Montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, for the treatment of mild asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Inhaled budesonide inhibits OVA-induced airway narrowing, inflammation, and cys-LT synthesis in BN rats

The objective of the present investigation was to examine the effects of an inhaled glucocorticoid, budesonide, on antigen-induced production of cysteinyl leukotrienes (cys-LTs) and pulmonary inflammatory cell infiltration in the Brown Norway rat, an animal model of asthma. Two weeks after sensitization to ovalbumin, rats were treated with budesonide (2.5 mg/kg) 18 and 1 h before challenge with antigen. Budesonide abolished the late response to ovalbumin (P<0.02) and strongly inhibited the in vivo synthesis of N-acetyl-leukotriene E(4), an indicator of cys-LT synthesis, during this period (P<0.005). Both total bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells (P<0.01) and BAL macrophages (P<0.005) were markedly reduced to approximately 25% of their control levels after treatment with budesonide. It can be concluded that inhibition of the antigen-induced late response in Brown Norway rats by budesonide is associated with reductions in both BAL macrophages and cys-LT synthesis. It is possible that the effect of budesonide on cys-LT synthesis is related to its effects on pulmonary macrophages.

Allergy and asthma in elite summer sport athletes

Exercise may increase ventilation up to 200 L/min for short periods of time in speed and power athletes, and for longer periods in endurance athletes, such as long-distance runners and swimmers. Therefore highly trained athletes are repeatedly and strongly exposed to cold air during winter training and to many pollen allergens in spring and summer. Competitive swimmers inhale and microaspirate large amounts of air that floats above the water surface, which means exposure to chlorine derivatives from swimming pool disinfectants. In the summer Olympic Games, 4% to 15% of the athletes showed evidence of asthma or used antiasthmatic medication. Asthma is most commonly found in endurance events, such as cycling, swimming, or long-distance running. The risk of asthma is especially increased among competitive swimmers, of which 36% to 79% show bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine or histamine. The risk of asthma is closely associated with atopy and its severity among athletes. A few studies have investigated occurrence of exercise-induced bronchospasm among highly trained athletes. The occurrences of exercise-induced bronchospasm vary from 3% to 35% and depend on testing environment, type of exercise used, and athlete population tested. Mild eosinophilic airway inflammation has been shown to affect elite swimmers and cross-country skiers. This eosinophilic inflammation correlates with clinical parameters (ie, exercise-induced bronchial symptoms and bronchial hyperresponsiveness). Athletes commonly use antiasthmatic medication to treat their exercise-induced bronchial symptoms. However, controlled studies on their long-term effects on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation in the athletes are lacking. Follow-up studies on asthma in athletes are also lacking. What will happen to bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation after discontinuation of competitional career is unclear. In the future, follow-up studies on bronchial responsiveness and airway inflammation, as well as controlled studies on both short- and long-term effects of antiasthmatic drugs in the athletes are needed.

Antileukotriene drugs in childhood asthma: what is their place in therapy?

Leukotriene antagonists are a new class of anti-inflammatory drugs which have shown clinical efficacy in the management of asthma. However, their role in paediatric asthma is still unclear. In essence, while there are theoretical reasons as to why leukotriene antagonists would be of use in the management of childhood asthma, there is little clinical data on their use in this patient group. Studies with leukotriene antagonists to date have been performed in children with chronic 'undertreated' asthma which, under current recommendations, should be treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Furthermore, the magnitude of effect of leukotriene antagonists on lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second of less than 5% better than placebo) and daily symptoms (0.23 puffs per day of B2 agonist less than placebo), while reaching statistical significance, is unlikely to be of clinical significance in children with chronic undertreated asthma. There is, however, good evidence for leukotriene antagonist use in exercise induced asthma in children. We conclude that although leukotriene antagonists may play an important role in the management of childhood asthma in the future, particularly as corticosteroid sparing agents and in exercise induced asthma, clinical data in paediatric asthma is poor.

Montelukast adult (10-mg film-coated tablet) and pediatric (5-mg chewable tablet) dose selections

Montelukast is a selective leukotriene receptor antagonist that has been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic asthma. It is approved in more than 70 countries for patients 6 years of age and older. For adults (> or = 15 years of age), a 10-mg film-coated tablet (FCT) is available, and for children (aged 6 to 14 years), a 5-mg chewable tablet (CT) is available. The adult montelukast dose (10-mg FCT) was selected on the basis of classic dose-ranging studies as the lowest dose that produces maximal improvement in both measures of airway function and patient-reported outcomes in chronic asthma and in the attenuation of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The strategy used for the pediatric dose selection for montelukast was based on the determination of a CT dose that would provide an overall systemic exposure to montelukast in children similar to that in adults who receive a 10-mg FCT dose. Because montelukast was to be given chronically for the treatment of asthma, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was considered to be the pharmacokinetic measurement that best represented systemic exposure to the drug. A 5-mg CT yielded a comparable single-dose area under the plasma concentration-time curve profile to that of the adult 10-mg FCT dose and, therefore, was selected as the pediatric dose for children aged 6 to 14 years with asthma. Subsequently, 2 studies of efficacy and tolerability validated the choice of the 5-mg CT dose.

Exercise-induced asthma: is it the right diagnosis in elite athletes?

Exercise-induced asthma, as recognized in asthmatic subjects, is an exaggerated airway response to airway dehydration in the presence of inflammatory cells and their mediators. The airway narrowing is primarily caused by contraction of bronchial smooth muscle. The milder airway narrowing documented in response to exercise in elite athletes and otherwise healthy subjects may simply be the result of the physiologic responses and pathologic changes in airway cells arising from dehydration injury. These changes, which include excessive mucus production and airway edema, would serve both to cause cough and to amplify the narrowing effects of normal bronchial smooth muscle contraction, resulting in symptoms. These changes are more likely to occur in healthy subjects who exercise intensely for long periods of time breathing cold air, dry air, or both. Under these conditions, the ability to humidify inspired air may be overwhelmed, causing significant dehydration of the airway mucosa and an increase in osmolarity, even in small airways. In addition to dehydration injury, airway narrowing to pharmacologic and physical agents may occur as a result of injury caused by large volumes of air containing irritant gases, particulate matter, or allergens being inspired during exercise. As a result, the airways may become inflamed, and the airway smooth muscle may become more sensitive. These events could result in the same exaggerated airway response to dehydration, as documented in asthmatic subjects.

Comparative effects of long-acting beta2-agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor on exercise-induced asthma

BACKGROUND

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) is a common problem that can be controlled with long-acting beta-agonists and leukotriene-modifying compounds. There is, however, limited information on the comparative effectiveness of the two classes of drugs, as well as the relative potencies of the antileukotriene agents.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to provide data on the above issues.

