301
|
Torphy RJ, Fujiwara Y, Schulick RD. Pancreatic cancer treatment: better, but a long way to go. Surg Today 2020; 50:1117-1125. [PMID: 32474642 PMCID: PMC7837389 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02028-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Remarkable progress has been made in treating pancreatic cancer over the past century, including refinement of our surgical techniques and improvements in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies. Despite these advances, the incidence of pancreatic cancer is rising globally, and it remains a deadly disease. In this review, we highlight the historical perspectives of pancreatic cancer treatment and outline the areas of future advancement that will assist progression towards better outcomes. Areas of future advancement include improving prevention strategies and early detection, refining our molecular understanding of pancreatic cancer, identifying more effective systemic therapies, and improving quality of life and surgical outcomes. Furthermore, systems need to be put in place to ensure all patients with pancreatic cancer receive high quality care and are given the appropriate options and sequence of therapy. This is best achieved through multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Torphy
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, C-305, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Yuki Fujiwara
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, C-305, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, C-305, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
302
|
Zhang J, Zhu L, Yao L, Ding X, Chen D, Wu H, Lu Z, Zhou W, Zhang L, An P, Xu B, Tan W, Hu S, Cheng F, Yu H. Deep learning-based pancreas segmentation and station recognition system in EUS: development and validation of a useful training tool (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:874-885.e3. [PMID: 32387499 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS is considered one of the most sensitive modalities for pancreatic cancer detection, but it is highly operator-dependent and the learning curve is steep. In this study, we constructed a system named BP MASTER (pancreaticobiliary master) for EUS training and quality control. METHODS The standard procedure of pancreatic EUS was divided into 6 stations. We developed a station classification model and a pancreas/abdominal aorta/portal confluence segmentation model with 19,486 images and 2207 images, respectively. Then, we used 1920 images and 700 images for classification and segmentation internal validation, respectively. To test station recognition we used 396 videos clips. An independent data set containing 180 images was applied for comparing the performance between models and EUS experts. Seven hundred sixty-eight images from 2 other hospitals were used for external validation. A crossover study was conducted to test the system effect on reducing difficulty in ultrasonographics interpretation among trainees. RESULTS The models achieved 94.2% accuracy in station classification and .836 dice in segmentation at internal validation. At external validation, the models achieved 82.4% accuracy in station classification and .715 dice in segmentation. For the video test, the station classification model achieved a per-frame accuracy of 86.2%. Compared with EUS experts, the models achieved 90.0% accuracy in classification and .77 and .813 dice in blood vessel and pancreas segmentation, which is comparable with that of experts. In the crossover study, trainee station recognition accuracy improved from 67.2% to 78.4% (95% confidence interval, .058-1.663; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS The BP MASTER system has the potential to play an important role in shortening the pancreatic EUS learning curve and improving EUS quality control in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Liangru Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Liwen Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiangwu Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan Puai Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Di Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Huiling Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zihua Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lihui Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Ping An
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Bo Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan Puai Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Shan Hu
- Research and Development Department, Wuhan EndoAngel Medical Technology Company, Wuhan, China
| | - Fan Cheng
- Department of Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Honggang Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
303
|
Cost-effectiveness of Abdominal Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pancreatic Cancer Screening in Familial High-Risk Individuals in Japan. Pancreas 2020; 49:1052-1056. [PMID: 32769852 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess cost-effectiveness of abdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and no screening for pancreatic cancer screening in familial high-risk individuals (HRIs). METHODS We developed decision trees with Markov models for a hypothetical cohort of familial HRIs at the age of 50 year using a healthcare sector perspective and a lifetime horizon. Main outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS In a base-case analysis, abdominal ultrasound was the most cost-effective (US $11,035, 17.4875 QALYs). Magnetic resonance imaging yielded the best benefits. Cost-effectiveness was sensitive to the incidence of pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound was more cost-effective than abdominal ultrasound when the incidence of pancreatic cancer was greater than 0.008 and under 0.016. Magnetic resonance imaging was more cost-effective than endoscopic ultrasound when the incidence of pancreatic cancer was greater than 0.016. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte-Carlo simulation for 10,000 trials demonstrated that abdominal ultrasound was cost-effective 76% of the time at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US $50,000/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS Abdominal ultrasound is the most cost-effective and recommended for pancreatic cancer screening in familial HRIs in Japan. Evaluating the risk of pancreatic cancer among familial HRIs as a target for screening is significant.
