Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Dermatologist-Diagnosed Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases

Biologics for Hidradenitis suppurativa: evolution of the treatment paradigm

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an autoinflammatory skin disease with a high unmet need for effective medical management. Clinically, it is characterized by inflammatory nodules that may progress into abscesses, draining tunnels and extensive scarring, mainly affecting apocrine gland-bearing areas.

AREAS COVERED

Treatment options include topical and systemic medications and a variety of surgical procedures. The anti-TNF-α antibody adalimumab and the anti-IL-17 secukinumab are the only two approved biologics for HS, showing moderate efficacy. HS research is a rapidly growing field, with a wide range of agents leveraging distinct mechanisms of action currently under development. Drugs targeting the IL-17 and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathways are the most advanced in both ongoing and completed Phase 3 studies, promising deeper levels of response. Use of other, off-label biologics is also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

A therapeutic algorithm is proposed based on comorbidities and existing evidence. Patient-tailored combinations between biologics and other biologics or small molecules will hopefully allow clinicians to target most events in HS pathophysiology in a complementary way while obtaining a meaningful effect on their devastating manifestations.

Venous thromboembolism risk is lower in patients with atopic dermatitis than other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study using US claims data

BACKGROUND

Certain immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) may increase patients' risk for venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), yet how atopic dermatitis (AD) influences VTE risk remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Describe VTE incidence in patients with AD compared with other IMIDs and unaffected, AD-matched controls.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study used Optum Clinformatics United States claims data (2010-2019) of adults with AD, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Unaffected control patients were matched 1:1 with patients with AD.

RESULTS

Of 2,061,222 patients with IMIDs, 1,098,633 had AD. Patients with AD had a higher VTE incidence (95% CI) than did unaffected, AD-matched controls (0.73 [0.72-0.74] versus 0.59 [0.58-0.60] cases/100 person-years). When controlling for baseline VTE risk factors, however, AD was not associated with increased VTE risk (HR 0.96 [0.90-1.02]). VTE risk was lower in patients with AD versus RA, UC, CD, AS, or PsA; VTE risk was similar to patients with PsO.

LIMITATIONS

Disease activity and severity were not accounted for.

CONCLUSION

AD did not increase VTE risk when accounting for underlying risk factors. AD was associated with lower VTE risk compared with several rheumatologic and gastrointestinal IMIDs.

Novel Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Dermatologic Conditions

Janus kinase inhibitors, also known as JAK inhibitors, JAKinibs or JAKi, are a new group of disease-modifying drugs. They work by inhibiting enzymes involved in the transmission of information from receptors located in the cell membrane to the cell interior, specifically to the cell nucleus, thus disrupting the JAK-STAT pathway. This pathway plays a role in key cellular processes such as the immune response and cell growth. This feature is used in the treatment of patients with rheumatological, gastroenterological and hematological diseases. Recently, it has been discovered that JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors also show therapeutic potential against dermatological diseases such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, alopecia areata and acquired vitiligo. Studies are underway to use them in the treatment of several other dermatoses. Janus kinase inhibitors represent a promising class of drugs for the treatment of skin diseases refractory to conventional therapy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the latest knowledge on the use of JAKi in dermatological treatment.

Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) may increase risk for atherothrombotic and cardiovascular (CV) disease.

OBJECTIVE

Determine CV disease and venous thromboembolism risk among patients with AD.

METHODS

Cohort study using electronic health data from U.K. general practices in 1994 to 2015. Children (<18 y) and adults (≥18 y) with AD were matched to patients without AD on age, same practice, and encounter date. Treatments and specialist referrals served as proxies of AD severity. Outcomes were incident myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism. Cox regression analysis was used to compare outcomes in AD versus non-AD patients.

RESULTS

Comparing 409,341 children with AD (93.2% mild, 5.5% moderate, and 1.3% severe) to 1,809,029 unaffected children, AD was associated with higher risk of DVT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02-1.48) and severe AD was associated with higher risk of CVA (HR 2.43; 95% CI 1.13-5.22) and diabetes (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.06-2.01). Comparing 625,083 adults with AD (65.7% mild, 31.4% moderate, and 2.9% severe) to 2,678,888 unaffected adults, AD, especially when severe, was associated with higher risk of DVT (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.11-1.18; and HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.49-1.82, respectively) and small but increased risks of CVA, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Adults with severe AD had higher risk of myocardial infarction (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.15-1.39), CVA (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.13-1.30), diabetes (HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.09-1.22), dyslipidemia (HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.06-1.17), and pulmonary embolism (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.21-1.60) compared with adults without AD.

