Participation of Black US Residents in Clinical Trials of 24 Cardiovascular Drugs Granted FDA Approval, 2006-2020

JAHA at Scientific Sessions 2023: Moving Toward Social Justice in Cardiovascular Health in the United States

Attention to social justice is essential to improving cardiovascular health outcomes. In the absence of social justice, equitable cardiovascular health is impossible. This viewpoint provides a brief synopsis of the 2023 Journal of the American Heart Association (JAHA)-sponsored session titled "Moving Towards Social Justice in Cardiovascular Health." We define social justice and summarize the burden of cardiovascular disease inequity in the United States. We also highlight strategies for achieving social justice, including addressing workforce diversity, integrating social determinants into cardiovascular research, designing cardiovascular interventions to close the equity gap, and improving inclusivity in cardiovascular disease trials.

The diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trials and racial and ethnic minority enrollment: impact, barriers, and potential solutions

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects millions of individuals worldwide and is a well-documented risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease and chronic kidney disease, both of which are leading causes of mortality. Racial and ethnic minority groups in the US, including but not limited to Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic Black, and Southeast Asian individuals, are disproportionately burdened by both T2D and its adverse outcomes. In recent years, there have been numerous cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) on novel antidiabetic therapies, including the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. CVOTs's initial aim was to demonstrate the cardiovascular safety of these drugs. Unexpected CV and kidney protective effects were found, specifically among the GLP-1 RAs and the SGLT2 inhibitors. These benefits informed the new paradigm of the management of patients with T2D. However, some experts argued that the lack of racial and ethnic minority group representation in these trials represented a challenge. While the downstream effects of this lack of representation must be further elucidated, it is clear and recognized that efforts need to be made to include a more representative sample in future CVOTs, specifically including individuals from those groups most burdened by T2D and its complications, if clinicians are to have an accurate picture of the benefits and potential pitfalls of utilizing these drugs in a real-world setting. In this comprehensive review, we briefly summarize the significant findings from the CVOTs, report the lack of representation of Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic Black, and Southeast Asian individuals in the CVOTs, investigate the barriers to recruiting racial and ethnic minority groups into clinical trials, and suggest potential solutions to overcome these obstacles at the patient-, provider-, and sponsor/system-level in future trials.

Underrepresentation of black individuals in pivotal trials for novel anticancer drugs: Potential consequence of using estimated creatinine clearance to assess kidney function?

BACKGROUND

Black individuals are historically underrepresented in oncology clinical trials. One potential reason for this is the prevalence of kidney disease in Black individuals, utilization of estimated creatinine clearance as a surrogate for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in oncology, and GFR-based trial eligibility criteria. We characterized the representation of racial minorities in anticancer agent pivotal trials and examined if GFR-based trial eligibility criteria impact the proportion of Black individuals in trial populations.

METHODS

We constructed a data repository for anticancer drugs FDA-approved from 2015 to 2019 and associated pivotal trials, from which we extracted trial population racial compositions and GFR-based trial eligibility criteria. We calculated the participation-to-incidence ratio (PIR) and participation-to-mortality ratio (PMR) for a variety of cancer sites, where PIR or PMR >1.2 and <0.8 indicate overrepresentation and underrepresentation, respectively. We evaluated the relationship between GFR eligibility cutoffs and the proportion of Black enrollees with Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

We assessed 24,698 patients in 74 trials. Black individuals were underrepresented in all trials (PIR ≤0.48, PMR ≤0.50). For trials with GFR-based eligibility criteria (n = 49), a lower GFR cutoff was modestly associated with a higher proportion of Black enrollees (r = -0.29, p = 0.039). This relationship was strengthened for trials that only used estimated creatinine clearance to estimate GFR (r = -0.43, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

GFR-related eligibility, and specifically the use of estimated creatinine clearance, may contribute to Black individuals being disproportionately excluded from cancer clinical trials. This highlights the need for implementation of contemporary GFR equations and other interventions to boost racial minority trial enrollment.

