1
|
Lyon ME, Fraser JL, Thompkins JD, Clark H, Brodie N, Detwiler K, Torres C, Guerrera MF, Younge T, Aoun S, Trujillo Rivera EA. Advance Care Planning for Children With Rare Diseases: A Pilot RCT. Pediatrics 2024; 153:e2023064557. [PMID: 38699801 PMCID: PMC11153326 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-064557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Pediatric rare diseases are often life-limiting conditions and/or require constant caregiving. Investigators assessed the initial efficacy of the FAmily CEntered (FACE) pediatric advance care planning (pACP), FACE-Rare, intervention on families' quality of life. METHODS A pilot-phase, single-blinded, intent-to-treat, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled families from 1 pediatric quaternary hospital between 2021 and 2023. Intervention families received 3 weekly 60-minute (FACE-Rare pACP) sessions: (1) Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool or Action Plan, (2) Carer Support Needs Assessment Tol Action Plan Review, and (3) Pediatric Next Steps: Respecting Choices pACP. Controls received treatment as usual (TAU). Outcome measures were Beck Anxiety Inventory, Family Appraisal of Caregiving, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Spirituality, and health care utilization. Generalized mixed effect models with γ response assessed the intervention effect at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS Children (n = 21) were aged 1 to 10 years, 48% male, 24% Black; and 100% technology dependent. Primary family caregivers (n = 21) were aged 30 to 43 years, 19% male, 19% Black; and 27% household income below the Federal poverty level. Dyads underwent 1:1 randomization: 9 to FACE-Rare and 12 to TAU. TAU caregivers reported statistically lower meaning and peace than FACE-Rare caregivers (0.9, P = .03, confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.99). Black caregivers reported significantly less caregiver distress (0.7, P = .04, CI: 0.47-0.98) than non-Black caregivers. Poor families reported more anxiety (3.5, P = .002, CI: 1.62-7.94), more caregiver strain (1.2, P = .006, CI: 1.07-1.42); and less family well-being (0.8, P = .02, CI: 0.64-0.95). CONCLUSIONS FACE®-Rare was feasible, acceptable, safe, and demonstrated initial efficacy, providing greater feelings of meaning and peace to caregivers. Poverty impacted well-being. A multisite trial is needed to determine generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen E. Lyon
- Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
- Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Jamie L. Fraser
- Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
- Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - Heidi Clark
- Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Nicola Brodie
- Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
- Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - Clarivet Torres
- Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - Tamiko Younge
- Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Samar Aoun
- Peron Institute, Palliative Care, The Western University of Australia, Perth, Washington, Australia
| | - Eduardo A. Trujillo Rivera
- Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
- Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ouyang N, Feder SL, Baker JN, Knobf MT. Prognostic Communication Between Parents and Clinicians in Pediatric Oncology: An Integrative Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024; 41:545-557. [PMID: 37309610 DOI: 10.1177/10499091231183107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Prognostic communication between clinicians and parents in pediatric oncology is complex. However, no review has exclusively examined research on prognostic communication in pediatric oncology. In this review, we synthesize the evidence on prognostic communication in pediatric oncology and provide recommendations for future research. Methods: We conducted an integrative review searching six databases for studies on prognostic communication in pediatric oncology as of August 2022. We applied descriptive and narrative approaches to data analysis. Results: Fourteen quantitative and five qualitative studies were included. All studies were conducted in Western developed countries. In total, 804 parents of 770 children with cancer were included. Across studies, parents were predominately female, Non-Hispanic White, and had high school or higher levels of education. Most parents reported that prognostic communication was initiated in the first year after their children's diagnosis. High-quality prognostic communication was positively associated with trust and hope and negatively associated with parental distress and decisional regret. In qualitative studies, parents suggested that prognostic communication should be open, ongoing, and delivered with sensitivity. Most studies were of moderate quality. The main gaps included inconsistent definitions of prognostic communication, and a lack of comprehensive and validated measurements, high-quality longitudinal studies, and diverse settings and participants. Conclusions: Clinicians should initiate high-quality prognostic communication early on in clinical practice. Future research should consider conducting high-quality longitudinal studies, developing prognostic communication definitions and measurements, and conducting studies across settings with diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Ouyang
- School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA
| | - Shelli L Feder
- School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - M Tish Knobf
- School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sisk BA, Bereitschaft C, Enloe M, Schulz G, Mack J, DuBois J. Oncology Clinicians' Perspectives on Online Patient Portal Use in Pediatric and Adolescent Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2300124. [PMID: 37972324 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Online patient portals represent widely available communication tools in pediatric oncology. Previous studies have not evaluated clinicians' perspectives on portal use, including issues related to access to adolescents' portals. METHODS We performed semistructured interviews with physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) who care for children or adolescents with cancer. We performed thematic analysis of benefits, problems, and accommodations related to portal use in oncology. RESULTS We interviewed 29 physicians and 24 APPs representing 26 institutions. Participants described five themes of benefits provided by portals: (1) empowering adolescents, (2) improving efficiency and accuracy of communication, (3) promoting open and adaptive communication, (4) supporting parents in managing care, and (5) bolstering clinical relationships. Participants described eight themes of problems caused by portal access: (1) creating emotional distress and confusion, (2) increasing workload and changing workflows, (3) threatening adolescent confidentiality, (4) adolescents lacking interest to engage, (5) diminishing clinical relationship, (6) misusing portal messages, (7) diminishing quality of sensitive documentation, and (8) parents losing access to adolescents' records. Participants described three themes related to accommodations they made as a result of portal access: (1) modifying note writing, (2) providing anticipatory guidance about viewing results, and (3) adapting workflows. Some portal functions created either benefits or problems depending on the clinical context. CONCLUSION Oncologists identified benefits and problems created by portal use, which were sometimes in tension, depending on the clinical context. To make portals useful, we must take steps to mitigate risks while preserving functionality for parents and adolescent patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | | | - Madi Enloe
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Ginny Schulz
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Jennifer Mack
- Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - James DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mastropolo R, Altschuler A, Brock KE, Casperson M, Chao CR, Fisher L, Greenzang KA, Kushi LH, Lakin JR, Lefebvre A, Schwartz CM, Shalman DM, Wall CB, Wiener L, Mack JW. Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on Core Components of Therapeutic Alliance for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2328153. [PMID: 37556137 PMCID: PMC10413170 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance The patient-clinician therapeutic alliance is an important aspect of high-quality cancer care. However, components of the therapeutic alliance in adolescents and young adults (AYAs, aged 12-39 years) with cancer have not been defined. Objective To identify components of and barriers to the therapeutic alliance between AYAs, caregivers, and clinicians from the perspective of all key stakeholders. Design, Setting, and Participants In this qualitative study, semistructured in-depth interviews with patients, caregivers, and clinicians were conducted from 2018 to 2021 with no additional follow-up, with content analysis of resulting transcripts. Participants were recruited from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, and an online cancer support community (Cactus Cancer Society). Eligible participants were English- or Spanish-speaking. Eligible patients were aged 12 to 39 years with stage IV or recurrent cancer. Eligible caregivers cared for an AYA living with advanced cancer or one who had died within 5 years. Eligible clinicians routinely provided care for AYAs with cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures Perspectives on therapeutic alliance. Results Interviews were conducted with 80 participants: 23 were patients (48% were female; 78% were White), 28 were caregivers (82% were female; 50% were White), and 29 were clinicians (69% were female; 45% were White). The mean (SD) age of patients was 29 (7.3) years. Interviews identified 6 components of therapeutic alliance: (1) compassion; (2) sense of connection; (3) clinician presence; (4) information sharing; (5) shared goals; and (6) individualization of care. While some domains were represented in prior models of therapeutic alliance, a unique domain was identified related to the need for individualization of the approach to care for AYA patients and their caregivers. Interviews also identified potential barriers to building the therapeutic alliance specific to the AYA population, including managing discordant needs between patients and caregivers and communication challenges at the end of life. Conclusions and Relevance This study identified core components and barriers to building therapeutic alliance in the AYA advanced cancer population from the perspective of all the key stakeholders in the relationship. A novel component highlighting the need for individualization was identified. This model enables a deeper understanding of how to build therapeutic alliance in the AYA advanced cancer population, which may guide clinician training and facilitate improved care for this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemarie Mastropolo
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrea Altschuler
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Katharine E. Brock
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emory University and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mallory Casperson
- Divisions of Pediatric Oncology and Palliative Care, Cactus Cancer Society, Oakland, California
| | - Chun R. Chao
- Department of Research and Evaluation (C.R.C.), Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena
| | - Lauren Fisher
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katie A. Greenzang
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lawrence H. Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Joshua R. Lakin
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anna Lefebvre
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Corey M. Schwartz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Dov M. Shalman
- Department of Palliative Care, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena
| | - Catherine B. Wall
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lori Wiener
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mack JW. The Day One Talk, 20 Years Later: What Have We Learned? JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:164-166. [PMID: 36800565 PMCID: PMC10113114 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer W. Mack
