Use of medications of questionable benefit in advanced dementia

Insights into designing educational materials for persons living with dementia: a focus group study

BACKGROUND

Persons living with dementia (PLWD) may experience communication difficulties that impact their ability to process written and pictorial information. Patient-facing education may help promote discontinuation of potentially inappropriate medications for older adults without dementia, but it is unclear how to adapt this approach for PLWD. Our objective was to solicit feedback from PLWD and their care partners to gain insights into the design of PLWD-facing deprescribing intervention materials and PLWD-facing education material more broadly.

METHODS

We conducted 3 successive focus groups with PLWD aged ≥ 50 (n = 12) and their care partners (n = 10) between December 2022 and February 2023. Focus groups were recorded and transcripts were analyzed for overarching themes.

RESULTS

We identified 5 key themes: [1] Use images and language consistent with how PLWD perceive themselves; [2] Avoid content that might heighten fear or anxiety; [3] Use straightforward delivery with simple language and images; [4] Direct recipients to additional information; make the next step easy; and [5] Deliver material directly to the PLWD.

CONCLUSION

PLWD-facing educational material should be addressed directly to PLWD, using plain, non-threatening and accessible language with clean, straightforward formatting.

Statin Use and All-Cause Mortality in Nursing Home Residents With and Without Dementia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Claims Data

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the benefits of statin therapy in older adults with dementia. We aimed to evaluate the role of statin use for all-cause mortality in nursing home residents with and without dementia.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used claims data collected between January 2015 and December 2019 from a German health and long-term care insurance provider. Propensity score-based Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association of statin use with all-cause mortality and adjusted for potential confounders in nursing home residents. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the presence or absence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), statin intensity (low, moderate, high), dementia type, age, sex, and level of care required.

RESULTS

A total of 282,693 participants were included in the study, of which 96,162 were matched. In total, 68.9% were women, and the mean age was 82.91 years (SD ±7.97). The average observation period was 2.25 years (SD ±1.35), and 54,269 deaths were recorded. Statin use in individuals with dementia resulted in lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.78-0.82, p < 0.001) compared with statin nonusers. Similarly, in individuals without dementia, statin use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.76, p < 0.001) compared with statin nonusers. Similar findings were observed in subanalyses excluding participants with a history of ASCVD and across subgroups stratified by age, sex, care level required, and dementia type. Statin benefits were consistent among individuals with and without dementia.

DISCUSSION

Statin benefits were consistent among individuals with and without dementia. Statin therapy may be continued in nursing home residents with dementia to mitigate the risk of all-cause mortality.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that nursing home patients receiving statins have a lower mortality rate, whether they have a dementia diagnosis or not.

Changes in Antidementia Medications upon Admission to the Nursing Home: Who Decides and Why? Results From a National Survey of Nursing Home Administrators

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about who is involved and what factors influence changes in antidementia medications for older adults living in nursing homes. The study sought to describe factors associated with initiation and discontinuation of antidementia medications in nursing home residents with dementia.

DESIGN

National survey of nursing homes with ≥30 beds; homes with dementia units were oversampled.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Nursing home administrators [eg, Directors of Nursing (DoNs)].

METHODS

In 2022, 1293 homes were surveyed (response rate: 26.6%, n = 340). Weighted analyses provided nationally representative results corrected for nonresponse (n = 14,455).

RESULTS

DoNs reported that people always/almost always involved in antidementia medication decisions included nursing home prescriber (84.4%), nursing staff (33.2%), family (23.4%), resident (13.8%), community primary care provider (12.1%), and dementia specialist (5.8%). DoNs reported that antidementia medications were much more likely to be initiated if residents (55.8%) and family members (53.2%) wanted antidementia medications, a dementia specialist was involved (51.9%), resident had aggressive behaviors (44.8%), resisted care (31.6%), or had severe physical/cognitive impairment (22.3%). DoNs reported that antidementia medications were much more likely to be discontinued with dementia specialist involvement (46.5%), progression to severe impairment (39.2%), hospice involvement (31.5%), <6 months' prognosis (28.5%), emergence of aggressive behaviors (25.2%), or resisting care (19.0%) and much less likely to be discontinued if residents (30.2%) and family (27.3%) were reluctant to discontinue. One in 6 homes reported that residents had no immediate family/caregivers usually or almost always/always.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

DoNs report that family/caregivers and dementia specialists have significant influence on antidementia medication decisions in nursing homes, but many residents lack their involvement. Real-world evidence on the risks and benefits of antidementia medications in nursing homes is needed to inform clinical guidance about appropriate use of antidementia medications in nursing homes.

The role of pharmacists in deprescribing benzodiazepines: A scoping review

Background

Polypharmacy can increase the risk of adverse drug events, hospitalisation, and unnecessary healthcare costs. Evidence indicates that discontinuing certain medications, such as benzodiazepines, can improve health outcomes, by resolving adverse drug effects. This scoping review aims to explore the pharmacists' role in deprescribing benzodiazepines.

Method

A scoping review has been conducted to distinguish and map the literature, discover research gaps, and focus on targeted areas for future studies and research. A systematic search strategy was conducted to identify relevant studies from PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE databases. The eligibility criteria involved studies that focused on the role of pharmacists in benzodiazepine deprescribing, quantitative and qualitative studies conducted in humans, full-text articles published in English.

Results

Twenty studies were identified, revealing three themes: 1) pharmacists' involvement in benzodiazepine deprescribing, 2) the impact of their involvement, and 3) obstacles impeding the process. Pharmacists involved in deprescribing procedures, mainly through completing medication reviews, collaborative work with other healthcare providers, and education. Pharmacists' involvement in benzodiazepine deprescribing intervention led to better health and economic outcomes. Withdrawal symptoms after medication discontinuation, dependence on medication, and lack of time and guidelines were identified in the literature as barriers to deprescribing.

Conclusion

Pharmacists' involvement in deprescribing benzodiazepines is crucial for optimizing medication therapy. This scoping review examines the pharmacists' role in benzodiazepine deprescribing. The findings contribute to enhancing healthcare outcomes and guiding future research in this area.

Prescriber Perspectives and Experiences with Deprescribing Versus Continuing Bisphosphonates in Older Nursing Home Residents with Dementia

BACKGROUND

Few guidelines address fracture prevention medication use in nursing home (NH) residents with dementia.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify factors that influence prescriber decision-making for deprescribing of bisphosphonates for older NH residents with dementia.

METHODS

We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with prescribers who care for older adults with dementia in NHs.

MAIN MEASURES

Interview prompts addressed experiences treating fractures, benefits, and harms of bisphosphonates, and experiences with deprescribing. Coding was guided by the social-ecological framework including patient-level (intrapersonal) and external (interpersonal, system, community, and policy) influences.

RESULTS

Most prescribers were physicians (83%); 75% were female and 75% were White. Most (75%) spent less than half of their clinical effort in NHs and half were in the first decade of practice. Among patient-level influences, prescribers uniformly agreed that a prior bisphosphonate treatment course of several years, emergence of adverse effects, and changing goals of care or limited life expectancy were compelling reasons to deprescribe. External influences were frequently discussed as barriers to deprescribing. At the interpersonal level, prescribers noted that family/informal caregivers are diverse in their involvement in decision-making, and frequently concerned about the adverse effects of bisphosphonates, but perceive deprescribing as "withdrawing care." At the health system level, prescribers felt that frequent transitions make it difficult to determine duration of prior treatment and to implement deprescribing. At the policy level, prescribers highlighted the lack of guidelines addressing residents with limited mobility and dementia or criteria for deprescribing, including uncertainty in the setting of prior fractures and lack of bone densitometry in NHs.

CONCLUSION

Systems-level barriers to evaluating bone densitometry and treatment history in NHs may impede person-centered decision-making for fracture prevention. Further research is needed to evaluate the residual benefits of bisphosphonates in medically complex residents with limited mobility and dementia to inform recommendations for deprescribing versus continued use.

Changes in the Use of Long-Term Medications Following Incident Dementia Diagnosis

Importance

Dementia is a life-altering diagnosis that may affect medication safety and goals for chronic disease management.

Objective

To examine changes in medication use following an incident dementia diagnosis among community-dwelling older adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study of adults aged 67 years or older enrolled in traditional Medicare and Medicare Part D, patients with incident dementia diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2018 were matched to control patients based on demographics, geographic location, and baseline medication count. The index date was defined as the date of first dementia diagnosis or, for controls, the date of the closest office visit. Data were analyzed from August 2021 to June 2023.

