1
|
Swartz HA, Bylsma Ph D LM. Should Psychotherapy Be Approved and Prescribed Like a Drug? Am J Psychother 2024; 77:43-45. [PMID: 38877754 DOI: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20240015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Holly A Swartz
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh
| | - Lauren M Bylsma Ph D
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
CHO TED, GOWDA VRUSHAB, SCHULZRINNE HENNING, MILLER BRIANJ. Integrated Devices: A New Regulatory Pathway to Promote Revolutionary Innovation. Milbank Q 2024; 102:367-382. [PMID: 38253988 PMCID: PMC11176405 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Policy Points Current medical device regulatory frameworks date back half a century and are ill suited for the next generation of medical devices that involve a significant software component. Existing Food and Drug Administration efforts are insufficient because of a lack of statutory authority, whereas international examples offer lessons for improving and harmonizing domestic medical device regulatory policy. A voluntary alternative pathway built upon two-stage review with individual component review followed by holistic review for integrated devices would provide regulators with new tools to address a changing medical device marketplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- TED CHO
- University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - BRIAN J. MILLER
- The Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
- The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School
- American Enterprise Institute
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bozuyuk U, Wrede P, Yildiz E, Sitti M. Roadmap for Clinical Translation of Mobile Microrobotics. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2024; 36:e2311462. [PMID: 38380776 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202311462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Medical microrobotics is an emerging field to revolutionize clinical applications in diagnostics and therapeutics of various diseases. On the other hand, the mobile microrobotics field has important obstacles to pass before clinical translation. This article focuses on these challenges and provides a roadmap of medical microrobots to enable their clinical use. From the concept of a "magic bullet" to the physicochemical interactions of microrobots in complex biological environments in medical applications, there are several translational steps to consider. Clinical translation of mobile microrobots is only possible with a close collaboration between clinical experts and microrobotics researchers to address the technical challenges in microfabrication, safety, and imaging. The clinical application potential can be materialized by designing microrobots that can solve the current main challenges, such as actuation limitations, material stability, and imaging constraints. The strengths and weaknesses of the current progress in the microrobotics field are discussed and a roadmap for their clinical applications in the near future is outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugur Bozuyuk
- Physical Intelligence Department, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Paul Wrede
- Physical Intelligence Department, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8093, Switzerland
| | - Erdost Yildiz
- Physical Intelligence Department, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Metin Sitti
- Physical Intelligence Department, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany
- School of Medicine and College of Engineering, Koc University, Istanbul, 34450, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Szewczyk T, Sinha MS, Gerling J, Zhang JK, Mercier P, Mattei TA. Health Care Fraud and Abuse: Lessons From One of the Largest Scandals of the 21st Century in the Field of Spine Surgery. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2024; 5:e452. [PMID: 38911625 PMCID: PMC11191893 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Up to hundreds of billions of dollars are annually lost to fraud and abuse in the US health care, making it a significant burden on the system. This study investigates a specific instance of health care fraud in spine surgery, in which a medical device company ended up paying $75 million to settle violations of the False Claims Act. We review the surgical background regarding the kyphoplasty procedure, as well as its billing and reimbursement details. We also explore the official legal complaint brought by the US Department of Justice to tell the story of how one of the most significant medical innovations in spine surgery in the 21st century turned into a widespread fraudulent marketing scheme. In the sequence, we provide a detailed root cause analysis of this scandal and propose some proactive measures that can be taken to avoid such type of unfortunate events. Ultimately, this historical health care scandal constitutes a valuable lesson to surgeons, health care administrators, medical device companies, and policymakers on how misaligned incentives and subsequent unscrupulous practices can transform a medical innovation into an unfortunate tale of fraud and deceit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Szewczyk
- From the Division of Neurological Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Michael S. Sinha
- Center for Health Law Studies, Saint Louis University School of Law, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Jack Gerling
- From the Division of Neurological Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Justin K. Zhang
- From the Division of Neurological Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Philippe Mercier
- From the Division of Neurological Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Tobias A. Mattei
- From the Division of Neurological Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Athanasopoulos M, Samara P, Athanasopoulos I. Advances in 3D Inner Ear Reconstruction Software for Cochlear Implants: A Comprehensive Review. Methods Protoc 2024; 7:46. [PMID: 38921825 PMCID: PMC11207030 DOI: 10.3390/mps7030046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Auditory impairment stands as a pervasive global issue, exerting significant effects on individuals' daily functioning and interpersonal engagements. Cochlear implants (CIs) have risen as a cutting-edge solution for severe to profound hearing loss, directly stimulating the auditory nerve with electrical signals. The success of CI procedures hinges on precise pre-operative planning and post-operative evaluation, highlighting the significance of advanced three-dimensional (3D) inner ear reconstruction software. Accurate pre-operative imaging is vital for identifying anatomical landmarks and assessing cochlear deformities. Tools like 3D Slicer, Amira and OTOPLAN provide detailed depictions of cochlear anatomy, aiding surgeons in simulating implantation scenarios and refining surgical approaches. Post-operative scans play a crucial role in detecting complications and ensuring CI longevity. Despite technological advancements, challenges such as standardization and optimization persist. This review explores the role of 3D inner ear reconstruction software in patient selection, surgical planning, and post-operative assessment, tracing its evolution and emphasizing features like image segmentation and virtual simulation. It addresses software limitations and proposes solutions, advocating for their integration into clinical practice. Ultimately, this review underscores the impact of 3D inner ear reconstruction software on cochlear implantation, connecting innovation with precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Athanasopoulos
- Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Athens Pediatric Center, 15125 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (I.A.)
| | - Pinelopi Samara
- Children’s Oncology Unit “Marianna V. Vardinoyannis-ELPIDA”, Aghia Sophia Children’s Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Athanasopoulos
- Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Athens Pediatric Center, 15125 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (I.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gellasch P, Torraca M, Okun ML. Sleep and Mood Among Women With Histories of Depression When They Used a Responsive Infant Bassinet During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2024:S0884-2175(24)00035-2. [PMID: 38552674 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the experiences of women with histories of depression who used a responsive infant bassinet during the first 6 months after birth during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN Secondary qualitative descriptive study with analytic expansion. SETTING United States. PARTICIPANTS Women (N = 139) who gave birth up to 6 months previously and had histories of depression. METHODS We used Kyngäs's method of inductive content analysis to analyze 109 open-ended responses that were collected between August 2020 to November 2021 as part of a previously conducted longitudinal study of women who used a responsive bassinet. RESULTS Most participants indicated that the responsive bassinet improved their infants' sleep, which, in turn, subjectively improved their sleep and mood. External stressors and challenges presented barriers to good sleep for the participants and their infants, and participants described how these challenges contributed to their symptoms related to mood. When participants reported that they used the responsive bassinet, they shared that their infants were swaddled in the supine sleep position. Participants who did not use the bassinet commonly reported unsafe sleep practices. We identified seven themes from the data: Improved Maternal Sleep Quality, Barriers to Good Maternal Sleep, Mood and Sleep Go Hand and Hand, External Stressors Impair Mood, Improved Infant Sleep Quality, Barriers to Good Infant Sleep, and Safe Sleep Positioning. CONCLUSION These findings can be used to inform clinicians on how a responsive bassinet may offer women at high risk for postpartum depression improved sleep and instrumental support. Future researchers should use validated measures to objectively evaluate rates of postpartum depression and sleep quality in high-risk women when using a responsive bassinet.
