Trough imatinib plasma levels are associated with both cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

Clinical profile of dasatinib in Asian and non-Asian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Resistance and intolerance to imatinib are of particular clinical relevance to Asian patients because of their lower body surface area. Dasatinib is 325-fold more potent than imatinib in inhibiting BCR-ABL in vitro and is indicated for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Data from a series of phase I/II research trials were analyzed to compare the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profile of dasatinib 70 mg twice daily in Asian and non-Asian patients. Results from 55 Asian and 615 non-Asian patients demonstrated that the efficacy and safety of dasatinib was comparable. Dasatinib was well tolerated, with no observed toxicities exclusive to Asian patients. A higher incidence of adverse events and lower rate of response observed among Asian patients with myeloid blast phase CML reflected the aggressive nature of the disease. Analyses of noncompartmental pharmacokinetics (5 Asian and 49 non-Asian patients) and population pharmacokinetics (17 Asian and 382 non-Asian patients) were also comparable. The efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profile of dasatinib 70 mg twice daily is similar in Asian and non-Asian patients with CML. Dasatinib is therefore an important therapeutic option for this patient population.

Imatinib plasma levels are correlated with clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PURPOSE To study the pharmacokinetics (PK) of imatinib (IM) in patients with advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs) treated in a randomized phase II study and to explore the potential relationship between IM plasma levels and long-term clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive IM at 400 mg versus 600 mg daily. IM plasma levels were analyzed in a subset of patients (n = 73) for whom PK data on day 1 and at steady-state (SS, day 29) were available. IM PK was evaluated using a population PK approach. The relationship between IM plasma exposure and clinical outcome was explored by grouping patients into quartiles according to IM trough concentration (C(min)). The clinical outcome parameters evaluated include overall objective benefit rate (OOBR; complete response plus partial response plus stable disease) time to progression (TTP), and KIT genotyping. Results IM PK exposure showed a high inter-patient variability, and clinical outcomes were correlated with IM trough levels at SS. The median TTP was 11.3 months for patients in the lowest C(min) quartile (Q1, < 1,110 ng/mL) compared with more than 30 months for Q2 to Q4 (P = .0029). OOBR was also inferior in Q1 patients. In patients with GIST with KIT exon 11 mutations (n = 39), the OOBR was 67% for Q1 patients versus 100% for all others (P = .001). CONCLUSION In patients with advanced GIST, IM trough levels at SS were associated with clinical benefit. Patients with IM C(min) below 1,100 ng/mL showed a shorter TTP and lower rate of clinical benefit (OOBR). Further studies are justified to test whether monitoring IM plasma levels might optimize clinical outcomes for patients with GIST.

Kinase mutations and efficacy of imatinib in Korean patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PURPOSE

This study analyzed the relationship between treatment outcome and kinase mutational status in Korean patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Clinical data were collected from 113 consecutive patients with metastatic or unresectable GISTs treated with imatinib from June 2001 through June 2005 at five institutions in Korea. KIT exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 and PDGFRA exons 12 and 18 were examined.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 57 years (range, 31-82 years). The overall response rate was 67.2%. KIT mutations were found in exon 11 (n = 92, 81.4%) and exon 9 (n = 10, 8.8%). One patient had a PDGFRA exon 18 mutation. The overall mutation rate was 91.2%. Response rates were 68.4%, 50.0%, and 80.0% in patients with KIT exon 11 mutations, KIT exon 9 mutations, and no kinase mutations, respectively. With a median follow-up of 49.0 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 42.0 months and median overall survival (OS) time was not reached. PFS and OS times did not differ significantly according to KIT genotype.

CONCLUSION

This study was unable to find an association between KIT mutational status and clinical outcome of imatinib in Korean patients with advanced GISTs. There was a trend toward better outcomes for patients with wild-type KIT or exon 11 mutations compared with exon 9 mutations, although this was not statistically significant. Compared with previous studies in western populations, these results suggest that ethnic differences may influence the relationship between KIT genotype and clinical outcome to imatinib.

First-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia: Past, present, and future

The development of Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Standard-dose imatinib (400 mg/day in chronic phase, 600 mg/day in advanced CML) now dominates the management of this disease, producing considerably higher hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular response rates than seen with previous drug therapies. However, although many patients respond well to standard-dose imatinib initially, some patients do not achieve adequate levels of response or discontinue therapy because of resistance. One approach to improving treatment response with first-line imatinib may be to increase the imatinib dose (800 mg/day), although recent trial data indicate that overall increases in response rates may be modest. Newer Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors can induce responses in patients with all phases of imatinib-resistant CML, even those with imatinib-resistant mutations in the BCR-ABL gene. Furthermore, in initial studies, first-line dasatinib or nilotinib treatment has produced response rates that compare favorably with historical controls treated with imatinib, although confirmation is required from head-to-head clinical trials. Future clinical approaches may include drug combinations, which may allow quiescent leukemia stem cells to be eradicated. Further improvements in drug treatment for first-line CML are expected during the next few years.

Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study

Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) has been shown to be highly efficacious in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Continuous and adequate dosing is essential for optimal outcomes and with imatinib treatment possibly being lifelong, patient adherence is critical. The ADAGIO (Adherence Assessment with Glivec: Indicators and Outcomes) study aimed to assess prospectively over a 90-day period the prevalence of imatinib nonadherence in patients with CML; to develop a multivariate canonical correlation model of how various determinants may be associated with various measures of nonadherence; and to examine whether treatment response is associated with adherence levels. A total of 202 patients were recruited from 34 centers in Belgium, of whom 169 were evaluable. One-third of patients were considered to be nonadherent. Only 14.2% of patients were perfectly adherent with 100% of prescribed imatinib taken. On average, patients with suboptimal response had significantly higher mean percentages of imatinib not taken (23.2%, standard deviation [SD] = 23.8) than did those with optimal response (7.3%, SD = 19.3, P = .005; percentages calculated as proportions x 100). Nonadherence is more prevalent than patients, physicians, and family members believe it is, and therefore should be assessed routinely. It is associated with poorer response to imatinib. Several determinants may serve as alert signals, many of which are clinically modifiable.

Optimizing treatment with Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia: focus on dosing schedules

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), a genetic aberration that codes for bcrabl, which plays a key role in disease pathophysiology. The first oral inhibitor of Brc-Abl was imatinib, which also targets KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor kinase and has demonstrated improved outcomes when compared with interferon, the previous standard of care. Imatinib resistance and intolerance have been an issue for patients, and as a result, new therapeutic approaches have been evaluated. Dose-escalated imatinib (800 mg daily) has shown some limited activity in patients with imatinib-resistant CML, but the development of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors has broadened the treatment options. Dasatinib is also an oral kinase inhibitor, but it has increased potency for Brc-Abl compared with imatinib. Dasatinib has demonstrated activity in all phases of CML and Ph+ acute lymphocytic leukemia and is approved for the treatment of adults in this setting. Recent phase III data have demonstrated that, in patients with chronic-phase CML, dasatinib 100 mg once daily is equally effective, with improved tolerability, compared with the previously approved 70-mg twice-daily dose. Nilotinib, which has been recently approved, has increased potency for Brc-Abl compared with imatinib and has demonstrated activity in patients with imatinib-resistant and -intolerant chronic- and accelerated-phase CML. As experience with these agents continues to mature, we might optimize the treatment efficacy and safety profiles by altering dose regimens.

Efficacy of various doses and schedules of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Imatinib is one of the most potent cancer therapeutic agents identified to date. Before the introduction of this tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), 5-year survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was approximately 40%-60%, but since the introduction of imatinib, overall survival has increased to approximately 90% for patients with chronic-phase disease. However, nearly one fifth of patients are intolerant or resistant to imatinib, resulting in patients with persistent or progressive disease. Recent research has identified a number of additional compounds that more efficiently inhibit the Abl tyrosine kinase and additional kinases that potentially play a role in imatinib resistance. The advent of dasatinib and nilotinib has provided additional options for patients with progressive disease. A number of phase II clinical trials have recently demonstrated that these second-generation TKIs are well tolerated and effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemias. Recent clinical trial developments raise questions regarding the proper dosage and schedule of these newer agents as well as the timing of their use in the treatment of patients with CML. Additionally, the development of nonoverlapping resistance patterns with sequential drug exposure argues for the possibility of a drug selection scheme that might limit the development of resistant disease. As the era of personalized medicine has begun to take shape in the 21st century, the addition of newer TKIs might facilitate this trend in the treatment of Ph+ leukemias.

Mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Although the vast majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) respond to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib mesylate, resistance might occur de novo or during treatment.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the known mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to imatinib and other TKIs used in the management of CML.

RESULTS

Mutations within the kinase domain of BCR-ABLI account for 30% to 40% of cases of imatinib resistance. Other mechanisms include BCR-ABLI amplification, overexpression of the SRC family of kinases, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not all resistance mechanisms have been identified and understood, several agents based on the known mechanisms have already been designed and developed and are beginning clinical trials.

Long-term efficacy of imatinib in a practical setting is correlated with imatinib trough concentration that is influenced by body size: a report by the Nagasaki CML Study Group

Imatinib has dramatically improved long-term survival of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients. To analyze its efficacy in a practical setting, we registered most of CML patients in Nagasaki Prefecture of Japan. Of these, 73 patients received imatinib as an initial therapy. The overall survival rate of these patients was 88.7% at 6 years, and the cumulative complete cytogenetic response rate was 82.5% at 18 months. These results are comparable with the data of other reports including the IRIS study; however, the administered imatinib dose was smaller in our study than that in other reports. To address these discrepancies, we measured the trough concentration of imatinib among 35 patients. Although 39% of the patients were administered less than 400 mg/day, the trough level was comparable to those of previous reports. The trough level of imatinib showed a significant relationship with its efficacy, and was clearly related to dose of imatinib administrated and dose of imatinib divided by body surface area (BSA). Considering the smaller BSA of Japanese patients as compared to those of foreign origin, the results suggest that a lower dose of imatinib could maintain enough trough level and provided excellent results for the treatment of CML in our registry.

