Platelet transfusion for patients with cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Measuring the concerns of cancer patients with low platelet counts: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Thrombocytopenia (FACT-Th) questionnaire

PURPOSE

The specific concerns of people with low platelet counts (thrombocytopenia) have not been characterized well in the literature and as a result proper measurement of patient-reported concerns is lacking. We report on the development and validation of questions specifically targeted to patients with thrombocytopenia that can be added to the more general concerns in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An 18-item FACT-Thrombocytopenia Subscale (ThS) was rated and evaluated by thrombocytopenic patients at baseline during a validation study of 40 thrombocytopenic and 43 nonthrombocytopenic cancer patients. To evaluate responsiveness, patients completed a battery of self-report measures including the FACT-Th and were followed up for change in platelet count over 2 weeks.

RESULTS

All subscales and aggregated scores showed high internal consistency at initial assessment and at retesting. Convergent and divergent validity were demonstrated by predicted relationships between FACT-Th subscales and mood, mental and physical component scores of the SF-36, and social desirability. The ThS differentiated patients with low platelets from those with normal platelet counts and good performance from poor performance status patients.

CONCLUSION

The FACT-Th is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the impact of thrombocytopenia on patients' lives. It can distinguish cancer patients with and without thrombocytopenia and is responsive to increase in platelet count over time. The FACT-Th may therefore prove useful as a measure of self-reported symptoms and concerns related to thrombocytopenia in clinical trials evaluating new pharmacologic agents and/or platelet transfusion practice.

Utilization of platelet transfusions in the intensive care unit: indications, transfusion triggers, and platelet count responses

BACKGROUND

A description of current platelet (PLT) transfusion practice in the intensive care unit (ICU) is needed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

All thrombocytopenic patients (PLT count, <150 x 10(9)/L) who received PLT transfusions were identified from a previous prospective study of consecutive medical-surgical ICU patients; trauma, orthopedic, and cardiac surgery were exclusions. Risk factors for ineffective transfusions were examined.

RESULTS

Of 261 ICU patients, 118 (45.2%) had thrombocytopenia and a PLT count nadir of less than 50 x 10(9) per L (n = 22), 50 to 99 x 10(9) per L (n = 37), and 100 to 149 x 10(9) per L (n = 59). Twenty-seven (22.9%) patients received PLT transfusions (n = 76 transfusions) and 37 (31.4%) had major bleeding. PLT dose was approximately 3 to 4 x 10(11) per L transfusion. Therapeutic (n = 24) and prophylactic (n = 52) PLT transfusion triggers were 51 x 10(9) per L (interquartile range [IQR], 26 to 68) and 41 x 10(9) per L (IQR, 20 to 57), respectively, as measured at a median of 4.5 hours (IQR, <1.6 to 6.9) before transfusion. A single PLT transfusion resulted in a median PLT increase of 14 x 10(9) per L (IQR, -2 to 30) measured at 5.2 hours (IQR, 1.8 to 8.8) after the transfusion; however, no PLT count increase was observed after 17 transfusions given to 13 (48.1%) patients. No risk factors for ineffective transfusions were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Among critically ill patients, most PLT transfusions were administered to prevent, rather than to treat, bleeding, with a transfusion trigger of 40 to 50 x 10(9) per L. Nearly half of ICU patients who received transfusions failed to mount a PLT count increase after a single transfusion. Prospective studies are needed to determine the effects of PLT transfusions on bleeding and predictors of ineffective transfusions in the ICU.

Discrepancy between impedance and immunofluorescence platelet counting has implications for clinical decision making in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura

This study investigated whether differences occur between the impedance and immunofluorescence methods for platelet quantification in idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP). Immunofluorescence gave a platelet count >50% higher than the impedance test in 9/35 (26%) patients, of which 4/35 (11%) were >100% higher. The clinical severity of thrombocytopenia was changed as a result of the immunofluorescence test in 14/35 (40%) patients. Neither mean platelet volume nor platelet distribution width predicted impedance/immunofluorescence method discrepancy. It is suggested that immunofluorescence platelet counts should be performed on all ITP patients when the implementation of a therapeutic or diagnostic intervention is being considered.

Feasibility and usefulness of self-assessment of bleeding in patients with haematological malignancies, and the association between platelet count and bleeding

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the collection of daily prospective information about bleeding outcomes in patients with thrombocytopenia, including information obtained by patient self-assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with haematological malignancies were enrolled in a study of bleeding data collection during the period of thrombocytopenia. A short educational session and information sheet was designed for self-assessment. Platelet counts and all transfusions were recorded daily. Bleeding scores were translated into World Health Organization (WHO) bleeding grades.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in the study. Four-hundred and ten days of thrombocytopenia were eligible for assessment of bleeds. Self-assessment was feasible, as defined by the total proportion of days on which self-assessment was completed (70%, 288 thrombocytopenic days). There was 86% agreement between bleeding data collected by self-assessment and by medical examination using a structured assessment form. Examples of discrepancies included the duration of petechiae/bruises and the reporting of minor bleeding. There was no evidence for an association between patients' morning platelet count and daily WHO bleeding grade. The incidences of WHO grade 1 and grade 2 bleeding on days with platelet counts < or = 10 x 10(9)/l, 11-20 x 10(9)/l, and > 20 x 10(9)/l were similar and did not reveal higher rates of bleeding at lower counts.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient self-assessment can help to support comprehensive daily prospective monitoring of bleeding, specifically facilitating data collection following hospital discharge. The discrepancies between self-assessment and medical examination highlight the need to develop a validated international assessment tool. The association among platelet count, risk of bleeding and role of prophylactic platelet transfusions needs further evaluation in larger prospective trials.

A descriptive analysis of international transfusion practice and bleeding outcomes in patients with acute leukemia

BACKGROUND

Recently, bleeding has been used in platelet (PLT) trials rather than surrogate outcomes. The purpose of this study was to provide a descriptive summary of data from PLT studies conducted in four countries and exploratory analyses to determine the relationship between bleeding and PLT count.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A descriptive analysis was performed on original data from the Italian trigger study, the US TRAP study, the Canadian febrile reaction study, and a clinical chart review from one hospital site in the United Kingdom. The relationship between bleeding and PLT count was explored with the Italian data.

