3751
|
Woo HY, Heo J. New perspectives on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis. Clin Mol Hepatol 2015; 21:115-121. [PMID: 26157747 PMCID: PMC4493353 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2015.21.2.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), managing HCC with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains challenging. PVT is present in 10-40% of HCC cases at the time of diagnosis and its therapeutic options are very limited. Current guidelines mainly recommend sorafenib for advanced HCC with PVT, but surgery, transarterial chemoemolization, external radiation therapy, radioembolization, transarterial infusion chemotherapy, and combination therapy are also still used. Furthermore, several new emerging therapies such as the administration of immunotherapeutic agents and oncolytic viruses are under investigation. This comprehensive literature review presents current and future management options with their relative advantages and disadvantages and summary data on overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Young Woo
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Pusan National University and Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Jeong Heo
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Pusan National University and Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3752
|
Zhang L, Li Y, Qiao L, Zhao Y, Wei Y, Li Y. Protective effects of hepatic stellate cells against cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human hepatoma G2 cells. Int J Oncol 2015; 47:632-40. [PMID: 26035065 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 04/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The effects of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) on tumorigenicity of HCC have been previously reported. However, the detailed mechanisms responsible for these effects remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of HSCs on cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human hepatoma HepG2 cell lines. HepG2 cells were treated with cisplatin alone or co-cultured with LX-2 cells 3 days before incubation with cisplatin. Cisplatin causes apoptosis in HepG2 cells and LX-2 cells protect HepG2 cells from death. The protection of LX-2 cells against cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells appeared to be related to the inhibition of apoptosis, as determined by cytotoxicity assay and nuclear staining analysis. p53 and Bax mRNA levels were elevated, and cell cycle arrest was produced after cisplatin treatment. LX-2 cells suppressed this elevation of p53 and Bax as well as the cell cycle arrest induced by cisplatin, when compared with those of the treated cells with cisplatin alone. The LX-2 cells pretreatment inhibited the cisplatin-induced apoptosis, which was related with the incomplete blockage in p53 activation. In summary, the results of our present study demonstrate that HSCs protect HepG2 cells against cisplatin-induced apoptosis and its protective effects occur via inhibiting the activation of p53, which is of critical importance for enhanced understanding of fundamental cancer biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, P.R. China
| | - Yi Li
- School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
| | - Liang Qiao
- Storr Liver Unit at the Westmead Millennium Institute, the University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Yongxun Zhao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China
| | - Yucai Wei
- Key Laboratory of Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, P.R. China
| | - Yumin Li
- Key Laboratory of Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3753
|
Slotta JE, Kollmar O, Ellenrieder V, Ghadimi BM, Homayounfar K. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Surgeon's view on latest findings and future perspectives. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:1168-1183. [PMID: 26019733 PMCID: PMC4438492 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i9.1168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2014] [Revised: 11/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/20/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver-derived malignancy with a high fatality rate. Risk factors for the development of HCC have been identified and are clearly described. However, due to the lack of tumor-specific symptoms, HCC are diagnosed at progressed tumor stages in most patients, and thus curative therapeutic options are limited. The focus of this review is on surgical therapeutic options which can be offered to patients with HCC with special regard to recent findings, not exclusively focused on surgical therapy, but also to other treatment modalities. Further, potential promising future perspectives for the treatment of HCC are discussed.
Collapse
|
3754
|
Huertas A, Baumann AS, Saunier-Kubs F, Salleron J, Oldrini G, Croisé-Laurent V, Barraud H, Ayav A, Bronowicki JP, Peiffert D. Stereotactic body radiation therapy as an ablative treatment for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2015; 115:211-6. [PMID: 26028227 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2014] [Revised: 03/16/2015] [Accepted: 04/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS The records of 77 consecutive patients treated with SBRT for 97 liver-confined HCC were reviewed. A total dose of 45Gy in 3 fractions was prescribed to the 80% isodose line. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were studied. RESULTS The median follow-up was 12months. The median tumor diameter was 2.4cm. The LC rate was 99% at 1 and 2years. The 1 and 2-year OS were 81.8% and 56.6% respectively. The median time to progression was 9months (0-38). The rate of hepatic toxicity was 7.7% [1.6-13.7], 14.9% [5.7-23.2] and 23.1% [9.9-34.3] at 6months, 1year and 2years respectively. In multivariate analysis, female gender (HR 7.87 [3.14-19.69]), a BCLC B-C stage (HR 3.71 [1.41-9.76]), a sum of all lesion diameters ⩾2cm (HR 7.48 [2.09-26.83]) and a previous treatment (HR 0.10 [0.01-0.79]) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. CONCLUSION SBRT allows high local control for inoperable hepatocellular carcinomas. It should be considered when an ablative treatment is indicated in Child A patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Huertas
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Baumann
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Fleur Saunier-Kubs
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Management, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Guillaume Oldrini
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - Hélène Barraud
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, CHU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Ahmed Ayav
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, CHU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - Didier Peiffert
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3755
|
Gene transcript analysis blood values correlate with 68Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging in neuroendocrine tumors and can define disease status. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 42:1341-52. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3075-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
3756
|
Dreyer C, Sablin MP, Bouattour M, Neuzillet C, Ronot M, Dokmak S, Belghiti J, Guedj N, Paradis V, Raymond E, Faivre S. Disease control with sunitinib in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma resistant to gemcitabine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:910-915. [PMID: 25937868 PMCID: PMC4411533 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i6.910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2014] [Revised: 01/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced cholangiocarcinoma is associated with poor prognostic survival and has limited therapeutic options available at present. The importance of angiogenesis and expression of pro-angiogenic factors in intrahepatic forms of cholangiocarcinoma suggest that therapies targeting angiogenesis might be useful for the treatment of this disease. Here we report three cases of patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progressive after standard chemotherapy and treated with sunitinib 50 mg/d in 6-wk cycles of 4 wk on treatment followed by 2 wk off treatment (Schedule 4/2). In all three patients, sunitinib treatment was associated with a sustained disease control superior to 4 mo, patients achieving either a partial response or stable disease. A reduction in tumor size and density was observed in all cases, suggesting tumor necrosis as a result of sunitinib treatment in these patients. In addition, sunitinib was generally well tolerated and the occurrence of side effects was managed with standard medical interventions, as required. Our results suggest that sunitinib therapy may be associated with favorable outcomes and tolerability in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Those observations contributed to launch a prospective phase II multicenter trial investigating sunitinib in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (SUN-CK study; NCT01718327).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Dreyer
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Marie-Paule Sablin
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Mohamed Bouattour
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Cindy Neuzillet
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Jacques Belghiti
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Nathalie Guedj
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Valérie Paradis
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Eric Raymond
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Sandrine Faivre
- Chantal Dreyer, Marie-Paule Sablin, Mohamed Bouattour, Cindy Neuzillet, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP - PRES Paris 7 Diderot), 92110 Clichy, France
| |
Collapse
|
3757
|
Hong Y, Zhou L, Xie H, Wang W, Zheng S. Differences in antiproliferative effect of STAT3 inhibition in HCC cells with versus without HBV expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015; 461:513-8. [PMID: 25899746 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 04/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) plays an important role in the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) inactivation could inhibit the tumor growth of HCC. In this study, differential antiproliferative effect of STAT3 inhibition was observed with HBV-related HCC cells being more resistant than non-HBV-related HCC cells. Resistance of HBV-related HCC cells to STAT3 inhibition was positively correlated to the expression of HBV. Enhanced ERK activation after STAT3 blockade was detected in HBV-related HCC cells but not in non-HBV-related HCC cells. Combined ERK and STAT3 inhibition eliminates the discrepancy between the two types of HCC cells. Moderate reduced HBV expression was found after STAT3 inhibition. These findings disclose a discrepancy in cellular response to STAT3 inhibition between non-HBV-related and HBV-related HCC cells and underscore the complexity of antiproliferative effect of STAT3 inactivation in HBV-related HCC cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Hong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation of Ministry of Public Health, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China
| | - Lin Zhou
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation of Ministry of Public Health, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China
| | - Haiyang Xie
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation of Ministry of Public Health, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China
| | - Weilin Wang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation of Ministry of Public Health, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation of Ministry of Public Health, Qingchun Road 79, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3758
|
Sommer CM, Stampfl U, Kauczor HU, Pereira PL. [National S3 guidelines on hepatocellular carcinoma]. Radiologe 2015; 54:642-53. [PMID: 25047521 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-014-2656-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE Evidence-based therapeutic and diagnostic algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS Ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, image-guided percutaneous biopsy, percutaneous thermal ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS Diagnostic and therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma according to the official German interdisciplinary guidelines. PERFORMANCE The formulation of the German S3 guidelines on diagnosis and therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma was performed under special consideration of quality indicators and standardized quality improvement methods. ACHIEVEMENTS In 2013 the German S3 guidelines on diagnosis and therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma were published and clinically implemented as part of the nationwide guideline program in oncology of the Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (German Cancer Society). PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS The German S3 guidelines on diagnosis and therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma have to be considered as the national gold standard with the goal of optimization of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Sommer
- Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Radiologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3759
|
Lee SH, Song IH, Noh R, Kang HY, Kim SB, Ko SY, Lee ES, Kim SH, Lee BS, Kim AN, Chae HB, Kim HS, Lee TH, Kang YW, Lee JD, Lee HY. Clinical outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: a retrospective study of routine clinical practice in multi-institutions. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:236. [PMID: 25885683 PMCID: PMC4403976 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1273-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2014] [Accepted: 03/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sorafenib is an orally administered multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antiproliferative properties. The results of large clinical trials demonstrate that sorafenib prolongs survival and the time to progression of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of the present study was to determine the outcomes of such patients who were routinely treated with sorafenib at multi-institutions in Korea, in contrast to formal clinical trials. Methods Between August 2007 and March 2012, patients with advanced HCC in seven referral medical centers in Daejeon-Chungcheong Province of Korea were retrospectively enrolled to evaluate treatment response, survival, and tolerability following administration of sorafenib. The treatment response was assessed in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor 1.1 guidelines. Results Among 116 patients, 66 (57%) had undergone treatment for HCC, and 77 (66%) were accompanied with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. The median duration of sorafenib treatment was 67 days (range 14–452 days). Median overall survival and median time to progression were 141 days and 90 days, respectively. Complete response, partial response, and stable disease were achieved for 0%, 2%, and 29% of patients, respectively. Overall median survival, but not the median time to progression, was significantly shorter for patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis compared with those with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (64 days vs 168 days, P = 0.004). Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (P = 0.024) and a high level of serum alpha-fetoprotein (P = 0.039) were independent risk factors for poor overall survival. Thirty-nine (34%) patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events such as hand-foot skin reactions and diarrhea that required dose adjustment. Conclusions The clinical outcomes of sorafenib-treated patients with advanced HCC were comparable to those reported by formal clinical trial conducted in the Asia-Pacific region. Underlying hepatic dysfunction was the most important risk factor for shorter survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sae Hwan Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
| | - Il Han Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, 201 Manghyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, 330-715, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ran Noh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, 201 Manghyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, 330-715, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ha Yan Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, 201 Manghyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, 330-715, Republic of Korea.
