Comparison of Survival and Patterns of Recurrence in Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma, Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma, and Adenocarcinoma

Molecular subtypes of neuroendocrine carcinomas: A cross-tissue classification framework based on five transcriptional regulators

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are extremely lethal malignancies that can arise at almost any anatomic site. Characterization of NECs is hindered by their rarity and significant inter- and intra-tissue heterogeneity. Herein, through an integrative analysis of over 1,000 NECs originating from 31 various tissues, we reveal their tissue-independent convergence and further unveil molecular divergence driven by distinct transcriptional regulators. Pan-tissue NECs are therefore categorized into five intrinsic subtypes defined by ASCL1, NEUROD1, HNF4A, POU2F3, and YAP1. A comprehensive portrait of these subtypes is depicted, highlighting subtype-specific transcriptional programs, genomic alterations, evolution trajectories, therapeutic vulnerabilities, and clinicopathological presentations. Notably, the newly discovered HNF4A-dominated subtype-H exhibits a gastrointestinal-like signature, wild-type RB1, unique neuroendocrine differentiation, poor chemotherapeutic response, and prevalent large-cell morphology. The proposal of uniform classification paradigm illuminates transcriptional basis of NEC heterogeneity and bridges the gap across different lineages and cytomorphological variants, in which context-dependent prevalence of subtypes underlies their phenotypic disparities.

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in gastroenteropancreatic tract

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms that can settle in the gastroenteropancreatic tract. They are composed of a neuroendocrine (NE) and a non-NE component in at least 30% of each tumour. The non-NE component can include different histological combinations of glandular, squamous, mucinous and sarcomatoid phenotypes, and one or both of the components can be low-or high grade malignant. Recent changes in the nomenclature of these neoplasms might lead to great deal of confusion, and the lack of specific clinical trials is the main reason why their management is difficult. The review aims to clarify the definition of MiNEN and analyze available evidence about their diagnosis and treatment options according to their location and extension through careful analysis of the available data. It would be important to reach a general consensus on their diagnosis in order to construct a classification that remains stable over time and facilitates the design of clinical trials that, due to their low incidence, will require long recruitment periods.

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms

The uncommon tumour known as gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-MiNENs) is made up of parts of neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The biological and clinical features are different from those of gastric adenocarcinoma. Their pathophysiology, diagnostic standards, and clinical behaviour have all been the subject of lengthy debates, and their nomenclature has undergone multiple changes. Its emergence has created new challenges in the classification and diagnosis of gastric tumours. This review will update information on the topic, covering molecular aspects, diagnostic criteria, treatment, and prognostic factor discovery. It will also provide a historical context that will aid in understanding the evolution of the idea and nomenclature of mixed gastric tumours. Additionally, it will provide the reader a thorough understanding of this difficult topic of cancer that is applicable to real-world situations.

Management of Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Review

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NET) are rare tumors arising from enterochromaffin-like cells of the gastric mucosa. They belong to a larger group called gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and are classified as low, intermediate, or high-grade tumors based on their proliferative indices. They are further categorized into three subtypes based on their morphologic characteristics, pathogenesis, and behavior. Types 1 and 2 tumors are characterized by elevated serum gastrin and are usually multifocal. They typically occur in the setting of atrophic gastritis or MEN1/Zollinger Ellison syndrome, respectively. Type 2 tumors are associated with the most symptoms, such as abdominal pain and diarrhea. Type 3 tumors are associated with normal serum gastrin, are usually solitary, and occur sporadically. This type has the most aggressive phenotype and metastatic potential. Treatment and prognosis for G-NET is dependent on their type, size, and stage. Type 1 has the best prognosis, and Type 3 has the worst. This review discusses the presentation, workup, and surgical management of these tumors.

Favorable response to PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumor: a case report

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumor (MiNEN), a rare malignancy, currently has no standard treatment. Here, we report a patient with pathologically confirmed gastric MiNEN following radical surgery with rapid postoperative distant tumor recurrence. Immunofluorescence results suggested intensive lymphocyte infiltration in the tumor. The programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry 22C3 pharmDx assay showed tumor proportion score was 5% and combined positive score was 10. After 6 cycles of treatment with etoposide and cisplatin in combination with toripalimab, efficacy was assessed as a complete response. Our report shows that for gastric MiNEN patients with high expression of PD-L1, chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors may achieve more significant efficacy.

Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A comprehensive analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic implications of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs).

METHODS

A retrospective enrollment of 142 patients diagnosed with g-NENs was conducted at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021. The study compared essential clinicopathological features and survival rates. Additionally, the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas/mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NEC/MiNEN) were contrasted with those of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC).