METHODS

We performed a random-order, blinded, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial in 10 patients with EIA. Each subject received standard single doses of salmeterol, montelukast, zafirlukast, zileuton, and placebo on separate days. The participants performed 4 minutes of cycle ergometry while breathing frigid air 1, 4, 8, and 12 hours after administration of the test agents. The primary endpoint was the extent of the decrement in the FEV(1) 10 minutes after exertion.

RESULTS

With placebo, symptomatic airway narrowing developed at all times (mean +/- SE decrease in FEV(1) ranged between 21% +/- 5% and 26% +/- 5%). Salmeterol acted quickly and significantly blunted the obstructive response for 12 hours (DeltaFEV(1) first hour: 8% +/- 3%; DeltaFEV(1) twelfth hour: 8% +/- 3%; P <.0001 vs placebo and P =.72 vs time). The leukotriene-modifying agents produced effects within 1 hour of ingestion. Like salmeterol, montelukast and zafirlukast also offered long-lasting protection, and there were no significant differences between them (montelukast DeltaFEV(1) twelfth hour: 9% +/- 4%; zafirlukast DeltaFEV(1) twelfth hour: 11% +/- 2%; P =.75) or the beta(2)-agonist (montelukast vs salmeterol: P =.72; zafirlukast vs salmeterol: P =.48). Zileuton provided equivalent prophylaxis for the first 4 hours (DeltaFEV(1) fourth hour: 11% +/- 2%); however, by 8 hours, it was less efficacious than all of the other active compounds, and by 12 hours it did not differ from placebo (DeltaFEV(1) twelfth hour: 19% +/- 4%; P =.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Single doses of the currently available leukotriene receptor antagonists provide prompt effective and persistent defense against EIA that equals that seen with a long-acting beta(2)-agonist. The synthesis inhibitor zileuton affords a comparable magnitude of prophylaxis but has a considerably shorter duration of action.

[Role of leukotriene inhibitors in the treatment of childhood asthma]

Leukotriene inhibitors are new pharmacological agents for the treatment of mild to moderate persistent asthma and exercise-induced asthma (EIA). Studies concerning their use in children remain scarce. Available data in the treatment of persistent asthma in children suggest that they could be an alternative to long-acting beta 2-agonists when asthma control cannot be obtained with inhaled steroids alone. Their main advantages are first that they are given orally once daily; second, that they do not induce tachyphylaxis to bronchoprotection against EIA, unlike long-acting beta 2-agonists. Studies specifically conducted in children are necessary to best describe their place in pediatric asthma treatment.

Zafirlukast improves asthma control in patients receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids

Not all asthma can be adequately controlled, despite the use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Because cysteinyl-leukotrienes (Cys-LT) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma, we hypothesized that the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast, in combination with high-doses of inhaled corticosteroids, might be efficacious in severe asthma. In a double-blind, parallel group study, 368 chronic adult asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids (1,000 to 4,000 microgram/d), who had a predefined level of asthma symptoms during the run in period of the study, were randomly assigned to receive additional treatment with a high dose of zafirlukast (80 mg twice daily) (n = 180) or placebo (n = 188) for 6 wk. Compared with placebo, zafirlukast produced a significant improvement over baseline in the primary study endpoint of mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (18.7 L/min versus 1.5 L/min, p < 0.001), as well as in evening PEFR (p < 0.01), FEV(1) (p < 0.05), daytime symptom score (p < 0.001), and beta(2)-agonist use (p < 0.001). Furthermore, zafirlukast significantly reduced the risk of an exacerbation of asthma (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 0.99) and the risk of patients requiring a further increase in asthma controller therapy (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.8). In conclusion, in patients taking high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, zafirlukast improves pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, and reduces the risk of an asthma exacerbation, suggesting that the contribution of leukotrienes to asthma symptoms and exacerbations is not adequately controlled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

Effects of adding a leukotriene antagonist or a long-acting beta(2)-agonist in asthmatic patients with the glycine-16 beta(2)-adrenoceptor genotype

PURPOSE

In the United Kingdom, about 40% of patients with asthma are homozygous for the glycine-16 beta(2)-adrenoceptor polymorphism, which predisposes them to agonist-induced down-regulation and desensitization of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor. We assessed the effects of adding treatment with either a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (inhaled formoterol, 12 microg twice daily) or a leukotriene receptor antagonist (oral zafirlukast, 20 mg twice daily) to inhaled corticosteroid therapy in patients with this genotype.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 24 patients with mild to moderate asthma who were being treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments (placebo, zafirlukast, or formoterol in addition to inhaled corticosteroids) for 1 week each in a crossover fashion, separated by a 1-week placebo run-in and washout period. Measurements of bronchoprotection (measured as the provocative dose of methacholine that produced a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)]), exhaled nitric oxide (a surrogate marker of airway inflammation), and symptoms were made before each treatment and 12 hours after the last dose of each treatment.

RESULTS

Both formoterol and zafirlukast were equally effective in maintaining asthma control compared with placebo: the geometric mean-fold difference in the methacholine provocative dose was 1.5-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1- to 2.2-fold) for zafirlukast and 1.9-fold (95% CI: 1.2- to 2.9-fold) for formoterol. As compared with placebo, zafirlukast caused a significant suppression in exhaled nitric oxide (1.7-fold difference in geometric mean values, 95% CI: 1.1- to 2.6-fold) but formoterol did not (1.2-fold difference, 95% CI: 0.8- to 1.9-fold). Diary cards showed significant (P <0.05) improvements in the peak flow with formoterol (morning and evening) and zafirlukast (evening) as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Formoterol and zafirlukast maintained asthma control in patients who might be genetically predisposed to fare worse with long-acting beta(2)-agonists. The reduction in exhaled nitric oxide with zafirlukast suggests that it may have anti-inflammatory effects in addition to those seen with inhaled corticosteroids.

Role of leukotrienes in asthma pathophysiology

Inflammation is an essential component of asthma pathophysiology. While beta(2)-agonists are often used for short-term relief of acute bronchospasm, anti-inflammatory agents are required for the long-term management of chronic inflammation in this disease. Corticosteroids have emerged as the first-line anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma management. However, in some patients, especially children, the high doses of corticosteroids that may be required to control features of hyperresponsiveness, including exercise-induced asthma, raise safety concerns. Thus, there is a need for complementary anti-inflammatory, steroid-sparing agents in asthma therapy. Several inflammatory mediators have been targeted in an attempt to thwart this inflammatory process, but so far with little success. The cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLT), LTC(4), LTD(4), and LTE(4), have been shown to be essential mediators in asthma, making them obvious targets for therapy. These cysteinyl leukotrienes, previously known as the slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A), mediate many of the features of asthma, including bronchial constriction, bronchial hyperreactivity, edema, and eosinophilia. Data show that selective cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonists (CysLTRAs) effectively reverse these pathologic changes. Corticosteroids do not inhibit the production of CysLTs in vivo, suggesting that CysLTRAs and corticosteroids affect different targets. The bronchodilator properties of CysLTRAs seem to be additive to those of beta(2)-agonists and corticosteroids. These data suggest that CysLTs are important therapeutic targets in the management of inflammation in asthma.

