Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial

Simultaneous Endovascular Aortic Repair Expands Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Eligibility to Patients With Hostile Aortic Pathology

BACKGROUND

In recent years, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has become a primary modality of therapy in moderate-high risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Although clinicians remain vigilant about screening for both aortic stenosis, many patients still, nevertheless, often present only when they are symptomatic. Unfortunately, when isolated TAVR is performed in the context of hostile aortic pathology, it has been reported that patients suffer from higher rates of complications such as rupture, dissection, or death post-operatively.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the utility of a simultaneous TAVR and endovascular aortic repair in addressing symptomatic aortic stenosis in challenging patients with hostile aortic pathology.

METHODS

Retrospective case series within a tertiary care hospital between May 2017 and December 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients underwent simultaneous endovascular aortic repair and TAVR. TAVR was performed first in 9/11 (82%) of the procedures while endovascular aortic repair was performed first in 2/11 procedures (18%). The median age was 84 years old (IQR = 77-86 years old). The median LOS was 3 days (IQR = 2-10 days). The median procedure time was 155 minutes (IQR = 111-202 minutes) and the median contrast amount was 100 CC (IQR = 65-139 CC). 2 patients (18%) experienced post-operative complications. Both of these patients required re-intervention. This cohort of patients did not experience any mortality at 30 days related to pertinent complications or adverse MACE events. All patients were transferred to the PACU and ultimately discharged home.

CONCLUSIONS

Extending TAVR eligibility to high-risk patients with hostile aortic pathology through the implementation of simultaneous endovascular aortic repair, performed via the same access site, is an effective strategy for management of symptomatic aortic stenosis in the context of extensive cardiovascular co-morbidities.

Single center experience with the balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter aortic valve system with the first 100 patients: 30-day and 1-year follow-up

AIMS

To report our single-center data, regarding the first 100 patients who underwent TAVR procedure with the new balloon-expandable MYVAL system. We report 30-day and 1-year outcomes in low to high-risk TAVR patient population.

METHODS

From November 2019 to July 2021, 100 consecutive patients underwent TAVR procedure. Patient outcome was classified according to the VARC-2 definitions. The device performance was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography. Data collection was allowed by the Local Ethical Committee.

RESULTS

The mean age was 74.7 years, 63 (63%) were male. The mean Euroscore II and STS score were 4.8 ± 4.9 and 5.6 ± 3.9, respectively. Transfemoral access was the most frequent (surgical vs. percutaneous 2% vs. 97%) and in one patient surgical subclavian access was used. VARC-2 outcomes were as follows: device success 99%, STROKE 1%, major and minor vascular complication was 1% and 11%, respectively, the rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation was 30.7%. At discharge, the incidence of grade I, grade II aortic regurgitation was 39% and 1%, respectively, without relevant PVL. In-hospital mortality was only 1%. These results included a high proportion (17%) of patients with bicuspid aortic valves. At 1 year, the all-cause mortality rate was 7% (only two due to cardiac event) and only a single patient had valve-related dysfunction requiring surgical aortic replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVR procedure with MYVAL transcatheter heart valve system shows excellent 30-day and 1-year outcomes regarding patient survival, technical success, and valve-related adverse events. The limitations of our study comprise a single-center study with retrospective data collection.

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide is associated with clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Limited data on the prognostic value of periprocedural changes of plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS

Data of plasma NT-proBNP were retrospectively collected in 357 patients before TAVR procedure and at discharge from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021 in our single center. Patients were grouped as responders and non-responders according to the NT-proBNP ratio (postprocedural NT-proBNP at discharge/ preprocedural NT-proBNP). Responders were defined as NT-proBNP ratio < 1 and non-responders were defined as NT-proBNP ratio ≥ 1. Outcomes were defined according to the Valve Academy Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients (65.5%) and 123 patients (34.5%) were grouped as the responders and the non-responders, respectively. Responders and non-responders were significantly different in both median preprocedural (2103.5 vs. 421.0 pg/ml, p < 0.001) and postprocedural (707.6 vs. 1009.0, p < 0.001) NT-proBNP levels. Patients in the non-responder group were more inclined to have comorbidities of hypertension (73.2% vs. 51.7%, p < 0.001), hyperlipidaemia (46.3% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.031), peripheral vascular disease (20.3% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.001) and pure aortic insufficiency (15.4% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001). In the contrast, patients in the responder group had higher prevalence of maximum transvalvular velocity (4.6 vs. 4.2 m/s, p < 0.001), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (58.0% vs. 63.0%, p < 0.001), heart failure (9.4% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.014), mitral regurgitation ≥ moderate (13.7% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.010), tricuspid regurgitation ≥ moderate (12.0% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.002), and pulmonary hypertension (32.9% vs. 13.0%, p < 0.001). Patients in the non-responder group were moderately longer than the responder group in total hospitalization length (14 vs. 12 days, p < 0.001). The non-responder group were significantly associated with cumulative all-cause mortality (p = 0.009) and cardiac mortality (p < 0.001) during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Periprocedural changes of NT-proBNP is clinically useful for the risk stratification of survival in patients after TAVR.

Comparison of middle-term valve durability between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

Background

This study aims to compare valve durability between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was structural valve deterioration (SVD). Secondary outcomes were bioprosthetic valve failure, reintervention, effective orifice area (EOA), mean pressure gradient, and moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (AR, transvalvular and/or paravalvular).