Participant Diversity in United States Randomized Controlled Trials of Antibacterials for Staphylococcus aureus Infections, 2000-2021

BACKGROUND

Equitable representation of members from historically marginalized groups is important in clinical trials, which inform standards of care. The goal of this study was to characterize the demographics and proportional subgroup reporting and representation of participants enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antibacterials used to treat Staphylococcus aureus infections.

METHODS

We examined randomized controlled registrational and strategy trials published from 2000 to 2021 to determine the sex, race, and ethnicity of participants. Participant to incidence ratios (PIRs) were calculated by dividing the percentage of study participants in each demographic group by the percentage of the disease population in each group. Underrepresentation was defined as a PIR < 0.8.

RESULTS

Of the 87 included studies, 82 (94.2%) reported participant sex, 69 (79.3%) reported participant race, and 20 (23.0%) included ethnicity data. Only 17 (19.5%) studies enrolled American Indian/Alaskan Native participants. Median PIRs indicated that Asian and Black participants were underrepresented in RCTs compared with the incidence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections in these subgroups. Underrepresentation of Black participants was associated with a larger study size, international sites, industry sponsorship, and phase 2/3 trials compared with phase 4 trials (P < .05 for each). Black participants had more than 4 times the odds of being underrepresented in phase 2/3 trials compared with phase 4 trials (odds ratio, 4.57; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-18.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized reporting methods for race and ethnicity and efforts to increase recruitment of marginalized groups would help ensure equity, rigor, and generalizability in RCTs of antibacterial agents and reduce health inequities.

Addressing Disparities in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease: A Call for Equitable Health Care

While significant progress has been made in reducing disparities within the US health care system, notable gaps remain. This article explores existing disparities within pediatric congenital heart disease care. Congenital heart disease, the most common birth defect and a leading cause of infant death, has garnered substantial attention, revealing certain disparities within the US health care system. Factors such as race, ethnicity, insurance coverage, socioeconomic status, and geographic location are all commonalities that significantly affect health disparities in pediatric congenital heart disease. This comprehensive review sheds light on disparities from diverse perspectives in pediatric care, demonstrates the inequities and inequalities leading to these disparities, presents effective solutions, and issues a call to action for providers, institutions, and the health care system. Recognizing and addressing these disparities is imperative for ensuring equitable care and enhancing the long-term well-being of children affected by congenital heart disease. Implementing robust, evidence-based frameworks that promote responsible and safe interventions is fundamental to enduring change.

Enrollment of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) and female participants in the US diabetes trials spanning 2000 to 2020: A chronological survey

AIMS

Little is known about the enrollment practice of both Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) and females in the US diabetes trials. We aimed to perform a chronological survey to evaluate the enrollment of BIPOC and female participants in the US diabetes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) over the past two decades.

METHODS

We searched databases to systematically include the US diabetes RCTs from 2000 January 1st to 2020 December 31st. Primary outcome was the adequate enrollment of both BIPOC and females, defined by the participation to prevalence ratio (PPR) > 0.8. We tested the temporal trend in adequate enrollment over time and used logistic regression analysis to explore the relationship between adequate enrollment and trial characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 69 US diabetes trials were included for analyses, with a median BIPOC and female enrollment percentage of 29.0 % and 45.4 % respectively. There were 22 (31.9 %) trials with adequate enrollment of both BIPOC and females. No significant trend of adequate enrollment percentage of BIPOC and females over time was observed (P = 0.16). Of trial types, those with medication interventions were significantly related to decreased odds of adequate enrollment, when compared to trials with non-drug interventions (odds ratio = 0.29, 95 % confidence interval: 0.11-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than one third of the US diabetes trials adequately enrolled both BIPOC and females over the past two decades, and no temporal improvement in BIPOC and female participant enrollment was observed. These results highlight the need for more endeavors to mitigate inadequate representation regarding BIPOC and female enrollment in diabetes trials.