CONCLUSIONS

Atopic dermatitis, particularly when severe, is associated with small but increased risks of CV risk factors and events and significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism.

The risk of venous thromboembolism in atopic dermatitis: a matched cohort analysis in UK primary care

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin condition. While other chronic inflammatory conditions are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), associations between AD and VTE have not been established.

OBJECTIVES

We examined whether AD is associated with an increased risk of VTE in a population-based study.

METHODS

Electronic health records were extracted from UK general practices contributing to the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (1 January 2010 to 1 January 2020). All adults with AD were identified (n = 150 975) and age- and sex-matched with unaffected controls (n = 603 770). The risk of VTE, consisting of pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), was compared in people with AD vs. controls using Cox proportional hazard models. PE and DVT were examined separately as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 150 975 adults with active AD and matched them with 603 770 unaffected controls. During the study, 2576 of those with active AD and 7563 of the matched controls developed VTE. Individuals with AD had a higher risk of VTE than controls [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.22]. When assessing VTE components, AD was associated with a higher risk of DVT (aHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23-1.37) but not PE (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87-1.02). The VTE risk was greater in older people with AD (≥ 65 years: aHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.15-1.29; 45-65 years: aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26; < 45 years: aHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97-1.19) and those with obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30: aHR 1.25, 95% CI 1.12-1.39; BMI < 30: aHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15). Risk was broadly consistent across mild, moderate or severe AD.

CONCLUSIONS

AD is associated with a small increase in risk of VTE and DVT, with no increase in risk of PE. The magnitude of this risk increase is modest in younger people, and those without obesity.

Markers of Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Patients with Alopecia Areata: Is There Anything to Worry about?

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have indicated that alopecia areata is associated with a chronic systemic inflammation, which is considered as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism. The aim of the study was to evaluate the following markers of venous thromboembolism risk: soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TATC), and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) in patients with alopecia areata and compare them with healthy controls.

METHODS

In total, 51 patients with alopecia areata [35 women and 16 men; mean age: 38 (19-54) years] and 26 controls [18 women and 8 men; mean age: 37 (29-51) years] were enrolled in the study. The serum concentrations of thromboembolism markers were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit.

RESULTS

An increased level of SFMC was detected in patients with alopecia areata compared with the controls [25.66 (20-34.86) versus 21.46 (15.38-29.48) µg/ml; p < 0.05)]. In addition, a higher level of F1 + 2 was observed in patients with alopecia areata in comparison with the control group [70150 (43720-86070) versus 38620 (31550-58840) pg/ml; p < 0.001]. No significant correlation was detected among SFMC or F1 + 2 and the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, disease duration, or the number of the hair loss episodes.

CONCLUSION

Alopecia areata may be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Regular screening and preventive management of venous thromboembolism may be beneficial in patients with alopecia areata, especially before and during systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors or glucocorticoid therapy.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid

Importance

Studies have linked bullous pemphigoid (BP) with venous thromboembolism (VTE) across several data sources finding 6-fold to 15-fold increased incidence rates.

Objective

To determine the incidence of VTE in patients with BP compared with similar controls.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used insurance claims data from a nationwide US health care database from January 1, 2004, through January 1, 2020. Patients with dermatologist-recorded BP were identified (≥2 diagnoses of BP [International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) 694.5 and ICD-10 L12.0] recorded by dermatologists within 1 year). Risk-set sampling identified comparator patients without BP and free of other chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Patients were followed-up until the first of the following events occurred: VTE, death, disenrollment, or end of data stream.

Exposures

Patients with BP compared with those without BP and free of other chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISD).

Main outcome

Venous thromboembolism events were identified and incidence rates were computed before and after propensity-score (PS) matching to account for VTE risk factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) compared the incidence of VTE in BP vs non-CISD.

