Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer

Health related quality of life after oesophagectomy: elderly patients refer similar eating and swallowing difficulties than younger patients

Background

Oesophagectomy for cancer could be safe and worthwhile in selected older patients, but less is known about the effect of oesophagectomy on perceived quality of life of such delicate class of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of oesophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients in term of health-related quality of life.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer at the Surgical Oncology Unit of the Veneto Institute of Oncology between November 2009 and March 2014. Quality of life was evaluated using EORTC C-30 and OES-18 questionnaires at admission, at discharge and 3 months after surgery. Adjusted multivariable linear mixed effect models were estimated to assess mean score differences (MDs) of selected aspects in older (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients.

Results

Among 109 participating patients, 23 (21.1 %) were at least 70 years old and 86 (78.9 %) were younger than 70 years. Global quality of life was clinically similar between older and younger patients over time (MD 4.4). Older patients reported clinically and statistically significantly worse swallowing saliva (MD 17.4, 95 % C.I. 3.6 to 31.2), choking when swallowing (MD 13.8, 95 % C.I. 5.8 to 21.8) and eating difficulties (MD 20.1 95 % C.I. 7.4 to 32.8) than younger patients only at admission.

Conclusions

Early health-related quality of life perception after surgery resulted comparable in older and younger patients. This result may also be due to some predisposition of the elderly to adapt to the new status.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1647-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Chemotherapy use in stage III colon cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis

BACKGROUND

Although adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer improves overall survival, prior studies have shown that it is underused. We analyzed different factors that may influence its use.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of stage III colon cancer patients (n = 207,718) diagnosed between 2000 and 2011 in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). The NCDB contains ~70% of new cancer diagnosis from >1500 American College of Surgeons accredited cancer programs in the United States and Puerto Rico. The chi-squared test was used to determine any difference in characteristics of patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 35% of all stage III colon cancer patients, and 38% of stage III cases undergoing surgery, did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of chemotherapy had increased in recent years (64% in 2007-2011 versus 59% in 2000-2002; p < 0.0001). Its use was lower in whites (61%), females (60%), patients ⩾60 years (55%), patients with one or more comorbidities (55%), nonacademic centers (62%), those with medicare insurance (52%), lower education (61%) and income levels (59%, all p < 0.0001). The nonwhite and uninsured were more likely to be <60 years old.

CONCLUSION

More than one-third did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, although its use has increased in more recent years. Age was one of the most important determinants of chemotherapy use, which may explain higher rates in nonwhite and uninsured. In addition to patient characteristics, race, gender and socioeconomic factors influence chemotherapy use. These findings have important implications for healthcare reform.

Tolerability and outcomes of curative radiotherapy in patients aged 85 or more years

OBJECTIVES

To assess the tolerability and survival outcome of curative radiotherapy in patients over the age of 85 years.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective analysis of all patients aged over 85 years who received radiotherapy as part of curative treatment for any cancer (excluding insignificant skin cancers) at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Poor treatment tolerability (defined as hospital admission during radiotherapy, treatment break, or early treatment cessation); predictors for poor treatment tolerability, overall survival and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

327 treatment courses met eligibility criteria. The median age of patients was 87 years. The most common treatment sites were pelvis (30%), head and neck (25%), and breast (18%). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score was 0 or 1 for 70% of patients. Overall, 79% of patients completed the prescribed treatment without poor treatment tolerability, and 95% of patients completed all treatment. Only unfavourable ECOG PS score (odds ratio [OR], 1.80; P = 0.005) and increasing age (OR, 1.18; P = 0.018) predicted poor treatment tolerability. ECOG PS score predicted overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.53; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Age should not be the sole discriminator in decisions to prescribe aggressive loco-regional radiotherapy. ECOG PS score predicts for treatment tolerability, and also overall survival. The risk of cancer death was higher than non-cancer death for more than 5 years after treatment.

Randomised study of tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin versus capecitabine as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer--TLC study

BACKGROUND

Prospective data on chemotherapy for (frail) elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) are scant. UFT/leucovorin might be as effective as and less toxic than capecitabine. We firstly randomized both agents in patients >65 years with aCRC not amenable to receive combination chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomised between first-line oral UFT/leucovorin and capecitabine in a Dutch multicentre trial. Primarily, efficacy and toxicity were determined. Secondary, quality of life (QoL) and abbreviated common geriatric assessment (aCGA) were analysed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were randomised with a median age of 77 years and 96% being frail. After interim analysis it was decided to stop recruitment because of low accrual. At a median follow up of 34 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar for both therapies, being 21 weeks (p=0.17) and 12 months (p=0.83), respectively. The overall response rates were 24% and 21%, respectively. Two patients died of possible treatment related complications in the UFT/leucovorin arm and 3 patients in the capecitabine arm. For UFT/leucovorin significantly less grade 3 or 4 hand/foot syndrome (0 vs 5) was observed. Overall, PFS was related to Charlson-comorbidity index (p=0.049), LDH (p=0.0011) and albumin (p=0.009). OS was related to LDH (p=0.0003), albumin (p=0.0001), QoLC30/CR38 (p=0.041), QoL visual analogue scale (VAS; p=0.016), and GFI (p=0.028).

CONCLUSION

UFT/leucovorin and capecitabine had similar efficacy and different toxicity profiles in frail elderly patients with aCRC. Baseline serum levels of albumin and LDH, Charlson-comorbidity index, GFI and QoL were prognostic for clinical outcome.

Predicting 5- and 10-year survival in older women with early-stage breast cancer: self-rated health and walking ability

OBJECTIVES

To determine life expectancy for older women with breast cancer.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study with 10 years of follow-up data.

SETTING

Hospitals or collaborating tumor registries in four geographic regions (Los Angeles, California; Minnesota; North Carolina; Rhode Island).

PARTICIPANTS

Women aged 65 and older at time of breast cancer diagnosis with Stage I to IIIA disease with measures of self-rated health (SRH) and walking ability at baseline (N = 615; 17% aged ≥80, 52% Stage I, 58% with ≥2 comorbidities).

