Aspirin Use for Preeclampsia Prevention Among Women With Prepregnancy Diabetes, Obesity, and Hypertension

Mortality Following Childbirth in Ontario: A 20-Year Analysis of Temporal Trends and Causes

OBJECTIVES

Maternal death during or after pregnancy is often preventable and accurate surveillance is key to prevention. We examined the number and causes of maternal death in Ontario over 20 years.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study including all hospital livebirths and stillbirths from 2002-2022 in the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstracts (for hospitalizations) and National Ambulatory Care System (for emergency department encounters) linked to the Better Outcomes and Registry and Network births. Death was ascertained from childbirth to 365 days thereafter; all deaths were reviewed by at least 3 clinicians.

RESULTS

There were 485 deaths among 2 764 214 live and stillbirths over 20 years-a maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 17.5 per 100 000 (95% CI 16.0-19.2). There were 222 (45.8%) early deaths within 42 days of birth (MMR of 8.0 per 100 000; 95% CI 7.0-9.2), and 263 (54.2%) late deaths from 43 to 365 days after birth (MMR 9.5 per 100 000; 95% CI 8.4-10.7). Death was pregnancy-related in 169/485 cases (34.8%). Early death causes were predominantly hemorrhage, infection, preeclampsia, and pulmonary embolism. The top causes of 263 late deaths were cancer, injury, and cardiac arrest, or unknown.

CONCLUSIONS

Most deaths within 1 year of childbirth are not related to obstetrical factors; however, pregnancy complications factor in early deaths. Causes of early and late deaths differ, but examining late deaths is equally important to identify factors not regularly examined in maternal mortality. As death in early pregnancy or outside hospitals is not reported, mortality is likely higher.

Severe Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity Among Gestational Carriers : A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Use of a gestational ("surrogate") carrier is increasingly common. Risk for maternal and neonatal adversity is largely unknown in this birthing population.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk for severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and severe neonatal morbidity (SNM) in gestational carriers.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

All of Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

All singleton births at more than 20 weeks' gestation, from 2012 to 2021.

MEASUREMENTS

Exposure was type of conception, namely, gestational carriage (main exposure), unassisted conception (comparison group 1), and in vitro fertilization (IVF) (comparison group 2). Main composite outcomes were SMM and SNM. Modified Poisson regression models generated weighted relative risks (wRRs) using propensity score-based overlap weighting. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and postpartum hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Of all eligible singleton births, 846 124 (97.6%) were by unassisted conception, 16 087 (1.8%) by IVF, and 806 (0.1%) by gestational carriage. Respective risks for SMM were 2.3%, 4.3%, and 7.8%. The wRRs were 3.30 (95% CI, 2.59 to 4.20) comparing gestational carriage with unassisted conception and 1.86 (CI, 1.36 to 2.55) comparing gestational carriage with IVF. Respective risks for SNM were 5.9%, 8.9%, and 6.6%, generating wRRs of 1.20 (CI, 0.92 to 1.55) for gestational carriage versus unassisted conception and 0.81 (CI, 0.61 to 1.08) for gestational carriage versus IVF. Hypertensive disorders, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm birth at less than 37 weeks were also significantly higher contrasting gestational carriers to either comparison group.

LIMITATION

Absence of information about indications for choosing a gestational carrier, and oocyte or sperm donor source.

CONCLUSION

Among singleton births of more than 20 weeks' gestation, a higher risk for SMM and adverse pregnancy outcomes was seen among gestational carriers compared with women who conceived with and without assistance. Although gestational carriage was associated with preterm birth, there was less clear evidence of severe neonatal morbidity. Potential mechanisms for higher maternal morbidity among gestational carriers require elucidation, alongside developing special care plans for gestational carriers.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

The Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Implications of pregnancy on cardiometabolic disease risk: preeclampsia and gestational diabetes

Cardiometabolic disorders, such as obesity, insulin resistance, and hypertension, prior to and within pregnancy are increasing in prevalence worldwide. Pregnancy-associated cardiometabolic disease poses a great risk to the short- and long-term well-being of the mother and offspring. Hypertensive pregnancy, notably preeclampsia, as well as gestational diabetes are the major diseases of pregnancy growing in prevalence as a result of growing cardiometabolic disease prevalence. The mechanisms whereby obesity, diabetes, and other comorbidities lead to preeclampsia and gestational diabetes are incompletely understood and continually evolving in the literature. In addition, novel therapeutic avenues are currently being explored in these patients to offset cardiometabolic-induced adverse pregnancy outcomes in preeclamptic and gestational diabetes pregnancies. In this review, we discuss the emerging pathophysiological mechanisms of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes in the context of cardiometabolic risk as well as the most recent preclinical and clinical updates in the pathogenesis and treatment of these conditions.

