Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer

A phase II study of weekly cisplatin, 6S-stereoisomer leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) increases significantly after the fifth decade and palliative chemotherapy is the ultimate treatment in the majority of patients. We investigated safety and efficacy of a weekly regimen with cisplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced GC. Chemotherapy-naive patients older than 65 years were considered eligible for study entry. Frail elderly patients were identified and excluded according to the following criteria: age >85 years, dependence in one or more activities of daily living (activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living scales), three or more comorbid conditions, one or more geriatric syndromes. Chemotherapy consisted of 1-day per week administration of intravenous cisplatin 35 mg m(-2), 6S-stereoisomer leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) and fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2) (PLF). Patients were re-evaluated after eight weekly cycles and six additional weekly administrations were planned for patients without disease progression. A 5-day subcutaneous filgrastim (5 mug Kg(-1) day(-1), days +1-+5) was used after the first treatment delay for neutropenia and maintained thereafter. In the whole group, the best intention-to-treat overall response rate was 43% (95% CI: 30-56%). The time to disease progression and the median survival time were 5.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. Fatigue was the commonest nonhaematologic toxicity (71% of the patients). Filgrastim was used in 30 patients who showed grade II (20 patients) or grade III (10 patients) neutropenia. Neither grade IV toxicity nor toxic deaths were observed. The weekly PLF regimen resulted safe and effective in elderly patients with advanced GC. This outpatient regimen is based on old and low-cost drugs and it may represent an alternative to new and more expensive combinations.

The role of oxaliplatin in the management of upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies

Following the successful introduction of oxaliplatin into the management of advanced colorectal cancer, its clinical utility is currently being investigated in a variety of other malignancies, including cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. In advanced pancreatic cancer, oxaliplatin has been found to be clinically effective in phase II trials in which it was combined with either 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine, the current standard chemotherapy for this disease. In a phase II trial involving 67 patients, the combination of oxaliplatin and 5-FU in a high dose infusional regimen (n = 31) achieved an objective response rate of 9.7%, stable disease for at least three cycles in 48.4% of patients, tumour growth control in 58% of patients, a median time to progression of 4.9 months and median overall survival reaching 9.2 months. In combination with gemcitabine in a phase II trial involving 64 patients with metastatic (n = 34) or locally advanced (n = 30) pancreatic cancer, there was an objective response rate of 30.6%, treatment benefit in 39.7%, a median progression-free survival of 5.3 months and again a median overall survival of 9.2 months. Response rates and survival times did not differ between locally advanced and metastatic disease. On the basis of these encouraging results, phase III studies of oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer are now in progress in Europe and the United States. In metastatic gastric cancer, a phase II study investigated the combined use of oxaliplatin and 5-FU using the FOLFOX6 regimen in 53 patients, of whom 49 were evaluable for efficacy. The objective response rate was 44.9% and the median duration of response was 7.9 months. Large phase III trials of oxaliplatin-based treatment for advanced gastric cancer are now in progress. Oxaliplatin is also being investigated in oesophageal cancer and several other gastrointestinal tumours. In summary, oxaliplatin is emerging as an effective and highly promising chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Current treatments and future perspectives in colorectal and gastric cancer

Given the high rate of distant spread, effective systemic therapy is key to improving survival in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The past 40 years have seen progress. The addition of folinic acid (FA) to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the use of infusional rather than bolus 5-FU, and the combination of new active agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin with 5-FU/FA have each led to an increase in activity. In trials of current combination regimens first-line, response rates (RRs) in excess of 50% and median survival durations longer than 16 months are seen. A recent controlled trial suggests that overall time to progression is maximized and toxicity minimized when an irinotecan/5-FU/FA combination is used first-line, followed by an oxaliplatin/ 5-FU/FA combination on progression. In the adjuvant setting, 5-FU/FA is the standard of care in stage III disease but of uncertain value in stage II patients. The role of new agents such as irinotecan in adjuvant regimens is being assessed. Use of highly active chemotherapy in patients with unresectable disease (particularly liver metastases) achieves responses that allow a subset of patients to proceed to potentially curative surgery. The emergence of novel agents targeted at processes such as tumor angiogenesis will complement cytotoxic chemotherapy, while improved understanding of tumor biology should enable agents to be selected according to the likely sensitivity of the disease in a particular patient. In gastric cancer also, surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment. The extent of dissection required is debated, as is the potential benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (indeed the degree of resection may interact with the effect of adjuvant treatment). In untreated metastatic gastric cancer, median survival is 3-4 months. This can be increased to around 10 months using chemotherapy. Quality of life is also enhanced. There is no clearly defined standard of care. However, some form of cisplatin/5-FU combination can serve as a reference regimen. As single agents, both irinotecan and docetaxel achieve RRs of around 20% in metastatic CRC. In combination with cisplatin and/or 5-FU a very high and promising RR is achieved. The promise of these agents in combination with 5-FU and 5-FU plus cisplatin is currently being tested in phase III trials.

Irinotecan in the treatment of gastric cancer

Chemotherapy has a proven palliative role in advanced gastric cancer, significantly improving quality of life and prolonging survival compared with best supportive care alone. Although there is no standard of treatment, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin doublets and the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU (ECF) have both achieved response rates in the range of 40-50% and median overall survival of 8-10 months. Either could claim the status of a reference regimen. Single-agent irinotecan achieved response rates (RR) of 18% and 23% in phase II studies, and 48% when combined with cisplatin. However, a randomized trial of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan plus 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) showed that the latter regimen achieved a higher RR (34% versus 28%) and significantly longer median survival (10.7 versus 6.9 months). Hematological toxicity was lower with the irinotecan/5-FU/FA combination. This regimen has therefore been taken forward into a randomized phase III comparison against a 5-FU/cisplatin doublet. Use of irinotecan-based combinations should also be investigated as an adjuvant treatment (probably in combination with radiotherapy) and in the neoadjuvant setting.

