Long-term Effectiveness of a Peer-Led Asthma Self-management Program on Asthma Outcomes in Adolescents Living in Urban Areas: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Peer support in adolescents and young adults with chronic or rare conditions in northern America and Europe: Targeted literature review

PROBLEM

Adolescents and young adults with chronic or rare conditions face unique risks to their physical, social and emotional development. Research suggests that peer support improves their quality of life and reduces social isolation. However, there is a paucity of current information considering multiple intervention formats.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

A targeted literature review was conducted to identify peer support interventions and assess their feasibility, acceptability and efficacy for this population. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and American Psychological Association PsycINFO for records reporting peer support interventions in young adults with chronic or rare conditions. Data were extracted from relevant publications and qualitatively evaluated.

SAMPLE

Thirty studies were included, which assessed the use of peer support for young adults (aged 13-30 years) with chronic or rare conditions in Europe or North America.

RESULTS

Peer support interventions had positive effects on social positivity, psychosocial development and medical outcomes, though significance was not always demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Peer support can enhance care for young adults with chronic or rare conditions. Current literature suggests that once-weekly virtual interventions are the most feasible and acceptable for patients, leading to multifaceted improvements in their well-being.

IMPLICATIONS

This study is one of the first to discuss in-person, virtual and hybrid peer-based interventions for young adults with chronic and rare conditions. While all formats improved social, psychological and medical outcomes, virtual formats may be most accessible to participants. Interventions should be made available to this population, and guidelines for optimal implementation of peer support are needed.

The effect of online peer and adult education given to adolescents with allergic asthma on their quality of life, self-efficacy, anxiety, and disease knowledge and management: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of interactive online education given by peers or adults on anxiety, self-efficacy, quality of life, disease knowledge and management in adolescents with allergic asthma.

METHODS

This was a randomized controlled trial. The study sample consisted of 84 adolescents divided into experimental groups (peer education group, adult education group) and a control group. Peer and adult groups who received training were also compared with each other. The adolescents in the peer or adult education groups were given online interactive education. Data were collected from the adolescents before and immediately after education, one and three months after education.

RESULTS

The study was completed by 41 adolescents. The anxiety scores of the adolescents in the experimental groups were lower immediately and one month after education than those of the control group (p = .006; p = .012, respectively). The self-efficacy, disease knowledge and management scores of the adolescents in the experimental groups immediately after education and one and three months after education were higher than those in the control group (p < .001; p < .001; p = .015, respectively and p < .001; p < .001; p < .001, respectively). There was no difference between the groups in terms of quality of life (p > .05). No difference was found between the peer and adult groups in terms of anxiety, self-efficacy, quality of life, disease knowledge and management (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, peer or adult education reduced adolescents' anxiety, increased self-efficacy, and disease knowledge and management, but there was no effect on quality of life. There was no difference in measured values between the peer and adult education groups.

Assessing asthma self-management education among US children with current asthma, Asthma Call-back Survey (ACBS) 2015-2017

OBJECTIVE

Asthma self-management education (AS-ME) is an effective strategy to help children with asthma achieve better asthma control and outcome. The objective of this study is to assess the association between the prevalence of receiving AS-ME curriculum components and sociodemographic characteristics among children with current asthma.

METHODS

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, child Asthma Call-back Survey 2015-2017 aggregated data were used. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations of each AS-ME component question and sociodemographic characteristic, adjusting for sample weighting.