Collapse
|
304
|
Grossberg AJ, Chu LC, Deig CR, Fishman EK, Hwang WL, Maitra A, Marks DL, Mehta A, Nabavizadeh N, Simeone DM, Weekes CD, Thomas CR. Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70:375-403. [PMID: 32683683 PMCID: PMC7722002 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 237] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite tremendous gains in the molecular understanding of exocrine pancreatic cancer, the prognosis for this disease remains very poor, largely because of delayed disease detection and limited effectiveness of systemic therapies. Both incidence rates and mortality rates for pancreatic cancer have increased during the past decade, in contrast to most other solid tumor types. Recent improvements in multimodality care have substantially improved overall survival, local control, and metastasis-free survival for patients who have localized tumors that are amenable to surgical resection. The widening gap in prognosis between patients with resectable and unresectable or metastatic disease reinforces the importance of detecting pancreatic cancer sooner to improve outcomes. Furthermore, the developing use of therapies that target tumor-specific molecular vulnerabilities may offer improved disease control for patients with advanced disease. Finally, the substantial morbidity associated with pancreatic cancer, including wasting, fatigue, and pain, remains an under-addressed component of this disease, which powerfully affects quality of life and limits tolerance to aggressive therapies. In this article, the authors review the current multidisciplinary standards of care in pancreatic cancer with a focus on emerging concepts in pancreatic cancer detection, precision therapy, and survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J. Grossberg
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
- Brenden-Colson Center for Pancreatic Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Linda C. Chu
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christopher R. Deig
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Eliot K. Fishman
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - William L. Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Departments of Pathology and Translational Molecular Pathology, Sheikh Ahmed Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel L. Marks
- Brenden-Colson Center for Pancreatic Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
- Department of Pediatrics and Pape Family Pediatric Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Arnav Mehta
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Nima Nabavizadeh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Diane M. Simeone
- Departments of Surgery and Pathology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Colin D. Weekes
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Charles R. Thomas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
305
|
Barreto SG, D'Onise K. Pancreatic cancer in the Australian population: identifying opportunities for intervention. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90:2219-2226. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.16272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Savio George Barreto
- Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine Flinders Medical Centre Adelaide South Australia Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Katina D'Onise
- Prevention and Population Health Wellbeing South Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
306
|
Giri VN, Knudsen KE, Kelly WK, Cheng HH, Cooney KA, Cookson MS, Dahut W, Weissman S, Soule HR, Petrylak DP, Dicker AP, AlDubayan SH, Toland AE, Pritchard CC, Pettaway CA, Daly MB, Mohler JL, Parsons JK, Carroll PR, Pilarski R, Blanco A, Woodson A, Rahm A, Taplin ME, Polascik TJ, Helfand BT, Hyatt C, Morgans AK, Feng F, Mullane M, Powers J, Concepcion R, Lin DW, Wender R, Mark JR, Costello A, Burnett AL, Sartor O, Isaacs WB, Xu J, Weitzel J, Andriole GL, Beltran H, Briganti A, Byrne L, Calvaresi A, Chandrasekar T, Chen DYT, Den RB, Dobi A, Crawford ED, Eastham J, Eggener S, Freedman ML, Garnick M, Gomella PT, Handley N, Hurwitz MD, Izes J, Karnes RJ, Lallas C, Languino L, Loeb S, Lopez AM, Loughlin KR, Lu-Yao G, Malkowicz SB, Mann M, Mille P, Miner MM, Morgan T, Moreno J, Mucci L, Myers RE, Nielsen SM, O’Neil B, Pinover W, Pinto P, Poage W, Raj GV, Rebbeck TR, Ryan C, Sandler H, Schiewer M, Scott EMD, Szymaniak B, Tester W, Trabulsi EJ, Vapiwala N, Yu EY, Zeigler-Johnson C, Gomella LG. Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2798-2811. [PMID: 32516092 PMCID: PMC7430215 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing-initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing-was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veda N. Giri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William K. Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Clinical Research, Seattle, WA
| | - Kathleen A. Cooney
- Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | | | - William Dahut
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | - Adam P. Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Amanda E. Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Colin C. Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Robert Pilarski
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Amie Blanco
- University of California, San Francisco, Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ashley Woodson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alanna Rahm
- Center for Health Research, Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | | | | | | | - Colette Hyatt
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Felix Feng
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Jacqueline Powers
- University of Pennsylvania, Basser Center for BRCA, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anthony Costello
- Urology at Royal Melbourne Hospital, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Jianfeng Xu
