Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:734-744. [PMID: 23165462 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01568-12]

Drug-induced impairment of renal function

Pharmaceutical agents provide diagnostic and therapeutic utility that are central to patient care. However, all agents also carry adverse drug effect profiles. While most of these are clinically insignificant, some drugs may cause unacceptable toxicity that impacts negatively on patient morbidity and mortality. Recognizing adverse effects is important for administering appropriate drug doses, instituting preventive strategies, and withdrawing the offending agent due to toxicity. In the present article, we will review those drugs that are associated with impaired renal function. By focusing on pharmaceutical agents that are currently in clinical practice, we will provide an overview of nephrotoxic drugs that a treating physician is most likely to encounter. In doing so, we will summarize risk factors for nephrotoxicity, describe clinical manifestations, and address preventive and treatment strategies.

How do we use therapeutic drug monitoring to improve outcomes from severe infections in critically ill patients?

High mortality and morbidity rates associated with severe infections in the critically ill continue to be a significant issue for the healthcare system. In view of the diverse and unique pharmacokinetic profile of drugs in this patient population, there is increasing use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in attempt to optimize the exposure of antibiotics, improve clinical outcome and minimize the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Despite this, a beneficial clinical outcome for TDM of antibiotics has only been demonstrated for aminoglycosides in a general hospital patient population. Clinical outcome studies for other antibiotics remain elusive. Further, there is significant variability among institutions with respect to the practice of TDM including the selection of patients, sampling time for concentration monitoring, methodologies of antibiotic assay, selection of PK/PD targets as well as dose optimisation strategies. The aim of this paper is to review the available evidence relating to practices of antibiotic TDM, and describe how TDM can be applied to potentially improve outcomes from severe infections in the critically ill.

Innovative approaches to optimizing the delivery of vancomycin in individual patients

The delivery of personalized antimicrobial therapy is a critical component in the treatment of patients with invasive infections. Vancomycin, the drug of choice for infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, requires the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for delivery of optimal therapy. Current guidance on vancomycin TDM includes the measurement of a trough concentration as a surrogate for achieving an AUC to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by broth microdilution (AUC/MICBMD) ratio≥400. Although trough-only monitoring has been widely integrated into clinical practice, there is a high degree of inter-individual variability between a measured trough concentration and the actual AUC value. The therapeutic discordance between AUC and trough may lead to suboptimal outcomes among patients with infections due to less susceptible pathogens or unnecessarily increase the probability of acute kidney injury (AKI) in others. Given the potentially narrow vancomycin AUC range for optimal effect and minimal AKI, clinicians need a "real-time" system to predict accurately the AUC with limited pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling. This article reviews two innovative approaches for calculating the vancomycin AUC in clinical practice based on one or two drug concentrations. One such approach involves the use of Bayesian computer software programs to estimate the "true" vancomycin AUC value with minimal PK sampling and provide AUC-guided dosing recommendations at the bedside. An alternative involves use of two concentrations (peak and trough) and simple analytic equations to estimate AUC values. Both approaches provide considerable improvements over the current trough-only concentration monitoring method.

Assessment of initial vancomycin dosing in neonates

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is recommended for optimal treatment of late-onset sepsis caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in neonates.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of an empirical vancomycin dosing regimen in achieving target trough levels, and to revise this regimen if needed.

METHODS

Data regarding doses and levels were collected and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated, where possible, for neonates receiving vancomcyin in a neonatal intensive care unit. The primary measure was the percentage of neonates with initial prevancomycin levels of <10 mg/L, 10 mg/L to 20 mg/L and >20 mg/L. Secondary measures included the percentage of neonates with extrapolated trough levels in these ranges, total daily doses that achieved target levels (10 mg/L to 20 mg/L) and total daily doses/dosing intervals that were pharmacokinetically predicted to achieve trough levels of 15 mg/L.

RESULTS

Of 153 infants started on the empirical regimen (15 mg/kg/day to 45 mg/kg/day, depending on postnatal age and weight), 34.2% initially achieved target trough levels (mean 8.7 mg/L). Analysis of actual doses and pharmacokinetically predicted doses required to reach target levels suggested increasing the empirical dosing for all neonatal age groups. The revised regimen used in the present study (20 mg/kg/day to 40 mg/kg/day, depending on postmenstrual age and postnatal age) was predicted to result in 72% of infants achieving initial target trough levels (mean 15.4 mg/L).