Diversity in Cardio-Oncology Clinical Trials: JACC: CardioOncology How To

•Intersectionality of health inequities in CVD and cancer may compound inequities in cardio-oncology.•Equitable access to clinical trials is 1 of many key strategies to mitigate these health disparities.•Cardio-oncology trials should collect and report the race and ethnicity of participants, including disaggregate data on smaller minority groups.•Successful interventions consist of multilevel strategies targeting structural-, clinical-, provider-, and patient-level barriers.

More than Just a Number: Perspectives from Black Male Participants on Community-Based Interventions and Clinical Trials to Address Cardiovascular Health Disparities

BACKGROUND

Black Americans remain significantly underrepresented and understudied in research. Community-based interventions have been increasingly recognized as an effective model for reckoning with clinical trial participation challenges amongst underrepresented groups, yet a paucity of studies implement this approach. The present study sought to gain insight into Black male participants' perception of clinical trials before and after participating in a community-based team lifestyle intervention in the United States.

METHODS

Black Impact, a 24-week community-based lifestyle intervention, applied the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 (LS7) framework to assess changes in the cardiovascular health of seventy-four Black male participants partaking in weekly team-based physical activities and LS7-themed education and having their social needs addressed. A subset of twenty participants completed an exit survey via one of three semi-structured focus groups aimed at understanding the feasibility of interventions, including their perceptions of participating in clinical trials. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a content analysis, which involved systematically identifying, coding, categorizing, and interpreting the primary patterns of the data.

RESULTS

The participants reported a positive change in their perceptions of clinical trials based on their experience with a community-based lifestyle intervention. Three prominent themes regarding their perceptions of clinical trials prior to the intervention were as follows: (1) History of medical abuse; (2) Lack of diversity amongst research teams and participants; and (3) A positive experience with racially concordant research teams. Three themes noted to influence changes in their perception of clinical trials based on their participation in Black Impact were as follows: (1) Building trust with the research team; (2) Increasing awareness about clinical trials; and (3) Motivating participation through community engagement efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved perceptions of participating in clinical trials were achieved after participation in a community-based intervention. This intervention may provide a framework by which to facilitate clinical trial participation among Black men, which must be made a priority so that Black men are "more than just a number" and no longer "receiving the short end of the stick".

Sociodemographic predictors of successful screening and subsequent randomization in a digital health hypertension intervention

Introduction

Clinical trials often enroll nonrepresentative participant samples, limiting generalizability of trial findings. The current analysis explores the influences of remote recruitment and screening protocols on participation in a digital health intervention (DHI) to promote the evidence-based Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) eating pattern.

Methods

Nourish was a 12-month randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of a DHI to an attention control arm among US adults with hypertension. Participants were recruited using digital approaches; eligible individuals completed several screening steps. We examined associations between sociodemographics and mobile technology use and completion of each screening step and compared those characteristics between randomized and nonrandomized participants (those consented but were screened out before randomization).

Results

A total of 678 adults consented to participate in Nourish; 44% of those consented were randomized (n = 301). Those randomized possessed a higher education level (p < 0.0001); were more likely to use health-related apps (p < 0.0001) and wearables (p < 0.0001); and were older (p = 0.01) than nonrandomized individuals. Randomized adults were more likely to use a desktop/laptop/tablet for Internet access (vs mobile phones) (p = 0.01). No significant association was observed existed between sex, race, ethnicity, income, or geographic density of residence and subsequent randomization.

Conclusions

Participants with lower education levels or limited experience in using mobile technologies may require additional support to participate in DHIs. Future research is needed to evaluate remote clinical trial procedures and impacts on generalizability to achieve equitable clinical trial participation.

Eliminating Health Disparities in Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, and Dyslipidemia: A Path Toward Achieving Pharmacoequity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pharmacoequity refers to the goal of ensuring that all patients have access to high-quality medications, regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender, or other characteristics. The goal of this article is to review current evidence on disparities in access to cardiovascular drug therapies across sociodemographic subgroups, with a focus on heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and dyslipidemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Considerable and consistent disparities to life-prolonging heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and dyslipidemia medications exist in clinical trial representation, access to specialist care, prescription of guideline-based therapy, drug affordability, and pharmacy accessibility across racial, ethnic, gender, and other sociodemographic subgroups. Researchers, health systems, and policy makers can take steps to improve pharmacoequity by diversifying clinical trial enrollment, increasing access to inpatient and outpatient cardiology care, nudging clinicians to increase prescription of guideline-directed medical therapy, and pursuing system-level reforms to improve drug access and affordability.

