Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience

Use of CT Angiography to Classify Endoleaks after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE

Accurate endoleak detection and classification is critical for the follow-up of patients who have undergone endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This determination is often made with computed tomography angiography (CTA). This investigation was performed to determine the accuracy of CTA in the classification of endoleaks in patients who have undergone EVAR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with endoleaks underwent both CTA and conventional contrast digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to determine endoleak etiology. Two independent radiologists determined the source of the endoleak based on a retrospective review of the CTA. The results of the CTA-based endoleak classification were compared to the reference standard, contrast DSA.

RESULTS

There was agreement regarding endoleak classification between CTA and DSA on 86% of the patients (31 of 36 patients). Correlation between the CTA reading of the two readers was 94% (34 of 36 patients), yielding a kappa statistic of 0.8. In three patients, the CTA reading incorrectly classified endoleaks as type 2 when the endoleaks were actually type 1 endoleaks on DSA. One patient was incorrectly classified as having a type 1 endoleak on CTA when it was a type 2 endoleak on DSA. Finally, one patient had a type 1 endoleak on DSA that was incorrectly classified as a type 3 endoleak on CTA. The change in CTA endoleak classification based on the DSA resulted in a significant change in patient management in four of the 36 patients (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoleak classification based on CTA correlates fairly well with DSA findings. However, optimal endoleak management requires performance of selective angiograms with DSA to classify endoleaks that are detected on CTA.

Influence of type II endoleak volume on aneurysm wall pressure and distribution in an experimental model

OBJECTIVE(S)

We have previously shown that type II endoleak size is a predictor of aneurysm growth after aortic endografting. To better understand this observation, we investigated the influence of endoleak size on pressure transmitted to the aneurysm wall and its distribution within the aneurysm sac.

METHODS

In an ex vivo model, an artificial aneurysm sac was incorporated within a mock circulation comprised of rubber tubing and a pulsatile pump. Three strain-gauge pressure transducers were placed in the aneurysm wall at different locations, including the site of maximum aneurysm diameter. The aneurysm was filled with either human aneurysm thrombus or dough that mimicked thrombus and simulated type II endoleaks of varying volumes (1 to 10 mL) were created. Aneurysm wall pressure (AWP) measurements were recorded at mean arterial pressures (MAPs) of 60, 80, and 100 mm Hg. Correlation coefficients ( r ) and analysis of variance were used to assess the relationship between endoleak volume and AWP.

RESULTS

Increasing endoleak volume '3 cm 3 resulted in proportionally increased AWP at all levels of MAP and at all sites, with highest pressures recorded at the site of the maximum aneurysm diameter (r = 0.83 when MAP = 100 mm Hg; r = 0.85 when MAP = 80 mm Hg; r = 0.88 when MAP = 60 mm Hg; P < .001). AWP plateaued when the endoleak volume was >3 cm 3 . Pressure distribution within the sac was not uniform. Although the difference was within +/-10%, statistically significant higher AWPs were observed at the site of maximum aneurysm diameter (P <.001). AWP also correlated with MAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing type II endoleak volume results in proportionally higher AWP, which is greatest at the site of maximum aneurysm diameter. This study confirms the clinical observation that type II endoleak volume and MAP may be important predictors of aneurysm expansion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our experimental model of a type II endoleak revealed that endoleak size is a significant factor that influences the magnitude of pressure transmission into the aneurysm wall. Increasing volume of the endoleak nidus was associated with proportionally higher aneurysm sac pressures. This mechanism may, in fact, account for the increased risk of aneurysm expansion observed in our clinical experience, thereby suggesting the need for more aggressive surveillance and possibly earlier intervention for patients with larger endoleaks.

Endoleak: Treatment Options

Endoleak, also called leakage, leak, and Perigraft leak, is a major complication and its persistence represents a failure of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Its detection and treatment is therefore of primary importance since endoleak is associated with pressurization (increases pressure) of the sac, resulting in expansion and rupture of the aneurysm. The aim of this article was to discuss the different options to treat endoleak.

A canine model to study the significance and hemodynamics of type II endoleaks1

OBJECTIVE

The clinical significance of Type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) remains incompletely delineated. This study describes the development of a novel canine model that allows for continuous monitoring of intraaneurysmal pressure in the setting of Type 2 endoleak.

METHODS

Infrarenal AAA were created in 10 mongrel dogs by implanting a prosthetic aneurysm containing an intraluminal, solid-state, strain gauge pressure transducer which is able to measure pressures in both solid and liquid media. A segment of native aorta with two or more patent side branch vessels was reimplanted into the prosthetic aneurysm using a Carrel patch. Four animals had two lumbar vessels implanted; two had two lumbar vessels and the caudal mesenteric artery implanted, and four control animals had no vessels reimplanted. Retrograde flow in the aneurysmal side branches caused a Type 2 endoleak after the aneurysm was excluded from antegrade flow by deploying a stent graft. Both systemic and intra-sac pressures were measured daily for up to 90 days after endovascular exclusion and indexed to systemic pressure. Endoleak patency and flow were assessed with digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound, and cine-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Histological characterization of the intraaneurysmal contents was performed.

RESULTS

Before endovascular exclusion, the systolic, mean arterial, and pulse pressure within the aneurysmal sac closely matched that of the systemic circulation (systolic, 0.96 +/- 0.22; mean, 0.94 +/- 0.21; pulse pressure, 0.97 +/- 0.22) (R value, 0.97). Endovascular exclusion in animals with no collateral side branch vessels resulted in no endoleak and significantly reduced intraaneurysmal pressure when compared to systemic pressure, with systolic, mean arterial, and pulse pressure 0.172 +/- 0.05, 0.137 +/- 0.05, and 0.098 +/- 0.02, respectively (P < 0.001). In animals with Type 2 endoleaks, the pressures were lower than systemic pressure, but statistically significant in their difference from the control group. The systolic pressure of those with Type 2 endoleaks was 0.702 +/- 0.048; mean arterial pressure was 0.784 +/- 0.028, and pulse pressure was 0.406 +/- 0.031 when indexed to systemic pressure (P < 0.001). Cine-MRA and Duplex ultrasound documented persistent patency of the Type 2 endoleaks throughout the study period in animals with multiple side branches.

CONCLUSION

Intraaneurysmal pressure in the setting of Type 2 endoleaks may be accurately determined using this canine model. Intraaneurysmal pressure is maintained at a significant level in the context of this retrograde collateral perfusion, suggesting that persistent Type 2 endoleaks are of clinical significance. This model may serve to allow further evaluation and characterization of Type 2 endoleaks.

Does Chronic Oral Anticoagulation With Warfarin Affect Durability of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Exclusion in a Midterm Follow-up?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of oral anticoagulation on durability of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

Retrospective review was conducted of 182 consecutive EVAR patients (169 men; mean age 75.3 years, range 53-89) between 1999 and 2003. Patients on warfarin anticoagulation (WA, n=21; International Normalized Ratio of 2 to 3) were compared against a control group (CG) with no postoperative anticoagulation (n=161). Death, aneurysm rupture, and reintervention were considered primary endpoints; endoleaks, endograft migration, and aneurysm remodeling were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 16.3+/-12.6 months. One-year mortality was 6.6% (9.5% WA versus 6.2% CG); overall mortality was 14.3% (p=0.414). No aneurysm rupture occurred. At 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, cumulative reinterventions (20%/20%/20% WA versus 12%/15%/20% CG; p=0.633) and endoleak rates (25%/25%/25% WA versus 17%/22%/34% CG; p=0.649) were comparable. In both groups, most completion endoleaks resolved (42.9% WA versus 74.4% CG; p=0.474), but few de novo endoleaks did (0% WA versus 12.8% CG; p=0.538). Anticoagulation did not affect mean time to aneurysm sac shrinkage (1.3+/-0.3 WA versus 1.4+/-0.1 years CG; p=0.769).

CONCLUSIONS

After EVAR, anticoagulation appears safe and does not significantly alter mortality, risk for rupture, or the incidence of reintervention. Early endoleaks appear more common in anticoagulated patients, but anticoagulation does not preclude spontaneous endoleak resolution nor does it increase late endoleak rates. Irrespective of the anticoagulation status, early but not late endoleaks usually sealed spontaneously. Observing type II endoleaks appears safe in the absence of aneurysm enlargement.

Type II lumbar endoleaks: Hemodynamic differentiation by contrast-enhanced ultrasound scanning and influence on aneurysm enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to differentiate type II lumbar endoleaks on the basis of dynamic features identified by contrast-enhanced ultrasound scanning (CUS) and to evaluate the role of this differentiation in detecting abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) enlargement > or =1 mL/mo.

METHODS

Eighteen male patients (mean age, 71.8 years) with type II lumbar endoleak suspected at CUS underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). On CTA, AAA volumes and endoleak visualization and volume were assessed. At CUS, performed after a bolus of 1.5 to 2.4 mL of a second generation blood pool contrast agent, the following parameters were evaluated: presence of contrast material within the aneurysmal sac (endoleak), delay of endoleak detection (wash-in) and disappearance (washout) from the beginning of contrast injection, visualization of inflow and outflow vessels, and presence of cavity filling. Statistical analysis was performed regarding endoleak features at CUS, endoleak detection at CTA, and rate of AAA enlargement.

