Coronary artery calcification screening: estimated radiation dose and cancer risk

Canadian Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Calcium Screening Based on the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Background

Cost-effectiveness of testing for coronary artery calcium (CAC) relative to other treatment strategies is not established in Canada.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using CAC score-guided statin treatment compared with universal statin therapy among intermediate-risk, primary prevention patients eligible for statins.

Methods

A state transition, microsimulation model used data from Canadian sources and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis to simulate clinical and economic consequences of cardiovascular disease from a Canadian publicly funded health care system perspective. In the CAC score-guided treatment arm, statins were started when CAC ≥1. Outcome of interest was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 5 and 10 years; an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was considered cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses examined uncertainty in model parameters.

Results

Compared with universal statin treatment at 5 and 10 years, CAC score-guided statin treatment was projected to increase mean costs by $326 (95% CI: $325-$326) and $172 (95% CI: $169-$175), increase mean QALYs by 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01-0.01) and 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02-0.02), and cost $54,492 (95% CI: $52,342-$56,816) and $8,118 (95% CI: $7,968-$8,279) per QALY gained, respectively. The model was most sensitive to statin cost, CAC testing cost, adherence to statin monitoring, and disutility associated with daily statin use. At 5 years, CAC score-guided statin treatment was cost-effective when CAC test costs ranged from $80 to $160 in different scenarios.

Conclusions

CAC score-guided statin initiation in comparison to universal statin treatment was borderline cost-neutral at 5 years and cost-effective at 10 years in statin-eligible Canadian patients at intermediate cardiovascular disease risk.

Beyond symptoms: Unlocking the potential of coronary calcium scoring in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) represents a persistent global health menace, particularly prevalent in Eastern European nations. Often asymptomatic until its advanced stages, CAD can precipitate life-threatening events like myocardial infarction or stroke. While conventional risk factors provide some insight into CAD risk, their predictive accuracy is suboptimal. Amidst this, Coronary Calcium Scoring (CCS), facilitated by non-invasive computed tomography (CT), emerges as a superior diagnostic modality. By quantifying calcium deposits in coronary arteries, CCS serves as a robust indicator of atherosclerotic burden, thus refining risk stratification and guiding therapeutic interventions. Despite certain limitations, CCS stands as an instrumental tool in CAD management and in thwarting adverse cardiovascular incidents. This review delves into the pivotal role of CCS in CAD diagnosis and treatment, elucidates the involvement of calcium in atherosclerotic plaque formation, and outlines the principles and indications of utilizing CCS for predicting major cardiovascular events.

Artificial intelligence-based automated left ventricular mass quantification from non-contrast cardiac CT scans: correlation with contrast CT and cardiac MRI

Background

Non-contrast CT scans are not used for evaluating left ventricle myocardial mass (LV mass), which is typically evaluated with contrast CT or cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the feasibility of LV mass estimation from standard, ECG-gated, non-contrast CT using an artificial intelligence (AI) approach and compare it with coronary CT angiography (CTA) and cardiac MRI.

Methods

We enrolled consecutive patients who underwent coronary CTA, which included non-contrast CT calcium scanning and contrast CTA, and cardiac MRI. The median interval between coronary CTA and MRI was 22 days (IQR: 3-76). We utilized an nn-Unet AI model that automatically segmented non-contrast CT structures. AI measurement of LV mass was compared to contrast CTA and MRI.

Results

A total of 316 patients (Age: 57.1±16.7, 56% male) were included. The AI segmentation took on average 22 seconds per case. An excellent correlation was observed between AI and contrast CTA LV mass measures (r=0.84, p<0.001), with no significant differences (136.5±55.3 vs. 139.6±56.9 g, p=0.133). Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias of 2.9. When compared to MRI, measured LV mass was higher with AI (136.5±55.3 vs. 127.1±53.1 g, p<0.001). There was an excellent correlation between AI and MRI (r=0.85, p<0.001), with a small bias (-9.4). There were no statistical differences between the correlations of LV mass between contrast CTA and MRI, or AI and MRI.

Conclusions

The AI-based automated estimation of LV mass from non-contrast CT demonstrated excellent correlations and minimal biases when compared to contrast CTA and MRI.

Opportunistic screening for coronary artery calcium deposition using chest radiographs - a multi-objective models with multi-modal data fusion

Background

To create an opportunistic screening strategy by multitask deep learning methods to stratify prediction for coronary artery calcium (CAC) and associated cardiovascular risk with frontal chest x-rays (CXR) and minimal data from electronic health records (EHR).

Methods

In this retrospective study, 2,121 patients with available computed tomography (CT) scans and corresponding CXR images were collected internally (Mayo Enterprise) with calculated CAC scores binned into 3 categories (0, 1-99, and 100+) as ground truths for model training. Results from the internal training were tested on multiple external datasets (domestic (EUH) and foreign (VGHTPE)) with significant racial and ethnic differences and classification performance was compared.

Findings

Classification performance between 0, 1-99, and 100+ CAC scores performed moderately on both the internal test and external datasets, reaching average f1-score of 0.66 for Mayo, 0.62 for EUH and 0.61 for VGHTPE. For the clinically relevant binary task of 0 vs 400+ CAC classification, the performance of our model on the internal test and external datasets reached an average AUCROC of 0.84.

Interpretation

The fusion model trained on CXR performed better (0.84 average AUROC on internal and external dataset) than existing state-of-the-art models on predicting CAC scores only on internal (0.73 AUROC), with robust performance on external datasets. Thus, our proposed model may be used as a robust, first-pass opportunistic screening method for cardiovascular risk from regular chest radiographs. For community use, trained model and the inference code can be downloaded with an academic open-source license from https://github.com/jeong-jasonji/MTL_CAC_classification .

Funding

The study was partially supported by National Institute of Health 1R01HL155410-01A1 award.

Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Asymptomatic Patients

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is an important prognostic tool for personalized cardiovascular preventive care and has recently been incorporated into American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. CAC provides direct visualization and quantification of CAC burden for risk stratification and primary prevention of cardiovascular events in an asymptomatic population. CAC scoring is recommended for individuals with intermediate 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk and selective populations with borderline ASCVD risk. In this review, we outline the interpretation of CAC scores for predicting the risk of cardiovascular events, and we highlight the guidelines for starting statin and potentially starting aspirin therapy. A CAC score of 0 is the strongest negative predictive factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and a 0 score can successfully de-risk a patient. On the contrary, higher CAC scores correlate with worse cardiovascular prognostic outcomes. The CAC scan is a widely available and reproducible means for an early look at the atherosclerotic burden, and it can help strategize early interventions. The CAC interpretation and the decision to start treatment need to be personalized based on individual risk factors. We believe the emerging literature supports our contention that the CAC score can be used more broadly to improve the prophylaxis and treatment of a wider range of apparently healthy patients.

