Increased risk for nonmelanoma skin cancers in patients who receive thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease

Dermatological adverse reactions during anti-TNF treatments: focus on inflammatory bowel disease

The clinical introduction of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors has deeply changed the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). It has demonstrated impressive efficacy as compared to alternative treatments, allowing for the chance to achieve near-remission and long-term improvement in function and quality of life and to alter the natural history of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). As a consequence of longer follow-up periods the number of side effects which may be attributed to treatment with biologics is growing significantly. Cutaneous reactions are among the most common adverse reactions. These complications include injection site reactions, cutaneous infections, immune-mediated complications such as psoriasis and lupus-like syndrome and rarely skin cancers. We review the recent literature and draw attention to dermatological side effects of anti-TNF therapy of inflammatory bowel disease.

Review article: dermatological complications of immunosuppressive and anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

With the expanding list of medications available to treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it is important to recognise adverse events, including those involving the skin. Dermatological adverse events may be confused with extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD.

AIM

To review drug-related dermatological manifestations associated with immunosuppressive and anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy.

METHODS

The literature was searched on PubMed for dermatological adverse events in IBD.

RESULTS

Present thiopurine exposure was associated with a 5.9-fold [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1-16.4] increased risk of developing non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The peak incidence is highest in Caucasians over the age of 65 years with crude incidence rates of 4.0 and 5.7/1000 patient-years for present and previous use. In anti-TNF-exposed subjects, drug-induced lupus was reported in 1% of the cases and a psoriatic rash in up to 3% of the cases. Anti-TNF monotherapy increases the risk of NMSC ~2-fold to a rate of 0.5 cases per 1000 person-years. Cutaneous lymphomas have been rarely reported in subjects on thiopurine or anti-TNF drug monotherapy. Combination therapy seems to have an additive effect on the risk of developing NMSC and lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians need to be aware of the wide spectrum of dermatological complications of immunosuppressive and anti-TNF therapy in IBD, especially psoriasis and non-melanoma skin cancer. Vigilance and regular screening for non-melanoma skin cancer is recommended. Case discussions between gastroenterologists and dermatologists should be undertaken to best manage dermatological adverse events.

Practical guidelines for the use of steroid-sparing agents in the treatment of chronic pruritus

Chronic pruritus in the adult patient is both an underappreciated and a difficult to treat condition. In the vast majority of cases, itch is the result of inflammatory skin disease and therefore may be responsive to systemic anti-inflammatory therapies. Urticarial dermatitis is an under-recognized cause of chronic itch in the adult population. Patients with this disorder are characterized by prolonged, prednisone-responsive pruritus, often in the absence of substantial cutaneous findings. Skin findings, when present, can range from subtle, persistent urticarial lesions to excoriated papules, often intermixed with urticaria, eczematous change, and lichenification secondary to chronic scratching. Hereby, we describe our algorithm for evaluation and management of adult patients with refractory pruritus (urticarial dermatitis in particular), including evaluation for other etiologies of pruritus, pre-immunosuppression workup, and the use of azathioprine and other steroid-sparing agents for treatment of recalcitrant itch.

Interventions and targets aimed at improving quality in inflammatory bowel disease ambulatory care

Over the past decade, there has been increasing focus on improving the quality of healthcare delivered to patients with chronic diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory bowel disease is a complex, chronic condition with associated morbidity, health care costs, and reductions in quality of life. The condition is managed primarily in the outpatient setting. The delivery of high quality of care is suboptimal in several ambulatory inflammatory bowel disease domains including objective assessments of disease activity, the use of steroid-sparing agents, screening prior to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, and monitoring thiopurine therapy. This review outlines these gaps in performance and provides potential initiatives aimed at improvement including reimbursement programs, quality improvement frameworks, collaborative efforts in quality improvement, and the use of healthcare information technology.

Mortality and cancer in pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study

OBJECTIVES

Although the incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to rise in Northern France, the risks of death and cancer in this population have not been characterized.