RESULTS

DSA confirmed all the endoleaks. Mean +/- standard deviation wash-in and washout times were 121.9 +/- 132.6 and 337.2 +/- 193.7 seconds, respectively; a significant relation was observed between these two parameters (P < .01, analysis of variance). By Youden plots, endoleaks were classified as hyperdynamic when wash-in was <100 seconds (n = 10, 55.5%) and/or washout was <520 seconds (n = 13, 72.2%). A slower washout was associated with nonvisualized outflow (66.7%) and/or inflow arteries (66.7%) ( P < .05). Eight endoleaks (44.4%) were missed at CTA; it occurred in hypodynamic endoleaks, absence of detectable inflow or outflow vessels, and absence of cavity filling at CUS (P < .05). Overall mean AAA volume increase rate was 1.1 +/- 1.7 mL/mo. By multiple logistic regression model, the washout time > or = 520 seconds was the only independent predictor of AAA volume increase > or = 1 mL/mo (8 patients, 44.4%).

CONCLUSION

Type II lumbar endoleaks show different hemodynamic features at CUS, which might influence the rate of aneurysm enlargement, addressing the need for treatment.

Pulsatile Wall Motion (PWM) Measurements after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Exclusion are not Useful in the Classification of Endoleak

The pulsatile wall motion (PWM) of AAA is reduced after endovascular stent-graft placement. The purpose of this study was to identify whether PWM after endografting was useful in the classification of endoleak.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

162 patients treated with EVAR underwent pre- and post-operative PWM assessment with ultrasonography. Follow-up was 1-9 years. 111 patients had well-excluded aneurysms, three patients had enlarging aneurysms without any recognizable endoleak (endotension), 16 had type I, 31 had type II and 1 had type III endoleak.

RESULTS

The PWM was reduced from about 1mm pre-operatively to 0.24 mm post-operatively in well-excluded aneurysms. PWM remained stable during follow-up. Type I endoleak was associated with moderately reduced PWM (proximal endoleak 0.79 mm and distal 0.32 mm). PWM in patients with type II endoleak was higher (0.32 mm) post-operatively (p=0.002) compared to well-excluded aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

PWM is permanently reduced after endografting. The smallest reduction in PWM was in patients with type II endoleaks. However, the overlap between the groups does not allow reliable identification of patients having endoleak with PWM-measurements.

Characterization of retrograde collateral (type II) endoleak using a new canine model

OBJECTIVE

The clinical significance of retrograde collateral arterial perfusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair (type II endoleak) has not been completely characterized. In this study a canine model was used to analyze intra-aneurysmal pressure, thrombus histologic characteristics, endoleak patency, and radiographic appearance of type II endoleaks originating from single and multiple aneurysm side branches.

METHODS

Prosthetic aneurysms with an intraluminal solid-state strain-gauge pressure transducer were created in the infrarenal aorta of 14 mongrel dogs. A single collateral side branch was reimplanted in 4 animals, multiple side branches were reimplanted in 6 animals, and no side branches were reimplanted in 4 control animals. Intra-aneurysmal and systemic pressure was measured for 60 to 90 days after creation of the type II endoleak. Endoleak patency and flow were assessed with duplex ultrasound scanning and cine-magnetic resonance angiography. Histologic analysis of the intra-aneurysmal thrombus was also performed.

RESULTS

Stent-graft exclusion reduced intra-aneurysmal pressure significantly in all animals, as compared with systemic pressure (P < .001). All intra-aneurysmal pressure values are indexed to the systemic pressure, and are represented as a percentage of the simultaneously obtained systemic pressure, which has a value of 1.0. Type II endoleaks originating from multiple side branches exhibited significantly increased intra-aneurysmal systolic pressure, mean pressure, and pulse pressure, as compared with endoleaks derived from either a single side branch (systolic pressure: multiple, 0.70 +/- 0.28 vs single, 0.50 +/- 0.19; P < .001; mean pressure: multiple, 0.78 +/- 0.23 vs single, 0.59 +/- 0.22, P < .001; pulse pressure: multiple, 0.41 +/- 0.25 vs single, 0.17 +/- 0.15, P < .001) or excluded control aneurysms that had no side branches and no endoleak (systolic pressure, 0.17 +/- 0.09; mean pressure, 0.14 +/- 0.10; pulse pressure, 0.098 +/- 0.08; P < .001). Cine-magnetic resonance angiograms and duplex ultrasound scans documented persistent patency of multiple branch endoleaks up to the time of euthanasia. In contrast, single side branch endoleaks thrombosed within 3 days (P < .001). Thrombus in the aneurysm sac in close proximity to the endoleak contained intact red blood cells and limited fibrin. Thrombus distant from the endoleak demonstrated extensive fibrin deposition and degraded red blood cells.

CONCLUSION

The canine model may be used to reliably measure intra-aneurysmal pressure in the presence of patent and thrombosed type II endoleaks. In this model 2 or more side branches are necessary to maintain persistent patency of type II endoleaks. These endoleaks are associated with significantly elevated intra-aneurysmal pressure, that is, 70% to 80% of systemic pressure. These results suggest that persistent type II endoleaks have clinical significance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Endoleaks originating from retrograde flow in the side branch vessels of the aneurysm generate significant levels of intra-aneurysmal pressure, that is, 70% to 80% of systemic pressure. At least 2 patent side branch vessels appear to be necessary to cause persistent patency of type II endoleak in the canine model. Further studies will be necessary to enable more complete characterization of retrograde endoleaks and to extend these findings to allow clinical application. However, these results suggest that persistently patent type II endoleaks are clinical significance and may require more intensive follow-up intervention.

Proximal Type I Endoleak After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Predictive Factors

Proximal type I endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) are associated with a high risk of rupture. Risk factors for developing this complication are not fully elucidated. We aimed to define preoperative predictors for proximal type I endoleak and describe its clinical outcome. From a consecutive series of 257 patients who underwent EVAR, we selected 202 who had available pre- and postoperative CT scan studies. Proximal neck diameter, length, angulation, calcification, thrombus load (thickness, percentage of neck circumference coverage, percentage of neck area occupancy), and maximum aneurysm diameter were evaluated on preoperative CT scans. All postoperative CT and duplex ultrasound scans, supplemented with angiograms in selected cases, were reviewed for the presence or absence of endoleak. Device overlap and oversizing (relative to the proximal neck) were also determined. Type I proximal endoleak rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The associations between the variables listed above and proximal type I endoleak were evaluated by use of Cox proportional hazards models. Proximal type I endoleak occurred in eight patients, corresponding to a 3-year incidence rate of 4% (SE = 1.5%). The median follow-up was 340 days (range, 22-1954). Univariate analyses found significant associations between proximal type I endoleak and the following variables: percentage of calcified neck circumference (hazards ratio = 2.19 for a 25% increase, p = 0.019), aneurysm maximum diameter (hazards ratio = 1.98 for a 1-cm increase, p = 0.006) and proximal neck and device overlap (hazards ratio = 0.53 for a 5-mm increase, p = 0.007). The mean overlap among cases with and without type I proximal endoleak was 15.6 mm and 29.3 mm, respectively. When these variables were included in a multivariate model, all remained statistically significant. No significant association could be documented for neck thrombus-related variables. Thirty-nine (19.3%) patients had a beta neck angle inferior to 120 degrees . There was a trend toward a higher incidence of proximal type I endoleaks in these patients (p = 0.057). Device oversize relative to proximal neck diameter did not affect the probability of this type of endoleak. One patient survived an emergency open repair of a ruptured aneurysm after significant expansion. Six patients underwent endovascular reinterventions (4 additional proximal cuff placements, 2 proximal angioplasties). The mean interval for reintervention was 389 days. Distal migration (>or=5 mm) was identified in four cases (50%). Proximal type I endoleak is a rare complication after EVAR, but it is associated with a high number of reinterventions and potentially serious consequences. Patients with short and heavily calcified aneurysmal necks and large aneurysms are at increased risk of proximal type I endoleaks.

Inferior Mesenteric Artery Embolization before Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Technique and Initial Results

PURPOSE

To report a single center's technique and initial results in the preoperative embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) before endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 3-year period, 102 patients at a single clinical site, including 86 men and 16 women aged 54-93 years (mean, 75 years), were found to have a patent IMA on computed tomographic (CT) angiography before EVAR. Coil embolization was performed after subselective catheterization with use of microcoils placed in the IMA proximal to the origin of the left colic artery. All patients in whom the IMA was visualized on flush aortography and successfully accessed underwent embolization. One month and 6 months after surgery, results in this cohort were retrospectively compared with those from a similar group of patients who underwent EVAR during the same period. These patients had patent IMAs on preoperative CT angiography but did not undergo embolization as a result of nonvisualization during flush aortography. All patients underwent EVAR with bifurcated modular devices with proximal transrenal fixation. All patients underwent postoperative follow-up with multiphase CT angiography to detect the presence of endoleak. Six-month follow-up data were available for 18 patients who underwent embolization and 54 patients who did not. Change in sac diameter was compared in these patients.

