Assessment of Blood Biomarker Profile After Acute Concussion During Combative Training Among US Military Cadets: A Prospective Study From the NCAA and US Department of Defense CARE Consortium

Military Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the military can involve distinct injury mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, treatments, and course of recovery. TBI has played a prominent role in recent conflicts, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Blast-related TBI in combat settings is often accompanied by other physical injuries. Military TBIs of all severities can lead to prolonged recoveries and persistent sequelae. The complex interplay between TBI, pain, and mental health conditions can significantly complicate diagnosis and recovery. Military and veteran health settings and programs provide comprehensive care along the continuum of TBI recovery rehabilitation with the goal of optimizing recovery and function.

Biomarkers of Neurobiologic Recovery in Adults With Sport-Related Concussion

Importance

Sport-related concussion (SRC), a form of mild traumatic brain injury, is a prevalent occurrence in collision sports. There are no well-established approaches for tracking neurobiologic recovery after SRC.

Objective

To examine the levels of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light (NfL) in Australian football athletes who experience SRC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A cohort study recruiting from April 10, 2021, to September 17, 2022, was conducted through the Victorian Amateur Football Association, Melbourne, Australia. Participants included adult Australian football players with or without SRC. Data analysis was performed from May 26, 2023, to March 27, 2024.

Exposure

Sport-related concussion, defined as at least 1 observable sign and/or 2 or more symptoms.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were serum GFAP and NfL levels at 24 hours, and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were symptoms, cognitive performance, and return to training times.

Results

Eighty-one individuals with SRC (median age, 22.8 [IQR, 21.3-26.0] years; 89% male) and 56 control individuals (median age, 24.6 [IQR, 22.4-27.3] years; 96% male) completed a total of 945 of 1057 eligible testing sessions. Compared with control participants, those with SRC exhibited higher GFAP levels at 24 hours (mean difference [MD] in natural log, pg/mL, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.50-0.82]) and 4 weeks (MD, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.02-0.32]), and NfL from 1 to 12 weeks (1-week MD, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.12-0.51]; 2-week MD, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.19-0.58]; 4-week MD, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.12-0.51]; 6-week MD, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.07-0.47]; 8-week MD, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.15-0.56]; and 12-week MD, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.04-0.46]). Growth mixture modeling identified 2 GFAP subgroups: extreme prolonged (16%) and moderate transient (84%). For NfL, 3 subgroups were identified: extreme prolonged (7%), moderate prolonged (15%), and minimal or no change (78%). Individuals with SRC who reported loss of consciousness (LOC) (33% of SRC cases) had higher GFAP at 24 hours (MD, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.77-1.24]), 1 week (MD, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.06-0.49]), 2 weeks (MD, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.004-0.42]) and 4 weeks (MD, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.13-0.55]), and higher NfL from 1 week to 12 weeks (1-week MD, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.42-1.03]; 2-week MD, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.61-1.21]; 4-week MD, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.59-1.20]; 6-week MD, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.50-1.13]; 8-week MD, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.42-1.04]; and 12-week MD, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.22-0.85]) compared with SRC participants without LOC. Return to training times were longer in the GFAP extreme compared with moderate subgroup (incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.69-2.34]; NfL extreme (IRR, 3.24 [95% CI, 2.63-3.97]) and moderate (IRR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.18-1.72]) subgroups compared with the minimal subgroup, and for individuals with LOC compared with those without LOC (IRR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.41-1.93]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, a subset of SRC cases, particularly those with LOC, showed heightened and prolonged increases in GFAP and NfL levels, that persisted for at least 4 weeks. These findings suggest that serial biomarker measurement could identify such cases, guiding return to play decisions based on neurobiologic recovery. While further investigation is warranted, the association between prolonged biomarker elevations and LOC may support the use of more conservative return to play timelines for athletes with this clinical feature.

Elevated Serum Tau and UCHL-1 Concentrations Within 12 Months of Injury Predict Neurobehavioral Functioning 2 or More Years Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVE

Blood-based biomarkers have received considerable attention for their diagnostic and prognostic value in the acute and postacute period following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose of this study was to examine whether blood-based biomarker concentrations within the first 12 months of TBI can predict neurobehavioral outcome in the chronic phase of the recovery trajectory.

SETTING

Inpatient and outpatient wards from 3 military medical treatment facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 161 service members and veterans classified into 3 groups: ( a ) uncomplicated mild TBI (MTBI; n = 37), ( b ) complicated mild, moderate, severe, penetrating TBI combined (STBI; n = 46), and ( c ) controls (CTRL; n = 78).

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal.

MAIN MEASURES

Participants completed 6 scales from the Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life (ie, Anger, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Headaches, and Cognitive Concerns) within 12 months (baseline) and at 2 or more years (follow-up) post-injury. Serum concentrations of tau, neurofilament light, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and UCHL-1 at baseline were measured using SIMOA.

RESULTS

Baseline tau was associated with worse anger, anxiety, and depression in the STBI group at follow-up ( R2 = 0.101-0.127), and worse anxiety in the MTBI group ( R2 = 0.210). Baseline ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL-1) was associated with worse anxiety and depression at follow-up in both the MTBI and STBI groups ( R2 Δ = 0.143-0.207), and worse cognitive concerns in the MTBI group ( R2 Δ = 0.223).