A multimodal treatment approach including high-dose chemotherapy in very advanced gastric cancer: evidence for control of metastatic disease

The present multimodal treatment approach was designed to achieve prolonged tumor control in advanced gastric cancer. A total of 26 patients with stage IV gastric cancer (metastatic disease n=25), ECOG performance status 0-3 and laparoscopically evaluated peritoneal status received a modified EAP schedule to prove chemosensitivity and to mobilize autologous peripheral blood stem cells (aPBSC). Patients without progressive disease proceeded to tandem high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) and aPBSCT. Patients with >50% reduction of the target lesion received a second cycle of HD-CT. Responders were selected for local R0 resections (D2 resection) according clinical criteria. Of 26 patients, 20(77%) achieved partial remission after dose-intensive chemotherapy: local R0 resection was achieved in 12 out of 14 patients selected for surgery (46% of all patients). Eight of these R0-resected patients initially had peritoneal carcinomatosis. With a median follow-up of 3.2 years, four patients are still alive. The median overall survival was 8.4 months (CI 2.5-14.4 months), for histologic regression grade 3 (seven out of 25 patients, 28%) 29 months (CI 12-46 months). The combined treatment approach is tolerable and feasible in advanced disease and opens a therapeutic window for a significant proportion of patients, even in cases with histologically proven peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Phase II study of pemetrexed disodium (Alimta®) administered with oral folic acid in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the activity of pemetrexed in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight eligible patients (median age 60 years) received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Since toxicity was considerable in the first six patients, the protocol was amended to supplement subsequent patients with oral folic acid (5 mg/day on days -2 to +2 of every cycle).

RESULTS

Among 36 stage IV patients evaluable for efficacy (six non-supplemented\30 supplemented), there were two complete and six partial responses. The response rate was 21% (95% confidence interval 8% to 32%) according to intention-to-treat analysis. All responding patients were in the supplemented group. The median duration of response was 4.6 months and the median survival was 7.8 months. Five of six non-supplemented patients (83%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia; two (33%) unsupplemented patients discontinued; two (33%) patients died due to toxicity. In the supplemented group, 12 of 32 patients (37%) had grade 3/4 neutropenia. None of the supplemented patients discontinued treatment due to hematological toxicity. Severe non-hematological toxicities were infrequent.

CONCLUSIONS

The activity of pemetrexed is promising in light of the tumor burden in these patients (all patients were stage IV and 39% had three or more organs involved). Toxicities were remarkably decreased with folic acid supplementation. Combination studies are warranted.

Phase I study of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours

This phase I study was conducted to determine the recommended phase II doses, safety profile, and antitumour activity of a combination regimen of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours. Cisplatin and epirubicin were given at fixed doses of 50 and 60 mg m(-2), respectively. The irinotecan dose was escalated at 10 mg m(-2) increments from a starting dose level of 70 mg m(-2). Epirubicin, irinotecan, and their metabolites were measured with HPLC methods. In all, 35 patients received 141 courses of treatment. Irinotecan dose was escalated in seven cohorts up to 130 mg m(-2), and then finally de-escalated to 110 mg m(-2). The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. Nonhaematologic toxicities included mild to moderate nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea and fatigue. Of 34 patients with evaluable disease, one patient had a complete response and nine patients had partial response, yielding an overall response rate of 29.4%. Pharmacokinetic parameters of epirubicin were not affected by the sequence of drug administration. However, the AUCs of irinotecan and its metabolites were increased significantly when irinotecan and epirubicin were administered concurrently. This combination regimen has promising broad antitumour activity, and will be further evaluated in phase II studies in multiple tumour types.

Feasibility of quality of life assessment in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer

Quality of life (QOL) is an important outcome after treatment for upper gastrointestinal tract cancer but few studies report good accrual and subsequent attrition is usually high. This study investigated the feasibility of a nurse-led service to obtain longitudinal QOL assessments and explored how clinical and sociodemographic factors influence patients' need for help to complete questionnaires. Fully informed patients were invited into the study. Baseline hospital assessments were scheduled by telephone and thereafter by post unless patients' health indicated the need for a home visit. In all, 128 out of 140 (91%) baseline QOL assessments were performed. Follow-up questionnaire completion was good, with 114 patients (89%) completing all but one of the expected assessments. At baseline, 41 (32%) patients required a lot of help to complete questionnaires. Patients requiring help were more likely to be undergoing palliative treatment than treatment aimed at cure (68 vs 33%; odds ratio 3.48, P<0.01). Patients' with advanced stage cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract receiving palliative treatment require dedicated staff to ensure good compliance with longitudinal QOL data collection. It is essential to budget for this in clinical trails.

Cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (PELF) is more active than 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) and cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-FU (PELF) have both been reported to be superior to the combination 5-FU, doxorubicin and mitomycin C (FAM) in advanced gastric carcinoma. On the basis of the presence and dose intensity of the included agents, we hypothesised that PELF would be superior to FAMTX.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred patients with untreated advanced gastric carcinoma were randomised to receive PELF or FAMTX for a maximum of six cycles or until disease progression.

RESULTS

The complete response (CR) rates to PELF and FAMTX were, respectively, 13% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 6% to 20%] and 2% (95% CI 0% to 5%; P = 0.003), and the objective response rates [CR plus partial response (PR) rates] 39% (95% CI 29% to 49%) and 22% (95% CI 13% to 30%; P = 0.009), thus significantly favouring the PELF combination. The survival rates after 12 months (30.8% versus 22.4%) and 24 months (15.7% versus 9.5%) were also higher among patients receiving PELF, but these differences were not statistically significant. The toxicities were qualitatively different but quantitatively similar. Both regimens seem to be feasible provided that careful patient monitoring is assured.

CONCLUSIONS

PELF is significantly more active than FAMTX and deserves further research in the adjuvant setting.

Chemotherapy in gastric cancer: a review and updated meta-analysis

The five years survival rate for patients with gastric cancer is 15-25%. With the aim of improving survival, chemotherapy has been used in different adjuvant settings. Similarly, but with the aim of improving quality of life and prolonging life, chemotherapy has been used extensively in metastatic disease. In this review we have included studies of systemic and intraperitoneal chemotherapy given before, during or after operation and for advanced disease. A meta-analysis has been made on the 21 randomised studies that used adjuvant systemic chemotherapy postoperatively. A significant survival benefit for the patients treated postoperatively compared with controls was identified (odds ratio (OR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.96). When western and Asian studies were analysed separately we found no survival benefit for the treated patients in the western groups (OR 0.96 (95 CI 0.83 to 1.12)). Flaws in the conduct of several trials made it difficult to draw firm conclusions, including the exclusion of a small but clinically meaningful survival benefit. Preoperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown effects in some patients, but no significant benefit was found in the few randomised studies. The few studies that reported intraperitoneal therapy showed no detectable survival benefit either. In patients with advanced disease, four small randomised studies found significantly longer survival in the treated patients. The survival benefit is in the range of 3-9 months, and there were also improvements of the quality of life. Several drug combinations have been tested, however, with no confirmed superiority for a particular regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy cannot be recommended as a routine because of the lack of confirmed beneficial effects. Some patients with advanced disease will have a clinically important benefit from palliative chemotherapy, so this can be recommended for patients who are otherwise in good health.