Results

Twenty-five publications from seven RCTs consisting of 7,970 patients were included in the analysis with follow-up ranges of 2-8 years. No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to SVD [odds ratio (OR) 0.72; 95% CI: 0.25-2.12]. The TAVI group was reported to exhibit a statistically significant higher risk of reintervention (OR 2.03; 95% CI: 1.34-3.05) and a moderate-severe AR (OR 6.54; 95% CI: 3.92-10.91) compared with the SAVR group. A trend toward lower mean pressure gradient in the TAVI group [(mean difference (MD) -1.61; 95% CI: -3.5 to 0.28)] and significant higher EOA (MD 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08-0.31) was noted.

Conclusion

The present data indicate that TAVI provides a comparable risk of SVD with favorable hemodynamic profile compared with SAVR. However, the higher risk of significant AR and reintervention was demonstrated.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42022363060).

Hemodynamic Performance of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: A Comprehensive Review

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a widely adopted treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Its popularity has grown significantly in recent years due to advancements in technology and imaging. As TAVI use is increasingly expanded to younger patients, the need for long-term assessment and durability becomes paramount. This review aims to provide an overview of the diagnostic tools to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of aortic prosthesis, with a special focus on the comparison between transcatheter and surgical aortic valves and between self-expandable and balloon-expandable valves. Moreover, the discussion will encompass how cardiovascular imaging can effectively detect long-term structural valve deterioration.

Identifying opportunities to advance health equity in interventional cardiology: Structural heart disease

Health care practices are influenced by variety of factors. These factors that include social determinants, race and ethnicity, and gender not only affect access to health care but can also affect quality of care and patient outcomes. These are a source of health care disparities. This article acknowledges that these disparities exist in getting optimal care in structural heart disease, reviews the literature and proposes steps that can help reduce these disparities on personal and committee levels.

Pushing the limits for interventional treatment of aortic valve stenosis

As we approach 20 years of clinical experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), a vast portfolio of high-quality clinical data has accumulated, confirming the safety and efficacy of TAVR across the entire spectrum of surgical risk. Although many aspects of this innovative therapy have been thoroughly studied, several challenges remain. As TAVR is expanding to include younger low-risk patients, with longer life expectancy, one major unsolved issue is represented by transcatheter heart valve (THV) durability, since robust THV durability data are currently limited to approximately 5-6 years. Additionally, steric interactions between THV components and coronary ostia may render coronary access particularly difficult, and thus personalized decisions regarding THV type and implanting techniques are of paramount importance to secure future coronary access. Since bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis may be associated with unfavorable anatomic factors, it has represented an exclusion criterion in major randomized TAVR trials. Albeit promising data are available from multicenter registries, results of specifically designed randomized trials are eagerly needed to inform use of TAVR for BAV stenosis. Although valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR has emerged as an effective treatment option for degenerated aortic bioprostheses, ViV procedures are associated with specific risks, which mandated the development of specific techniques aimed at reducing the occurrence of periprocedural adverse events. Despite the transfemoral approach represents the access of choice for TAVR, a significant proportion of patients have significant peripheral artery disease and alternative vascular access routes have been increasingly evaluated with encouraging data regarding their safety and feasibility.

Leaflet stress quantification of porcine vs bovine surgical bioprostheses: an in vitro study

Calcified aortic stenoses are among the most prevalent form of cardiovascular diseases in the industrialized countries. This progressive disease, with no effective medical therapy, ultimately requires aortic valve replacement - either a surgical or very recently transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Increase leaflet mechanical stress is one of the main determinants of the structural deterioration of bioprosthetic aortic valves. We applied a coupled in vitro/in silico method to compare the timing, magnitude, and regional distribution of leaflet mechanical stress in porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses (Mosaic and Trifecta). A double activation simulator was used for in vitro testing of a bioprosthesis with externally mounted pericardium (Abbott, Trifecta) and a bioprosthesis with internally mounted porcine valve (Medtronic, Mosaic). A non-contact system based on stereophotogammetry and digital image correlation (DIC) with high spatial and temporal resolution (2000 img/s) was used to visualize the valve leaflet motion and perform the three-dimensional analysis. A finite element model of the valve was developed, and the leaflet deformation obtained from the DIC analysis was applied to the finite element model calculate local leaflet mechanical stress throughout the cardiac cycle. The maximum leaflet stress was higher with the pericardial versus the porcine bioprosthesis (2.03 vs. 1.30 MPa) For both bioprostheses the highest values of leaflet stress occurred during diastole and were primarily observed in the upper leaflet edge near the commissures and to a lesser extent in the mid-portion of the leaflet body. In conclusion, the coupled in vitro/in silico method described in this study shows that the highest levels of leaflet stress occur in the regions of the commissures and mid-portion of the leaflet body. This method may have important insight with regard to bioprosthetic valve durability. Our results suggest that, compared to porcine bioprostheses, those with externally mounted pericardium have higher leaflet mechanical stress, which may translate into shorter durability.