CONCLUSIONS

A blood-based panel including these biomarkers could be a useful tool for identifying individuals at risk of poor outcome following TBI.

Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury: Unmasking and Addressing the Gaps

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant, global public health concern. Women, individuals with historically underrepresented identities, and disabilities are at high risk for IPV and tend to experience severe injuries. There has been growing concern about the risk of exposure to IPV-related head trauma, resulting in IPV-related brain injury (IPV-BI), and its health consequences. Past work suggests that a significant proportion of women exposed to IPV experience IPV-BI, likely representing a distinct phenotype compared with BI of other etiologies. An IPV-BI often co-occurs with psychological trauma and mental health complaints, leading to unique issues related to identifying, prognosticating, and managing IPV-BI outcomes. The goal of this review is to identify important gaps in research and clinical practice in IPV-BI and suggest potential solutions to address them. We summarize IPV research in five key priority areas: (1) unique considerations for IPV-BI study design; (2) understanding non-fatal strangulation as a form of BI; (3) identifying objective biomarkers of IPV-BI; (4) consideration of the chronicity, cumulative and late effects of IPV-BI; and (5) BI as a risk factor for IPV engagement. Our review concludes with a call to action to help investigators develop ecologically valid research studies addressing the identified clinical-research knowledge gaps and strategies to improve care in individuals exposed to IPV-BI. By reducing the current gaps and answering these calls to action, we will approach IPV-BI in a trauma-informed manner, ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life for those impacted by IPV-BI.

Optimizing Concussion Care Seeking: Connecting Care-Seeking Behaviors and Neurophysiological States Through Blood Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Timely and appropriate medical care after concussion presents a difficult public health problem. Concussion identification and treatment rely heavily on self-report, but more than half of concussions go unreported or are reported after a delay. If incomplete self-report increases exposure to harm, blood biomarkers may objectively indicate this neurobiological dysfunction.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to compare postconcussion biomarker levels between individuals with different previous concussion diagnosis statuses and care-seeking statuses. It was hypothesized that individuals with undiagnosed concussions and poorer care seeking would show altered biomarker profiles.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 287 military academy cadets and collegiate athletes diagnosed with concussion in the Advanced Research Core of the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium. The authors extracted each participant's self-reported previous concussion diagnosis status (no history, all diagnosed, ≥1 undiagnosed) and whether they had delayed or immediate symptom onset, symptom reporting, and removal from activity after the incident concussion. The authors compared the following blood biomarkers associated with neural injury between previous concussion diagnosis status groups and care-seeking groups: glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), neurofilament light chain (NF-L), and tau protein, captured at baseline, 24 to 48 hours, asymptomatic, and 7 days after unrestricted return to activity using tests of parallel profiles.

RESULTS

The undiagnosed previous concussion group (n = 21) had higher levels of NF-L at 24- to 48-hour and asymptomatic time points relative to all diagnosed (n = 72) or no previous concussion (n = 194) groups. For those with delayed removal from activity (n = 127), UCH-L1 was lower at 7 days after return to activity than that for athletes immediately removed from activity (n = 131). No other biomarker differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with previous undiagnosed concussions or delayed removal from activity showed some different biomarker levels after concussion and after clinical recovery, despite a lack of baseline differences. This may indicate that poorer care seeking can create neurobiological differences in the concussed brain.

Innovative Insights into Traumatic Brain Injuries: Biomarkers and New Pharmacological Targets

A traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health issue affecting many people across the world, causing significant morbidity and mortality. TBIs often have long-lasting effects, disrupting daily life and functionality. They cause two types of damage to the brain: primary and secondary. Secondary damage is particularly critical as it involves complex processes unfolding after the initial injury. These processes can lead to cell damage and death in the brain. Understanding how these processes damage the brain is crucial for finding new treatments. This review examines a wide range of literature from 2021 to 2023, focusing on biomarkers and molecular mechanisms in TBIs to pinpoint therapeutic advancements. Baseline levels of biomarkers, including neurofilament light chain (NF-L), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), Tau, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in TBI, have demonstrated prognostic value for cognitive outcomes, laying the groundwork for personalized treatment strategies. In terms of pharmacological progress, the most promising approaches currently target neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptotic mechanisms. Agents that can modulate these pathways offer the potential to reduce a TBI's impact and aid in neurological rehabilitation. Future research is poised to refine these therapeutic approaches, potentially revolutionizing TBI treatment.

Association of Blood Biomarkers of Inflammation With Acute Concussion in Collegiate Athletes and Military Service Academy Cadets

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The objective was to characterize the acute effects of concussion (a subset of mild traumatic brain injury) on serum interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (RA) and 5 additional inflammatory markers in athletes and military service academy members from the Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium and to determine whether these markers aid in discrimination of concussed participants from controls.

METHODS

Athletes and cadets with concussion and matched controls provided blood at baseline and postinjury visits between January 2015 and March 2020. Linear models investigated changes in inflammatory markers measured using Meso Scale Discovery assays across time points (baseline and 0-12, 12-36, 36-60 hours). Subanalyses were conducted in participants split by sex and injury population. Logistic regression analyses tested whether acute levels of IL-6 and IL-1RA improved discrimination of concussed participants relative to brain injury markers (glial fibrillary acidic protein, tau, neurofilament light, ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase-L1) or clinical data (Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-Third Edition, Standardized Assessment of Concussion, Balance Error Scoring System).