Advances in the therapy of gastric cancer

Many issues remain unclear in the management of gastric cancer. Randomized trials have failed to show the superiority of D2 over D1 dissection, and comparisons between countries showing higher survival rates following more extensive surgery may be influenced at least in part by the fact that D1 dissection underestimates disease stage in many patients. No studies have yet shown a benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 9008 trial provides convincing evidence that a regimen of postoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiotherapy improves disease-free and overall survival when compared with observation alone. In the chemotherapy of advanced disease, use of the epirubicin plus cisplatin plus 5-FU (ECF) regimen leads to significantly longer median survival than 5-FU plus adriamycin plus methotrexate-C (FAMTX), but the rate of complete response remains low and the effect on longterm survival minimal. There are indications that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase the resectability of tumors and reduce risk of postoperative recurrence. Substantial improvements in outcome are likely to depend on the integration into multimodality strategies of novel, molecularly targeted agents in all stages of gastric cancer treatment.

The role of chemotherapy in the current treatment of gastric cancer

Metaanalyses of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in gastric cancer have shown at best marginal benefits, although a recent trial of postoperative chemoradiotherapy has demonstrated significantly increased overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are also feasible and are the subject of several ongoing studies. This setting may provide valuable evidence of the activity of new agents and the chemosensitivity of specific tumors. In metastatic disease, chemotherapy confers benefit when compared with best supportive care alone. No particular regimen has been shown to be superior to others in this context, and there is a pressing need for the evaluation of newer agents such as the oral fluoropyrimidines, taxanes, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin.

Analysis of the time course and prognostic factors determining toxicity due to infused fluorouracil

This study used a prospectively managed clinical database in order to identify 1470 patients with gastrointestinal cancers receiving protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5FU). It aimed to determine the time course of toxicity due to PVI 5FU and to analyse factors predicting toxicity. The initial development of stomatitis occurred more rapidly than diarrhoea or palmar plantar erythema (PPE). The percentage of patients with National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 2 or worse PPE peaked at 9% between weeks 8 and 17, whereas this peak occurred earlier for stomatitis and diarrhoea. The development of CTC grade 1 toxicity in the first 28 days after commencement of chemotherapy was classified as early grade 1 toxicity. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that female sex, better performance status, elevated bilirubin, early grade 1 PPE and early grade 1 diarrhoea were independent prognostic factors for the development of CTC grade 2 or worse PPE (P<0.01). Female sex, increased age, elevated alanine transaminase and urea and early grade 1 PPE were significant independent prognostic factors for the development of CTC grade 2 or worse stomatitis (P<0.01). Early CTC grade 1 diarrhoea predicted CTC grade 2 or worse diarrhoea (P<0.01). Older, female patients with good performance status and impaired liver and renal function who develop early grade 1 PPE alone or in combination with diarrhoea are at highest risk of subsequently developing grade 2 or worse PPE or stomatitis during treatment with PVI 5FU. Reduction of infused 5FU dose should be considered for these patients. Such an approach could both reduce severe toxicity owing to chemotherapy and minimise treatment delays, and should be evaluated prospectively.

Status of treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Advanced gastric cancer is incurable. The most widely investigated single-agent chemotherapy is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with partial response rates up to 20%. Pilot phase II studies investigating combinations of 5-FU, anthracyclines, mitomycin, methotrexate, and platinums achieved higher response rates; however, the response rates declined in subsequent larger trials. Furthermore, toxicity was substantially higher in confirmatory trials, emphasizing the need to develop well-tolerated regimens prior to multi-institutional testing. Although phase III studies of combination regimens have not achieved a clear worldwide standard, the regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion 5-FU achieved a survival benefit, possibly through the increased activity of infusional 5-FU combined with cisplatin. The taxanes, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, have recently shown important activity in gastric cancer. Patient accrual to a phase III trial comparing a docetaxel-based combination regimen with the regimen of cisplatin and 5-FU has completed accrual. Whether patients with adenocarcinomas of the proximal stomach and gastroesophageal junction will have the same response rates to these new agents as did patients with classical body and distal gastric cancers is unknown. It is anticipated that the development of these active new agents will ultimately improve survival for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Improvement of oral drug treatment by temporary inhibition of drug transporters and/or cytochrome P450 in the gastrointestinal tract and liver: an overview

The oral bioavailability of many cytotoxic drugs is low and/or highly variable. This can be caused by high affinity for drug transporters and activity of metabolic enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract and liver. In this review, we will describe the main involved drug transporters and metabolic enzymes and discuss novel methods to improve oral treatment of affected substrate drugs. Results of preclinical and clinical phase I and II studies will be discussed in which affected substrate drugs, such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, and topotecan, are given orally in combination with an inhibitor of drug transport or drug metabolism. Future randomized studies will, hopefully, confirm that this strategy for oral treatment is at least as equally effective and safe as standard intravenous administration of these drugs.

Weekly oral paclitaxel as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic study has shown that co-administration of cyclosporin A (CsA), which acts as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP-3A blocker, resulted in an 8-fold increase in the systemic exposure of oral paclitaxel. Two doses of oral paclitaxel on 1 day in combination with CsA resulted in higher systemic exposure than single dose administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase II study, chemonaïve patients with advanced gastric cancer received oral paclitaxel weekly in two doses of 90 mg/m(2) on the same day; CsA (10 mg/kg) was given 30 min before each dose of oral paclitaxel.