- North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| | | | | | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Anne Calvaresi
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Robert B. Den
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Albert Dobi
- Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - James Eastham
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Marc Garnick
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Nathan Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark D. Hurwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joseph Izes
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Costas Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lucia Languino
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Ana Maria Lopez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Grace Lu-Yao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Mark Mann
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Patrick Mille
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Lorelei Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston MA
| | - Ronald E. Myers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Brock O’Neil
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Peter Pinto
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Wendy Poage
- Prostate Conditions Education Council, Elizabeth, CO
| | - Ganesh V. Raj
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Timothy R. Rebbeck
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston MA
| | - Charles Ryan
- University of Minnesota and Masonic Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | | | - Matthew Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - William Tester
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Edouard J. Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Evan Y. Yu
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Charnita Zeigler-Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
307
|
Beyer G, Habtezion A, Werner J, Lerch MM, Mayerle J. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet 2020; 396:499-512. [PMID: 32798493 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31318-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 227] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis is a multifactorial, fibroinflammatory syndrome in which repetitive episodes of pancreatic inflammation lead to extensive fibrotic tissue replacement, resulting in chronic pain, exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, reduced quality of life, and a shorter life expectancy. The incidence and prevalence of chronic pancreatitis is rising and no curative treatment is available. Using novel diagnostic algorithms, definitive chronic pancreatitis can be diagnosed by imaging criteria alone, whereas probable chronic pancreatitis requires clinical features and imaging criteria. Criteria for the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis are still under discussion and need prospective validation in clinical trials. Cross-sectional imaging should be used first; endoscopic ultrasound is needed only when CT or MRI are inconclusive or to plan therapeutic interventions. Management of chronic pancreatitis requires an interdisciplinary approach including primary care practitioners, gastroenterologists, surgeons, radiologists, pain specialists, and nutritional therapists. Patients with chronic pancreatitis should be seen at least once a year and re-evaluated for causal risk factors, symptom control, and complications such as malnutrition, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, and diabetes; refer to a specialised centre if symptoms are poorly controlled or there is risk of deterioration. Scoring systems to monitor disease progression have been developed and validated internationally. Interventional treatments for pain or cholestasis should be done by specialists only, and early discussion of treatment approaches should include all medical disciplines involved in care. Throughout this Seminar, we address research needs such as staging of pancreatitis, aspects of malnutrition and pain, and cancer surveillance, to help improve the care of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Beyer
- Medical Department II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Aida Habtezion
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus M Lerch
- Department of Medicine A, University Medicine, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Medical Department II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
308
|
Kupfer SS, Gupta S, Weitzel JN, Samadder J. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancer Risk and Screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers: Commentary. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:760-764. [PMID: 32335146 PMCID: PMC7483595 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia S. Kupfer
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Samir Gupta
- VA San Diego Healthcare System; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
309
|
Use of Biomarkers and Imaging for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12071965. [PMID: 32707720 PMCID: PMC7409286 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest cancers worldwide, and it is typically diagnosed late, with a poor prognosis. Early detection is the most important underlying factor for improving the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients. One of the most effective strategies for detecting cancers at an early stage is screening of the general population. However, because of the low incidence of pancreatic cancer in the general population, the stratification of subjects who need to undergo further examinations by invasive and expensive modalities is important. Therefore, minimally invasive modalities involving biomarkers and imaging techniques that would facilitate the early detection of pancreatic cancer are highly needed. Multiple types of new blood biomarkers have recently been developed, including unique post-translational modifications of circulating proteins, circulating exosomes, microRNAs, and circulating tumor DNA. We previously reported that circulating apolipoprotein A2 undergoes unique processing in the bloodstream of patients with pancreatic cancer and its precancerous lesions. Additionally, we recently demonstrated a new method for measuring pancreatic proton density in the fat fraction using a fat–water magnetic resonance imaging technique that reflects pancreatic steatosis. In this review, we describe recent developments in potential biomarkers and imaging modalities for the early detection and risk stratification of pancreatic cancer, and we discuss current strategies for implementing screening programs for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
