Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency. The Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency Study Group

Treatment of hypertension with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and renal dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine whether inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reduce the incidence of renal dysfunction when compared to other antihypertensive treatments in patients with essential hypertension and no pre-existent renal disease.

METHODS

The search strategy used the Cochrane Library, Medline, previous meta-analyses, and journal reviews. The selection criteria included randomized, controlled trials of antihypertensive drugs that compared a RAS inhibitor with another treatment in essential hypertension. Studies that specifically enrolled only patients with diabetes or renal disease were not included. The quality assessment and data extraction of studies were performed by two independent reviewers. Effects on dichotomous renal outcome (serum creatinine (SCreat) higher than a prespecified value, doubling of SCreat or end-stage renal disease) and secondary continuous marker of renal outcome (change in SCreat) were calculated using Peto's method.

RESULTS

33,240 patients met the inclusion criteria for studies with a dichotomous outcome and 10,634 patients for studies with a continuous outcome. The mean follow-up was 42 ± 13 months. Patients randomized to RAS inhibitors did not show a significant reduction in the risk of developing renal dysfunction as compared to other antihypertensive strategies (odds ratio = 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.25; P = 0.54). There was no significant difference in change of SCreat between groups (mean difference = 0.0005 mg/dl; 95% CI -0.0068 to 0.0077 mg/dl; P = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

In patients with essential hypertension and no pre-existent renal disease, prevention of renal dysfunction is not significantly different with RAS inhibitors when compared to other antihypertensive agents.

Tolerating increases in the serum creatinine following aggressive treatment of chronic kidney disease, hypertension and proteinuria: pre-renal success

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) reduction in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI), commonly leads to an initial decrease in glomerular filtration rate. The current clinical guideline, based on studies with single RASIs, is to tolerate an increase in the serum creatinine only up to 30%. This guideline has aptly guided CKD care for over a decade, but should be updated in the contemporary context of more aggressive RASI and diuretic use.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of 48 mostly African-American patients with CKD treated with multiple and/or high-dose renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition and diuretics, targeting both low BP and reduction of urine protein. RASI was not reduced in response to initial increases in serum creatinine greater than 30%.

RESULTS

A clinically well-tolerated increase in serum creatinine over 30% during the first year occurred in 41% of the patients. Treatment was unaltered, and target goals for BP and urine protein were typically achieved. After the point of maximal serum creatinine in the first year, these patients had minimal progression of disease over the next 6 years, with a long-term estimated glomerular filtration rate slope of only -0.52 ml/min/year/1.73 m(2). Only 25% progressed to end-stage renal disease or death.

CONCLUSION

The 30% limitation to initial increases in the serum creatinine still pertains for single RASI at usual doses. However, favorable long-term outcomes suggest that initial increases over 30% should be tolerated in the context of dual goal-directed, more aggressive RASI and diuretic use.

Effects of 22-oxa-calcitriol on podocyte injury in adriamycin-induced nephrosis

BACKGROUND

In various animal studies, vitamin D has been shown to have a significant effect on reduction of proteinuria and the progression of kidney disease. However, little is known on its renoprotective effect in adriamycin (ADR)-induced nephrosis mice. The present study was intended to determine the therapeutic benefit of 22-oxa-calcitriol (OCT), a vitamin D analog, in reducing proteinuria and its renoprotective effect, i.e. preventing podocyte injury on ADR-induced nephrosis mice.

METHODS

Three experimental groups were used as follows: (1) nephrosis mice, established by a single intravenous injection of ADR; (2) ADR+OCT mice, nephrosis mice treated with OCT, and (3) mice treated only with OCT as the control group. Podocyte injury was assessed by podocyte apoptosis using the TUNEL assay, podocyte counting, podocyte-specific expressed protein by immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis, and foot process effacement using electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Lower proteinuria was observed in ADR+OCT mice. Improvement in glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis, and prevention of glomerular hyperfiltration were observed in ADR+OCT mice. Immunofluorescence and Western blot analyses showed restoration of downregulated expression of nephrin, CD2AP and podocin. Nevertheless, dendrin expression was not restored. An insignificant reduction in podocyte numbers was found in ADR+OCT mice. Complete foot process effacement was partially prevented in ADR+OCT mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that OCT reduces podocyte injury and has renoprotective effects in ADR nephrosis mice.

Clinical and hemodynamic effects of renin-angiotensin system blockade in cardiac transplant recipients

Chronic kidney disease continues to be a major limiting factor for long-term survival of heart transplant recipients. Little is known about the early use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blocking agents and their impact on renal function and hemodynamics in heart transplant recipients. In this cohort study all eligible recipients of orthotopic heart transplants at the UTAH cardiac transplantation program from 2001 through 2007 were divided into 2 groups-patients who were started on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers within the first 4 weeks of transplantation and continued on these for ≥4 weeks during the first 3 months (RAS blockade group, n = 75) and those who were not (non-RAS blockade group, n = 52). All patients were followed for 1 year after transplantation. There were no significant differences at baseline between the 2 groups. Estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months was significantly higher in the RAS blockade group compared to the non-RAS blockade group (mean ± SD, 56.3 ± 22.4 vs 47.3 ± 18.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2), p = 0.036). At 12 months pulmonary artery systolic pressure was significantly lower in the RAS blockade group compared to the non-RAS blockade group (30.2 ± 7.4 vs 32.9 ± 9.3 mm Hg, p = 0.023). Left ventricular ejection fraction and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, early RAS blockade after heart transplantation is safe, well tolerated, and associated with better renal function and hemodynamic profile at 1 year after transplantation.