- Division of Population Sciences and Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aglio T, Woods C, Baker JN, Mack JW, Kaye EC. "Seed Planting" As an Approach for Longitudinal Prognostic Disclosure in Pediatric Cancer: A Case Series. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:447-451. [PMID: 36094817 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Most children with cancer and their parents desire honest communication about prognosis, even when prognosis is poor. Unfortunately, many parents perceive deficits in communication about prognosis, and strategies are needed to encourage timely person-centered prognostic discussions. To better understand patterns in prognostic communication, we audio-recorded serial disease re-evaluation conversations between pediatric oncologists, children with poor-prognosis cancer diagnoses, and their families across the illness trajectory. Prior analysis revealed broad prognostic communication patterns, including a "seed planting" approach where prognostic information was offered gradually across time. In this case series, we examine the seed planting approach more closely, identifying language strategies that clinicians used to help patients and families gain insight into prognostic gravity as their illness evolved. Although further research is needed to measure the full impact of a seed planting approach, this case series explores a longitudinal communication strategy with potential to improve prognostic communication across an advancing illness course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Aglio
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Cameka Woods
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erica C Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Porter AS, Woods C, Stall M, Baker JN, Mack JW, Kaye EC. Mismatch between Pediatric Oncologists' Private and Parent-Facing Prognostic Communication: Communication Patterns Used to Soften Prognostic Disclosure. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:210-219. [PMID: 35976087 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Most parents of children with cancer desire honest prognostic communication, yet oncologists often avoid clear prognostic disclosure. This study explored differences between oncologists' private assessments of prognosis and their prognostic communication with patients and parents. Patients and Methods: In this prospective, longitudinal, mixed-methods study, we audio-recorded serial disease reevaluation conversations between children with advancing cancer, parents, and primary oncologists and separately surveyed and interviewed oncologists at disease progression time points. At time points when oncologists privately described curability as ≤10%, content analysis was used to compare prognostic language in recorded dialogue with private responses about prognosis. Results: Of 33 enrolled patient-parent dyads, 17 patients with high-risk cancer under the care of 6 primary oncologists experienced disease progression during the study period. In 95% of oncologist interviews at disease progression time points, oncologists either predicted curability to be ≤10% or incurable. In most interviews (82%), oncologists stated unequivocally that chances of cure were ≤10%, yet did not communicate these low odds during recorded discussions at the same time point. Analysis revealed three distinct communication patterns through which oncologists softened prognostic disclosure to patients and families: (1) space-holding for hope of cure: statements acknowledging difficult prognosis yet leaving room for possibility of cure; (2) vague warning: statements implying that cancer may progress without offering specifics; and (3) data without interpretation: statements describing disease progression findings in detail without explaining what this meant for the patient's future life or survival. Conclusion: Pediatric oncologists often temper their assessment of poor prognosis when speaking with patients and families. Future work should explore serious conversation guides and other clinical interventions aimed at encouraging person-centered prognostic disclosure for patients with advancing cancer and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy S Porter
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Cameka Woods
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Melanie Stall
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erica C Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu V, Yilmaz S, Freitag J, Loh KP, Kehoe L, Digiovanni G, Bauer J, Sanapala C, Epstein RM, Yousefi-Nooraie R, Mohile S. The role of social networks in prognostic understanding of older adults with advanced cancer. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 106:135-141. [PMID: 36270857 PMCID: PMC10069282 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Explore how older patients utilize their social networks to inform prognostic understanding. METHODS In a pilot study of adults (≥65 years old) with advanced cancer, 16 patients completed surveys, social network maps, and semi-structured interviews exploring with whom they preferred to communicate about their illness. Interviews were analyzed using open-coding, and codes were categorized into emergent themes. Social network maps and themes were analyzed via mixed-methods social network analysis (MMSNA). Three case examples with diverse network characteristics and communication patterns were selected for further analysis. RESULTS Three overarching themes (i.e., prognostic understanding, social support, and therapeutic alliance) revealed that patients' prognostic understanding was strongly influenced by the quality of the social support patients perceived from members of their social networks. Patients demonstrated prognostic understanding when they reported close relationships and open communication with their network members. Case examples revealed some ways that patients sought information and had better sense of their prognosis when they had supportive social networks. CONCLUSION Findings illustrate how understanding social networks may provide information on how older adults with cancer seek, share, and process prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Yu
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Sule Yilmaz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Jorie Freitag
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Lee Kehoe
- Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Grace Digiovanni
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Bauer
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Chandrika Sanapala
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Ronald M Epstein
- Department of Family Medicine Research, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Reza Yousefi-Nooraie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Supriya Mohile
- Geriatric Oncology Research, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Porter AS, Woods C, Stall M, Velrajan S, Baker JN, Mack JW, Kaye EC. Oncologist approaches to communicating uncertain disease status in pediatric cancer: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1109. [PMCID: PMC9620648 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10190-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most patients with cancer and their caregivers desire honest, clear prognostic communication, yet oncologists often disclose prognosis inconsistently. Prognostic communication becomes even more challenging when disease progression is unclear or equivocal. Presently, oncologist approaches for discussing uncertain disease findings are poorly understood. Methods In this prospective, longitudinal study, we audio-recorded serial disease reevaluation conversations between children with high-risk cancer, their families, and their primary oncologists over 24 months and conducted content analysis at recorded timepoints when oncologists categorized disease progression as equivocal. Results Of the 265 medical discussions recorded across the illness course for 33 patient-parent dyads, a total of 40 recorded discussions took place at equivocal timepoints, comprising > 500 min of medical dialogue. Prognosis talk encompassed < 3% of dialogue and was absent in nearly half of equivocal discussions (17/40, 42.5%). Curability statements were identified in only two conversations. Inductive content analysis of dialogue revealed four distinct patterns for communicating equivocal disease status: (1) up-front reassurance, (2) softening the message, (3) describing possible disease progression without interpretation, (4) expressing uncertainty without discussing the bigger picture. Conclusion Oncologists rarely discuss prognosis with children with high-risk cancer and their families at timepoints when disease progression is not definitive. Formal guidance is needed to better support oncologists in navigating uncertainty while sharing honest, person- and family-centered information about prognosis. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10190-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy S. Porter
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XSt. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Cameka Woods
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XSt. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Melanie Stall
- grid.267313.20000 0000 9482 7121The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA
| | | | - Justin N. Baker
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XSt. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.2515.30000 0004 0378 8438Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Erica C. Kaye
- grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XSt. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA ,grid.240871.80000 0001 0224 711XDivision of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Mail Stop 1121, 38105 Memphis, TN USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu Q, Ho KY, Lam KKW, Lam WYY, Cheng EHL, Ching SSY, Wong FKY. A Descriptive and Phenomenological Exploration of the Spiritual Needs of Chinese Children Hospitalized with Cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph192013217. [PMID: 36293795 PMCID: PMC9602965 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Spiritual well-being is the fourth dimension of health, as equally important as physical, mental, and social well-being. The shadow of death associated with cancer triggers children to explore their personal values, meanings, and life goals throughout the illness trajectory, enabling them to identify their unique spiritual needs. Chinese children are generally non-religious, unlike Western children, which affects their spiritual needs. To address the literature gaps, we applied a qualitative, descriptive, phenomenological approach for exploring the spiritual needs of Chinese children hospitalized with cancer. Purposive sampling was conducted in two public hospitals with special wards for pediatric oncology patients in Hunan Province, China. Consequently, 22 children, hospitalized with cancer, were recruited and individually interviewed using a semi-structured interview format. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts. Four important themes were identified: the need for self-exploration, inner needs, need for a connection with others, and need for a connection with gods, supernatural powers, and fictional characters. We found that culture significantly influenced the spiritual needs of Chinese children with cancer. Hope was a key factor motivating the children to continue cancer treatment. To address their unique spiritual needs, culturally specific interventions should be developed and incorporated into their care to enhance their spiritual well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ka-Yan Ho
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +852-27666417