RESULTS

Embolization was technically successful in 30 of 32 patients (94%) in whom it was attempted. There were no complications. At 1-month follow-up, five of 30 patients in the embolization group were noted to have a type II endoleak (17%). None of the endoleaks in this group were related to the IMA. The group with patent IMAs who did not undergo preoperative embolization had a 42% incidence of type II endoleak (P < .05). At 6 months after surgery, three of 18 patients who had undergone embolization (17%) had a type II endoleak, compared with 26 of 54 in the other group (48%; P < .05). Among the patients in whom 6-month data were available, mean changes in sac diameter were -5.2 mm (range, -24 to 2 mm) in the embolized group and -2.1 mm (range, -19 to 8 mm) in the nonembolized group.

CONCLUSION

These initial results demonstrate that embolization of the IMA with subselective microcoils before EVAR is a safe and effective procedure to reduce the incidence of type II endoleaks. The data also suggest that preoperative embolization of the IMA is associated with greater shrinkage of aneurysm sac diameter at 6 months.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Contrast-enhanced US for Missed Endoleaks after Endoluminal Repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) for depiction of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (or endovascular aneurysm repair [EVAR]) in patients with aneurysm enlargement and no evidence of endoleak.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 1998 to February 2003, 112 patients underwent EVAR. At follow-up, duplex US and biphasic multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography were performed. In 10 patients (group A), evident aneurysm enlargement was observed, with no evidence of complications, at both CT angiography and duplex US. Group A patients, 10 men (mean age, 69.6 years +/- 10 [standard deviation]), underwent US after intravenous bolus injection of a second-generation contrast agent, with continuous low-mechanical index (0.01-0.04) real-time tissue harmonic imaging. Group B patients, 10 men (mean age, 71.3 years +/- 8.2) with aneurysm shrinkage and no evidence of complications, and group C patients, 10 men (mean age, 73.2 years +/- 6) with CT angiographic evidence of endoleak, underwent contrast-enhanced US. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in groups A and C. Endoleak detection and characterization were assessed with imaging modalities used in groups A-C; at contrast-enhanced US, time of detection of endoleak, persistence of sac enhancement, and morphology of enhancement were evaluated.

RESULTS

In group A, contrast-enhanced US depicted one type I, six type II, one type III, and two undefined endoleaks that were not detected at CT angiography. All leakages were characterized by slow and delayed echo enhancement detected at longer than 150 seconds after contrast agent administration. DSA results confirmed findings in all patients; percutaneous treatment was performed. In group B, contrast-enhanced US did not show echo enhancement; in group C, results with this modality confirmed findings at CT angiography and DSA.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced US depicts endoleaks after EVAR, particularly when depiction fails with other imaging modalities.

Frequency and Outcome of Re-interventions after Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To describe frequency, type, and outcome of re-intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

Between September 1996 and December 2003, 308 patients were treated, with data collected prospectively. No patient was lost to follow up, but two were excluded (one primary conversion, and one post-operative death). Vanguard, Talent, Excluder, Zenith, and Quantum devices were used. Follow up required a CT scan before discharge. Initially, a CT scan was done at each follow up. Subsequently, we used duplex ultrasound and abdominal X-ray, with CT scan used selectively.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 36+/-22 months. Re-interventions were required in 47 (15%) patients, 31 (66%) elective and 16 (34%) emergency cases. In 32 patients, the primary re-intervention was successful; in 15 patients an additional 13 secondary and four tertiary re-interventions were required. A total of 72 adjunctive manoeuvres were performed: 49 endovascular (68%) and 23 open (32%). The success of endovascular re-interventions was 80%. The success of open re-interventions was 96%. Open conversions were required in nine patients (3%). There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

EVAR was associated with a low burden of re-interventions, with only 15% patients requiring re-intervention. Our long-term follow up, without regular CT, was simple and effective.

Stent-Graft Repair Versus Open Surgery for the Descending Aorta:A Case-Control Study

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of open surgery versus endovascular repair in patients with pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 44 patients (28 men; mean age 68+/-12 years, range 37-86) treated for DTA pathologies between 1995 and 2003. Twenty-two patients (15 men; mean age 68+/-13 years, range 37-86) undergoing stent-graft implantation were matched for sex, age, emergency operation, and comorbidities (coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) with a 22-patient contemporaneous surgical cohort (13 men; mean age 69+/-11 years, range 41-80).

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was 5% in the stent-graft group and 27% in the open surgery group (p=0.047). The incidences of postoperative stroke and paraplegia were both 5% in the stent-graft group and 9%, respectively, in the open surgery cohort. One patient required a second stent-graft due to an endoleak during the same hospital stay, and 2 reoperations were performed in the standard operation group (p = NS). Lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital were 4.3+/-5.4 and 11.9+/-15.0 days, respectively, in the stent-graft group and 10.0+/-7.4 and 21.5+/-17.4 days, respectively, in the open surgery group (p<0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Stent-graft repair was associated with lower 30-day mortality and comparable complication rates in older patients with significant comorbidities and a high percentage of emergency operations compared to open surgery. Stent-graft implantation shortens ICU and hospital stays significantly. In the future, subgroups of patients who may experience the greatest benefit from stent-graft repair in the long term should be defined.

Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a new technology to treat patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) when the anatomy is suitable. Uncertainty exists about how endovascular repair compares with conventional open surgery. EVAR trial 1 was instigated to compare these treatments in patients judged fit for open AAA repair.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2003, 1082 elective (non-emergency) patients were randomised to receive either EVAR (n=543) or open AAA repair (n=539). Patients aged at least 60 years with aneurysms of diameter 5.5 cm or more, who were fit enough for open surgical repair (anaesthetically and medically well enough for the procedure), were recruited for the study at 41 British hospitals proficient in the EVAR technique. The primary outcome measure is all-cause mortality and these results will be released in 2005. The primary analysis presented here is operative mortality by intention to treat and a secondary analysis was done in per-protocol patients.

FINDINGS

Patients (983 men, 99 women) had a mean age of 74 years (SD 6) and mean AAA diameter of 6.5 cm (SD 1). 1047 (97%) patients underwent AAA repair and 1008 (93%) received their allocated treatment. 30-day mortality in the EVAR group was 1.7% (9/531) versus 4.7% (24/516) in the open repair group (odds ratio 0.35 [95% CI 0.16-0.77], p=0.009). By per-protocol analysis, 30-day mortality for EVAR was 1.6% (8/512) versus 4.6% (23/496) for open repair (0.33 [0.15-0.74], p=0.007). Secondary interventions were more common in patients allocated EVAR (9.8% vs 5.8%, p=0.02).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with large AAAs, treatment by EVAR reduced the 30-day operative mortality by two-thirds compared with open repair. Any change in clinical practice should await durability and longer term results.

Post-Endograft Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Shrinkage Varies Among Hospitals:Observations From Multicenter Trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) shrinkage among hospitals following protocol-driven patient selection and using endografts from a single manufacturer.

METHODS

Standardized inclusion criteria for the Talent endograft multicenter trials included AAA diameter >/=40 mm and proximal neck limits of length >/=5 mm, diameter 14 to 32 mm, and angle </=60 degrees. AAA reporting standards categories were used to classify distal aorta and common iliac artery involvement. Serial computed tomographic scans through 12-month follow-up were examined by independent core laboratory review. Significant shrinkage was defined as a >/=5-mm decrease in the AAA largest minor axis diameter. Trial sites with >10 complete study cases were selected for stepwise logistic regression analysis. In the 13 trial sites meeting this criterion, 323 patients (mean age 74; 93% men) were treated for aneurysms with a mean pretreatment diameter of 53 mm.

RESULTS

At 12 months, significant AAA shrinkage occurred in 192 (59%) cases. The AAA shrinkage rate was 71% to 82% at 3 sites, 60% to 64% at 4 sites, 45% to 50% at 4 sites, and 35% and 27% at the 2 remaining sites. In the multivariate analysis, the hospital site showed a strong, independent association with aneurysm shrinkage (p<0.04). Neck and pretreatment AAA diameters were also found to be important factors (p<0.04). Age, gender, AAA classification, neck length, and angle were not significant correlates. Sixty-four (20%) endoleaks (29 type I, 34 type II, and 1 type III) were observed. The incidence of proximal endoleak was significantly different among sites (p<0.001) and highest in the 3 sites with the lowest AAA shrinkage rate.

CONCLUSIONS

AAA shrinkage rates vary significantly among hospitals using the same endograft and protocol-defined patient selection criteria. Site-specific factors appear to be an important variable leading to successful endograft repair, as defined by post-endograft aneurysm shrinkage.

Effect of improved endograft design on outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to identify factors that lead to improvements in the results of endovascular aneurysm repair, with particular focus on new endograft design.

METHODS

We analyzed data for patients enrolled in the European Collaborators on Stent Graft Techniques for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EUROSTAR) registry, and compared those for endografts now withdrawn from the market with those for endografts currently in use. Patients in whom a variety of endograft types were used in small numbers were excluded. Postoperative and long-term outcomes were initially compared with univariate analyses, and subsequently multivariate tests were used to adjust for baseline differences between the 2 groups. The main outcome measures were freedom from a variety of secondary interventions, aneurysm rupture, and death.