Accuracy of aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia prevention documentation within a large administrative dataset

BACKGROUND

Low-dose aspirin prophylaxis is recommended for women at risk of preeclampsia. Capturing aspirin prophylaxis within administrative databases can be challenging since it is an over-the-counter medication. The Better Outcome Registry and Network (BORN) database, a perinatal health registry in Ontario, Canada, includes a formal variable that captures aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia. This variable has not been formally validated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy of the aspirin prophylaxis variable in the BORN database against an electronic medical record (EMR).

METHODS

This validation study comprised 200 randomly selected women who had a livebirth at St. Michael's Hospital (SMH) in Toronto, Ontario, from January 2018 to July 2022. Recorded aspirin prophylaxis in pregnancy and maternal sociodemographic characteristics were independently extracted by two abstractors. Accuracy of aspirin prophylaxis use in the BORN database was compared to that in the SMH EMR, expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), Cohen's kappa (κ), and overall percent agreement, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for missing or unclear aspirin prophylaxis use.

RESULTS

Among 200 women, 24 (12.0%) received aspirin prophylaxis - 12.5% within the SMH EMR and 8.0% in the BORN database. Women using aspirin were older (37.0 vs 33.0 years) and had higher median gravidity (3 vs. 2). Sensitivity and specificity of the BORN aspirin prophylaxis variable were 62.5% (95% CI 40.6, 81.2) and 100.0% (95% CI 97.3, 100.0), respectively. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 100.0% (95% CI 78.2, 100.0), and 93.8% (95% CI 88.6, 97.1), respectively. Cohen's κ was 0.74 (95% CI 0.58, 0.90), and overall percent agreement was 94.4% (95% CI 87.1, 100.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin use within the BORN database, based on a standard variable field, appears accurate enough for the potential use in epidemiological studies of aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia or as a covariate in related studies.

Trends in rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and associated morbidities in Canada: a population-based study (2012-2021)

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a leading cause of severe maternal morbidity (SMM). We sought to explore trends in HDP and related morbidity outcomes in Canada.

METHODS

In this retrospective population-based study, we used hospital discharge data from Canada, excluding Quebec, to identify females who had an HDP diagnosis during a birth admission between 2012 and 2021. We analyzed temporal and geographical trends in HDP, as well as temporal trends in adverse outcomes associated with HDP.

RESULTS

Among 2 804 473 hospital admissions for birth between 2012 and 2021, the rate of any HDP increased from 6.1% to 8.5%, including pre-existing hypertension (0.6% to 0.9%), gestational hypertension (3.9% to 5.1%), and preeclampsia (1.6% to 2.6%). For 2017-2021 combined, relative to Ontario (6.9%), HDP were significantly more prevalent in nearly all other Canadian regions. For example, in Newfoundland and Labrador, the rate was 10.7% (unadjusted rate ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.49-1.63). Among females with any HDP, rates of cesarean delivery rose from 42.0% in 2012 to 44.3% in 2021, as did acute renal failure (0.4% to 0.6%), while rates of early preterm delivery, intrauterine fetal death, maternal hospital length of stay (≥ 7 d), admission to the maternal intensive care unit, severe hemorrhage, and SMM trended downward.

INTERPRETATION

The rate of HDP has risen across Canada, with a concomitant decline in some HDP-associated morbidities. Ongoing surveillance of HDP is needed to assess the factors associated with temporal trends, including the effectiveness of evolving HDP prevention and management efforts.

Missed opportunity for aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia prevention: a cross-sectional study from Sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND

Recent studies showed that aspirin for preeclampsia prevention is underused despite its effectiveness in preventing preeclampsia among patients with moderate and high risk factors. Little is known about this issue in the Sub-Saharan setting, including Ethiopia.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the missed opportunity for aspirin prophylaxis among candidates for this preeclampsia preventive intervention at a national tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study on pregnant women who had preeclampsia and who were managed at the St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Ethiopia) over a 6-month period (April 1-September 30, 2023). Data were collected prospectively using a structured questionnaire. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who had an indication for aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia prevention but were not given the opportunity (missed opportunity for aspirin) among all pregnant preeclampsia patients presenting to our hospital. Secondary outcomes were adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the data. Proportions and percentages were used to present the results.