RESULTS

The study comprised a total of 142 g-NENs cases, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1. The 5-year survival rates for g-NEC and g-MiNEN were 26.7% and 35.2%, respectively. Corresponding 5-year survival rates for G1 and G2 were observed at 100% and 80.0%, respectively. g-NEC/MiNEN showed a significantly worse prognosis compared to g-NET (p < 0.001). g-NEC/MiNEN exhibited a poor prognosis compared to GAC (p < 0.001), and within poorly differentiated GAC, g-NEC/MiNEN demonstrated a worse prognosis (p = 0.007). Additionally, patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy exhibited notably prolonged overall survival (OS) in the case of g-NEC/MiNEN (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

In short, the prognosis of g-NEC/MiNEN was worse than that of g-NET, GAC and poorly differentiated GAC, but this group benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy.

A gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma with good prognosis after chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy: A case report (CARE-compliant)

INTRODUCTION

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNENs), as a highly malignant gastrointestinal tumor, is characterized by easy postoperative metastasis, and its prognosis has always been poor compared to other gastrointestinal tumors. Due to its rarity, there have been few case reports and studies on it. As of now, there is no clear diagnosis and treatment sequence and guidelines. In this report, we present a case of GNENs that underwent first-line treatment after surgery. The patient achieved an excellent prognosis and survival after a combination of chemotherapy resistance and immunotherapy. This report aims to provide valuable reference and guidance for the treatment of GNENs in the future. Therefore, we conducted a literature review on GNENs.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 61-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with complaints of upper abdominal distension and discomfort that had been persistent for 1 month. During the endoscopy examination, a 2.5 cm irregular deep mucosal defect was observed at the center of the gastric angle. The defect appeared covered with dirty moss, had a hard texture, and exhibited a tendency to bleed upon contact.

DIAGNOSIS

Biopsy results confirmed the presence of a medium to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in the gastric horn. Subsequently, the patient underwent surgery, and the removed specimen was diagnosed as GNENs.

INTERVENTION

Postoperative chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy.

OUTCOME

The patient in this case achieved a good prognosis and extremely long survival [overall survival > 3 years+] after receiving first-line treatment, which included chemotherapy, drug resistance and immunotherapy, and is currently in good health condition. The tumor is not sensitive to the standard EP regimen for neuroendocrine carcinoma, but after being replaced with oxaliplatin based regimen combined with immunotherapy, partial response was obtained, indicating a synergistic effect between chemotherapy and immunity. After treatment, it remained stable for a considerable period of time.

CONCLUSION

Immunotherapy, as a new mode of cancer treatment can provide new guidance and ideas for the treatment of GNENs.

Deep learning radiomics analysis based on computed tomography for survival prediction in gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm: a multicenter study

Background

Survival prediction is crucial for patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (gNENs) to assess the treatment programs and may guide personalized medicine. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL) radiomics model to predict the overall survival (OS) in patients with gNENs.

Methods

The retrospective analysis included 162 consecutive patients with gNENs from two hospitals, who were divided into a training cohort, internal validation cohort (The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University; n=108), and an external validation cohort (The Henan Cancer Hospital; n=54). DL radiomics analysis was applied to computed tomography (CT) images of the arterial phase and venous phase, respectively. Based on pretreatment CT images, two DL radiomics signatures were developed to predict OS. The combined model incorporating the radiomics signatures and clinical factors was built through the multivariable Cox proportional hazards (CPH) method. The combined model was visualized into a radiomics nomogram for individualized OS estimation. Prediction performance was assessed with the concordance index (C-index) and the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimator.

Results

The DL-based radiomics signatures based on two phases were significantly correlated with OS in the training (C-index: 0.79-0.92; P<0.01), internal validation (C-index: 0.61-0.86; P<0.01), and external validation (C-index: 0.56-0.75; P<0.01) cohorts. The combined model integrating radiomics signatures with clinical factors showed a significant improvement in predictive performance compared to the clinical model in the training (C-index: 0.86 vs. 0.80; P<0.01), internal validation (C-index: 0.77 vs. 0.71; P<0.01), and external validation (C-index: 0.71 vs. 0.66; P<0.01) cohorts. Moreover, the combined model classified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, and the high-risk group had a shorter OS compared to the low-risk group in the training cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 3.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.34-3.93; P<0.01], which was validated in the internal (HR 2.51, 95% CI: 1.57-3.99; P<0.01) and external validation cohort (HR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.21-2.59; P<0.01).

Conclusions

DL radiomics analysis could serve as a potential and noninvasive tool for prognostic prediction and risk stratification in patients with gNENs.