Creatinine Score Can Predict Persistent Renal Dysfunction Following Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is often accompanied by renal dysfunction, which portends a poor prognosis. Trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an accepted therapy for patients with severe AS, whereas the prediction of persistent renal dysfunction following TAVR remains challenging. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the pre-procedural score to assess the reversibility of renal dysfunction following TAVR. A total of 2,588 patients with severe AS who received TAVR and were enrolled in the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN-TAVI) multicenter registry (UMIN000020423) were retrospectively investigated and those with serum creatinine (Cre) data at baseline and one year following TAVR were included. The Cre score was calculated using the formula: 0.2 × (age [years]) + 3.6 × (baseline serum Cre [mg/dL]). This score was evaluated to assess the risk of persistent renal dysfunction defined as serum Cre level > 1.5 mg/dL at one year following TAVR. Of the 1705 patients (84.3 ± 5.0 years old) included, 246 (14%) had persistent renal dysfunction following TAVR. The Cre score predicted the incidence of persistent renal dysfunction with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 1.48 (95% confidence interval 1.42-1.56) with a cutoff of 21.4 (43% versus 5%, P < 0.001). The Cre score also predicted 4-year survival following TAVR (70% versus 52%, P < 0.001) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.75 (95% confidence interval 1.29-2.37). In conclusion, the Cre score identified those with a high risk of one-year persistent renal dysfunction following TAVR. The implication of Cre score-guided therapeutic strategy is the next concern.

Effect of Transaortic Valve Intervention for Aortic Stenosis on Myocardial Mechanics

Chronic afterload excess in aortic stenosis results in compensatory concentric hypertrophy which mitigates the increased systolic load. Surgical aortic valve replacement has been shown to decrease afterload and improve left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). The extent to which these changes take place in patients undergoing TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve intervention) may be different than what has been observed in the surgical aortic valve replacement patients who were generally younger with few co-morbidities. Accordingly, we analyzed indices of LV structure and ventricular mechanics pre- and 1-year after TAVI in 397 patients (mean age 81±9, 46% women) with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, complete echocardiographic data was available in 156 patients and these patients compromised our study population. Our principal findings are: (1) LV remodeling occurs after TAVI; (2) afterload decreases significantly; (3) LV chamber and myocardial function, assessed by left ventricular ejection fraction and midwall fractional shortening, and stroke volume, respectively, remain unchanged or decrease. In conclusion, TAVI effects LV remodeling despite significant co-morbidities. Thus, TAVI reduces afterload and leads to LV remodeling. Surprisingly, however, systolic function does not improve. These data run counter to the paradigm that afterload reduction improves systolic function and suggest that the response to afterload reduction is complex in the TAVI population.

Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Update 2020

The implantation of bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) is increasingly becoming the treatment of choice in patients requiring heart valve replacement surgery. Unlike mechanical heart valves, BHVs are less thrombogenic and exhibit superior hemodynamic properties. However, BHVs are prone to structural valve degeneration (SVD), an unavoidable condition limiting graft durability. Mechanisms underlying SVD are incompletely understood, and early concepts suggesting the purely degenerative nature of this process are now considered oversimplified. Recent studies implicate the host immune response as a major modality of SVD pathogenesis, manifested by a combination of processes phenocopying the long‐term transplant rejection, atherosclerosis, and calcification of native aortic valves. In this review, we summarize and critically analyze relevant studies on (1) SVD triggers and pathogenesis, (2) current approaches to protect BHVs from calcification, (3) obtaining low immunogenic BHV tissue from genetically modified animals, and (4) potential strategies for SVD prevention in the clinical setting.

Aortic Valve Replacement in Young and Middle-Aged Adults: Current and Potential Roles of TAVR

BACKGROUND

Contemporary practice patterns and outcomes for aortic valve replacement (AVR) among young and middle-aged adults are unknown given guideline modifications for surgical AVR (SAVR) and increasing transcatheter AVR (TAVR) acceptance. This study describes SAVR and TAVR use and outcomes using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Databases.

METHODS

Adults 18 to 55 years of age in the Congenital Heart Surgery Database (CHSD) and the Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) who underwent SAVR or TAVR from 2013 to 2018 were included. Perioperative characteristics and early outcomes were described by valve type. Multivariable regression identified determinants of death, length of hospital stay, and a composite end point of renal failure, persistent neurologic deficit, readmission, and reoperation.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 1580 unique CHSD and 44,173 ACSD operations, 16% of which were performed in patients with congenital heart disease. Valve use included the following: TAVR, 1%; mechanical, 42%; bioprosthetic, 55%; autograft, 0.6%; homograft, 1.2%; and Ozaki, 0.4%. Over time, TAVR volumes increased by 167%. The 30-day mortality was as follows: TAVR, 3.8%; mechanical, 3.2%; bioprosthetic, 3.7%; autograft, 0.6%; homograft, 9%; and Ozaki, 3.4%. Stroke rate was lower for isolated SAVR vs isolated TAVR (0.9% vs 2.4%; P = .002). In multivariable analyses, mortality risk was lower with mechanical valves, congenital morbidity risk was higher with TAVR, and length of stay was shorter with TAVR.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVR is increasingly used for adults younger than 55 years of age. Given the uniformly excellent results with SAVR, including both mortality and morbidity-particularly regarding stroke, our data favor SAVR in this population, but a prospective trial is needed. Ongoing efforts to harmonize variables and outcomes definitions between the ACSD and CHSD are valuable.

TAVR in Patients with Pure Aortic Regurgitation: Ready to Use?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR) occurs in 0.5% of the population and typically peaks in the fourth to sixth decade of life. A significant proportion of patients have prohibitive surgical risk and are therefore treated medically with pharmacological management of heart failure and no definitive treatment of the underlying valvular pathology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been used in an off-label setting to treat AR to attempt to reduce mortality and improve quality of life with varying levels of success. New-generation TAVR devices currently used in AS have demonstrated safety and feasibility when used in patients with AR. Novel TAVR devices dedicated for use in AR are being developed and early studies demonstrate promising results. Ongoing studies with larger clinical trials and novel methods of device anchoring are required, which if positive, will in turn lead to commercial approval and reimbursement, eventually making TAVR ready for use in AR.