Exposure

Incident dementia diagnosis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcomes were overall medication counts and use of cardiometabolic, central nervous system (CNS)-active, and anticholinergic medications. A comparative time-series analysis was conducted to examine quarterly changes in medication use in the year before through the year following the index date.

Results

The study included 266 675 adults with incident dementia and 266 675 control adults; in both groups, 65.1% were aged 80 years or older (mean [SD] age, 82.2 [7.1] years) and 67.8% were female. At baseline, patients with incident dementia were more likely than controls to use CNS-active medications (54.32% vs 48.39%) and anticholinergic medications (17.79% vs 15.96%) and less likely to use most cardiometabolic medications (eg, diabetes medications, 31.19% vs 36.45%). Immediately following the index date, the cohort with dementia had a greater increase in mean number of medications used (0.41 vs -0.06; difference, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.27-0.66]) and in the proportion of patients using CNS-active medications (absolute change, 3.44% vs 0.79%; difference, 2.65% [95% CI, 0.85%-4.45%]) owing to an increased use of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and antiepileptics. The cohort with dementia also had a modestly greater decline in use of anticholinergic medications (quarterly change in use, -0.53% vs -0.21%; difference, -0.32% [95% CI, -0.55% to -0.08%]) and most cardiometabolic medications (eg, quarterly change in antihypertensive use: -0.84% vs -0.40%; difference, -0.44% [95% CI, -0.64% to -0.25%]). One year after diagnosis, 75.2% of the cohort with dementia were using 5 or more medications (2.8% increase).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of Medicare Part D beneficiaries, following an incident dementia diagnosis, patients were more likely to initiate CNS-active medications and modestly more likely to discontinue cardiometabolic and anticholinergic medications compared with the control group. These findings suggest missed opportunities to reduce burdensome polypharmacy by deprescribing long-term medications with high safety risks or limited likelihood of benefit or that may be associated with impaired cognition.

Global prevalence of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication in older patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Older patients with dementia always need multiple drugs due to comorbidities and cognitive impairment, further complicating drug treatment and increasing the risk of potentially inappropriate medication. The objective of our study is to estimate the global prevalence of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and explore the factors of PIM for older patients with dementia. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and Web of Science databases to identify eligible studies from inception to 16 June 2023. We conducted a meta-analysis for observational studies reporting the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication and polypharmacy in older patients with dementia using a random-effect model. The factors associated with PIM were meta-analyzed. Results: Overall, 62 eligible studies were included, of which 53 studies reported the prevalence of PIM and 28 studies reported the prevalence of polypharmacy. The pooled estimate of PIM and polypharmacy was 43% (95% CI 38-48) and 62% (95% CI 52-71), respectively. Sixteen studies referred to factors associated with PIM use, and 15 factors were further pooled. Polypharmacy (2.83, 95% CI 1.80-4.44), diabetes (1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.65), heart failure (1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.37), depression (1.45, 95% CI 1.14-1.88), history of cancer (1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32), hypertension (1.46, 95% CI 1.05-2.03), ischemic heart disease (1.55, 95% CI 0.77-3.12), any cardiovascular disease (1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17), vascular dementia (1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.16), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1.39, 95% CI 1.13-1.72), and psychosis (1.91, 95% CI 1.04-3.53) are positively associated with PIM use. Conclusion: PIM and polypharmacy were highly prevalent in older patients with dementia. Among different regions, the pooled estimate of PIM use and polypharmacy varied widely. Increasing PIM in older patients with dementia was closely associated with polypharmacy. For other comorbidities such as heart failure and diabetes, prescribing should be cautioned.

Mindfulness-based stress reduction for community-dwelling older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Primary care is often the first point of contact when community-dwelling older adults experience subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Living with SCD or MCI can be life-altering, resulting in low mood and increased anxiety, further exacerbating cognitive decline. However, there is scant literature on interventions that interprofessional primary care providers can provide to support those living with SCD or MCI. Practicing mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in an interprofessional primary care setting may support emotional health and well-being for those with cognitive decline, but it has not been studied in an interprofessional primary care context.

OBJECTIVES

This study's primary aim was to determine the feasibility of, and perceived benefits to and satisfaction with, a 9-Week MBSR program delivered in a team-based primary care setting. The secondary aim was to examine the acceptability of using technology (computer tablet and App Insight Timer®) for program delivery and home practice.

METHODS

A convergent mixed-methods, single-blind pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) study design was used. A quantitative strand was used to evaluate the feasibility of the MBSR program. The qualitative strand used a focus group with older adult participants with SCD or MCI. Individual semi-structured interviews with occupational therapists who are qualified-MBSR teachers were conducted to explore the acceptability of using computer tablets for program delivery and home practice.

RESULTS

27 participants were randomized (14 MBSR; 13 Control) with retention rates of 64.3% (9/14 completed ≥6 sessions), true adherence rates of 50% (7/14 met ≥19.5 hrs of home practice), 21.4% attrition rates, and 100% post-intervention follow-up. No participants who used computer tablets at the beginning of the intervention switched to low technology. Older adult participants found the use of computer tablets in the MBSR course acceptable and appreciated the portability of the tablets.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the lower-than-expected rates of recruitment, retention, and adherence, our study, as designed, did not meet the feasibility benchmarks that were set. However, with minor modifications to the design, including changing how participants who drop-out are analyzed, extending recruitment, and adding multiple sites, this intervention would be well suited to further study using a full-scale RCT. However, we found that embedding MBSR in an interprofessional primary care setting was feasible in practice and qualitative data highlighted the satisfaction and perceived benefits based on the intervention. The use of technology was acceptable and portable, as participants utilized their computer tablets consistently until the study's end. Our study showed that older adults living with SCD or MCI were highly receptive to learning how to use technology, and future group intervention programs in interprofessional primary care settings may also incorporate tablet use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Board in Toronto, Ontario, Canada (REB# 2017-0056-E); Queen's University (REB# 6026418) in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and Clinicaltrials.gov (08/03/2019; NCT03867474).

Do not PIMP my nursing home ride! The impact of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Prescribing on residents' emergency care use

Nursing home residents often are poly-medicated, which increases their risks of receiving potentially inappropriate medications. This problem has become a major public health issue in many countries, and in particular in France. Indeed, high uses of potentially inappropriate medication prescriptions can lead to adverse effects that are likely to increase emergency room (ER) visits. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence on the causal relationship between the amount of use of potentially inappropriate medications and ER visit risks among nursing homes residents. Indeed, this question is subject to endogeneity issues due to omitted variables that simultaneously affect inappropriate medications prescriptions and ER use. We take advantage of the IDEM Randomized Clinical Trial (Systematic Dementia Screening by Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Nursing Homes for Reducing Emergency Department Transfers) to overcome that issue. Indeed, randomization in the IDEM intervention group created exogenous variations in potentially inappropriate prescriptions, and was thus used as an instrument. Using an instrumental variable model, we show that over a 12-month period, a 1% increase in the share of potentially inappropriate medications spending in total medication spending leads to a 5.7 percentage point increase in residents' ER use risks (p < 0.001). This effect is robust to various model specifications. Moreover, the intensity of this correlation persists over an 18-month period. While tackling wasteful spending has become a priority in most countries, our results have important policy implications. Indeed, reducing potentially inappropriate medication spending in nursing homes should be a key component of value-based aging policies, which objectives are to reduce inefficient care, and provide health care services centered in people's interest.

Factors Associated with Potentially Harmful Medication Prescribing in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

To summarize current evidence regarding facility and prescriber characteristics associated with potentially harmful medication (PHM) use by residents in nursing homes (NHs), which could inform the development of interventions to reduce this potentially harmful practice.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Studies conducted in the United States that described facility and prescriber factors associated with PHM use in NHs.

METHODS

Electronic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE were conducted for articles published in English between April 2011 and November 2021. PHMs were defined based on the Beers List criteria. Studies testing focused interventions targeting PHM prescribing or deprescribing were excluded. Studies were characterized by the strengths and weaknesses of the analytic approach and generalizability.

RESULTS

Systematic search yielded 1253 articles. Of these, 29 were assessed in full text and 20 met inclusion criteria. Sixteen examined antipsychotic medication (APM) use, 2 anticholinergic medications, 1 sedative-hypnotics, and 2 overall PHM use. APM use was most commonly associated with facilities with a higher proportion of male patients, younger patients, and patients with severe cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, and aggressive behavior. The use of APM and anticholinergic medications was associated with low registered nurse staffing ratios and for-profit facility status. No studies evaluated prescriber characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Included studies primarily examined APM use. The most commonly reported facility characteristics were consistent with previously reported indicators of poor NH quality and NHs with patient case mix more likely to use PHMs.