Persistent renin-angiotensin system activation after anti-reflux surgery and its management

PURPOSE

To study renin-angiotensin system activation and the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACE-I) after anti-reflux surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty nine children underwent anti-reflux surgery for high grades of primary VUR. Plasma renin activity (PRA), urinary microalbumin, renal scars, split renal function (SRF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), serum creatinine, blood pressure and episodes of breakthrough urinary tract infection were monitored in the early (5.9 ± 3.9; range 3-9 months) and late (27.1 ± 6.5; range 15-36 months) postoperative phase, before and after therapy with ACE-I (mean period 13.6 ± 2.5; range 10-24 months).

RESULTS

The early postoperative improvement in renal parameters (rise in SRF and GFR by 11.2% and 7.3%, respectively, and fall in PRA by 68.8%), was not sustained subsequently (minimal improvement in SRF, 7.4%, and GFR, 0.14%, was accompanied by a rise in PRA by 92.3%). After ACE-I therapy, improvement was noted in SRF and GFR by 0.5% and 7.5%, respectively, and there was a fall in urinary microalbumin by 52.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant down regulation of rennin-angiotensin system activation and the accompanying improvement in renal function seen early after surgery is not sustained during follow up. ACE-I aids renal recovery.

Adherence to biochemical monitoring recommendations in patients starting with renin angiotensin system inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) are frequently involved in serious adverse events. These events principally occur in high-risk patients and often arise within the first days after treatment initiation; therefore, guidelines recommend biochemical monitoring within 3 weeks after the start of therapy with RASIs.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the level of biochemical monitoring directly after treatment initiation with RASIs in patients with different risk profiles and to study the attitudes of the physicians involved towards biochemical monitoring.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of 202 patients who started RASI therapy in 2006 in Groesbeek, the Netherlands. We determined the rate of serum creatinine and potassium monitoring within 3 weeks after the start of therapy. In addition, we studied the intentions and attitudes towards biochemical monitoring during RASI therapy among 68 general practitioners and medical specialists by way of a brief questionnaire.

RESULTS

Serum creatinine and potassium monitoring after treatment initiation was performed in 34% and 28% of patients, respectively. Of all the patients, 29% had two or more additional risk factors for renal function deterioration. In these high-risk patients, creatinine was significantly less often monitored compared with low-risk patients (22% vs 39%). In contrast to these findings, the prescribing physicians claimed to check serum creatinine within 2 weeks after treatment initiation in 85% of their patients. Most of the prescribing physicians (88%) rated this monitoring as (very) important.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that, despite positive intentions of physicians, the biochemical monitoring recommendation in patients treated with RASIs is poorly met. In addition, serum creatinine monitoring was significantly less often performed in high-risk patients compared with low-risk patients.

Automated clinical reminders for primary care providers in the care of CKD: a small cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Primary care physicians (PCPs) care for most non-dialysis-dependent patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Studies suggest that PCPs may deliver suboptimal CKD care. One means to improve PCP treatment of CKD is clinical decision support systems (CDSSs).

STUDY DESIGN

Cluster-randomized controlled trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

30 PCPs in a university-based outpatient general internal medicine practice and their 248 patients with moderate to advanced CKD who had not been referred to a nephrologist.

INTERVENTION

2 CKD educational sessions were held for PCPs in both arms. The 15 intervention-arm PCPs also received real-time automated electronic medical record alerts for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) recommending renal referral and urine albumin quantification if not done within the prior year.

OUTCOMES

Primary outcome was referral to a nephrologist; secondary outcomes were albuminuria/proteinuria assessment, CKD documentation, optimal blood pressure (ie, <130/80 mm Hg), and use of renoprotective medications.

RESULTS

The intervention and control arms did not differ in renal referrals (9.7% vs 16.5%, respectively; between-group difference, -6.8%; 95% CI, -15.5% to 1.8%; P = 0.1) or proteinuria assessments (39.3% vs 30.1%, respectively; between-group difference, 9.2%; 95% CI, -2.7% to 21.1%; P = 0.1). For intervention and control patients without a baseline proteinuria assessment, 27.7% versus 16.3%, respectively, had one at follow-up (P = 0.06). After controlling for clustering, these findings were largely unchanged and no significant differences were apparent between groups.

LIMITATIONS

Small single-center university-based practice, use of a passive CDSS that required PCPs to trigger the electronic order set.

CONCLUSIONS

PCPs were willing to partake in a randomized trial of a CDSS to improve outpatient CKD care. Although CDSSs may have potential, larger studies are needed to further explore how best to deploy them to enhance CKD care.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for adults with early (stage 1 to 3) non-diabetic chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a long term condition that occurs as a result of damage to the kidneys. Early recognition of CKD is becoming increasingly common due to widespread laboratory estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reporting, raised clinical awareness, and international adoption of Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) classification. Early recognition and management of CKD affords the opportunity not only to prepare for progressive kidney impairment and impending renal replacement therapy, but also for intervening to reduce the risk of progression and cardiovascular disease. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are two classes of antihypertensive drugs that act on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Beneficial effects of ACEi and ARB on renal outcomes and survival in people with a wide range of severity of renal impairment have been reported; however, their effectiveness in the subgroup of people with early CKD (stage 1 to 3) is less certain.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of ACEi and ARB or both in the management of people with early (stage 1 to 3) CKD who do not have diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In March 2010 we searched The Cochrane Library, including The Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE. Reference lists of review articles and relevant studies were also checked. The search was conducted using the optimally sensitive strategy developed by the Cochrane Collaboration for the identification of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with input from an expert in trial search strategy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs reporting the effect of ACEi or ARB in people with early (stage 1 to 3) CKD who did not have diabetes mellitus were selected for inclusion. Only studies of at least four weeks duration were selected. Authors, working in teams of two, independently assessed the retrieved titles and abstracts, and whenever necessary the full text of these studies were screened to determine which studies satisfied the inclusion criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction was carried out by two authors, independently, using a standard data extraction form and cross checked by two other authors. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data entry was carried out by one author and cross checked by another author. When more than one study reported similar outcomes, data were pooled using the random-effects model, but a fixed-effect model was also analysed to ensure the robustness of the model chosen and to check susceptibility to outliers. Heterogeneity was analysed using a Chi² test on N-1 degrees of freedom, with an alpha of 0.05 used for statistical significance and with the I² test. Where data permitted, subgroup analysis was used to explore possible sources of heterogeneity. The quality of the evidence was analysed.