Computed Tomography-Based Coronary Artery Calcium Score Calculation at a Reduced Tube Voltage Utilizing Iterative Reconstruction and Threshold Modification Techniques: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) indicates cardiovascular health. A concern in this regard is the ionizing radiation from computed tomography (CT). Recent studies have tried to introduce low-dose CT techniques to assess CACS. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of iterative reconstruction (IR) and threshold modification while applying low tube voltage in coronary artery calcium imaging.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 107 patients. Each subject underwent an electrocardiogram-gated CT twice, once with a standard voltage of 120 kVp and then a reduced voltage of 80 kVp. The standard filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction was applied in both voltages. Considering Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholds other than 130 (150, 170, and 190), CACS was calculated using the FBP-reconstructed 80 kVp images. Moreover, the 80 kVp images were reconstructed utilizing IR at different strength levels. CACS was measured in each set of images. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare the CACSs.

RESULTS

A 64% reduction in the effective dose was observed in the 80 kVp protocol compared to the 120 kVp protocol. Excellent agreement existed between CACS at high-level (strength level = 5) IR in low-kVp images and the standard CACS protocol in scores ≥ 11 (ICC > 0.9 and p < 0.05). Increasing the threshold density to 190 HU in FBP-reconstructed low-kVp images yielded excellent agreement with the standard protocol in scores ≥ 11 (ICC > 0.9 and p < 0.05) and good agreement in score zero (ICC = 0.84 and p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The modification of the density threshold and IR provides an accurate calculation of CACS in low-voltage CT with the potential to decrease patient radiation exposure.

Protocol: Can coronary artery calcium score identified on thoracic planning CT scans be used and actioned to identify cancer survivors at high risk of cardiac events: A feasibility study in cancer survivors undergoing radiotherapy in Australia

INTRODUCTION

A coronary artery calcium (CAC) CT scan can identify calcified plaque and predict risk of future cardiac events. Cancer survivors undergoing thoracic radiotherapy routinely undergo a planning CT scan, which presents a unique opportunity to use already obtained medical imaging to identify those at the highest risk of cardiac events. While radiation therapy is an important modality for many cancer treatments, radiation dose to the heart in thoracic radiotherapy leads to cardiotoxicity and may accelerate pre-existing atherosclerosis. The primary aims of this study are to investigate the feasibility of using CAC scores calculated on thoracic radiotherapy planning CT scans to identify a subset of cancer survivors at an increased risk of future cardiac events, and to establish and evaluate a referral pathway for assessment and management in a cardio-oncology clinic. An optional substudy aims to investigate using abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) as a practical, low-radiation alternative to CAC to evaluate and monitor vascular health.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an observational, prospective study in a minimum of 100 cancer survivors commencing radiotherapy. Participants will have CAC scored from thoracic radiotherapy planning CT scans. Those identified as high risk (CAC score>0) will be referred to a cardio-oncology clinic. Feasibility, determined by adherence to the recommended pathway, and impact on quality of life and anxiety measured via questionnaire, will be assessed. Participants in Western Australia will be invited to participate in a 12-month observational pilot substudy, investigating lifestyle behaviours and the use of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry machine to measure musculoskeletal health and AAC.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been obtained from St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney (Project number 2021/ETH11847), GenesisCare and Edith Cowan University (2022-03326-DALLAVIA). Study results will be reported in peer-reviewed academic journals, at scientific conferences, and at clinical forums, irrespective of the results observed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12621001343897.

Association between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Vascular Biomarkers in Primary Prevention

Several noninvasive vascular biomarkers have been proposed to improve risk stratification for atherothrombotic events. To identify biomarkers suitable for detecting intermediate-risk individuals who might benefit from lipid-lowering treatment in primary prevention, the present study tested the association of plasma LDL-cholesterol with coronary artery calcification (CAC) Agatston score, high carotid and femoral intima-media thickness (IMT), low carotid distensibility and high carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity in 260 asymptomatic individuals at intermediate cardiovascular risk and without diabetes and lipid-lowering treatment. High or low vascular biomarkers were considered when their value was above the 95th or below the 5th percentile, respectively, of the distribution in the healthy or in the study population. LDL-cholesterol was independently associated with the CAC score = 0 (OR 0.67; 95%CI 0.48-0.92, p = 0.01), CAC score > 100 (1.59; 1.08-2.39, p = 0.01) and high common femoral artery (CFA) IMT (1.89; 1.19-3.06, p < 0.01), but not with other biomarkers. Our data confirm that in individuals at intermediate risk, lipid-lowering treatment can be avoided in the presence of a CAC score = 0, while it should be used with a CAC score > 100. CFA IMT could represent a useful biomarker for decisions regarding lipid-lowering treatment. However, sex- and age-specific reference values should be established in a large healthy population.

Low-dose coronary artery calcium scoring compared to the standard protocol

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) with computed tomography (CT) with 80 and 120 kVp in a large patient population and to establish whether there is a difference in risk classification between the two scores.

METHODS

Patients with suspected CAD undergoing MPS were included. All underwent standard CACS assessment with 120-kVp tube voltage and with 80 kVp. Two datasets (low-dose and standard) were generated and compared. Risk classes (0 to 25, 25 to 50, 50 to 75, 75 to 90, and > 90%) were recorded.

RESULTS

1511 patients were included (793 males, age 69 ± 9.1 years). There was a very good correlation between scores calculated with 120 and 80 kVp (R = 0.94, R2 = 0.88, P < .001), with Bland-Altman limits of agreement of - 563.5 to 871.9 and a bias of - 154.2. The proportion of patients assigned to the < 25% percentile class (P = .03) and with CACS = 0 differed between the two protocols (n = 264 vs 437, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In a large patient population, despite a good correlation between CACS calculated with standard and low-dose CT, there is a systematic underestimation of CACS with the low-dose protocol. This may have an impact especially on the prognostic value of the calcium score, and the established "power of zero" may no longer be warranted if CACS is assessed with low-dose CT.

Radiation Dose Reduction for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using a Virtual Noniodine Algorithm on Photon-Counting Detector Computed-Tomography Phantom Data

Background: On the basis of the hypothesis that virtual noniodine (VNI)-based coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) is feasible at reduced radiation doses, this study assesses the impact of radiation dose reduction on the accuracy of this VNI algorithm on a photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. Methods: In a systematic in vitro setting, a phantom for CACS simulating three chest sizes was scanned on a clinical PCD-CT. The standard radiation dose was chosen at volumetric CT dose indices (CTDI_Vol) of 1.5, 3.3, 7.0 mGy for small, medium-sized, and large phantoms, and was gradually reduced by adjusting the tube current resulting in 100, 75, 50, and 25%, respectively. VNI images were reconstructed at 55 keV, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR)1, and at 60 keV/QIR4, and evaluated regarding image quality (image noise (IN), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)), and CACS. All VNI results were compared to true noncontrast (TNC)-based CACS at 70 keV and standard radiation dose (reference). Results: IN_TNC was significantly higher than IN_VNI, and IN_VNI at 55 keV/QIR1 higher than at 60 keV/QIR4 (100% dose: 16.7 ± 1.9 vs. 12.8 ± 1.7 vs. 7.7 ± 0.9; p < 0.001 for every radiation dose). CNR_TNC was higher than CNR_VNI, but it was better to use 60 keV/QIR4 (p < 0.001). CACS_VNI showed strong correlation and agreement at every radiation dose (p < 0.001, r > 0.9, intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). The coefficients of the variation in root-mean squared error were less than 10% and thus clinically nonrelevant for the CACS_VNI of every radiation dose. Conclusion: This phantom study suggests that CACS_VNI is feasible on PCD-CT, even at reduced radiation dose while maintaining image quality and CACS accuracy.