CONCLUSIONS

A revised empirical vancomycin dosage regimen for neonates was required based on poor achievement of target trough levels (10 mg/L to 20 mg/L) using the previous regimen. The modified regimen is predicted to reach target trough levels more often and increase the mean initial trough levels achieved. This regimen requires clinical validation in an independent cohort in the future.

Antibiotic Dosing in Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: "Enough But Not Too Much"

Increasing evidence suggests that antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) often does not achieve pharmacodynamic goals, and the continued high mortality rate due to infectious causes appears to confirm these findings. Although there are compelling reasons why clinicians should use more aggressive antibiotic dosing, particularly in patients receiving aggressive renal replacement therapies, concerns for toxicity associated with higher doses are real. The presence of multisystem organ failure and polypharmacy predispose these patients to drug toxicity. This article examines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of critical illness, AKI, and renal replacement therapy and describes potential solutions to help clinicians give "enough but not too much" in these very complicated patients.

European perspective and update on the management of nosocomial pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after more than 10 years of experience with linezolid

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important cause of antimicrobial-resistant hospital-acquired infections worldwide and remains a public health priority in Europe. Nosocomial pneumonia (NP) involving MRSA often affects patients in intensive care units with substantial morbidity, mortality and associated costs. A guideline-based approach to empirical treatment with an antibacterial agent active against MRSA can improve the outcome of patients with MRSA NP, including those with ventilator-associated pneumonia. New methods may allow more rapid or sensitive diagnosis of NP or microbiological confirmation in patients with MRSA NP, allowing early de-escalation of treatment once the pathogen is known. In Europe, available antibacterial agents for the treatment of MRSA NP include the glycopeptides (vancomycin and teicoplanin) and linezolid (available as an intravenous or oral treatment). Vancomycin has remained a standard of care in many European hospitals; however, there is evidence that it may be a suboptimal therapeutic option in critically ill patients with NP because of concerns about its limited intrapulmonary penetration, increased nephrotoxicity with higher doses, as well as the emergence of resistant strains that may result in increased clinical failure. Linezolid has demonstrated high penetration into the epithelial lining fluid of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and shown statistically superior clinical efficacy versus vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA NP in a phase IV, randomized, controlled study. This review focuses on the disease burden and clinical management of MRSA NP, and the use of linezolid after more than 10 years of clinical experience.

Vancomycin-associated renal dysfunction: where are we now?

Vancomycin has been in clinical use for over 60 years, during which time renal toxicity has been well documented. Multiple risk factors and outcomes are associated with vancomycin-related nephrotoxicity. Risk factors include vancomycin exposure (trough levels 15 mg/L or higher, larger area under the curve, duration of therapy), host susceptibility to vancomycin (increased body weight, preexisting renal dysfunction, critical illness), and concurrent nephrotoxin therapy. Nephrotoxicity is associated with prolonged hospital stays, mortality, and the need for renal replacement therapy. To what degree vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity exacerbates these adverse clinical outcomes remains unclear. This article reviews the current evidence on vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity and explores future research directions with potential implications for improved patient safety.

Impact of empiric weight-based vancomycin dosing on nephrotoxicity and mortality in geriatric patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Few studies have evaluated the effect of vancomycin dosing on the health outcomes in geriatric patients. Data are needed to determine whether higher vancomycin dosing strategies are more effective in geriatric patients and/or lead to excessive rates of adverse events.

METHODS

This study used a subset of patients aged ≥65 years from a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia. Patients received ≥ 48 h of empiric vancomycin between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2008. We compared the incidence of nephrotoxicity and in-hospital mortality in patients who received guideline-recommended dosing (at least 15 mg/kg/dose) to patients who received lower dosing. Multivariable generalized mixed-effect models were constructed to determine independent risk factors for nephrotoxicity and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Half of the cohort (46% of 92 patients) received guideline-recommended dosing. Empiric use of weight-based dosing did increase the percentage of patients achieving a vancomycin trough ≥ 15 mg/L (57% vs. 42%). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 32% of patients and 26% died during their hospitalization. Guideline-recommended dosing was not associated with significant changes in nephrotoxicity (OR 1·13; 95% CI 0·40-3·19) or in-hospital mortality (OR 1·14; 95% CI 0·41-3·18) in the multivariable analysis.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

In this study of geriatric patients, guideline-recommended dosing was not associated with significant changes in nephrotoxicity or mortality. As 40% of the patients who received guideline-recommended dosing failed to achieve a target vancomycin trough of ≥ 15 mg/L, future studies should focus on dosing strategies to increase target attainment rate.