ASCP's 2021 Choosing Wisely® Recommendations: A Proud Accomplishment

Choosing Wisely® (CW) is a campaign to engage physicians and patients in conversations about unnecessary tests, treatments, and procedures. The campaign began in the United States in 2012 and in Canada in 2014, and now many countries around the world are adapting the campaign and implementing it. Currently, approximately 80 societies in the United States have published CW recommendations. Each recommendation is supported by clinical guidelines (when necessary), evidence-based ratinale, including information about when these tests or procedures may be appropriate. A deprescribing task force led by Chair Beier was created by ASCP in November 2018 after several conversations between ASCP leadership (notably, President J. Hirshfield) and Beier. Task force members comprise pharmacists practicing in academia, community, and long-term care settings. The chair also invited pharmacists from international countries (Canada and Australia) where deprescribing initiatives have a strong focus and scientific literature base. One of the primary goals for Chair Beier was to add ASCP's voice to the ABIM CW Campaign. Because ASCP is a membership association that represents pharmacists, health care professionals, and students serving the unique medication needs of older patients, by adding its name to the list of supporting partners, the organization makes a compelling argument to address deprescribing initiatives, tools, scientific literature, and resources to assist in initiating deprescribing conversations and their subsequent implementation.

Methodological Challenges for Epidemiologic Studies of Deprescribing at the End of Life

Purpose of Review

To describe approaches to measuring deprescribing and associated outcomes in studies of patients approaching end of life (EOL).

Recent Findings

We reviewed studies published through 2020 that evaluated deprescribing in patients with limited life expectancy and approaching EOL. Deprescribing includes reducing the number of medications, decreasing medication dose(s), and eliminating potentially inappropriate medications. Tools such as STOPPFrail, OncPal, and the Unnecessary Drug Use Measure can facilitate deprescribing. Outcome measures vary and selection of measures should align with the operationalized deprescribing definition used by study investigators.

Summary

EOL deprescribing considerations include medication appropriateness in the context of patient goals for care, expected benefit from medication given life expectancy, and heightened potential for medication-related harm as death nears. Additional data are needed on how EOL deprescribing impacts patient quality of life, caregiver burden, and out-of-pocket medication-related costs to patients and caregivers. Investigators should design deprescribing studies with this information in mind.

Shared Medication PLanning In (SIMPLIfy) Home Hospice: An Educational Program to Enable Goal-Concordant Prescribing In Home Hospice

CONTEXT

Simplifying medication regimens by tapering and/or withdrawing unnecessary drugs is important to optimize quality of life and safety for patients with serious illness. Few resources are available to educate clinicians, patients and family caregivers about this process.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development of an educational program called Shared Medication PLanning In (SIMPLIfy) Home Hospice.

METHODS

An environmental scan identified a state-of-the-art educational program for home hospice deprescribing that we adapted using a stakeholder panel engagement process. The stakeholder panel (two hospice administrators, three nurses, two physicians, two pharmacists, and two former family caregivers) drawn from two geographically diverse hospice agencies reviewed the educational program and recommended additional content.

RESULTS

Iterative rounds of review and feedback resulted in: 1) a three-part clinician educational program (total duration = 1.5 hour) that presents a standardized, goal-concordant, medication review approach to align medications and conversations about regimen simplification with patient and family caregiver goals of care; 2) a patient-family caregiver medication management educational notebook that presents common symptoms, hospice medications, and medication regimen simplification principles; and 3) a brief guide including helpful phrases to use as conversation starters for key steps in the program. A professional designer created thematic coherence for all materials that was well received by stakeholder panelists and hospice staff.

CONCLUSION

Educational materials can support hospice programs' and clinicians' efforts to implement goal-concordant medication simplification that optimizes end-of-life outcomes for patients and family caregivers. Evaluation of outcomes including medication appropriateness and family caregiver medication administration burden are not yet available.

Frailty Status and Cognitive Function Should Guide Prescribing in Long-term Care Facilities

Frailty, dementia and complex multimorbidity are highly prevalent among residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Prescribing for residents of LTCFs is often informed by disease-specific clinical practice guidelines based on research conducted among younger and more robust adults. However, frailty and cognitive impairment may modify medication benefits and risks. Residents with frailty and advanced dementia may be at increased susceptibility to adverse drug events (ADEs) and often have a lower likelihood of achieving long-term therapeutic benefit from chronic preventative medications. For this reason, there is a strong rationale for deprescribing, particularlyamong residents with high medication burdens, swallowing difficulties or limited dexterity. Conversely, frailty and dementia have also been associated with under-prescribing of clinically indicated medications. Unnecessarily withholding treatment based on assumed risk may deprive vulnerable population groups from receiving evidence-based care. There is a need for specific evidence regarding medication benefits and risks in LTCF residents with frailty and dementia. Observational studies conducted using routinely collected health data may complement evidence from randomized controlled trials that often exclude people living with dementia, frailty and in LTCFs. Balancing over- and under-prescribing requires consideration of each resident's frailty and cognitive status, therapeutic goals, time-to-benefit, potential ADEs, and individual values or preferences. Incorporating frailty screening into medication review may also provide better alignment of medication regimens to changing goals of care. Timely identification of frail residents as part of treatment decision-making may assist with targeting interventions to minimize and monitor for ADEs. Shifting away from rigid application of conventional disease-specific clinical practice guidelines may provide an individualized and more holistic assessment of medication benefits and risks in the LTCF setting.

The value of deprescribing in older adults with dementia: a narrative review

Introduction:Mitigating the burden of unnecessary polypharmacy or multiple medication use in people living with dementia has been recognized as a key priority internationally. One approach to reducing inappropriate polypharmacy is through medication withdrawal or deprescribing.Area covered:Non-systematic searches of key databases including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were conducted from inception to 28 February 2021 for articles that assessed the safety and/or efficacy of deprescribing in older adults living with dementia. Personal reference libraries were also utilized. Information on current clinical trials was found in clinicaltrial.gov.Expert Opinion: There is limited direct evidence to inform deprescribing in older adults with dementia specifically. This review identified nineteen studies that have assessed the impact of deprescribing interventions to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy or direct deprescribing of specific medications. However, the current evidence is limited in scope as most studies focused on medication-related outcomes (e.g. discontinuation of high-risk medications) rather than patient-centered outcomes in individuals living with dementia. Furthermore, most studies focused on addressing inappropriate polypharmacy in older adults with dementia living in long-term care facilities, and interventions did not involve the person and their carer. Further evidence on the impact of deprescribing in this population across clinical settings is needed.

Anticholinergic Use Among the Elderly With Alzheimer Disease in South Korea: A Population-based Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the characteristics of anticholinergic use in the elderly with Alzheimer disease (AD) compared with those in the non-AD elderly.

METHODS

Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service Elderly cohort database, 388,629 adults aged 70 years and older in 2012 were included. The use of strong anticholinergic agents (ACs) in 2012 was quantified by standardized prescribed doses. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to examine the level of their heavy use (≥90 doses of the prescribed amount in 2012) in patients with AD and potential explanations of the heavy use.

RESULTS

Antihistamines and antidepressants were the most prescribed strong ACs among non-AD and AD elderly, respectively. The heavy use of strong ACs was more prevalent in patients with AD than in non-AD elderly [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)=1.48 (1.41-1.56)]. When the morbidities associated with AD were adjusted for, odds ratio were reduced [0.91 (0.85-0.96)].

CONCLUSIONS

Heavy use of strong ACs was more prevalent in patients with AD than in non-AD elderly. Multiple ACs for treating multimorbidities in AD were mainly attributable to their heavy use. In patients with AD, the integrated management of medications for reducing the preventable heavy use of these drugs should be reinforced.

Polypharmacy is associated with functional decline in Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia

BACKGROUND

In dementia, a number of factors may influence functional decline in addition to cognition. In this study, we aimed to study the potential association of the number of prescribed medications with functional decline trajectories over a five-year follow-up in people diagnosed with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) or Lewy Body dementia (LBD).

METHODS

This is a longitudinal analysis of a Norwegian cohort study entitled "The Dementia Study of Western Norway". We included 196 patients newly diagnosed with AD (n=111) and LBD (n=85), followed annually for 5 years. We conducted linear mixed-effects models to analyse the association of the number of medications with functional decline measured by the Rapid Disability Rating Scale - 2.