Resection of the primary tumor improves the prognosis of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms with liver metastases: mutual validation based on SEER database and institutional data

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GI-NENs) often result in liver metastases, and the role of Primary Tumor Resection (PTR) in managing GI-NENs with liver metastases (GI-NENLM) is still debated. This study aimed to investigate the potential benefits of PTR in treating GI-NENLM by analyzing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (FAH).

METHODS

The SEER Registry 17 database and the FAH clinical pathology database were used to collect clinicopathology data for GI-NENLM diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 and between 2011 and 2022, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the clinicopathological characteristics of patients from both cohorts. Inverse probability weighting (IPTW) was used to weigh the PTR and non-PTR groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After matching, 155 patients from the SEER database were matched to the FAH cohort. PTR was significantly associated with better prognosis in PSM-matched/unmatched SEER cohorts (P < 0.01) and in the FAH cohort even after eliminating selection bias using IPTW (p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis suggests that the cohort consisting of patients aged 55 years or older, individuals with colorectal primary tumors, those at the T1 disease stage, and those without extrahepatic metastasis may potentially benefit from PTR. Interaction analysis showed no significant interaction between PTR and other clinical and pathological factors except for age.

CONCLUSION

The employment of PTR in patients with GI-NENLM is significantly correlated with individual survival benefits. We support performing PTR on carefully evaluated patients.

Endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (G-NEC) have not been clarified; therefore, they were investigated in relation to clinicopathological findings.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with G-NECs who had undergone endoscopic or surgical resection at our institution between January 2005 and March 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The endoscopic and clinicopathological findings of the lesions were analyzed to provide information of diagnostic value. In addition, cases of gastric neuroendocrine tumor (G-NET) and common-type gastric adenocarcinoma treated in the same study period were identified to compare the endoscopic findings between each G-NEC versus G-NET, and G-NEC versus common-type gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients with common-type gastric adenocarcinoma were matched for age, sex, tumor size, and depth of tumor invasion in 1:3 ratio.

RESULTS

Among 15 patients with 15 G-NECs, submucosal tumor-like marginal elevation (87%), adherent white coat (67%), and ulceration with a distinct border (60%) were characteristic endoscopic findings in white-light images. Magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy revealed an absent microsurface (MS) pattern plus disrupted irregular microvessel (MV) in five (71%) of seven cases with evaluable MS and MV patterns. The area with an absent MS pattern plus disrupted irregular MV corresponded to the histological finding of NEC component in all five cases. These endoscopic features were all significantly more frequent in G-NECs than G-NETs (n = 22) or common-type gastric adenocarcinomas (n = 45).

CONCLUSIONS

These endoscopic features should be taken into consideration to increase the index of suspicion and to improve the accuracy of target biopsies for G-NEC.

Equivalent Survival between Gastric Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Gastric Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

According to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms, gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) can be further divided into gastric large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GLNEC) and gastric small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GSNEC). Whether the prognoses of the two types have a discrepancy has long been disputed.

METHOD

We collected patients diagnosed with GLNEC or GSNEC in the National Cancer Center of China between January 2000 and December 2020. The characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. We further verified our conclusion using the SEER dataset.

RESULTS

A total of 114 GNEC patients, including 82 patients with GLNEC and 32 patients with GSNEC, have completed treatment in our hospital. Clinicopathologic differences were not observed between patients with GSNEC and GLNEC concerning the sex, age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor location, tumor size, stage, treatment received, the expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56, Chromogranin A, synaptophysin), and score on the Ki-67 index. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of GLNEC and GSNEC were 89.0%, 60.5%, and 52.4%, and 93.8%, 56.3%, and 52.7%, which showed no statistically significant differences. This result was confirmed further by using the SEER dataset after the inverse probability of treatment weighting.

CONCLUSIONS

Although with different cell morphology, the comparison of prognosis between the GLNEC and GSNEC has no significant statistical difference.

A novel nomogram and risk stratification system predicting the cancer-specific survival of patients with gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: a study based on SEER database and external validation

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) is a rare histology of gastric cancer. The retrospective study was designed to construct and validate a nomogram for predicting the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of postoperative GNEC patients.

METHODS

Data for 28 patients from the Hangzhou TCM Hospital were identified as the external validation cohort. A total of 1493 patients were included in the SEER database and randomly assigned to the training group (1045 patients) and internal validation group (448 patients). The nomogram was constructed using the findings of univariate and multivariate Cox regression studies. The model was evaluated by consistency index (C-index), calibration plots, and clinical net benefit. Finally, the effect between the nomogram and AJCC staging system was compared by net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

RESULTS

Age, gender, grade, T stage, N stage, metastasis, primary site, tumor size, RNE, and chemotherapy were incorporated in the nomogram. The C-indexes were 0.792 and 0.782 in the training and internal verification sets. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS predicted by the nomogram and actual measurements had good agreement in calibration plots. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year NRI were 0.21, 0.29, and 0.37, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year IDI values were 0.10, 0.12, and 0.13 (P < 0.001), respectively. In 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS prediction using DCA curves, the nomogram outperformed the AJCC staging system. The nomogram performed well in both the internal and external validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a nomogram to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS for GNEC patients after surgical resection. This well-performing model could help doctors enhance the treatment plan.