RESULTS

Participants with concussion (total, N = 422) had elevated IL-6 and IL-1RA at 0-12 hours vs controls (n = 345; IL-6: mean difference [MD] (standard error) = 0.701 (0.091), p < 0.0001; IL-1RA: MD = 0.283 (0.042), p < 0.0001) and relative to baseline (IL-6: MD = 0.656 (0.078), p < 0.0001; IL-1RA: MD = 0.242 (0.038), p < 0.0001), 12-36 hours (IL-6: MD = 0.609 (0.086), p < 0.0001; IL-1RA: MD = 0.322 (0.041), p < 0.0001), and 36-60 hours (IL-6: MD = 0.818 (0.084), p < 0.0001; IL-1RA: MD = 0.317 (0.040), p < 0.0001). IL-6 and IL-1RA were elevated in participants with sport (IL-6: MD = 0.748 (0.115), p < 0.0001; IL-1RA: MD = 0.304 (0.055), p < 0.0001) and combative-related concussions (IL-6: MD = 0.583 (0.178), p = 0.001; IL-1RA: MD = 0.312 (0.081), p = 0.0001). IL-6 was elevated in male (MD = 0.734 (0.105), p < 0.0001) and female participants (MD = 0.600 (0.177), p = 0.0008); IL-1RA was only elevated in male participants (MD = 0.356 (0.047), p < 0.0001). Logistic regression showed the inclusion of IL-6 and IL-1RA at 0-12 hours improved the discrimination of participants with concussion from controls relative to brain injury markers (χ2(2) = 17.855, p = 0.0001; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.73 [0.66-0.80] to 0.78 [0.71-0.84]), objective clinical measures (balance and cognition; χ2(2) = 40.661, p < 0.0001; AUC 0.81 [0.76-0.86] to 0.87 [0.83-0.91]), and objective and subjective measures combined (χ2(2) = 13.456, p = 0.001; AUC 0.97 [0.95-0.99] to 0.98 [0.96-0.99]), although improvement in AUC was only significantly relative to objective clinical measures.

DISCUSSION

IL-6 and IL-1RA (male participants only) are elevated in the early-acute window postconcussion and may aid in diagnostic decisions beyond traditional blood markers and common clinical measures. IL-1RA results highlight sex differences in the immune response to concussion which should be considered in future biomarker work.

Increased brain age and relationships with blood-based biomarkers following concussion in younger populations

OBJECTIVE

Brain age is increasingly being applied to the spectrum of brain injury to define neuropathological changes in conjunction with blood-based biomarkers. However, data from the acute/sub-acute stages of concussion are lacking, especially among younger cohorts.

METHODS

Predicted brain age differences were independently calculated in large, prospectively recruited cohorts of pediatric concussion and matched healthy controls (total N = 446), as well as collegiate athletes with sport-related concussion and matched non-contact sport controls (total N = 184). Effects of repetitive head injury (i.e., exposure) were examined in a separate cohort of contact sport athletes (N = 82), as well as by quantifying concussion history through semi-structured interviews and years of contact sport participation.

RESULTS

Findings of increased brain age during acute and sub-acute concussion were independently replicated across both cohorts, with stronger evidence of recovery for pediatric (4 months) relative to concussed athletes (6 months). Mixed evidence existed for effects of repetitive head injury, as brain age was increased in contact sport athletes, but was not associated with concussion history or years of contact sport exposure. There was no difference in brain age between concussed and contact sport athletes. Total tau decreased immediately (~ 1.5 days) post-concussion relative to the non-contact group, whereas pro-inflammatory markers were increased in both concussed and contact sport athletes. Anti-inflammatory markers were inversely related to brain age, whereas markers of axonal injury (neurofilament light) exhibited a trend positive association.

CONCLUSION

Current and previous findings collectively suggest that the chronicity of brain age differences may be mediated by age at injury (adults > children), with preliminary findings suggesting that exposure to contact sports may also increase brain age.

Plasma phosphorylated tau181 as a biomarker of mild traumatic brain injury: findings from THINC and NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium prospective cohorts

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate phosphorylated tau (p-tau181) protein in plasma in a cohort of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients and a cohort of concussed athletes.

Methods

This pilot study comprised two independent cohorts. The first cohort-part of a Traumatic Head Injury Neuroimaging Classification (THINC) study-with a mean age of 46 years was composed of uninjured controls (UIC, n = 30) and mTBI patients (n = 288) recruited from the emergency department with clinical computed tomography (CT) and research magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The second cohort-with a mean age of 19 years-comprised 133 collegiate athletes with (n = 112) and without (n = 21) concussions. The participants enrolled in the second cohort were a part of a multicenter, prospective, case-control study conducted by the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium at six CARE Advanced Research Core (ARC) sites between 2015 and 2019. Blood was collected within 48 h of injury for both cohorts. Plasma concentration (pg/ml) of p-tau181 was measured using the Single Molecule Array ultrasensitive assay.