| | - Suk Bae Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, 201 Manghyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, 330-715, Republic of Korea.
| | - Soon Young Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Republic of Korea.
| | - Eoum Seok Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| | - Seok Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| | - Byung Seok Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| | - An Na Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eulji University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hee Bok Chae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hong Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
| | - Tae Hee Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| | - Young Woo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jae Dong Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Republic of Korea.
| | - Heon Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3760
|
de Baere T, Deschamps F, Tselikas L, Ducreux M, Planchard D, Pearson E, Berdelou A, Leboulleux S, Elias D, Baudin E. GEP-NETS update: Interventional radiology: role in the treatment of liver metastases from GEP-NETs. Eur J Endocrinol 2015; 172:R151-66. [PMID: 25385817 DOI: 10.1530/eje-14-0630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors from gastro-pancreatic origin (GEP-NET) can be responsible for liver metastases. Such metastases can be the dominant part of the disease as well due to the tumor burden itself or the symptoms related to such liver metastases. Intra-arterial therapies are commonly used in liver only or liver-dominant disease and encompass trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), trans-arterial embolization (TAE), and radioembolization (RE). TACE performed with drug emulsified in Lipiodol has been used for the past 20 years with reported overall survival in the range of 3-4 years, with objective response up to 75%. Response to TACE is higher when treatment is used as a first-line therapy and degree of liver involvement is lower. Benefit of TACE over TAE is unproven in randomized study, but reported in retrospective studies namely in pancreatic NETs. RE provides early interesting results that need to be further evaluated in terms of benefit and toxicity. Radiofrequency ablation allows control of small size and numbered liver metastases, with low invasiveness. Ideal metastases to target are one metastasis <5 cm, or three metastases <3 cm, or a sum of diameter of all metastases below 8 cm. Ablation therapies can be applied in the lung or in the bones when needed, and more invasive surgery should be probably saved for large-size metastases. Even if the indication of image-guided therapy in the treatment of GEP-NET liver metastases needs to be refined, such therapies allow for manageable invasive set of treatments able to address oligometastatic patients in liver, lung, and bones. These treatments applied locally will save the benefit and the toxicity of systemic therapy for more advanced stage of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry de Baere
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Frederic Deschamps
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Michel Ducreux
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - David Planchard
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Ernesto Pearson
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Amandine Berdelou
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Sophie Leboulleux
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Dominique Elias
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Eric Baudin
- Interventional RadiologyMedical OncologyNuclear Medicine and Endocrine OncologyOncology SurgeryEndocrinologyInstitut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, FranceUniversité Paris-SudLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
3761
|
Hayano K, Lee SH, Sahani DV. Imaging for assessment of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma: Current update. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2015; 25:121-128. [PMID: 25969635 PMCID: PMC4419421 DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.155835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Morphologic methods such as the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are considered as the gold standard for response assessment in the management of cancer. However, with the increasing clinical use of antineoplastic cytostatic agents and locoregional interventional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), conventional morphologic methods are confronting limitations in response assessment. Thus, there is an increasing interest in new imaging methods for response assessment, which can evaluate tumor biology such as vascular physiology, fibrosis, necrosis, and metabolism. In this review, we discuss various novel imaging methods for response assessment and compare them with the conventional ones in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Hayano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sang Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3762
|
Quirk M, Kim YH, Saab S, Lee EW. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:3462-3471. [PMID: 25834310 PMCID: PMC4375567 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2014] [Revised: 12/24/2014] [Accepted: 02/05/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is complex and requires an understanding of multiple therapeutic options. PVT is present in 10%-40% of HCC at the time of diagnosis, and is an adverse prognostic factor. Management options are limited, as transplantation is generally contraindicated, and surgical resection is only rarely performed in select centers. Systemic medical therapy with sorafenib has been shown to modestly prolong survival. Transarterial chemoembolization has been performed in select cases but has shown a high incidence of complications. Emerging data on treatment of PVT with Y-90 radioembolization suggest that this modality is well-tolerated and associated with favorable overall survival. Current society guidelines do not yet specifically recommend radioembolization for patients with PVT, but this may change with the development of newer staging systems and treatment algorithms. In this comprehensive literature review, we present current and available management options with the relative advantages, disadvantages and contraindications of these treatment options with summarized data on overall survival.