RESULTS

Some 1224 patients received "withdrawn" endografts, and 2768 patients received "current" endografts. The 2 groups were generally similar, but patients with current devices were more often men, significantly older, more frequently unfit for open surgery, and had larger aneurysms with wider necks. Of no surprise, current endografts were also more often used by experienced (>60 previous cases) surgical teams (44% vs 20%; P <.0001). Thirty-day clinical outcomes were comparable in the 2 groups, although patients with withdrawn devices were less likely to have type II endoleak (9.2% vs 5.5%; P <.0001), and those with current devices had a shorter mean hospital stay (5.4 vs 6.8 days; P <.0001). At 3 years more patients with current devices were free from secondary transfemoral intervention (88.4% vs 76%; P <.0001) and conversion to open repair (95.4% vs 93.4%; P =.007). Aneurysm-related mortality at 3 years, defined as death due to aneurysm rupture or within 30 days of a secondary intervention, was also less frequent with current endografts (2.7% vs 4.4%; P =.02). Aneurysm rupture at 3 years was infrequent (0.8% vs 1.8%; P =.07). At multivariate analysis the use of current devices was a protective factor against late conversion to open repair (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.86; P =.014) and aneurysm-related death (hazard ratio, 0.51, 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.75; P =.0008). Larger aneurysm or neck diameter and shorter neck length were also associated with late conversion to open repair; larger aneurysm diameter, older age, and unfitness for open surgery were predictive of aneurysm-related death.

CONCLUSION

Modern endograft design has improved the results of endovascular aneurysm repair.

Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become widely used. Supporters claim high success rates, few complications and a dramatically reduced hospital stay. However, endoleak, endotension and reports of endoprosthesis rupture are causes of concern.

METHODS

A Medline search was undertaken to identify articles on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Additional papers were identified by manual scanning of the references from key articles.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Endoleak is a potentially serious complication of the endovascular technique and occurs in a significant proportion of patients. It is still not possible to judge whether the presence of an endoleak alone signifies failure of treatment, and the long-term durability of prosthetic covered stents is unknown. However, endovascular repair does appear to confer a degree of protection from rupture although patients must be advised of the need for life-long imaging surveillance and, perhaps, further intervention.

Intraoperative management: endovascular stents

This article discusses the current state of minimally invasive treatment options for a variety of vascular diseases. Advances that have been introduced over the last two decades have dramatically changed the practice of vascular surgery and anesthesia. The ability to treat pathology, using both intraluminal and extraluminal means,has provided vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and cardiologists with unique treatment options that were not available less than a decade ago. Peripheral interventions to treat vascular disease have exploded, from 90,000 in 1994 to more than 200,000 in 1997, and endovascular procedures now replace almost 50% of traditional open vascular operations.

Predicting aneurysm enlargement in patients with persistent type II endoleaks

OBJECTIVE

The clinical significance of type II endoleaks is not well understood. Some evidence, however, indicates that some type II endoleaks might result in aneurysm enlargement and rupture. To identify factors that might contribute to aneurysm expansion, we analyzed the influence of several variables on aneurysm growth in patients with persistent type II endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

In a series of 348 EVARs performed during a 10-year period, 32 patients (9.2%) developed type II endoleaks that persisted for more than 6 months. Variables analyzed included those defined by the reporting standards for EVAR (SVS/AAVS) as well as other endoleak characteristics. Univariate, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the association between variables and aneurysm enlargement.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 26.5 months (range, 6-88 months). Thirteen patients (41%) had aneurysm enlargement by 5 mm or more (median increase in diameter, 10 mm), whereas 19 (59%) had stable or shrinking aneurysm diameter. Univariate and Cox regression analyses identified the maximum diameter of the endoleak cavity, ie, the size of the nidus as defined on contrast computed tomography scan, as a significant predictor for aneurysm enlargement (relative risk, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.19; P =.001). The median size of the nidus was 23 mm (range, 13-40 mm) in patients with aneurysm enlargement and 8 mm (range, 5-25 mm) in those without expansion (Mann-Whitney U test, P <.001). Moreover, receiver operating characteristic curve and Cox regression analyses showed that a maximum nidus diameter greater than 15 mm was particularly associated with an increased risk of aneurysm enlargement (relative risk, 11.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-85.8; P =.02). Other risk factors including gender, smoking history, hypertension, need of anticoagulation, aneurysm diameter, type of endograft used, and number or type of collateral vessels were not significant predictors of aneurysm enlargement.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with persistent type II endoleaks after EVAR, the maximum diameter of the endoleak cavity or nidus is an important predictor of aneurysm growth and might indicate the need for more aggressive surveillance as well as earlier treatment.

Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: significance and methods to minimize

OBJECTIVES

We noted substantial differences when measuring repeatedly the same abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) on the same computed tomography (CT) scan. This study quantitated this variability, and methods to minimize it were developed.

METHODS

The CT maximal diameter of 25 AAAs was measured by eight experienced observers, including six vascular surgeons and two radiologists, using two methods: an unstandardized protocol, and a standardized protocol using fine calipers to carefully measure the largest diameter perpendicular to the estimated aneurysm centerline, from outer aneurysm wall to outer wall. The average measurement difference between observers was calculated for each method. The average difference between each observer's measurement and the official radiology report value was also calculated. Agreement between the two measurement methods was assessed with Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

The difference in maximal diameter measurements between each observer averaged 4.0 +/- 5.1 mm (range, 0.0-35.0 mm) with the unstandardized method. The mean measurement difference with the standardized protocol was significantly lower, and averaged 2.8 +/- 4.4 mm (range, 0.0-26.0 mm; P<.05). Measurements taken from the official radiology report differed from each of the observer's standardized measurement by an average of 5.0 +/- 6.3 mm (range, 0.0-28.0 mm). This difference was similar for both the unstandardized and standardized methods. Bland-Altman plots confirmed the wide variation of the maximal diameter measurements when the unstandardized method was compared with the standardized method (95% confidence interval, -9-9 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine CT maximal diameter measurement of AAAs can have substantial interobserver variability. Standardized measurement protocols can decrease, but not eliminate, this measurement variability. Thus apparent size changes based on CT measurements may represent measurement artifact rather than actual aneurysm growth or shrinkage, particularly when a standardized system is not used.

Diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm and outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair: does size matter? A report from EUROSTAR

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to determine the effect of the preoperative diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysms on the midterm outcome after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHOD

The data for 4392 patients who had undergone EVAR were analyzed. Patients were enrolled over 6 years to June 2002 in the EUROSTAR database. Outcomes were compared between three groups defined by the preoperative diameter of the aneurysm: group A (n = 1962), 4.0 to 5.4 cm; group B (n = 1528), 5.5 to 6.4 cm; and group C (n = 902), 6.5 cm or larger. Patient characteristics, details of aortoiliac anatomy, operative procedures, old or current device generation, and postoperative complications in the three patient groups were compared. Outcome events included aneurysm-related death, unrelated death, conversion, and post-EVAR rupture of the aneurysm. Life table analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare outcome in the three study groups. Multivariate Cox models were used to determine whether baseline and follow-up variables were independently associated with adverse outcome events.

RESULTS

Patients in group C were significantly older than patients in groups A and B (73 years vs 70 and 72 years, respectively; P =.003 - P <.0001 for different group comparisons), and more frequently were at higher operative risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >or=3; 63% vs 48% and 54%; P =.0002-P <.0001). Device-related (type I) endoleaks were more frequently observed at early postoperative arteriography in group C compared with groups A and B (9.9% vs 3.7% and 6.8%; P =.01-P <.0001). Postoperatively systemic complications were more frequently present in group C (17.4% vs 12.0% in group A and 12.6% in group B; P <.0001 and.001). The first-month mortality was approximately twice as high in group C compared with the other groups combined (4.1% vs 2.1%; P <.0001). Late rupture was most frequent in group C. Follow-up results at midterm were less favorable in groups C and B compared with group A (freedom from rupture, 90%, 98%, and 98% at 4 years in groups C, B, and A, respectively; P <.0001 for group C vs groups A and B). Aneurysm-related death was highest in group C (88% freedom at 4 years, compared with 95% in group B and 97% in A; P =.001 and P <.0001, respectively; group B vs A, P =.004). The annual rate of aneurysm-related death in group C was 1% in the first 3 years, but accelerated to 8.0% in the fourth year. Incidence of unrelated death also was higher in groups C and B than in group A (76% and 82% freedom at 4 years vs 87%; P <.0001 for both comparisons). Ratio of aneurysm-related to unrelated death was 23%, 21%, and 50% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Cox models demonstrated that the correlation between large aneurysms (group C) and all assessed outcome events was independent and highly significant. Older generation devices had an independent association with aneurysm-related and unrelated deaths (P =.02 and P =.04, respectively). However, this correlation was less strong than large aneurysm diameter (P =.0001 and P =.0009, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The midterm outcome of large aneurysms after EVAR was associated with increased rates of aneurysm-related death, unrelated death, and rupture. Reports of EVAR should stratify their outcomes according to the diameter of the aneurysm. Large aneurysms need a more rigorous post-EVAR surveillance schedule than do smaller aneurysms. In small aneurysms EVAR was associated with excellent outcome. This finding may justify reappraisal of currently accepted management strategies.

Outcomes of secondary interventions after abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair

PURPOSE

We assessed the distribution of secondary interventions after aortic stent grafting (EVAR) performed to treat infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and evaluated clinical success and survival in patients who underwent a secondary procedure (group 2) compared with patients who did not undergo a secondary procedure (group 1).