MAIN RESULTS

Four RCTs enrolling 2177 participants met our inclusion criteria. Of these, three compared ACEi with placebo and one compared ACEi with ARB. Two studies had an overall low risk of bias, and the other two were considered to be at moderate to high risk of bias. Low to moderate quality of evidence (from two studies representing 1906 patients) suggested that ACEi had no impact on all-cause mortality (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.17 to 19.27, P = 0.63) or cardiovascular events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.14, P = 0.31) in people with stage 3 CKD. For all-cause mortality, there was substantial heterogeneity in the results. One study (quality assessment: low risk of bias) reported no difference in the risk of end-stage kidney disease in those with an eGFR > 45 mL/min/1.74 m² treated with ACEi versus placebo (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.11, P = 0.99). The (high risk of bias) study that compared ACEi with ARB reported little difference in effect between the treatments when urinary protein, blood pressure or creatinine clearance were compared. No published studies comparing ARB with placebo or ACEi and ARB with placebo were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrated that there is currently insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of ACEi or ARB in patients with stage 1 to 3 CKD who do not have diabetes mellitus. We have identified an area of significant uncertainty for a group of patients who account for most of those labelled as having CKD.

Management of patients with chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a silent disease which worsens gradually to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). US kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (KDOQI) guidelines indicate five stages of CKD based on the severity of kidney function which is assessed by estimating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. The management of CKD patients with mild renal damage (stage 1-2 KDOQI) is articulated on the reduction of proteinuria (<500 mg/day), reduction of sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (<130/80 mmHg), salt restriction diet, diuretics (furosemide, spironolactone), antihypertensive agents (ACE inhibitors or ARBs (angiotensin II receptor blockers) or both as first-line therapy), additional other antihypertensives (aliskiren, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, beta blockers), body weight reduction, cigarette smoking stopping, allopurinol therapy and non-use of some drugs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, acetaminophen, bisphosphonates, oral estrogens) and herbals. The management of CKD patients with moderate-severe renal damage (stage 3-5 KDOQI) is based on the above recommendations plus low protein diet, correction of hyperkalaemia, metabolic acidosis, and administration of vitamin D derivates and erythropoietin for the correction of mineral metabolism disorders and anemia, respectively. In conclusion, patients with CKD (stage 1-2 KDOQI) may be correctly managed by primary care physicians, individuals in stage 3-5 KDOQI need the supervision of nephrologists to assess those patients who progress to ESKD and require renal replacement therapy.

Is nocturnal blood pressure reduction the secret to reducing the rate of progression of hypertensive chronic kidney disease?

Hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease. Lowering blood pressure (BP) has been shown to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease, but randomized trials have not demonstrated a benefit of lowering BP for the progression of renal disease except in secondary analyses in patients with significant proteinuria. Recently, there has been increasing interest in measuring BP outside of the clinic, using both home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). ABPM has the advantage of measuring BP throughout both the day and night. Elevated nighttime BP and a lack of decline in BP from day to night (nondipping) are more potent risk factors for cardiovascular and renal outcomes than elevated daytime or clinic BP. Studies have shown that it is possible to lower nighttime BP and restore normal dipping with the administration of antihypertensive medications in the evening, known as chronotherapy. Evening administration of antihypertensives not only lowers nighttime BP but also is associated with decreased urinary protein excretion, decreased cardiovascular events, and decreased all-cause mortality. Reducing nighttime BP may slow the progression of chronic kidney disease and may be the key to linking the treatment of hypertension with improved renal outcomes.

Effect of combining an ACE inhibitor and a VDR activator on glomerulosclerosis, proteinuria, and renal oxidative stress in uremic rats

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors ameliorate the progression of renal disease. In combination with vitamin D receptor activators, they provide additional benefits. In the present study, uremic (U) rats were treated as follows: U+vehicle (UC), U+enalapril (UE; 25 mg/l in drinking water), U+paricalcitol (UP; 0.8 μg/kg ip, 3 × wk), or U+enalapril+paricalcitol (UEP). Despite hypertension in UP rats, proteinuria decreased by 32% vs. UC rats. Enalapril alone, or in combination with paricalcitol, further decreased proteinuria (≈70%). Glomerulosclerosis and interstitial infiltration increased in UC rats. Paricalcitol and enalapril inhibited this. The increase in cardiac atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) seen in UC rats was significantly decreased by paricalcitol. Enalapril produced a more dramatic reduction in ANP. Renal oxidative stress plays a critical role in inflammation and progression of sclerosis. The marked increase in p22(phox), a subunit of NADPH oxidase, and decrease in endothelial nitric oxide synthase were inhibited in all treated groups. Cotreatment with both compounds inhibited the uremia-induced increase in proinflammatory inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and glutathione peroxidase activity better than either compound alone. Glutathione reductase was also increased in UE and UP rats vs. UC. Kidney 4-hydroxynonenal was significantly increased in the UC group compared with the normal group. Combined treatment with both compounds significantly blunted this increase, P < 0.05, while either compound alone had no effect. Additionally, the expression of Mn-SOD was increased and CuZn-SOD decreased by uremia. This was ameliorated in all treatment groups. Cotreatment with enalapril and paricalcitol had an additive effect in increasing CuZn-SOD expression. In conclusion, like enalapril, paricalcitol alone can improve proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, and interstitial infiltration and reduce renal oxidative stress. The effects of paricalcitol may be amplified when an ACE inhibitor is added since cotreatment with both compounds seems to have an additive effect on ameliorating uremia-induced changes in iNOS and CuZn-SOD expression, peroxidase activity, and renal histomorphometry.

Metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and kidney function in non-diabetic individuals

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome has been recently identified as a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Since the five individual components of the metabolic syndrome have also been identified as risk factors for CKD, the metabolic syndrome diagnosis may represent an aggregate of CKD risk factors. On the other hand, the components of the metabolic syndrome are also associated with insulin resistance, which may directly mediate the increased CKD risk.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional evaluation of the relationship between metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 574 non-diabetic individuals. Insulin resistance was directly quantified using the insulin suppression test, and the metabolic syndrome components were measured. eGFR was calculated using the three validated estimation equations: the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation, the Mayo quadratic equation and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation.

RESULTS

While CKD prevalence was higher and mean eGFR was lower in individuals who met the metabolic syndrome criteria compared with those who did not, we did not observe a significant relationship between insulin resistance and eGFR. Of all of the components of the metabolic syndrome, only hypertension was significantly associated with CKD prevalence [odds ratio (95% confidence interval), 3.5 (1.2-10.1), P=0.02].

CONCLUSION

Although CKD is more common among individuals with the metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance is not a common factor.

Metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and kidney function in non-diabetic individuals

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome has been recently identified as a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Since the five individual components of the metabolic syndrome have also been identified as risk factors for CKD, the metabolic syndrome diagnosis may represent an aggregate of CKD risk factors. On the other hand, the components of the metabolic syndrome are also associated with insulin resistance, which may directly mediate the increased CKD risk.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional evaluation of the relationship between metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 574 non-diabetic individuals. Insulin resistance was directly quantified using the insulin suppression test, and the metabolic syndrome components were measured. eGFR was calculated using the three validated estimation equations: the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation, the Mayo quadratic equation and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation.

RESULTS

While CKD prevalence was higher and mean eGFR was lower in individuals who met the metabolic syndrome criteria compared with those who did not, we did not observe a significant relationship between insulin resistance and eGFR. Of all of the components of the metabolic syndrome, only hypertension was significantly associated with CKD prevalence [odds ratio (95% confidence interval), 3.5 (1.2-10.1), P=0.02].

CONCLUSION

Although CKD is more common among individuals with the metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance is not a common factor.

[Slowing chronic kidney disease progression: hopes and disappointments. Vascular repair of chronic kidney]

In chronic kidney disease patients, inexorable renal function decline is reduced by renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers decrease blood pressure and proteinuria. Guidelines recommend a reduction of blood pressure to less than 130/80 mmHg and urinary protein excretion below 0.5 g/d. The combined use of a diuretic increases anti-proteinuric effect and blood pressure control of RAS blockers. Drugs as mineralo-corticocoids receptor antagonist and endothelin receptor antagonists reduce further albuminuria in combination with RAS blocker, but side effects need to be precised. Both metabolic acidosis and hyperuricemia represent new therapeutic goals to slow renal function decline in CKD patients. Renal fibrosis treatment and regenerative medicine are stemming and will be important issues for kidney and other organs in the future.

Rationale for combining a direct renin inhibitor with other renin- angiotensin system blockers. Focus on aliskiren and combinations

Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system has been a highly successful therapeutic approach for the prevention of hypertension-related end organ damage. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers lower blood pressure and reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular and kidney disease. However, progression to end-stage disease remains common in these patient populations. A compensatory increase in plasma renin activity occurs with the use of either angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, thus causing increased levels of angiotensin II, which may limit the therapeutic effectiveness of these agents. The direct renin inhibitor, aliskiren, suppresses the renin-angiotensin system by inhibiting its first and rate-limiting step. This early inhibition reduces the production of all downstream components of the system. In this review, recent clinically relevant advances in the understanding of renin-angiotensin system biology are explored as a rationale for combining aliskiren with other blockers of the renin-angiotensin system. These combinations more fully inhibit the renin-angiotensin system, with the goal of providing additional therapeutic benefits in diseases associated with chronic activation of the renin-angiotensin system.

Management of heart failure with renal artery ischemia

With improved treatment, patients are surviving longer with impaired ventricular function. Hypertension results in ventricular remodeling in many patients. More than 5 million people have heart failure and are likely to have one or more co-existent diseases associated with aging, one of which is chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal artery stenosis is fraught with varying opinions. Nephrologists, cardiologists, and interventional radiologists all manage these diseases with different strategies. This article outlines renovascular disease as it relates to CKD, the pathophysiology of development of renovascular disease and effects leading to congestive heart failure, treatment modalities, and outcomes of treatment regimens.

