A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in kidney transplants from extended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT study)

Calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation: friend or foe?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The utilization of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in kidney transplantation has dramatically improved short-term outcomes but significant gains in long-term outcomes have proved elusive. Nephrotoxicity is the major problem associated with CNIs and is responsible for the disappointing progress seen in long-term graft survival. In this review, we assess CNI efficacy as well as the latest strategies employed to limit long-term CNI nephrotoxicity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three CNI sparing strategies - CNI withdrawal, CNI avoidance, and CNI minimization - are evaluated with discussion of key studies such as the Efficacy Limiting Toxicity Elimination-Symphony and Spare-the-Nephron studies. Recent breakthroughs in transplant immunosuppression are discussed such as the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies, which have led to the recent US Food and Drug Administratrion approval of belatacept, a novel T-cell costimulation blocker.

SUMMARY

For now, CNIs remain the proven standard of care in modern immunosuppression. However, some novel agents may challenge the role CNIs play in kidney transplantation in the very near future.

[Current topics in cardiology. Heart failure and heart transplantation]

The mission of the Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation Section of the Spanish Society of Cardiology is to study, promote interest in, and disseminate information about all aspects of myocardial dysfunction and heart transplantation. Heart failure is a highly prevalent disorder that consumes a substantial proportion of healthcare resources. Consequently, there is a very high level of interest in the condition and a wide range of preclinical and clinical research is being carried out, including research into new ways of looking at the disease that will increase our understanding. The aim of this article was to describe current developments concerning this disease and its treatment. Firstly, the latest publications on heart failure are summarized. Then, the most recent studies on advanced heart failure and ventricular assist devices are reviewed. Finally, the latest findings on heart transplantation are reported.

Belatacept: a new biologic and its role in kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and role of belatacept in maintenance immunosuppression in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Knowledge (1990-November 2011), and Google were searched using the terms belatacept, kidney or renal, and transplant.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant articles (English language and human subjects) were reviewed. Selected studies included 3 Phase 2 and 2 Phase 3 trials. Data were compared with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) briefing documents and belatacept full prescribing information.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Belatacept, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4-immunoglobulin, is the first marketed intravenous maintenance immunosuppressant. It is approved for use in combination with basiliximab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids to prevent rejection in adult KTR. Belatacept exhibits linear pharmacokinetics and first-order elimination. The less intensive regimen used in Phase 3 trials is approved by the FDA. In low-moderate immunologic risk KTR, short-term patient and allograft survival appear comparable with that seen with cyclosporine, with improved renal function despite more frequent and severe early acute rejection. Preliminary data from Phase 2 corticosteroid-avoidance and conversion trials suggest that better renal function, acceptable rejection rates, and comparable patient and allograft survival may be achieved with belatacept compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Common adverse effects of belatacept include anemia, neutropenia, urinary tract infection, headache, and peripheral edema. While a more favorable cardiovascular and metabolic profile and lack of requirement for therapeutic drug monitoring are attractive, a higher frequency of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is concerning. Belatacept drug costs are significantly higher than those of standard CNI- or sirolimus-based regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Belatacept provides a new option for maintenance immunosuppression in adult KTR. Further research is needed to compare its efficacy and safety with standard tacrolimus-based regimens, to evaluate whether increased drug costs are offset by long-term improvements in patient and allograft survival, and to establish its role in the immunosuppression armamentarium.

Relative efficiency of porcine and human cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin in inhibiting human CD4+ T-cell responses co-stimulated by porcine and human B7 molecules

α1,3-Galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pigs transgenic for porcine cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin (pCTLA4-Ig) have been produced to reduce T-cell-mediated rejection following xenotransplantation. The level of soluble pCTLA4-Ig in their blood was greatly in excess of the therapeutic level in patients, rendering the pigs immune-incompetent. Soluble pCTLA4-Ig produced by these transgenic pigs was evaluated for binding to porcine and human (h) B7 molecules, and for its inhibitory effect on allogeneic and xenogeneic human T-cell responses. Porcine CTLA4-Ig-expressing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and aortic endothelial cells (AECs) were evaluated for their direct inhibitory effect on hCD4+ T-cell responses. Soluble pCTLA4-Ig and purified hCTLA4-Ig showed similar binding to pB7 molecules, but pCTLA4-Ig showed significantly less binding to hB7 molecules. The pCTLA4-Ig and hCTLA4-Ig inhibited the response of hCD4+ T cells to pAECs equally, but pCTLA4-Ig was less successful in inhibiting the human allogeneic response. The hCD4+ T-cell response to PBMCs from pCTLA4-Ig pigs was significantly lower than that of non-pCTLA4-Ig pigs. Although pCTLA4-Ig was detected in the cytoplasm of pCTLA4-Ig-expressing pAECs, only a minimal level of soluble pCTLA4-Ig was detected in the supernatant during culture, and pCTLA4-Ig-expressing pAECs did not inhibit the xenogeneic direct human T-cell response. High-level tissue-specific production of pCTLA4-Ig may be required for sufficient immunosuppression for organ or cell (e.g., islets) transplantation.

Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT, a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study in adult kidney transplant recipients

The clinical profile of belatacept in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated to determine if earlier results in the BENEFIT study were sustained at 3 years. BENEFIT is a randomized 3 year, phase III study in adults receiving a kidney transplant from a living or standard criteria deceased donor. Patients were randomized to a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept, or cyclosporine. 471/666 patients completed ≥3 years of therapy. A total of 92% (MI), 92% (LI), and 89% (cyclosporine) of patients survived with a functioning graft. The mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was ∼21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) higher in the belatacept groups versus cyclosporine at year 3. From month 3 to month 36, the mean cGFR increased in the belatacept groups by +1.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (MI) and +1.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (LI) versus a decline of -2.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (cyclosporine). One cyclosporine-treated patient experienced acute rejection between year 2 and year 3. There were no new safety signals and no new posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases after month 18. Belatacept-treated patients maintained a high rate of patient and graft survival that was comparable to cyclosporine-treated patients, despite an early increased occurrence of acute rejection and PTLD.

Integrin antagonists prevent costimulatory blockade-resistant transplant rejection by CD8(+) memory T cells

The success of belatacept in late-stage clinical trials inaugurates the arrival of a new class of immunosuppressants based on costimulatory blockade, an immunosuppression strategy that disrupts essential signals required for alloreactive T-cell activation. Despite having improved renal function, kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept experienced increased rates of acute rejection. This finding has renewed focus on costimulatory blockade-resistant rejection and specifically the role of alloreactive memory T cells in mediating this resistance. To study the mechanisms of costimulatory blockade-resistant rejection and enhance the clinical efficacy of costimulatory blockade, we developed an experimental transplant system that models a donor-specific memory CD8(+) T-cell response. After confirming that graft-specific memory T cells mediate costimulatory blockade-resistant rejection, we characterized the role of integrins in this rejection. The resistance of memory T cells to costimulatory blockade was abrogated when costimulatory blockade was coupled with either anti-VLA-4 or anti-LFA-1. Mechanistic studies revealed that in the presence of costimulatory blockade, anti-VLA-4 impaired T-cell trafficking to the graft but not memory T-cell recall effector function, whereas anti-LFA-1 attenuated both trafficking and memory recall effector function. As antagonists against these integrins are clinically approved, these findings may have significant translational potential for future clinical transplant trials.

Belatacept: from rational design to clinical application

Gradually improved immunosuppression has contributed significantly to the progress achieved in transplantation medicine so far. Nevertheless, current drug regimens are associated with late graft loss--in particular as a result of immunologic damage or drug toxicity--and substantial morbidity. Recently, the costimulation blocker belatacept (marketed under the name Nulojix®) has been approved for immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Belatacept (a mutated version of CTLA4Ig) is a fusion protein rationally designed to block CD28, a critical activating receptor on T cells, by binding and saturating its ligands B7-1 and B7-2. In phase II and III trials, belatacept was compared with cyclosporine (in combination with basiliximab, MMF, and steroids). Advantages observed with belatacept include superior graft function, preservation of renal structure and improved cardiovascular risk profile. Concerns associated with belatacept are a higher frequency of cellular rejection episodes and more post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases especially in EBV seronegative patients, who should be excluded from belatacept-based regimens. Thus, after almost three decades of calcineurin inhibitors as mainstay of immunosuppression, belatacept offers a potential alternative. In this article, we will provide an overview of belatacept's preclinical development and will discuss the available evidence from clinical trials.

The PROMISE study: a phase 2b multicenter study of voclosporin (ISA247) versus tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation

Voclosporin (VCS, ISA247) is a novel calcineurin inhibitor being developed for organ transplantation. PROMISE was a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, open-label study of three ascending concentration-controlled groups of VCS (low, medium and high) compared to tacrolimus (TAC) in 334 low-risk renal transplant recipients. The primary endpoint was demonstration of noninferiority of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) rates. Secondary objectives included renal function, new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), hypertension, hyperlipidemia and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation. The incidence of BPAR in the VCS groups (10.7%, 9.1% and 2.3%, respectively) was noninferior to TAC (5.8%). The incidence of NODAT for VCS was 1.6%, 5.7% and 17.7% versus 16.4% in TAC (low-dose VCS, p = 0.03). Nankivell estimated glomerular filtration rate was respectively: 71, 72, 68 and 69 mL/min, statistically lower in the high-dose group, p = 0.049. The incidence of hypertension and adverse events was not different between the VCS groups and TAC. VCS demonstrated an excellent correlation between trough and area under the curve (r(2) = 0.97) and no difference in mycophenolic acid exposure compared to TAC. This 6-month study shows VCS to be as efficacious as TAC in preventing acute rejection with similar renal function in the low- and medium-exposure groups, and potentially associated with a reduced incidence of NODAT.

