1
|
Saeed A, Park R, Pathak H, Al-Bzour AN, Dai J, Phadnis M, Al-Rajabi R, Kasi A, Baranda J, Sun W, Williamson S, Chiu YC, Osmanbeyoglu HU, Madan R, Abushukair H, Mulvaney K, Godwin AK, Saeed A. Clinical and biomarker results from a phase II trial of combined cabozantinib and durvalumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC): CAMILLA CRC cohort. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1533. [PMID: 38378868 PMCID: PMC10879200 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45960-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
CAMILLA is a basket trial (NCT03539822) evaluating cabozantinib plus the ICI durvalumab in chemorefractory gastrointestinal cancer. Herein, are the phase II colorectal cohort results. 29 patients were evaluable. 100% had confirmed pMMR/MSS tumors. Primary endpoint was met with ORR of 27.6% (95% CI 12.7-47.2%). Secondary endpoints of 4-month PFS rate was 44.83% (95% CI 26.5-64.3%); and median OS was 9.1 months (95% CI 5.8-20.2). Grade≥3 TRAE occurred in 39%. In post-hoc analysis of patients with RAS wild type tumors, ORR was 50% and median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 21.5 months respectively. Exploratory spatial transcriptomic profiling of pretreatment tumors showed upregulation of VEGF and MET signaling, increased extracellular matrix activity and preexisting anti-tumor immune responses coexisting with immune suppressive features like T cell migration barriers in responders versus non-responders. Cabozantinib plus durvalumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity, manageable toxicity, and have led to the activation of the phase III STELLAR-303 trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anwaar Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Robin Park
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Cente, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Harsh Pathak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Ayah Nedal Al-Bzour
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Junqiang Dai
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Milind Phadnis
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Ks, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Anup Kasi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Ks, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Joaquina Baranda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Ks, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Weijing Sun
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Ks, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Stephen Williamson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Ks, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | - Rashna Madan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Hassan Abushukair
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kelly Mulvaney
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Azhar Saeed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kasi A, Gaudel P, Lekkala M, Al-Rajabi R, Saeed A, Sun W, Porter C. A novel outpatient regimen in management of fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiotoxicity. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023; 29:1951-1956. [PMID: 36883259 DOI: 10.1177/10781552231161822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fluoropyrimidines (FP) are cornerstone drugs in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Cardiotoxicity secondary to an FP chemotherapy is a serious complication. There are no standardized guidelines on the treatment of FP induced cardiotoxicity which may result in interruption and even discontinuation of life saving treatment. We present our experience in FP rechallenge using a novel outpatient regimen based on our "up-front" triple agent antianginal protocol. METHODS We report the retrospective study of the patients with suspected FP induced cardiotoxicity. Patients meeting the criteria were selected by C3OD (curated cancer clinical outcomes database) at Kansas University Medical Center (KUMC). We identified all patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who had suspected FP induced cardiotoxicity from January 2015 to March 2022. We then included the patients who were rechallenged with planned fluoropyrimidine regimen utilizing the three drug KU-protocol. We utilized a novel regimen by repurposing the already FDA-approved anti-anginal drugs in a manner that minimizes the risk of hypotension and bradycardia. RESULTS In this retrospective study, 10 patients with suspected fluoropyrimidine induced cardiotoxicity were included from January-2015 to March-2022 at KUMC. Out of 10 patients who were rechallenged utilizing KU-protocol, eight patients (80%) were able to complete the previously planned fluoropyrimidine regimen. None of the patients required ER visits or hospital admission due to cardiac symptoms during the rechallenge utilizing the KU-protocol. CONCLUSIONS Utilizing our novel outpatient regimen, we have successfully and safely allowed re-challenge of FP chemotherapy with good tolerability and completion of the intended course of chemotherapy without recurrent morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anup Kasi
- Medical Oncology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Pramod Gaudel
- Hematology-Oncology Physician, Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois, Decatur, USA
| | - Manidhar Lekkala
- Hematology-Oncology Physician, The University of Kansas Cancer Center at St Francis Campus, Kansas, USA
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Medical Oncology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Anwaar Saeed
- Medical Oncology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Weijing Sun
- Medical Oncology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Charles Porter
- Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Freed IM, Kasi A, Fateru O, Hu M, Gonzalez P, Weatherington N, Pathak H, Hyter S, Sun W, Al-Rajabi R, Baranda J, Hupert ML, Chalise P, Godwin AK, A. Witek M, Soper SA. Circulating Tumor Cell Subpopulations Predict Treatment Outcome in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Patients. Cells 2023; 12:2266. [PMID: 37759489 PMCID: PMC10526802 DOI: 10.3390/cells12182266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a high clinical unmet need to improve outcomes for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients, either with the discovery of new therapies or biomarkers that can track response to treatment more efficiently than imaging. We report an innovative approach that will generate renewed interest in using circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to monitor treatment efficacy, which, in this case, used PDAC patients receiving an exploratory new therapy, poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi)-niraparib-as a case study. CTCs were enumerated from whole blood using a microfluidic approach that affinity captures epithelial and mesenchymal CTCs using anti-EpCAM and anti-FAPα monoclonal antibodies, respectively. These antibodies were poised on the surface of two separate microfluidic devices to discretely capture each subpopulation for interrogation. The isolated CTCs were enumerated using immunophenotyping to produce a numerical ratio consisting of the number of mesenchymal to epithelial CTCs (denoted "Φ"), which was used as an indicator of response to therapy, as determined using computed tomography (CT). A decreasing value of Φ during treatment was indicative of tumor response to the PARPi and was observed in 88% of the enrolled patients (n = 31). Changes in Φ during longitudinal testing were a better predictor of treatment response than the current standard CA19-9. We were able to differentiate between responders and non-responders using ΔΦ (p = 0.0093) with higher confidence than CA19-9 (p = 0.033). For CA19-9 non-producers, ΔΦ correctly predicted the outcome in 72% of the PDAC patients. Sequencing of the gDNA extracted from affinity-selected CTC subpopulations provided information that could be used for patient enrollment into the clinical trial based on their tumor mutational status in DNA repair genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian M. Freed
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA; (I.M.F.); (O.F.); (M.H.); (P.G.); (N.W.); (M.A.W.)