A transdisciplinary perspective of chronic stress in relation to psychopathology throughout life span development

The allostatic load (AL) model represents an interdisciplinary approach to comprehensively conceptualize and quantify chronic stress in relation to pathologies throughout the life cycle. This article first reviews the AL model, followed by interactions among early adversity, genetics, environmental toxins, as well as distinctions among sex, gender, and sex hormones as integral antecedents of AL. We next explore perspectives on severe mental illness, dementia, and caregiving as unique human models of AL that merit future investigations in the field of developmental psychopathology. A complimenting transdisciplinary perspective is applied throughout, whereby we argue that the AL model goes beyond traditional stress–disease theories toward the advancement of person-centered research and practice that promote not only physical health but also mental health.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on cancer risk

The renin-angiotensin system is an important mediator of tumor progression and metastasis. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reported an increased risk of cancer with angiotensin receptor blockers. It is unknown whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may have a similar effect. Our primary objective was to determine the effect of ACE inhibitors on cancer occurrence and cancer death. Our secondary objective was to determine the effect of ACE inhibitors on occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers given previous concerns of increased risk. Systematic searches of SCOPUS (covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases) and the Food and Drug Administration official web site were conducted for all randomized controlled trials of ACE inhibitors. Trials with ≥1 year of follow-up and enrolling a minimum of 100 patients were included. Fourteen trials reported cancer data in 61,774 patients. This included 10 trials of 59,004 patients providing information on cancer occurrence, 7 trials of 37,515 patients for cancer death, and 5 trials including 23,291 patients for GI cancer. ACE inhibitor therapy did not have an effect on occurrence of cancer (I(2) 0%, risk ratio [RR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 1.07, p = 0.78), cancer death (I(2) 0%, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.13, p = 0.95), or GI cancer (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.35, p = 0.43). In conclusion, ACE inhibitors did not significantly increase or decrease occurrence of cancer or cancer death. There was also no significant difference in risk of GI cancer.

Therapeutic approaches in lowering albuminuria: travels along the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system pathway

Achieving optimal blood pressure and albuminuria control is a major therapeutic treatment goal in patients with renal insufficiency. Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) are the mainstay of therapy in these patients. However, despite these therapies many patients remain at high risk of renal or cardiovascular disease that shows a relationship with albuminuria. Various approaches have been tested to maximize the efficacy of ACEI and ARB. Increasing the dose of an ACEI or ARB beyond the maximal registered antihypertensive dose causes a distinct decrease in albuminuria without additional effects on blood pressure. The combination of an ACEI and ARB is another possibility to further reduce albuminuria. However, the alleged beneficial effects on hard renal and cardiovascular outcome are not unambiguously demonstrated. Adding a direct renin inhibitor to an ACEI or ARB has been shown to lower albuminuria in patients with and without diabetes. Long-term trials are currently under way to determine the effects of direct renin inhibition on clinical outcomes. Volume excess has been shown to blunt the blood pressure and albuminuria response to ACEI or ARB therapy. Intervening in volume status by means of restricting dietary sodium intake or diuretic therapy has convincingly been shown to lower blood pressure and albuminuria. Whether this strategy translates into a reduction in the risk of renal or cardiovascular events has not (yet) been investigated in prospective randomized trials. Various options are at hand which have been shown to maximize the blood pressure and albuminuria response to ACEI and ARB treatment. However, long-term studies supporting the benefits of these strategies on hard renal and cardiovascular outcomes are warranted.

Geographic differences in the increasing ESRD rate have disappeared in Japan

BACKGROUND

We previously showed that there are marked geographic differences in the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) within Japan. In addition, the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors was found to be inversely correlated with the increasing ESRD rate. It was recently demonstrated that the incidence of ESRD due to diabetic nephropathy is declining in both Europe and USA. Therefore, we investigated the increasing ESRD rate and its geographic difference in Japan.

METHODS

Each year, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy reports the numbers of patients initiating maintenance dialysis therapy in each prefecture of Japan. We used old (1984-1991) and recent (2001-2008) data to compare the increasing ESRD rate, which was estimated from the slope of the regression line of the annual incidence corrected for population, between the two periods in 11 regions of Japan.

RESULTS

Increasing ESRD rate almost halved, from 11.1 ± 5.6 to 5.4 ± 0.7/million per year from the old to the recent period. Deceleration of the increasing ESRD rate from the old to the recent period was correlated with the incidence in the old period across 11 regions (r = 0.81, p < 0.003); i.e., the deceleration was greater in the regions where ESRD incidence had been higher. Whereas the increasing ESRD rate was significantly different among regions in the old period, this was not the case in the recent period, resulting in uniformity throughout Japan.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing ESRD rate is slowing in Japan, and its geographic differences, previously observed, have disappeared.

Hypertension in chronic kidney disease: navigating the evidence

Hypertension is both an important cause and consequence of chronic kidney disease. Evidence from numerous clinical trials has demonstrated the benefit of blood pressure control. However, it remains unclear whether available results could be extrapolated to patients with chronic kidney diseases because most studies on hypertension have excluded patients with kidney failure. In addition, chronic kidney disease encompasses a large group of clinical disorders with heterogeneous natural history and pathogenesis. In this paper, we review current evidence supporting treatment of hypertension in various forms of chronic kidney disease and highlight some of the gaps in the extant literature.

Special considerations on the management of Latino patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Latinos are the largest minority population in the United States, and are characterized by higher rates of obesity and diabetes compared to Whites. The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in Latinos is two-fold higher than in Caucasians, and Latinos suffer from higher rates of diabetic complications and mortality. As the diabetes epidemic continues to expand and exert greater socioeconomic strain on national healthcare systems, the success of global and national healthcare initiatives for diabetes prevention and improvement of care will depend upon strategies targeted specifically toward this population. Essential to such strategies is an understanding of success factors unique to the Latino population for diabetes prevention and achievement of optimal treatment outcomes.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for literature describing type 2 diabetes and its complications in Latinos. Specifically, we sought data describing epidemiology, disparities, management considerations, and success factors in this population.

RESULTS

The title search yielded more than 2000 articles, 80 of which were deemed directly relevant to this review. The inherent limitations of this subjective selection process are acknowledged.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of studies have highlighted various ethnic disparities in Latinos with diabetes including higher HbA1c levels, greater rates of obesity and metabolic syndrome, and a larger proportion of individuals with inadequate access to care. While relatively fewer studies describe success factors for redressing cultural disparities in diabetes, the current body of literature supports primary care strategies aimed at effective provider-patient relationships and culturally tailored education and lifestyle modification regimens. Further research demonstrating effective, culturally tailored practices that are suitable to the primary care setting would be of value to providers treating Latinos with diabetes.