Effect of pranlukast on bronchial inflammation in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Pranlukast (8-[p-(4-phenylbutyloxy) benzol] amino-2-[tetrazol-5-yl]-4-oxo-4H-1-benzopyran hemihydrate), a selective cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, has been reported to exhibit not only antileukotrine activity but also pharmacological activity including antieosinophilic effects.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate whether the antiasthmatic activity of pranlukast is associated with a reduction in eosinophilic inflammation.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, crossover design was used. Subjects received 225 mg of pranlukast or placebo orally twice daily for 4 weeks and then, after a washout period of at least 4 weeks, crossed over to receive the alternative treatment. We assessed the effects of pretreatment with pranlukast on bronchoconstriction precipitated by inhalation of methacholine in 32 adult patients with mild or moderate bronchial asthma; those who were in stable clinical condition were allocated to this study. Blood and sputum samples were taken the morning of the methacholine provocation test. Eosinophil counts and measurement of eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) were performed.

RESULTS

After the 4 weeks of treatment with pranlukast, patients' symptoms, blood eosinophils, serum ECP, sputum eosinophils, and sputum ECP were significantly decreased. Furthermore, values of PC20-methacholine significantly improved in the treatment with pranlukast.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that pranlukast has an anti-inflammatory effect on bronchial eosinophilic infiltration. This study raises further interesting therapeutic possibilities and argues for further trials of new approaches to the treatment of bronchial asthma.

Current treatment of asthma--focus on leukotrienes

Since their identification in 1979, the cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) have been shown to be prominent in many inflammatory conditions, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, cystic fibrosis and inflammatory bowel disease. They are potent pro-inflammatory agents, as well as causing bronchoconstriction, and undoubtedly have a role in asthma. The cysLTs are products of arachidonic acid metabolism and have been shown to have effects via a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor (CysLTR1) on vascular permeability, mucus production, chemotaxis and bronchial smooth muscle. Their detection in certain body fluids in allergic, aspirin-sensitive and exercise-induced asthma is well documented and potential roles in pathogenesis, proposed. The development of agents affecting production or action offers an exciting new approach to the treatment of asthma. Two approaches to antileukotriene therapy have been developed: blocking their production by inhibiting the action of 5-lipoxygenase enzyme or blocking the CysLTR1. Both approaches have been tried in studies in asthma and overall the results are encouraging, with a decrease in both daytime and nocturnal symptoms, a decrease in additional beta 2 agonist usage and improvement in lung function. The changes, however, are small in some studies. This may be a reflection of disease severity in the study subjects, but of note is a heterogeneity of response to these treatments that may be genetically determined. Antileukotriene therapy has been shown to have an effect in specific types of asthma where the role of cysLTs seems well established--aspirin-sensitive/intolerant asthma and exercise-induced asthma. Longer term studies are needed in other areas such as severe asthma and chronic persistent asthma in both children and adults to provide evidence for the appropriate placement of antileukotriene treatment in current asthma guidelines, in comparison with other established treatments.

Bronchoprotection with a leukotriene receptor antagonist in asthmatic preschool children

We hypothesized that a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) could provide bronchoprotection against the cold, dry air-induced response in asthmatic preschool children. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, we examined the effect of the specific LTRA montelukast at 5 mg/d for 2 d on the bronchoconstriction induced by hyperventilation of cold, dry air in 13 asthmatic children 3 to 5 yr old. The bronchoconstriction was measured as the specific airway resistance (sRaw) in a whole-body plethysmograph before and 4 min after challenge with cold, dry air. The repeatability of the bronchoprotection was examined by repeating the placebo-controlled study in six of the 13 children. sRaw increased by an average of 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30 to 63%) after placebo treatment and 17% (95% CI: 3 to 31%) after montelukast (p < 0.01). Eight of the children were receiving regular treatment with budesonide delivered by an inhaler with a spacer in a mean daily dose of 350 microg, but the bronchoprotection provided by montelukast was independent of concurrent steroid treatment. There was no convincing evidence of failure to respond, and the protective effect of montelukast was consistent upon repeated testing (p = 0. 02). We conclude that the LTRA montelukast provided clinically significant bronchoprotection against the effect of hyperventilation of cold dry air in asthmatic children 3 to 5 yr old. The bronchoprotection appeared to be homogeneous among the children, and seemed independent of steroid treatment. This suggests that LTRAs may be of therapeutic use in limiting clinical symptoms of asthma in young children.

Update in internal medicine

More than 500,000 new medical articles are published every year and available time to keep updated is scarcer every day. Nowadays, the task of selecting useful, consistent, and relevant information for clinicians is a priority in many major medical journals. This review has the aim of gathering the results of the most important findings in clinical medicine in the last few years. It is focused on results from randomized clinical trials and well-designed observational research. Findings were included preferentially if they showed solid results, and we avoided as much as possible including only preliminary data, or results that included only non-clinical outcomes. Some of the most relevant findings reported here include the significant benefit of statins in patients with coronary artery disease even with mean cholesterol level. It also provides a substantial review of the most significant trials assessing the effectiveness of IIb/IIIa receptor blockers. In gastroenterology many advances have been made in the H. pylori eradication, and the finding that the cure of H. pylori infection may be followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease. Some new antivirals have shown encouraging results in patients with chronic hepatitis. In the infectious disease arena, the late breaking trials in anti-retroviral disease are discussed, as well as the new trends regarding antibiotic resistance. This review approaches also the role of leukotriene modifiers in the treatment of asthma and discusses the benefit of using methylprednisolone in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome, among many other advances in internal medicine.

State of the art: therapeutic controversies in severe acute asthma

This is a transcript of the 1999 SAEM State-of-the-Art session on "Therapeutic Controversies in Severe Acute Asthma," presented at the 1999 SAEM annual meeting in Boston. The aim of this session was to address some of the current controversies in the management of acute asthma exacerbations, a major issue in emergency medicine. Despite many recent advances in asthma management, morbidity and mortality remain high. While many of us have strong feelings on how asthma patients should be treated, many of our assertions are not based on good science, and there are numerous areas of controversy. This discussion focuses on the controversy over beta agonist treatment for acute asthma, the physiology of corticosteroids in asthma, and the emergency use of leukotriene-modifying agents.