Impact of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CT coronary angiography scan length and effective radiation dose

Objective

Imaged scan length (z-axis coverage) is a simple parameter that can reduce CT dose without compromising image quality. In CT coronary angiography (CTCA), z-axis coverage may be planned using non-contrast calcium score scan (CaCS) to identify the relevant coronary anatomy. However, standardised Agatston CaCS is acquired at 120 kV which adds a relatively high contribution to total study dose and CaCS is no longer routinely recommended in UK guidelines. We evaluate an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CTCA scan length and effective radiation dose.

Methods

An ultra-low dose tin filter (Sn-filter) planning scan (100 kVp, maximum iterative reconstruction) was performed and used to plan the z-axis coverage on 48 consecutive CTCAs (62% men, 62 ± 13 years) compared with 47 CTCA planned using a localiser alone (46% men, 59 ± 12 years) between May and June 2019. Excess scanning beyond the ideal scan length was calculated for both groups. Estimations of radiation dose were also compared between the two groups.

Results

Addition of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan to CTCA protocol was associated with reduction in overscanning with no impact on image quality. There was no significant difference in total study effective dose with the addition of the planning scan, which had an average dose-length product of 3 mGy.cm. (total study dose: Protocol A 2.1 mSv vs Protocol B 2.2 mSv, p = 0.92).

Conclusion

An ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan facilitates optimal scan length for the diagnostic CTCA, reducing overscanning and preventing incomplete cardiac imaging with no significant dose penalty or impact on image quality.

Advances in knowledge

An ultra-low dose CTCA planning is feasible and effective at optimising scan length.

Federated machine learning for a facilitated implementation of Artificial Intelligence in healthcare - a proof of concept study for the prediction of coronary artery calcification scores

The implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) still faces significant hurdles and one key factor is the access to data. One approach that could support that is federated machine learning (FL) since it allows for privacy preserving data access. For this proof of concept, a prediction model for coronary artery calcification scores (CACS) has been applied. The FL was trained based on the data in the different institutions, while the centralized machine learning model was trained on one allocation of data. Both algorithms predict patients with risk scores ≥5 based on age, biological sex, waist circumference, dyslipidemia and HbA1c. The centralized model yields a sensitivity of c. 66% and a specificity of c. 70%. The FL slightly outperforms that with a sensitivity of 67% while slightly underperforming it with a specificity of 69%. It could be demonstrated that CACS prediction is feasible via both, a centralized and an FL approach, and that both show very comparable accuracy. In order to increase accuracy, additional and a higher volume of patient data is required and for that FL is utterly necessary. The developed "CACulator" serves as proof of concept, is available as research tool and shall support future research to facilitate AI implementation.

CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is still uncertainty on whether ionizing radiation from CT scans can increase the risks of cancer. This study aimed to identify the association of cumulative ionizing radiation from CT scans with pertaining cancer risks in adults.

METHODS

Five databases were searched from their inception to November 15, 2020. Observational studies reporting cancer risks from CT scans in adults were included. The main outcome included quantified cancer risks as cancer case numbers in exposed/unexposed adult participants with unified converted measures to odds ratio (OR) for relative risk, hazard ratio. Global background radiation (2.4 mSv per year) was used as control for lifetime attribution risk (LAR), with the same period from incubation after exposure until survival to 100 years.

RESULTS

25 studies were included with a sum of 111,649,943 participants (mean age: 45.37 years, 83.4% women), comprising 2,049,943 actual participants from 6 studies with an average follow-up period as 30.1 years (range, 5 to 80 years); 109,600,000 participants from 19 studies using LAR. The cancer risks for adults following CT scans were inordinately increased (LAR adults, OR, 10.00 [95% CI, 5.87 to 17.05]; actual adults, OR, 1.17 [95%CI, 0.89 to 1.55]; combined, OR, 5.89 [95%CI, 3.46 to 10.35]). Moreover, cancer risks elevated with increase of radiation dose (OR, 33.31 [95% CI, 21.33 to 52.02]), and multiple CT scan sites (OR, 14.08 [95% CI, 6.60 to 30.05]). The risk of solid malignancy was higher than leukemia. Notably, there were no significant differences for age, gender, country, continent, study quality and studying time phrases.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on 111.6 million adult participants from 3 continents (Asia, Europe and America), this meta-analysis identifies an inordinately increase in cancer risks from CT scans for adults. Moreover, the cancer risks were positively correlated with radiation dose and CT sites. The meta-analysis highlights the awareness of potential cancer risks of CT scans as well as more reasonable methodology to quantify cancer risks in terms of life expectancy as 100 years for LAR.

PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019133487.

Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomographic Coronary Artery Calcium Evaluation With a 64-Slice Scanner Versus a 256-Slice Scanner

Computed tomographic coronary artery calcium scanning enables cardiovascular risk stratification; however, exposing patients to high radiation levels is an ongoing concern. New-generation computed tomographic systems use lower radiation doses than older systems do. To quantify comparative doses of radiation exposure, we prospectively acquired images from 220 patients with use of a 64-slice GE LightSpeed VCT scanner (control group, n=110) and a 256-slice GE Revolution scanner (study group, n=110). The groups were matched for age, sex, and body mass index; statistical analysis included t tests and linear regression. The mean dose-length product was 21% lower in the study group than in the control group (60.2 ± 27 vs 75.9 ± 22.6 mGy·cm; P <0.001) and also in each body mass index subgroup. Similarly, the mean effective radiation dose was 21% lower in the study group (0.84 ± 0.38 vs 1.06 ± 0.32 mSv) and lower in each weight subgroup. After adjustment for sex, women in the study group had a lower dose-length product (50.4 ± 23.4 vs 64.7 ± 27.6 mGy·cm) than men did and received a lower effective dose (0.7 ± 0.32 vs 0.9 ± 0.38 mSv) (P=0.009). As body mass index and waist circumference increased, so did doses for both scanners. Our study group was exposed to radiation doses lower than the previously determined standard of 1 mSv, even after adjustment for body mass index and waist circumference. In 256-slice scanning for coronary artery calcium, radiation doses are now similar to those in lung cancer screening and mammography.

Utility of Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Predicting Risk of Subclinical Cardiovascular Atherosclerotic Disease: An Analysis of Limitations to its Adoption With Policy Recommendations

This survey-based analysis aims to highlight key limitations to a wider adoption of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring as a means of screening asymptomatic individuals for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The need for a screening tool that adds objective anatomical information to historically established risk scores in the aforementioned population has been met by this imaging modality. Despite that, there has been a hesitance towards frequent usage of these scans. Within the pre-set sampling frame of the University of Toledo, a convenience sampling technique was used to reach out to 60 health care providers. The resultant responses were analyzed and discussed. In addition to identifying patients who need to be worked up further, CAC scans can also help re-stratify patients within-risk groups and inform decision-making regarding the use of lipid-lowering therapies. The public health impact of a greater but appropriate utilization of this diagnostic tool will be impactful. This analysis seeks to better understand real-life obstacles to a wider adoption of these scans and attempts to lay out policy recommendations to address these issues.

Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Personalization of Antihypertensive Therapy: A Pooled Cohort Analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association high blood pressure (BP) guidelines recommend risk assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to inform hypertension treatment in adults with elevated BP or low-risk stage I hypertension. The use of coronary artery calcium (CAC) score to guide hypertension therapy has not been adequately evaluated. Participants free of cardiovascular disease were pooled from Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults, and Jackson Heart Study. The risk for incident cardiovascular events (heart failure, stroke, coronary heart disease), by CAC status (CAC-0 or CAC>0) and BP treatment group was assessed using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression. The 10-year number needed to treat to prevent a single cardiovascular event was also estimated. This study included 6461 participants (median age 53 years; 53.3% women; 32.3% Black participants). Over a median follow-up of 8.5 years, 347 incident cardiovascular events occurred. Compared with those with normal BP, the risk of incident cardiovascular event was higher among those with elevated BP/low-risk stage I hypertension and CAC>0 (hazard ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.7–3.4]) and high-risk stage I/stage II hypertension (BP, 140–160/80–100 mm Hg) with CAC>0 (hazard ratio, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.1–4.0]). A similar pattern was evident across racial subgroups and for individual study outcomes. Among those with CAC-0, the 10-year number needed to treat was 160 for elevated BP/low-risk stage I hypertension and 44 for high-risk stage I or stage II hypertension (BP, 140–160/80–100 mm Hg). Among those with CAC>0, the 10-year number needed to treat was 36 and 22, respectively. Utilization of the CAC score may guide the initiation of hypertension therapy and preventive approaches to personalize cardiovascular risk reduction among individuals where the current guidelines do not recommend treatment.

Vascular calcification relationship to vascular biomarkers and bone metabolism in advanced chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Vascular calcification (VC) and renal osteodystrophy are important complications of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) is able to assess bone microstructure in renal osteodystrophy and lower leg arterial calcification (LLAC) is usually seen as an incidental finding. LLAC can be a useful quantitative assessment of VC in CKD but the relationship between LLAC and vascular biomarkers and bone is unknown. We aimed to assess the relationship between LLAC and biomarkers, bone turnover and microstructure.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, fasting blood samples were taken from 69 CKD stages 4-5D patients and 68 healthy controls. HRpQCT of distal tibia and radius were performed. 43 CKD patients had trans-iliac bone biopsy after tetracycline labelling.

RESULTS

LLAC was more severe in CKD than controls (median [IQR] 1.043 [0.05-16.52] vs 0 [0-0.55] mgHA, p < 0.001). CKD patients with diabetes (28%) had significantly higher LLAC compared to non-diabetic CKD (median [IQR] 24.07 [3.42-61.30] vs 0.23 [0-3.78] mgHA, p < 0.001). LLAC mass in CKD correlated with serum phosphate (rho = 0.29, p < 0.05), calcium x phosphate product (rho = 0.31, p < 0.05), intact parathyroid hormone (rho = 0.38, p < 0.01), intact fibroblast growth factor-23 (iFGF23) (rho = 0.40, p = 0.001), total alkaline phosphatase (rho = 0.41, p < 0.001), bone alkaline phosphatase (rho = 0.29, p < 0.05), osteocalcin (rho = 0.32, p < 0.05), osteoprotegerin (rho = 0.40, p = 0.001) and dephosphorylated-uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein (rho = 0.31, p < 0.05). LLAC in CKD also correlated with worse distal tibia cortical bone mineral density, thickness and porosity. No association was found between LLAC and bone turnover, mineralization or volume on biopsy in CKD. In multivariate analysis, only age, diabetes, iPTH and iFGF23 were independently associated with LLAC in CKD.

CONCLUSIONS

High levels of PTH and FGF23, along with older age and the presence of diabetes may all play independent roles in the development of LLAC in advanced CKD.

Comparison of Calcium Scoring Between 64-Multidetector Computed Tomography and 320-Multidetector Computed Tomography Using a Cardiac Phantom: Achieving Consistent Image Quality With Dose Optimization

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between radiation dose and noise level on various coronary calcium scoring protocols between 64-multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and 320-MDCT. The cardiac QRM phantoms (1 small size and 1 medium size) were used in this study. Lower-dose imaging protocols were proposed for optimization with the parameters of 120 kVp and 10 mAs for small-size phantom (0.336 mSv) in 64-MDCT imaging and small-size phantom (0.2 mSv) in 320-MDCT case, and 120 kVp and 80 mAs for medium-size phantom (2.73 mSv) in 64-MDCT imaging and medium-size phantom (1.58 mSv) in 320-MDCT case. Our results suggest that people can apply lower-dose protocols in the clinical use for early diagnosis of coronary disease without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy.

Reduced Axial Scan Length Coronary Calcium Scoring Reduces Radiation Dose and Provides Adequate Clinical Decision-Making Before Coronary CT Angiography

Extensive coronary artery calcium (CAC) diminishes the accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Many imagers adjust CCTA acquisition parameters depending on a preCCTA Agatston CAC score to optimize diagnostic accuracy. Typical preCCTA CAC imaging adds considerably to radiation exposure, partially attributable to imaging beyond the area known for highest CAC, the proximal coronary arteries. We aimed to determine whether a z-axis reduced scan length (RSL) would identify the majority of CAC and provide adequate information to computed tomography angiography providers relative to a standard full-scan length (FSL) preCCTA noncontrast CT. We retrospectively examined 200 subjects. The mean CAC scores detected in RSL and FSL were 77.4 (95% CI 50.6 to 104.3) and 93.9 (95% CI 57.3 to 130.5), respectively. RSL detected 81% of the FSL CAC. Among false negatives, with no CAC detected in RSL, FSL CAC severity was minimal (mean score 2.8). There was high concordance, averaging 88%, between CCTA imaging parameter adjustment decisions made by 2 experienced imagers based on either RSL or FSL. CAC detected and decision concordance decreased with increasing CAC burden. CAC detected was lower, and false negatives were more common in the right coronary artery owing to its anatomic course, placing larger segments outside RSL. Axial scan length and effective dose decreased 59% from FSL (∼14.5 cm/∼1.1 mSv) to RSL (∼5.9 cm/∼0.45 mSv). This retrospective study suggests that RSL identifies most CAC, results in similar CCTA acquisition parameter modifications, and reduces radiation exposure. Our colleagues corroborated these results in a recently published prospective study.

Management of Dyslipidemia for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction: Synopsis of the 2020 Updated U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline

DESCRIPTION

In June 2020, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) released a joint update of their clinical practice guideline for managing dyslipidemia to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in adults. This synopsis describes the major recommendations.