Prognostic value of computed tomography radiomics features in patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm

Purpose

The present study aimed to investigate the clinical prognostic significance of radiomics signature (R-signature) in patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm (GNEN).

Methods and Materials

A retrospective study of 182 patients with GNEN who underwent dual-phase enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning was conducted. LASSO-Cox regression analysis was used to screen the features and establish the arterial, venous and the arteriovenous phase combined R-signature, respectively. The association between the optimal R-signature with the best prognostic performance and overall survival (OS) was assessed in the training cohort and verified in the validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to identify the significant factors of clinicopathological characteristics for OS. Furthermore, the performance of a combined radiomics-clinical nomogram integrating the R-signature and independent clinicopathological risk factors was evaluated.

Results

The arteriovenous phase combined R-signature had the best performance in predicting OS, and its C-index value was better than the independent arterial and venous phase R-signature (0.803 vs 0.784 and 0.803 vs 0.756, P<0.001, respectively). The optimal R-signature was significantly associated with OS in the training cohort and validation cohort. GNEN patients could be successfully divided into high and low prognostic risk groups with radiomics score median. The combined radiomics-clinical nomogram combining this R-signature and independent clinicopathological risk factors (sex, age, treatment methods, T stage, N stage, M stage, tumor boundary, Ki67, CD56) exhibited significant prognostic superiority over clinical nomogram, R-signature alone, and traditional TNM staging system (C-index, 0.882 vs 0.861, 882 vs 0.803, and 0.882 vs 0.870 respectively, P<0.001). All calibration curves showed remarkable consistency between predicted and actual survival, and decision curve analysis verified the usefulness of the combined radiomics-clinical nomogram for clinical practice.

Conclusions

The R-signature could be used to stratify patients with GNEN into high and low risk groups. Furthermore, the combined radiomics-clinical nomogram provided better predictive accuracy than other predictive models and might aid clinicians with therapeutic decision-making and patient counseling.

Optimal postoperative surveillance strategies for cancer survivors with gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on individual risk: a multicenter real-world cohort study

BACKGROUND

The best follow-up strategy for cancer survivors after treatment should balance the effectiveness and cost of disease detection while detecting recurrence as early as possible. Due to the low incidence of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma [G-(MA)NEC], high-level evidence-based follow-up strategies is limited. Currently, there is a lack of consensus among clinical practice guidelines regarding the appropriate follow-up strategies for patients with resectable G-(MA)NEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included patients diagnosed with G-(MA)NEC from 21 centers in China. The random forest survival model simulated the monthly probability of recurrence to establish an optimal surveillance schedule maximizing the power of detecting recurrence at each follow-up. The power and cost-effectiveness were compared with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and European Society for Medical Oncology Guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 801 patients with G-(MA)NEC were included. The patients were stratified into four distinct risk groups utilizing the modified TNM staging system. The study cohort comprised 106 (13.2%), 120 (15.0%), 379 (47.3%), and 196 cases (24.5%) for modified groups IIA, IIB, IIIA, and IIIB, respectively. Based on the monthly probability of disease recurrence, the authors established four distinct follow-up strategies for each risk group. The total number of follow-ups 5 years after surgery in the four groups was 12, 12, 13, and 13 times, respectively. The risk-based follow-up strategies demonstrated improved detection efficiency compared to existing clinical guidelines. Further Markov decision-analytic models verified that the risk-based follow-up strategies were better and more cost-effective than the control strategy recommended by the guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed four different monitoring strategies based on individualized risks for patients with G-(MA)NEC, which may improve the detection power at each visit and were more economical, effective. Even though our results are limited by the biases related to the retrospective study design, we believe that, in the absence of a randomized clinical trial, our findings should be considered when recommending follow-up strategies for G-(MA)NEC.