Results

Concentrations of plasma p-tau181 in both cohorts were significantly elevated compared to controls within 48 h of injury, with the highest concentrations of p-tau181 within 18 h of injury, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.690-0.748, respectively, in distinguishing mTBI patients and concussed athletes from controls. Among the mTBI patients, the levels of plasma p-tau181 were significantly higher in patients with positive neuroimaging (either CT+/MRI+, n = 74 or CT-/MRI+, n = 89) compared to mTBI patients with negative neuroimaging (CT-/MRI-, n = 111) findings and UIC (P-values < 0.05).

Conclusion

These findings indicate that plasma p-tau181 concentrations likely relate to brain injury, with the highest levels in patients with neuroimaging evidence of injury. Future research is needed to replicate and validate this protein assay's performance as a possible early diagnostic biomarker for mTBI/concussions.

Are EPB41 and alpha-synuclein diagnostic biomarkers of sport-related concussion? Findings from the NCAA and Department of Defense CARE Consortium

BACKGROUND

Current protein biomarkers are only moderately predictive at identifying individuals with mild traumatic brain injury or concussion. Therefore, more accurate diagnostic markers are needed for sport-related concussion.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, prospective, case-control study of athletes who provided blood samples and were diagnosed with a concussion or were a matched non-concussed control within the National Collegiate Athletic Association-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium conducted between 2015 and 2019. The blood was collected within 48 h of injury to identify protein abnormalities at the acute and subacute timepoints. Athletes with concussion were divided into 6 h post-injury (0-6 h post-injury) and after 6 h post-injury (7-48 h post-injury) groups. We applied a highly multiplexed proteomic technique that used a DNA aptamers assay to target 1305 proteins in plasma samples from athletes with and without sport-related concussion.

RESULTS

A total of 140 athletes with concussion (79.3% males; aged 18.71 ± 1.10 years, mean ± SD) and 21 non-concussed athletes (76.2% males; 19.14 ± 1.10 years) were included in this study. We identified 338 plasma proteins that significantly differed in abundance (319 upregulated and 19 downregulated) in concussed athletes compared to non-concussed athletes. The top 20 most differentially abundant proteins discriminated concussed athletes from non-concussed athletes with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.954 (95% confidence interval: 0.922‒0.986). Specifically, after 6 h of injury, the individual AUC of plasma erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1 (EPB41) and alpha-synuclein (SNCA) were 0.956 and 0.875, respectively. The combination of EPB41 and SNCA provided the best AUC (1.000), which suggests this combination of candidate plasma biomarkers is the best for diagnosing concussion in athletes after 6 h of injury.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that proteomic profiling may provide novel diagnostic protein markers and that a combination of EPB41 and SNCA is the most predictive biomarker of concussion after 6 h of injury.

Refinement of saliva microRNA biomarkers for sports-related concussion

BACKGROUND

Recognizing sport-related concussion (SRC) is challenging and relies heavily on subjective symptom reports. An objective, biological marker could improve recognition and understanding of SRC. There is emerging evidence that salivary micro-ribonucleic acids (miRNAs) may serve as biomarkers of concussion; however, it remains unclear whether concussion-related miRNAs are impacted by exercise. We sought to determine whether 40 miRNAs previously implicated in concussion pathophysiology were affected by participation in a variety of contact and non-contact sports. Our goal was to refine a miRNA-based tool capable of identifying athletes with SRC without the confounding effects of exercise.

METHODS

This case-control study harmonized data from concussed and non-concussed athletes recruited across 10 sites. Levels of salivary miRNAs within 455 samples from 314 individuals were measured with RNA sequencing. Within-subjects testing was used to identify and exclude miRNAs that changed with either (a) a single episode of exercise (166 samples from 83 individuals) or (b) season-long participation in contact sports (212 samples from 106 individuals). The miRNAs that were not impacted by exercise were interrogated for SRC diagnostic utility using logistic regression (172 samples from 75 concussed and 97 non-concussed individuals).

RESULTS

Two miRNAs (miR-532-5p and miR-182-5p) decreased (adjusted p < 0.05) after a single episode of exercise, and 1 miRNA (miR-4510) increased only after contact sports participation. Twenty-three miRNAs changed at the end of a contact sports season. Two of these miRNAs (miR-26b-3p and miR-29c-3p) were associated (R > 0.50; adjusted p < 0.05) with the number of head impacts sustained in a single football practice. Among the 15 miRNAs not confounded by exercise or season-long contact sports participation, 11 demonstrated a significant difference (adjusted p < 0.05) between concussed and non-concussed participants, and 6 displayed moderate ability (area under curve > 0.70) to identify concussion. A single ratio (miR-27a-5p/miR-30a-3p) displayed the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.810, sensitivity = 82.4%, specificity = 73.3%) for differentiating concussed and non-concussed participants. Accuracy did not differ between participants with SRC and non-SRC (z = 0.5, p = 0.60).

CONCLUSION

Salivary miRNA levels may accurately identify SRC when not confounded by exercise. Refinement of this approach in a large cohort of athletes could eventually lead to a non-invasive, sideline adjunct for SRC assessment.