Antihypertensive and organ-protective effects of benazepril

Benazepril is a nonsulfhydryl ACE inhibitor with favorable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, well-established antihypertensive effects and a good tolerability profile. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that patients treated with benazepril alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine may achieve beneficial renal outcomes that extend beyond blood pressure control. Furthermore, the recent Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial showed decreased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality with benazepril when administered as a cotreatment. An additional novel therapeutic area for benazepril is atrial fibrillation. Differences between combination therapies have implications for which patients may be best suited to particular interventions, and further studies are required to fully ascertain this potential.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and combined therapy in patients with micro- and macroalbuminuria and other cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

A recent clinical trial showed harmful renal effects with the combined use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARB) in people with diabetes or vascular disease. We examined the benefits and risks of these agents in people with albuminuria and one or more cardiovascular risk factors.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Renal Health Library were searched for trials comparing ACEI, ARB or their combination with placebo or with one another in people with albuminuria and one or more cardiovascular risk factor.

RESULTS

Eighty-five trials (21,708 patients) were included. There was no significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality or fatal cardiac-cerebrovascular outcomes with ACEI versus placebo, ARB versus placebo, ACEI versus ARB or with combined therapy with ACEI + ARB versus monotherapy. There was a significant reduction in the risk of nonfatal cardiovascular events with ACEI versus placebo but not with ARB versus placebo, ACEI versus ARB or with combined therapy with ACEI + ARB versus monotherapy. Development of end-stage kidney disease and progression of microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria were reduced significantly with ACEI versus placebo and ARB versus placebo but not with combined therapy with ACEI + ARB versus monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ACEI and ARB exert independent renal and nonfatal cardiovascular benefits while their effects on mortality and fatal cardiovascular disease are uncertain. There is a lack of evidence to support the use of combination therapy. A comparative clinical trial with ACE, ARB and its combination in people with albuminuria and a cardiovascular risk factor is warranted.

Hypertension after kidney transplant

Hypertension in kidney transplant recipients is a major "traditional" risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Importantly, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of premature death and a major factor in death-censored graft failure in transplant recipients. The blood pressure achieved after transplant is related inversely to postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), with many patients experiencing a significant improvement in blood pressure control with fewer medications within months of surgery. However, the benefits of improved GFR and fluid status may be affected by the immunosuppression regimen. Immunosuppressive agents affect hypertension through a variety of mechanisms, including catechol- and endothelin-induced vasoconstriction, abrogation of nitric oxide-induced vasodilatation, and sodium retention. Most notable is the role of calcineurin inhibitors in promoting hypertension, cyclosporine more so than tacrolimus. Additionally, the combination of calcineurin- and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-inhibitor therapy is synergistically nephrotoxic and promotes hypertension, whereas steroid withdrawal and minimization strategies seem to have little or no impact on hypertension. Other important causes of hypertension after transplant, beyond a progressive decrease in GFR, include transplant renal artery stenosis and sequelae of antibody-mediated rejection. Calcium channel blockers may be the most useful medication for mitigating calcineurin inhibitor-induced vasoconstriction, and use of such agents may be associated with improvements in GFR. Use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, remains an attractive strategy for many transplant recipients, although some recipients may have significant adverse effects associated with these medications, including decreased GFR, hyperkalemia, and anemia. In conclusion, hypertension control affects both patient and long-term transplant survival, and its best management requires careful analysis of causes and close monitoring of therapies.

Cyclosporin A therapy for Henoch-Schönlein nephritis with nephrotic-range proteinuria

To evaluate the therapeutic role of cyclosporin A (CyA) for the treatment of Henoch-Schönlein nephritis (HSN), 29 patients (18 boys, 11 girls) with nephrotic-range proteinuria were analyzed retrospectively. Mean age was 8.6 years (range 2.0-15.5 years) at diagnosis of Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP). All patients had developed the nephrotic-range proteinuria at a mean interval of 4.4 months (range 0-50.7 months) after the diagnosis of HSP. Mean duration of CyA treatment was 12.3 months (range 2.6-55.0 months). Mean follow-up times were 3.7 years (range 1.2-12.9 years) from the beginning of the CyA treatment. Steroids were tapered off and stopped gradually after initiation of CyA. All patients responded to the CyA treatment within a mean of 1.8 months (range 1 week to 3.5 months). Twenty-three patients achieved stable remission with mean follow-up duration of 3.2 years and 6 patients seemed to become CyA-dependent, since they developed proteinuria when the treatment was stopped. Renal function was preserved in all patients but one who developed end-stage renal disease after poor compliance with CyA. We concluded that CyA treatment for HSN showing nephrotic-range proteinuria is very effective and a safe method, although some patients become CyA-dependent.

Atherosclerosis in chronic kidney disease: the role of macrophages

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and loss of renal parenchyma accelerates atherosclerosis in animal models. Macrophages are central to atherogenesis because they regulate cholesterol traffic and inflammation in the arterial wall. CKD influences macrophage behavior at multiple levels, rendering them proatherogenic. Even at normal creatinine levels, macrophages from uninephrectomized Apoe(-/-) mice are enriched in cholesterol owing to downregulation of cholesterol transporter ATP-binding cassette subfamily A member 1 levels and activation of nuclear factor κB, which leads to impaired cholesterol efflux. Interestingly, treatment with an angiotensin-II-receptor blocker (ARB) improves these effects. Moreover, atherosclerotic aortas from Apoe(-/-) mice transplanted into renal-ablated normocholesterolemic recipients show plaque progression and increased macrophage content instead of the substantial regression seen in recipient mice with intact kidneys. ARBs reduce atherosclerosis development in mice with partial renal ablation. These results, combined with the clinical benefits of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and ARBs in patients with CKD, suggest an important role for the angiotensin system in the enhanced susceptibility to atherosclerosis seen across the spectrum of CKD. The role of macrophages could explain why these therapies may be effective in end-stage renal disease, one of the few conditions in which statins show no clinical benefit.