Integrative single-cell multiomics analyses dissect molecular signatures of intratumoral heterogeneities and differentiation states of human gastric cancer

Human gastric cancer is a highly lethal disease, but the underlying multiomic molecular signatures remain largely unclear. Here, we performed multi-regional sampling, parallel single-cell multiomics sequencing and integrated analyses of human gastric cancer. We identified common transcriptomic alterations of gastric cancer cells, such as aberrant down-regulation of genes associated with normal stomach function and up-regulation of KRT7, PI3, S100A4, etc. Surprisingly, aberrant and prevalent up-regulation of genes highly expressed in normal colorectal epithelial cells were also identified in cancer cells, which may be partially regulated by promoter chromatin accessibility and DNA methylation levels. We revealed the single-cell DNA methylome landscape of gastric cancer, and identified candidate DNA methylation biomarkers, such as hypermethylated promoters of TMEM240 and HAGLROS, and hypomethylated promoters of TRPM2-AS and HRH1. Additionally, the relationships between genetic lineages, DNA methylation and transcriptomic clusters were systematically revealed at single-cell level. We showed that DNA methylation heterogeneities were mainly among different genetic lineages of cancer cells. Moreover, we found that DNA methylation levels of cancer cells with poorer differentiation states tend to be higher than those of cancer cells with better differentiation states in the primary tumor within the same patient, although still lower than in normal gastric epithelial cells. Cancer cells with poorer differentiation states also prevalently down-regulated MUC1 expression and immune-related pathways, and had poor infiltration of CD8⁺ T cells. Our study dissected the molecular signatures of intratumoral heterogeneities and differentiation states of human gastric cancer using integrative single-cell multiomics analyses.

SHMT2 Promotes Gastric Cancer Development through Regulation of HIF1α/VEGF/STAT3 Signaling

The metabolic enzymes involved in one-carbon metabolism are closely associated with tumor progression and could be potential targets for cancer therapy. Recent studies showed that serine hydroxymethyltransferase 2 (SHMT2), a crucial enzyme in the one-carbon metabolic pathway, plays a key role in tumor proliferation and development. However, the precise role and function of SHMT2 in gastric cancer (GC) remain poorly understood. In this study, we presented evidence that SHMT2 was necessary for hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α) stability and contributed to GC cells' hypoxic adaptation. The analysis of datasets retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the experimentation with human cell lines revealed a marked increase in SHMT2 expression in GC. The SHMT2 knockdown in MGC803, SGC7901, and HGC27 cell lines inhibited cell proliferation, colony formation, invasion, and migration. Notably, SHMT2 depletion disrupted redox homeostasis and caused glycolytic function loss in GC cells under hypoxic circumstances. Mechanistically, we discovered SHMT2 modulated HIF1α stability, which acted as a master regulator of hypoxia-inducible genes under hypoxic conditions. This, in turn, regulated the downstream VEGF and STAT3 pathways. The in vivo xenograft experiments showed that SHMT2 knockdown markedly reduced GC growth. Our results elucidate the novel function of SHMT2 in stabilizing HIF1α under hypoxic conditions, thus providing a potential therapeutic strategy for GC treatment.

Comprehensive analysis of mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs): A SEER database analysis of 767 cases

Background

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is an extremely rare entity, consisting of neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components. It can occur in various organs throughout the body, with a rising incidence. Its clinical management is a rapidly growing field of interest; however, large-scale patient cohorts are still missing to guide clinical practice.

Patients and methods

The demographic, clinicopathological, and survival information of all patients diagnosed with MiNEN in the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database (2000-2017) were extracted and further analyzed. The information of the patients before and after 2010 was compared to understand the epidemiological changes of MiNEN. The characteristics of MiNEN originating in different organs were compared. The clinical significance of surgical resection for metastatic MiNENs was also analyzed.

Results

A total of 1081 patients were screened, and after applying the exclusion criteria, 767 patients were finally analyzed. There was no obvious sex preference (49.2% vs 50.8%, p>0.05) and the majority of the patients were Caucasians (n=627, 81.7%). A total of 88.3% of the patients were older than 50 years old, and the median age was 60 years. 79.3% of the tumors are located in the distal digestive tract, and 67.7% were grade 3/4. Distant metastasis was presented in 33.9% of the patients at diagnosis. A total of 88% of the patients underwent surgical treatments. The number of patients increased 10-fold between 2000 and 2017. There was no significant difference in sex, race, stage, or surgical treatments among the patients diagnosed before and after 2010. More patients older than 60 years were diagnosed after 2010 (p=0.009). The median survival was 61.0 ± 9.8 months for the whole cohort. After multivariate analysis, older age (>60 years, p<0.01), more advanced stage (p<0.01), grade 3/4 (p<0.01), and non-surgical treatment (p<0.01) were independent risk factors for poorer survival. The appendiceal MiNENs showed the best prognosis. A total of 260 metastatic MiNENs were further analyzed. Only patients with metastatic MiNENs originating from the appendix had a potential benefit from surgical resection, compared to other sites (p=0.05).