Collapse
|
3763
|
Prognostic factors for prediction of survival of hepatocellular cancer patients after selective internal radiation therapy. Ann Nucl Med 2015; 29:426-30. [PMID: 25783289 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-015-0962-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2014] [Accepted: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
AIM In this study, it was aimed to explore the prognostic factors in patients who received selective internal radiation therapy for hepatocellular cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective evaluation was made of 28 (24 male, 4 female, mean age 65.4 ± 6.8 years) hepatocellular cancer patients who received selective internal radiation therapy with Y-90 resin microspheres. Using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the relationship between age, gender, MELD score, serum albumin and AFP levels, number of liver lesions, size of the largest lesion, absence of (18)F-FDG uptake, maximum standardized uptake value and overall survival times was analyzed. RESULTS Treatment was applied to the right lobe in 22 and both in 6 patients. Mean treatment dose was 1.5 ± 0.2 GBq. Number of liver lesions were 1, <5 and multiple in 16, 5 and 7 patients, respectively, and the mean size of the largest lesion was 41.5 mm (min-max 15-160 mm). While (18)F-FDG uptake was seen in 24 patients, liver lesions were hypometabolic in 4 patients. Mean SUVmax of liver lesions was calculated as 5.3 ± 0.3. During the mean 17.8 (min-max 2-39) months follow-up period, 19 patients died. Median survival time was computed as 18 ± 5 months (95% CI 8.1-27.8). Age (p = 0.04), serum AFP level (p = 0.03) and size of the largest lesion (p = 0.02) had a significant negative effect on survival according to the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. CONCLUSION Age, serum AFP level and the size of the largest liver lesion have a negative significant effect on survival of hepatocellular cancer patients who received selective internal radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
3764
|
Petrelli F, Pietrantonio F, Cremolini C, Di Bartolomeo M, Coinu A, Lonati V, de Braud F, Barni S. Early tumour shrinkage as a prognostic factor and surrogate end-point in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and pooled-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51:800-7. [PMID: 25794604 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Revised: 02/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early tumour shrinkage (ETS), defined as a reduction of at least 20% in tumour size at first reassessment, has been recently investigated retrospectively in first-line trials of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), and appears to be associated with better outcomes. We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials to evaluate the prognostic value of ETS in CRC in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). MATERIAL AND METHODS An electronic search of the PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial databases identified trials that compared outcomes of patients with or without ETS during first-line chemotherapy for metastatic CRC. The OS, reported as a hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was the primary outcome measure; the correlation coefficient (R) between ETS with median OS was also estimated. RESULTS Twenty-one trials from 10 publications were analysed. Overall, patients with ETS were associated with a better OS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.64; P<0.00001) and PFS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.69; P<0.00001) compared with patients who were early non-responders. However, ETS was poorly correlated with OS in terms of surrogacy (R=0.37; 95% CI - 0.31-0.78; P=0.28). CONCLUSIONS ETS is a good prognostic factor but an inappropriate surrogate for predicting outcome in CRC patients. These findings support ETS as prognostic tool in ascertaining earlier non-responders; however, its role as a surrogate end-point deserves further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fausto Petrelli
- Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- UO Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana and Università di Pisa, via Roma 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Coinu
- Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
| | - Veronica Lonati
- Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Sandro Barni
- Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3765
|
|
3766
|
Kim MN, Kim BK, Han KH, Kim SU. Evolution from WHO to EASL and mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma: considerations for tumor response assessment. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 9:335-348. [PMID: 25370168 DOI: 10.1586/17474124.2015.959929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Radiological response assessment criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have evolved to accurately evaluate tumor responses. The WHO criteria and the subsequent Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) evaluate change in tumor size; however, these criteria generally ignore tumor necrosis and therefore may underestimate treatment responses. Thus, a panel of experts of the European Association for the Study of Liver (EASL) amended the response criteria to take into account tumor necrosis. In 2010, the modified RECIST (mRECIST) was developed, which consider both the concept of tumor viability based on arterial enhancement and single linear summation, ultimately simplifying EASL criteria. Currently, the mRECIST represents the gold standard for radiologically evaluating tumor response during HCC treatment. Here, the authors review application and performance of mRECIST as well as other HCC response assessment criteria and discuss unmet and open issues regarding response evaluation for HCC treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Na Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3767
|
Hussein KH, Park KM, Ghim JH, Yang SR, Woo HM. Three dimensional culture of HepG2 liver cells on a rat decellularized liver matrix for pharmacological studies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015; 104:263-73. [DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Revised: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 01/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal H. Hussein
- Stem Cell Institute; Kangwon National University; Chuncheon Gangwon 200-701 Korea
- Department of Veterinary Surgical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine; Kangwon National University; Chuncheon Gangwon 200-701 Korea
| | - Kyung M. Park
- Stem Cell Institute; Kangwon National University; Chuncheon Gangwon 200-701 Korea
- Department of Veterinary Surgical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine; Kangwon National University; Chuncheon Gangwon 200-701 Korea
| | - Jinn H. Ghim
- Stem Cell Institute; Kangwon National University; Chuncheon Gangwon 200-701 Korea
| | - Se R. Yang
- Stem Cell Institute; Kangwon National University; Chuncheon Gangwon 200-701 Korea
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery; School of Medicine; Kangwon National University; Chuncheon Gangwon 200-701 Korea
| | - Heung M. Woo
- Stem Cell Institute; Kangwon National University; Chuncheon Gangwon 200-701 Korea
- Department of Veterinary Surgical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine; Kangwon National University; Chuncheon Gangwon 200-701 Korea
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute; Renal Division; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School; Massachusetts 02115
| |
Collapse
|
3768
|
Hu H, Duan Z, Long X, Hertzanu Y, Tong X, Xu X, Shi H, Liu S, Yang Z. Comparison of treatment safety and patient survival in elderly versus nonelderly patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score matching study. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0117168. [PMID: 25689846 PMCID: PMC4331363 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2014] [Accepted: 12/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS This retrospective study was carried out to compare the outcomes between elderly (≥70 years of age) and nonelderly patients (<70 years of age) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). METHODS 88 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced HCC were enrolled in this study. Of these, 24 elderly patients were matched with 48 nonelderly patients at a 1:2 ratio using propensity score matching to minimize selection bias. The related adverse events and survival benefits were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Sorafenib combined with TACE was equally well tolerated in both age groups, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events were similarly observed in 54.2% of elderly and 50.0% of nonelderly patients (P = 0.739). There were no significant differences in survival time between the elderly and nonelderly patients (P = 0.876). Significant prognostic factors for overall survival as identified by multivariate analysis were the Child-Pugh score and portal vein invasion. CONCLUSIONS Sorafenib combined with TACE may be well tolerated and effective in elderly patients with advanced HCC. Age alone is not a parameter for the treatment of advanced HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Hu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhenhua Duan
- Chengdu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoran Long
- School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yancu Hertzanu
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Xiaoqiang Tong
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoquan Xu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Haibin Shi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sheng Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhengqiang Yang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3769
|
Sacco R, Mismas V, Romano A, Bertini M, Bertoni M, Federici G, Metrangolo S, Parisi G, Tumino E, Bresci G, Giacomelli L, Marceglia S, Bargellini I. Assessment of clinical and radiological response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:33-39. [PMID: 25624994 PMCID: PMC4295191 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i1.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2014] [Revised: 10/10/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Sorafenib is an effective anti-angiogenic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The assessment of tumor progression in patients treated with sorafenib is crucial to help identify potentially-resistant patients, avoiding unnecessary toxicities. Traditional methods to assess tumor progression are based on variations in tumor size and provide unreliable results in patients treated with sorafenib. New methods to assess tumor progression such as the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or European Association for the Study of Liver criteria are based on imaging to measure the vascularization and tumor volume (viable or necrotic). These however fail especially when the tumor response results in irregular development of necrotic tissue. Newer assessment techniques focus on the evaluation of tumor volume, density or perfusion. Perfusion computed tomography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-UltraSound can measure the vascularization of HCC lesions and help predict tumor response to anti-angiogenic therapies. Mean Transit Time is a possible predictive biomarker to measure tumor response. Volumetric techniques are reliable, reproducible and time-efficient and can help measure minimal changes in viable tumor or necrotic tissue, allowing the prompt identification of non-responders. Volume ratio may be a reproducible biomarker for tumor response. Larger trials are needed to confirm the use of these techniques in the prediction of response to sorafenib.
Collapse
|
3770
|
McNamara MG, Le LW, Horgan AM, Aspinall A, Burak KW, Dhani N, Chen E, Sinaei M, Lo G, Kim TK, Rogalla P, Bathe OF, Knox JJ. A phase II trial of second-line axitinib following prior antiangiogenic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2015; 121:1620-7. [PMID: 25565269 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2014] [Revised: 11/07/2014] [Accepted: 11/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Second-line treatment options in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are limited. Axitinib, a selective potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF) receptors 1, 2, and 3, merits exploration in HCC. METHODS This was a single-arm phase II trial of axitinib in advanced HCC. Eligible patients were Child-Pugh A/B7, with measurable progressive disease after TKIs/antiangiogenic drugs. Axitinib was started at 5 mg twice daily orally, titrated from 2 to 10 mg twice daily as tolerated. The primary end point was tumor control at 16 weeks by RECIST1.1; secondary end points were response rate, comparing response by RECIST1.1 to Choi and modified RECIST, exploring dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging models, safety, progression-free (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty patients were treated. Of 26 patients evaluable for response, there were 3 partial responses (PR) per RECIST1.1; 13 PR by Choi, 6 PR and 1 complete response by modified RECIST. Tumor control rate at 16 weeks was 42.3%. Two-week perfusion changes were noted on functional imaging. Of 21 patients with evaluable α-fetoprotein response, 43% had >50% decrease from baseline. Most common axitinib-related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension, thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. Of 11 patients with any grade hypertension, 7 had disease control >36 wks. Four patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. Median PFS was 3.6 months. Median OS was 7.1 months. CONCLUSIONS With 42.3% tumor control at 16 weeks, primary endpoint was met. Axitinib has shown encouraging tolerable clinical activity in VEGF-pretreated HCC patients but further study should be in a selected population incorporating potential biomarkers of response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairéad G McNamara
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/University of Manchester, Withington, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3771
|
Hollebecque A, Malka D, Ferté C, Ducreux M, Boige V. Systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: from disillusions to new horizons. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51:327-39. [PMID: 25559615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Accepted: 12/11/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy, which accounts for a third of all cancer deaths globally each year. The management of patients with HCC is complex, as both the tumour stage and any underlying liver disease must be considered conjointly. Since the approval of sorafenib in advanced HCC, several phase III clinical trials have failed to demonstrate any superiority over sorafenib in the frontline setting, and no agent has been shown to impact outcomes after sorafenib failure. This review will focus on the range of experimental therapeutics for patients with advanced HCC and highlight the successes and failures of these treatments as well as areas for future development. Specifics such as dose limiting toxicity and safety profile in patients with liver dysfunction related to the underlying chronic liver disease should be considered when developing therapies in HCC. Finally, robust validated and reproducible surrogate end-points as well as predictive biomarkers should be defined in future randomised trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Hollebecque
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France; Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - David Malka
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Ferté
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Michel Ducreux
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Valérie Boige
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3772
|
Marotta V, Sciammarella C, Vitale M, Colao A, Faggiano A. The evolving field of kinase inhibitors in thyroid cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015; 93:60-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Revised: 06/15/2014] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
3773
|
Romero Gutiérrez M, Ruano Díaz L, Muñoz López D, Artaza Varasa T, González de Frutos C, Sánchez Ruano JJ, de la Cruz Pérez G, Gómez Rodríguez R. [Percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in older patients in clinical practice]. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2014; 38:54-61. [PMID: 25499846 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2014] [Revised: 10/05/2014] [Accepted: 11/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A high percentage of older patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are potential candidates for percutaneous ablation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We prospectively assessed data from patients older than 70 years with HCC. We determined their demographic and clinical characteristics, the treatment provided and the response, complications and survival among those treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and/or percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI). RESULTS Of 194 patients with HCC, 84 were older than 70 years (43.3%). The mean age was 76.8 ± 4.5 years. Seventy-five percent were male and 91.7% had cirrhosis. Cancer was initially identified by a surveillance program in 61.9%. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, 60.7% were classified as having early stage cancer (0-A), 19% as stage B, 12% as stage C, and 8.3% as stage D. Potentially curative initial treatment was provided in 38.2% (surgical resection in 4.8%, PEI in 22.6%, RFA in 4.8%, PEI+RFA in 6%), transarterial chemoembolization in 20.2%, and sorafenib in 3.6%. Twenty-five percent of patients were not treatment candidates and 13% refused the recommended treatment. The median follow-up after percutaneous ablation was 23 months (IQR 14.2-40.6). The mean number of sessions was 3.5 ± 2.2 for PEI and 1.8 ± 1.6 for RFA. The complications rate per session was 4%. Remission was achieved in 35.7%. The overall median survival was 45.7 months (95% CI 20.8-70.6). CONCLUSIONS Almost half of the patients with HCC in our sample were elderly and more than half were diagnosed at an early stage. Percutaneous ablation was performed in one-third of the sample, achieving remission in 37.5%. There were few complications. Therefore, these patients should be assessed for percutaneous ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Romero Gutiérrez
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España.
