompted questions for further investigation. We advocate for further research into the safety and impact of SGLT-2 inhibitors among LVAD patients.

Multidimensional Approach of Heart Failure Diagnosis and Prognostication Utilizing Cardiac Imaging with Biomarkers

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome caused by various etiologies that results in systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction with congestion. While evaluating HF and planning for treatment, physicians utilize various laboratory tests, including electrocardiography, diverse imaging tests, exercise testing, invasive hemodynamic evaluation, or endomyocardial biopsy. Among these, cardiac imaging modalities and biomarkers are the mainstays during HF diagnosis and treatment. Recent developments in non-invasive imaging modalities, such as echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear imaging, have helped us understand the etiology, pathophysiology, and hemodynamics of HF, and determine treatment options and predict the outcomes. Due to the convenience of their use and potential impact on HF management, biomarkers are increasingly adopted in our clinical practice as well as research purpose. Natriuretic peptide is the most widely used biomarker for the diagnosis of HF, evaluation of treatment response, and prediction of future outcomes. Other cardiac biomarkers to evaluate the pathophysiological mechanisms of HF include myocardial injury, oxidative stress, inflammation, fibrosis, hypertrophy, and neurohormonal activation. Because HF results from complex cardiac disorders, it is essential to assess the disease status multidimensionally. The proper utilization of multimodality imaging and cardiac biomarkers can improve the quality of patient management and predict clinical outcomes in HF in the era of personalized medicine.

Evolving therapeutic strategies for patients hospitalized with new or worsening heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic, progressive, and increasingly prevalent syndrome characterized by stepwise declines in health status and residual lifespan. Despite significant advancements in both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management approaches for chronic HF, the burden of HF hospitalization-whether attributable to new-onset (de novo) HF or worsening of established HF-remains high and contributes to excess HF-related morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. Owing to a paucity of evidence to guide tailored interventions in this heterogeneous group, management of acute HF events remains largely subject to clinician discretion, relying principally on alleviation of clinical congestion, as-needed correction of hemodynamic perturbations, and concomitant reversal of underlying trigger(s). Following acute stabilization, the subsequent phase of care primarily involves interventions known to improve long-term outcomes and rehospitalization risk, including initiation and optimization of disease-modifying pharmacotherapy, targeted use of adjunctive therapies, and attention to contributing comorbid conditions. However, even with current standards of care many patients experience recurrent HF hospitalization, or after admission incur worsening clinical trajectories. These patterns highlight a persistent unmet need for evidence-based approaches to inform in-hospital HF care and call for renewed focus on urgent implementation of interventions capable of ameliorating risk of worsening HF. In this review, we discuss key contemporary and emerging therapeutic strategies for patients hospitalized with de novo or worsening HF.

Digital Technologies to Support Better Outcome and Experience of Care in Patients with Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we review a range of digital technologies for possible application in heart failure patients, with a focus on lessons learned. We also discuss a future model of heart failure management, as digital technologies continue to become part of standard care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Digital technologies are increasingly used by healthcare professionals and those living with heart failure to support more personalised and timely shared decision-making, earlier identification of problems, and an improved experience of care. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the acceptability and implementation of a range of digital technologies, including remote monitoring and health tracking, mobile health (wearable technology and smartphone-based applications), and the use of machine learning to augment data interpretation and decision-making. Much has been learned over recent decades on the challenges and opportunities of technology development, including how best to evaluate the impact of digital health interventions on health and healthcare, the human factors involved in implementation and how best to integrate dataflows into the clinical pathway. Supporting patients with heart failure as well as healthcare professionals (both with a broad range of health and digital literacy skills) is crucial to success. Access to digital technologies and the internet remains a challenge for some patients. The aim should be to identify the right technology for the right patient at the right time, in a process of co-design and co-implementation with patients.

Implementing Evidence-Based Motivational Interviewing Strategies in the Care of Patients with Heart Failure

Motivational interviewing (MI) has positive effects on heart failure patient outcomes related to self-care. MI can be effectively used by the interprofessional team in the hospital and clinic settings, and it can be effective even in brief patient interactions. The spirit of MI uses collaboration, evocation, and honoring the patient's autonomy. Open-ended questions, affirmations, reflective listening, and summarization are skills used to build empathy and elicit change talk with the MI framework. Clinicians can consider obtaining feedback to improve their practice of MI techniques for enhanced efficacy in helping heart failure patients improve self-care behaviors.

Effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical studies

INTRODUCTION

Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a critical problem with an impact on both oncological and cardiovascular prognosis, especially when it prevents patients from receiving cancer treatment. However, there are very limited data on the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in the prevention and treatment of cardiotoxicity. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the potential benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with CTRCD.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The databases included MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Scopus and Cochrane Central up to January 20, 2022. All pre-clinical and clinical studies including observational studies (cohorts, case-control, cross-sectional and case reports) that used sacubitril/valsartan for prevention or treatment of CTRCD. The primary effectiveness endpoints was CTRCD, defined as a clinically significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the end of the follow-up.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

And after applying the eligibility criteria, 12 articles (9 in humans and 3 preclinical studies) were included in this systematic review. The 3 preclinical studies demonstrated beneficial effects in preventing, attenuating and/or delaying the onset of myocardial damage at the cellular level, ventricular dysfunction and remodeling. Regardind human studies, most of them were composed of case reports. The largest study consisted of a retrospective multicentric cohort with 64 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

All clinical studies have demonstrated that used Sac/Val in human showed a significant increase in LVEF, and when reported, a reduction in left ventricular volume and NT-proBNP (or BNP). Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials established the cardiac protection of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors among adults with type 2 diabetes. New evidence suggests that these results could extend to people without diabetes.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure, regardless of the presence of type 2 diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase (OVID interface).

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible trials randomly assigned adults with heart failure to SGLT2 inhibitors or control.

DATA EXTRACTION

Time-to-event individual patient data were reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier plots; time-varying risk ratios (RRs) were calculated in half-, 1-, and 2-year time frames; and anticipated absolute benefits were calculated using simple models applying relative effects to baseline risks.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors reduce hospitalization for heart failure by 37% (95% CI, 25% to 47%) at 6 months, 32% (CI, 20% to 42%) at 1 year, and 26% (CI, 10% to 40%) at 2 years (all high certainty) and reduce cardiovascular death by 14% (CI, 1% to 25%) at 1 year (high certainty). Nevertheless, low-certainty evidence did not indicate protection against all-cause death, kidney disease progression, or kidney failure. Anticipated absolute benefits are greater for patients treated in the first year and for those with poorer prognoses, such as those newly diagnosed with heart failure in the hospital. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors doubled the risk for genital infections (RR, 2.69 [CI, 1.61 to 4.52]; high certainty).

LIMITATION

Covariates were unavailable in meta-analyses with reconstructed individual patient data.

CONCLUSION

Among people with heart failure, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce hospitalizations for heart failure regardless of the presence of diabetes; absolute benefits are most pronounced in first-year treatment and vary with prognostic factors. Clinicians should note the increased risk for genital infection in patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

1.3.5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence, West China Hospital of Sichuan University. (PROSPERO: CRD42021255544).

A Mistake Not to Be Repeated: What Can We Learn from the Underutilization of Statin Therapy for Efficient Dissemination of Cardioprotective Glucose Lowering Agents?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the factors contributing to underutilization of guideline-directed therapies, identify strategies to alleviate these factors, and apply these strategies for effective and timely dissemination of novel cardioprotective glucose-lowering agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent analyses demonstrate underutilization of cardioprotective glucose lowering agents despite guideline recommendations for their use. Major contributors to underutilization of guideline-directed therapies include therapeutic inertia, perceptions about side effects, and factors found at the level of the clinicians, patients, and the healthcare system. The recent emergence of several novel therapies, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, for use in cardiovascular disease provides a unique avenue to improve patient outcomes. To effectively utilize novel cardioprotective glucose lowering agents to improve cardiovascular outcomes, clinicians must recognize and learn from prior barriers to application of guideline-directed therapies. Further endeavors are prudent to ensure uptake of novel agents.

Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Prognostic Scales: The Impact of Exercise Modality in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests

The cardiopulmonary exercise (CPET) test is an essential tool to determine the severity, prognosis, and need for invasive treatments in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but disregards the exercise modality. The present study aimed at analyzing the differences between treadmill and cycle-ergometer exercises. This was a prospective study, involving 65 patients with HfrEF who performed treadmill exercise followed by cycle-ergometer exercise 72 h later. We enrolled 65 patients, aged 58 ± 9 years, with an ejection fraction of 29 ± 9%. Peak VO2 was 20% greater (95% CI: 18−21%; p < 0.000) on the treadmill, and the ventilatory efficiency estimated by the VE/VCO2 slope (32 ± 8 vs. 34 ± 9; p < 0.05). The ventilatory response was greater on the treadmill: maximum ventilation (55 ± 16 vs. 46 ± 11 L/min; p < 0.000) and ventilatory reserve at the maximum effort (28 ± 17 vs. 41 ± 15%; p < 0.000). These values led to a change in the functional class of 23 (51%) patients and ventilatory class of 28 (47%) patients. Differences in the main parameters, including peak VO2 and VE/VCO2, impact prognostic scales and possible advanced treatments; therefore, the results should be interpreted in accordance with the exercise modality.

