Effect of More vs Less Frequent Follow-up Testing on Overall and Colorectal Cancer-Specific Mortality in Patients With Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer: The COLOFOL Randomized Clinical Trial

Early-Stage Colon Cancer Surveillance: Pattern and Timing of Recurrence and the Role of 5-Year Surveillance

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the third most prevalent cancer among both men and women with 80% of patients having localized disease enabling curative treatments. Given the low recurrence rate in early-stage disease, there is a growing interest in reviewing follow-up protocols. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and timing of recurrence in early-stage colon cancer, as well as recurrence patterns.

Methods

The data from all patients with colon adenocarcinoma consecutively treated with surgery at the Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, EPE, between January 2013 and December 2016, were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

A total of 1,372 patients with colon cancer were submitted to surgery during the study period. From this group, 51.4% (n = 705) were early-stage colon cancers. Regarding the pathological stage, 3.5% were stage 0, 37.4% were stage I and 59.1% were stage II. The overall recurrence rate was 6.7%. When considering the group of patients without risk factors, the recurrence rate was 5.6%. The majority of recurrences occurred in the first 3 years of follow-up. The recurrence was diagnosed in the majority of patients through carcinoembryonic antigen elevation, followed by imaging exams. The presence of one or more risk factors (high nuclear grade, vascular invasion, extramural venous invasion, and perineural invasion) showed a statistically significant association with recurrence rate.

Conclusion

The recurrence rate was low in early-stage colon cancer, with the majority of recurrences occurring in the first 3 years. Our study results show that surveillance should be tailored according to individual risk factors.

Diagnostic yield of follow-up in patients undergoing surgery for non-metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence on adherence, diagnostic performance and impact on survival to intensive follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is limited.

AIM

To analyze the diagnostic performance of surveillance colonoscopy, computed tomography (CT), and tumor markers (TMs) in detecting CRC recurrence or metastasis during follow-up after CRC resection. Secondary objectives included degree of adherence to clinical practice guidelines surveillance recommendations and factors associated with adherence and all-cause and CRC mortality.

METHODS

The single-center retrospective cohort study including patients undergoing curative resection of stage I-III CRC during 2010-2015. Follow-up was performed using TMs every 6 months, yearly CT for 5 years, and colonoscopy at years 1 and 4. Demographic, primary tumor data, and results at follow-up were collected.

RESULTS

Of 574 included patients included, 153 had recurrences or metastases. Of this group, 136 (88.9%) were diagnosed by CT, 10 (6.5%) by CT and colonoscopy, and 7 (4.6%) by colonoscopy; only 67.8% showed TMs elevation. Adherence to follow-up recommendations was 68.8% for the first colonoscopy, 74% for the first CT scan, and 96.6% for the first blood test; these values declined over time. Younger age at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 0.93; 95%CI: 0.91-0.95], CRC stages I-II (OR 0.38; 95%CI: 0.24-0.61), and adherence to follow-up recommendations (OR 0.30; 95%CI: 0.20-0.46) were independently associated with lower risk for all-cause death at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

CT scan had the highest diagnostic yield. Adherence to follow-up recommendations was low and decreased during follow-up. Younger age at diagnosis, stage, and follow-up adherence were associated with lower 5-year mortality.

[Postsurgical follow-up and long-term monitoring of colorectal cancer : Radiology as a key component]

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Postsurgical follow-up and long-term monitoring are essential to detect local recurrence, metastases, or secondary tumors at an early stage.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

According to the current guideline on colorectal cancer, radiologic follow-up is primarily performed using a single computed tomography (CT) scan 3 months after completion of therapy. Annual chest X‑ray examinations within the first 5 years after completion of treatment can be employed, and, due to cost-effective availability, regular abdominal ultrasound is recommended.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

The German guideline on colorectal cancer is currently being revised. As the sensitivity of ultrasound is inferior to CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), thoracoabdominal CT will probably become crucial in follow-up care with the revised guideline, which would align with international recommendations.

PERFORMANCE

CT is well suited for detecting local recurrence, as well as lung or liver metastases. MRI is used in assessing local cancer grades for treatment planning and monitoring. Structured reporting, stage- and guideline-based recommendations including follow-up intervals as well as interdisciplinary tumor conferences ensure high-quality follow-up care.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Radiology is essential to interdisciplinary follow-up care for colorectal cancer.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Structured reporting and clear recommendations on follow-up intervals should be standard in radiological reports. The importance of radiological follow-up for patients with colorectal cancer is likely to increase further with the guideline that is currently being revised.

Impact of Sensitive Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring on CT Scan Intervals During Postoperative Colorectal Cancer Surveillance

Objective

This study investigated whether digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR)-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring can allow longer intervals between computed tomography (CT) scans during postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC).

Background

Practical guidelines still recommend intensive postoperative surveillance of CRC using periodical CT scans and serum carcinoembryonic antigen testing.

Methods

The longitudinal dynamics of ctDNA for 52 patients with CRC as measured by dPCR using probes targeting 87 individual tumor-specific mutations (1-5 per patient) were compared with results from conventional (ie, clinical) surveillance using serum tumor markers and CT.

Results

A total of 382 CT procedures were carried out for the patient cohort (3.3/year per patient) and the median lead time from ctDNA relapse to clinical relapse was 182 days (range, 0-376 days). If the CT interval was annual, potential delays in the detection of clinical relapse would have occurred for 7 of the 10 patients who experienced clinical relapse (9 of 13 events), with a median delay of 164 days (range, 0-267 days). If annual CT surveillance was performed together with ctDNA monitoring, 218 (57.1%) CTs would not have been needed to detect the first clinical relapse. In addition, the ctDNA monitoring would have provided a lead time of 339 days for detection of clinical relapse (range, 42-533 days).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the ctDNA monitoring as part of postoperative surveillance and clinical relapse detection for patients with CRC could allow the CT interval to be lengthened.

Trial Registration

This trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000045114).

Environmental Sustainability and Cancer Imaging

The rising global burden of cancer drives increased demands for medical imaging, which is essential throughout cancer care. However, delivering medical imaging presents significant environmental challenges including high energy use, reliance on single-use supplies, and the production of environmental pollutants. Environmental factors, such as ultraviolet radiation, wildfire smoke, and carcinogenic pollutants contribute to rising cancer rates, while extreme weather events driven by climate change disrupt cancer care delivery-highlighting the close connection between patient and planetary health. This review explores opportunities to improve the environmental sustainability of oncologic imaging, emphasizing the importance of patient-relevant outcomes-such as quality of life and overall survival-as a guiding principle in cancer care. Key strategies include optimizing imaging schedules to reduce low-value imaging, selecting modalities with lower environmental impact where clinically appropriate, minimizing waste streams, and adopting energy-efficient practices. Artificial intelligence offers the potential to personalize imaging schedules and improve efficiency, though its benefits must be weighed against energy use. Mobile imaging programs and integrated scheduling reduce patient travel-related emissions while promoting health equity, particularly in underserved communities. Future research should focus on optimizing imaging intervals to address patient-relevant outcomes better, expanding the use of abbreviated imaging protocols, and the judicious deployment of artificial intelligence, ensuring its benefits justify energy use.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence free survival per consensus molecular subtype in stage III colon cancer

The consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification divides colon tumors into four subtypes holding promise as a predictive biomarker. However, the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence free survival (RFS) per CMS in stage III patients remains inadequately explored. With this intention, we selected stage III colon cancer (CC) patients from the MATCH cohort (n = 575) and RadboudUMC (n = 276) diagnosed between 2005 and 2018. Patients treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy were matched based on tumor location, T- and N-stage (n = 522). Tumor material was available for 464 patients, with successful RNA extraction and CMS subtyping achieved in 390 patients (surgery alone group: 192, adjuvant chemotherapy group: 198). In the overall cohort, CMS4 was associated with poorest prognosis (HR 1.55; p = .03). Multivariate analysis revealed favorable RFS for the adjuvant chemotherapy group in CMS1, CMS2, and CMS4 tumors (HR 0.19; p = .01, HR 0.27; p < .01, HR 0.19; p < .01, respectively), while no significant difference between treatment groups was observed within CMS3 (HR 0.68; p = .51). CMS subtyping in this non-randomized cohort identified patients with poor prognosis and patients who may not benefit significantly from adjuvant chemotherapy.