Serum Tau, Neurofilament Light Chain, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, and Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1 Are Associated with the Chronic Deterioration of Neurobehavioral Symptoms after Traumatic Brain Injury

The purpose of this study was to examine the association of serum tau, neurofilament light chain (NFL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL-1) concentrations evaluated within the first 12 months after a military-related TBI, with longitudinal changes in neurobehavioral functioning extending two or more years post-injury. Participants were 84 United States service members and veterans (SMVs) prospectively enrolled in the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center of Excellence/Traumatic Brain Injury Center 15-Year Longitudinal TBI Study, separated into three discreet groups: (a) uncomplicated mild TBI (MTBI; n = 28), (b) complicated mild, moderate, severe, and penetrating TBI combined (STBI; n = 29], and (c) non-injured controls (NIC, n = 27). Participants completed a battery of self-report neurobehavioral symptom measures (e.g., depression, post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD], post-concussion, anxiety, somatic, cognitive, and neurological symptoms) within 12 months of injury (baseline), and then again at two or more years post-injury (follow-up). At baseline, participants also completed a blood draw to determine serum concentrations of tau, NFL, GFAP, and UCHL-1 using an ultra-sensitivity assay method. In the MTBI and STBI groups (using hierarchical regression analyses), (1) baseline tau concentrations predicted the deterioration of neurobehavioral symptoms from baseline to follow-up on measures of anxiety, PTSD, depression, post-concussion, somatic, and neurological symptoms (accounting for 10-28% of the variance); (2) NFL predicted the deterioration of depression, post-concussion, somatic, cognitive, and neurological symptoms (10-32% variance); (3) GFAP predicted the deterioration of post-concussion, PTSD, depression, anxiety, somatic, neurological, and cognitive symptoms (11-43% variance); and (4) UCHL-1 predicted the deterioration of anxiety, somatic, and neurological symptoms (10-16% variance). In the NIC group, no meaningful associations were found between baseline biomarker concentrations and the deterioration of neurobehavioral symptoms on the majority of measures. This study reports that elevated tau, NFL, GFAP, and UCHL-1 concentrations within the first 12 months of injury are associated with the deterioration of neurobehavioral symptoms that extends to the chronic phase of recovery after a TBI. These findings suggest that a blood-based panel including these biomarkers could be a useful prognostic tool to identifying those individuals at risk of poor future outcome after TBI.

Clinical and Blood Biomarker Trajectories after Concussion: New Insights from a Longitudinal Pilot Study of Professional Flat-Track Jockeys

There is a recognized need for objective tools for detecting and tracking clinical and neuropathological recovery after sports-related concussion (SRC). Although computerized neurocognitive testing has been shown to be sensitive to cognitive deficits after SRC, and some blood biomarkers have shown promise as indicators of axonal and glial damage, the potential utility of these measures in isolation and combination for assisting SRC diagnosis and tracking recovery is not well understood. To provide new insights, we conducted a prospective study of 64 male and female professional flat-track jockeys (49 non-SRC, 15 SRC), with each jockey undergoing symptom evaluation, cognitive testing using the CogSport battery, and serum biomarker quantification of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), tau, and neurofilament light (NfL) using a Simoa HD-X Analyzer. Measures were performed at baseline (i.e., pre-injury), and 2 and 7 days and 1 and 12 months after SRC. Symptoms were most pronounced at 2 days and had largely resolved by either 7 days or 1 month. CogSport testing at 2 days revealed cognitive impairments relative to both non-concussed peers and their own pre-injury baselines, with SRC classification utility found at 2 days, and to a slightly lesser extent, at 7 days. Relatively prolonged changes in serum NfL were observed, with elevated levels and classification utility persisting beyond the resolution of SRC symptoms and cognitive deficits. Finally, SRC classification performance throughout the 1st month after SRC was optimized through the combination of cognitive testing and serum biomarkers. Considered together, these findings provide further evidence for a role of computerized cognitive testing and fluid biomarkers of neuropathology as objective measures to assist in the identification of SRC and the monitoring of clinical and neuropathological recovery.

When Is Air Travel Safe after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury/Sports-Related Concussion?

ABSTRACT

While the literature regarding return to play and recovery protocols from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and sports-related concussions (SRC) is growing, there continues to be a paucity of data regarding when air travel is safe for athletes after sustaining certain brain injuries, such as mTBI and SRC. Although it is known hypoxia can negatively affect severe TBI patients, it is unclear whether mild hypoxia, which may be experienced during commercial air travel, is clinically significant for athletes who have recently sustained mTBI injuries. Further research is required to provide more standardized recommendations on when air travel is safe. With the current available literature, clinicians still need to weigh the evidence, consider how it applies to each individual patient, and engage in shared decision making to ultimately decide what is best for the patient.

Neurotrauma Prevention Review: Improving Helmet Design and Implementation

Neurotrauma continues to contribute to significant mortality and disability. The need for better protective equipment is apparent. This review focuses on improved helmet design and the necessity for continued research. We start by highlighting current innovations in helmet design for sport and subsequent utilization in the lay community for construction. The current standards by sport and organization are summarized. We then address current standards within the military environment. The pathophysiology is discussed with emphasis on how helmets provide protection. As innovative designs emerge, protection against secondary injury becomes apparent. Much research is needed, but this focused paper is intended to serve as a catalyst for improvement in helmet design and implementation to provide more efficient and reliable neuroprotection across broad arenas.