METHODS

Two hundred fifty patients (mean age, 71.3 years) with asymptomatic AAAs (mean aneurysm diameter, 54.5 mm) underwent treatment with commercially available stent grafts. Mean follow-up was 28 months (median, 25 months). Secondary procedures were defined as any additional procedures performed after initial graft placement to treat endoleak, migration, kinking, stenosis, or occlusion. Overall clinical success was defined according to reporting standards of the Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients (27%) required 112 secondary procedures, with a mean time from initial graft placement of 18.2 months. Patients who received grafts since removed from the market required more secondary procedures (59%, procedure:patient ratio) compared with patients who received devices still on the market (21%; P =.001). Thirty-six patients (53%) required a single secondary procedure, 24 patients (35%) required two procedures, 5 patients (10%) required three procedures, 2 patients (3%) required four procedures, and 1 patient required five secondary procedures. Ninety-eight procedures (87%) were performed with endovascular methods, including placement of 42 additional covered stent grafts (36 iliac, 6 aortic), with a success rate of 85%; 35 embolization procedures (21 lumbar, 9 internal iliac artery, 5 mesenteric), with only 23 (65%) successful; 14 angioplasty procedures, with 85% successful; 4 thrombolysis procedures, 2 of them successful (50%); and 3 successfully placed new endografts within a previous endovascular graft. Surgical secondary operations included nine femorofemoral bypass procedures and three femoral thromboendarterectomies, all of which remain patent; one cerclage of an external iliac limb; and one laparoscopic repair of a type II endoleak, which was successful. Overall clinical success rate for EVAR was 84% (211 of 250) in this series. Clinical success rate in groups 1 and 2 was 91% (166 of 182) versus 66% (45 of 68; P =.001) if all endoleaks on the most recent computed tomography scans are taken into account, and 94% (171 of 182) versus 76% (52 of 68; P =.001) if type II endoleak without aneurysm growth is not considered failure. The survival rate and rupture-free survival in groups 1 and 2 were, respectively, 97.7% +/- 1.0% and 98.5% +/- 1.4% at 1 month, 95.9% +/- 1.5% and 96.9% +/- 2.1% at 6 months, 94.4% +/- 2.0% and 93.2% +/- 3.4% at 1 year, and 80.8% +/- 5.2% and 88.5% +/- 5.0% at 3 years (P =.273, log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

With close follow-up and a significant number of secondary operations, this 8-year experience has not included any aneurysm ruptures to date. Secondary operations did not lead to increased mortality, but were associated with more surgical conversions and with a higher clinical failure rate.

Quality of Life after Endovascular and Open AAA Repair. Results of a Randomised Triala

AIM

To compare the quality of life (QoL) in the first postoperative year after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open repair (OR) in a randomised study.

METHODS

In the Dutch Randomised Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) trial, patients are randomly allocated to EVAR or OR. QoL questionnaires (SF-36 and EuroQoL-5D) were sent to all patients preoperatively (PREOP) and at five time points in the first postoperative year (3W, 6W, 3M, 6M and 12M). Between November 1999 and August 2002, 153 patients (141 male; 12 female) were randomised (78 EVAR and 75 OR; one crossover from OR to EVAR). The EuroQoL-5D scores and the eight domains of the SF-36 for the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Changes over time were analysed using the Wilcoxon sign test.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, gender and SVS risk factors). The preoperative QoL scores of the study group were similar to the QoL scores of the general population of the same age. After 3W the OR group showed a significant decrease on the EuroQol-5D (p=0.022) and in six of the eight SF-36 domains. The EVAR group also showed a significant decrease on the EuroQol-5D (p=0.004) and in 5 of the 8 domains of the SF-36. At 6W the EuroQol-5D had recovered to baseline in the OR group and the decreased domains of the SF-36 had partially recovered. In the EVAR group the EuroQol-5D and three of the five decreased SF-36 domains, had returned to baseline. From 6M on, the OR group reported a significantly higher score on the EuroQoL-5D than the EVAR group (p=0.045 (6M) and p=0.001 (12M)).

CONCLUSION

In the early postoperative period there is a small, yet significant QoL advantage for EVAR compared to OR. At 6 months and beyond, patients reported better QoL after OR than after EVAR.

Is a Type II Endoleak after EVAR a Harbinger of Risk? Causes and Outcome of Open Conversion and Aneurysm Rupture during Follow-up

OBJECTIVE

There is still debate whether type II endoleaks represent a risk for the patient after EVAR. Treatment policies vary from fairly conservative to active intervention. In this analysis risk factors for type II endoleak and adverse events during follow-up were assessed. In addition, risk factors and causes for conversion to open repair and for rupture post-EVAR were studied.

METHODS

The data of 3595 patients, who underwent operation between 1996 and 2002 in 114 European institutions that collaborated in the EUROSTAR Registry, were assessed. To accurately assess the influence of type II endoleaks patients with type I, III and combined endoleaks were excluded from the present study cohort.

RESULTS

A combined adverse outcome event consisting of aneurysmal growth, transfemoral reintervention, and transabdominal secondary procedures (including laparoscopic branch vessel clipping) occurred in 55% in patients with type II endoleak at 3 years, compared to 15% in patients without any endoleak (p<0.0001). Conversion to open repair or post-EVAR rupture was not significantly associated with type II endoleaks. An independent association of device migration and expansion of the aneurysm with late conversion was observed. The cumulative incidence of aneurysm rupture at 3 years of follow-up was 1.2% for an annual rate of 0.4%. Variables that significantly and independently correlated with rupture were size of the aneurysm at preoperative measurement and device migration during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Endoleak type II may not be harmless as it was more frequently associated with enlargement of the aneurysm and reinterventions. Large aneurysms and migration of the device were the main risk factors for rupture. The clinical implications of these findings may involve more frequent surveillance visits for patients with type II endoleak. Aneurysm expansion is a clear indication for reintervention. Patients with large aneurysms, 65 mm or larger, may also benefit from a more comprehensive surveillance schedule.

Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective

OBJECTIVES

The conservative versus therapeutic approach to type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) has been controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of the conservative approach of embolizing type II endoleak only when persistent for more than 6 months and associated with aneurysm sac growth of 5 mm or more.

METHODS

Data for 486 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR were analyzed for incidence and outcome of type II endoleaks. Spiral computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed, and patient outcome was evaluated at either office visit or telephone contact. Patients with new or late-appearing type II endoleak were evaluated with spiral CT at 6-month intervals to evaluate both persistence of the endoleak and size of the aneurysm sac. Persistent (>or=6 months) type II endoleak and aneurysm sac growth of 5 mm or greater were treated with either translumbar glue or coil embolization of the lumbar source, or transarterial coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery.

RESULTS

Type II endoleaks were detected in 90 (18.5%) patients. With a mean follow-up of 21.7 +/- 16 months, only 35 (7.2%) patients had type II endoleak that persisted for 6 months or longer. Aneurysm sac enlargement was noted in 5 patients, representing 1% of the total series. All 5 patients underwent successful translumbar sac embolization (n = 4) or transarterial inferior mesenteric artery embolization (n = 4) at a mean follow-up of 18.2 +/- 8.0 months, with no recurrence or aneurysm sac growth. No patient with treated or untreated type II endoleak has had rupture of the aneurysm. The mean global cost for treatment of persistent type II endoleak associated with aneurysm sac growth was US dollars 6695.50 (hospital cost plus physician reimbursement). Treatment in the 30 patients with persistent type II endoleak but no aneurysm sac growth would have represented an additional cost of US dollars 200000 or more. The presence or absence of a type II endoleak did not affect survival (78% vs 73%) at 48 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective intervention to treat type II endoleak that persists for 6 months and is associated with aneurysm enlargement seems to be both safe and cost-effective. Longer follow-up will determine whether this conservative approach to management of type II endoleak is the standard of care.

Variable sac behavior after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of core laboratory data

OBJECTIVES

The behavior of the aneurysm sac after endovascular grafting has been the subject of significant speculation. The importance of sac behavior is manifested by the correlation between aneurysm size or size change and risk for rupture, and potentially further extrapolated to define the need for secondary intervention. This study was undertaken to define graft-specific differences and the effect of endoleak on sac remodeling.

METHODS

Core laboratory data were obtained for three US Phase II clinical trials. Patients were included if they met anatomic inclusion criteria and underwent placement of the latest version of a bifurcated endovascular prosthesis. Unsupported Dacron (Ancure), supported Dacron (Zenith), and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Excluder) grafts were evaluated. Digitized images were electronically assessed for aneurysm size (area, maximum, minimum diameter) with National Institutes of Health Image software. Two blinded reviewers analyzed each radiographic study to ensure accurate image selection and establish the presence or absence of endoleak. A third reviewer adjudicated discrepancies. chi(2) analysis and mixed nonlinear modeling were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

Of 1506 patients evaluated, 723 (227 Ancure, 343 Excluder, 153 Zenith) met inclusion criteria for the study. Mean follow-up was 23.2 months (Ancure, 31.3 months; Excluder, 19.6 months; Zenith, 19.3 months). The incidence of any endoleak was 39.1% (Ancure, 58.1%; Excluder, 34.7%; Zenith, 20.9%; P <.001). Type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size were determinants of rate of aneurysm shrinkage. Reduction in sac size was greatest with the Zenith graft, followed by the Ancure and Excluder grafts. Presence of endoleak had a moderating effect on rate of sac shrinkage with the Zenith and Ancure grafts; however, sac size increased in the presence of endoleak with the Excluder graft. Finally, baseline size was positively correlated with rate of aneurysm shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

The behavior of the aneurysm sac depends on the type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size of the sac. Differential sac behavior must be considered when determining the need for secondary interventions, timing follow-up studies, and assessing success or failure of endovascular repair.