RESULTS

A total of 897 patients with acute leukemia received 10,506 PLT transfusions. Grade 3 or Grade 4 WHO bleeding frequency was 28.1 percent (252/897) but varied by country: Italy, 10.8 percent (27/250); United States, 36.4 percent (217/598); Canada, 18.9 percent (7/37); and the United Kingdom, 8.3 percent (1/12). Grade 1 or Grade 2 bleeding was reported only in the Italian study (46.4%[116/250] and 11.6%[29/250], respectively). The relative rates of WHO Grade 2, 3, or 4 bleeding for PLT counts in the ranges of 0 to 4, 5 to 9, 10 to 14, and 15 to 19 (x10(9)/L) were 8.8, 1.9, 1.8, and 1.2, respectively, compared to those counts within the range of 20 to 29 (x10(9)/L).

CONCLUSION

The study provides descriptive data on PLT use and frequency of bleeding. When PLT counts were 0x10(9) to 4x10(9) per L there was an eightfold increase in bleeding and a twofold risk increase when counts were 5x10(9) to 14x10(9) per L compared to the 20x10(9) to 29x10(9) per L reference range. The increased rate of bleeding at low counts occurred despite PLT therapy.

Fresh frozen plasma and platelet transfusion for nonbleeding patients in the intensive care unit: benefit or harm?

OBJECTIVE

Whereas restrictive red cell transfusion has become a standard of care for the critically ill, evidenced-based indications for use of other blood components such as fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet transfusions are limited. We searched the National Library of Medicine PubMed database as well as references of retrieved articles and summarized the current evidence for the use of FFP and platelet transfusions in critically ill patients.

RESULTS

Routine coagulation tests are poor determinants of bleeding risk in critically ill patients with coagulopathy. FFP transfusion has limited efficacy and is associated with significant morbidity in critically ill patients, in particular, pulmonary edema and acute lung injury. Routine minimally invasive critical care procedures can be safely performed by experienced clinicians in the setting of mildly abnormal coagulation test results, and there is no evidence that FFP transfusion alters the risk of bleeding. For platelet transfusion, the American Society of Clinical Oncology has developed practice guidelines designed for oncology patients. However, because the pathophysiology of thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients often differs from that of thrombocytopenia in oncology patients, published guidelines for oncology patients may not be applicable.

CONCLUSION

Because the risk-benefit ratio of a liberal FFP or platelet transfusion strategy for critically ill patients may not be favorable, randomized controlled trials are warranted for evaluating a restrictive vs. liberal FFP or platelet transfusion strategy for nonbleeding patients in the intensive care unit.

Thrombocytopenia in Adults: A Practical Approach to Evaluation and Management

With the widespread use of automated cell counters, clinicians in any field of medicine may encounter thrombocytopenia. The symptomatology may vary greatly and the underlying cause may be either inconsequential (pseudothrombocytopenia) or life threatening. It is important to be aware of common conditions leading to thrombocytopenia and have a systematic approach to evaluation and management of these patients. In this review we highlight common etiologies seen in adult patients with thrombocytopenia. A brief description and management approach to common conditions, as well as to conditions that may be less frequent but require emergent intervention, is provided. Often the clinician is called upon to make a decision about platelet transfusions. The review also discusses the various types of platelet products available for transfusion and gives guidance regarding selection of the appropriate product, indications and contraindications, and suggested target platelet counts for various clinical situations.

Autoimmunthrombozytopenie (AITP) des Erwachsenen: Klinik, Diagnose und Therapie

The incidence of AITP is 20-30/million/year. The diagnosis is based on the finding of an isolated thrombocytopenia without other blood abnormalities and absence of a palpable spleen. Additional tests such as bone marrow examination, determination of platelet antibodies and of thrombopoetin are required only in special cases. The usual first line therapy in patients with bleeding tendency and a low platelet count is prednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day. Patients who have platelet counts of less than 20,000/microl 3-6 months after steroid therapy are candidates for splenectomy, in particular if more than 0.1 mg/kg/day prednisolone is required to keep the patient free of bleedings. Laparoscopic splenectomy has a low mortality (0.2%) and morbidity (10%). The risk of post-splenectomy overwhelming pneumococcal septicaemia can be minimized by preoperative vaccination. Older patients, who have low platelet counts after splenectomy, have a high bleeding risk. The most effective treatment options for these patients are cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and rituximab, but the choice of treatment should be carefully considered, since the risk of adverse effects may be greater than the risk of fatal bleeding.

Management of sepsis in neutropenia: guidelines of the infectious diseases working party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)

These guidelines from the infectious diseases working party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO) give recommendations for the management of adults with neutropenia and the diagnosis of sepsis. The guidelines are written for clinicians and focus on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of sepsis. The manuscript contains evidence-based recommendations for the assessment of the quality and strength of the data.

In vivo recovery and survival of apheresis and whole blood-derived platelets: a paired comparison in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Methods of platelet preparation may alter the recovery and survival characteristics of platelets following transfusion. As suggested by a recent clinical trial, platelet recovery may be better preserved with apheresis platelet preparations than with platelets prepared from whole blood by the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) method.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In vivo platelet recovery and survival of autologous leukoreduced (LR) apheresis platelets and autologous filter-LR PRP platelets were compared in 22 healthy volunteers using a paired crossover design. On the same day, each participant gave one apheresis platelet donation and one whole blood donation from which platelets were recovered from the PRP. The sequence of donations was randomly assigned for each participant. Following 5 days of storage and bacterial screening, a sample from each platelet product was labeled with either (51)chromium or (111)indium (randomly assigned) and both samples were simultaneously re-infused into the original donor. Recovery and gamma-function platelet survival were calculated for each platelet product using the multiple hit mathematical model.

RESULTS

Five day stored LR-apheresis platelets had 18.8 percent better recovery, and 32.9 percent longer gamma-survival than filter-LR PRP platelets. Stored apheresis platelets had lower p-selectin expression and higher morphology scores than stored PRP platelets.

CONCLUSIONS

Filter-LR PRP platelet preparation appears to adversely affect platelet recovery and survival characteristics. The reasons for this effect are not clear. These results may not apply to all apheresis and PRP methods of platelet preparation.