MEASUREMENTS

Baseline SRH, baseline self-reported walking ability, all-cause and breast cancer-specific estimated probability of 5- and 10-year survival.

RESULTS

At the time of breast cancer diagnosis, 39% of women reported poor SRH, and 28% reported limited ability to walk several blocks. The all-cause survival curves appear to separate after approximately 3 years, and the difference in survival probability between those with low SRH and limited walking ability and those with high SRH and no walking ability limitation was significant (0.708 vs 0.855 at 5 years, P ≤ .001; 0.300 vs 0.648 at 10 years, P < .001). There were no differences between the groups in breast cancer-specific survival at 5 and 10 years (P = .66 at 5 years, P = .16 at 10 years).

CONCLUSION

The combination of low SRH and limited ability to walk several blocks at diagnosis is an important predictor of worse all-cause survival at 5 and 10 years. These self-report measures easily assessed in clinical practice may be an effective strategy to improve treatment decision-making in older adults with cancer.

Analysis of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: aggressive therapy is a reasonable approach for 'unfit' patients classified by comprehensive geriatric assessment

BACKGROUND

The treatment strategy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in elderly patients is problematic. Although several researchers have reported the effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and the futility of curative treatment in 'unfit' patients with DLBCL, these propositions are not firmly established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis using a database. Patients with DLBCL were eligible if ≧ 60 yr old. CGA stratification was performed using medical records.

RESULTS

One hundred and 35 patients were identified. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy with curative intent was performed in 115 (85%) patients. According to CGA, 82 (61%) patients were classified as 'fit'. Their 1-yr overall survival (OS) was significantly better than that of 'unfit' patients [91.3% vs. 53.8%, P < 0.001]. Patients classified as 'unfit' treated with curative intent had a significantly better 1-yr OS when compared with those receiving palliative measures [66.1% vs. 19.0%, P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

CGA is an effective tool for predicting outcomes in older patients with DLBCL. The patients treated with curative intent had significantly better outcomes compared with those receiving palliation, irrespective of CGA stratification. Curative treatment should be considered even for 'unfit' patients.

Estimating the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients with cancer: The role of the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13)

OBJECTIVE

Some parameters of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) are predictive of chemotherapy toxicity. The Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) is a short instrument that has been tested as a means of identifying patients who need a full CGA, but its ability to predict chemotherapy toxicity is still unclear. We performed a pooled analysis of four published clinical trials studying VES-13 as a means of diagnosing vulnerability, in order to evaluate its accuracy in predicting the risk of grade 3/4 toxicity in older patients undergoing chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved patients aged ≥ 66 years with a diagnosis of solid or hematological cancer, all of whom were administered VES-13. The number of medications taken by each patient, their comorbidities, their Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score and index, the type of chemotherapy and treatment line, and their Mini Mental State Evaluation (MMSE), and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores were recorded. Information was available concerning the grades 3-4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities experienced by each patient.

RESULTS

The study involved 648 patients aged ≥ 66 years (mean age 76.2±4.5, range 66-90) of whom 336 (51.9%) were female. VES-13 identified 287 patients (44.3%) as vulnerable. Grades 3-4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were more prevalent in the vulnerable subjects (35.2% vs 20.8%, p<0.0001, and 18.5% vs 10.8%, p=0.0055), who were also at higher risk of both (adjusted ORs 2.15, 95% CI 1.46-3.17, p<0.001); and 1.66 (95% CI 1.02-2.72, p=0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

VES-13 could be considered to be a good candidate for future prospective studies to assess older patients with cancer at risk of toxicity.

Non-hematologic predictors of mortality improve the prognostic value of the international prognostic scoring system for MDS in older adults

OBJECTIVES

The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) is commonly used to predict survival and assign treatment for the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We explored whether self-reported and readily available non-hematologic predictors of survival add independent prognostic information to the IPSS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive MDS patients ≥age 65 who presented to Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2006 and 2011 and completed a baseline quality of life questionnaire. Questions corresponding to functional status and symptoms and extracted clinical-pathologic data from medical records. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate survival.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients consented and were available for analysis. Median age was 73 years, and the majority of patients were White, were male, and had a Charlson comorbidity score of <2. Few patients (24%) had an IPSS score consistent with lower-risk disease and the majority received chemotherapy. In addition to IPSS score and history of prior chemotherapy or radiation, significant univariate predictors of survival included low serum albumin, Charlson score, performance status, ability to take a long walk, and interference of physical symptoms in family life. The multivariate model that best predicted mortality included low serum albumin (HR=2.3; 95% CI: 1.06-5.14), therapy-related MDS (HR=2.1; 95% CI: 1.16-4.24), IPSS score (HR=1.7; 95% CI: 1.14-2.49), and ease taking a long walk (HR=0.44; 95% CI: 0.23-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of older adults with MDS, we found that low serum albumin and physical function added important prognostic information to the IPSS score. Self-reported physical function was more predictive than physician-assigned performance status.

Approach to therapy of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the elderly: the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) expert position commentary

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a treatable and potentially curable malignancy that is increasing in prevalence in the elderly. Until recently, older patients with this malignancy were under-represented on clinical treatment trials, so optimal therapeutic approaches for these patients were generally extrapolated from the treatment of younger patients with this disorder. Because of heightened toxicity concerns, older patients were sometimes given reduced dose therapy, potentially negatively impacting outcome. Geriatric considerations including functional status and comorbidities often were not accounted for in treatment decisions. Because of these issues as well as the lack of treatment guidelines for the elderly population, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology convened an expert panel to review DLBCL treatment in the elderly and develop consensus guidelines for therapeutic approaches in this patient population. The following treatment guidelines address initial DLBCL therapy, in both limited and advanced stage disease, as well as approaches to the relapsed and refractory patient.