Ischemic Colitis following Translumbar Thrombin Injection for Treatment of Endoleak

Endoleaks remain a significant challenge after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Translumbar thrombin injection of the aneurysm sac has been used to treat endoleaks, with low reported morbidity. We present an unusual case of ischemic colitis following translumbar thrombin injection of an endoleak. A 67-year-old male with a 5.8-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was evaluated for endograft repair. The patient underwent preoperative embolization of the right hypogastric artery. The AAA was repaired using a unibody bifurcated graft (Ancure). Completion aortogram revealed no endoleak and a widely patent left hypogastric artery. Computed tomography (CT) at 2 months showed an endoleak appearing to originate from a lumbar artery near the proximal attachment site with outflow via the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). The endoleak was successfully treated with CT-guided translumbar injection of 8000 units of thrombin into the aneurysm sac. The patient subsequently developed chronic abdominal pain, diarrhea, and a weight loss of 20 lbs. Colonoscopy revealed ischemic colitis of the rectosigmoid colon. Duplex evaluation indicated a patent superior mesenteric artery and IMA distal to its origin. Medical treatment failed and the patient underwent a low anterior resection 2 months later (4 months post-EVAR). Subsequently, the aneurysm has decreased to 5.4 cm, with no evidence of endoleak at 1 year. We conclude that ischemic colitis may occur following translumbar thrombin injection. Thrombin embolization into the rectosigmoid arcade via the IMA was most likely the cause in this case. This problem can potentially be avoided by treating the IMA endoleak outflow prior to translumbar thrombin injection of the aneurysm sac. Thorough arteriographic evaluation of endoleaks should be performed prior to any interventions.

Endotension is Influenced by Wall Compliance in a Latex Aneurysm Model

OBJECTIVES

Even though endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) creates a closed chamber except for patent branches, the intra-sac pressure is never zero. This study was designed to investigate whether, and to what extent, aneurysm wall compliance influences intra-sac pressure.

DESIGN

In vitro experimental study.

METHODS

Aneurysm models with six and 12 latex layers were produced, resulting in elastic and stiff circumferential compliance (3.5 +/- 0.5 and 0.9 +/- 0.3%/100 mmHg, respectively). The models with an 18 mm internal neck and maximum aneurysm diameter of 60 mm were inserted into an in vitro circulation system. The systemic mean pressure (SPmean) was varied from 50 to 120 mmHg. After the aneurysm was excluded with a knitted polyethylene graft, aneurysm sac mean pressure (ASPmean) and aneurysm sac pulse pressure (ASPpulse) were measured. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. Statistics were performed using repeated measurements of variance; p<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In the model EVAR created a closed chamber without endoleak, but with an aneurysm sac pressure related to wall compliance. In the elastic aneurysm model with six latex coats the aneurysm sac mean pressure (ASPmean) and the aneurysm sac pulse pressure (ASPpulse) at all systemic pressures were significantly lower than they were in the stiffer model with 12 latex coats (p<0.05). At a SPmean of 90 mmHg, the ASPmean was 21.0 +/- 0.9 mmHg (six latex coats) and 26.0 +/- 0.2 mmHg (12 latex coats) (p<0.05), the ASPpulse was 5.7 +/- 0.2 mmHg (six latex coats) and 8.8 +/- 0.3 mmHg (12 latex coats) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This in vitro model demonstrated that the aneurysm sac mean pressure (ASPmean) and the aneurysm sac pulse pressure (ASPpulse) were significantly influenced by the compliance of the aneurysm wall. These data highlight the need for further studies regarding endotension.

Small Intestinal Submucosa Aneurysm Sac Embolization for Endoleak Prevention after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endografting: A Pilot Study in Sheep

PURPOSE

To percutaneously create an improved abdominal aortic aneurysm model of endoleak after endograft placement and to explore efficacy of small intestinal submucosal embolization of the residual aneurysmal sac for prevention of endoleaks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Abdominal aortic aneurysm was created transluminally by over-dilation of a Palmaz stent in 12 sheep. Approximately 20% undersized endografts suspended between two stent-graft adapters were used to bridge the aneurysm in a manner that two lumbar pairs remained patent within the residual aneurysm sac. Size of the residual aneurysm sac was increased by placement of an undersized stent-graft consisting of damaged lyophilized small intestinal submucosal sheets sandwiched between two Zilver stents. In six sheep, residual aneurysm sacs were embolized by combining small intestinal submucosal sponge and small intestinal submucosal sheet pieces. The other six sheep served as the control group. Angiography performed immediately after the procedure was compared with follow-up angiography before the animals were killed at 1, 3, and 7 months. Gross and histologic examinations were also obtained.

RESULTS

Aortic ruptures (n = 3) and dissections (n = 2) during aneurysm creation responded well to endograft placement. Eleven endografts were placed successfully, one was misplaced. The mean diameter of aneurysmal sac was 16 mm in the study and 15.2 mm in the control group. In the study group, in four sheep, the sac and seven pairs of lumbar arteries were occluded by embolization and remained obstructed by organized thrombus during the entire study. There were no type II endoleaks. Four type III new endoleaks developed without antegrade filling of lumbar arteries. In the control group, five animals had type I and II endoleaks at the initial studies. Only one sheep exhibited completely organized thrombosis of the aneurysmal sac and without endoleaks. In the other four sheep with partially organized sac thrombosis, endoleaks were unchanged. One type III endoleak occurred in this group.

CONCLUSION

The combination of small intestinal submucosal sponge and small intestinal submucosal sheet pieces is a promising embolic material for occlusion of the residual sac after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and for prevention of type II endoleaks.

Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography as a noninvasive method to characterize endoleaks: initial results compared with conventional angiography

PURPOSE

Several types of endoleaks have been described, each with different methods of treatment. Conventional arteriography is widely regarded as the gold standard for the classification of endoleaks. Recently, faster magnetic resonance gradients have allowed for rapid data acquisition and review of vascular studies as a real-time continuous angiogram (time resolved magnetic resonance angiography [TR-MRA]). This study was performed to compare the findings of TR-MRA with conventional angiography for the characterization of endoleaks.

METHODS

Between June 2002 and June 2003, 12 patients with documented endoleaks following endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms (10 abdominal and two thoracic) underwent TR-MRA to identify and characterize the endoleak. All patients had nitinol-based aortic stent grafts. MRA was performed on a 1.5-Tesla magnet (Sonata class; Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin, NJ). The TR-MRA studies were reviewed under continuous observation as a "cine MR angiogram." These MRA data sets were used to classify the endoleaks into types 1 through 3. The patients underwent conventional angiography following the MRA to confirm the findings and to plan treatment. The MRA findings were compared with the findings made at conventional arteriography.

RESULTS

TR-MRA identified seven patients with type 1 leaks, including four proximal and three distal. Four patients had type 2 leaks, including two arising from the inferior mesenteric artery and two from an iliolumbar artery. One patient had a type 3 leak. Conventional angiography confirmed the type of endoleak in all 12 patients.

CONCLUSION

These initial results demonstrate TR-MRA to be an effective noninvasive method for classifying endoleaks. This technique may allow for screening of patients with endoleaks to identify those requiring urgent repair.

Delayed open conversion following endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair: partial (or complete) endograft preservation as a useful adjunct

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to review our experience with delayed open conversion (>30 days) following endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair (EVAR) and to introduce the concept and advantages of endograft retention in this setting.

METHODS

From January 1992 to January 2003, a total of 386 EVARs using a variety of endografts were successfully deployed. Eleven (2.8%) patients required delayed conversion to open repair at an average of 30 months (range, 10-64). Data from all patients undergoing both EVAR and open conversion were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

EVARs were performed using grafts made by Talent (4), Vanguard (2,) AneuRx (1), and Surgeon (4). Conversion to open repair (9 transabdominal, 1 retroperitoneal, 1 transabdominal plus thoracotomy) was performed for aneurysm rupture in 7 patients (4 type 1 endoleak, 2 type 2 endoleak, 1 aortoenteric fistula) and aneurysm enlargement in 4 patients (1 type 1 endoleak, 1 type 2 endoleak, 1 type 3 endoleak, 1 endotension). Patients with aneurysm rupture were treated on an emergent basis. Complete removal of the endograft with supraceliac cross-clamping was performed in two cases. One patient (rupture) did not survive the operation, and one patient (aortoenteric fistula) died 2 weeks postoperatively. In the remaining nine cases, the endograft was either completely (1) or partially (6) removed, or left in situ (2). Supraceliac balloon control (2), supraceliac clamping (1), suprarenal clamping (1), or infrarenal clamping (5) was used in these cases. All nine of these patients survived the operation. In one procedure in which the endograft was left intact (endotension), repair was accomplished by exposing the endograft and by placing a standard tube graft over it as a sleeve. In the second procedure in which the graft was left in situ (rupture), the graft was well incorporated, and bleeding lumbar arteries were oversewn and the sac was closed tightly over the endograft. In the remaining 7 cases, the endograft was transected and the proximal portion only (6) or the proximal and distal portions (1) were excised. All surviving patients continue to do well and remain without complications associated with the endograft remnant at a mean follow-up of 22 months (range, 3-56) from the time of open conversion and 46 months (range, 10-73) from the time of original EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Open repair in the setting of a long-standing endograft offers several unique technical challenges but can be successfully accomplished in most patients. Preservation of all or part of the endograft is possible in many patients. This technique simplifies the operative approach and is preferred over complete endograft removal if possible.