Factors Associated With Acute Kidney Injury in Children Receiving Vancomycin

Background: As higher vancomycin doses have been used in children, concern for acute kidney injury (AKI) has increased. Data describing factors associated with AKI, particularly dose-related factors, are limited. Objective: To determine the incidence of AKI in children receiving intravenous vancomycin and to identify factors associated with increased odds of AKI. Methods: A retrospective review of patients admitted to a tertiary academic pediatric hospital from February 2009 to September 2010 was performed. Patients 3 months to <19 years old with normal kidney function, receiving vancomycin for at least 48 hours were included. Incidence of AKI was assessed as defined by the Pediatric-Modified RIFLE criteria. Patients with and without AKI were compared to determine factors associated with increased odds of AKI, focusing on vancomycin dose. Results: Of 175 patients included, 24 (13.7%) met AKI criteria. In a multivariate regression, likelihood of AKI increased with each 5 mg/kg increase in vancomycin dose (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.01-1.33). Odds of AKI increased with each additional day of therapy (OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.01-1.22) and use of concomitant nephrotoxic medications (OR = 5.02; 95% CI = 1.09-23.19). The study was limited by small sample size and retrospective design. Conclusions: AKI was common in children receiving vancomycin. Higher doses of vancomycin were associated with increased odds of AKI. The risks and benefits of higher vancomycin dosing should be considered for each patient. Patients should be monitored closely for AKI, especially with higher doses, extended durations of therapy, or concomitant use of nephrotoxic medications.

Implementation of vancomycin dosing nomogram in an electronic prescribing system: an innovative tool in antibiotic stewardship

Vancomycin (VAN) is the gold standard therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) infections such as bacteremia and endocarditis. However, VAN suboptimal dosing for serious infections caused by S. aureus isolates that have elevated minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), could be associated with poor outcome. Better understanding of VAN pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) has led to the creation of new recommendations with optimized dosing regimens for the treatment of MRSA infections. For severe infectious, such as pneumonia and endocarditis, a VAN serum trough concentration of 15-20 mg/L at the steady state should be targeted. The aim of this study was to show how a nomogram with updated VAN dosing was devised and how it was implemented in the electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) system of a teaching hospital. VAN loading dose and maintenance doses were calculated from a pharmacokinetic equation using basic parameters: weight, estimated creatinine clearance, as well as peak and trough serum concentrations. The implementation of the VAN dosing nomogram in the hospital e-prescribing system definitively changed the long-standing medical prescription fallacy of "same dose fits all". Finally, this computer-based electronic program has allowed a wide-ranging intervention and should be recognized as a powerful tool for implementation in antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Nasal screening is useful in excluding methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in ventilator-associated pneumonia

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening performed for infection control purposes may be useful in guiding decisions regarding the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the intensive care unit. A cohort study of adults with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) found that admission MRSA nasal swabs had a negative predictive value of 94% for later MRSA VAP.

Association between vancomycin trough concentration and area under the concentration-time curve in neonates

National treatment guidelines for invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections recommend targeting a vancomycin 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24)-to-MIC ratio of >400. The range of vancomycin trough concentrations that best predicts an AUC0-24 of >400 in neonates is not known. This understanding would help clarify target trough concentrations in neonates when treating MRSA. A retrospective chart review from a level III neonatal intensive care unit was performed to identify neonates treated with vancomycin over a 5-year period. Vancomycin concentrations and clinical covariates were utilized to develop a one-compartment population pharmacokinetic model and examine the relationships between trough and AUC0-24 in the study neonates. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to examine the effect of dose, postmenstrual age (PMA), and serum creatinine level on trough and AUC0-24 achievement. A total of 1,702 vancomycin concentrations from 249 neonates were available for analysis. The median (interquartile range) PMA was 39 weeks (32 to 42 weeks) and weight was 2.9 kg (1.6 to 3.7 kg). Vancomycin clearance was predicted by weight, PMA, and serum creatinine level. At a trough of 10 mg/liter, 89% of the study neonates had an AUC0-24 of >400. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that troughs ranging from 7 to 11 mg/liter were highly predictive of an AUC0-24 of >400 across a range of PMA, serum creatinine levels, and vancomycin doses. However, a trough of ≥10 mg/liter was not readily achieved in most simulated subgroups using routine starting doses. Higher starting doses frequently resulted in troughs of >20 mg/liter. A vancomycin trough of ∼10 mg/liter is likely adequate for most neonates with invasive MRSA infections based on considerations of the AUC0-24. Due to pharmacokinetic and clinical heterogeneity in neonates, consistently achieving this target vancomycin exposure with routine starting doses is difficult. More robust clinical dosing support tools are needed to help clinicians with dose individualization.