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bogetz JF, Revette A, Partin L, DeCourcey DD. Relationships and Resources Supporting Children With Serious Illness and Their Parents. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12:832-842. [PMID: 35945359 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) and their parents benefit from supportive serious illness care when their conditions are severe and impact their quality of life and stress. This includes not only expert medical care but also effective relationships with the clinical team. Existing data suggest that there are opportunities for improvement. This study's aim was to explore important aspects of the relationships and resources that facilitate supportive serious illness care among children with CCCs and their parents. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with CCCs (aged 13-35 years), and parents of children with CCCs across 2 academic pediatric centers in the United States from December 2018 to April 2019. Transcripts were iteratively coded and analyzed by a team that included a sociologist, pediatric intensivist, and palliative care researcher by using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Seven AYAs with CCCs and 9 parents participated (16 total; 1 AYA-parent dyad). Two key categories were identified around relationships with the clinical team: trust and fostering collaboration. Three key categories related to resources are information needs, making sense of life with illness, and supportive community. Many of the key categories and themes identified by participants had both tangible and intangible components and revealed the distinct yet interconnected nature of these aspects of care. CONCLUSIONS Awareness and cultivation of relationship and resource support through innovative interventions and attention to those with increased needs in these areas may improve the serious illness care provided to children with CCCs and their parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jori F Bogetz
- Division of Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.,Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle, Washington
| | - Anna Revette
- Survey Qualitative Methods Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lindsay Partin
- Division of Medical Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sisk BA, Keenan M, Goodman MS, Servin AE, Yaeger LH, Mack JW, DuBois JM. Racial and ethnic disparities in communication study enrollment for young people with cancer: A descriptive analysis of the literature. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2067-2073. [PMID: 34991915 PMCID: PMC9203904 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the racial and ethnic diversity of study participants in recent pediatric cancer communication literature. METHODS We systematically searched for communication studies in pediatric oncology published between January 2018 and September 2020, limiting analysis to US studies. We considered race and ethnicity as separate categories in our analysis. Two authors screened studies and abstracted characteristics of race and ethnicity reporting and enrollment. RESULTS Of 98 articles included in this analysis, many studies failed to report participants' race (21/98) and ethnicity (40/98). Most studies ascertained race and ethnicity by self-report (51/98); 25 studies did not describe how they ascertained race and ethnicity. White participants were overrepresented in studies relative to the US population (median 80% in studies vs 72% in 2020 US census). Racial and ethnic minorities were underrepresented (Black: 7% vs 14%; Asian: 4% vs 7%; Pacific Islander: 0% vs 0.5%; Native American: 0.5% vs 3%; Hispanic 8% vs 19%). CONCLUSION Communication literature in pediatric oncology underrepresents all racial and ethnic minority populations and is inconsistent in the reporting of race and ethnicity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Future work should follow best practices to ensure this literature adequately represents the experiences of all families in pediatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Megan Keenan
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Melody S Goodman
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Argentina E Servin
- Department of Medicine, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Lauren H Yaeger
- Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James M DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Graetz DE, Caceres-Serrano A, Radhakrishnan V, Salaverria CE, Kambugu JB, Sisk BA. A proposed global framework for pediatric cancer communication research. Cancer 2022; 128:1888-1893. [PMID: 35201609 PMCID: PMC9303244 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The authors introduce a functional communication framework that can be used for global pediatric cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan E Graetz
- Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.,Solid Tumor Division, Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Ana Caceres-Serrano
- Department of Psychology, Unidad Nacional Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | | | - Carmen E Salaverria
- Department of Psychology, Fundacion Ayudame a Vivir, San Salvador, El Salvador
| | - Joyce B Kambugu
- Department of Oncology, Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Bryan A Sisk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.,Bioethics Research Center, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sisk BA, Schulz G, Kaye EC, Baker JN, Mack JW, DuBois JM. Conflicting goals and obligations: Tensions affecting communication in pediatric oncology. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:56-61. [PMID: 33992486 PMCID: PMC8978564 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the tensions experienced by clinicians and psychosocial professionals that affect communication in pediatric oncology. METHODS Ten focus groups with nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and psychosocial professionals at 2 US institutions. We analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis, assessing tensions experienced when communicating with parents. RESULTS We identified 5 themes of tensions, defined as challenges experienced when clinicians and psychosocial professionals are trying to achieve multiple conflicting goals or obligations while communicating: (1) Supporting parental hopes while providing honest opinions and information; (2) disclosing all possible outcomes while avoiding the creation of new worries or uncertainties; (3) building relationships while maintaining personal boundaries; (4) disclosing sensitive information while adhering to professional role and perceived authority; (5) validating parental beliefs or decisions while fulfilling obligation for honesty. Some tensions represented conflicts between different communication goals. Others represented conflicts between a communication goal and another obligation. CONCLUSION Clinicians and psychosocial professionals experience tensions that affect communication with parents in pediatric oncology. Some tensions might be addressed with interventions or education. Others will require further analysis to provide sufficient guidance to clinicians. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Unaddressed tensions might lead to poor communication and clinician burnout. Future work should explore solutions to these tensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Ginny Schulz
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Erica C Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA; Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James M DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sisk BA, Harvey K, Friedrich AB, Antes AL, Yaeger LH, Mack JW, DuBois J. Multilevel barriers and facilitators of communication in pediatric oncology: A systematic review. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29405. [PMID: 34662485 PMCID: PMC8875310 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Multiple factors can facilitate or impede the fulfillment of communication functions in pediatric cancer. In this systematic review, we evaluated 109 studies from the preceding 20 years that presented qualitative or quantitative evidence of barriers or facilitators to communication in pediatric cancer. Using a multilevel framework developed in our prior study, we then analyzed and categorized the levels of barriers and facilitators identified in included studies. The vast majority of studies focused on individual-level barriers, rather than team, organization/system, collaborating hospital, community, or policy-level barriers. Future studies should explore the full range of factors that affect communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kieandra Harvey
- Brown School of Social Work, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Annie B. Friedrich
- Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alison L. Antes
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren H Yaeger
- Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Putting Prognosis First: Impact of an Intensive Care Unit Team Premeeting Curriculum. ATS Sch 2021; 2:386-396. [PMID: 34667988 PMCID: PMC8519315 DOI: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0063oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The paradigm of care has shifted in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) such that patients are frequently cared for by teams of specialists rather than the ICU attending physician solely managing care. An unintended consequence of care managed by multiple specialists is that families often receive conflicting messages from different team members, with little focus on disclosing prognosis. Objective: To address this gap, we developed and pilot-tested a team communication skills training (CST) program focused on the healthcare team premeeting in which roles, purpose, and prognosis are clarified before meeting with the family. Our aim was to assess whether the team CST program was associated with increased discussion of prognosis during the team premeeting. Methods: We conducted a single-center, observational pilot study to develop and test a team CST program using a before/after design. Pediatric ICU physicians and specialists from pediatric neurology and pediatric oncology who co-led family conferences in the pediatric ICU participated in a 1-day team CST program. Team premeetings were audio-recorded and transcribed. Results: We analyzed seven pre- and 10 post-CST program audio-recorded team premeetings, which each compromised a median of eight healthcare team members. Prognosis was more likely to be discussed in post-CST team premeetings (10/10 vs. 3/7; P = 0.0147). Agreement on prognosis was achieved more frequently in post-CST teams compared with pre-CST teams, although the percentage of agreement did not reach significance (9/10 vs. 3/7; P = 0.1007). Conclusions: A CST program with a structured approach to conducting a team premeeting was associated with an increased discussion of prognosis among team members before convening with the family in the pediatric ICU.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sisk BA, Schulz GL, Blazin LJ, Baker JN, Mack JW, DuBois JM. Parental views on communication between children and clinicians in pediatric oncology: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:4957-4968. [PMID: 33569673 PMCID: PMC8295182 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06047-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Communication is essential to providing family-centered care in pediatric oncology. Previously, we developed a functional model of communication between parents and clinicians. Prior research has not examined the domains and purposes of communication between children and clinicians. We explored parental perspectives to begin understanding this communication. METHODS Secondary analysis of semi-structured interviews with 80 parents of children with cancer across 3 academic medical centers during treatment, survivorship, or bereavement. We employed semantic content analysis, using the functional model of parental communication as an a priori framework. RESULTS We identified 6 distinct functions of communication in child-clinician interactions: building relationships, promoting patient engagement, addressing emotions, exchanging information, managing uncertainty, and fostering hope. These communication functions were identified by parents of older (> 13 years old) and younger (< 12 years old) children, although the specific manifestations sometimes differed by age. Notably, age was not always an indicator of the child's communication needs. For example, some parents noted older children who did not want to discuss difficult topics, whereas other parent described younger children who wanted to know every detail. Two functions from the previous parental model of communication were absent from this analysis: supporting family self-management and making decisions. CONCLUSION Interviews with 80 parents provided evidence for 6 distinct functions of communication between children and clinicians. These functions apply to older and younger children, although specific manifestations might vary by age. This functional model provides a framework to guide clinicians' communication efforts and future communication research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Avenue, Campus Box 8005, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Ginny L Schulz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Avenue, Campus Box 8005, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Lindsay J Blazin