Collapse
|
7
|
Aboy M, Crespo C, Stern A. Beyond the 510(k): The regulation of novel moderate-risk medical devices, intellectual property considerations, and innovation incentives in the FDA's De Novo pathway. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7:29. [PMID: 38332182 PMCID: PMC10853500 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01021-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Moderate-risk medical devices constitute 99% of those that have been regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since it gained authority to regulate medical technology nearly five decades ago. This article presents an analysis of the interaction between the 510(k) process -the historically dominant path to market for most medical devices- and the De Novo pathway, a more recent alternative that targets more novel devices, including those involving new technologies, diagnostics, hardware, and software. The De Novo pathway holds significant potential for innovators seeking to define new categories of medical devices, as it represents a less burdensome approach than would have otherwise been needed historically. Moreover, it supports the FDA in its effort to modernize the long-established 510(k) pathway by promoting the availability of up-to-date device "predicates" upon which subsequent device applications can be based, reflecting positive spillovers that are likely to encourage manufacturers to adopt current state-of-the-art technologies and modern standards of safety and effectiveness. We analyze the of characteristics all the De Novo classification requests to date, including the submission type, trends, FDA review times, and device types. After characterizing how the De Novo process has been used over time, we discuss its unique challenges and opportunities with respect to medical device software and AI-enabled devices, including considerations for intellectual property, innovation, and competition economics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateo Aboy
- Centre for Law, Medicine, and Life Sciences (LML), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Cristina Crespo
- Centre for Law, Medicine, and Life Sciences (LML), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ariel Stern
- Harvard Business School and Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Boston, MA, USA
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering, Potsdam, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Harkin KR, Sorensen J, Thomas S. Lifecycle evaluation of medical devices: supporting or jeopardizing patient outcomes? A comparative analysis of evaluation models. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2024; 40:e2. [PMID: 38179661 PMCID: PMC10859834 DOI: 10.1017/s026646232300274x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lack of evidence regarding safety and effectiveness at market entry is driving the need to consider adopting a lifecycle approach to evaluating medical devices, but it is unclear what lifecycle evaluation means. This research sought to explore the tacit meanings of "lifecycle" and "lifecycle evaluation" as embodied within evaluation models/frameworks used for medical devices. METHODS Drawing on qualitative evidence synthesis methods and using an inductive approach, novel methods were developed to identify, appraise, analyze, and synthesize lifecycle evaluation models used for medical devices. Data was extracted (including purpose; audience; characterization; outputs; timing; and type of model) from key texts for coding, categorization, and comparison, exploring embodied meaning across four broad perspectives. RESULTS Fifty-two models were included in the synthesis. They demonstrated significant heterogeneity of meaning, form, scope, timing, and purpose. The "lifecycle" may represent a single stage, a series of stages, a cycle of innovation, or a system. "Lifecycle evaluation" focuses on the overarching goal of the stakeholder group, and may use a single or repeated evaluation to inform decision-making regarding the adoption of health technologies (Healthcare), resource allocation (Policymaking), investment in new product development or marketing (Trade and Industry), or market regulation (Regulation). The adoption of a lifecycle approach by regulators has resulted in the deferral of evidence generation to the post-market phase. CONCLUSIONS Using a "lifecycle evaluation" approach to inform reimbursement decision-making must not be allowed to further jeopardize evidence generation and patient safety by accepting inadequate evidence of safety and effectiveness for reimbursement decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen R. Harkin
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin (TCD), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jan Sorensen
- RCSI Healthcare Outcomes Research Centre, School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Steve Thomas
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin (TCD), Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Konnick EQ. Point: The Need for Additional FDA Regulations in Laboratory Medicine. J Appl Lab Med 2024; 9:151-154. [PMID: 38167766 DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfad084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Q Konnick
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pacheco-Barrios K, Gianlorenco AC, Camargo L, Dodurgali MR, Tangjade A, Fregni F. Accelerating the development of noninvasive brain stimulation devices: using design thinking to facilitate its clinical use and acceptance. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:5-9. [PMID: 38149610 PMCID: PMC10983014 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2292733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| | - Anna Carolyna Gianlorenco
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, Brazil
| | - Lucas Camargo
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mustafa Reha Dodurgali
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Anamon Tangjade
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vajira hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Felipe Fregni
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dhruva SS, Kesselheim AS, Woloshin S, Ji RZ, Lu Z, Darrow JJ, Redberg RF. Physicians' Perspectives On FDA Regulation Of Drugs And Medical Devices: A National Survey. Health Aff (Millwood) 2024; 43:27-35. [PMID: 38190596 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Physicians' knowledge of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval processes is important in informing clinical decisions and patient discussions. Among a randomly selected national sample of 509 internists, cardiologists, and oncologists, 41 percent reported moderate or better understanding of the FDA's drug approval process, and 17 percent reported moderate or better understanding of the FDA's medical device approval process. Nearly all physicians thought that randomized, blinded trials that met primary endpoints should be very important factors required to secure regulatory approval. Also, nearly all physicians thought that the FDA should revoke approval for accelerated-approval drugs or breakthrough devices that did not show benefit in postapproval studies. Our findings suggest that physicians commonly lack familiarity with drug and medical device regulatory practices and are under the impression that the data supporting FDA drug and high-risk device approvals are more rigorous than they often are. Physicians would value more rigorous premarket evidence, as well as regulatory action for drugs and devices that do not demonstrate safety and effectiveness in the postmarket setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanket S Dhruva
- Sanket S. Dhruva , University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Aaron S Kesselheim
- Aaron S. Kesselheim, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Robin Z Ji
- Robin Z. Ji, University of California San Francisco
| | - Zhigang Lu
- Zhigang Lu, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University
| | - Jonathan J Darrow
- Jonathan J. Darrow, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mejía-Granda CM, Fernández-Alemán JL, Carrillo-de-Gea JM, García-Berná JA. Security vulnerabilities in healthcare: an analysis of medical devices and software. Med Biol Eng Comput 2024; 62:257-273. [PMID: 37789249 PMCID: PMC10758361 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-023-02912-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
The integration of IoT in healthcare has introduced vulnerabilities in medical devices and software, posing risks to patient safety and system integrity. This study aims to bridge the research gap and provide valuable insights for addressing healthcare vulnerabilities and their mitigation mechanisms. Software vulnerabilities related to health systems from 2001 to 2022 were collected from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) systematized by software developed by the researchers and assessed by a medical specialist for their impact on patient well-being. The analysis revealed electronic health records, wireless infusion pumps, endoscope cameras, and radiology information systems as the most vulnerable. In addition, critical vulnerabilities were identified, including poor credential management and hard-coded credentials. The investigation provides some insights into the consequences of vulnerabilities in health software products, projecting future security issues by 2025, offers mitigation suggestions, and highlights trends in attacks on life support and health systems are also provided. The healthcare industry needs significant improvements in protecting medical devices from cyberattacks. Securing communication channels and network schema and adopting secure software practices is necessary. In addition, collaboration, regulatory adherence, and continuous security monitoring are crucial. Industries, researchers, and stakeholders can utilize these findings to enhance security and safeguard patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos M Mejía-Granda
- Department of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
| | - José L Fernández-Alemán
- Department of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain
| | - Juan M Carrillo-de-Gea
- Department of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain
| | - José A García-Berná
- Department of Informatics and Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Werner RM, Soffa AN. Considerations for the development of a field-based medical device for the administration of adjunctive therapies for snakebite envenoming. Toxicon X 2023; 20:100169. [PMID: 37661997 PMCID: PMC10474190 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2023.100169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The timely administration of antivenom is the most effective method currently available to reduce the burden of snakebite envenoming (SBE), a neglected tropical disease that most often affects rural agricultural global populations. There is increasing interest in the development of adjunctive small molecule and biologic therapeutics that target the most problematic venom components to bridge the time-gap between initial SBE and the administration antivenom. Unique combinations of these therapeutics could provide relief from the toxic effects of regional groupings of medically relevant snake species. The application a PRISMA/PICO literature search methodology demonstrated an increasing interest in the rapid administration of therapies to improve patient symptoms and outcomes after SBE. Advice from expert interviews and considerations regarding the potential routes of therapy administration, anatomical bite location, and species-specific venom delivery have provided a framework to identify ideal metrics and potential hurdles for the development of a field-based medical device that could be used immediately after SBE to deliver adjunctive therapies. The use of subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) injection were identified as potential routes of administration of both small molecule and biologic therapies. The development of a field-based medical device for the delivery of adjunctive SBE therapies presents unique challenges that will require a collaborative and transdisciplinary approach to be successful.