Recent advances in immunosuppressive therapy for prevention of renal allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current immunosuppressive therapies are highly successful at regulating acute allograft rejection and inducing long-term transplanted kidney survival; however, currently available medications are associated with generalized immune suppression and drug toxicities, including nephrotoxicity. In recent years, advances in immunosuppression that target specific pathways involved in immune activation have been developed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In particular, promising medications are currently under evaluation that target ischemia-reperfusion injury as well as the cellular and humoral branches of the adaptive immune response. Targets of T-cell-mediated activation include antibodies and fusion proteins interfering with LFA-1/ICAM-1, CD2/LFA-3, CD40/CD154, and CD28/B7.1 and B7.2 interactions. Intracellular targets involved in T- and B-cell activation pathways are being evaluated, including protein kinase C inhibitors, Janus-associated kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and proteasome inhibitors. Several new medications demonstrate promise in inhibiting donor-directed humoral immunity by targeting B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) and complement activation pathways.

SUMMARY

The present review evaluates the recent clinical advances in immunosuppressive therapies for kidney transplantation. Publications regarding advances in immunosuppressive therapies over the past year were evaluated in the context of the specific immune pathways involved in allograft rejection.

Belatacept-versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients with pre-existing diabetes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Renal transplant recipients with pre-existing diabetes (PD) have reduced graft survival and increased risk of mortality and ischemic heart disease compared with nondiabetic transplant recipients. To assess the effect of belatacept in this high-risk group, we evaluated outcomes of the subpopulation with PD from previously published BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A post hoc analysis evaluated pooled data from BENEFIT (living donors or standard criteria donors) and BENEFIT-EXT (extended criteria donors). Patients were randomized to receive cyclosporine or a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept regimen.

RESULTS

Of 1209 intent-to-treat patients, 336 had PD. At 12 months, the belatacept LI arm demonstrated a numerically higher rate of patients surviving with a functioning graft (90.4% MI [103 of 114], 92.8% LI [90 of 97], and 80.8% cyclosporine [101 of 125]), and fewer serious adverse events than cyclosporine or MI patients. Three cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder were reported in LI patients, one involving the central nervous system. Higher rates (% [95% confidence interval]: 22.8% MI [15.1 to 30.5]; 20.6% LI [12.6 to 28.7]; 14.4% cyclosporine (8.2 to 20.6]) and grades of acute rejection were observed with belatacept. Measured GFR (ml/min per 1.73 m(2), 59.8 MI; 62.5 LI; 45.4 cyclosporine), and cardiovascular risk profile were better for belatacept versus cyclosporine.

CONCLUSIONS

In post hoc analysis of patients with PD, patient/graft survival and renal function at 12 months were numerically higher with belatacept versus cyclosporine, but not statistically significant. Further study is necessary to confirm the benefits belatacept may provide in these patients.

Immunosuppression: does one regimen fit all?

There has been considerable interest in the individualization of immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to avoid side effects and improve long-term outcomes. Most available studies have addressed steroid and calcineurin inhibitor minimization in an attempt to prevent the development of chronic allograft dysfunction and cardiovascular mortality. Herein, we evaluate the available evidence for incorporation of these novel strategies in standard clinical care of kidney transplant recipients. Protocol biopsies, pharmacogenetics, and other assays have been developed to guide tailoring of immunosuppression; however, although promising results have been obtained, trials showing their ability to improve long-term outcome are lacking and urgently needed.

Meta-analysis of calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens in kidney transplantation

Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies in kidney transplantation may spare patients the adverse effects of these drugs, but the efficacy of these strategies is unknown. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis to assess outcomes associated with reducing calcineurin inhibitor exposure from the time of transplantation. We search Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2010 that compared de novo calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens to calcineurin-inhibitor-based regimens. In this analysis, we include 56 studies comprising data from 11337 renal transplant recipients. Use of the contemporary agents belatacept or tofacitinib, in combination with mycophenolate, decreased the odds of overall graft failure (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.96; P = 0.03). Similarly, minimization of calcineurin inhibitors in combination with various induction and adjunctive agents reduces the odds of graft failure (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58-0.92; P = 0.009). Conversely, the use of inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), in combination with mycophenolate, increases the odds of graft failure (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.90; P = 0.01). Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies are associated with less delayed graft function (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80-0.98; P = 0.02), improved graft function, and less new-onset diabetes. The more contemporary protocols did not seem to increase rates of acute rejection. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that reducing exposure to calcineurin inhibitors immediately after kidney transplantation may improve clinical outcomes.