RESULTS

In 25 patients, the main toxicities were: nausea CTC grade 2/3, 10 patients (40%); vomiting grade 2/3, 4 patients (20%); diarrhea grade 2/3, 6 patients (24%); neutropenia grade 3/4, 5 patients (20%). In the 24 evaluable patients, eight partial responses were observed, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18% to 52%]. Eleven patients had stable disease (46%) and 5 patients showed progressive disease (21%). The ORR in the total population was 32% (95% CI 17% to 50%). The median time to progression was 16 weeks (95% CI 9-22). Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed that the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of orally administered paclitaxel (+/- standard deviation) was 3757.6 +/- 939.4 ng.h/ml in week 1 and 3928.4 +/- 1281 ng.h/ml in week 2. The intrapatient variability in the AUC was 12%.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral paclitaxel in combination with CsA is both active and safe in chemonaïve patients with advanced gastric cancer. Toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal.

Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205)

PURPOSE

To compare fluorouracil (FU) alone with FU plus cisplatin (FP) and with uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin (UFTM) for patients with advanced gastric cancer in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 280 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly allocated and analyzed for survival, response, and toxicity. The survival curves were compared between groups by log-rank test on an intent-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

At the interim analysis, the UFTM arm showed a significantly inferior survival with higher incidences of hematologic toxic effects than did control arm FU alone, and the registration to UFTM was terminated. Both investigational regimens, FP and UFTM, had a significantly higher incidence of hematologic toxic effects than FU alone, although the effects were manageable. The overall response rates of the FU-alone, FP, and UFTM arms were 11%, 34%, and 9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months with FU alone, 3.9 months with FP, and 2.4 months with UFTM, respectively. Although FP demonstrated a higher response rate (P <.001) and longer progression-free survival than did FU alone (P <.001), no differences in overall survival were observed between the arms. The median survival times and 1-year survival rates were 7.1 months and 28% with FU, 7.3 months and 29% with FP, and 6.0 months and 16% with UFTM, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neither investigational regimen, FP nor UFTM, showed a survival advantage as compared with FU alone. FU alone will remain a reference arm in our future trial for advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II study of capecitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable measurable gastric adenocarcinoma received oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14, and i.v. cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1. This cycle was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 38 patients were assessable for efficacy and 40 were assessable for toxicity. One patient achieved a complete response and 22 patients had partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 54.8% in the intention-to-treat population (95% confidence interval 39.8% to 69.8%). The median time to progression was 6.3 months and the median overall survival was 10.1 months. The principal adverse events were neutropenia and hand-foot syndrome. Grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (32.5% of patients), thrombocytopenia (10%), stomatitis (2.5%) and diarrhea (5%). Grade 2 and 3 hand-foot syndrome occurred in 20% and 7.5% of patients, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of capecitabine and cisplatin is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) combination in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer (M/AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of the 54 eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC, 53 received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 400 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) (10-minute infusion) and then 5-FU 3,000 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days.

RESULTS

Patients (69% male, 31% female) had a median age of 61 years (range, 31 to 75 years), 89% had a performance status of 0 or 1, 70% had newly diagnosed disease, and 87% had metastatic disease. All had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. With a median of three involved organs, disease sites included the lymph nodes (67%), stomach (65%), and liver (61%). A median of 10 cycles per patient and 468 complete cycles were administered. Best responses in the 49 assessable patients were two complete responses and 20 partial responses, giving an overall best response rate of 44.9%. Eight patients underwent complementary treatment with curative intent (six with surgery and two with chemoradiotherapy). Median follow-up, time to progression, and overall survival were 18.6 months, 6.2 months, and 8.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 38%, 19%, 4%, and 11% of patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients (one episode each). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21% of patients (oxaliplatin-specific scale). Seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in M/AGC patients, and may prove to be a suitable alternative regimen in this indication.

Irinotecan, cisplatin and mitomycin in inoperable gastro-oesophageal and pancreatic cancers - a new active regimen

Irinotecan, mitomycin and cisplatin all demonstrate activity in gastro-oesophageal cancers. This novel combination was administered to outpatients with previously untreated inoperable gastro-oesophageal or pancreatic cancer, in a 28-day cycle. A total of 26 out of 31 patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer and 12 out of 14 patients with pancreatic cancer have been treated with this combination, and were evaluable for response. The overall response rates for patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer was 42%, with a median survival of 9.5 months. In patients with pancreatic cancer, the overall response rate was 42% with a median survival of 8 months. There was a statistically significant increase in survival between those patients who achieved a stable disease response and those who achieved either a partial response or complete response. The toxicity profiles for both cancers were virtually identical. There were five treatment-related deaths, and a high admission rate (42%). Thus irinotecan, mitomycin and cisplatin is a new combination with activity in inoperable upper gastro-oesophageal cancers, but with a high toxicity profile. Future developments include reducing the dose of irinotecan and number of cycles of therapy to four.

A multicentre, randomised phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin C in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This randomised study compared protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-four patients with adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma involving the oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction or the stomach were randomised. The major end points were tumour response, survival, toxicity and quality of life.

RESULTS

The median age of patients treated was 72 years and the two arms were well-balanced for baseline demographic factors. The overall response rate was 16.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.5% to 22.7%] in patients treated with PVI 5-FU alone compared with 19.1% (95% CI 12.0% to 26.0%) for those treated with PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 0.555). Median time to treatment failure was 3.9 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.8 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 0.195). Median survival was 6.3 months for PVI 5-FU and 5.3 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 1.0). Toxicity was mild for both treatments. Symptomatic benefit measured by improvement in pain control, weight loss, dysphagia and oesophageal reflux was observed in over 64% of patients in each arm. Quality of life scores were comparable in each arm.

CONCLUSIONS

PVI 5-FU is a safe, effective form of palliation for patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer although the addition of MMC adds little extra benefit.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine when used in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin (ECC) in patients with oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma. Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were also determined, and the effect of previous oesophago-gastric surgery or concurrent oesophago-gastric cancer on the absorption and metabolism of capecitabine was evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma received up to six cycles of epirubicin (50 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly), cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly) and capecitabine, the latter administered orally in an intermittent schedule (14 days treatment; 7-day rest period) at 3-weekly intervals. Patients were recruited into one of four escalating dose cohorts (500, 825, 1000 and 1250 mg/m(2) bd). Dose escalation occurred after six patients had completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy at the previous dose level, with DLT assessed on the toxicity of the first cycle only. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analyses was performed over the first 10 h of day 1 of cycle 1.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients, median age 63 years (range 32-76 years), ECOG performance status < or =2 with locally advanced (10) or metastatic (22) disease were recruited and were evaluable for toxicity. Two of five patients experienced DLT at 1250 mg/m(2) bd with grade II stomatitis (one patient) and grade III diarrhoea with febrile neutropenia (one patient). Cumulative toxicity for all cycles (n = 140) (worst grade per patient) includes grade IV oesophagitis (one patient), grade III diarrhoea (five), grade IV neutropenia with infection (seven), grade II stomatitis (four) and grade IV thrombocytopenia (one). Of 29 patients with evaluable disease, there was one complete response and six partial responses [24% response rate [95% confidence interval (CI) 10% to 44%]], a median PFS of 22 weeks (95% CI 17-27 weeks) and median overall survival of 34 weeks (95% CI 19-49 weeks). Capecitabine was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with a t(max) of 1-2 h for capecitabine, DFCR (5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine) and DFUR (5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine). The C(max) and AUC(0-)( infinity ) for capecitabine, DFCR and DFUR were similar to those observed in previous monotherapy studies of capecitabine taken after food.