Collapse
|
14
|
Chan BCF. The Challenges in Conducting Economic Evaluations for Rehabilitation Technologies. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2023; 29:44-52. [PMID: 38174139 PMCID: PMC10759881 DOI: 10.46292/sci23-00035s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Background Health technology assessment (HTA) is an important evidentiary component in the decision-making process for the adoption of new healthcare technologies to the healthcare system. Economic evidence is an important consideration in HTAs. Recent systematic reviews in rehabilitation have shown a limited number of economic evaluations and high levels of uncertainty in the results. It is unclear whether there are challenges related to the field of rehabilitation and the technologies used in rehabilitation that inhibit the development of economic evidence. Methods In this study, economic evaluations in rehabilitation were reviewed. This was followed by a summary of the latest evidence on the challenges of conducting HTA for medical devices and the relationship with rehabilitation technologies. Finally, several considerations are suggested to improve the HTA of technologies that target rehabilitation. A literature review of Google Scholar and PubMed was conducted to identify reviews in economic evaluations in rehabilitation. A recent review on the barriers to HTA of medical devices in general was also examined to identify similar concerns with rehabilitation technologies. Results The challenges identified include the lack of high-quality studies, the interaction between the technology and the user, the short product life cycle, and estimation of efficacy in technologies with multiple target populations. Conclusion Overall, many of the challenges in evaluating medical devices also apply to rehabilitation interventions. Further research and discussion on these issues are necessary to increase the clinical evidence for rehabilitation technologies, strengthen the development of HTAs, and facilitate the use of technologies to improve the health of individuals requiring rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Chun-Fai Chan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wu J, Yao H, Yu L, Li H, Zuo Y, Liu W, Zhang C, Fu C, Liu M. A novel 3D printed type II silk fibroin/polycaprolactone mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Biomater Sci 2023; 11:7203-7215. [PMID: 37750690 DOI: 10.1039/d3bm01158e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is one of the common diseases in middle-aged and elderly women, caused by weakened pelvic floor muscle ligament tissue support. Pelvic floor reconstruction with mesh implantation has been proven to be an effective treatment for POP. However, traditional non-degradable and inflexible pelvic floor implantation meshes have been associated with pain, vaginal infections, and the need for additional surgeries. In this study, novel meshes with pre-designed structures were fabricated with solution-based electrohydrodynamic printing (EHDP) technology, using a series of polycaprolactone/silk fibroin composites as bioinks. The PCL/SF mesh mechanical performances were particularly enhanced with the addition of silk II, leading it to obtain higher adaptability with soft tissue repair. The mesh containing SF showed more robust degradation performance in the in vitro degradation assay. Furthermore, biocompatibility tests conducted on mouse embryonic fibroblasts (NIH/3T3) revealed enhanced cell affinity. Finally, the biocompatibility and tissue repair properties of PCL/SF mesh were verified through the implantation of meshes in the muscle defect site of mice. The results demonstrated that the 3D printed PCL/SF mesh prepared by EHDP exhibits superior mechanical properties, biocompatibility, biodegradability, as well as ligament and muscle fiber repair ability. The novel implantable meshes are promising for curing POP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingya Wu
- Department of Gynecology, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, 519050, China.
| | - Hai Yao
- Center for Peak of Excellence on Biological Science and Food Engineering, National University of Singapore (Suzhou) Research Institute, Suzhou, 215004, China.
| | - Lili Yu
- Center for Peak of Excellence on Biological Science and Food Engineering, National University of Singapore (Suzhou) Research Institute, Suzhou, 215004, China.
| | - Huawen Li
- Department of Gynecology, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, 519050, China.
| | - Yan Zuo
- Department of Gynecology, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, 519050, China.
| | - Wenjun Liu
- Department of Research and Development, Zhejiang Zhongwei Medical Research Center, Hangzhou, 310018, China
| | - Chunye Zhang
- Center for Peak of Excellence on Biological Science and Food Engineering, National University of Singapore (Suzhou) Research Institute, Suzhou, 215004, China.
| | - Caili Fu
- Center for Peak of Excellence on Biological Science and Food Engineering, National University of Singapore (Suzhou) Research Institute, Suzhou, 215004, China.
| | - Mubiao Liu
- Department of Gynecology, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, 519050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ivanovski S, Breik O, Carluccio D, Alayan J, Staples R, Vaquette C. 3D printing for bone regeneration: challenges and opportunities for achieving predictability. Periodontol 2000 2023; 93:358-384. [PMID: 37823472 DOI: 10.1111/prd.12525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
3D printing offers attractive opportunities for large-volume bone regeneration in the oro-dental and craniofacial regions. This is enabled by the development of CAD-CAM technologies that support the design and manufacturing of anatomically accurate meshes and scaffolds. This review describes the main 3D-printing technologies utilized for the fabrication of these patient-matched devices, and reports on their pre-clinical and clinical performance including the occurrence of complications for vertical bone augmentation and craniofacial applications. Furthermore, the regulatory pathway for approval of these devices is discussed, highlighting the main hurdles and obstacles. Finally, the review elaborates on a variety of strategies for increasing bone regeneration capacity and explores the future of 4D bioprinting and biodegradable metal 3D printing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saso Ivanovski
- School of Dentistry, Centre for Orofacial Regeneration, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (COR3), The University of Queensland, Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Omar Breik
- Herston Biofabrication Institute, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Danilo Carluccio
- Herston Biofabrication Institute, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jamil Alayan
- School of Dentistry, Centre for Orofacial Regeneration, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (COR3), The University of Queensland, Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Ruben Staples
- School of Dentistry, Centre for Orofacial Regeneration, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (COR3), The University of Queensland, Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Cedryck Vaquette
- School of Dentistry, Centre for Orofacial Regeneration, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (COR3), The University of Queensland, Queensland, Herston, Australia
- Herston Biofabrication Institute, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Quazi S, Narang C, Espinoza JC, Bourgeois FT. Characteristics and Results of Pediatric Medical Device Studies: 2017-2022. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2022059842. [PMID: 37565273 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-059842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The development of medical devices for children faces unique challenges that have contributed to a paucity of devices specifically designed and tested for children. Increased knowledge on research activities for pediatric devices can guide optimal study design and ensure timely dissemination of clinical findings. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional analysis of interventional studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, initiated January 1, 2017, through December 12, 2022, evaluating a Food and Drug Administration-regulated class II or III device, and enrolling any pediatric patients (aged ≤17 years). Data were extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov on study characteristics and from Devices@FDA on device features. For completed studies, we determined whether results were reported in a peer-reviewed publication as of December 27, 2022. RESULTS Among 482 studies, 406 (84.2%) examined a class II device and 76 (15.8%) a class III device. The most common device types were diabetes-related devices (N = 57, 11.8%) and monitors and measurement devices (N = 39, 8.1%). Most studies were single-center (N = 326, 67.6%), used a nonrandomized (N = 255, 52.9%), open label (N = 350, 72.6%) design, and were funded by academic institutions (N = 278, 57.7%) or industry (N = 142, 29.5%). A total of 291 (60.4%) studies included a primary outcome of only efficacy without safety endpoints. Among completed studies, more than half (N = 64, 51.6%) enrolled <50 participants and 71.0% (N = 88) <100. After median follow-up of 3.0 years, results were available in publications for 27 (21.8%) completed studies. CONCLUSIONS Our findings serve to inform programs and initiatives seeking to increase pediatric-specific device development. In addition to considerations on ensuring rigorous trial design, greater focus is needed on timely dissemination of results generated in pediatric device studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Quazi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Claire Narang
- Pediatric Therapeutics and Regulatory Science Initiative, Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Juan C Espinoza
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Florence T Bourgeois