| | - Lucía Ruano Díaz
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España
| | - Diego Muñoz López
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España
| | - Tomás Artaza Varasa
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España
| | | | - Juan José Sánchez Ruano
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España
| | - Gema de la Cruz Pérez
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España
| | - Rafael Gómez Rodríguez
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España
| |
Collapse
|
3774
|
Okuyama H, Ikeda M, Kuwahara A, Takahashi H, Ohno I, Shimizu S, Mitsunaga S, Senda S, Okusaka T. Prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory or intolerant to sorafenib. Oncology 2014; 88:241-6. [PMID: 25503567 DOI: 10.1159/000369351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 10/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are refractory or intolerant to sorafenib and to exclude unsuitable candidates from subsequent therapy. METHODS The study cohort consisted of 111 patients who had discontinued sorafenib therapy. Uni- and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic factors for survival after discontinuation of sorafenib therapy. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 70 years, and 96 of them (86%) were male. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0-1 in 94 patients (85%). Forty patients (36%) were classified as Child-Pugh class A and 57 (51%) as Child-Pugh class B. The median survival time after discontinuation of sorafenib therapy was 146 days. Hepatitis C viral antibody negativity, presence of ascites, absence of a history of previous treatment excluding sorafenib, elevated serum total bilirubin level, and elevated serum α-fetoprotein level were identified as the independent unfavorable prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. The median survival time of the patients with 4 or 5 unfavorable prognostic factors was 59 days. CONCLUSIONS We should judge the indication of any subsequent therapy carefully in patients with 4 or 5 of the aforementioned factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Okuyama
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3775
|
Expert consensus for the management of advanced or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2014; 75:1099-114. [DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2642-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2014] [Accepted: 11/24/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
3776
|
Vilgrain V, Abdel-Rehim M, Sibert A, Ronot M, Lebtahi R, Castéra L, Chatellier G. Radioembolisation with yttrium‒90 microspheres versus sorafenib for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15:474. [PMID: 25472660 PMCID: PMC4265525 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 11/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is linked to poor prognosis. While sorafenib is the current recommended treatment for advanced HCC, radioembolisation (RE; also called selective internal radiation therapy or SIRT) with yttrium-90 microspheres has shown efficacy in cohort studies. However, there are no head-to-head trials comparing radiation therapy with yttrium-90 microspheres and sorafenib in advanced HCC. The SARAH trial has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib therapy and RE using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres™; Sirtex Medical Limited, North Sydney, Australia) in patients with advanced HCC. Quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness will also be compared between therapies. Methods/Design SARAH is a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre trial comparing the efficacy of RE with sorafenib in the treatment of patients with advanced HCC. The trial aims to recruit adults with a life expectancy of >3 months, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1, and: advanced HCC according to the Barcelona criteria (stage C) or recurrent HCC after surgical or thermoablative treatment who are not eligible for surgical resection, liver transplantation or thermal ablation; or two rounds of failed chemoembolisation. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to receive either RE or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. All patients will be monitored for between 12 and 48 months following start of treatment. The primary endpoint of the SARAH trial is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include: adverse events, progression-free survival at 6 months; tumour response rate; general or liver disease-specific QoL scores; and cost of each treatment strategy. Assuming an increase in median OS of 4 months with RE versus sorafenib therapy, randomising at least 400 patients (200 in each treatment arm) will be sufficient for 80% power and a bilateral alpha risk of 5%; therefore, 440 patients will be enrolled to allow for 10% loss of patients due to ineligibility. Discussion The SARAH trial is the first randomised head-to-head study to compare RE with sorafenib in advanced HCC, and will establish the potential role of RE in HCC treatment guidelines. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT01482442, first received 28 November 2011 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-474) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie Vilgrain
- Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, 100 boulevard General Leclerc, 92118 Clichy, Hauts-de-Seine, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3777
|
Lassau N, Bonastre J, Kind M, Vilgrain V, Lacroix J, Cuinet M, Taieb S, Aziza R, Sarran A, Labbe-Devilliers C, Gallix B, Lucidarme O, Ptak Y, Rocher L, Caquot LM, Chagnon S, Marion D, Luciani A, Feutray S, Uzan-Augui J, Coiffier B, Benastou B, Koscielny S. Validation of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting outcomes of antiangiogenic therapy for solid tumors: the French multicenter support for innovative and expensive techniques study. Invest Radiol 2014; 49:794-800. [PMID: 24991866 PMCID: PMC4222794 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) has been used in single-center studies to evaluate tumor response to antiangiogenic treatments: the change of area under the perfusion curve (AUC), a criterion linked to blood volume, was consistently correlated with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. The main objective here was to do a multicentric validation of the use of DCE-US to evaluate tumor response in different solid tumor types treated by several antiangiogenic agents. A secondary objective was to evaluate the costs of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study included patients from 2007 to 2010 in 19 centers (8 teaching hospitals and 11 comprehensive cancer centers). All patients treated with antiangiogenic therapy were eligible. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound examinations were performed at baseline as well as on days 7, 15, 30, and 60. For each examination, a perfusion curve was recorded during 3 minutes after injection of a contrast agent. Change from baseline at each time point was estimated for each of 7 fitted criteria. The main end point was freedom from progression (FFP). Criterion/time-point combinations with the strongest correlation with FFP were analyzed further to estimate an optimal cutoff point. RESULTS A total of 1968 DCE-US examinations in 539 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 1.65 years. Variations from baseline were significant at day 30 for several criteria, with AUC having the most significant association with FFP (P = 0.00002). Patients with a greater than 40% decrease in AUC at day 30 had better FFP (P = 0.005) and overall survival (P = 0.05). The mean cost of each DCE-US was 180&OV0556;, which corresponds to $250 using the current exchange rate. CONCLUSIONS Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a new functional imaging technique that provides a validated criterion, namely, the change of AUC from baseline to day 30, which is predictive of tumor progression in a large multicenter cohort. Because of its low cost, it should be considered in the routine evaluation of solid tumors treated with antiangiogenic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Lassau
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Julia Bonastre
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Michèle Kind
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Joëlle Lacroix
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marie Cuinet
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Taieb
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Richard Aziza
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Antony Sarran
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Labbe-Devilliers
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Benoit Gallix
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Lucidarme
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Yvette Ptak
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Laurence Rocher
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Louis-Michel Caquot
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Chagnon
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Denis Marion
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Sylvaine Feutray
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Joëlle Uzan-Augui
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Benedicte Coiffier
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Baya Benastou
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Serge Koscielny
- From the *Integrated Research Cancer Institute, Research Department, Villejuif; †Service Biostatistique et Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; ‡Imaging Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; §Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité; ∥Department of Radiology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; ¶Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; #Imaging Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; **Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; ††Imaging Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; ‡‡Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre R Gauducheau, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Nantes; §§Department of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging, Hôpital Saint-Éloi, Montpellier; ∥∥Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris; ¶¶Radiodiagnostics Department, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand; ##Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; ***Radiodiagnostics and Imaging Department, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims; †††Ultrasonography Department, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; ‡‡‡Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Lyon; §§§Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil; ∥∥∥Imaging Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon Cedex; and ¶¶¶Radiology Department, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3778
|