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James M DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sisk BA, Keenan MA, Blazin LJ, Kaye E, Baker JN, Mack JW, DuBois JM. "Don't be afraid to speak up": Communication advice from parents and clinicians of children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e29052. [PMID: 33861026 PMCID: PMC8286806 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parents and clinicians of children with cancer can provide advice to improve communication that reflects lessons learned through experience. We aimed to identify categories of communication advice offered to parents of children with cancer from clinicians and other parents. PROCEDURE (1) Semi-structured interviews with 80 parents of children with cancer at three sites; (2) single-item, open-ended survey administered following 10 focus groups with 58 pediatric oncology clinicians at two sites. We asked participants for communication advice to parents, and analyzed responses using semantic content analysis. RESULTS Parents provided five categories of communication advice to other parents. Advocacy involved asking questions, communicating concerns, and speaking up for the child. Support involved pursuing self-care, seeking and accepting help, and identifying supportive communities. Managing information involved taking and organizing notes, remaining open to difficult truths, and avoiding inaccurate information. Partnership involved establishing open lines of communication with clinicians, making the family's values and priorities known, and trusting the clinical team. Engaging and supporting the child involved, understanding and incorporating the child's preferences and values, and creating a loving environment. Clinicians' advice addressed similar categories, although only one clinician described engaging and supporting the child. Furthermore, parental advice expanded beyond interactions with the clinical team, whereas clinician advice focused more on the role of clinicians. CONCLUSIONS Parents and clinicians of children with cancer provided five categories of communication advice. With these data, clinicians, health care organizations, support groups, and patient advocates could offer experience-informed advice to parents who are seeking information and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Megan A Keenan
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Lindsay J Blazin
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Erica Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James M DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kaye EC, Stall M, Woods C, Velrajan S, Gattas M, Lemmon M, Baker JN, Mack JW. Prognostic Communication Between Oncologists and Parents of Children With Advanced Cancer. Pediatrics 2021; 147:peds.2020-044503. [PMID: 33952691 PMCID: PMC8503785 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-044503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Parents of children with cancer perceive deficits in quality of prognostic communication. How oncologists disclose information about disease progression and incurability and how prognostic communication impacts parental understanding of prognosis are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to (1) characterize communication strategies used by pediatric oncologists to share prognostic information across a child's advancing illness course and (2) explore relationships between different communication approaches and concordance of oncologist-parent prognostic understanding. METHODS In this prospective, longitudinal, mixed-methods study, serial disease reevaluation conversations were audio recorded across an advancing illness course for children with cancer and their families. Surveys and interviews also were conducted with oncologists and caregivers at specific time points targeting disease progression. RESULTS Seventeen children experienced advancing illness on study, resulting in 141 recordings (40 hours). Fewer than 4% of recorded dialogue constituted prognostic communication, with most codes (77%) occurring during discussions about frank disease progression. Most recordings at study entry contained little or no prognosis communication dialogue, and oncologists rated curability lower than parents across all dyads. Parent-oncologist discordance typically was preceded by conversations without incurability statements; ultimately, concordance was achieved in most cases after the oncologist made direct statements about incurability. Content analysis revealed 3 distinct patterns (absent, deferred, and seed planting) describing the provision of prognostic communication across an advancing pediatric cancer course. CONCLUSIONS When oncologists provided direct statements about incurability, prognostic understanding appeared to improve. Further research is needed to determine optimal timing for prognostic disclosure in alignment with patient and family preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica C. Kaye
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Melanie Stall
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Cameka Woods
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Melanie Gattas
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Monica Lemmon
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Thompkins JD, Needle J, Baker JN, Briggs L, Cheng YI, Wang J, Friebert S, Lyon ME. Pediatric Advance Care Planning and Families' Positive Caregiving Appraisals: An RCT. Pediatrics 2021; 147:peds.2020-029330. [PMID: 33958436 PMCID: PMC8442842 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-029330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Little is known about how families respond to pediatric advance care planning. Physicians are concerned that initiating pediatric advance care planning conversations with families is too distressing for families. We examined the effect of family centered pediatric advance care planning intervention for teens with cancer (FACE-TC) advance care planning on families' appraisals of their caregiving, distress, and strain. METHODS In a randomized clinical trial with adolescents with cancer and their families conducted from July 2016 to April 2019 in 4 tertiary pediatric hospitals, adolescents and family dyads were randomly assigned at a 2:1 intervention/control ratio to either the 3 weekly sessions of FACE-TC (Advance Care Planning Survey; Next Steps: Respecting Choices; Five Wishes) or treatment-as-usual. Only the family member was included in this study. Generalized estimating equations assessed the intervention effect measured by Family Appraisal of Caregiving Questionnaire. RESULTS Families' (n = 126) mean age was 46 years; 83% were female, and 82% were white. FACE-TC families significantly increased positive caregiving appraisals at 3-months postintervention, compared with those in the control group (β = .35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19 to 0.36; P = .03). No significant differences were found between groups for strain (β = -.14; 95% CI = -0.42 to 0.15; P = .35) or distress (β = -.01; CI = -0.35 to 0.32; P = .93). CONCLUSIONS Families benefited from participation in FACE-TC, which resulted in positive appraisals of their caregiving for their child with cancer, while not significantly burdening them with distress or strain. Clinicians can be assured of the tolerability of this family-supported model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Needle
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical School and,Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Linda Briggs
- Respecting Choices, Coalition to Transform Advanced
Care Innovations, Washington, DC
| | | | - Jichuan Wang
- Division of Biostatistics and Study Methodology and
Children’s National Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Sarah Friebert
- Haslinger Family Pediatric Palliative Care Center
and,Rebecca D. Considine Research Institute, Akron
Children’s Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Maureen E. Lyon
- Center for Translational Research and,Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and
Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC; and,Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine,
Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sisk BA, Friedrich AB, Kaye EC, Baker JN, Mack JW, DuBois JM. Multilevel barriers to communication in pediatric oncology: Clinicians' perspectives. Cancer 2021; 127:2130-2138. [PMID: 33598930 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication serves several functions in pediatric oncology, but communication deficiencies persist. Little is known about the broad spectrum of barriers contributing to these deficiencies. Identifying these barriers will support new strategies to improve communication. METHODS The authors performed 10 focus groups on perceived communication barriers with nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and psychosocial professionals across 2 academic institutions. They analyzed transcripts by adapting a multilevel framework from organizational psychology. RESULTS The authors identified 6 levels of barriers to communication from the clinicians' perspectives: individual, team, organization, collaborating hospital, community, and policy. Individual barriers were subdivided into clinician characteristics, family characteristics, or characteristics of the clinician-family interaction. Within each level and sublevel, several manifestations of barriers were identified. Some barriers, such as a lack of comfort with difficult topics (individual), cultural differences (individual), a lack of a shared team mental model (team), and time pressure (organization), manifested similarly across professions and institutions. Other barriers, such as a need for boundaries (individual), intimidation or embarrassment of family (individual), unclear roles and authority (team), and excessive logistical requirements (policy), manifested differently across professions. With the exception of collaborating hospitals, participants from all professions identified barriers from each level. Physicians did not discuss collaborating hospital barriers. CONCLUSIONS Nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and psychosocial professionals experience communication barriers at multiple levels, which range from individual- to policy-level barriers. Yet their unique clinical roles and duties can lead to different manifestations of some barriers. This multilevel framework might help clinicians and researchers to identify targets for interventions to improve communication experiences for families in pediatric oncology. LAY SUMMARY Clinicians and families experience many barriers to communication in pediatric oncology. The authors performed 10 focus groups with 59 clinicians who cared for children with cancer. In these focus groups, barriers to effective communication were discussed. In this article, the authors report on an analysis of the responses. Six levels of barriers to communication were found: individual, team, organization, collaborating hospital, community, and policy. With an understanding of these barriers, interventions can be developed to target these barriers in hopes of improving communication for parents and patients in pediatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Annie B Friedrich
- Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Erica C Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.,Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James M DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mack JW, Kang TI. Care experiences that foster trust between parents and physicians of children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28399. [PMID: 32827346 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trust is a core aspect of the patient-physician relationship, especially in cancer care. We sought to examine parents' experiences with trust over the first year after a child's cancer diagnosis. PROCEDURE We conducted a prospective, questionnaire-based longitudinal cohort study of parents and physicians of children with cancer at two academic pediatric hospitals. We evaluated trust among 166 parents of children with cancer over the first year after diagnosis. Surveys were administered after diagnosis, at 4 months, and at 12 months after diagnosis. RESULTS Seventy-one percent of parents trusted the child's oncologist "completely" at baseline, as did 79% at 4 months and 77% at 12 months. At baseline, high-quality physician communication (OR 4.11 [1.78-9.51], P = .001) and information (OR 2.82 [1.29-6.16], P = .01) were associated with trust, after adjustment for parent gender, race/ethnicity, and education. Parents were less likely to trust the physician completely at 12 months if the child had experienced cancer relapse or progression (OR 0.28 [0.10-0.81], P = .02). In a mixed linear model adjusted for parent gender, race/ethnicity, education, and clustering by physician, trust was associated with high-quality communication (OR 3.40 [1.61-7.20], P = .001) and receipt of high-quality information (OR 2.48 [1.18-5.21], P = .02), and inversely associated with relapse or progression (OR 0.39 [0.17-0.92], P = 0.03); trust increased over time (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Most parents form trusting relationships with their children's oncologists. Physicians can foster trust through patient-centered communication and provision of high-quality information about a child's cancer. Poor outcomes such as relapse are a threat to trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer W Mack
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tammy I Kang
- Section of Pediatric Palliative Care, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sisk BA, Friedrich A, Blazin LJ, Baker JN, Mack JW, DuBois J. Communication in Pediatric Oncology: A Qualitative Study. Pediatrics 2020; 146:peds.2020-1193. [PMID: 32820068 PMCID: PMC7461134 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-1193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When children are seriously ill, parents rely on communication with their clinicians. However, in previous research, researchers have not defined how this communication should function in pediatric oncology. We aimed to identify these communication functions from parental perspectives. METHODS Semistructured interviews with 78 parents of children with cancer from 3 academic medical centers at 1 of 3 time points: treatment, survivorship, or bereavement. We analyzed interview transcripts using inductive and deductive coding. RESULTS We identified 8 distinct functions of communication in pediatric oncology. Six of these functions are similar to previous findings from adult oncology: (1) building relationships, (2) exchanging information, (3) enabling family self-management, (4) making decisions, (5) managing uncertainty, and (6) responding to emotions. We also identified 2 functions not previously described in the adult literature: (7) providing validation and (8) supporting hope. Supporting hope manifested as emphasizing the positives, avoiding false hopes, demonstrating the intent to cure, and redirecting toward hope beyond survival. Validation manifested as reinforcing "good parenting" beliefs, empowering parents as partners and advocates, and validating concerns. Although all functions seemed to interact, building relationships appeared to provide a relational context in which all other interpersonal communication occurred. CONCLUSIONS Parent interviews provided evidence for 8 distinct communication functions in pediatric oncology. Clinicians can use this framework to better understand and fulfill the communication needs of parents whose children have serious illness. Future work should be focused on measuring whether clinical teams are fulfilling these functions in various settings and developing interventions targeting these functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of
Pediatrics and
| | - Annie Friedrich
- Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint
Louis University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Lindsay J. Blazin
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s
Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Justin N. Baker
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care
and,Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s
Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Division of Population Sciences, McGraw Patterson
Center for Population Sciences and Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber
Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston
Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James DuBois
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of
Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis,
Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Greenzang KA, Fasciano KM, Block SD, Mack JW. Early information needs of adolescents and young adults about late effects of cancer treatment. Cancer 2020; 126:3281-3288. [PMID: 32365227 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors have high risks of late effects. Little is known about the late-effect information needs of AYAs early in treatment or their role in treatment decision making. This study evaluated the importance, quality, and implications of information about late effects in AYAs recently diagnosed with cancer. METHODS This study surveyed 201 AYAs with cancer who were 15 to 29 years old and were treated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, Massachusetts). Patients were approached within 6 weeks of their diagnosis and were asked about their late-effect and infertility information needs, treatment decision making, and communication outcomes. RESULTS Forty-five percent of the participants were female; 88% were white. Most AYAs (87% [173 of 200]) considered information about the risks of late effects to be extremely or very important; 80% (159 of 200) valued information about infertility. Many were distressed by information about late effects (53% [105 of 200]) and infertility (45% [89 of 200]); those who considered late-effect information distressing were more likely to value this information (P < .0001). Consideration of late effects (41% [82 of 201]) and infertility (36% [72 of 201]) greatly influenced many patients' treatment decision making. Although 92% of the patients (184 of 199) reported receiving high-quality information about the diagnosis, 57% (113 of 199; P < .0001) and 65% (130 of 199; P < .0001) felt that they had received high-quality information about late effects and infertility, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Most AYAs with cancer value early information about the risks of late effects and infertility, yet many patients felt that they had not received high-quality information about these topics. The development of age-appropriate late-effect communication strategies that recognize high AYA distress may help to address the gap between desired information and perceived information quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie A Greenzang
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karen M Fasciano
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan D Block
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sisk BA, Dobrozsi S, Mack JW. Teamwork in prognostic communication: Addressing bottlenecks and barriers. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28192. [PMID: 31965719 PMCID: PMC7096274 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Prognostic communication is essential to family-centered care in pediatric oncology. Yet, prognostic communication from the medical team to the family is often absent or incomplete. In our experience, many clinical groups view prognostic disclosure as the responsibility of the patient's primary oncologist, and nurses are often excluded from these conversations. This current individual-based model of prognostic disclosure lacks redundancy and creates a communication bottleneck. We propose that clinical groups should address prognostic communication with a multidisciplinary team-based approach that incorporates three critical components: shared team mental models, distribution and redundancy in role assignment, and high fidelity monitoring of communication milestones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sarah Dobrozsi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin/Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sisk BA, Friedrich AB, Mozersky J, Walsh H, DuBois J. Core Functions of Communication in Pediatric Medicine: an Exploratory Analysis of Parent and Patient Narratives. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:256-263. [PMID: 30565162 PMCID: PMC6581646 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1458-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Communication in pediatrics is important for psychological well-being and health outcomes. However, consensus is lacking regarding the core functions of communication in pediatrics. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate whether and how core communication functions from adult oncology apply to communication in pediatric medicine and (2) to examine whether any unique core communication functions exist in pediatric medicine. We analyzed 36 narratives written by parents (n = 23) or former patients (n = 13) describing pediatric communication experiences with clinicians that were published in Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics. Utilizing deductive and inductive coding, we evaluated narratives for evidence of core communication functions previously documented in adult oncology. We also evaluated for novel functions not represented in adult oncology. We identified the presence of all adult core communication functions in pediatric narratives. We also found evidence of a novel function, "engendering solidarity and validation." We report clinician behaviors that appeared to facilitate or impair these core functions. Core communication functions in adult oncology apply to communication in pediatric medicine, but we also identified a novel communication function in pediatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Avenue, Campus Box 8005, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Annie B Friedrich
- Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jessica Mozersky
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Heidi Walsh
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - James DuBois
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mooney-Doyle K, Ulrich CM. Parent moral distress in serious pediatric illness: A dimensional analysis. Nurs Ethics 2020; 27:821-837. [PMID: 32138577 DOI: 10.1177/0969733019878838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Moral distress is an important and well-studied phenomenon among nurses and other healthcare providers, yet the conceptualization of parental moral distress remains unclear. OBJECTIVE The objective of this dimensional analysis was to describe the nature of family moral distress in serious pediatric illness. DESIGN AND METHODS A dimensional analysis of articles retrieved from a librarian-assisted systematic review of Scopus, CINAHL, and PsychInfo was conducted, focusing on how children, parents, other family members, and healthcare providers describe parental moral distress, both explicitly through writings on parental moral experience and implicitly through writings on parental involvement in distressing aspects of the child's serious illness. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS To promote child and family best interest and minimize harm, a nuanced understanding of the moral, existential, emotional, and spiritual impact of serious pediatric illness is needed. The cases used in this dimensional analysis come from the first author's IRB approved study at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and subsequent published studies; or have been adapted from the literature and the authors' clinical experiences. FINDINGS Three dimensions emerged from the literature surrounding parent moral distress: an intrapersonal dimension, an interpersonal dimension, and a spiritual/existential dimension. The overarching theme is that parents experience relational solace and distress because of the impact of their child's illness on relationships with themselves, their children, family, healthcare providers, their surrounding communities, and society. DISCUSSION Elucidating this concept can help nurses and other professionals understand, mitigate, or eliminate antecedents to parental moral distress. We discuss how this model can facilitate future empirical and conceptual bioethics research, as well as inform the manner in which healthcare providers engage, collaborate with, and care for families during serious pediatric illness. CONCLUSION Parent moral distress is an important and complex phenomenon that requires further theoretical and empirical investigation. We provide an integrated definition and dimensional schematic model that may serve as a starting point for future research and dialogue.