RESULTS

The mean prescribed medications at baseline was 4.18∓2.60, for AD 3.92∓2.51 and LBD 4.52∓2.70. The number of medications increased during the follow-up; at year five the mean for AD was 7.28∓4.42 and for LBD 8.11∓5.16. Using more medications was associated with faster functional decline in AD (Est 0.04, SE 0.01, p-value 0.003) and LBD (Est 0.08, SE 0.03, p-value 0.008) after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and cognition. For each medication added during the follow-up, functional trajectories worsened by 1% for AD and 2% for LBD. The number of medications was not associated with cognitive decline.

CONCLUSION

We found that higher number of medications was related to a faster functional decline, both in AD and LBD. With disease progression, there was an increase in the number of medications. Prescription in dementia should be carefully assessed, possibly improving the functional prognosis.

Using data linkage for national surveillance of clinical quality indicators for dementia care among Australian aged care users

Care quality has important implications for people with dementia. We examined trends and geographical variation of four clinical quality indicators (CQIs) in Australia. This retrospective cohort study included all people with dementia using Australian government-subsidised aged care in 2008-2016 (n = 373,695). Quality indicator data were derived from linked national aged care, health, and pharmaceutical datasets. Negative binomial regression modelling assessed trends in CQI performance over time (2011-2016) and funnel plots examined geographical variation in performance. The incidence rate of antipsychotic medicine dispensing decreased slightly from 1.17/1000 person-days to 1.07/1000 person-days (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) = 0.98, 95%CI 0.98-0.99). Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine dispensing did not change (aIRR = 1.02, 95%CI 1.00-1.04), while exposure to high sedative load increased slightly from 1.39/1000 person-days to 1.44/1000 person-days (aIRR = 1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.01). Dementia and delirium-related hospitalisations increased slightly from 0.17/1000 person-days to 0.18/1000 person-days (aIRR = 1.02, 95%CI 1.01-1.03). There was marked variation in cholinesterase inhibitor and memantine dispensing by geographical area (0-41%). There has been little change in four indicators of dementia care quality in Australian aged care users over time. Cholinesterase inhibitor and memantine dispensing varied substantially by geographical region. Existing strategies to improve national performance on these indicators appear to be insufficient, despite the significant impact of these indicators on outcomes for people with dementia.

Use of item response theory to investigate disability-related questions in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

OBJECTIVES

Accurately measuring disability is critical toward policy development, economic analyses, and determining individual-level effects of health interventions. Nationally representative population surveys such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provide key opportunities to measure disability constructs such as activity limitations. However, only very limited work has previously evaluated the item response properties of questions pertaining to limitations in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. We included participants ⩾20 years old for the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles. Activity limitations, and a smaller number of body function impairments or participation restrictions, were determined from interview questions. We performed item response theory models (a two-parameter logistic and a graded response model) to characterize discriminating information along the latent continuum of activity limitation.

RESULTS

We included 17,057 participants. Although each particular limitation was somewhat rare (maximally 13%), 7214 (38%) responded having at least one limitation. We found a high amount of discriminating information at 1-2 standard deviations above average limitation, though essentially zero discrimination below that range. Items had substantial overlap in the range at which they provided information distinguishing individuals. The ordinal graded response model including 20 limitations provided greater information than the dichotomous two-parameter logistic model, though further omitting items from the graded response model led to loss of information.

CONCLUSION

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey disability-related questions, mostly specifically activity limitations, provided a high degree of information distinguishing individuals with higher than average limitations on the latent continuum, but essentially zero resolution to distinguish individuals with low or average limitations. Future work may focus on developing items which better distinguish individuals at the "lower" end of the limitation spectrum.

Cholinesterase Inhibitor Use in Patients With Dementia Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit

OBJECTIVES

Current guidelines suggest that patients with severe dementia on cholinesterase inhibitors (CHEIs) should discontinue their CHEIs by taper. This study aims to define the prevalence of patients admitted to a palliative care unit (PCU) with dementia on a CHEI and to determine whether these patients were tapered off their CHEIs according to current deprescribing guidelines.

DESIGN

This is a descriptive retrospective chart review that examined patients admitted to a PCU with dementia on a CHEI from January 2015 to June 2019.

METHODS

Individuals admitted to the PCU with a primary or comorbid diagnosis of dementia were identified. Their corresponding CHEI dose, frequency and discontinuation pattern were identified. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients were admitted to the PCU with dementia on a CHEI (prevalence of 2.3%). The median length of stay was 21 days. For 31 of these patients, their CHEI was discontinued, only 9 of which had a taper. Of the 24 patients who discontinued their CHEI suddenly, 10 patients had an order to discontinue their CHEI in the last 2 days before their date of death.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that although patients admitted to a PCU with dementia have their CHEI discontinued, the discontinuation was done without a taper. In many cases the CHEIs were continued through the active stage of dying. Future work should explore reasons why PCU physicians are mostly late to taper CHEIs for patients admitted with dementia.

Effect of a Social Norm Email Feedback Program on the Unnecessary Prescription of Nimodipine in Ambulatory Care of Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Nimodipine is a highly prescribed drug for the treatment of cognitive impairment and dementia in Argentina. There is little evidence to support the use of nimodipine for cognitive impairment and dementia.

OBJECTIVE

To test the effectiveness of a behavioral intervention based on social norm feedback to reduce prescription of nimodipine for cognitive impairment in Argentina.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This pragmatic parallel-group randomized clinical trial included 2 arms with a 1:1 allocation ratio. General practitioner physicians in the national health care system for older adults in Argentina (INSSJP-PAMI) with history of high nimodipine prescription rate were enrolled. The study was conducted from May 2019 to October 2019, and data were analyzed from November 2019 to February 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

The treatment group received 2 emails with evidence-based information about nimodipine plus the individual's level of nimodipine prescription compared with their peers. The control group received 2 emails with general information about the risks of overprescription in older adults.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the cumulative number of nimodipine prescriptions per 1000 prescriptions of all drugs made by the targeted physicians during the 6 months of the study. Secondary outcomes included annual monetary savings attributable to the intervention and physicians' qualitative perceptions of the acceptability of the procedure.

RESULTS

Of 1811 physicians enrolled, 906 physicians (354 [39.1%] women; mean [SD] age, 57.10 [10.73] years) were randomized to treatment and 905 participants (331 [36.6%] women; mean [SD] age, 56.49 [10.47] years) to the control group. Physicians in the treatment group wrote a mean of 93.25 (95% CI, 89.27 to 97.24) prescriptions of nimodipine, compared with 98.99 (95% CI, 95.00 to 102.98) prescriptions among practitioners in the control group during the half-year of the intervention (mean difference, -5.73 [95% CI, -11.38 to -0.10] prescriptions; P = .046), which meant a 5.79% reduction. Regression analysis revealed a significant association of the group condition with number of prescriptions per 1000 total prescriptions when controlling for baseline prescriptions (B = -0.312 [95% CI, -0.465 to -0.160]; P < .001). The observed difference corresponds to a 4.48% reduction in nimodipine prescriptions per 1000 prescriptions of all drugs made by physicians in the treated group compared with the control group. Physicians who effectively opened the email in the treatment group (427 physicians [47.1%]) prescribed the drug 11.3% less compared with the control group (426 physicians) (mean difference, -10.78 [95% CI, -18.53 to -3.03] prescriptions; P = .006). Expenditures were 7.18% lower in the treatment group, resulting in an estimated annual net cost benefit of US $234 893.35 (95% CI, $225 565.35 to $237 112.30).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, the social norm email feedback program showed an effect on curbing the nonrecommended prescription of nimodipine. It was highly cost-effective and well accepted by participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN.org identifier: ISRCTN17823729.

"… Above All, It's a Matter of This Person's Quality of Life": Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Deprescribing in Older Patients With Limited Life Expectancy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Deprescribing may be particularly relevant in older people with limited life expectancy. In order to effectively carry out deprescribing in this population, it is important to understand the perspectives of the full spectrum of health care professionals (HCPs) involved in the management of these patients' medication. Thus, we aimed to explore different HCPs' perspectives on deprescribing in older patients with limited life expectancy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Six qualitative focus group interviews were conducted using a semistructured approach. The groups comprised HCPs from both primary and secondary care, including family physicians (FPs), geriatricians, clinical pharmacologists, clinical pharmacists, nurses, and health care assistants. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Results were analyzed using systematic text condensation.

