Assessment of Capecitabine and Bevacizumab With or Without Atezolizumab for the Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Upfront Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab With or Without Atezolizumab for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated and Overall Survival Results of the ATEZOTRIBE Study

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We report 4-year results of the phase II randomized AtezoTRIBE study. Eligible patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) received first-line fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)/bevacizumab (control group, n = 73) or FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab plus atezolizumab (experimental group, n = 145). We present overall survival (OS) and updated outcomes according to tumor immune-related biomarkers, both in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and the cohort of patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors. Median follow-up was 45.2 months (IQR, 42.6-49.2). In the ITT population, median OS was 33.0 and 27.2 months for experimental and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 [80% CI, 0.61 to 0.98]; P = .084). An interaction effect between Immunoscore Immune-Checkpoint (IC) and treatment arm was observed (Pint, .089), with higher benefit from atezolizumab in the Immunoscore IC-high group. In the pMMR cohort (N = 202), median OS was 30.8 and 29.2 months for experimental and control groups, respectively (HR, 0.80 [80% CI, 0.63 to 1.02]; P = .117). Interactions between treatment group and tumor mutational burden (TMB) and Immunoscore IC were reported (Pint, .043 and .092, respectively), with patients bearing TMB-high and Immunoscore IC-high tumors deriving higher benefit from the addition of atezolizumab. First-line FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab plus atezolizumab improves OS in patients with mCRC. In the pMMR group, patients with Immunoscore IC-high and/or TMB-high tumors are identified as a subgroup of interest to further develop this treatment.

Biomarkers to predict efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved to treat colorectal cancer (CRC) with mismatch-repair gene deficiency, but the response rate remains low. Value of current biomarkers to predict CRC patients' response to ICIs is unclear due to heterogeneous study designs and small sample sizes. Here, we aim to assess and quantify the magnitude of multiple biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in CRC patients. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases (to June 2023) for clinical studies examining biomarkers for efficacy of ICIs in CRC patients. Random-effect models were performed for meta-analysis. We pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for biomarkers predicting response rate and survival. 36 studies with 1867 patients were included in systematic review. We found that a lower pre-treatment blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (n=4, HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.21-0.67) predicts good prognosis, higher tumor mutation burden (n=10, OR 4.83, 95%CI 2.16-10.78) predicts response to ICIs, and liver metastasis (n=16, OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.16-0.63) indicates resistance to ICIs, especially when combined with VEGFR inhibitors. But the predictive value of tumor PD-L1 expression (n=9, OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.48-2.14) was insignificant in CRC. Blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, tumor mutation burden, and liver metastasis, but not tumor PD-L1 expression, function as significant biomarkers to predict efficacy of ICIs in CRC patients. These findings help stratify CRC patients suitable for ICI treatments, improving efficacy of immunotherapy through precise patient management. (PROSPERO, CRD42022346716).

Pembrolizumab Plus mFOLFOX7 or FOLFIRI for Microsatellite Stable/Mismatch Repair-Proficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: KEYNOTE-651 Cohorts B and D

BACKGROUND

The phase 1b KEYNOTE-651 study evaluated pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in microsatellite stable or mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (previously untreated; cohort B) or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (previously treated with fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin; cohort D) every 2 weeks. Primary end point was safety; investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 was secondary and biomarker analysis was exploratory.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in cohort B and 32 in cohort D; median follow-up was 30.2 and 33.5 months, respectively. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 small intestine obstruction) occurred in cohort D. In cohort B, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 18 patients (58%), most commonly neutropenia and decreased neutrophil count (n = 5 each). In cohort D, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 17 patients (53%), most commonly neutropenia (n = 7). No grade 5 treatment-related AEs occurred. Objective response rate was 61% in cohort B (KRAS wildtype: 71%; KRAS mutant: 53%) and 25% in cohort D (KRAS wildtype: 47%; KRAS mutant: 6%). In both cohorts, PD-L1 combined positive score and T-cell-inflamed gene expression profiles were higher and HER2 expression was lower in responders than nonresponders. No association between tumor mutational burden and response was observed.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan demonstrated an acceptable AE profile. Efficacy data appeared comparable with current standard of care (including by KRAS mutation status). Biomarker analyses were hypothesis-generating, warranting further exploration.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03374254.

Antiangiogenic-immune-checkpoint inhibitor combinations: lessons from phase III clinical trials

Antiangiogenic agents, generally antibodies or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors that target the VEGF-VEGFR pathway, are currently among the few combination partners clinically proven to improve the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This benefit has been demonstrated in pivotal phase III trials across different cancer types, some with practice-changing results; however, numerous phase III trials have also had negative results. The rationale for using antiangiogenic drugs as partners for ICIs relies primarily on blocking the multiple immunosuppressive effects of VEGF and inducing several different vascular-modulating effects that can stimulate immunity, such as vascular normalization leading to increased intratumoural blood perfusion and flow, and inhibition of pro-apoptotic effects of endothelial cells on T cells, among others. Conversely, VEGF blockade can also cause changes that suppress antitumour immunity, such as increased tumour hypoxia, and reduced intratumoural ingress of co-administered ICIs. As a result, the net clinical benefits from antiangiogenic-ICI combinations will be determined by the balance between the opposing effects of VEGF signalling and its inhibition on the antitumour immune response. In this Perspective, we summarize the results from the currently completed phase III trials evaluating antiangiogenic agent-ICI combinations. We also discuss strategies to improve the efficacy of these combinations, focusing on aspects that include the deleterious functions of VEGF-VEGFR inhibition on antitumour immunity, vessel co-option as a driver of non-angiogenic tumour growth, clinical trial design, or the rationale for drug selection, dosing and scheduling.

Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer - Finding the Achilles' Heel

AbstractColorectal cancer treatment has evolved considerably in the last decade with the development of immunotherapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies have brisk and durable responses in patients with advanced microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer, both surgically resectable and unresectable; however, patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer in general do not respond to the same therapy. Emerging evidence shows that immune checkpoint inhibitors may elicit responses in subsets of patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, especially when combined with other anticancer agents that can modulate the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, rationally designed therapeutic combinations involving immune checkpoint inhibitors, as well as the development of predictive biomarkers for optimal patient selection, have emerged as two key areas of active research. In addition, other immunotherapeutic agents such as cell-based therapies and bispecific T-cell engagers are beginning to be studied in preclinical and early-phase settings. Although by no means a universal treatment strategy, immunotherapy can elicit responses in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer and further research is needed to extend their benefit to patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Here, we review the current state of immunotherapeutic regimens for microsatellite stable colorectal cancer.

A case of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia in a lung cancer patient receiving atezolizumab maintenance

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are linked with various cutaneous side effects ranging from mild to life-threatening. Herein, we present a unique case of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) in a patient treated with atezolizumab.