Single-center experience with kidney transplantation using deceased donors older than 75 years

BACKGROUND

Use of kidneys from donors aged 75 years and older is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of kidney transplantation (KT) involving these expanded criteria donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2001 to November 2009, 52 patients were transplanted with grafts from deceased donors aged 75 years and older. Donor and recipient data and intra- and postoperative variables were analyzed by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Graft and patient survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Forty-one single and 11 double KTs were performed. Median recipient age was 66 years. After a median follow-up of 30 months, 37 of 52 patients are alive, 30 with functioning grafts (81%). Graft and patient survival rates at 3 and 5 years are 63% and 53%, and 78% and 64%, respectively. Double KT was significant predictor for graft survival by multivariate analysis. Five-year graft survival for single and double KT was 41% and 90%, respectively (P=0.0394). Comorbidity Index, hospital stay, acute rejection reaction, re-KT, and induction immunosuppressive therapy with interleukin-2 were significant predictors for patient survival by univariate analysis. Hospital stay and induction immunosuppression therapy reached multivariate significance. Double KT, cold ischemia time, and Comorbidity Index were found potential predictors of delayed graft function in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

Fairly good long-term outcome of KT from donors aged 75 years and older can be achieved in elderly recipients with low comorbidities when dual kidney grafting is used and when re-transplantations and high grade surgical complications are avoided.

Challenges and opportunities in targeting the costimulation pathway in solid organ transplantation

Signaling through the costimulatory pathway is critical in the regulation of T cell activation. Abatacept, a selective costimulatory antagonist FDA approved for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, binds to CD80 and CD86 on antigen presenting cells, blocking the interaction with CD28 on T cells. Belatacept, a second generation CTLA4-Ig with 2 amino acid substitutions, has shown considerable promise in clinical transplantation as part of a maintenance immunosuppression regimen. This review will summarize the role of costimulation in T cell activation, detail the development of costimulation antagonists and highlight the pertinent clinical trials completed and ongoing utilizing belatacept as part of an immunosuppressive regimen in organ transplantation.

Conventional and novel approaches to immunosuppression

Immunosuppressive therapy has contributed significantly to improved survival after solid organ transplantation. Nevertheless, treatment-related adverse events and persistently high risk of chronic graft rejection remain major obstacles to long-term survival after lung transplantation. The development of new agents, refinements in techniques to monitor immunosuppression, and enhanced understanding of transplant immunobiology are essential for further improvements in outcome. In this article, conventional immunosuppressive regimens, novel approaches to preventing graft rejection, and investigational agents for solid organ transplantation are reviewed.

Targets of new immunosuppressants in renal transplantation

Although current immunosuppression is highly effective in avoiding acute rejection, it is associated with nephrotoxicity, cardiovascular morbidity, infection, and cancer. Thus, new drugs dealing with new mechanisms, as well as minimizing comorbidities, are warranted in renal transplantation. Few novel drugs are currently under investigation in Phase I, II, or III clinical trials. Belatacept is a humanized antibody that inhibits T-cell co-stimulation and has shown encouraging results in Phase II and III trials. Moreover, two new small molecules are under clinical development: AEB071 or sotrastaurin (a protein kinase C inhibitor) and CP-690550 or tasocitinib (a Janus kinase inhibitor). Refinement in selecting the best combinations for the new and current immunosuppressive agents is probably the main challenge for the next few years.

Costimulatory pathways in transplantation

Secondary, so-called costimulatory, signals are critically required for the process of T cell activation. Since landmark studies defined that T cells receiving a T cell receptor signal without a costimulatory signal, are tolerized in vitro, the investigation of T cell costimulation has attracted intense interest. Early studies demonstrated that interrupting T cell costimulation allows attenuation of the alloresponse, which is particularly difficult to modulate due to the clone size of alloreactive T cells. The understanding of costimulation has since evolved substantially and now encompasses not only positive signals involved in T cell activation but also negative signals inhibiting T cell activation and promoting T cell tolerance. Costimulation blockade has been used effectively for the induction of tolerance in rodent models of transplantation, but turned out to be less potent in large animals and humans. In this overview we will discuss the evolution of the concept of T cell costimulation, the potential of 'classical' and newly identified costimulation pathways as therapeutic targets for organ transplantation as well as progress towards clinical application of the first costimulation blocking compound.

Efficacy and safety of early cyclosporine conversion to sirolimus with continued MMF-four-year results of the Postconcept study

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal has been used as a strategy to improve renal allograft function. We previously reported that conversion from cyclosporine A (CsA) to sirolimus (SRL) 3 months after transplantation significantly improved renal function at 1 year. In the Postconcept trial, 77 patients in the SRL group and 85 in the CsA group were followed for 48 months. Renal function (Cockcroft and Gault) was significantly better at month 48 (M48) in the SRL group both in the intent-to-treat population (ITT): 62.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) versus 57.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.013) and in the on-treatment population (OT): 67.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) versus 57.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.002). Two biopsy proven acute rejection episodes occurred after M12 in each group. Graft and patient survival were comparable (graft survival: 97.4 vs. 100%; patient survival: 97.4 vs. 97.6%, respectively). The incidence of new-onset diabetes was numerically increased in the SRL group (7 vs. 2). In OT, three cancers occurred in the SRL group versus nine in the CsA group and mean proteinuria was increased in the SRL group (0.42 ± 0.44 vs. 0.26 ± 0.37; p = 0.018). In summary, the renal benefits associated with conversion of CsA to SRL, at 3 months posttransplantation, in combination with MMF were maintained for 4 years posttransplantation.