METHODS

All patients <17 years, recorded in EPIMAD registry, and diagnosed between 1988 and 2004 with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) were included. The observed incidences of death and cancer were compared with those expected in the regional general population obtained by French Statistical Institute (INSEE) and the cancer Registry from Lille. Comparisons were performed using Fisher's exact test and were expressed using the standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and standardized incidence ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 698 patients (538 with CD and 160 with UC) were identified; 360 (52%) were men, the median age at IBD diagnosis was 14 years (12-16) and the median follow-up time was 11.5 years (7-15). During follow-up, the mortality rate was 0.84% (6/698) and did not differ from that in the reference population (SMR=1.4 (0.5-3.0); P=0.27). After a median follow-up of 15 years (10-17), 1.3% of patients (9/698) had a cancer: colon (n=2), biliary tract (cholangiocarcinoma; n=1), uterine cervix (n=1), prepuce (n=1), skin (basal cell carcinoma (n=2), hematological (acute leukemia; n=1), and small bowel carcinoid (n=1). There was a significantly increased risk of cancer regardless of gender and age (standardized incidence ratio=3.0 (1.3-5.9); P<0.02). Four out of nine patients who developed a cancer had received immunosuppressants or anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy (including combination therapy in three patients).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large pediatric population-based IBD cohort, mortality did not differ from that of the general population but there was a significant threefold increased risk of neoplasia.

Use of immunosuppressants and biologicals in patients with previous cancer

Thiopurines promote Epstein-Barr virus-related lymphomas, nonmelanoma skin cancers and acute myeloid leukemias. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents may inhibit or activate carcinogenesis according to the cellular pathways that are activated. A mild increase in the risk of melanoma has been reported in patients exposed to anti-TNF agents. Transplanted patients with previous history of cancer are at high risk of cancer recurrence when receiving posttransplant immunosuppressive therapy, particularly within the first 2 years of treatment. Few data exist for patients with chronic inflammatory disease. In the CESAME cohort that included essentially patients receiving thiopurines, there was no excess incidence of recurrent or new cancer associated with exposure to immunosuppressive therapy in the patients with previous cancer at cohort entry. In clinical practice, the decision to start or resume immunosuppressive therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with recent cancer should be discussed case by case with cancer specialists. However, taken into account the experience of transplant specialists, it could be suggested not to consider a waiting period for women with adequately treated uterine high-grade cervical dysplasia. For invasive cancers, a waiting period of 2 years should be considered if possible. During this period, treatment of IBD should be restricted to 5-aminosalicylic acid, steroids, nutritional therapy, or surgery, except in case of aggressive IBD that cannot be controlled by these methods. A longer waiting period of 5 years could be recommended for the most aggressive forms of cancers, such as melanomas, aggressive breast cancers, sarcomas, urinary tract cancers, and myelomas.

Long-term outcomes after single-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists on the long-term outcomes of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) following single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE).

AIM

To examine the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing SBE for OGIB.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing SBE for OGIB at a tertiary care center between 2008 and 2010 were retrospectively identified. Clinical data and SBE findings were extracted from the medical record. Recurrence of OGIB during follow-up through 2012 was assessed by a combination of chart review and telephone interviews.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-seven patients were included in the study. The overall diagnostic yield of SBE was 64.6% (95/147 patients). Findings of SBE included vascular lesions (VLs, 53.7%), small bowel neoplasm (2.7%), inflammatory lesions (4.8%), and normal SBE (35.4%). One hundred and ten patients (56.4% female, mean age 70.6±11.3 years) were followed for an average 23.9 months after initial SBE. During follow-up, OGIB recurred in 39.5% of patients in whom a source of OGIB was identified on SBE and 55.9% of patients with normal findings on SBE. OGIB recurred in 47.6% of patients in whom small bowel VLs were treated endoscopically. None of the 13 patients in whom a non-VL lesion was identified as the source of bleeding on SBE experienced recurrent bleeding (p=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

SBE is a safe and valuable method for managing patients with OGIB. More than 50% of patients experienced no recurrent bleeding during 2 years of follow-up after SBE. The long-term management of OGIB due to small bowel VLs remains challenging.

Management of the elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease: practical considerations

The aging U.S. population will approach 20% of the total population by 2030. The number of older patients with inflammatory bowel disease is anticipated to increase accordingly bringing the burden of multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy with drug interactions, the aging immune system, and extended social and financial issues to overall management of an already challenging management of these patients. Each of these concerns is measured by the metric of distinguishing the "fit versus frail" elderly and will be discussed in this review with an emphasis on a practical guide to therapy.