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in the elderly

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the elderly. However, elderly patients with CRC tend to be under-presented in clinical trials and undertreated in clinical practice. Advanced age alone should not be the only criteria to preclude effective therapy in elderly patients with CRC. The best guide about optimal cancer treatment can be provided by comprehensive geriatric assessment. Elderly patients with stage III colon cancer can enjoy the same benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin or capecitabine as younger patients, without a substantial increase in toxicity. With conflicting results of retrospective studies and a lack of data available from randomized studies, combined modality treatment should be used with great caution in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Combination chemotherapy can be considered for older patients with metastatic CRC. For elderly patients who are frail or vulnerable, however, monotherapy or a stop-and-go strategy may be desirable. The use of targeted therapies in older patients with metastatic CRC appears to be promising in view of their better efficacy and toxicity. Treatment should be individualized based on the nature of the disease, the physiologic or functional status, and the patient’s preference.

Geriatric assessment of older patients with cancer in Australia--a multicentre audit

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of geriatric assessment in patients aged over 70 years in Australian medical oncology clinics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a multicentre audit in two parts: a retrospective file review of initial consultations with an oncologist and prospective audit of case presentations at multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs). Patients aged over 70 years presenting to a medical oncology clinic or being discussed at an MDM were eligible. Data was collected at six oncology centres in Victoria, NSW and Canberra from October 2009 to March 2010.

RESULTS

Data was collected from 251 file reviews and 108 MDM discussions in a total of 304 patients. Median age was 76 years (range 70-95). The geriatric assessment (GA) domains most frequently assessed during an initial consultation were the presence of comorbidities (92%), social situation-living alone or with someone (80%), social supports (63%), any mention of at least one Activity of Daily Living (ADL) (50%) and performance status (49%). Less frequently assessed were any Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL) (26%), presence of a geriatric syndrome (24%), polypharmacy (29%) and creatinine clearance (11%). Only one patient had all components of ADLs and IADLs assessed. During MDMs all the geriatric domains were comparatively less frequently assessed. No patients had all ADL and IADL components discussed formally in an MDM.

CONCLUSION

This is the first multicentre audit that reveals the low rates of GA in Australian medical oncology practice and describes the GA domains considered important by oncology clinicians.

The role of behavioural modification and exercise in the management of cancer-related fatigue to reduce its impact during and after cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is a symptom that can occur during treatment as an acute side effect but can also result in persistent fatigue as a long-term side effect or late effect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We undertook a narrative review of the current literature and discuss the current evidence of assessment of fatigue and we specifically focus on the role of promoting behavioural change and focused rehabilitation to minimise these long-term effects and update the literature relating to this area from 2012 to date.

RESULTS

We suggest there are behavioural change models that can be scaled up to enable patients to manage long-term fatigue using exercise. However, from this updated review there are limitations to the current infrastructure and evidence base that will impact on the ability to do this.

CONCLUSION

We continually need to raise awareness amongst health professionals to continue to suggest modifications to impact on fatigue at all stages of cancer treatment and into survivorship and late effects. These can range from simple brief interventions suggested in the clinic to full scale rehabilitation programmes if the correct infrastructure is available. Whichever approach is adopted we suggest exercise will be the mainstay of the treatment of fatigue in this group.

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Medication Assessment Used to Identify Prevalence of and Associations With Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Ambulatory Senior Adults With Cancer

Purpose

The use of multiple and/or inappropriate medications in seniors is a significant public health problem, and cancer treatment escalates its prevalence and complexity. Existing studies are limited by patient self-report and medical record extraction compared with a pharmacist-led comprehensive medication assessment.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively examined medication use in ambulatory senior adults with cancer to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy (PP) and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and associated factors. PP was defined as concurrent use of five or more and less than 10 medications, and excessive polypharmacy (EPP) was defined as 10 or more medications. PIMs were categorized by 2012 Beers Criteria, Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP), and the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS).

Results

A total of 248 patients received a geriatric oncology assessment between January 2011 and June 2013 (mean age was 79.9 years, 64% were women, 74% were white, and 87% had solid tumors). Only 234 patients (evaluated by pharmacists) were included in the final analysis. Mean number of medications used was 9.23. The prevalence of PP, EPP, and PIM use was 41% (n = 96), 43% (n = 101), and 51% (n = 119), respectively. 2012 Beers, STOPP, and HEDIS criteria classified 173 occurrences of PIMs, which were present in 40%, 38%, and 21% of patients, respectively. Associations with PIM use were PP (P < .001) and increased comorbidities (P = .005).

Conclusion

A pharmacist-led comprehensive medication assessment demonstrated a high prevalence of PP, EPP, and PIM use. Medication assessments that integrate both 2012 Beers and STOPP criteria and consider cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and cancer-related therapy are needed to optimize medication use in this population.

The prevalence of potentially modifiable functional deficits and the subsequent use of occupational and physical therapy by older adults with cancer

BACKGROUND

Occupational and physical therapy (OT/PT) services seek to reduce morbidity, mortality, and improve the quality of life of individuals; however, little is known about the needs and use of OT/PT for older adults with cancer. The goal of this study was to describe the functional deficits and their associations with other factors, and to examine the use of OT/PT after a noted functional deficit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study analyzed data from an institution-based registry that included geriatric assessments of older adults with cancer linked to billing claims data. Logistic regression was used to model predictors of functional deficits. Use of OT/PT was determined and validated with medical chart review.

RESULTS

529 patients with cancer, a median age of 71, 78% were female, 87% Caucasian, 57% married, 53% post-secondary education, and 63% with breast cancer were included. In a multivariable model, the odds of having any functional deficits increased with age [5 year OR: 1.31, 95% CI: (1.10, 1.57)] were higher for those with a high school diploma versus those with advanced degrees [OR: 1.66, 95% CI: (1.00, 2.77)] and were higher for patients with comorbidities [OR: 1.15, 95% CI: (1.10, 1.21)]. Of patients with functional deficits only 9% (10/111) received OT/PT within 12 months of a noted deficit.

DISCUSSION

The odds of having any potentially modifiable functional deficit were higher in patients with increasing age, comorbid conditions, and with less than a college degree. Few were referred for OT/PT services suggesting major underutilization of these potentially beneficial services.