Peng Q, Li S, Lao X, Chen Z, Li R, Deng Y, Qin X. The association of common functional polymorphisms in mir-146a and mir-196a2 and hepatocellular carcinoma risk: evidence from a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93:e252. [PMID: 25546664 PMCID: PMC4602591 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000000252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNA molecules that function as tumor suppressors or oncogenes. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in the miRNAs influence the function of mature miRNAs and may contribute to cancer development. Studies investigating the association between miR-146a rs2910164 and miR-196a2 rs11614913 polymorphisms and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk reported inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis of all available studies to summarize this situation. Eligible studies were identified by search of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library for the period up to August 2014. The association of miR-146a rs2910164 and miR-196a2 rs11614913 polymorphisms and HCC risk was assessed by odds ratios (ORs) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Finally, a total of 12 studies with 4171 cases and 4901 controls were included for miR-146a rs2910164 polymorphism and 10 studies with 4687 cases and 4990 controls were available for miR-196a2 rs11614913 polymorphism. With respect to miR-146a rs2910164 polymorphism, statistical significant increased HCC risk was found when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (GG+CG vs CC: OR = 1.097, 95% CI 1.005-1.197, P = 0.037). In subgroup analyses by ethnicity, source of control, and HWE in controls, significant increase of HCC risk was found in Asians, population-based studies, and studies consistent with HWE, but not in Caucasians, hospital-based studies, and studies inconsistent with HWE. With respect to miR-196a2 rs11614913 polymorphism, no significant association with HCC risk was found in the overall and subgroup analyses. The results suggest that the miR-146a rs2910164 polymorphism contributes to increased HCC susceptibility, especially in Asian populations. Further large and well-designed studies are required to validate this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiliu Peng
- From the Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (QP, SL, XL, YD, XQ); Department of Occupational Health and Environmental Health, School of Public Health at Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (ZC); and Department of Medicine Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (RL)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3779
|
de Gramont A, Watson S, Ellis LM, Rodón J, Tabernero J, de Gramont A, Hamilton SR. Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 12:197-212. [PMID: 25421275 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Predictive biomarkers are becoming increasingly important tools in drug development and clinical research. The importance of using both guidelines for specimen acquisition and analytical methods for biomarker measurements that are standardized has become recognized widely as an important issue, which must be addressed in order to provide high-quality, validated assays. Herein, we review the major challenges in biomarker validation processes, including pre-analytical (sample-related), analytical, and post-analytical (data-related) aspects of assay development. Recommendations for improving biomarker assay development and method validation are proposed to facilitate the use of predictive biomarkers in clinical trials and the practice of oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armand de Gramont
- New Drug Evaluation Laboratory, Centre of Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Watson
- INSERM U830, Genetics and Biology of Paediatric Tumours Group, Institut Curie, France
| | - Lee M Ellis
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, and Molecular and Cellular Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| | - Jordi Rodón
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Spain
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Spain
| | - Aimery de Gramont
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, France
| | - Stanley R Hamilton
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3780
|
Nishino M, Giobbie-Hurder A, Ramaiya NH, Hodi FS. Response assessment in metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab and bevacizumab: CT tumor size and density as markers for response and outcome. J Immunother Cancer 2014; 2:40. [PMID: 25411640 PMCID: PMC4236430 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-014-0040-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 10/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Investigate the tumor diameter and density changes in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab plus bevacizumab, compare response rates based on different response criteria, and study association between these measures and survival. METHODS Twenty-one advanced melanoma patients with 59 measurable lesions treated in a phase 1 trial of ipilimumab plus bevacizumab were retrospectively studied. Tumor diameter and density were measured on baseline and first follow-up CT. Responses were assigned using RECIST, MASS and Choi criteria. Diameter and density measures and responses by these criteria were studied for the association with survival. RESULTS Twenty-three (39%) lesions and 7 (33%) patients met the Choi density criteria for response (≥15% density decrease) at the first follow-up. The response rates were 14% (3/21, 95% CI: 3-36%) by RECIST and MASS, and 52% (11/21, 95% CI: 30-74%) by Choi criteria, when both size and density criteria were used. Larger baseline tumor diameter was significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (log-rank p = 0.001 and 0.003; respectively). Diameter or density changes, or responses by RECIST, MASS or Choi criteria at the first follow-up, were not associated with PFS or OS. CONCLUSION Tumor density decrease meeting Choi criteria was noted in one-third of advanced melanoma patients at the first follow-up scan during ipilimumab plus bevacizumab therapy. While larger baseline tumor diameter was strongly associated with shorter survival, changes of diameter or density, or responses by three criteria did not predict survival. The role of density changes in evaluating response during ipilimumab and bevacizumab therapy for advanced melanoma remains to be further established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizuki Nishino
- />Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Anita Giobbie-Hurder
- />Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Nikhil H Ramaiya
- />Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- />Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3781
|
Enguita-Germán M, Fortes P. Targeting the insulin-like growth factor pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2014; 6:716-737. [PMID: 25349643 PMCID: PMC4209417 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i10.716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Revised: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 08/31/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Only 30%-40% of the patients with HCC are eligible for curative treatments, which include surgical resection as the first option, liver transplantation and percutaneous ablation. Unfortunately, there is a high frequency of tumor recurrence after surgical resection and most HCC seem resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Sorafenib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the only chemotherapeutic option for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients treated with Sorafenib have a significant increase in overall survival of about three months. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop alternative treatments. Due to its role in cell growth and development, the insulin-like growth factor system is commonly deregulated in many cancers. Indeed, the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis has recently emerged as a potential target for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. To this aim, several inhibitors of the pathway have been developed such as monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, antisense oligonucleotides or small interfering RNAs. However recent studies suggest that, unlike most tumors, HCC development requires increased signaling through insulin growth factor II rather than insulin growth factor I. This may have great implications in the future treatment of HCC. This review summarizes the role of the IGF axis in liver carcinogenesis and the current status of the strategies designed to target the IGF-I signaling pathway for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.
Collapse
|
3782
|
Emblem KE, Farrar CT, Gerstner ER, Batchelor TT, Borra RJH, Rosen BR, Sorensen AG, Jain RK. Vessel caliber--a potential MRI biomarker of tumour response in clinical trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 11:566-84. [PMID: 25113840 PMCID: PMC4445139 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of the importance of blood vessels and angiogenesis in cancer has increased considerably over the past decades, and the assessment of tumour vessel calibre and structure has become increasingly important for in vivo monitoring of therapeutic response. The preferred method for in vivo imaging of most solid cancers is MRI, and the concept of vessel-calibre MRI has evolved since its initial inception in the early 1990s. Almost a quarter of a century later, unlike traditional contrast-enhanced MRI techniques, vessel-calibre MRI remains widely inaccessible to the general clinical community. The narrow availability of the technique is, in part, attributable to limited awareness and a lack of imaging standardization. Thus, the role of vessel-calibre MRI in early phase clinical trials remains to be determined. By contrast, regulatory approvals of antiangiogenic agents that are not directly cytotoxic have created an urgent need for clinical trials incorporating advanced imaging analyses, going beyond traditional assessments of tumour volume. To this end, we review the field of vessel-calibre MRI and summarize the emerging evidence supporting the use of this technique to monitor response to anticancer therapy. We also discuss the potential use of this biomarker assessment in clinical imaging trials and highlight relevant avenues for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyrre E Emblem
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Christian T Farrar
- Department of Radiology and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Ronald J H Borra
- Department of Radiology and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Department of Radiology and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - A Gregory Sorensen
- Siemens Healthcare Health Services, 51 Valley Stream Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355, USA
| | - Rakesh K Jain
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory of Tumor Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3783
|
MicroRNAs in liver cancer: a model for investigating pathogenesis and novel therapeutic approaches. Cell Death Differ 2014; 22:46-57. [PMID: 25190143 DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2014.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Revised: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/24/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) constitute a large class of short RNAs (e.g., 20-24 nucleotides in length), whose main function is to posttranscriptionally regulate the expression of protein-coding genes. Their importance in tumorigenesis has been demonstrated over the past decade, and correspondingly, they have emerged as potential therapeutic molecules and targets. Liver cancer is one of the most common neoplastic diseases worldwide, and it currently has a poor prognosis owing to largely ineffective therapeutic options. Liver cancer is also an excellent model for testing miRNA-based therapy approaches as it can be easily targeted with the systemic delivery of oligonucleotides. In recent years, the role of miRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been established with molecular studies and the development of animal models. These studies have also provided the basis for evaluating the therapeutic potential of miRNAs, or anti-miRNAs. In general, the safety of miRNAs has been proven and antitumor activity has been observed. Moreover, because of the absence or presence of mild side effects, the prophylactic use of miRNA-based approaches may be foreseen.