RESULTS

A total of 427 pregnant women with preeclampsia were screened for inclusion and 32 of them were excluded based on the study criteria. Among the 395 pregnant women with preeclampsia who were included in the final analysis, 195 (50.6%) had an indication for aspirin prophylaxis for the prevention of preeclampsia. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements at presentation were 153.8±12.8 and 100.6±8.5 mm Hg, respectively. Most patients had proteinuria (51.7% of the participants had a urine test-strip protein level of +2, whereas 18.5% [74/395] had a urine test-strip protein level of +1 and 10.9% had 24-hour urine protein levels in the preeclampsia range). Among the women who had an indication for aspirin prophylaxis, only 1.1% received aspirin (the missed opportunity for aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia prevention was 98.9%). The perinatal morality rate was 11.9%, whereas the neonatal intensive care unit admission rate was 20.5%. The rate of a low Apgar score at 5 minutes was 8.9%. Eight mothers (2.1%) developed hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome, whereas another 3 (0.8%) mothers developed a pulmonary edema.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the missed opportunity for administration of aspirin prophylaxis for the prevention of preeclampsia was high although more than half of the study subjects were candidates for this preventive intervention. Preeclampsia was also associated with higher rates of adverse perinatal outcomes and serious maternal morbidity.

Implementation of Multiple Marker Screening for Preterm Preeclampsia in a Single Tertiary Obstetric Centre

OBJECTIVES

Early assessment of pregnant individuals for risk of preterm preeclampsia (PE) is possible at the 11-14 week ultrasound visit using a validated multiple marker algorithm, allowing timely use of preventative low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (LDA) in high-risk patients. With no established early screening program for preterm PE in Canada, our objectives were to assess the acceptability and operational impact of routine screening for preterm PE during the 11-14 week ultrasound visit, evaluate uptake and adherence to LDA when recommended, and assess screening performance.

METHODS

A prospective implementation study of preterm PE screening among pregnant patients at the ultrasound unit of a tertiary obstetric centre in Toronto, Canada.

RESULTS

A total of 1057 patients were screened, with an acceptance rate of 87.1%. First-trimester ultrasound appointment time increased by a median time of 7 minutes (Interquartile range 6-9). By 16 weeks gestation, 88.7% of high-risk patients had started LDA, with adherence of 88.7%‒94.6% from 16‒36 weeks. Satisfaction with counselling was ≥7/10 in more than 95% of patients. There were 7 cases of preterm PE (0.73%), 3 in the low-risk group (0.35%), and 4 in the high-risk group (4.1%). When accounting for LDA use, the treatment-adjusted detection rate was 78.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate successful implementation of a validated, effective screening and prevention program for preterm PE as a first step in the implementation of a broader program adaptable for cultural, access/equity considerations, and marker availability.

Hofbauer cell function in the term placenta associates with adult cardiovascular and depressive outcomes

Pathological placental inflammation increases the risk for several adult disorders, but these mediators are also expressed under homeostatic conditions, where their contribution to adult health outcomes is unknown. Here we define an inflammation-related expression signature, primarily expressed in Hofbauer cells of the term placenta and use expression quantitative trait loci to create a polygenic score (PGS) predictive of its expression. Using this PGS in the UK Biobank we conduct a phenome-wide association study, followed by Mendelian randomization and identify protective, sex-dependent effects of the placental module on cardiovascular and depressive outcomes. Genes differentially regulated by intra-amniotic infection and preterm birth are over-represented within the module. We also identify aspirin as a putative modulator of this inflammation-related signature. Our data support a model where disruption of placental Hofbauer cell function, due to preterm birth or prenatal infection, contributes to the increased risk of depression and cardiovascular disease observed in these individuals.