Comparison of imatinib 400 mg and 800 mg daily in the front-line treatment of high-risk, Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia: a European LeukemiaNet Study

Imatinib mesylate (IM), 400 mg daily, is the standard treatment of Philadelphia-positive (Ph(+)) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Preclinical data and results of single-arm studies raised the suggestion that better results could be achieved with a higher dose. To investigate whether the systematic use of a higher dose of IM could lead to better results, 216 patients with Ph(+) CML at high risk (HR) according to the Sokal index were randomly assigned to receive IM 800 mg or 400 mg daily, as front-line therapy, for at least 1 year. The CCgR rate at 1 year was 64% and 58% for the high-dose arm and for the standard-dose arm, respectively (P = .435). No differences were detectable in the CgR at 3 and 6 months, in the molecular response rate at any time, as well as in the rate of other events. Twenty-four (94%) of 25 patients who could tolerate the full 800-mg dose achieved a CCgR, and only 4 (23%) of 17 patients who could tolerate less than 350 mg achieved a CCgR. This study does not support the extensive use of high-dose IM (800 mg daily) front-line in all CML HR patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00514488.

Drug monitoring of imatinib levels in patients undergoing therapy for chronic myeloid leukaemia: comparing plasma levels of responders and non-responders

PURPOSE

Imatinib mesylate is used as first line therapy in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia. This study was designed to study the correlation of plasma levels of imatinib with response to the therapy.

METHODS

A total of 40 chronic myeloid leukaemia patients in the chronic phase of the disease were recruited and placed into two groups of 20 patients: imatinib responders and imatinib non-responders, respectively. Each blood sample was taken 24 h after and immediately prior to taking a 400 mg oral dose of imatinib. Drug levels were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

The mean plasma imatinib levels in the imatinib non-responders were significantly lower than those in the imatinib responders (0.70 vs. 2.34 microM, respectively; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma levels of imatinib were correlated with response to the therapy, so routine monitoring of the therapeutic levels of the drug should be carried out specifically in treatment-resistant cases for determining dose escalation.

Results of high-dose imatinib mesylate in intermediate Sokal risk chronic myeloid leukemia patients in early chronic phase: a phase 2 trial of the GIMEMA CML Working Party

Imatinib mesylate has become the treatment of choice for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): the standard dose for chronic- phase (CP) CML is 400 mg daily. Response rates are different according to Sokal score, being significantly lower in intermediate and high Sokal risk patients. Phase 1 and 2 trials have shown a dose-response effect and high-dose imatinib trials in early CP CML showed better results compared with standard dose. Our study is the first prospective trial planned to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose imatinib in previously untreated intermediate Sokal risk CML patients. Seventy-eight patients were treated with 400 mg imatinib twice daily: complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) rates at 12 and 24 months were 88% and 91%; moreover, at 12 and 24 months 56% and 73% of CCgR patients achieved a major molecular response. The incidence of adverse events was slightly higher than reported by the most important standard-dose trials. With a median follow-up of 24 months, 3 patients progressed to advanced phase. In intermediate Sokal risk newly diagnosed CML patients, high-dose imatinib induced rapid and high response rates, apparently faster than those documented in the International Randomized Study of IFN and Imatinib for the same risk category. These clinical trials are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT00510926.

Development and targeted use of nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

The development of imatinib has resulted in sustained hematologic and cytogenetic remissions in all phases of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Despite the high efficacy, relapses have been observed and are much more prevalent in patients with advanced disease. The most common mechanism of acquired resistance has been traced to Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations. Several strategies have been developed to overcome the problem of imatinib resistance, including imatinib dose escalation, novel targeted agents and combination treatments. A second generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors was developed, which displays increased potency towards Bcr-Abl and is able to target the majority of CML mutant clones. Nilotinib (Tasigna^®, AMN107, Novartis) is a close analog of imatinib with approximately 20-fold higher potency for BCR-ABL kinase inhibition. Preclinical and clinical investigations demonstrate that nilotinib effectively overcomes imatinib resistance, and has induced high rates of hematologic and cytogenetic responses in CML post imatinib failure, with a good tolerance. Nilotinib has been approved for CML patients in chronic and accelerated phases, post imatinib failure.

Molecular perspectives on the non-responder phenomenon

With the advent of targeted therapies promising to revolutionise the nature and success of patient care, the field of clinical oncology is facing a highly exciting future. While much of this enthusiasm comes from the hope for improved patient outcomes, a review of clinical response/relapse rates for current therapies provides a more sobering perspective. Given that the majority of patients are intrinsically resistant to the therapeutic potential of these molecules, efforts are now directed at characterising such non-responsive system behaviour and causative molecular insults. Testament to this is an expanding catalogue of target and system-based aberrations, often defined through retrospective analyses of clinical tissue and associated outcome data. What has emerged is a complex picture, where numerous potential sources of cancer-specific aberration can contribute to refractory tumour behaviour. Clinicians, regulators and sponsors must now collaborate to determine how such knowledge should be used to enhance the clinical decision process and associated regulatory guidance.

