1
|
Dickstein DR, Amarasekera C, Chen RC, Nguyen PL, Hoffman KE. Clinical considerations for sexual and gender minorities with prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:345-351. [PMID: 38987120 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
At every stage of the cancer continuum, the management of sexual and gender minorities with prostate cancer requires a thoughtful and multidisciplinary approach. For example, it is important to recognize that receptive anal intercourse, common among sexual minority men-i.e. gay and bisexual men-can potentially elevate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Additionally, it is important to understand that sexual minority men with prostate cancer might engage in insertive and/or receptive anal intercourse, as opposed to insertive vaginal intercourse, requiring a treatment conversation that expands beyond the usual discussion of sexual health in prostate cancer patients. For gender minorities-i.e. transgender women or trans feminine individuals (those recorded male at birth with feminine gender identities)-it is important to consider gender affirming hormones and pelvic surgeries as they can cause diagnostic and treatment challenges, including PSA suppression, more aggressive disease, and anatomical changes. Furthermore, it is essential to recognize that gender minorities are a diverse cohort and may or may not be on gender affirming hormone therapy and may or may not have received or intend to receive pelvic affirming surgery. In this seminar article, we highlight considerations for personalized management of prostate cancer in sexual and gender minorities to improve care for this understudied cohort and enhance health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY.
| | - Channa Amarasekera
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Babalola O, Gebben D, Tarver ME, Joyce Lee TH, Wang S, Siddiqui MM, Sonn GA, Viviano CJ. Patient Preferences for Benefit and Risk Associated With High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Ablation of Prostate Tissue in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102113. [PMID: 38845330 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Food and Drug Administration must make decisions about emerging high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) devices that may lack relevant clinical oncologic data but present with known side effects. This study aims to capture patients' perspective by quantifying their preferences regarding the available benefit and important side effects associated with HIFU for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preferences for HIFU outcomes were examined using a discrete choice experiment survey. Participants were asked to choose a preferred treatment option in 9 choice questions. Each included a pair of hypothetical treatment profiles that have similar attributes/outcomes with varying levels. Outcomes included prostate biopsy outcome and treatment-related risks of erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence (UI). We calculated the maximum risk of side effect patients were willing to tolerate in exchange for increased benefit. Preferences were further explored via clinical and demographic data. RESULTS About 223 subjects with a mean age of 64.8 years completed the survey. Respondents were willing to accept a 1.51%-point increase in new ED risk for a 1%-point increase in favorable biopsy outcome. They were also willing to accept a 0.93%-point increase in new UI risk for a 1%-point increase in biopsy outcome. Subjects who perceived their cancer to be more aggressive had higher risk tolerance for UI. Younger men were willing to tolerate less ED risk than older men. Respondents with greater than college level of education had a lower risk tolerance for ED or UI. CONCLUSIONS Results may inform development and regulatory evaluation for future HIFU ablation devices by providing supplemental information from the patient perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olufemi Babalola
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
| | - David Gebben
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Michelle E Tarver
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Ting-Hsuan Joyce Lee
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Shu Wang
- Department of Urology, University of Maryland Urology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - M Minhaj Siddiqui
- Department of Urology, University of Maryland Urology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Geoffrey A Sonn
- Department of Urology, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Charles J Viviano
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mattes MD. Overview of Radiation Therapy in the Management of Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:181-192. [PMID: 38861238 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01217-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The goal is to describe the evolution of radiation therapy (RT) utilization in the management of localized and metastatic prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Long term data for a variety of hypofractionated definitive RT dose-fractionation schemes has matured, allowing patients and providers many standard-of-care options to choose from. Post-prostatectomy, adjuvant RT has largely been replaced by an early salvage approach. Multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET have enabled increasingly targeted RT delivery to the prostate and oligometastatic tumors. Areas of active investigation include determining the value of proton beam therapy and perirectal spacers, and optimally incorporate genomic tumor profiling and next generation hormonal therapies with RT in the curative setting. The use of radiation therapy to treat prostate cancer is rapidly evolving. In the coming years, there will be continued improvements in a variety of areas to enhance the value of RT in multidisciplinary prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm D Mattes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bela Andela S, Amthauer H, Furth C, Rogasch JM, Beck M, Mehrhof F, Ghadjar P, van den Hoff J, Klatte T, Tahbaz R, Zips D, Hofheinz F, Zschaeck S. Quantitative PSMA-PET parameters in localized prostate cancer: prognostic and potential predictive value. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:97. [PMID: 39080696 PMCID: PMC11288109 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02483-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PSMA-PET is increasingly used for staging prostate cancer (PCA) patients. However, it is not clear if quantitative imaging parameters of positron emission tomography (PET) have an impact on disease progression and are thus important for the prognosis of localized PCA. METHODS This is a monocenter retrospective analysis of 86 consecutive patients with localized intermediate or high-risk PCA and PSMA-PET before treatment The quantitative PET parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor asphericity (ASP), PSMA tumor volume (PSMA-TV), and PSMA total lesion uptake (PSMA-TLU = PSMA-TV × SUVmean) were assessed for their prognostic significance in patients with radiotherapy or surgery. Cox regression analyses were performed for biochemical recurrence-free survival, overall survival (OS), local control, and loco-regional control (LRC). RESULTS 67% of patients had high-risk disease, 51 patients were treated with radiotherapy, and 35 with surgery. Analysis of metric PET parameters in the whole cohort revealed a significant association of PSMA-TV (p = 0.003), PSMA-TLU (p = 0.004), and ASP (p < 0.001) with OS. Upon binarization of PET parameters, several other parameters showed a significant association with clinical outcome. When analyzing high-risk patients according to the primary treatment approach, a previously published cut-off for SUVmax (8.6) showed a significant association with LRC in surgically treated (p = 0.048), but not in primary irradiated (p = 0.34) patients. In addition, PSMA-TLU (p = 0.016) seemed to be a very promising biomarker to stratify surgical patients. CONCLUSION Our data confirm one previous publication on the prognostic impact of SUVmax in surgically treated patients with high-risk PCA. Our exploratory analysis indicates that PSMA-TLU might be even better suited. The missing association with primary irradiated patients needs prospective validation with a larger sample size to conclude a predictive potential. Trial registration Due to the retrospective nature of this research, no registration was carried out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Bela Andela
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian M Rogasch
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Mehrhof
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rana Tahbaz
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Diven M, Ballman K, Marciscano A, Barbieri C, Piscopo J, Wang S, Nagar H, McClure T. Radiation therapy and IRreversible electroporation for intermediate risk prostate cancer (RTIRE). BMC Urol 2024; 24:151. [PMID: 39054460 PMCID: PMC11271032 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01506-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation Therapy and IRreversible Electroporation for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer (RTIRE) is a phase II clinical trial testing combination of radiation therapy and irreversible electroporation for intermediate risk prostate cancer BACKGROUND: PCa is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men and the second leading cause of cancer death in men. PCa treatment is associated with long term side effects including urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction. Management of PCa is based on risk stratification to prevent its overtreatment and associated treatment-related toxicity. There is increasing interest in novel treatment strategies, such as focal therapy, to minimize treatment associated morbidity. Focal therapy alone has yet to be included in mainstream guidelines, given ongoing concerns with potentially higher risk of recurrence. We hypothesize combining focal therapy with whole gland, reduced dose radiotherapy will provide acceptable oncologic efficacy with minimal treatment associated morbidity. RTIRE is a phase II single institution, investigator-initiated study combining a local ablative technique though local irreversible electroporation (IRE) with MR guided RT (MRgRT) to treat the entire prostate. The goal is to provide excellent oncologic outcomes and minimize treatment related side effects through leveraging benefits of locally ablative therapy with established radiation treatment techniques. METHODS A total of 42 men with intermediate risk PCa per NCCN guidelines and focal grade group (GG) 2 or 3, Gleason Score (GS) 3 + 4 or GS 4 + 3, cancer in an MRI target will be enrolled. Patients with MRI visible foci of GG2/GG3 will undergo focal therapy with IRE of this lesion. Following successful focal therapy, patients will then undergo a course of reduced dose, whole gland MRgRT with either 32.5 Gy in 5 Fractions or 22 Gy in 2 fractions. The primary objective of the study is to determine safety. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of oncologic efficacy (as measured by the proportion of patients free of clinically significant cancer as defined as > Grade Group 1 at 1-year follow-up biopsy), imaging characteristics of patients pre and post RTIRE, impact on quality of life (QoL), and PSA kinetics. DISCUSSION Combining IRE with a reduced dose radiotherapy may offer a new treatment paradigm for PCa by both reducing treatment effects of full dose radiotherapy and minimizing the risk of recurrence observed with focal therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05345444. Date of registration: April 25, 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION 6.0, July 7, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marshall Diven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Karla Ballman
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ariel Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Piscopo
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shu Wang
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy McClure
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Potosky AL, Ahn J, Xia Y, Lin L, Chen RC, Graves KD, Pan W, Fall-Dickson JM, Keegan THM, Paddock LE, Wu XC, Shrestha A, Reeve BB. Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality-of-Life Profiles Among Prostate Cancer Survivors. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:921-931. [PMID: 38466917 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to describe the prevalence and predictors of symptom and function clusters related to physical, emotional, and social components of general health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a population-based sample of prostate cancer (PCa) survivors. METHODS Participants (N = 1,162) completed a baseline survey at a median of 9 months after diagnosis to ascertain the co-occurrence of eight symptom and functional domains that are common across all cancers and not treatment-specific. We used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subgroup profiles of survivors with low, moderate, or high HRQOL levels. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to identify clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with survivors' membership in the low versus moderate or high HRQOL profile. RESULTS The LPA identified 16% of survivors who were categorized in the low HRQOL profile at baseline, indicative of the highest symptom burden and lowest functioning. Factors related to survivors' membership in the low versus higher HRQOL profile groups included less than age 65 years at diagnosis, identifying as non-Hispanic Black race, not working, being a former versus never smoker, systemic therapy, less companionship, more comorbidities, lower health care financial well-being, or less spirituality. Several factors remained associated with remaining in the low versus higher HRQOL profiles on the follow-up survey (n = 699), including younger age, Black race, comorbidity, and lower financial and spiritual well-being. CONCLUSION About one of six PCa survivors experienced elevated physical and psychosocial symptoms that were independent of local curative therapy, but with younger age, race, comorbidity, and lower financial and spiritual well-being as stable risk factors for poor HRQOL over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnold L Potosky
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Yi Xia
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Li Lin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Measurement, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Kristi D Graves
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Wei Pan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Jane M Fall-Dickson
- Georgetown University School of Nursing, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
- Daniel K. Inouye School of Nursing, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| | - Theresa H M Keegan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California-Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Lisa E Paddock
- Rutgers School of Public Health and Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, Louisiana Tumor Registry, New Orleans, LA
| | - Anshu Shrestha
- Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Measurement, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alberti A, Nicoletti R, Castellani D, Yuan Y, Maggi M, Dibilio E, Resta GR, Makrides P, Sessa F, Sebastianelli A, Serni S, Gacci M, De Nunzio C, Teoh JYC, Campi R. Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Experience Measures After Active Surveillance Versus Radiation Therapy Versus Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Prospective Comparative Studies. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00138-X. [PMID: 38816298 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Current management options for localized prostate cancer (PCa) include radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), and active surveillance (AS). Despite comparable oncological outcomes, there is still lack of evidence on their comparative effectiveness in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing PROMs and PREMs after all recommended management options for localized PCa (RP, RT, AS). METHODS A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases in accordance with recommendations from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Office and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. All prospective clinical trials reporting PROMs and/or PREMs for comparisons of RP versus RT versus AS were included. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize the review findings. No quantitative synthesis was performed because of the heterogeneity and limitations of the studies available. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Our findings reveal that RP mostly affects urinary continence and sexual function, with better results for voiding symptoms in comparison to other treatments. RT was associated with greater impairment of bowel function and voiding symptoms. None of the treatments had a significant impact on mental or physical quality of life. Only a few studies reported PREMs, with a high rate of decision regret for all modalities (up to 23%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS All recommended treatments for localized PCa have an impact on PROMs and PREMs, but for different domains and with differing severity. We found significant heterogeneity in PROM collection, so standardization in real-world practice and clinical trials is warranted. Only a few studies have reported PREMs, highlighting an unmet need that should be explored in future studies. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed differences in patient reports of their outcomes and experiences after surgical prostate removal, radiotherapy, or active surveillance for prostate cancer. We found differences in the effects on urinary, bowel, and sexual functions among the treatments, but no difference for mental or physical quality of life. Our results can help doctors and prostate cancer patients in shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Alberti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Dibilio
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Raffaele Resta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pantelis Makrides
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Arcangelo Sebastianelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Devlies W, Silversmit G, Ameye F, Dekuyper P, Quackels T, Roumeguère T, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Van Damme N, Claessens F, Everaerts W, Joniau S. Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated by Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with or Without Adjuvant Treatments. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00107-X. [PMID: 38755093 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is used frequently to treat prostate cancer; yet, prospective data on the quality of life and functional outcomes are lacking. OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of life and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in different risk groups with or without adjuvant treatments. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Be-RALP database is a prospective multicentre database that covers 9235 RALP cases from 2009 until 2016. Of these 9235 patients, 2336 high-risk prostate cancer patients were matched with low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. INTERVENTION Patients were treated with RALP only or followed by radiotherapy and/or hormone treatment. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We used a mixed-model analysis to longitudinally analyse quality of life, urinary function, and erectile function between risk groups with or without additional treatments. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Risk group was not significant in predicting quality of life, erectile function, or urinary function after RALP. Postoperative treatment (hormone and/or radiotherapy treatment) was significant in predicting International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), sexual activity, and sexual functioning. CONCLUSIONS Risk group was not linked with clinically relevant declines in functional outcomes after RALP. The observed functional outcomes and quality of life are in favour of considering RALP for high-risk prostate cancer. Postoperative treatment resulted in lower erectile function measures without clinically relevant changes in quality of life and urinary functions. Hormone therapy seems to have the most prominent negative effects on these outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY This study investigated the quality of life, and urinary and erectile function in patients with aggressive and less aggressive prostate cancer after surgery only or in combination with hormones or radiation. We found that quality of life recovers completely, while erectile and urinary function recovers only partially after surgery. Aggressiveness of the disease had a minimal effect on the outcomes; yet, postoperative treatments lowered erectile function further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wout Devlies
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Filip Ameye
- Department of Urology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Dekuyper
- Department of Urology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thierry Quackels
- Department of Urology, Université Libre De Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Frank Claessens
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gartrell BA, Phalguni A, Bajko P, Mundle SD, McCarthy SA, Brookman-May SD, De Solda F, Jain R, Yu Ko W, Ploussard G, Hadaschik B. Influential Factors Impacting Treatment Decision-making and Decision Regret in Patients with Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00106-8. [PMID: 38744587 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Treatment decision-making (TDM) for patients with localized (LPC) or locally advanced (LAPC) prostate cancer is complex, and post-treatment decision regret (DR) is common. The factors driving TDM or predicting DR remain understudied. OBJECTIVE Two systematic literature reviews were conducted to explore the factors associated with TDM and DR. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three online databases, select congress proceedings, and gray literature were searched (September 2022). Publications on TDM and DR in LPC/LAPC were prioritized based on the following: 2012 onward, ≥100 patients, journal article, and quantitative data. The Preferred Reporting Items Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Influential factors were those with p < 0.05; for TDM, factors described as "a decision driver", "associated", "influential", or "significant" were also included. The key factors were determined by number of studies, consistency of evidence, and study quality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seventy-five publications (68 studies) reported TDM. Patient participation in TDM was reported in 34 publications; overall, patients preferred an active/shared role. Of 39 influential TDM factors, age, ethnicity, external factors (physician recommendation most common), and treatment characteristics/toxicity were key. Forty-nine publications reported DR. The proportion of patients experiencing DR varied by treatment type: 7-43% (active surveillance), 12-57% (radical prostatectomy), 1-49% (radiotherapy), 28-49% (androgen-deprivation therapy), and 21-47% (combination therapy). Of 42 significant DR factors, treatment toxicity (sexual/urinary/bowel dysfunction), patient role in TDM, and treatment type were key. CONCLUSIONS The key factors impacting TDM were physician recommendation, age, ethnicity, and treatment characteristics. Treatment toxicity and TDM approach were the key factors influencing DR. To help patients navigate factors influencing TDM and to limit DR, a shared, consensual TDM approach between patients, caregivers, and physicians is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY We looked at factors influencing treatment decision-making (TDM) and decision regret (DR) in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. The key factors influencing TDM were doctor's recommendation, patient age/ethnicity, and treatment side effects. A shared, consensual TDM approach between patients and doctors was found to limit DR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Gartrell
- Departments of Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | - Angaja Phalguni
- Evidence Synthesis, Genesis Research Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paulina Bajko
- Evidence Synthesis, Genesis Research Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Suneel D Mundle
- Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Sharon A McCarthy
- Clinical Research Oncology, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Sabine D Brookman-May
- Clinical Research Oncology, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, München, Germany
| | - Francesco De Solda
- Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Ruhee Jain
- Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Wellam Yu Ko
- University of British Columbia Men's Health Research Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhu A, Strasser MO, McClure TD, Gereta S, Cheng E, Pandit K, Hu JC. Comparative Effectiveness of Partial Gland Cryoablation Versus Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Cancer Control. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00060-9. [PMID: 38677913 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE There is an absence of high-level evidence comparing oncologic endpoints for partial gland ablation, and most series use prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rather than biopsy endpoints. Our aim was to compare oncologic outcomes between partial gland cryoablation (PGC) and radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. METHODS This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of subjects treated with PGC (n = 98) or RP (n = 536) between January 2017 and December 2022 as primary treatment for intermediate-risk (Gleason grade group [GG] 2-3) prostate cancer. Oncologic endpoints included surveillance biopsies per protocol after PGC in comparison to serial PSA testing after RP. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a need for any salvage treatment or development of metastatic disease. Treatment failure and survival analyses were conducted using Cox proportional-hazard regression and Kaplan Meier survival curves. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the PGC (n = 75) and RP (n = 298) groups were compared. PGC patients were significantly older (71 vs 64 yr; p < 0.001), but there were no differences in PSA, biopsy GG, or treatment year between the groups. The PGC group had higher rates of treatment failures at 24 mo (33% vs 11%; p < 0.001) and 48 mo (43% vs 14%; p < 0.001). One PGC patient (2.1%) and one RP patient (0.7%) developed metastases by 48-mo follow-up (p = 0.4). On adjusted analysis, PGC was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure (hazard ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 2.7-7.9; p < 0.001). Limitations include observational biases associated with the retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS This is the first comparative effectiveness study of cancer control outcomes for PGC versus RP. The results demonstrate an almost fivefold higher risk of treatment failure with PGC during short-term follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY We compared cancer control outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with partial gland cryoablation versus radical prostatectomy. We found that partial gland cryoablation had an almost fivefold higher risk of treatment failure. Men with prostate cancer should be counseled regarding this difference in treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Zhu
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary O Strasser
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy D McClure
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sofia Gereta
- Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Emily Cheng
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kshitij Pandit
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jim C Hu
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boellaard TN, van Dijk-de Haan MC, Heijmink SWTPJ, Tillier CN, Veerman H, Mertens LS, van der Poel HG, van Leeuwen PJ, Schoots IG. Membranous urethral length measurement on preoperative MRI to predict incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a literature review towards a proposal for measurement standardization. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:2621-2640. [PMID: 37737870 PMCID: PMC10957670 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10180-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the membranous urethral length (MUL) measurement and its interobserver agreement, and propose literature-based recommendations to standardize MUL measurement for increasing interobserver agreement. MUL measurements based on prostate MRI scans, for urinary incontinence risk assessment before radical prostatectomy (RP), may influence treatment decision-making in men with localised prostate cancer. Before implementation in clinical practise, MRI-based MUL measurements need standardization to improve observer agreement. METHODS Online libraries were searched up to August 5, 2022, on MUL measurements. Two reviewers performed article selection and critical appraisal. Papers reporting on preoperative MUL measurements and urinary continence correlation were selected. Extracted information included measuring procedures, MRI sequences, population mean/median values, and observer agreement. RESULTS Fifty papers were included. Studies that specified the MRI sequence used T2-weighted images and used either coronal images (n = 13), sagittal images (n = 18), or both (n = 12) for MUL measurements. 'Prostatic apex' was the most common description of the proximal membranous urethra landmark and 'level/entry of the urethra into the penile bulb' was the most common description of the distal landmark. Population mean (median) MUL value range was 10.4-17.1 mm (7.3-17.3 mm), suggesting either population or measurement differences. Detailed measurement technique descriptions for reproducibility were lacking. Recommendations on MRI-based MUL measurement were formulated by using anatomical landmarks and detailed descriptions and illustrations. CONCLUSIONS In order to improve on measurement variability, a literature-based measuring method of the MUL was proposed, supported by several illustrative case studies, in an attempt to standardize MRI-based MUL measurements for appropriate urinary incontinence risk preoperatively. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Implementation of MUL measurements into clinical practise for personalized post-prostatectomy continence prediction is hampered by lack of standardization and suboptimal interobserver agreement. Our proposed standardized MUL measurement aims to facilitate standardization and to improve the interobserver agreement. KEY POINTS • Variable approaches for membranous urethral length measurement are being used, without detailed description and with substantial differences in length of the membranous urethra, hampering standardization. • Limited interobserver agreement for membranous urethral length measurement was observed in several studies, while preoperative incontinence risk assessment necessitates high interobserver agreement. • Literature-based recommendations are proposed to standardize MRI-based membranous urethral length measurement for increasing interobserver agreement and improving preoperative incontinence risk assessment, using anatomical landmarks on sagittal T2-weighted images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry N Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Stijn W T P J Heijmink
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Corinne N Tillier
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Veerman