Evaluation of Treatment Courses When Vancomycin Is Given Every 8 Hours in Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Several nomograms include recommendations to give intravenous (IV) vancomycin at 8-hour dosing intervals (Q8H). However, there is a lack of detailed data regarding this dosing recommendation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 100 patients who received 107 treatment courses of vancomycin Q8H for at least 5 days was performed. Distribution of vancomycin trough levels and rate of nephrotoxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 38 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27-50 years), median weight was 67 kg (IQR 55-79 kg), and median creatinine clearance was 124 mL/min (IQR 101-147 mL/min). Median duration of Q8H dosing was 9 days (IQR 7-12 days). Within the initial 96 hours, only 7% (7 of 104) of maximum trough concentrations were >20 mg/L (median dose 15 mg/kg [IQR 15-18 mg/kg]). After 96 hours of Q8H dosing, 34% (30 of 89) of maximum troughs were >20 mg/L (median dose 17 mg/kg [IQR 15-20 mg/kg]), P = .0005. The rate of nephrotoxicity was 4%.

CONCLUSION

We observed an increase in the percentage of trough levels >20 mg/L later during treatment courses of vancomycin IV Q8H with a relatively small corresponding increase in vancomycin dose. Close monitoring of trough levels (eg, every 3 days) with prolonged courses of vancomycin IV Q8H is warranted.

Impact of source of infection and vancomycin AUC0-24/MICBMD targets on treatment failure in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

Despite recent controversies about toxicity and reduced efficacy, vancomycin remains the current treatment of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia. The parameter associated with treatment success is the vancomycin 24-h area under concentration-time curve to MIC ratio (AUC0-24/MIC). We aimed to determine the utility of calculated AUCs and explore the optimal AUC0-24/MIC targets associated with treatment success. In this single-centre retrospective observational cohort study of 127 patients with MRSA bacteraemia, forty-five (35.4%) did not respond to vancomycin treatment. Patient characteristics were essentially the same between those who did not respond to vancomycin treatment and those with treatment success, with independent predictors of treatment failure being source of bacteraemia (odds ratio (OR), 4.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.50-12.26; p 0.007) and not achieving an AUC0-24/MICBMD (using broth microdilution) target of ≥398 (OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 4.57-28.46; p< 0.001). Bacteraemic source-specific thresholds were observed with a higher AUC0-24/MICBMD target of 440 required for high-risk sources (e.g. infective endocarditis) compared with 330 for low-risk sources (line related bacteraemia). Overall treatment success in patients with MRSA bacteraemia was associated with a vancomycin AUC0-24/MICBMD target of ≥398, with source-specific targets observed. Future vancomycin practice guidelines will need to take into account MIC methodology, source of bacteraemia and patient populations prior to setting targets and monitoring recommendations.

Epidemiological Evaluation of Blood Culture Patterns among Neonates Receiving Vancomycin

The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of blood culture (BC) collection among neonates who received vancomycin. Demographic, clinical, microbiologic, and pharmacy data were collected for 1275 neonates (postnatal age 0-27 days) who received vancomycin at an Intermountain Healthcare facility between 1/2006 and 9/2011. Neonates treated with vancomycin had a BC collected 94 % (n = 1198) of the time, of which 37 % (n = 448) grew one or more bacterial organisms (BC positive). Of these, 1 % (n = 5) grew methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 71 % (n = 320) grew coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), 9 % (n = 40) grew methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), and 22 % (n = 97) grew other bacterial species (total exceeds 100 % due to co-detection). In patients with negative BC or no BC, vancomycin therapy was extended beyond 72 h 52 % of the time. The median duration of vancomycin therapy for patients with a negative BC was 4 (IQR: 2-10) days. BCs were frequently obtained among neonates who received vancomycin. Vancomycin therapy beyond the conventional 'empiric' treatment window of 48-72 h was common without isolation of resistant gram-positive bacteria.