METHODS

On 6 August to 9 August 2019, the VA/DoD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group (EBPWG) convened a joint VA/DoD guideline development effort that included clinical stakeholders and conformed to the Institute of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. The guideline panel developed key questions, systematically searched and evaluated the literature (English-language publications from 1 December 2013 to 16 May 2019), and developed 27 recommendations and a simple 1-page algorithm. The recommendations were graded by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.

RECOMMENDATIONS

This synopsis summarizes key features of the guideline in 7 crucial areas: targeting of statin dose (not low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals), additional tests for risk prediction, primary and secondary prevention, laboratory testing, physical activity, and nutrition.

The Future of Concurrent Automated Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Screening Low-Dose Computed Tomography

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been extensively validated for lung cancer screening in selected patient populations. Additionally, the use of gated cardiac CT to assess coronary artery calcium (CAC) burden has been validated to determine a patient's risk for major cardiovascular adverse events. This is typically performed by calculating an Agatston score based on density and overall burden of calcified plaque within the coronary arteries. Patients that qualify for LDCT for lung cancer screening commonly share major risk factors for coronary artery disease and would frequently benefit from an additional gated cardiac CT for the assessment of CAC. Given the widespread use of LDCT for lung cancer screening, we evaluated current literature regarding the use of non-gated chest CT, specifically LDCT, for the detection and grading of coronary artery calcifications. Additionally, given the evolving and increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the interpretation of radiologic studies, current literature for the use of AI in CAC assessment was reviewed.  We reviewed primary scientific literature dating up to April 2020 using Pubmed and Google Scholar, with the search terms low dose CT, lung cancer screening, coronary artery calcium, EKG/cardiac gated CT, deep learning, machine learning, and AI. These publications were then independently evaluated by each member of our team. Overall, there was a consensus within these papers that LDCT for lung cancer screening plays a role in the evaluation of CAC. Most studies note the inherent problems with the evaluation of the density of coronary calcifications on LDCT to give an accurate numeric calcium or Agatston score. The current method of evaluating CAC on LDCT involves using a qualitative categorical system (none, mild, moderate, or severe). When performed by cardiac imaging experts, this method broadly correlates with traditional CAC score groups (0, 1 to 100, 101 to 400, and > 400). Furthermore, given the high sensitivity of a properly protocolled LDCT for coronary calcium, a negative study for CAC precludes the need for a dedicated gated CT assessment. However, qualitative methods are not as accurate or reproducible when performed by general radiologists. The implementation of AI in the LDCT screening process has the potential to give a quantifiable and reproducible numeric value to the calcium score, based on whole heart volume scoring of calcium. This more closely aligns with the Agatston score and serves as a better guide for treatment and risk assessment using current guidelines. We conclude that CAC should be assessed on all LDCT performed for lung cancer screening and that a qualitative categorical scoring system should be provided in the impression for each patient. Early studies involving AI for the assessment of CAC are promising, but more extensive studies are needed before a final recommendation for its use can be given. The implementation of an accurate, automated AI CAC assessment tool would improve radiologist compliance and ease of overall workflow. Ultimately, the potential end result would be improved turnaround time, better patient outcomes, and reduced healthcare costs by maximizing preventative care in this high-risk population.

Individualized coronary calcium scoring at any tube voltage using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm

PURPOSE

We prospectively investigate the feasibility of a patient specific automated tube voltage selection (ATVS)-based coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) protocol, using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm, to achieve significant dose reductions while maintaining the overall cardiac risk classification.

METHODS

Forty-three patients (mean age, 61.8 ± 9.0 years; 40% male) underwent a clinically indicated CACS scan at 120kVp, as well as an additional CACS acquisition using an individualized tube voltage between 70 and 130kVp based on the ATVS selection (CARE-kV). Datasets of the additional CACS scans were reconstructed using a kV-independent algorithm that allows for calcium scoring without changing the weighting threshold of 130HU, regardless of the tube voltage chosen for image acquisition. Agatston scores and radiation dose derived from the different ATVS-based CACS studies were compared to the standard acquisition at 120kVp.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients displayed a score of 0 and were correctly identified with the ATVS protocol. Agatston scores derived from the standard 120kVp (median, 33.4; IQR, 0-289.7) and the patient-tailored kV-independent protocol (median, 47.5; IQR, 0-287.5) showed no significant differences (p = 0.094). The intra-class correlation for Agatston scores derived from the two different protocols was excellent (ICC = 0.99). The mean dose-length-product was 29.8 ± 11.9 mGy × cm using the ATVS protocol and 31.7 ± 11.4 mGy × cm using the standard 120kVp protocol (p < 0.001). Additionally, 95% of patients were classified into the same risk category (0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, or > 400) using the patient-tailored protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

ATVS-based CACS, using a kV-independent algorithm, allows for high accuracy compared to the standard 120kVp scanning, while significantly reducing radiation dose parameters.

KEY POINTS

• ATVS allows for CT scanning with reduced radiation dose values. • KV-independent CACS is feasible at any tube voltage between 70 and 130 kVp. • ATVS applied to kV-independent CACS can significantly reduce the radiation dose.

Optimization of HU threshold for coronary artery calcium scans reconstructed at 0.5-mm slice thickness using iterative reconstruction

PURPOSE

This work investigated the simultaneous influence of tube voltage, tube current, body size, and HU threshold on calcium scoring reconstructed at 0.5-mm slice thickness using iterative reconstruction (IR) through multivariate analysis. Regression results were used to optimize the HU threshold to calibrate the resulting Agatston scores to be consistent with those obtained from the conventional protocol.

METHODS

A thorax phantom set simulating three different body sizes was used in this study. A total of 14 coronary artery calcium (CAC) protocols were studied, including 1 conventional protocol reconstructed at 3-mm slice thickness, 1 FBP protocol, and 12 statistical IR protocols (3 kVp values*4 SD values) reconstructed at 0.5-mm slice thickness. Three HU thresholds were applied for calcium identification, including 130, 150, and 170 HU. A multiple linear regression method was used to analyze the impact of kVp, SD, body size, and HU threshold on the Agatston scores of three calcification densities for IR-reconstructed CAC scans acquired with 0.5-mm slice thickness.

RESULTS

Each regression relationship has R² larger than 0.80, indicating a good fit to the data. Based on the regression models, the HU thresholds as a function of SD estimated to ensure the quantification accuracy of calcium scores for 120-, 100-, and 80-kVp CAC scans reconstructed at 0.5-mm slice thickness using IR for three different body sizes were proposed. Our results indicate that the HU threshold should be adjusted according to the imaging condition, whereas a 130-HU threshold is appropriate for 120-kVp CAC scans acquired with SD = 55 for body size of 24.5 cm.

CONCLUSION

The optimized HU thresholds were proposed for CAC scans reconstructed at 0.5-mm slice thickness using IR. Our study results may provide a potential strategy to improve the reliability of calcium scoring by reducing partial volume effect while keeping radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable.