[Development and implementation of a heart failure telemonitoring system: the single centre experience]

Aim      To evaluate the efficacy of remote monitoring by the compliance with body weight control and drug therapy in patients with CHF, using a specially developed software module for chronic heart failure (CHF) monitoring.Material and methods  During 2018-2020, 79 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (mean age, 36.1 [34.2; 38.4] years) and NYHA II-IV functional class CHF were included in the outpatient telemonitoring (TM) program.Results The duration of monitoring was 965 [768; 1065] days. During the monitoring time, the compliance with outpatient body weight control significantly improved: 73.3 [70; 80] % at baseline vs. 86.7 [76.7; 86.7] % at the end of the 31st month (p&lt;0.001). The proportion of patients measuring their body weight at least 6 times a week significantly increased: 8.9 % at baseline vs. 58.1 % by the end of the monitoring (p&lt;0.001). There was no significant association between the time-related changes in the compliance with body weight control and drug therapy and the patient's gender. In addition, during long-term TM, a small but statistically significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction was noted (36.3 [35.5; 37.2] % at baseline vs. 37.2 [35.8; 38.3] % at the end of monitoring; p=0.0008). The involvement of staff physicians in the remote correction of therapy for CHF decreased during the study: the number of system notifications that required a physician's response reduced over two years from 26.6 to 13 % (p=0.011).Conclusion      Participation of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and CHF in the structured TM program was associated with a significant increase in the compliance with regular self-control of body weight and drug therapy for heart failure.

Same day discharge after structural heart disease interventions in the era of the coronavirus-19 pandemic and beyond

With recent advancements in imaging modalities and techniques and increased recognition of the long-term impact of several structural heart disease interventions, the number of procedures has significantly increased. With the increase in procedures, also comes an increase in cost. In view of this, efficient and cost-effective methods to facilitate and manage structural heart disease interventions are a necessity. Same-day discharge (SDD) after invasive cardiac procedures improves resource utilization and patient satisfaction. SDD in appropriately selected patients has become the standard of care for some invasive cardiac procedures such as percutaneous coronary interventions. This is not the case for the majority of structural heart procedures. With the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, safely reducing the duration of time spent within the hospital to prevent unnecessary exposure to pathogens has become a priority. In light of this, it is prudent to assess the feasibility of SDD in several structural heart procedures. In this review we highlight the feasibility of SDD in a carefully selected population, by reviewing and summarizing studies on SDD among patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion, patent foramen ovale/atrial septal defect closure, Mitra-clip, and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement procedures.

Dapagliflozin Impact on the Exercise Capacity of Non-Diabetic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients

Background: Dapagliflozin has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), but its impact on exercise capacity of non-diabetic HF outpatients is unknown. Methods: Adult non-diabetic HF patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% were randomized 1:1 to receive dapagliflozin 10 mg or to continue with HF medication. Patients underwent an initial evaluation which was repeated after 6 months. The variation of several clinical parameters was compared, with the primary endpoint being the 6 month peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) variation. Results: A total of 40 patients were included (mean age 61 ± 13 years, 82.5% male, mean LVEF 34 ± 5%), half being randomized to dapagliflozin, with no significant baseline differences between groups. The reported drug compliance was 100%, with no major safety events. No statistically significant difference in HF events was found (p = 0.609). There was a 24% reduction in the number of patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III in the treatment group as opposed to a 15.8% increase in the control group (p = 0.004). Patients under dapagliflozin had a greater improvement in pVO2 (3.1 vs. 0.1 mL/kg/min, p = 0.030) and a greater reduction in NT-proBNP levels (−217.6 vs. 650.3 pg/mL, p = 0.007). Conclusion: Dapagliflozin was associated with a significant improvement in cardiopulmonary fitness at 6 months follow-up in non-diabetic HFrEF patients.

Effects of omecamtiv mecarbil in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction according to blood pressure: the GALACTIC-HF trial

AIM

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) have high mortality, hospitalizations, and poorly tolerate evidence-based medical treatment. Omecamtiv mecarbil may be particularly helpful in such patients. This study examined its efficacy and tolerability in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg enrolled in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The GALACTIC-HF enrolled patients with baseline SBP ≥85 mmHg with a primary outcome of time to cardiovascular death or first heart failure event. In this analysis, patients were divided according to their baseline SBP (≤100 vs. >100 mmHg). Among the 8232 analysed patients, 1473 (17.9%) had baseline SBP ≤100 mmHg and 6759 (82.1%) had SBP >100 mmHg. The primary outcome occurred in 715 (48.5%) and 2415 (35.7%) patients with SBP ≤100 and >100 mmHg, respectively. Patients with lower SBP were at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Omecamtiv mecarbil, compared with placebo, appeared to be more effective in reducing the primary composite endpoint in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg [hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-0.94] compared with those with SBP >100 mmHg (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88-1.03; P-value for interaction = 0.051). In both groups, omecamtiv mecarbil did not change SBP values over time and did not increase the risk of adverse events, when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

In GALACTIC-HF, risk reduction of heart failure outcomes with omecamtiv mecarbil compared with placebo was large and significant in patients with low SBP. Omecamtiv mecarbil did not affect SBP and was well tolerated independent of SBP values.