Results

Overall, 2654 patients with BP and 26 814 comparator patients without BP or another CISD were identified. The mean (SD) age in the BP group was 73.0 (12.6) years and 55.0 (18.9) years in the non-CSID group. With a median follow-up time was 2 years, the unadjusted incidence rate (per 1000 person-years) of outpatient or inpatient VTE was 8.5 in the BP group compared with 1.8 in patients without a CISD. Adjusted rates were 6.7 in the BP group compared with 3.0 in the non-CISD group. Age-specific adjusted incidence rates (per 1000 person-years) in patients aged 50 to 74 years was 6.0 (vs 2.9 in the non-CISD group) and in those aged 75 years or older was 7.1 (vs 4.53 in the non-CISD group). After 1:1 propensity-score matching including 60 VTE risk factors and severity markers, BP was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of VTE (2.24 [1.26-3.98]) vs those in the non-CISD group. When restricting to patients aged 50 years or older, the adjusted relative risk of VTE was 1.82 (1.05-3.16) for the BP vs non-CISD groups.

Conclusions

In this nationwide US cohort study, BP was associated with a 2-fold increased incidence of VTE after controlling for VTE risk factors in a dermatology patient population.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Among Adults With Atopic Dermatitis

Importance

The associations of atopic dermatitis (AD) with multiple cardiovascular comorbidities have been investigated because of its pathomechanisms regarding chronic systemic inflammation and potential vascular effects. Nevertheless, the association between AD and incident venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adulthood is largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate the association of AD with incident VTE.

Objective

To examine the risk of incident VTE among patients with AD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based nationwide cohort study included adults 20 years or older (adults with AD newly diagnosed between 2003 and 2017 and matched controls) from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with AD were subgrouped according to the severity of the disease. A Cox regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for VTE. Stratified analyses according to age and sex, and a sensitivity analysis excluding systemic steroid users were performed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Hazard ratios (HRs) for incident VTE associated with AD.

Results

This analysis included a total of 284 858 participants, with 142 429 participants each in the AD (mean [SD] age, 44.9 [18.3] years; 78 213 women) and non-AD cohorts (mean [SD] age, 44.1 [18.1] years; 79 636 women). During the follow-up, 1066 patients (0.7%) in the AD cohort and 829 patients (0.6%) in the non-AD cohort developed VTE, with incidence rates of 1.05 and 0.82 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Adults with AD had a significantly increased risk of incident VTE (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40) compared with adults without AD. Individual outcome analyses suggested that AD was associated with higher risks of deep vein thrombosis (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14-1.40) and pulmonary embolism (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08-1.57).

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cohort study suggest that AD in adulthood is associated with an increased risk of VTE; however, the absolute risk difference of VTE between adults with and without AD appears small. Nevertheless, cardiovascular examination and imperative management may be considered for adults with AD who present with symptoms suggestive of VTE. Future research is warranted to elucidate the pathophysiology underlying the association between AD and VTE.

Incidence Rates of Infections, Malignancies, Thromboembolism, and Cardiovascular Events in an Alopecia Areata Cohort from a US Claims Database

INTRODUCTION

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease with an underlying immuno-inflammatory pathogenesis. Treatments can include systemic corticosteroids and immunomodulators (such as Janus kinase inhibitors); these medications may be associated with a risk of some adverse events. However, large-scale observational studies of baseline incidence rates (IRs) of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and thromboembolism in US patients with AA, including those with alopecia totalis or alopecia universalis (AT/AU), are limited. This real-world, US claims-based study aimed to estimate the incidence of events in patients with AA compared with matched patients without AA.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 12 years enrolled in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database from 1 October 2016 to 30 September 2020, with ≥ 2 AA diagnosis codes were included in the AA cohort. Patients without AA were age-, sex-, and race-matched 3:1 to patients with AA. Baseline comorbidities were evaluated during the 12-month period pre-index date. Incident cases of serious/herpes infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and thromboembolic events were evaluated post-index date. Data are presented using descriptive statistics, proportional percentages, frequencies, and IRs (calculated with 95% CI).

RESULTS

Overall, 8784 patients with AA, 599 of whom had AT/AU, were matched to 26,352 patients without AA. IRs per 1000 person-years among the AA and non-AA cohorts, respectively, were 18.5 and 20.6 for serious infections, 19.5 and 9.7 for herpes simplex infections, 7.8 and 7.6 for herpes zoster infections, 12.5 and 11.6 for primary malignancies, 16.0 and 18.1 for MACE, and 4.9 and 6.1 for venous thromboembolisms. Compared with patients with non-AT/AU AA, patients with AT/AU largely had higher IRs for most baseline comorbidities and outcome events evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Patients with AA had a higher IR of herpes simplex infection than the matched non-AA cohort. Patients with AT/AU generally had higher rates of outcome events than patients without AT/AU.