CONCLUSION

A dose of 1000 mg/m(2) bd of capecitabine is recommended for use on an intermittent schedule in combination with these doses and schedule of epirubicin and cisplatin. This regimen is tolerable and active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. A randomised phase III comparison with ECF is justified.

Effective combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and/or erythropoietin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

A phase II trial was performed to determine the antitumour efficacy and tolerance of combined paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without hematopoetic growth factor support in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Forty-five patients with histologically confirmed metastatic gastric cancer were entered in this trial. Treatment consisted of 2-weekly courses of paclitaxel 160 mg per m2 and cisplatin 60 mg per m2 both given on day 1. Depending on absolute neutrophil counts on the days of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration (1000-2000 per microl), a 5-day course of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg x kg(-1) per day was given subcutaneously; in addition, if haemoglobin was <12.0 mg dl(-1), erythropoietin 10 000 IU was administered subcutaneously three times per week. The confirmed overall response rate (intent-to-treat) was 44%, including five complete (11%) and 15 partial remissions (33%). Twelve patients had stable disease (27%), 11 (24%) progressed while on chemotherapy, and two patients were not evaluable. The median time to response was 3 months, the median time to progression 7.0 months, and the median survival time was 11.2 months with 12 patients currently alive. Haematologic toxicity was common, though WHO grade 4 neutropenia occurred in only five patients (11%). Apart from total alopecia in 16 patients (36%), severe non-haematologic adverse reactions included grade 3 peripheral neuropathy in six (13%) and anaphylaxis in two patients. In addition, there was one patient each who experienced grade 3 emesis, diarrhea, and infection, respectively. Our data suggest that the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without G-CSF and/or erythropoietin has promising therapeutic activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel plus 24-h continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and 3-weekly cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with weekly 24-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid, weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly cisplatin in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Between November 1999 and November 2001, 29 chemotherapy-naive patients (13 male and 16 female) with a median age of 56 years (range 22-72) were consecutively enrolled at three centers. 5-FU 2 g/m2 was given weekly over 24 h i.v. preceded by folinic acid 500 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 was administered as a 1-h infusion weekly and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 as 1-h infusion on days 8 and 29. Six weeks of therapy (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36) followed by 1 week of rest was considered one cycle. A median of 3 cycles (range 1-5) was administered to 29 patients with a total of 73 cycles applied. All patients were assessable for toxicity and survival, 28 patients were assessable for response (one patient received less than one complete cycle and could not be evaluated for response). Four patients (14%) obtained a complete response and 10 patients (34%) a partial response (overall response rate 48%, 95% CI 29-68%). Seven patients (24%) had stable disease. Seven patients (24%) had progressive disease during or within 4 weeks after treatment. The median progression-free and overall survival times were 8 months (range 1-23) and 11 months (range 1-23), respectively. Overall toxicity was acceptable. Hematological toxicity was favorable with only one patient (3%) experiencing WHO grade 3/4 leukocytopenia and one patient (3%) WHO grade 3/4 anemia. Non-hematologic WHO grade 3/4 toxicities included alopecia in 19 (66%), nausea/vomiting in six (21%), diarrhea in six (21%), neurotoxicity grade 3 in three (10%) and infection in three (10%) patients. A total of 42 applications (10%) (range 0-5) had to be postponed and dose reductions of at least one drug was necessary in 37% of applications. In three patients (10%) treatment was stopped because of toxicity. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis. Thus, the combination of weekly paclitaxel, cisplatin and continuously infused 5-FU/folinic acid appears to be a highly active regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Compared with our previous experience with the same combination of drugs but using paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks, the protocol with weekly application of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 shows a reduced incidence of hematologic toxicity, particularly leukopenia. Other organ toxicities apart from a slightly higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy were comparable between the two treatment protocols. Efficacy with a response rate of 50% was well preserved by this weekly regimen.

Docetaxel in advanced gastric cancer

Standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer remains undefined. Two of the most popular regimens-ECF [epirubicin-cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] and PELF (cisplatin-epirubicin-5-FU-leucovorin)-have been shown to be active, but each has limitations. Phase II trials show that single-agent docetaxel is an active agent in advanced gastric cancer, producing overall response rates (ORRs) of 17.5-24%. Docetaxel has also been shown to lack cross-resistance with other drugs in gastric cancer, and is likely to be at least additive to cisplatin and 5-FU. Phase II results of docetaxel combinations in advanced gastric cancer are encouraging. Docetaxel-cisplatin has yielded response rates similar to those achieved by ECF and PELF. Adding 5-FU to docetaxel-cisplatin has achieved an ORR of 52 versus 45% for docetaxel-cisplatin in a randomized phase II trial. Docetaxel-based regimens demonstrate acceptable tolerability despite predictable hematotoxicity. Neutropenia, the major toxicity, is manageable by dose modification or by using prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Several phase III trials are now ongoing, including a large-scale trial of docetaxel-cisplatin-5-FU versus cisplatin-5-FU. Results will show whether docetaxel improves overall response and survival, as suggested in the phase II setting.