NanoCMSer: a consensus molecular subtype stratification tool for fresh-frozen and paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer samples

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant contributor to cancer-related mortality, emphasizing the need for advanced biomarkers to guide treatment. As part of an international consortium, we previously categorized CRCs into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1-CMS4), showing promise for outcome prediction. To facilitate clinical integration of CMS classification in settings where formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples are routinely used, we developed NanoCMSer, a NanoString-based CMS classifier using 55 genes. NanoCMSer achieved high accuracy rates, with 95% for fresh-frozen samples from the MATCH cohort and 92% for FFPE samples from the CODE cohort, marking the highest reported accuracy for FFPE tissues to date. Additionally, it demonstrated 96% accuracy across a comprehensive collection of 23 RNAseq-based datasets, compiled in this study, surpassing the performance of existing models. Classifying with only 55 genes, the CMS predictions were still biologically relevant, recognizing CMS-specific biology upon enrichment analysis. Additionally, we observed substantial differences in recurrence-free survival curves when comparing CMS2/3 patients in stage III versus II. Probability of recurrence after 5 years increased by 21% in CMS2 and 31% in CMS3 for patients in stage III, whereas this difference was less pronounced for CMS1 and CMS4, with 11% and 10%, respectively. We posit NanoCMSer as a robust tool for subtyping CRCs for both tumor biology and clinical practice, accessible via nanocmser r package (https://github.com/LEXORlab/NanoCMSer) and Shinyapp (https://atorang.shinyapps.io/NanoCMSer).

Circulating Tumor DNA Testing in Curatively Resected Colorectal Cancer and Salvage Resection

Importance

Serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a routine surveillance strategy for patients with resected colorectal cancer, but how serial ctDNA monitoring is associated with potential curative outcomes has not been formally assessed.

Objective

To examine whether there is a benefit of adding serial ctDNA assays to standard-of-care imaging surveillance for potential curative outcomes in patients with resected colorectal cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this single-center (City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California), retrospective, case cohort study, patients with stage II to IV colorectal cancer underwent curative resection and were monitored with serial ctDNA assay and National Cancer Center Network (NCCN)-guided imaging surveillance from September 20, 2019, to April 3, 2024. The median duration of follow-up was 26 months (range, 2-54 months).

Interventions

Serial ctDNA assays were performed every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months for the 3 following years in conjunction with NCCN-guided radiographic surveillance.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinical benefit from ctDNA testing, defined as the proportion of patients with a newly positive ctDNA assay and negative scheduled imaging (most recent or concurrent) that subsequently led to early imaging confirmation of recurrence, followed by curative-intent intervention with no evidence of recurrence at the time of data cutoff. Recurrence was categorized by ctDNA recurrence, radiographic recurrence, or concurrent ctDNA and imaging recurrence. Salvage resections and associated durable remissions were described within each of the 3 categories. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population.

Results

In total, 184 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 32-88 years]; 97 female [52.7%]) were included in this study, and 129 (70.1%) had stage II to III disease. Forty-five patients (24.5%) had ctDNA or imaging-confirmed recurrence. Of these 45 patients, 14 had radiographic recurrence with negative ctDNA, and 11 had concurrent ctDNA and imaging recurrence. Twenty of 45 patients had ctDNA positivity with negative imaging at first ctDNA positivity; 6 had reflex imaging that was positive for recurrence, and 14 continued with serial imaging and ctDNA monitoring. Ten of 14 patients had subsequent recurrent disease, 3 patients had a spontaneous clearance of ctDNA, and 1 patient remained imaging negative 7 months after positive ctDNA, after which she was lost to follow-up. Altogether, 11 of 20 patients with ctDNA recurrence without initial concurrent imaging recurrence had subsequent metastasectomy, and only 3 were disease-free at the cutoff date in April 2024, representing 1.6% of the surveilled population.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with stage II to IV colorectal cancer who underwent curative-intent resection, the addition of serial tumor-informed ctDNA assay to the standard NCCN-recommended surveillance had limited clinical benefits. Additional prospective research is needed to clarify the value of ctDNA testing in the surveillance setting.

Risk of recurrence in early-onset versus late-onset non-metastatic colorectal cancer, 2004-2019: a nationwide cohort study

Background

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals younger than 50 years of age (early-onset CRC) is increasing. Early-onset CRC often present at advanced stage, suggesting a more aggressive cancer course compared to late-onset CRC (age 50-79). This nationwide cohort study estimates the incidence of recurrence following early-onset CRC and late-onset CRC.

Methods

The study included all Danish patients <80 years old operated for first-time Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage I-III CRC between January 2004 and December 2019. Recurrence status was determined by applying a validated algorithm to individual-level data from nationwide health registries. The 5-year cumulative incidence functions (CIF) of recurrence were reported for early-onset versus late-onset CRC. The difference in time to recurrence was estimated as a time ratio (TR) using an accelerated failure time model.

Findings

Among 25,729 CRC patients, 1441 (5.6%) had early-onset CRC. Compared to late-onset CRC, early-onset was associated with advanced disease stages and higher treatment intensity. The 5-year CIF of recurrence was 29% (95% CI: 26%-31%) in early-onset versus 21% (95% CI: 21%-22%) in late-onset CRC. The higher CIF of recurrence for early-onset patients persisted in stage-stratified analysis. Time to recurrence was shorter in early-onset versus late-onset patients with TR = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67-0.85). The 5-year CIF of recurrence decreased from 2004 to 2019 for both early- and late-onset patients-most prominent for early-onset patients.

Interpretation

Early-onset CRC was associated with higher incidence of recurrence at all disease stages. Indicating that the increased risk is not explained by delayed diagnosis. The excess risk diminished from 2004 to 2019, suggesting that early-onset CRC may achieve a similar recurrence risk as late-onset CRC in a contemporary setting.

Funding

Aarhus University, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Innovation Fund Denmark, and the Danish Cancer Society.

Localized Rectal Cancer: Indian Consensus and Guidelines

The rising incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in India, particularly the prevalence of rectal cancer over colon cancer (0.7:1), has been a growing concern in recent decades; especially notable is the trend of increasing cases among young CRC patients. Given the diverse treatment approaches for rectal cancer globally and the varying economic capacities of patients in low to middle-income countries (LMICs) like India, it is essential to establish consensus guidelines that are specifically tailored to meet the needs of these patients. To achieve this, a panel comprising 30 eminent rectal cancer experts convened to conduct a comprehensive and impartial evaluation of existing practices and recent advancements in the field. Through meticulous scrutiny of published literature and a consensus-building process that involved voting on pertinent questions, the panel formulated management strategies. These recommendations are the result of a rigorous, evidence-based process and encapsulate the collective wisdom and judgment of leading authorities in the field.

More vs Less Frequent Follow-Up Testing and 10-Year Mortality in Patients With Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the COLOFOL Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Although intensive follow-up of patients after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is common in clinical practice, evidence for a long-term survival benefit of more frequent testing is limited.

Objective

To examine overall and colorectal cancer-specific mortality rates in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery and underwent high-frequency or low-frequency follow-up testing.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial with posttrial prespecified follow-up was performed in 23 centers in Sweden and Denmark. The original study enrolled 2509 patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer from Sweden, Denmark, and Uruguay (1 center) who received treatment from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2010, and were followed up for up to 5 years. The participants from Sweden and Denmark were then followed up for 10 years through population-based health registries. The 53 patients from Uruguay were not included in the posttrial follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed from March to June 2024.

Interventions

Patients were randomly allocated to follow-up testing with computed tomography (CT) scans and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) screening at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after surgery (high-frequency group; 1227 patients), or at 12 and 36 months after surgery (low-frequency group, 1229 patients).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcomes were 10-year overall mortality and colorectal cancer-specific mortality rates. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed.

Results

Of the 2555 patients who were randomly allocated, 2509 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, of whom 2456 (97.9%) were included in this posttrial analysis (median age, 65 years [IQR, 59-70 years]; 1355 male patients [55.2%]). The 10-year overall mortality rate for the high-frequency group was 27.1% (333 of 1227; 95% CI, 24.7%-29.7%) compared with 28.4% (349 of 1229; 95% CI, 26.0%-31.0%) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 1.3% [95% CI, -2.3% to 4.8%]). The 10-year colorectal cancer-specific mortality rate in the high-frequency group was 15.6% (191 of 1227; 95% CI, 13.6%-17.7%) compared with 16.0% (196 of 1229; 95% CI, 14.0%-18.1%) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 0.4% [95% CI, -2.5% to 3.3%]). The same pattern resulted from the per-protocol analysis.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer, more frequent follow-up testing with CT scans and CEA testing did not result in a significant reduction in 10-year overall mortality or colorectal cancer-specific mortality. The results of this trial should be considered as the evidence base for updating clinical guidelines.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00225641.

Oncologic surveillance after surgical treatment for clinically localized kidney cancer: UroCCR study n. 129

BACKGROUND

In 2021, the EAU Guidelines implemented a novel, expert opinion-based follow-up scheme, with a three-risk-category system for clear cell (cc) and non-cc renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) after surgery with curative intent. We aimed to validate the novel follow-up scheme and provide data-driven recurrence estimates according to risk groups, to confirm or implement the oncologic surveillance strategy.

METHODS

We identified 5,320 patients from a prospectively maintained database involving 28 French referral centers. The risk of recurrence, as either loco-regional or distant, was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method for each group (low- intermediate- or high-risk) according to ccRCC or non-ccRCC histology. The noncumulative distribution of recurrences was graphically investigated through the LOWESS smoother.