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Neilsen BK, Ma TM, Akingbemi WO, Neylon J, Casado MC, Sharma S, Sheng K, Ruan D, Low DA, Yang Y, Valle LF, Steinberg ML, Lamb JM, Cao M, Kishan AU. Impact of Interfractional Bladder and Trigone Displacement and Deformation on Radiation Exposure and Subsequent Acute Genitourinary Toxicity: A Post Hoc Analysis of Patients Treated with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Phase 3 Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:986-997. [PMID: 37871887 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Emerging data suggest that trigone dosimetry may be more associated with poststereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) urinary toxicity than whole bladder dosimetry. We quantify the dosimetric effect of interfractional displacement and deformation of the whole bladder and trigone during prostate SBRT using on-board, pretreatment 0.35T magnetic resonance images (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventy-seven patients treated with MRI-guided prostate SBRT (40 Gy/5 fractions) on the MRI arm of a phase 3 single-center randomized trial were included. Bladder and trigone structures were contoured on images obtained from a 0.35T simulation MRI and 5 on-board pretreatment MRIs. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores and changes in volume between simulation and daily treatments were calculated. Dosimetric parameters including Dmax, D0.03 cc, Dmean, V40 Gy, V39 Gy, V38 Gy, and V20 Gy for the bladder and trigone for the simulation and daily treatments were collected. Both physician-scored (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 scale) as well as patient-reported (International Prostate Symptom Scores and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 scores) acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS The average treatment bladder volume was about 30% smaller than the simulation bladder volume; however, the trigone volume remained fairly consistent despite being positively correlated with total bladder volume. Overall, the trigone accounted for <2% of the bladder volume. Median DSC for the bladder was 0.79, whereas the median DSC of the trigone was only 0.33. No statistically significant associations between our selected bladder and trigonal dosimetric parameters and grade ≥2 GU toxicity were identified, although numerically, patients with GU toxicity (grade ≥2) had higher intermediate doses to the bladder (V20 Gy and Dmean) and larger volumes exposed to higher doses in the trigone (V40 Gy, V39 Gy, and V38 Gy). CONCLUSIONS The trigone exhibits little volume change, but considerable interfractional displacement/deformation. As a result, the relative volume of the trigone receiving high doses during prostate SBRT varies substantially between fractions, which could influence GU toxicity and may not be predicted by radiation planning dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth K Neilsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Jack Neylon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Maria C Casado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sahil Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Luca F Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wallis CJD, Penson DF, Huang LC, Zhao Z, Conwill R, Talwar R, Morgans AK, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Wu XC, Paddock LE, Stroup A, O’Neil BB, Koyama T, Hoffman KE, Barocas DA. Functional Outcomes After Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment. JAMA 2024; 331:302-317. [PMID: 38261043 PMCID: PMC10807259 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.26491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Importance Adverse outcomes associated with treatments for localized prostate cancer remain unclear. Objective To compare rates of adverse functional outcomes between specific treatments for localized prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants An observational cohort study using data from 5 US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registries. Participants were treated for localized prostate cancer between 2011 and 2012. At baseline, 1877 had favorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT1-cT2bN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level <20 ng/mL, and grade group 1-2) and 568 had unfavorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT2cN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level of 20-50 ng/mL, or grade group 3-5). Follow-up data were collected by questionnaire through February 1, 2022. Exposures Radical prostatectomy (n = 1043), external beam radiotherapy (n = 359), brachytherapy (n = 96), or active surveillance (n = 379) for favorable-prognosis disease and radical prostatectomy (n = 362) or external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy (n = 206) for unfavorable-prognosis disease. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes were patient-reported sexual, urinary, bowel, and hormone function measured using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (range, 0-100; 100 = best). Associations of specific therapies with each outcome were estimated and compared at 10 years after treatment, adjusting for corresponding baseline scores, and patient and tumor characteristics. Minimum clinically important differences were 10 to 12 for sexual function, 6 to 9 for urinary incontinence, 5 to 7 for urinary irritation, and 4 to 6 for bowel and hormone function. Results A total of 2445 patients with localized prostate cancer (median age, 64 years; 14% Black, 8% Hispanic) were included and followed up for a median of 9.5 years. Among 1877 patients with favorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -12.1 [95% CI, -16.2 to -8.0]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -7.2 [95% CI, -12.3 to -2.0]), compared with active surveillance. Among 568 patients with unfavorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -26.6 [95% CI, -35.0 to -18.2]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -1.4 [95% CI, -11.1 to 8.3), compared with external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy. Among patients with unfavorable prognosis, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.2 to -0.7]) and hormone (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.5 to -0.3]) function compared with radical prostatectomy. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients treated for localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence but not worse sexual function at 10-year follow-up compared with radiotherapy or surveillance among people with more favorable prognosis and compared with radiotherapy for those with unfavorable prognosis. Among men with unfavorable-prognosis disease, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel and hormone function at 10-year follow-up compared with radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher J. D. Wallis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David F. Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Nashville
| | - Li-Ching Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ralph Conwill
- Office of Patient and Community Education, Patient Advocacy Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ruchika Talwar
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alicia K. Morgans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ann S. Hamilton
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans
| | - Lisa E. Paddock
- Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Brock B. O’Neil
- Department of Urology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City
| | - Tatsuki Koyama
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Karen E. Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chaudhary M, Kumar S, Kaur P, Sahu SK, Mittal A. Comprehensive Review on Recent Strategies for Management of Prostate Cancer: Therapeutic Targets and SAR. Mini Rev Med Chem 2024; 24:721-747. [PMID: 37694781 DOI: 10.2174/1389557523666230911141339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a disease that is affecting a large population worldwide. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has become a foundation for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, as used in most clinical settings from neo-adjuvant to metastatic stage. In spite of the success of ADT in managing the disease in the majority of men, hormonal manipulation fails eventually. New molecules are developed for patients with various hormone-refractory diseases. Advancements in molecular oncology have increased understanding of numerous cellular mechanisms which control cell death in the prostate and these insights can lead to the development of more efficacious and tolerable therapies for carcinoma of the prostate. This review is focused on numerous therapies that might be a boon for prostate therapy like signaling inhibitors, vaccines, and inhibitors of androgen receptors. Along with these, various bioactive molecules and their derivatives are highlighted, which act as potential antiprostate cancer agents. This article also emphasized the recent advances in the field of medicinal chemistry of prostate cancer agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Chaudhary
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar-Delhi G.T. Road, Phagwara, Punjab, 144001, India
| | - Shubham Kumar
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar-Delhi G.T. Road, Phagwara, Punjab, 144001, India
| | - Paranjeet Kaur
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
| | - Sanjeev Kumar Sahu
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar-Delhi G.T. Road, Phagwara, Punjab, 144001, India
| | - Amit Mittal
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Amloh Road, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, 147301, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tae BS, Ahn ST, Yoo JW, Song MS, Choi H, Bae JH, Park JY. Is There a Difference in the Incidence of Depression between Radiation and Surgical Treatments in Patients with Prostate Cancer? World J Mens Health 2024; 42:237-244. [PMID: 38171378 PMCID: PMC10782121 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with cancer have a high risk of depression. However, a few studies have assessed differences in the incidence of depression among patients with prostate cancer (PC) based on whether they received radiotherapy (RTx) or surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Sharing Service database regarding the entire Korean adult population with PC (n=210,924) between 2007 and 2017. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of depression associated with treatment were estimated using propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS Our final cohort comprised 9,456 patients with PC; of which, 8,050 men underwent surgery. During a mean follow-up duration of 7.1 years, 503 (5.3%) patients were newly diagnosed with depression. A significant difference in the incidence of depression was noted between the RTx and surgery groups (RTx vs. surgery: 5.55% vs. 5.28%; p=0.011) in the unmatched cohort. In the matched cohort, older age (≥70 years, HR: 1.596, p<0.001) and poor Charlson comorbidity index scores (HR: 1.232, p=0.039) were correlated with the risk of depression. In addition, the adjusted HR for depression in the surgery group was 0.843 (p=0.221) compared with that in the RTx group. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that no significant difference in the cumulative probability of persistent depression was detected between the RTx and surgery groups in matched cohort (p=0.3386). CONCLUSIONS In this nationwide population-based study, no significant differences in the risk of depression were observed between the surgical and RTx groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bum Sik Tae
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Sun Tae Ahn
- Department of Urology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Wan Yoo
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Min Sung Song
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Hoon Choi
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Bae
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Jae Young Park
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zamora V, Garin O, Suárez JF, Gutiérrez C, Guedea F, Cabrera P, Castells M, Herruzo I, Fumadó L, Samper P, Ferrer C, Regis L, Pont À, Ferrer M. Comparative effectiveness of new treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer through patient-reported outcome measures. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100694. [PMID: 38021091 PMCID: PMC10663757 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is scarce comparative effectiveness research on the new treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer. We aim to compare through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) the impact of active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and real-time brachytherapy, considering side effects (incontinence, irritative/obstructive urinary symptoms, sexual dysfunction and bowel symptoms) and physical and mental health. Materials and Methods Prospective cohort of men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer (age 50-75y, T1-T2, and low risk including Gleason 3 + 4 in T1c) from 18 Spanish hospitals, followed up to 24 months. Treatment decisions were jointly made by patients and physicians (n = 572). The Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) were administered through telephone interviews before and three, six, 12, and 24 months after treatment. To account for correlation among repeated measures, generalized estimating equation models were constructed. All analyses were performed with propensity score weights to solve treatment selection bias. Results The PROMs completion rate at 24 months was 95.0 %. Active surveillance entails the fewest side effects, but with significant sexual (0.4 standard deviations [SD], p < 0.001) and physical health deterioration (0.5 SD, p < 0.001); and moderate mental health improvement (0.4 SD, p = 0.001) at 24 months. Compared with active surveillance, RARP presented greater urinary incontinence (p = 0.030), and IMRT and real-time brachytherapy worse bowel symptoms (p = 0.027 and p = 0.007) at 24 months. Conclusions Most side effects of the new treatment modalities seem to be limited to short-term deteriorations, except for moderate-large urinary incontinence in patients who had undergone RARP and moderate bowel deterioration in patients treated with IMRT or with real-time brachytherapy. Furthermore, patients under active surveillance, IMRT, and real-time brachytherapy showed a moderate improvement in mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Víctor Zamora
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Olatz Garin
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Francisco Suárez
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Gutiérrez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Cabrera
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Manuel Castells
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ismael Herruzo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
| | - Lluis Fumadó
- Urology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar Samper
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain
| | - Carlos Ferrer
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| | - Lucas Regis
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Àngels Pont
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
| | - Montse Ferrer
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tiruye T, O'Callaghan M, Ettridge K, Moretti K, Jay A, Higgs B, Santoro K, Kichenadasse G, Beckmann K. Clinical and functional outcomes for risk-appropriate treatments for prostate cancer. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:109-120. [PMID: 38179028 PMCID: PMC10764171 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To describe real-world clinical and functional outcomes in an Australian cohort of men with localised prostate cancer according to treatment type and risk category. Subjects and methods Men diagnosed from 2008 to 2018 who were enrolled in South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry-a multi-institutional prospective clinical registry-were studied. The main outcome measures were overall survival, cancer-specific survival, decline in functional outcomes, biochemical recurrence and transition to active treatment following active surveillance. Multivariable adjusted models were applied to estimate outcomes. Results Of the 8513 eligible men, majority of men (46%) underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy (EBRT +/- ADT) in 22% of the cohort. Five-year overall survival was above 91%, and 5-year prostate cancer-specific survival was above 97% in the low- and intermediate-risk categories across all treatments. Five-year prostate cancer-specific survival in the active surveillance group was 100%. About 37% of men with high-risk disease treated with RP and 17% of men treated with EBRT +/- ADT experienced biochemical recurrence within 5 years of treatment. Of men on active surveillance, 15% of those with low risk and 20% with intermediate risk converted to active treatment within 2 years. The decline in urinary continence and sexual function 12 months after treatment was greatest among men who underwent RP while the decline in bowel function was greatest for men who received EBRT +/- ADT. Conclusion This contemporary real-world evidence on risk-appropriate treatment outcomes helps inform treatment decision-making for clinicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenaw Tiruye
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
- Public Health DepartmentDebre Markos UniversityDebre MarkosEthiopia
| | - Michael O'Callaghan