RESULTS

A total of 32 HCPs participated in the study (median age of 40.5 years; 22% male). The analysis elicited three main themes related to HCPs' perspectives on deprescribing in older patients with limited life expectancy: (a) Approaching deprescribing, (b) Taking responsibility, and (c) Collaboration across professions. Within themes, subthemes were identified and analyzed.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Our results imply that different groups of HCPs consider deprescribing an essential aspect of providing good care for older people with limited life expectancy and find that all HCPs play a crucial role in the deprescribing process, with FPs having the primary responsibility. In order to facilitate deprescribing among this population, however, the collaboration between different HCPs should be improved.

Sex Differences in Antipsychotic and Benzodiazepine Prescribing Patterns: A Cohort Study of Newly Admitted Nursing Home Residents with Dementia in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

In nursing homes, residents with dementia frequently receive potentially inappropriate medications that are associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Despite known sex differences in clinical presentation and sociodemographic characteristics among persons with dementia, few studies have examined sex differences in patterns and predictors of potentially inappropriate medication use.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to examine sex differences in the patterns of antipsychotic and benzodiazepine use in the 180 days following admission to a nursing home, estimate clinical and sociodemographic predictors of antipsychotic and benzodiazepine use in male and female residents, and explore the effects of modification by sex on the predictors of using these drug therapies.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 35,169 adults aged 66 years and older with dementia who were newly admitted to nursing homes in Ontario, Canada between 2011 and 2014. Health administrative databases were linked to detailed clinical assessment data collected using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI-MDS 2.0). Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for clinical and sociodemographic covariates to estimate the rate of antipsychotic and benzodiazepine initiation and discontinuation in the 180 days following nursing home admission in the total sample and stratified by sex. Sex-covariate interaction terms were used to assess whether sex modified the association between covariates and the rate of drug therapy initiation or discontinuation following nursing home entry.

RESULTS

Across 638 nursing homes, our analytical sample included 22,847 females and 12,322 males. At admission, male residents were more likely to be prevalent antipsychotic users than female residents (33.8% vs 28.3%; p < 0.001), and female residents were more likely to be prevalent benzodiazepine users than male residents (17.2% vs 15.3%, p < 0.001). In adjusted models, female residents were less likely to initiate an antipsychotic after admission (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.86); however, no sex difference was observed in the rate of benzodiazepine initiation (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.12). Female residents were less likely than males to discontinue antipsychotics (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98) and benzodiazepines (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89). Sex modified the association between some covariates and the rate of changes in drug use (e.g., widowed males exhibited an increased rate of antipsychotic discontinuation (p-interaction = 0.03) compared with married males), but these associations were not statistically significant among females. Sex did not modify the effect of frailty on the rates of initiation and discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Males and females with dementia differed in their exposure to antipsychotics and benzodiazepines at nursing home admission and their patterns of use following admission. A greater understanding of factors driving sex differences in potentially inappropriate medication use may help tailor interventions to reduce exposure in this vulnerable population.

Use of medication among nursing home residents: a Danish drug utilisation study

BACKGROUND

Data on drug utilisation patterns in nursing home populations is scarce. We aimed to describe drug use patterns in Danish nursing home residents.

METHODS

We established a cohort of 5,179 individuals (63% women; median age of 84 years) admitted into 94 nursing homes across Denmark during 2015-2017. Data on prescription drug use and other census data were obtained from the nationwide Danish health registries.

RESULTS

The total number of drug classes filled increased from a median of 6 drugs (interquartile range [IQR] 3-9) at 18-24 months before nursing home admission to a median of 8 drugs (IQR 6-11) just after admission, with the most common drug classes comprising paracetamol (61%), platelet inhibitors (41%), proton pump inhibitors (34%), statins (33%) and potassium supplements (31%). The incidence rate of new drug treatments increased from 21 new treatments/100 residents/month at 12-24 months before admission to a peak of 71 new treatments/100 residents/month in the month prior to admission, while it levelled off to about 34 new treatments/100 residents/month after 6-9 months. The drug classes primarily responsible for this peak were laxatives, antibiotics and analgesics. The largest absolute increases were seen for laxatives (53%), paracetamol (43%) and antidepressants (36%), all showing a marked increase up to and following admission. A high proportion of residents remained on therapy in the 3-year period following admission, with users of antidepressants and antidementia drugs being most persistent.

CONCLUSION

Nursing home admission is associated with an increase in use of both predominantly preventive and non-preventive drug classes.

Pharmacist-led medication reviews in aged care residents with dementia: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate outcomes associated with pharmacist-led medication reviews in residential aged care facility (RACF) residents with dementia.

METHODS

Six scientific databases were searched. All study designs investigating pharmacist-led medication reviews in RACF residents with dementia were considered. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019121681).

RESULTS

One randomised controlled trial (RCT) and five observational studies were identified. Two studies reported reductions in medication usage per resident, and one study reported improved appropriateness of psychotropic use following reviews as part of multi-faceted, collaborative interventions. In three studies, reviews undertaken as an isolated intervention or by a visiting pharmacist with minimal collaboration with physicians were associated with low implementation rates of recommendations to alter therapy.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacist-led medication reviews, when conducted collaboratively, may improve the use of medicines in RACF residents with dementia. However, robust conclusions cannot be drawn, largely due to the low quality of evidence available, including only one RCT.

Deprescribing: a challenge for clinical cardiologists

Deprescribing is a holistic process to identify medications that can be ceased, substituted or reduced. This process can improve the health of older patients and also enhance their compliance to the prescribed medications which are actually beneficial. Recommendations and guidelines have been elaborated for extensively prescribed drugs. In clinical cardiology the process of deprescribing is a challenge for doctors because of withdrawal-related adverse effects, but it may be applied in certain clinical conditions such as the discontinuation of statin prescription in patients with advanced senile dementia and those with limited life expectancy. Deprescribing is also focussed on the scarcely known effects of prolonged therapy after the acute phase of a disease is over, especially when continuation may signify potential life-long treatment. There needs to be collaboration between the consultant cardiologist who first prescribes medications and family doctors who are responsible for the long-term care of the patient and reviewing prescribed medications may be necessary.

Prescribing medications of questionable benefit prior to death: a retrospective study on older nursing home residents with and without dementia in Germany

Purpose

We studied the prevalence of medications of questionable benefit in the last 6 months of life among older nursing home residents with and without dementia in Germany.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on claims data from 67,328 deceased nursing home residents aged 65+ years who were admitted between 2010 and 2014. We analyzed prescription regimens of medications of questionable benefit in the 180–91-day period and the 90-day period prior to death for residents with dementia (n = 29,052) and without dementia (n = 38,276). Factors associated with new prescriptions of medications of questionable benefit prior to death were analyzed using logistic regression models among all nursing home residents and stratified by dementia.

Results

A higher proportion of nursing home residents with dementia were prescribed at least one medication of questionable benefit in the 180–91-day (29.6%) and 90-day (26.8%) periods prior to death, compared with residents without dementia (180–91 days, 22.8%; 90 days, 20.1%). Lipid-lowering agents were the most commonly prescribed medications. New prescriptions of medications of questionable benefit were more common among residents with dementia (9.8% vs. 8.7%). When excluding anti-dementia medication, new prescriptions of these medications were more common among residents without dementia (6.4% vs. 8.0%). The presence of dementia (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.32–1.48) and excessive polypharmacy were associated with new prescriptions of medications of questionable benefit prior to death (OR 4.74, 95%CI 4.15–5.42).

Conclusion

Even when accounting for anti-dementia prescriptions, the prevalence of nursing home residents with dementia receiving medications of questionable benefit is considerable and may require further attention.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02859-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Medication use and cognitive impairment among residents of aged care facilities

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate polypharmacy is common in residential aged care facilities (RACF). This is of particular concern among people with cognitive impairment who, compared with cognitively intact residents, are potentially more sensitive to the adverse effects of medications.

AIM

To compare the patterns of medication prescribing of RACF residents based on cognitive status.

METHODS

De-identified data collected during telehealth-mediated geriatric consultations with 720 permanent RACF residents were analysed. Residents were categorised into cognitively intact, mild to moderate impairment and severe impairment groups using the interRAI Cognitive Performance Scale. The number of all regular and when-required medications used in the past 3 days, the level of exposure to anti-cholinergic/sedative medications and potentially inappropriate medications and the use of preventive and symptom control medications were compared across the groups.

RESULTS

The median number of medications was 10 (interquartile range (IQR) 8-14). Cognitively intact residents were receiving significantly more medications (median (IQR) 13 (10-16)) than those with mild to moderate (10 (7-13)) or severe (9 (7-12)) cognitive impairment (P < 0.001). Overall, 82% of residents received at least one anti-cholinergic/sedative medication and 26.9% were exposed to one or more potentially inappropriate medications, although the proportions of those receiving such medications were not significantly different across the groups. Of 7658 medications residents were taking daily, 21.3% and 11.7% were classified as symptom control and preventive medications respectively with no significant difference among the groups in their use.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the need for optimising prescribing in RACF residents, with particular attention to medications with anti-cholinergic effects.