Surveillance protocol kidney transplant biopsies: their evolving role in clinical practice

Protocol renal allograft biopsies at fixed time points from transplantation have aided research and provided insights into the pathogenesis of early and late allograft injury. Their role is evolving from research to a clinical management tool needed to detect subclinical pathology requiring treatment adjustment. They frequently reveal unexpected findings and influence therapy in the majority of patients. Detection of subclinical rejection (SCR) remains important despite declining prevalence with triple therapy, the evidence favors treatment, if found. Surveillance biopsies in steroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal programs provide an important safety net against the increased rates of late acute and SCR. Individualization of therapy in high-risk patients and safe reduction of immunosuppression in standard risk individuals becomes possible. Other potentially reversible chronic pathologies that may be detected, include chronic T-cell or antibody-mediated rejection, recurrent disease, BK virus-associated nephropathy, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and CNI nephrotoxicity, allowing modifications of therapy to limit ongoing graft injury. Biopsy is safe and inexpensive compared with costs of earlier graft failure and return to dialysis. This review summarizes current evidence on use of surveillance histology for the clinical practice of renal transplantation.

Belatacept-based regimens are associated with improved cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors compared with cyclosporine in kidney transplant recipients (BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies)

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease, the most common cause of death with a functioning graft among kidney transplant recipients, can be exacerbated by immunosuppressive drugs, particularly the calcineurin inhibitors. Belatacept, a selective co-stimulation blocker, may provide a better cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile than current immunosuppressants.

METHODS

Cardiovascular and metabolic endpoints from two Phase III studies (BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT) of belatacept-based regimens in kidney transplant recipients were assessed at month 12. Each study assessed belatacept in more intensive (MI) and less intensive (LI) regimens versus cyclosporine A (CsA). These secondary endpoints included changes in blood pressure, changes in serum lipids, and the incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT).

RESULTS

A total of 1209 patients were randomized and transplanted across the two studies. Mean systolic blood pressure was 6 to 9 mm Hg lower and mean diastolic blood pressure was 3 to 4 mm Hg lower in the MI and LI groups versus CsA (P ≤ 0.002) across both studies at month 12. Non-HDL cholesterol was lower in the belatacept groups versus CsA (P<0.01 MI or LI vs. CsA in each study). Serum triglycerides were lower in the belatacept groups versus CsA (P<0.02 MI or LI vs. CsA in each study). NODAT occurred less often in the belatacept groups versus CsA in a prespecified pooled analysis (P<0.05 MI or LI vs. CsA).

CONCLUSIONS

At month 12, belatacept regimens were associated with better cardiovascular and metabolic risk profiles, with lower blood pressure and serum lipids and less NODAT versus CsA. The overall profile of belatacept will continue to be assessed over the 3-year trials.

Novel strategies in immunosuppression: issues in perspective

Recent findings suggest that a chronic alloimmune response is playing the dominant role in late allograft loss, challenging the notion that most grafts are lost due to the inexorable progression of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. CNIs have failed to improve long-term outcomes and are associated with multiple metabolic derangements. Thus, improvement in long-term allograft outcomes may depend on new agents with novel mechanisms of action, devoid of the toxicities associated with CNIs. To meet this need, inhibitors of novel pathways in B cell and plasma cell activation have emerged to combat the humoral immune response including belimumab and atacicept, both promising targets of B-cell survival factors and bortezomib and eculizumab, agents currently in trials for desensitization protocols and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Promising agents for maintenance immunosuppression, used as monotherapy or synergistically, include monoclonal antibodies and fusion receptor proteins targeting the CD40-CD154 pathway (multiple anti-CD40 antibodies), the CD28-CD80/86 pathway (i.e., belatacept), the LFA3-CD2 pathway (i.e., alefacept), and small molecules such as tofacitinib, a janus kinase 1/3 inhibitor. The induction of allograft tolerance has been attempted with some success with simultaneous bone marrow/kidney transplantation from the same donor, albeit, limited by its associated toxicites. Finally, the exciting fields of tissue engineering and stem cell biology with the repopulation of decellularized organs is ushering in a new paradigm for transplantation. The era of simplified immunosuppression regimens devoid of toxicities is upon us with the promise of dramatic improvement in long term survival.