Myelotoxicity From Chemotherapy

Myelosuppression continues to be a major dose-limiting toxicity for most chemotherapy regimens. While the development of growth factors has changed the approach to myelosuppression, costs remain high and can be measured both in terms of quality of life (QOL) and economic outcomes. Growing data suggest that there may also be effects on response and survival in some tumors. This review will highlight the incidence, effect, and treatment/prevention of myelosuppression and briefly discuss the questions that remain.

Pretransfusion trigger platelet counts and dose for prophylactic platelet transfusions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess critically both the blood platelet counts that prompt a platelet transfusion (i.e. trigger) in various clinical settings in patients with thrombocytopenia caused by marrow failure and the dose of platelets infused (i.e. number per each transfusion) for optimal hemostasis, feasibility, and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

Definitive studies (e.g. well-designed, prospective, randomized clinical trials) are not available either historically or at present to support evidence-based decisions. Instead, retrospective reviews and anecdotal reports provide observational data to assist in best guess clinical practices.

SUMMARY

Reasonable clinical practice, until more definitive data become available, is to transfuse enough platelets per each transfusion to maintain the blood platelet count >10 x 10/L in stable nonbleeding patients, >20 x 10(9)/L in unstable nonbleeding patients, and >50 x 10(9)/L in bleeding patients or in those undergoing invasive procedures.

Platelet transfusion prophylaxis for patients with haematological malignancies: where to now?

National guidelines for platelet transfusion in many countries recommend that the general platelet transfusion trigger for prophylaxis is 10x10(9)/l. This annotation reviews the evidence for this threshold level and discusses other current unresolved issues relevant to platelet transfusion practice such as the optimal dose and the clinical benefit of a strategy for the prophylactic use of platelet transfusions when the platelet count falls below a given threshold.

A therapeutic platelet transfusion strategy is safe and feasible in patients after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Prophylactic platelet transfusions are considered as standard in most hematology centers, but there is a long-standing controversy as to whether standard prophylactic platelet transfusions are necessary or whether this strategy could be replaced by a therapeutic transfusion strategy. In 106 consecutive cases of patients receiving 140 autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantations, we used a therapeutic platelet transfusion protocol when patients were in a clinically stable condition. Platelet transfusions were only used when relevant bleeding occurred (more than petechial). Median duration of thrombocytopenia <20 x 10(9)/l and <10 x 10(9)/l was 6 and 3 days, which resulted in a total of 989 and 508 days, respectively. In only 26 out of 140 transplants (19%), we observed clinically relevant bleeding of minor or moderate severity. No severe or life-threatening bleeding was registered. The median and mean number of single donor platelet transfusions was one per transplant (range 0-18). One-third of all transplants, and 47% after high-dose melphalan could be performed without any platelet transfusion. Compared with a historical control group, we could reduce the number of platelet transfusions by one half. This therapeutic platelet transfusion strategy can be performed safely resulting in a considerable reduction in prophylactic platelet transfusions.

Non-small cell lung cancer treatment-related bone marrow toxicities

A major consequence of administering increasingly aggressive therapies (chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is the adverse effects on the bone marrow that may lead to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and/or anemia. Myelosuppression or bone marrow toxicity may also lead to dose reduction of chemotherapy and/or treatment delays in both chemotherapy and radiation therapy, diminishing the efficacy of therapy in the curative setting. In this setting, the use of hematopoietic growth factors may thus be beneficial.

High dose intermittent ARA-C (HiDAC) for consolidation of patients with de novo AML: a single center experience

High dose intermittent ARA-C (2x3 g/m(2) i.v., days 1, 3, 5)=HiDAC was introduced as consolidation in AML by the CALGB-group in 1994. We treated 44 de novo AML patients in CR with up to four cycles of HiDAC (four cycles: 56.8%; three cycles: 22.7%; two cycles: 6.8%; one cycle: 13.7%). Median duration of aplasia (ANC<0.5x10(9)/l) was 12 days. Neutropenic fever occurred in 38.6% of the patients during the first, 52.6% during the second, 45.7% during the third, and in 40% during the fourth cycle. Non-hematologic toxicity was tolerable. The median overall- and disease-free survival were 19.3 and 11.3 months, respectively. The best outcome was seen in patients aged <40 years. These results confirm that HiDAC is a safe and effective consolidation in AML.

Clinical audit of the use of fresh-frozen plasma and platelets in a tertiary teaching hospital and the impact of a new transfusion request form

AIM

To carry out an audit of the appropriateness of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets (Plt) transfusion with reference to the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council/Australian Society of Blood Transfusion Clinical Practice Guidelines, and to assess the impact of a self-educating transfusion request form.

METHODS

A prospective review of the clinical indications and laboratory data in all transfusion episodes of FFP and Plt occurring in a tertiary teaching hospital in South Australia in two 2-month periods of the years 2002 and 2003.

RESULTS

Reversal of warfarin has emerged as the major indication to transfuse FFP (34%). More than 72% FFP and 88% Plt were prescribed in an appropriate manner, and the majority were monitored adequately. The transfusion request form further improved the appropriate uses and was met with a satisfactory compliance. Further grounds for improvement are in FFP usage by the haematology unit and in cardiac bypass surgery, and Plt by surgical units.

CONCLUSION

Clinical transfusion audit helps to identify current pattern of usage and areas of improvement. A self-educating transfusion specific request form is also beneficial.

Reticulated platelets: a reliable measure to reduce prophylactic platelet transfusions after intensive chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Reticulated platelets (RPs) are the youngest circulating platelets (PLTs). The aim of our study was to predict PLT recovery with RP percentage (RP%) and therefore to identify PLT transfusions that could be avoided after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

With a whole-blood dual-labeling flow cytometric method, RP% was prospectively assessed in 47 patients who received myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous PBPC transplantation. Retrospective analysis of RP evolution identified three time points: nadir of the RP% (NRP), imminent PLT recovery (IPR) corresponding to an RP% of greater than 7 percent, and PLT transfusion autonomy (PTA).