Familial adenomatous polyposis and Crohn's disease in one patient: dilemmas and concerns

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and Crohn's disease (CD) are two entities with no known etiologic or physiopathogenic relation. The rarity of the former makes the coincidence of both diagnoses in one patient very unlikely. Nevertheless, management in such cases can be puzzling as surgical options must be considered, and immunosuppression/immunomodulation is set in a territory of accelerated carcinogenesis. We report the case of a 29-year-old male with a diagnosis of FAP since adolescence, already submitted to prophylactic proctocolectomy, presenting with anemia and bloody diarrhea, revealing small bowel CD. This case allows for a rich discussion of the clinical dilemmas presenting when FAP and CD are diagnosed in the same patient and for a deep analysis of the concerns inherent to the available therapeutic options.

Risk of colorectal high-grade dysplasia and cancer in a prospective observational cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is an unclear risk of colonic high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with immunosuppressants. We analyzed data on CRC development among patients with IBD enrolled in the observational cohort Cancers et Surrisque Associé aux Maladies Inflammatoires Intestinales En France (CESAME).

METHODS

We followed and collected data from 19,486 patients with IBD (60.3% with Crohn's disease, 30.1% receiving thiopurine therapy) enrolled in CESAME from May 2004 and June 2005, and followed them until December 2007. When the study began, 2841 patients (14.6%) were characterized as having long-standing extensive colitis (ie, >10 years and involving ≥50% of the colon). Early lesions (HGD and CRC) were defined as those diagnosed within 10 years after diagnosis of IBD.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients developed CRC during the follow-up period, and 20 developed colorectal HGD. The standardized incidence ratios of CRC were 2.2 for all IBD patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-3.0; P < .0001), 7.0 for patients with long-standing extensive colitis (95% CI: 4.4-10.5; P < .001), and 1.1 for patients without long-standing extensive colitis (95% CI: 0.6-1.8; P = .84). Among patients with long-standing extensive colitis, the multivariate adjusted hazard ratio for colorectal HGD and cancer was 0.28 for those who received thiopurines compared with those who never received thiopurine therapy (95% CI: 0.1-0.9; P = .03). Twenty-two patients developed early lesions; 7 of these were related to IBD, based on histologic analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD and long-standing extensive colitis are at increased risk for CRC, although the risk is lower among patients receiving thiopurine therapy. Patients without long-standing extensive colitis have a risk for CRC similar to that of the general population, but they can develop IBD-related lesions within 10 years after diagnosis of IBD.

Review article: strategies for the management of chronic unremitting ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic active ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with significant morbidity, loss of productivity, increased colorectal cancer risk and cost. Up to 18% of patients suffer chronic active disease, with 30% requiring colectomy at 10 years. The management remains challenging given the relatively few clinical trials in this area.

AIM

To summarise the evidence regarding optimal management strategies for patients with chronic active UC of differing disease extents and degrees of treatment refractoriness.

METHOD

A literature search using the PubMed and Medline databases was performed. No time limit was set on article publication for inclusion.

RESULTS

The principles of management should focus on confirming disease activity, exclusion of alternative diagnoses, adherence and treatment escalation. Infliximab and topical tacrolimus are options in refractory proctitis, although the evidence for these therapies is limited. Both infliximab and adalimumab are effective in corticosteroid-refractory disease, although the proportions of patients achieving corticosteroid-free remission remain modest (24% at 30 weeks and 16.9% at 8 weeks respectively). Alternatives include ciclosporin and tacrolimus, and possibly methotrexate. Colectomy often leads to an improved quality of life; medical strategies unlikely to provide durable corticosteroid-free remission should not be pursued.

CONCLUSIONS

No current pharmacological treatment delivers mucosal healing in the majority of patients. Newer treatments such as vedolizumab and tofacitinib may represent valuable future therapies. Available medical options should be discussed with patients at every step of their management, with an honest appraisal of the evidence. Surgery should always be considered in patients with chronic refractory disease of any extent.