- Center of Bio-Modular Multiscale Systems for Precision Medicine (CBM), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA;
| | - Anup Kasi
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (W.S.); (R.A.-R.); (J.B.); (P.C.)
| | - Oluwadamilola Fateru
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA; (I.M.F.); (O.F.); (M.H.); (P.G.); (N.W.); (M.A.W.)
- Center of Bio-Modular Multiscale Systems for Precision Medicine (CBM), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA;
| | - Mengjia Hu
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA; (I.M.F.); (O.F.); (M.H.); (P.G.); (N.W.); (M.A.W.)
- Center of Bio-Modular Multiscale Systems for Precision Medicine (CBM), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA;
- Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.P.); (S.H.)
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Phasin Gonzalez
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA; (I.M.F.); (O.F.); (M.H.); (P.G.); (N.W.); (M.A.W.)
- Center of Bio-Modular Multiscale Systems for Precision Medicine (CBM), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA;
| | - Nyla Weatherington
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA; (I.M.F.); (O.F.); (M.H.); (P.G.); (N.W.); (M.A.W.)
- Center of Bio-Modular Multiscale Systems for Precision Medicine (CBM), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA;
| | - Harsh Pathak
- Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.P.); (S.H.)
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Stephen Hyter
- Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.P.); (S.H.)
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Weijing Sun
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (W.S.); (R.A.-R.); (J.B.); (P.C.)
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (W.S.); (R.A.-R.); (J.B.); (P.C.)
| | - Joaquina Baranda
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (W.S.); (R.A.-R.); (J.B.); (P.C.)
| | | | - Prabhakar Chalise
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (W.S.); (R.A.-R.); (J.B.); (P.C.)
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- Center of Bio-Modular Multiscale Systems for Precision Medicine (CBM), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA;
- Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.P.); (S.H.)
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Malgorzata A. Witek
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA; (I.M.F.); (O.F.); (M.H.); (P.G.); (N.W.); (M.A.W.)
- Center of Bio-Modular Multiscale Systems for Precision Medicine (CBM), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA;
- Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.P.); (S.H.)
| | - Steven A. Soper
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA; (I.M.F.); (O.F.); (M.H.); (P.G.); (N.W.); (M.A.W.)
- Center of Bio-Modular Multiscale Systems for Precision Medicine (CBM), The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA;
- Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.P.); (S.H.)
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
- BioFluidica, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA;
- Bioengineering Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun W, Veeramachaneni N, Al-Rajabi R, Madan R, Kasi A, Al-Kasspooles M, Baranda J, Saeed A, Phadnis MA, Godwin AK, Olyaee M, Streeter N, Nagji A, Dai J, Williamson S. A phase II study of perioperative pembrolizumab plus mFOLFOX in patients with potentially resectable esophagus, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and stomach adenocarcinoma. Cancer Med 2023; 12:16098-16107. [PMID: 37326317 PMCID: PMC10469814 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative chemotherapy/chemoradiation is standard in esophageal/gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) effect in setting of metastatic and postoperatively. This study is to assess ICI + chemotherapy perioperatively. METHODS Patients with locally advanced (T1N1-3M0 or T2-3NanyM0) potentially resectable esophageal/gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma by PET/EUS/CT and staging-laparoscopy, were treated preoperative 4 cycles mFOLFOX6 (Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 /Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 /5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2 then infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 46 h q2weeks) and 3 cycles pembrolizumab (200 mg q3week). Those without distal disease post-neoadjuvant and eligible for resection underwent surgery. Postoperative treatment was initiated at 4-8 weeks with 4 cycles mFOLFOX and 12 cycles pembrolizumab. The primary objective is pathological response (ypRR with tumor regression score, TRS ≤2). The expression of ICI-related markers PD-L1 (CPS), CD8, and CD20 were analyzed before and after preoperative therapy. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients completed the preoperative treatment. Twenty-nine patients had curative R0 resection. 6/29 (21%; 95% CI: 0.08-0.40) achieved ypCR with TRS 0 in resected patients. 26/29 (90%; 95% CI: 0.73-0.98) had ypRR with TRS ≤2. Twenty-six patients finished adjuvant therapy with a median 36.3-month follow-up. Three patients had recurrence/metastatic disease (at 9-, 10-, 22 months enrollment) with one dead at 23 months, and two are still alive at 28 and 36.5 months. The remaining (23/26) are free of disease with 3 years DFS of 88.5% and 3 years OS of 92.3%. There were no unexpected toxicities. Preoperative ICI + chemotherapy enhanced immune responses significantly with increasing expression of PD-L1 (CPS ≥10, p = 0.0078) and CD8 (>5%, p = 0.0059). CONCLUSIONS The perioperative pembrolizumab and mFOLFOX combination in resectable esophageal/gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma is very effective with 90% ypRR, 21% ypCR, and impressive long-time survival benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijing Sun
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Nirmal Veeramachaneni
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Rashna Madan
- Department of Pathology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Anup Kasi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Mazin Al-Kasspooles
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Joaquina Baranda
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Anwaar Saeed
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Milind A Phadnis
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Mojtaba Olyaee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | | | - Alykhan Nagji