Prevalence of cardiovascular drug use before and after diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Both cardiovascular diseases and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are common in aging populations. We investigated the prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) drug use in relation to AD diagnosis, and compared the prevalence to a matched cohort without AD.

METHODS

Point prevalence of CV drugs was counted every six months, from five years before to five years after AD diagnosis in the register-based Medication Use and Alzheimer's disease (MEDALZ) study, including community dwellers who received a clinically verified AD diagnosis during 2005-2011 in Finland, and compared to a matched cohort without AD. Data on drugs purchases was extracted from the Prescription Register by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical-classification system codes C* (excluding C04 and C05) and modelled to use periods with PRE2DUP method.

RESULTS

Before AD diagnosis, the prevalence of CV drug use was higher in persons with AD (RR 1.04; confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.06). At the index date (AD diagnosis date), the prevalence of CV drug use was similarly among persons with AD (75.8%), in comparison to matched cohort without AD (73.4%). However, after that, the prevalence of CV drug use started decline in persons with AD.

CONCLUSIONS

The decline in use of CV drugs after AD diagnosis likely reflects discontinued need for treatment due to weight loss, frailty, decline in blood pressure and serum lipid levels. It may also reflect the change in prescribing due to adverse events and priorities of care to improve the quality of end-of-life.

Effect of continuation of antiplatelet therapy on survival in patients receiving physician home visits

Background

Little is known about the effects of continued antiplatelet therapy in patients who receive physician home visits. This study aimed to evaluate the association of survival with the continuation of antiplatelet drugs in patients who received physician home visits.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a teaching hospital in Toyota, Japan, from April 2015 to October 2018. All patients who received home visits by physicians from the department of Family Medicine of the hospital were included. The primary outcome was the difference in all-cause mortality between patients who were taking antiplatelet drugs and those who were not. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied, adjusted for the patient’s demographic features, activities of daily living, comorbidities, and primary disease requiring home care.

Results

A total of 815 patients were included, of whom 61 received antiplatelet drugs (n = 42 for aspirin, n = 17 for clopidogrel, and n = 8 for cilostazol) and 772 received no antiplatelet drugs. The mean age of the patients was 78.3 years, 409 (49.1%) were male, and 314 (37.7%) had end-stage cancer. During a median follow-up period of 120 days (interquartile range, 29–364), 54.3% of the patients died. Compared with patients not taking antiplatelet drugs, patients taking antiplatelet drugs had a better outcome (p <  0.01, log-rank test) and a significantly lower hazard ratio (0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.65; Cox proportional hazards regression).

Conclusions

The continuous prescription of antiplatelet drugs may have beneficial effects on mortality among patients who receive physician home visits.

How many older adults receive drugs of questionable clinical benefit near the end of life? A cohort study

BACKGROUND

The high burden of disease-oriented drugs among older adults with limited life expectancy raises important questions about the potential futility of care.

AIM

To describe the use of drugs of questionable clinical benefit during the last 3 months of life of older adults who died from life-limiting conditions.

DESIGN

Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study of decedents. Death certificate data were linked to administrative and healthcare registries with national coverage in Sweden.

SETTING

Older adults (≥75 years) who died from conditions potentially amenable to palliative care between 1 January and 31 December 2015 in Sweden. We identified drugs of questionable clinical benefit from a set of consensus-based criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 58,415 decedents were included (mean age, 87.0 years). During their last 3 months of life, they received on average 8.9 different drugs. Overall, 32.0% of older adults continued and 14.0% initiated at least one drug of questionable clinical benefit (e.g. statins, calcium supplements, vitamin D, bisphosphonates, antidementia drugs). These proportions were highest among younger individuals (i.e. aged 75-84 years), among people who died from organ failure and among those with a large number of coexisting chronic conditions. Excluding people who died from acute and potentially unpredictable fatal events had little influence on the results.

CONCLUSION

A substantial share of older persons with life-limiting diseases receive drugs of questionable clinical benefit during their last months of life. Adequate training, guidance and resources are needed to rationalize and deprescribe drug treatments for older adults near the end of life.

The Impact of Dementia Diagnosis on Patterns of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Older Adults

Background

Use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) among people with dementia is common. We assessed the patterns of medication use from 1-year before dementia diagnosis, to 1-year after dementia diagnosis, compared with patterns of medication use in people without dementia.

Methods

We conducted longitudinal study using the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data. Adults aged 65 years and older newly diagnosed with dementia (n = 2,418) during 2005-2015 were year, age, and sex matched 1:1 with controls. Generalized estimating equation models weighted for missingness and adjusted for 15 participant characteristics were fit.

Results

Among participants with dementia, number of medications reported 1-year prediagnosis was 8% lower than at diagnosis year (p < .0001) and 11% higher 1-year postdiagnosis compared with year of diagnosis (p < .0001). Among participants with dementia, the odds of PIM exposure, assessed using the 2015 Beers Criteria, was 17% lower 1-year prediagnosis (p < .0001) and 17% higher 1-year postdiagnosis (p = .006) compared with year of diagnosis. Among controls, there were approximately 6% more medications reported between consecutive years (p < .0001 each comparison) and the odds of PIM exposure increased 11% between consecutive years (p = .006 and p = .047). At each annual follow-up, participants with dementia had lower odds of PIM exposure than their controls (prediagnosis p < .0001, at diagnosis p = .0007, postdiagnosis p = .03, respectively). There were no differences in exposure to anticholinergic medications.

Conclusions

Number of medications and PIM use increased annually for participants with and without dementia. Persistent challenge of increasing PIM use in this group of older adults is of major concern and warrants interventions to minimize such prescribing.

Sex-Specific Differences in End-of-Life Burdensome Interventions and Antibiotic Therapy in Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia

IMPORTANCE

Nursing home residents with advanced dementia have limited life expectancies yet are commonly subjected to burdensome interventions at the very end of life. Whether sex-specific differences in the receipt of these interventions exist and what levels of physical restraints and antibiotics are used in this terminal setting are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the population-based frequency, factors, and sex differences in burdensome interventions and antibiotic therapy among nursing home residents with advanced dementia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based cohort study from Ontario, Canada, used linked administrative databases held at ICES, including the Continuing Care Resident Reporting System Long-Term Care database, which contains data from the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set, version 2.0. Nursing home residents (n = 27 243) with advanced dementia who died between June 1, 2010, and March 31, 2015, at 66 years or older were included in the analysis. Initial statistical analysis was completed in May 2017, and analytical revisions were conducted from November 2018 to January 2019.

EXPOSURE

Sex of the nursing home resident.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Burdensome interventions (transitions of care, invasive procedures, and physical restraints) and antibiotic therapy in the last 30 days of life.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 27 243 nursing home residents with advanced dementia (19 363 [71.1%] women) who died between June 1, 2010, and March 31, 2015, at the median (interquartile range) age of 88 (83-92) years. In the last 30 days of life, burdensome interventions were common, especially among men: 5940 (21.8%) residents were hospitalized (3661 women [18.9%] vs 2279 men [28.9%]; P < .001), 2433 (8.9%) had an emergency department visit (1579 women [8.2%] vs 854 men [10.8%]; P < .001), and 3701 (13.6%) died in an acute care facility (2276 women [11.8%] vs 1425 men [18.1%]; P < .001). Invasive procedures were also common; 2673 residents (9.8%) were attended for life-threatening critical care (1672 women [8.6%] vs 1001 men [12.7%]; P < .001), and 210 (0.8%) received mechanical ventilation (113 women [0.6%] vs 97 men [1.2%]; P < .001). Among the 9844 residents (36.1%) who had a Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set, version 2.0, completed in the last 30 days of life, 2842 (28.9%) were physically restrained (2002 women [28.3%] vs 840 men [30.4%]; P = .005). More than one-third (9873 [36.2%]) of all residents received an antibiotic (6599 women [34.1%] vs 3264 men [41.4%]; P < .001). In multivariable models, men were more likely to have a transition of care (adjusted odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.33-1.49; P < .001) and receive antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.26-1.41; P < .001). Only 3309 residents (12.1%; 2382 women [12.3%] vs 927 men [11.8%]) saw a palliative care physician in the year before death, but those who did experienced greater than 50% lower odds of an end-of-life transition of care (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.43-0.54); P < .001) and greater than 25% lower odds of receiving antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.81; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, many nursing home residents with advanced dementia, especially men, received burdensome interventions and antibiotics in their final days of life. These findings appear to emphasize the need for sex-specific analysis in dementia research as well as the expansion of palliative care and end-of-life antimicrobial stewardship in nursing homes.