Comparative effectiveness of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in United States veterans age 80 and older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

While anthracycline-based treatment can cure diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, most patients over age 80 do not receive doxorubicin due to toxicity concerns. This study evaluated this practice, as patients age 80 and older are largely excluded from clinical trials. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included treatment-related mortality and anthracycline dose intensity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assembled a cohort of 530 newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients age 80 or older diagnosed within United States Veterans Health Administration. Treatment and survival information were obtained to determine associations between anthracycline use, dose intensity, treatment-related mortality and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 530 patients, 285 received systemic treatment and 193 received an anthracycline. After controlling for potential confounders, rituximab decreased mortality (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.88), while doxorubicin was not significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI: 0.64-1.17). Completion of treatment with anthracycline dose intensity ≥85% of expected was only 14%. Patients treated with anthracycline dose intensity <85% had better one year survival compared to those treated at ≥85% (70% vs. 59%, p=0.029).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that full dose anthracycline therapy may be less important in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients over age 80. The low frequency of completion of full dose intensity treatment suggests that standard doses are an unrealistic standard of care for patients this age. Alternate treatment strategies and risk stratification should be considered for these patients.

Multimorbidity redefined: prospective health outcomes and the cumulative effect of co-occurring conditions

INTRODUCTION

Multimorbidity is common among middle-aged and older adults; however the prospective effects of multimorbidity on health outcomes (health status, major health decline, and mortality) have not been fully explored. This study addresses this gap in the literature.

METHODS

We used self-reported data from the 2008 and 2010 Health and Retirement Study. Our study population included 13,232 adults aged 50 or older. Our measure of baseline multimorbidity in 2008 was based on the occurrence or co-occurrence of chronic conditions, functional limitations, and/or geriatric syndromes, as follows: MM0, no chronic conditions, functional limitations, or geriatric syndromes; MM1, occurrence (but no co-occurrence) of chronic conditions, functional limitations, or geriatric syndromes; MM2, co-occurrence of any 2 of chronic conditions, functional limitations, or geriatric syndromes; and MM3, co-occurrence of all 3 of chronic conditions, functional limitations, and geriatric syndromes. Outcomes in 2010 included fair or poor health status, major health decline, and mortality.

RESULTS

All 3 outcomes were significantly associated with multimorbidity. Compared with MM0 (respectively for fair or poor health and major health decline), the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals were as follows: 2.61 (1.79-3.78) and 2.20 (1.42-3.41) for MM1; 7.49 (5.20-10.77) and 3.70 (2.40-5.71) for MM2; and 22.66 (15.64-32.83) and 4.72 (3.03-7.37) for MM3. Multimorbidity was also associated with mortality: an adult classified as MM3 was nearly 12 times (AOR, 11.87 [5.72-24.62]) as likely as an adult classified as MM0 to die within 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Given the strong and significant association between multimorbidity and prospective health status, major health decline, and mortality, multimorbidity may be used - both in clinical practice and in research - to identify older adults with heightened vulnerability for adverse outcomes.

The impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment interventions on tolerance to chemotherapy in older people

Background:

Although comorbidities are identified in routine oncology practice, intervention plans for the coexisting needs of older people receiving chemotherapy are rarely made. This study evaluates the impact of geriatrician-delivered comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) interventions on chemotherapy toxicity and tolerance for older people with cancer.

Methods:

Comparative study of two cohorts of older patients (aged 70+ years) undergoing chemotherapy in a London Hospital. The observational control group (N=70, October 2010–July 2012) received standard oncology care. The intervention group (N=65, September 2011–February 2013) underwent risk stratification using a patient-completed screening questionnaire and high-risk patients received CGA. Impact of CGA interventions on chemotherapy tolerance outcomes and grade 3+ toxicity rate were evaluated. Outcomes were adjusted for age, comorbidity, metastatic disease and initial dose reductions.

Results:

Intervention participants undergoing CGA received mean of 6.2±2.6 (range 0–15) CGA intervention plans each. They were more likely to complete cancer treatment as planned (odds ratio (OR) 4.14 (95% CI: 1.50–11.42), P=0.006) and fewer required treatment modifications (OR 0.34 (95% CI: 0.16–0.73), P=0.006). Overall grade 3+ toxicity rate was 43.8% in the intervention group and 52.9% in the control (P=0.292).

Conclusions:

Geriatrician-led CGA interventions were associated with improved chemotherapy tolerance. Standard oncology care should shift towards modifying coexisting conditions to optimise chemotherapy outcomes for older people.

Disease characteristics, treatment patterns, prognosis, outcomes and lymphoma-related mortality in elderly follicular lymphoma in the United States

Data from the National LymphoCare Study (a prospective, multicentre registry that enrolled follicular lymphoma (FL) patients from 2004 to 2007) were used to determine disease characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes and prognosis for elderly FL (eFL) patients. Of 2650 FL patients, 209 (8%) were aged >80 years; these eFL patients more commonly had grade 3 disease, less frequently received chemoimmunotherapy and anthracyclines, and had lower response rates when compared to younger patients. With a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 5-year overall survival (OS) for eFL patients was 59%; 38% of deaths were lymphoma-related. No treatment produced superior OS among eFL patients. In multivariate Cox models, anaemia, B-symptoms and male sex predicted worse OS (P < 0.01); a prognostic index of these factors (0, 1 or ≥ 2 present) predicted OS [hazard ratio (95% CI): ≥ 2 vs. 0, 4.72 (2.38-9.33); 1 vs. 0, 2.63 (1.39-4.98)], with a higher concordance index (0.63) versus the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (0.55). The index was validated in an independent cohort. In the largest prospective US-based eFL cohort, no optimal therapy was identified and nearly 40% of deaths were lymphoma-related, representing baseline outcomes in the modern era.

Predictors of 1-Year Mortality in a Prospective Cohort of Elderly Patients With Cancer

BACKGROUND

Mortality prediction is crucial to select the optimal treatment in elderly cancer patients. Our objective was to identify cancer-related factors and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) findings associated with 1-year mortality in elderly inpatients and outpatients with cancer.