RESULTS

Among 3,213 children with current asthma, 52% of children reported ever being given an asthma action plan by a doctor or other healthcare professional. After adjusting for other variables, boys and Non-Hispanic Black children were more likely to report being given an action plan (APR= 1.15[95% CI 1.00-1.32] and APR= 1.28[95% CI 1.07-1.54] respectively). Non-Hispanic Black (APR = 2.15 [95% CI 1.30-3.55]), non-Hispanic, other race (APR = 1.95 [95% CI1.04-3.66]), and Hispanic children (APR = 1.84 [95% CI 1.18-2.89]) were more likely to report taking a course to learn how to manage asthma than non-Hispanic White children. Hispanic children (40.8%) were more likely to report being advised to change home environment compared to non-Hispanic Whites (31.5%) (APR =1.28 [95% CI 1.01-1.63).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of some elements of asthma-self management education was relatively low and there were differences observed in the prevalence of receiving AS-ME by race/ethnicity, parental education, and income. Targeted implementation of asthma self-management components and interventions may improve asthma control and reduce asthma morbidity.

Assessing Available Adolescent Self-Reported Measures for Asthma Management: A Systematic Literature Review

Objective: Asthma is a common chronic disease and a substantial public health problem for children, adolescents, and adults. Adolescence, a period of increased independence and striving for autonomy, is an opportune time for youth transitioning to adulthood to assume more responsibility for their own asthma self-management. However, accurate measures of adolescent asthma outcomes are limited. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify self-reported asthma measures currently available in the empirical literature focused on adolescent populations. Methods: Search terms were based on the National Library of Medical Subject Headings and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Databases searched included CINAHL, Nursing Allied Health Prevention, Medline, ProQuest, and PubMed. Included studies were peer reviewed and published in English between 2010 and 2022. All studies reported on asthma measures for adolescents between 10 and 19 years old. Results: Nineteen studies were included, comprising 15 experimental and 4 quasi-experimental. This review revealed the following asthma measure domains: asthma knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, self-care, self-regulation, symptom prevention and management, medication adherence, asthma disease control, symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) for evaluating psychosocial, behavioral, clinical, and QOL outcomes. Conclusion: This review revealed the necessity of developing a comprehensive measure to assess the asthma self-management behaviors of adolescents. A comprehensive tool related to adolescent asthma self-management behavior would enhance the assessment and evaluation of adolescent asthma self-management behaviors and extend the science and clinical practice around adolescent self-management. Present measures for asthma self-management behavior for adolescents are limited; therefore, developing a valid and reliable measure is necessary not only to assess adolescents' asthma self-management behavior outcomes but also to identify and evaluate the essential components to include in educational interventions for adolescent self-management.

Personalised management and supporting individuals to live with their asthma in a primary care setting

INTRODUCTION

Complementing recognition of biomedical phenotypes, a primary care approach to asthma care recognizes diversity of disease, health beliefs, and lifestyle at a population and individual level.

AREAS COVERED

We review six aspects of personalized care particularly pertinent to primary care management of asthma: personalizing support for individuals living with asthma; targeting asthma care within populations; managing phenotypes of wheezy pre-school children; personalizing management to the individual; meeting individual preferences for provision of asthma care; optimizing digital approaches to enhance personalized care.

EXPERT OPINION

In a primary care setting, personalized management and supporting individuals to live with asthma extend beyond the contemporary concepts of biological phenotypes and pharmacological 'treatable traits' to encompass evidence-based tailored support for self-management, and delivery of patient-centered care including motivational interviewing. It extends to how we organize clinical practiceand the choices provided in mode of consultation. Diagnostic uncertainty due to recognition of phenotypes of pre-school wheeze remains a challenge for primary care. Digital health can support personalized management, but there are concerns about increasing inequities. This broad approach reflects the traditionally holistic ethos of primary care ('knowing their patients and understanding their communities'), but the core concepts resonate with all healthcare.

Socioeconomic determinants of asthma health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review provides an assessment of the recent pediatric literature evaluating socioeconomic drivers of asthma incidence and morbidity. The review addresses the specific social determinants of health related to housing, indoor and outdoor environmental exposures, healthcare access and quality, and the impact of systematic racism.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many social risk factors are associated with adverse asthma outcomes. Children living in low-income, urban neighborhoods have greater exposure to both indoor and outdoor hazards, including molds, mice, second-hand smoke, chemicals, and air pollutants, all of which are associated with adverse asthma outcomes. Providing asthma education in the community - via telehealth, school-based health centers, or peer mentors - are all effective methods for improving medication adherence and asthma outcomes. The racially segregated neighborhoods created by the racist 'redlining' policies implemented decades ago, persist today as hotspots of poverty, poor housing conditions, and adverse asthma outcomes.