Role of Coronary Calcium Score to Identify Candidates for ASCVD Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we describe the mechanism behind coronary artery calcification formation and detection, as well as its implication in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification, intervention, and prognosis in asymptomatic individuals.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple cohort and population studies have shown that coronary artery calcium scoring is effective and reproducible in predicting the risk for cardiovascular disease. The updated 2018 ACC/AHA guideline has incorporated consideration of coronary artery calcification testing into cardiovascular disease risk stratification and therapy guidance. Coronary artery calcification's evidence-based role in detection, risk stratification, and ultimately its unique influence on therapeutic intervention and prognosis of cardiovascular disease in asymptomatic population is increasingly being recognized..

The Role of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Arterial Remodeling: Focus on Calcification-Related Processes

Arterial remodeling refers to the structural and functional changes of the vessel wall that occur in response to disease, injury, or aging. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) play a pivotal role in regulating the remodeling processes of the vessel wall. Phenotypic switching of VSMC involves oxidative stress-induced extracellular vesicle release, driving calcification processes. The VSMC phenotype is relevant to plaque initiation, development and stability, whereas, in the media, the VSMC phenotype is important in maintaining tissue elasticity, wall stress homeostasis and vessel stiffness. Clinically, assessment of arterial remodeling is a challenge; particularly distinguishing intimal and medial involvement, and their contributions to vessel wall remodeling. The limitations pertain to imaging resolution and sensitivity, so methodological development is focused on improving those. Moreover, the integration of data across the microscopic (i.e., cell-tissue) and macroscopic (i.e., vessel-system) scale for correct interpretation is innately challenging, because of the multiple biophysical and biochemical factors involved. In the present review, we describe the arterial remodeling processes that govern arterial stiffening, atherosclerosis and calcification, with a particular focus on VSMC phenotypic switching. Additionally, we review clinically applicable methodologies to assess arterial remodeling and the latest developments in these, seeking to unravel the ubiquitous corroborator of vascular pathology that calcification appears to be.

Diagnostic Tests for Vascular Calcification

Vascular calcification (VC) is the heterogeneous endpoint of multiple vascular insults, which varies by arterial bed, the layer of the arterial wall affected, and is propagated by diverse cellular and biochemical mechanisms. A variety of in vivo and ex vivo techniques have been applied to the analysis of VC in preclinical studies, but clinical examination has principally relied on a number of noninvasive and invasive imaging modalities for detection and quantitation. Most imaging methods suffer from suboptimal spatial resolution, leading to the inability to distinguish medial from intimal VC and insufficient sensitivity to detect microcalcifications that are indicative of active mineral deposition and of vulnerable plaques which may be prone to rupture. Serum biomarkers lack specificity for VC and cannot discriminate pathology. Overall, uncertainties surrounding the sensitivity and specificity of different VC testing modalities, the absence of a clear cause-effect relationship, and lack of any evidence-based diagnostic or therapeutic protocols in relation to VC testing in chronic kidney disease has yielded weak or ungraded recommendations for their use in clinical practice. While VC is recognized as a key manifestation of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder and those with an increasing burden of VC are considered to be at higher cardiovascular risk, routine screening is not currently recommended.

How have advances in CT dosimetry software impacted estimates of CT radiation dose and cancer incidence? A comparison of CT dosimetry software: Implications for past and future research

Objective

Organ radiation dose from a CT scan, calculated by CT dosimetry software, can be combined with cancer risk data to estimate cancer incidence resulting from CT exposure. We aim to determine to what extent the use of improved anatomical representation of the adult human body “phantom” in CT dosimetry software impacts estimates of radiation dose and cancer incidence, to inform comparison of past and future research.

Methods

We collected 20 adult cases for each of three CT protocols (abdomen/pelvis, chest and head) from each of five public hospitals (random sample) (January-April inclusive 2010) and three private clinics (self-report). Organ equivalent and effective dose were calculated using both ImPACT (mathematical phantom) and NCICT (voxelised phantom) software. Bland-Altman plots demonstrate agreement and Passing-Bablok regression reports systematic, proportional or random differences between results. We modelled the estimated lifetime attributable risk of cancer from a single exposure for each protocol, using age-sex specific risk-coefficients from the Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII report.

Results

For the majority of organs used in epidemiological studies of cancer incidence, the NCICT software (voxelised) provided higher dose estimates. Across the lifespan NCICT resulted in cancer estimates 2.9%-6.6% and 14.8%-16.3% higher in males and females (abdomen/pelvis) and 7.6%-19.7% and 12.9%-26.5% higher in males and females respectively (chest protocol). For the head protocol overall cancer estimates were lower for NCICT, but with greatest disparity, >30% at times.

Conclusion

When the results of previous studies estimating CT dose and cancer incidence are compared to more recent, or future, studies the dosimetry software must be considered. Any change in radiation dose or cancer risk may be attributable to the software and phantom used, rather than—or in addition to—changes in scanning practice. Studies using dosimetry software to estimate radiation dose should describe software comprehensively to facilitate comparison with past and future research.

Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium scoring using novel scoring thresholds for low tube voltage protocols-a pilot study

Aims

To determine if tube-adapted thresholds for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring by computed tomography at 80 kilovolt-peak (kVp) tube voltage and 70-kVp yield comparable results to the standard 120-kVp protocol.

Methods and results

We prospectively included 103 patients who underwent standard scanning with 120-kVp tube voltage and additional scans with 80 kVp and 70 kVp. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.9 ± 5.1 kg/m2. For the lowered tube voltages, we applied novel kVp-adapted thresholds for calculation of CAC scores and compared them with standard 120-kVp scans using intraclass correlation and Bland-Altman (BA) analysis. Furthermore, risk-class (CAC score 0/1-10/11-100/101-400/>400) changes were assessed. Median CAC score from 120-kVp scans was 212 (interquartile range 25-901). Thirteen (12.6%) patients had zero CAC. Using the novel kVp-adapted thresholds, CAC scores derived from 80-kVp scans showed excellent correlation (r = 0.994, P < 0.001) with standard 120-kVp scans with BA limits of agreement of -235 (-39.5%) to 172 (28.9%). Similarly, for 70-kVp scans, correlation was excellent (r = 0.972, P < 0.001) but with broader limits of agreement of -476 (-85.0%) to 270 (48.2%). Only 2 (2.8%) reclassifications were observed for the 80-kVp scans in patients with a BMI <30 kg/m2 (n = 71), and 2 (6.1%) for the 70-kVp scans in patients with a BMI <25 kg/m2 (n = 33). Mean effective radiation dose was 0.60 ± 0.07 millisieverts (mSv), 0.19 ± 0.02 mSv, and 0.12 ± 0.01 mSv for the 120-kVp, 80-kVp, and 70-kVp scans, respectively.

Conclusion

The present study suggests that CAC scoring with reduced peak tube voltage is accurate if kVp-adapted thresholds for calculation of CAC scores are applied while offering a substantial further radiation dose reduction.

Applications of Cardiac Computed Tomography in the Cardio-Oncology Population

OPINION STATEMENT

The increased risk for cardiovascular events in aging cancer survivors and those undergoing certain chemotherapeutic treatments has raised concern for more rigorous screening and surveillance methods above that of the general population. At this time, there are limited guidelines for how to best manage this vulnerable cohort. Questions regarding timing of screening, choice of imaging modality and risk reduction strategies-especially in those patients with known atherosclerotic disease-remain to be elucidated. Over a decade of case series, retrospective studies and clinical trials have shed light on the evolving role of cardiac computed tomography (CT) in this population, of which there is a relative paucity of data regarding its potential utility in the specific cardio-oncology population. Focusing on ability of cardiac CT to evaluate multiple cardiac and vascular structures, provide diagnostic and prognostic information, as well as assist interventional and surgical colleagues in surgical/percutaneous valve replacement and revascularization strategies is the premise for this review.