Co-stimulation blockade as a new strategy in kidney transplantation: benefits and limits

New immunosuppressive drugs have greatly decreased the frequency of graft failure due to acute rejection but have had little impact on long-term graft survival. This is due, at least in part, to the broad non-immune effects of the current immunosuppressive drugs, which are involved in the death of patients and in chronic allograft dysfunction, particularly due to their nephrotoxicity. Recent progress in the development of biologicals, i.e. antibodies and fusion proteins, allows precise targeting of the immune system, preventing the non-immune side effects encountered with current protocols. In particular, targeting of the two most important co-stimulation pathways critical for T-cell activation, i.e. B7/CD28 and CD40/CD40L, has provided excellent results in many experimental models of organ transplantation. This has led to the clinical development of belatacept, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig) fusion protein, which has proved to be efficient in preventing acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Its use is associated with improved renal function and a better metabolic profile than calcineurin inhibitors. However, because belatacept does not selectively target alloreactive T lymphocytes and must be combined with classical immunosuppressive drugs, infectious and neoplastic complications may occur, particularly post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders. We also address the current development of molecules targeting other co-stimulatory pathways (CD40/CD40L, leukocyte function-associated antigen [LFA]-1/intercellular adhesion molecule [ICAM], CD2/LFA-3). Many unresolved issues regarding the use of co-stimulation blocking agents are also discussed, e.g. their long half-life, which can be problematic in cases of serious adverse events, their long-term safety and efficacy, and the lack of monitoring tools to allow modulation of their use over time.

Association of HLA polymorphisms with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in solid-organ transplant recipients

The association between HLA polymorphisms and PTLD was investigated in a case-control study, comparing 110 predominantly adult solid-organ transplant recipients who developed PTLD to 5601 who did not. Donor and recipient HLA were analyzed. We detected a significant association between recipient HLA-A26 and the development of PTLD (OR 2.74; p = 0.0007). In Caucasian recipients, both recipient and donor HLA-A26 were independently associated with development of PTLD (recipient A26 OR 2.99; p = 0.0004, donor A26 OR 2.81; p = 0.002). Analysis of HLA-A and -B haplotypes revealed that recipient HLA-A26, B38 haplotype was strongly correlated with a higher incidence of EBV-positive PTLD (OR 3.99; p = 0.001). The common ancestral haplotype HLA-A1, B8, DR3, when carried by the donor, was protective against PTLD (OR 0.41; p = 0.05). Several other HLA specificities demonstrated associations with clinical and pathological characteristics as well as survival. These findings demonstrate the importance of HLA polymorphisms in modulating the risk for PTLD, and may be useful in risk stratification and development of monitoring and prophylaxis strategies.

Rationale for using belatacept in combination with sirolimus

Kidney transplantation can be used to replace failing native kidneys; however, it requires long-term immunosuppression, and immunological tolerance for this is not yet achievable. The cornerstone of immunosuppression is based on calcineurin inhibitors, which are nephrotoxic. Therefore, new drugs are being developed that provide efficacious immunosuppression and almost no renal toxicity. The first family of drugs that have these properties are mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors: these include sirolimus and everolimus. These two drugs, besides their immunosuppressive properties, also have beneficial effects regarding cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, which is a very common posttransplantation complication. In phase III trials, belatacept, a costimulatory blocker, has also been shown to provide a good immunosuppressive effect and also gives a significantly better cardiovascular profile than cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. However, belatacept can potentially increase infections such as CMV. Thus, herein, we describe the rationale for combining belatacept with sirolimus for kidney transplant patients.

Optimal immunosuppression to prevent chronic allograft dysfunction

Prevention of chronic allograft dysfunction is currently one of the main goals in renal transplantation for the improvement of kidney graft survival. For this purpose, refinements in immunosuppressive regimens, both controlling alloimmune responses and avoiding calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-derived nephrotoxicity, are mandatory. The majority of trials aiming to avoid CNI-related nephrotoxicity have only reported short-term data, with different rates of acute rejection depending on the strategy performed. First attempts of CNI-free strategies in micophenolate mofetil-based regimens showed unsatisfactory results in terms of increased acute rejection events. With the advent of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, a new optimistic perspective seemed to appear. Despite an increased risk of rejection, better graft function and graft parenchyma preservation seem to be associated with such a strategy, at least in the short term, with a potential benefit in terms of less cardiovascular-related adverse events and malignancies. New biological agents such as belatacep have been developed as another interesting strategy for CNI avoidance. Importantly, in any case, longer-term analyses of all these CNI-avoidance strategies are warranted in order to confirm whether persistent immune-mediated graft damage can be safely overcome.

Malignancy after renal transplantation: the role of immunosuppression

Outcomes of kidney transplantation, in terms of graft and patient survival, have improved over the past few decades, partly as a result of the introduction of new immunosuppressive drugs. Many immunosuppressive agents are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and an increased risk of cancer, however, which can compromise patient survival. Cancer is more common among solid-organ transplant recipients than it is in the general population or in patients on dialysis. In fact, malignancy is the third most common cause of death in renal transplant recipients. Immunosuppressive treatments used in renal transplant recipients can cause malignancy by supporting oncogenesis caused by certain viruses or by impairing immune surveillance thereby enabling faster tumor growth. In this Review, we describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of common tumor types occurring after kidney transplantation, and the etiopathogenetic factors that lead to their appearance, with a particular focus on the relationship between immunosuppressive treatment and malignancy. Immunosuppressive drugs associated with an increased risk of malignancy after transplantation are also discussed, as are immunosuppressive drugs that seem to have antioncogenic properties.