Antihypertensive drugs and risk of cancer: network meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 324,168 participants from randomised trials

BACKGROUND

The risk of cancer from antihypertensive drugs has been much debated, with a recent analysis showing increased risk with angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs). We assessed the association between antihypertensive drugs and cancer risk in a comprehensive analysis of data from randomised clinical trials.

METHODS

We undertook traditional direct comparison meta-analyses, multiple comparisons (network) meta-analyses, and trial sequential analyses. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1950, to August, 2010, for randomised clinical trials of antihypertensive therapy (ARBs, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors [ACEi], β blockers, calcium-channel blockers [CCBs], or diuretics) with follow-up of at least 1 year. Our primary outcomes were cancer and cancer-related deaths.

FINDINGS

We identified 70 randomised controlled trials (148 comparator groups) with 324,168 participants. In the network meta-analysis (fixed-effect model), we recorded no difference in the risk of cancer with ARBs (proportion with cancer 2·04%; odds ratio 1·01, 95% CI 0·93-1·09), ACEi (2·03%; 1·00, 0·92-1·09), β blockers (1·97%; 0·97, 0·88-1·07), CCBs (2·11%; 1·05, 0·96-1·13), diuretics (2·02%; 1·00, 0·90-1·11), or other controls (1·95%, 0·97, 0·74-1·24) versus placebo (2·02%). There was an increased risk with the combination of ACEi plus ARBs (2·30%, 1·14, 1·02-1·28); however, this risk was not apparent in the random-effects model (odds ratio 1·15, 95% CI 0·92-1·38). No differences were detected in cancer-related mortality for ARBs (death rate 1·33%; odds ratio 1·00, 95% CI 0·87-1·15), ACEi (1·25%; 0·95, 0·81-1·10), β blockers (1·23%; 0·93, 0·80-1·08), CCBs (1·27%; 0·96, 0·82-1·11), diuretics (1·30%; 0·98, 0·84-1·13), other controls (1·43%; 1·08, 0·78-1·46), and ACEi plus ARBs (1·45%; 1·10, 0·90-1·32). In direct comparison meta-analyses, similar results were recorded for all antihypertensive classes, except for an increased risk of cancer with ACEi and ARB combination (OR 1·14, 95% CI 1·04-1·24; p=0·004) and with CCBs (1·06, 1·01-1·12; p=0·02). However, we noted no significant differences in cancer-related mortality. On the basis of trial sequential analysis, our results suggest no evidence of even a 5-10% relative risk (RR) increase of cancer and cancer-related deaths with any individual class of antihypertensive drugs studied. However, for the ACEi and ARB combination, the cumulative Z curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary, suggesting firm evidence for at least a 10% RR increase in cancer risk.

INTERPRETATION

Our analysis refutes a 5·0-10·0% relative increase in the risk of cancer or cancer-related death with the use of ARBs, ACEi, β blockers, diuretics, and CCBs. However, increased risk of cancer with the combination of ACEi and ARBs cannot be ruled out.

Resistive index predicts renal prognosis in chronic kidney disease: results of a 4-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

While the clinical validity of Doppler ultrasonography in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is still controversial, we have shown in a 2-year follow-up study that the resistive index (RI) could estimate renal prognosis in CKD. The purpose of the present study is to determine whether RI could predict long-term renal prognosis in CKD.

METHODS

We performed a 4-year follow-up study with an observational cohort of 281 CKD patients (GFR 51 ± 31 ml/min/1.73 m(2), age 54 ± 17 years). The patients were examined by Doppler ultrasonography for RI [(peak-systolic velocity--end-diastolic velocity)/peak-systolic velocity] to be calculated. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated with the revised Japanese equation. Worsening renal function was defined as a decrease in GFR of at least 20 ml/min/1.73 m(2) or the need for long-term dialysis therapy until the end of the 4-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Among the 281 CKD patients, 89 patients presented with worsening renal function during the 4-year follow-up. When we divided the patients into two groups by RI value of 0.70, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the event-free rates of worsening renal function at 48 months were 0.86 and 0.37 in patients with RI ≤ 0.70 and RI > 0.70, respectively (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Cox proportional-hazard analysis identified overt proteinuria (≥ 1.0 g/g creatinine), high RI (>0.70), low GFR (<50 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and high systolic blood pressure (≥ 140 mmHg) as independent predictors of worsening renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that high RI as well as proteinuria, low GFR, and hypertension were independent risk factors for the progression of CKD in the 4-year follow-up.

Application of direct renin inhibition to chronic kidney disease

Purpose

Chronic kidney disease has serious implications with a high risk for progressive loss of renal function, increased cardiovascular events as well as a substantial financial burden. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is activated in chronic kidney disease, especially in diabetes and hypertension, which are the leading causes of chronic kidney disease. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) decrease the rate of progression of diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy and are recommended therapy for chronic kidney disease.

Methods

Key clinical trials supporting the use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in chronic kidney disease are discussed. Recent developments in our understanding of RAAS biology and the use of direct renin inhibition are reviewed in the context of their potential impact on the prevention and management of chronic kidney disease.