Collapse
|
3784
|
Cohen MJ, Levy I, Barak O, Bloom AI, Fernández-Ruiz M, Di Maio M, Perrone F, Poon RT, Shouval D, Yau T, Shibolet O. Trans-arterial chemo-embolization is safe and effective for elderly advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients: results from an international database. Liver Int 2014; 34:1109-17. [PMID: 24512125 DOI: 10.1111/liv.12486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2013] [Accepted: 02/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence among elderly patients is increasing. Trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE) prolongs survival in selected HCC patients. The safety and efficacy of TACE in elderly patients has not been extensively studied. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of TACE in elderly patients (older than 75) with HCC. DESIGN Combined HCC registries (Spain, Italy, China and Israel) and cohort design analysis of patients who underwent TACE for HCC. RESULTS Five hundred and forty-eight patients diagnosed and treated between 1988 and 2010 were included in the analysis (China 197, Italy 155, Israel 102 and Spain 94,). There were 120 patients (22%) older than 75 years and 47 patients (8.6%) older than 80. Median (95% CI) survival estimates were 23 (17-28), 21 (17-26) and 19 (15-23) months (P=0.14) among patients aged younger than 65, 65-75 and older than 75 respectively. An age above 75 years at diagnosis was not associated with worse prognosis, hazard ratio of 1.05 (95% CI 0.75-1.5), controlling for disease stage, sex, diagnosis year, HBV status and stratifying per database. No differences in complication rates were found between the age groups. CONCLUSIONS TACE is safe for patients older than 75 years. Results were similar over different eras and geographical locations. Though selection bias is inherent, the results suggest overall adequate selection of patients, given the similar outcomes among the different age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matan J Cohen
- Division of Internal Medicine and Center for Clinical Quality and Safety, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3785
|
Modlin IM, Drozdov I, Alaimo D, Callahan S, Teixiera N, Bodei L, Kidd M. A multianalyte PCR blood test outperforms single analyte ELISAs (chromogranin A, pancreastatin, neurokinin A) for neuroendocrine tumor detection. Endocr Relat Cancer 2014; 21:615-28. [PMID: 25015994 DOI: 10.1530/erc-14-0190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
A critical requirement in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management is a sensitive, specific and reproducible blood biomarker test. We evaluated a PCR-based 51 transcript signature (NETest) and compared it to chromogranin A (CgA), pancreastatin (PST) and neurokinin A (NKA). The multigene signature was evaluated in two groups: i) a validation set of 40 NETs and controls and ii) a prospectively collected group of NETs (n=41, 61% small intestinal, 50% metastatic, 44% currently treated and 41 age-sex matched controls). Samples were analyzed by a two-step PCR (51 marker genes) protocol and ELISAs for CgA, PST and NKA. Sensitivity comparisons included χ(2), non-parametric measurements, ROC curves and predictive feature importance (PFAI) analyses. NETest identified 38 of 41 NETs. Performance metrics were: sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 92.8%, positive predictive value 92.8% and negative predictive value 92.8%. Single analyte ELISA metrics were: CgA 76, 59, 65, and 71%; PST 63, 56, 59, and 61% and NKA 39, 93, 84, and 60%. The AUCs (ROC analysis) were: NETest: 0.96±0.025, CgA: 0.67±0.06, PST 0.56±0.06, NKA: 0.66±0.06. NETest significantly outperformed single analyte tests (area differences: 0.284-0.403, Z-statistic 4.85-5.9, P<0.0001). PFAI analysis determined NETest had most value (69%) in diagnosis (CgA (13%), PST (9%), and NKA (9%)). Test data were consistent with the validation set (NETest >95% sensitivity and specificity, AUC =0.98 vs single analytes: 59-67% sensitivity, AUCs: 0.58-0.63). The NETest is significantly more sensitive and efficient (>93%) than single analyte assays (CgA, PST or NKA) in NET diagnosis. Blood-based multigene analytic measurement will facilitate early detection of disease recurrence and can predict therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irvin M Modlin
- Wren Laboratories35 NE Industrial Road, Branford, Connecticut 06405, USA
| | - Ignat Drozdov
- Wren Laboratories35 NE Industrial Road, Branford, Connecticut 06405, USA
| | - Daniele Alaimo
- Wren Laboratories35 NE Industrial Road, Branford, Connecticut 06405, USA
| | - Stephen Callahan
- Wren Laboratories35 NE Industrial Road, Branford, Connecticut 06405, USA
| | - Nancy Teixiera
- Wren Laboratories35 NE Industrial Road, Branford, Connecticut 06405, USA
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Wren Laboratories35 NE Industrial Road, Branford, Connecticut 06405, USA
| | - Mark Kidd
- Wren Laboratories35 NE Industrial Road, Branford, Connecticut 06405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3786
|
Hayano K, Yoshida H, Zhu AX, Sahani DV. Fractal analysis of contrast-enhanced CT images to predict survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sunitinib. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59:1996-2003. [PMID: 24563237 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3064-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2013] [Accepted: 02/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intratumoral heterogeneity is a well-recognized feature of malignancy. AIMS To assess the heterogeneity of tumor using fractal analysis of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) images for predicting survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with sunitinib. METHODS The patient cohort comprised 23 patients (19 men, 4 women; mean age 61.5 years) with HCC who underwent CE-CT at baseline and after one cycle of sunitinib. Arterial-phase (AP) and portal-phase (PP) CE-CT images were analyzed using a plugin software for ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD). A differential box-counting method was employed to calculate the fractal dimension (FD) of the tumor. Tumor FD, density, and size were compared with survival. RESULTS Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.43 months. Patients were grouped into a favorable PFS (PFS >4.43 months; 9 patients) and an unfavorable PFS group (PFS ≤ 4.43; 13 patients). The baseline FD on both the AP and PP images was lower in the favorable PFS group than in the unfavorable PFS group (both P = 0.03). There was a significant difference in the change of the FD on the AP image between the favorable and unfavorable PFS groups (P = 0.02). Tumor density and size showed no significant correlations with PFS. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with tumors showing lower FD on the AP image at baseline showed longer PFS (P = 0.002). Patients with tumors showing a greater reduction in the FD on the PP image after one cycle of the therapy showed longer overall survival (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION The FD of the tumor on CE-CT images may be a useful biomarker for HCC patients treated with sunitinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Hayano
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3787
|
Nölting S, Giubellino A, Tayem Y, Young K, Lauseker M, Bullova P, Schovanek J, Anver M, Fliedner S, Korbonits M, Göke B, Vlotides G, Grossman A, Pacak K. Combination of 13-Cis retinoic acid and lovastatin: marked antitumor potential in vivo in a pheochromocytoma allograft model in female athymic nude mice. Endocrinology 2014; 155:2377-90. [PMID: 24762141 PMCID: PMC4060189 DOI: 10.1210/en.2014-1027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Currently, there are no reliably effective therapeutic options for metastatic pheochromocytoma (PCC) and paraganglioma. Moreover, there are no therapies that may prevent the onset or progression of tumors in patients with succinate dehydrogenase type B mutations, which are associated with very aggressive tumors. Therefore, we tested the approved and well-tolerated drugs lovastatin and 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cRA) in vitro in an aggressive PCC mouse cell line, mouse tumor tissue-derived (MTT) cells, and in vivo in a PCC allograft nude mouse model, in therapeutically relevant doses. Treatment was started 24 hours before sc tumor cell injection and continued for 30 more days. Tumor sizes were measured from outside by caliper and sizes of viable tumor mass by bioluminescence imaging. Lovastatin showed antiproliferative effects in vitro and led to significantly smaller tumor sizes in vivo compared with vehicle treatment. 13cRA promoted tumor cell growth in vitro and led to significantly larger viable tumor mass and significantly faster increase of viable tumor mass in vivo over time compared with vehicle, lovastatin, and combination treatment. However, when combined with lovastatin, 13cRA enhanced the antiproliferative effect of lovastatin in vivo. The combination-treated mice showed slowest tumor growth of all groups with significantly slower tumor growth compared with the vehicle-treated mice and significantly smaller tumor sizes. Moreover, the combination-treated group displayed the smallest size of viable tumor mass and the slowest increase in viable tumor mass over time of all groups, with a significant difference compared with the vehicle- and 13cRA-treated group. The combination-treated tumors showed highest extent of necrosis, lowest median microvessel density and highest expression of α-smooth muscle actin. The combination of high microvessel density and low α-smooth muscle actin is a predictor of poor prognosis in other tumor entities. Therefore, this drug combination may be a well-tolerated novel therapeutic or preventive option for malignant PCC.
Collapse
|
3788
|
Comparison of RECIST, mRECIST, and choi criteria for early response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2014; 38:391-7. [PMID: 24681857 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine appropriate imaging criteria for early response evaluation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using drug-eluting beads. METHODS Seventy-six patients who underwent TACE with drug-eluting beads as a first-line treatment were included. Responses at 1 month after treatment were evaluated by comparing contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging performed before TACE. Evaluations were performed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and Choi criteria. Correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS Modified RECIST yielded a significant difference in PFS across the different response categories (P < 0.01); the Choi criteria exhibited a satisfactory difference in PFS, although the number of nonresponder patients was small (n = 5 [8.6%]). CONCLUSION Application of mRECIST criteria at the 1-month follow-up computed tomography may be a reliable early predictor of outcome response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE using drug-eluting beads.