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes CollaborativeAdelaideAustralia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research InstituteFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
- Discipline of MedicineUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
- Flinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAustralia
| | - Kerry Ettridge
- Health Policy CentreSouth Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteAdelaideAustralia
- School of Public HealthUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
| | - Kim Moretti
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes CollaborativeAdelaideAustralia
- Discipline of SurgeryUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
| | - Alex Jay
- Flinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAustralia
| | - Braden Higgs
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia
| | - Kerry Santoro
- Southern Adelaide Local Health NetworkAdelaideAustralia
| | - Ganessan Kichenadasse
- Flinders Health and Medical Research InstituteFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
- Flinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAustralia
| | - Kerri Beckmann
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Basin MF, Crane K, Basnet A, Chandrasekar T, Shapiro O, Jacob JM, Bratslavsky G, Goldberg H. Disparities Associated with Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:1008-1015. [PMID: 37198068 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer screening guidelines recommend shared decision-making (SDM) regarding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. However, it is unclear who undergoes SDM and whether any disparities exist. OBJECTIVE To examine sociodemographic differences in participation of SDM and its association with PSA testing in prostate cancer screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among men aged 45-75 yr undergoing PSA screening, using the 2018 National Health Interview Survey database. The evaluated sociodemographic features included age, race, marital status, sexual orientation, smoking status, working status, financial difficulty, US geographic regions, and cancer history. Questions regarding self-reported PSA testing and whether respondents discussed its advantages and disadvantages with their healthcare provider were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Our primary outcome was to evaluate the possible associations between various sociodemographic factors and undergoing PSA screening and SDM. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to detect potential associations. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 59596 men were identified, of whom 5605 answered the question regarding PSA testing, with 2288 (40.6%) undergoing PSA testing. Of these men, 39.5% (n = 2226) discussed the advantages and 25.6% (n = 1434) discussed the disadvantages of PSA testing. On a multivariable analysis, older (odds ratio [OR] 1.092; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.081-1.103, p < 0.001) and married (OR 1.488; 95% CI 1.287-1.720, p < 0.001) men were more likely to undergo PSA testing. Although Black men were more likely to discuss PSA advantages (OR 1.421; 95% CI 1.150-1.756, p = 0.001) and disadvantages (OR 1.554; 95% CI 1.240-1.947, p < 0.001) than White men, this did not correlate with higher rates of PSA screening (OR 1.086; 95% CI 0.865-1.364, p = 0.477). The lack of important clinical data remains a limitation. CONCLUSIONS Overall, SDM rates were low. Older and married men had an increased likelihood of SDM and PSA testing. Despite higher rates of SDM, Black men had similar rates of PSA testing to White men. PATIENT SUMMARY We evaluated sociodemographic differences in shared decision-making (SDM) in prostate cancer screening using a large national database. We found that SDM had varying results in different sociodemographic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Basin
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Kelly Crane
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Alina Basnet
- Department of Medical Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Oleg Shapiro
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Joseph M Jacob
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Hanan Goldberg
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Frank CH, Ramesh P, Lyu Q, Ruan D, Park SJ, Chang AJ, Venkat PS, Kishan AU, Sheng K. Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection. Med Phys 2023; 50:6525-6534. [PMID: 37650773 PMCID: PMC10635680 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is commonly used to treat prostate cancer. Existing HDR planning systems solve the dwell time problem for predetermined catheters and a single energy source. PURPOSE Additional degrees of freedom can be obtained by relaxing the catheters' pre-designation and introducing more source types, and may have a dosimetric benefit, particularly in improving conformality to spare the urethra. This study presents a novel analytical approach to solving the corresponding HDR planning problem. METHODS The catheter and dual-energy source selection problem was formulated as a constrained optimization problem with a non-convex group sparsity regularization. The optimization problem was solved using the fast-iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm (FISTA). Two isotopes were considered. The dose rates for the HDR 4140 Ytterbium (Yb-169) source and the Elekta Iridium (Ir-192) HDR Flexisource were modeled according to the TG-43U1 formalism and benchmarked accordingly. Twenty-two retrospective HDR prostate brachytherapy patients treated with Ir-192 were considered. An Ir-192 only (IRO), Yb-169 only (YBO), and dual-source (DS) plan with optimized catheter location was created for each patient with N catheters, where N is the number of catheters used in the clinically delivered plans. The DS plans jointly optimized Yb-169 and Ir-192 dwell times. All plans and the clinical plans were normalized to deliver a 15 Gy prescription (Rx) dose to 95% of the clinical treatment volume (CTV) and evaluated for the CTV D90%, V150%, and V200%, urethra D0.1cc and D1cc, bladder V75%, and rectum V75%. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were generated for each structure. RESULTS The DS plans ubiquitously selected Ir-192 as the only treatment source. IRO outperformed YBO in organ at risk (OARs) OAR sparing, reducing the urethra D0.1cc and D1cc by 0.98% (p = 2.22 ∗ 10 - 9 $p\ = \ 2.22*{10^{ - 9}}$ ) and 1.09% (p = 1.22 ∗ 10 - 10 $p\ = \ 1.22*{10^{ - 10}}$ ) of the Rx dose, respectively, and reducing the bladder and rectum V75% by 0.09 (p = 0.0023 $p\ = \ 0.0023$ ) and 0.13 cubic centimeters (cc) (p = 0.033 $p\ = \ 0.033$ ), respectively. The YBO plans delivered a more homogenous dose to the CTV, with a smaller V150% and V200% by 3.20 (p = 4.67 ∗ 10 - 10 $p\ = \ 4.67*{10^{ - 10}}$ ) and 1.91 cc (p = 5.79 ∗ 10 - 10 $p\ = \ 5.79*{10^{ - 10}}$ ), respectively, and a lower CTV D90% by 0.49% (p = 0.0056 $p\ = \ 0.0056$ ) of the prescription dose. The IRO plans reduce the urethral D1cc by 2.82% (p = 1.38 ∗ 10 - 4 $p\ = \ 1.38*{10^{ - 4}}$ ) of the Rx dose compared to the clinical plans, at the cost of increased bladder and rectal V75% by 0.57 (p = 0.0022 $p\ = \ 0.0022$ ) and 0.21 cc (p = 0.019 $p\ = \ 0.019$ ), respectively, and increased CTV V150% by a mean of 1.46 cc (p = 0.010 $p\ = \ 0.010$ ) and CTV D90% by an average of 1.40% of the Rx dose (p = 8.80 ∗ 10 - 8 $p\ = \ 8.80*{10^{ - 8}}$ ). While these differences are statistically significant, the clinical differences between the plans are minimal. CONCLUSIONS The proposed analytical HDR planning algorithm integrates catheter and isotope selection with dwell time optimization for varying clinical goals, including urethra sparing. The planning method can guide HDR implants and identify promising isotopes for specific HDR clinical goals, such as target conformality or OAR sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Holly Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Pavitra Ramesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Qihui Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Sang-June Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Albert J. Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Puja S. Venkat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rai KS, Mann U, Harasemiw O, Tangri N, Eng A, Patel P, Nayak JG. A prospective evaluation of patient perspectives and financial considerations during prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Can Urol Assoc J 2023; 17:E244-E251. [PMID: 37458740 PMCID: PMC10544398 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In universal healthcare systems, patients may still encounter financial obstacles from cancer treatments, potentially influencing treatment decision-making. We investigated the relationship between socioeconomic status and treatment decision-making as it pertains to patient values, preferences, and perceived barriers to care for localized prostate cancer. METHODS We conducted a prospective study of patients undergoing a prostate biopsy for the initial detection of prostate cancer. Sociodemographic variables were collected, with validated instruments used to determine health literacy levels. Patients were divided into two groups using self-reported income; those with a positive identification of prostate cancer underwent additional surveys to ascertain their knowledge of their diagnosis, treatment-related preferences, and socioeconomic barriers to care. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS Of 160 patients, approximately one-third were classified as having low health literacy. Within the low-income group, education levels were lower (34.6% had less than high school education vs. 10.2% in the high-income group) and unemployment rates higher (75.0% unemployed vs. 38.9% in the high-income group). Low-income patients with prostate cancer placed greater importance on indirect out-of-pocket expenses related to treatment (78.3% vs. 33.3%, p=0.001), higher emphasis on treatment-related travel time (50% vs. 15.1%, p=0.004), and more often had difficulty paying for healthcare services in the past (30.9% vs. 9.1%, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Patients with lower household incomes have unique treatment values and decision-making preferences. They may experience additional challenges and barriers to obtaining cancer care, at least partly related to indirect costs. These findings should be considered when framing prostate cancer treatment discussions and designing patient-facing health information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karnvir S Rai
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Uday Mann
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Oksana Harasemiw
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Amanda Eng
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Premal Patel
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Men's Health Clinic Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Jasmir G Nayak
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Men's Health Clinic Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Manitoba Prostate Centre, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Biran A, Bolnykh I, Rimmer B, Cunliffe A, Durrant L, Hancock J, Ludlow H, Pedley I, Rees C, Sharp L. A Systematic Review of Population-Based Studies of Chronic Bowel Symptoms in Cancer Survivors following Pelvic Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4037. [PMID: 37627064 PMCID: PMC10452492 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Pelvic radiotherapy can damage surrounding tissue and organs, causing chronic conditions including bowel symptoms. We systematically identified quantitative, population-based studies of patient-reported bowel symptoms following pelvic radiotherapy to synthesize evidence of symptom type, prevalence, and severity. Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsychINFO were searched from inception to September 2022. Following independent screening of titles, abstracts, and full-texts, population and study characteristics and symptom findings were extracted, and narrative synthesis was conducted. In total, 45 papers (prostate, n = 39; gynecological, n = 6) reporting 19 datasets were included. Studies were methodologically heterogeneous. Most frequently assessed was bowel function ('score', 26 papers, 'bother', 19 papers). Also assessed was urgency, diarrhea, bleeding, incontinence, abdominal pain, painful hemorrhoids, rectal wetness, constipation, mucous discharge, frequency, and gas. Prevalence ranged from 1% (bleeding) to 59% (anal bleeding for >12 months at any time since start of treatment). In total, 10 papers compared radiotherapy with non-cancer comparators and 24 with non-radiotherapy cancer patient groups. Symptom prevalence/severity was greater/worse in radiotherapy groups and symptoms more common/worse post-radiotherapy than pre-diagnosis/treatment. Symptom prevalence varied between studies and symptoms. This review confirms that many people experience chronic bowel symptoms following pelvic radiotherapy. Greater methodological consistency, and investigation of less-well-studied survivor populations, could better inform the provision of services and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Biran
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Iakov Bolnykh
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Ben Rimmer
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Anthony Cunliffe
- NHS Southwest London Clinical Commissioning Group, London SW19 1RH, UK;
| | - Lisa Durrant
- Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK;
| | - John Hancock
- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Hartlepool TS24 9AH, UK;
| | - Helen Ludlow
- Llandough, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff CF64 2XX, UK;
| | - Ian Pedley
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 3HD, UK;
| | - Colin Rees
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Linda Sharp
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Leong JY, Chung PH. Penile prosthesis implantation after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2023; 12:1045-1046. [PMID: 37554531 PMCID: PMC10406547 DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joon Yau Leong
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paul H Chung
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhu A, Gereta S, Zhang TR, Stangl-Kremser J, Mora RM, Margolis DJ, Hu JC. Partial-gland Cryoablation Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-visible and MRI-invisible Lesions. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 53:38-45. [PMID: 37441341 PMCID: PMC10334232 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Expert consensus recommends treatment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible prostate cancer (PCa). Outcomes of partial-gland ablation (PGA) for MRI-invisible PCa remain unknown. Objective To compare recurrence-free survival, adverse events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes following cryoablation of MRI-visible vs invisible PCa. Design setting and participants We analyzed data for 75 men who underwent cryoablation therapy between January 2017 and January 2022. PCa identified on MRI-targeted and/or adjacent systematic biopsy cores was defined as MRI-visible, whereas PCa identified on systematic biopsy beyond the targeted zone was defined as MRI-invisible. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary outcome was recurrence at 12 mo after PGA, defined as the presence of clinically significant PCa (grade group [GG] ≥2) on surveillance biopsy. Adverse events were captured using the Clavien-Dindo classification and HRQoL was captured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) tool. Results and limitations Of the 58 men treated for MRI-visible and 17 treated for MRI-invisible lesions, 51 (88%) and 16 (94%), respectively, had at least one surveillance biopsy performed. There were no statistically significant differences in age, race, body mass index, biopsy GG, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, or treatment extent between the MRI-visible and MRI-invisible groups. Median follow-up was 44 mo (interquartile range 17-54) and did not significantly differ between the groups. The recurrence rate at 12 mo did not significantly differ between the groups (MRI-visible 39%, MRI-invisible 19%; p = 0.2), and log-rank survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (p = 0.15). Adverse event rates did not significantly differ (MRI-visible 29%, MRI-invisible 53%; p = 0.092); no man in the MRI-visible group had a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complication, while one subject in the MRI-invisible group had a Clavien-Dindo grade III complication. Median EPIC-CP urinary and sexual function scores were similar for the two groups at baseline and at 12 mo after PGA. Study limitations include the retrospective design and small sample size. Conclusions We observed similar cancer control, adverse event, and HRQoL outcomes for MRI-visible versus MRI-invisible PCa in the first comparison of partial-gland cryoablation. Longer follow-up and external validation of our findings are needed to inform patient selection for PGA for MRI-invisible PCa. Patient summary Patients with prostate cancer lesions that are not visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans who undergo partial gland ablation may have similar treatment outcomes compared to patients with cancer lesions that are visible on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Zhu