Anemia warrants treatment to improve survival in patients with heart failure receiving sacubitril-valsartan

Angiotensin inhibition remains a cornerstone for pharmacologic management of heart failure (HF), despite being associated with decreased hemoglobin (Hb) levels. To investigate the effect of anemia and its treatment on patients with HF treated with sacubitril-valsartan (S/V), we conducted a retrospective study involving patients with recorded left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) of < 40% between January 2017 and December 2019. We identified 677 patients, 37.7% of whom received S/V. The median follow-up period was 868 days. Anemia was associated with significantly decreased survival, increased mortality rates, and higher all-cause hospitalizations in S/V-using patients. We further analyzed 236 patients with HF who had recorded renal function, LVEF, and Hb at the initiation of S/V therapy to identify Hb patterns after S/V therapy. Of these patients, 35.6% exhibited decreasing Hb 12 months after S/V initiation, which was associated with a lower survival rate. Among the patients who were not prescribed anemia medications, Hb of ≥ 12 (vs. < 12 g/dL) was associated with a higher survival rate; this association was absent among the patients undergoing anemia treatment. These results emphasize that consistent screening and treatment for anemia should be implemented to reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with HF receiving S/V.

Comment on Montagnani et al. Optimization of RAASi Therapy with New Potassium Binders for Patients with Heart Failure and Hyperkalemia: Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5483

The recent rapid review and meta-analysis by Montagnani et al. [...].

New therapies for the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

This review of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), including new and emerging evidence for treatment of patients with this condition, is intended to offer data supporting the use of specific agents for this patient population.

SUMMARY

Chronic heart failure is a major health concern affecting millions of Americans annually and remains a significant burden on the healthcare system. Heart failure is divided into categories based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Current treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, defined by an LVEF of less than 40%, involve a variety of agents with established morbidity and mortality benefits. This is in stark contrast to directed treatments for patients with HFpEF, defined by an LVEF of greater than 50%. Treatments for this form of heart failure have been elusive until recently, when studies were published with sacubitril/valsartan and empagliflozin. Results of the PARAGON-HF trial suggested benefit from sacubitril/valsartan in patients with an ejection fraction between 45% and 57%, leading to its approval in 2021 as the first medication indicated for treatment of patients with a preserved ejection fraction. Months later, the results of the EMPEROR-Preserved trial demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in the composite outcome of heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death in patients with HFpEF taking empagliflozin. This medication has yet to gain approval for HFpEF; however, these data along with ongoing and future trials will likely impact standard treatment for these patients.

CONCLUSION

The PARAGON-HF and EMPEROR-Preserved trials will serve as the foundation for a new era in the treatment of HFpEF.

Adequate enrollment of women in cardiovascular drug trials and the need for sex-specific assessment and reporting

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death for women in the United States and globally. There is an abundance of evidence-based trials evaluating the efficacy of drug therapies to reduce morbidity and mortality in CVD. Additionally, there are well-established influences of sex, through a variety of mechanisms, on pharmacologic treatments in CVD. Despite this, the majority of drug trials are not powered to evaluate sex-specific outcomes, and much of the data that exists is gathered post hoc and through meta-analysis. The FDA established a committee in 1993 to increase the enrollment of women in clinical trials to improve this situation. Several authors, reviewing committees, and professional societies have highlighted the importance of sex-specific analysis and reporting. Despite these statements, there has not been a major improvement in representation or reporting. There are ongoing efforts to assess trial design, female representation on steering committees, and clinical trial processes to improve the representation of women. This review will describe the pharmacologic basis for the need for sex-specific assessment of cardiovascular drug therapies. It will also review the sex-specific reporting of landmark drug trials in hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), hyperlipidemia, and heart failure (HF). In reporting enrollment of women, several therapeutic areas like antihypertensives and newer anticoagulation trials fare better than therapeutics for HF and acute coronary syndromes. Further, drug trials and cardiometabolic or lifestyle intervention trials had a higher percentage of female participants than the device or procedural trials.