Advances in medical management of asthma, headaches, and fatigue

The 1990s in medicine have been characterized by the development of various clinical guidelines to assist in the diagnosis, classification, and management of common disorders. Among the most frequent presenting complaints of adolescent patients are asthma, headaches, and fatique. In an era of managed care and brief clinical encounters, application of standardized guidelines, modified appropriately for adolescents, is likely to improve clinical outcomes, including patient and parent satisfaction. In each of these disorders, engaging the adolescent patient as a partner in planning and implementing management is crucial to success.

Montelukast or salmeterol combined with an inhaled steroid in adult asthma: design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind comparative study (the IMPACT Investigation of Montelukast as a Partner Agent for Complementary Therapy-trial)

Asthma patients who continue to experience symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids represent a management challenge. Leukotrienes play a key role in asthma pathophysiology, and since pro-inflammatory leukotrienes are poorly suppressed by corticosteroids it seems rational to add a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) when a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids does not provide sufficient disease control. Long acting beta2-agonist (LABA) treatment represents an alternative to LTRAs and both treatment modalities have been shown to provide additional disease control when added to corticosteroid treatment. To compare the relative clinical benefits of adding either a LTRA or a LABA to asthma patients inadequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids, a randomized, double-blind, multi-centre, 48-week study will be initiated at approximately 120 centres throughout Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa and the Asia-Pacific region in early 2000. The study will compare the oral LTRA montelukast with the inhaled LABA salmeterol, each administered on a background of inhaled fluticasone, on asthma attacks, quality of life, lung function, eosinophil levels, healthcare utilization, and safety, in approximately 1200 adult asthmatic patients. The requirements for study enrollment include a history of asthma, FEV1 or PEFR values between 50% and 90% of the predicted value together with > or = 12% improvement in FEV1 after beta-agonist administration, a minimum pre-determined level of asthma symptoms and daily beta-agonist medication. The study will include a 4-week run-in period, during which patients previously taking inhaled corticosteroids are switched to open-label fluticasone (200 microg daily), followed by a 48-week double-blind, treatment period in which patients continuing to experience abnormal pulmonary function and daytime symptoms are randomized to receive montelukast (10 mg once daily) and salmeterol placebo, or inhaled salmeterol (100 microg daily) and montelukast placebo. All patients will continue with inhaled fluticasone (200 microg daily). During the study, asthma attacks, overnight asthma symptoms, and morning peak expiratory flow rate will be assessed using patient diary cards; quality of life will also be assessed using an asthma-specific quality-of life questionnaire. The results of this study are expected to provide physicians with important clinical evidence to help them make a rational and logical treatment choice for asthmatic patients experiencing breakthrough symptoms on inhaled corticosteroids.

Clinical evidence with montelukast in the management of chronic childhood asthma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to review data on the efficacy and safety of montelukast in the treatment of children with asthma.

METHODOLOGY

Available published literature, including published abstracts, is reviewed.

RESULTS

In patients aged 6 to 14 years with asthma (n = 27), montelukast 5mg demonstrated a significant decrease in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction 20 to 24 hours postdose after 2 days of treatment. For children with chronic asthma, only one study of the regular use of a leukotriene receptor antagonist has been published. The efficacy and safety of montelukast in children aged 6 to 14 years with asthma (n = 336) were studied during an 8-week, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. There was a significantly greater improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline for the montelukast group (8.23%) compared with the placebo group (3.58%). There was a significant decrease in the use of a 3-agonist for symptom relief, as well as in the percentage of days and percentage of patients with asthma exacerbations. An asthma specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire revealed a significant overall improvement in QOL and a significant improvement in the QOL domains for symptoms, activity and emotions in montelukast recipients. There was no significant difference between montelukast and placebo recipients in the frequency of adverse events, with the exception of allergic rhinitis, which was more prevalent in the placebo group. An open label follow-up of patients from the above study was undertaken. The effect of montelukast on FEV1 was consistent for up to 1.4 years, with the increase in FEV1 being not significantly different from that in a small control group treated with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate. QOL remained significantly improved during the open treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast appears effective and safe for the treatment of children with asthma.

Nordic consensus report on asthma management. Nordic Asthma Consensus Group

The work with the Nordic consensus report on asthma management started some years ago. The Nordic countries have common socioeconomic conditions. We acknowledge the international as well as other European guidelines providing valuable recommendations. Nevertheless, we felt the need to combine the common Nordic experiences in order to have a local statement of asthma and asthma care, based upon Nordic clinical science and tradition. The work has been rewarding and we acknowledge many valuable contributions from paediatricians, allergologists and lung physicians in all Nordic countries. The response has so far been positive and we feel that the present material reflects the main opinion of Nordic physicians taking care of asthma patients of all ages. However, the asthma and allergy research field is rapidly developing. Thus, this document should merely be regarded as a time-limited contribution to the continuing scientific discussion of this fascinating field.

Montelukast: a review of its therapeutic potential in persistent asthma

Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist used to treat persistent asthma in patients aged > or = 6 years. The drug has a rapid onset of action. Improvements in lung function and reductions in as-needed beta2-agonist usage are apparent within 1 day of initiating montelukast treatment in adults and adolescents (aged > or = 15 years treated with 10 mg/day) or children (aged 6 to 14 years treated with 5 mg/day) with persistent asthma as shown in clinical trials. In two 12-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind studies in adults and adolescents aged > or = 15 years with persistent asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 50 to 85% predicted] there was significantly (p < 0.05) greater improvement in FEV1, symptom scores, peak expiratory flow (PEF), as-needed beta2-agonist use, peripheral eosinophil counts and health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients treated with montelukast 10 mg/day than in recipients of placebo. Improvements were significantly greater in patients treated with inhaled beclomethasone 400 microg/day than in recipients of montelukast 10 mg/day in 1 of these studies. Nonetheless, 42% of montelukast recipients experienced > or = 11% improvement in FEV1, the median improvement in this parameter in beclomethasone-treated patients. In an 8-week multicentre, randomised, double-blind, study in children aged 6 to 14 years with persistent asthma (FEV1 50 to 85% predicted), montelukast 5 mg/day produced significantly greater improvements in FEV1, clinic PEF, as-needed beta2-agonist use, peripheral eosinophil counts, asthma exacerbations and QOL scores than placebo. The combination of montelukast 10 mg/day plus inhaled beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily provided significantly better asthma control than inhaled beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily in adults with poorly controlled asthma (mean FEV1 = 72% predicted) despite 4 weeks treatment with inhaled beclomethasone. Patients receiving the combination experienced significant improvements in FEV1 and morning PEF, significant reductions in daytime symptom scores, as-needed beta2 agonist usage and night-time awakenings with asthma, and had significantly lower peripheral blood eosinophil counts after 16 weeks in this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Among adults (FEV1 > or = 70%) treated with montelukast 10 mg/day for 12 weeks, inhaled corticosteroid dosages were titrated downward by 47% (vs 30% in placebo recipients), 40% of patients were tapered off of inhaled corticosteroids (vs 29%), and significantly fewer patients (16 vs 30%) experienced failed corticosteroid rescues in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study. During clinical studies, the frequency of adverse events in montelukast-treated adults, adolescents and children was similar to that in placebo recipients. In conclusion, montelukast is well tolerated and effective in adults and children aged > or = 6 years with persistent asthma including those with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and/or aspirin sensitivity. Furthermore, montelukast has glucocorticoid sparing properties. Hence, montelukast, as monotherapy in patients with mild persistent asthma, or as an adjunct to inhaled corticosteroids is useful across a broad spectrum of patients with persistent asthma.