Treatment options for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection: Where are we now?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection continues to be a substantial global problem with significant associated morbidity and mortality. This review summarises the discussions that took place at the 4th MRSA Consensus Conference in relation to the current treatment options for serious MRSA infections and how to optimise whichever therapy is embarked upon. It highlights the many challenges faced by both the laboratory and clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of MRSA infections.

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy practices among adult infectious disease physicians

OBJECTIVE

To identify current outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy practice patterns and complications.

METHODS

We administered an 11-question survey to adult infectious disease physicians participating in the Emerging Infections Network (EIN), a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored sentinel event surveillance network in North America. The survey was distributed electronically or via facsimile in November and December 2012. Respondent demographic characteristics were obtained from EIN enrollment data.

RESULTS

Overall, 555 (44.6%) of EIN members responded to the survey, with 450 (81%) indicating that they treated 1 or more patients with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) during an average month. Infectious diseases consultation was reported to be required for a patient to be discharged with OPAT by 99 respondents (22%). Inpatient (282 [63%] of 449) and outpatient (232 [52%] of 449) infectious diseases physicians were frequently identified as being responsible for monitoring laboratory results. Only 26% (118 of 448) had dedicated OPAT teams at their clinical site. Few infectious diseases physicians have systems to track errors, adverse events, or "near misses" associated with OPAT (97 [22%] of 449). OPAT-associated complications were perceived to be rare. Among respondents, 80% reported line occlusion or clotting as the most common complication (occurring in 6% of patients or more), followed by nephrotoxicity and rash (each reported by 61%). Weekly laboratory monitoring of patients who received vancomycin was reported by 77% of respondents (343 of 445), whereas 19% of respondents (84 of 445) reported twice weekly laboratory monitoring for these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although use of OPAT is common, there is significant variation in practice patterns. More uniform OPAT practices may enhance patient safety.

Large retrospective evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of ceftaroline fosamil therapy

Ceftaroline has been approved for acute bacterial skin infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Limited clinical experience exists for use outside these indications. The objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients treated with ceftaroline for various infections. Retrospective analyses of patients receiving ceftaroline ≥72 h from 2011 to 2013 were included. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were analyzed. Clinical success was defined as resolution of all signs and symptoms of infection with no further need for escalation while on ceftaroline treatment during hospitalization. A total of 527 patients received ceftaroline, and 67% were treated for off-label indications. Twenty-eight percent (148/527) of patients had bacteremia. Most patients (80%) were initiated on ceftaroline after receipt of another antimicrobial, with 48% citing disease progression as a reason for switching. The median duration of ceftaroline treatment was 6 days, with an interquartile range of 4 to 9 days. A total of 327 (62%) patients were culture positive, and the most prevalent pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus, with a frequency of 83% (271/327). Of these patients, 88.9% (241/271) were infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Clinically, 88% (426/484) achieved clinical success and hospital mortality was seen in 8% (40/527). While on ceftaroline, adverse events were experienced in 8% (41/527) of the patients and 9% (28/307) were readmitted within 30 days after discharge for the same infection. Patients treated with ceftaroline for both FDA-approved and off-label infections had favorable outcomes. Further research is necessary to further describe the role of ceftaroline in a variety of infections and its impact on patient outcomes.

Drug-induced nephrotoxicity: clinical impact and preclinical in vitro models

The kidney is a major target for drug-induced toxicity. Drug-induced nephrotoxicity remains a major problem in the clinical setting, where the use of nephrotoxic drugs is often unavoidable. This leads frequently to acute kidney injury, and current problems are discussed. One strategy to avoid such problems would be the development of drugs with decreased nephrotoxic potential. However, the prediction of nephrotoxicity during preclinical drug development is difficult and nephrotoxicity is typically detected only late. Also, the nephrotoxic potential of newly approved drugs is often underestimated. Regulatory approved or validated in vitro models for the prediction of nephrotoxicity are currently not available. Here, we will review current approaches on the development of such models. This includes a discussion of three-dimensional and microfluidic models and recently developed stem cell based approaches. Most in vitro models have been tested with a limited number of compounds and are of unclear predictivity. However, some studies have tested larger numbers of compounds and the predictivity of the respective in vitro model had been determined. The results showed that high predictivity can be obtained by using primary or stem cell derived human renal cells in combination with appropriate end points.