Conclusion

This study provides the epidemiological, clinicopathological, and survival information of the largest number of MiNEN patients. Although MiNEN is an extremely rare malignant neoplasm, its incidence increases rapidly. The majority of the patients suffered from advanced-stage disease, which highlights the need for improvement of early detection in the future. The appendix is the most common primary site of MiNEN, and surgical resection for selected metastatic MiNEN originating in the appendix has favorable survival outcomes.

Relationships of tumor differentiation and immune infiltration in gastric cancers revealed by single-cell RNA-seq analyses

Gastric cancers are highly heterogeneous malignant tumors. To reveal the relationship between differentiation status of cancer cells and tumor immune microenvironments in gastric cancer, single-cell RNA-sequencing was performed on normal mucosa tissue, differentiated gastric cancer (DGC) tissue, poorly differentiated gastric cancer (PDGC) tissue and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) tissue sampled from surgically resected gastric cancer specimens. We identified the signature genes for both DGC and PDGC, and found that signature genes of PDGC strongly enriched in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) program. Furthermore, we found that DGC tends to be immune-rich type whereas PDGC tends to be immune-poor type defined according to the density of tumor-infiltrating CD8⁺ T cells. Additionally, interferon alpha and gamma responding genes were specifically expressed in the immune-rich malignant cells compared with immune-poor malignant cells. Through analyzing the mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma, we identified intermediate state malignant cells during the trans-differentiation process from DGC to NEC, which showed double-negative expressions of both DGC marker genes and NEC marker genes. Interferon-related pathways were gradually downregulated along the DGC to NEC trans-differentiation path, which was accompanied by reduced CD8⁺ cytotoxic T-cell infiltration. In summary, molecular features of both malignant cells and immune microenvironment cells of DGC, PDGC and NEC were systematically revealed, which may partially explain the strong tumor heterogeneities of gastric cancer. Especially along the DGC to NEC trans-differentiation path, immune-evasion was gradually enhanced with the decreasing activities of interferon pathway responses in malignant cells.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: a primer for radiologists

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms are uncommon tumors with variable differentiation and malignant potential. Three main subtypes are recognized: type 1, related to autoimmune atrophic gastritis; type 2, associated with Zollinger-Ellison and MEN1 syndrome; and type 3, sporadic. Although endoscopy alone is often sufficient for diagnosis and management of small, indolent, multifocal type 1 tumors, imaging is essential for evaluation of larger, high-grade, and type 2 and 3 neoplasms. Hypervascular intraluminal gastric masses are typically seen on CT/MRI, with associated perigastric lymphadenopathy and liver metastases in advanced cases. Somatostatin receptor nuclear imaging (such as Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT) may also be used for staging and assessing candidacy for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Radiotracer uptake is more likely in well-differentiated, lower-grade tumors, and less likely in poorly differentiated tumors, for which F-18-FDG-PET/CT may have additional value. Understanding disease pathophysiology and evolving histologic classifications is particularly useful for radiologists, as these influence tumor behavior, preferred imaging, therapy options, and patient prognosis.

Differences in clinicopathology and prognosis between gastroesophageal junctional and gastric non-cardiac neuroendocrine carcinomas: a retrospective comparison study of consecutive 56 cases from a single institution in China

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), including mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN), is uncommon and differences in clinicopathological features and outcomes of NEC arising in various gastric regions remain elusive. We investigated 56 consecutive NECs identified among 3961 gastrectomies performed at our center between 2005 and 2021. We then compared clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) NECs (N=39) and gastric non-cardiac NECs (N=17). No significant difference was found between the two groups in age, gender, tumor size, mixed non-neuroendocrine carcinoma component, MiNEN, NEC type, metastatic NEC component in lymph nodes, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular or perineural invasion, intestinal metaplasia in adjacent non-neoplastic mucosa, and expression of P53, PD-L1, TTF-1, HER2, and Ki-67. However, compared to gastric non-cardiac NECs, GEJ NECs displayed a significantly higher frequency of prevalence (2.79% versus 0.66%), pT3-T4 (92.3% versus 64.7%), advanced pathological stage (IIb-IV) (76.9% versus 47.1%), and a significantly lower 5-year overall survival rate (46.1% versus 73.1%) (P<0.05). The GEJ location was the only independent risk factor for overall survival. In stage-stratified comparisons, patients with stage II GEJ NEC demonstrated a significantly lower 5-year survival rate than those with gastric non-cardiac NEC at the same stage. Compared to non-NECs matched for age, gender, tumor location, and pathological summary stage, GEJ NEC was associated with significantly worse prognosis. In conclusion, GEJ NEC showed deeper invasion, more advanced pathological stages, and worse prognosis than gastric non-cardiac NEC. The findings provide pathologic evidence for individualized management strategies for patients with GEJ NEC. Future studies with larger samples are needed.