Eligibility for pharmacological therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: implications of the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate

AIMS

The new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), based on serum creatinine, that does not incorporate race may reclassify individuals, irrespective of race, from one eGFR category to another, with implications for eligibility for treatments in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 43 138 ambulatory patients with HFrEF from 12 clinical trials were included (mean age 64.3 years; 9580 [22.2%] women). Mean eGFR was 67 (standard deviation [SD] 21) ml/min/1.73 m2 and 70 (SD 21) ml/min/1.73 m2 using the original and new CKD-EPI equations, respectively (mean difference 3.20 ml/min/1.73 m2 , 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.17-3.23, p < 0.001). Of the 935 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 or 5, identified using the original equation, 309 (33.0%) were reclassified to CKD stages 1-3 (eGFR ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) with the new equation. However, the opposite was observed among the 2521 Black patients (5.8%) included, with a reduction in mean eGFR from 75 to 68 ml/min/1.73 m2 using the original and new equations, respectively (mean difference 6.94 ml/min/1.73 m2 , [95% CI 6.82-7.06], p < 0.001). The number of Black patients with an eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 increased from 49 (1.9%) using the original equation to 71 (2.8%) with the new equation.

CONCLUSIONS

The new CKD-EPI creatinine equation reclassified CKD stage in a large proportion of patients with HFrEF enrolled in clinical trials. As eGFR is an essential determinant of eligibility for several key pharmacological therapies in HFrEF, this reclassification could result in a substantial change in the proportion of patients considered eligible for such therapies and reduce the proportion of eligible Black patients.

Development and Current Role of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter Inhibition in Cardiorenal Metabolic Syndrome

ABSTRACT

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors were approved as adjunct therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes and have become a high-level recommendation for this population with cardiorenal metabolic syndrome. In addition, evidence continues to grow supporting this class of medications for people with heart failure and chronic kidney disease, regardless of diabetes status. This narrative review summarizes the sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors for cardiorenal metabolic syndrome.

The use of multidisciplinary teams, electronic health records tools, and technology to optimize heart failure population health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Given the limited population level, adoption of optimal therapy that has been shown in recent clinical trials and heart failure registries, efforts to rapidly and safely improve adoption of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure should be prioritized. Opportunities to leverage remote monitoring technology, the electronic health record (EHR), and multidisciplinary teams to improve heart failure care merit review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dedicated multidisciplinary teams employing algorithmic medication titration schema have shown better efficacy than clinician alerts or quality initiatives that focus on education and audit-feedback processes alone. Technology that enables invasive pressure monitoring and wearable devices that transmit physiologic data have the potential to predict decompensation and allow for early intervention by alerting clinicians to signs of congestion/clinical worsening but further real-world data is needed to prove efficacy and develop effective treatment protocols.

SUMMARY

The combination of technology, multidisciplinary teams, and identification of populations for intervention using the EHR will be central to impactful innovation in heart failure population health and prevention of avoidable morbidity. Novel approaches to study implementation efforts including cluster randomized trials are needed.

ANMCO statement on the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure: a practical guide for a streamlined implementation

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin, first developed as glucose-lowering agents for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes, have been demonstrated to improve prognosis in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) regardless of the presence of diabetes. Since these drugs have only recently been included among the four pillars of HFrEF treatment, cardiologists are still unfamiliar with their use in this setting. This article provides an up-to-date practical guide for the initiation and monitoring of patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors.

Association between dosing and combination use of medications and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry

AIMS

To assess the association between combination, dose and use of current guideline-recommended target doses (TD) of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) and β-blockers, and outcomes in a large and unselected contemporary cohort of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Overall, 17 809 outpatients registered in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) from May 2000 to December 2018, with ejection fraction <40% and duration of HF ≥90 days were selected. Primary outcome was a composite of time to cardiovascular death and first HF hospitalization. Compared with no use of RASi or ARNi, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.83 (0.76-0.91) with <50% of TD, 0.78 (0.71-0.86) with 50%-99%, and 0.73 (0.67-0.80) with ≥100% of TD. Compared with no use of β-blockers, the adjusted HR (95% CI) was 0.86 (0.76-0.91), 0.81 (0.74-0.89) and 0.74 (0.68-0.82) with <50%, 50%-99% and ≥100% of TD, respectively. Patients receiving both an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/ARNi and a β-blocker at 50%-99% of TD had a lower adjusted risk of the primary outcome compared with patients only receiving one drug, i.e. ACEi/ARB/ARNi or β-blocker, even if this was at ≥100% of TD.

CONCLUSION

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients using higher doses of RASi or ARNi and β-blockers had lower risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Use of two drug classes at 50%-99% of TD dose was associated with lower risk than one drug class at 100% of TD.

Role of medical management of cardiogenic shock in the era of mechanical circulatory support

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the role of medical management of cardiogenic shock in the era of mechanical circulatory support based on important lessons from clinical trials and routine clinical practice, with a focus on providing practical recommendations that can improve contemporary in-hospital management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite an increasing number of invasive therapies being used to manage cardiogenic shock, evidence-based treatment regimens known to improve outcomes are limited. Medical management of cardiogenic shock includes pharmacological interventions aimed at optimizing determinants of cardiac output-contractility, preload, afterload, and heart rate. In this regard, inotropes and vasopressors remain cornerstone therapies for the management of cardiogenic shock. Norepinephrine has shown potential vasopressor advantage with compared with dopamine, and although milrinone and dobutamine are both considered appropriate first-line inotropes, there is limited data to guide selection, and a recent randomized clinical trial found no significant differences in the treatment of cardiogenic shock.