Collapse
|
28
|
Perez GK, Salsman JM, Fladeboe K, Kirchhoff AC, Park ER, Rosenberg AR. Taboo Topics in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: Strategies for Managing Challenging but Important Conversations Central to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivorship. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2020; 40:1-15. [PMID: 32324424 PMCID: PMC7328818 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_279787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
Research on adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer has flourished over the past decade, underscoring the unique medical and psychosocial needs of this vulnerable group. A cancer diagnosis during adolescence and young adulthood intersects with the developmental trajectory of AYAs, derailing critical physical, social, and emotional development. AYAs face these abrupt life changes needing age-appropriate information and resources to offset these challenges. Greater attention is needed to address AYA-specific concerns on reproductive and sexual health, financial security and independence, emotional well-being, social support, and end-of-life care. If these unique needs are unaddressed, this can adversely affect AYAs' health care engagement and overall quality of life, increasing their risk for cancer-related morbidity and early mortality. In particular, health care decisions made during treatment have important implications for AYA patients' future health. Oncology clinicians are well positioned to address AYA patients' concerns by anticipating and addressing the challenges this age group is likely to face. In this paper, we explore several core topics that affect AYAs' quality of life and that can be challenging to address. Starting from the moment of diagnosis, through cancer treatment and post-treatment survivorship, and into end of life, each section highlights critical developmental-centric life domains that are affected by the cancer experience. Specifically, we discuss resources, tools, and strategies to navigate these challenging conversations. Taking a risk-reduction approach that invites two-way communication and facilitates referral to age-appropriate resources would help destigmatize these experiences and, in turn, would support the provision of compassionate and effective age-concordant care to this vulnerable group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giselle K. Perez
- Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John M. Salsman
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Kaitlyn Fladeboe
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Anne C. Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Elyse R. Park
- Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Abby R. Rosenberg
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Snaman J, McCarthy S, Wiener L, Wolfe J. Pediatric Palliative Care in Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:954-962. [PMID: 32023163 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric palliative care aims to alleviate suffering and improve the quality of life of children with serious disease and increase support for their parents and other family members. Integration of palliative care into the routine care of children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer has resulted in improved outcomes in patients and their families. The field of pediatric palliative oncology-encompassing primary palliative care provided by the multidisciplinary oncology team as well as subspecialty palliative care provided by the palliative care team for more complex cases-is unique from palliative care in adults given its focus on care of the child and the larger family. In this review, we focus on advancements in the specific domains within pediatric palliative oncology care including family-centered communication, assessment and management of physical symptoms and distress, psychosocial concerns, and spiritual considerations of the patient, parents, and siblings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Snaman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lori Wiener
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Joanne Wolfe
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wiener L, Tager J, Mack J, Battles H, Bedoya SZ, Gerhardt CA. Helping parents prepare for their child's end of life: A retrospective survey of cancer-bereaved parents. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e27993. [PMID: 31595653 PMCID: PMC8330433 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most parents vividly recall the weeks, days, and moments preceding their child's death for years to come. Dissatisfaction with communication about their child's condition and lack of guidance can contribute to stress prior to a child's death. Based on findings from a study assessing the degree of preparation bereaved parents received and our collective clinical experience, the authors provide suggestions on end-of-life communication and guidance for parents. METHODS Caregivers of a child who died from cancer were invited to complete a 46-item survey through a closed social media (Facebook) group ("Parents who lost children to cancer"). In four months' time, 131 bereaved caregivers completed the survey. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square analyses, and a thematic content analysis framework. The mean age of the child at the time of death was 12. RESULTS Approximately 40% of the parents in this study felt unprepared for both the medical problems their child faced and how to respond to their child's emotional needs; fewer than 10% felt very prepared for either. Parents were more likely to feel unprepared when perceived suffering was high, highlighting the critical importance of communication and support from the healthcare team as an adjunct to optimal symptom control. CONCLUSIONS Through quantitative and open-ended responses, this study identified specific medical and emotional issues about which parents wanted greater preparation. Future research to evaluate guidance strategies to reduce parental suffering prior to the child's death is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Wiener
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Julia Tager
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
- University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts
| | | | - Haven Battles
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sima Zadeh Bedoya
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Cynthia A. Gerhardt
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yamaji N, Sawaguchi M, Ota E. Talking with Children about Cancer: A Content Analysis of Text in Children’s Picture Books. Health (London) 2020. [DOI: 10.4236/health.2020.127055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
32
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gittzus JA, Fasciano KM, Block SD, Mack JW. Peace of mind among adolescents and young adults with cancer. Psychooncology 2019; 29:572-578. [PMID: 31825157 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer have high rates of psychological distress and unmet support needs. Peace of mind is an important construct among older cancer patients and parents of children with cancer but has not been explored in AYAs. We sought to evaluate the extent to which AYAs with cancer experience peace of mind and to identify factors associated with greater peace of mind. METHODS We surveyed 193 AYAs with cancer aged 15 to 29 years within 12 weeks of diagnosis; 137 patients completed the same measures again 4 and 12 months after diagnosis. Patients were asked to report peace of mind, measured using items from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness, Spiritual Well-being scale (FACIT-Sp); anxiety and depression, using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); and experiences surrounding medical communication and decision making. RESULTS Mean scores for peace of mind were 3.59 at diagnosis (range 1-5, standard deviation 0.84), with similar scores at 4 (3.53, P = .34) and 12 (3.59, P = .94) months. In a multivariable model adjusted for age and gender, patients who reported receiving high-quality information about their cancer had greater peace of mind at diagnosis (β = .25, P = .03), whereas those who reported holding a passive role in treatment decision making (β = -.47, P < .0001) or who had anxiety (β = -.64, P = .0003) or depression (β = -.51, P = .04) had lower peace of mind. CONCLUSION Peace of mind did not improve significantly over time for AYAs with cancer. While high-quality communication may be associated with heightened peace of mind, further study is needed to clarify relationships between peace of mind and other psychological variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan A Gittzus
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen M Fasciano
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susan D Block
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sisk BA, Fasciano K, Block SD, Mack JW. Longitudinal prognostic communication needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer. Cancer 2019; 126:400-407. [PMID: 31568584 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the majority of adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer desire prognostic information, to the authors' knowledge little is known regarding how preferences for prognostic communication change over time. METHODS The current study was a longitudinal, prospective, questionnaire-based cohort study of 136 AYA patients with cancer who were aged 15 to 29 years and who were treated at a large academic cancer center. Previously published scales were administered at the time of diagnosis and at 4 months and 12 months after diagnosis. RESULTS The majority of patients reported that prognostic information was very/extremely important at the time of diagnosis (85%), at 4 months (96%; P = .002 compared with baseline), and at 12 months (81%; P = .02 compared with baseline). Few patients reported that prognostic knowledge was very/extremely upsetting at baseline (7%), at 4 months (9%; P = .44 compared with baseline), or at 12 months (11%; P = .27 compared with baseline). The majority of patients were satisfied with the amount of prognostic information received throughout the year after diagnosis (81%, 86%, and 81%, respectively, at the time of diagnosis, at 4 months, and at 12 months). This percentage did not change between the time of diagnosis and 4 months (P = .16) or between diagnosis and 12 months (P = 1.00). In multivariable analysis, satisfaction with prognostic information received was associated with patient report of high-quality communication (odds ratio, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.38-5.17) and having a >75% chance of cure (odds ratio, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.24-4.61) after adjustment for patient age category, race/ethnicity, and time point of administration. CONCLUSIONS The majority of AYA patients with cancer were satisfied with prognostic disclosure over time, but a sizeable minority wanted additional information. Desire for prognostic information increased over time. Clinicians should return to prognostic discussions over time to support AYA patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Karen Fasciano
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susan D Block
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Robert R, Stavinoha P, Jones BL, Robinson J, Larson K, Hicklen R, Smith B, Perko K, Koch K, Findley S, Weaver MS. Spiritual assessment and spiritual care offerings as a standard of care in pediatric oncology: A recommendation informed by a systematic review of the literature. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27764. [PMID: 31033210 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Children with cancer and their families experience shifts in spiritual wellness from diagnosis through treatment and survivorship or bereavement. An interdisciplinary team conducted a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research on spiritual assessments, interventions, and outcomes in childhood cancer following PRISMA guidelines using a PROSPERO registered protocol. Thirty-nine well-designed studies were included in the final analysis. The findings from this systematic review indicate the need for early spiritual assessment with offering of continued support for the spiritual functioning of children with cancer and their families as a standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda Robert
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pete Stavinoha
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barbara L Jones
- Steve Hicks School of Social Work and Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Jacob Robinson
- Division of Pediatric Palliative Care, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Kara Larson
- Division of Spiritual Ministry and Chaplaincy, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Rachel Hicklen
- The Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Blake Smith
- Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Kathleen Perko
- Bridges Palliative Care Program, Doernbecher, Children's Hospital, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Kendra Koch
- Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Stephen Findley
- Department of Spiritual Care and Education, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Meaghann S Weaver