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Junqiang Dai
- Department of Pathology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Stephen Williamson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Richardson GE, Al-Rajabi R, Uprety D, Hamid A, Williamson SK, Baranda J, Mamdani H, Lee YL, Li L, Wang X, Dong X. A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase I/II Study of FN-1501 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092553. [PMID: 37174019 PMCID: PMC10177510 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND FN-1501, a potent inhibitor of receptor FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and CDK4/6, KIT, PDGFR, VEGFR2, ALK, and RET tyrosine kinase proteins, has demonstrated significant in vivo activity in various solid tumor and leukemia human xenograft models. Anomalies in FLT3 have an established role as a therapeutic target where the gene has been shown to play a critical role in the growth, differentiation, and survival of various cell types in hematopoietic cancer and have shown promise in various solid tumors. An open-label, Phase I/II study (NCT03690154) was designed to evaluate the safety and PK profile of FN-1501 as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors and relapsed, refractory (R/R) AML. METHODS Pts received FN-1501 IV three times a week for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week off treatment in continuous 21-day cycles. Dose escalation followed a standard 3 + 3 design. Primary objectives include the determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity. Exploratory objectives include the relationship between pharmacogenetic mutations (e.g., FLT3, TP53, KRAS, NRAS, etc.), safety, and efficacy; as well as an evaluation of the pharmacodynamic effects of treatment with FN-1501. Dose expansion at RP2D further explored the safety and efficacy of FN-1501 in this treatment setting. RESULTS A total of 48 adult pts with advanced solid tumors (N = 47) and AML (N = 1) were enrolled at doses ranging from 2.5 to 226 mg IV three times a week for two weeks in 21-day cycles (2 weeks on and 1 week off treatment). The median age was 65 years (range 30-92); 57% were female and 43% were male. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 5 (range 1-12). Forty patients evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment had a median exposure of 9.5 cycles (range 1-18 cycles). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported for 64% of the pts. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), defined as those occurring in ≥20% of pts, primarily consisted of reversible Grade 1-2 fatigue (34%), nausea (32%), and diarrhea (26%). The most common Grade ≥3 events occurring in ≥5% of pts consisted of diarrhea and hyponatremia. Dose escalation was discontinued due to DLTs of Grade 3 thrombocytopenia (N = 1) and Grade 3 infusion-related reaction (N = 1) occurring in 2 pts. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 170 mg. CONCLUSIONS FN-1501 demonstrated reasonable safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity against solid tumors in doses up to 170 mg. Dose escalation was terminated based on 2 DLTs occurring at the 226 mg dose level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 64114, USA
| | - Dipesh Uprety
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Anis Hamid
- Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC 3144, Australia
| | | | | | - Hirva Mamdani
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Ya-Li Lee
- Fosun Pharma USA, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
| | - Li Li
- Fosun Pharma USA, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saeed A, Park R, Dai J, Al-Rajabi R, Kasi A, Baranda J, Williamson S, Saeed A, Ripp J, Collins Z, Mulvaney K, Shugrue M, Firth-Braun J, Godwin AK, Madan R, Phadnis M, Sun W. Cabozantinib plus durvalumab in advanced gastroesophageal cancer and other gastrointestinal malignancies: Phase Ib CAMILLA trial results. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:100916. [PMID: 36702123 PMCID: PMC9975105 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
This is the phase Ib part of the phase I/II CAMILLA trial evaluating cabozantinib plus durvalumab in advanced chemo-refractory proficient mismatch repair or microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) gastrointestinal malignancies including gastric/gastroesophageal junction/esophageal (G/GEJ/E) adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Thirty-five patients are enrolled. There are no observed dose-limiting toxicities during dose escalation. The overall grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event rate is 34%. Among evaluable patients (n = 30), the objective response rate (ORR) is 30%, disease control rate (DCR) 83.3%, 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) 36.7%, median PFS 4.5 months, and median overall survival (OS) 8.7 months. Responses are seen in 4 of 17, 3 of 10, and 2 of 3 patients with CRC, G/GEJ/E adenocarcinoma, and HCC, respectively. Participants with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥5 have numerically higher ORR, PFS, and OS. Cabozantinib plus durvalumab demonstrates a tolerable safety profile and potential efficacy in previously treated advanced pMMR/MSS gastrointestinal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anwaar Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | - Robin Park
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Junqiang Dai
- Department of Biostatistics, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA
| | - Anup Kasi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA
| | - Joaquina Baranda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA
| | - Stephen Williamson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA
| | - Azhar Saeed
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Jacob Ripp
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Zachary Collins
- Department of Radiology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Kelly Mulvaney
- Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA
| | - Molly Shugrue
- Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA
| | | | - Andrew K Godwin
- Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Rashna Madan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Milind Phadnis
- Department of Biostatistics, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Weijing Sun