New developments in the treatment of esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is a rare but highly virulent malignancy in the United States and Western Europe, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus has had the most rapid rate of increase of any solid tumor malignancy. Combined chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care in the nonsurgical management of esophageal cancer. Trials of preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery have not shown a consistent benefit. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery continues to be actively studied in the surgical management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Pathologic complete responses are seen in 20% to 40% of patients, with 5-year survival achieved in 30% to 35%. Newer agents, such as the taxanes and irinotecan, have been evaluated in combined chemoradiotherapy trials. These trials have shown promising antitumor activity and therapy tolerance, depending on the dose and schedule of therapy administered. Increasing the dose of radiotherapy, or adding a brachytherapy boost to chemoradiotherapy, has not improved the outcome of treatment in clinical trials. The advent of newer targeted therapies, including agents directed against growth factor receptor pathways, tumor angiogenesis, and tumor invasion and metastasis, is leading to a new generation of clinical trials combining these agents with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation.

Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) With epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer

PURPOSE

We report the results of a prospectively randomized study that compared the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) (ECF) with the combination of mitomycin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU (MCF) in previously untreated patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred eighty patients with adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma were randomized to receive either ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks and PVI 5-FU 200 mg/m(2)/d) or MCF (mitomycin 7 mg/m(2) every 6 weeks, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, and PVI 5-FU 300 mg/m(2)/d) and analyzed for survival, response, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 42.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37% to 48%) with ECF and 44.1% (95% CI, 38% to 50%) with MCF (P =.692). Toxicity was tolerable, and there were only two toxic deaths. ECF resulted in more grade 3/4 neutropenia and grade 2 alopecia, but MCF caused more thrombocytopenia and plantar-palmar erythema. Median survival was 9.4 months with ECF and 8.7 months with MCF (P =.315); at 1 year, 40.2% (95% CI, 34% to 46%) of ECF and 32.7% (95% CI, 27% to 38%) of MCF patients were alive. Median failure-free survival was 7 months with both regimens. Global QOL scores were better with ECF at 3 and 6 months.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms response, survival, and QOL benefits of ECF observed in a previous randomized study. The equivalent efficacy of MCF was demonstrated, but QOL was superior with ECF. ECF remains one of the reference treatments for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Raltitrexed: current clinical status and future directions

Raltitrexed ('Tomudex') monotherapy is a conveniently administered alternative to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), and has single-agent activity in a variety of advanced solid tumours. Although both raltitrexed and 5-FU are thymidylate synthase inhibitors, raltitrexed has a specific mode of action and a toxicity profile distinct from 5-FU. The mechanism of action of raltitrexed is also completely different from that of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and other drugs with which it has been combined. These properties, together with preclinical data, suggested that combinations of raltitrexed with 5-FU, other chemotherapeutic agents, or radiotherapy could result in improved therapies for a variety of advanced solid tumours, including advanced CRC. This review outlines the appropriate management of patients treated with raltitrexed, whether as monotherapy or in combination, and discusses the preliminary results of combination studies with raltitrexed in a range of tumour types including advanced CRC, malignant mesothelioma, gastric, pancreatic, head and neck, and non-small-cell lung cancers. Of particular interest is the combination of raltitrexed and oxaliplatin, which has shown promising antitumour effects in first-line treatment of advanced CRC and malignant mesothelioma, a disease that is refractory to chemotherapy.

Excellent disease control and survival in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiation

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of epirubicin, cisplatin, and infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy followed by radiation with concurrent cisplatin in patients with locally and/or regionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients were treated with three cycles of induction chemotherapy with epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) combined with continuous-infusion 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) daily for 9 weeks, followed by concurrent chemoradiation of 60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions with cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days in weeks 1 and 6.

RESULTS

Median age was 43 years, 74% had World Health Organization type III histology, and 91% had stage IV disease (International Union Against Cancer, ed 4). All patients received three cycles of induction chemotherapy, and 97% completed chemoradiation. The estimated 4-year progression-free survival rate was 81% (95% CI, 59% to 93%), and the estimated 4-year overall survival rate was 90% (95% CI, 74% to 97%). Only two patients have had a locoregional relapse by the close-out date despite the use of only 60 Gy. Induction chemotherapy was well tolerated, with 11% grade 3 or 4 stomatitis, 26% grade 3 vomiting, and no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Acute toxicities of chemoradiation were as follows: 23% grade 3 or 4 vomiting, 6% febrile neutropenia, 31% grade 3 mucositis, and 23% grade 3 skin toxicity. The most prevalent grade 3 late effects were xerostomia and hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

This regimen was well tolerated, can be delivered as planned, and has resulted in excellent locoregional disease control and survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.

Recent advances in the treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. The prognosis of the disease is poor, with only 40% of patients eligible to undergo potentially curative surgery. Even for those patients who undergo a complete resection, the rate of recurrence is very high. Extensive studies of multidisciplinary adjuvant treatment have been conducted seeking to improve the cure rates in the past two decades. The benefit of D2 dissection is still controversial and is undergoing prospective evaluation. Preliminary results from the United States Gastrointestinal Intergroup study, a well designed trial, have shown overall survival benefit of postoperative chemoradiation therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation is under active study in order to increase the number of patients to undergo potential curative surgery. Although many chemotherapy regimens have been developed recently, only modest clinical efficacy has been demonstrated for advanced metastatic disease. So far, there is no single regimen considered to be standard.

Health-related quality of life and gastrointestinal disease

Society is changing rapidly, and new aspects need to be considered when evaluating treatment of disease. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a relatively new addition to the tools clinicians use to gain a better understanding of the impact of disease and its treatment. The questions 'What is it?', 'How it is measured?' and 'How can the information be used?' are now better understood than a few years ago. Generic instruments to capture HRQL enable a broad assessment of a range of aspects and can be used to make comparisons between different patient populations. Irrespective of the choice of instrument, they can classify the influence of different factors, such as gender, age, general health status and disease severity. Health-related quality of life assessments have been made in many areas of gastroenterology, such as reflux disease, inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome, to describe the burden of illness and the impact of treatment. Health-related quality of life as a prediction of treatment response is another interesting option. Its ability in the context of surgical intervention and outcomes is also emerging even though more work must be done in this area. Health-related quality of life evaluations, as an additional tool in the management of patients, are here to stay.