Retrospective review of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with leukemia

Background

The occurrence of nephrotoxicity with vancomycin is approximately 17%, but can increase to 35% when combined with other nephrotoxic agents. Patients with hematologic malignancies may be at greater risk for vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity due to nephrotoxic chemotherapy and tumor lysis syndrome.

Objective

The primary objective of this study was to determine the occurrence of nephrotoxicity in adult patients with leukemia receiving vancomycin.

Methods

A retrospective review approved by the Institutional Review Board was conducted on adult patients with leukemia who received at least one dose of vancomycin during hospital admission between 1 January 2009 and 30 April 2009.

Results

Forty patients had an occurrence of nephrotoxicity (16%) while 210 patients did not have an occurrence of nephrotoxicity. In multivariate analysis, variables significantly associated with development of nephrotoxicity included active disease status (odds ratio, 4.38 [95% CI 1.1–29.4], p = 0.0291), concomitant intravenous acyclovir administration (odds ratio, 3.83 [95% CI, 1.6–8.9]; p = 0.0022), and concomitant amphotericin administration (odds ratio, 4.26 [95% CI, 1.9–9.4]; p = 0.0004).

Conclusion

The occurrence of nephrotoxicity in patients with leukemia treated with vancomycin was 16% in our study, similar to previously published reports. Active disease status and concomitant use of intravenous acyclovir and amphotericin were identified as significant risk factors for development of nephrotoxicity. The presence of risk factors for vancomycin nephrotoxicity should be evaluated prior to initiation of therapy to determine appropriateness of use.

Desired vancomycin trough serum concentration for treating invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal infections

Vancomycin area under the curve/minimal inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) >400 best predicts the outcome when treating invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection; however, trough serum concentrations are used clinically to assess the appropriateness of dosing. We used pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation to examine the relationship between vancomycin trough values and AUC/MIC in children receiving vancomycin 15 mg/kg every 6 hours and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MIC of 1 μg/mL. A trough of 7-10 μg/mL predicted achievement of AUC/MIC >400 in >90% of children.

Is it time to replace vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections?

For more than 4 decades, vancomycin has been the antibiotic of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Recently, infections due to isolates with high but susceptible vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations have been associated with additional treatment failures and patient mortality. These poorer outcomes may in part be explained by the inability of attaining appropriate vancomycin levels in these patients. However, assumptions that these poor outcomes are solely due to failure to achieve optimal serum levels of vancomycin are premature. The availability of effective alternatives further erodes the position of vancomycin as first-line therapy. The emergence of resistance and cost considerations, however, favor a more measured approach when using alternative antimicrobials. Collectively, the current available data suggest that the optimal therapy for MRSA infections remains unclear. In the absence of further data, the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines remain relevant and inform clinicians of best practice for treating patients with MRSA infections.

Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is used abundantly in patients undergoing HSCT, especially during neutropenic fever. Despite its widespread use little is known about vancomycin pharmacokinetics in HSCT patients. We conducted this study to investigate vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters in our HSCT patients and to evaluate current dosing regimen based on trough vancomycin concentrations measurement.

METHODS

Vancomycin serum concentration at steady-state was determined prospectively in 46 adult HSCT patients who received vancomycin as empirical treatment of neutropenic fever. Individual steady-steady pharmacokinetic parameters were also determined in 20 patients who had two vancomycin levels from an administered dose, assuming one-compartment model. Acute kidney injury was also evaluated in our patients during vancomycin therapy.

RESULTS

Mean (±SD) apparent volume of distribution (L/kg) and clearance (mL/min) were 0.6 (± 0.33) and 109.7 (± 57.5) respectively. With mean (±SD) total daily dose of vancomycin 31.9 (±10.5) mg/kg/day that was administered, more than 90% of measured vancomycin trough concentrations were outside the range of 15-20 mg/L and 54.3% of patients had trough concentrations below 10 mg/L. Of 46 patients, 21 patients (45.7%) developed acute kidney injury (AKI) during vancomycin therapy; among them 19 patients were receiving nephrotoxic drug(s) concomitantly.

CONCLUSION

Current vancomycin dosage regimen could not lead to recommended therapeutic serum concentrations in our patients. Large variation in vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters observed among patients of this study along with difference of vancomycin pharmacokinetics in our study and other similar studies further explain the need for therapeutic drug monitoring and individualization of vancomycin dosing.