Association of day-of-injury plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein concentration and six-month posttraumatic stress disorder in patients with mild traumatic brain injury

Several proteins have proven useful as blood-based biomarkers to assist in evaluation and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this study was to determine whether two day-of-injury blood-based biomarkers are predictive of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We used data from 1143 individuals with mild TBI (mTBI; defined as admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 13-15) enrolled in TRACK-TBI, a prospective longitudinal study of level 1 trauma center patients. Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured from blood collected within 24 h of injury. Two hundred and twenty-seven (19.9% of) patients had probable PTSD (PCL-5 score ≥ 33) at 6 months post-injury. GFAP levels were positively associated (Spearman's rho = 0.35, p < 0.001) with duration of posttraumatic amnesia (PTA). There was an inverse association between PTSD and (log)GFAP (adjusted OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.95 per log unit increase) levels, but no significant association with (log)hsCRP (adjusted OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.98-1.25 per log unit increase) levels. Elevated day-of-injury plasma GFAP, a biomarker of glial reactivity, is associated with reduced risk of PTSD after mTBI. This finding merits replication and additional studies to determine a possible neurocognitive basis for this relationship.

Serum Amyloid Beta Precursor Protein, Neurofilament Light, and Visinin-like Protein-1 in Rugby Players: An Exploratory Study

Concussion diagnosis is difficult and may be improved with the addition of a blood-based biomarker that indicates concussion. The purpose of this research was to investigate the capability of serum amyloid beta precursor protein (APP), neurofilament light (NfL), and visinin-like protein-1 (VILIP-1) to distinguish athletes who were diagnosed with a concussion pitch-side. An observational cross-sectional study design was used to replicate sideline concussion diagnosis. Subjects included mutually exclusive pre-match (n = 9), post-match (n = 15), and SRC (n = 7) groups. Six paired pre-and post-match subjects were analyzed for APP. APP increased significantly from pre-match (mean = 57.98 pg·mL−1, SD = 63.21 pg·mL−1) to post-match (mean = 111.37 pg·mL−1, SD = 106.89 pg·mL−1, p = 0.048) in the paired subjects. NfL was lower in the SRC group (median = 8.71 pg·mL−1, IQR = 6.09 pg·mL−1) compared to the post-match group (median = 29.60 pg·mL−1, IQR = 57.45 pg·mL−1, p < 0.001). VILIP-1 was higher in the post-match group (median = 212.18 pg·mL−1, IQR = 345.00 pg·mL−1) compared to both the pre-match (median = 32.63 pg·mL−1, IQR = 52.24 pg·mL−1), p = 0.001) and SRC (median = 30.21 pg·mL−1, IQR = 47.20 pg·mL−1), p = 0.003) groups. APP, NfL, and VILIP-1 were all able to distinguish between pre-match and post-match groups (AUROC > 0.700) but not from the SRC group (AUROC < 0.660). Our results show that APP, NfL, and VILIP-1 were not helpful in differentiating concussed from non-concussed athletes pitch-side in this study.

The Potential Role of Neurofilament Light in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is an insult to the CNS often overlooked at the time of presentation due to variable symptomatology and undetectable nature on CT/MRI. Increased exposure to repetitive head injuries results in a high prevalence of mTBI among athletes and military personnel. While most patients fully recover with rest, some are at risk for long-lasting neurocognitive dysfunction, leading to a high morbidity and cost burden on the healthcare system. Currently, there are no unified symptom-based criteria or gold standard objective measurement for mTBI. Neurofilament light (Nf-L) is a highly sensitive biomarker for axonal injury with the potential to serve as an objective serum measurement for mTBI. This systematic review investigates the ability of Nf-L to accurately diagnose acute mTBI in athletes and military personnel. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar from 2010 to 2021 using keywords neurofilament light chain, mTBI, concussion, athletes, and military identified 239 articles for eligibility screening. Ten articles met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis, with extracted data including Nf-L levels, recovery characteristics, and neuroimaging results. Of the 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria, one was military-related, five were sports-related, and four were mixed-focus. Six studies investigated the association between mTBI and Nf-L levels within 24 hours of injury. Four of these studies involved athletes, with three showing evidence of acute Nf-L elevations. No evidence of acute Nf-L elevations was reported among military personnel or emergency department patients. Nf-L elevations were recorded at various time points greater than 24 hours post-injury in athletes (two studies) and emergency department patients (one study). Positive associations were found between Nf-L levels and loss of consciousness/post-traumatic amnesia (one study), positive neuroimaging findings (three studies), and prolonged recovery times (three studies). We are unable to conclude whether Nf-L has the capacity for acute diagnosis of mTBI or the optimal time for serum measurement. Nf-L does, however, shows promise as a prognostic factor for mTBI complications, neuroimaging findings, and recovery. Additional studies are warranted, as the use of Nf-L in early diagnosis of mTBI in the future would improve clinical management while decreasing complications and healthcare costs.