Mid-term outcomes of Sapien 3 versus Perimount Magna Ease for treatment of severe aortic stenosis

Background

There is limited information on the longer-term outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with new-generation prostheses compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The aim of this study was to compare the mid-term outcomes after TAVR with Sapien 3 and SAVR with Perimount Magna Ease bioprostheses for severe aortic stenosis.

Methods

In a retrospective study, we included patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR with Sapien 3 or SAVR with Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis between January 2008 and October 2017 from the nationwide FinnValve registry. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in the baseline characteristics. The Kaplan-Meir method was used to estimate late mortality.

Results

A total of 2000 patients were included (689 in the TAVR cohort and 1311 in the SAVR cohort). Propensity score matching resulted in 308 pairs (STS score, TAVR 3.5 ± 2.2% vs. SAVR 3.5 ± 2.8%, p = 0.918). In-hospital mortality was 3.6% after SAVR and 1.3% after TAVR (p = 0.092). Stroke, acute kidney injury, bleeding and atrial fibrillation were significantly more frequent after SAVR, but higher rate of vascular complications was observed after TAVR. The cumulative incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation at 4 years was 13.9% in the TAVR group and 6.9% in the SAVR group (p = 0.0004). At 4-years, all-cause mortality was 20.6% for SAVR and 25.9% for TAVR (p = 0.910). Four-year rates of coronary revascularization, prosthetic valve endocarditis and repeat aortic valve intervention were similar between matched cohorts.

Conclusions

The Sapien 3 bioprosthesis achieves comparable midterm outcomes to a surgical bioprosthesis with proven durability such as the Perimount Magna Ease. However, the Sapien 3 bioprosthesis was associated with better early outcome.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03385915.

Structural durability of early-generation Transcatheter aortic valve replacement valves compared with surgical aortic valve replacement valves in heart valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The current treatment for aortic stenosis includes open surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as well as endovascular transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aims to compare the 1-year, 2–3 year and 5-year structural durability of TAVR valves with that of SAVR valves.

Method

A systematic literature search was conducted in July 2019 on Medline (via PubMed), Embase and Cochrane electronic databases according to the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included. From the meta-analysis, we observed higher rates of 1-year (OR: 7.65, CI: 4.57 to 12.79, p < 0.00001), 2–3-year (OR: 13.49, CI: 5.66 to 32.16, p < 0.00001) and 5-year paravalvular regurgitation (OR: 14.51, CI: 4.47 to 47.09, p < 0.00001) associated with the TAVR valves than the SAVR valves. There were also higher rates of 1-year (OR: 5.00, CI: 3.27 to 7.67, p < 0.00001), 2–3-year (OR: 8.14, CI: 3.58 to 18.50, p < 0.00001) and 5-year moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (MD: 14.65, CI: 4.55 to 47.19, p < 0.00001), and higher rates of 1-year (OR: 3.55, CI: 1.86 to 6.77, p = 0.0001), 2–3-year (OR: 3.55, CI: 1.86 to 6.77, p = 0.0001) and 5-year reintervention (OR: 3.55, CI: 1.22 to 10.38, p = 0.02) in the TAVR valves as compared to SAVR valves.

Conclusion

TAVR valves appear to be more susceptible to structural valve deterioration and thus potentially less structurally durable than SAVR valves, given that they may be associated with higher rates of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, paravalvular regurgitation and reintervention in the 1-year-, 2–3 year, and 5-year period.

2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Statement for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or replacement has rapidly changed the treatment of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. It is now the standard of care for patients believed to be inoperable or at high surgical risk, and a reasonable alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for those at intermediate surgical risk. Recent clinical trial data have shown the benefits of this technology in patients at low surgical risk as well. This update of the 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular Society TAVI position statement incorporates clinical evidence to provide a practical framework for patient selection that does not rely on surgical risk scores but rather on individual patient evaluation of risk and benefit from either TAVI or surgical aortic valve replacement. In addition, this statement features new wait time categories and treatment time goals for patients accepted for TAVI. Institutional requirements and recommendations for operator training and maintenance of competency have also been revised to reflect current standards. Procedural considerations such as decision-making for concomitant coronary intervention, antiplatelet therapy after intervention, and follow-up guidelines are also discussed. Finally, we suggest that all patients with aortic stenosis might benefit from evaluation by the heart team to determine the optimal individualized treatment decision.

Bench to bedside defining calcific aortic valve disease: osteocardiology

INTRODUCTION

For years, calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) was thought to be due to a degenerative process, but recent scientific discoveries have proven it to be an active process. Understanding the cellular mechanisms for the development of disease and translating the cellular changes critical in the development of calcific phenotypes. The use of multimodality imaging has been the gold standard to define the development of calcification to determine the timing of therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review will discuss the scientific literature in a new and evolving field known as osteocardiology, which specifically defines the cellular mechanisms involved in the development of the osteogenic phenotype in the heart and vasculature. The work in this field has been highlighted by the calcific aortic valve disease working group at the NIH. This review will discuss the appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging techniques to identify early cellular and hemodynamic disease progression in the aortic valve to help determine the timing of therapy, the osteocardiology theory.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors will provide their background in basic science and clinical medicine to support the opinions in this paper.