Baricitinib Safety for Events of Special Interest in Populations at Risk: Analysis from Randomised Trial Data Across Rheumatologic and Dermatologic Indications

INTRODUCTION

Baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, is an approved treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), atopic dermatitis (AD), and alopecia areata (AA). Further characterisation of adverse events of special interest (AESI) for JAK inhibitors in at-risk populations will improve benefit-risk assessment for individual patients and diseases.

METHODS

Data were pooled from clinical trials and long-term extensions in moderate-to-severe active RA, moderate-to-severe AD, and severe AA. Incidence rates (IR) per 100 patient-years of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), malignancy, venous thromboembolism (VTE), serious infection, and mortality were calculated for patients with low risk (younger than 65 years with no specified risk factors), and patients at risk (≥ 1 of: aged 65 years or older, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, current smoking, HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, poor mobility on EQ-5D, or history of malignancy).

RESULTS

Datasets included baricitinib exposure up to 9.3 years with 14,744 person-years of exposure (PYE) (RA), 3.9 years with 4628 PYE (AD), and 3.1 years with 1868 PYE (AA). In patients with low risk (RA: 31%, AD: 48%, AA: 49%), IRs for MACE (0.05, 0.04, 0), malignancies (0.20, 0.13, 0), VTE (0.09, 0.04, 0), serious infection (1.73, 1.18, 0.6), and mortality (0.04, 0, 0) in the RA, AD, and AA datasets, respectively, were low. In patients at risk (RA: 69%, AD: 52%, AA: 51%), IRs were for MACE (0.70, 0.25, 0.10), malignancies (1.23, 0.45, 0.31), VTE (0.66, 0.12, 0.10), serious infection (2.95, 2.30, 1.05), and mortality (0.78, 0.16, 0) for RA, AD, and AA datasets, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Populations with low risk have low incidence of the examined JAK inhibitor-related AESI. In the dermatologic indications, incidence is also low for patients at risk. Considering individual disease burden, risk factors, and response to treatment is relevant to make informed decisions for individual patients treated with baricitinib.

A Review on the Safety of Using JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology: Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are disease-modifying agents with efficacy in treating a spectrum of burdensome dermatologic conditions. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently placed a black box warning on this class of medications due to safety concerns based on data from studies investigating tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Here we provide an overview of the timeline of FDA approval of JAK inhibitors in dermatology. We also discuss the available safety profiles of approved oral JAK1 inhibitors, namely abrocitinib and upadacitinib, oral baricitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, a Tyk2 inhibitor, and the topical JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in dermatology patients. Additionally, we offer suggestions for initial screening and laboratory monitoring for patients receiving JAK inhibitors. We found that the rates of venous thromboembolism reported in trials ranged from no events to 0.1-0.5% in dermatology-specific phase 3 clinical trials compared with no events in the placebo. The rates of cardiovascular events ranged from no events to 0.4-1.2% compared with no events to 0.5-1.2% in the placebo. The rates of serious infections were 0.4-4.8% compared with no events to 0.5-1.3% in the placebo. The rates of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) ranged from no event to 0.6-0.9% compared with no events in the placebo. The rates of non-NMSC ranged from no event to 0.2-0.7% compared with no event to 0.6% in the placebo. Most patients who developed these adverse events had risk factors for the specific event. The most common adverse events of oral JAK inhibitors included upper respiratory infections, nasopharyngitis, nausea, headache, and acne. Dermatologists should consider patients' baseline risk factors for developing serious complications when prescribing oral JAK inhibitors.