RESULTS

Two thousand two hundred ninety-three (58%), 926 (23%), and 738 (19%) had low-, intermediate, and high-risk ccRCC, and 683 (50%), 297 (22%), and 383 (28%) had low-, intermediate, and high-risk non-ccRCC, respectively. Median follow-up for survivors was 46 months. Overall, 661 patients experienced recurrence. Over time, the noncumulative risk of recurrence was approximately 10% for low-risk cc-RCC, non-ccRCC, and intermediate-risk non-ccRCC, with non-significant difference among the three recurrence functions (P=0.9). At 5-year, time point after which imaging should be de-intensified to biennial, the noncumulative risks of recurrence were: for intermediate risk ccRCC and non-ccRCC: 15% and 11%, respectively; for high-risk ccRCC and non-ccRCC: 24% and 8%, respectively. Among high-risk non-ccRCC patients there were 9 recurrences at 3-month. There was no significant difference between the recurrence function of high-risk non-ccRCC patients with negative imaging at 3-month and the one of intermediate-risk ccRCC (P=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the relatively low recurrence risk of patients with intermediate-risk non-ccRCC, those individuals could be followed up with a similar strategy to the low-risk category. Similarly, patients with high-risk non-ccRCC with negative imaging at 3-month, could be followed up similarly to intermediate-risk ccRCC after the 3-month time point.

ESR Essentials: Imaging in colorectal cancer-practice recommendations by ESGAR

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health concern. Diagnostic imaging, using different modalities, has a pivotal role in CRC, from early detection (i.e., screening) to follow-up. The role of imaging in CRC screening depends on each country's approach: if an organized screening program is in place, the role of CT colonography (CTC) is limited to the study of either individuals with a positive stool test unwilling/unable to undergo colonoscopy (CC) or in patients with incomplete CC. Although CC is the most common modality to diagnose CRC, CRC can be also incidentally detected during a routine abdominal imaging examination or at the emergency room in patients presenting with intestinal occlusion/subocclusion or perforation. Staging is a crucial aspect of CRC management, guiding treatment decisions and providing valuable prognostic information. An accurate local staging is mandatory in both rectal and colon cancer to drive the appropriate therapeutic workflow. Important limitations of US, CT, and MR in N-staging can be partially solved by FDG PET/CT. Distant staging is usually managed by CT, with MR and FDG PET/CT which can be used as problem-solving techniques. Follow-up is performed according to the general recommendations of the oncological societies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: It is essential to summarize each phase of colorectal cancer workup, differentiating the management for colon and rectal cancer supported by the main international guidelines and literature data, with the aim to inform the community on the best practice imaging in colorectal cancer. KEY POINTS: • Colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease that lends itself to imaging at each stage of detection and management. • Various imaging modalities can be used as adjuncts to, or in place of, direct visualization methods of screening and are necessary for evaluating metastatic disease. • Reevaluation of follow-up strategies should be considered depending on patients' individual risk of recurrence.

Intervention of epithelial mesenchymal transition against colon cancer cell growth and metastasis based on SOX21/POU4F2/Hedgehog signaling axis

AIMS

Colon cancer poses a major threat to human health and a heavy burden on the national economy. As a member of the SOX transcription factor family, SRY-box transcription factor 21 (SOX21) is associated with various cancers, but its mechanism of action in colon cancer remains unclear. This study focused on the molecular mechanisms of transcription factor SOX21 in proliferation and metastasis of colon cancer cells.

MAIN METHODS

We analyzed SOX21 expression level and its impact on survival in colon cancer patients by bioinformatics analysis. We used public databases for gene correlation, GSEA enrichment analysis. Cell function experiments (colony formation assay, wound healing assay, Transwell migration and invasion assay) were utilized to determine the impact of SOX21 silencing and over-expression on cell proliferation and metastasis. The luciferase reporter assay, CUT&RUN-qPCR assay and Methylation Specific PCR were used to explore SOX21-POU class 4 homeobox 2 (POU4F2) molecular interactions. The molecular mechanisms were verified by Quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot analysis.

KEY FINDINGS

SOX21 is highly expressed and affects the overall survival of colon cancer patients. SOX21 can attenuates POU4F2 methylation state by binding with it. In addition, this interaction facilitate its transcriptional activation of Hedgehog pathway, mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), consequently promoting the proliferation and metastasis of colon cancer cells.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study reveals that SOX21 is an oncogenic molecule and suggests its regulatory role in colon carcinogenesis and progression, providing new insights into the treatment of this disease.

Targeting circ-0034880-enriched tumor extracellular vesicles to impede SPP1highCD206+ pro-tumor macrophages mediated pre-metastatic niche formation in colorectal cancer liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

Information transmission between primary tumor cells and immunocytes or stromal cells in distal organs is a critical factor in the formation of pre-metastatic niche (PMN). Understanding this mechanism is essential for developing effective therapeutic strategy against tumor metastasis. Our study aims to prove the hypothesis that circ-0034880-enriched tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (TEVs) mediate the formation of PMN and colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM), and targeting circ-0034880-enriched TEVs might be an effective therapeutic strategy against PMN formation and CRLM.

METHODS

We utilized qPCR and FISH to measure circRNAs expression levels in human CRC plasma, primary CRC tissues, and liver metastatic tissues. Additionally, we employed immunofluorescence, RNA sequencing, and in vivo experiments to assess the effect mechanism of circ-0034880-enriched TEVs on PMN formation and CRC metastasis. DARTS, CETSA and computational docking modeling were applied to explore the pharmacological effects of Ginsenoside Rb1 in impeding PMN formation.

RESULTS

We found that circ-0034880 was highly enriched in plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from CRC patients and closely associated with CRLM. Functionally, circ-0034880-enriched TEVs entered the liver tissues and were absorbed by macrophages in the liver through bloodstream. Mechanically, TEVs-released circ-0034880 enhanced the activation of SPP1highCD206+ pro-tumor macrophages, reshaping the metastasis-supportive host stromal microenvironment and promoting overt metastasis. Importantly, our mechanistic findings led us to discover that the natural product Ginsenoside Rb1 impeded the activation of SPP1highCD206+ pro-tumor macrophages by reducing circ-0034880 biogenesis, thereby suppressing PMN formation and inhibiting CRLM.

CONCLUSIONS

Circ-0034880-enriched TEVs facilitate strong interaction between primary tumor cells and SPP1highCD206+ pro-tumor macrophages, promoting PMN formation and CRLM. These findings suggest the potential of using Ginsenoside Rb1 as an alternative therapeutic agent to reshape PMN formation and prevent CRLM.

Imaging and Biomarker Surveillance for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria Statement

Surveillance for survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) is focused on early detection of recurrent or second primary malignancies. After initial restaging confirms disease-free status, the use of surveillance imaging for asymptomatic patients with HNC is controversial. Our objective was to comprehensively review literature pertaining to imaging and biomarker surveillance of asymptomatic patients treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and to convene a multidisciplinary expert panel to provide appropriate use criteria for surveillance in representative clinical scenarios. The evidence base for the appropriate use criteria was gathered through a librarian-mediated search of literature published from 1990 to 2022 focused on surveillance imaging and circulating tumor-specific DNA for nonmetastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The systematic review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Using the modified Delphi process, the expert panel voted on appropriate use criteria, providing recommendations for appropriate use of surveillance imaging and human papillomavirus (HPV) circulating tumor DNA. Of 5178 studies identified, 80 met inclusion criteria (5 meta-analyses/systematic reviews, 1 randomized control trial, 1 post hoc analysis, 25 prospective, and 48 retrospective cohort studies [with ≥50 patients]), reporting on 27,525 patients. No large, randomized, prospective trials examined whether asymptomatic patients who receive surveillance imaging or HPV circulating tumor DNA monitoring benefit from earlier detection of recurrence or second primary tumors in terms of disease-specific or quality-of-life outcomes. In the absence of prospective data, surveillance imaging for HNC survivors should rely on individualized recurrence-risk assessment accounting for initial disease staging, HPV disease status, and tobacco use history. There is an emerging surveillance role for circulating tumor biomarkers.

Implications of pretreatment extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer patients: A population-based study

AIM

Extramural venous invasion detected by MRI (mrEMVI) has in several expert centre studies been identified as an important prognostic factor in rectal cancer, and in guiding neoadjuvant therapy. However, population-based evidence for mrEMVI as a predictor for recurrent disease is lacking.

METHOD

This was a multicentre retrospective study based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The study period encompassed patients operated with abdominal resection for rectal cancer 2017-2021, with follow-up until January 2023. Patients diagnosed at hospitals with radiological registry data coverage <90% or with metastatic disease were excluded. Pretreatment mrEMVI constituted exposure, while recurrence-free survival was the main outcome. Distant and local recurrence, and overall survival were secondary outcomes, and pretreatment and postoperative scenarios were explored using multivariable Cox regression with multiple imputation. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 2737 patients from 13 hospitals were eligible for analysis. Pretreatment mrEMVI was reported in 14.5% of patients, while 71.9% had negative findings and 13.6% had missing data. In the pretreatment scenario, mrEMVI was an independent predictor for worse recurrence-free survival with an adjusted HR of 1.64 (95% CI: 1.31-2.06). In the postoperative MDT setting, the influence of mrEMVI on recurrence-free survival decreased with an adjusted HR of 1.27 (95% CI: 1.00-1.61).