Analysis of Female Participant Representation in Registered Oncology Clinical Trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Female underrepresentation in oncology clinical trials can result in outcome disparities. We evaluated female participant representation in US oncology trials by intervention type, cancer site, and funding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from the publicly available Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database. Initially, 270,172 studies were identified. Following the exclusion of trials using Medical Subject Heading terms, manual review, those with incomplete status, non-US location, sex-specific organ cancers, or lacking participant sex data, 1650 trials consisting of 240,776 participants remained. The primary outcome was participation to prevalence ratio (PPR): percent females among trial participants divided by percent females in the disease population per US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data. PPRs of 0.8-1.2 reflect proportional female representation.

RESULTS

Females represented 46.9% of participants (95% CI, 45.4-48.4); mean PPR for all trials was 0.912. Females were underrepresented in surgical (PPR 0.74) and other invasive (PPR 0.69) oncology trials. Among cancer sites, females were underrepresented in bladder (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.91, P = .02), head/neck (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.68, P < .01), stomach (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.70, P < .01), and esophageal (OR 0.40 95% CI 0.22-0.74, P < .01) trials. Hematologic (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-1.82, P < .01) and pancreatic (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.46-3.26, P < .01) trials had higher odds of proportional female representation. Industry-funded trials had greater odds of proportional female representation (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09-1.82, P = .01) than US government and academic-funded trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholders should look to hematologic, pancreatic, and industry-funded cancer trials as exemplars of female participant representation and consider female representation when interpreting trial results.

Public reporting of black participation in anti-hypertensive drug clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Non-Hispanic Black people in the United States have the highest prevalence of essential hypertension. Unfortunately, clinical trials often underrepresent Black patients. We aim to understand whether trial sponsorship type is associated with representation of Black participants in anti-hypertensive drug clinical trials. Then, we contextualize our findings amongst current efforts to improve diversity in clinical research populations.

METHODS

We searched ClinicalTrials.gov in May 2022 for antihypertensive drug trials. Of n = 408 trials in our initial search, n = 97 (23.77%) met inclusion criteria and were stratified by sponsorship type (industry vs non-industry). Standardized tests of difference were employed to compare characteristics of these trials, and linear regression was used to model change over time.

RESULTS

Of 97 trials reporting results from 2010 to 2020, there were minimal differences in the percent of Black patients enrolled in anti-hypertensive clinical trials by sponsorship type. Both industry and non-industry sponsored studies had high rates of non-reporting, with slightly more non-reporting for industry (73.2%) vs non-industry (66.67%) studies. Industry funded studies reported results to ClinicalTrials.gov within 23.3 ± 15.0 months from completing studies, while non-industry funded trials reported within 18.9 ± 10.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite Black Americans carrying the highest burden of disease for essential hypertension, they are underrepresented in anti-hypertension clinical trials and their overall participation has decreased between 2010 and 2020. In addition, there is major underreporting of trial participant race. We implore researchers and funders to establish clear, meaningful targets for anti-hypertensive drug trial diversity, and improve transparency in reporting of study characteristics.

Remote Patient Monitoring for Patients with Heart Failure: Sex- and Race-based Disparities and Opportunities

Remote patient monitoring (RPM), within the larger context of telehealth expansion, has been established as an effective and safe means of care for patients with heart failure (HF) during the recent pandemic. Of the demographic groups, female patients and black patients are underenrolled relative to disease distribution in clinical trials and are under-referred for RPM, including remote haemodynamic monitoring, cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), wearables and telehealth interventions. The sex- and race-based disparities are multifactorial: stringent clinical trial inclusion criteria, distrust of the medical establishment, poor access to healthcare, socioeconomic inequities, and lack of diversity in clinical trial leadership. Notwithstanding addressing the above factors, RPM has the unique potential to reduce disparities through a combination of implicit bias mitigation and earlier detection and intervention for HF disease progression in disadvantaged groups. This review describes the uptake of remote haemodynamic monitoring, CIEDs and telehealth in female patients and black patients with HF, and discusses aetiologies that may contribute to inequities and strategies to promote health equity.