Suboptimal response to or failure of imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: what is the optimal strategy?

Treatment responses to imatinib vary among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and definitions of treatment failure and suboptimal response have been published. This article discusses monitoring and treatment of patients with CML after failure of or suboptimal response to imatinib therapy. We reviewed articles listed on PubMed from January 1, 2002, to July 31, 2008, and abstracts from the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Search terms used were chronic myeloid/myelogenous leukemia, imatinib, and BCR-ABL. To enable early recognition of suboptimal responses, patients should be frequently monitored according to published guidelines, including cytogenetic analysis every 6 months until a complete response is achieved and molecular monitoring every 3 months from the start of therapy or monthly if an increasing BCR-ABL1 transcript level is detected. Mutational analysis of BCR-ABL1 may assist with treatment selection. A recent survey suggests that a notable proportion of physicians do not follow treatment guidelines and that broader communication is required. Recent recommendations state that, in patients whose response to imatinib at 400 mg/d is suboptimal, the dose should be increased, whereas alternative therapies, such as dasatinib, nilotinib, and allogeneic stem cell transplant (in eligible patients), and imatinib dose escalation should be considered after imatinib failure. However, clinical data are lacking to confirm this sequence of treatments, and introducing alternative therapies at an earlier stage of treatment, for example, after a suboptimal response, may produce better long-term outcomes in a higher proportion of patients. Patient and disease characteristics should be carefully considered to optimize treatment strategy for CML.

Suboptimal response to or failure of imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: what is the optimal strategy?

Treatment responses to imatinib vary among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and definitions of treatment failure and suboptimal response have been published. This article discusses monitoring and treatment of patients with CML after failure of or suboptimal response to imatinib therapy. We reviewed articles listed on PubMed from January 1, 2002, to July 31, 2008, and abstracts from the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Search terms used were chronic myeloid/myelogenous leukemia, imatinib, and BCR-ABL. To enable early recognition of suboptimal responses, patients should be frequently monitored according to published guidelines, including cytogenetic analysis every 6 months until a complete response is achieved and molecular monitoring every 3 months from the start of therapy or monthly if an increasing BCR-ABL1 transcript level is detected. Mutational analysis of BCR-ABL1 may assist with treatment selection. A recent survey suggests that a notable proportion of physicians do not follow treatment guidelines and that broader communication is required. Recent recommendations state that, in patients whose response to imatinib at 400 mg/d is suboptimal, the dose should be increased, whereas alternative therapies, such as dasatinib, nilotinib, and allogeneic stem cell transplant (in eligible patients), and imatinib dose escalation should be considered after imatinib failure. However, clinical data are lacking to confirm this sequence of treatments, and introducing alternative therapies at an earlier stage of treatment, for example, after a suboptimal response, may produce better long-term outcomes in a higher proportion of patients. Patient and disease characteristics should be carefully considered to optimize treatment strategy for CML.

ABCG2: a perspective

ABCG2, or breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), is an ABC transporter that has been the subject of intense study since its discovery a decade ago. With high normal tissue expression in the brain endothelium, gastrointestinal tract, and placenta, ABCG2 is believed to be important in the protection from xenobiotics, regulating oral bioavailability, forming part of the blood-brain barrier, the blood-testis barrier, and the maternal-fetal barrier. Notably, ABCG2 is often expressed in stem cell populations, where it likely plays a role in xenobiotic protection. However, clues to its epigenetic regulation in various cell populations are only beginning to emerge. While ABCG2 overexpression has been demonstrated in cancer cells after in vitro drug treatment, endogenous ABCG2 expression in certain cancers is likely a reflection of the differentiated phenotype of the cell of origin and likely contributes to intrinsic drug resistance. Notably, research into the transporter's role in cancer drug resistance and its development as a therapeutic target in cancer has lagged. Substrates and inhibitors of the transporter have been described, among them chemotherapy drugs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antivirals, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, carcinogens, and flavonoids. This broad range of substrates complements the efficiency of ABCG2 as a transporter in laboratory studies and suggests that, while there are redundant mechanisms of xenobiotic protection, the protein is important in normal physiology. Indeed, emerging studies in pharmacology and toxicology assessing polymorphic variants in man, in combination with murine knockout models have confirmed its dynamic role. Work in pharmacology may eventually lead us to a greater understanding of the physiologic role of ABCG2.