Effect of Player Position on Serum Biomarkers during Participation in a Season of Collegiate Football

This prospective cohort study examined the relationship between a panel of four serum proteomic biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 [UCH-L1], total Tau, and neurofilament light chain polypeptide [NF-L]) in 52 players from two different cohorts of male collegiate student football athletes from two different competitive seasons of Division I National Collegiate Athletic Association Football Bowl Subdivision. This study evaluated changes in biomarker concentrations (as indicators of brain injury) over the course of the playing season (pre- and post-season) and also assessed biomarker concentrations by player position using two different published classification systems. Player positions were divided into: 1) speed (quarterbacks, running backs, halfbacks, fullbacks, wide receivers, tight ends, defensive backs, safety, and linebackers) versus non-speed (offensive and defensive linemen), and 2) "Profile 1" (low frequency/high strain magnitudes positions including quarterbacks, wide receivers, and defensive backs), "Profile 2" (mid-range impact frequency and strain positions including linebackers, running backs, and tight ends), and "Profile 3" (high frequency/low strains positions including defensive and offensive linemen). There were significant increases in GFAP 39.3 to 45.6 pg/mL and NF-L 3.5 to 5.4 pg/mL over the course of the season (p < 0.001) despite only five players being diagnosed with concussion. UCH-L1 decreased significantly, and Tau was not significantly different. In both the pre- and post-season blood samples Tau and NF-L concentrations were significantly higher in speed versus non-speed positions. Concentrations of GFAP, Tau, and NF-L increased incrementally from "Profile 3," to "Profile 2" to "Profile 1" in the post-season. UCH-L1 did not. GFAP increased (by Profiles 3, 2, 1) from 42.4 to 49.6 to 78.2, respectively (p = 0.051). Tau increased from 0.37 to 0.61 to 0.67, respectively (p = 0.024). NF-L increased from 3.5 to 4.9 to 8.2, respectively (p < 0.001). Although GFAP and Tau showed similar patterns of elevations by profile in the pre-season samples they were not statistically significant. Only NF-L showed significant differences between profiles 2.7 to 3.1 to 4.2 in the pre-season (p = 0.042). GFAP, Tau, and NF-L concentrations were significantly associated with different playing positions with the highest concentrations in speed and "Profile 1" positions and the lowest concentrations were in non-speed and "Profile 3" positions. Blood-based biomarkers (GFAP, Tau, NF-L) provide an additional layer of injury quantification that could contribute to a better understanding of the risks of playing different positions.

Serum GFAP - reference interval and preanalytical properties in Danish adults

OBJECTIVES

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a promising biomarker that could potentially contribute to diagnosis and prognosis in neurological diseases. The biomarker is approaching clinical use but the reference interval for serum GFAP remains to be established, and knowledge about the effect of preanalytical factors is also limited.

METHODS

Serum samples from 371 apparently healthy reference subjects, 21-90 years of age, were measured by a single-molecule array (Simoa) assay. Continuous reference intervals were modelled using non-parametric quantile regression and compared with traditional age-partitioned non-parametric reference intervals established according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline C28-A3. The following preanalytical conditions were also examined: stability in whole blood at room temperature (RT), stability in serum at RT and -20 °C, repeated freeze-thaw cycles, and haemolysis.

RESULTS

The continuous reference interval showed good overall agreement with the traditional age-partitioned reference intervals of 25-136 ng/L, 34-242 ng/L, and 5-438 ng/L for the age groups 20-39, 40-64, and 65-90 years, respectively. Both types of reference intervals showed increasing levels and variability of serum GFAP with age. In the preanalytical tests, the mean changes from baseline were 2.3% (95% CI: -2.4%, 6.9%) in whole blood after 9 h at RT, 3.1% (95% CI: -4.5%, 10.7%) in serum after 7 days at RT, 10.4% (95% CI: -6.0%, 26.8%) in serum after 133 days at -20 °C, and 10.4% (95% CI: 9.5%, 11.4%) after three freeze-thaw cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

The study establishes age-dependent reference ranges for serum GFAP in adults and demonstrates overall good stability of the biomarker.

Elevated Axonal Protein Markers Following Repetitive Blast Exposure in Military Personnel

Blast exposures that occur during training are common in military personnel; however, the biomarkers that relate to these subtle injuries is not well understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the acute biomarkers related to blast injury in a cohort of military personnel exposure to blast-related training. Thirty-four military personnel who participated in the training program were included in this study. Blood samples were collected before and after repetitive blast-related training on days 2 (n = 19) and days 7 (n = 15). Serum concentration (pg/mL) of tau, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL), and phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181) were measured using an ultrasensitive immunoassay platform. We observed that serum p-tau181 concentrations were elevated after exposed to repetitive blast on days 2 (z = −2.983, p = 0.003) and days 7 (z = −2.158, p = 0.031). Serum tau (z = −2.272, p = 0.023) and NfL (z = −2.158, p = 0.031) levels were significantly elevated after exposure to repetitive blasts on days 7. Our findings indicate that blast exposure affects serum biomarkers indicating axonal injury.

Blood-based biomarkers and traumatic brain injury-A clinical perspective

Blood-based biomarkers are promising tools to complement clinical variables and imaging findings in the diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Several promising biomarker candidates have been found for various clinical questions, but the translation of TBI biomarkers into clinical applications has been negligible. Measured biomarker levels are influenced by patient-related variables such as age, blood-brain barrier integrity and renal and liver function. It is not yet fully understood how biomarkers enter the bloodstream from the interstitial fluid of the brain. In addition, the diagnostic performance of TBI biomarkers is affected by sampling timing and analytical methods. In this focused review, the clinical aspects of glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light, S100 calcium-binding protein B, tau and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 are examined. Current findings and clinical caveats are addressed.