RESULTS

Median occurrences of NRP, IPR, and PTA were on Days +5, +8, and +12 after transplantation, respectively. The RP% value at NRP (4%) was significantly lower compared to the IPR (15%) and PTA (14%). Thirty patients (64%) achieved PTA within 4 days after IPR. On Day +8, if RP% was greater than 7 percent, positive and negative predictive values for PTA within 4 days, specificity, and sensitivity were 79, 63, 66, and 76 percent, respectively. Fever between IPR and PTA was the only factor found to negatively influence PLT recovery (p = 0.02). All patients required at least one PLT transfusion. Among patients with rapid PLT recovery (IPR-PTA interval < 4 days; n = 30), half of them received one PLT transfusion after RP increase, which could be avoided.

CONCLUSION

These encouraging results may allow us to reduce the prophylactic PLT transfusion according to patients RP% increase.

Transfusion management strategies: a survey of practicing pediatric hematology/oncology specialists

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the criteria used by pediatric oncologists for the transfusion of red blood cells and platelets to pediatric oncology patients.

PROCEDURE

Data regarding red blood cell and platelet transfusion practices were collected with an internet-based survey of physician members of the American Society for Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (ASPH/O). Respondents were asked to define platelet and red blood cell transfusion thresholds in a variety of clinical scenarios, and to describe criteria for dealing with cytomegalovirus (CMV) transmission from blood products, platelet dosing strategies, and prevention of RhD alloimmunization.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 31.4% (264 of 841). Of the respondents, 76% indicated that their institution had defined criteria for acceptable transfusion practice; of these respondents, 114 (57%) indicated that there were special guidelines for pediatric oncology patients. Examination of the distribution of threshold platelet counts and hemoglobin levels that would prompt transfusion indicated a wide range of transfusion practice in commonly encountered clinical scenarios. Similar variability in practice was evident in platelet dosing strategies, CMV prevention strategies, and in the use of anti-D in RhD-negative patients who received RhD-positive platelets.

CONCLUSIONS

This current survey demonstrates that transfusion practices vary widely among pediatric hematology/oncology specialists and that prospective clinical trials may be necessary to determine optimal criteria for blood product support in pediatric oncology patients.

Estimation and predictive use of the corrected count increment—a proposed clinical guideline

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Platelets are frequently given inappropriately. The accepted indication is symptomatic thrombocytopaenia due to bone marrow failure. In contrast replacement therapy is contraindicated in immune mediated peripheral sequestration because it is almost always ineffective and also aggravates the already rapid rate of the clearance due to superimposed isoimmunisation. Furthermore circulating levels, rather than the clinical situation, customarily trigger the request and would typically be at 20 x 10(9)/l. Usage is under evaluated and, accordingly, current practice has been scrutinised and a guideline proposed that is applicable to user and vendor alike.

DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

Prospectively a consecutive series of eligible cases were selected and, with informed consent, all relevant information recorded. Specific observations were haematologic status, quality of the product and the impact of previous exposure to blood fractions on outcome. Additionally, factors that influence response were documented and included disseminated intravascular coagulation, splenomegaly and concurrent use of intravenous Amphotericin B. The absolute numbers infused, the increase in peripheral value recorded and this ratio which is designated as corrected count index generated in each instance.

RESULTS

The CCI was computed for each of the 85 megaunits given to 29 individuals and subsequently estimated for the entire sample population using regression analysis. Each of the variables was used to test the hypothesis that such a figure might differ depending on patient sub-population. This approach was accurate in 60% of the time and predicates a more rational use of donor characteristics. The cardinal measurement is that supplied by the transfusion service which can be used as a basis for clinically important predictors of anticipated benefit.

CONCLUSION

This data, in keeping with international practice, leads to the recommendation that commercial and other services routinely measure and specify absolute numbers. The clinicians, reciprocally, should always confirm this figure and then match anticipated to observed outcome. Failure to carry out these simple procedures lead to gross over utilisation of this expensive intervention, risks unnecessary sensitisation and furthers persistence with sub-optimum administration.

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura

We define chronic refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) as ITP with persistent thrombocytopenia following treatment with glucocorticoids and splenectomy. Chronic refractory ITP is uncommon, occurring in fewer than 10% of all adult patients with ITP diagnoses. The goal of treatment is only to achieve a safe platelet count with minimal treatment-related risk. A safe platelet count may be considered to be as low as 10,000/microL, because the risk for major bleeding in otherwise healthy subjects is great only when the platelet count is less than 10,000/microL. Observation without specific treatment is appropriate for patients with moderate thrombocytopenia and no clinically important bleeding symptoms. For patients with chronic refractory ITP who require treatment, there is no consensus for what therapies to use or the sequence in which to use them. For patients with severe and symptomatic thrombocytopenia, the use of anti-CD20 (rituximab) and immunosuppressive agents, alone or in combination, may be most effective. The mechanism of all current therapies is to decrease the accelerated platelet destruction brought about by immunosuppression. An alternative approach, the stimulation of platelet production with thrombopoietic agents, has been successful in investigational studies and may provide a new management option.

Adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in adults is a relatively rare neoplasm with a curability rate around 30% at 5 years. This consideration makes it imperative to dissect further the biological mechanisms of disease, in order to selectively implement an hitherto unsatisfactory success rate. The recognition of discrete ALL subtypes (some of which deserve specific therapeutic approaches, like T-lineage ALL (T-ALL) and mature B-lineage ALL (B-ALL)) is possible through an accurate combination of cytomorphology, immunophenotytpe and cytogenetic assays and has been a major result of clinical research studies conducted over the past 20 years. Two-three major prognostic groups are now easily identifiable, with a survival probability ranging from <10 to 20% (Philadelphia-positive ALL) to about 50-60% (low-risk T-ALL and selected patients with B-lineage ALL). These issues are extensively reviewed and form the basis of current knowledge. The second major point relates to the emerging importance of studies that reveal a dysregulated gene activity and its clinical counterpart. It is now clear that prognostication is a complex matter ranging from patient-related issues to cytogenetics to molecular biology, including the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) and possibly gene array tests. On these bases, the role of a correct, highly personalised therapeutic choice will soon become fundamental. Therapeutic progress may be obtainable through a careful integration of chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation, and the new targeted treatments with highly specific metabolic inhibitors and humanised monoclonal antibodies.