- Division of Pediatric Palliative Care, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sisk BA, Schulz GL, Mack JW, Yaeger L, DuBois J. Communication interventions in adult and pediatric oncology: A scoping review and analysis of behavioral targets. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0221536. [PMID: 31437262 PMCID: PMC6705762 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improving communication requires that clinicians and patients change their behaviors. Interventions might be more successful if they incorporate principles from behavioral change theories. We aimed to determine which behavioral domains are targeted by communication interventions in oncology. Methods Systematic search of literature indexed in Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov (2000–October 2018) for intervention studies targeting communication behaviors of clinicians and/or patients in oncology. Two authors extracted the following information: population, number of participants, country, number of sites, intervention target, type and context, study design. All included studies were coded based on which behavioral domains were targeted, as defined by Theoretical Domains Framework. Findings Eighty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions varied widely in which behavioral domains were engaged. Knowledge and skills were engaged most frequently (85%, 75/88 and 73%, 64/88, respectively). Fewer than 5% of studies engaged social influences (3%, 3/88) or environmental context/resources (5%, 4/88). No studies engaged reinforcement. Overall, 7/12 behavioral domains were engaged by fewer than 30% of included studies. We identified methodological concerns in many studies. These 88 studies reported 188 different outcome measures, of which 156 measures were reported by individual studies. Conclusions Most communication interventions target few behavioral domains. Increased engagement of behavioral domains in future studies could support communication needs in feasible, specific, and sustainable ways. This study is limited by only including interventions that directly facilitated communication interactions, which excluded stand-alone educational interventions and decision-aids. Also, we applied stringent coding criteria to allow for reproducible, consistent coding, potentially leading to underrepresentation of behavioral domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Ginny L. Schulz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Lauren Yaeger
- Becker Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - James DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of Ameica
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sisk BA, Kang TI, Mack JW. The evolution of regret: decision-making for parents of children with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:1215-1222. [PMID: 31297592 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04933-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Parents of children with cancer make treatment decisions in highly emotional states while feeling overwhelmed with information. In previous work, 1 in 6 parents demonstrated heightened decisional regret regarding treatment at diagnosis. However, it is unclear how regret evolves over time. We aimed to determine whether parents of children with cancer experience decisional regret over time and to identify parental characteristics and clinician behaviors associated with longitudinal regret. METHODS Prospective, questionnaire-based cohort study of parents of children with cancer at two academic pediatric hospitals. Parents reported decisional regret at diagnosis, 4 months, and 12 months. RESULTS At baseline, 13% of parents (21/158) reported heightened regret, 11% (17/158) at 4 months (p = 0.43, McNemar's test relative to baseline), and 11% (16/158) at 12 months (p = 0.35 relative to baseline and p = 0.84 relative to 4 months). In multivariable analysis using generalized estimating equations adjusted for the time point of survey completion, heightened regret was associated with non-white race/ethnicity (OR 11.57, 95% CI 3.53 to 41.05, p < .0001) and high anxiety (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.90, p = .04). Parents with high peace of mind (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.62, p = .003) and those reporting high-quality information (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.69, p = 0.01) had lower odds of heightened regret. We found no association between heightened regret and the time point of survey administration. CONCLUSIONS A small, significant proportion of parents experience heightened regret throughout the first year of their child's cancer treatment; non-white parents are at higher risk. Effective communication may protect against regret.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Avenue, Campus Box 8005, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Tammy I Kang
- Section of Pediatric Palliative Care, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dobrozsi S, Trowbridge A, Mack JW, Rosenberg AR. Effective Communication for Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Patients With Cancer: Considerations for the Patients, Family Members, Providers, and Multidisciplinary Team. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:573-581. [PMID: 31099665 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_238181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Hearing that a child has been diagnosed with cancer is invariably difficult for both patients and their caregivers. Effective communication among patients, caregivers, and medical teams is necessary not only to deliver information and facilitate cancer care delivery but also to support patient and family coping and well-being. In this review, we focus on early communication in pediatric oncology care to (1) highlight the importance of communication between clinicians and patients and within the medical team and (2) describe resources and opportunities for clinicians to improve communication skills. For example, communication between patients and the medical team has several core functions, including the development of shared knowledge and decision-making and the formation of a therapeutic relationship. High-quality communication, regardless of the news being shared, supports and facilitates patient and parent adjustment to diagnosis, hope, and trust. Communication within the medical team supports the delivery of high-quality, personalized care. Despite these critical roles of communication in pediatric cancer care and evidence suggesting communication skills can be learned, formal training is limited. Resources include educational efforts, practical tools, and specific strategies to enhance systematic multidisciplinary team communication. Taken together, continued recognition of the importance of communication in pediatric cancer care has the potential to improve patient, family, and clinician experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Dobrozsi
- 1 Medical College of Wisconsin/Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Amy Trowbridge
- 2 Seattle Children's Research Institute/University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- 3 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Abby R Rosenberg
- 2 Seattle Children's Research Institute/University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sisk BA, Weng S, Mack JW. Persistently low peace of mind in parents of cancer patients: A five-year follow-up study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27609. [PMID: 30663226 PMCID: PMC6428606 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric cancer affects the well-being of the entire family. Previously, our group found that 76% of parents experience low peace of mind after diagnosis. Herein, we present a five-year follow-up study of these same parents, aiming to determine whether low peace of mind persisted, and what baseline variables associate with persistently low peace of mind. PROCEDURE Cross-sectional survey of parents of children with cancer between April 2004 and September 2005 within one year of diagnosis, and a follow-up questionnaire administered at least five years later. RESULTS Sixty-six percent of parents whose children were living and who were able to be contacted completed follow-up questionnaires (91/138). Of these parents, 77% (70/91) were parents of disease-free survivors and 23% (21/91) had recurrent disease. The majority of parents (66%, 53/88) had low peace of mind five years after diagnosis, regardless of relapse status or prognosis. Additionally, 28% of parents of disease-free survivors reported being very/extremely worried about relapse (18/66), late toxicities (19/66), and late effects (19/66). Each worry was associated with low peace of mind (OR between 9.66 and 20.09 for each worry). In bivariable logistic regression, low peace of mind at five years was negatively associated with trusting the physician completely at baseline, with and without adjustment for relapse status (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.87, P = 0.032, adjusted for relapse). CONCLUSION Most long-term studies and interventions have focused on parental bereavement. Our findings show that most parents are changed by pediatric cancer, even when children survive and the future is bright.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Shicheng Weng
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Pediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sisk BA, Canavera K, Sharma A, Baker JN, Johnson LM. Ethical issues in the care of adolescent and young adult oncology patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27608. [PMID: 30623573 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of cancer leads to short-term and long-term challenges for every patient. This is especially true for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer who strive to gain independence, autonomy, confidence, and social status while developing into adulthood. In this article, we review prominent ethical issues in AYA oncology that are related to autonomy, shared decision-making, care refusal or abandonment, end-of-life care, truth telling, and fertility preservation. Clinicians should recognize that AYA patients develop at their own pace; the onus lies with clinicians to determine the patient's interests, values, maturity, and desire to participate in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A Sisk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kristin Canavera
- Division of Psychology, Department of Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Akshay Sharma
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Justin N Baker
- Division of Quality-of-Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Liza-Marie Johnson
- Division of Quality-of-Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mack JW, Fasciano KM, Block SD. Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients' Experiences With Treatment Decision-making. Pediatrics 2019; 143:peds.2018-2800. [PMID: 31000684 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-2800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer generally want to engage in decision-making but are not always able to do so. We evaluated cancer treatment decision-making among AYAs, including decisional engagement and regret. METHODS We surveyed 203 AYA patients with cancer aged 15 to 29 (response rate 74%) treated at a large academic center and their oncologists. Patients were approached within 6 weeks of diagnosis and asked to report decision-making preferences and experiences (Decisional Roles Scale) and the extent to which they regretted their initial treatment decision (Decisional Regret Scale) assessed at baseline and 4 and 12 months later. RESULTS A majority of AYAs (58%) wanted to share responsibility for decision-making with oncologists; half (51%) preferred limited involvement from parents. Although most AYAs held roles they preferred, those who did not reported holding more passive roles relative to oncologists (P < .0001) and parents (P = .002) than they desired. Nearly one-quarter of patients (24%; 47 of 195) experienced regret about initial cancer treatment decisions at baseline, with similar rates at 4 (23%) and 12 (19%) months. In a multivariable model adjusted for age, decisional roles were not associated with regret; instead, regret was less likely among patients who trusted oncologists completely (odds ratio 0.17 [95% confidence interval 0.06-0.46]; P < .001) and who reported that oncologists understood what was important to them when treatment started (odds ratio 0.13 [95% confidence interval 0.04-0.42]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Nearly one-fourth of AYA patients expressed regret about initial treatment decisions. Although some AYAs have unmet needs for decisional engagement, attributes of the patient-oncologist relationship, including trust and mutual understanding, may be most protective against regret.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer W Mack
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Pediatric Oncology, McGraw/Patterson Center for Outcomes and Policy Research and .,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | - Karen M Fasciano
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Departments of Psychiatry and
| | - Susan D Block
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Departments of Psychiatry and.,Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Stuart B, Danaher T, Awdish R, Berry L. Finding Hope and Healing When Cure Is Not Possible. Mayo Clin Proc 2019; 94:677-685. [PMID: 30922692 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Traditional medical training focused on curing disease may not prepare clinicians to provide comfort and solace to their patients facing life-limiting illness. But dying patients and their families still need healing, and clinicians can actively facilitate it. We explore the clinician's role in the healing journey through the lens of pediatric brain cancer. Specifically, we examine how clinicians can help affected families find their way from "focused hope" (which centers on cure) to "intrinsic hope," which offers a more realistic and resilient emotional foundation as the child's death approaches and letting go becomes essential. Drawing on their clinical experience and medical knowledge, clinicians can help families comprehend the lessons that their seriously ill child's body has to teach, highlighting the importance of cherishing the present and creating new memories that outlast the disease. Clinicians can avoid the mindset of "nothing more can be done," emphasizing that there is plenty to do in providing physical, emotional, and spiritual comfort. Clinicians can learn how to be "unconditionally present" for patients and families without immersing themselves in anguish and, eventually, how to help the family find freedom from despair and a full life that still honors the child's memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad Stuart
- Coalition to Transform Advanced Care, Washington, DC.