5-Year Outcomes After TAVR With Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Valves: Results From the CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and echocardiographic outcome data of the CHOICE (Randomized Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis: Medtronic CoreValve Versus Edwards SAPIEN XT) trial at 5 years.

BACKGROUND

The CHOICE trial was designed to compare device performance of a balloon-expandable (BE) transcatheter heart valve (THV) versus a self-expanding (SE) THV.

METHODS

The CHOICE trial is an investigator-initiated trial that randomized 241 high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and an anatomy suitable for treatment with both BE and SE THVs to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with either device. The primary endpoint was device success. Patients were followed up to 5 years, with assessment of clinical outcomes, and echocardiographic evaluation of valve function and THV durability.

RESULTS

After 5 years, there were no statistically significant differences between BE and SE valves in the cumulative incidence of death from any cause (53.4% vs. 47.6%; p = 0.38), death from cardiovascular causes (31.6% vs. 21.5%; p = 0.12), all strokes (17.5% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.73), and repeat hospitalization for heart failure (28.9% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.75). SE patients had larger prosthetic valve area (1.6 ± 0.5 cm² vs. 1.9 ± 0.5 cm²; p = 0.02) with a lower mean transprosthetic gradient (12.2 ± 8.7 mm Hg vs. 6.9 ± 2.7 mm Hg; p = 0.001) at 5 years. No differences were observed in the rates of paravalvular regurgitation. Clinical valve thrombosis occurred in 7 BE patients (7.3%) and 1 SE patient (0.8%; p = 0.06), and moderate or severe structural valve deterioration in 6 BE patients (6.6%) and no SE patient (0%; p = 0.018). The rate of bioprosthetic valve failure was low and not significantly different between both groups (4.1% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year follow-up of patients in the CHOICE trial revealed clinical outcomes after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with early-generation BE and SE valves that were not statistically significantly different, with limited statistical power. Forward flow hemodynamics were significantly better with the SE valve. Moderate or severe structural valve deterioration was uncommon but occurred more frequently with the BE valve. (A Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The CHOICE Trial [CHOICE]; NCT01645202).

3-Year Outcomes After Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerated Bioprostheses: The PARTNER 2 Registry

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for degenerated surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves is associated with favorable early outcomes. However, little is known about the durability and longer-term outcomes associated with this therapy.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine late outcomes after valve-in-valve TAVR.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic degeneration of surgical aortic bioprostheses at high risk (≥50% major morbidity or mortality) for reoperative surgery were prospectively enrolled in the multicenter PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 2 valve-in-valve and continued access registries. Three-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was obtained.

RESULTS

Valve-in-valve procedures were performed in 365 patients. The mean age was 78.9 ± 10.2 years, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 9.1 ± 4.7%. At 3 years, the overall Kaplan-Meier estimate of all-cause mortality was 32.7%. Aortic valve re-replacement was required in 1.9%. Mean transaortic gradient was 35.0 mm Hg at baseline, decreasing to 17.8 mm Hg at 30-day follow-up and 16.6 mm Hg at 3-year follow-up. Baseline effective orifice area was 0.93 cm², increasing to 1.13 and 1.15 cm² at 30 days and 3 years, respectively. Moderate to severe aortic regurgitation was reduced from 45.1% at pre-TAVR baseline to 2.5% at 3 years. Importantly, moderate or severe mitral and tricuspid regurgitation also decreased (33.7% vs. 8.6% [p < 0.0001] and 29.7% vs. 18.8% [p = 0.002], respectively). Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 50.7%, increasing to 54.7% at 3 years (p < 0.0001), while left ventricular mass index was 136.4 g/m², decreasing to 109.1 g/m² at 3 years (p < 0.0001). New York Heart Association functional class improved, with 90.4% in class III or IV at baseline and 14.1% at 3 years (p < 0.0001), and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall score increased (43.1 to 73.1; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

At 3-year follow-up, TAVR for bioprosthetic aortic valve failure was associated with favorable survival, sustained improved hemodynamic status, and excellent functional and quality-of-life outcomes. (The PARTNER II Trial: Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves II - PARTNER II - Nested Registry 3/Valve-in-Valve [PII NR3/ViV]; NCT03225001).

Impact of leaflet thrombosis on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Leaflet thrombosis (LT, also called cusp thrombosis) detected by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is common in bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR). However, it remains contradictory whether MDCT-defined LT following bAVR is associated with hemodynamic deterioration and stroke. Thus, we performed the first meta-analysis to assess hemodynamic outcomes and updated the latest researches on the clinical outcomes of MDCT-defined LT after bAVR.

HYPOTHESIS

MDCT-defined LT might be associated with worse hemodynamic and clinical outcomes after bAVR.

METHOD

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched from inception to 15th April 2019. The fix-effect model was utilized to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcomes were hemodynamic stability indexes, including mean pressure gradient (MPG), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), paravalvular leak (PVL), and clinical heart failure. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), which consisted of myocardial infarction, all-cause death, stroke, and transient ischemic attack (TIA).

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 4820 patients were included. The total prevalence of MDCT-defined LT was 9.7%. MDCT-defined LT was associated with a significantly increased risk of MPG (inverse variance 0.43, 95% CI: [0.30, 0.57]), MACCEs (OR 2.43, 95% CI: [1.45, 4.06]), stroke (OR 1.79, 95% CI: [1.03, 3.11]), and TIA (OR 4.09, 95% CI: [1.59, 10.54]). There were no differences for other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

MDCT-defined LT after bAVR is associated with increased MPG and increased risk of adverse cerebrovascular events, including TIA and stroke. While LVEF, PVL, and clinical heart failure were similar between patient with and without LT.