Initial treatment for patients with CML

For adult patients who present with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase it is now generally agreed that initial treatment should start with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib at 400 mg daily. Five years after starting imatinib about 60% of these patients will be in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), still taking imatinib; an appreciable proportion of these will have achieved a major molecular response, defined as a 3-log reduction in the level of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in their blood. The patients in CCyR seem to have a very low risk of relapse to chronic phase or of progression to advanced phase. Other patients may be resistant to imatinib or may experience significant side effects that require change of therapy. The best method of monitoring responding patients is to enumerate Philadelphia chromosome–positive marrow metaphases at 3-month intervals until CCyR and to perform RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL1 transcripts at 3-month intervals after starting imatinib. The recommendations for defining “failure” and “sub-optimal response” proposed by the European LeukemiaNet in 2006 have proved to be a major contribution to assessing responses in individual patients and are now being updated. Patients who fail imatinib may respond to second-generation TKIs, but allogeneic stem cell transplantation still plays an important role for eligible patients who fare badly with TKIs. Patients who present in advanced phases of CML should be treated initially with TKI alone or with TKI in conjunction with cytotoxic drugs, but their overall prognosis is likely to be much inferior to that of those presenting in early chronic phase.

Monitoring disease response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in CML

The remarkable progress made in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) over the past decade has been accompanied by steady improvements in our capacity to accurately and sensitively monitor response to therapy. After the initial target of therapy, complete cytogenetic response (CCR), is achieved, peripheral blood BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RQ-PCR) define the subsequent response targets, major and complete molecular response (MMR and CMR). The majority of patients on first-line imatinib therapy achieve a “safe haven” defined as a confirmed MMR, but 20% to 30% stop imatinib due to intolerance and/or resistance. Many imatinib-resistant patients can be effectively treated with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but the actual drug selected should be based on the resistance profile of each inhibitor, in addition to issues of tolerance and disease phase. The main purpose of monitoring response with cytogenetics and RQ-PCR is to identify patients likely to achieve better long-term outcome if they are switched early to second-line therapy, either another TKI or an allograft. Mutation screening is most valuable in cases of loss of response to imatinib or a second-line TKI, but there are other settings where a high yield of mutations may justify regular mutation screening.

Mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia and recent therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance

Given its relative rarity, it may at first seem surprising that chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has garnered so much attention over the last decade. Yet, the advances in molecular pathogenesis that have been derived from studying this leukemia have clearly benefited all of oncology. Moreover, the strides in drug design and development that have also ensued around CML have given rise to what others have called a molecular revolution in cancer therapy. While a majority of patients with chronic phase CML (CP-CML) have an excellent durable response to imatinib (Gleevec, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), a clear minority will unfortunately have signs of primary or secondary resistance to therapy. Significant efforts geared toward understanding the molecular mechanisms of imatinib resistance have yielded valuable insights into the biology of drug trafficking into and out of cells, epigenetic control of cellular processes, alterations in enzymatic structures, and the rational structural-based design of small molecule enzyme inhibitors. This review will describe the efforts at understanding the pathogenesis of imatinib resistance and the molecular rationale for the development of second- and now third-generation therapies for patients with CML.

CML Patients with Low OCT-1 Activity Achieve Better Molecular Responses on High Dose Imatinib Than on Standard Dose. Those with High OCT-1 Activity Have Excellent Responses on Either Dose: A TOPS Correlative Study

We have previously demonstrated in CML patients enrolled to the Australian TIDEL trial, (600mg imatinib upfront in newly diagnosed patients) that patients with high OCT-1 activity, measured in patient blood mononuclear cells prior to imatinib start, achieve a superior molecular response, compared to those with low OCT-1 activity 1. Furthermore, the impact of low OCT-1 activity could be partially overcome with increased imatinib dose. We now prospectively test the predictive value of OCT-1 activity on the achievement of a major molecular response (&lt;0.1 BCR-ABL IS) by 12 months, in CML patients enrolled to the TOPS trial (randomised 400 vs 800 mg imatinib). A subset of 131 TOPS2 patients had OCT-1 activity measured prior to the start of therapy, as part of the Global Novartis Correlative Science Studies. 41 had high OCT-1 activity (&gt;7.2ng/200,000 cells) as defined in our original study. Patients with high OCT-1 activity had a markedly superior rate of MMR, on either standard or high dose imatinib (table 1). Significantly, a greater proportion of patients with low OCT-1 activity achieved MMR on the high dose arm compared to those on standard dose. This finding was not evident in the high OCT-1 activity group.

The % of patients achieving MMR by 12 months (n) Total Low OCT-1 Activity High OCT-1 Activity p- value Total 48% (90) 90% (41) &lt;0.001 400mg 59% (34) 24% (17) 94% (17) &lt;0.001 800mg 62% (97) 53% (73) 87% (24) 0.044 p-value 0.27 0.012 0.64

Table 1: The % of patients achieving MMR based on OCT-1 activity and Randomised dose.