METHODS

We prospectively included patients aged ≥70 years who had solid or hematologic malignancies and in whom the CGA was performed by geriatricians in two French teaching hospitals. We identified independent predictors of 1-year mortality after study inclusion, using multivariate Cox models stratified on inpatient/outpatient status. We built three multivariate Cox models, since strong correlations linked activities of daily living (ADL), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), and timed get-up-and-go test (GUG) results; and since physicians' preferences for these three assessments vary. A sensitivity analysis was performed using multiple imputation.

RESULTS

Of the 993 patients (mean age, 80.2 years; 51.2% men), 58.2% were outpatients and 46% had metastatic disease. Colorectal cancer was the most common malignancy (21.4%). Mortality rates after 6 and 12 months were 30.1% and 41.2%, respectively. In all models, tumor site and metastatic status (p < .001), age >80 years (p < .05), higher number of severe comorbidities (p < .05), and malnutrition (p < .001) were associated with death independently from impaired ECOG-PS (p < .001), ADL (p < .001), and GUG (p < .001). The adverse effect of metastatic status differed significantly across tumor sites, being greatest for breast and prostate cancer (p < .001). Multiple imputation produced similar results.

CONCLUSION

The predictors of 1-year mortality identified in our study may help physicians select the optimal cancer-treatment strategy in elderly patients.

How old is "too old" for translational research?

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapies are now widely used for lung cancer management. Numerous biomarkers are performed in these patients in the diagnosis phase and have consequences on patient's management. There are some changes during elderly which can influence the biology of cancer; particularly mitochondrial dysfunction and deregulation of nutrient sensing. Elderly patients are candidate to these biological assessments, like younger ones.

METHODS

We review all the published papers based on Mesh carries with "elderly", "lung cancer", "targeted therapy".

RESULTS

After description of biological modification during elderly, the use of targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is presented and discussed. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and antiangiogenic molecules were depicted in selected or unselected population.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted therapies can be used in older patients with lung cancer and are sometimes an optimal choice in this particular population.

Management of elderly patients

SUMMARY

Elderly patients are often excluded from clinical trials, yet more than two-thirds of patients diagnosed with lung cancer are over 65 years old. It is therefore important to develop specific tools and trials for this specific patient population.

METHODS

This chapter first examines the management specificities of elderly patients. Randomized trials specifically involving elderly patients are then described, and likely future developments are considered.

RESULTS

Older people have several specificities. In addition to traditional criteria such as age and performance status, other important factors include the number of comorbidities and age-related changes such as cognitive deficits and depression. Specific indices taking these factors into account have been published and validated. Single-agent therapy has been widely used to treat metastatic lung cancer in the elderly, following publication of negative results from randomized phase III trials of combination chemotherapy. Recently, however, a trial of doublet therapy gave positive results, in a subgroup of independent older patients. The benefit of patient selection based on a combination of these indices has been demonstrated in open-label and randomized trials. These results must now be confirmed in phase III trials including the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Indices based on a combination of age-related factors, together with judicious use of biological markers, will further improve the prognosis of elderly lung cancer patients.

Geriatric assessment-identified deficits in older cancer patients with normal performance status

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether a brief geriatric assessment (GA) would identify important patient deficits that could affect treatment tolerance and care outcomes within a sample of older cancer patients rated as functionally normal (80%-100%) on the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scale.

METHODS

Cancer patients aged ≥65 years were assessed using a brief GA that included both professionally and patient-scored KPS and measures of comorbidity, polypharmacy, cognition, function, nutrition, and psychosocial status. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The sample included 984 patients: mean age was 73 years (range: 65-99 years), 74% were female, and 89% were white. GA was conducted before (23%), during (41%), or after (36%) treatment. Overall, 54% had a breast cancer diagnosis (n = 528), and 46% (n = 456) had cancers at other sites. Moreover, 81% of participants (n = 796) had both professionally and self-rated KPS ≥80, defined as functionally normal, and those patients are the focus of analysis. In this subsample, 550 (69%) had at least 1 GA-identified deficit, 222 (28%) had 1 deficit, 140 (18%) had 2 deficits, and 188 (24%) had ≥3 deficits. Specifically, 43% reported taking ≥9 medications daily, 28% had decreased social activity, 25% had ≥4 comorbidities, 23% had ≥1 impairment in instrumental activities of daily living, 18% had a Timed Up and Go time ≥14 seconds, 18% had ≥5% unintentional weight loss, and 12% had a Mental Health Index score ≤76.

CONCLUSION

Within this sample of older cancer patients who were rated as functionally normal by KPS, GA identified important deficits that could affect treatment tolerance and outcomes.

Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: results of a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Geriatric screening tools are increasingly implemented in daily practice, especially in the oncology setting, but also in primary care in some countries such as the Netherlands. Nonetheless, validation of these tools regarding their ability to predict relevant outcomes is lacking. In this study we evaluate if geriatric screening tools predict decline in functional status and quality of life after one year, in a population of older cancer patients and an older primary care population without cancer with a life expectancy of at least six months.

METHODS

Older cancer patients and a general older primary care population without a history of cancer (≥ 70 years) were included in an on-going prospective cohort study. Data were collected at baseline and after one-year follow-up. Functional decline was based on the Katz Index and Lawton IADL-scale and was defined as deterioration on one or more domains. Decline in quality of life was measured using the global health related subscale of the EORTC QLQ-C30, and was defined as a decline ≥ 10 points. The selected geriatric screening tools were the abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Groningen Frailty Indicator, Vulnerable Elders Survey-13, and G8. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and odds ratios to assess if normal versus abnormal scores predict functional decline and decline in quality of life.

RESULTS

One-year follow-up data were available for 134 older cancer patients and 220 persons without cancer. Abnormal scores of all screening tools were significantly associated with functional decline. However, this was only true for older persons without cancer, and only in univariate analyses. For functional decline, sensitivity ranged from 54% to 71% and specificity from 33% to 66%. For decline in quality of life, sensitivity ranged from 40% to 67% and specificity from 37% to 54%.