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sofia Gereta
- Dell Medical School, University of Texas-Austin Austin, TX, USA
| | - Tenny R. Zhang
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Judith Stangl-Kremser
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard M. Mora
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel J.A. Margolis
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Orji P, Sun H, Isali I, Bell S, Zaorsky N, Mishra K, Gupta S, Correa A, Smaldone M, Calaway A, Viterbo R, Bukavina L. Female sexual function evaluation and intraoperative vaginal reconstruction in bladder cancer. World J Urol 2023; 41:1751-1762. [PMID: 37419972 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04502-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
RC significantly negatively impacts sexual function (SF) in both men and women. While significant research resources have been allocated to examine the deleterious effects of post prostatectomy erectile dysfunction, little attention has been directed towards female sexual function and organ preservation post cystectomy. These academic shortcomings often result in poor provider awareness and inadequate preoperative assessment. As such, it is crucial for all providers involved in female RC care to understand the necessary and available tools for preoperative evaluation, in addition to the anatomic and reconstructive techniques. This review aims to summarize the current preoperative evaluation and available tools of SF assessment and describe in detail the varying operative techniques in the preservation or restoration of SF in women after RC. The review explores the intricacies of preoperative evaluation tools, and intraoperative techniques for organ- and nerve-sparing during radical cystectomy in females. Particular emphasis on vaginal reconstruction after partial or complete resection is provided, including split-thickness skin (STF) graft vaginoplasy, pedicled flaps, myocutaneous flaps and use of bowel segments. In conclusion, this narrative review highlights the importance of understanding anatomic considerations and nerve-sparing strategies in promoting postoperative SF and quality of life. Furthermore, the review describes the advantages and limitations of each organ- and nerve-sparing technique and their impact on sexual function and overall well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peace Orji
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Helen Sun
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ilaha Isali
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Spencer Bell
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nicholas Zaorsky
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kirtishri Mishra
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shubham Gupta
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andres Correa
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marc Smaldone
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam Calaway
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rosalia Viterbo
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Laura Bukavina
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dickstein DR, Edwards CR, Lehrer EJ, Tarras ES, Gallitto M, Sfakianos J, Galsky MD, Stock R, Safer JD, Rosser BRS, Marshall DC. Sexual health and treatment-related sexual dysfunction in sexual and gender minorities with prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:332-355. [PMID: 37217695 PMCID: PMC10389287 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00778-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer treatment has substantial effects on sexual health and function. Sexual function is a vital aspect of human health and a critical component of cancer survivorship, and understanding the potential effects of different treatment modalities on sexual health is crucial. Existing research has extensively described the effects of treatment on male erectile tissues necessary for heterosexual intercourse; however, evidence regarding their effects on sexual health and function in sexual and gender minority populations is minimal. These groups include sexual minority - gay and bisexual - men, and transgender women or trans feminine people in general. Such unique effects in these groups might include altered sexual function in relation to receptive anal and neovaginal intercourse and changes to patients' role-in-sex. Sexual dysfunctions following prostate cancer treatment affecting quality of life in sexual minority men include climacturia, anejaculation, decreased penile length, erectile dysfunction, and problematic receptive anal intercourse, including anodyspareunia and altered pleasurable sensation. Notably, clinical trials investigating sexual outcomes after prostate cancer treatment do not collect sexual orientation and gender identity demographic data or outcomes specific to members of these populations, which perpetuates the uncertainty regarding optimal management. Providing clinicians with a solid evidence base is essential to communicate recommendations and tailor interventions for sexual and gender minority patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Collin R Edwards
- Department of Radiology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S Tarras
- Department of Pulmonology, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Matthew Gallitto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard Stock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua D Safer
- Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - B R Simon Rosser
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health at University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Deborah C Marshall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, Young GJ, Metcalfe C, Walsh EI, Davis M, Steuart-Feilding T, Blazeby JM, Avery KNL, Martin RM, Bollina P, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Paez E, Powell P, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Mason M, Catto JWF, Peters TJ, Wade J, Turner EL, Williams NJ, Oxley J, Staffurth J, Bryant RJ, Neal DE. Patient-Reported Outcomes 12 Years after Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment. NEJM EVIDENCE 2023; 2:EVIDoa2300018. [PMID: 38320051 DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2300018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term patient-reported outcomes are needed to inform treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Patient-reported outcomes of 1643 randomly assigned participants in the ProtecT (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment) trial were evaluated to assess the functional and quality-of-life impacts of prostatectomy, radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation, and active monitoring. This article focuses on the outcomes of the randomly assigned participants from 7 to 12 years using mixed effects linear and logistic models. RESULTS: Response rates exceeded 80% for most measures. Among the randomized groups over 7 to 12 years, generic quality-of-life scores were similar. Among those in the prostatectomy group, urinary leakage requiring pads occurred in 18 to 24% of patients over 7 to 12 years, compared with 9 to 11% in the active monitoring group and 3 to 8% in the radiotherapy group. In the prostatectomy group, 18% reported erections sufficient for intercourse at 7 years, compared with 30% in the active monitoring and 27% in the radiotherapy groups; all converged to low levels of potency by year 12. Nocturia (voiding at least twice per night) occurred in 34% in the prostatectomy group compared with 48% in the radiotherapy group and 47% in the active monitoring group at 12 years. Fecal leakage affected 12% in the radiotherapy group compared with 6% in the other groups by year 12. The active monitoring group experienced gradual age-related declines in sexual and urinary function, avoiding radical treatment effects unless they changed management. CONCLUSIONS: ProtecT provides robust evidence about continued impacts of treatments in the long term. These data allow patients newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and their clinicians to assess the trade-offs between treatment harms and benefits and enable better informed and prudent treatment decisions. (Funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme projects 96/20/06 and 96/20/99; ISRCTN number, ISRCTN20141297; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172.)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - J Athene Lane
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Grace J Young
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor I Walsh
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Davis
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Steuart-Feilding
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Kerry N L Avery
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard M Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Doble
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - David Gillatt
- Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Howard Kynaston
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Phillip Powell
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Derek J Rosario
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Malcolm Mason
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Tim J Peters
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Wade
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Emma L Turner
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi J Williams
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David E Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Katz AJ, Chen RC, Usinger DS, Danus SM, Zullig LL. Cardiovascular disease prevention and management of pre-existent cardiovascular disease in a cohort of prostate cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:351-359. [PMID: 35790675 PMCID: PMC9813269 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01229-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common cause of mortality among men with prostate cancer. However, receipt of preventive care and management of pre-existent CVD has not been well studied in prostate cancer survivors. METHODS This study examined a prospective cohort of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2011 and 2013 throughout North Carolina linked to Medicare and private insurance claims and clinical data from the Veterans Affairs (VA). In patients without pre-existent CVD, the primary outcome was a composite measure of annual preventive care (blood glucose screening, cholesterol level testing, and ≥ 1 primary care provider visit). In patients with pre-existent CVD, the primary outcome was annual cardiologist visit; blood glucose, cholesterol level testing, and primary care visits were also assessed. RESULTS Our sample comprised 492 patients successfully linked to insurance claims and/or VA data, among whom 103 (20.9%) had pre-existent CVD. Receipt of preventive care declined from 52.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.7 to 57.6%) during the first year after prostate cancer diagnosis to 40.8% (95% CI: 33.7 to 48.4%) during the third year. Among patients with pre-existent CVD, only 23.4% (95% CI: 13.6 to 37.2%) visited a cardiologist in all 3 years. Black men were more likely than White men to visit a cardiologist the first year (risk ratio [RR] = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.71). CONCLUSION In a population-based cohort of prostate cancer survivors, receipt of CVD preventive care declined over time, and frequency of cardiologist-led management of pre-existent CVD was low. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS There is a need to improve clinical strategies for reducing cardiovascular risk and managing pre-existent CVD in prostate cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Katz
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Deborah S Usinger
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Susanne M Danus
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lozano-Lorca M, Barrios-Rodríguez R, Redondo-Sánchez D, Cózar JM, Arrabal-Martín M, García-Caballos M, Salcedo-Bellido I, Sánchez MJ, Jiménez-Moleón JJ, Olmedo-Requena R. Health-related quality of life in patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer: CAPLIFE study. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:977-988. [PMID: 36409391 PMCID: PMC10063519 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03302-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyse the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) at diagnosis of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) according to tumour extension and urinary symptomatology and to explore factors associated with HRQoL. METHODS 408 Controls and 463 PCa cases were included. Eligibility criteria were a new diagnosis of PCa (cases), 40-80 years of age, and residence in the participating hospitals' coverage area for ≥ 6 months before recruitment. HRQoL was evaluated using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Summaries (PCS), and urinary symptoms with the International Prostate Symptom Score. HRQoL scores for all PCa cases, according to tumour extension and urinary symptoms, were compared with controls. In addition, information about lifestyles and comorbidities was collected and its association with low HRQoL (lower scores) were explored using logistic regression models. RESULTS Overall cases had similar PCS score, but lower MCS score than controls. The lowest standardised scores for both PCS and MCS were reached by cases with severe urinary symptoms and a metastatic tumour [mean (SD); PCS: 41.9 (11.5), MCS: 42.3 (10.3)]. Having "below" PCS and MCS scores was associated with the presence of three or more comorbidities in the cases [aOR = 2.86 (1.19-6.84) for PCS and aOR = 3.58 (1.37-9.31) for MCS] and with severe urinary symptomatology [aOR = 4.71 (1.84-12.08) for PCS and aOR = 7.63 (2.70-21.58) for MCS]. CONCLUSION The mental dimension of HRQoL at diagnosis of patients with PCa was lower than in controls, especially for cases with severe urinary symptoms and a metastatic tumour. Comorbidities and urinary symptoms were variables associated with the HRQoL of PCa cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macarena Lozano-Lorca
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, 18016, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, 18014, Granada, Spain
| | - Rocío Barrios-Rodríguez
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, 18016, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, 18014, Granada, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Redondo-Sánchez
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, 18014, Granada, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Campus Universitario de Cartuja, C/Cuesta del Observatorio 4, 18080, Granada, Spain
| | - José-Manuel Cózar
- Urology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Marta García-Caballos
- Cartuja Primary Health Care Centre, Distrito Sanitario Granada-Metropolitano, 18013, Granada, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Salcedo-Bellido
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, 18016, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, 18014, Granada, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - María-José Sánchez
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, 18016, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, 18014, Granada, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Campus Universitario de Cartuja, C/Cuesta del Observatorio 4, 18080, Granada, Spain
| | - José-Juan Jiménez-Moleón
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, 18016, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, 18014, Granada, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocío Olmedo-Requena
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, 18016, Granada, Spain.
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, 18014, Granada, Spain.