SUMMARY

Routine screening for social determinants of health in clinical settings is important to identify the social risk factors of pediatric patients with asthma. Interventions targeting social risk factors can improve pediatric asthma outcomes, but more studies are needed related to social risk interventions.

Adherence and Self-management Interventions among Systemically Marginalized and Underserved Youth with Asthma

Objective

Asthma disproportionately impacts youth who have been systemically marginalized and underserved, henceforth termed underserved for brevity. Disparities are driven by systemic and structural racism and social determinants of health. We aimed to synthesize findings from interventions delivered among youth who have been underserved, highlight effective intervention strategies, and provide recommendations to promote health equity. To demonstrate, we also present a case example of clinical application.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search of randomized trials among youth (≤18 years old) who are often underserved, delivered in clinical, community, or home-based settings with medication adherence and/or self-management behaviors as an intervention outcome. We used descriptive statistics to synthesize study characteristics and outcomes.

Results

Twenty four articles, representing 21 unique interventions, met inclusion criteria. Forty-six percent reported significant improvements in adherence or self-management for the intervention group. Self-management interventions focused on symptom recognition and monitoring demonstrated the greatest percentage of significant intervention findings (71.4%); controller medication adherence interventions demonstrated the fewest (33.3%).

Conclusions

Interventions are not consistently effective for youth who have been underserved. Findings suggest that pediatric psychologists can help patients from underserved backgrounds by bolstering symptom recognition and monitoring skills, providing self-management skill education, and problem-solving ways to reduce triggers through individually tailored, multicomponent approaches. Pediatric psychologists should simultaneously strive to consider and address systemic, structural, and social determinants of asthma disparities in their work.

Implementation of Coach McLungsSM into primary care using a cluster randomized stepped wedge trial design

Background

Asthma is a prevalent chronic disease that is difficult to manage and associated with marked disparities in outcomes. One promising approach to addressing disparities is shared decision making (SDM), a method by which the patient and provider cooperatively make a decision about asthma care. SDM is associated with improved outcomes for patients; however, time constraints and staff availability are noted implementation barriers. Use of health information technology (IT) solutions may facilitate the utilization of SDM. Coach McLungs^SM is a collaborative web-based application that involves pediatric patients, their caregivers, and providers in a personalized experience while gathering patient-reported data. Background logic provides decision support so both audiences can develop a well-informed treatment plan together. The goal of this study is to evaluate the implementation of the Coach McLungs^SM intervention into primary care.

Methods

Implementation will be evaluated using a stepped wedge randomized control study design at 21 pediatric and family medicine practices within a large, integrated, nonprofit healthcare system. We will measure changes in emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and oral steroid use, which serve as surrogate measures for patient-centered asthma outcomes. We will use a generalized linear mixed models with logit link to test the hypothesis for the reduction in exacerbation rates specifying the fixed effects of intervention and time and random effects for practice and practice*time. This design achieves 84% power to detect the hypothesized effect size difference of 10% in overall exacerbation between control (40%) and intervention (30%) periods (two-sided, p = 0.05). Implementation will be guided using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC), a compilation of implementation strategies, and evaluated using the CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) and RE-AIM (Reach Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance).

Discussion

We anticipate that a tailored implementation of Coach McLungs^SM across diverse primary care practices will lead to a decrease in emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and oral steroid use for patients in the intervention group as compared to the control condition.

Trial Registration: Clincaltrials.gov, NCT05059210. Registered 28 September 2021, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05059210

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-02030-1.