CONCLUSION

In older persons with a relatively good prognosis, geriatric screening tools are of limited use in identifying persons at risk for decline in functional status or quality of life after one year. Hence, a geriatric screening tool cannot be relied on in isolation, but they do provide very valuable information and may prompt physicians to also consider different aspects of functioning.

Depressão, déficit cognitivo e fatores associados à desnutrição em idosos com câncer

Objetiva-se analisar a presença de depressão, a função cognitiva, o estado nutricional e os fatores associados à desnutrição em idosos em tratamento para o câncer. Foi realizado um estudo transversal em um centro oncológico em Minas Gerais que incluiu a aplicação de um questionário sociodemográfico e de saúde, a avaliação de sintomas depressivos, da função cognitiva e do estado nutricional. Foram avaliados 96 idosos, 50% do sexo feminino e com idade média de 70,6 anos. O déficit cognitivo foi identificado em 39,6% e a presença de depressão em 17,7% dos avaliados, com um maior número de sintomas depressivos sexo feminino (p = 0,017). Foi diagnosticada desnutrição moderada ou suspeita de desnutrição em 29,2% dos avaliados, desnutrição grave em 14,6% e 47,9% apresentou necessidade de intervenção nutricional crítica. Na análise multivariada foram condições independentemente associadas à desnutrição o déficit funcional (RP: 3,40; IC: 1,23-9,45), a presença de dois ou mais sintomas de impacto nutricional (RP: 3,22; IC: 1,03-10,10) e o tratamento atual por quimioterapia (RP: 2,96; IC: 1,16-7,56). Idosos com câncer apresentaram elevada prevalência de desnutrição e de necessidade de intervenção nutricional. A avaliação da depressão e do déficit cognitivo também devem ser partes integrantes na abordagem deste grupo.

An interprofessionally developed geriatric oncology curriculum for hematology-oncology fellows

OBJECTIVE

Because the cancer population is aging, interprofessional education incorporating geriatric principles is essential to providing adequate training for oncology fellows. We report the targeted needs assessment, content, and evaluation tools for our geriatric oncology curriculum at MD Anderson Cancer Center.

METHODS

A team comprising a geriatrician, a medical oncologist, an oncology PharmD, an oncology advanced nurse practitioner, and two oncology chief fellows developed the geriatric oncology curriculum. First, a general needs assessment was conducted by reviewing the literature and medical societies' publications and by consulting experts. A targeted needs assessment was then conducted by reviewing the fellows' evaluations of the geriatric oncology rotation and by interviewing fellows and recently graduated oncology faculty.

RESULTS

Geriatric assessment, pharmacology, and psychosocial knowledge skills were the three identified areas of educational need. Curriculum objectives and an evaluation checklist were developed to evaluate learners in the three identified areas. The checklist content was validated by consulting experts in the field. Online materials, including a curriculum, a geriatric pharmacology job aid, and pharmacology cases, were also developed and delivered as part of the curriculum.

CONCLUSION

An interprofessional team approach was a successful method for identifying areas of learners' educational needs, which in turn helped us develop an integrated geriatric oncology curriculum. The curriculum is currently being piloted and evaluated.

A model for the functional assessment of elderly with myeloid neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

Myeloid neoplasms are heterogeneous diseases that are more incident in the elderly. The goals of this study were to aggregate a geriatric approach to the patient assessment, to show the impact of gender, age, hemoglobin concentration and comorbidities on the functionality of elderly with myeloid neoplasms and to better understand how the instruments of functional assessment work according to the aggressiveness of the disease.

METHODS

Elderly patients (≥60 years old) with myeloid neoplasms were assessed using the Karnofsky scale, Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group scale, and basic and instrumental activities of daily living scales. The hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index assessed the comorbidities. A mixed logistical regression model was fitted to estimate the impact of gender, age, hemoglobin concentration and the hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index on patients' functionality.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients with a mean age of 72.8 years (range: 60-92 years) were evaluated. Eighty percent had good Karnofsky and Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group scales and 39% were independent according to the daily living activity scales. All of the patients with poor Karnofsky and Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group scales were classified as dependent by the daily living activity scales. The mixed logistic regression models showed that age, gender, hemoglobin concentration and the comorbidity index impacted on the daily living activity scales. Karnofsky and Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group scales were affected by hemoglobin and the comorbidity index. The model hypothesized the hemoglobin concentration at which there was a higher risk of poor Karnofsky and Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group scales. This hemoglobin concentration depended on comorbidities and on the aggressiveness of the myeloid neoplasm.

CONCLUSION

The geriatric approach improved the sensitivity and specificity of the patients' assessment. Hemoglobin concentration associated to the risk of poor Karnofsky and Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group scales depended on the comorbidity score and on the disease aggressiveness. The Karnofsky and Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group scales had higher sensitivity in patients with more aggressive diseases.

Treatment Approaches in 102 Elderly Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

The life expectancy and presence of co-morbidities cause reservations in treatment decisions for elderly patients with cancer. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 102 patients who are considered as middle-old aged (aged 75 - 84) by gerontologists.

Methods

Medical records of patients were reviewed. One hundred and two patients with a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose follow-up ended with death between March 2006 and May 2013 were examined.

Results

The median age at diagnosis was 77 (75 - 85) years. Thirty-three patients (67.6%) were over 80 years old. The number of patients with metastasis was 57 (55.8%). Forty-two (41.2%) patients had stage IIIA and IIIB disease. Fifteen of the metastatic patients (26.3%) were given chemotherapy, while 12 of the non-metastatic patients (26.6%) were given chemotherapy. Of the non-metastatic patients, 25 (55.6%) were treated with radiotherapy, and five (11.1%) were treated with chemotherapy. The median duration of follow-up was 4 (1-55) months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 4 months in non-metastatic patients, and 3 months in metastatic patients. Overall survival (OS) was 4 months. OS rates for 1 and 2 years were 10% and 2%.

Conclusion

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be administered even to patients of this age group. The beneficial effect of chemotherapy in patients with metastasis on OS is an important finding of our study.