Moving towards disease modification in inflammatory bowel disease therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic disabling conditions. Despite the benefits of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents in improving quality of life and reducing the need for surgeries, overall only one-third of patients are in clinical remission at 1 year and loss of response is frequent. It seems clear that treatment must go beyond alleviation of symptoms in IBD. It is important that treatment targets in IBD will ensure mucosal healing and deep remission.

RECENT FINDINGS

The induction of deep remission might be the best way to alter the natural course of these diseases by preventing disability and bowel damage. New disability indices and the new Crohn's disease damage score have recently been developed and they can be used to evaluate the long-term effect on patients and as new endpoints in trials. Early intervention with disease-modifying anti-IBD drugs (DMAIDs) should be considered in patients with poor prognostic factors.

SUMMARY

New therapeutic targets in IBD patients who failed anti-TNF-α therapy are urgently required, and tofacitinib, vedolizumab and ustekinumab appear to be the most promising drugs. Herein, we review the new and current trends in IBD therapy, with the final aim of changing disease course and patients' lives by both improving quality of life and avoiding disability.

Clinical outcomes and management of inflammatory bowel disease in the older patient

The management of inflammatory bowel disease in the older patient extends beyond the gastrointestinal tract. Pre-existing comorbidities, polypharmacy, functional status and physical reserve can impact disease course, response to therapy and quality of life. Current therapeutic endpoints may not be as immediately applicable to the older IBD patient at higher risk for adverse outcomes. This review focuses on the latest studies addressing the natural history, clinical course and therapeutic outcomes among the older IBD cohort.

Use of azathioprine and the risk of cancer in inflammatory bowel disease

Increased risks of lymphoma and skin cancer associated with thiopurine use among patients with inflammatory bowel disease have been shown, but data on the overall cancer risk are limited. We conducted a historical cohort study of 45,986 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (of whom, 5,197 (11%) used azathioprine) in Denmark from 1997 to 2008. We linked registry data on filled drug prescriptions, cancer diagnoses, and covariates and compared rates of overall incident cancer and cancer subgroups between users and nonusers of azathioprine, adjusting for propensity scores. During a median 7.9 (interquartile range: 3.5-12.0) person-years of follow-up, 2,596 incident cases of cancer were detected. Azathioprine use was associated with an increased risk of overall cancer (rate ratio = 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.15, 1.74), whereas former use of azathioprine (rate ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.83, 1.25) or increasing cumulative received doses (increase in rate ratio per 365 additional defined daily doses = 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 0.89, 1.27) were not. In subgroup analyses, azathioprine use was associated with increased risk of lymphoid tissue cancer (rate ratio = 2.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.13, 5.11) and urinary tract cancer (rate ratio = 2.84, 95% confidence interval: 1.24, 6.51). In conclusion, azathioprine use was associated with an increased risk of overall cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, although these data cannot establish causality.

First-line therapy in adult Crohn's disease: who should receive anti-TNF agents?

Therapy for Crohn's disease has long been based on a step-up approach, with monoclonal antibodies against TNF as a final option before surgery. Despite the introduction of these monoclonal antibodies, no major changes have occurred in the natural history of Crohn's disease, with half of all patients still requiring intestinal resection at 10 years. Labelling for anti-TNF agents does not take into account prognostic factors. In this Review, we propose that treatment of Crohn's disease be based on the following three disease stages: mild, moderate and severe. In patients with Crohn's disease who have complicated disease or bowel damage, and with poor prognostic factors and/or severe disease, anti-TNF treatment should be considered as first-line therapy. For patients living in areas of high risk of developing tuberculosis, as well as for patients with mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease without poor prognostic factors and with uncomplicated disease, steroids and thiopurine should be the first-line therapy. By treating patients with Crohn's disease in accordance with these disease stages, we might be able to alter disease course and reduce overtreatment. Upcoming disease-modification trials are expected to provide information to guide decision-making, ultimately changing the course of disease and improving patient quality of life.