Low-dose prophylactic platelet transfusions in recipients of an autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant and patients with acute leukemia: a randomized controlled trial with a sequential Bayesian design

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic platelet (PLT) transfusions are standard treatment for patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy, but the optimal dose is not known. A randomized controlled trial was undertaken to examine the effectiveness of low-dose PLT transfusions and to determine the need for further studies.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients (n = 111) with acute leukemia or undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation were randomly assigned to receive low-dose (3 PLT units) or standard-dose (5 PLT units) prophylactic PLT transfusions and were monitored daily for bleeding. Using a sequential Bayesian design, the difference in major bleeding events was determined.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with major bleeding events was 10.7 percent (95% credible region, 5.1%-21.2%) in the low-dose PLT group and 7.3 percent (95% credible region, 2.9%-17.2%) in the standard-dose PLT group. The two additional events in the low-dose group occurred when the PLT count exceeded 100 x 10(9) per L. There is an 89 percent probability that the absolute increase in major bleeds is less than 10 percent with low-dose PLT transfusions. The number of minor bleeding events was higher in the standard-dose group. Patients receiving low-dose PLT transfusions received 25 percent fewer PLT units. There was an 89 percent probability that low-dose transfusions reduced PLT utilization in patients with acute leukemia and a 60 percent probability in patients undergoing PBPC transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose PLT transfusions appear to be safe and effective and reduce PLT utilization. They should be further evaluated in clinical trials designed to evaluate equivalency.

Partial Splenic Embolization in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Associated with Immune Thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Currently, all treatments for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are still experimental. Supportive care, including treatment of infection and transfusion of blood and blood-related products, remains the most important aspect of therapy in these cases. This article discusses the results of partial splenic embolization in a patient who had MDS with refractory anemia.

METHODS

The patient was placed under observation and was given supportive treatment. In addition to MDS with refractory anemia, there were management difficulties related to severe thrombocytopenia after alloimmunization from multiple blood transfusions. Therefore it is thought that partial splenic embolization might be an alternative treatment for the management thrombocytopenia.

RESULTS

Although the patient did not live long because of the sepsis and ileus, hematologic response was obtained.

CONCLUSION

The observation during the treatment in this case suggests that partial splenic embolization may be a valid new alternative for treating thrombocytopenia due to alloimmunization.

Strategies for transfusion therapy

Transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets is associated with risks, and outcome studies comparing liberal and restrictive transfusion regimens are lacking in surgical patients. Therefore, guidelines have been established. They recommend first maintaining normovolaemia by the use of crystalloids and colloids. RBC transfusions are recommended for haemoglobin levels < 6 g/dl and for physiological signs of inadequate oxygenation such as haemodynamic instability, oxygen extraction > 50% and myocardial ischaemia (new ST-segment depressions > 0.1 mV, new ST-segment elevations > 0.2 mV or new wall motion abnormalities in transoesophageal echocardiography). FFP transfusions are recommended for urgent reversal of anticoagulation, known coagulation factor deficiencies, microvascular bleeding in the presence of elevated (> 1.5 times normal) prothrombin time (PT) or partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and microvascular bleeding after the replacement of more than one blood volume when PT or PTT cannot be obtained. Platelet transfusions are recommended prior to major operations in patients with platelet counts < 50,000/microl, intraoperatively with microvascular bleeding at platelet counts < 50,000/microl and in the range of 50,000-100,0000/microl following cardiopulmonary bypass and in patients undergoing surgery where already minimal bleeding may cause major damage such as in neurosurgery.

Prophylactic platelet transfusion for haemorrhage after chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusions are used in modern clinical practice to prevent and treat bleeding in thrombocytopenic patients with bone marrow failure. Although considerable advances have been made in platelet transfusion therapy in the last 30 years, some areas continue to provoke debate, especially the use of prophylactic platelet transfusions for the prevention of thrombocytopenic bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the optimal use of platelet transfusion for the prevention of haemorrhage (prophylactic platelet transfusion) in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were searched for in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Searching was also undertaken on the OVID versions of MEDLINE and EMBASE using an RCT search filter strategy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials involving transfusions of platelet concentrates, prepared either from individual units of whole blood or by apheresis, and given prophylactically to prevent bleeding in patients with haematological malignancies and receiving treatment with chemotherapy and/or stem cell transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All electronically derived citations and abstracts of papers identified by the review search strategy were initially screened for relevancy by one reviewer. Studies clearly irrelevant were excluded at this stage. The full text of all potentially relevant trials was then formally assessed for eligibility by two reviewers independently. Two reviewers completed data extraction independently. Missing data were requested from the original investigators, as appropriate. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with the other reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight completed published trials, with a total of 390 participants in the intervention groups and 362 participants in the control groups, were included in the review for further analysis. The eight studies were classified as: * three trials relevant to prophylactic platelet transfusions versus therapeutic platelet transfusions; * three trials relevant to prophylactic platelet transfusion with one trigger level versus prophylactic platelet transfusion with another trigger level; * two trials relevant to prophylactic platelet transfusion with one dose schedule versus prophylactic platelet transfusion with another dose schedule. The few reports of controlled trials addressing prophylactic versus therapeutic transfusions contained small numbers of patients and were all undertaken over 25 years ago. None of these three studies explicitly clarified whether the lack of a reported difference was a reflection of insufficient power in the trials. The findings of the meta-analyses for this group of three small studies must be interpreted with caution. In contrast, more contemporary trials addressed the question of what platelet count thresholds should apply for prophylactic transfusion; three identified studies broadly compared platelet transfusion thresholds of 10 versus 20 x 109/litre for different clinical groups of patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regards to mortality, remission rates, number of participants with severe bleeding events or red cell transfusion requirements. However, it was unclear whether the studies had sufficient power to demonstrate in combination non-inferiority in terms of safety of the lower threshold, 10 x 109/litre. Insufficient randomised trials have been undertaken to make clinically relevant conclusions about the effect of different platelet doses.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no reasons to change current practice but uncertainty about the practice of prophylactic transfusion therapy should be recognised, particularly in the light of concerns about the scenario that blood products, including platelets, could become an increasingly scarce resource in the future and for which adequate alternatives do not exist. Consideration should be given to developing adequately powered trials comparing strategies of prophylaxis versus therapeutic platelet transfusion.