Better Prognosis of Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Than Gastric Adenocarcinoma among Whites in the United States: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on SEER

It was generally believed that the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) was worse than gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). However, almost all previous studies compared the prognosis of GNEC and GAC based on East Asians. In this study, we evaluated the clinicopathological features and prognosis of GNEC and GAC in Whites. Patients with GNEC and GAC were identified from 2000 to 2018 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to match the age, sex, TNM stage, and treatments received between GNEC and GAC, then compared the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the two types. A total of 392 cases of GNEC and 12,835 cases of GAC in Whites were recognized. After PSM, the 5-year OS rates of GNEC and GAC were 50.3% and 43.0%, respectively (p = 0.010). The 5-year CSS rates of GNEC and GAC were 57.4% and 50.1%, respectively (p = 0.012). Besides, multivariable cox regression analyses showed that GNEC was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.719; 95% CI 0.607–0.853) and CSS (HR 0.691; 95% CI 0.571–0.835) in the matched data. The prognosis of GNEC was better than GAC in Whites, showing significant ethnic differences. Appropriate treatments and follow-up strategies for GNEC in Whites are probably different from East Asians. The potential genetic and molecular mechanisms need to be further explored.

The clinical and prognostic factors for biliary neuroendocrine neoplasm: a study based on the SEER database

Background

In this study, we aimed at elucidating the postoperative survival and prognostic factors in patients with biliary neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN).

Methods

Cases of biliary system NEN and adenocarcinoma from 1975 to 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to adjust baseline differences in clinicopathological characteristics in our analysis. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was carried out for survival analysis.

Results

A total of 233 patients with biliary system NEN were enrolled in this study, of which 119 patients’ lesions located in gallbladder, while the others’ located in bile duct. The postoperative overall survival of bile duct NEN is significantly longer than that of gallbladder NEN (P < 0.001). For gallbladder NENs, surgery method (P = 0.020) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.018) were identified as independent prognostic factors. In terms of ampulla of vater (AOV) NENs, age (P = 0.017) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.006) were identified as independent prognostic factors, while grade (P = 0.002) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.036) were identified as independent prognostic factors for extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) NENs. PSM analysis indicated that patients with biliary duct NENs have a better postoperative prognosis than biliary duct adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions

Patients with NEN have better overall survival than patients with adenocarcinoma. Gallbladder NEN has an adverse prognosis than that of biliary tract NEN. The pathological subtype, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, surgery method, and lymph node resection could affect the postoperative prognosis of the gallbladder and biliary tract NEN.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01689-7.

Prognosis of patients with poorly differentiated gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: a multi-center study in China

Background: The incidence of poorly differentiated gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-NENs) has been increasing during the past decades. Methods: A total of 183 patients diagnosed with poorly differentiated G-NENs were enrolled from eight hospitals during 2010-2019 in China. All cases included have accepted abdominal surgery in tertiary hospitals. Result: T3 (HR: 2.66, p = 0.019), T4 (HR: 3.62, p = 0.005), stage IV (HR: 5.67, p < 0.001), vascular invasion (HR: 1.59, p = 0.048) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis of poorly differentiated G-NENs. In stratified analysis, for patients with stage III tumors, those treated with chemotherapy had significantly longer survival than those accepting surgery alone. Conclusion: T3/T4 stage, TNM stage IV and vascular invasion were independent negative prognostic factors for patients with poorly differentiated G-NENs. Patients with stage III tumors can benefit from chemotherapy. Highly selected patients with stage IV tumors may also benefit from surgery.

Mixed large and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) is a rare histological subtype of gastric cancer, which is categorized into small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. It is characterized by strong invasiveness and poor prognosis. Mixed large and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (L/SCNEC) is an extremely rare pathological type of gastric cancer, and there have been no reports on this situation until now.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we first present a 57-year-old patient diagnosed with L/SCNEC of the stomach. A 57-year-old Chinese male presented with epigastric discomfort. Outpatient gastroscopic biopsy was performed, and pathological examination revealed that the cardia was invaded by adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical proximal subtotal gastrectomy and was diagnosed with L/SCNEC. He refused adjuvant treatment and was followed up every 3 mo. Eight months after the operation, the patient showed no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

We advocate conducting further genomic studies to explore the origin of gastric large cell and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and using different chemotherapy schemes according to large or small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach for clinical research to clarify the heterogeneity of GNEC and improve the prognosis of patients with GNEC.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: A mini-review

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare mixed tumors containing both neuroendocrine (NE) and non-NE components. Each component must occupy at least 30% of the tumor volume by definition. Recent molecular evidence suggests MiNENs are clonal neoplasms and potentially harbor targetable mutations similar to conventional carcinomas. There have been multiple changes in the nomenclature and classification of MiNENs which has created some confusion among pathologists on how to integrate the contributions of each component in a MiNEN, an issue which in turn has resulted in confusion in communication with front-line treating oncologists. This mini review summarizes our current understanding of MiNENs and outline diagnosis, prognosis, and management of these neoplasms. The authors emphasize the importance of treating the most aggressive component of the tumor regardless of its percentage volume.