Coronary artery calcium scoring with photon-counting CT: first in vivo human experience

To evaluate the performance of photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) for coronary artery calcium (CAC) score imaging at standard and reduced radiation doses compared to conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. A dedicated cardiac CT phantom, ten ex vivo human hearts, and ten asymptomatic volunteers underwent matched EID and PCD CT scans at different dose settings without ECG gating. CAC score, contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated in the cardiac CT phantom. CAC score accuracy and reproducibility was assessed in the ex vivo hearts. Standard radiation dose (120 kVp, reference mAs = 80) in vivo CAC scans were compared against dose-reduced CAC scans (75% dose reduction; reference mAs = 20) for image quality and CAC score reproducibility. Interstudy agreement was assessed by using intraclass correlation (ICC), linear regression, and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% confidence interval limits of agreement (LOA). Calcium-soft tissue contrast and CNR were significantly higher for the PCD CAC scans in the cardiac CT phantom (all P < 0.01). Ex vivo hearts: CAC score reproducibility was significantly higher for the PCD scans at the lowest dose setting (50 mAs) (P = 0.002); score accuracy was similar for both detector systems at all dose settings. In vivo scans: the agreement between standard dose and low dose CAC score was significantly better for the PCD than for the EID with narrower LOA in Bland-Altman analysis, linear regression slopes closer to 1 (0.96 vs. 0.84), and higher ICC values (0.98 vs. 0.93, respectively). Phantom and in vivo human studies showed PCD may significantly improve CAC score image quality and/or reduce CAC score radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality.

Breast Arterial Calcification: A Potential Surrogate Marker for Cardiovascular Disease

Breast arterial calcifications (BAC), frequently observed on screening mammography, have been considered as an incidental finding without increased risk for breast cancer. They are medial calcifications and therefore, are indicative of arteriosclerosis. Previous studies indicated that the risk factors of BAC partly overlap with those of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and the presence of BAC is associated with prevalent and incident CVD. This suggests that medial arterial calcification might contribute to CVD through a pathway distinct from the intimal atherosclerotic process. A recent study showed that the presence and severity of BAC are associated with the presence of coronary artery calcification or plaques on coronary computed tomography angiography in asymptomatic women aged more than 40 years. In addition, BAC provided an independent and incremental predictive value over conventional risk factors. Given that population-based mammography screening is currently recommended in asymptomatic women, the evaluation of BAC may be helpful in identifying high-risk women without additional cost or radiation exposure.

Optimized categorization algorithm of coronary artery calcification score on non-gated chest low-dose CT screening using iterative model reconstruction technique

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the optimized categorization algorithm of coronary artery calcification score (CACS) for more accurate risk assessment on non-gated chest low-dose CT (LDCT) screening using iterative model reconstruction (IMR) technique.

METHODS

We enrolled 102 patients who required coronary artery CTA examination and had coronary artery calcification (CAC) in this study. The CACS on non-gated LDCT and ECG-gated CT images were both measured by Agatston analysis software on Philips workstation.

RESULTS

According to the original algorithm (1-100, 100-400 and >400), the CACS measured by non-gated LDCT scan showed a good agreement with ECG-gated CT scan (weighted kappa value of 0.602, P < 0.05). Two ROC curves were drawn to evaluate the accuracy of CACS categorization. The cutoff values were 87.44 and 255.26 respectively. Based on the best diagnostic cutoff value, the CACS measured by the non-gated LDCT scan showed an excellent agreement with ECG-gated CT scan (weighted kappa value of 0.781, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The CACS on non-gated LDCT may have been underestimated. We therefore developed an optimized categorization algorithm of non-gated CACS in this study.

Radiation exposure and coronary artery calcium scans in the society for heart attack prevention and eradication cohort

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is used in asymptomatic patients to improve their clinically predicted risk for future cardiovascular events. Current CT protocols seek to reduce radiation exposure without diminishing image quality. Reported radiation exposure remains widely variable (0.8-5 mSv) depending on the type of protocol. In this study, we report the radiation exposure of CAC scoring from the Society for Heart Attack Prevention and Eradication (SHAPE) early detection program cohort sites, which spanned multiple centers using 64-MDCT (multi-detector computed tomography) scanners. We reviewed radiation exposure in milliSieverts (mSv) for 82,214 participants from the SHAPE early detection program cohort who underwent CAC scoring. This occurred over a 2.5-year period (2012-2014) divided among 33 sites in 7 countries with four different types 64-MDCT scanners. The effective radiation dose was reported as mSv. Mean radiation dosing amongst all 82,214 participants was 1.03 mSv, a median dose of 0.94 mSv. The mean radiation dose ranged from 0.76 to 1.31 mSv across the 33 sites involved with the SHAPE program cohort. Subgroup analysis by age, gender or body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m² showed no variability. Radiation dose in patients with BMI > 30 kg/m² were significantly greater than other subgroups (µ = 1.96 mSv, p < 0.001). The use of 64-MDCT scanners and protocols provide the effective radiation dose for CAC scoring, which is approximately 1 mSv. This is consistently lower than previously reported for CAC scanning, regardless of scanner type, age or gender. In contrast, a greater BMI influenced mean radiation doses.

Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate integrated adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) algorithm in automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) for the quantification of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and cardiac risk stratification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thoracic phantom with calcium inserts of known densities was scanned with filtered back projection (FBP) and AIDR 3D algorithms in small- and medium-sized phantoms. Twenty-four patients underwent two consecutive scans of CACS with FBP and AIDR 3D algorithms. The absolute Agatston score, Agatston score risk, volume score, and Agatston score percentile-based risk were compared, and concordance coefficients and agreement plots were made.

RESULTS

Agatston and volume scores were significantly different between the phantom sizes (P < .01). There were no significant differences in the Agatston scores between FBP and AIDR 3D for the medium phantoms (P = .25). In the patients, there were no significant differences in Agatston and volume scores between FBP and AIDR 3D (P = .06 and P = .09, respectively). The correlation coefficients of Agatston and volume scores with AIDR 3D were excellent compared to those of FBP. There were no significant differences in Agatston score risk and Agatston score percentile-based risk between FBP and AIDR 3D (P = .74 and P = 1, respectively). There was mean dose reduction of 57.8% ± 18.6% for AIDR 3D.

CONCLUSION

The absolute Agatston score differed between FBP and AIDR 3D reconstructions. However, the cardiac risk categorizations of the two methods were comparable. An integrated AIDR 3D algorithm with automatic tube current modulation enables radiation dose savings at a consistent noise level without sacrificing CACS.