Optimizing platelet transfusion therapy

Platelet transfusions are widely used. Prophylactic transfusions are employed in severely thrombocytopenic patients without evidence of bleeding, but no randomized trial data prove the safety or efficacy of this approach. Randomized trials have demonstrated the equivalence of transfusion triggers of 10,000 and 20,000/microl for prophylactic transfusions. The former threshold is potentially safer for the patient, conservative of donor resources and leads to lower costs, with perhaps a slightly greater risk of minor hemorrhage. Randomized trials have demonstrated the equivalence of pheresis or whole blood-derived platelet transfusions. The former present a lower risk for infectious agents, and the latter are less expensive and a more efficient use of limited donor resources. Randomized trials prove that leukoreduced and ABO identical platelet transfusions reduce the risks of HLA alloimmunization and platelet transfusion refractoriness (both leukoreduction and ABO matching), transfusion reactions (leukoreduction) and CMV transmission (leukoreduction). Leukoreduction and ABO matching of platelet transfusions also have been associated in preliminary observational studies with reduced morbidity and mortality in surgical patients and reduced infections in patients with leukemia. These results require further investigation. Future challenges include (1) determining the best approach to bacterial contamination of platelets, whether by detection methods or pathogen inactivation and (2) determining the threshold for prophylactic platelet transfusions in thrombocytopenic patients undergoing surgery or invasive procedures.

Thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic risk in cancer patients

In patients with malignant diseases, despite a direct relationship between the level of platelet count and bleeding episodes, it is evident that the risk of bleeding depends not only on the platelet count, but also on the underlying disease, the use of drugs interfering with platelet function and complications such as fever and infection or the presence of coagulation defects. As a consequence, it is not only the absolute platelet count, but rather the number of functional platelets that is important for the prevention of bleeding. As for Prophylaxis of hemorrhagic risk in these setting of patients, studies have now convincingly demonstrated that a 10,000/microL threshold for prophylactic platelet transfusion is safe and effective in uncomplicated thrombocytopenic patients. However, a threshold of 20,000/microL must be considered only for patients with high fever, hyperleukocytosis, coagulation abnormalities or who necessitate of invasive procedure. Moreover, as suggested by the clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, a threshold of 20,000/microL must be considered for patients receiving aggressive therapy for bladder tumors and for those with demonstrated necrotic tumors.

Decreased platelet aggregation of platelet concentrate during storage recovers in the body after transfusion

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have shown that storage decrease the ability of PLTs to aggregate in the form of PLT concentrate (PC). Nevertheless, there are few reports that have studied the PLT function in blood samples obtained from recipients after PLT transfusion. In this study, this issue was addressed by examining the ability of PLTs to aggregate after being transfused into the blood stream.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

PC was transfused to the patients with extremely low PLT counts resulting from chemotherapy. The maximum extent of PLT aggregation and size of the aggregates were compared between PLT in stored PC before transfusion with the PLT-rich plasma (PRP) from the recipients after transfusion and with PRP from patients with moderate decrease in PLT counts after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The maximum extent of PLT aggregation was significantly higher in PRP collected from the patients after transfusion compared to the extent obtained before transfusion. There were no significant differences in the maximum extents of PLT aggregation between the PRP collected from the recipients after PC transfusion and, in the same patients, when PLT counts were moderately low.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the observed decreased in PLT aggregation after storage can improve in the body after transfusion, and transfused PLTs have similar aggregation ability compared to the PLTs derived from the patient.

Updates in perioperative coagulation: physiology and management of thromboembolism and haemorrhage

Understanding of blood coagulation has evolved significantly in recent years. Both new coagulation proteins and inhibitors have been found and new interactions among previously known components of the coagulation system have been discovered. This increased knowledge has led to the development of various new diagnostic coagulation tests and promising antithrombotic and haemostatic drugs. Several such agents are currently being introduced into clinical medicine for both the treatment or prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease and for the treatment of bleeding. This review aims to elucidate these new concepts and to outline some consequences for clinical anaesthesia and perioperative medicine.

To filter blood or universal leukoreduction: what is the answer?

The safety of the blood supply has been a concern over the past 20-30 years because of the transmission of infectious diseases. Blood is still routinely tested for viruses, and leukoreduction is an effective strategy to reduce the transmission of cell-associated viruses. Clinically, the benefits of leukoreduction include decreases in transfusion reactions, HLA alloimmunization, infections, fever episodes, and antibiotic use. Although leukoreduction will add cost to a unit of blood, projections indicate that leukoreduced blood will become the standard of care.

Triggers for prophylactic use of platelet transfusions and optimal platelet dosing in thrombocytopenic dogs and cats

Prophylactic platelet transfusions are frequently given to human patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. For several decades, the most common transfusion trigger was 20,000/microL, but the trend is now to use 10,000/microL in the absence of other risk factors for bleeding. This trigger seems to reduce the number of transfusions without increasing the risk of severe bleeding. Most studies involved in establishing platelet transfusion policies have involved patients with acute leukemia, with fewer studies involving patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or aggressive chemotherapy for other cancers and patients with aplastic anemia. In the presence of other risk factors for spontaneous bleeding, 20,000/microL is still considered an appropriate trigger. The trigger for prophylactic transfusion before surgery has not undergone the same recent scrutiny as has the trigger for spontaneous bleeding. The recommendation remains to raise the platelet count to 50,000 to 100,000/microL if possible, although it is recognized that surgery and other invasive procedures have been performed at lower platelet counts without major bleeding. Prophylactic transfusion is not used in disorders of platelet consumption and destruction to prevent spontaneous bleeding but is used before surgery. Because of the comparative lack of experience with platelet transfusion in veterinary medicine, it is difficult to make generalizations for dogs and cats. Using the guidelines established for therapeutic and prophylactic transfusion of human patients is a reasonable starting point, however. A therapeutic transfusion policy is suggested in the veterinary setting provided that the patient can be closely observed for critical bleeding and a prompt transfusion can be given. This policy should ultimately reduce the overall number of platelet transfusions given to hospital patients. If an animal cannot be closely observed or the ability to transfuse on demand is limited, prophylactic transfusion is recommended. The triggers for initiating a platelet transfusion in dogs are extrapolated from human data; these values are lower by 50% for cats. Because of the imprecision of platelet counting at low values, platelet counts must always be interpreted in conjunction with clinical signs of hemorrhage. If platelet-rich plasma or platelet concentrate is available, a dose of 1 platelet unit per 10 kg is recommended, although resources may dictate a smaller dose. This will raise the recipient platelet count by a maximum of about 40,000/microL. Assuming a trigger of 10,000/microL, a transfusion will probably be required approximately every 3 days. It must be remembered that the frequency of platelet transfusions may be greater in the presence of factors accelerating platelet loss or destruction. If fresh whole blood is used, a rule of thumb is to transfuse 10 mL/kg, which will raise the recipient platelet count by a maximum of approximately 10,000/microL. Daily transfusions or transfusions every other day will probably be required.