Collapse
|
3789
|
Hsu CH, Shen YC, Shao YY, Hsu C, Cheng AL. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2014; 1:85-99. [PMID: 27508178 PMCID: PMC4918267 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s45040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The approval of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor targeting primarily Raf kinase and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, in 2007 for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has generated considerable enthusiasm in drug development for this difficult-to-treat disease. However, because several randomized Phase III studies testing new multikinase inhibitors failed, sorafenib remains the standard of first-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced HCC. Field practice studies worldwide have suggested that in daily practice, physicians are adopting either a preemptive dose modification or a ramp-up strategy to improve the compliance of their patients. In addition, accumulating data have suggested that patients with Child-Pugh class B liver function can tolerate sorafenib as well as patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function, although the actual benefit of sorafenib in patients with Child-Pugh class B liver function has yet to be confirmed. Whether sorafenib can be used as an adjunctive therapy to improve the outcomes of intermediate-stage HCC patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization or early-stage HCC patients after curative therapies is being investigated in several ongoing randomized Phase III studies. An increasing number of studies have reported that sorafenib exerts "off-target" effects, including the modulation of signaling pathways other than Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, nonapoptotic cell death mechanisms, and even immune modulation. Finally, although sorafenib in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted therapies has the potential to improve therapeutic efficacy in treating HCC, it also increases toxicity. Additional clinical studies are warranted to determine useful sorafenib-based combinations for the treatment of advanced HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Hung Hsu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Chun Shen
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Yun Shao
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chiun Hsu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ann-Lii Cheng
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3790
|
de Mestier L, Dromain C, d'Assignies G, Scoazec JY, Lassau N, Lebtahi R, Brixi H, Mitry E, Guimbaud R, Courbon F, d'Herbomez M, Cadiot G. Evaluating digestive neuroendocrine tumor progression and therapeutic responses in the era of targeted therapies: state of the art. Endocr Relat Cancer 2014; 21:R105-20. [PMID: 24351682 DOI: 10.1530/erc-13-0365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of heterogeneous rare tumors. They are often slow-growing and patients can have very long survival, even at the metastatic stage. The evaluation of tumor progression and therapeutic responses is currently based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1.1 (RECIST) criteria. As for other malignancies, RECIST criteria are being reexamined for NETs in the era of targeted therapies because tumor response to targeted therapies is rarely associated with shrinkage, as opposed to prolonged progression-free survival. Therefore, size-based criteria no longer seem to be suitable to the assessment of NET progression and therapeutic responses, especially considering targeted therapies. New imaging criteria, combining morphological and functional techniques, have proven relevant for other malignancies treated with targeted therapies. To date, such studies have rarely been conducted on NETs. Moreover, optimizing the management of NET patients also requires considering clinical, biological, and pathological aspects of tumor evolution. Our objectives herein were to comprehensively review current knowledge on the assessment of tumor progression and early prediction of therapeutic responses and to broaden the outlook on well-differentiated NETs, in the era of targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis de Mestier
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Avenue du Général Koenig, 51092 Reims Cedex, France Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France Department of Radiology, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France Department of Pathology, Edouard-Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France Integrated Research Cancer Institute in Villejuif, UMR 8081, Paris-Sud University, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France Department of Medical Oncology, René-Huguenin Hospital, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France Department of Digestive Oncology, Institut Claudius-Regaud and Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Claudius-Regaud, Toulouse, France Department of Biology and Pathology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3791
|
|
3792
|
Méndez-Sánchez N, Ridruejo E, Alves de Mattos A, Chávez-Tapia NC, Zapata R, Paraná R, Mastai R, Strauss E, Guevara-Casallas LG, Daruich J, Gadano A, Parise ER, Uribe M, Aguilar-Olivos NE, Dagher L, Ferraz-Neto BH, Valdés-Sánchez M, Sánchez-Avila JF. Latin American Association for the Study of the Liver (LAASL) clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Hepatol 2014; 13 Suppl 1:S4-S40. [PMID: 24998696 DOI: 10.1016/s1665-2681(19)30919-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in the world and the third most common cause of cancer death, and accounts for 5.6% of all cancers. Nearly 82% of the approximately 550,000 liver cancer deaths each year occur in Asia. In some regions, cancer-related death from HCC is second only to lung cancer. The incidence and mortality of HCC are increasing in America countries as a result of an ageing cohort infected with chronic hepatitis C, and are expected to continue to rise as a consequence of the obesity epidemic. Clinical care and survival for patients with HCC has advanced considerably during the last two decades, thanks to improvements in patient stratification, an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, and because of developments in diagnostic procedures and the introduction of novel therapies and strategies in prevention. Nevertheless, HCC remains the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. These LAASL recommendations on treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma are intended to assist physicians and other healthcare providers, as well as patients and other interested individuals, in the clinical decision-making process by describing the optimal management of patients with liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ezequiel Ridruejo
- Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine. Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno "CEMIC". Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina; Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit. Hospital Universitario Austral, Pilar, Argentina
| | | | | | - Rodrigo Zapata
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit. University of Chile School of Medicine, German Clinic. Santiago, Chile
| | - Raymundo Paraná
- Associate Professor of School of Medicine - Federal University of Bahia Head of the Gastro-Hepatologist Unit of the University Bahia University Hospital
| | - Ricardo Mastai
- Transplantation Unit. German Hospital.Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Edna Strauss
- Clinical hepatologist of Hospital do Coraçao - São Paulo - Brazil. Professor of the Post Graduate Course in the Department of Pathology at the School of Medicine, University of São Paulo
| | | | - Jorge Daruich
- Hepatology Department, Clinical Hospital San Martín. University of Buenos Aires Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Adrian Gadano
- Section of Hepatology, Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Edison Roberto Parise
- Professor Associado da Disciplina de Gastroenterologia da Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Presidente Eleito da Sociedade Brasileira de Hepatologia
| | - Misael Uribe
- Digestive Diseases and Obesity Clinic, Medica Sur Clinic Foundation. México City, Mexico
| | - Nancy E Aguilar-Olivos
- Digestive Diseases and Obesity Clinic, Medica Sur Clinic Foundation. México City, Mexico
| | - Lucy Dagher
- Consultant Hepatologist. Metropolitan Policlinic- Caracas- Venezuela
| | - Ben-Hur Ferraz-Neto
- Director of Liver Institute - Beneficencia Portuguesa de São Paulo. Chief of Liver Transplantation Team
| | - Martha Valdés-Sánchez
- Department of Pediatric Oncology National Medical Center "Siglo XXI". Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Juan F Sánchez-Avila
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Department National Institute of Nutrition and Medical Sciences "Salvador Zubirán" Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
3793
|
Lencioni R, Kudo M, Ye SL, Bronowicki JP, Chen XP, Dagher L, Furuse J, Geschwind JF, de Guevara LL, Papandreou C, Takayama T, Yoon SK, Nakajima K, Lehr R, Heldner S, Sanyal AJ. GIDEON (Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma and Of its treatment with sorafeNib): second interim analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2014; 68:609-17. [PMID: 24283303 PMCID: PMC4265239 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND GIDEON (Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] and Of its treatment with sorafeNib) is a global, prospective, non-interventional study undertaken to evaluate the safety of sorafenib in patients with unresectable HCC in real-life practice, including Child-Pugh B patients who were excluded from clinical trials. METHODS Patients with unresectable HCC, for whom the decision to treat with sorafenib, based on the approved label and prescribing guidelines, had been taken by their physician, were eligible for inclusion. Demographic data and disease/medical history were recorded at entry. Sorafenib dosing and adverse events (AEs) were collected at follow-up visits. The second interim analysis was undertaken when ~1500 treated patients were followed up for ≥ 4 months. RESULTS Of the 1571 patients evaluable for safety, 61% had Child-Pugh A status and 23% Child-Pugh B. The majority of patients (74%) received the approved 800 mg initial sorafenib dose, regardless of Child-Pugh status; however, median duration of therapy was shorter in Child-Pugh B patients. The majority of drug-related AEs were grade 1 or 2, and the most commonly reported were consistent with previous reports. The incidence and nature of drug-related AEs were broadly similar across Child-Pugh, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) and initial dosing subgroups, and consistent with the overall population. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with the first interim analysis, overall safety profile and dosing strategy are similar across Child-Pugh subgroups. Safety findings also appear comparable irrespective of initial sorafenib dose or BCLC stage. Final analyses in > 3000 patients are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Lencioni
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Pisa University Hospital and School of Medicine, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3794
|