- Pediatric Therapeutics and Regulatory Science Initiative, Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Miller BJ, Blanks W, Yagi B. The 510(k) Third Party Review Program: Promise and Potential. J Med Syst 2023; 47:93. [PMID: 37642768 PMCID: PMC10465388 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-023-01986-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Every year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clears approximately 3,000 medical devices for marketing via the 510(k) pathway. These constitute 99% of all devices approved for human use and includes the premarket review of many devices incorporating newer technology such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and other software. As the complexity of these novel technologies and the number of applications is expected to increase in the coming years, statutory changes such as the 2016 21st Century Cures Act, regulations, and guidance documents have increased both the volume and complexity of device review. Thus, the ability to streamline the review of less complex, low-to-moderate risk devices through the 510(k) pathway will maximize the FDA's capability to address other important, future-oriented regulatory questions. For over twenty five years, third party review organizations have served a defined function to assist with the review of 510(k) applications for a set of enumerated device classes. This paper reviews the history of FDA device regulation, the evolution of the 510(k) review pathway, and the recent history of the 510(k) third party review program. Finally, the paper addresses policy concerns from all stakeholders - including the FDA - along with policy suggestions to improve the third party review program and FDA device regulation writ large.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Miller
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Meyer 8-143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
- The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - William Blanks
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Brian Yagi
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Meyer 8-143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
White NA, Oude Vrielink TJC, van der Bogt KEA, Cohen AF, Rotmans JI, Horeman T. Question-based development of high-risk medical devices: A proposal for a structured design and review process. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:2144-2159. [PMID: 36740771 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The recent introduction of the European Medical Device Regulation poses stricter legislation for manufacturers developing medical devices in the EU. Many devices have been placed into a higher risk category, thus requiring more data before market approval, and a much larger focus has been placed on safety. For implantable and Class III devices, the highest risk class, clinical evidence is a necessity. However, the requirements of clinical study design and developmental outcomes are only described in general terms due to the diversity of devices. METHODS A structured approach to determining the requirements for the clinical development of high-risk medical devices is introduced, utilizing the question-based development framework, which is already used for pharmaceutical drug development. An example of a novel implantable device for haemodialysis demonstrates how to set up a relevant target product profile defining the device requirements and criteria. The framework can be used in the medical device design phase to define specific questions to be answered during the ensuing clinical development, based upon five general questions, specified by the question-based framework. RESULTS The result is a clear and evaluable overview of requirements and methodologies to verify and track these requirements in the clinical development phase. Development organizations will be guided to the optimal route, also to abandon projects destined for failure early on to minimize development risks. CONCLUSION The framework could facilitate communication with funding agencies, regulators and clinicians, while highlighting remaining 'known unknowns' that require answering in the post-market phase after sufficient benefit is established relative to the risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A White
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Koen E A van der Bogt
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- University Vascular Centre, Leiden | The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Adam F Cohen
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tim Horeman
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Darrow JJ, Van de Wiele V, Beran D, Kesselheim AS. An Empirical Review of Key Glucose Monitoring Devices: Product Iterations and Patent Protection. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231178016. [PMID: 37272495 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231178016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Each year, people with diabetes and their insurers or governments spend billions of dollars on blood glucose monitors and their associated components. These monitors have evolved substantially since their introduction in the 1970s, and manufacturers frequently protect original medical devices and their modifications by applying for and obtaining patent protection. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We tracked the product iterations of five widely used blood glucose monitors-manufactured by LifeScan, Dexcom, Abbott, Roche, and Trividia-from information published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and extracted relevant U.S. patents. RESULTS We found 384 products made by the five manufacturers of interest, including 130 devices cleared through the 510(k) pathway, 251 approved via the premarket approval (PMA) pathway or via PMA supplements, and three for which de novo requests were granted. We identified 8095 patents potentially relevant to these devices, 2469 (31%) of which were likely to have expired by July 2021. CONCLUSIONS Manufacturers of blood glucose monitoring systems frequently modified their devices and obtained patent protection related to these device modifications. The therapeutic value of these new modifications should be critically evaluated and balanced against their additional cost. Older glucose monitoring devices that were marketed in decades past are now in the public domain and no longer protected by patents. Newer devices will join them as their patents expire. Increased demand from people with diabetes and the health care system for older, off-patent devices would provide an incentive for the medical device industry to make these devices more widely available, enabling good care at lower cost when such devices are substantially equivalent in effectiveness and safety. In turn, availability and awareness of older, off-patent devices could help stimulate such demand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J Darrow
- Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Victor Van de Wiele
- Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Beran
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aaron S Kesselheim
- Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Safari F, Kehelpannala C, Safarchi A, Batarseh AM, Vafaee F. Biomarker Reproducibility Challenge: A Review of Non-Nucleotide Biomarker Discovery Protocols from Body Fluids in Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2780. [PMID: 37345117 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer has now become the most commonly diagnosed cancer, accounting for one in eight cancer diagnoses worldwide. Non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers and associated tests are superlative candidates to complement or improve current approaches for screening, early diagnosis, or prognosis of breast cancer. Biomarkers detected from body fluids such as blood (serum/plasma), urine, saliva, nipple aspiration fluid, and tears can detect breast cancer at its early stages in a minimally invasive way. The advancements in high-throughput molecular profiling (omics) technologies have opened an unprecedented opportunity for unbiased biomarker detection. However, the irreproducibility of biomarkers and discrepancies of reported markers have remained a major roadblock to clinical implementation, demanding the investigation of contributing factors and the development of standardised biomarker discovery pipelines. A typical biomarker discovery workflow includes pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases, from sample collection to model development. Variations introduced during these steps impact the data quality and the reproducibility of the findings. Here, we present a comprehensive review of methodological variations in biomarker discovery studies in breast cancer, with a focus on non-nucleotide biomarkers (i.e., proteins, lipids, and metabolites), highlighting the pre-analytical to post-analytical variables, which may affect the accurate identification of biomarkers from body fluids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Safari
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Cheka Kehelpannala
- BCAL Diagnostics Ltd., Suite 506, 50 Clarence St, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
- BCAL Dx, The University of Sydney, Sydney Knowledge Hub, Merewether Building, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Azadeh Safarchi
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- Microbiomes for One Systems Health, Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Amani M Batarseh
- BCAL Diagnostics Ltd., Suite 506, 50 Clarence St, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
- BCAL Dx, The University of Sydney, Sydney Knowledge Hub, Merewether Building, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Fatemeh Vafaee