CONCLUSION

mrEMVI at diagnosis is an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival in an unselected population of rectal cancer patients undergoing abdominal resection.

Imaging in the era of risk-adapted treatment in colon cancer

The treatment landscape for patients with colon cancer is continuously evolving. Risk-adapted treatment strategies, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy, are slowly finding their way into clinical practice and guidelines. Radiologists are pivotal in guiding clinicians toward the most optimal treatment for each colon cancer patient. This review provides an overview of recent and upcoming advances in the diagnostic management of colon cancer and the radiologist's role in the multidisciplinary approach to treating colon cancer.

Cost-effectiveness of surveillance intervals after curative resection of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Major guidelines consistently recommend 5 years of postoperative surveillance for patients with colorectal cancer. However, they differ in their recommendations for examination intervals and whether they should vary according to disease stage. Furthermore, there are no reports on the cost-effectiveness of the different surveillance schedules. The objective of this study is to identify the most cost-effective surveillance intervals after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 3701 patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer at the National Cancer Center Hospital were included. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for the five surveillance strategies with reference to the guidelines. Expected medical costs and quality-adjusted life years after colorectal cancer resection were calculated using a state-transition model by Monte Carlo simulation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life years gained was calculated for each strategy, with a maximum acceptable value of 43 500-52 200 USD (5-6 million JPY).

RESULTS

Stages I, II and III included 1316, 1082 and 1303 patients, respectively, with 45, 140 and 338 relapsed cases. For patients with stage I disease, strategy 4 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $26 555/quality-adjusted life year) was considered to be the most cost-effective, while strategies 3 ($83 071/quality-adjusted life year) and 2 ($289 642/quality-adjusted life year) exceeded the threshold value. In stages II and III, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for strategy 3 was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $18 358-22 230/quality-adjusted life year.

CONCLUSIONS

In stage I, the cost-effectiveness of intensive surveillance is very poor and strategy 4 is the most cost-effective. Strategy 3 is the most cost-effective in stages II and III.

Waiting for the "liquid revolution" in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer patients: a review of ongoing trials

Since colon cancer has a high rate of shedding of tumour fragments into the blood, several research efforts are now focused on the investigation of the minimal residual disease through the detection of ctDNA to tailor the adjuvant therapy of colon cancer patients and optimize its cost/effectiveness balance. The negative prognostic impact of detectable ctDNA in patients' blood after radical surgery for colon cancer is well established. Several clinical trials adopting heterogeneous designs and techniques are now ongoing to translate promises into daily practice by answering five general questions: i) is a ctDNA-guided decision making efficacious in the post-operative management of colon cancer patients? ii) are de-escalation strategies possible in ctDNA-negative cases? iii) are escalation strategies useful to improve the prognosis of ctDNA-positive patients? iv) when MRD is identified at the end of the adjuvant chemotherapy, is another post-adjuvant systemic therapy efficacious? v) can we exploit ctDNA technologies in the follow up of colon cancer patients? This review focuses on currently ongoing trials and how their results may affect the ctDNA "liquid revolution" of early colon cancer.

Non-metastatic colon cancer: French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFP, AFEF, and SFR)

INTRODUCTION

This article is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of non-metastatic colon cancer (CC), revised in November 2022.

METHODS

These guidelines represent collaborative work of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of CC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B, and C) according to the level of evidence found in the literature published up to November 2022.

RESULTS

Initial evaluation of CC is based on clinical examination, colonoscopy, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) scan, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. CC is usually managed by surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on the pathological findings. The use of adjuvant therapy remains a challenging question in stage II disease. For high-risk stage II CC, adjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy proposed according to the type and number of poor prognostic features. Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is the current standard for adjuvant therapy of patients with stage III CC. However, these regimens are associated with significant oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The results of the recent IDEA study provide evidence that 3 months of treatment with CAPOX is as effective as 6 months of oxaliplatin-based therapy in patients with low-risk stage III CC (T1-3 and N1). A 6-month oxaliplatin-based therapy remains the standard of care for high-risk stage III CC (T4 and/or N2). For patients unfit for oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is recommended.

CONCLUSION

French guidelines for non-metastatic CC management help to offer the best personalized therapeutic strategy in daily clinical practice. Each individual case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board and then the treatment option decided with the patient.

Association of preoperative and recurrent serum carcinoembryonic antigen and outcome of colorectal cancer patients with metastatic relapse

Background

Seldom have the associations of preoperative CEA (p-CEA) and recurrent CEA (r-CEA) levels as well as changes in p-CEA and r-CEA with survival in patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) who have experienced metastatic relapse, been thoroughly examined.

Methods

241 consecutive patients with stage I-III CRC who experienced metastatic relapse at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) between January 2008 and January 2016 were investigated. The influence of p-CEA, r-CEA and CEA alteration on the overall survival (OS) and relapse-to-death survival (RDS) was evaluated. The restricted cubic spline regression model was employed to explore the optimal cut-off value of CEA.

Results

All 241 patients were categorized into four groups built on their CEA alteration patterns as follows: A, patients presenting elevated p-CEA levels but normal r-CEA levels (P-N); B, patients displaying normal levels of both p-CEA and r-CEA (N-N); C, patients exhibiting elevated levels of both p-CEA and r-CEA (P-P); D, patients with normal p-CEA levels but elevated r-CEA levels (N-P). The correlation between p-CEA and OS (P = 0.3266) and RDS (P = 0.2263) was insignificant. However, r-CEA exhibited a significant association with both OS (P = 0.0005) and RDS (P = 0.0002). Group A demonstrated the longest OS and RDS, whereas group D exhibited the poorest OS and RDS outcomes. For both OS and RDS, the CEA alteration groups served as an independent prognostic indicator. The optimal cut-off threshold for CEA was determined to be 5.1 ng/ml via the restricted cubic spline regression model.

Conclusion

r-CEA has a stronger correlation with OS and RDS in individuals with stage I-III CRC who have experienced metastatic relapse.The change between p-CEA and r-CEA could further indicate post-relapse survival, thereby facilitating the assessment of mortality risk stratification in stage I-III CRC patients experiencing metastatic relapse.

Unraveling the potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA detection in colorectal cancer-evaluation in a nationwide Danish cohort

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is proposed as a tool for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. Digital PCR (dPCR) offers low analysis costs and turnaround times of less than a day, making it ripe for clinical implementation. Here, we used tumor-informed dPCR for ctDNA detection in a large colorectal cancer (CRC) cohort to evaluate the potential for post-operative risk assessment and serial monitoring, and how the metastatic site may impact ctDNA detection. Additionally, we assessed how altering the ctDNA-calling algorithm could customize performance for different clinical settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage II-III CRC patients (N = 851) treated with a curative intent were recruited. Based on whole-exome sequencing on matched tumor and germline DNA, a mutational target was selected for dPCR analysis. Plasma samples (8 ml) were collected within 60 days after operation and-for a patient subset (n = 246)-every 3-4 months for up to 36 months. Single-target dPCR was used for ctDNA detection.

RESULTS

Both post-operative and serial ctDNA detection were prognostic of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 11.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-16.4, P < 0.001; HR = 30.7, 95% CI 20.2-46.7, P < 0.001], with a cumulative ctDNA detection rate of 87% at the end of sample collection in recurrence patients. The ctDNA growth rate was prognostic of survival (HR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.4, P = 0.001). In recurrence patients, post-operative ctDNA detection was challenging for lung metastases (4/21 detected) and peritoneal metastases (2/10 detected). By modifying the cut-off for calling a sample ctDNA positive, we were able to adjust the sensitivity and specificity of our test for different clinical contexts.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented results from 851 stage II-III CRC patients demonstrate that our personalized dPCR approach effectively detects MRD after operation and shows promise for serial ctDNA detection for recurrence surveillance. The ability to adjust sensitivity and specificity shows exciting potential to customize the ctDNA caller for specific clinical settings.

Sensitive and Specific Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Recurrence through Multiplex superRCA Mutation Detection in Blood Plasma

Mutation analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has applications in monitoring of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients for recurrence. Considering the low tumor fraction of ctDNA in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolated from blood plasma, the sensitivity of the detection method is important. Here, plasma DNA collected at diagnosis and follow-up from 25 CRC patients was analyzed using a multiplex superRCA mutation detection assay. The assay was also performed on genomic DNA (gDNA) from tumor and normal tissue from 20 of these patients. The lower limit of detection for most sequence variants was in the range of 10-5, while when analyzing cfDNA from plasma with a typical input of 33 ng, the practical detection limit was ~10-4 or 0.01% mutant allele frequency (MAF). In 17 of 19 patients with identified hotspot mutations in tumor gDNA, at least one hotspot mutation could be detected in plasma DNA at the time of diagnosis. The MAF increased at subsequent time points in four of the patients who experienced a clinical relapse. Multiplex superRCA analysis of the remaining six patients did not reveal any hotspot mutations. In conclusion, multiplex superRCA assays proved suitable for monitoring CRC patients by analyzing hotspot mutations in cfDNA, and dynamic changes in MAF were observed in patients with clinical relapse.