Management of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders following solid organ transplant: an update

Development of secondary malignancies is a well-known complication of solid organ transplant, with skin cancer and lymphoproliferative disorders being most frequently observed. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders, caused by diminished immune surveillance, represent a broad spectrum of pathological and clinical disorders, ranging from benign conditions to very aggressive lymphomas. Here we review treatment options for adult patients experiencing posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders following solid organ transplant.

Limiting the amount and duration of antigen exposure during priming increases memory T cell requirement for costimulation during recall

Donor-reactive memory T cells (Tmem) can play an important role in mediating graft rejection after transplantation. Transplant recipients acquire donor-reactive Tmem not only through prior sensitization with alloantigens but also through previous exposure to environmental pathogens that are cross-reactive with allogeneic peptide-MHC complexes. Current dogma suggests that most, if not all, Tmem responses are independent of the requirement for CD28 and/or CD154/CD40-mediated costimulation to mount a recall response. However, heterogeneity among Tmem is increasingly being appreciated, and one important factor known to impact the function and phenotype of Ag-specific T cell responses is the amount/duration of Ag exposure. Importantly, the impact of Ag exposure on development of costimulation independence is currently unknown. In this study, we interrogated the effect of decreased Ag amount/duration during priming on the ability of donor-reactive Tmem to mediate costimulation blockade-resistant rejection during a recall response after transplantation in a murine model. Recipients possessing donor-reactive Tmem responses that were generated under conditions of reduced Ag exposure exhibited similar frequencies of Ag-specific T cells at day 30 postinfection, but, strikingly, failed to mediate costimulation blockade-resistant rejection after challenge with an OVA-expressing skin graft. Thus, these data demonstrate the amount/duration of Ag exposure is a critical factor in determining Tmem's relative requirement for costimulation during the recall response after transplantation.

Switching from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to a belatacept-based regimen in renal transplant recipients: a randomized phase II study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prolonged use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidney transplant recipients is associated with renal and nonrenal toxicity and an increase in cardiovascular risk factors. Belatacept-based regimens may provide a treatment option for patients who switch from CNI-based maintenance immunosuppression.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This is a randomized, open-label Phase II trial in renal transplant patients with stable graft function and receiving a CNI-based regimen. Patients who were ≥6 months but ≤36 months after transplantation were randomized to either switch to belatacept or continue CNI treatment. All patients received background maintenance immunosuppression. The primary end point was the change in calculated GFR (cGFR) from baseline to month 12.

RESULTS

Patients were randomized either to switch to belatacept (n=84) or to remain on a CNI-based regimen (n=89). At month 12, the mean (SD) change from baseline in cGFR was higher in the belatacept group versus the CNI group. Six patients in the belatacept group had acute rejection episodes, all within the first 6 months; all resolved with no allograft loss. By month 12, one patient in the CNI group died with a functioning graft, whereas no patients in the belatacept group had graft loss. The overall safety profile was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identifies a potentially safe and feasible method for switching stable renal transplant patients from a cyclosporine- or tacrolimus-based regimen to a belatacept-based regimen, which may allow improved renal function in patients currently treated with CNIs.

Belatacept-based regimens versus a cyclosporine A-based regimen in kidney transplant recipients: 2-year results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies

BACKGROUND

At 1 year, belatacept was associated with similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, and an improved cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine A (CsA) in the Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as Firstline Immunosuppression Trial (BENEFIT) and Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as Firstline Immunosuppression Trial-EXTended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT) studies. Acute rejection was more frequent with belatacept in BENEFIT. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD)--specifically central nervous system PTLD--was observed more frequently in belatacept-treated patients. This analysis assesses outcomes from BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT after 2 years of treatment.

METHODS

Patients received a more intensive (MI) or a less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept or a CsA-based regimen.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-three of 666 patients (74%) in BENEFIT and 347 of 543 (64%) in BENEFIT-EXT completed 2 years of treatment. The proportion of patients who survived with a functioning graft was similar across groups (BENEFIT: 94% MI, 95% LI, and 91% CsA; BENEFIT-EXT: 83% MI, 84% LI, and 83% CsA). Belatacept's renal benefits were sustained, as evidenced by a 16 to 17 mL/min (BENEFIT) and an 8 to 10 mL/min (BENEFIT-EXT) higher calculated glomerular filtration rate in the belatacept groups versus CsA. There were few new acute rejection episodes in either study between years 1 and 2. Because PTLD risk was highest in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (-) patients, an efficacy analysis of EBV (+) patients was performed and was consistent with the overall population results. There were two previously reported cases of PTLD in each study between years 1 and 2 in the belatacept groups. The overall balance of safety and efficacy favored the LI over the MI regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

At 2 years, belatacept-based regimens sustained better renal function, similar patient/graft survival, and an improved cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus CsA; outcomes that were maintained in EBV (+) patients. No new safety signals emerged.