Long-acting beta(2)-agonists in management of childhood asthma: A critical review of the literature

This review assesses the evidence regarding the use of long-acting beta(2)-agonists in the management of pediatric asthma. Thirty double-blind, randomized, controlled trials on the effects of formoterol and salmeterol on lung function in asthmatic children were identified. Single doses of inhaled salmeterol or formoterol cause prolonged bronchodilatation (>12 h) and extended bronchoprotection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children, some children achieving full protection for more than 12 h. Heterogeneity in bronchoprotection has been observed, and individual dose-titration may be attempted. The onset of action of formoterol is comparable to salbutamol, while salmeterol has a slower onset of action. Partial tolerance develops when long-acting beta(2)-agonists are used as regular treatment, including cross-tolerance to short-acting beta(2)-agonists. Regular treatment with salmeterol in children with or without corticosteroids provides statistically significant bronchodilatation, but the degree of improvement in lung function or bronchoprotection against exercise and nonspecific irritants is small with regular use. There is no evidence of anti-inflammatory effects from inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists, which is reflected by unchanged or increased bronchial hyperreactivity and no reduction of exacerbation rates. The evidence does not support a recommendation for long-acting beta(2)-agonists as monotherapy, nor does it support their general use as regular add-on therapy. In conclusion, long-acting beta(2)-agonists provide effective bronchodilatation and bronchoprotection when used as intermittent, single-dose treatment of asthma in children, but not when used as regular treatment. Future studies should examine the positioning of long-acting beta(2)-agonists as an "as needed" rescue medication instead of short-acting beta(2)-agonists for pediatric asthma management.

Role for cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist therapy in asthma and their potential role in allergic rhinitis based on the concept of "one linked airway disease"

OBJECTIVE

This review focuses on the shared pathophysiology of asthma and allergic rhinitis. The similarities illustrate the "one linked airway disease" concept, a unifying theory of these upper and lower airway inflammatory disorders. Since leukotrienes are mediators in both conditions, studies have been performed to assess the potential therapeutic role of cysteinyl leukotriene antagonists. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the accumulating data concerning these agents in treating asthma and allergic rhinitis.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant publications obtained from a literature review.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant publications on the topics of leukotrienes, leukotriene receptor antagonists, asthma, and allergic rhinitis were critically evaluated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Studies to date have documented the efficacy of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonists for asthma. The pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis and its similarities to asthma suggest that these agents could play a significant therapeutic role in managing this upper airway disorder. Because the leukotriene antagonists are oral agents, they may be valuable in treating not only either condition but also both at the same time when they coexist. They appear to be beneficial when prescribed as the initial medicine and when used in conjunction with other therapies.

Oral montelukast compared with inhaled salmeterol to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. A randomized, double-blind trial. Exercise Study Group

BACKGROUND

Montelukast, an oral, once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, provides protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of 8 weeks of therapy with salmeterol aerosol or montelukast on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in adults with asthma.

DESIGN

8-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.

SETTING

17 asthma treatment centers in the United States.

PATIENTS

191 adults with asthma who had documented exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

INTERVENTION

Qualified patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with montelukast (10 mg once in the evening) or salmeterol (50 microg [2 puffs] twice daily).

MEASUREMENTS

Changes in pre-exercise and postexercise challenge values; percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1; the area above the FEV1-time curve; and time to recovery of FEV1 at days 1 to 3, week 4, and week 8 of treatment.

RESULTS

By day 3, similar and statistically significant reductions in maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 were seen with both therapies. Sustained improvement occurred in the montelukast group at weeks 4 and 8; at these time points, the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol decreased significantly. At week 8, the percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 was 57.2% in the montelukast group and 33.0% in the salmeterol group (P = 0.002). By week 8, 67% of patients receiving montelukast and 46% of patients receiving salmeterol had a maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 of less than 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

The bronchoprotective effect of montelukast was maintained throughout 8 weeks of study. In contrast, significant loss of bronchoprotection at weeks 4 and 8 was seen with salmeterol. Long-term administration of montelukast provided consistent inhibition of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction at the end of the 8-week dosing interval without tolerance.

What are the candidate groups for pharmacotherapeutic intervention to prevent asthma?

Despite the development of many new therapies for the treatment of asthma, the prevalence of this disease is still increasing in many areas of the world. Today no intervention is able to completely cure asthma but chronic therapies could decrease its severity. Moreover, asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood and its pharmacoeconomic burden is huge. Epidemiologic studies have identified some of the major factors involved in the pathogenesis and evolution of asthma. Several prevention programs have been developed in different countries with various success rates. Most of those interventions were based on allergen avoidance. From studies aimed at controlling early asthma and from epidemiologic data, we have learned to identify high-risk groups, e.g, the atopic child with allergic asthma, with a family history of asthma or allergy-related disease and early sensitization to aeroallergens. Only a few prospective studies aimed at preventing the onset of asthma have been published. With ketotifen, Iikura et al. could prevent the onset of asthma after a 1-year period in patients suffering from atopic dermatitis. Another study has been published by Bustos et al. concerning children with a family history of allergy and high total IgE levels. Those studies involved about 100 patients. No follow-up data has been published for either of them. Recently, the first results from the ETAC (Early Treatment of the Atopic Child) trial have been reported. This study involved 817 atopic children with atopic dermatitis and a family history of atopy: cetirizine halved the number of patients developing asthma in the subgroups (200 children) sensitized to house dust mite (51.5% versus 28.6%) or pollen (58.8% versus 27.8%). The optimal target for pharmaceutical intervention to prevent asthma would seem to be high risk patients: children with atopic dermatitis, a family history of asthma or atopic disease and early sensitization to aeroallergens. Primary prevention in whole populations (e.g. starting even before the onset of atopic dermatitis or allergen sensitization) does not at present appear to be a realistic approach.