Racial and ethnic subgroup reporting in diabetes randomized controlled trials published from 2000 to 2020: A survey

BACKGROUND

It remained unknown about the status of and trends in racial/ethnic subgroup reporting in the diabetes trials over the past two decades.

OBJECTIVES

In this survey, we aimed to evaluate the current state of and temporal trends in subgroup reporting by race/ethnicity regarding the effects of interventions in diabetes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from year 2000-2020 and to explore the potential trial factors in relation to racial/ethnic subgroup reporting.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases for eligible diabetes RCTs. The outcome was whether the trials had the event of racial/ethnic subgroup reporting regarding the intervention effects on trial primary outcomes. Poisson regression was used to assess the temporal trends in racial/ethnic subgroup reporting, and univariable logistic regression models were employed for evaluating trial factors related to racial/ethnic subgroup reporting.

RESULTS

A total of 405 diabetes RCTs were eligible for inclusion. There were 26 (6.42%) trials with racial/ethnic subgroup reporting. A chronological trend towards increased rates of racial/ethnic subgroup reporting was observed; however, the trend was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). Advanced patients' age (Odds ratio [OR] = 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-6.88), follow-up duration (OR = 3.53, 95% CI: 1.13-11.00), and BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour) enrolment (OR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.01-5.62) were found to positively relate with racial/ethnic subgroup reporting, while the industrial funding was associated with decreased reporting (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.19-0.97). Less than one fourth of the trials with racial/ethnic subgroup reporting predefined the subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of diabetes RCTs did not report intervention effects by racial/ethnic subgroup, which was not temporally improved over the past two decades. More efforts and strategies are needed to improve the racial/ethnic subgroup consideration and reporting in diabetes trials.

The Role of Social Support in Cardiovascular Clinical Trial Participation among Black Men: Black Impact

BACKGROUND

Attainment of the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 (LS7) metrics reduces cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; yet, Black Americans have the lowest LS7 attainment among all communities, the highest rate of CVD mortality, and low clinical trial participation. Social support is positively correlated with chronic disease self-management. Here, we describe the role of social support in a single-arm pilot clinical trial of a community-based lifestyle intervention among Black American men.

METHODS

The 24-week intervention featured weekly team-based physical activity and LS7-themed education. Seventy-four Black men participated in the intervention; twenty agreed to participate in exit surveys via one of three semi-structured focus groups. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content analysis framed by House's social support framework.

RESULTS

Participants reported support from both peers and health coaches. The sub-themes of social support among peers were: (1) acknowledgement, understanding, and validation, (2) inspiration, (3) sense of community, (4) fear of disappointing fellow participants, and (5) group synergy. The sub-themes of social support from the health coaches and study team staff included: (1) contemplation of current health status, (2) racial concordance of health coaches and study team staff, (3) investment of the research team, (4) incentives, (5) access to healthcare providers, and (6) the COVID-19 pandemic. Emotional support was the most frequently discussed theme.

CONCLUSIONS

Social support, especially emotional support, from peers and health coaches was a driver of clinical trial participation among participants. The intervention created a positive social environment and decreased medical mistrust. This intervention may provide a framework by which to facilitate clinical trial participation among Black men.

Public knowledge and information sources for clinical trials among adults in the USA: evidence from a Health Information National Trends Survey in 2020

BACKGROUND

Lack of clinical trial awareness has been identified as a barrier to clinical trial recruitment. Identifying factors associated with clinical trial knowledge could inform ongoing efforts to improve diversity in clinical trials.