Expert opinion: Experience with 6-mercaptopurine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Arbitrarily, modern day treatment of inflammatory bowel disease begins with the introduction of immunosuppressives for ulcerative colitis. Clinical improvement with sulfasalazine had been meaningful but modest. Treatment with adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosteroids led to clinical responses never before realized but it took much too long to recognize that they were not capable of maintaining remission, that adverse reactions were subtle but potentially devastating and that some other agent would be necessary to capitalize on their transient advantage. This of course was true in the treatment of Crohn’s disease as well. Not much was ever made of the role of sulfasalazine for Crohn’s disease, but with the severing of the diazobond and the elimination of the sulphur component, the 5-aminosalacylic acid (5-ASA) products clearly led to clinical improvement, especially in cases of Crohn’s colitis and those with ileitis where the 5-ASA product was released in the terminal ileum and more proximal in the small bowel as well as in ulcerative colitis. The induction of remission was first demonstrated by 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) with case reports and uncontrolled trials in patients with ulcerative colitis, but its placebo controlled trial for Crohn’s disease firmly established its role in inducing remission. No subsequent trial has confirmed its similar role for ulcerative colitis, but nevertheless clinicians know well that 6-MP works at least as well and probably more effectively for ulcerative colitis than for Crohn’s disease. What changes have taken place utilizing 6-MP in the management of inflammatory bowel disease since its introduction in the 1960’s and 1970’s and its trial for Crohn’s disease published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1980?

Long-term outcome of patients with Crohn's disease who respond to azathioprine

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who have a complete response to therapy with azathioprine. We assessed the long-term effects of azathioprine in responders.

METHODS

We collected data from the MICISTA registry (a database from the Rothschild and Saint-Antoine Hospitals, Paris, France) on consecutive CD patients treated with azathioprine from 1987 to 1999 who responded to therapy (steroid-free clinical remission at 1 y); they were followed up until 2011 (n = 220; 86 men; median age, 32 y; median follow-up period, 12.6 y). Data were compared with those from 440 matched patients with CD who did not receive immunosuppressants during the same inclusion period (controls).

RESULTS

The cumulative rate of sustained remission 10 years after treatment with azathioprine was 38%. Among patients exposed to azathioprine during a prospective follow-up period (1995-2011, 1936 patient-years), the percentage of patient-years with active disease (flare or complication during the calendar year) was 17.6%. Compared with the control group, at baseline, responders were more often active smokers with significantly more extensive disease, perianal lesions, and extradigestive manifestations. During follow-up evaluation, responders had a significantly reduced risk of intestinal surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.91) and perianal surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.46). A significantly higher percentage of responders developed cancers, including nonmelanoma skin cancers, compared with controls (9.5% vs 4.1%; P < .01). Survival rates after 20 years were 92.8% ± 2.3% of responders vs 97.9% ± 0.8% of controls (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a study at a single center, patients with CD who responded to azathioprine had a smaller proportion of patient-years with active disease, and were less likely to be hospitalized or undergo intestinal surgery, than patients with CD who did not receive immunosuppressants. These benefits, however, could be offset by an increased risk of malignancies.

Thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease revisited

Although a great variety of new drugs have been introduced for the therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases so far, a definite cure of the disease is still out of scope. An anti-inflammatory approach to induce remission followed by maintenance therapy with immunosupressants is still the mainstay of therapy. Thiopurines comprising azathioprine and its active metabolite mercaptopurine as well as tioguanine, are widely used in the therapy of chronic active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Their steroid sparing potential and efficacy in remission maintenance are out of doubt. Unfortunately, untoward adverse events are frequently observed and may preclude further administration or be life threatening. This review will focus on new aspects of thiopurine therapy in IBD, its efficacy and safety.

Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor therapy and cancer risk in chronic immune-mediated diseases

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of cancer following tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor therapy to that with commonly used alternative therapies across multiple immune-mediated diseases.

METHODS

The Safety Assessment of Biological Therapeutics study used data from 4 sources: national Medicaid and Medicare databases, Tennessee Medicaid, pharmacy benefits plans for Medicare beneficiaries in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, and Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Propensity score-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were computed to estimate the relative rates of cancer, comparing those treated with TNFα inhibitors to those treated with alternative disease-modifying therapies. The cancer-finding algorithm had a positive predictive value ranging from 31% for any leukemia to 89% for female breast cancer.