310
|
Aslanian HR, Lee JH, Canto MI. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Pancreas Cancer Screening in High-Risk Individuals: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:358-362. [PMID: 32416142 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
DESCRIPTION The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Practice Update is to describe the indications for screening for pancreas cancer in high-risk individuals. METHODS The evidence reviewed in this work is based on reports of pancreas cancer screening studies in high-risk individuals and expert opinion. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Pancreas cancer screening should be considered in patients determined to be at high risk, including first-degree relatives of patients with pancreas cancer with at least 2 affected genetically related relatives. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Pancreas cancer screening should be considered in patients with genetic syndromes associated with an increased risk of pancreas cancer, including all patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, hereditary pancreatitis, patients with CDKN2A gene mutation, and patients with 1 or more first-degree relatives with pancreas cancer with Lynch syndrome, and mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM genes. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Genetic testing and counseling should be considered for familial pancreas cancer relatives who are eligible for surveillance. A positive germline mutation is associated with an increased risk of neoplastic progression and may also lead to screening for other relevant associated cancers. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Participation in a registry or referral to a pancreas Center of Excellence should be pursued when possible for high-risk patients undergoing pancreas cancer screening. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Clinicians should not screen average-risk individuals for pancreas cancer. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Pancreas cancer screening in high-risk individuals should begin at age 50 years, or 10 years younger than the initial age of familial onset. Screening should be initiated at age 40 years in CKDN2A and PRSS1 mutation carriers with hereditary pancreatitis and at age 35 years in the setting of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) should be used in combination as the preferred screening modalities in individuals undergoing pancreas cancer screening. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: The target detectable pancreatic neoplasms are resectable stage I pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and high-risk precursor neoplasms, such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with high-grade dysplasia and some enlarged pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Screening intervals of 12 months should be considered when there are no concerning pancreas lesions, with shortened intervals and/or the performance of EUS in 6-12 months directed towards lesions determined to be low risk (by a multidisciplinary team). EUS evaluation should be performed within 3-6 months for indeterminate lesions and within 3 months for high-risk lesions, if surgical resection is not planned. New-onset diabetes in a high-risk individual should lead to additional diagnostic studies or change in surveillance interval. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Decisions regarding therapy directed towards abnormal findings detected during screening should be made by a dedicated multidisciplinary team together with the high-risk individual and their family. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Surgical resection should be performed at high-volume centers. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Clinicians should consider discontinuing pancreas cancer screening in high-risk individuals when they are more likely to die of non-pancreas cancer-related causes due to comorbidity and/or are not candidates for pancreas resection. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: The limitations and potential risks of pancreas cancer screening should be discussed with patients before initiating a screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
311
|