Biological agents in kidney transplantation: belatacept is entering the field

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for end-stage kidney-disease patients. However, despite major breakthroughs in the last decades, and the progresses made with immunosuppressants, the long-term results still need to be improved. This is related to the increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, de novo post-transplant malignancies, and chronic kidney disease within the allograft. The last is multifactorial and includes immunological and non-immunological factors. Amongst the last is the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) (cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus)-related nephrotoxicity. Kidney-allograft function at 1-year post-transplantation is a good surrogate marker of long-term allograft survival.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4)-Ig, a fusion protein, presents as abatacept, which conserves the natural structure of CTLA4, and belatacept, which has enhanced activity thanks to two amino-acid substitutions. Abatacept and belatacept block CD86-CD28 interaction, but belatacept blocks them more powerfully. Abatacept is already approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and is marketed as Orencia(®) (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA), whereas belatacept is not yet approved. Herein, we review the current data available on the use of belatacept in Phase II and III kidney-transplantation trials. Note, though, that data from belatacept Phase II liver transplantation trials are not yet available.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The results show in de novo kidney transplant patients that as compared to CsA-treated patients, belatacept-treated patients showed: i) a significant better allograft function both at 1- and 2- year post-transplantation and ii) better cardiovascular and metabolic profiles. Regarding the safety data, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seronegative belatacept-treated patients experience more post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders than the EBV seropositive belatacept-treated patients and the CsA-treated patients.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

CNIs are potent immunosuppressants but have some degree of nephrotoxicity. Therefore, it is important to have strong data showing that belatacept-based therapy is as efficient as CsA-based therapy, but displaying at both 1- and 2-year post-transplantation a better allograft function, which might translate in the long-term into longer allograft survival.

Immunosuppression with belatacept-based, corticosteroid-avoiding regimens in de novo kidney transplant recipients

Current immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation typically include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, both of which have toxicities that can impair recipient and allograft health. This 1-year, randomized, controlled, open-label, exploratory study assessed two belatacept-based regimens compared to a tacrolimus (TAC)-based, steroid-avoiding regimen. Recipients of living and deceased donor renal allografts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive belatacept-mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), belatacept-sirolimus (SRL), or TAC-MMF. All patients received induction with 4 doses of Thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg maximum) and an associated short course of corticosteroids. Eighty-nine patients were randomized and transplanted. Acute rejection occurred in 4, 1 and 1 patient in the belatacept-MMF, belatacept-SRL and TAC-MMF groups, respectively, by Month 6; most acute rejection occurred in the first 3 months. More than two-thirds of patients in the belatacept groups remained on CNI- and steroid-free regimens at 12 months and the calculated glomerular filtration rate was 8-10 mL/min higher with either belatacept regimen than with TAC-MMF. Overall safety was comparable between groups. In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with belatacept may enable the simultaneous avoidance of both CNIs and corticosteroids in recipients of living and deceased standard criteria donor kidneys, with acceptable rates of acute rejection and improved renal function relative to a TAC-based regimen.

Lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation-classification, incidence, risk factors, early detection and treatment options

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a heterogeneous disease group of benign and malignant entities. The new World Health Organisation classification introduced in 2008 distinguishes early lesions, polymorphic, monomorphic and classical Hodgkin lymphoma-type PTLD. Based on the time of appearance, early and late forms can be identified.PTLDs are the second most frequent posttransplantation tumors in adulthood, and the most frequent ones in childhood. The incidence varies with the transplanted organ-from 1%-2% following kidney transplantation to as high as 10% following thoracic organ transplantation-due to different intensities in immunosuppression. Immunocompromised state and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection are the two major risk factors.In Europe and the US approximately 85% of PTLDs are of B-cell origin, and the majority are EBV-associated. Symptoms are often unspecific; extranodal, organ manifestations and central nervous system involvement is common. Early lesions respond well to a decrease in immunosuppression. Malignant entities are treated with rituximab, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical therapy. Adoptive T-cell transfer represents a promising therapeutic approach. The prognosis is favorable in early PTLD, and poor in late PTLD. Five-year survival is 30% for high-grade lymphomas. The prognosis of EBV-negative lymphomas is worse.Lowering the risk of PTLD may be achieved by low dose maintenance immunosuppression, immunosuppressive drugs inhibiting cell proliferation, and special immunotherapy (e.g. interleukin-2 inhibitors). Early detection is especially important for high risk-e.g. EBV-negative-patients, where the appearance of EBV-DNA and the increase in its titer may help.