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Standing D, Arnold L, Dandawate P, Ottemann B, Snyder V, Ponnurangam S, Sayed A, Subramaniam D, Srinivasan P, Choudhury S, New J, Kwatra D, Ramamoorthy P, Roy BC, Shadoin M, Al-Rajabi R, O’Neil M, Gunewardena S, Ashcraft J, Umar S, Weir SJ, Tawfik O, Padhye SB, Biersack B, Anant S, Thomas SM. Doublecortin-like kinase 1 is a therapeutic target in squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Carcinog 2023; 62:145-159. [PMID: 36218231 PMCID: PMC9852063 DOI: 10.1002/mc.23472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Doublecortin like kinase 1 (DCLK1) plays a crucial role in several cancers including colon and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. However, its role in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains unknown. To this end, we examined DCLK1 expression in head and neck SCC (HNSCC) and anal SCC (ASCC). We found that DCLK1 is elevated in patient SCC tissue, which correlated with cancer progression and poorer overall survival. Furthermore, DCLK1 expression is significantly elevated in human papilloma virus negative HNSCC, which are typically aggressive with poor responses to therapy. To understand the role of DCLK1 in tumorigenesis, we used specific shRNA to suppress DCLK1 expression. This significantly reduced tumor growth, spheroid formation, and migration of HNSCC cancer cells. To further the translational relevance of our studies, we sought to identify a selective DCLK1 inhibitor. Current attempts to target DCLK1 using pharmacologic approaches have relied on nonspecific suppression of DCLK1 kinase activity. Here, we demonstrate that DiFiD (3,5-bis [2,4-difluorobenzylidene]-4-piperidone) binds to DCLK1 with high selectivity. Moreover, DiFiD mediated suppression of DCLK1 led to G2/M arrest and apoptosis and significantly suppressed tumor growth of HNSCC xenografts and ASCC patient derived xenografts, supporting that DCLK1 is critical for SCC growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Standing
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Levi Arnold
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Prasad Dandawate
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Brendan Ottemann
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Vusala Snyder
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Sivapriya Ponnurangam
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Afreen Sayed
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | | | | | - Sonali Choudhury
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Jacob New
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Deep Kwatra
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Prabhu Ramamoorthy
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Badal C. Roy
- Department of General Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Melissa Shadoin
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Maura O’Neil
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Sumedha Gunewardena
- Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - John Ashcraft
- Department of General Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Shahid Umar
- Department of General Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Scott J. Weir
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
- Institute for Advancing Medical Innovation, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Ossama Tawfik
- Department of Pathology, Saint Luke’s Health System, Kansas City, Missouri and MAWD Pathology Group, Kansas City, Kansas
| | | | | | - Shrikant Anant
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Sufi Mary Thomas
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khan QJ, Bivona CR, Martin GA, Zhang J, Liu B, He J, Li KH, Nelson M, Williamson S, Doolittle GC, Sun W, Mudaranthakam DP, Streeter NR, McGuirk JP, Al-Rajabi R, Hoffmann M, Kasi A, Parikh RA, Zhong C, Mitchell L, Pessetto ZY, Pathak H, Ghosh A, LaFaver S, Sharma P, Godwin AK. Evaluation of the Durability of the Immune Humoral Response to COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Treatment or Who Received a Stem Cell Transplant. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1053-1058. [PMID: 35446353 PMCID: PMC9026224 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Importance The durability of the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer undergoing treatment or who received a stem cell transplant is unknown and may be associated with infection outcomes. Objective To evaluate anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) and neutralizing antibody (nAb) responses to COVID-19 vaccines longitudinally over 6 months in patients with cancer undergoing treatment or who received a stem cell transplant (SCT). Design, Setting, and Participants In this prospective, observational, longitudinal cross-sectional study of 453 patients with cancer undergoing treatment or who received an SCT at the University of Kansas Cancer Center in Kansas City, blood samples were obtained before 433 patients received a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273), after the first dose of the mRNA vaccine, and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the second dose. Blood samples were also obtained 2, 4, and 7 months after 17 patients received the JNJ-78436735 vaccine. For patients receiving a third dose of an mRNA vaccine, blood samples were obtained 30 days after the third dose. Interventions Blood samples and BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or JNJ-78436735 vaccines. Main Outcomes and Measures Geometric mean titers (GMTs) of the anti-RBD; the ratio of GMTs for analysis of demographic, disease, and treatment variables; the percentage of neutralization of anti-RBD antibodies; and the correlation between anti-RBD and nAb responses to the COVID-19 vaccines. Results This study enrolled 453 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.4 [13,1] years; 253 [56%] were female). Of 450 patients, 273 (61%) received the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer), 160 (36%) received the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna), and 17 (4%) received the JNJ-7846735 vaccine (Johnson & Johnson). The GMTs of the anti-RBD for all patients were 1.70 (95% CI, 1.04-2.85) before vaccination, 18.65 (95% CI, 10.19-34.11) after the first dose, 470.38 (95% CI, 322.07-686.99) at 1 month after the second dose, 425.80 (95% CI, 322.24-562.64) at 3 months after the second dose, 447.23 (95% CI, 258.53-773.66) at 6 months after the second dose, and 9224.85 (95% CI, 2423.92-35107.55) after the third dose. The rate of threshold neutralization (≥30%) was observed in 203 of 252 patients (80%) 1 month after the second dose and in 135 