Impact of Stroke Volume Index and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of stroke volume index (SVI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis, comparing those undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and those with surgical AVR (SAVR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 742 patients from the CoreValve US Pivotal High-Risk Trial randomized to TAVR (n=389) or SAVR (n=353) from February 2011 to September 2012 were stratified by an SVI of 35 mL/m² and LVEF of 50% for comparing all-cause mortality at 1 year.

RESULTS

The prevalence of an SVI of less than 35 mL/m² in patients who underwent TAVR and SAVR was 35.8% (125 of 349) and 31.3% (96 of 307), respectively; LVEF of less than 50% was present in 18.1% (63 of 348) and 19.6% (60 of 306), respectively. Among patients with an SVI of less than 35 mL/m², 1-year mortality was similar between patients with TAVR and SAVR (16.3% vs 22.2%; P=.25). However, in those with an SVI of 35 mL/m² or greater, 1-year mortality was lower in those with TAVR than SAVR (10.3% vs 17.3%; P=.03). In patients with an LVEF of less than 50%, mortality was not affected by AVR approach (P>.05). In patients with an LVEF of 50% or higher, TAVR was associated with lower mortality than SAVR when SVI was preserved (9.8% vs 18.6%; P=.01). Mortality was not affected by SVI within the same AVR approach when LVEF was 50% or higher.

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe aortic stenosis at high risk, there is a significant interaction between AVR approach and the status of SVI and LVEF. When LVEF or SVI was reduced, prognosis was similar regardless of AVR approach. In those with preserved LVEF or SVI, TAVR was associated with a better prognosis than SAVR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01240902.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Current Indications and Future Directions

Degenerative heart valve disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and healthcare expenditures. Transcatheter heart valve repair and replacement has introduced a fundamental change in the therapeutic management and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has gained substantial popularity. Favorable results from randomized trials and large real world registries lead to TAVR being considered a standard procedure with high rates of procedural success and low rates of peri-procedural complications. This article aims to review the past evolution, summarize the available evidence, discuss current indications and limitations and venture a glimpse into the future of percutaneous interventions for aortic valve disease.

Postimplant biological aortic prosthesis degeneration: challenges in transcatheter valve implants

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is highly effective and can be achieved with relatively low risk in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Bioprostheses have been used most frequently during the past 60 years. However, the function of biological valves usually declines after 10-15 years from implant when structural valve degeneration occurs often mandating a reoperation once valve dysfunction becomes haemodynamically significant. Known for many years by surgeons and cardiologists taking care of patients with SAVR, the issue of postimplant structural valve degeneration has been recently highlighted also in patients with transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI). There is growing concern that TAVI valves exhibit structural valve degeneration due to inherent challenges of the deployment mode. The impact on postimplant degeneration of TAVI valves compared to SAVR has still to be understood and defined. Based on the ongoing process of expanding TAVI indications, several potential shortcomings and caveats, learned during the last 60 years of SAVR experience, should be taken into consideration to refine this technique.

Long-Term Functional and Structural Durability of Bioprosthetic Valves Placed in the Aortic Valve Position via Percutaneous Rout in Israel

There is limited organized "real life" data regarding the long-term structural and functional durability of transcatheter aortic valve implants, a topic of major importance. We assessed the 5-year structural and functional integrity outcomes following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with both self-expandable and balloon-expandable prosthetic valve devices. This study included 450 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) between September 2008 and December 2011. Data were acquired from a multicenter Israeli registry and the median follow up time was 5.6 years. In 184 patients (40.9%) who survived 5 years, prostheses displayed sustained hemodynamic performance, with average peak and mean aortic valve gradients of 16.2 ± 8.9 and 9.2 ± 6.6 mm Hg, respectively. Late structural valve deterioration was found in 22 (12.3%) patients. Of these, 16 (8.9%) experienced valve deterioration and 6 (3.3%) experienced valve failure. Among the 6 patients with bioprosthetic valve failure, only 3 underwent re-interventions. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction occurred more frequently in patients with small valves (23 mm) and high peak and mean transvalvular gradients at baseline. In conclusion, a relatively low rate of valve deterioration or failure was noted in our long-term follow-up study after TAVI procedures with both the catheter-based self-expandable and balloon-expandable prosthetic valves.

Long-Term Durability of Transcatheter Heart Valves: Insights From Bench Testing to 25 Years

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the long-term durability of nominally deployed transcatheter heart valves (THV) to 1 billion cycles (equivalent to 25 years) and non-nominal (overexpansion, underexpansion, and elliptical) THV deployments to 200 million cycles (equivalent to 5 years) with accelerated wear testing.

BACKGROUND

The long-term durability of THVs is currently unknown. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement expands to lower-risk patients, durability will be of increasing importance.

METHODS

SAPIEN 3 THVs, sized 20, 23, 26, and 29 mm were assessed. Nominally deployed THVs underwent hydrodynamic performance and mechanical durability as assessed with accelerated wear testing to 1 billion cycles. Magna Ease surgical valves were used as comparators. Durability of non-nominal THV deployments was tested to 200 million cycles. Valves were tested to International Standards Organization 5840:2013 standard.