SUMMARY

In the absence of an evidence-based management approach to cardiogenic shock, clinical guidelines are based on expert opinion and routine clinical practice patterns. Further studies focusing on clinical outcomes among specific cardiogenic shock phenotypes are needed to better assess the clinical efficacy of these agents.

Methamphetamine-Associated Cardiomyopathy: Addressing the Clinical Challenges

The growth in methamphetamine usage worldwide continues to present increasing societal and health care challenges. With the escalation of its usage in a variety of social demographics, the entity of methamphetamine-associated cardiomyopathy (MA-CMP) has emerged. This entity is increasingly responsible for an important proportion of heart failure burden in both admissions to hospital and in those individuals requiring chronic heart failure care. MA-CMP poses some unique challenges including its recognition, particularly in younger patients presenting with new-onset heart failure, its severity at presentation and complications as well as management options. The challenging nature of methamphetamine addiction and the necessity to achieve abstinence is a fundamental aspect of management of this condition. As methamphetamine use continues at high levels in Australia, the burden of MA-CMP will inevitably increase and, therefore, all clinicians responsible for heart failure management require an awareness of this disease entity and the specific clinical challenges of its care.

Optimizing Foundational Therapies in Patients With HFrEF

•

Clinical practice guidelines emphasize the need for guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

•

Recently, international guidelines and the American College of Cardiology Expert Consensus Decision Pathway recommended quadruple therapy for these patients, including angiotensin receptor blockers/neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors.

•

Strategies to optimize use of novel therapies, achieving target doses and management of side effects and tolerability, are needed to achieve this goal.

•

Future prospective studies aimed at guiding optimal implementation of quadruple therapy are needed.

Given the high risk of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), there is an urgent need for the initiation and titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) that can reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality. Clinical practice guidelines are now emphasizing the need for early and rapid initiation of therapies that have cardiovascular benefit. Recognizing that there are many barriers to GDMT initiation and optimization, health care providers should aim to introduce the 4 pillars of quadruple therapy now recommended by most clinical practice guidelines: angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. A large proportion of patients with HFrEF do not have clinical contraindications to GDMT but are not treated with these therapies. Early initiation of low-dose combination therapy should be tolerated by most patients. However, patient-related factors such as hemodynamics, frailty, and laboratory values will need consideration for maximum tolerated GDMT. GDMT initiation in acute heart failure hospitalization represents another important avenue to improve use of GDMT. Finally, removal of therapies that do not have clear cardiovascular benefit should be considered to lower polypharmacy and reduce the risk of adverse side effects. Future prospective studies aimed at guiding optimal implementation of quadruple therapy are warranted to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with HFrEF.

Accelerated and personalized therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AIMS

Previously, guidelines recommended initiating therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in a sequence that follows the chronological order in which trials were conducted, with cautious up-titration of each treatment. It remains unclear whether this historical approach is optimal and alternative approaches may improve patient outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The potential reductions in events that might result from (i) more rapid up-titration of therapies used in the conventional order (based on the chronology of the trials), and (ii) accelerated up-titration and using treatments in different orders than is conventional were modelled using data from six pivotal trials in HFrEF. Over the first 12 months from starting therapy, using a rapid up-titration schedule led to 23 fewer patients per 1000 patients experiencing the composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death and seven fewer deaths from any cause. In addition to accelerating up-titration of treatments, optimized alternative ordering of the drugs used resulted in a further reduction of 24 patients experiencing the composite outcome and six fewer deaths at 12 months. The optimal alternative sequences included sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist as the first two therapies.

CONCLUSION

Modelling of accelerated up-titration schedule and optimized ordering of treatment suggested that at least 14 deaths and 47 patients experiencing the composite outcome per 1000 treated might be prevented over the first 12 months after starting therapy. Standard treatment guidance may not lead to the best patient outcomes in HFrEF, though these findings should be tested in clinical trials.

Dynamic Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Current Evidence and Challenges for the Future

Heart failure (HF) is a challenging situation in healthcare worldwide. Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is a common condition in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and tends to be increasingly associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes as the severity of SMR increases. It is worth noting that SMR can deteriorate dynamically under stress. Over the past three decades, the characteristics of dynamic SMR have been studied. Dynamic SMR contributes to the reduction in exercise capacity and adverse clinical outcomes. Current guidelines refer to the indication of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for significant SMR based on data from the Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation (COAPT) trial if symptomatic despite optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but nonpharmacological treatment for dynamic SMR remains challenging. In HFrEF patients with LV dyssynchrony and dynamic SMR, CRT can improve LV dyssynchrony and subsequently attenuate SMR at rest and during exercise. Also, a recent study suggests that TEER with GDMT and CRT is more effective in symptomatic patients with HFrEF and dynamic SMR than GDMT and CRT alone. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments for dynamic SMR. In this review, current evidence and challenges for the future of dynamic SMR are discussed.

Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan on Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Polygraphic Parameters in Patients Affected by Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Sleep Apnea

Background

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a clinical condition frequently diagnosed in clinical practice. In patients affected by HFrEF, sleep apnea (SA) can be detected among the most frequent comorbidities. Sacubitril–valsartan (sac/val) association has been proven to be effective in reducing disease progression and all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients. Sac/val treatment can potentially attenuate SA development via several pathophysiologic mechanisms, including improvement of global hemodynamics, reduction of extracellular fluid overload, and decrease of sympathetic neural activity.

Methods

We recruited 132 patients affected by HFrEF and SA, already under treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which was discontinued 24 h before the scheduled study timepoints. Physical examination, echocardiography, nocturnal cardio-respiratory monitoring, and laboratory tests were performed in each patient at baseline and after a 6-month treatment with sac/val.

Results

After 6 months, sac/val induced statistically significant changes in clinical, hemodynamic, biohumoral (NT-proBNP, serum electrolytes, creatinine, and uric acid), and echocardiographic parameters. In particular, cardiac index (CI), both atrial and ventricular volumes and global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved. Moreover, polysomnography, carried out during a temporary CPAP interruption, revealed a significant reduction in global apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) value (p < 0.0001), central AHI (p < 0.0001), obstructive AHI (p < 0.0001), oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (p < 0.0001), and percentage time of saturation below 90% (TC90) (p < 0.0001). The changes of CI, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), NT-proBNP, and tricuspid annular plane excursion (TAPSE) contributed to 23.6, 7.6, 7.3, and 4.8% of AHI variability, respectively, and the whole model accounted for a 43.3% of AHI variation.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that treatment with sac/val is able to significantly improve the cardiorespiratory performance of patients with HFrEF and SA, integrating the positive impact of CPAP. Thus, both CPAP and sac/val therapy may synergistically contribute to lower the risks of both cardiac and pulmonary complications in HFrEF patients with SA.

Economic Evaluation of Dapagliflozin in the Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

Objective: The objective of this study is to systematically review the economic evaluations of dapagliflozin in the treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) and describe their general and methodological features.

Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE/PubMed, Website Of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched to collect relevant studies, and the retrieval time ended on 31 October 2021. Articles on the economic evaluation of dapagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure were included. Secondary studies, incomplete economic indicators, and non-English-language and non-Chinese-language studies were excluded. Standard drug treatment was selected as the comparison. Basic characteristics, methods, and main results were extracted and analyzed systematically.

Result: A total of eight studies were identified, and the overall quality was accepted, which were performed in nine developed countries (Austria, United States, Korea, Japan, Singapore, Spanish, Germany, and United Kingdom) and three developing countries (the Philippines, Thailand, and China). With the exception of the Philippines, the remaining countries considered that dapagliflozin was cost effective. In the analyses of all included studies, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were most sensitive to the cost of dapagliflozin, cardiovascular mortality, the duration of dapagliflozin effectiveness, and the probability of HF hospitalization.

Conclusion: Dapagliflozin in the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was considered cost effective. Further studies are needed to evaluate the comprehensive value of dapagliflozin on HF.

Comparative Efficacy of Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin of a Fixed Dose in Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background

The efficacy of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in sodium-glucose cotransport-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in patients with heart failure (HF) has been discovered. However, which drug could improve varied prognostic outcomes has not been elucidated. Hence, we compared their efficacies on the prognostic improvement of HF.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholars, and the Cochrane Library were searched for all related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception to 13 October 2021. Network meta-analyses were performed to generate matrices to show the effect size for pairwise comparison regarding all the interventions.

Results

Eventually a total of 11 RCTs were included in this study. For the primary endpoints, dapagliflozin was comparable with empagliflozin in hospitalization for HF, and empagliflozin (OR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.59-0.84) decreased the risk of exacerbation of HF over dapagliflozin. For the secondary endpoints, dapagliflozin was comparable with empagliflozin in cardiovascular (CV) death /hospitalization for HF, and for CV death, dapagliflozin (OR=0.78, 95%CI: 0.65-0.92) significantly reduced mortality over the placebo. For the tertiary endpoints, dapagliflozin (OR=0.80, 95%CI: 0.66-0.98) significantly decreased the mortality over empagliflozin in all-cause death, and neither drug significantly increased the risk of hypoglycemia.

Recommendations

Overall, 10 mg/day dapagliflozin may be the optimal recommendation for its premium and comprehensive effect on improving the prognosis of patients with HF compared to 10 mg/day empagliflozin.