Maternal First-Trimester Alpha-Fetoprotein and Placenta-Mediated Pregnancy Complications

BACKGROUND

Maternal serum markers used for trisomy 21 screening are associated with placenta-mediated complications. Recently, there has been a transition from the traditional first-trimester screening (FTS) that included PAPP-A (pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A) and beta-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin), to the enhanced FTS test, which added first-trimester AFP (alpha-fetoprotein) and PlGF (placental growth factor). However, whether elevated first-trimester AFP has a similar association with placenta-mediated complications to that observed for elevated second-trimester AFP remains unclear. Our objective was to estimate the association of first-trimester AFP with placenta-mediated complications and compare it with the corresponding associations of second-trimester AFP and other first-trimester serum markers.

METHODS

Retrospective population-based cohort study of women who underwent trisomy 21 screening in Ontario, Canada (2013-2019). The association of first-trimester AFP with placenta-mediated complications was estimated and compared with that of the traditional serum markers. The primary outcome was a composite of stillbirth or preterm placental complications (preeclampsia, birthweight less than third centile, or placental abruption).

RESULTS

A total of 244 990 and 96 167 women underwent FTS and enhanced FTS test screening, respectively. All markers were associated with the primary outcome, but the association for elevated first-trimester AFP (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.57 [95% CI, 1.37-1.81]) was weaker than that observed for low PAPP-A (aRR, 2.48 [95% CI, 2.2-2.8]), low PlGF (aRR, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.97-2.64]), and elevated second-trimester AFP (aRR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.81-2.15]). When the models were adjusted for all 4 enhanced FTS test markers, elevated first-trimester AFP was no longer associated with the primary outcome (aRR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.58-1.02]).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike second-trimester AFP, elevated first-trimester AFP is not an independent risk factor for placenta-mediated complications.

Preventing Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Pregnancy Complicated by Obesity

Purpose of review

Obesity is a chronic disease that is becoming increasingly prevalent, and more individuals of reproductive age have obesity prior to becoming pregnant. Obesity in pregnancy is associated with short- and long-term adverse consequences for both the birthing person and their offspring which have been associated with increased long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The goal of this review is to discuss what is currently understood about the relationship between maternal obesity and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), the association between APOs and future cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and what evidence-based interventions can be implemented to prevent adverse outcomes in this population.

Recent findings

Maternal obesity has been associated with an increased risk of APOs such as gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and preterm birth as well as an increased risk of future CVD, such as metabolic syndrome, chronic hypertension, coronary heart disease, and stroke. The impact of maternal obesity also extends beyond the pregnant individual to the offspring, increasing the risk of fetal, neonatal, and infant mortality, as well as of congenital malformations, prematurity, and long-term health problems such as insulin resistance and childhood obesity. Prevention guidelines are incorporating the increased risk of adverse outcomes from maternal obesity into formalized risk assessments to guide both prenatal and postpartum care. It is becoming evident that a multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics team is an important part of providing comprehensive care for pregnant individuals with obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors, including preexisting CVD and a history of prior APOs. There remains a need for further studies to better understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between maternal obesity and APOs, as well as the racial and ethnic disparities that have been noted in the prevalence of APOs and associated CVD risk and mortality.

Summary

There is increasing awareness that obesity in pregnancy is associated with various short- and long-term adverse maternal and offspring outcomes. There are multiple screening and prevention strategies that may be implemented before, during, and after pregnancy to prevent these adverse outcomes.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy pre- and postaspirin guideline publication in individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The US Preventive Services Taskforce published guidelines in 2014 recommending that low-dose aspirin be initiated between 12 and 28 weeks of gestation among high-risk patients for preeclampsia prophylaxis. Moreover, low-dose aspirin is recommended by some clinicians for the prevention of preterm birth.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether there is an association between the US Preventive Services Taskforce aspirin guideline hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preterm birth in individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a repeated cross-sectional analysis of individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus and at least 1 singleton delivery at >20 weeks of gestation with records available in the National Vital Statistics System between 2010 and 2018. The primary outcome was hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and the secondary outcome was preterm birth. Demographics and clinical characteristics among individuals in the pre-US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline cohort (2010-2013) were compared with that of individuals in the post-US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline cohort (2015-2018). Multivariable regression estimated the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between guideline publication and the selected endpoints. Effect modification was assessed for access to prenatal care using the Kotelchuck Index (<80% vs ≥80%). Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis limited to nulliparas was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 224,065 individuals were included. Individuals in the post-US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline cohort were more likely to be older, be obese, and have a history of preterm birth. In unadjusted and adjusted modeling, delivery in the post-US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline cohort was associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.28) and preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.12). The adjusted odds ratios for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preterm birth were more pronounced among those with less than adequate access to care. The findings were similar in the sensitivity analysis of only nulliparas.