| | - Tracey Danaher
- Department of Marketing, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rana Awdish
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Leonard Berry
- Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Doumit MA, Rahi AC, Saab R, Majdalani M. Spirituality among parents of children with cancer in a Middle Eastern country. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2019; 39:21-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
44
|
Brand McCarthy SR, Kang TI, Mack JW. Inclusion of children in the initial conversation about their cancer diagnosis: impact on parent experiences of the communication process. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:1319-1324. [PMID: 30675664 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-4653-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Including children in medical conversations is considered the standard of care for children with cancer. However, previous qualitative research has raised concerns about how the child's presence impacts the parent's communication experience. The current study examines the frequency and impact of child presence during a serious medical conversation on the parent's communication experience in pediatric oncology. METHODS Three hundred sixty parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer completed questionnaires assessing the child's presence during the initial conversation with the oncologist about diagnosis and treatment and parental communication experiences. Primary oncologists completed a survey question about the child's prognosis. RESULTS Sixty-one percent of children were present during the initial conversation, with lowest rates among children aged 3-6 (44%) and 7-12 (44%). Child presence was not associated with parents' reports that they received prognostic information (p = 0.20), high-quality information (p = 0.19), or high-quality communication about the child's cancer (p = 1.0). DISCUSSION The parent's communication experience is not diminished by the choice to include the child. Given the bioethical imperative to include children in conversations about serious illness whenever possible, this concern should not be used to exclude children, but rather to give parents additional time of their own when needed to fully process decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R Brand McCarthy
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Tammy I Kang
- Section of Pediatric Palliative Care, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sisk BA, Kang TI, Goldstein R, DuBois JM, Mack JW. Decisional burden among parents of children with cancer. Cancer 2019; 125:1365-1372. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missour
| | - Tammy I. Kang
- Section of Pediatric Palliative Care Texas Children’s Hospital Houston Texas
- Department of Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas
| | - Richard Goldstein
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Medicine Boston Children’s Hospital Boston Massachusetts
| | - James M. DuBois
- Department of Medicine Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Pediatric Oncology, Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts
- Division of Population Sciences Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Boston Children’s Hospital Boston Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mack JW, Fasciano KM, Block SD. Communication About Prognosis With Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Cancer: Information Needs, Prognostic Awareness, and Outcomes of Disclosure. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1861-1867. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.78.2128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Communication about prognosis affects decisions patients and family members make about cancer care, and most patients say they want to know about their chances of cure. We sought to evaluate experiences with prognosis communication among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. Patients and Methods We surveyed 203 AYAs with cancer age 15 to 29 years (response rate, 74%) treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and their oncologists. Patients were approached within 6 weeks of diagnosis and asked to report on their prognosis communication preferences and experiences, their beliefs about likelihood of cure, and psychosocial outcomes of communication, such as trust (using an item from the Trust in Physician Scale), peace of mind (using select items from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being Scale), and anxiety and depression (using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Oncologists were asked to report the patient’s likelihood of cure. Results Most patients (83%, 167 of 203 patients) considered prognostic information to be extremely or very important. Patients who reported having received more extensive prognostic disclosure had higher odds of trust in the oncologist (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.67; P = .05), peace of mind (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.51; P = .002), and hope related to physician communication (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.59; P = .04), after adjusting for patient sex, age, race or ethnicity, prognosis, and diagnosis. Disclosure was also associated with lower distress related to knowing about prognosis (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.95; P = .03). However, a majority of patients (62%) reported prognostic estimates that exceeded those reported by physicians (McNemar P < .001). Conclusion Most AYAs with cancer value receiving prognostic information, which is positively associated with aspects of well-being. However, most overestimate chances of cure relative to oncologists, highlighting the importance of efforts to improve communication with this young population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer W. Mack
- Jennifer W. Mack, Karen M. Fasciano, and Susan D. Block, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; and Jennifer W. Mack, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Karen M. Fasciano
- Jennifer W. Mack, Karen M. Fasciano, and Susan D. Block, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; and Jennifer W. Mack, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Susan D. Block
- Jennifer W. Mack, Karen M. Fasciano, and Susan D. Block, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; and Jennifer W. Mack, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Katz JD. At the intersection of self and not-self: finding the locus of 'self' in autoimmunity. MEDICAL HUMANITIES 2018; 44:137-139. [PMID: 29436480 PMCID: PMC6087542 DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with chronic autoimmune disease experience a sense of vulnerability. In part, this relates to the struggle for finding the meaning of the illness. The consequent existential distress may manifest in an unseated sense of personhood. Insight into the mechanism of this state of powerlessness and of perceived loss of agency is central to establishing a supportive clinician-patient relationship. This present exposition underscores the concept of autoimmunity as one that represents a demarcation in the psyche: one that is not just a threat to our sense of self-hood but also to our humanity. Autoimmunity exposes the challenge imposed on the relating of the self to one's own self and hence is an ontological challenge. The breach of the boundary between self and not-self that is caused by the autoimmune process culminates in feelings of alienation.
Collapse
|
48
|
Marsac ML, Kindler C, Weiss D, Ragsdale L. Let's Talk About It: Supporting Family Communication during End-of-Life Care of Pediatric Patients. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:862-878. [PMID: 29775556 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication is key in optimizing medical care when a child is approaching end of life (EOL). Research is yet to establish best practices for how medical teams can guide intrafamily communication (including surviving siblings) when EOL care is underway or anticipated for a pediatric patient. While recommendations regarding how medical teams can facilitate communication between the medical team and the family exist, various barriers may prevent the implementation of these recommendations. OBJECTIVE This review aims to provide a summary of research-to-date on family and medical provider perceptions of communication during pediatric EOL care. DESIGN Systematic review. RESULTS Findings from a review of 65 studies suggest that when a child enters EOL care, many parents try to protect their child and/or themselves by avoiding discussions about death. Despite current recommendations, medical teams often refrain from discussing EOL care with pediatric patients until death is imminent for a variety of reasons (e.g., family factors and discomfort with EOL conversations). Parents consistently report a need for honest complete information, delivered with sensitivity. Pediatric patients often report a preference to be informed of their prognosis, and siblings express a desire to be involved in EOL discussions. CONCLUSIONS Families may benefit from enhanced communication around EOL planning, both within the family and between the family and medical team. Future research should investigate a potential role for medical teams in supporting intrafamily communication about EOL challenges and should examine how communication between medical teams and families can be facilitated as EOL approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan L Marsac
- 1 Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children's Hospital , Lexington, Kentucky.,2 College of Medicine, University of Kentucky , Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Christine Kindler
- 1 Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children's Hospital , Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Danielle Weiss
- 3 Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lindsay Ragsdale
- 1 Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children's Hospital , Lexington, Kentucky.,2 College of Medicine, University of Kentucky , Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Marron JM, Cronin AM, Kang TI, Mack JW. Intended and unintended consequences: Ethics, communication, and prognostic disclosure in pediatric oncology. Cancer 2018; 124:1232-1241. [PMID: 29278434 PMCID: PMC5839950 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of patients desire all available prognostic information, but some physicians hesitate to discuss prognosis. The objective of the current study was to examine outcomes of prognostic disclosure among the parents of children with cancer. METHODS The authors surveyed 353 parents of children with newly diagnosed cancer at 2 tertiary cancer centers, and each child's oncologist. Using multivariable logistic regression, the authors assessed associations between parental report of elements of prognosis discussions with the oncologist (quality of information/communication and prognostic disclosure) and potential consequences of these discussions (trust, hope, peace of mind, prognostic understanding, depression, and anxiety). Analyses were stratified by oncologist-reported prognosis. RESULTS Prognostic disclosure was not found to be associated with increased parental anxiety, depression, or decreased hope. Among the parents of children with less favorable prognoses (<75% chance of cure), the receipt of high-quality information from the oncologist was associated with greater peace of mind (odds ratio [OR], 5.23; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.81-15.16) and communication-related hope (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.00-6.40). High-quality oncologist communication style was associated with greater trust in the physician (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.09-5.48) and hope (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.26-7.19). Accurate prognostic understanding was less common among the parents of children with less favorable prognoses (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.88). Receipt of high-quality information, high-quality communication, and prognostic disclosure were not found to be significantly associated with more accurate prognostic understanding. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study demonstrate no evidence that disclosure is associated with anxiety, depression, or decreased hope. Communication processes may increase peace of mind, trust, and hope. It remains unclear how best to enhance prognostic understanding. Cancer 2018;124:1232-41. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Marron
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Office of Ethics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Angel M Cronin
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tammy I Kang
- Section of Palliative Care, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
- Section of Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sisk BA, Mack JW, Ashworth R, DuBois J. Communication in pediatric oncology: State of the field and research agenda. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:10.1002/pbc.26727. [PMID: 28748597 PMCID: PMC6902431 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
From the time of diagnosis through either survivorship or end of life, communication between healthcare providers and patients or parents can serve several core functions, including fostering healing relationships, exchanging information, responding to emotions, managing uncertainty, making decisions, and enabling patient/family self-management. We systematically reviewed all studies that focused on communication between clinicians and patients or parents in pediatric oncology, categorizing studies based on which core functions of communication they addressed. After identifying gaps in the literature, we propose a research agenda to further the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan A. Sisk
- Department of Pediatrics, St. Louis Children’s, Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Medicine, Boston Children’s, Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel Ashworth
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington, University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - James DuBois
- Department of Medicine, Washington, University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|