Novel therapy for asthma

The health burden of asthma is increasing globally at an alarming rate, providing a strong impetus for the development of new therapeutics. Currently available inhaled bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory drugs are effective in most asthmatics, but this palliative therapy requires long-term daily administration. Despite considerable efforts by the pharmaceutical industry, it has been difficult to develop novel therapeutic agents; the leukotriene antagonists and synthesis inhibitors being the only new class of asthma treatments to have been licensed in the last 30 years. It is clearly important to understand more about the underlying mechanisms of asthma and about how current drugs work before rational improvements in therapy can be expected. There are numerous therapies in clinical development that combat the inflammation found in asthma, specifically targeting eosinophils, IgE, adhesion molecules, cytokines and chemokines, inflammatory mediators and cell signalling. In particular, there is the obvious need for new therapy for severe asthma that is poorly controlled by high doses of corticosteroids, as well as agents to counter acute emergency asthma. A long-term goal is to develop disease-modifying immunotherapy, that could be introduced in childhood to alter the natural history of asthma. Thanks to the extensive efforts of the pharmaceutical industry, in the near future we can expect the introduction of a range of novel therapies for asthma.

Pharmacotherapy of asthma in children, with special reference to leukotriene receptor antagonists

Asthma in adults is generally recognized as a chronic inflammatory airway disease, although this association is less well established in childhood asthma. Thus, recent asthma guidelines have emphasized that asthma treatment should be directed toward the underlying inflammatory aspects of the disease. The prevalence of asthma and resultant hospitalizations and deaths have increased or remained stable over the past 10 years in the United States. In part, this appears to be caused by shortcomings of available antiasthma therapeutic agents. Because these trends are particularly troublesome in children and young adults, there is a need for effective anti-inflammatory therapies that are safe and tolerable. The leukotrienes are a family of lipid mediators that appear to play an important role in the symptomology and pathogenesis of asthma. The results of clinical trials in adults with asthma demonstrated that antileukotriene drugs such as zafirlukast, montelukast, and zileuton improve pulmonary function, decrease asthma symptoms, and decrease the concomitant use of other antiasthma drugs. Most antileukotriene agents are orally bioavailable and well tolerated, offering the potential for improved patient compliance. Montelukast and zafirlukast have received approval for use in pediatric asthma patients, and approval of zafirlukast in this patient population is pending.

Montelukast: data from clinical trials in the management of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist used to treat asthma, and to discuss the therapeutic role of montelukast as long-term medication and difficulties associated with the management of asthma.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (up to May 1999) was conducted to identify relevant English-language publications, including preclinical studies, clinical trials, and recent reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

All available published reports of controlled, clinical trials of montelukast in adults and children with asthma were summarized, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacologic effects of montelukast.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information on the safety and efficacy of montelukast was evaluated on the basis of patient selection, study design, methodology, and statistical significance as compared with placebo or inhaled corticosteroid treatment.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Montelukast is approved for the prophylaxis and chronic treatment of asthma at a dose of 10 mg once daily for adolescents (> or =15 y) and adults and 5 mg once daily for children (6-14 y). In placebo-controlled clinical trials, montelukast significantly improved pulmonary lung function (as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 sec), significantly reduced beta2-agonist use, and significantly improved patient-reported end points in adults and children (> or =6 y) with chronic asthma. In adults, a similar magnitude of improvement in lung function is seen with or without inhaled corticosteroid use; the effects of montelukast may be additive to those of inhaled corticosteroids and permit the reduction of the required dose of inhaled corticosteroids. In cases of exercise-induced asthma (adults and children), montelukast treatment attenuates the fall in pulmonary function following exercise. It attenuates both the early- and late-phase responses of asthma after allergen inhalation. Improvements in asthma control are similar in asthmatic patients who are aspirin-sensitive or not aspirin-sensitive and can be seen within one day of treatment. Tolerance does not develop, and the adverse events do not differ from those of placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast is indicated for the prophylaxis of chronic asthma in adults and children (> or =6 y). It may be considered for use as first-line therapy in patients with mild persistent asthma or for additional control in patients who are still symptomatic while receiving treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. It may also be used for additional control in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic patients. Consideration may be given for using montelukast to allow tapering of the dose of inhaled corticosteroids while maintaining clinical stability. Chronic treatment with montelukast can provide additional control of symptoms during exercise, but inhaled beta2-agonists remain first-line therapy for prophylaxis and treatment.

Effect of intravenous corticosteroid on ex vivo leukotriene generation by blood leucocytes of normal and asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

The cysteinyl-leukotrienes (LTC(4), LTD(4), LTE(4)) are critical bronchoconstrictor and eosinophilotactic mediators in asthma while LTB(4) is a potent neutrophil chemoattractant. Glucocorticosteroids are front line anti-inflammatory treatment for asthma but the evidence that they reduce leukotriene (LT) synthesis in vivo is poor.

METHODS

In a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial immunoassays were used to measure ex vivo synthesis of LTC(4) and LTB(4) by calcium ionophore stimulated blood leucocytes and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells of eight normal subjects and eight patients with mild allergic asthma 4-6 hours after intravenous administration of a single 100 mg dose of methylprednisolone.

RESULTS

Ionophore stimulated synthesis of LTC(4) (but not LTB(4)) in blood granulocytes tended to be higher in asthmatic subjects (mean 9.7 ng/10(6) cells) than in normal subjects (4.2 ng/10(6) cells; p = 0.08) and intravenous methylprednisolone reduced synthesis of LTC(4) (but not LTB(4)) to normal levels (2.9 ng/10(6) cells; 95% CI for the reduction 1.0 to 12.5 ng/10(6) cells; p = 0.03). In blood mononuclear cells methylprednisolone reduced LTC(4) synthesis in asthmatic subjects from 1.26 to 0.79 ng/10(6) cells (95% CI for the reduction 0.26 to 0.79, p = 0.014) and tended to reduce LTC(4) synthesis in normal subjects from 1.51 to 0.86 ng/10(6) cells (p = 0.08). Methylprednisolone also significantly reduced synthesis of LTB(4) in mononuclear cells from both subject groups (p = 0.014). It had no effect on LT synthesis in BAL cells from either group nor on LT levels in BAL fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous methylprednisolone can reduce synthesis of leukotrienes in blood granulocytes and mononuclear cells within six hours of a single intravenous dose.