Universal prestorage leukoreduction in Canada decreases platelet alloimmunization and refractoriness

Randomized controlled trials have shown a reduction in platelet alloimmunization and refractoriness in patients with acute leukemia (AL) with the use of poststorage leukoreduction of blood products. Universal prestorage leukoreduction (ULR) of red cell and platelet products has been performed in Canada since August 1999. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 13 902 platelet transfusions in 617 patients undergoing chemotherapy (CT) for AL or stem cell transplantation (SCT) before (n = 315) and after (n = 302) the introduction of ULR. Alloimmunization was significantly reduced (19% to 7%, P <.001) in the post-ULR group. Alloimmune platelet refractoriness was similarly reduced (14% to 4%, P <.001). Fewer patients in the post-ULR group received HLA-matched platelets (14% vs 5%, P <.001). Alloimmunization and alloimmune refractoriness in the 318 patients who were previously pregnant and/or transfused were also reduced after ULR (P =.023 and P =.005, respectively). In a Cox regression model, the 3 independent factors that predicted for alloimmune refractoriness were nonleukoreduced blood products (relative risk [RR], 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2-4.3]), a history of pregnancy and/or transfusion (RR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.3-4.2]), and receipt of 13 or more platelet transfusions (RR, 6.0 [95% CI, 2.4-15.3]). In conclusion, ULR reduces alloimmunization, refractoriness, and requirements for HLA-matched platelets when applied as routine transfusion practice to patients receiving CT or SCT.

Importance of predosing of recombinant human thrombopoietin to reduce chemotherapy-induced early thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) increases platelets, and the peak response of rhTPO is delayed and is, therefore, not uniformly effective when administered after chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to identify an effective schedule of rhTPO to best attenuate early thrombocytopenia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cohorts of six patients with sarcoma (66 assessable patients) were treated sequentially with doxorubicin and ifosfamide (AI), with rhTPO by a fixed dose and varying schedules being administered before and/or after chemotherapy in cycle 2 and subsequent cycles. Cycle 1 without rhTPO served as an internal control.

RESULTS

AI causes cumulative thrombocytopenia. The platelet nadir in cycle 2 was higher than in cycle 1 (mean nadir +/- SEM, 119 +/- 12 x 10(3)/microL v 80 +/- 7 x 10(3)/microL, respectively; P <.001) in 24 (80%) of the 30 patients (P <.001) in whom rhTPO (1.2 microg/kg) was administered starting from 5 days before chemotherapy (pre/postdoses, three/one or one/one) compared with only four (17%) of 24 patients given rhTPO by other schedules (pre/postdoses, two/two, one/three, zero/four, or four/zero) and none of 15 historical control patients. The need for platelet transfusions in four cycles was significantly lower (13 [11%] of 114 cycles, P <.001) in patients who received rhTPO from day -5 (pre/post doses, three/one or one/one) compared with patients who received rhTPO at later time points (28 [47%] of 60 cycles). Bone marrow megakaryocytes increased markedly (four-fold) before chemotherapy with predosing rhTPO and remained elevated (two-fold) after chemotherapy, which may explain the possible mechanism for response. One patient developed subclavian vein thrombosis, and no patients developed neutralizing antibodies to rhTPO.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate the importance of timing of rhTPO in relation to chemotherapy and indicate that, by optimizing the timing, only two doses of rhTPO (one before and one after chemotherapy) were required to significantly reduce the severity of chemotherapy-related early thrombocytopenia.

Treatment concepts for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

The majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are over 60 years of age at diagnosis. Unlike treatment options for younger adults, those for older patients are limited to non-myeloablative therapy, and many patients are not treatable because of poor performance status. In those who are treatable, long-term survival can be achieved using intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy. Such curative treatment can be administered in about 70% of elderly patients with AML. In responding patients (up to 60%) the disease-free survival may be almost comparable to that of younger adults. However, treatment-related toxicity results in a higher mortality rate in the elderly patients. Moreover, aggressive chemotherapy cannot be used for 30% of the patients, due to their poor performance status. Currently, palliative cytoreductive treatment and supportive care are considered appropriate for these patients. Recently, however, targeting antileukemic antibodies and inhibitors of signal transduction have been introduced as promising new treatment options. The therapeutic efficiency and toxicity-profiles of these novel drugs are currently under investigation in clinical trials.

Prophylactic platelet transfusions: which dose is the best dose? A review of the literature

Routine platelet transfusions for patients with acute leukemia were introduced in the early 1960s, and since then platelet use has increased steadily. Despite widespread use, good clinical evidence supporting prophylactic platelet transfusions is limited, and there are very few studies that have examined the dose for prophylactic platelet transfusions. Review of the platelet dose used in both early studies of routine platelet transfusions and more recent clinical trials of platelet transfusions shows wide variation in dosing, which is also reflected in clinical practice. As such, only limited recommendations for platelet dose have been forthcoming from consensus conferences or guidelines. The results from 3 recent clinical trials and a mathematical model examining the dose for prophylactic platelet transfusions suggest that lower dose transfusions may decrease the total number of platelets transfused; however, no definitive conclusions about the optimal platelet dose can be reached as these trials were not designed to evaluate bleeding outcomes or total platelet utilization. Future large clinical trials of platelet dose, which examine these critical outcomes, are required. Only with these results can the optimal platelet dose be determined.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of oprelvekin (recombinant human interleukin-11) for secondary prophylaxis of thrombocytopenia in solid tumor patients receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown oprelvekin (recombinant human interleukin-11 [rhIL-11]) to be effective in reducing the requirements for platelet transfusions after myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients who have previously experienced thrombocytopenia. The economic consequences of the routine use of this platelet growth factor and the usual standard of platelet transfusions for prophylaxis of severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia have not been compared.