Polypharmacy patterns in the last year of life in patients with dementia

PURPOSE

To describe prescribing of medicines in primary care in the last year of life in patients with dementia.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort analysis in UK primary care using routinely collected data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Number of medications and potentially inappropriate medication prescribed one year prior to, and including death, was ascertained.

RESULTS

Dementia patients (n = 6923) aged 86.6 ± 7.3 years (mean ± SD) were prescribed 4.8 ± 4.0 drugs 1 year prior to death, increasing to 5.6 ± 4.0 2 months prior, before falling to 4.9 ± 4.1 at death. One year prior to death, 50% of patients were prescribed a potentially inappropriate medication, falling to 41% at death. Cardiovascular medications were the most common, with decreases in drug count only occurring in the last month prior to death. Prescriptions for gastrointestinal and central nervous system medication increased throughout the year, particularly laxatives/analgaesics, antidepressants and hypnotic/antipsychotics. Women (vs. men) and patients with Alzheimer's (vs. vascular dementia) were prescribed 4.7% (95% CI 2.3%-7%) and 14.6% (11.7-17.3%) fewer medications, respectively. Prescribing decreased with age and increased with additional comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Dementia patients are prescribed high levels of medication, many potentially inappropriate, during their last year of life, with reductions occurring relatively late. Improvements to medication optimisation guidelines are needed to inform decision-making around deprescribing of long-term medications in patients with limited life-expectancy.

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy with Older Adults: A Qualitative Review of Randomized Controlled Outcome Research

Objective: Many older adults cope with various chronic physical health conditions, and in some cases, with mental health and/or cognitive difficulties. Mindfulness-based interventions offer an evidence-based, mind-body complementary treatment approach for a wide range of comorbidities, yet most investigations were conducted with young or middle-aged adults. The purpose of this review was to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two leading mindfulness-based interventions conducted with older adults. Methods: Our search of five databases identified seven RCT investigations of either Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) or Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) conducted exclusively with older adults. Results: Results generally supported the use of MBSR for chronic low back pain, chronic insomnia, improved sleep quality, enhanced positive affect, reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression, and improved memory and executive functioning. In a sample of older adults exhibiting elevated anxiety in the absence of elevated depression, MBCT effectively reduced symptoms of anxiety. Conclusions: This review highlights the feasibility and possible benefits of MBSR and MBCT for older adults. Additional large scale RCTs conducted with older adults coping with the range of physical, behavioral, and cognitive challenges older adults commonly face still are needed. Clinical Implications: MBSR may be a promising intervention for older adults experiencing a variety of health concerns and possibly even cognitive decline. MBCT may reduce geriatric anxiety, although its effects on geriatric depression were not measured.

Prescription and deprescription of medications for older adults receiving palliative care during the last 3 months of life: a single-center retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Near the end of life, drugs to ensure comfort and improve quality of life should be prioritized, and unnecessary drugs should be avoided. The aim was to assess the evolution and quality of drug therapy throughout the last 3 months of life of older adults in need of palliative care.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study included older adults (≥ 65 years) who died in a teaching hospital between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2014 and had been identified as patients in need of palliative care in their last 3 months of life. Drugs were collected from electronic medical records and defined as 'unnecessary' or 'essential' based on a review of the literature.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were included [age: 82.1 (SD 8.6) years, women: 46.3%]. The mean number of medications varied from 6.7 (SD 3.3) drugs 90 days before death, to 7.5 (SD 4.1) 7 days before death, to 5.6 (SD 3.6) on the day of death. During the final week of life, one additional prescription of essential drugs was observed for 75.2% of patients and 79.3% of patients had at least one unnecessary drug deprescribed. The most prescribed and deprescribed drug classes were, respectively, analgesics (56.4%) and antithrombotic agents (38.2%) during the last week of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Near the end of life, medication therapy is adapted to the goals of palliative care. However, this only occurs during the last week of life. Earlier transition to palliative care is necessary to avoid exposure to unnecessary drugs.

Nurses' Perspectives on Family Caregiver Medication Management Support and Deprescribing

Nurses who care for patients with life-limiting illness operate at the interface of family caregivers (FCGs), patients, and prescribers and are uniquely positioned to guide late-life medication management, including challenging discussions about deprescribing. The study objective was to describe nurses' perspectives about their role in hospice FCG medication management. Content analysis was used to analyze qualitative interviews with nurses from a parent study exploring views on medication management and deprescribing for advanced cancer patients. Ten home and inpatient hospice nurses, drawn from 3 hospice agencies and their referring hospital systems in New England, were asked to describe current practices of medication management and deprescribing and to evaluate a pilot tool to standardize hospice medication review. Analysis of the 10 interviews revealed that hospice nurses are receptive to a standardized approach for comprehensive medication review upon hospice transition and responded favorably to opportunities to discuss medication discontinuation with FCGs and prescribers. Effective framing for discussions included focus on reducing harmful and nonessential medications and reducing caregiver burden. Results indicate that nurses who care for hospice-eligible and enrolled patients are willing to discuss deprescribing with FCGs and prescribers when conversations are framed around medication harms and their impact on quality of life.

Identifying potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people with dementia: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Older people with dementia are at risk of adverse events associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing.

AIM

to describe (1) how international tools designed to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing have been used in studies of older people with dementia, (2) the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in this cohort and (3) advantages/disadvantages of tools METHODS: Systematic literature review, designed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, the Social Science Citation Index, OpenGrey, Base, GreyLit, Mednar and the National Database of Ageing Research were searched in April 2016 for studies describing the use of a tool or criteria to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people with dementia.

RESULTS

Three thousand three hundred twenty-six unique papers were identified; 26 were included in the review. Eight studies used more than one tool to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing. There were variations in how the tools were applied. The Beers criteria were the most commonly used tool. Thirteen of the 15 studies using the Beers criteria did not use the full tool. The prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing ranged from 14 to 74% in older people with dementia. Benzodiazepines, hypnotics and anticholinergics were the most common potentially inappropriately prescribed medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Variations in tool application may at least in part explain variations in potentially inappropriate prescribing across studies. Recommendations include a more standardised tool usage and ensuring the tools are comprehensive enough to identify all potentially inappropriate medications and are kept up to date.

Barriers and enablers to deprescribing in people with a life-limiting disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND:

Knowing the barriers/enablers to deprescribing in people with a life-limiting disease is crucial for the development of successful deprescribing interventions. These barriers/enablers have been studied, but the available evidence has not been summarized in a systematic review.

AIM:

To identify the barriers/enablers to deprescribing of medications in people with a life-limiting disease.

DESIGN:

Systematic review, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017073693).

DATA SOURCES:

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL was conducted and extended with a hand search. Peer-reviewed, primary studies reporting on barriers/enablers to deprescribing in the context of explicit life-limiting disease were included in this review.

RESULTS:

A total of 1026 references were checked. Five studies met the criteria and were included in this review. Three types of barriers/enablers were found: organizational, professional and patient (family)-related barriers/enablers. The most prominent enablers were organizational support (e.g. for standardized medication review), involvement of multidisciplinary teams in medication review and the perception of the importance of coming to a joint decision regarding deprescribing, which highlighted the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and involving the patient and his family in the decision-making process. The most important barriers were shortages in staff and the perceived difficulty or resistance of the nursing home resident's family - or the resident himself.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS:

The scarcity of findings in the literature highlights the importance of filling this gap. Further research should focus on deepening the knowledge on these barriers/enablers in order to develop sustainable multifaceted deprescribing interventions in palliative care.

Pharmacotherapy in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: Report from an American College of Cardiology, American Geriatrics Society, and National Institute on Aging Workshop

OBJECTIVES

To identify the top priority areas for research to optimize pharmacotherapy in older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD).

DESIGN

Consensus meeting.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary workshop supported by the National Institute on Aging, the American College of Cardiology, and the American Geriatrics Society, February 6-7, 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

Leaders in the Cardiology and Geriatrics communities, (officers in professional societies, journal editors, clinical trialists, Division chiefs), representatives from the NIA; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Food and Drug Administration; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, pharmaceutical industry, and trainees and early career faculty with interests in geriatric cardiology.

MEASUREMENTS

Summary of workshop proceedings and recommendations.