Use of leukotriene antagonists in childhood asthma

Leukotrienes have been shown to cause bronchoconstriction, increased mucus production, and airway inflammation, three critical features in asthma. Antileukotriene drugs were developed to inhibit the effects of these lipid mediators. This class of drugs represents the first new approach to asthma therapy in 25 years. The leukotriene receptor antagonists, montelukast, zafirlukast, and pranlukast, and the 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, zileuton, are unique in their ability to target specific components of asthmatic inflammation. Although the role of these drugs continues to evolve, the antileukotrienes have demonstrated efficacy against exercise and allergen-induced bronchoconstriction and additive benefit for use in patients with symptomatic, moderate asthma on maintenance-inhaled corticosteroids. Further, they may be considered for primary use in patients with mild, persistent asthma, especially those who are steroid-phobic or who have compliance issues.

Exercise-induced asthma

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) is a common condition that can impede physical activity, particularly for children, adolescents, and young adults. A detailed patient history can help the physician identify subtle EIA clues such as fatigue or poorer performance than training would predict. A careful physical exam can help rule out conditions that mimic EIA such as respiratory infections or cardiac conditions. Pulmonary function testing is often useful for assessing severity and establishing a baseline for assessing treatment efficacy. Treatment options include nonpharmacologic measures that address the exercise environment and warm-up routines. Several medication options and combinations can help patients avoid symptoms and participate fully in fitness and sports activities.

Asthma therapy with agents preventing leukotriene synthesis or action

Elucidation of the biochemistry of leukotriene production and the pharmacology of its actions has led to the development of a number of therapeutic agents shown to be of value in the treatment of asthma. These agents either prevent the synthesis of the leukotrienes, by preventing the action of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein or the catalytic action of the 5-lipoxygenase, or by inhibiting the action of leukotrienes at the CysLT1 receptor. Numerous clinical trials in exercise-induced asthma, allergen-induced asthma, aspirin-induced asthma, and spontaneously occurring asthmatic episodes have indicated that these agents are safe and effective asthma treatments.

Prevention of severe premenstrual asthma attacks by leukotriene receptor antagonist

BACKGROUND

The etiology and treatment of premenstrual exacerbations of asthma (PMA) remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the role of cellular mediators released from inflammatory cells in the airflow limitation during PMA.

METHODS

Serum levels of leukotriene (LT) B(4), LTC(4), platelet- activating factor, histamine, IL-1beta, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and GM-CSF were measured at different time points, first just before or during menstruation when the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) began to decrease precipitously and second during the menstrual midcycle week (days 10-16) when the PEFR returned to baseline values in patients with PMA and in age-matched asthma patients without PMA at the same intervals.

RESULTS

Serum levels of LTC(4) were significantly higher during exacerbations of asthma than after recovery (69.0 +/- 16.0 pg/mL vs 24.0 +/- 9.5 pg/mL, P <.05), whereas those of IL-1beta, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, GM-CSF, histamine, LTB(4), and platelet-activating factor did not differ between 2 periods in 5 patients with PMA. In contrast, in 5 asthmatic patients without PMA serum levels of cellular mediators did not differ between corresponding periods. Oral administration of pranlukast, an LT receptor antagonist (225 mg twice daily), significantly reduced decreases in PEFR from the baseline values (110 +/- 21 L/min with pranlukast vs 233 +/- 20 L/min without pranlukast, P <.01) in association with an improvement of asthma symptom scores (6.5 +/- 1. 1 with pranlukast vs 9.8 +/- 0.7 without pranlukast, P <0.05) in 5 patients with PMA.

CONCLUSION

LTs are partly involved in the pathogenesis of PMA, and LT receptor antagonists may be useful for preventing airflow obstruction in patients with PMA.

Allergen-mediated disease: keeping patients active

A nasal corticosteroid is the most effective treatment for allergic rhinitis, but delayed improvement can reduce compliance. Topical vasoconstrictors, cromolyn, and NSAIDs are recommended for allergic conjunctivitis. Some athletes who have exercise-induced or exercise-exacerbated asthma may have a refractory period, which, along with short- and long-term beta-2 agonists, inhaled corticosteroids, and leukotriene antagonists, may be used to manage symptoms. Topical steroids are the main treatment for atopic dermatitis. Drug restrictions by sports governing bodies can limit therapies for competitive athletes.

Montelukast versus salmeterol in patients with asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Montelukast/Salmeterol Exercise Study Group

BACKGROUND

Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, and salmeterol, a long-acting beta(2)-receptor agonist, each have demonstrated benefits in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in short-term studies. Direct comparisons between these agents in long-term studies are limited.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare montelukast and salmeterol in the long-term treatment of EIB.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-seven patients with mild asthma and a postexercise fall in FEV(1) of at least 18% were randomized (double-blind) to receive montelukast 10 mg once daily or salmeterol 50 microg twice daily for 8 weeks. Exercise challenge was repeated at day 3, week 4, and week 8 after randomization near the end of the dosing interval for both drugs. The primary efficacy endpoint was the maximal percent fall in postexercise FEV(1) at week 8.

RESULTS

Montelukast was effective in treating EIB without inducing tolerance and provided superior (P </=.001) protection than salmeterol at weeks 4 and 8, with comparable protection at day 3. The frequency of respiratory clinical adverse events (P =.046) and discontinuations because of clinical adverse events (P =.052) were less with montelukast.

CONCLUSION

The effect of montelukast was greater than that of salmeterol in the chronic treatment of EIB over a period of 8 weeks in patients with mild asthma as demonstrated by effect size, maintenance of effect, and fewer respiratory clinical adverse events during the study period. Montelukast may be a better alternative to salmeterol as a controller agent for the chronic treatment of EIB.

Montelukast dose selection in 6- to 14-year-olds: comparison of single-dose pharmacokinetics in children and adults

Montelukast, an oral leukotriene-receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults. A once-daily 10 mg dose (film-coated tablet) was selected as the optimal adult dose based on dose-ranging studies. Asthma is a similar disease and is treated with the same medications in children and adults. These observations suggested that a dose of montelukast in children providing overall drug exposure (i.e., montelukast plasma concentrations) similar to that of the 10 mg film-coated tablet dose in adults would be efficacious, well tolerated, and obviate the need for separate dose-ranging studies in children. Therefore, the dose of montelukast for 6- to 14-year-old children was selected by identifying the chewable tablet dose of montelukast yielding a single-dose area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) comparable to that achieved with the adult 10 mg film-coated tablet dose. Based on this approach, which included dose normalization of data from several pediatric pharmacokinetic studies, a 5 mg chewable tablet dose of montelukast was selected for use in clinical efficacy studies in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.

Prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by inhaled low-molecular-weight heparin

Because many biological actions of heparin including the antiallergic activity are molecular weight dependent, we hypothesized that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may have greater potency in attenuating exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Therefore, in the present investigation we studied the effects of inhaled LMWH, enoxaparin, and unfractionated heparin on EIB in subjects with asthma. Thirteen asthmatic subjects performed a standardized exercise challenge on a treadmill to document the presence of EIB. The workload was increased until 85% of predicted maximal heart rate was achieved, and the exercise was sustained at that workload for 10 min. EIB was assessed by measuring FEV(1) before and immediately after the exercise. On five different experiment days the subjects were pretreated with 4 ml of aerosolized heparin (80,000 units = 7.5 mg/kg), placebo, or 3 different doses of enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg) in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design, and exercise challenge was performed 45 min later. Bronchial provocation with methacholine was also performed in five subjects on two additional days after pretreatment with either placebo or inhaled enoxaparin (2 mg/kg), and venous blood was obtained for analysis of plasma antifactor Xa. Postexercise, the maximal decreases in FEV(1) (mean +/- SE) were 30 +/- 4% and 29 +/- 5% on control and placebo days. The exercise-induced decreases in FEV(1) were inhibited by 31% with heparin (DeltaFEV(1) = 20 +/- 4%); and by 28%, 38%, and 48% by enoxaparin at doses of 0.5 mg/kg (DeltaFEV(1) = 21 +/- 5%), 1 mg/kg (DeltaFEV(1) = 18 +/- 5%), and 2 mg/kg (DeltaFEV(1) = 15 +/- 3%), respectively (p < 0.05). The inhibitory effect of 0.5 mg/kg dose of enoxaparin was comparable to heparin (7.5 mg/kg), whereas 2 mg/ kg dose of enoxaparin was the most potent. Inhaled enoxaparin failed to modify the bronchoconstrictor response to methacholine, and did not change the plasma antifactor Xa activity. These data demonstrate that inhaled enoxaparin prevents EIB in a dose-dependent manner; and its antiasthmatic activity is independent of its effect on plasma antifactor Xa activity.

Randomised, placebo controlled trial of effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, on tapering inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the ability of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, to allow tapering of inhaled corticosteroids in clinically stable asthmatic patients.

DESIGN

Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel group study. After a single blind placebo run in period, during which (at most) two inhaled corticosteroids dose decreases occurred, qualifying, clinically stable patients were allocated randomly to receive montelukast (10 mg tablet) or matching placebo once daily at bedtime for up to 12 weeks.

SETTING

23 academic asthma centres in United States, Canada, and Europe.

PARTICIPANTS

226 clinically stable patients with chronic asthma receiving high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (113 randomised to montelukast and 113 to placebo).

INTERVENTIONS

Every 2 weeks, the inhaled corticosteroids dose was tapered, maintained, or increased (rescue) based on a standardised clinical score.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Last tolerated dose of inhaled corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, montelukast allowed significant (P=0. 046) reduction in the inhaled corticosteroid dose (montelukast 47% v placebo 30%; least square mean difference 17.6%, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 34.8). Fewer patients on montelukast (18 (16%) v 34 (30%) placebo, P=0.01) required discontinuation because of failed rescue.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast reduces the need for inhaled corticosteroids among patients requiring moderate to high doses of corticosteroid to maintain asthma control.

Leukotrienes, leukotriene receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors in asthma: an update. Part II: clinical studies with leukotriene receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors in asthma

The demonstration that leukotrienes, mainly cysteinyl leukotrienes, have biological properties relevant to the pathogenesis of asthma has stimulated the development of many therapeutic compounds to block these deleterious effects. Two main classes of leukotriene modulators have been developed: CysLT1 receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors. This article reviews the pharmacodynamics, the effects on baseline airway function, the protective effects in airway challenges as well as the results in chronic asthma of the different leukotriene modulators. In addition, the complementary anti-inflammatory effect of leukotriene modulators to that of corticosteroids and H1-histamine receptor antagonists is reviewed. Finally, a concise overview of the clinical responsiveness to this new class of drug, the safety and the drug interactions as well as the place in the strategies of treatment for asthmatic patients of the leukotriene modulators is also provided.

Characterization of the human cysteinyl leukotriene CysLT1 receptor

The cysteinyl leukotrienes-leukotriene C4(LTC4), leukotriene D4(LTD4) and leukotriene E4(LTE4)-are important mediators of human bronchial asthma. Pharmacological studies have determined that cysteinyl leukotrienes activate at least two receptors, designated CysLT1 and CysLT2. The CysLT1-selective antagonists, such as montelukast (Singulair), zafirlukast (Accolate) and pranlukast (Onon), are important in the treatment of asthma. Previous biochemical characterization of CysLT1 antagonists and the CysLT1 receptor has been in membrane preparations from tissues enriched for this receptor. Here we report the molecular and pharmacological characterization of the cloned human CysLT1 receptor. We describe the functional activation (calcium mobilization) of this receptor by LTD4 and LTC4, and competition for radiolabelled LTD4 binding to this receptor by the cysteinyl leukotrienes and three structurally distinct classes of CysLT1-receptor antagonists. We detected CysLT1-receptor messenger RNA in spleen, peripheral blood leukocytes and lung. In normal human lung, expression of the CysLT1-receptor mRNA was confined to smooth muscle cells and tissue macrophages. Finally, we mapped the human CysLT1-receptor gene to the X chromosome.

Leukotriene pathway inhibitors in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Leukotrienes can be generated from a wide variety of cells including mast cells and eosinophils. The biological properties of these products include bronchial smooth muscle contraction, stimulation of mucous production, enhancement of vascular permeability, and recruitment of eosinophils. These properties can contribute significantly to the pathobiology of asthma. Recently, zafirlukast and montelukast, and zileuton, leukotriene D4 receptor antagonists and 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, respectively, have been developed and are available for treating asthma. Studies have found these compounds modify bronchospasm with exercise, the pulmonary reaction to aspirin in sensitive subjects, and the airway response to inhaled antigen. Furthermore, in patients with chronic asthma, leukotriene modifiers improve airflow obstruction, decrease the need for rescue medication, and diminish symptoms. Moreover, these drugs can prevent asthma exacerbations. However, there is little evidence that these medications have potent anti-inflammatory activity. Nonetheless, leukotriene modifiers represent new, and effective, therapeutics in the treatment of asthma; at present, the positioning of these products in relationship to inhaled corticosteroids, for example, in the treatment of asthma has not been fully defined but will emerge with further study and use in the clinic setting.