Generalizability of trial results to elderly Medicare patients with advanced solid tumors (Alliance 70802)

BACKGROUND

In the United States, patients who enroll in chemotherapy trials seldom reflect the attributes of the general population with cancer, as they are often younger, more functional, and have less comorbidity. We compared survival following three chemotherapy regimens according to the setting in which care was delivered (ie, clinical trial vs usual care) to determine the generalizability of clinical trial results to unselected elderly Medicare patients.

METHODS

Using SEER-Medicare data, we estimated survival for elderly patients (ie, age 65 years or older, n = 14097) with advanced pancreatic or lung cancer following receipt of one of three guideline-recommended first-line chemotherapy regimens. We compared their survival to that of similarly treated clinical trial enrollees, without age restrictions, with the same diagnosis and stage (n = 937). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Trial patients were 9.5 years younger than elderly Medicare patients. Medicare patients were more often white and tended to live in areas of greater educational attainment than trial enrollees. For each tumor type, Medicare patients who were 75 years or older had median survivals that were six to eight weeks shorter than those of trial patients (4.3 vs 5.8 months following treatment with single agent gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer, P = .03; 7.3 vs 8.9 months following treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, P = .91; 8.2 vs 10.2 months following treatment with CDDP/ VP16 for extensive stage small cell lung cancer, P ≤ .01), whereas younger Medicare patients had survival times that were similar to those of trial patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of clinical trials for advanced pancreatic cancer and lung cancers tended to correctly estimate survival for Medicare patients aged 65 to 74 years, but to overestimate survival for older Medicare patients by six to eight weeks. These estimates of Medicare patients' survival may aid subsequent patients and their oncologists in treatment decision-making.

Multiple myeloma in the older adult: better prospects, more challenges

PURPOSE

Multiple myeloma (MM) is disproportionately diagnosed in older adults; with the aging of the population, the number of older adults diagnosed with MM will increase by nearly 80% in the next two decades. Duration of survival has improved dramatically over the last 20 years, but the improvements in older adults have not been as great as those in younger adults with MM.

METHODS

In this article, we address treatment approaches in older adults who are eligible for and those ineligible for high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation as well as supportive care considerations and the potential role for geriatric assessment in facilitating decision making for older adults with MM.

RESULTS

The evidence from recent studies demonstrates that combinations of novel and conventional antimyeloma agents result in improved response rates and, in some cases, improved progression-free and overall survival. However, some older adults are particularly vulnerable to toxicities of therapy and discontinuation of therapy and, consequently, they have poorer survival. In addition, older adults may prioritize other outcomes of therapy, such as quality of life, over more conventional end points such as disease response and duration of survival. Geriatric assessment can facilitate risk-stratification of older adults at greater risk for adverse events from therapy and aid in personalizing therapy for vulnerable or frail older adults.

CONCLUSION

Survival in older adults with MM is improving with novel therapeutics, but efficacy must be balanced with risk of toxicity of therapy and maintenance of quality of life. Novel instruments such as geriatric assessment tools may facilitate these aims.

Screening for vulnerability in older cancer patients: the ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

Geriatric Assessment is an appropriate method for identifying older cancer patients at risk of life-threatening events during therapy. Yet, it is underused in practice, mainly because it is time- and resource-consuming. This study aims to identify the best screening tool to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment by comparing the performance of two short assessment tools the G8 and the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13).

Patients and Methods

The diagnostic accuracy of the G8 and the (VES-13) were evaluated in a prospective cohort study of 1674 cancer patients accrued before treatment in 23 health care facilities. 1435 were eligible and evaluable. Outcome measures were multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA), sensitivity (primary), specificity, negative and positive predictive values and likelihood ratios of the G8 and VES-13, and predictive factors of 1-year survival rate.

Results

Patient median age was 78.2 years (70-98) with a majority of females (69.8%), various types of cancer including 53.9% breast, and 75.8% Performance Status 0-1. Impaired MGA, G8, and VES-13 were 80.2%, 68.4%, and 60.2%, respectively. Mean time to complete G8 or VES-13 was about five minutes. Reproducibility of the two questionnaires was good. G8 appeared more sensitive (76.5% versus 68.7%, P =  0.0046) whereas VES-13 was more specific (74.3% versus 64.4%, P<0.0001). Abnormal G8 score (HR = 2.72), advanced stage (HR = 3.30), male sex (HR = 2.69) and poor Performance Status (HR = 3.28) were independent prognostic factors of 1-year survival.

Conclusion

With good sensitivity and independent prognostic value on 1-year survival, the G8 questionnaire is currently one of the best screening tools available to identify older cancer patients requiring geriatric assessment, and we believe it should be implemented broadly in daily practice. Continuous research efforts should be pursued to refine the selection process of older cancer patients before potentially life-threatening therapy.

Design and rationale of the comprehensive evaluation of risk factors in older patients with AMI (SILVER-AMI) study

Background

While older adults (age 75 and over) represent a large and growing proportion of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), they have traditionally been under-represented in cardiovascular studies. Although chronological age confers an increased risk for adverse outcomes, our current understanding of the heterogeneity of this risk is limited. The Comprehensive Evaluation of Risk Factors in Older Patients with AMI (SILVER-AMI) study was designed to address this gap in knowledge by evaluating risk factors (including geriatric impairments, such as muscle weakness and cognitive impairments) for hospital readmission, mortality, and health status decline among older adults hospitalized for AMI.

Methods/Design

SILVER-AMI is a prospective cohort study that is enrolling 3000 older adults hospitalized for AMI from a recruitment network of approximately 70 community and academic hospitals across the United States. Participants undergo a comprehensive in-hospital assessment that includes clinical characteristics, geriatric impairments, and health status measures. Detailed medical record abstraction complements the assessment with diagnostic study results, in-hospital procedures, and medications. Participants are subsequently followed for six months to determine hospital readmission, mortality, and health status decline. Multivariable regression will be used to develop risk models for these three outcomes.

Discussion

SILVER-AMI will fill critical gaps in our understanding of AMI in older patients. By incorporating geriatric impairments into our understanding of post-AMI outcomes, we aim to create a more personalized assessment of risk and identify potential targets for interventions.