The median OCT-1 activity for those patients achieving a MMR (n=80) was 6.05ng/200,000 cells compared to 3.9 for those patients failing to achieve MMR (n=51:p=0.003). Of the 131 patients, trough imatinib levels were available on 61. A greater proportion of patients with a trough imatinib plasma level of &gt;1000ng/ml 3 (n=50) at 1 month achieved MMR (88%) compared to those with plasma levels of &lt;1000ng/ml (n=11:45%: p=0.032). Importantly, OCT-1 activity is not significantly different comparing those patients with trough levels &gt;1000ng/ml (5.6ng/200,000 cells) at 1 month to those with lower trough levels (7.3ng/200,000 cells: p=0.117). This indicates that OCT-1 activity is not providing a surrogate marker of imatinib PK. Dividing the imatinib PK data into quartiles, there is no significant difference in the % of patients achieving MMR based on trough imatinib levels, in patients with high OCT-1 activity. In contrast significantly fewer patients with low OCT-1 activity and low trough levels achieve MMR by 12 months. (Table 2)

The % of patients achieving MMR by 12 months (n) Imatinib PK (ng/ml) Total Low OCT-1 Activity High OCT-1 Activity P value Quartile 1 &lt;1600 47% (15) 12% (8) 86% (7) 0.013 Quartile 2 &gt;1600 &lt; 2500 80% (15) 67% (6) 89% (9) 0.469 Quartile 3 &gt;2500 &lt; 3500 80% (15) 77% (13) 100% (2) 0.654 Quartile 4 &gt;3500 75% (16) 60% (10) 91% (6) 0.559

Table 2: The percentage of patients achieving MMR based on quartile analysis of imatinib PK at day 29

In the Australian cohort of 60 patients where detailed molecular response data is available the median molecular response in the 4 subgroups at 12 months shows a significant difference between the 400 mg group with low and high OCT-1 activity (Median BCR-ABL 0.2% IS v 0.02% IS p=0.03) but no difference in the 800 mg groups (low OCT-1 activity v high Median BCR-ABL 0.05% IS v 0.03% IS p=0.139). These analyses support our original proposal that OCT-1 activity defined at diagnosis has a major impact on molecular response and raises the possibility of patient-specific dosing. Patients with low OCT-1 activity are likely to achieve superior molecular responses if they receive imatinib at doses greater than 400 mg, whereas we could not find evidence of a molecular benefit to high dose imatinib for patients with high OCT-1 activity. The clinical value of monitoring trough imatinib drug levels remains to be clearly defined but it is likely to be greatly enhanced if it assessed in the context of the patient’s OCT-1 activity.

Multicenter prospective trial evaluating the tolerability of imatinib for Japanese patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in the chronic phase: does body weight matter?

Imatinib at a daily dose of 400 mg is the standard treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia in the chronic phase. However, the feasibility of this dose for small Japanese adults has not been clarified. We prospectively investigated the toxicity and efficacy of this dose in adult Japanese patients. Among the 89 evaluable patients with a median body weight of 62.8 kg, imatinib therapy was held in 40 subjects (45%), due to Grade 3-4 toxicities in 30 patients (75%) and Grade 2 toxicities at the discretion of the attending physician in 10 patients (25%). However, treatment was resumed and the dose was gradually increased until 62 of the 89 patients tolerated a maintenance dose of 400 mg. Older age and lower body weight were significant independent risk factors for discontinuation of imatinib. After a median follow-up period of 31 months, 84 patients were alive without progression. The complete cytogenetic response rate was 60 and 90% at 6 months and 1 year after starting imatinib, respectively. Older patients and those with a lower body weight were less likely to achieve a complete cytogenetic response. These findings suggest that the body weight has a significant influence on the toxicity and efficacy of imatinib in patients with a small body size, although dose reduction in proportion to weight may result in an inadequate response to imatinib.

Impact of early dose intensity on cytogenetic and molecular responses in chronic- phase CML patients receiving 600 mg/day of imatinib as initial therapy

We conducted a trial in 103 patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) using imatinib 600 mg/day, with dose escalation to 800 mg/day for suboptimal response. The estimated cumulative incidences of complete cytogenetic response (CCR) by 12 and 24 months were 88% and 90%, and major molecular responses (MMRs) were 47% and 73%. In patients who maintained a daily average of 600 mg of imatinib for the first 6 months (n = 60), MMR rates by 12 and 24 months were 55% and 77% compared with 32% and 53% in patients averaging less than 600 mg (P = .037 and .016, respectively). Dose escalation was indicated for 17 patients before 12 months for failure to achieve, or maintain, major cytogenetic response at 6 months or CCR at 9 months but was only possible in 8 patients (47%). Dose escalation was indicated for 73 patients after 12 months because their BCR-ABL level remained more than 0.01% (international scale) and was possible in 45 of 73 (62%). Superior responses achieved in patients able to tolerate imatinib at 600 mg suggests that early dose intensity may be critical to optimize response in CP-CML. The trial was registered at www.ANZCTR.org.au as #ACTRN12607000614493.