CASE REPORT

A 72-year-old white man was diagnosed with Tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma in November 2022. He underwent right lower lobectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant cisplatin-pemetrexed. As of May 2023, he did not have any evidence of relapse. He then started switch maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. At 24 weeks, the patient developed erythematous palmar skin lesions, followed by blisters and peeling of both palms, which were associated with swelling and pain, consistent with grade 2 PPE.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Causality assessment between nivolumab and PPE via adverse drug reaction probability scale revealed a score of 5. Atezolizumab was continued, and he started on a cream consisting of trolamine and 75% water to palms twice daily. A follow-up visit 6 weeks later showed significant improvement in symptoms and appearance of palmar lesions.

DISCUSSION

Cutaneous side effects are commonly seen with ICIs. PPE is a common dermatologic toxicity of certain tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This effect has been previously reported with combination therapies consisting of an ICI plus a TKIs, but not with ICI monotherapy. Awareness of this potential side effect of ICIs would prevent unnecessary work-up, and lead to its prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Oleuropein impact on colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is considered the third most common cancer in the world. In Mediterranean region, olives and olive oil play a substantial role in diet and medical traditional behaviors. They totally believe that high consumption of olive products can treat a wide range of diseases and decrease risk of illness. Oleuropein is the main active antioxidant molecule found in pre-mature olive fruit and leaves. Recently, it has been demonstrated that oleuropein is used in cancer therapy as an anti-proliferative and apoptotic agent for some cancer cells. In this review, we would like to explore the conclusive effects of oleuropein on CRC with respect to in vitro and in vivo studies.

Phase 1a dose escalation study of ivonescimab (AK112/SMT112), an anti-PD-1/VEGF-A bispecific antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Studies showed that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors could improve therapeutic efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies by transforming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) into an immunoresponsive TME. Ivonescimab is a first-in-class, humanized tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF-A simultaneously. Here, we report the first-in-human, phase 1a study of ivonescimab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with ivonescimab 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 20 or 30 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks using a 3+3+3 dose escalation design. Dose expansion occurred at 10 and 20 mg/kg in selected tumor types. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary antitumor activity based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1.

RESULTS

Between October 2, 2019 and January 14, 2021, a total of 51 patients were enrolled and received ivonescimab. Two dose-limiting toxicities were reported at 30 mg/kg. The MTD of ivonescimab was 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Grade≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 patients (27.5%). The most common TRAEs of any grade were rash (29.4%), arthralgia (19.6%), hypertension (19.6%), fatigue (17.6%), diarrhea (15.7%) and pruritus (11.8%). The most common grade≥3 TRAEs were hypertension (7/51, 13.7%), alanine aminotransferase increased (3/51, 5.2%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (2/51, 3.9%) and colitis (2/51, 3.9%). Of 47 patients who had at least one postbaseline assessment, the confirmed objective response rate was 25.5% (12/47) and disease control rate was 63.8% (30/47). Among 19 patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, 5 patients (26.3%) achieved partial response (PR). Efficacy signals were also observed in patients with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and both MMR deficient and pMMR endometrial cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Ivonescimab demonstrated manageable safety profiles and promising efficacy signals in multiple solid tumors. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens of ivonescimab monotherapy and combination therapies is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04047290.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with a portal vein tumor thrombus and pulmonary metastases of rectal cancer with microsatellite stability using atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

Herein, we report the successful treatment using atezolizumab plus bevacizumab of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a portal vein tumor thrombus and multiple pulmonary metastases from rectal cancer with microsatellite stability. This patient developed rectal cancer with synchronous pulmonary metastases and HCC. After resecting the primary lesion of the rectal cancer, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was performed for the HCC. Drug therapy was planned for multiple pulmonary metastases of rectal cancer; however, the early development of recurrent HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus had to be highly prioritized, and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was introduced. Following the disappearance of the recurrent HCC lesion, the metastatic pulmonary nodules shrunk into scar-like spots. The treatment for both HCC and pulmonary metastases of rectal cancer were considered to result in clinical complete response.

Cardiovascular Eligibility Criteria and Adverse Event Reporting in Combined Immune Checkpoint and VEGF Inhibitor Trials

Background

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFIs) has improved cancer outcomes and is increasingly used. These drug classes are associated with cardiovascular toxicities when used alone, but heterogeneity in trial design and reporting may limit knowledge of toxicities in patients receiving these in combination.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess consistency and clarity in definitions and reporting of cardiovascular eligibility criteria, baseline characteristics, and cardiovascular adverse events in ICI and VEGFI combination trials.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted of phase 2 to 4 randomized controlled trials of ICI and VEGFI combination therapy for solid tumors. Trial cardiovascular eligibility criteria and baseline cardiovascular characteristic reporting in trial publications was assessed, and cardiovascular adverse event definitions and reporting criteria were also examined.

Results

Seventeen trials (N = 10,313; published 2018-2022) were included. There were multiple cardiovascular exclusion criteria in 15 trials. No primary trial publication reported baseline cardiovascular characteristics. Thirteen trials excluded patients with prior heart failure, myocardial infarction, hypertension, or stroke. There was heterogeneity in defining cardiovascular conditions. "Grade 1 to 4" cardiovascular adverse events were reported when incidence was ≥5% to 25% in 15 trials. Incident hypertension was recorded in all trials, but other cardiovascular events were not consistently reported. No trial specifically noted the absence of cardiovascular events.

Conclusions

In ICI and VEGFI combination trials, there is heterogeneity in cardiovascular exclusion criteria, reporting of baseline characteristics, and reporting of cardiovascular adverse events. This limits an optimal understanding of the incidence and severity of events relating to these combinations. Better standardization of these elements should be pursued. (Exclusions and Representation of Patients With Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Disease in Drug Trials of the Novel Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapies VEGF-Signalling Pathway Inhibitors Alone or in Combination With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; CRD42022337942).

Siglec9 + tumor-associated macrophages predict prognosis and therapeutic vulnerability in patients with colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Siglec9 has been identified as an immune checkpoint molecule on tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Nevertheless, the expression profile and clinical significance of Siglec9 + TAMs in colon cancer (CC) are still not fully understood.

METHODS

Two clinical cohorts from distinct medical centers were retrospectively enrolled. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were conducted to evaluate the infiltration of immune cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing and flow cytometry were utilized to identify the impact of Siglec9 + TAMs on the tumor immune environment, which was subsequently validated through bioinformatics analysis of the TCGA database. Prognosis and the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) were also evaluated using Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

High infiltration of Siglec9 + TAMs was associated with worse prognosis and better benefit from 6-month ACT. Siglec9 + TAMs contributed to immunoevasion by promoting the infiltration of immunosuppressive cells and the dysfunction process of CD8 + T cells. Additionally, high infiltration of Siglec9 + TAMs was associated with the mesenchymal-featured subtype and overexpression of the VEGF signaling pathway, which was validated by the strongest communication between Siglec9 + TAMs and vascular endothelial cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Siglec9 + TAMs may serve as a biomarker for prognosis and response to ACT in CC. Furthermore, the immunoevasive contexture and angiogenesis stimulated by Siglec9 + TAMs suggest potential treatment combinations for CC patients.

Redefining the battle against colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review of emerging immunotherapies and their clinical efficacy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer globally and presents a significant challenge owing to its high mortality rate and the limitations of traditional treatment options such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. While these treatments are foundational, they are often poorly effective owing to tumor resistance. Immunotherapy is a groundbreaking alternative that has recently emerged and offers new hope for success by exploiting the body's own immune system. This article aims to provide an extensive review of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of various immunotherapies, including CRC vaccines, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also discuss combining CRC vaccines with monoclonal antibodies, delve into preclinical studies of novel cancer vaccines, and assess the impact of these treatment methods on patient outcomes. This review seeks to provide a deeper understanding of the current state of CRC treatment by evaluating innovative treatments and their potential to redefine the prognosis of patients with CRC.

Blood Vessel-Targeted Therapy in Colorectal Cancer: Current Strategies and Future Perspectives

The vasculature is a key player and regulatory component in the multicellular microenvironment of solid tumors and, consequently, a therapeutic target. In colorectal carcinoma (CRC), antiangiogenic treatment was approved almost 20 years ago, but there are still no valid predictors of response. In addition, treatment resistance has become a problem. Vascular heterogeneity and plasticity due to species-, organ-, and milieu-dependent phenotypic and functional differences of blood vascular cells reduced the hope of being able to apply a standard approach of antiangiogenic therapy to all patients. In addition, the pathological vasculature in CRC is characterized by heterogeneous perfusion, impaired barrier function, immunosuppressive endothelial cell anergy, and metabolic competition-induced microenvironmental stress. Only recently, angiocrine proteins have been identified that are specifically released from vascular cells and can regulate tumor initiation and progression in an autocrine and paracrine manner. In this review, we summarize the history and current strategies for applying antiangiogenic treatment and discuss the associated challenges and opportunities, including normalizing the tumor vasculature, modulating milieu-dependent vascular heterogeneity, and targeting functions of angiocrine proteins. These new strategies could open perspectives for future vascular-targeted and patient-tailored therapy selection in CRC.

Clinical and biomarker results from a phase II trial of combined cabozantinib and durvalumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC): CAMILLA CRC cohort

CAMILLA is a basket trial (NCT03539822) evaluating cabozantinib plus the ICI durvalumab in chemorefractory gastrointestinal cancer. Herein, are the phase II colorectal cohort results. 29 patients were evaluable. 100% had confirmed pMMR/MSS tumors. Primary endpoint was met with ORR of 27.6% (95% CI 12.7-47.2%). Secondary endpoints of 4-month PFS rate was 44.83% (95% CI 26.5-64.3%); and median OS was 9.1 months (95% CI 5.8-20.2). Grade≥3 TRAE occurred in 39%. In post-hoc analysis of patients with RAS wild type tumors, ORR was 50% and median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 21.5 months respectively. Exploratory spatial transcriptomic profiling of pretreatment tumors showed upregulation of VEGF and MET signaling, increased extracellular matrix activity and preexisting anti-tumor immune responses coexisting with immune suppressive features like T cell migration barriers in responders versus non-responders. Cabozantinib plus durvalumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity, manageable toxicity, and have led to the activation of the phase III STELLAR-303 trial.

Risk of cardiovascular toxicity with combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and angiogenesis inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Introduction

Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and angiogenesis inhibitors (AIs) have been investigated for the treatment of several tumor types. Both ICIs and AIs may lead to cardiovascular adverse events, and their combination may potentially increase the risk for cardiovascular toxicity. In the present meta-analysis, we aim to assess the cardiovascular toxicity of ICIs plus AIs vs. AIs alone. Secondary objectives are non-cardiovascular adverse events and efficacy.

Methods

Systematic review was performed according to PRISMA statement. Phase II and III randomized clinical trials were identified by searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library and ASCO Meeting abstracts, from inception to June 2022. The pooled risks for overall response rate (ORR), 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), immune-related AEs, (irAEs), hypertension, and vascular events defined as stroke, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolisms, were calculated.

Results

In terms of cardiovascular toxicity, we found higher risk for severe hypertension among patients treated with ICIs plus AIs as compared with those receiving AIs (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.53), but no significant difference was found for any-grade hypertension, and for vascular events. There was also no difference in terms of overall AEs, whereas the incidence of irAEs was increased in the ICIs plus AIs arm, as expected. In terms of efficacy, ICIs plus AIs achieved better ORR (OR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.70-2.97) and PFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39-0.63) as compared to AIs alone.

Conclusion

The addition of ICIs to AIs significantly increased the risk of high-grade hypertension, but not that of acute vascular events.

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for colorectal cancer: Clinical implications and future considerations

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in the world. The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays a crucial role in modulating immune response to cancer, and PD-L1 expression has been observed in tumor and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment of CRC. Thus, immunotherapy drugs, specifically checkpoint inhibitors, have been developed to target the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 and restoring T-cell function in cancer cells. However, the emergence of resistance mechanisms can reduce the efficacy of these treatments. To counter this, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used to improve the efficacy of CRC treatments. mAbs such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab are currently approved for CRC treatment. These antibodies impede immune checkpoint receptors, including PD-1/PD-L1, and their combination therapy shows promise in the treatment of advanced CRC. This review presents a concise overview of the use of the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as a therapeutic strategy for CRC using monoclonal antibodies and combination therapies. Additionally, this article outlines the function of PD-1/PD-L1 as an immune response suppressor in the CRC microenvironment as well as the potential advantages of administering inflammatory agents for CRC treatment. Finally, this review analyzes the outcomes of clinical trials to examine the challenges of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapeutic resistance.

Immune-related cardiovascular toxicities of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in solid tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The objective of this study was to investigate the risk of cardiovascular toxicities related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in solid tumors.

Methods

A literature search was performed following the participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design (PICOS) principles, and the study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager version 5.4.

Results

This meta-analysis included 69 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) divided into five groups based on the treatment regimens: PD-1/PD-L1 + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 versus chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 versus placebo, PD-1/PD-L1 + CTLA-4 versus PD-1/PD-L1 and PD-1/PD-L1 + CTLA-4 versus chemotherapy. Compared to chemotherapy treatment alone, PD-1/PD-L1 +chemotherapy significantly increased the risk of hypertension [all-grade (OR = 1.27, 95% CI [1.05, 1.53], p = 0.01); grade 3-5 (OR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.04, 1.79], p = 0.03)], hypotension [all-grade (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.19, 3.45], p = 0.009); grade 3-5 (OR = 3.60, 95% CI [1.22, 10.60], p = 0.02)], arrhythmia [all-grade (OR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.02, 2.30], p = 0.04); grade 3-5 (OR = 2.91, 95% CI [1.33, 6.39], p = 0.008)] and myocarditis [all-grade (OR = 2.42, 95% CI [1.06, 5.54], p = 0.04)]. The risk of all-grade hypotension (OR = 2.87, 95% CI [1.26, 6.55], p = 0.01) and all-grade arrhythmia (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.13, 3.64], p = 0.02) significantly increased when treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared to the placebo. The risks of cardiovascular toxicities are significantly higher with PD-1+CTLA-4 compared to PD-1 alone (OR = 2.02, 95% CI [1.12, 3.66], p = 0.02).

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular toxicities, especially hypertension, hypotension, arrhythmia, and myocarditis.

Treatment Options in Late-Line Colorectal Cancer: Lessons Learned from Recent Randomized Studies

Systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably over the past 20 years. First- and second-line combinations of 5FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without anti-angiogenic and/or anti-EGFR antibodies, were approved shortly after the turn of the millennium. Further triumphs were not seen for almost 10 years, until the approval of initially regorafenib and shortly after trifluridine/tipiracil. A growing understanding of tumor biology through molecular profiling has led to further treatment options. Here, we review the most recent clinical data for late-line treatment options in mCRC, focusing on randomized trials if available. We include recommendations for options in unselected patients and therapies that should only be offered in patients with distinct tumor profiles (e.g., BRAF mutations, KRAS G12C mutations, HER2 amplification, deficient MMR, or NTRK gene fusions).

PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in cold colorectal cancer: challenges and strategies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer mortality, with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and/or microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC making up more than 80% of metastatic CRC. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved as monotherapy in many cancers including a subset of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with deficiency in mismatch repair (dMMR) and/or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). However, proficient mismatch repair and microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) cold CRCs have not shown clinical response to ICIs alone. To potentiate the anti-tumor response of PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in patients with MSS cold cancer, combination strategies currently being investigated include dual ICI, and PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) /VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors, and signal transducer and activation of transcription 3 (STAT3) inhibitors. This paper will review the mechanisms of PD-1/PD-L1 ICI resistance in pMMR/MSS CRC and potential combination strategies to overcome this resistance, summarize the published clinical experience with different combination therapies, and make recommendations for future avenues of research.

Hematologic and lymphatic system toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world study

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) exert antitumor responses in many types of cancer but may also induce serious or fatal toxicities that affect all organ systems, including the hematologic and lymphatic systems. However, the risk of hematologic and lymphatic system toxicities following different ICI treatments remains unknown. This study aimed to describe the hematologic and lymphatic system toxicities associated with different ICI regimens and the impact of combining ICIs with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System pharmacovigilance database. Methods: The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) indices were used to identify disproportionate reporting of ICI-associated hematologic and lymphatic adverse events (AEs). Results: We extracted 10,971 ICI-associated hematologic and lymphatic AEs from 35,417,155 reports. These AEs were more frequently reported in female patients (ROR: 1.04 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.07) and younger patients (ROR: 1.05 95% CI: 1.01-1.09). The disseminated intravascular coagulation fatality rate (63.97%) was the highest among the reported preferred terms, despite its low incidence (3.32%). The time to onset of ICI-related hematologic and lymphatic AEs was relatively short, with 77.44% reported within 3 months. Disproportionate analysis showed that most ICIs were associated with significant overreporting of hematologic and lymphatic AEs (IC025: 0.34 and ROR025: 2.10). Hematologic and lymphatic system AEs were more frequently reported in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 monotherapy than in those treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 monotherapy (ROR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.38-1.71), with atezolizumab showing the strongest signal (ROR025: 4.19, IC025: 1.00). In patients receiving combined treatment, ICIs plus bevacizumab exerted a higher disproportion signal than monotherapy (ROR: 161, 95% CI: 1.75-1.88). Discussion: The spectrum of hematologic and lymphatic AEs differed according to the ICI regimen. Early recognition and management of ICI-related hematologic and lymphatic AEs are vital in clinical practice.

Targeting Liver Metastases to Potentiate Immunotherapy in MS-Stable Colorectal Cancer-A Review of the Literature

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of several cancers, including melanoma and lung cancer. However, for colorectal cancer, it is ineffective for 95% of patients with microsatellite-stable disease. Recent evidence suggests that the liver's immune microenvironment plays a pivotal role in limiting the effectiveness of immunotherapy. There is also evidence to show that targeting liver metastases with locoregional therapies, such as surgery or irradiation, could potentiate immunotherapy for these patients. This review presents evidence from preclinical studies regarding the underlying mechanisms and from clinical studies that support this approach. Furthermore, we outline potential directions for future clinical trials. This innovative strategy could potentially establish immunotherapy as an effective treatment for MS-stable colorectal cancer patients, which are currently considered resistant.

Immunocheckpoint Inhibitors in Microsatellite-Stable or Proficient Mismatch Repair Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Are We Entering a New Era?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Europe. About 5% of metastatic CRC (mCRC) are characterized by high microsatellite instability (MSI) due to a deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR), and this condition has been related to a high sensitivity to immunotherapy, in particular to the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). In fact, in MSI-H or dMMR mCRC, treatment with ICIs induced remarkable response rates and prolonged survival. However, the majority of mCRC cases are mismatch-repair-proficient (pMMR) and microsatellite-stable (MSS), and unfortunately these conditions involve resistance to ICIs. This review aims to provide an overview of the strategies implemented to overcome ICI resistance and/or define subgroups of patients with MSS or dMMR mCRC who may benefit from immunotherapy.

Optimizing the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer represents an important oncological challenge both for its incidence, which makes it an important health problem, and for its biological complexity, which has made clinical results very difficult in terms of outcome for this category of patients. To date these diseases should not be treated as a single entity but it is necessary to distinguish colorectal cancers based on characteristics that nowadays are essential to have greater therapeutic benefits. These include the sideness of the disease, the state of microsatellites, the presence of prognostic and predictive mutations of response to treatments currently available in clinical practice, which are associated with new therapeutic targets. The greatest challenge in the future will be to circumvent the resistance mechanisms that make this disease very difficult to treat with good long-term results by studying effective combination treatments with a good toxicity profile. Once such combinations or targeted treatments are consolidated, it will be desirable to shift the best therapies to the first line treatment to make them immediately accessible to the patient. It will also be essential to refine the selection of patients who can benefit from these treatments.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Proficient Mismatch Repair (pMMR)/ Non-Microsatellite Instability-High (non-MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer: a study based on 39 cohorts incorporating 1723 patients

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based therapy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/non-microsatellite instability-high (non-MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

Electronic databases were screened to identify relevant trials. The primary endpoints were pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Stratified analysis was accomplished on ICIs-based regimens, treatment lines and RAS status.

RESULTS

Totally, 1723 mCRC patients from 39 cohorts were included. The pooled ORR, DCR, 12-month overall survival (OS) rate and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate of ICIs-based therapy in pMMR/non-MSI-H mCRC were 8.5% (95% CI: 4.4%-13.5%), 48.2% (95% CI: 37.8%-58.6%), 52.3% (95% CI: 46.4%-58.1%) and 32.8% (95% CI: 23.5%-42.7%) respectively. As a whole, no significantly differences were shown between ICIs-based and non-ICIs-based therapy for pMMR/non-MSI-H mCRC in terms of both PFS (HR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.1, P = 0.91) and OS (HR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.2, P = 0.51). It was worth noting that the addition of ICIs to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent plus chemotherapy displayed excellent efficacy in pMMR/non-MSI-H mCRC (ORR = 42.4%, 95% CI: 10.0%-78.6%; DCR = 92.0%, 95% CI: 68.3%-100.0%; 12-month OS rate = 71.4%, 95% CI: 50.0%-89.1%; 6-month PFS rate = 55.2%, 95% CI: 24.8%-83.8%; and PFS (compared with non-ICIs-based therapy): HR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-1.0, P = 0.02), especially served as first-line therapy (ORR = 74.2%, 95% CI: 61.4%-85.4%; DCR = 98.7%, 95% CI: 92.0%-100.0%); and without additional treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs-based combination therapy, especially the addition of ICIs to first-line anti-VEGF agent plus chemotherapy, is promising in pMMR/non-MSI-H mCRC with good efficacy and controllable toxicity.

Light on life: immunoscore immune-checkpoint, a predictor of immunotherapy response

In the last decade, a plethora of immunotherapeutic strategies have been designed to modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. In particular, immune checkpoint (IC) blockade therapies present the most promising advances made in cancer treatment in recent years. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), biomarkers predicting response to IC treatments are currently lacking. We have recently identified Immunoscore-IC, a powerful biomarker that predicts the efficiency of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC patients. Immunoscore-IC is an in vitro diagnostic assay that quantifies densities of PD-L1+, CD8+ cells, and distances between CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells in the tumor microenvironment. Immunoscore-IC can classify responder vs non-responder NSCLC patients for ICIs therapy and is revealed as a promising predictive marker of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in these patients. Immunoscore-IC has also shown a significant predictive value, superior to the currently used PD-L1 marker. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the addition of atezolizumab to first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC. In the AtezoTRIBE trial, Immunoscore-IC emerged as the first biomarker with robust predictive value in stratifying pMMR metastatic CRC patients who critically benefit from checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, Immunoscore-IC could be a universal biomarker to predict response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy across multiple cancer indications. Therefore, cancer patient stratification (by Immunoscore-IC), based on the presence of T lymphocytes and PD-L1 potentially provides support for clinicians to guide them through combination cancer treatment decisions.

Irinotecan- vs. Oxaliplatin-Based Doublets in KRASG12C-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Multicentre Propensity-Score-Matched Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

KRAS^G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has recently been recognized as a distinct druggable molecular entity; however, there are limited data on its sensitivity to standard chemotherapy. In the near future, the combination of chemotherapy plus a KRAS^G12C-inhibitor might become the standard of care; however, the optimal chemotherapy backbone is unknown.

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective analysis was conducted including KRAS^G12C-mutated mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI or FOLFOX +/- bevacizumab. Both unmatched and propensity-score-matched analysis (PSMA) were conducted, with PSMA controlling for: previous adjuvant chemotherapy, ECOG PS, use of bevacizumab in first line, timing of metastasis appearance, time from diagnosis to first-line start, number of metastatic sites, presence of mucinous component, gender, and age. Subgroup analyses were also performed to investigate subgroup treatment-effect interactions. KRAS^G12D-mutated patients were analysed as control.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients treated with irinotecan-(N = 47) or oxaliplatin-based (N = 57) chemotherapy were included. In the unmatched population, objective response rate (ORR) and median (m) progression-free and overall survival (mPFS and mOS) were comparable between the treatment arms. However, a late (>12 months) PFS advantage was observed with irinotecan (HR 0.62, p = 0.02). In the PSMA-derived cohort, a significant improvement with irinotecan vs. oxaliplatin was observed for both PFS and OS: 12- and 24-month PFS rates of 55% vs. 31% and 40% vs. 0% (HR 0.40, p = 0.01) and mOS 37.9 vs. 21.7 months (HR 0.45, p = 0.045), respectively. According to the subgroup analysis, interaction effects between the presence of lung metastases and treatment groups were found in terms of PFS (p for interaction = 0.08) and OS (p for interaction = 0.03), with a higher benefit from irinotecan in patients without lung metastases. No difference between treatment groups was observed in the KRAS^G12D-mutated cohort (N = 153).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line irinotecan-based regimens provided better survival results in KRAS^G12C-mutated mCRC patients and should be preferred over oxaliplatin. These findings should also be considered when investigating chemotherapy plus targeted agent combinations.

Targeting angiogenesis in oncology, ophthalmology and beyond

Angiogenesis is an essential process in normal development and in adult physiology, but can be disrupted in numerous diseases. The concept of targeting angiogenesis for treating diseases was proposed more than 50 years ago, and the first two drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), bevacizumab and pegaptanib, were approved in 2004 for the treatment of cancer and neovascular ophthalmic diseases, respectively. Since then, nearly 20 years of clinical experience with anti-angiogenic drugs (AADs) have demonstrated the importance of this therapeutic modality for these disorders. However, there is a need to improve clinical outcomes by enhancing therapeutic efficacy, overcoming drug resistance, defining surrogate markers, combining with other drugs and developing the next generation of therapeutics. In this Review, we examine emerging new targets, the development of new drugs and challenging issues such as the mode of action of AADs and elucidating mechanisms underlying clinical benefits; we also discuss possible future directions of the field.

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patient with Microsatellite Stability and Germline BRAC2 Mutation Shows a Complete Response to Olaparib in Combination with a PD-1 Inhibitor and Bevacizumab: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a poor prognosis. Combining chemotherapy with targeted therapy constitutes a basic form of mCRC treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been recommended for microsatellite instability mCRC, while most patients harboring microsatellite stability (MSS) or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) are less responsive to immunotherapy. Combinational targeted therapy, including poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, has been considered a promising way to reverse immunotherapy resistance; however, there is no clear and consistent conclusions can be drawn from the current research. Here, we report the case of a 59-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IVB MSS mCRC who received three courses of capecitabine/oxaliplatin chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab as a first-line treatment, resulting in an overall evaluation of stable disease (-25.7%). However, the occurrence of adverse events of intolerable grade 3 diarrhea and vomiting forced the cessation of this therapy. A germline BRCA2 mutation was found by next-generation sequencing, and the patient further received a combination of olaparib, tislelizumab, and bevacizumab. This treatment regime resulted in a complete metabolic response and a partial response (-50.9%) after 3 months of treatment. Mild asymptomatic interstitial pneumonia and manageable hematologic toxicity were two adverse events associated with this combination therapy. This study provides new insights into the combination of PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy for MSS mCRC patients carrying germline BRCA2 mutations.

[Checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal carcinoma: are we entering a new era?]

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint-inhibitors have shown high response rates in some tumours such as melanomas.

OBJECTIVES

This article describes the data concerning the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

CURRENT DATA

Efficacy for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in CRC has only been shown for tumours with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or a deficient mismatch repair system (dMMR). The proportion of patients with MSI-H/dMMR cancers is 10-12% in colon cancers and 3% in rectal cancers. In cohort studies with patients that had progressed under at least one chemotherapy a response rate of 33% could be shown for pembrolizumab and 65% for the combination nivolumab and ipilimumab. In many patients the response was long-lasting. After 2 years between 55 and 75% of patients were still alive. In a randomized study comparing first-line therapy with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy progression-free survival was much longer for the pembrolizumab group (16.5 vs. 8.2 months). In a small series of patients with MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancers treatment with dostarlimab resulted in complete remission in all patients with no regrowth during an admittedly short follow-up. A series of patients with locally advanced MSI-H/dMMR colon cancers showed a treatment response in nearly all patients with 67% experiencing complete remission. In patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) cancers checkpoint inhibitors showed no effect, the combination with chemotherapy at most a modest effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Checkpoint inhibitors are the first-choice palliative treatment in patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRC and have replaced chemotherapy as the first option. Early data show a high response rate for the neoadjuvant treatment of MSI-H/dMMR rectal and colon cancers.

The Gut Microbiome, Microsatellite Status and the Response to Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer

There is increasing evidence in a range of cancer types that the microbiome plays a direct role in modulating the anti-cancer immune response both at the gut level and systemically. Differences in the gut microbiota have been shown to correlate with differences in immunotherapy responses in a range of non-gastrointestinal tract cancers. DNA mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) is radically different to DNA mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) CRC in clinical phenotype and in its very good responses to immunotherapy. While this has usually been thought to be due to the high mutational burden in dMMR CRC, the gut microbiome is radically different in dMMR and pMMR CRC in terms of both composition and diversity. It is probable that differences in the gut microbiota contribute to the varied responses to immunotherapy in dMMR versus pMMR CRC. Targeting the microbiome offers a way to boost the response and increase the selection of patients who might benefit from this therapy. This paper reviews the available literature on the role of the microbiome in the response to immunotherapy in dMMR and pMMR CRC, explores the potential causal relationship and discusses future directions for study in this exciting and rapidly changing field.

Emerging evidence of immunotherapy for colorectal cancer

Since the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which modulate the interplay between the tumor cell and immune system, immunotherapy has become widely recognized as a new standard treatment for cancers including microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibodies) that act in the effector phase of T cells and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) that acts mainly in the priming phase are now in clinical use. These antibodies have shown therapeutic efficacy in MSI colorectal cancer patients who have failed to respond to existing standard therapies. Pembrolizumab is also strongly recommended as first-line therapy for MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer. Therefore, the MSI status and tumor mutation burden of the tumor should be clarified before starting treatment. Because many patients do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors, combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or molecularly targeted agents, are being investigated. Furthermore, treatment methods for preoperative adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer are being developed.

An Exploration of Trifluridine/Tipiracil Monotherapy and in Combination With Bevacizumab or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) has achieved modest efficacy in the late-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The present study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and drug toxicities of TAS-102 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

From October 2020 to February 2022, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed from 2 or more lines of prior therapy and treated with TAS-102 monotherapy, in combination with bevacizumab or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were analyzed. The evaluation indicators were progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate , disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and drug toxicities.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate and DCR were 1.4% and 68.6%. The median PFS and OS were 6.0 (95% CI: 4.1-7.9) and 10.0 (95% CI: 8.3-11.7) months. Compared with TAS-102 monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab obtained superior DCR (75.9% vs. 50% vs. 40%, P = .047), PFS (6.3m vs. 3.0 m vs. 3.0 m, P = .041) and OS (12.0 m vs. 6.5 m vs. 6.0m, P = .013). Patients without prior regorafenib or fruquintinib therapy obtained better median PFS (6.3 vs. 4.3 m, P = .031) and OS (NR vs. 9.0 m, P = .036). Other indicators, including age, tumor site, KRAS status and use of fluoropyrimidine as last regimen before TAS-102, did not affect the clinical efficacy of TAS-102. The most frequent adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

In real-world clinical setting, TAS-102 showed consistent clinical efficacy and manageable safety with previous prospective clinical studies. Compared with monotherapy and TAS-102 plus ICIs, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab demonstrated better clinical efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Advances in immune checkpoint inhibitor combination strategies for microsatellite stable colorectal cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have reshaped the prognostic of several tumor types, including metastatic colorectal tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI). However, 90-95% of metastatic colorectal tumors are microsatellite stable (MSS) in which immunotherapy has failed to demonstrate meaningful clinical results. MSS colorectal tumors are considered immune-cold tumors. Several factors have been proposed to account for this lack of response to immune checkpoint blockade including low levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, low tumor mutational burden, a high rate of WNT/β-catenin pathway mutations, and liver metastases which have been associated with immunosuppression. However, studies with novel combinations based on immune checkpoint inhibitors are showing promising activity in MSS colorectal cancer. Here, we review the underlying biological facts that preclude immunotherapy activity, and detail the different immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations evaluated, along with novel immune-based therapies, to overcome innate mechanisms of resistance in MSS colorectal cancer.

Long-term response to sintilimab, bevacizumab and chemotherapy in heavily pretreated microsatellite stable colon cancer

Most advanced colorectal cancer patients with proficient DNA mismatch repair or microsatellite stability (MSS) are insensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This report describes a heavily pretreated refractory colon adenocarcinoma patient with MSS. After experiencing four lines of treatment, the patient received the fifth-line therapy with the combined sintilimab, bevacizumab and chemotherapy. She achieved a long-term clinical outcome. The patient's progression-free survival after the fifth-line therapy was approximately 9.3 months, and her overall survival was approximately 57 months. To the best of our knowledge, this case represents the first report of durable clinical benefit from combination of an immune checkpoint inhibitor, bevacizumab and chemotherapy in a heavily pretreated patient with refractory metastatic colon adenocarcinoma with MSS.

Hypertransaminasemia in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and immune-based combinations: the MOUSEION-05 study

BACKGROUND

The antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has increasingly emerged during the last few years. However, there is a need to identify the safety profile of these agents more comprehensively, including liver toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the risk of all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia in cancer patients receiving ICIs-as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents. All the relevant trials were retrieved through EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/Medline databases; eligible studies were selected according to PRISMA statement. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies were included. The pooled RRs for all-grade AST and ALT increase were 1.45 (95% CI 1.26-1.67) (Supplementary Fig. 3) and 1.51 (95% CI 1.29-1.77) in patients receiving ICIs monotherapy and immune-based combinations compared to control treatment, respectively. The pooled RRs for grade 3-4 AST and ALT increase were 2.16 (95% CI 1.77-2.64) and 2.3 (95% CI 1.91-2.77).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, ICIs monotherapy and immune-based combinations were associated with higher risk of all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia. Monitoring liver function should be recommended in cancer patients treated with ICIs monotherapy or immune-based combination, and in case of underlying liver disease, a careful risk-benefit assessment appears as a mandatory need.

Therapeutic landscape and future direction of metastatic colorectal cancer

In the era of targeted therapy based on genomic alterations, the treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been changing. Before systemic treatment initiation, determination of tumour genomic status for KRAS and NRAS, BRAF^V600E mutations, ERBB2, and microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair (MMR) status is recommended. In patients with deficient MMR and BRAF^V600E mCRC, randomized phase III trials have established the efficacy of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy and the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab as second-line or third-line therapy. In addition, new agents have been actively developed in other rare molecular fractions such as ERBB2 alterations and KRAS^G12C mutations. In March 2022, the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for ERBB2-positive mCRC was approved in Japan, thereby combining real-world evidence from the SCRUM-Japan Registry. As the populations are highly fragmented owing to rare genomic alterations, various strategies in clinical development are expected. Clinical development of a tumour-agnostic approach, such as NTRK fusion and tumour mutational burden, has successfully introduced corresponding drugs to clinical practice. Considering the difficulty of randomized trials owing to cost-benefit and rarity, a promising solution could be real-world evidence utilized as an external control from the molecular-based disease registry.

Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Multimodal Therapy

Despite a steady decline in incidence and mortality rates, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second most common cancer diagnosis in women and the third most common in men worldwide. Notably, the liver is recognized as the most common site of CRC metastasis, and metastases to the liver remain the primary driver of disease-specific mortality for patients with CRC. Although hepatic resection is the backbone of curative-intent treatment, management of CRLM has become increasingly multimodal during the last decade and includes the use of downstaging chemotherapy, ablation techniques, and locoregional therapy, each of which are reviewed herein.

The role of immunotherapy in microsatellites stable metastatic colorectal cancer: state of the art and future perspectives

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, despite several advances has been achieved in last decades. Few prognostic and predictive biomarkers guide therapeutic choice in metastatic CRC (mCRC), among which DNA mismatch repair deficiency and/or microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI) holds a crucial role. Tumors characterized by dMMR/MSI benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, most of the mCRC patients (around 95%) are microsatellite stable (MSS), thereby intrinsically resistant to immunotherapy. This represents a clear unmet need for more effective treatments in this population of patients. In this review, we aim to analyze immune-resistance mechanisms and therapeutic strategies to overcome them, such as combinations of immunotherapy and chemotherapy, radiotherapy or target therapies specifically in MSS mCRC. We also explored both available and potential biomarkers that may better select MSS mCRC patients for immunotherapy. Lastly, we provide a brief overview on future perspectives in this field, such as the gut microbiome and its potential role as immunomodulator.

Value assessment of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of oesophageal and gastrointestinal cancers

Background: Evidence of efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors in oesophageal cancer (EC), gastric cancer (GC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) was inconsistent, obscuring their clinical application and decision-making. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the value of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in EC, GC and CRC to select valuable PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and to assess the association between the value and cost of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: A comprehensive search of trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in EC, GC and CRC was performed in Chinese and English medical databases with a cut-off date of 1 July 2022. Two authors independently applied the ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS to assess the value of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to establish the predictive value of the ASCO-VF score to meet the threshold of the ESMO-MCBS grade. Spearman's correlation was used to calculate the relationship between the cost and value of drugs. Results: Twenty-three randomized controlled trials were identified: ten (43.48%) in EC, five (21.74%) in CRC, and eight (34.78%) in GC or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). For advanced diseases, ASCO-VF scores ranged from -12.5 to 69, with a mean score of 26.5 (95% CI 18.4-34.6). Six (42.9%) therapeutic regimens met the ESMO-MCBS benefit threshold grade. The area under the ROC curve was 1.0 (p = 0.002). ASCO-VF scores and incremental monthly cost were negatively correlated (Spearman's ρ = -0.465, p = 0.034). ESMO-MCBS grades and incremental monthly cost were negatively correlated (Spearman's ρ = -0.211, p = 0.489). Conclusion: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not meet valuable threshold in GC/GEJC. Pembrolizumab met valuable threshold in advanced microsatellite instability-high CRC. The value of camrelizumab and toripalimab may be more worth paying in EC.

Acute inflammatory reaction during anti-angiogenesis therapy combined with immunotherapy as a possible indicator of the therapeutic effect: Three case reports and literature review

The posterior line treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) tumors has always been a challenging point. In particular, for patients with microsatellite stable (MSS)/mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) 0GI tumors, the difficulty of treatment is exacerbated due to their insensitivity to immune drugs. Accordingly, finding a new comprehensive therapy to improve the treatment effect is urgent. In this study, we report the treatment histories of three patients with MSS/pMMR GI tumors who achieved satisfactory effects by using a comprehensive treatment regimen of apatinib combined with camrelizumab and TAS-102 after the failure of first- or second-line regimens. The specific contents of the treatment plan were as follows: apatinib (500 mg/d) was administered orally for 10 days, followed by camrelizumab (200 mg, ivgtt, day 1, 14 days/cycle) and TAS-102 (20 mg, oral, days 1-21, 28 days/cycle). Apatinib (500 mg/d) was maintained during treatment. Subsequently, we discuss the possible mechanism of this combination and review the relevant literature, and introduce clinical trials on anti-angiogenesis therapy combined with immunotherapy.

The heterogeneity effect of surveillance intervals on progression free survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) is an increasingly important surrogate endpoint in cancer clinical trials. However, the true time of progression is typically unknown if the evaluation of progression status is only scheduled at given surveillance intervals. In addition, comparison between treatment arms under different surveillance schema is not uncommon. Our aim is to explore whether the heterogeneity of the surveillance intervals may interfere with the validity of the conclusion of efficacy based on PFS, and the extent to which the variation would bias the results. We conduct comprehensive simulation studies to explore the aforementioned goals in a two-arm randomized control trial. We introduce three steps to simulate survival data with predefined surveillance intervals under different censoring rate considerations. We report the estimated hazard ratios and examine false positive rate, power and bias under different surveillance intervals, given different baseline median PFS, hazard ratio and censoring rate settings. Results show that larger heterogeneous lengths of surveillance intervals lead to higher false positive rate and overestimate the power, and the effect of the heterogeneous surveillance intervals may depend upon both the life expectancy of the tumor prognoses and the censoring proportion of the survival data. We also demonstrate such heterogeneity effect of surveillance intervals on PFS in a phase III metastatic colorectal cancer trial. In our opinions, adherence to consistent surveillance intervals should be favored in designing the comparative trials. Otherwise, it needs to be appropriately taken into account when analyzing data.

Clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of the digestive system in clinical practice. Due to the anatomical characteristics of the colorectum itself, colorectal cancer is prone to liver metastasis. Approximately 15%-25% of colorectal cancer cases are complicated with liver metastasis at diagnosis, 15%-25% are complicated with liver metastasis after radical resection of colorectal cancer, and 80%-90% with liver metastasis cannot undergo radical resection initially. The 5-year survival rate is less than 5%, and liver metastasis is the main cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. In recent years, with the clinical application of effective chemotherapy and molecular targeted drugs, as well as the rapid development of surgical techniques, an individualized safe, efficient, fast, treatment plan can be formulated according to patients' age, primary colorectal tumor location, degree of differentiation, Ras and B-Raf gene status, tumor size, number and distribution of metastases in the liver. By shrinking the tumor volume in the liver and increasing the residual liver volume, liver metastatic tumors can undergo surgical resection or disease-free status can be achieved in patients with liver metastasis. As a result, patients with colorectal liver metastases can achieve a 5-year survival rate of 30%-57%, which greatly improves the prognosis after operation. According to the postoperative adverse factors, individualized preventive measures are worked out to reduce the impact of adverse factors and improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases. In this paper, we systematically discuss the clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases by reviewing the relevant domestic and foreign literature, so as to provide a theoretical reference for the selection of clinical treatment and program for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer without liver metastasis may be preferred population for regorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as third-line or above therapy:A real-world study

Objectives

The antitumor activity of nivolumab plus regorafenib in colorectal cancer from a phase Ib REGONIVO study is encouraging. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as third-line or above therapy in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients with MSS metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed from prior treatment and received regorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as third-line or above therapy from January 2019 to December 2020 were prospectively analyzed based on real-world clinical practice. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

42 patients received regorafenib plus sintilimab(RS), and the other 30 patients received fruquintinib plus sintilimab(FS). In the general population, the ORR and DCR were 13.9% and 70.8%, and the median PFS and OS was 4.2(95% CI=2.9-5.5) and 10.5 (95% CI=8.6-12.4) months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between RS and FS group in PFS (3.5(2.2-4.8) vs. 5.5(3.5-7.5) months, P=0.434) and OS (11.0(7.0-15.0) vs. 10.5(3.8-17.2) months, P=0.486). Subgroup analysis suggested that patients without liver metastasis responded well to this combination regimen (ORR: 21.4% vs. 9.1%) and obtained better OS (26(8.8-43.2) vs. 10.0(7.4-12.6) months, P=0.016). The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) was 15.3% and the toxicities were generally tolerable and manageable.

Conclusions

Regorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as third-line or above therapy provide a feasible treatment regimen for MSS metastatic colorectal cancer with tolerated toxicity. Patients without liver metastasis may be the preferred population for this combination regimen.

Prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers in advanced colorectal cancer

The revolution of precision medicine has produced unprecedented seismic shifts in the treatment paradigm of advanced cancers. Among the major killers, colorectal cancer (CRC) is far behind the others. In fact, the great successes obtained in breast, NSCLC, melanoma, and genitourinary tract tumors have been observed only in fewer than 5 % metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): those with the mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), a well-known predictive factor for to the outstanding efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). The treatment of the remaining vast majority mCRC patients is still based upon only two molecular determinants: the RAS and BRAF mutational status. New promising biomarkers include HER2, tumor mutational burden (TMB) for its possible implications on CPI efficacy, and the extremely rare NTRK fusions. The Consensus Molecular Subtypes classification (CMS) is a good example of the efforts to combine different molecular features of this disease, although its relevance in clinical practice is still under investigation. In this Review, we focus on all these prognostic and predictive biomarkers, analyzing data from the most important clinical trials of the last years. We also try to rank them according to their prognostic and predictive power.

Short bevacizumab infusion as an effective and safe treatment for colorectal cancer

Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that contains <10% murine protein. To prevent infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), the initial bevacizumab infusion is delivered for 90 min, the second for 60 min and subsequent doses for 30 min. Several previous studies have shown that short bevacizumab infusions are safe and do not result in severe HSRs in patients with colorectal, lung, ovarian and brain cancer. However, the efficacy of short bevacizumab infusions for colorectal cancer management remains unclear. Therefore, to investigate this issue, a prospective multicenter study was conducted using 23 patients enrolled between June 2017 and March 2019. The initial infusion of bevacizumab was for 30 min followed by a second infusion rate of 0.5 mg/kg/min (5 mg/kg over 10 min and 7.5 mg/kg over 15 min. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The overall response and disease control rates were 57 and 87%, respectively. The median PFS time was 306 days (interquartile range, 204-743 days). No HSRs were noted. Adverse events associated with bevacizumab included grade 4 small intestinal perforation and grade 3 stroke in 1 patient each. These results suggest that a short bevacizumab infusion regime comprising an initial infusion for 30 min followed by a second infusion at 0.5 mg/kg/min is safe and efficacious for the management of colorectal cancer.

Immunotherapy for Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancers: Challenges and Novel Therapeutic Avenues

With the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy researchers have facilitated substantial progress for patients with mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer, which has led to practice changes at a head-spinning pace. However, this benefit has not been translated into microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, which carries the hallmarks of chromosomal instability. So far, clinical trials have not shown any substantial clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer, which has been disappointing. Recently, combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and targeted therapies have been investigated for potential synergistic effects that may increase antitumor activity in the tumor microenvironment and achieve more substantial clinical and radiologic responses. In this article, we discuss the current state of the science for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite stable colorectal cancers, and we review the molecular underpinnings of inherited physiologic barriers for the delivery of effective immunotherapy. We also elaborate on existing therapeutic opportunities to convert microsatellite stable colorectal cancer into an "immune hot" cancer, which may define the future treatment paradigm of colorectal cancer for which there is a great unmet need.