of 166 patients (81%) 3 months after the second dose. Anti-RBD and nAb were highly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.93 [0.92-0.94]; P < .001). Three months after the second dose, anti-RBD titers were lower in male vs female patients (ratio of GMTs, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.34-0.81]), patients older than 65 years vs patients 50 years or younger (ratio of GMTs, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.25-0.57]), and patients with hematologic malignant tumors vs solid tumors (ratio of GMTs, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20-0.81]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, after 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine, anti-RBD titers peaked at 1 month and remained stable over the next 6 months. Patients older than 65 years of age, male patients, and patients with a hematologic malignant tumor had low antibody titers. Compared with the primary vaccine course, a 20-fold increase in titers from a third dose suggests a brisk B-cell anamnestic response in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qamar J. Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Cory R. Bivona
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City
| | - Grace A. Martin
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Ben Liu
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Kansas, Lawrence
| | - Jianghua He
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Kevin H. Li
- School of Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Maggie Nelson
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City
| | - Stephen Williamson
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Gary C. Doolittle
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Weijing Sun
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Natalie R. Streeter
- Clinical Research, Strategy & Operations, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Joseph P. McGuirk
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Marc Hoffmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Anup Kasi
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Rahul A. Parikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Cuncong Zhong
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Kansas, Lawrence
| | - Laura Mitchell
- Clinical Research, Strategy & Operations, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Ziyan Y. Pessetto
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Harsh Pathak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Arnab Ghosh
- Department of Zoology, Rajiv Gandhi University, Arunachal Pradesh, India
| | - Stephanie LaFaver
- Department of Nursing, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
- The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vogel A, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, Vaccaro G, Melisi D, Al-Rajabi R, Paulson S, Borad M, Gallinson D, Murphy A, Oh D, Dotan E, Catenacci D, Van Cutsem E, Lihou C, Zhen H, Veronese L, Abou-Alfa G. O-2 Pemigatinib for previously treated locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: Final results from FIGHT-202. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
10
|
Hewitt DB, Nissen N, Hatoum H, Musher B, Seng J, Coveler AL, Al-Rajabi R, Yeo CJ, Leiby B, Banks J, Balducci L, Vaccaro G, LoConte N, George TJ, Brenner W, Elquza E, Vahanian N, Rossi G, Kennedy E, Link C, Lavu H. A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Algenpantucel-L (HyperAcute-Pancreas) Immunotherapy in Subjects With Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg 2022; 275:45-53. [PMID: 33630475 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety of algenpantucel-L [HyperAcute-Pancreas algenpantucel-L (HAPa); IND# 12311] immunotherapy combined with standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy and chemoradiation to SOC chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy alone in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA To date, immunotherapy has not been shown to benefit patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced unresectable PDAC. HAPa is a cancer vaccine consisting of allogeneic pancreatic cancer cells engineered to express the murine α(1,3)GT gene. METHODS A multicenter, phase 3, open label, randomized (1:1) trial of patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced unresectable PDAC. Patients received neoadjuvant SOC chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel) followed by chemoradiation (standard group) or the same standard neoadjuvant regimen combined with HAPa immunotherapy (experimental group). The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS Between May 2013 and December 2015, 303 patients were randomized from 32 sites. Median (interquartile range) overall survival was 14.9 (12.2-17.8) months in the standard group (N = 158) and 14.3 (12.6-16.3) months in the experimental group (N = 145) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 95% confidence intervals 0.66-1.58; P = 0.98]. Median progression-free survival was 13.4 months in the standard group and 12.4 months in the experimental group (HR 1.33, 95% confidence intervals 0.72-1.78; P = 0.59). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 105 of 140 patients (75%) in the standard group and in 115 of 142 patients (81%) in the experimental group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Algenpantucel-L immunotherapy did not improve survival in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced unresectable PDAC receiving SOC neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01836432.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Brock Hewitt
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - John Seng
- Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Andrew L Coveler
- University of Washington-Seattle Cancer Care, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Charles J Yeo
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Benjamin Leiby
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joshua Banks
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Gina Vaccaro
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | - Emad Elquza
- University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California
| | | | | | - Eugene Kennedy
- NewLink Genetics Corporation, Ames, Iowa
- Lumos Pharma Inc, Ames, Iowa
| | | | - Harish Lavu