An Up-to-Date Article Regarding Particularities of Drug Treatment in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

Since the prevalence of heart failure (HF) increases with age, HF is now one of the most common reasons for the hospitalization of elderly people. Although the treatment strategies and overall outcomes of HF patients have improved over time, hospitalization and mortality rates remain elevated, especially in developed countries where populations are aging. Therefore, this paper is intended to be a valuable multidisciplinary source of information for both doctors (cardiologists and general physicians) and pharmacists in order to decrease the morbidity and mortality of heart failure patients. We address several aspects regarding pharmacological treatment (including new approaches in HF treatment strategies [sacubitril/valsartan combination and sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors]), as well as the particularities of patients (age-induced changes and sex differences) and treatment (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes in drugs; cardiorenal syndrome). The article also highlights several drugs and food supplements that may worsen the prognosis of HF patients and discusses some potential drug-drug interactions, their consequences and recommendations for health care providers, as well as the risks of adverse drug reactions and treatment discontinuation, as an interdisciplinary approach to treatment is essential for HF patients.

Renin Angiotensin Blockers and Cardiac Protection: From Basis to Clinical Trials

Despite a similar beneficial effect on blood pressure lowering observed with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blocker (ARBs), several clinical trials and meta-analyses have reported higher cardiovascular mortality and lower protection against myocardial infarction with ARBs when compared with ACEIs. The European guidelines for the management of coronary syndromes and European guidelines on diabetes recommend using ARBs in patients who are intolerant to ACEIs. We reviewed the main pharmacological differences between ACEIs and ARBs, which could provide insights into the differences in the cardiac protection offered by these 2 drug classes. The effect of ACEIs on the tissue and plasma levels of bradykinin and on nitric oxide production and bioavailability is specific to the mechanism of action of ACEIs; it could account for the different effects of ACEIs and ARBs on endothelial function, atherogenesis, and fibrinolysis. Moreover, chronic blockade of AT1 receptors by ARBs induces a significant and permanent increase in plasma angiotensin II and an overstimulation of its still available receptors. In animal models, AT4 receptors have vasoconstrictive, proliferative, and inflammatory effects. Moreover, in models with kidney damage, atherosclerosis, and/or senescence, activation of AT2 receptors could have deleterious fibrotic, vasoconstrictive, and hypertrophic effects and seems prudent and reasonable to reserve the use of ARBs for patients who have presented intolerance to ACE inhibitors.

Guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in Oman: utilization, reasons behind non-prescribing, and dose optimization

Background Objective

To determine the reasons behind guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) non-prescribing, drug utilization before and after excluding those intolerable to GDMT, as well as dose optimization in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) (HFrEF) in Oman.

Methods

The study included HF patients seen at the medical outpatient clinics at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, between January 2016 and December 2019 and followed up until the end of June 2021. The use of renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) blockers (angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs)), beta blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) were evaluated as per the European, American, and Canadian HF guidelines. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics.

Results

A total of 171 HFrEF patients were enrolled for this study, the overall mean age of the cohort was 63 ± 15 years old and 59% were male. Over 65% of the patients had chronic kidney disease. Almost 55% of the patients were intolerable to GDMT. The proportion of patients on beta blockers, RAS blockers/ hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate combination, and MRAs, before and after excluding those intolerable to GDMT, were 89%, 97%, and 77%, and, 94%, 47% and 85%, respectively, while the proportion of patients on the GDMT combination concomitantly was 41% and 83%, respectively. A total of 61%, 44% and 100% of the patients were prescribed ≥50% of the target dose for beta blockers, RAS blockers/ HYD-ISDN combination and MRAs respectively, while 19%, 8.2% and 94% of the patients attained 100% of the target dose for beta blockers, RAS blockers/ HYD-ISDN combination and MRAs respectively.

Conclusions

Reasons behind GDMT non-prescribing were frequent and not clearly obvious in patients' medical notes. The majority of the patients were prescribed GDMT. However, dose optimization, specifically for beta blockers and RAS blockers/ HYD-ISDN combination, was still suboptimal. The findings should be interpreted in the context of low study power and that future studies, with larger sample sizes, are warranted to minimize this limitation.

Utilizing Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Health Equity Among Patients with Heart Failure

Patients with heart failure (HF) are heterogeneous with various intrapersonal and interpersonal characteristics contributing to clinical outcomes. Bias, structural racism, and social determinants of health have been implicated in unequal treatment of patients with HF. Through several methodologies, artificial intelligence (AI) can provide models in HF prediction, prognostication, and provision of care, which may help prevent unequal outcomes. This review highlights AI as a strategy to address racial inequalities in HF; discusses key AI definitions within a health equity context; describes the current uses of AI in HF, strengths and harms in using AI; and offers recommendations for future directions.