Mixed neuroendocrine–nonneuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal system: An update

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the digestive tract are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors that present many challenges in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Over the years, the diagnostic criteria, classification, and clinical behavior of these tumors have been the subjects of ongoing debate, and the various changes in their nomenclature have strengthened the challenges associated with MiNENs. This review is performed to provide an understanding of the key factors involved in the evolution of the designation of these tumors as MiNEN, highlight the current diagnostic criteria, summarize the latest data on pathogenesis and provide information on available treatments. Moreover, this work seeks to increase the awareness about these rare neoplasms by presenting the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors that play important roles in their behavior and discussing their different regions of origin in the gastrointestinal system (GIS). Currently, the MiNEN category also includes tumors in the GIS with a nonneuroendocrine component and epithelial tumors other than adenocarcinoma, depending on the organ of origin. Diagnosis is based on the presence of both morphological components in more than 30% of the tumor. However, this value needs to be reconfirmed with further studies and may be a limiting factor in the diagnosis of MiNEN by biopsy. Furthermore, available clinicopathological data suggest that the inclusion of amphicrine tumors in the definition of MiNEN is not supportive and warrants further investigation. The diagnosis of these tumors is not solely based on immunohistochemical findings. They are not hybrid tumors and both components can act independently; thus, careful grading of each component separately is required. In addition to parameters such as the metastatic state of the tumor at the time of diagnosis and the feasibility of surgical resection, the aggressive potential of both components has paramount importance in the choice of treatment. Regardless of the organ of origin within the GIS, almost MiNENs are tumors with poor prognosis and are frequently encountered in the elderly and men. They are most frequently reported in the colorectum, where data from molecular studies indicate a monoclonal origin; however, further studies are required to provide additional support for this origin.

New Developments in Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Purpose of Review

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) are a rare type of stomach cancer. The three main subtypes have different pathogeneses, biological behaviours and clinical characteristics, so they require different management strategies. This article will provide an overview of g-NENs and highlight recent advances in the field.

Recent Findings

Molecular profiling has revealed differences between indolent and aggressive g-NENs, as well as a new somatic mutation responsible for some familial type I g-NENs. Novel biomarkers have been developed which will hopefully improve diagnosis, treatment, risk stratification and follow-up. Patient treatment is also changing, as evidence supports the use of less aggressive options (e.g. endoscopic surveillance or resection) in some patients with more indolent tumours.

Summary

g-NEN heterogeneity poses challenges in understanding and managing this rare disease. More basic science research is needed to investigate molecular pathogenesis, and future larger clinical studies will hopefully also further improve treatment and patient outcomes.

The Clinicopathological Features and Overall Survival of Patients With Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) is a class of rare histological subtypes in gastric cancer (GC). This retrospective case-control study aimed to explore the clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) of patients with GNEC.

METHODS

A large population of GNEC and intestinal-type GC (IGC) patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was initiated to adjust the confounders between GNEC and IGC cohorts. Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots with log-rank tests were used to compare the survival differences in GNEC versus IGC. Additionally, Cox proportional hazard regression models were adopted to characterize the prognostic factors relevant to OS of the GNEC patients.

RESULTS

An entity of 4596 patients were collected, including 3943 (85.8%) IGC patients and 653 (14.2%) GNEC patients. The PSM analysis well-balanced all confounders in GNEC versus IGC (all P > .05). The KM plots showed that GNEC had significantly superior OS to IGC both before and after PSM analysis. Before PSM, the median OS was 52 (33.6-70.4) months in GNEC versus 32 (29.3-34.7) months in IGC (P  =  .0015). After PSM, the median OS was 26 (18.3-33.7) months in GNEC versus 21 (17.7-24.3) months in IGC (P  =  .0039). Stratified analysis indicated that GNEC had superior survivals to IGC in early stage patients and those who received surgery. In Cox regression analysis, age ≥ 60, tumor size > 50 mm, stage II-IV, T2, and N3 were independent risk factors for the GNEC patients (hazard ratio [HR]>1, P < .05). By contrast, year 2010 to 2015, female, and surgery were independent protective factors for these patients (HR < 1, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

GNEC has unique clinicopathological features quite different from IGC and may have a superior survival to IGC in early stage patients. The prognostic factors identified here may assist the clinicians to more individually treat these patients.