Dullens B, de Putter R, Lambertini M, Toss A, Han S, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Van Gorp T, Vanderstichele A, Van Ongeval C, Keupers M, Prevos R, Celis V, Dekervel J, Everaerts W, Wildiers H, Nevelsteen I, Neven P, Timmerman D, Smeets A, Denayer E, Van Buggenhout G, Legius E, Punie K. Cancer Surveillance in Healthy Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1/2: A Review of Secondary Prevention Guidelines. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020; 2020:9873954. [PMID: 32655641 PMCID: PMC7322604 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9873954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Germline pathogenic alterations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 (BRCA1) and 2 (BRCA2) are the most prevalent causes of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The increasing trend in proportion of cancer patients undergoing genetic testing, followed by predictive testing in families of new index patients, results in a significant increase of healthy germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who are at increased risk for breast, ovarian, and other BRCA-related cancers. This review aims to give an overview of available screening guidelines for female and male carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 variants per cancer type, incorporating malignancies that are more or less recently well correlated with BRCA1/2. We selected guidelines from national/international organizations and/or professional associations that were published or updated between January 1, 2015, and February 1, 2020. In total, 12 guidelines were included. This review reveals several significant discordances between the different guidelines. Optimal surveillance strategies depend on accurate age-specific cancer risk estimates, which are not reliably available for all BRCA-related cancers. Up-to-date national or international consensus guidelines are of utmost importance to harmonize counseling and proposed surveillance strategies for BRCA1/2 carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boudewijn Dullens
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robin de Putter
- Department of Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Médica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Sileny Han
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Adriaan Vanderstichele
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chantal Van Ongeval
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Machteld Keupers
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Renate Prevos
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valerie Celis
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Dekervel
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ines Nevelsteen
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Neven
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ellen Denayer
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Griet Van Buggenhout
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eric Legius
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, UZ-KU Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
312
|
Overbeek KA, Rodríguez-Girondo MD, Wagner A, van der Stoep N, van den Akker PC, Oosterwijk JC, van Os TA, van der Kolk LE, Vasen HFA, Hes FJ, Cahen DL, Bruno MJ, Potjer TP. Genotype-phenotype correlations for pancreatic cancer risk in Dutch melanoma families with pathogenic CDKN2A variants. J Med Genet 2020; 58:264-269. [PMID: 32482799 PMCID: PMC8005797 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathogenic variants in the CDKN2A gene are generally associated with the development of melanoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but specific genotype-phenotype correlations might exist and the extent of PDAC risk is not well established for many variants. METHODS Using the Dutch national familial melanoma database, we identified all families with a pathogenic CDKN2A variant and investigated the occurrence of PDAC within these families. We also estimated the standardised incidence ratio and lifetime PDAC risk for carriers of a highly prevalent variant in these families. RESULTS We identified 172 families in which 649 individuals carried 15 different pathogenic variants. The most prevalent variant was the founder mutation c.225_243del (p16-Leiden, 484 proven carriers). Second most prevalent was c.67G>C (55 proven carriers). PDAC developed in 95 of 163 families (58%, including 373 of 629 proven carriers) harbouring a variant with an effect on the p16INK4a protein, whereas PDAC did not occur in the 9 families (20 proven carriers) with a variant affecting only p14ARF. In the c.67G>C families, PDAC occurred in 12 of the 251 (5%) persons at risk. The standardised incidence ratio was 19.1 (95% CI 8.3 to 33.6) and the cumulative PDAC incidence at age 75 years (lifetime risk) was 19% (95% CI 7.5% to 30.1%). CONCLUSIONS Our results support the notion that pathogenic CDKN2A variants affecting the p16INK4a protein, including c.67G>C, are associated with increased PDAC risk and carriers of such variants should be offered pancreatic cancer surveillance. There is no clinical evidence that impairment of only the p14ARF protein leads to an increased PDAC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper A Overbeek
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mar Dm Rodríguez-Girondo
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke van der Stoep
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter C van den Akker
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Theo A van Os
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lizet E van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans F A Vasen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik J Hes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Djuna L Cahen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas P Potjer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
313
|
Chu LC, Fishman EK. Deep learning for pancreatic cancer detection: current challenges and future strategies. LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH 2020; 2:e271-e272. [DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30105-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
314
|
Cremin C, Lee MK, Hong Q, Hoeschen C, Mackenzie A, Dixon K, McCullum M, Nuk J, Kalloger S, Karasinska J, Scudamore C, Kim PTW, Donnellan F, Lam ECS, Lim HJ, Neben CL, Stedden W, Zhou AY, Schaeffer DF, Sun S, Renouf DJ, Schrader KA. Burden of hereditary cancer susceptibility in unselected patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma referred for germline screening. Cancer Med 2020; 9:4004-4013. [PMID: 32255556 PMCID: PMC7286471 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent guidelines recommend consideration of germline testing for all newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The primary aim of this study was to determine the burden of hereditary cancer susceptibility in PDAC. A secondary aim was to compare genetic testing uptake rates across different modes of genetic counselling. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients diagnosed with PDAC in the province of British Columbia, Canada referred to a population-based hereditary cancer program were eligible for multi-gene panel testing, irrespective of cancer family history. Any healthcare provider or patients themselves could refer. RESULTS A total of 305 patients with PDAC were referred between July 2016 and January 2019. Two hundred thirty-five patients attended a consultation and 177 completed index germline genetic testing. 25/177 (14.1%) of unrelated patients had a pathogenic variant (PV); 19/25 PV were in known PDAC susceptibility genes with cancer screening or risk-reduction implications. PDAC was significantly associated with PV in ATM (OR, 7.73; 95% CI, 3.10 to 19.33, P = 6.14E-05) when comparing age and gender and ethnicity-matched controls tested on the same platform. The overall uptake rate for index testing was 59.2% and was significantly higher with 1-on-1 consultations and group consultations compared to telehealth consultations (88.9% vs 82.9% vs 61.8%, P < .001). CONCLUSION In a prospective clinic-based cohort of patients with PDAC referred for testing irrespective of family history, germline PV were detected in 14.1%. PV in ATM accounted for half of all PVs and were significantly associated with PDAC. These findings support recent guidelines and will guide future service planning in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Cremin
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
| | - Michael Kuan‐Ching Lee
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Division of Medical OncologyBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| | - Quan Hong
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| | - Carolyn Hoeschen
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Division of Medical OncologyBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| | - Anna Mackenzie
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| | - Katherine Dixon
- Department of Medical GeneticsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Mary McCullum
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| | - Jennifer Nuk
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| | - Steve Kalloger
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineVancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | | | - Charles Scudamore
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Department of SurgeryVancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Peter T. W. Kim
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Department of SurgeryVancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Fergal Donnellan
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Department of GastroenterologyVancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Eric C. S. Lam
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Department of GastroenterologySt. Paul's HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Howard J. Lim
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Division of Medical OncologyBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| | | | | | | | - David F. Schaeffer
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineVancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Sophie Sun
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
- Division of Medical OncologyBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| | - Daniel J. Renouf
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Division of Medical OncologyBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| | - Kasmintan A. Schrader
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramBC Cancer, part of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
- Pancreas Centre BCVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Medical GeneticsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancerpart of Provincial Health Services AuthorityVancouverBCCanada
| |
Collapse
|
315
|
Pederson HJ, Noss R. Updates in hereditary breast cancer genetic testing and practical high risk breast management in gene carriers. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:182-186. [PMID: 32513422 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Testing for hereditary predisposition to breast cancer is rapidly expanding in parallel with the emerging field of molecular genetics given the associated implications for screening, risk reduction and cancer therapeutics for identified gene mutation carriers. With the advent of next generation multigene panel testing for hereditary predisposition and decreasing cost for that testing, more breast cancer patients (and unaffected family members) are undergoing cancer genetic testing. With multiple genes being tested and the myriad of possible results and implications for patients and their families, the process of genetic counseling is of paramount importance in promoting understanding by both patients and providers of risks and options for risk management. Guidelines exist to facilitate a multidisciplinary approach to management of individuals identified as being at increased risk, and there must be an appreciation for flexibility as guidelines are applied to individual families. This update summarizes recommendations regarding who may benefit from breast cancer risk assessment and genetic counseling, controversies regarding inclusion for testing and provides a framework for the practical management of high risk gene carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly J Pederson
- Cleveland Clinic, Breast Center - Departments of General Surgery and Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland, OH.
| | - Ryan Noss
- Cleveland Clinic, Breast Center - Departments of General Surgery and Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
316
|
Eguchi H, Kobayashi S, Gotoh K, Noda T, Doki Y. Characteristics of early-onset pancreatic cancer and its association with familial pancreatic cancer and hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020; 4:229-233. [PMID: 32490337 PMCID: PMC7240141 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of pancreatic cancer is high among those in their sixties to seventies but low in those in their fifties or younger. Although there is no unified definition regarding the age of early-onset pancreatic cancer, previously published reports suggest that, compared to later-onset pancreatic cancer patients, early-onset pancreatic cancer patients tend to be detected at advanced stages and thus have poor prognoses, but they do not show significantly higher rates of patients with genetic factors. On the other hand, it has been reported that patients with familial pancreatic cancer and hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes often develop pancreatic cancer at a young age. The broad definition of familial pancreatic cancer is pancreatic cancer in patients who have two or more first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer; whereas the narrow definition of familial pancreatic cancer is the broad definition of familial pancreatic cancer, while excluding those with inherited tumor syndromes. Hereditary tumors developing pancreatic cancer include hereditary pancreatitis, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, all of which are autosomal dominant hereditary diseases. This study reviews the clinical characteristics of early-onset pancreatic cancer and its association with familial pancreatic cancer and hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan
| | - Kunihito Gotoh
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan
| | - Takehiro Noda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan
| |
Collapse
|
317
|
Sirtl S, Oehrle B, Mayerle J, Goni E. [Diabetes and pancreatic cancer - state of the art]. MMW Fortschr Med 2020; 162:42-46. [PMID: 32342372 DOI: 10.1007/s15006-020-0428-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Sirtl
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians, Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Bettina Oehrle
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians, Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377, München, Deutschland.
| | - Elisabetta Goni
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians, Universität München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
318
|
Overbeek KA, Cahen DL, Kamps A, Konings ICAW, Harinck F, Kuenen MA, Koerkamp BG, Besselink MG, van Eijck CH, Wagner A, Ausems MGE, van der Vlugt M, Fockens P, Vleggaar FP, Poley JW, van Hooft JE, Bleiker EMA, Bruno MJ. Patient-reported burden of intensified surveillance and surgery in high-risk individuals under pancreatic cancer surveillance. Fam Cancer 2020; 19:247-258. [PMID: 32193697 PMCID: PMC7242488 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00171-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
In high-risk individuals participating in a pancreatic cancer surveillance program, worrisome features warrant for intensified surveillance or, occasionally, surgery. Our objectives were to determine the patient-reported burden of intensified surveillance and/or surgery, and to assess post-operative quality of life and opinion of surgery. Participants in our pancreatic cancer surveillance program completed questionnaires including the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). For individuals who underwent intensified surveillance, questionnaires before, during, and ≥ 3 weeks after were analyzed. In addition, subjects who underwent intensified surveillance in the past 3 years or underwent surgery at any time, were invited for an interview, that included the Short-Form 12 (SF-12). A total of 31 high-risk individuals were studied. During the intensified surveillance period, median CWS scores were higher (14, IQR 7), as compared to before (12, IQR 9, P = 0.007) and after (11, IQR 7, P = 0.014), but eventually returned back to baseline (P = 0.823). Median HADS scores were low: 5 (IQR 6) for anxiety and 3 (IQR 5) for depression, and they were unaffected by the intensified surveillance period. Of the 10 operated patients, 1 (10%) developed diabetes and 7 (70%) pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. The interviews yielded median quality-of-life scores comparable to the general population. Also, after surgery, patients’ attitudes towards surveillance were unchanged (5/10, 50%) or became more positive (4/10, 40%). Although patients were aware of the (sometimes benign) pathological outcome, when asked if surgery had been justified, only 20% (2/10) disagreed, and all would again have chosen to undergo surgery. In conclusion, in individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer, intensified surveillance temporarily increased cancer worries, without affecting general anxiety or depression. Although pancreatic surgery led to substantial co-morbidity, quality of life was similar to the general population, and surgery did not negatively affect the attitude towards surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper A Overbeek
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Djuna L Cahen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Kamps
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid C A W Konings
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femme Harinck
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne A Kuenen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon van der Vlugt
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
319
|
King E, Nehoray BM. Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer Syndromes: Providing Care to At-Risk Families. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2019; 23:579-582. [PMID: 31730603 DOI: 10.1188/19.cjon.579-582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary pancreatic cancer continues to pose challenges to providers, as well as to patients and their families. Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis, and individuals with family histories of pancreatic cancer are often motivated to pursue genetic testing. This article reviews various hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes, as well as pancreatic cancer screening recommendations, options, and limitations.
Collapse
|