Comparison of mutated ABL1 and JAK2 as oncogenes and drug targets in myeloproliferative disorders

Constitutively activated mutants of the non-receptor tyrosine kinases (TK) ABL1 (Abelson murine leukemia viral (v-abl) homolog (1) protein) and JAK2 (JAnus Kinase 2 or Just Another Kinase 2) play a central role in the pathogenesis of clinically and morphologically distinct chronic myeloproliferative disorders but are also found in some cases of de novo acute leukemia and lymphoma. Ligand-independent activation occurs as a consequence of point mutations or insertions/deletions within functionally relevant regulatory domains (JAK2) or the creation of TK fusion proteins by balanced reciprocal translocations, insertions or episomal amplification (ABL1 and JAK2). Specific abnormalities are correlated with clinical phenotype, although some are broad and encompass several World Health Organization-defined entities. TKs are excellent drug targets as exemplified by the activity of imatinib in BCR-ABL1-positive disease, particularly chronic myeloid leukemia. Resistance to imatinib is seen in a minority of cases and is often associated with the appearance of secondary point mutations within the TK domain of BCR-ABL1. These mutations are highly variable in their sensitivity to increased doses of imatinib or alternative TK inhibitors such as nilotinib or dasatinib. Selective and non-selective inhibitors of JAK2 are currently being developed, and encouraging data from pre-clinical experiments and initial phase-I studies regarding efficacy and potential toxicity of these compounds have already been reported.

Emerging stem cell concepts for imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia: implications for the biology, management, and therapy of the disease

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a myeloid neoplasm defined by the BCR/ABL oncoprotein that is considered essential for leukaemogenesis and accumulation of neoplastic cells. The BCR/ABL kinase inhibitor imatinib is an effective agent in most patients and can now be regarded as front-line therapy. Hence, intrinsic and acquired resistance to imatinib has been described and is an emerging challenge in clinical practice. While CML stem cells display primary resistance, stem cell subclones may, in addition, acquire imatinib-resistant mutants of BCR/ABL. Other factors that are considered to contribute to stem cell resistance include the genetic background, clonal evolution, additional biological features of subclones, gene amplifications, silencing of tumour suppressor genes and specific pharmacological aspects. In this article, mechanisms of resistance of CML (stem) cells against imatinib and other BCR/ABL inhibitors are discussed, together with strategies to overcome and/or to prevent resistance with available drugs or novel anti-leukaemic approaches.

Multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) polymorphisms are associated with major molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

Despite the excellent efficacy of imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the response in patients is heterogeneous, which may in part be caused by pharmacogenetic variability. Imatinib has been reported to be a substrate of the P-glycoprotein pump. In the current study, we focused on the ABCB1 (MDR1) genotype. We analyzed the 3 most relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms of MDR1 in 90 CML patients treated with imatinib. Among the patients homozygous for allele 1236T, 85% achieved a major molecular response versus 47.7% for the other genotypes (P = .003). For the 2677G>T/A polymorphism, the presence of G allele was associated with worse response (77.8%, TT/TA; vs 47.1%, GG/GA/GT; P = .018). Patients with 1236TT genotype had higher imatinib concentrations. One of the haplotypes (1236C-2677G-3435C) was statistically linked to less frequent major molecular response (70% vs 44.6%; P = .021). Hence, we demonstrated the usefulness of these single nucleotide polymorphisms in the identification of CML who may or may not respond optimally to imatinib.

Relationship of imatinib-free plasma levels and target genotype with efficacy and tolerability

Imatinib has revolutionised the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Using a nonlinear mixed effects population model, individual estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were derived and used to estimate imatinib exposure (area under the curve, AUC) in 58 patients. Plasma-free concentration was deduced from a model incorporating plasma levels of alpha₁-acid glycoprotein. Associations between AUC (or clearance) and response or incidence of side effects were explored by logistic regression analysis. Influence of KIT genotype was also assessed in GIST patients. Both total (in GIST) and free drug exposure (in CML and GIST) correlated with the occurrence and number of side effects (e.g. odds ratio 2.7±0.6 for a two-fold free AUC increase in GIST; P<0.001). Higher free AUC also predicted a higher probability of therapeutic response in GIST (odds ratio 2.6±1.1; P=0.026) when taking into account tumour KIT genotype (strongest association in patients harbouring exon 9 mutation or wild-type KIT, known to decrease tumour sensitivity towards imatinib). In CML, no straightforward concentration–response relationships were obtained. Our findings represent additional arguments to further evaluate the usefulness of individualising imatinib prescription based on a therapeutic drug monitoring programme, possibly associated with target genotype profiling of patients.

Imatinib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with response and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the IRIS study

Imatinib at 400 mg daily is standard treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. We here describe the correlation of imatinib trough plasma concentrations (Cmins) with clinical responses, event-free survival (EFS), and adverse events (AEs). Trough level plasma samples were obtained on day 29 (steady state, n = 351). Plasma concentrations of imatinib and its metabolite CGP74588 were determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The overall mean (± SD, CV%) steady-state Cmin for imatinib and CGP74588 were 979 ng/mL (± 530 ng/mL, 54.1%) and 242 ng/mL (± 106 ng/mL, 43.6%), respectively. Cumulative estimated complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) rates differed among the quartiles of imatinib trough levels (P = .01 for CCyR, P = .02 for MMR). Cmin of imatinib was significantly higher in patients who achieved CCyR (1009 ± 544 ng/mL vs 812 ± 409 ng/mL, P = .01). Patients with high imatinib exposure had better rates of CCyR and MMR and EFS. An exploratory analysis demonstrated that imatinib trough levels were predictive of higher CCyR independently of Sokal risk group. AE rates were similar among the imatinib quartile categories except fluid retention, rash, myalgia, and anemia, which were more common at higher imatinib concentrations. These results suggest that an adequate plasma concentration of imatinib is important for a good clinical response. This study is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00333840.

Molecular monitoring in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia

Imatinib has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Given the high rates of complete cytogenetic remission achieved with imatinib therapy, molecular monitoring of BCR-ABL transcript levels by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction has become the method of choice to assess the amount of residual disease below the cytogenetic threshold. BCR-ABL transcript levels measured at specific times during therapy may predict durable cytogenetic remission and prolonged progression-free survival or, on the contrary, failure and suboptimal response, thus directing clinical decisions. Recently, recommendations have been established for harmonizing the methodologies used to measure BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with CML, allowing results to be expressed on a standardized comparable international scale. Rising levels of BCR-ABL transcripts indicate the need for an analysis of kinase mutations, the major mechanism of imatinib resistance. The early detection and the characterization of these mutations may allow timely and appropriate treatment to overcome resistance.

Targeted therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the formation of the Philadelphia chromosome and oncogenic signaling by the resulting Bcr-Abl fusion protein. Understanding the molecular basis of CML has led to the development of highly effective targeted therapies that block Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase activity. Imatinib, the current first-line therapy for CML, induces durable treatment responses in most patients. However, patients may develop imatinib resistance, which is often due to BCR-ABL mutations. With the availability of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, an effective therapeutic option other than stem cell transplantation is available following imatinib failure. Randomized trial data suggest that dasatinib treatment is superior to imatinib dose escalation in patients with imatinib resistance. Nilotinib, a recently approved analogue of imatinib, has also demonstrated encouraging treatment responses in patients with imatinib-resistant CML. Other agents (including bosutinib and INNO-406) are in clinical development. With the potential availability of multiple treatment options for patients with CML, it may be possible to tailor treatment according to individual patient or disease characteristics, for example, BCR-ABL mutations. Future CML treatment may involve combination strategies. Overall, targeted agents have significantly improved the prognosis of patients diagnosed with CML.

Milestones and Monitoring in Patients with CML Treated with Imatinib

Imatinib is the therapeutic standard for newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Recent updates of the IRIS trial, a study of standard-dose imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase patients treated with 400 mg imatinib daily, suggest a stabilization of progression-free survival curves at a high level, implying that the majority of patients will do well on standard therapy. However, some 20% to 30% of patients will fail on imatinib and require alternative therapies. Identification of those patients likely to fail would be desirable to allow for more intensive therapy up front. After a brief overview of the history of CML, this paper will review current recommendations for staging of CML patients at diagnosis. Next, the various tests used to monitor their response to imatinib will be discussed in the context of the currently accepted criteria for imatinib failure and suboptimal response. Last, approaches to identify high-risk patients at diagnosis will be addressed.

Part II: management of resistance to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia

Updated findings from a randomised comparison of imatinib versus previous standard treatment in the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia suggest that this first-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor can induce excellent long-term responses in most patients. However, a small proportion of patients will not respond or will lose previous responses, and, for these patients, alternative treatments are needed. This review is the second of two parts: the first part provided a review of the mechanisms underlying resistance to imatinib and this second part will discuss the management of patients who are resistant to imatinib by reviewing the many new drugs being introduced into clinical practice and suggesting strategies for decision making.

Part I: mechanisms of resistance to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia

The introduction of selective tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia has changed patient outcome and, consequently, management of this disease. Imatinib is now the treatment of choice for most newly diagnosed patients. Excellent responses, in terms of symptom control and haematological parameters, are usually obtained. However, failure to completely eradicate leukaemic cells and the escape of these cells from previous control has led to an intensive search for the mechanisms of resistance and subsequent treatments by which to overcome this resistance. Up to now, there has been considerable focus on the role of ABL-kinase-domain mutations as mediators of resistance to imatinib, thereby encouraging the development of a second generation of TKIs capable of inhibiting these mutant proteins. However, studies have increasingly shown that these mutations do not account for all cases of resistance and have a negligible role in the inability of TKIs to eradicate residual disease in patients who are good responders. More recently, attention has turned to the relative roles of drug bioavailability and drug efflux and drug influx proteins in the development of resistance to imatinib. This review is the first of two papers and discusses imatinib resistance and its potential causes. The second paper will focus on the assessment and subsequent management of patients with less than optimum responses to imatinib.