RESULTS

We included 29,555 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (13,102 person-years), 6,357 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (1,508 person-years), 1,298 patients with psoriasis (371 person-years), and 2,498 patients with psoriatic arthritis (618 person-years). The incidence of any solid cancer was not elevated in RA (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.59-1.08]), inflammatory bowel disease (HR 1.42 [95% CI 0.47-4.26]), psoriasis (HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.10-3.31]), or psoriatic arthritis (HR 0.74 [95% CI 0.20-2.76]) during TNFα inhibitor therapy compared to disease-specific alternative therapy. Among RA patients, the incidence of any of the 10 most common cancers in the US and of nonmelanoma skin cancer was not increased with TNFα inhibitor therapy compared to treatment with comparator drugs.

CONCLUSION

Short-term cancer risk was not elevated among patients treated with TNFα inhibitor therapy relative to commonly used therapies for immune- mediated chronic inflammatory diseases in this study.

Use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease

The use of thiopurines as immunosuppression for the treatment of refractory or chronic active inflammatory bowel disease is established for both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Nevertheless, many questions remain concerning the optimal treatment regimens of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and thioguanine. We will briefly summarize dose recommendations, indications for thiopurine therapy and side effects which are relevant in clinical practice. We discuss some currently debated topics, including the combination of azathioprine and allopurinol, switching of thiopurine therapy in case of side effects, the use of azathioprine in pregnancy, the infection risk using thiopurines and the evidence when to stop thiopurines. Excellent reviews have been published on the thiopurine metabolic pathway which will not be discussed here in detail.

Recent advances using immunomodulators for inflammatory bowel disease

Use of the immunomodulators thiopurines and methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), i.e., Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC), is considered to be good clinical practice. However, despite being administered to a considerable number of IBD patients over the years, questions remain about the most rational treatment regimens of azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), and MTX, and results from a range of recent studies necessitate increased attention to how to optimize the use of these immunomodulators. First and foremost, it is of utmost importance to define the subgroup of IBD patients in need of immunomodulators, including those in need of combination therapy with biologic agents, especially because some side effects may be rather severe. Second, colorectal cancer is observed more often in IBD patients than in the background population. However, a recent nationwide Dutch study pointed to a preventive effect of thiopurines. Finally, the need for an appropriate approach to the discontinuation of immunomodulators is emphasized. Since controversy continues regarding the most appropriate use of immunomodulators, this paper is focusing on pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, and therapeutic blood testing, as well as the occurrence of adverse events, when using AZA, 6-MP, and MTX in an attempt to determine a more up-to-date and rational treatment regimen in IBD.

One-year maintenance outcomes among patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis who responded to induction therapy with adalimumab: subgroup analyses from ULTRA 2

BACKGROUND

Patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) are unlikely to continue anti-TNF therapy in the absence of early therapeutic response.

AIM

To assess week 52 efficacy, safety and benefit/risk balance of adalimumab treatment in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC failing conventional therapy who achieved clinical response at week 8 in the 52-week ULTRA 2 trial.

METHODS

Patients randomised to adalimumab (160/80 mg, week 0/2; 40 mg, every other week thereafter) in ULTRA 2 who achieved clinical response at week 8 per partial Mayo score (Mayo score without endoscopy subscore) were assessed for week 52 clinical remission, clinical response, mucosal healing, steroid-free remission and steroid discontinuation rates, overall and by prior anti-TNF use. Benefit/risk balance for the overall ITT population (regardless of week 8 responder status) was assessed using 'net efficacy adjusted for risk' (NEAR) odds ratios. Safety was assessed using adverse event rates.

RESULTS

Of 248 adalimumab-treated patients, 123 (49.6%) achieved clinical response at week 8. Of these, 30.9%, 49.6%, and 43.1% achieved clinical remission, clinical response, and mucosal healing, respectively, at week 52. Of the week 8 responders using corticosteroids at baseline (N = 90), 21.1% achieved steroid-free remission and 37.8% were steroid-free at week 52. NEAR odds ratios indicated a positive benefit/risk balance for achievement of week 8 and week 52 response or remission without serious adverse events or serious infections. No safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab treatment was associated with a positive benefit/risk balance in the overall population of patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis in ULTRA 2; early response was predictive of a positive outcome at 1 year (NCT00408629).