Infusional 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and mitomycin C in advanced gastric cancer: a low cost effective regimen

Recently, we reported a highly active regimen in advanced gastric cancer including a weekly administration of cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil with the support of filgrastim. In order to simplify the administration and to decrease the toxicity of these drugs, mainly epidoxorubicin-induced alopecia, we designed a regimen including an infusional 5-fluorouracil schedule according to the de Gramont regimen, cisplatin and mitomycin C replacing epidoxorubicin. Forty-five patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were treated with cisplatin 50 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 1, every 2 weeks, 6S-stereoisomer-leucovorin 100 mg m(-2) i.v. followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) i.v. in a 22-h infusion, on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks, and mitomycin C 7 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2, every 6 weeks. Grades 3-4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria) consisted mainly of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Five patients had a complete response and 16 had a partial response for an overall response rate of 46.7% (95% confidence interval, 32.1-61.2%). The median survival was 11 months. The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin according to de Gramont, and mitomycin C seems to be an active and safe regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Because of its low cost it may be suggested for patients not enrolled into clinical trials.

Phase I-II study of irinotecan combined with mitomycin-C in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan (CPT-11) shows synergism with mitomycin-C (MMC) in a preclinical setting. The goals of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose limiting toxicity, the recommended dose (RD), and preliminary anti-tumor activity in a combined CPT-11 and MMC treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was designed to evaluate escalated doses of CPT-11 and MMC administered every two weeks. Five escalating dose levels were studied (CPT-11/ MMC: 100/5; 125/5; 150/5; 150/7; 150/10 mg/m2).

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled. Thirty patients were assessable for toxicity and tumor response for 89 treatment cycles. The median age was 60 years (32-73 years), and most patients (90%) had a performance status of 0 to 1. Fourteen patients were previously treated and 17 were chemotherapynaive. The MTD was CPT-11 150 mg/m2 plus MMC 10 mg/m2, in which all three patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. including one episode of prolonged and one of febrile neutropenia, and one patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea during the first cycle. Fifteen partial responses were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The RD based on this phase I-II study was CPT-11 150 mg/m2 plus MMC 5 mg/m2 administered every two weeks. This combination demonstrates promising activity against advanced gastric cancer and warrants further investigation in another phase II study.

Measurement of outcome

The outcomes of treatment of oesophageal cancer include traditional biological and physical measures, such as mortality and morbidity data, disease free and overall survival, clinical and pathological response rates and symptom control. Such factors are essential and should be recorded prospectively for clinical audit. Using this type of information alone to evaluate effectiveness of treatment is inadequate, however, because the diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal cancer has a major impact on functional well-being (including psycho-social function), general health perceptions and overall quality of life (QL)/satisfaction with health and health care. These aspects of patients' well-being need to be considered, in addition to standard outcomes in the evaluation of treatment of oesophageal cancer. Recent needs to judge the economic efficiency of health care by comparing health outcomes with costs may also be part of treatment appraisal. This article reviews surgical, oncological, patient-based and economic outcomes in oesophageal cancer.

A phase II study of epirubicin, cisplatin and raltitrexed combination chemotherapy (ECT) in patients with advanced oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and ralitrexed (Tomudex). ECT, in patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma. Efficacy was assessed primarily as response rate and secondarily in terms of toxicity, time to progression and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with histologically and/or cytologically proven unresectable (7) or metastatic (14) gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma, who had bi-dimensionally measurable disease, with ECOG performance status < or = 2. with adequate haematological, hepatic and renal function received first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin (50 mg/m2). cisplatin (60 mg/m2) and Tomudex (2.5 mg/m2), ECT, at three-weekly intervals. Treatment consisted of three cycles of chemotherapy, with a further three cycles if there was disease response or stabilisation.

RESULTS

ECT is an active regimen in the treatment of advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma with an overall intention-to-treat response rate of 29% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 11%-52%). In addition, 4 (19%) patients had stable disease. Median time to progression was 19 weeks (95% CI: 7-31 weeks). Median overall survival was 18 weeks (95% CI: 11-24 weeks). Seventeen patients failed to complete the six cycles of treatment due to disease progression (5). toxicity (3), non-toxic death (1 pulmonary embolism, 1 cardiac), severe allergy to epirubicin (1), patient decision (1) and five patients after the study was discontinued early due to toxicity. There were three toxic deaths: two due to sepsis complicating neutropaenia and one due to cardiorespiratory failure following drug induced enteritis. Nine patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropaenia, two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 nausea and vomiting and one patient had grade 4 diarrhoea.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and tomudex is active against advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma but the toxicity suggests that further evaluation in a randomised comparison to ECF is not appropriate.

Timing of quality of life (QoL) assessments as a source of error in oncological trials

AIM OF THE STUDY

To produce an empirical estimate of the nature and magnitude of the error produced by incorrect timing quality of life (QoL) measurements in patients receiving chemotherapy.

DESIGN

In a multicentre trial, 283 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). The QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The study design was retrospective. Data were analysed using t-tests.

RESULTS

Erroneous timing affected the QoL findings in both treatment arms. At baseline, there were statistically significant differences in the MF group on the nausea/vomiting scale, with ill-timed assessment showing more symptoms, and in the T group on the physical functioning scale with ill-timed assessments indicating better QoL. The mean scores of correct vs. incorrect timings over the first 14 cycles showed statistically significant differences on several scales. In the MF group, ill-timed assessments indicated significantly worse physical functioning and global QoL, and significantly more of the following symptoms: fatigue, nausea/vomiting, insomnia, appetite loss, and constipation. In the T group, ill-timed assessment showed better physical functioning, less dyspnoea and more insomnia than correctly timed assessments. The reasons for erroneous timing were not always detectable retrospectively. However, in some cases the MF group, being in standard treatment, seemed to have followed a clinical routine not involving the active participation of the study nurse responsible, whereas patients in the experimental T group were more consistently taken care of by the study nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorrect timing of QoL assessments in oncological trials jeopardises both the reliability of the QoL findings within treatment and the validity of QoL outcome comparisons between treatments. This issue should be emphasized in the planning of both the study design and clinical routines.

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer carries a poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rate following resection ranges from 10 to 35 per cent. Recent evidence suggests that the addition of non-surgical treatments to surgery may improve resection rates, reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival. This review examines the role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

A Medline-based literature review (1980-2000) was performed using the key words 'neoadjuvant or preoperative' and 'chemoradiotherapy or radiochemotherapy'. Additional literature was obtained from original papers and published meeting abstracts.