CONCLUSION

Delivery after US Preventive Services Taskforce aspirin guideline publication was associated with higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preterm birth in a population of individuals with diabetes mellitus. It is unknown whether patient or practitioner factors, or other changes in obstetrical care, contributed to these findings.

The Implementation of Preeclampsia Screening and Prevention (IMPRESS) Study

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia affects between 2% and 5% of pregnancies and is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite strong evidence that the combination of systematic preeclampsia screening based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation preeclampsia risk calculation algorithm with treatment of high-risk patients with low-dose aspirin reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia more than currently used risk-factor-based screening, real-world implementation studies have not yet been done in Canada.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the operational feasibility of implementing first-trimester screening and prevention of preterm preeclampsia (<37 weeks) alongside a publicly funded first-trimester combined screening program for aneuploidies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective implementation study. Consecutive pregnant patients referred for first-trimester combined screening (11-13+6 weeks) were offered screening for preeclampsia based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm concomitantly with their aneuploidy screen. Consenting participants were screened using maternal risk factors, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, and placental growth factor. Risk for preterm preeclampsia (<37 weeks) was calculated using the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm, and individuals with a risk score ≥1 per 100 were recommended to use aspirin (162 mg once daily at bedtime, <16-36 weeks). Implementation metrics assessed included: acceptability, operational impact, proportion of aspirin initiation, quality and safety measures, and screen performance.

RESULTS

Between December 1, 2020 and April 23, 2021, 1124 patients consented to preeclampsia screening (98.3% uptake), and 92 (8.2%) screened positive. Appointments for patients receiving first-trimester combined screening aneuploidy and preeclampsia screening averaged 6 minutes longer than first-trimester combined screening alone, and adding uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index averaged 2 minutes. Of the 92 patients who screened as high-risk for preeclampsia, 72 (78.3%) were successfully contacted before 16 weeks' gestation. Of these, 62 (86.1%) initiated aspirin, and 10 (13.9%) did not. Performance audit identified a consistent negative bias with mean arterial pressure measurements (median multiple of the median <1 in 10%); other variables were satisfactory. There were 7 cases of preterm preeclampsia (0.69%): 5 and 2 in the high- and low-risk groups, respectively. Screening detected 5 of 7 (71.4 %) preterm preeclampsia cases, with improved performance after adjustment for aspirin treatment effect.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the operational feasibility of implementing an evidence-based preeclampsia screening and prevention program in a publicly funded Canadian setting. This will facilitate implementation into clinical service and the scaling up of this program at a regional and provincial level.

Diabetes und Schwangerschaft – Update 2022

Gestationsdiabetes mellitus (GDM) ist mit einem Anteil von 80 % die häufigste Form der Hyperglykämie in der Schwangerschaft. Stillen reduziert das Risiko für Typ-2-Diabetes, je länger die Stilldauer, umso größer ist der Effekt. Bei Frauen, die eine Früh- oder eine Totgeburt durchgemacht haben, besteht ein erhöhtes Risiko, selbst frühzeitig zu versterben. Das Potenzial einer Präeklampsieprävention durch niedrig dosierte Azetylsalizylsäuregabe bei Frauen mit Diabetes mellitus wird bei weitem nicht ausgeschöpft. Schwangere reduzieren durch eine COVID-19-Impfung (COVID-19: „coronavirus disease 2019“) ihr Risiko für einen schweren Krankheitsverlauf. Die nach wie vor hohe Rate an perinataler Mortalität bei Schwangerschaften mit Typ-1- und Typ-2-Diabetes kann in erster Linie durch eine Verbesserung von Basisfaktoren bei der perikonzeptionellen Betreuung reduziert werden. Zweizeitiges Screening auf GDM reduziert im Vergleich zum einzeitigen Screening die GDM-Prävalenz und die Medikalisierung ohne Nachteile für die Mütter und ihre Neugeborenen. Die Zulassung von Metformin für Schwangere seit Februar 2022 bedeutet nicht, dass dieses Arzneimittel als primäre Pharmakotherapie für schwangere Frauen empfohlen wird.