METHODS

The authors constructed a decision-analytic model to compare the alternatives of rhIL-11 versus usual care using probability, outcome, and cost data from previously published clinical trials and their own institutional sources. They incorporated the costs of platelet transfusions and adverse events from rhIL-11 into the analysis. Quality-of-life outcomes were not considered. The pharmacoeconomic analysis was based on the criterion of cost minimization from the payer's perspective.

RESULTS

The expected cost of the usual care strategy for prophylaxis of severe thrombocytopenia (transfusion when platelets < 20000 microL(-1)) was US dollars 3495 for a 3-week cycle of chemotherapy. The prophylactic rhIL-11 strategy was more expensive, with an expected cost of US dollars 5328 over the same time period. Nonetheless, it was associated with fewer platelet transfusions, avoiding an average of 6.7 U compared with usual care. The savings from avoidance of platelet transfusion and adverse reactions to transfusion from the use of rhIL-11 were not offset by the substantial cost of the pharmaceutical. The greater expected costs from the rhIL-11 strategy were relatively insensitive to the unit price and efficacy of rhIL-11 and the costs of platelet transfusions and monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

From the payer's perspective, rhIL-11 cannot be considered a cost-saving clinical strategy compared with routine platelet transfusions for patients with severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.

Methodologic issues in the use of bleeding as an outcome in transfusion medicine studies

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic platelet transfusions are given to thrombocytopenic patients to prevent bleeding. The benefit of platelet transfusions has frequently been assessed by measuring the count increment; however, more recently, an assessment of bleeding has been used because it is a more clinically relevant outcome measure. The purpose of this study was to identify platelet transfusion trigger studies that used bleeding as an outcome measure, compare and contrast methods used to document bleeding and analyze bleeding outcomes, and identify and discuss methodologic issues to consider when bleeding is used as a study outcome.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic search to identify platelet transfusion trigger studies was performed. Relevant articles were reviewed to identify how bleeding data was captured and analyzed, and methodologic considerations were identified.

RESULTS

Seven articles meeting the predefined entry criteria were identified. Methods used to document bleeding included chart review and clinical assessment. The frequency of assessment and the type of personnel performing the assessment were variable. Four approaches to analysis were identified: descriptive; comparison of the proportions of patients having at least one bleed; comparison of patient days with bleeding expressed as a proportion of the total days at risk of bleeding; and time-to-event (first bleed) analysis.

CONCLUSION

Methodologic issues for consideration when designing a clinical study with bleeding as the outcome measure included approaches to minimize bias in the documentation and classification of bleeding and selection of an analysis approach that is appropriate to the question being asked. The need for development of a valid and reliable bleeding scale was also identified.

Management of patients refractory to platelet transfusion

OBJECTIVE

To present a current assessment and practical approach to the diagnosis and management of patients who are refractory to platelet transfusions.

DESIGN

A task force was convened by the College of American Pathologists under the auspices of the Transfusion Medicine Resource Committee for the purposes of outlining current concepts in the definition and diagnosis of this difficult clinical management problem and selection of the optimal platelet component for these patients.

RESULTS

This article represents a contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of patients who are refractory to platelet transfusions. This document is based on a current literature review and dialog among members of the task force convened to address the subject.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that this document will represent a resource and practical approach to the issue of diagnosis and management of patients who are refractory to platelet transfusions.

Cost of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia among patients with lymphoma or solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to estimate the mean incremental cost of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia and the drivers of cost. Another goal was to estimate the impact of depth and duration of thrombocytopenia on the cost of thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort, consisting of a random sample of 75 solid tumor or lymphoma patients who developed chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (</= 50,000 platelets per microl), was chosen. The number of each type of resource used during 217 cycles with and 300 cycles without thrombocytopenia were multiplied by the cost of each resource and summed to yield the total cost of care (in 1999 dollars from the provider's perspective).

RESULTS

Compared with cycles without thrombocytopenia, the mean incremental cost of thrombocytopenia was $1037 per cycle. However, 60% of cycles were usual cost, with a mean cost of thrombocytopenia of $43 per cycle less than control cycles. Twelve percent of cycles were high cost (mean incremental cost = $612 per cycle); 28% were very high cost (mean incremental cost = $3519). The excess cost during high-cost cycles was due to high consumption of prophylactic platelet transfusions and during very high-cost cycles to both higher platelet transfusion consumption and to a high incidence of major bleeding episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although thrombocytopenia is a common complication of chemotherapy, only 40% of cycles with thrombocytopenia would be considered high or very high cost. Interventions targeted at this subset of cycles could significantly reduce the cost of thrombocytopenia provided they are initiated early enough in the chemotherapy experience to be effective.

Transjugular liver biopsy in patients with hematologic malignancy and severe thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study are to report experience with transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) in patients with hematologic malignancy and severe thrombocytopenia and to determine the incidence of hemorrhage-related complications in patients with prebiopsy and pretransfusion platelet counts of 30 x 10(9) /L or lower to propose a threshold platelet count above which TJLB can be safely performed without transfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records and laboratory reports of 50 patients with severe thrombocytopenia who had undergone 51 TJLB procedures and prebiopsy platelet transfusions between August 1999 and September 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Biopsy success and procedural complications were recorded.

RESULTS

TJLB was technically successful in 49 of 51 procedures (96%). The mean prebiopsy, pretransfusion platelet count was 17 x 10(9)/L (range, 3-30 x 10(9)/L) and a mean of 11 U (range, 6-32 U) of platelets per patient were transfused. The overall mean postbiopsy platelet count was 38 x 10(9)/L (range, 5-105 x 10(9)/L), but it remained 30 x 10(9)/L or lower in 24 TJLB procedures. No hemorrhage-related complications were encountered, but ventricular fibrillation occurred in one patient during the procedure.

CONCLUSION

A threshold platelet count for safe TJLB resides below 30 x 10(9)/L. A prospective study is necessary to better define a lower threshold above which TJLB can be performed without platelet transfusion.

The pediatrician and medical care of the child with cancer

The child's pediatrician is an important resource for families regarding a host of issues such as infections, complications and side effects of chemotherapy, school issues, and psychosocial stressors that are common in families of children with life-threatening illness. This article provides guidance for caring for children with malignancies in the primary care setting.