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Adenis A, Kulkarni AS, Girotto GC, de la Fouchardiere C, Senellart H, van Laarhoven HWM, Mansoor W, Al-Rajabi R, Norquist J, Amonkar M, Suryawanshi S, Bhagia P, Metges JP. Impact of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer on Health-Related Quality of Life in KEYNOTE-181. J Clin Oncol 2021; 40:382-391. [PMID: 34730989 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the phase III KEYNOTE-181 study (NCT02564263) of patients with advanced esophageal cancer (EC), pembrolizumab monotherapy prolonged overall survival versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10. We present the results of the prespecified health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) analyses of the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), CPS ≥ 10, and CPS ≥ 10 SCC populations. PATIENTS AND METHODS HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), EORTC QLQ EC questionnaire (OES18), and EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Data were analyzed in patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment and completed ≥ 1 HRQoL assessment. Key analyses included baseline to week 9 least squares mean change in global health status/quality of life, functional or symptom subscales, and time to deterioration (≥ 10-point deterioration) for specific subscales. RESULTS The HRQoL population included 387 patients with SCC. Compliance and completion rates for all three questionnaires were similar in both treatment groups at baseline and week 9. No clinically meaningful differences in global health status/quality of life scores were observed between treatment groups from baseline to week 9 (least squares mean difference, 2.80; 95% CI, -1.48 to 7.08); patients in both treatment groups generally exhibited stable functioning and symptom scores of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 from baseline to week 9. Time to deterioration for pain (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.89), reflux (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.25), and dysphagia (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.31) subscales were similar between treatment groups. These findings were generally similar in the CPS ≥ 10 (n = 218) and CPS ≥ 10 SCC (n = 166) subgroups. CONCLUSION In patients with advanced EC, pembrolizumab monotherapy and chemotherapy maintained HRQoL in patients with SCC, CPS ≥ 10, and CPS ≥ 10 SCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Adenis
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier and IRCM, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Gustavo C Girotto
- Hospital de Base de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil
| | | | | | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wasat Mansoor
- Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean-Philippe Metges
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest-Hôpital Morvan, Arpego Network, Brest, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Saeed A, Park R, Dai J, Al-Rajabi R, Kasi A, Baranda J, Williamson S, Collins Z, Ripp J, Saeed A, Mulvaney K, Manirad V, Madan R, Subramaniam D, Anant S, Phadnis M, Sun W. 345 Phase I/II trial of cabozantinib plus durvalumab in advanced gastroesophageal cancer and other gastrointestinal malignancies (CAMILLA): phase Ib safety and efficacy results. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundCabozantinib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor primarily targeting VEGFR, MET, and AXL. These targets promote a tumor immune permissive microenvironment. Cabozantinib has demonstrated immunomodulatory properties & clinical synergy when paired with PD-L1 inhibitors such as durvalumab. Here, we present final results of phase Ib of the Camilla trial assessing cabozantinib plus durvalumab in advanced GE adenocarcinoma (GEA), colorectal cancer (CRC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This is an investigator-initiated trial funded by Exelixis & Astrazeneca.MethodsPatients were administered cabozantinib + durvalumab in a dose escalation (3+3) then expansion to find the Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs), Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D), ORR, PFS, and OS. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess efficacy in patients with PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥ 5. Dosing of cabozantinib was 20mg QD, 40mg QD, and 60mg QD PO in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd cohorts. Dosing of durvalumab was 1500mg IV Q4W in all cohorts. DLT window was 28 days. Treatment beyond progression was allowed following modified RECIST v1.1 criteria.Results35 patients (14F, 21M), median age 53 years (range 27–79) were enrolled. 10 patients had GEA, 20 had CRC, and 5 had HCC; none had MMR deficiency. Median number of prior systemic therapies was 3 (range 0–3). No DLTs were observed during dose escalation. Per mature tolerability data, 11/14 patients receiving cabozantinib 60mg required dose-reduction post cycle 2 to 40mg. RP2D was determined to be cabozantinib 40mg QD plus durvalumab 1500mg Q4W. Of the 247 observed Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs), 10% (24) were grade≥3. Most common TRAEs were grade 1–2 fatigue (57%), nausea (43%), anorexia (40%), diarrhea (37%), transaminitis (34%), hand-foot syndrome (23%), & weight loss (23%). 2 patients each developed grade≥3 fatigue, weight loss, & abdominal pain. Overall, 30 pts were evaluable for efficacy. ORR 26.7%; DCR 83.3%; median PFS 4.5 months; 6-month PFS 36.7%; and median OS 9.1 months. 12 patients had PD-L1 CPS ≥5. In this subgroup, ORR 33.33%; DCR 91.67%; median PFS 6.13 months; 6-month PFS 50%; and median OS was not reached.ConclusionsCabozantinib plus durvalumab demonstrated promising efficacy and was fairly tolerated without new safety signals. High PD-L1 expression defined as CPS ≥ 5 was associated with improved efficacy & survival. The phase II multi-cohort part of the trial is currently ongoing.Trial RegistrationNCT03539822Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by the participating site’s local IRB.ConsentAll study participants granted a written informed consent prior to treatment initiation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abou-Alfa G, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, Vaccaro G, Melisi D, Al-Rajabi R, Paulson A, Borad M, Gallinson D, Murphy A, Oh D, Dotan E, Catenacci D, Van Cutsem E, Lihou C, Ren H, Bibeau K, Feliz L, Vogel A. SO-4 Progression-free survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements: A FIGHT-202 post-hoc analysis of prior systemic therapy response. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
14
|
Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, Francois E, Adenis A, Hsu CH, Doi T, Moriwaki T, Kim SB, Lee SH, Bennouna J, Kato K, Shen L, Enzinger P, Qin SK, Ferreira P, Chen J, Girotto G, de la Fouchardiere C, Senellart H, Al-Rajabi R, Lordick F, Wang R, Suryawanshi S, Bhagia P, Kang SP, Metges JP. Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020. [PMID: 33026938 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01888.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with advanced esophageal cancer have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options after first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label, phase III study, we randomly assigned (1:1) 628 patients with advanced/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, that progressed after one prior therapy, to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 2 years or chemotherapy (investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10, in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and in all patients (one-sided α 0.9%, 0.8%, and 0.8%, respectively). RESULTS At final analysis, conducted 16 months after the last patient was randomly assigned, OS was prolonged with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for patients with CPS ≥ 10 (median, 9.3 v 6.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.93]; P = .0074). Estimated 12-month OS rate was 43% (95% CI, 33.5% to 52.1%) with pembrolizumab versus 20% (95% CI, 13.5% to 28.3%) with chemotherapy. Median OS was 8.2 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96]; P = .0095) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 7.1 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.05]; P = .0560) in all patients. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.2% of patients with pembrolizumab versus 40.9% in those who underwent chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10, with fewer treatment-related adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kei Muro
- Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Antoine Adenis
- IRCM, Inserm, Université Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ken Kato
- National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Lin Shen
- Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peter Enzinger
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shu-Kui Qin
- PLA Cancer Centre of Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Paula Ferreira
- Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Do Porto Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Porto, Portugal
| | - Jia Chen
- Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanging, China
| | - Gustavo Girotto
- Hospital de Base de Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean-Philippe Metges
- CHU Brest - Institut de Cancerologie et d'Hematologie, Arpego Network, Brest, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kasi A, Abbasi S, Handa S, Al-Rajabi R, Saeed A, Baranda J, Sun W. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs Standard Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2030097. [PMID: 33326026 PMCID: PMC7745099 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer includes concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT plus A). An alternative strategy known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) involves administration of CRT plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery with the goal of delivering uninterrupted systemic therapy to eradicate micrometastases. A comparison of these 2 approaches has not been systematically reviewed previously. Objective To determine the differences in rates of pathologic complete response (PCR), disease-free and overall survival, sphincter-preserving surgery, and ileostomy between patients receiving TNT vs standard CRT plus A. Data Sources MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase (via OVID) were searched from inception through July 1, 2020, for the following terms: anal/anorectal neoplasms OR anal/anorectal cancer AND total neoadjuvant treatment OR total neoadjuvant therapy. Only studies in English were included. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials or prospective/retrospective cohort studies comparing outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received TNT vs CRT plus A. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data regarding the first author, publication year, location, sample size, and rates of PCR, sphincter-preserving surgery, ileostomy, and disease-free and overall survival were extracted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines and pooled using a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures Rates of PCR, sphincter-preserving surgery, ileostomy, and disease-free and overall survival. Results After reviewing 2165 reports, 7 unique studies including a total of 2416 unique patients, of whom 1206 received TNT, were selected. The median age for the patients receiving TNT ranged from 57 to 69 years, with 58% to 73% being male. The pooled prevalence of PCR was 29.9% (range, 17.2%-38.5%) in the TNT group and 14.9% (range, 4.2%-21.3%) in the CRT plus A group. Total neoadjuvant therapy was associated with a higher chance of achieving a PCR (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% CI, 1.99-2.98). No statistically significant difference in the proportion of sphincter-preserving surgery (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.73-1.54) or ileostomy (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.76-1.46) between recipients of TNT and CRT plus A was observed. Only 3 studies presented data on disease-free survival, and pooled analysis showed significantly higher odds of improved disease-free survival in patients who received TNT (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.20-3.56; I2 = 49%). Data on overall survival were not consistently reported. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that TNT is a promising strategy in locally advanced rectal cancer, with superior rates of PCR compared with standard therapy. However, the long-term effect on disease recurrence and overall survival needs to be explored in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anup Kasi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Westwood
| | - Saqib Abbasi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Westwood
| | - Shivani Handa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine/Mount Sinai West and Morningside, New York, New York
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Westwood
| | - Anwaar Saeed