METHODS

Using data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2020, we examined the knowledge of clinical trials, associated characteristics, sources of clinical trial information and motives to participate in clinical trials among the general population in the USA.

RESULTS

Of 3,772 US adults, 41.3% reported not knowing about clinical trials. Prevalence of having no knowledge of clinical trials was higher among Hispanic adults (51.8%) and non-Hispanic Black adults (41.8%) compared with non-Hispanic White adults (37.4%; p=0.013). Other significant predictors of knowledge about clinical trials included higher education, online health information-seeking behaviour and patient portal access. Most respondents (73.2%) reported that healthcare providers were the most trusted source of information. Helping other people (71.6%) was the primary motivation for clinical trial participation, followed by financial compensation (12.5%) and receiving better treatment (5.1%).

CONCLUSION

There is a gap in knowledge about clinical trials among the US population. Development of multimodal approaches, including online and offline information broadcasting, is needed to improve knowledge and clinical trial recruitment in diverse populations.

Exploring ethnic representativeness in diabetes clinical trial enrolment from 2000 to 2020: a chronological survey

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Ethnic representativeness of participant enrolment in diabetes RCTs involving multiple ethnicities remains unknown. The aims of this study were to evaluate the status and temporal trend of ethnic representativeness in enrolment to diabetes RCTs, and to assess under-enrolment of non-white ethnic groups and explore trial characteristics associated with under-enrolment.

METHODS

We conducted a chronological survey by systematically searching the literature to include eligible RCTs published between January 2000 and December 2020. We assessed temporal trends in enrolment of ethnic groups in the included trials. Univariable logistic regression was used to explore the association between trial characteristics and under-enrolment of non-white groups, using a participant to prevalence ratio of <0.8 to define under-enrolment. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021229100).

RESULTS

We included 405 RCTs for analysis (327 multi-country trials, 69 conducted in the USA and nine conducted in the UK). The median enrolment rate of all non-white groups was 24.0% in the overall RCTs. Trials conducted in the USA and the UK had median enrolment rates of 29.0% and 12.0% for all non-white groups, respectively. There was a temporal trend towards increased participation of non-white ethnic groups in the overall RCTs; however, no significant improvement over time was found in the US or UK trials. Non-white groups were under-enrolled in most included trials: 62.3% (43/69) in US trials and 77.8% (7/9) in UK trials. The US trials with a high female proportion were associated with lower odds of under-enrolment of all non-white groups (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.07, 0.65), while trials receiving funding from industry showed increased odds of under-enrolment (OR 4.64; 95% CI 1.50, 14.35). Outpatient enrolment and intervention duration were significantly associated with under-enrolment of Black participants. Only a small proportion of trials reported subgroup results or explored the effect modification by ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

A temporal trend towards increased non-white ethnic enrolment was found in diabetes RCTs globally, but not in the USA or the UK. Non-white ethnic groups were under-represented in the majority of diabetes trials conducted in the USA and the UK. Some trial characteristics may be associated with non-white under-enrolment in diabetes trials. These findings provide some evidence for non-white ethnic representativeness in diabetes trials over the past two decades, and highlight the need for more effective strategies and endeavours to alleviate under-enrolment of non-white ethnic groups.

Improving Clinical Trial Efficiency Using a Machine Learning Based Risk Score to Enrich Study Populations

AIMS

Prognostic enrichment strategies can make trials more efficient, although potentially at the cost of diminishing external validity. Whether using a risk score to identify a population at increased mortality risk could improve trial efficiency is uncertain. We aimed to assess whether Machine learning Assessment of RisK and EaRly mortality in Heart Failure (MARKER-HF), a previously validated risk score, could improve clinical trial efficiency.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Mortality rates and association of MARKER-HF with all-cause death by one year was evaluated in four community-based heart failure (HF) and five HF clinical trial cohorts. Sample size required to assess effects of an investigational therapy on mortality was calculated assuming varying underlying MARKER-HF risk and proposed treatment effect profiles. Patients from community-based HF cohorts (n=11,297) had higher observed mortality and MARKER-HF scores than did clinical trial patients (n=13,165) with HF with either reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). MARKER-HF score was strongly associated with risk of one-year mortality both in the community (HR 1.48 [95% CI: 1.44-1.52]) and clinical trial cohorts with HFrEF (HR 1.41 [95% CI: 1.30-1.54]), and HFpEF (HR 1.74 [95% CI: 1.53-1.98]), per 0.1 increase in MARKER-HF. Using MARKER-HF to identify patients for a hypothetical clinical trial assessing mortality reduction with an intervention, enabled a reduction in sample size required to show benefit.