Results

Despite the clinical success of ACE inhibitors and ARBs the rates of mortality and progression to renal failure remain high in these patient populations. ACE inhibitor or ARB monotherapy, in doses commonly used in clinical practice does not result in complete suppression of the RAAS. Aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor, offers a novel approach to inhibit the RAAS in chronic kidney disease.

Conclusions

High dose ARB therapy or combination therapies with ACE inhibitors and ARBs have shown beneficial effects on surrogate markers of chronic kidney disease. Early data based on urinary protein excretion rates as a surrogate marker for renal function suggest a possibly novel role for aliskiren alone or in combination with ARBs in chronic kidney disease.

Doubling of serum creatinine: is it appropriate as the endpoint for CKD? Proposal of a new surrogate endpoint based on the reciprocal of serum creatinine

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of the progression of renal insufficiency, or decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), has been approached more simply and precisely by converting measured serum creatinine value into the reciprocal of serum creatinine, estimated GFR, or other parameters. Doubling of serum creatinine (simple doubling) is conveniently used as a surrogate endpoint for progression of renal disease but is thought to be biased unfairly by the initial value of serum creatinine (Scr(Int)). We proposed the definite decline in the reciprocal of serum creatinine (2-4 doubling) as a surrogate endpoint, comparing simple doubling with this new endpoint to verify the effect of Scr(Int) on the endpoint.

METHODS

For the purpose of comparison between endpoints, 194 patients in a historical cohort of chronic glomerulonephritis were investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with the composite endpoint of need for dialysis and either simple doubling or 2-4 doubling. Then, the distribution of Scr(Int) was compared between total patients and patients developing each endpoint.

RESULTS

The endpoint value of serum creatinine (Scr(End)) with 2-4 doubling was lower than that with simple doubling at Scr(Int) <2.00 mg/dl, and the difference of Scr(End) between simple doubling and 2-4 doubling was larger, as Scr(Int) became lower. In patients reaching simple doubling, Scr(Int) was higher than that of the total patients (1.66 vs. 1.07 mg/dl in median, respectively; p < 0.001). In patients reaching 2-4 doubling, there was no significant difference in Scr(Int).

CONCLUSION

Patients with low serum creatinine concentration at baseline had a tendency of prolonged development into simple doubling. In contrast, with 2-4 doubling, there was no bias of Scr(Int).

Population based screening for chronic kidney disease: cost effectiveness study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost effectiveness of one-off population based screening for chronic kidney disease based on estimated glomerular filtration rate.

DESIGN

Cost utility analysis of screening with estimated glomerular filtration rate alone compared with no screening (with allowance for incidental finding of cases of chronic kidney disease). Analyses were stratified by age, diabetes, and the presence or absence of proteinuria. Scenario and sensitivity analyses, including probabilistic sensitivity analysis, were performed. Costs were estimated in all adults and in subgroups defined by age, diabetes, and hypertension.

SETTING

Publicly funded Canadian healthcare system.

PARTICIPANTS

Large population based laboratory cohort used to estimate mortality rates and incidence of end stage renal disease for patients with chronic kidney disease over a five year follow-up period. Patients had not previously undergone assessment of glomerular filtration rate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Lifetime costs, end stage renal disease, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, and incremental cost per QALY gained.

RESULTS

Compared with no screening, population based screening for chronic kidney disease was associated with an incremental cost of $C463 (Canadian dollars in 2009; equivalent to about £275, €308, US $382) and a gain of 0.0044 QALYs per patient overall, representing a cost per QALY gained of $C104 900. In a cohort of 100 000 people, screening for chronic kidney disease would be expected to reduce the number of people who develop end stage renal disease over their lifetime from 675 to 657. In subgroups of people with and without diabetes, the cost per QALY gained was $C22 600 and $C572 000, respectively. In a cohort of 100 000 people with diabetes, screening would be expected to reduce the number of people who develop end stage renal disease over their lifetime from 1796 to 1741. In people without diabetes with and without hypertension, the cost per QALY gained was $C334 000 and $C1 411 100, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Population based screening for chronic kidney disease with assessment of estimated glomerular filtration rate is not cost effective overall or in subgroups of people with hypertension or older people. Targeted screening of people with diabetes is associated with a cost per QALY that is similar to that accepted in other interventions funded by public healthcare systems.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor associated cough: deceptive information from the Physicians' Desk Reference

BACKGROUND

Dry cough is a common, annoying adverse effect of all angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. The present study was designed to compare the rate of coughs reported in the literature with reported rates in the Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR)/drug label.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE/EMBASE/CENTRAL for articles published from 1990 to the present about randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ACE inhibitors with a sample size of at least 100 patients in the ACE inhibitors arm with follow-up for at least 3 months and reporting the incidence or withdrawal rates due to cough. Baseline characteristics, cohort enrolled, metrics used to assess cough, incidence, and withdrawal rates due to cough were abstracted.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five studies that satisfied our inclusion criteria enrolled 198,130 patients. The pooled weighted incidence of cough for enalapril was 11.48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.54% to 13.41%), which was ninefold greater compared to the reported rate in the PDR/drug label (1.3%). The pooled weighted withdrawal rate due to cough for enalapril was 2.57% (95% CI, 2.40-2.74), which was 31-fold greater compared to the reported rate in the PDR/drug label (0.1%). The incidence of cough has increased progressively over the last 2 decades with accumulating data, but it has been reported consistently several-fold less in the PDR compared to the RCTs. The results were similar for most other ACE inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ACE inhibitor-associated cough and the withdrawal rate (the more objective metric) due to cough is significantly greater in the literature than reported in the PDR/drug label and is likely to be even greater in the real world when compared with the data from RCTs. There exists a gap between the data available from the literature and that which is presented to the consumers (prescribing physicians and patients).