Comorbidities in Patients with Vitiligo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vitiligo has been reported to be associated with a variety of diseases, but it has not been systematically reviewed. Therefore, we aimed to identify prevalent diseases in patients with vitiligo and quantify their associations compared with those in healthy controls. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE from the inception to June 2022 was conducted. Observational studies on prevalent diseases in patients with vitiligo compared with those in healthy controls were included, whereas studies limited to pediatrics or providing only laboratory results were excluded. A total of 78 studies were eligible for analyses. Patients with vitiligo showed higher risks of having comorbid autoimmune and connective tissue diseases, including alopecia areata (OR = 2.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.50‒2.78), discoid lupus erythematosus (OR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.74‒3.72), Sjogren's syndrome (OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.98‒3.16), myasthenia gravis (OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.74‒3.02), systemic lupus erythematosus (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.52‒2.52), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.55‒2.15). Thyroid diseases, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, sensorineural hypoacusis, and ophthalmic abnormalities were also more prevalent in patients with vitiligo. In conclusion, vitiligo is associated with various systemic diseases. Physicians should evaluate and manage potential comorbid conditions in patients with vitiligo.

Association of Risk of Incident Venous Thromboembolism With Atopic Dermatitis and Treatment With Janus Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), especially when receiving treatment with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, is unclear.

Objective

To determine the association of AD with incident VTE and evaluate the risk of incident VTE among patients with AD who were receiving treatment with JAK inhibitors.

Data Sources

The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched with no restrictions on language nor geographic locations from their respective inception to February 5, 2022.

Study Selection

Cohort studies examining the association of AD with incident VTE and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting VTE events in participants with AD receiving JAK inhibitors were included. Around 0.7% of initially identified articles met the selection criteria.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed. The risk of bias of included cohort studies and RCTs was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, respectively. A random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and risk difference for incident VTE.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The HRs for incident VTE associated with AD and risk difference for incident VTE between participants with AD who were receiving treatment with JAK inhibitors and controls receiving placebo or dupilumab.

Results

Two cohort studies and 15 RCTs with a total of 466 993 participants were included. The meta-analysis found no significant association of AD with incident VTE (HR, 0.95; 95% CI 0.62-1.45; incidence rate of VTE, 0.23 events/100 patient-years). Overall, 3 of 5722 patients with AD (0.05%) who were receiving treatment with JAK inhibitors experienced VTE compared with 1 of 3065 patients with AD (0.03%) receiving placebo or dupilumab (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 0; 95% CI, 0-0). The incidence rate of VTE was 0.15 and 0.12 events per 100 patient-years in participants with AD receiving JAK inhibitors and placebo, respectively. The findings were similar in 4 unique JAK inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and SHR0302).

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the currently available evidence does not detect an increased risk of VTE associated with AD or treatment with JAK inhibitors. These findings may provide a reference for clinicians in prescribing JAK inhibitors for patients with AD.

Occurrence of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Several studies linked various chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISDs) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a range of data sources with mixed conclusions.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the incidence of IBD-ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD)- in patients with a CISD versus similar persons without a CISD.

METHODS

In this cohort study using nationwide, longitudinal, commercial insurance claims data from the US, we identified adults and children who were seen by a dermatologist between 2004-2020, and diagnosed with either psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, vitiligo, or hidradenitis suppurativa. Comparator patients were identified through risk-set sampling; they were eligible if they were seen by a dermatologist at least twice and not diagnosed with a CISD. Patient follow-up lasted until either IBD diagnosis, death, disenrollment, or end of data stream, whichever came first. IBD events, ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's (CD), were identified via validated algorithms-hospitalization or diagnosis with endoscopic confirmation. Incidence rates were computed before and after adjustment via propensity-score (PS) decile stratification to account for IBD risk factors. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated to compare the incidence of IBD in CISD versus non-CISD.

RESULTS

We identified patients with atopic dermatitis (n=123,614), psoriasis (n=83,049), alopecia areata (n=18,135), vitiligo (n=9,003) or hidradenitis suppurativa (n=6,806), and comparator patients without a CISD (n=2,376,120). During a median follow-up time of 718 days, and after applying PS adjustment for IBD risk factors, we observed increased risk of both UC (HR_UC =2.30; 1.61-3.28) and CD (HR_CD =2.70; 1.69-4.32) in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa, an increased risk of CD (HR_CD =1.23; 1.03-1.46) but not UC (HR_UC =1.01; 0.89-1.14) in psoriasis, and no increased risk of IBD in atopic dermatitis (HR_UC =1.02; 0.92-1.12, HR_CD =1.08; 0.94-1.23), alopecia areata (HR_UC =1.18; 0.89-1.56, HR_CD =1.26; 0.86-1.86) or vitiligo (HR_UC =1.14; 0.77-1.68, HR_CD =1.45; 0.87-2.41).