CONCLUSION

Using a reliable predictor of mortality such as MARKER-HF to enrich clinical trial populations provides a potential strategy to improve efficiency by requiring a smaller sample size to demonstrate a clinical benefit.

Diversity in modern heart failure trials: Where are we, and where are we going

Over the last three decades, increased attention has been given to the representation of historically underrepresented groups within the landscape of pivotal clinical trials. However, recent events (i.e., coronavirus pandemic) have laid bare the potential continuation of historic inequities in available clinical trials and studies aimed at the care of broad patient populations. Anecdotally, cardiovascular disease (CVD) has not been immune to these disparities. Within this review, we examine and discuss recent landmark CVD trials, with a specific focus on the representation of Blacks within several critically foundational heart failure clinical trials tied to contemporary treatment strategies and drug approvals. We also discuss solutions for inequities within the landscape of cardiovascular trials. Building a more diverse clinical trial workforce coupled with intentional efforts to increase clinical trial diversity will advance equity in cardiovascular care.

Improving the enrollment of women and racially/ethnically diverse populations in cardiovascular clinical trials: An ASPC practice statement

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death for both women and men worldwide. In the United States (U.S.), there are significant disparities in cardiovascular risk factors and CVD outcomes among racial and ethnic minority populations, some of whom have the highest U.S. CVD incidence and mortality. Despite this, women and racial/ethnic minority populations remain underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials, relative to their disease burden and population percentage. The lack of diverse participants in trials is not only a moral and ethical issue, but a scientific concern, as it can limit application of future therapies. Providing comprehensive demographic data by sex and race/ethnicity and increasing representation of diverse participants into clinical trials are essential in assessing accurate drug response, safety and efficacy information. Additionally, diversifying investigators and clinical trial staff may assist with connecting to the language, customs, and beliefs of study populations and increase recruitment of participants from diverse backgrounds. In this review, a working group for the American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC) reviewed the literature regarding the inclusion of women and individuals of diverse backgrounds into cardiovascular clinical trials, focusing on prevention, and provided recommendations of best practices for improving enrollment to be more representative of the U.S. society into trials.

Racial Representation in Clinical Trials for Dermatologic New Molecular Entities

Underrepresentation of minorities in clinical research has major implications for equality of access to current treatments in the field of dermatology. To determine whether there has been equitable representation of Black individuals in the clinical trials for dermatologic new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2015, we analyzed data from the FDA Drug Trials Snapshots program from January 2015 to the present. During this period, there was significant underrepresentation of Black people in the clinical trials for NMEs treating acne vulgaris, plaque psoriasis, actinic keratosis, and squamous cell carcinoma. These findings highlight the need to prioritize representation in clinical trials to enhance clinical practice in the field of dermatology and to improve the care and health of minorities.

Vericiguat, organic nitrates, and heart failure in African Americans

African Americans (AA) have a higher prevalence of heart failure (HF) when compared with White Americans (3% vs 2%), respectively and HF comes on at an earlier age and is more severe in AA. The A-HEFT trial with the combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDNHYD) for self-described AA with NYHA class III-IV heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) showed reduction in mortality and HF hospitalizations with a class I level of evidence A recommendation in the ACC/AHA guidelines. Vericiguat is an oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator that enhances the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP) pathway. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with higher risk HFrEF in which AA were underrepresented found that vericiguat reduced the composite primary outcome of cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization. In the new era of guideline directed medical therapies of quadruple therapy - hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate should be preferred over vericiguat in AA with HFrEF.