Incidence of Recurrence and Time to Recurrence in Stage I to III Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study

Importance

Management of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been updated continuously over the past 2 decades. While the combination of these initiatives has had implications for improved survival, the implications for rates of recurrence remain unexplored.

Objective

To ascertain the rates of recurrence and describe time to recurrence within 5 years of surgery with curative intent for stages I to III CRC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group Database to identify patients with Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stages I to III CRC who underwent primary surgery between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019. They were followed up until recurrence (event), death (competing event), diagnosis of a second cancer (competing event), emigration (censoring event), 5 years postoperatively (censoring event), or January 1, 2023 (censoring event), whichever came first. Recurrence status was ascertained through individual-level linked data from the Danish Cancer Registry, Danish National Patient Registry, and Danish Pathology Registry using a validated algorithm. Data were analyzed from January 1 to August 8, 2023.

Exposure

Primary surgery performed during 3 calendar periods (2004-2008, 2009-2013, and 2014-2019) stratified by tumor site (colon or rectum) and UICC stage (I, II, and III).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Stage-specific 5-year recurrence reported as the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of recurrence, the association between calendar period of primary surgery and recurrence risk reported as subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs), and the time from surgery to recurrence.

Results

Of the 34 166 patients with UICC stages I to III CRC (median [IQR] age, 70 [62-77] years); 18 552 males [54.3%]) included in the study, 7027 developed recurrence within 5 years after the primary surgery. For colon cancer, the 5-year CIF of recurrence decreased over the 3 calendar periods from 16.3% to 6.8% for UICC stage I, from 21.9% to 11.6% for UICC stage II, and from 35.3% to 24.6% for UICC stage III colon cancer. For rectal cancer, the 5-year CIF decreased over the 3 periods from 19.9% to 9.5% for stage I, from 25.8% to 18.4% for stage II, and from 38.7% to 28.8% for stage III disease. Patients with stage III disease had a shorter time from surgery to recurrence compared with those with stage I disease (time ratio stage III vs stage I = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.28-0.32). Cancers detected through screening were associated with lower stage-adjusted risks of recurrence (sHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91) compared with cancers not detected through screening.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort of patients with CRC, the risk of recurrence decreased in patients with stages I to III disease during the study period. Cancer detection by screening was associated with an even lower risk of recurrence. Time to recurrence differed according to UICC stage. Because the risk of recurrence was so low in selected patient groups, future research is warranted to explore risk-stratified surveillance protocols in patients with CRC.

Early recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer with D3 lymphadenectomy: pattern, risk factors, prognostic impact, and individualized follow-up

The definition of early recurrence (ER) for right-sided colon cancer patients after complete mesocolic excision (CME) with D3 lymphadenectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to define the optimal time for ER and clarify risk factors for ER and post-recurrence survival (PRS). A total of 578 right-sided colon cancer patients who underwent CME with D3 lymphadenectomy were included. The minimum p value method was used to evaluate theme optimal time of recurrence-free survival to discriminate between ER and late recurrence (LR). Risk factors for ER were determined by a logistics regression model. The PRS was compared between ER and LR. The optimal time to define ER was 15 months (P = 1.8697E-7). 93 patients developed tumor recurrence, 46 patients had ER (≤15 months) and 47 patients had LR (>15 months). Preoperative serum CA19-9 > 37 U/mL (OR = 3.185, P = 0.001), pathological N+ stage (OR = 3.042, P = 0.027), and lymphovascular invasion (OR = 2.182, P = 0.027) were identified as independent risk factors associated with ER. Age > 75 years (HR = 1.828, P = 0.040), pathological N2 stage (HR = 1.850, P = 0.009), multiple sites of recurrence (HR = 1.680, P = 0.024), and time to recurrence ≤15 months (HR = 2.018, P = 0.043) were significantly associated with worse PRS in patients with recurrence. 15 months was the optimal time to distinguish ER and LR. ER was associated with a poor PRS. Elevated preoperative serum CA19-9 level, pathological N+ stage, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly predictive of ER.

Intensive follow-up vs conventional follow-up for patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer treated with curative intent: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The frequency and content of follow-up strategies remain controversial for colorectal cancer (CRC), and scheduled follow-ups have limited value.

AIM

To compare intensive and conventional follow-up strategies for the prognosis of non-metastatic CRC treated with curative intent using a meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for potentially eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until April 2023. The Cochrane risk of bias was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The hazard ratio, relative risk, and 95% confidence interval were used to calculate survival and categorical data, and pooled analyses were performed using the random-effects model. Additional exploratory analyses were performed for sensitivity, subgroups, and publication bias.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs involving 8533 patients with CRC were selected for the final analysis. Intensive follow-up may be superior to conventional follow-up in improving overall survival, but this difference was not statistically significant. Moreover, intensive follow-up was associated with an increased incidence of salvage surgery compared to conventional follow-up. In addition, there was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence between intensive and conventional follow-up strategies, whereas intensive follow-up was associated with a reduced risk of interval recurrence compared to conventional follow-up. Finally, the effects of intensive and conventional follow-up strategies differed when stratified by tumor location and follow-up duration.

CONCLUSION

Intensive follow-up may have a beneficial effect on the overall survival of patients with non-metastatic CRC treated with curative intent.

Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies

This study aimed to assess recurrence patterns and related risk factors following curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center, including 2622 patients with stage I-III CRC who underwent curative resection between 2008 and 2018. Hazard rates of recurrence were calculated using a hazard function. The primary outcome was the peak recurrence time after curative resection and secondary outcomes were prognostic factors associated with recurrence. Over a median follow-up period of 53 months, the overall, locoregional and systemic recurrence rates were 8.9%, 0.7%, and 8.5%, respectively. Recurrence rates were significantly higher for rectal cancer (14.9% overall, 4.4% locoregionally, and 12.3% systemically) than for colon cancer (all p < 0.001). The peak recurrence time was 11 months, with variations in hazard rates and curves depending on the tumor location, stage, and risk factors. Patients with AL or CRM involvement exhibited a distinct pattern, with a high hazard rate in the early postoperative period. Understanding these recurrence patterns and risk factors is crucial for establishing effective postoperative surveillance strategies. Our findings suggested that short-interval surveillance should be considered during the first 2 years post-surgery, particularly for high-risk patients who should receive early attention.

Survivorship in Early-Stage Rectal Cancer Patients Who Have Received Combined Modality Therapy

Survival rates in early-stage rectal cancer patients have increased over the past few decades. Societies such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), American Cancer Society (ACS), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) have proposed guidelines related to cancer survivorship care including formal recommendations to address the needs in early-stage rectal cancer survivors. These guidelines, in addition to new clinical research findings in survivorship will be reviewed, specifically looking at physical, psychosocial, and financial concerns in rectal cancer survivorship.

Colon Cancer Survivorship in Patients Who Have Received Adjuvant Chemotherapy

The number of colon cancer survivors in the United States is increasing due to improved early detection, better treatments that extend survival, and the growing aging population who are at high risk for cancer. Following initial active treatment, colon cancer survivors experience a wide range of long-term physical, psychological, and socio-economic effects that impact their overall well-being. Healthcare providers caring for survivors need to prioritize not only monitoring for cancer recurrence but also optimizing their overall health through addressing these long-term effects; managing their comorbidities; promoting healthy behaviors (like exercise, nutrition, and weight loss); and screening for a second primary cancer depending on their risk. Personalized survivorship care plans should be formulated clearly outlining the roles of various healthcare providers involved in their care. Our review article focuses on these various aspects of colon cancer survivorship, including surveillance for cancer recurrence specific to those who received adjuvant chemotherapy with curative intent.

Towards patient-led follow-up after curative surgical resection of stage I, II and III colorectal cancer (DISTANCE-trial): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most frequently diagnosed cancers. Approximately 20-30% of stage I-III CRC patients develop a recurrent tumour or metastases after curative surgical resection. Post-operative follow-up is indicated for the first five years after curative surgical resection. As intensified follow-up after curative surgical resection has shown no effect on survival, patient organisations and policy makers have advocated for a more patient-centred approach to follow-up. The objective of this study is to successfully implement patient-led, home-based follow-up (PHFU) in six hospitals in The Netherlands, with as ultimate aim to come to a recommendation for a patient-centred follow-up schedule for stage I-III CRC patients treated with surgical resection with curative intent.

METHODS

This study is designed as a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial (SW-CRT) in six participating centres. During the trial, three centres will implement PHFU after six months; the other three centres will implement PHFU after 12 months of inclusion in the control group. Eligible patients are those with pT2-4N0M0 or pT1-4N1-2M0 CRC, who are 18 years or older and have been free of disease for 12 months after curative surgical resection. The studied intervention is PHFU, starting 12 months after curative resection. The in-hospital, standard-of-care follow-up currently implemented in the participating centres functions as the comparator. The proportion of patients who had contact with the hospital regarding CRC follow-up between 12-24 months after curative surgical resection is the primary endpoint of this study. Quality of life, fear of cancer recurrence, patient satisfaction, cost-effectiveness and survival are the secondary endpoints.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will provide evidence on whether nationwide implementation of PHFU for CRC in The Netherlands will be successful in reducing contact between patient and health care provider. Comparison of PROMs between in-hospital follow-up and PHFU will be provided. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of PHFU will be assessed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trail Register (NTR): NL9266 (Registered on January 1st, 2021).

Primary Colorectal Tumor Displays Differential Genomic Expression Profiles Associated with Hepatic and Peritoneal Metastases

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in characterization of CRC heterogeneity, appropriate risk stratification tools are still lacking in clinical practice. This study aimed to elucidate the primary tumor transcriptomic signatures associated with distinct metastatic routes.

METHODS

Primary tumor specimens obtained from CRC patients with either isolated LM (CRC-Liver) or PM (CRC-Peritoneum) were analyzed by transcriptomic mRNA sequencing, gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) and immunohistochemistry. We further assessed the clinico-pathological associations and prognostic value of our signature in the COAD-TCGA independent cohort.

RESULTS

We identified a significantly different distribution of Consensus Molecular Subtypes between CRC-Liver and CRC-peritoneum groups. A transcriptomic signature based on 61 genes discriminated between liver and peritoneal metastatic routes. GSEA showed a higher expression of immune response and epithelial invasion pathways in CRC-Peritoneum samples and activation of proliferation and metabolic pathways in CRC-Liver samples. The biological relevance of RNA-Seq results was validated by the immunohistochemical expression of three significantly differentially expressed genes (ACE2, CLDN18 and DUSP4) in our signature. In silico analysis of the COAD-TCGA showed that the CRC-Peritoneum signature was associated with negative prognostic factors and poor overall and disease-free survivals.

CONCLUSIONS

CRC primary tumors spreading to the liver and peritoneum display significantly different transcriptomic profiles. The implementation of this signature in clinical practice could contribute to identify new therapeutic targets for stage IV CRC and to define individualized follow-up programs in stage II-III CRC.

Effect of High-Versus Low-Frequency of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Follow-Up Testing on Overall Survival in Patients With Stage II Or III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Intensive surveillance of colon cancer by using the abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT) is common in real world practice; however, it is still unclear whether high-frequency surveillance using AP-CT in patients with these risk factors is superior to that in the low-frequency surveillance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1803 patients with stage II-III colon cancer receiving curative surgery between January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015. We evaluated the average scan-to-scan intervals of postoperative AP-CT testing and assigned patients with an interval of 5 to 8 and 9 to 13 months to the high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) groups, respectively. The cutoff value of preoperative and postoperative CEA levels was 5 ng/mL. We also applied propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

We matched 1:1 for each surveillance group yielding a cohort of 776 matched patients. After PSM, Baseline demographics were overall well balanced between 2 groups. Stage III (OR, 2.00; 95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.21-3.30) and postoperative CEA elevation (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.08-4.92) were independent risk factors of recurrence in multivariate analyses. Patient in the HF group had more surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment than patient in the LF group (46.2% vs. 23.1%, P = .017). This trend was retained after PSM, although it is not significant (44.4% vs. 23.1%, P = .060). However, survival outcomes of high-frequency AP-CT surveillance were not superior to those of low-frequency surveillance in all subgroups, including stage III (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.40-2.47) and postoperative CEA elevation (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.45-4.11).

CONCLUSION

High-frequency AP-CT testing is associated with a higher proportion of surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment, without improvement in 5-year overall survival.

High resection rates of colorectal liver metastases after standardized follow-up and multimodal management: an outcome study within the COLOFOL trial

BACKGROUND

Outcome after colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) resection has improved over time, despite increased resection rates. Hence, it's crucial to identify all patients possible to treat with curative intent. The objectives of this study were to map recurrence pattern, treatment strategy and survival depending on treatment and follow-up strategy.

METHODS

In the COLOFOL-trial, patients with radically resected stage II-III colorectal cancer were randomized to high-frequency (6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months; HF) or low-frequency (12 and 36 months; LF) follow-up. In this study, all CRLM within 5 years were identified and medical files scrutinized. Overall survival (OS) was analysed in uni- and multivariable analyses. Primary endpoint was 5-year OS.

RESULTS

Of 2442 patients, 235 (9.6%) developed metachronous CRLM of which 123 (52.3%) underwent treatment with curative intent, resulting in 5-year OS of 58%. Five-year OS for patients with CRLM was 43% after HF versus 24% after LF. The survival benefit was confirmed for HF 8 years from resection of the primary tumour, HR 0.63 (CI 0.46-0.85).

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of metachronous CRLM was possible to treat with curative intent, yielding high survival rates. More intense follow-up after colorectal cancer resection might be of value in high-risk patients.

Treatment and survival of patients with metachronous colorectal lung metastases

INTRODUCTION

The lungs are the second most common site for metachronous metastases in colorectal cancer. No treatment algorithm is established, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. This study aimed to map pulmonary recurrences in a modern multimodal treated population, and to evaluate survival depending on management.

METHODS

Retrospective study based on the COLOFOL-trial population of 2442 patients, radically resected for colorectal cancer stage II-III. All recurrences within 5 years were identified and medical records were scrutinized.

RESULTS

Of 165 (6.8%) patients developing lung metastases as first recurrence, 89 (54%) were confined to the lungs. Potentially curative treatment was possible in 62 (37%) cases, of which 33 with surgery only and 29 with surgery and chemotherapy combined. The 5-year overall survival (5-year OS) for all lung recurrences was 28%. In patients treated with chemotherapy only the 5-year OS was 7.5%, compared with 55% in patients treated with surgery, and 72% when surgery was combined with chemotherapy. Hazard ratio for mortality was 2.9 (95% confidence interval 1.40-6.10) for chemotherapy only compared to surgery.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of metachronous lung metastases after colorectal surgery were possible to resect, yielding good survival. The combination of surgery and chemotherapy might be advantageous for survival.

Imaging in rhabdomyosarcoma: a patient journey

Rhabdomyosarcoma, although rare, is the most frequent soft tissue sarcoma in children and adolescents. It can present as a mass at nearly any site in the body, with most common presentations in the head and neck, genitourinary tract and extremities. The optimal diagnostic approach and management of rhabdomyosarcoma require a multidisciplinary team with multimodal treatment, including chemotherapy and local therapy. Survival has improved over the last decades; however, further improvement in management is essential with current 5-year overall survival ranging from 35% to 100%, depending on disease and patient characteristics. In the full patient journey, from diagnosis, staging, management to follow-up after therapy, the paediatric radiologist and nuclear physician are essential members of the multidisciplinary team. Recently, guidelines of the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group, the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe and the Oncology Task Force of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR), in an ongoing collaboration with the International Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Database Consortium, provided guidance for high-quality imaging. In this educational paper, given as a lecture during the 2022 postgraduate ESPR course, the multi-disciplinary team of our national paediatric oncology centre presents the journey of two patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and discusses the impact on and considerations for the clinical (paediatric) radiologist and nuclear physician. The key learning points of the guidelines and their implementation in clinical practice are highlighted and up-to-date insights provided for all aspects from clinical suspicion of rhabdomyosarcoma and its differential diagnosis, to biopsy, staging, risk stratification, treatment response assessment and follow-up.

Reliable capillary sampling of carcinoembryonic antigen at home: the CASA feasibility study

AIM

Follow-up after colorectal cancer requires frequent surveillance of the tumour marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Home-based blood sampling could be beneficial in terms of patients' well-being and societal cost-effectiveness. Blood sampling by venepuncture is unsuitable for home-based sampling. The aim of this feasibility study is to evaluate the long-term whole-blood stability of CEA.

METHOD

In this prospective feasibility study capillary blood withdrawal was collected in a Hem-Col^® microtube containing a patented stabilization buffer using an internal lithium standard to correct for dilution. Long-term whole-blood stability was considered adequate if the relative bias in CEA concentration between delayed analysis of capillary samples and directly processed venepuncture is within the total error margin of CEA.

RESULTS

Twenty two colorectal cancer patients were included to determine the stability of CEA in capillary sampling compared with directly processed (i.e. within 2 h) venepuncture sampling. The median time between venous sampling and CEA analysis and capillary sampling and CEA analysis was 2 h (interquartile range 1-4 h) and 76 h (interquartile range 74-95 h), respectively. A Bland-Altman difference plot excluding outliers showed an overall relative bias of -1.23%. The two capillary samples in our outlier analysis also showed the highest lithium concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Home-based capillary sampling with the use of the Hem-Col^® buffer is a feasible method for CEA determination when analysed within 4 days after blood withdrawal, allowing monitoring for colorectal cancer patients from home. High lithium concentrations due to insufficient filling of the Hem-Col^® tube suggest less reliable CEA measurements.

Is a less-intensive follow-up for colon cancer in early stages reasonable?

PURPOSE

Patients with colon cancer are usually included in an intensive 5-year surveillance protocol after curative resection, independent of the tumor stage, though early stages have a considerably lower risk of recurrence. The aim of this study was to analyze the adherence to an intensive follow-up and the risk of recurrence in patients with colon cancer in UICC stages I and II.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we assessed patients who underwent resection for colon cancer in UICC stages I and II between 2007 and 2016. Data were collected on demographics, tumor stages, therapy, surveillance, recurrent disease, and oncological outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 232 included patients, 43.5% (n = 101) reached the 5-year follow-up disease-free. Seven (7.5%) patients in stage UICC I and sixteen (11.5%) in UICC II had a recurrence, with the highest risk in patients with pT4 (26.3%). A metachronous colon cancer was detected in four patients (1.7%). The therapy of recurrence was intended to be curative in 57.1% (n = 4) of UICC stage I and in 43.8% (n = 7) of UICC stage II, but only in one of seven patients over 80 years. 44.8% (n = 104) of the patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A postoperative surveillance in patients with colon cancer is important and recommended as a recurrent disease can be treated successfully in many patients. However, we suggest that a less intensive surveillance protocol is reasonable for patients with colon cancer in early tumor stages, especially in UICC stage I, as the risk of recurrent disease is low. With elderly and/or frail patients in a reduced general condition, who will not endure further specific therapy in case of a recurrence, the performance of the surveillance should be discussed: we recommend a significant reduction or even renunciation.

Management of treatment-related sequelae following colorectal cancer

AIM

Colorectal cancer survivors are one of the most rapidly growing groups of patients living with and beyond cancer. In a national multidisciplinary setting, we have examined the extent of late treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors and present the scientific evidence for management of these conditions in this patient category with the aim of facilitating identification and treatment.

METHOD

A systematic search for existing guidelines and relevant studies was performed across 16 and 4 databases, respectively, from inception to 2021. This yielded 13 guidelines and 886 abstracts, of which 188 were included in the finalized guideline (231 included for full text review). Secondarily, bibliographies were cross-referenced and 53 additional articles were included.

RESULTS

Symptoms have been divided into overall categories including psychosocial, bowel-related, urinary, sexual (male and female), pain/neuropathy and fatigue symptoms or complaints that are examined individually. Merging and grading of data resulted in 22 recommendations and 42 management strategies across categories. Recommendations are of a more general character, whereas management strategies provide more practical advice suited for initiation on site before referral to specialized units.

CONCLUSION

Treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors are common and attention needs to be focused on identifying patients with unmet treatment needs and the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms.

Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations

Different follow-up strategies are available for patients with rectal cancer following curative treatment. A combination of biochemical testing and imaging investigation, associated with physical examination are commonly used. However, there is currently no consensus about the types of tests to perform, the timing of the testing, and even the need for follow-up at all has been questioned. The aim of this study was to review the evidence of the impact of different follow-up tests and programs in patients with non-metastatic disease after definitive treatment of the primary. A literature review was performed of studies published on MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to November 2022. Current published guidelines from the most authoritative specialty societies were also reviewed. According to the follow-up strategies available, the office visit is not efficient but represents the only way to maintain direct contact with the patient and is recommended by all authoritative specialty societies. In colorectal cancer surveillance, carcinoembryonic antigen represents the only established tumor marker. Abdominal and chest computed tomography scan is recommended considering that the liver and lungs are the most common sites of recurrence. Since local relapse in rectal cancer is higher than in colon cancer, endoscopic surveillance is mandatory. Different follow-up regimens have been published but randomized comparisons and meta-analyses do not allow to determine whether intensive or less intensive follow-up had any significant influence on survival and recurrence detection rate. The available data do not allow the drawing of final conclusions on the ideal surveillance methods and the frequency with which they should be applied. It is very useful and urgent for clinicians to identify a cost-effective strategy that allows early identification of recurrence with a special focus for high-risk patients and patients undergoing a “watch and wait” approach.

Colonoscopy, imaging, and carcinoembryonic antigen: Comparison of guideline adherence to surveillance strategies in patients who underwent resection of colorectal cancer - A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Almost one-third of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) experience recurrence after resection. Adherence to surveillance guidelines largely dictates efficacy in early detection of recurrence. We sought to assess and compare adherence to postoperative surveillance guidelines for colonoscopy, imaging, and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA).

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL were systematically searched. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed and pooled adherence to each surveillance strategy was assessed for CEA, imaging, and colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Overall 14 studies (55,895 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Adherence to colonoscopy guidelines was the highest (70%, 95%CI 67-73), followed by imaging (63%, 95%CI 47-80), and CEA (54%; 95%CI 42-66). Among 7 (50%) studies that examined adherence to the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, compliance with colonoscopy was the highest (73%; 95% CI 70-76), followed by imaging (58%; 95% CI 37-78), and CEA (45%; 95%CI 37-52). Of note, guideline adherence to CEA testing was much lower than colonoscopy among patients with colon (OR 0.21; 95%CI 0.20-0.22) and rectal cancer (OR 0.25; 95%CI 0.23-0.28) (both p < 0.05). This was also noted when compared with imaging recommendations among older patients (OR = 0.62; 95%CI 0.42-0.93) and patients with stage II, (OR = 0.80; 95%CI 0.76-0.84) and stage III disease (OR = 0.88; 95%CI 0.82-0.94) (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While guideline adherence to postoperative surveillance with colonoscopy was high, adherence to CEA testing and imaging surveillance strategies was markedly lower following CRC resection. Future studies should investigate avenues to improve compliance with surveillance guidelines among health care providers and patients to optimize postoperative follow-up for CRC.

Oncological surgery follow-up and quality of life: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous trials found that more intensive postoperative surveillance schedules did not improve survival. Oncological follow-up also provides an opportunity to address psychological issues (for example anxiety, depression, and fear of recurrence). This systematic review assessed the impact of a less intensive surveillance strategy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), emotional well-being, and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane database, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar to identify studies comparing different follow-up strategies after oncological surgery and their effect on HRQoL and patient satisfaction, published before 4 May 2022. A meta-analysis was conducted on the most relevant European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale subscales.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were identified, focusing on melanoma (4), colorectal (10), breast (7), prostate (4), upper gastrointestinal (4), gynaecological (3), lung (2), and head and neck (1) cancers. Twenty-two studies were considered to have a low risk of bias, of which 14 showed no significant difference in HRQoL between follow-up approaches. Five studies with a low risk of bias showed improved HRQoL or emotional well-being with a less intensive follow-up approach and three with an intensive approach. Meta-analysis of HRQoL outcomes revealed no negative effects for patients receiving less intensive follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Low-intensity follow-up does not diminish HRQoL, emotional well-being, or patient satisfaction.

Identifying Recurrences Among Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Using National Health Data Registries: Validation and Optimization of a Registry-Based Algorithm in a Modern Danish Cohort

Purpose

Colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence is not routinely recorded in Danish health data registries. Here, we aimed to revalidate a registry-based algorithm to identify recurrences in a contemporary cohort and to investigate the accuracy of estimating the time to recurrence (TTR).

Patients and Methods

We ascertained data on 1129 patients operated for UICC TNM stage I-III CRC during 2012-2017 registered in the CRC biobank at the Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Individual-level data were linked with data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, Danish Cancer Registry, Danish National Registry of Patients, and Danish Pathology Registry. The algorithm identified recurrence based on diagnosis codes of local recurrence or metastases, the receipt of chemotherapy, or a pathological tissue assessment code of recurrence more than 180 days after CRC surgery. A subgroup was selected for validation of the algorithm using medical record reviews as a reference standard.

Results

We found a 3-year cumulative recurrence rate of 20% (95% CI: 17-22%). Manual medical record review identified 80 recurrences in the validation cohort of 522 patients. The algorithm detected recurrence with 94% sensitivity (75/80; 95% CI: 86-98%) and 98% specificity (431/442; 95% CI: 96-99%). The positive and negative predictive values of the algorithm were 87% (95% CI: 78-93%) and 99% (95% CI: 97-100%), respectively. The median difference in TTR (TTR_{Medical_chart}-TTR_algorithm) was -8 days (IQR: -21 to +3 days). Restricting the algorithm to chemotherapy codes from oncology departments increased the positive predictive value from 87% to 94% without changing the negative predictive value (99%).

Conclusion

The algorithm detected recurrence and TTR with high precision in this contemporary cohort. Restriction to chemotherapy codes from oncology departments using department classifications improves the algorithm. The algorithm is suitable for use in future observational studies.

Circulating Tumor DNA, Imaging, and Carcinoembryonic Antigen: Comparison of Surveillance Strategies Among Patients Who Underwent Resection of Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Almost one-third of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients experience recurrence after resection; nevertheless, follow-up strategies remain controversial. We sought to systematically assess and compare the accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), imaging [positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans], and circulating tumor DNA (CtDNA) as surveillance strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL were systematically searched. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess methodological quality. We performed a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and reported pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) values for each surveillance strategy.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the analysis. PET scans had the highest sensitivity to detect recurrence (0.95; 95%CI 0.91-0.97), followed by CT scans (0.77; 95%CI 0.67-0.85). CtDNA positivity had the highest specificity to detect recurrence (0.95; 95%CI 0.91-0.97), followed by increased CEA levels (0.88; 95%CI 0.82-0.92). Furthermore, PET scans had the highest DOR to detect recurrence (DOR 120.7; 95%CI 48.9-297.9) followed by CtDNA (DOR 37.6; 95%CI 20.8-68.0).

CONCLUSION

PET scans had the highest sensitivity and DOR to detect recurrence, while CtDNA had the highest specificity and second highest DOR. Combinations of traditional cross-sectional/functional imaging and newer platforms such as CtDNA may result in optimized surveillance of patients following resection of CRC.

Follow-up strategy and survival for five common cancers: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intensive follow-up after curative intent treatment for five common solid tumours, in terms of survival and treatment of recurrences.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted, identifying comparative studies on follow-up for colorectal, lung, breast, upper gastro-intestinal and prostate cancer. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and treatment of recurrences. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, with particular focus on studies at low risk of bias.

RESULTS

Fourteen out of 63 studies were considered to be at low risk of bias (8 colorectal, 4 breast, 0 lung, 1 upper gastro-intestinal, 1 prostate). These studies showed no significant impact of intensive follow-up on OS (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) for colorectal (0.99; 0.92-1.06), breast 1.06 (0.92-1.23), upper gastro-intestinal (0.78; 0.51-1.19) and prostate cancer (1.00; 0.86-1.16). No impact on CSS (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) was found for colorectal cancer (0.94; 0.77-1.16). CSS was not reported for other cancer types. Intensive follow-up increased the rate of curative treatment (relative risk; 95% confidence interval) for colorectal cancer recurrences (1.30; 1.05-1.61), but not for upper gastro-intestinal cancer recurrences (0.92; 0.47-1.81). For the other cancer types, no data on treatment of recurrences was available in low risk studies.

CONCLUSION

For colorectal and breast cancer, high quality studies do not suggest an impact of intensive follow-up strategies on survival. Colorectal cancer recurrences are more often treated locally after intensive follow-up. For other cancer types evaluated, limited high quality research on follow-up is available.

Provider imaging practices and outcomes of advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the real-world utilization of computerized tomography (CT) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and the associated outcomes.

METHODS

Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (2008-2016), we identified patients with CRC receiving combination of chemotherapies (fluoropyrimidines with either oxaliplatin or irinotecan, or capecitabine with either oxaliplatin or irinotecan) combined with bevacizumab as the initial treatment, and its starting date was registered as the index date. End of treatment was defined by the presence of a gap in therapy > 60 days or treatment switch. We assessed the CT scan utilization during the period between 60 days pre-index and 30 days post-end of treatment. Cox regressions were performed to assess the impact of intensity of follow-up CT scans, measured by time to the first scan from the index date, on likelihood of treatment switch and survival.

RESULTS

Among included 4,810 patients, the median (standard deviation) time to the first follow-up scan was 57 (45) days. The mean and median number of CT scans was 4 and 3, respectively. An earlier follow-up scan was associated with significantly greater chance of treatment switch (hazard ratio = 0.99 for each day of delay, P < 0.01), and greater likelihood of death (hazard ratio = 0.99 for each day of delay, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

More intense follow-up increased the likelihood of treatment switch, yet it was not associated with better survival outcome. Further analysis in populations with longer follow-up period is warranted to elucidate the link between CT scan utilization and outcomes.

Follow-up of curatively treated cancer in primary care: a qualitative study of the views of Dutch GPs

Background

Follow-up for cancer typically occurs in secondary care, and improved survival has increased demands on these services. Other care models may alleviate this burden, such as moving (parts of) follow-up care for curatively treated patients from secondary to primary care (care substitution).

Aim

To explore the opinions of GPs regarding the potential benefits, barriers, and requirements of care substitution for breast and colorectal cancer.

Design and setting

A qualitative study of the opinions of purposively sampled GPs in Dutch primary care.

Method

Focus group sessions and individual semi-structured interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed by two independent researchers using thematic analysis.

Results

Two focus groups (n = 14) were conducted followed by nine individual interviews. Three main themes were identified: perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and perceived requirements. Perceived benefits included better accessibility and continuity of care, and care closer to patients’ homes. Uncertainty about cancer-related competences and practical objections were perceived as barriers. Requirements included close specialist collaboration, support from patients for this change, and stepwise implementation to avoid loss of existing care quality.

Conclusion

Most GPs reported that they were not in favour of complete care substitution, but that primary care could have greater formal involvement in oncological follow-up if there is close collaboration with secondary care (that is, shared care), support from patients, sufficient resource allocation, stepwise implementation with clear guidelines, and monitoring of quality. Clear and broadly supported protocols need to be developed and tested before implementing follow-up in primary care.

Longitudinal changes in personalized platelet count metrics are good indicators of initial 3-year outcome in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Platelet count or complete blood count (CBC)-based ratios including lymphocyte-to-monocyte (LMR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), hemoglobin-to-platelet (HPR), red blood cell count distribution width-to-platelet (RPR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratio are good predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. Their change in time is not well documented, however.

AIM

To investigate the effect of longitudinal CBC ratio changes on CRC survival and their possible associations with clinicopathological properties, comorbidities, and anamnestic data.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal observational study was conducted with the inclusion of 835 CRC patients, who attended at Semmelweis University, Budapest. CBC ratios and two additional newly defined personalized platelet count metrics (pPLT_D and pPLT_S, the platelet counts relative to the measurement at the time of CRC diagnosis and to the one 4-6 wk after tumor removal surgery, respectively) were recorded.

RESULTS

The 835 CRC patients had a total of 4608 measurements (5.52 visits/patient, in average). Longitudinal survival models revealed that the increases/decreases in LMR [hazard ratio (HR): 0.4989, P < 0.0001], NLR (HR: 1.0819, P < 0.0001), HPR (HR: 0.0533, P = 0.0038), pPLT_D (HR: 4.9229, P < 0.0001), and pPLT_S (HR: 4.7568, P < 0.0001) values were poor prognostic signs of disease-specific survival. The same was obtained for all-cause mortality. Most abnormal changes occurred within the first 3 years after the diagnosis of CRC. RPR and PLR had an only marginal effect on disease-specific (P = 0.0675) and all-cause mortality (Bayesian 95% credible interval: 0.90–186.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

LMR, NLR, and HPR are good metrics to follow the prognosis of the disease. pPLT_D and pPLT_S perform just as well as the former, while the use of RPR and PLR with the course of the disease is not recommended. Early detection of the abnormal changes in pPLT_D, pPLT_S, LMR, NLR, or HPR may alert the practicing oncologist for further therapy decisions in a timely manner.

Detection of methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 after curative-intent treatment as a prognostic indicator for colorectal cancer recurrence

BACKGROUND

The risk of recurrence after completion of curative-intent treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) is hard to predict. Post-treatment assaying for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an encouraging approach for stratifying patients for therapy, but the prognostic value of this approach is less explored. This study aimed to determine if detection of methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 following completion of initial treatment identified patients with a poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS).

METHODS

142 CRC stage I-III cases with at least 2 years of follow up (unless recurrence was evident sooner) and a methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 test result between 2 weeks and 12 months after completion of initial treatment were eligible for study inclusion. The association between BCAT1/IKZF1 and RFS was assessed by the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) method. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used for multivariable survival analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (23.2%) had recurrence at a median 1.6y (interquartile range: 0.8-2.4). Methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 was detected in 19 of the 142 patients (13.4%) and was associated with a significant risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 5.7, 95%CI: 1.9-17.3, p = 0.002). Three-year RFS for patients with or without detectable methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 was 56.5% and 83.3%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that detection of methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 (HR = 2.6, p = 0.049) and site of the primary tumor (HR = 4.2, p = 0.002) were the only significant prognostic indicators of poor RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

BCAT1/IKZF1 methylation testing after curative-intent treatment is an independent prognostic indicator for RFS and identifies a subgroup at high risk. Personalized surveillance is warranted for patients with these ctDNA biomarkers detectable after curative-intent treatment.