CONCLUSIONS

IBD was increased in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Crohn's disease alone was increased in patients with psoriasis. Neither ulcerative colitis nor Crohn's disease was increased in patients with atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata or vitiligo.

JAK in the [Black] Box: A Dermatology Perspective on Systemic JAK Inhibitor Safety

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are immunomodulatory agents with broad potential for use within dermatology. However, the US Food and Drug Administration has recently placed additional warning labels on JAK inhibitors given concern for an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, malignancy, venous thromboembolism, and mortality. Here, we summarize recent efficacy and safety data of multiple JAK inhibitors including tofacitinib, upadacitinib, baricitinib, and abrocitinib. JAK inhibitors have high efficacy in treating psoriatic arthritis and atopic dermatitis, but carry an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular events relative to other approved treatments. Here, we provide current considerations on balancing the benefits of JAK inhibitors with potentially serious, but low-absolute risk, safety concerns.

A Review of Safety Outcomes from Clinical Trials of Baricitinib in Rheumatology, Dermatology and COVID-19

Baricitinib is an oral, selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 that transiently and reversibly inhibits many proinflammatory cytokines. This mechanism is a key mediator in a number of chronic inflammatory diseases; accordingly, baricitinib has been studied and approved for the treatment of several rheumatological and dermatological disorders, as well as COVID-19. This narrative review summarises and discusses the safety profile of baricitinib across these diseases, with special focus on adverse events of special interest (AESI) for JAK inhibitors, using integrated safety data sets of clinical trial data, and puts findings into context with the underlying risk in the respective disease populations, using supporting literature. We show that rates of infection with baricitinib generally reflected the inherent risk of the disease populations being treated, with serious infections and herpes zoster being more frequent in rheumatic diseases than in dermatological disorders, and herpes simplex being reported particularly in atopic dermatitis. Similarly, rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancies were generally within or below the ranges reported for the respective disease populations, thereby reflecting the underlying risk; these events were therefore more frequent in patients with rheumatic diseases than in those with dermatological disorders, the latter of whom generally had low absolute risk. AESI were usually more common in patients with risk factors specific for each event. When a population similar to that of ORAL Surveillance was considered, the incidence rate of MACE with baricitinib was numerically lower than that reported with tofacitinib and similar to that of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. No safety concerns were observed in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who received baricitinib for up to 14 days. Identifying the patterns and likelihoods of AEs that occur during treatment in large groups of patients with different diseases can help the physician and patient better contextualise the benefit-to-risk ratio for the individual patient.

Association of Psoriasis With Incident Venous Thromboembolism and Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Psoriasis, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) share similar mechanisms involving chronic inflammation. However, the associations between psoriasis and VTE or PVD are unclear.

Objective

To determine the association of psoriasis with incident VTE and PVD.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were systematically searched for relevant publications from their respective inception through May 21, 2021. No restrictions on language or geographic locations were imposed.

Study Selection

Two authors independently selected cohort studies that investigated the risk for incident VTE or PVD in patients with psoriasis. Any discrepancy was resolved through discussion with 2 senior authors until reaching consensus. Only 13 initially identified studies met the selection criteria for qualitative review, and only 9 of these for quantitative analysis.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline was followed. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with 2 other authors. A random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with the corresponding confidence intervals for incident VTE and PVD. Subgroup analyses based on arthritis status, psoriasis severity, sex, and geographic location were also performed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Hazard ratios for incident VTE and PVD associated with psoriasis.

Results

A total of 13 cohort studies with 12 435 982 participants were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased risk for incident VTE (pooled HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.48) and PVD (pooled HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16-1.40) among patients with psoriasis. Subgroup analyses illustrated increased risk for incident VTE among participants with psoriatic arthritis (pooled HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.53), women (pooled HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.36-2.61), and those in Asia (pooled HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.42-2.88) and Europe (pooled HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.06-1.53).

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review and meta-analysis found an increased risk for incident VTE and PVD among patients with psoriatic disease. Typical presentations of VTE or PVD should not be overlooked in patients with psoriasis. Risk factors, such as obesity, physical inactivity, smoking, and varicose veins, should be identified and treated in patients with psoriasis, and medications like hormone-related therapies should be prescribed with caution.