The Importance of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography in Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

Endovascular repair of the aorta (EVAR) is a promising alternative to open repair. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a sensitive imaging modality for aortic disease. We reviewed our experience with TEE in thoracic EVAR. Seven patients underwent thoracic EVAR under general anesthesia. Intraoperative angiography and TEE were used to identify the extent of the aneurysm and guide placement of the stent. Doppler color flow was used to supplement angiography to detect flow within the aneurysmal sac after stent placement. The endograft was successfully deployed in six patients. Endoleak was identified by TEE in three patients and confirmed by angiography in two of them. EVAR was abandoned in one patient on the basis of TEE findings of extensive aortic dissection. We found TEE to be a valuable intraoperative tool for 1) identifying aortic pathology, 2) confirming that the guidewire is in the true lumen, 3) aiding stent graft positioning, and 4) supplementing angiography for detecting endoleaks. TEE can supplement information obtained by angiography to enhance the accuracy of EVAR and potentially improve outcomes. The anesthesiologist is ideally positioned to provide the endovascular team with vital information regarding stent positioning, endoleaks, and cardiac performance with a single imaging modality.

IMPLICATIONS

Endovascular repair is an emerging alternative to open surgery for aortic aneurysms. We found transesophageal echocardiography to be a valuable imaging tool for guiding placement of the endograft, detecting leaks around the endograft, and supplementing information derived from angiography during endograft deployment.

Rupture of Infra-renal Aortic Aneurysm after Endovascular Repair: A Series from EUROSTAR Registry

OBJECTIVES

Although small, the risk of rupture after EVAR remains a major concern. The aim of this study was to identify mechanisms of late aneurysm rupture after endovascular repair.

METHODS

Patients who suffered a proven aneurysm rupture after EVAR were identified from the EUROSTAR (European Collaborators on Stent-graft Techniques for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair) registry. Complications preceding rupture were studied to identify common patterns and possible mechanisms of late rupture.

RESULTS

A rupture was documented in 34 patients resulting in death of 21 (62%). Adverse events documented during previous follow-up in these patients included endoleak (30%), migration (18%), limb occlusion (12%) and kinking (12%). The findings at time of rupture were documented in 24 patients and including endoleak: Type III (10), Type I (9), Type II (1); stent-graft disintegration (2) and migration (3). Aneurysm diameter changes could be ascertained in 24 patients and had increased in only seven.

CONCLUSION

The importance of graft-related endoleak, stent-graft disintegration and migration in the causation of aneurysm rupture was confirmed. Poor compliance with follow-up schedule was also identified as a common feature. However, the absence of complications in some patients, who attended regularly for follow-up, highlights the difficulty of predicting rupture after EVAR.

Initial successful management of type I endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with n-butyl cyanoacrylate adhesive

OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter embolization with coils and other agents has been described as a treatment method for type II endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Type I endoleak has not been treated commonly with such therapies, although most investigators believe they warrant definitive intervention. The liquid adhesive n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) is often used to treat congenital arteriovenous malformations. The objective of this study is to report our initial experience in treating type I endoleak with n-BCA and with a variety of other interventions.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 270 patients who underwent EVAR at our institution between January 1994 and December 2002. Of these, 24 patients had type I endoleak (8.9%), diagnosed either intraoperatively (n = 13, 52%) or during follow-up (n = 12, 48%). Among these 24 patients, 17 had proximal leaks and the remaining 8 patients had distal leaks. These cases form the focus of this study.

RESULTS

Twenty-two leaks required endovascular intervention, with the following success rate: n-BCA, 12 of 13 cases (92.3%); extender cuffs, 4 of 5 cases (80%); coils with or without thrombin, 3 of 4 cases (75%). In one patient with persistent endoleak despite attempted endovascular intervention the device ultimately was surgically explanted, and the patient did well. Of six patients with endoleak initially managed expectantly, two eventually underwent attempts at definitive intervention, both with n-BCA. Three sealed spontaneously before definitive intervention could be performed; and in one 97-year-old patient who refused intervention, the aneurysm subsequently ruptured and the patient died. In total, 13 patients with type I endoleak underwent n-BCA transcatheter embolotherapy. No serious complications were directly related to this therapy. Colon ischemia developed in one patient, and was believed to be a result of thromboembolism during wire and catheter manipulation rather than n-BCA treatment. Twelve of these 13 leaks remain sealed at mean follow-up of 5.9 months (range, 0-19 months).

CONCLUSION

Our initial use of n-BCA occlusion suggests that it may be an effective and safe method of treatment of type I endoleak after EVAR. In particular, n-BCA embolotherapy may be especially useful in treating type I endoleak not amenable to placement of extender cuffs. Larger case series and longer follow-up are needed before this treatment is more broadly recommended. Type I endoleak after EVAR can be treated successfully with a variety of endovascular methods, and surgical explantation is rarely required.

Endoleaks after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms shows promising initial results. Endoleaks represent one of the unique causes of endovascular repair failure not seen with traditional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Endoleaks occur when there is blood flow outside the stent-graft lumen but within the aneurysm sac. They can be difficult to diagnose and treat, and their management is a source of continued controversy. This review further defines endoleaks and the clinical challenges that they create. Current methods for endoleak detection, classification, and management are reviewed.

Emergency treatment of acute symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Outcome of a prospective intent-to-treat by EVAR protocol

OBJECTIVE

Outcome of treatment of patients with ruptured or symptomatic non-ruptured aneurysm (rAAA and snrAAA), preferentially treated by emergency endovascular repair was assessed. The outcome was compared with a historical group of patients treated by open repair.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two groups of patients presenting with acute symptomatic AAA were compared. Group I (study group) consisted of 40 consecutive prospectively enrolled patients from May 2001 until June 2002, in whom emergency endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (e-EVAR) was the preferential management. Short or wide neck or profound hypovolemic shock were exclusion criteria for e-EVAR. Group II (control group) consisted of 28 patients, retrospectively analysed, all treated by conventional surgical repair between January 1999 and May 2001. In group I, 26 patients had rAAA and in group II 22 patients. The other patients had snrAAA.

RESULTS

In group I, 14 patients were treated by open repair. Unsuitable anatomy or profound hypovolemia was the cause of open repair in eight patients, while logistic reasons were the reasons for use of open repair in six patients (off-protocol use of open surgery). Thus, in this prospective series the feasibility of EVAR was 80% (32/40). Patient characteristics, proportion rAAA or hemodynamically unstable patients were comparable in group I and II. Volume of blood loss and need for fluid transfusion were significantly less in group I compared to group II. The perioperative mortality in group I was significantly less than in group II (20% vs. 43%, respectively, p = 0.04). If patients with rAAA were considered the mortality was 31% in group I and 50% in group II, which difference did not reach the level of statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

e-EVAR was a feasible treatment in the majority of patients with rAAA and snrAAA. Blood loss and the requirements of fluid transfusion were significantly decreased. Most importantly in this institutional series significantly lower first-month mortality was observed in the group with preferential e-EVAR compared to a control group. A multi-center study assessing the outcome of preferential use of e-EVAR in patients with acute symptomatic AAA is required.

Does the wide application of endovascular AAA repair affect the results of open surgery?

PURPOSE

to examine the effect of the adoption of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) on the outcome of open repair (OR).

METHODS

between May 1998 and December 2001, EVAR (Zenith) was performed in 117 patients, and OR was performed because of anatomic restrictions in 40 (group A), and because of young age in 11 patients (group B).

RESULTS

EVAR patients had higher ASA classifications (p < 0.0001). EVAR was associated with a 98.3% (115 patients) technical success rate, one conversion to OR and one fatal cardiac arrest. Thirty-day mortality was 2.6% (3 patients) in EVAR, 15% (6 patients) in group A and none in group B. There was no difference in late survival between the three groups. Late reinterventions, mainly endovascular, were more frequent in EVAR. At a median follow-up of 17 months one stent-graft had migrated 5 mm distally and five stents had fractured, but without clinical consequence.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR provides good results even with inclusion of high-risk patients. The adoption of EVAR may adversely affect the results of OR offered to patients because of anatomic considerations. However, OR continues to be the first option for low-risk young patients.

Salvage of a difficult situation: method for conversion of failed endograft

Complications of endovascular aneurysm repair can be difficult to manage. One of the more difficult situations is conversion to open surgery because of a failed endograft. We describe a technique for conversion that allows the proximal attachment system to remain intact. It may also enable infrarenal clamping of the aorta during the operation. The anastomosis is performed by incorporating the proximal attachment system of the endograft. This technique simplifies both vascular control of the aorta and the necessary reconstruction during creation of the proximal anastomosis. We believe this technique has important advantages when conversion of a failed endograft is required.

Technique and results of transfemoral superselective coil embolization of type II lumbar endoleak

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to describe the technique of transfemoral superselective coil embolization of type II endoleak and its influence on abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter.