RESULTS

To better align older adults' healthcare preferences with their care, research is needed to improve skills in patient engagement and communication. Similarly, to coordinate and meet the needs of older adults with multiple comorbidities encountering multiple healthcare providers and systems, systems and disciplines must be integrated. The lack of data from efficacy trials of CVD medications relevant to the majority of older adults creates uncertainty in determining the risks and benefits of many CVD therapies; thus, developing evidence-based guidelines for older adults with CVD is a top research priority. Polypharmacy and medication nonadherence lead to poor outcomes in older people, making research on appropriate prescribing and deprescribing to reduce polypharmacy and methods to improve adherence to beneficial therapies a priority.

CONCLUSION

The needs and circumstances of older adults with CVD differ from those that the current medical system has been designed to meet. Optimizing pharmacotherapy in older adults will require new data from traditional and pragmatic research to determine optimal CVD therapy, reduce polypharmacy, increase adherence, and meet person-centered goals. Better integration of the multiple systems and disciplines involved in the care of older adults will be essential to implement and disseminate best practices. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:371-380, 2019.

Prevalence and Incidence of Statin Use and 3-Year Adherence and Discontinuation Rates Among Older Adults With Dementia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the patterns of statin use and determine the 3-year adherence and discontinuation rates among a cohort of Australians aged ≥65 years with dementia.

METHODS

The yearly prevalence and incidence of statin use were compared via Poisson regression modeling using 2007 as the reference year. People with dementia were identified according to dispensing of antidementia medications. A cohort of 589 new statin users was followed longitudinally. Adherence was estimated via the proportion of days covered (PDC). Discontinuation was defined as ≥90 days without statin coverage.

RESULTS

The annual prevalence of statin use among older Australians with dementia increased from 20.6% in 2007 to 31.7% in 2016 (aged-sex adjusted rate ratio: 1.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.35-1.69). Among the new users, the proportion adherent (PDC ≥ 0.80) decreased from 60.3% at 6 months to 31.0% at 3 years. During the 3-year follow-up, 58.7% discontinued their statin.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increased use of statins among older Australians with dementia, adherence is low and discontinuation is high, which may point to intentional cessation.

Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Australian Nursing Home Residents with Advanced Dementia: A Substudy of the IDEAL Study

BACKGROUND

Prescribing medications for nursing home residents with advanced dementia should focus on optimizing function and comfort, reducing unnecessary harms and aligning care goals with a palliative approach.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to estimate the proportion of Australian nursing home residents with advanced dementia receiving potentially inappropriate medications, and identify those most commonly prescribed and factors associated with their use.

DESIGN

Data were collected through retrospective audit of medication charts.

SETTING/SUBJECTS

Two hundred eighteen nursing home residents with advanced dementia from 20 nursing homes participated in a cluster-randomized controlled trial of case conferencing (the IDEAL Study) from June 2013 to December 2014.

MEASUREMENTS

Inappropriate drug use was defined as medications classified as "never appropriate" by the Palliative Excellence in Alzheimer Care Efforts (PEACE) program criteria. Generalized linear mixed models were used to identify variables predicting use of "never" appropriate medications.

RESULTS

Over a quarter (n = 65, 30%) of residents received at least one medication classed as "never" appropriate, the most common being lipid-lowering agents (n = 38, 17.4%), antiplatelet agents (n = 18, 8.3%), and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (n = 16, 7.3%). Residents who had been at the nursing home for ≤10 months (odds ratio [OR] 5.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-18.06) and 11-21 months (OR 5.41, 95% CI 1.67-17.75) had significantly greater odds of receiving a never appropriate medication compared with residents who had been at the nursing home for >5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of potentially inappropriate medications in Australian nursing home residents with advanced dementia is common. A greater understanding of the rationale that underpins prescribing of medications is required.

A qualitative exploration of proxy decision makers' expectations of prescribed medications for people with advanced dementia

Background:

Proxy decision makers often have to make decisions for people with advanced dementia. Their expectations regarding prescribed medications have the potential to influence prescription or withdrawal of medications. However, few studies to date have explored this.

Aim:

To explore proxy decision makers’ expectations of prescribed medications for people with advanced dementia and to consider how these change with changing goals of care and dementia progression.

Design:

This is a qualitative semi-structured interview study.

Setting/participants:

In total, 15 proxy decision makers of people with advanced dementia were recruited via general practitioners ( n = 9), Join Dementia Research ( n = 3) and the Alzheimer’s Society Northern Ireland ( n = 3).

Results:

Five key themes emerged: the role as advocate, attitudes to medicines and medicine taking, uncertainty over the benefit of anti-dementia medications, stopping medications, and communication and decision-making. Proxy decision makers desired more information about prescribed medicines, particularly the indications, benefits and risks of treatment. Despite uncertainty about the benefits of anti-dementia medications, proxy decision makers were reluctant for these medications to be withdrawn. Reluctance to stop other prescribed medicines was also expressed but reduced with changing goals of care and dementia progression. Although some proxy decision makers expected to be involved in medication-related decisions, the majority preferred to delegate these decisions to healthcare professionals. However, they expected to be informed of any medication-related decisions made.

Conclusion:

Proxy decision makers vary in terms of their desire for active involvement in the medication decision-making process. Healthcare professionals should facilitate proxy decision maker involvement if desired. Further research is required to consider the impact of proxy decision maker involvement in decision-making.

The epidemiology of polypharmacy in older adults: register-based prospective cohort study

Objective

Polypharmacy is the concomitant use of several drugs by a single person, and it increases the risk of adverse drug-related events in older adults. Little is known about the epidemiology of polypharmacy at the population level. We aimed to measure the prevalence and incidence of polypharmacy and to investigate the associated factors.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted using register data with national coverage in Sweden. A total of 1,742,336 individuals aged ≥65 years at baseline (November 1, 2010) were included and followed until death or the end of the study (December 20, 2013).

Results

On average, individuals were exposed to 4.6 (SD =4.0) drugs at baseline. The prevalence of polypharmacy (5+ drugs) was 44.0%, and the prevalence of excessive polypharmacy (10+ drugs) was 11.7%. The incidence rate of polypharmacy among individuals without polypharmacy at baseline was 19.9 per 100 person-years, ranging from 16.8% in individuals aged 65-74 years to 33.2% in those aged ≥95 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] =1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-1.56). The incidence rate of excessive polypharmacy was 8.0 per 100 person-years. Older adults using multi-dose dispensing were at significantly higher risk of developing incident polypharmacy compared with those receiving ordinary prescriptions (HR =1.51, 95% CI 1.47-1.55). When adjusting for confounders, living in nursing home was found to be associated with lower risks of incident polypharmacy and incident excessive polypharmacy (HR =0.79 and HR =0.86, p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

The prevalence and incidence of polypharmacy are high among older adults in Sweden. Interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence of polypharmacy should also target potential incident polypharmacy users as they are the ones who fuel future polypharmacy.

Medication appropriateness for patients with dementia approaching the end of their life

AIM

To examine medication use among patients with dementia towards the end of their life and to evaluate the appropriateness of medication use by using a nationwide database.

METHODS

Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 6532 people with dementia that died between 2008 and 2012. For each person with dementia, data of medication use in the last month of outpatient setting (vs -12th month [baseline]) and last hospitalization (vs -3rd hospitalization [baseline]) before death were retrieved for study. The medications of interest were selected according to a consensus recommendation, which included five categories defining their appropriateness (i.e. always, sometimes, rarely and never appropriate, as well as no consensus). Multivariable logistic regression was carried out to analyze the determinants for use of "never appropriate" medications.

RESULTS

Approximately 10% of the study participants were prescribed medications categorized as "never appropriate" in the last month of life in the outpatient settings, which was significantly lower than their baseline (-12th month: 17.5%; P < 0.0001). A similar pattern was identified in the last hospitalization before death. Older age was associated with a lower likelihood of being prescribed "never appropriate" medications (age 75-84: aOR 0.34 [0.29-0.41], P < 0.0001; age ≥85: aOR 0.34 [0.28-0.40], P < 0.0001). In contrast, patients with a history of diabetes mellitus (aOR 1.31 [1.10-1.55], P = 0.0018) were associated with a higher likelihood of being prescribed "never appropriate" medications.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to sophisticatedly describe medications use, particularly according to their appropriateness for palliative care, in Asian people with dementia at the end of their life. Approximately 10% of all patients were prescribed "never appropriate" medications at the end of their life, which deserves further study to evaluate the clinical impact of the quality of care. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017: 17 (Suppl. 1): 65-74..