RESULTS

THV durability was excellent for both the nominal and non-nominal THV deployments to 1 billion and 200 million cycles, respectively. At 1 billion cycles the regurgitant fraction for the 20-, 23-, 26-, and 29-mm SAPIEN 3 was 0.92 ± 0.47%, 1.29 ± 0.04%, 1.73 ± 0.46%, and 2.47 ± 0.15%, respectively. There was also excellent durability in the comparator Magna Ease valves. The regurgitant fraction of non-nominal overexpanded (20 mm, 4.36 ± 0.53; 23 mm, 7.68 ± 1.39; 26 mm, 6.80 ± 1.17; 29 mm, 9.00 ± 0.37), underexpanded (20 mm, 3.06 ± 0.28; 23 mm, 4.46 ± 0.45; 26 mm, 7.72 ± 0.48; 29 mm, 8.65 ± 2.01), and elliptical (20 mm, 3.30 ± 0.38; 23 mm, 6.13 ± 0.94; 26 mm, 6.77 ± 1.22; 29 mm, 8.72 ± 0.24) THVs were excellent at 200 million cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Nominal SAPIEN 3 THVs demonstrated excellent durability, to an equivalent of 25-years wear. THV durability was similar to the comparator surgical valves tested. Non-nominal (overexpansion, underexpansion, and elliptical) THV deployments also had excellent durability to an equivalent of 5 years wear.

Long-Term Outcomes of High-Risk or Inoperable Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Few studies have evaluated transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) beyond 5 years. We investigated long-term outcomes (≥5 years) and transcatheter heart valve (THV) performance in patients who had undergone TAVI at least 5 years previously, based on annual follow-up. We reviewed 114 consecutive patients who were of high surgical risk or inoperable and underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis from October 2009 to November 2013. There was no lost to follow-up, and median time to death or latest follow-up was 5.0 years (range: 0.1 to 8.5). Structural valve degeneration (SVD) was defined on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as follows: (1) mean pressure gradient ≥20 mm Hg with a >10 mm Hg increase from the post-TAVI baseline, and/or (2) moderate or severe transvalvular regurgitation. The mean patient age was 82.7 ± 6.4 years, and 37.7% of patients were men. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 7.6% (interquartile range 5.8 to 10.9). TTE ≥5 years was 76.1% complete (51 of 67 patients who survived ≥5 years postoperatively). The estimated cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 88.6%, 72.8%, 58.8%, and 45.3%, respectively. Albumin <3.5 g/dl was strongly associated with increased long-term mortality on multivariate analysis. Longitudinal TTE confirmed durable performance of THV up to 7 years in the majority of patients; however, 6 patients (5.3% of the total cohort) experienced SVD during the follow-up. In conclusion, this study demonstrated favorable long-term survival and stable THV performance after TAVI, although SVD was not rare.

Veterans Affairs Heart Team Experience With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Minimally Invasive Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve disease is prevalent in the veteran population. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) are minimally invasive approaches predominantly performed at higher-volume cardiac centers. The study aim was to evaluate our experience with minimally invasive techniques at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), since outcomes from lower-volume federal facilities are relatively unknown.

METHODS

This study examined retrospective data from 228 consecutive patients who underwent treatment for isolated aortic valve disease with MIAVR or TAVR via intent-to-treat at a VAMC between January 2011 and July 2017. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed using Stata version 15.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 1.1% for MIAVR and 0.7% for TAVR (Χ² P=.79). Median length of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR], 7-14 days) for MIAVR and 4 days for TAVR (IQR, 3-6 days; Mann-Whitney P<.001). Postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 52% of MIAVR patients and 5.2% of TAVR patients (Χ² P<.001). Stroke occurred in 2.2% of MIAVR patients and 3.0% of TAVR patients (Χ² P=.71). In patients who underwent MIAVR, 5.4% required placement of a permanent pacemaker postoperatively, compared with 14% of TAVR patients (Χ² P=.04). Mild paravalvular leak (PVL) affected 2.2% of MIAVR and 28% of TAVR patients, with moderate PVL reported in 2.2% of MIAVR and 3% of TAVR patients (Χ² P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The VAMC heart team offers MIAVR and TAVR to veterans with isolated aortic valve disease, and has achieved excellent outcomes despite relatively lower case volumes. Both offer excellent hemodynamic results, with low mortality in a complex population.

Valvular Heart Disease in Patients ≥80 Years of Age

In the United States, the octogenarian population is projected to triple by 2050. With this aging population, the prevalence of valvular heart disease (VHD) is on the rise. The etiology, approach to treatment, and expected outcomes of VHD are different in the elderly compared with younger patients. Both stenotic and regurgitant lesions are associated with unfavorable outcomes if left untreated. Surgical mortality remains high due to multiple co-morbidities, and long-term survival benefit is dependent on many variables including valvular pathology. Quality of life is an important consideration in treatment decisions in this age group. Increasingly, octogenarian patients are receiving transcatheter therapies, with transcatheter aortic valve replacement having the greatest momentum. Numerous transcatheter devices for management of other valve lesions are currently in early clinical trials. This review will describe the epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic options for VHD in the oldest old, with a focus on transcatheter technologies.

How to treat severe symptomatic structural valve deterioration of aortic surgical bioprosthesis: transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation or redo valve surgery?