Trial registration

Trial registration number: NCT01755052.

Clinical significance of chemotherapy for geriatric patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

Recent clinical trials, such as JCOG9912 and SPIRITS, excluded geriatric patients aged ≥75 years. The clinical significance of intensive chemotherapy for geriatric patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer remains unclear. Between 2002 and 2010, 54 consecutive advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients aged ≥75 years were enrolled in this study. We analyzed the predictors of chemotherapy administration and evaluated the survival benefit of chemotherapy for geriatric patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. A total of 23 geriatric patients received no chemotherapy (GP), whereas the remaining 31 patients were administered chemotherapy (GPC). Of the 54 patients, 20 had severe concomitant illnesses, such as cardiorespiratory disease. Lymph node involvement (P=0.044) and the absence of cardiorespiratory disease (P<0.001) were found to be independently associated with chemotherapy administration. The GPC group exhibited a significantly better prognosis compared to the GP group (median survival time, 19.4 vs. 13.6 months, respectively; P=0.043). GPC patients without cardiorespiratory disease tended to have a better prognosis compared to GP patients without cardiorespiratory disease (P=0.106), whereas there were no significant differences between GP and GPC patients with cardiorespiratory disease. However, administration of chemotherapy was identified as an independent prognostic factor by the Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio = 2.609; 95% confidence interval: 1.173-5.761; P=0.019). Therefore, chemotherapy appears to provide a survival benefit in geriatric patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, particularly those without concomitant cardiorespiratory disease.

Nutritional advice in older patients at risk of malnutrition during treatment for chemotherapy: a two-year randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We tested the effect of dietary advice dedicated to increase intake in older patients at risk for malnutrition during chemotherapy, versus usual care, on one-year mortality.

METHOD

We conducted a multicentre, open-label interventional, stratified (centre), parallel randomised controlled trial, with a 1∶1 ratio, with two-year follow-up. Patients were aged 70 years or older treated with chemotherapy for solid tumour and at risk of malnutrition (MNA, Mini Nutritional Assessment 17-23.5). Intervention consisted of diet counselling with the aim of achieving an energy intake of 30 kCal/kg body weight/d and 1.2 g protein/kg/d, by face-to-face discussion targeting the main nutritional symptoms, compared to usual care. Interviews were performed 6 times during the chemotherapy sessions for 3 to 6 months. The primary endpoint was 1-year mortality and secondary endpoints were 2-year mortality, toxicities and chemotherapy outcomes.

RESULTS

Between April 2007 and March 2010 we randomised 341 patients and 336 were analysed: mean (standard deviation) age of 78.0 y (4·9), 51.2% male, mean MNA 20.2 (2.1). Distribution of cancer types was similar in the two groups; the most frequent were colon (22.4%), lymphoma (14.9%), lung (10.4%), and pancreas (17.0%). Both groups increased their dietary intake, but to a larger extent with intervention (p<0.01). At the second visit, the energy target was achieved in 57 (40.4%) patients and the protein target in 66 (46.8%) with the intervention compared respectively to 13 (13.5%) and 20 (20.8%) in the controls. Death occurred during the first year in 143 patients (42.56%), without difference according to the intervention (p = 0.79). No difference in nutritional status changes was found. Response to chemotherapy was also similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Early dietary counselling was efficient in increasing intake but had no beneficial effect on mortality or secondary outcomes. Cancer cachexia antianabolism may explain this lack of effect.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00459589.

PPT and VES-13 in elderly patients with cancer: evaluation in multidimensional geriatric assessment and prediction of survival

OBJECTIVES

The multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA) detects impairments in the elderly and forms the basis for individualized treatment algorithms. Screening tools have been developed to detect patients in need of a full assessment. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the discriminative power and the prognostic impact of the screening scores for the Physical Performance Test (PPT) and the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 77 patients with cancer aged ≥60years (median 74years) from the Department of Internal Medicine V, Innsbruck Medical University, VES-13 and PPT were performed and compared with data from MGA and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, of the 77 patients 70% was deemed impaired, as defined by impairments in two or more scores of the MGA. The VES-13 showed 42% to be impaired, the PPT 79%. Using a cut-off of ≤19, the PPT exhibited better discriminative power than did the standard PPT (≤20). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of VES-13, PPT≤20 and PPT≤19 in the detection of impairments were 56% (88%, 82%), 91% (45%, 75%), 94% (80%, 89%), and 45% (60%, 63%) respectively. The area under the curve was 0.73 (0.67, 0.79), respectively. Both impaired VES-13 and PPT significantly correlated with an unfavorable overall survival in both uni- and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

PPT (≤19) reveals favorable sensitivity, NPV and overall accuracy in elderly patients with cancer. Still, the NPV is too low to sufficiently discriminate between fit and frail patients. Both PPT and VES-13 are useful predictors for survival.

[Assessment of screening in women cancers and in 75 years older in Loire department]

In France, there is an important interregional disparity concerning participation to cancer screening programs. The aim of this study was to assess oncologic screening practices in Loire, a French rural department, in women and in the elderly (over age 74 years). For this, two surveys were conducted. The first one was regarding screening for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer in women over age 18 years living in Loire. The second survey was regarding onco-geriatric screening through two questionnaires : one for the elderly and the other for general practitioner (GP) of the department, evaluating screening for breast, colorectal, prostate, cervical and lung cancer. One hundred sixty six women were included in the first investigation mean age of 47.6 years. Ninety three point six per cent were screening for breast cancer, 19% received Human Papilloma virus vaccine, 83.1% were screening by Papanicolau smear for cervical cancer and finally, 51.7% were screening for colorectal cancer, among the one entering screening program criteria. In the second survey, 44 patients and 28 GP were included. Thirty-eight point six per cent of patients over 74 years continue screening. Only 11.4% were reluctant to screening and in 80% because of anxiety du to the results. Among GP, 50 % continued screening on two major criteria : life expectancy and performans status. The present study shows heterogeneity of screening in this department both rural and working class and gives us a societo-medical photography.