Relapse is almost universal after withdrawal of immunosuppressive medication in patients with autoimmune hepatitis in remission

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Current treatment strategies in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) include long-term treatment with corticosteroids and/or azathioprine. Here we determined the risk of relapse after drug withdrawal in patients in long-term remission and factors associated with such a relapse.

METHODS

A total of 131 patients (out of a cohort including 844 patients) from 7 academic and 14 regional centres in the Netherlands were identified in whom treatment was tapered after at least 2 years of clinical and biochemical remission. Relapse was defined as alanine-aminotransferase levels (ALT) three times above the upper limit of normal and loss of remission as a rising ALT necessitating the reinstitution of drug treatment.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 61 (47%) patients relapsed and 56 (42%) had a loss of remission. In these 117 patients, 60 patients had fully discontinued medication whereas 57 patients were still on a withdrawal scheme. One year after drug withdrawal, 59% of the patients required retreatment, increasing to 73% and 81% after 2 and 3 years, respectively. Previous combination therapy of corticosteroids and azathioprine, a concomitant autoimmune disease and younger age at time of drug withdrawal were associated with an increased risk of relapse. Subsequent attempts for discontinuation after initial failure in 32 patients inevitably resulted in a new relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis indicates that loss of remission or relapse occurs in virtually all patients with AIH in long-term remission when immunosuppressive therapy is discontinued. These findings indicate a reluctant attitude towards discontinuation of immunosuppressive treatment in AIH patients.

Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease is a relapsing systemic inflammatory disease, mainly affecting the gastrointestinal tract with extraintestinal manifestations and associated immune disorders. Genome wide association studies identified susceptibility loci that--triggered by environmental factors--result in a disturbed innate (ie, disturbed intestinal barrier, Paneth cell dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, defective unfolded protein response and autophagy, impaired recognition of microbes by pattern recognition receptors, such as nucleotide binding domain and Toll like receptors on dendritic cells and macrophages) and adaptive (ie, imbalance of effector and regulatory T cells and cytokines, migration and retention of leukocytes) immune response towards a diminished diversity of commensal microbiota. We discuss the epidemiology, immunobiology, amd natural history of Crohn's disease; describe new treatment goals and risk stratification of patients; and provide an evidence based rational approach to diagnosis (ie, work-up algorithm, new imaging methods [ie, enhanced endoscopy, ultrasound, MRI and CT] and biomarkers), management, evolving therapeutic targets (ie, integrins, chemokine receptors, cell-based and stem-cell-based therapies), prevention, and surveillance.

Clinical, serological and genetic predictors of inflammatory bowel disease course

Patients with extensive or complicated Crohn’s disease (CD) at diagnosis should be treated straightaway with immunosuppressive therapy according to the most recent guidelines. In patients with localized and uncomplicated CD at diagnosis, early use of immunosuppressive therapy is debated for preventing disease progression and limiting the disabling clinical impact. In this context, there is a need for predictors of benign or unfavourable subsequent clinical course, in order to avoid over-treating with risky drugs those patients who would have experienced spontaneous mid-term asymptomatic disease without progression towards irreversible intestinal lesions. At diagnosis, an age below 40 years, the presence of perianal lesions and the need for treating the first flare with steroids have been consistently associated with an unfavourable subsequent 5-year or 10-year clinical course. The positive predictive value of unfavourable course in patients with 2 or 3 predictors ranges between 0.75 and 0.95 in population-based and referral centre cohorts. Consequently, the use of these predictors can be integrated into the elements that influence individual decisions. In the CD postoperative context, keeping smoking and history of prior resection are the strongest predictors of disease symptomatic recurrence. However, these clinical predictors alone are not as reliable as severity of early postoperative endoscopic recurrence in clinical practice. In ulcerative colitis (UC), extensive colitis at diagnosis is associated with unfavourable clinical course in the first 5 to 10 years of the disease, and also with long-term colectomy and colorectal inflammation-associated colorectal cancer. In patients with extensive UC at diagnosis, a rapid step-up strategy aiming to achieve sustained deep remission should therefore be considered. At the moment, no reliable serological or genetic predictor of inflammatory bowel disease clinical course has been identified.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma in a Crohn's disease patient taking azathioprine: case report and review of the literature

Thiopurines are widely used for remission maintenance and post-operative recurrence prevention in Crohn's disease. The increased risk of cancer in transplant recipients on azathioprine is well recognized and there are concerns that this may also be true for inflammatory bowel disease patients. We report a case of a 33-year-old Caucasian woman with Crohn's disease treated with azathioprine for 9 years who developed an ulcerated lesion at the right superior retromolar trigone. Biopsy specimen revealed a squamous cell carcinoma.

Risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer among patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk for certain malignancies. We aimed to determine the risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in patients with IBD and how medications affect these risks.

METHODS

We performed retrospective cohort and nested case-control studies using administrative data from the LifeLink Health Plan Claims Database from 1997 to 2009. The cohort comprised 108,579 patients with IBD, and each was matched to 4 individuals without IBD. The risk of melanoma and NMSC was evaluated by incidence rate ratio (IRR) and by adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) modeling. In nested case-control studies, patients with melanoma or NMSC were matched to 4 patients with IBD without melanoma or NMSC. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine associations between medications and both skin cancers.

RESULTS

In the cohort, IBD was associated with an increased incidence of melanoma (IRR, 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.53). Risk was greatest among individuals with Crohn's disease (IRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.85; adjusted HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00-1.64). The incidence of NMSC also increased among patients with IBD (IRR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.40-1.53) and was greatest among those with CD (IRR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.54-1.74). In the nested case-control studies, therapy with biologics increased the risk of melanoma (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.08-3.29). Patients who had been treated with thiopurines had an increased risk of NMSC (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.66-2.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression increases the risk of melanoma and NMSC among patients with IBD. The risk of melanoma is increased by use of biologics, and the risk of NMSC is increased by use of thiopurines. Patients with IBD should be counseled and monitored for skin cancer.

Managing risks of neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been linked with a variety of intestinal and extraintestinal cancers. This review summarizes the latest literature with regard to which cancers are truly linked with IBD and which are not, the absolute and relative risks of these cancers, how medications commonly prescribed for IBD affect this risk, and finally strategies for managing these risks. Physicians and health professionals may find this information useful for counseling and educating patients as well as for improving patient care.

Immunosuppression in inflammatory bowel disease: how much is too much?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current treatment approaches favor the early introduction of immunomodulators and/or antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. There is now strong evidence showing that combination therapy appears to be more effective than monotherapy in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, there are concerns associated with this strategy, and eventually the following questions will emerge when discussing therapeutic options with our patients: is it safe to maintain these therapies for the long-term?; how long should we maintain therapy?; and if we decide to stop or de-escalate therapy, what strategy should we use?

RECENT FINDINGS

During the past year new evidence regarding safety of long-term therapy with anti-TNF and immunomodulators, and predictors of relapse following therapy discontinuation have become available.

SUMMARY

In this review we aim to discuss some of the safety concerns related to the use of immunosuppressive drugs used in inflammatory bowel disease, as well as the possible strategy for de-escalation or discontinuation therapy. Eventually, choosing to stop either the anti-TNF or the immunomodulator is a case-by-case decision based on the estimated risk-benefit ratio. In addition to the identified predictors of relapse after therapy discontinuation, other considerations such as long-term safety, cost, and natural history of the disease must be brought into this discussion.

Health maintenance in the inflammatory bowel disease patient

Gastroenterologists are in a unique position to make very positive differences in the lives of their IBD patients. We understand that IBD patients do not receive preventive services at the same rate as general medical patients. Because these individuals are at increased risk for complications from preventable diseases, we have a valuable opportunity to protect this population (Table 1). Establishing a close working relationship with PCPs can facilitate delivering quality care, but it is important to note that some of these patients rely solely on their GI clinician for the majority of their care. In such a vulnerable population, it is important to be aggressive with vaccine recommendations, monitoring for depression, tobacco cessation, and in performing the appropriate cancer screening examinations. As professional societies and health care system increase their focus on quality measures, incorporating these important issues into routine practice will ultimately result in addressing quality standards; perhaps more important, it should provide our patients with the best individual care possible.