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Boellaard TN, Hagens MJ, Veerman H, Yakar D, Mertens LS, Heijmink SWTPJ, van der Poel HG, van Leeuwen PJ, Schoots IG, van Dijk-de Haan MC. Prostate MRI for Improving Personalized Risk Prediction of Incontinence and Surgical Planning: The Role of Membranous Urethral Length Measurements and the Use of 3D Models. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:830. [PMID: 36983985 PMCID: PMC10054694 DOI: 10.3390/life13030830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate MRI has an important role in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, including detection, the targeting of prostate biopsies, staging and guiding radiotherapy and active surveillance. However, there are other ''less well-known'' applications which are being studied and frequently used in our highly specialized medical center. In this review, we focus on two research topics that lie within the expertise of this study group: (1) anatomical parameters predicting the risk of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy, allowing more personalized shared decision-making, with special emphasis on the membranous urethral length (MUL); (2) the use of three-dimensional models to help the surgical planning. These models may be used for training, patient counselling, personalized estimation of nerve sparing and extracapsular extension and may help to achieve negative surgical margins and undetectable postoperative PSA values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry N. Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J. Hagens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Veerman
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Yakar
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Imaging Center, Departments of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn W. T. P. J. Heijmink
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G. Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nakai Y, Tanaka N, Asakawa I, Hori S, Miyake M, Yamaki K, Anai S, Torimoto K, Inoue T, Hasegawa M, Fujimoto K. Quality of life in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with those who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Prostate 2023; 83:701-712. [PMID: 36879383 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the quality of life (QOL) in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for prostate cancer. METHODS We enrolled patients who underwent LDR-BT (LDR-BT alone [n = 540] or LDR-BT plus external beam radiation therapy [n = 428]) and RARP (n = 142). QOL was evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), and 8-item Short Form (SF-8) health survey. The two groups were compared using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS At 24 months after treatment, the number of patients with worsened urinary QOL in the urinary domain of EPIC compared with baseline was 78/111 (70%) and 63/137 (46%) in the RARP and LDR-BT groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In the urinary incontinence and function domain, this number was higher in the RARP group versus the LDR-BT group. However, in the urinary irritative/obstructive domain, the number of patients with improved urinary QOL at 24 months compared with baseline was 18/111 (16%) and 9/137 (7%), respectively (p = 0.01). Regarding the SHIM score, sexual domain of EPIC, and mental component summary of SF-8, there were more number of patients with worsened QOL in the RARP group than in the LDR-BT group. In the EPIC bowel domain, the number of patients with worsened QOL was lower in the RARP group versus the LDR-BT group. CONCLUSION The differences in QOL observed between patients treated with RARP and LDR-BT could assist in treatment selection for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Isao Asakawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Shunta Hori
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kaori Yamaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Satoshi Anai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Torimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Takeshi Inoue
- Department of Urology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Hasegawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Knull E, Park CKS, Bax J, Tessier D, Fenster A. Toward mechatronic MRI-guided focal laser ablation of the prostate: Robust registration for improved needle delivery. Med Phys 2023; 50:1259-1273. [PMID: 36583505 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is an effective tool for detecting and staging prostate cancer (PCa), guiding interventional therapy, and monitoring PCa treatment outcomes. MRI-guided focal laser ablation (FLA) therapy is an alternative, minimally invasive treatment method to conventional therapies, which has been demonstrated to control low-grade, localized PCa while preserving patient quality of life. The therapeutic success of FLA depends on the accurate placement of needles for adequate delivery of ablative energy to the target lesion. We previously developed an MR-compatible mechatronic system for prostate FLA needle guidance and validated its performance in open-air and clinical 3T in-bore experiments using virtual targets. PURPOSE To develop a robust MRI-to-mechatronic system registration method and evaluate its in-bore MR-guided needle delivery accuracy in tissue-mimicking prostate phantoms. METHODS The improved registration multifiducial assembly houses thirty-six aqueous gadolinium-filled spheres distributed over a 7.3 × 7.3 × 5.2 cm volume. MRI-guided needle guidance accuracy was quantified in agar-based tissue-mimicking prostate phantoms on trajectories (N = 44) to virtual targets covering the mechatronic system's range of motion. 3T gradient-echo recalled (GRE) MRI images were acquired after needle insertions to each target, and the air-filled needle tracks were segmented. Needle guidance error was measured as the shortest Euclidean distance between the target point and the segmented needle trajectory, and angular error was measured as the angle between the targeted trajectory and the segmented needle trajectory. These measurements were made using both the previously designed four-sphere registration fiducial assembly on trajectories (N = 7) and compared with the improved multifiducial assembly using a Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS The median needle guidance error of the system using the improved registration fiducial assembly at a depth of 10 cm was 1.02 mm with an interquartile range (IQR) of 0.42-2.94 mm. The upper limit of the one-sided 95% prediction interval of needle guidance error was 4.13 mm. The median (IQR) angular error was 0.0097 rad (0.0057-0.015 rad) with a one-sided 95% prediction interval upper limit of 0.022 rad. The median (IQR) positioning error using the previous four-sphere registration fiducial assembly was 1.87 mm (1.77-2.14 mm). This was found to be significantly different (p = 0.0012) from the median (IQR) positioning error of 0.28 mm (0.14-0.95 mm) using the new registration fiducial assembly on the same trajectories. No significant difference was detected between the medians of the angular errors (p = 0.26). CONCLUSION This is the first study presenting an improved registration method and validation in tissue-mimicking phantoms of our remotely actuated MR-compatible mechatronic system for delivery of prostate FLA needles. Accounting for the effects of needle deflection, the system was demonstrated to be capable of needle delivery with an error of 4.13 mm or less in 95% of cases under ideal conditions, which is a statistically significant improvement over the previous method. The system will next be validated in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Knull
- Faculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Keun Sun Park
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Bax
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Tessier
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron Fenster
- Faculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tiruye T, O'Callaghan M, Ettridge K, Jay A, Santoro K, Moretti K, Beckmann K. Factors impacting on sexual function among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Prostate 2023; 83:678-687. [PMID: 36825533 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) aims to reduce overtreatment and minimize the negative side effects of radical therapies (i.e., prostatectomy or radiotherapy) while preserving quality of life. However, a substantial proportion of men can experience a decline in sexual function during AS follow-up. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of declining sexual function among men on AS. METHODS Men enrolled from 2008 to 2018 in the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry-a prospective clinical registry-were studied. Sexual function outcomes were measured using expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC-26) at baseline and 12-months postdiagnosis. Multivariable regression models adjusted for baseline score and other sociodemographic and clinical factors were applied to identify predictors of sexual function score at 12-months. RESULTS A total of 554 men were included. Variables that showed significant association with decline in sexual function score at 12-months were: having two or more biopsies after diagnosis (mean change score (MCS): -16.3, p < 0.001) compared with no biopsy, higher number of positive biopsy cores (MCS: -1.6, p = 0.004), being in older age category (above 70 vs. below 60: MCS: -16.7, p < 0.001; 65-70 vs. below 60: MCS: -9.7, p = 0.024), having had depression (MCS: -9.0, p = 0.020), and impaired physical function (MCS: -10.0, p = 0.031). Greater socioeconomic advantage (highest vs. lowest quintile: MCS: 15.7, p = 0.022) and year of diagnosis (MCS: 2.6 for every year, p < 0.001) were positively associated with 12-months sexual function score. Neither biopsy type, biopsy timing nor PSA velocity were associated with declines in sexual function. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that multiple factors affected sexual function during AS. Interventions toward reducing the number of biopsies through less invasive monitory approaches, screening for physical and mental well-being, and targeted emotional support and counseling services may be helpful for men on AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenaw Tiruye
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Public Health Department, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
| | - Michael O'Callaghan
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, Australia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Urology Unit, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kerry Ettridge
- Health Policy Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alex Jay
- Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia
| | - Kerry Santoro
- Urology Unit, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kim Moretti
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kerri Beckmann
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
A Contemporary Report of Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer Using MRI for Risk Stratification: Disease Outcomes and Patient-Reported Quality of Life. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041336. [PMID: 36831677 PMCID: PMC9953871 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We examined a prospective consecutive cohort of low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer to evaluate the efficacy of monotherapy for unfavorable-intermediate risk (UIR) disease, and explore factors associated with toxicity and quality of life (QOL). METHODS 149 men with prostate cancer, including 114 staged with MRI, received Iodine-125 brachytherapy alone (144-145 Gy) or following external beam radiation therapy (110 Gy; EBRT). Patient-reported QOL was assessed by the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) survey, and genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were prospectively recorded (CTC v4.0). Global QOL scores were assessed for decline greater than the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Univariate analysis (UVA) was performed, with 30-day post-implant dosimetry covariates stratified into quartiles. Median follow-up was 63 mo. RESULTS Men with NCCN low (n = 42) or favorable-intermediate risk (n = 37) disease were treated with brachytherapy alone, while most with high-risk disease had combined EBRT (n = 17 of 18). Men with UIR disease (n = 52) were selected for monotherapy (n = 42) based on clinical factors and MRI findings. Freedom from biochemical failure-7 yr was 98%. Of 37 men with MRI treated with monotherapy for UIR disease, all 36 men without extraprostatic extension were controlled. Late Grade 2+/3+ toxicity occurred in 55/3% for GU and 8/2% for GI, respectively. Fifty men were sexually active at baseline and had 2 yr sexual data; 37 (74%) remained active at 2 yr. Global scores for urinary incontinence (UC), urinary irritation/obstruction (UIO), bowel function, and sexual function (SF) showed decreases greater than the MCID (p < 0.05) in UC at 2 mo, UIO at 2 and 6 mo, and SF at 2-24 mo, and >5 yr. Analysis did not reveal any significant associations with any examined rectal or urethral dosimetry for late toxicity or QOL. CONCLUSION Disease outcomes and patient-reported QOL support LDR brachytherapy, including monotherapy for UIR disease.
Collapse
|
34
|
Xu D, Ma TM, Savjani R, Pham J, Cao M, Yang Y, Kishan AU, Scalzo F, Sheng K. Fully automated segmentation of prostatic urethra for MR-guided radiation therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:354-364. [PMID: 36106703 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate delineation of the urethra is a prerequisite for urethral dose reduction in prostate radiotherapy. However, even in magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT), consistent delineation of the urethra is challenging, particularly in online adaptive radiotherapy. This paper presented a fully automatic MRgRT-based prostatic urethra segmentation framework. METHODS Twenty-eight prostate cancer patients were included in this study. In-house 3D half fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) and turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences were used to image the Foley-free urethra on a 0.35 T MRgRT system. The segmentation pipeline uses 3D nnU-Net as the base and innovatively combines ground truth and its corresponding radial distance (RD) map during training supervision. Additionally, we evaluate the benefit of incorporating a convolutional long short term memory (LSTM-Conv) layer and spatial recurrent convolution layer (RCL) into nnU-Net. A novel slice-by-slice simple exponential smoothing (SEPS) method specifically for tubular structures was used to post-process the segmentation results. RESULTS The experimental results show that nnU-Net trained using a combination of Dice, cross-entropy and RD achieved a Dice score of 77.1 ± 2.3% in the testing dataset. With SEPS, Hausdorff distance (HD) and 95% HD were reduced to 2.95 ± 0.17 mm and 1.84 ± 0.11 mm, respectively. LSTM-Conv and RCL layers only minimally improved the segmentation precision. CONCLUSION We present the first Foley-free MRgRT-based automated urethra segmentation study. Our method is built on a data-driven neural network with novel cost functions and a post-processing step designed for tubular structures. The performance is consistent with the need for online and offline urethra dose reduction in prostate radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Xu
- Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ricky Savjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Pham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Fabien Scalzo
- Department of Computer Science, Pepperdine University, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kord E, Jung N, Posielski N, Jiang J, Elsamanoudi S, Chesnut GT, Speir R, Stroup S, Musser J, Ernest A, Tausch T, Flores JP, Porter C. Prospective Long-term Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes After Surgery, Radiotherapy, or Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 48:60-69. [PMID: 36743401 PMCID: PMC9895767 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatment is associated with reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Current literature is limited by short-term follow-up. Objective To prospectively evaluate the 5-yr HRQoL outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or active surveillance (AS). Design setting and participants We prospectively evaluated HRQoL in patients with low-risk/favorable intermediate-risk PCa enrolled in the Center for Prostate Disease Research multicenter database between 2007 and 2017. Intervention Of 1012 patients included in the study, 252 (24.9%) underwent AS, 557 (55.0%) RP, and 203 (20.0%) EBRT. Patients complete the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form at baseline and thereafter each year up to 5 yr after treatment. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Temporal changes in HRQoL were compared between treatments and were modeled using linear regression models adjusted for baseline HRQoL, demographic, and clinical characteristics. Results and limitations RP showed the least irritative symptoms and worse incontinence in comparison with AS (p < 0.001 for both subdomains) or EBRT (p < 0.001 for both subdomains) at all time points. RP sexual domain score was worse than the scores of AS (mean difference 22.3 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.5-27.8, p < 0.001) and EBRT (mean difference 16.9 points, 95% CI 12.5-20.3, p < 0.001) during years 1-3 and not different from that of EBRT (mean difference 2.9 points, 95% CI -4.8 to 8.3, p = 0.3) at years 4 and 5. Bowel function and bother were worse for EBRT than for AS (p < 0.001 for both subdomains) and RP (p < 0.001 for both subdomains) at all time points. During the 3-5-yr period, AS demonstrated the worst decline in all mental health domains (p < 0.001 in comparison with both EBRT and RP). Conclusions RP results in worse long-term urinary function and incontinence, but in less irritative and obstructive symptoms than EBRT and AS. Sexual domain scores were least affected by AS, while RP shows similar scores to EBRT at long term. Long-term HRQoL changes are critical for advising patients. Patient summary We evaluated long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a large US population treated for localized prostate cancer. HRQoL outcomes varied according to treatment modality and time. These changes should inform patients about their expected outcomes following treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyal Kord
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Corresponding author. Section of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Virginia Mason Hospital and Seattle Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Tel. +1 (425) 802 8881.