METHODS

Over 23 months, 104 aortic stent grafts were deployed to exclude abdominal aortic aneurysms, at an academic medical center. Increase in aneurysm diameter and perigraft findings on contrast material-enhanced computed tomography scans prompted arteriography. Procedures were performed solely by vascular surgeons in a surgical angiography suite. In 7 patients aneurysm access was via the iliolumbar branches of the internal iliac artery, and in 1 patient aneurysm access was via the inferior mesenteric artery through the arc of Riolan from the superior mesenteric artery. Coaxial catheters were placed to gain access to the aneurysm (8F to 5F to 3F, or 5F to 3F). A 3F Tracker18 was the most distal catheter through which an assortment of 0.018 microcoils were deployed within the aneurysm, and the origin of the feeding vessels when possible.

RESULTS

Aneurysm diameter increased 0.48 +/- 0.2 cm over 10.8 +/- 5 months before superselective coil embolization. In 6 of 8 patients superselective coil embolization embolization resulted in a mean decrease in aneurysm diameter of 1.3 +/- 1.2 cm over 9 +/- 3.2 months. Failure was presumed due to inability to reach the aneurysm sac in 1 patient and was associated with oral anticoagulation in 1 other patient.

CONCLUSION

Proper identification of the source of type II endoleak and its complete occlusion, combined with aneurysm sac coiling, may result in prompt decrease in aneurysm size.

The significance and management of different types of endoleaks

Development of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been accompanied by previously unencountered complications. The most challenging but least understood of these complications is the incomplete seal of the endovascular graft (endoleak), a phenomenon that has a variety of causes. An important consequence of endoleakage may be persistent pressurization of the aneurysm sac, which may ultimately lead to post-EVAR rupture. Data of 110 European centers were recorded in a central database (EUROSTAR). Patient, anatomic characteristics, and operative and device details were correlated with the occurrence of different types of endoleaks. Outcome events during follow-up, particularly expansion of the aneurysm, incidence of conversion to open repair, and post-EVAR rupture were assessed in the different categories of endoleaks and in a group of patients without any endoleak. Type I and III endoleak were associated with an increased frequency of open conversions or risk of rupture of the aneurysm. Device-related endoleaks also correlated with an increased need for secondary interventions. These types of endoleaks need to be treated without delay, and when no other possibilities are present, an open conversion to avert the risk of rupture should be considered. Type II endoleaks do not pose an indication for urgent treatment. However, they may not be harmless, because there was a frequent association with enlargement of aneurysm and reinterventions. Our findings suggest that more frequent surveillance examinations are indicated than in patients without collateral endoleak. The indication for intervention is primarily dictated by documented expansion of the aneurysm.

Durability of aortouniiliac endografting with femorofemoral crossover: 4-year experience in the Evt/Guidant trials

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated mid-term results of the multicenter EVT/Guidant aortouniiliac endograft (AI) trial and ascertained the durability of this endovascular technique in patients unable to undergo standard bifurcated endografting.

METHODS

From November 1996 to December 1998, 121 patients were enrolled to receive the AI device on the basis of complex iliac artery anatomy contraindicating bifurcated endografting. Clinical data were centrally collected, and radiographic data were evaluated by core facility.

RESULTS

AI placement was technically successful in 113 of 121 patients. At operation, patients who underwent AI had significantly more arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and peripheral occlusive disease (P <.05) compared with patients who underwent open aneurysmorrhaphy in the EVT/Guidant trials, indicating comorbid features in this anatomic cohort. Distal AI attachment was performed to the external iliac artery in 40 (36%) patients. Median follow-up was 38 months. In the AI group, overall aneurysm diameter decreased over the duration of study from 54.4 +/- 9.6 mm to 44.4 +/- 16.4 mm (P =.004). At 24 and 36 months after repair, reduction in aneurysm size was associated with absence of endoleak (P =.003 and P =.008, respectively). Aneurysms shrunk or remained stable in 109 (96.5%) patients. Endoleak was identified in 52.3% of patients at discharge, and at follow-up in 30.9% at 1 year, 34.8% at 2 years, 28.6% at 3 years, and 30.4% at 4 years. Type II endoleak predominated. Leak from failure to completely occlude contralateral iliac flow accounted for 8 of 58 endoleaks (13.8%) at discharge. Sixteen patients (14.2%) underwent postoperative endoleak treatment; in one of these patients open conversion was necessary at 20 months. Post-procedure thigh or buttock claudication developed in 16 patients (14.2%). Thirteen patients (81.3%) had either distal attachment in the external iliac artery or contralateral type IIA occlusion. Fifteen patients (13.3%) required intervention because of reduced limb flow; one of these patients underwent open conversion at 27 months, and another underwent axillofemoral grafting at 28 months. Device migration was confirmed in 2 (1.8%) patients, without current clinical sequelae. Whereas no femorofemoral graft thromboses occurred, graft infection developed in 3 patients (2.6%). During follow-up, aneurysm in 2 patients ruptured. Late death occurred in 41 patients (36.3%). Twenty-four patients (58.5%) died of cardiopulmonary disease; one death was endograft-related after aneurysm rupture; and one death was related to femorofemoral bypass infection. Actuarial survival was 78.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71%-86%) at 2 years and 63.4% (95% CI, 54%-73%) at 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with significant comorbid conditions and complex iliac anatomy unfavorable for bifurcated endografting, AI with femorofemoral bypass grafting is safe and effective. In most patients this endovascular option provides satisfactory mid-term results.

True juxta-anastomotic aneurysms in the residual infra-renal abdominal aorta

INTRODUCTION

abdominal aortic dilatation can occur above the graft following repair of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study aimed to determine the incidence and possible aetiological associations of recurrent juxta-anastomotic aneurysms following open repair of AAA.

METHODS

the diameter of the infra-renal aorta above the graft of 135 patients who had previously undergone open AAA repair was determined using ultrasound. In those where the diameter was greater than 40 mm a CT scan was undertaken. Co-morbid and operative details were determined from the patients and their clinical notes.

RESULTS

seven patients had true juxta-anastomotic aneurysms (>40 mm) in the residual infra-renal abdominal aorta, the occurrence of which was associated with tobacco smoking and hypertension. There was no association with other co-morbid factors, surgical operative details or the development of iliac aneurysms (which occurred in 3% of patients).

CONCLUSIONS

true juxta-anastomotic aneurysms develop in the residual infra-renal neck of patients following open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Tobacco smoking and hypertension are significant factors associated with the development of these aneurysms. This group of patients may warrant surveillance to prevent aneurysm rupture.

Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery

Decision-making in regard to elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) requires careful assessment of factors that influence rupture risk, operative mortality, and life expectancy. Individualized consideration of these factors in each patient is essential, and the role of patient preference is of increasing importance. It is not possible or appropriate to recommend a single threshold diameter for intervention which can be generalized to all patients. Based upon the best available current evidence, 5.5 cm is the best threshold for repair in an "average" patient. However, subsets of younger, good-risk patients or aneurysms at higher rupture risk may be identified in whom repair at smaller sizes is justified. Conversely, delay in repair until larger diameter may be best for older, higher-risk patients, especially if endovascular repair is not possible. Intervention at diameter <5.5 cm appears indicated in women with AAA. If a patient has suitable anatomy, endovascular repair may be considered, and it is most advantageous for older, higher-risk patients or patients with a hostile abdomen or other technical factors that may complicate standard open repair. With endovascular repair, perioperative morbidity and recovery time are clearly reduced; however, there is a higher reintervention rate, increased surveillance burden, and a small but ongoing risk of AAA rupture. There is no justification at present for different indications for endovascular repair, such as earlier treatment of smaller AAA. Until long-term outcome of endoluminal repair is better defined and results of randomized trials available, the choice between endovascular and open repair will continue to rely heavily on patient preference.

Aortic side branch perfusion alone does not account for high intra-sac pressure after endovascular repair (EVAR) in the absence of graft-related endoleak

OBJECTIVE

to examine the effect of stent-graft deployment on pressure within an aneurysm sac and to investigate the potential sources of intra-sac pressure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

intra-sac pressure was monitored during and immediately after endovascular repair via an indwelling catheter. Intra-sac pressure was also monitored during conventional open repair and was compared with the pressure measured within patent lumbar and inferior mesenteric side-branches, both before and after restoration of iliac arterial blood flow. Intra-sac and side-branch pressures were recorded and expressed as ratios of simultaneously measured radial artery pressure.

RESULTS

in the absence of a graft-related endoleak (23/25 patients), endovascular repair resulted in a significant reduction in intra-sac pulse pressure (median ratio 0.31 IQR 0.10-0.46). There was no corresponding reduction in mean intra-sac pressure (median ratio 0.91; IQR 0.83-1.00). Application of clamps at conventional open repair resulted in a fall in both intra-sac pressure (median ratio 0.39, IQR 0.32-0.64) and pressure within side-branches (median ratio 0.45, IQR 0.33-0.64). Restoration of iliac blood flow resulted in a modest recovery of the side-branch pressure (median ratio 0.63, IQR 0.57-0.81), which nonetheless remained significantly less than the intra-sac pressure recorded after EVAR (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

reperfusion of the aneurysm sac through patent side-branches seems insufficient to account for persistent pressurisation of the aneurysm after endovascular repair. This finding supports the hypothesis that pressure may be transmitted directly through stent-graft fabric.