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Cardiothoracic Vascular Imaging

Dual energy computed tomography is becoming increasingly widespread in clinical practice. It can expand on the traditional density-based data achievable with single energy computed tomography by adding novel applications to help reach a more accurate diagnosis. The implementation of this technology in cardiothoracic vascular imaging allows for improved image contrast, metal artifact reduction, generation of virtual unenhanced images, virtual calcium subtraction techniques, cardiac and pulmonary perfusion evaluation, and plaque characterization. The improved diagnostic performance afforded by dual energy computed tomography is not associated with an increased radiation dose. This review provides an overview of dual energy computed tomography cardiothoracic vascular applications.

Implications of Coronary Artery Calcium Testing for Treatment Decisions Among Statin Candidates According to the ACC/AHA Cholesterol Management Guidelines: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

This review evaluates the cost-effectiveness of using coronary artery calcium (CAC) to guide long-term statin therapy compared with treating all patients eligible for statins according to 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol management guidelines for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The authors used a microsimulation model to compare costs and effectiveness from a societal perspective over a lifetime horizon. Both strategies resulted in similar costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). CAC resulted in increased costs (+$81) and near-equal QALY (+0.01) for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $8,100/QALY compared with the treat-all strategy. For 10,000 patients, the treat-all strategy would theoretically avert 21 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events, but would add 47,294 person-years of statins. With CAC costs <$100, and higher cost and/or disutility associated with statin therapy, CAC strategy was favored. These findings suggest the economic value of both approaches were similar. Clinicians should account for individual preferences in context of shared decision making when choosing the most appropriate strategy to guide statin decisions.

Leveraging the coronary calcium scan beyond the coronary calcium score

Non-contrast cardiac computed tomography in order to obtain the coronary artery calcium score has become an established diagnostic procedure in the clinical setting, and is commonly employed in clinical and population-based research. This state-of-the-art review paper highlights the potential gain in information that can be obtained from the non-contrast coronary calcium scans without any necessary modifications to the scan protocol. This includes markers of cardio-metabolic health, such as the amount of epicardial fat and liver fat, but also markers of general health including bone density and lung density. Finally, this paper addresses the importance of incidental findings and of radiation exposure accompanying imaging with non-contrast cardiac computed tomography. Despite the fact that coronary calcium scan protocols have been optimized for the visualization of coronary calcification in terms image quality and radiation exposure, it is important for radiologists, cardiologists and medical specialists in the field of preventive medicine to acknowledge that numerous additional markers of cardio-metabolic health and general health can be readily identified on a coronary calcium scan.

KEY POINTS

• The coronary artery calcium score substantially increased the use of cardiac CT. • Cardio-metabolic and general health markers may be derived without changes to the scan protocol. • Those include epicardial fat, aortic valve calcifications, liver fat, bone density, and lung density. • Clinicians must be aware of this potential additional yield from non-contrast cardiac CT.

Accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring with tube current reduction by 75%, using an adaptive iterative reconstruction algorithm

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of an iterative reconstruction (IR) technique for coronary artery calcium scoring with reduced radiation dose.

METHODS

163 consecutive patients underwent twofold scanning by 320-row detector CT at 120 kVp. A low-dose scan at 25% tube current but with standard scan length (14 cm) was followed by a standard dose scan with routine tube current but reduced scan length (10 cm). Reduced dose images were constructed using filtered back-projection (FBP) and IR (adaptive iterative dose reduction in three dimensions). The standard dose scan reconstructed with FBP served as the gold standard for comparisons. Image noise and Agatston coronary calcium scores were determined and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Compared with FBP at standard dose, noise at reduced dose increased markedly with FBP but remained low with IR. Mean Agatston score with FBP at reduced dose showed a significant increase as compared with FBP at standard dose. No significant difference was observed when applying IR at reduced dose. At reduced dose, 38 (23.3%) patients were reassigned to a different cardiovascular risk category with FBP but only 8 (4.9%) with IR. Out of 47 patients with a zero Agatston score, 15 patients (31.9%) were false-positive with FBP at reduced dose, but no false positives were found with IR.

CONCLUSION

IR allows accurate coronary artery calcium scoring with a radiation dose reduced by 75%. Advances in knowledge: The application of adaptive iterative dose reduction in three dimensions allows the maintenance of accurate Agatston scores and risk stratification at significantly reduced tube current, thus reducing the patient's exposure to ionizing radiation.

Coronary Artery Calcium Imaging in the ROBINSCA Trial: Rationale, Design, and Technical Background

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the rationale, design, and technical background of coronary artery calcium (CAC) imaging in the large-scale population-based cardiovascular disease screening trial (Risk Or Benefit IN Screening for CArdiovascular Diseases [ROBINSCA]).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, literature search was performed to review the logistics, setup, and settings of previously performed CAC imaging studies, and current clinical CAC imaging protocols of participating centers in the ROBINSCA trial were evaluated. A second literature search was performed to evaluate the impact of computed tomography parameter settings on CAC score.

RESULTS

Based on literature reviews and experts opinion an imaging protocol accompanied by data management protocol was created for ROBINSCA. The imaging protocol should consist of a fixed tube voltage, individually tailored tube current setting, mid-diastolic electrocardiography-triggering, fixed field-of-view, fixed reconstruction kernel, fixed slice thickness, overlapping reconstruction and without iterative reconstruction. The analysis of scans is performed with one type and version of CAC scoring software, by two dedicated and experienced researchers. The data management protocol describes the organization of data handling between the coordinating center, participating centers, and core analysis center.

CONCLUSION

In this paper we describe the rationale and technical considerations to be taken in developing CAC imaging protocol, and we present a detailed protocol that can be implemented for CAC screening purposes.

In vitro evaluation of a new iterative reconstruction algorithm for dose reduction in coronary artery calcium scoring

Background

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is a widespread tool for cardiac risk assessment in asymptomatic patients and accompanying possible adverse effects, i.e. radiation exposure, should be as low as reasonably achievable.

Purpose

To evaluate a new iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm for dose reduction of in vitro coronary artery calcium scoring at different tube currents.

Material and Methods

An anthropomorphic calcium scoring phantom was scanned in different configurations simulating slim, average-sized, and large patients. A standard calcium scoring protocol was performed on a third-generation dual-source CT at 120 kVp tube voltage. Reference tube current was 80 mAs as standard and stepwise reduced to 60, 40, 20, and 10 mAs. Images were reconstructed with weighted filtered back projection (wFBP) and a new version of an established IR kernel at different strength levels. Calcifications were quantified calculating Agatston and volume scores. Subjective image quality was visualized with scans of an ex vivo human heart.

Results

In general, Agatston and volume scores remained relatively stable between 80 and 40 mAs and increased at lower tube currents, particularly in the medium and large phantom. IR reduced this effect, as both Agatston and volume scores decreased with increasing levels of IR compared to wFBP (P < 0.001). Depending on selected parameters, radiation dose could be lowered by up to 86% in the large size phantom when selecting a reference tube current of 10 mAs with resulting Agatston levels close to the reference settings.

Conclusion

New iterative reconstruction kernels may allow for reduction in tube current for established Agatston scoring protocols and consequently for substantial reduction in radiation exposure.