RESULTS

Forty-six non-randomized and six randomized trials of preoperative CRT were found. Resection rates, pathological complete response (pCR), treatment-related mortality rates and relapse patterns are documented. Improved 5-year survival rates approaching 60 per cent may be achieved following pCR. Three of the six randomized trials show a benefit in either overall survival or disease-free survival compared with surgery alone. Treatment-related toxicity can be significant.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRT may improve survival. Emerging evidence suggests that CRT alone can achieve similar survival rates to surgery alone. New imaging modalities may help to select which patients require surgery. Larger randomized trials of preoperative CRT or chemotherapy are needed to define optimal regimens and produce higher pCR rates with acceptable toxicity.

A phase II study of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel after the weekly PELF regimen in advanced gastric cancer. A report from the Italian group for the study of digestive tract cancer

In advanced gastric cancer, we investigated feasibility and activity of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel after an intensive weekly regimen consisting of cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, fluorouracil, leucovorin (PELF) plus filgrastim. Chemotherapy-naive patients with relapsed or metastatic gastric cancer received 8 weekly administrations of chemotherapy with cisplatin 40 mg/m(2), fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epidoxorubicin 35 mg/m(2), 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg/m(2) and glutathione 1.5 g/m(2). On the other days filgrastim 5 microg kg(-1) was administered by subcutaneous injection. Subsequently, patients with partial response or stable disease received 3 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. 40 patients have been enrolled and they are evaluable for response and toxicity. After the PELF regimen, 3 patients achieved complete response, 13 patients showed partial response, 21 patients had stable disease and 3 patients progressed (40% response rate; 95% CI 25% to 55%). After docetaxel, 9 out 34 patients improved the outcome (26.5%); 7 patients with stable disease achieved partial response and 2 patients with partial response achieved complete response. The overall response rate in the 40 patients was 57.5% (95% CI, 42.5% to 72.5%). The PELF regimen did not cause any grade IV toxicity, the most frequent grade III acute side-effects were thrombocytopenia and vomiting which occurred in the 10% of 320 PELF cycles. Docetaxel caused grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in the 10% and the 19% of cycles respectively. Fatigue was a frequent side-effect during both PELF and docetaxel chemotherapy. The sequential application of docetaxel after PELF chemotherapy gained major objective responses with manageable toxicity. This strategy is worth of further investigation in the setting of palliative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil in combination with subcutaneous interleukin-2 and alpha-interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: a phase II study

Our purpose was to assess the activity of alpha-interferon (IFN-alpha), interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 5 fluorouracil (5FU) administered by protracted venous infusion (PVI) as opposed to bolus injection. 55 patients with advanced renal cell cancer were treated as follows: IL-2 and IFN-alpha according to the schedule originally described by Atzpodien, with PVI 5FU 200 mg m(-2)day(-1)during weeks 5-9. 42 patients (76%) were of moderate or poor prognosis as defined by previous studies. The response rate by intention to treat was 31% (17 of 55, three complete response, 14 partial response; 95% CI = 19-45%) and in evaluable patients (completed one cycle, n = 42), it was 40% (95% CI = 26-57%). In addition, 24% (13 of 55) patients achieved disease stabilization. The overall median survival was 11 months with a 1-year survival of 45%. The median survival for evaluable patients was 18 months with 1- and 2-year survivals of 60% and 40% respectively. The median survival of responding patients was 31 months and the three patients achieving complete response remain progression-free at 14+, 18+ and 23+ months. Evaluable patients with poor prognostic features achieved a response rate of 54% and median survival of 18 months. Toxicity was significant yet manageable with 12 patients unable to complete one cycle due to side-effects and 36% experiencing grade 3-4 toxicities. The three on-treatment deaths were considered unlikely to be due to toxicity. The schedule of IFN-alpha, IL-2 and PVI 5FU has significant activity in advanced renal cell cancer with manageable toxicity. It is of particular interest that this regimen appears to have high activity in fit patients with poor prognostic features.

Phase I study of irinotecan and raltitrexed in patients with advanced gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma

To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan and raltitrexed given as sequential short infusions every 3 weeks, 33 patients with pretreated gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma (31 colorectal, 2 oesophagogastric) entered this open label dose-escalation study. For the first five dose levels patients received irinotecan 175-350 mg m(-2) followed by raltitrexed 2.6 mg m(-2). Level VI was irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) plus raltitrexed 3.0 mg m(-2), level VII was irinotecan 400 mg m(-2) plus raltitrexed 2.6 mg m(-2); 261 courses were administered. Only one patient at dose levels I-V experienced DLT. At level VI, 5/12 patients experienced DLT: one had grade 3 diarrhoea and lethargy, one had grade 4 diarrhoea and one had lethargy alone. Two others had lethargy caused by disease progression. There was no first-cycle neutropenia. At level VII, 3/6 patients experienced dose-limiting lethargy, one also had grade 3 diarrhoea. Dose intensity fell from over 90% for both drugs at level VI to 83% for irinotecan and 66% for raltitrexed at level VII. Lethargy was therefore the DLT, and level VII the MTD. Pharmacokinetic data showed no measurable drug interaction; 6/30 patients (20%) had objective responses. This combination is active with manageable toxicity. Recommended doses for further evaluation are irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) and raltitrexed 3.0 mg m(-2).

Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of etoposide, leucovorin, and bolus fluorouracil (ELF) or infusional fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FUP) with that of the reference protocol of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 399 patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach were randomized and analyzed for toxicity, tumor response, and progression-free and overall survival. Only reviewed and confirmed responses were considered. The analysis of remission was based on assessable patients with documented measurable lesions. The intent-to-treat principle, log-rank test, and Cox regression model were used for the statistical analysis of time-to-event end points.

RESULTS

The overall response rate for 245 eligible patients with measurable disease was 9% with ELF, 20% with FUP, and 12% with FAMTX, with no significant differences. One hundred twelve patients were eligible for efficacy in assessable, nonmeasurable disease. No change was observed in 66% of patients treated with ELF, 56% with FUP, and 55% with FAMTX. Two patients achieved a complete tumor regression (one each for ELF and FAMTX). With a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, the median survival times were 7.2 months with ELF, 7.2 months with FUP, and 6.7 months with FAMTX, respectively, with no significant differences. Nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities of ELF, FUP, and FAMTX were acceptable, with neutropenia being the major toxicity for all three regimens. Seven treatment-related deaths occurred (two with FUP and five with FAMTX).

CONCLUSION

All three investigated regimens demonstrate modest clinical efficacy and should not be regarded as standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer. New strategies should be considered to achieve a better clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.