| | - Nathan Jung
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Jiji Jiang
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sally Elsamanoudi
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gregory T. Chesnut
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ryan Speir
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Sean Stroup
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Naval Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - John Musser
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Alexander Ernest
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy Tausch
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John Paul Flores
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Taleb FR, Sameh WM, Tolba KG, Hegazi SA, Altaheri AT. The effect of nursing interventions on urinary, bowel and sexual dysfunction among post‐radical prostatectomy patients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/ijun.12338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fuad Radman Taleb
- Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science Taiz University Taiz Yemen
| | - Wael Mohammed Sameh
- Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt
| | - Kawthar Gaber Tolba
- Medical Surgical Nursing, Medical Surgical Department, Faculty of Nursing Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt
| | - Soheir AbuElfadhl Hegazi
- Medical Surgical Nursing, Medical Surgical Department, Faculty of Nursing Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt
| | - Asmaa Taha Altaheri
- Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science Taiz University Taiz Yemen
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
De B, Pasalic D, Barocas DA, Wallis CJ, Huang LC, Zhao Z, Koyama T, Tang C, Conwill R, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Wu XC, Paddock LE, Stroup A, Cooperberg MR, Hashibe M, O’Neil BB, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Penson DF, Hoffman KE. Patient-reported Outcomes After External Beam Radiotherapy With Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost vs Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Five-year Results From a Prospective Comparative Effectiveness Study. J Urol 2022; 208:1226-1239. [PMID: 36006050 PMCID: PMC9933910 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Data comparing radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost are lacking. To better guide shared decision making regarding treatment, we compared patient reported outcomes through 5 years following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2011-2012, men aged <80 years with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled and followed longitudinally. Patient reported outcomes included the Expanded Prostate Index Composite. Regression models adjusted for baseline scores and covariates were constructed. RESULTS The study population included 112 men treated with external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost and 1,553 treated with radical prostatectomy. Compared to radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with clinically meaningful worse urinary irritative/obstructive (adjusted mean score difference [95% confidence interval]: 5.0 [-8.7, -1.3]; P = .008 at 5 years) and better urinary incontinence function (13.3 [7.7, 18.9]; P < .001 at 5 years) through 5 years. Urinary function bother was similar between groups (P > .4 at all timepoints). Treatment with external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with worse bowel function (-4.0 [-6.9, -1.1]; P = .006 at 5 years) through 5 years compared to radical prostatectomy. Treatment with external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with better sexual function at 1 year (12.0 [6.5, 17.5]; P < .001 at 1 year) compared to radical prostatectomy, but there was insufficient evidence to reject the supposition that no difference was seen at 3 or 5 years. CONCLUSIONS Compared to radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with clinically meaningful worse urinary irritative/obstructive and bowel functions but better urinary incontinence function through 5 years after treatment. These patient-reported functional outcomes may clarify treatment expectations and help inform treatment choices for localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX
| | - Dario Pasalic
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Nashville, TN
| | - Christopher J.D. Wallis
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Li-Ching Huang
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics, Nashville, TN
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics, Nashville, TN
| | - Tatsuki Koyama
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics, Nashville, TN
| | - Chad Tang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX
| | - Ralph Conwill
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Office of Patient and Community Education, Patient Advocacy Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Michael Goodman
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ann S. Hamilton
- Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Department of Preventative Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana State University New Orleans School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, New Orleans, LA
| | - Lisa E. Paddock
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, Department of Epidemiology, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, Department of Epidemiology, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | - Mia Hashibe
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Brock B. O’Neil
- University of Utah Health, Department of Urology, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - David F. Penson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Nashville, TN
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN
| | - Karen E. Hoffman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mechanisms, mitigation, and management of urinary toxicity from prostate radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e534-e543. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00544-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
39
|
Tiruye T, O’Callaghan M, Moretti K, Jay A, Higgs B, Santoro K, Boyle T, Ettridge K, Beckmann K. Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer. BMC Urol 2022; 22:169. [PMID: 36335325 PMCID: PMC9637295 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01117-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to describe changes in patient-reported functional outcome measures (PROMs) comparing pre-treatment and 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy and active surveillance (AS). Methods Men enrolled from 2010 to 2019 in the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry a prospective clinical registry were studied. Urinary, bowel, and sexual functions were measured using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) at baseline and 12 months post-treatment. Higher scores on the EPIC-26 indicate better function. Multivariable regression models were applied to compare differences in function and extent of bother by treatment. Results Of the 4926 eligible men, 57.0% underwent RP, 20.5% EBRT, 7.0% brachytherapy and 15.5% AS. While baseline urinary and bowel function varied little across treatment groups, sexual function differed greatly (adjusted mean scores: RP = 56.3, EBRT = 45.8, brachytherapy = 61.4, AS = 52.8; p < 0.001). Post-treatment urinary continence and sexual function declined in all treatment groups, with the greatest decline for sexual function after RP (adjusted mean score change − 28.9). After adjustment for baseline differences, post-treatment sexual function scores after EBRT (6.4; 95%CI, 0.9–12.0) and brachytherapy (17.4; 95%CI, 9.4–25.5) were higher than after RP. Likewise, urinary continence after EBRT (13.6; 95%CI, 9.0-18.2), brachytherapy (10.6; 95%CI, 3.9–17.3) and AS (10.6; 95%CI, 5.9–15.3) were higher than after RP. Conversely, EBRT was associated with lower bowel function (− 7.9; 95%CI, − 12.4 to − 3.5) than RP. EBRT and AS were associated with lower odds of sexual bother (OR 0.51; 95%CI, 0.29–0.89 and OR 0.60; 95%CI, 0.38–0.96, respectively), and EBRT with higher odds of bowel bother (OR 2.01; 95%CI, 1.23–3.29) compared with RP. Conclusion The four common treatment approaches for prostate cancer were associated with different patterns of patient-reported functional outcomes, both pre- and 12 months post-treatment. However, after adjustment, RP was associated with a greater decline in urinary continence and sexual function than other treatments. This study underscores the importance of collecting baseline PROMs to interpret post-treatment functional outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01117-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenaw Tiruye
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia ,grid.449044.90000 0004 0480 6730Public Health Department,, Debre Markos University,, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
| | - Michael O’Callaghan
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, South Australia ,grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia ,grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia , Urology Unit, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Kim Moretti
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia ,South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, South Australia ,grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Alex Jay
- grid.414925.f0000 0000 9685 0624Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia
| | - Braden Higgs
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia ,grid.416075.10000 0004 0367 1221 Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Kerry Santoro
- Urology Unit, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Terry Boyle
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Kerry Ettridge
- grid.430453.50000 0004 0565 2606Health Policy Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia ,grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Kerri Beckmann
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Brundage MD, Crossnohere NL, O’Donnell J, Cruz Rivera S, Wilson R, Wu AW, Moher D, Kyte D, Reeve BB, Gilbert A, Chen RC, Calvert MJ, Snyder C. Listening to the Patient Voice Adds Value to Cancer Clinical Trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1323-1332. [PMID: 35900186 PMCID: PMC9552306 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials are critical for evaluating the safety and efficacy of interventions in oncology and informing regulatory decisions, practice guidelines, and health policy. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in randomized trials to reflect the impact of receiving cancer therapies from the patient perspective and can inform evaluations of interventions by providing evidence that cannot be obtained or deduced from clinicians' reports or from other biomedical measures. This commentary focuses on how PROs add value to clinical trials by representing the patient voice. We employed 2 previously published descriptive frameworks (addressing how PROs are used in clinical trials and how PROs have an impact, respectively) and selected 9 clinical trial publications that illustrate the value of PROs according to the framework categories. These include 3 trials where PROs were a primary trial endpoint, 3 trials where PROs as secondary endpoints supported the primary endpoint, and 3 trials where PROs as secondary endpoints contrast the primary endpoint findings in clinically important ways. The 9 examples illustrate that PROs add valuable data to the care and treatment context by informing future patients about how they may feel and function on different treatments and by providing clinicians with evidence to support changes to clinical practice and shared decision making. Beyond the patient and clinician, PROs can enable administrators to consider the cost-effectiveness of implementing new interventions and contribute vital information to policy makers, health technology assessors, and regulators. These examples provide a strong case for the wider implementation of PROs in cancer trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Brundage
- Queen’s University Cancer Research Institute, Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Norah L Crossnohere
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer O’Donnell
- Queen’s University Cancer Research Institute, Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- DEMAND (Data-Enabled Medical Technologies and Devices) Hub, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roger Wilson
- NCRI Consumer Forum National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Albert W Wu
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Derek Kyte
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Center for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Coventry, UK
- NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wang F, Luan Y, Fan Y, Huang T, Zhu L, Lu S, Tao H, Sheng T, Chen D, Ding X. Comparison of the Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Brachytherapy and Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58101387. [PMID: 36295548 PMCID: PMC9609680 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58101387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To compare the oncological and functional outcomes of brachytherapy (BT) and radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 557 patients with localized PCa who were treated with BT (n = 245) or RP (n = 312) at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital between January 2012 and December 2017. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared by treatment modality. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate bRFS. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire. Results: The BT group was older and had a higher initial PSA (iPSA). The 5-year bRFS was 82.9% in the BT group versus 80.1% in the RP group (p = 0.570). The 5-year CSS was 96.4% in the BT group versus 96.8% in the RP group (p = 0.967). Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, Gleason score ≥ 8 was the main independent prognostic factor for bRFS. Regarding the HRQoL, compared with the baseline, both treatments produced a significant decrease in different aspects of HRQoL at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Patients in the BT group had lower HRQoL with regard to urinary irritation/obstruction and bowel function or bother, while patients in the RP group had lower HRQoL concerning urinary incontinence and sexual function or bother. There was no significant difference in HRQoL aspects between the two groups after follow-up for 2 years compared with the baseline. Conclusions: BT provides equivalent oncological control outcomes in terms of bRFS and CSS for patients with localized PCa compared with RP. Gleason score ≥ 8 was the main independent prognostic factor for bRFS. BT had better HRQoL compared with RP, except for urinary irritation/obstruction and bowel function or bother, but returned to baseline after 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Wang
- Department of Urology, Municipal Key-Innovative Discipline, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China
| | - Yang Luan
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Yaqin Fan
- Departments of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China
| | - Tianbao Huang
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Liangyong Zhu
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Shengming Lu
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Huazhi Tao
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Tao Sheng
- Department of Urology, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinse Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China
| | - Deqing Chen
- Forensic and Pathology Laboratory, Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Electronics and Digital Health, Institute of Forensic Science, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China
- Correspondence: (D.C.); (X.D.)