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Westwood
| | - Joaquina Baranda
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Westwood
| | - Weijing Sun
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Westwood
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rawlley B, Diab O, Al-Rajabi R, Carroll E, Melancon T, Kasi A. Dual deficiency of DPD and UGT1A1 in a case of colon cancer. Pharmacogenomics 2020; 21:1265-1269. [PMID: 33203301 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2020-0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bharat Rawlley
- University College of Medical Sciences & GTB Hospital, New Delhi, 110095, India
| | - Osama Diab
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Erin Carroll
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Tina Melancon
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Anup Kasi
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Allen J, Cernik C, Bajwa S, Al-Rajabi R, Saeed A, Baranda J, Williamson S, Sun W, Kasi A. Association of Neutrophil, Platelet, and Lymphocyte Ratios with the Prognosis in Unresectable and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3283. [PMID: 33066235 PMCID: PMC7602063 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined the relationship between the daily rate of change of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) over the first 90 days of treatment (DRC90) and the pretreatment levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets with the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) who received chemotherapy. We retrospectively evaluated 102 locally advanced and metastatic PDA patients treated at the University of Kansas Cancer Center (KUCC) between January 2011 and September 2019. We compared the ratio of the pretreatment absolute neutrophil count to the pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (NLR) and the ratio between the pretreatment platelet count to the pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (PLR) with the OS and PFS. We compared the DRC90 to the OS and PFS. The ratios were analyzed using the log-rank trend test using the mean of the NLR, PLR, and DRC90 as the threshold for two groups within each variable. Patients with ≥mean NLR (4.6 K/µL) had a significantly lower OS (p = 0.0444) and PFS (p = 0.0483) compared with patients below the mean. Patients with PLR ≥ mean (3.9 K/µL) did not have a significantly different OS (p = 0.507) or PFS (p = 0.643) compared with patients below the mean. Patients with DRC90 ≥ mean (-1%) did not have a significantly different OS (p = 0.342) or PFS (p = 0.313) compared with patients below the mean. Patients with NLR ≥ mean (4.6 K/µL) had a significantly lower OS and PFS compared with patients with NLR below the mean. This implies the possibility of NLR as a prognostic marker in PDA that could guide treatment approaches but still requires validation in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Allen
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Kansas, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (J.A.); (S.B.)
| | - Colin Cernik
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas, 1450 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA;
| | - Suhaib Bajwa
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Kansas, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (J.A.); (S.B.)
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, 2650 Shawnee Mission Pkwy, Westwood, KS 66205, USA; (R.A.-R.); (A.S.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Anwaar Saeed
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, 2650 Shawnee Mission Pkwy, Westwood, KS 66205, USA; (R.A.-R.); (A.S.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Joaquina Baranda
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, 2650 Shawnee Mission Pkwy, Westwood, KS 66205, USA; (R.A.-R.); (A.S.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Stephen Williamson
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, 2650 Shawnee Mission Pkwy, Westwood, KS 66205, USA; (R.A.-R.); (A.S.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Weijing Sun
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, 2650 Shawnee Mission Pkwy, Westwood, KS 66205, USA; (R.A.-R.); (A.S.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Anup Kasi
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, 2650 Shawnee Mission Pkwy, Westwood, KS 66205, USA; (R.A.-R.); (A.S.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, Francois E, Adenis A, Hsu CH, Doi T, Moriwaki T, Kim SB, Lee SH, Bennouna J, Kato K, Shen L, Enzinger P, Qin SK, Ferreira P, Chen J, Girotto G, de la Fouchardiere C, Senellart H, Al-Rajabi R, Lordick F, Wang R, Suryawanshi S, Bhagia P, Kang SP, Metges JP. Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:4138-4148. [PMID: 33026938 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 507] [Impact Index Per Article: 126.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with advanced esophageal cancer have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options after first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label, phase III study, we randomly assigned (1:1) 628 patients with advanced/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, that progressed after one prior therapy, to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 2 years or chemotherapy (investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10, in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and in all patients (one-sided α 0.9%, 0.8%, and 0.8%, respectively). RESULTS At final analysis, conducted 16 months after the last patient was randomly assigned, OS was prolonged with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for patients with CPS ≥ 10 (median, 9.3 v 6.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.93]; P = .0074). Estimated 12-month OS rate was 43% (95% CI, 33.5% to 52.1%) with pembrolizumab versus 20% (95% CI, 13.5% to 28.3%) with chemotherapy. Median OS was 8.2 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96]; P = .0095) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 7.1 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.05]; P = .0560) in all patients. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.2% of patients with pembrolizumab versus 40.9% in those who underwent chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10, with fewer treatment-related adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kei Muro
- Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Antoine Adenis
- IRCM, Inserm, