HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Pathological and Clinical Landscape

Prognostic and Biologic Significance of ERBB2-Low Expression in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Importance

It is unclear whether ERBB2-low breast cancer should be considered an individual biologic subtype distinct from ERBB2-0 breast cancer.

Objective

To investigate whether low ERBB2 expression is associated with distinct clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis among patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was conducted using data from a prospectively maintained institutional database on all consecutive patients with breast cancer undergoing surgery between January 2016 and March 2021 at Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center. The study included 5235 patients with stage I through III, ERBB2-negative invasive breast cancer. Tumors were classified as ERBB2-low if they had an ERBB2 immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization assay and ERBB2-0 if they had an ERBB2 IHC score of 0. Data were analyzed from September 2021 through January 2022.

Exposures

Standard treatment according to institutional guidelines.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and disease outcomes (pathologic complete response rate [pCR], disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival) between patients with ERBB2-low and ERBB2-0 breast cancer.

Results

Among 5235 patients with ERBB2-negative invasive breast cancer (5191 [99.2%] women; median [range] age at primary surgery, 59.0 [21.0-95.0] years), 2917 patients (55.7%) and 2318 patients (44.3%) had ERBB2-low and ERBB2-0 tumors, respectively. Expression of HR was significantly more common among ERBB2-low compared with ERBB2-0 tumors (2643 patients [90.6%] vs 1895 patients [81.8%]; P < .001). The rate of ERBB2-low tumors increased progressively, from 296 of 739 estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors (40.1%) to 31 of 67 ER-low (ie, ER 1%-9%) tumors (46.3%), 37 of 67 ER-moderate (ie, ER, 10%-49%) tumors (55.2%), 2047 of 3542 ER-high (ie, ER, 50%-95%) tumors (57.8%), and 499 of 803 ER-very high (ie, ER > 95%) tumors (62.1%) (P < .001). Among 675 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, those with ERBB2-0 tumors experienced higher pCR rates (95 patients [26.8%] vs 53 patients [16.6%]; P = .002). However, there were no statistically significant differences in pCR rate between ERBB2-low and ERBB2-0 tumors when separately analyzing HR-positive, ER-low, HR-positive without ER-low, or TNBC tumors. In exploratory survival analysis, no differences by ERBB2-low expression in disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, or overall survival were observed among patients with HR-positive tumors or TNBC.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cohort study did not support the interpretation of ERBB2-low breast cancer as a distinct biologic subtype. ERBB2-low expression was positively associated with level of ER expression, and ER-low tumors were enriched among ERBB2-0 tumors, suggesting that, given the worse prognosis of ER-low tumors, they may be associated with confounding of prognostic analyses of ERBB2-low expression.

HER2-low breast cancers: incidence, HER2 staining patterns, clinicopathologic features, MammaPrint and BluePrint genomic profiles

Recently, clinical trials have demonstrated promising efficacy for novel HER2-targeted therapies in HER2-low breast cancers, raising the prospect of including a HER2-low category (immunohistochemical [IHC] score of 1+, or 2+ with non-amplified in-situ hybridization [ISH]) in the HER2 evaluation of breast cancers. In order to better understand this newly-proposed HER2 category, we investigated the incidence, HER2 staining patterns, clinicopathologic features, and genomic profile of HER2-low breast cancers. HER2-stained slides of 281 consecutive breast cancers were re-reviewed and the clinicopathologic information, MammaPrint, and BluePrint results of these cases were retrospectively analyzed. HER2-low breast cancers were identified in 31% of cases and were more common in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive than ER-negative breast cancers (33.6% vs 15%, p = 0.017). HER2-low cancers were generally clinical stages I-II (79%), ER-positive (93.1%), had homogenous HER2 staining (59.2%), HER2 IHC score of 1+ (87.4%), ductal phenotype (81.6%), histologic grades of 1 or 2 (94.2%) and luminal molecular subtypes (94.3%). Three HER2-low patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and none of them achieved pathologic complete response. When compared to HER2-negative (IHC of 0+) and HER2-positive (IHC of 3+ or IHC of 2+ with amplified ISH) cancers, HER2-low breast cancers had significantly lower Ki-67 (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively) and higher ER positivity (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). HER2-low breast cancers were less likely to be basal molecular subtype when compared to HER2-negative cancers (p < 0.01) and were less likely to have a HER2 molecular subtype when compared to HER2-positive cancers (p < 0.01). When adjusted for ER status, there was no significant difference on all the examined variables between HER2-low and HER2-negative groups. Our study provides valuable baseline characteristics of HER2-low breast cancers deriving from consecutive, real-world cases with a consensus confirmation of HER2 status, and would help to increase our understanding of this newly-proposed HER2 category in breast cancers.

Personalised Therapies for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: When Target Is Not Everything

Simple Summary

The purpose of the present review is to shed light on new molecular biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), showing emerging therapeutic approaches related to specific molecular signatures and their mechanisms of action. A general overview of ongoing clinical trials, future perspectives and differences in approval by American and European regulatory authorities is provided.

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer—defined by the absence of oestrogen/progesterone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression—is a complex and heterogeneous type of tumour characterised by poor prognosis, aggressive behaviour and lack of effective therapeutic strategies. The identification of new biomarkers and molecular signatures is leading to development of new therapeutic strategies including immunotherapy, targeted therapy and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Against a background where chemotherapy has always been considered the standard of care, evolution towards a precision medicine approach could improve TNBC clinical practice in a complex scenario, with many therapeutic options and new drugs. The aim of this review was to focus on emerging therapeutic targets and their related specific therapy, discussing available and emerging drugs, underlining differences in approval by American and European regulatory authorities and showing the future perspective in the large number of ongoing clinical trials.

HER2-low breast cancer shows a lower immune response compared to HER2-negative cases

Currently, the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of breast cancer is classified dichotomously as negative or positive to select patients for HER2-targeted therapy. However, with the introduction of novel treatment options, it is important to get more insight in the biology of cancers with low HER2 expression. Therefore, we studied several clinicopathologic characteristics in relation to the level of HER2 expression (HER2- versus HER2low). We used a well-documented cohort of breast cancer patients (n = 529), with available tissue microarrays and Affymetrix mRNA expression data. HER2 status was scored as negative (immunohistochemistry 0) or low (immunohistochemistry 1 + or 2 + without amplification). We associated HER2 status with several clinicopathologic characteristics, gene-expression data and survival, stratified for estrogen receptor (ER) status. Overall, breast cancers were scored as HER2- (n = 429) or HER2low (n = 100). Within the ER+ cohort (n = 305), no significant associations were found between the HER2 groups and clinicopathologic features. However, HER2low tumors showed several differentially expressed genes compared to HER2- cases, including genes that are associated with worse outcome and depletion of immunity. In ER- cases (n = 224), HER2low status was significantly associated with increased regional nodal positivity, lower density of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte and a lower protein expression of Ki-67 and EGFR compared to HER2- cases. After multivariate analysis, only density of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes remained significantly associated with HER2low status (P = 0.035). No difference in survival was observed between HER2low and HER2- patients, neither in the ER+ nor ER- cohort. In conclusion, our data suggests that HER2low breast cancer is associated with a lower immune response compared to HER2- breast cancer.

Navigating the HER2-Low Paradigm in Breast Oncology: New Standards, Future Horizons

SUMMARY

The confirmation of the HER2-low paradigm is expected to have a major impact in breast oncology. About half of all breast cancers harbor HER2-low expression, which can be targeted with the anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), leading to a relevant survival benefit in the metastatic setting. Given this observation, treatment algorithms for both hormone receptor-positive and triple-negative breast cancer are expected to significantly evolve in the next future. Several challenges, however, remain in the interpretation of HER2-low expression related to its biological role, its pathologic diagnosis, and the definition itself of HER2-low. In this article, we recapitulate the current knowledge on HER2-low breast cancer, discussing whether it should be considered a distinct subtype, how it should be implemented in the clinic, and how its definition may evolve in the coming years with the evolution of our clinical and translational knowledge.

Long-term prognostic significance of HER2-low and HER2-zero in node-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Recently, novel antibody--drug conjugates (ADCs) showed clinical activity in a subset of advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients. We investigated the prognostic significance of HER2-low and HER2-zero tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The retrospective cohort study included 410 consecutive node-negative breast cancer patients without adjuvant systemic therapy treated between 1985 and 2000 (median follow-up: 16.73 [IQR 8.58-23.45] years). 351 (85.6%) were HER-2 negative and subdivided into HER2-zero (immunohistochemistry [IHC] score 0) and HER2-low (IHC score 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridisation [ISH]-negative). HER2 gene expression was available in 170 (48.4%) patients. Differences in HER2 status for immunohistochemistry, gene expression and clinico-pathologic parameters were assessed using Fisher's exact test, Pearson's correlation and Mann-Whitney test. Prognosis was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 351 HER2-negative patients, 198 (56.4%) had HER2-low tumours and 153 (43.6%) were HER2-zero. Significant differences between HER2-zero and HER2-low tumours were found in histologic grading (P = 0.001), Ki-67 (P = 0.013) and HER2 gene expression (P = 0.002). HER2-low patients had significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) (15-year rate: 67.5% [95% CI 61.0-74.7] vs. 47.3% [95% CI 39.9-56.1], P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (15-year rate: 75.4% [95% CI 69.4-81.9] vs. 66.8% [95% CI 59.5-74.9], P = 0.009). The OS difference was observed in hormone receptor (HR)-positive (P = 0.039) but not HR-negative (P = 0.086) tumours. The results of multivariable analyses confirmed the independent prognostic significance of HER2 status (DFS: HR, 0.546; 95% CI, 0.402-0.743; P < 0.001; OS: HR, 0.653; 95% CI, 0.458-0.932; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

HER2-low patients had a better survival than HER2-zero patients.

The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are more likely to have discordant clinical and genomic risk than those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) when using the 21-gene recurrence score (RS), and to assess overall survival outcomes of patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 with and without chemotherapy, stratified by histology.

Methods

We performed a cohort study using the National Cancer Database and included patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, stage I–III invasive breast cancer who underwent 21-gene RS testing. Our primary outcome was rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk status by histologic subtype. Propensity score matching was used to compare 60-month overall survival in individuals with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 who did and did not receive chemotherapy.

Results

Overall, 186,867 patients were included in our analysis, including 37,685 (20.2%) patients with ILC. There was a significantly higher rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk in patients with ILC compared with IDC. Among patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25, there was no significant difference in survival between those who did and did not receive chemotherapy in the IDC or ILC cohorts. Unadjusted exploratory analyses of patients under age 50 years with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 showed improved overall survival in IDC patients who received chemotherapy, but not among those with ILC.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the importance of lobular-specific tools for stratifying clinical and genomic risk, as well as the need for histologic subtype-specific analyses in randomized trials.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Among breast cancers without human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification, overexpression, or both, a large proportion express low levels of HER2 that may be targetable. Currently available HER2-directed therapies have been ineffective in patients with these "HER2-low" cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3 trial involving patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer who had received one or two previous lines of chemotherapy. (Low expression of HER2 was defined as a score of 1+ on immunohistochemical [IHC] analysis or as an IHC score of 2+ and negative results on in situ hybridization.) Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan or the physician's choice of chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival in the hormone receptor-positive cohort. The key secondary end points were progression-free survival among all patients and overall survival in the hormone receptor-positive cohort and among all patients.

RESULTS

Of 557 patients who underwent randomization, 494 (88.7%) had hormone receptor-positive disease and 63 (11.3%) had hormone receptor-negative disease. In the hormone receptor-positive cohort, the median progression-free survival was 10.1 months in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 5.4 months in the physician's choice group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.51; P<0.001), and overall survival was 23.9 months and 17.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.64; P = 0.003). Among all patients, the median progression-free survival was 9.9 months in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 5.1 months in the physician's choice group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.50; P<0.001), and overall survival was 23.4 months and 16.8 months, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.64; P = 0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 52.6% of the patients who received trastuzumab deruxtecan and 67.4% of those who received the physician's choice of chemotherapy. Adjudicated, drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in 12.1% of the patients who received trastuzumab deruxtecan; 0.8% had grade 5 events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial involving patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, trastuzumab deruxtecan resulted in significantly longer progression-free and overall survival than the physician's choice of chemotherapy. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca; DESTINY-Breast04 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03734029.).

Interrogating breast cancer heterogeneity using single and pooled circulating tumor cell analysis

Single cell technologies allow the interrogation of tumor heterogeneity, providing insights into tumor evolution and treatment resistance. To better understand whether circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could complement metastatic biopsies for tumor genomic profiling, we characterized 11 single CTCs and 10 pooled CTC samples at the mutational and copy number aberration (CNA) levels, and compared these results with matched synchronous tumor biopsies from 3 metastatic breast cancer patients with triple-negative (TNBC), HER2-positive and estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors. Similar CNA profiles and the same patient-specific driver mutations were found in bulk tissue and CTCs for the HER2-positive and TNBC tumors, whereas different CNA profiles and driver mutations were identified for the ER+ tumor, which presented two distinct clones in CTCs defined by mutations in ESR1 Y537N and TP53, respectively. Furthermore, de novo mutational signatures derived from CTCs described patient-specific biological processes. These data suggest that tumor tissue and CTCs provide complementary clinically relevant information to map tumor heterogeneity and tumor evolution.

Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR for assessing ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 and evaluating subtypes in patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Currently, the most commonly applied method for the determination of breast cancer subtypes is to test estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 by immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, the IHC method has substantial intraobserver and interobserver variability. ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 mRNA tests by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay may improve the diagnostic objectivity and efficiency. Here, we compared the concordance between RT-qPCR and IHC for assessment of the same biomarkers and evaluated the subtypes.

METHODS

A total of 265 eligible cases were divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort, and the expressions of ER/ESR1, PR/PGR, HER2/ERBB2, and Ki67/MKI67 were tested by IHC and RT-qPCR. Then, the appropriate cutoff of RT-qPCR was calculated in the training cohort. The concordance between RT-qPCR and IHC was calculated for individual marker. In addition, we investigated the subtypes based on the RT-qPCR results.

RESULTS

The Spearman correlation coefficients between ER/ESR1, PR/PGR, HER2/ERBB2, and Ki67/MKI67 by IHC and RT-qPCR were 0.768, 0.699, 0.762, and 0.387, respectively. The cutoff values for the RT-qPCR assay of ESR1 (1%), PGR (1%), ERBB2, and MKi67 (14%) were 35.539, 32.139, 36.398, and 29.176, respectively. The overall percent agreement (OPA) between ER/ESR1, PR/PGR, HER2/ERBB2, and Ki67/MKI67 by IHC and RT-qPCR was 92.48%, 73.68%, 92.80%, and 74.44%, respectively. A total of 224 (84.53%) specimens were concordant for the breast cancer subtypes (IHC-based type) by RT-qPCR.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of breast cancer biomarker status by RT-qPCR was highly concordant with IHC. RT-qPCR can be used as a supplementary method to detect molecular markers of breast cancer.

Discordance between Immunohistochemistry and Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 mRNA to Determine Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Low Status for Breast Cancer

Novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody-drug conjugates have demonstrated efficacy in HER2-low expressing breast cancers, which are currently defined as those with immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores of 1+ or 2+ with a negative in situ hybridization assay. However, current HER2 testing methods are designed to identify HER2-amplified tumors with high expression levels. The true definition of HER2-low expressing breast cancers remains controversial. Using quantitative molecular analysis of breast cancers based on RNA expression, the dynamic range of HER2 expression exceeds that detected by in situ IHC approaches. Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) mRNA expression levels across IHC groups using patient samples derived from the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter Trial were investigated. The standardized mean differences in ERBB2 mRNA scores in log base 2 are 0.47 (95% CI, 0.36-0.57), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.26-0.70), and 0.32 (95% CI, -0.12 to 0.75) when comparing IHC 0+ without staining versus IHC 0+ with some staining, IHC 0+ with some staining versus IHC 1+, and IHC 1+ versus IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization-negative, respectively. The results showed immunohistochemical methods have a comparatively limited dynamic range for measuring HER2 protein expression. The range of expression based on RNA abundance suggests a molecular method defining HER2-low cancers may better serve the treatment decision needs of this group. Indeed, the validity of RNA abundance to identify HER2-low cancers and predict treatment response needs to be further evaluated by prospective clinical trials.

ASCO Annual Meeting 2022: Neue Daten zu Antikörper-Drug-Konjugaten (ADCs) und CDK4/6-Inhibitoren beim metastasierten Mammakarzinom

In der DESTINY-Breast04-Studie zeigte das ADC Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan bei vorbehandelten Patientinnen mit niedriger HER2-Expression eine deutliche Verlängerung des progressionsfreien Überlebens (PFS) sowie des Gesamtüberlebens (OS) verglichen mit konventioneller Chemotherapie nach Wahl des Behandlers [1]. Positive Ergebnisse gab es auch aus der TROPiCS-02-Studie mit dem ADC Sacituzumab-Govitecan bei Patientinnen mit metastasiertem, hormonresistentem Mammakarzinom [2]. Interessant waren auch die Ergebnisse der MAINTAIN-Studie zur Frage, ob CDK4/6-Inhibitoren bei Patientinnen mit HR+/HER2-negativem metastasiertem Mammakarzinom nach Fortschreiten der Erkrankung weiter verabreicht werden sollten [3]

Prognostic values of clinical and molecular features in HER2 low-breast cancer with hormonal receptor overexpression: features of HER2-low breast cancer

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low breast cancer was considered as a distinct subtype different from HER2-zero breast cancer. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic values of clinicopathological features and recurrence score (RS) in HER2-low and HER2-zero hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 2099 HR + primary female breast cancer patients diagnosed between Jan 2009 and Jan 2019 were collected. Tumors with immunohistochemistry 1 + /2 + and negative in situ hybridization results were defined as HER2-low. We compared the clinical and genetical features of HER2-low (n = 1732) and HER2-zero (n = 367) breast cancer and their prognostic values.

Results

Estrogen receptor (ER) high expression (> 90%) was more common in HER2-low breast cancer than HER2-zero breast cancer (78.2% vs 58.6%, p < 0.01). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between HER2-zero and HER2-low subgroups (92.3% vs 93.3%, p = 0.83). The predictive value of RS was only significant in HER2-zero patients (p = 0.03). The proliferation-related genes performed well in predicting DFS in HER2-zero patients, but not in HER2-low patients (p for interaction < 0.01). The higher HER2 module score was correlated with worse DFS only in HER2-low patients (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

We observed similar survival outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-zero HR + patients. HER2-low patients had a higher proportion of ER high expressed tumors than HER2-zero patients did. RS and its proliferation module might be less clinically meaningful to HER2-low patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12282-022-01364-y.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of HER2-Low Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience

Background

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, which is defined as HER2 1+ or 2+ in immunohistochemistry without gene amplification, accounts for a considerable part of all breast cancers. However, it remains controversial whether HER2-low breast cancer is a distinct entity. Our aim was to compare the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between HER2-zero and HER2-low early breast cancer.

Methods

The study was a retrospective analysis that enrolled 1,039 patients with available HER2 expression data in a single institute from 2013 to 2014, of whom 262 HER2-positive patients were excluded from the subsequent analysis. The remaining patients were divided into HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. Each group was further categorized into a hormone receptor (HR)-positive and an HR-negative subgroup. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected and compared between HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), which were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test, landmark analysis, and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

A total of 777 non-HER2-positive patients were included in this analysis, of whom 126, 552, 53, and 46 patients were HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-negative/HER2-zero, and HR-negative/HER2-low, respectively. No significant difference in DFS and OS was detected between the HER2-zero group and the HER2-low group when paired by HR status. Landmark analysis with a time point set at 5 years indicated that HR-positive/HER2-low patients had a better DFS compared with HR-positive/HER2-zero patients after 5 years (p = 0.0047). HER2-low status was an independent prognostic factor for DFS after 5 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13–0.75, p = 0.01].

Conclusion

The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer were similar regardless of HR status. Patients with HR-positive/HER2-low tumors tended to have a better DFS than their HR-positive/HER2-zero counterparts after 5 years.

Histology-agnostic approvals for antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumours: is the time ripe?

Several antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been recently approved to treat solid tumours. Since ADCs seem to have activity in multiple malignancies sharing the expression of a specific antigen, they may be mirroring the experience of histology-agnostic-targeted treatments. So, the possibility to interpret the activity of some ADCs across different cancer types in a biomarker-driven perspective arises. However, relevant biological, methodological, and regulatory challenges should be highlighted and addressed, in order to grant ADCs biomarker-driven regulatory approvals in the next future. In this review, we discuss challenges and opportunities posed by the pan-histological expansion of ADCs in solid tumours. In particular, we provide an overview about technological and manufacturing advancements; we offer up-to-date highlights of the current evidence from clinical trials investigating ADCs in solid tumours; we discuss the need for the identification of optimal predictive biomarkers, as well as major methodological, statistical, and regulatory considerations for a biomarker-driven histology-agnostic approach.

HER2-low-positive breast cancer: evolution from primary tumor to residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment

Approximately a half of breast tumors classified as HER2-negative exhibit HER2-low-positive expression. We recently described a high instability of HER2-low-positive expression from primary breast cancer (BC) to relapse. Previous studies reporting discordance in HER2 status between baseline biopsy and residual disease (RD) in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment did not include the HER2-low-positive category. The aim of this study is to track the evolution of HER2-low-positive expression from primary BC to RD after neoadjuvant treatment. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment with available baseline tumor tissue and matched samples of RD (in case of no pCR) were included. HER2-negative cases were sub-classified as HER2-0 or HER2-low-positive (IHC 1+ or 2+ and ISH negative). Four-hundred forty-six patients were included. Primary BC phenotype was: HR-positive/HER2-negative 23.5%, triple-negative (TN) 35%, HER2-positive 41.5%. HER2-low-positive cases were 55.6% of the HER2-negative cohort and were significantly enriched in the HR-positive/HER2-negative vs. TN subgroup (68.6% vs. 46.8%, p = 0.001 χ2 test). In all, 35.3% of non-pCR patients (n = 291) had a HER2-low-positive expression on RD. The overall rate of HER2 expression discordance was 26.4%, mostly driven by HER2-negative cases converting either from (14.8%) or to (8.9%) HER2-low-positive phenotype. Among HR-positive/HER2-negative patients with HER2-low-positive expression on RD, 32.0% and 57.1% had an estimated high risk of relapse according to the residual proliferative cancer burden and CPS-EG score, respectively. In conclusion, HER2-low-positive expression showed high instability from primary BC to RD after neoadjuvant treatment. HER2-low-positive expression on RD may guide personalized adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients in the context of clinical trials with novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates.

Impact of HER2 Status on Pathological Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Investigates the link between HER2 status and histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early TNBC.

METHODS

We retrieved clinical and anatomopathological data retrospectively from 449 patients treated for the first time with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early unilateral BC between 2005 and 2020. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR, i.e., ypT0 ypN0), according to HER2 status. Secondary endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (I-DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

437 patients were included, and 121 (27.7%) patients had HER2-low tumours. The pCR rate was not significantly different between the HER2-low group vs. the HER2-0 group (35.7% versus 41.8%, p = 0.284) in either univariate analysis or multivariate analysis adjusted for TNM classification and grade (odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, confidence interval [CI] 95% 0.45-1.08). With a median follow-up of 72.9 months, no significant survival differences were observed between patients with HER2-low tumours vs. patients with HER2-0 tumours in terms of I-DFS (p = 0.487) and OS (p = 0.329).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, HER2 status was not significantly associated with pCR in a manner consistent with data published recently on TNBC. However, the prognostic impact of HER2-low expression among TNBC patients warrants further evaluation.

Disentangling ERBB Signaling in Breast Cancer Subtypes-A Model-Based Analysis

Targeted therapies have shown striking success in the treatment of cancer over the last years. However, their specific effects on an individual tumor appear to be varying and difficult to predict. Using an integrative modeling approach that combines mechanistic and regression modeling, we gained insights into the response mechanisms of breast cancer cells due to different ligand-drug combinations. The multi-pathway model, capturing ERBB receptor signaling as well as downstream MAPK and PI3K pathways was calibrated on time-resolved data of the luminal breast cancer cell lines MCF7 and T47D across an array of four ligands and five drugs. The same model was then successfully applied to triple negative and HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines, requiring adjustments mostly for the respective receptor compositions within these cell lines. The additional relevance of cell-line-specific mutations in the MAPK and PI3K pathway components was identified via L1 regularization, where the impact of these mutations on pathway activation was uncovered. Finally, we predicted and experimentally validated the proliferation response of cells to drug co-treatments. We developed a unified mathematical model that can describe the ERBB receptor and downstream signaling in response to therapeutic drugs targeting this clinically relevant signaling network in cell line that represent three major subtypes of breast cancer. Our data and model suggest that alterations in this network could render anti-HER therapies relevant beyond the HER2-positive subtype.

Distinct clinical and somatic mutational features of breast tumors with high-, low-, or non-expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status

BACKGROUND

HER2-low breast cancers were reported to have distinct clinicopathological characteristics from HER2-zero; however, the difference in their genetic features remains unclear. This study investigated the clinical and molecular features of breast tumors according to HER2 status.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinicopathological and genomic data of 523 Chinese women with breast cancer. Genomic data was generated by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of breast tumor samples using a commercial 520 gene panel. The cohort was stratified according to HER2 status as HER2-zero (n = 90), HER2-low (n = 231), and HER2-positive (n = 202) according to their immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization results.

RESULTS

HER2-low breast tumors were enriched with hormone receptor-positive tumors, and who had lower Ki67 expression levels. Genes were differentially mutated across HER2 subgroups. HER2-low tumors had significantly more mutations involved in PI3K-Akt signaling than HER2-positive (p < 0.001) and HER2-zero breast tumors (p < 0.01). HER2-zero tumors had more mutations in checkpoint factors (p < 0.01), Fanconi anemia (p < 0.05), and p53 signaling and cell cycle pathway (p < 0.05) compared to HER2-low breast tumors. Compared with HER2-zero tumors, HER2-low tumors had significantly lower pathological complete response rates after neoadjuvant therapy (15.9% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.042) and proportion of relapsed/progressed patients across follow-up time points (p = 0.031), but had comparable disease-free survival (p = 0.271).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate the distinct clinical and molecular features and clinical outcomes of HER2-low breast tumors.

Clinical significance of HER2-low expression in early breast cancer: a nationwide study from the Korean Breast Cancer Society

Background

There is an increasing interest in HER2-low breast cancer with promising data from clinical trials using novel anti-HER2 antibody–drug conjugates. We explored the differences in clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-IHC 0 breast cancer.

Methods

Using nationwide data from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry between 2006 and 2011, 30,491 patients with stages I to III breast cancer were included in the analysis: 9,506 (31.2%) in the HER2-low group and 20,985 (68.8%) in the HER2-IHC 0 group. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression survival analysis were used to compare breast cancer-specific survival between the two groups.

Results

HER2-low breast cancer was more frequent in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer than in those with triple-negative breast cancer. In patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, HER2-low breast cancer was associated with fewer T4 tumors, higher histological grade, and a negative lymphatic invasion. In patients with triple-negative breast cancer, HER2-low breast cancer was associated with a high lymph node ratio and positive lymphatic invasion. HER2-low breast cancer was significantly associated with a lower Ki-67 labeling index. No significant difference was observed in overall survival between the two groups. HER2-low breast cancer showed significantly better breast cancer-specific survival than HER2-IHC 0 breast cancer, regardless of the hormone receptor status. In multivariate analysis, the impact of low HER2 expression on breast cancer-specific survival was significant only in triple-negative breast cancer (HRs, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49–0.93; P = 0.019).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the biology and clinical impact of low HER2 expression can differ according to the hormone receptor status and support the need for further investigation on the understanding of the biology of HER2-low breast cancer.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-022-01519-x.

HER2 expression, copy number variation and survival outcomes in HER2-low non-metastatic breast cancer: an international multicentre cohort study and TCGA-METABRIC analysis

BACKGROUND

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is currently an area of active interest. This study evaluated the impact of low expression of HER2 on survival outcomes in HER2-negative non-metastatic breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

Patients with HER2-negative non-metastatic BC from 6 centres within the Asian Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (ABCCG) (n = 28,280) were analysed. HER2-low was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ and in situ hybridization non-amplified (ISH-) and HER2-zero as IHC 0. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) by hormone receptor status and HER2 IHC 0, 1+ and 2+ ISH- status were the main outcomes. A combined TCGA-BRCA and METABRIC cohort (n = 1967) was also analysed to explore the association between HER2 expression, ERBB2 copy number variation (CNV) status and RFS.

RESULTS

ABCCG cohort median follow-up was 6.6 years; there were 12,260 (43.4%) HER2-low BC and 16,020 (56.6%) HER2-zero BC. The outcomes were better in HER2-low BC than in HER2-zero BC (RFS: centre-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.93, P < 0.001; OS: centre-adjusted HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.89, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, HER2-low status was prognostic (RFS: HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96, P = 0.002; OS: HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93, P < 0.001). These differences remained significant in hormone receptor-positive tumours and for OS in hormone receptor-negative tumours. Superior outcomes were observed for HER2 IHC1+ BC versus HER2-zero BC (RFS: HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96, P = 0.001; OS: HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93, P = 0.001). No significant differences were seen between HER2 IHC2+ ISH- and HER2-zero BCs. In the TCGA-BRCA and METABRIC cohorts, ERBB2 CNV status was an independent RFS prognostic factor (neutral versus non-neutral HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.86, P < 0.001); no differences in RFS by ERBB2 mRNA expression levels were found.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low BC had a superior prognosis compared to HER2-zero BC in the non-metastatic setting, though absolute differences were modest and driven by HER2 IHC 1+ BC. ERBB2 CNV merits further investigation in HER2-negative BC.

HER2 Low, Ultra-low, and Novel Complementary Biomarkers: Expanding the Spectrum of HER2 Positivity in Breast Cancer

HER2 status in breast cancer is assessed to select patients eligible for targeted therapy with anti-HER2 therapies. According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP), the HER2 test positivity is defined by protein overexpression (score 3+) at immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or gene amplification at in situ hybridization (ISH). The introduction of novel anti-HER2 compounds, however, is changing this paradigm because some breast cancers with lower levels of protein expression (i.e. score 1+/2+ with no gene amplification) benefited from HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). Recently, a potential for HER2 targeting in HER2 "ultra-low" (i.e. score 0 with incomplete and faint staining in ≤10% of tumor cells) and MutL-deficient estrogen receptor (estrogen receptor)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers has been highlighted. All these novel findings are transforming the traditional dichotomy of HER2 status and have dramatically raised the expectations in this field. Still, a more aware HER2 status assessment coupled with the comprehensive characterization of the clinical and molecular features of these tumors is required. Here, we seek to provide an overview of the current state of HER2 targeting in breast cancers beyond the canonical HER2 positivity and to discuss the practical implications for pathologists and oncologists.

Heterogenous and Low Expression of HER2 in Breast Cancer Overcome by DS-8201a in a Heavily Treated Patient: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Breast cancer is highly heterogenous with temporal and spatial heterogeneity making it necessary for rebiopsy. DS-8201a, a new potential therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low expression breast cancer, had been proved that it could overcome heterogenous HER2 expression in a preclinical setting. In January 2014, a 23-year-old woman was presented with a lump in the right breast with bone metastasis, diagnosed as infiltrating ductal carcinoma, estrogen receptor (ER)+, progesterone receptor (PR)+, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+, and fluorescence in situ hybridization negative. The patient received a series of therapies including surgery, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, target therapy, and chemotherapy. The longest progression-free survival was 17 months after surgery. Biopsy of liver metastasis in February 2020 showed triple negative (HER2-, ER-, PR-), which was quite different from the initial diagnosis in 2014, so retesting was performed and the results showed ER-, PR+ by 10%, HER2 IHC score of 1+, indicating heterogeneity of HER2 expression. In May 2020, DS-8201a treatment was initiated and continued for 10 cycles until November 2020. Remarkable relief in symptoms was observed after the first dose. A reduction in the metastatic lesion size (liver and brain) and improved liver function was observed during the therapy. This case indicated the heterogeneity of breast cancer, and impressive efficacy of DS-8201a in a heavily treated patient with HER2-low and HER2 heterogeneity.

HER2-Low Breast Cancers

OBJECTIVES

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefits from novel therapeutic compounds in breast cancer patient with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) result. A new concept of "HER2-low" breast cancer has been proposed and applied in the recent and ongoing clinical trials. In this article, we review the literature on the topic of HER2-low breast cancer.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed was performed using key words related to HER2-low breast cancer. Major relevant studies that were presented in international breast cancer conferences were also included.

RESULTS

HER2-low breast cancer is currently defined as breast cancer with HER2 IHC score of 1+ or 2+ and negative ISH result. It likely represents a group of tumors with significant biological heterogeneity. Reports of clinical activity using the next generation of HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates in HER2-low breast cancers suggest that some strategies of targeting HER2 might be effective in this patient population while raising considerable concerns over limitations in our current testing methodologies and our ability to accurately identify such patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The promising efficacy of novel HER2-targeted therapy in advanced HER2-low breast cancers has raised the possibility for changing the clinical interpretation of HER2 status in breast cancer to include a HER2-low category; however, the definition of HER2-low breast cancer, the corresponding reliable and accurate quantitative HER2 testing methodology, and the biology of HER2-low breast cancer remain poorly defined.

Antibody-drug conjugates: Smart chemotherapy delivery across tumor histologies

As distinct cancer biomarkers have been discovered in recent years, a need to reclassify tumors by more than their histology has been proposed, and therapies are now tailored to treat cancers based on specific molecular aberrations and immunologic markers. In fact, multiple histology-agnostic therapies are currently adopted in clinical practice for treating patients regardless of their tumor site of origin. In parallel with this new model for drug development, in the past few years, several novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved to treat solid tumors, benefiting from engineering improvements in the conjugation process and the introduction of novel linkers and payloads. With the recognition that numerous surface targets are expressed across various cancer histologies, alongside the remarkable activity of modern ADCs, this drug class has been increasingly evaluated as suitable for a histology-agnostic expansion of indication. For illustration, the anti-HER2 ADC trastuzumab deruxtecan has demonstrated compelling activity in HER2-overexpressing breast, gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer. Examples of additional novel and potentially histology-agnostic ADC targets include trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) and nectin-4, among others. In the current review article, the authors summarize the current approvals of ADCs by the US Food and Drug Administration focusing on solid tumors and discuss the challenges and opportunities posed by the multihistological expansion of ADCs.

A New Landscape of Testing and Therapeutics in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Predictive biomarker testing on metastatic breast cancer is essential for determining patient eligibility for targeted therapeutics. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network currently recommends assessment of specific biomarkers on metastatic tumor subtypes, including hormone receptors, HER2, and BRCA1/2 mutations, on all newly metastatic breast cancers subtypes; programmed death-ligand 1 on metastatic triple-negative carcinomas; and PIK3CA mutation status on estrogen receptor-positive carcinomas. In select circumstances mismatch repair protein deficiency and/or microsatellite insufficiency, tumor mutation burden, and NTRK translocation status are also testing options. Novel biomarker testing, such as detecting PIK3CA mutations in circulating tumor DNA, is expanding in this rapidly evolving arena.

Anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic breast cancer: many choices and future directions

Metastatic HER2 + breast cancer is an expanding area of drug development and research, with three new drugs approved in 2020 alone. While first-line therapy is well-established for metastatic HER2 + breast cancer, the standard of care for second-line therapy will likely be changing soon based on the results of the DESTINY-Breast03 trial. In the third-line setting, many options are available. Considerations in choosing between regimens in the third-line include resistance to trastuzumab, the presence of brain metastases, and tolerability. High rates of resistance exist in this setting particularly due to expression of p95, a truncated form of HER2 that constitutively activates downstream signaling pathways. We suggest a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based regimen because of the activity of TKIs in brain metastases and in p95-expressing tumors. Attempts to overcome resistance to anti-HER2 therapies with PI3K inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and CDK 4/6 inhibitors are an active area of research. In the future, biomarkers are needed to help predict which therapies patients may benefit from the most. We review the many new drugs in development, including those with novel mechanisms of action.

The spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer: linking immunohistochemistry quantification with in situ hybridization assay

We aimed to document the pathological characteristics of breast cancer (BC) cases with different scores of HER2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), as well as to establish a relationship between HER2 expression and HER2 amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH). A cohort of 258 primary BC cases was evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. All HER2-negative and HER2-positive cases by IHC were concordant with the ISH classification. BC cases with score of 0 had lower average of HER2 copy number compared to cases with score of 1 + . HER2-equivocal cases by IHC had intermediate pathological characteristics between HER2-negative and HER2-positive cases. About 12% of HER2-equivocal cases were classified as ISH-positive. HER2-equivocal cases with HER2 gene amplification had proliferation index, HER2/CEP17 ratio, and average of HER2 copy number between HER2-equivocal cases without HER2 gene amplification and HER2-positive cases by IHC. Additionally, HER2-equivocal cases with HER2 amplification had score of 2 + in at least 50% of the total tumor area, with a proportion of ISH-positive cases increasing with the amount of score of 2 + present in the tumor. The quantification of score of 2 + in the tumor predicted the ISH classification with an AUC of 0.902. A logistic regression model using the same HER2 quantification and the nuclear score was able to increase the abovementioned prediction to an AUC of 0.929. As such, we were able to link HER2 quantification by IHC and morphological analysis with HER2 amplification by ISH.

Impact of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Low Status in Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer

Introduction In clinical practice, there is a binary distinction between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). However, within HER2- disease, there is significant heterogeneity. Particularly, HER2- tumors that express some level of HER2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) non-amplified are currently defined as HER2-low. This subgroup has shown distinct biological features compared to HER2-zero (HER2-0) BC and additionally novel antibody-drug conjugate therapies have demonstrated a potential and promising activity in HER2-low BC population. This study aims to evaluate the impact of HER2-low status in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in HER2- BC being HER2-low and HER2-0 status. Materials and methods In a single institution, we retrospectively reviewed clinical and pathological data of HER2 early-stage BC patients treated with NACT following definitive surgery from January 2015 to December 2020. Tumors with HER2 IHC 0 were classified as HER2-0 and IHC score 1+ and 2+/ISH non-amplified as HER2-low. The primary objective was to evaluate the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) using the definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 according to HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups. Secondary objectives were to evaluate biological features between the two subgroups, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Pearson chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney tests were performed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot DFS and OS curves. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 72 patients with HER2 BC were included with a median age at diagnosis of 52.5 years and a median follow-up time of 35.5 months. Of patients, 56.9% had HER2-low disease and 43.1% had HER2-0 disease. Significant differences between the two subgroups were detected regarding hormonal receptor status and proliferation grade (Ki67). In the HER2-low subgroup, 70% of tumors were luminal-like and 64.5% of HER2-0 patients had triple-negative BC (p = 0.03). There were statistically significant differences regarding estrogen (p = 0.00) and progesterone (p = 0.02) receptors. The median Ki67 rate was higher in the HER2-0 subset (mean rank = 43.9) compared to HER2-low (mean rank = 30.9) and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.00). HER2-low patients presented more stage III tumors (65.9%) and HER2-0 patients were mainly stage II (61.3%), and this was statistically relevant (p = 0.03). The prevalence of other clinical and pathological features was comparable between both groups. HER2-low subgroup achieved lower pCR rates (14.6% vs. 29.0%) but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Similarly, there was no difference between the two subgroups regarding DFS (p = 0.97) and OS (p = 0.35), although the data were immature. Conclusion As in prior studies, this study did not support a significant impact of HER2-low status on response to NACT in HER2- patients with early-stage BC. HER2-low patients had a lower pCR, which may suggest a worse response to classic chemotherapy regimen and may have clinical implications that should be further exploited. The prevalence of hormonal receptors in HER2-low tumors was consistent with previous data in the literature. Although retrospective, the data suggest that HER2-low tumors should be regarded as a distinct biological subtype and more research is warranted.

Evolution of low HER2 expression between early and advanced-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is emerging as an actionable biomarker for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) with novel anti-HER2 drugs. However, the evolution of this biomarker during the course of disease is still poorly characterised, and controversial data exist on its prognostic implications.

METHODS

We reviewed data of patients with HER2-negative BC according to the latest ASCO/CAP guidelines referred between January 2014 and December 2020. We grouped patients based on the immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of HER2, HER2-zero (IHC 0) and HER2-low subgroup (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-negative) and evaluated the evolution of HER2 expression between the primary tumour and the first biopsy collected in the advanced setting. Disease-free survival, overall survival and progression-free survival were compared between patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low expression on the primary tumour.

RESULTS

232 patients were included in the analysis. Among the overall population, there was a relevant discordance in HER2 expression between the primary tumour and the matched biopsy (K = 0.33, 95%CI 0.21-0.44): 44% of the HER2-zero primary tumour showed an increased HER2 score on biopsy, and 22% of the HER2-low primary tumours turned into HER2-IHC 0. The findings in the sub-populations of hormone-receptors positive (K = 0.32, 95%CI 0.19-0.45) and triple-negative tumours (K = 0.18, 95%CI -0.09-0.46) were consistent with the primary analysis. No difference in survival outcomes was observed between HER2-low and HER2-zero primary tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low expression is dynamic in BC and may be enriched in the advanced-stage setting. No prognostic significance was demonstrated for HER2-low expression.

« HER2-faible », un nouveau concept dans la prise en charge des cancers du sein

HER2, a human epidermal growth factor, being activated by amplification, is a negative prognostic factor in breast cancer. HER2 is the target of anti-HER2 antibodies (Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab…). For more than 10 years, breast cancers have been classified into HER2 positive and HER2 negative. However, the advent of new cytotoxic drugs combined with anti-HER2 antibodies, such as TDM1 or trastuzumab déruxtécan, have shown very promising therapeutic activity in patients with low HER2 expression breast cancer. These new therapeutic perspectives encourage a better identification of low HER2 tumours in order to identify patients who could benefit from them. Thus, the classification of breast tumours evolves to individualize HER2-negative tumours (score 0), HER2-positive tumours (score 3+ and 2+ amplified) and HER2-low tumours (scores 1+ and 2+ not-amplified). HER2-low tumours are common and represent more than half of all breast cancers. To identify these HER2-low tumours, pathology laboratories should not change their usual technique calibrated according to ASCO/CAP and GEFPICS recommendations. Until more clinical data about response to these new treatment strategies are available, GEFPICS does not require pathologists to identify this HER2-low category. Nevertheless, this designation will allow clinicians to identify patients whose tumours fall into this category in the very short term and offer them new treatment options.

HER2-low expression does not affect the clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

There is accumulating evidence support human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low as a biologically distinct subtype of breast cancer. The present study was conducted to explore whether HER2-low expression will affect the clinical efficacy of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who were treated with palbociclib from January 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed based on real-world clinical practice. HER2-zero was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, and HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival(OS) and safety.

RESULTS

45 patients received palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant therapy, including 24 HER-2-zero and 21 HER-2-low patients. There were no statistically significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in ORR (41.7% vs. 28.6%, P=0.360) and DCR (79.2% vs. 76.2%, P=0.811) between HER-2-zero and HER-2-low patients. And simultaneously, HER2-zero and HER2-low patients obtained similar median PFS (16.2m vs. 14.1m, P=0.263). The median OS was not reached. Neutropenia and leukopenia were the most common adverse events. Grade 3-4 adverse events(AEs) occurred in 58.3% and 57.1% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low expression does not affect the clinical efficacy of palbociclib and our present study did not support incorporating HER2-low into systemic therapy decisions for patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor.

[New treatment options for metastatic HER2-low breast cancer : Consequences for histopathological diagnosis]

The overexpression of HER2 in breast cancer is a classic example for molecular targeted therapy, and it has been shown that classical anti-HER2 therapeutics were only effective in patients with HER2 overexpressing tumors. Therefore, in recent decades, pathologists have been focused on the reliable identification of HER2 overexpressing tumors. Based on the results of recent clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), this diagnostic strategy for evaluation of HER2 is currently changing. It has been shown that the ADC trastuzumab-deruxtecan is effective not only against tumors with classical HER2 overexpression, but also against HER2-low tumors. These clinical trial results lead to a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients whose tumours were previously classified as HER2 negative. In addition to the identification of HER2 (score 3+) overexpressing tumors, it is necessary to identify HER2-low expressing tumors (defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or IHC2+ with negative in situ hybridization).Due to the therapeutic consequences, it is important to quickly adapt the diagnostic workup and reporting to the new requirements. In addition, the new therapeutic options for anti-HER2 therapy lead to new challenges for standardization as well as to new scientific questions for the characterization of tumors with low HER2 expression.

Development and validation of the new HER2DX assay for predicting pathological response and survival outcome in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer

Background

Both clinical and genomic data independently predict survival and treatment response in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Here we present the development and validation of a new HER2DX risk score, and a new HER2DX pathological complete response (pCR) score, both based on a 27-gene expression plus clinical feature-based classifier.

Methods

HER2DX is a supervised learning algorithm incorporating tumour size, nodal staging, and 4 gene expression signatures tracking immune infiltration, tumour cell proliferation, luminal differentiation, and the expression of the HER2 amplicon, into a single score. 434 HER2-positive tumours from the Short-HER trial were used to train a prognostic risk model; 268 cases from an independent cohort were used to verify the accuracy of the HER2DX risk score. In addition, 116 cases treated with neoadjuvant anti-HER2-based chemotherapy were used to train a predictive model of pathological complete response (pCR); two independent cohorts of 91 and 67 cases were used to verify the accuracy of the HER2DX pCR likelihood score. Five publicly available independent datasets with >1,000 patients with early-stage HER2-positive disease were also analysed.

Findings

In Short-HER, HER2DX variables were associated with good risk outcomes (i.e., immune, and luminal) and poor risk outcomes (i.e., proliferation, and tumour and nodal staging). In an independent cohort, continuous HER2DX risk score was significantly associated with disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0·002); the 5-year DFS in the low-risk group was 97·4% (94·4-100·0%). For the neoadjuvant pCR predictor training cohort, HER2DX variables were associated with pCR (i.e., immune, proliferation and HER2 amplicon) and non-pCR (i.e., luminal, and tumour and nodal staging). In both independent test set cohorts, continuous HER2DX pCR likelihood score was significantly associated with pCR (p<0·0001). A weak negative correlation was found between the HER2DX risk score versus the pCR score (correlation coefficient -0·19).

Interpretation

The two HER2DX tests provide accurate estimates of the risk of recurrence, and the likelihood to achieve a pCR, in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

Funding

This study received funding from Reveal Genomics, IDIBAPS and the University of Padova.

Cancer du sein HER2-low : comment un concept biologique s’immisce-t-il dans la décision thérapeutique ?

The emergence of a new tumor entity called HER2-low breast cancer leads us to reconsider therapeutic indications in patients whose tumors were usually considered as luminal or triple negative. The development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) allows using HER2 as a vector of a cytoxic drug with significant clinical efficacy in breast cancer with low HER2 expression. Trastuzumab deruxtecan monotherapy is currently evaluated in phase III trials in HER2-low patients, but also in combination in earlier phase studies. Many ADCs are in development, with highly anticipated results. The toxicities of these various ADCs seem manageable and compatible with prolonged administration. Her2-low breast cancer subtype may benefit from dedicated therapeutic strategies in the next few years.

Antibody-drug conjugates in HER2-positive breast cancer

ABSTRACT

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) combine the high specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the high anti-tumor activity of small molecular cytotoxic payloads. The anti-tumor activity of ADCs is mainly achieved by the direct blocking of the receptor by monoclonal antibodies, direct action and bystander effect of cytotoxic drugs, and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. ADCs have been used in adjuvant therapy and rescue treatment of human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, greatly improving the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Several ongoing clinical trials of ADC for breast cancer and other solid tumors proved the potential of ADCs will provide more promising treatment options for patients with malignant tumors. This review introduces the mechanism and latest clinical progress of ADC drugs approved for HER2-positive breast cancer to guide clinical practice and conduct research.

Phase I Clinical Trial of an Autologous Dendritic Cell Vaccine Against HER2 Shows Safety and Preliminary Clinical Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances, there is an urgent need for agents targeting HER2-expressing cancers other than breast cancer. We report a phase I study (NCT01730118) of a dendritic cell (DC) vaccine targeting HER2 in patients with metastatic cancer or bladder cancer at high risk of relapse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Part 1 of the study enrolled patients with HER2-expressing metastatic cancer that had progressed after at least standard treatment and patients who underwent definitive treatment for invasive bladder cancer with no evidence of disease at the time of enrollment. Part 2 enrolled patients with HER2-expressing metastatic cancer who had progressed after anti-HER2 therapy. The DC vaccines were prepared from autologous monocytes and transduced with an adenoviral vector expressing the extracellular and transmembrane domains of HER2 (AdHER2). A total of five doses were planned, and adverse events were recorded in patients who received at least one dose. Objective response was evaluated by unidimensional immune-related response criteria every 8 weeks in patients who received at least two doses. Humoral and cellular immunogenicity were assessed in patients who received more than three doses.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were enrolled at four dose levels (5 × 10⁶, 10 × 10⁶, 20 × 10⁶, and 40 × 10⁶ DCs). Median follow-up duration was 36 weeks (4-124); 10 patients completed five doses. The main reason for going off-study was disease progression. The main adverse events attributable to the vaccine were injection-site reactions. No cardiac toxicity was noted. Seven of 21 evaluable patients (33.3%) demonstrated clinical benefit (1 complete response, 1 partial response, and 5 stable disease). After ≥3 doses, an antibody response was detected in 3 of 13 patients (23.1%), including patients with complete and partial responses. Lymphocytes from 10 of 11 patients (90.9%) showed induction of anti-HER2 responses measured by the production of at least one of interferon-gamma, granzyme B, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and there were multifunctional responses in 8 of 11 patients (72.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The AdHER2 DC vaccine showed evidence of immunogenicity and preliminary clinical benefit in patients with HER2-expressing cancers, along with an excellent safety profile. It shows promise for further clinical applications, especially in combination regimens.

Landscape of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC): results from the Austrian AGMT_MBC-Registry

Background

About 50% of all primary breast cancers show a low-level expression of HER2 (HER2-low), defined as immunohistochemically 1+ or 2+ and lack of HER2 gene amplification measured by in situ hybridization. This low HER2 expression is a promising new target for antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) currently under investigation. Until now, little is known about the frequency and the prognostic value of low HER2-expression in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and methods

The MBC-Registry of the Austrian Study Group of Medical Tumor Therapy (AGMT) is a multicenter nationwide ongoing registry for MBC patients in Austria. Unadjusted, univariate survival probabilities of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression models. In this analysis, only patients with known HER2 status and available survival data were included.

Results

As of 11/15/2020, 1,973 patients were included in the AGMT-MBC-Registry. Out of 1,729 evaluable patients, 351 (20.3%) were HER2-positive, 608 (35.2%) were HER2-low and 770 (44.5%) were completely HER2-negative (HER2-0). Low HER2-expression was markedly more frequent in the hormone-receptor(HR)+ subgroup compared to the triple-negative subgroup (40% vs. 23%). In multivariable analysis, low HER2 expression did not significantly influence OS neither in the HR+ (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.74–1.05; P = 0.171) nor in the triple-negative subgroup (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.68–1.25; P = 0.585), when compared to completely HER2-negative disease. Similar results were observed when HER2 IHC 2+ patients were compared to IHC 1+ or 0 patients.

Conclusion

Low-HER2 expression did not have any impact on prognosis of metastatic breast cancer in this real-world population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-021-01492-x.

Accelerating progress in early triple-negative breast cancer: A viewpoint on antibody-drug conjugates, back from St Gallen breast cancer conference 2021

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is associated with an aggressive disease course, and limited treatment options. The recent accelerated drug development in the space of mTNBC has been driven by a precision-medicine approach, with the potential to deliver more personalized treatments and result in better outcomes. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have introduced a novel paradigm in the space of mTNBC, leading to the approval of the first targeted agent in this setting. The research and development of ADCs comes in parallel with the identification of tumor-specific targets of pharmacological interest. As a result, ADCs bring the potential for agnostic treatment delivery-across multiple histology types, and theranostically, by coupling tumor-antigen identification and treatment, as a continuum. In this perspective, recent progress in ADCs development for early and mTNBC are outlined, in the trade-off of patient selection, tumor specificity, precise drug delivery, potent payloads safety and quality of life.

Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immune Response Indicators to Predict Overall Survival in a Retrospective Study of HER2-Borderline (IHC 2+) Breast Cancer Patients

Breast cancer (BC) categorized as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) borderline [2+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC 2+)] presents challenges for the testing, frequently obscured by intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH). This leads to difficulties in therapy decisions. We aimed to establish prognostic models of overall survival (OS) of these patients, which take into account spatial aspects of ITH and tumor microenvironment by using hexagonal tiling analytics of digital image analysis (DIA). In particular, we assessed the prognostic value of Immunogradient indicators at the tumor–stroma interface zone (IZ) as a feature of antitumor immune response. Surgical excision samples stained for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki67, HER2, and CD8 from 275 patients with HER2 IHC 2+ invasive ductal BC were used in the study. DIA outputs were subsampled by HexT for ITH quantification and tumor microenvironment extraction for Immunogradient indicators. Multiple Cox regression revealed HER2 membrane completeness (HER2 MC) (HR: 0.18, p = 0.0007), its spatial entropy (HR: 0.37, p = 0.0341), and ER contrast (HR: 0.21, p = 0.0449) as independent predictors of better OS, with worse OS predicted by pT status (HR: 6.04, p = 0.0014) in the HER2 non-amplified patients. In the HER2-amplified patients, HER2 MC contrast (HR: 0.35, p = 0.0367) and CEP17 copy number (HR: 0.19, p = 0.0035) were independent predictors of better OS along with worse OS predicted by pN status (HR: 4.75, p = 0.0018). In the non-amplified tumors, three Immunogradient indicators provided the independent prognostic value: CD8 density in the tumor aspect of the IZ and CD8 center of mass were associated with better OS (HR: 0.23, p = 0.0079 and 0.14, p = 0.0014, respectively), and CD8 density variance along the tumor edge predicted worse OS (HR: 9.45, p = 0.0002). Combining these three computational indicators of the CD8 cell spatial distribution within the tumor microenvironment augmented prognostic stratification of the patients. In the HER2-amplified group, CD8 cell density in the tumor aspect of the IZ was the only independent immune response feature to predict better OS (HR: 0.22, p = 0.0047). In conclusion, we present novel prognostic models, based on computational ITH and Immunogradient indicators of the IHC biomarkers, in HER2 IHC 2+ BC patients.

Prognostic impact of HER2-low expression in hormone receptor positive early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer may represent a distinct entity. We aimed to compare disease characteristics and outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-0 in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

A single center retrospective study comprising all women with ER positive, HER2 negative early breast cancer, for whom an Oncotype DX test was performed between 2005 and 2012. Women were grouped to HER2-low (immunohistochemistry +1 or +2 and in situ hybridization not amplified) or HER2-0. Clinico-pathological features and Oncotype recurrence score (RS) were collected. Data on overall-survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were evaluated according to HER2 expression status.

RESULTS

608 women were included, of which 304 women had HER2-0 and 304 had HER2-low disease. Lobular subtype was significantly more common in HER-0 compared to HER2-low disease (17% vs. 8%, p = 0.005). The prevalence of other clinic-pathological characteristics and long-term prognosis were comparable between both groups. For women with high genomic risk (RS > 25), HER2-low expression was associated with significantly favorable OS (HR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.78, p = 0.01), DFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.82, p = 0.01) and DDFS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.63, P = 0.002) compared to women with HER2-0. For women with low genomic risk (RS ≤ 25), long-term prognosis was unrelated to HER2 expression.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic impact of HER2-low expression in early-stage luminal disease varies across the genomic risk, with significant favorable outcomes of HER2-low expression compared to HER2-0 in women with high genomic risk.

Prognostic Value of HER2-Low Expression in Non-Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Correlation with Other Biomarkers

HER2-low breast cancer (i.e., HER 1+ or 2+, without gene amplification) is an emerging subtype for which very few data are available, especially within the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) group. Our aim was to evaluate HER2 expression and its prognostic value in a large retrospective series of patients with non-metastatic TNBC (median age: 57.7 years; range: 28.5-98.6). Among the 296 TNBC samples, 83.8% were HER2 0, 13.5% were HER2 1+, and 2.7% were HER2 2+ (HercepTest^TM and 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 scoring). CK5/6 and/or EGFR-expressing androgen receptors and FOXA1-expressing tumors were classified as basal-like (63.8%) and molecular apocrine-like (MA, 40.2%), respectively. Compared with HER2 0 tumors, HER2 1+/2+ tumors exhibited a lower histological grade (1/2) (35.4% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.007) and MA profile (57.5% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.008). Moreover, patients with HER2 1+/2+ tumors were older (p = 0.047). After a median follow-up of 9.7 years, HER2 2+ tumors (compared with HER2 0/1+ tumors) were associated with worse relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 3.16, 95% CI [1.27; 7.85], p = 0.034) in a univariate analysis. Overall survival (OS) and RFS were not different in the HER2 0 and 1+/2+ groups. HER2 levels were not significantly associated with OS or RFS in a multivariate analysis.

Open questions and controversies in the systemic treatment of breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Personalized therapy has revolutionized our approach to breast cancer (BC). Patient selection strategies and new biomarkers are the basis for increasingly complex diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. In this short review, we discuss recent developments in breast oncology, focusing on controversial topics with relevance for clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of gene expression signatures to guide adjuvant therapy in hormone receptor-positive tumors and personalized strategies for systemic treatment of early stage HER2-positive disease represent significant advances. Additionally, the current role of platinum salts, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and CDK4/6 inhibitors in the (neo)adjuvant treatment remains controversial, with several ongoing randomized clinical trials exploring their use. In the metastatic disease setting, we identify important unmet needs such as the development of predictive biomarkers and the definition of the ideal sequencing algorithm with the incorporation of innovative agents in all subtypes of BC.

SUMMARY

Advances in understanding the molecular biology and heterogeneity of BC have led to the development of new biomarkers and therapeutic agents that significantly impact current and future clinical practice.

HER2-low breast cancer could be associated with an increased risk of brain metastasis

PURPOSE

The HER2-low breast cancer is a newly recognized entity with the clinical characteristics is yet to be defined. We hypothesized that HER2-low breast cancer could lead to an increased rate of brain metastases in patients with localized breast cancer. We tested this hypothesis in a large cohort of breast cancer patients with long follow-up.

METHODS

We included 2686 adult breast cancer patients followed up in Hacettepe University Cancer Center. Patients with 1 + positive HER2 expression and 2 + HER2 expression with a negative FISH were categorized as HER2-low disease. We evaluated the brain metastasis risk with binary logistic regression analyses and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

During a median 95.4 (IQR 72.6-123.1) month follow-up, 184 patients developed brain metastasis (6.9%). The brain metastases were developed in 5.1% of the patients with HER2-negative disease, 8.5% of the patients with HER2-low disease, and 10.1% of the patients with HER2-positive disease. A multivariable binary logistic regression model demonstrated an increased risk of brain metastasis in patients with HER2-low disease (OR: 1.611, 95% CI 1.055-2.460, p = 0.027) and in HER2-positive patients (OR: 1.837, 95% CI 1.308-2.580, p < 0.001). Additionally, HR + -HER2-low disease was associated with a decreased DFS compared to HR + -HER2-negative disease (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observed an increased risk of brain metastasis in localized breast cancer patients with HER2-low disease. We think that a high level of vigilance and a low threshold for brain imaging could benefit HER2-low breast cancer patients similar to the patients with HER-positive disease.

Interstitial Lung Disease Induced by Anti-ERBB2 Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Review

Importance

In the past decade, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have substantially changed treatment of both advanced and early-stage ERBB2-positive breast cancer. Novel conjugates are now showing activity in trials of other ERBB2-associated tumors, leading to the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for ERBB2-positive gastric cancer, as well as beneficial results in colorectal, lung, and bladder cancer. It is thus possible that anti-ERBB2 ADCs may become a treatment option for multiple types of tumors because many have at least some expression of ERBB2. Despite an improved overall therapeutic index, clinical observations have recently raised a concern regarding potential lung toxicity of anti-ERBB2 ADCs. Deaths related to interstitial lung disease (ILD) have been reported with variable incidence in trials testing anti-ERBB2 conjugates, warranting appropriate training of clinicians for the identification and management of this toxic effect.

Observations

Although no specific guidelines are available for the diagnosis and management of ADC-related ILD, some recommendations can be derived based on general principles adopted for drug-induced and immunotherapy-related ILD. Overall, in symptomatic ILD, the ADC should be discontinued. Reintroduction of the conjugate can be considered only in asymptomatic cases after complete resolution. Corticosteroids represent the cornerstone of ILD treatment, and dosing should be adapted according to the severity of the event. Additional treatments can be considered based on the clinical scenario.

Conclusions and Relevance

This review summarizes the current knowledge on the pathogenesis and epidemiologic characteristics of anti-ERBB2 ADC-related lung toxicity, proposing strategies for its diagnosis and treatment. Earlier diagnosis and more adequate treatment of ADC-induced ILD may improve the therapeutic index of this important class of anticancer agents, allowing for a safe expansion of anti-ERBB2 ADCs across tumor types.

Evolution of HER2-low expression from primary to recurrent breast cancer

About a half of HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) show HER2-low expression that can be targeted by new antibody-drug conjugates. The main aim of this study is to describe the evolution of HER2 expression from primary BC to relapse by including HER2-low category in both primary and recurrent BC samples. Patients with matched primary and relapse BC samples were included. HER2 was evaluated according to ASCO/CAP recommendations in place at the time of diagnosis. A cutoff of >10% cells staining for HER2-positivity was applied. HER2-negative cases were sub-classified as HER2-low (IHC = 1 + /2+ and ISH not amplified), or HER2-0 (IHC-0). 547 patients were included. The proportion of HER2-low cases was 34.2% on the primary tumor and 37.3% on the relapse samples. Among HER2-negative cases, HER2-low status was more frequent in HR-positive vs triple-negative tumors (47.3% vs 35.4% on primary tumor samples, 53.8% vs 36.2% on relapse samples). The overall rate of HER2 discordance was 38.0%, mostly represented by HER2-0 switching to HER2-low (15%) and HER2-low switching to HER2-0 (14%). Among patients with a primary HER2-negative tumor, the rate of HER2 discordance was higher in HR-positive/HER2-negative vs triple-negative cases (45.5% vs 36.7% p = 0.170). This difference was mostly driven by cases switching from HER2-0 to HER2-low. HER2-low expression is highly unstable during disease evolution. Relapse biopsy in case of a primary HER2-0 tumor may open new therapeutic opportunities in a relevant proportion of patients.

Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in breast cancer

The identification of Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a target in breast cancer and the subsequent development of HER2-targeted therapies has revolutionized the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. However, there is an increasing awareness of how frequently tumors have low or heterogeneous expression of HER2. It is now recognized that this impacts the degree of benefit from HER2-targeted therapies. With the advent of novel and more potent antibody drug conjugates, targeting HER2 in traditional HER2-negative tumors with "HER2-low" expression is becoming possible. It is essential to refine the nomenclature around HER2 expression to enable clinicians to optimize treatment for patients across the HER2 expression spectrum in breast cancer. HER2 heterogeneity can be detected by conventional IHC, gene expression profiling or other methods and numerous studies have documented the correlation between the presence of HER2 heterogeneity and shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Validation of techniques to identify HER2 heterogeneity in the clinic and concurrent development of agents to effectively treat tumors with non-uniform HER2 expression is needed.

Management of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) is the major driver of most metastatic breast cancers (mBCs). Endocrine therapy (ET) is the most effective treatment for ER + mBC, but its effectiveness is limited by high rates of de novo and acquired resistance. A growing understanding of the biological characteristics and complexity of the ER pathway and the mechanisms of ET resistance has led to the development of a new generation of targeted therapies. One such mechanism is the cell cycle signaling pathways, which lead to the development of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) that have, in turn, transformed the management of such tumors. Another important mechanism is the alteration of the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Drugs targeting each component of these pathways are currently used in clinical practice, and several more are in development. As a result, a myriad of new targeted therapies are consistently being added to the clinical oncologist armamentarium. Navigating the evolving and highly complex treatment landscape of HR + /HER2- mBC remains both an art and a challenge. In this review, we discuss the biological features of HR + /HER2- mBC and the different mechanisms of resistance to ET. We also discuss the management of mBC as the disease changes from endocrine-sensitive to endocrine-resistant.