Zhai X, Zhu H, Wang W, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Mao G. Abnormal expression of EMT-related proteins, S100A4, vimentin and E-cadherin, is correlated with clinicopathological features and prognosis in HCC. Med Oncol 2014; 31:970. [PMID: 24781336 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0970-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We determined the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) indicator proteins, E-cadherin (E-cad), vimentin (VIM), mucin 1 (MUC1) and S100 calcium-binding protein A4 (S100A4) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patient tissue samples. We also investigated the relationship between the expression of these proteins and clinicopathologic factors in HCC. Finally, we assessed the potential value of these markers as prognostic indicators of survival in HCC patients. The expression of E-cad, VIM, MUC1 and S100A4 EMT indicator proteins was assessed in tissue microarray HCC tissue sections and corresponding peritumoral normal tissues by immunohistochemistry. In addition, the expression for the four EMT indicator proteins was correlated with clinicopathological features of HCC and patient outcome. Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and immunohistochemistry by χ(2) analysis revealed that downregulation of E-cad in HCC was significantly associated with later TNM cancer stage (P = 0.012), gross classification (P = 0.018), regional lymph node metastasis (P = 0.036) and liver cirrhosis (P = 0.028). Increased S100A4 expression in HCC was significantly associated with differentiation (P = 0.032), tumor with a complete fibrous capsule (P = 0.031) and portal vein invasion (P = 0.038). High VIM expression in HCC was significantly associated with high serum α-fetoprotein levels (P = 0.016). We also observed that low E-cad expression was significantly associated with overexpression of VIM (P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis revealed that low E-cad expression (HR = 0.164, 95 % CI 0.072 to 0.373, P < 0.001) and high serum α-fetoprotein levels (HR = 2.202, 95 % CI 1.054 to 4.598, P = 0.036) were independent prognostic factors in HCC. Our study demonstrates that high S100A4 and VIM expression and low E-cad expression correlate with an aggressive, malignant phenotype in HCC. These results also support a role for E-cad as a prognostic factor in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolu Zhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3795
|
Bargellini I, Scionti A, Mismas V, Masi G, Vivaldi C, Bartolozzi C, Sacco R. Identification of responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: is tumor volume measurement the way forward? Oncology 2014; 86:191-8. [PMID: 24800837 DOI: 10.1159/000358599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2013] [Accepted: 12/20/2013] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Early assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) response during sorafenib (SO) treatment is challenging, since tumor necrosis, extension and radiological appearance can be inhomogeneous. We evaluated the predictive value of different imaging criteria - such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), modified RECIST (mRECIST), tumor density and volume variations - in the early follow-up of SO treatment. METHODS The study included 22 patients. CT images from baseline and 2 months were reviewed to assess response according to RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, EASL, Choi's criteria (decreased tumor density by ≥15%) and arterial-enhancing tumor volume ratio; α-fetoprotein (AFP) variations were expressed as AFP ratio. RESULTS The response criteria and volume measurements were reproducible (k > 0.80). The overall disease control rate was 40.9% by EASL and mRECIST, and 27.3% by RECIST 1.1; a ≥15% decrease in tumor density was observed in 9 patients (40.9%). The mean volume ratio was 1.73 ± 2.12, the mean AFP ratio 14 ± 37. The 1-year survival rate was 65.9%. Volume ratio was the only predictive factor for survival, with 1-year cumulative survival rates of 90% for volume ratios ≤1.1 and of 45.4% for volume ratios >1.1 (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Tumor volume measurements are reproducible and might provide an early predictive marker of response in HCC patients treated with SO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Bargellini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3796
|
Huang B, Li H, Huang L, Luo C, Zhang Y. Clinical significance of microRNA 138 and cyclin D3 in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Res 2014; 193:718-23. [PMID: 25439221 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2014] [Revised: 03/15/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND MicroRNA 138 (miR-138) is recently shown to inhibit tumor growth and block cell cycle arrest of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by targeting cyclin D3 (CCND3). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of miR-138 and CCND3 in human HCC, which remains unclear. METHODS Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis was performed to detect the expression levels of miR-138 and CCND3 messenger RNA (mRNA) in 180 self-pairs of HCC and noncancerous liver tissues. RESULTS Compared with noncancerous liver tissues, the expression levels of miR-138 in HCC tissues were significantly downregulated (P < 0.001), whereas the expression levels of CCND3 mRNA in HCC tissues were significantly upregulated (P < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between miR-138 and CCND3 mRNA expression in HCC tissues (r = -0.56, P = 0.02). Additionally, statistical analysis showed that the combined miR 138 downregulation and CCND3 upregulation (miR-138-low-CCND3-high) was significantly associated with the advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage (P = 0.008) and the presence of portal vein invasion (P = 0.008) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.01). More importantly, a significant trend was identified between the combined expression of miR-138-low-CCND3-high in HCC and worsening clinical prognosis. Multivariate survival analysis further recognized miR-138-low-CCND3-high expression as an independent prognostic factor for patients with HCC. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that the combined expression of miR-138 and its direct target CCND3 may be correlated with significant characteristics of HCC. MiR-138 downregulation and CCND3 upregulation maybe concurrently associated with prognosis in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Huang
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huiwen Li
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Liyu Huang
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chaoyuan Luo
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- China Southern Aviation Hygiene Management Division, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3797
|
Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and survival outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma patients aged 70 years or older: a single-center retrospective study from China. Aging Clin Exp Res 2014; 26:123-30. [PMID: 24129805 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-013-0142-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2013] [Accepted: 09/04/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The information about clinical presentation and outcome of elderly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is limited. We performed this study to assess the impact of age on potential differences in clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and outcome in HCC patients. METHODS Clinical data of 164 "elderly" (≥70 years old) and 531 "younger" (<70 years old) HCC patients treated at a Chinese tertiary university-affiliated medical center between April 2004 and April 2012 were collected and compared using various parameters. RESULTS Compared with younger patients, the elderly patients had a higher proportion of females (32.9 % vs. 18.1 %, p < 0.001), less hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (40.9 % vs. 76.6 %, p < 0.001), more hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (23.8 % vs. 5.6 %, p < 0.001), less liver cirrhosis (68.3 % vs. 76.8 %, p = 0.03) and massive tumors (12.8 % vs. 21.8 %, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in Child-Pugh class and tumor stages. The elderly patients received less surgical resection (14.6 % vs. 29.6 %, p < 0.001) and more supportive care (48.8 % vs. 37.9 %, p = 0.01) than younger patients. The overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups (26.2 mo. vs. 28.3 mo., p = 0.75). CONCLUSION Characteristics that distinguish elderly from younger HCC patients included more female, less HBV infection, more HCV infection, less liver cirrhosis and massive tumors. Significant differences were observed in therapeutic strategies utilized with the two groups, but the overall survival was not significantly different.
Collapse
|
3798
|
Abstract
The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib, which inhibits targets related to tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis, was the first systemic agent to demonstrate a significant improvement in the overall survival for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in two large randomized controlled Phase III trials. Together with its manageable safety profile (mainly diarrhea, hand-foot skin reaction and fatigue), sorafenib was approved for the treatment of patients with (unresectable) HCC in 2007. Since then, sorafenib has been established as the standard of care in Child-Pugh A patients with advanced HCC or in those ineligible for or after failure of locoregional therapies in the intermediate stage of the disease. This article summarizes current knowledge and future perspectives regarding the use of sorafenib in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Alexander Wörns
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Robert Galle
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3799
|
Ronot M, Bouattour M, Wassermann J, Bruno O, Dreyer C, Larroque B, Castera L, Vilgrain V, Belghiti J, Raymond E, Faivre S. Alternative Response Criteria (Choi, European association for the study of the liver, and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) Versus RECIST 1.1 in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Oncologist 2014; 19:394-402. [PMID: 24652387 PMCID: PMC3983809 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2013] [Accepted: 12/23/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), may underestimate activity and does not predict survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib. This study assessed the value of alternative radiological criteria to evaluate response in HCC patients treated with sorafenib. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective blinded central analysis was performed of computed tomography (CT) scans from baseline and the first tumor evaluation in consecutive patients treated with sorafenib over a 2-year period in a single institution. Four different evaluation criteria were used: Choi, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and RECIST 1.1. RESULTS Among 82 HCC patients, 64 with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B-C were evaluable with a median follow-up of 22 months. Median duration of sorafenib treatment was 5.7 months, and median overall survival was 12.8 months. At the time of the first CT scan, performed after a median of 2.1 months, Choi, EASL, mRECIST, and RECIST 1.1 identified 51%, 28%, 28%, and 3% objective responses, respectively. Responders by all criteria showed consistent overall survival >20 months. Among patients with stable disease according to RECIST 1.1, those identified as responders by Choi had significantly better overall survival than Choi nonresponders (22.4 vs. 10.6 months; hazard ratio: 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.86, p = .0097). CONCLUSION Choi, EASL, and mRECIST criteria appear more appropriate than RECIST 1.1 to identify responders with long survival among advanced HCC patients benefiting from sorafenib.
Collapse
|
3800
|
Barbieri F, Albertelli M, Grillo F, Mohamed A, Saveanu A, Barlier A, Ferone D, Florio T. Neuroendocrine tumors: insights into innovative therapeutic options and rational development of targeted therapies. Drug Discov Today 2014; 19:458-68. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2013] [Revised: 09/02/2013] [Accepted: 10/21/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|