Neurochemical Markers of Traumatic Brain Injury: Relevance to Acute Diagnostics, Disease Monitoring, and Neuropsychiatric Outcome Prediction

Considerable advancements have been made in the quantification of biofluid-based biomarkers for traumatic brain injury (TBI), which provide a clinically accessible window to investigate disease mechanisms and progression. Methods with improved analytical sensitivity compared with standard immunoassays are increasingly used, and blood tests are being used in the diagnosis, monitoring, and outcome prediction of TBI. Most work to date has focused on acute TBI diagnostics, while the literature on biomarkers for long-term sequelae is relatively scarce. In this review, we give an update on the latest developments in biofluid-based biomarker research in TBI and discuss how acute and prolonged biomarker changes can be used to detect and quantify brain injury and predict clinical outcome and neuropsychiatric sequelae.

Characterization and standardization of multiassay platforms for four commonly studied traumatic brain injury protein biomarkers: a TBI Endpoints Development Study

Aim: There is a critical need to validate biofluid-based biomarkers as diagnostic and drug development tools for traumatic brain injury (TBI). As part of the TBI Endpoints Development Initiative, we identified four potentially predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for TBI: astroglial markers GFAP and S100B and the neuronal markers UCH-L1 and Tau. Materials & methods: Several commonly used platforms for these four biomarkers were identified and compared on analytic performance and ability to detect gold standard recombinant protein antigens and to pool control versus TBI cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Results: For each marker, only some assay formats could differentiate TBI CSF from the control CSF. Also, different assays for the same biomarker reported divergent biomarker values for the same biosamples. Conclusion: Due to the variability of TBI marker assay in performance and reported values, standardization strategies are recommended when comparing reported biomarker levels across assay platforms.

The Known Unknowns: An Overview of the State of Blood-Based Protein Biomarkers of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Blood-based protein biomarkers have revolutionized several fields of medicine by enabling molecular level diagnosis, as well as monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) so far has benefitted only moderately from using protein biomarkers to improve injury outcome. Because of its complexity and dynamic nature, TBI, especially its most prevalent mild form (mild TBI; mTBI), presents unique challenges toward protein biomarker discovery and validation given that blood is frequently obtained and processed outside of the clinical laboratory (e.g., athletic fields, battlefield) under variable conditions. As it stands, the field of mTBI blood biomarkers faces a number of outstanding questions. Do elevated blood levels of currently used biomarkers-ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light chain, and tau/p-tau-truly mirror the extent of parenchymal damage? Do these different proteins represent distinct injury mechanisms? Is the blood-brain barrier a "brick wall"? What is the relationship between intra- versus extracranial values? Does prolonged elevation of blood levels reflect de novo release or extended protein half-lives? Does biological sex affect the pathobiological responses after mTBI and thus blood levels of protein biomarkers? At the practical level, it is unknown how pre-analytical variables-sample collection, preparation, handling, and stability-affect the quality and reliability of biomarker data. The ever-increasing sensitivity of assay systems and lack of quality control of samples, combined with the almost complete reliance on antibody-based assay platforms, represent important unsolved issues given that false-negative results can lead to false clinical decision making and adverse outcomes. This article serves as a commentary on the state of mTBI biomarkers and the landscape of significant challenges. We highlight and discusses several biological and methodological "known unknowns" and close with some practical recommendations.

Blood biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury: a selective review of unresolved issues

Background

The use of blood biomarkers after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) has been widely studied. We have identified eight unresolved issues related to the use of five commonly investigated blood biomarkers: neurofilament light chain, ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1, tau, S100B, and glial acidic fibrillary protein. We conducted a focused literature review of unresolved issues in three areas: mode of entry into and exit from the blood, kinetics of blood biomarkers in the blood, and predictive capacity of the blood biomarkers after mTBI.

Findings

Although a disruption of the blood brain barrier has been demonstrated in mild and severe traumatic brain injury, biomarkers can enter the blood through pathways that do not require a breach in this barrier. A definitive accounting for the pathways that biomarkers follow from the brain to the blood after mTBI has not been performed. Although preliminary investigations of blood biomarkers kinetics after TBI are available, our current knowledge is incomplete and definitive studies are needed. Optimal sampling times for biomarkers after mTBI have not been established. Kinetic models of blood biomarkers can be informative, but more precise estimates of kinetic parameters are needed. Confounding factors for blood biomarker levels have been identified, but corrections for these factors are not routinely made. Little evidence has emerged to date to suggest that blood biomarker levels correlate with clinical measures of mTBI severity. The significance of elevated biomarker levels thirty or more days following mTBI is uncertain. Blood biomarkers have shown a modest but not definitive ability to distinguish concussed from non-concussed subjects, to detect sub-concussive hits to the head, and to predict recovery from mTBI. Blood biomarkers have performed best at distinguishing CT scan positive from CT scan negative subjects after mTBI.