The optimal management of aortic surgical bioprosthesis presenting with severe symptomatic structural valve deterioration is currently a matter of debate. Over the past 20 years, the number of implanted bioprostheses worldwide has been rapidly increasing at the expense of mechanical prostheses. A large proportion of patients, however, will require intervention for bioprosthesis structural valve deterioration. Current options for older patients who often have severe comorbidities include either transcatheter valve-in-valve (TVIV) implantation or redo valve surgery. The emergence of TVIV implantation, which is perceived to be less invasive than redo valve surgery, offers an effective alternative to surgery for these patients with proven safety and efficacy in high-risk patient groups including elderly and frail patients. A potential caveat to this strategy is that results of long-term follow-up after TVIV implantation are limited. Redo surgery is sometimes preferable, especially for young patients with a smaller-sized aortic bioprosthesis. With the emergence of TVIV implantation and the long experience of redo valve surgery, we currently have 2 complementary treatment modalities, allowing a tailor-made and patient-orientated intervention. In the heart team, the decision-making should be based on several factors including type of bioprosthesis failure, age, comorbidities, operative risk, anatomical factors, anticipated risks and benefits of each alternative, patient's choice and local experience. The aim of this review is to provide a framework for individualized optimal treatment strategies in patients with failed aortic surgical bioprosthesis.

Evolution of Minimally Invasive Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

OBJECTIVE

The majority of minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacements (MIAVRs) are performed at high-volume cardiac surgery centers. However, outcomes at lower volume federal facilities are not yet reported in the literature and not captured in the national Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. Our study objective was to describe the evolution of MIAVR at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed of 114 patients who underwent MIAVR for isolated aortic valvular disease between January 2011 and August 2018. Preoperative STS risk factors were determined and perioperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

By 2016, 100% of isolated surgical aortic valve replacements were performed as MIAVRs at our VAMC. Introduction of automatic knot-fastening devices, single-shot del Nido cardioplegia, and rapid deployment valves decreased aortic cross-clamp (AXC) times from a median of 96 (interquartile range [IQR]: 84 to 103) to 53 minutes (38 to 61, P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis). Thirty-day mortality was 0.9%. Median length of hospital stay was 9 days (7 to 13). Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred in 54% of patients, stroke occurred in 1.8% of patients, and 7.1% of patients required permanent pacemakers. Transition to rapid deployment valves decreased postoperative mean pressure gradient from median 14 mmHg (10 to 17) to 7 mmHg (4.7 to 10, P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney). At median 1.5-year follow-up echocardiogram, mean gradient was 10.8 mmHg with mild paravalvular leak rate of 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Facilitating technologies decreased operative times during MIAVR adoption at our VAMC. For patients with isolated aortic valve pathology, MIAVR can be performed with low morbidity and mortality at lower volume federal institutions, with outcomes comparable to those reported from higher volume centers.

Current Key Issues in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Undergoing a Paradigm Shift

As a new technology in the management of valvular heart disease, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has drawn much attention since its emergence. To date, numerous studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of TAVR in patients of various risk profiles with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and demonstrated comparable or superior outcomes of TAVR when compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The favorable outcomes of TAVR in inoperable patients, as well as in high- and intermediate-risk patients, are endorsed in current guidelines, and trials of low-risk patients have shown non-inferior or even superior results of TAVR than for SAVR, suggesting that the clinical indications of TAVR can be expanded to low-risk patients. Moreover, a therapeutic role of TAVR has been suggested in various aortic valve (AV) diseases, such as bicuspid AV, moderate AS with heart failure, aortic regurgitation, and bioprosthetic valve failure. In this review, we summarize the current issues of TAVR in various patient populations and discuss the expanding clinical indications of TAVR, which are driving a major paradigm shift in the management of AV disease.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis

Aims 

Owing to new evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, we compared the collective safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) across the entire spectrum of surgical risk patients.

Methods and results 

The meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016037273). We identified RCTs comparing TAVI with SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis reporting at different follow-up periods. We extracted trial, patient, intervention, and outcome characteristics following predefined criteria. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality up to 2 years for the main analysis. Seven trials that randomly assigned 8020 participants to TAVI (4014 patients) and SAVR (4006 patients) were included. The combined mean STS score in the TAVI arm was 9.4%, 5.1%, and 2.0% for high-, intermediate-, and low surgical risk trials, respectively. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with a significant reduction of all-cause mortality compared to SAVR {hazard ratio [HR] 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–0.99], P = 0.030}; an effect that was consistent across the entire spectrum of surgical risk (P-for-interaction = 0.410) and irrespective of type of transcatheter heart valve (THV) system (P-for-interaction = 0.674). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation resulted in lower risk of strokes [HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68–0.98), P = 0.028]. Surgical aortic valve replacement was associated with a lower risk of major vascular complications [HR 1.99 (95% CI 1.34–2.93), P = 0.001] and permanent pacemaker implantations [HR 2.27 (95% CI 1.47–3.64), P < 0.001] compared to TAVI.

Conclusion 

Compared with SAVR, TAVI is associated with reduction in all-cause mortality and stroke up to 2 years irrespective of baseline surgical risk and type of THV system.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement hemodynamic durability: Still in question?

This study shows excellent transcatheter aortic valve replacement hemodynamic mid-term durability, aligned with prior research up to 5-years. Long-term (10+ years) data are needed before treating young low-risk people with aortic stenosis. Data so far are excellent, indicating a prosperous future for this procedure in young patients.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Challenges and Pitfalls

Because of the unfavorable anatomic features of bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS), the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in bicuspid AS were suboptimal, particularly when using the first-generation transcatheter valves. However, the newer-generation transcatheter valves significantly improved the outcomes of TAVR in bicuspid AS. Nonetheless, long-term durability of transcatheter valves and concomitant aortopathy should be taken into account. Considering the expanding indication of TAVR to lower the surgical risk and a younger population, these issues should be evaluated in future studies.