| | - Xuefei Ding
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
- Correspondence: (D.C.); (X.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hammers J, Lindsay D, Narayanasamy G, Sud S, Tan X, Dooley J, Marks LB, Chen RC, Das SK, Mavroidis P. Evaluation of the clinical impact of the differences between planned and delivered dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on CT-on-rails IGRT and patient-reported outcome scores. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 24:e13780. [PMID: 36087039 PMCID: PMC9859987 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the clinical impact of differences between delivered and planned dose using dose metrics and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling. METHODS Forty-six consecutive patients with prostate adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2015 treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and who had undergone computed tomography on rails imaging were included. Delivered doses to bladder and rectum were estimated using a contour-based deformable image registration method. The bladder and rectum NTCP were calculated using dose-response parameters applied to planned and delivered dose distributions. Seven urinary and gastrointestinal symptoms were prospectively collected using the validated prostate cancer symptom indices patient reported outcome (PRO) at pre-treatment, weekly treatment, and post-treatment follow-up visits. Correlations between planned and delivered doses against PRO were evaluated in this study. RESULTS Planned mean doses to bladder and rectum were 44.9 ± 13.6 Gy and 42.8 ± 7.3 Gy, while delivered doses were 46.1 ± 13.4 Gy and 41.3 ± 8.7 Gy, respectively. D10cc for rectum was 64.1 ± 7.6 Gy for planned and 60.1 ± 9.3 Gy for delivered doses. NTCP values of treatment plan were 22.3% ± 8.4% and 12.6% ± 5.9%, while those for delivered doses were 23.2% ± 8.4% and 9.9% ± 8.3% for bladder and rectum, respectively. Seven of 25 patients with follow-up data showed urinary complications (28%) and three had rectal complications (12%). Correlations of NTCP values of planned and delivered doses with PRO follow-up data were random for bladder and moderate for rectum (0.68 and 0.67, respectively). CONCLUSION Sensitivity of bladder to clinical variations of dose accumulation indicates that an automated solution based on a DIR that considers inter-fractional organ deformation could recommend intervention. This is intended to achieve additional rectum sparing in cases that indicate higher than expected dose accumulation early during patient treatment in order to prevent acute severity of bowel symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Hammers
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Daniel Lindsay
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Ganesh Narayanasamy
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesArkansasUSA
| | - Shivani Sud
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Xianming Tan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina HospitalsChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - John Dooley
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Lawrence B. Marks
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Ronald C. Chen
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Shiva K. Das
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Panayiotis Mavroidis
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Randolph JT, Pak ES, McMains JC, Koontz BF, Hannan JL. Cocultured Schwann Cells Rescue Irradiated Pelvic Neuron Outgrowth and Increase Survival. J Sex Med 2022; 19:1333-1342. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
44
|
Mitchell JM, Gresenz CR. Association Between Receipt of Definitive Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer and Adverse Health Outcomes: A Claims-Based Approach. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:S1098-3015(22)02043-5. [PMID: 35965227 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine adverse health outcomes associated with receipt of definitive treatments (prostatectomy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy [IMRT] and brachytherapy). METHODS We identified men aged 65 years and older who received a new diagnosis of localized prostate cancer from 4 state cancer registries (CA, FL, NJ, and TX) during the years 2006 to 2013. We merged the registry records for this cohort with Medicare enrollment and claims. We constructed indicators of treatment-related adverse outcomes using diagnosis codes reported on the claims. Stage 1 models the choice of definitive treatment versus active surveillance. Stage 2 examines the probability of experiencing a treatment-related adverse health outcome among men who chose definitive treatment. RESULTS Notably, 81.4% of our cohort of 61 187 men received definitive treatment whereas 18.6% were monitored with active surveillance. The 5-year prostate cancer death rate was 0.28% to 1.75% irrespective of treatment received. Men monitored with active surveillance experienced minimal adverse health outcomes (0.16%-0.75%). The risks of urinary incontinence associated with prostatectomy were 31 and 39.5 percentage points higher than brachytherapy and IMRT, respectively. For erectile dysfunction, the risks were nearly 23 and 27.5 percentage points higher, respectively, than brachytherapy and IMRT. Prostatectomy was associated with lower risk of urinary dysfunction and bowel dysfunction than either brachytherapy or IMRT. Compared with brachytherapy, IMRT was associated with a lower risk of erectile dysfunction (32%), urinary incontinence (84%), and urinary dysfunction (30%). CONCLUSIONS This evidence should be of value to patient-physician decision making regarding the choice of definitive treatments versus active surveillance for men with localized disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean M Mitchell
- McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Carole Roan Gresenz
- Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Li SW, Chiu AW, Huang AC, Lai YW, Leu JD, Hsiao YC, Chen SS, Hsueh TY. Ten-years outcome analysis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. Front Surg 2022; 9:966025. [PMID: 35965869 PMCID: PMC9372291 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.966025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Since there was no consensus on treatment options for localized prostate cancer, we performed a retrospective study to compare the long-term survival benefit of radiotherapy (RT) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Taiwan. Methods 218 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated between 2008 and 2017 (64 with LRP and 154 with RT) were enrolled in this study. The outcomes of RT and LRP were assessed after patients were stratified according to Gleason score, stage, and risk group. Crude survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, and metastasis-free survival were evaluated using the log-rank test. Results The 5-year crude survival rate was 93.3% in the LRP group and 59.3% in the RT group. A significant survival benefit was found in the LRP group compared with the RT group (p = 0.004). Furthermore, significant differences were found in disease-specific survival (93.3% vs. 64.7%, p = 0.022) and metastasis-free survival (48% vs. 40.2%, p = 0.045) between the LRP and RT groups. Conclusions Men with localized prostate cancer treated initially with LRP had a lower risk of prostate cancer-specific death and metastases compared with those treated with RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Wen Li
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Andy C. Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wei Lai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Der Leu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Hsiao
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shiou-Sheng Chen
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Zhongxiao Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Correspondence: Thomas Y. Hsueh
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Patient reported outcomes and health related quality of life in localized prostate cancer: A review of current evidence. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:304-314. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
47
|
Bender JL, Flora PK, Soheilipour S, Dirlea M, Maharaj N, Parvin L, Matthew A, Catton C, Jamnicky L, Pollock P, Kwan W, Finelli A, Kazanjian A. Web-Based Peer Navigation for Men with Prostate Cancer and Their Family Caregivers: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:4285-4299. [PMID: 35735452 PMCID: PMC9221974 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability and potential effects of True North Peer Navigation (PN)—a web-based peer navigation program for men with prostate cancer (PC) and their family caregivers. A one-arm, pre-post pilot feasibility study was conducted at two cancer centres in Canada. Participants were matched through a web-app with a specially trained peer navigator who assessed needs and barriers to care, provided support and encouraged a proactive approach to health for 3 months. Descriptive statistics were calculated, along with paired t-tests. True North PN was feasible, with 57.9% (84/145) recruitment, 84.5% (71/84) pre-questionnaire, 77.5% (55/71) app registration, 92.7% (51/55) match and 66.7% (34/51) post-questionnaire completion rates. Mean satisfaction with Peer Navigators was 8.4/10 (SD 2.15), mean program satisfaction was 6.8/10 (SD 2.9) and mean app usability was 60/100 (SD 14.8). At 3 months, mean ± SE patient/caregiver activation had improved by 11.5 ± 3.4 points (p = 0.002), patient quality of life by 1.1 ± 0.2 points (p < 0.0001), informational support by 0.4 ± 0.17 points (p = 0.03), practical support by 0.5 ± 0.25 points (p = 0.04) and less need for support related to fear of recurrence among patients by 0.4 ± 19 points (p = 0.03). The True North web-based peer navigation program is highly feasible and acceptable among PC patients and caregivers, and the associated improvements in patient and caregiver activation are promising. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to determine effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline L. Bender
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; (P.K.F.); (M.D.)
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-416-581-8606
| | - Parminder K. Flora
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; (P.K.F.); (M.D.)
| | - Shimae Soheilipour
- Division of Health Services and Policy, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (S.S.); (N.M.); (L.P.); (A.K.)
- Department of Oral Public Health, Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
| | - Mihaela Dirlea
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; (P.K.F.); (M.D.)
| | - Nandini Maharaj
- Division of Health Services and Policy, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (S.S.); (N.M.); (L.P.); (A.K.)
| | - Lisa Parvin
- Division of Health Services and Policy, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (S.S.); (N.M.); (L.P.); (A.K.)
| | - Andrew Matthew
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (A.M.); (L.J.); (A.F.)
| | - Charles Catton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada;
| | - Leah Jamnicky
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (A.M.); (L.J.); (A.F.)
| | - Philip Pollock
- Clinical Trials and Clinical Research, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada;
| | - Winkle Kwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Fraser Valley, BC V3V 1Z2, Canada;
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (A.M.); (L.J.); (A.F.)
| | - Arminée Kazanjian
- Division of Health Services and Policy, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (S.S.); (N.M.); (L.P.); (A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Iizumi T, Ishikawa H, Sekino Y, Tanaka K, Takizawa D, Makishima H, Numajiri H, Mizumoto M, Nakai K, Okumura T, Sakurai H. Acute toxicity and patient-reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer. J Med Radiat Sci 2022; 69:198-207. [PMID: 34664410 PMCID: PMC9163454 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/fraction) PBT. METHODS We reviewed 289 patients with prostate cancer, of whom 73, 100, and 116 patients were treated with 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 Gy (RBE)/fraction, respectively. The endpoints were acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities and the IPSS, evaluated up to 6 months after PBT initiation. RESULTS No significant differences were found in acute toxicity rates or the IPSS among the fractionation schedules. Diabetes mellitus, age, and androgen deprivation therapy were not identified as factors associated with the IPSS. CONCLUSION There were no significant differences in adverse events or quality of life among the three fractionation schedules early after PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST HospitalNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Yuta Sekino
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
- Department of Radiation OncologyTsuchiura Kyodo General HospitalTsuchiuraJapan
| | - Keiichi Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
- Department of Radiation OncologyTsuchiura Kyodo General HospitalTsuchiuraJapan
| | - Daichi Takizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
- Department of Radiation OncologyHitachi General HospitalHitachi Ltd.HitachiJapan
| | - Hirokazu Makishima
- QST HospitalNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research CenterUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wu SY, Huy LD, Liao CJ, Huang CC. Acute, Subchronic, and Chronic Complications of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiotherapy With Hormone Therapy in Older Adults With High-Risk Prostate Adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:875036. [PMID: 35586485 PMCID: PMC9108927 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.875036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare acute, subchronic, and chronic complications between older patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (HR-LPC) receiving radical prostatectomy (RP) and high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with long-term hormone therapy (HT). Patients and Methods We recruited older patients (≥80 years) with HR-LPC from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. After propensity score matching, logistic regression analysis was used to compare the acute, subchronic, and chronic complication rates between patients who underwent RP (the RP group) and high-dose IMRT combined with long-term HT (the IMRT+HT group). Results Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms and urinary incontinence (UI) were the most common complications over 5 years (BPH symptoms: RP, 17.69%; IMRT+HT, 29.58%; UI: RP, 10.47%; IMRT+HT, 5.50%). Compared with the RP group, the IMRT+HT group had higher odds of BPH symptoms and lower odds of UI and hernia after the 5-year follow-up period. The impotence rates were significantly higher in the IMRT+HT group than in the RP group at 3 months and 1 year after treatment and became nonsignificant after 2 years. At 5 years after treatment, the IMRT+HT group had lower risks of UI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–0.88) and hernia (aOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11–0.82) and a higher risk of BPH symptoms (aOR, 4.15; 95% CI, 2.82–7.37) than the RP group. Conclusion IMRT+HT was associated with lower UI and hernia risks than RP. By contrast, RP was associated with fewer complications of BPH over the follow-up period and less impotence during the first year after treatment. Our findings provide important and valuable references for shared decision-making for optimal therapy selection among older men with HR-LPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Szu-Yuan Wu
- Department of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Big Data Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan
- Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Cancer Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Centers for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Le Duc Huy
- Master Program in School of Health Care Administration, Department of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Health Management Training Institute, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam
| | - Chih Jung Liao
- Department of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University-Shuang-ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Chien Huang
- International PhD Program in Biotech and Healthcare Management, School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Quality, Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital - Managed by Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Long-Term Care and School of Gerontology Health Management, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department and School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Chung-Chien Huang,
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Objective To investigate the functional and quality of life (QoL) outcomes of treatments for localised prostate cancer and inform treatment decision‐making. Patients and Methods Men aged 50–69 years diagnosed with localised prostate cancer by prostate‐specific antigen testing and biopsies at nine UK centres in the Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) trial were randomised to, or chose one of, three treatments. Of 2565 participants, 1135 men received active monitoring (AM), 750 a radical prostatectomy (RP), 603 external‐beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent androgen‐deprivation therapy (ADT) and 77 low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (BT, not a randomised treatment). Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) completed annually for 6 years were analysed by initial treatment and censored for subsequent treatments. Mixed effects models were adjusted for baseline characteristics using propensity scores. Results Treatment‐received analyses revealed different impacts of treatments over 6 years. Men remaining on AM experienced gradual declines in sexual and urinary function with age (e.g., increases in erectile dysfunction from 35% of men at baseline to 53% at 6 years and nocturia similarly from 20% to 38%). Radical treatment impacts were immediate and continued over 6 years. After RP, 95% of men reported erectile dysfunction persisting for 85% at 6 years, and after EBRT this was reported by 69% and 74%, respectively (P < 0.001 compared with AM). After RP, 36% of men reported urinary leakage requiring at least 1 pad/day, persisting for 20% at 6 years, compared with no change in men receiving EBRT or AM (P < 0.001). Worse bowel function and bother (e.g., bloody stools 6% at 6 years and faecal incontinence 10%) was experienced by men after EBRT than after RP or AM (P < 0.001) with lesser effects after BT. No treatment affected mental or physical QoL. Conclusion Treatment decision‐making for localised prostate cancer can be informed by these 6‐year functional and QoL outcomes.
Collapse
|