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- UNSW Data Science Hub (uDASH), University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- OmniOmics.ai Pty Ltd., Sydney, NSW 2035, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Akyurt N. Radiology Technologists' Perspective on Medical Imaging Device Use and Related Technologies: a Cross-sectional Survey with Respect to Hospital Type. J Digit Imaging 2023; 36:38-44. [PMID: 36127532 PMCID: PMC9984649 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00703-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate radiology technicians' view on the use of medical imaging devices and related technology. A total of 142 radiology technicians from Turkey were included on a voluntary basis in this cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. The questionnaire form elicited items on sociodemographic and occupational characteristics and personal opinions regarding the use of medical imaging devices and related technology. Majority of technicians agreed or strongly agreed that they prefer the latest technology medical imaging devices (32.4 and 54.2%) and there is an increase in the number of medical imaging devices (36.6 and 35.9%) and medical imaging examinations (32.4 and 43.7%), while the growing societal demands in field of health have a role in the increase in the number of medical imaging devices (34.5 and 32.4%). However, a relatively lower percentage of technicians agreed or strongly agreed that the latest technology medical imaging devices should be purchased no matter how much it costs (31.7 and 33.8%) and the yearly increase in the number of imaging examinations indicates provision of an improved healthcare (21.1 and 23.2%). A higher agreement was reported by private hospital (3.9 ± 1.1, p = 0.035) and university hospital (4.1 ± 1.1, p = 0.009) employees vs. state hospital employees (3.4 ± 1.3) on the growing societal demands in field of health to have a role in the increase in the number of medical imaging devices. Apart from this, no significant difference was noted in opinions of technicians on the use of medical imaging devices and related technology with respect to hospital types. Our findings indicate that radiology technicians report a considerable imaging workload volume and a preference for working with higher number of medical imaging devices particularly those with the latest technology, whereas they also emphasize that the yearly increase in the number of imaging examinations does not indicate provision of an improved healthcare, and the cost should always be a criterion when purchasing the latest technology devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuran Akyurt
- Department of Medical Imaging Techniques, Marmara University Vocational School of Health Services, Özcan Sabancı Binası, Kartal Yerleşkesi, Cevizli Mahallesi, D-100 Güney Yanyolu Üzeri, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kadakia KT, Dhruva SS, Caraballo C, Ross JS, Krumholz HM. Use of Recalled Devices in New Device Authorizations Under the US Food and Drug Administration's 510(k) Pathway and Risk of Subsequent Recalls. JAMA 2023; 329:136-143. [PMID: 36625810 PMCID: PMC9857464 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.23279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE In the US, nearly all medical devices progress to market under the 510(k) pathway, which uses previously authorized devices (predicates) to support new authorizations. Current regulations permit manufacturers to use devices subject to a Class I recall-the FDA's most serious designation indicating a high probability of adverse health consequences or death-as predicates for new devices. The consequences for patient safety are not known. OBJECTIVE To determine the risk of a future Class I recall associated with using a recalled device as a predicate device in the 510(k) pathway. DESIGN AND SETTING In this cross-sectional study, all 510(k) devices subject to Class I recalls from January 2017 through December 2021 (index devices) were identified from the FDA's annual recall listings. Information about predicate devices was extracted from the Devices@FDA database. Devices authorized using index devices as predicates (descendants) were identified using a regulatory intelligence platform. A matched cohort of predicates was constructed to assess the future recall risk from using a predicate device with a Class I recall. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Devices were characterized by their regulatory history and recall history. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated to compare the risk of future Class I recalls between devices descended from predicates with matched controls. RESULTS Of 156 index devices subject to Class I recall from 2017 through 2021, 44 (28.2%) had prior Class I recalls. Predicates were identified for 127 index devices, with 56 (44.1%) using predicates with a Class I recall. One hundred four index devices were also used as predicates to support the authorization of 265 descendant devices, with 50 index devices (48.1%) authorizing a descendant with a Class I recall. Compared with matched controls, devices authorized using predicates with Class I recalls had a higher risk of subsequent Class I recall (6.40 [95% CI, 3.59-11.40]; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Many 510(k) devices subjected to Class I recalls in the US use predicates with a known history of Class I recalls. These devices have substantially higher risk of a subsequent Class I recall. Safeguards for the 510(k) pathway are needed to prevent problematic predicate selection and ensure patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanket S. Dhruva
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - César Caraballo
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joseph S. Ross
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of General Internal Medicine and the National Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harlan M. Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Everhart AO, Sen S, Stern AD, Zhu Y, Karaca-Mandic P. Association Between Regulatory Submission Characteristics and Recalls of Medical Devices Receiving 510(k) Clearance. JAMA 2023; 329:144-156. [PMID: 36625811 PMCID: PMC9857565 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.22974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Most regulated medical devices enter the US market via the 510(k) regulatory submission pathway, wherein manufacturers demonstrate that applicant devices are "substantially equivalent" to 1 or more "predicate" devices (legally marketed medical devices with similar intended use). Most recalled medical devices are 510(k) devices. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between characteristics of predicate medical devices and recall probability for 510(k) devices. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this exploratory cross-sectional analysis of medical devices cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2003 and 2018 via the 510(k) regulatory submission pathway, linear probability models were used to examine associations between a 510(k) device's recall status and characteristics of its predicate medical devices. Public documents for the 510(k) medical devices were collected using FDA databases. A text extraction algorithm was applied to identify predicate medical devices cited in 510(k) regulatory submissions. Algorithm-derived metadata were combined with 2003-2020 FDA recall data. EXPOSURES Citation of predicate medical devices with certain characteristics in 510(k) regulatory submissions, including the total number of predicate medical devices cited by the applicant device, the age of the predicate medical devices, the lack of similarity of the predicate medical devices to the applicant device, and the recall status of the predicate medical devices. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Class I or class II recall of a 510(k) medical device between its FDA regulatory clearance date and December 31, 2020. RESULTS The sample included 35 176 medical devices, of which 4007 (11.4%) were recalled. The applicant devices cited a mean of 2.6 predicate medical devices, with mean ages of 3.6 years and 7.4 years for the newest and oldest, respectively, predicate medical devices. Of the applicant devices, 93.9% cited predicate medical devices with no ongoing recalls, 4.3% cited predicate medical devices with 1 ongoing class I or class II recall, 1.0% cited predicate medical devices with 2 ongoing recalls, and 0.8% cited predicate medical devices with 3 or more ongoing recalls. Applicant devices citing predicate medical devices with 3 or more ongoing recalls were significantly associated with a 9.31-percentage-point increase (95% CI, 2.84-15.77 percentage points) in recall probability compared with devices without ongoing recalls of predicate medical devices, or an 81.2% increase in recall probability relative to the mean recall probability. A 1-SD increase in the total number of predicate medical devices cited by the applicant device was significantly associated with a 1.25-percentage-point increase (95% CI, 0.62-1.87 percentage points) in recall probability, or an 11.0% increase in recall probability relative to the mean recall probability. A 1-SD increase in the newest age of a predicate medical device was significantly associated with a 0.78-percentage-point decrease (95% CI, 1.29-0.30 percentage points) in recall probability, or a 6.8% decrease in recall probability relative to the mean recall probability. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This exploratory cross-sectional study of 510(k) medical devices cleared by the FDA between 2003 and 2018 demonstrated significant associations between 510(k) submission characteristics and recalls of medical devices. Further research is needed to understand the implications of these associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander O. Everhart
- Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Soumya Sen
- Department of Information and Decision Sciences, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Ariel D. Stern
- Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Technology and Operations Management Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Digital Health Center, Hasso Plattner Institute, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Yi Zhu
- Department of Information and Decision Sciences, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Pinar Karaca-Mandic
- Department of Finance, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
- Business Advancement Center for Health, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Leung T, Hsieh HW, Roca J, Cano I. The Assessment of Medical Device Software Supporting Health Care Services for Chronic Patients in a Tertiary Hospital: Overarching Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e40976. [PMID: 36598817 PMCID: PMC9873251 DOI: 10.2196/40976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovative digital health tools are increasingly being evaluated and, in some instances, integrated at scale into health systems. However, the applicability of assessment methodologies in real-life scenarios to demonstrate value generation and consequently foster sustainable adoption of digitally enabled health interventions has some bottlenecks. OBJECTIVE We aimed to build on the process of premarket assessment of 4 digital health interventions piloted at the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona (HCB), as well as on the analysis of current medical device software regulations and postmarket surveillance in the European Union and United States in order to generate recommendations and lessons learnt for the sustainable adoption of digitally enabled health interventions. METHODS Four digital health interventions involving prototypes were piloted at the HCB (studies 1-4). Cocreation and quality improvement methodologies were used to consolidate a pragmatic evaluation method to assess the perceived usability and satisfaction of end users (both patients and health care professionals) by means of the System Usability Scale and the Net Promoter Score, including general questions about satisfaction. Analyses of both medical software device regulations and postmarket surveillance in the European Union and United States (2017-2021) were performed. Finally, an overarching analysis on lessons learnt was conducted considering 4 domains (technical, clinical, usability, and cost), as well as differentiating among 3 different eHealth strategies (telehealth, integrated care, and digital therapeutics). RESULTS Among the participant stakeholders, the System Usability Scale score was consistently higher in patients (studies 1, 2, 3, and 4: 78, 67, 56, and 76, respectively) than in health professionals (studies 2, 3, and 4: 52, 43, and 54, respectively). In general, use of the supporting digital health tools was recommended more by patients (studies 1, 2, 3, and 4: Net Promoter Scores of -3%, 31%, -21%, and 31%, respectively) than by professionals (studies 2, 3, and 4: Net Promoter Scores of -67%, 1%, and -80%, respectively). The overarching analysis resulted in pragmatic recommendations for the digital health evaluation domains and the eHealth strategies considered. CONCLUSIONS Lessons learnt on the digitalization of health resulted in practical recommendations that could contribute to future deployment experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hsin Wen Hsieh
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Roca
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isaac Cano
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhou Q, Lu M, Li GS, Peng GL, Song YF. Knowledge mapping and visualization analysis of pelvic organ prolapse repair with mesh from 2001 to 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1104724. [PMID: 37091336 PMCID: PMC10113510 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1104724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims: In recent decades, extensive attention has been paid to the application of mesh to repair pelvic floor defects. However, a large body of related literature has not been system summarized. The purpose of this study is to summarize and visualize the literature on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair with mesh using bibliometrics. Methods: Medical literature regarding POP repair with mesh were searched and obtained in the Web of Science™ Core (WoSCC) database from 2001 to 2021. Microsoft Excel 2020, CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to conduct the bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis. Results: In the past 20 years, a total of 2,550 articles and reviews have been published in 35 journals, and the published and cited results show a growing trend. Cosson M and International Urogynecology Journal were the authors and journals with the highest output, respectively. The United States, France and the United Kingdom are among the top three countries/organizations in relevant publications in worldwide. 584 key words in the literature are divided into 8 clusters, which are mainly related to prolapse type, risk factors, surgical methods, imaging, quality of life and bioengineering. Using clinical research and tissue engineering technology to reduce mesh complications is the current hot spot in this field. Conclusion: Reasonable application of mesh and avoiding mesh complications are still the most concerned topics in POP research. Although clinical research, surgical improvement, biological mesh and bioengineering technology have shown promising results, it is still urgent to carry out clinical transformation application research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quan Zhou
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People’s Hospital of China Three Gorges University/The First People’s Hospital of Yichang, Yichang, China
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- *Correspondence: Quan Zhou, ; Yan-Feng Song,
| | - Man Lu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People’s Hospital of China Three Gorges University/The First People’s Hospital of Yichang, Yichang, China
| | - Guo-Sheng Li
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People’s Hospital of China Three Gorges University/The First People’s Hospital of Yichang, Yichang, China
| | - Gan-Lu Peng
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The People’s Hospital of China Three Gorges University/The First People’s Hospital of Yichang, Yichang, China
| | - Yan-Feng Song
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brunoni AR, Ekhtiari H, Antal A, Auvichayapat P, Baeken C, Benseñor IM, Bikson M, Boggio P, Borroni B, Brighina F, Brunelin J, Carvalho S, Caumo W, Ciechanski P, Charvet L, Clark VP, Cohen Kadosh R, Cotelli M, Datta A, Deng ZD, De Raedt R, De Ridder D, Fitzgerald PB, Floel A, Frohlich F, George MS, Ghobadi-Azbari P, Goerigk S, Hamilton RH, Jaberzadeh SJ, Hoy K, Kidgell DJ, Zonoozi AK, Kirton A, Laureys S, Lavidor M, Lee K, Leite J, Lisanby SH, Loo C, Martin DM, Miniussi C, Mondino M, Monte-Silva K, Morales-Quezada L, Nitsche MA, Okano AH, Oliveira CS, Onarheim B, Pacheco-Barrios K, Padberg F, Nakamura-Palacios EM, Palm U, Paulus W, Plewnia C, Priori A, Rajji TK, Razza LB, Rehn EM, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Zare-Bidoky M, Simis M, Skorupinski P, Suen P, Thibaut A, Valiengo LCL, Vanderhasselt MA, Vanneste S, Venkatasubramanian G, Violante IR, Wexler A, Woods AJ, Fregni F. Digitalized transcranial electrical stimulation: A consensus statement. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 143:154-165. [PMID: 36115809 PMCID: PMC10031774 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although relatively costly and non-scalable, non-invasive neuromodulation interventions are treatment alternatives for neuropsychiatric disorders. The recent developments of highly-deployable transcranial electric stimulation (tES) systems, combined with mobile-Health technologies, could be incorporated in digital trials to overcome methodological barriers and increase equity of access. The study aims are to discuss the implementation of tES digital trials by performing a systematic scoping review and strategic process mapping, evaluate methodological aspects of tES digital trial designs, and provide Delphi-based recommendations for implementing digital trials using tES. METHODS We convened 61 highly-productive specialists and contacted 8 tES companies to assess 71 issues related to tES digitalization readiness, and processes, barriers, advantages, and opportunities for implementing tES digital trials. Delphi-based recommendations (>60% agreement) were provided. RESULTS The main strengths/opportunities of tES were: (i) non-pharmacological nature (92% of agreement), safety of these techniques (80%), affordability (88%), and potential scalability (78%). As for weaknesses/threats, we listed insufficient supervision (76%) and unclear regulatory status (69%). Many issues related to methodological biases did not reach consensus. Device appraisal showed moderate digitalization readiness, with high safety and potential for trial implementation, but low connectivity. CONCLUSIONS Panelists recognized the potential of tES for scalability, generalizability, and leverage of digital trials processes; with no consensus about aspects regarding methodological biases. SIGNIFICANCE We further propose and discuss a conceptual framework for exploiting shared aspects between mobile-Health tES technologies with digital trials methodology to drive future efforts for digitizing tES trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre R Brunoni
- Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo & Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Neurosciences (LIM-27), Instituto Nacional de Biomarcadores em Neuropsiquiatria (INBioN), Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Hamed Ekhtiari
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Paradee Auvichayapat
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Chris Baeken
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB): Department of Psychiatry University Hospital (UZBrussel), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium; Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, the Netherlands
| | - Isabela M Benseñor
- Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marom Bikson
- The Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, The City University of New York, NY, USA
| | - Paulo Boggio
- Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Center for Biological Science and Health, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Barbara Borroni
- Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Filippo Brighina
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Jerome Brunelin
- Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Bron, France; INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR 5292, PSYR2 Team, Centre de recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL), Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Sandra Carvalho
- Translational Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Education and Psychology and William James Center for Research (WJCR), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Wolnei Caumo
- Post-Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil; Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Pain and Palliative Care Service at HCPA, Brazil; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, UFRGS, Brazil
| | - Patrick Ciechanski
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 1-002 Katz Group Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Leigh Charvet
- Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vincent P Clark
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Department of Psychology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Roi Cohen Kadosh
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Maria Cotelli
- Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Abhishek Datta
- Research and Development, Soterix Medical Inc., New York, USA
| | - Zhi-De Deng
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rudi De Raedt
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare and Monash University Department of Psychiatry, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
| | - Agnes Floel
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Germany
| | - Flavio Frohlich
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Carolina Center for Neurostimulation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Peyman Ghobadi-Azbari
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Stephan Goerigk
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Hospital, Munich, Germany; Department of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, LMU, Munich, Germany; Hochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany
| | - Roy H Hamilton
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shapour J Jaberzadeh
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate Hoy
- Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare and Monash University Department of Psychiatry, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dawson J Kidgell
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Arash Khojasteh Zonoozi
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Adam Kirton
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven Laureys
- Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, GIGA Institute, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - Michal Lavidor
- Bar Ilan University, Department of Psychology, and the Gonda Brain Research Center, Israel
| | - Kiwon Lee
- Ybrain Corporation, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jorge Leite
- INPP, Portucalense University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sarah H Lisanby
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Colleen Loo
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Donel M Martin
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carlo Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Marine Mondino
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Bron, France
| | - Katia Monte-Silva
- Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil; NAPeN Network (Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
| | - Leon Morales-Quezada
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Alexandre H Okano
- NAPeN Network (Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil; Center for Mathematics, Computation, and Cognition, Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil; Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Claudia S Oliveira
- Master's and Doctoral Program in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Master's and Doctoral Program in Human Movement and Rehabilitation, Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis, Brazil
| | | | - Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Lima, Peru
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ester M Nakamura-Palacios
- Laboratory of Cognitive Sciences and Neuropsychopharmacology, Program of Post-Graduation in Physiological Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil
| | - Ulrich Palm
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany; Medical Park Chiemseeblick, Rasthausstr. 25, 83233 Bernau-Felden, Germany
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Neurology. Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum Großhadern, Marchioninistr, München, Germany
| | - Christian Plewnia
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Neurophysiology and Interventional Neuropsychiatry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alberto Priori
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Tarek K Rajji
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Toronto Dementia Research Alliance, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lais B Razza
- Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Mehran Zare-Bidoky
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; School of Medicine, Shahid-Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Marcel Simis
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Institute, General Hospital, Medical School of the University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Paulo Suen
- Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Aurore Thibaut
- Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness & Centre du Cerveau, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Leandro C L Valiengo
- Laboratory of Neurosciences (LIM-27), Instituto Nacional de Biomarcadores em Neuropsiquiatria (INBioN), Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
- Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sven Vanneste
- Lab for Clinical & Integrative Neuroscience, Trinity College of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Ines R Violante
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Anna Wexler
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam J Woods
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Felipe Fregni
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Goodney P, Mao J, Columbo J, Suckow B, Schermerhorn M, Malas M, Brooke B, Hoel A, Scali S, Arya S, Spangler E, Alabi O, Beck A, Gladders B, Moore K, Zheng X, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Sedrakyan A. Use of linked registry claims data for long term surveillance of devices after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: observational surveillance study. BMJ 2022; 379:e071452. [PMID: 36283705 PMCID: PMC9593227 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate long term outcomes (reintervention and late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm) of aortic endografts in real world practice using linked registry claims data. DESIGN Observational surveillance study. SETTING 282 centers in the Vascular Quality Initiative Registry linked to United States Medicare claims (2003-18). PARTICIPANTS 20 489 patients treated with four device types used for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): 40.6% (n=8310) received the Excluder (Gore), 32.2% (n=6606) the Endurant (Medtronic), 16.0% (n=3281) the Zenith (Cook Medical), and 11.2% (n=2292) the AFX (Endologix). Given modifications to AFX in late 2014, patients who received the AFX device were categorized into two groups: the early AFX group (n=942) and late AFX group (n=1350) and compared with patients who received the other devices, using propensity matched Cox models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Reintervention and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm post-EVAR; all patients (100%) had complete follow-up via the registry or claims based outcome assessment, or both. RESULTS Median age was 76 years (interquartile range (IQR) 70-82 years), 80.0% (16 386/20 489) of patients were men, and median follow-up was 2.3 years (IQR 0.9-4.1 years). Crude five year reintervention rates were significantly higher for patients who received the early AFX device compared with the other devices: 14.9% (95% confidence interval 13.7% to 16.2%) for Excluder, 19.5% (18.1% to 21.1%) for Endurant, 16.7% (15.0% to 18.6%) for Zenith, and early 27.0% (23.7% to 30.6%) for the early AFX. The risk of reintervention for patients who received the early AFX device was higher compared with the other devices in propensity matched Cox models (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 2.02) and analyses using a surgeon level instrumental variable of >33% AFX grafts used in their practice (1.75, 1.19 to 2.59). The linked registry claims surveillance data identified the increased risk of reintervention with the early AFX device as early as mid-2013, well before the first regulatory warnings were issued in the US in 2017. CONCLUSIONS The linked registry claims surveillance data identified a device specific risk in long term reintervention after EVAR of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Device manufacturers and regulators can leverage linked data sources to actively monitor long term outcomes in real world practice after cardiovascular interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jialin Mao
- Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jesse Columbo
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Bjoern Suckow
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Emily Spangler
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Olamide Alabi
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adam Beck
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Kayla Moore
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Xinyan Zheng
- Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Art Sedrakyan
- Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hu G, Habib AR, Redberg RF. Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device for Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock-A Call for Evidence of Benefit. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:903-905. [PMID: 35849388 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gene Hu
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
| | - Anand R Habib
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco.,Editorial Fellow, JAMA Internal Medicine
| | - Rita F Redberg
- Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco.,Editor, JAMA Internal Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Butala NM, Oseran AS, Yeh RW. Innovation's Disjointed Path From Approval to Payment-The Case of Embolic Protection Devices for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JAMA Cardiol 2022; 7:953-954. [PMID: 35976621 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Neel M Butala
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Cardiology Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Andrew S Oseran
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Cardiology Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Robert W Yeh
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Cardiology Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rathi VK, Ross JS, Redberg RF, Dhruva SS. Medical Device User Fee Reauthorization - Back to Basics or Looking Ahead? N Engl J Med 2022; 387:196-199. [PMID: 35675195 DOI: 10.1056/nejmp2204947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay K Rathi
- From the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston (V.K.R.); the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S.R.); and the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco (R.F.R., S.S.D.)
| | - Joseph S Ross
- From the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston (V.K.R.); the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S.R.); and the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco (R.F.R., S.S.D.)
| | - Rita F Redberg
- From the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston (V.K.R.); the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S.R.); and the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco (R.F.R., S.S.D.)
| | - Sanket S Dhruva
- From the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston (V.K.R.); the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S.R.); and the Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco (R.F.R., S.S.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Laser Sintering Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers (Basel) 2022; 14:polym14122336. [PMID: 35745911 PMCID: PMC9229946 DOI: 10.3390/polym14122336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques into the medical space has revolutionised tissue engineering. Depending upon the tissue type, specific AM approaches are capable of closely matching the physical and biological tissue attributes, to guide tissue regeneration. For hard tissue such as bone, powder bed fusion (PBF) techniques have significant potential, as they are capable of fabricating materials that can match the mechanical requirements necessary to maintain bone functionality and support regeneration. This review focuses on the PBF techniques that utilize laser sintering for creating scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) applications. Optimal scaffold requirements are explained, ranging from material biocompatibility and bioactivity, to generating specific architectures to recapitulate the porosity, interconnectivity, and mechanical properties of native human bone. The main objective of the review is to outline the most common materials processed using PBF in the context of BTE; initially outlining the most common polymers, including polyamide, polycaprolactone, polyethylene, and polyetheretherketone. Subsequent sections investigate the use of metals and ceramics in similar systems for BTE applications. The last section explores how composite materials can be used. Within each material section, the benefits and shortcomings are outlined, including their mechanical and biological performance, as well as associated printing parameters. The framework provided can be applied to the development of new, novel materials or laser-based approaches to ultimately generate bone tissue analogues or for guiding bone regeneration.
Collapse
|
33
|
Espinoza J, Shah P, Nagendra G, Bar-Cohen Y, Richmond F. Pediatric Medical Device Development and Regulation: Current State, Barriers, and Opportunities. Pediatrics 2022; 149:186768. [PMID: 35425971 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-053390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Few medical devices are designed and marketed specifically for children. Instead, adult devices are often repurposed and used off-label in pediatrics. The innovation gap between pediatric and adult devices is complex and multifactorial. This review aims to summarize the medical device landscape, describe barriers to pediatric device development, and provide an update on current strategies to help overcome these limitations. Medical devices are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. They are registered, cleared, or approved on the basis of a 3-tier risk classification system and a differentiated set of regulatory pathways. This includes some for products that receive special designations on the basis of specific aspects that warrant more rapid review and approval. Pediatric devices number only one-quarter of those developed for adults for multiple reasons. Clinically, innovators must adjust their products to address the smaller sizes, growth, and longer duration of use in children. Smaller sample sizes and population heterogeneity also challenge the ability to obtain sufficient safety data for regulatory submissions. Financial concerns stem from lower pediatric reimbursement rates coupled with a lack of nationally standardized coverage. There are a number of promising initiatives, including the Pediatric Device Consortia Program, Early Feasibility Studies, and the new System of Hospitals for Innovation in Pediatrics - Medical Devices. However, the gap will likely not be narrowed without broad cooperation across stakeholders from industry, academia, patient advocacy groups, health care providers, investors, payors, regulators, and Congress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Espinoza
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Payal Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gautam Nagendra
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yaniv Bar-Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Frances Richmond
- Department of Regulatory & Quality Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nguyen T, Hampton D, Eydelman MB. FDA Facilitating Innovation of Ophthalmic Devices While Balancing the Need for Safety and Effectiveness. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022; 140:309-311. [PMID: 35266956 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tieuvi Nguyen
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Denise Hampton
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Malvina B Eydelman
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Validation of an indirect linkage algorithm to combine registry data with Medicare claims. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:266-271.e2. [PMID: 35181518 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Linkage of registries to Medicare claims data can help extend follow-up for patients receiving medical devices. This study sought to test and validate an algorithm that does not require patient identifiers to link a national vascular registry and Medicare claims data. METHODS We used data from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI), a registry capturing data from more than 600 centers on several different vascular procedures and Medicare claims from 2003 to 2018. We restricted to patients aged 65 years and older who had fee-for-service entitlement at the time of the procedure for this study. We performed an indirect linkage to combine VQI with Medicare at the patient level using a sequential algorithm based on patient's date of birth, sex, zip code, procedure date, and procedure facility. We compared this against a gold standard of a cohort directly linked using social security numbers (SSNs). We calculated the matching rate and accuracy overall, and before and after October 2015 when the ICD-10 system was adopted in the US. RESULTS A total of 144,045 VQI-Medicare linked patients were in the gold standard cohort. Using the indirect linking algorithm, we matched 133,966 of the 144,045 VQI patients to their Medicare claims (matching rate: 93.0%). Among these, 133,104 patients were correctly matched (matching accuracy: 99.4%). The matching rate was higher when the indirect linkage was implemented in ICD-10 coded data than in ICD-9 coded data (94.0% vs. 92.2%). Accuracy of the indirect linkage remained high for all procedure modules post-ICD-10 coding change (overall 99.4%, range 99.0-99.7%). CONCLUSION In this study, we successfully used indirect identifiers to link the VQI to Medicare claims with more than 90% success and more than 99% accuracy. When direct linkage of registry-claims data using SSNs is not possible because of availability, confidentiality, or both, this method for indirect linkage provides a suitable alternative. The matching rate and accuracy help ensure the accuracy of long-term follow-up and the completeness and representativeness of linked databases for relevant research and quality improvement initiatives.
Collapse
|
36
|
Wilson NA, Tcheng JE, Graham J, Drozda JP. Advancing Patient Safety Surrounding Medical Devices: A Health System Roadmap to Implement Unique Device Identification at the Point of Care. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH 2021; 14:411-421. [PMID: 34880686 PMCID: PMC8645947 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s339232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The US Food and Drug Administration’s Unique Device Identification System Rule of 2013 mandated manufacturers to assign unique device identifiers (UDIs) to their medical devices. Most high-risk (Class III), moderate-risk (Class II) and implantable devices now have UDIs. To achieve the necessary next step for a comprehensive UDI-enabled system for patient safety, UDIs must be electronically documented during patient care, a process not routinely done. The purpose of this research was to study the implementation experiences of diverse health systems in order to develop a roadmap for UDI implementation at the point of care. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with personnel at health systems that had implemented UDI for implantable devices in their cardiac catheterization labs or operating rooms. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the framework methodology of Ritchie and Spencer. Data interpretation involved development of a conceptual model and detailed recommendations for UDI implementation. An expert panel evaluated and provided input on the roadmap. Results Twenty-four interviews at ten health systems were conducted by phone. Participants described implementation steps, factors and barriers impacting implementation. Findings populated a UDI implementation roadmap, that includes Foundational Themes, Key Components, Key Steps, UDI Use, and Outcomes. Conclusions and Implications The UDI implementation roadmap provides a framework for health systems to address the necessary steps and multilevel factors that underpin UDI implementation at the point of care. It is intended to guide and advance routine electronic documentation of UDIs for devices used during clinical care, the critical next step for a comprehensive UDI-enabled system to enhance medical device safety and effectiveness for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia A Wilson
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - James E Tcheng
- Duke University School of Medicine and Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jove Graham
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|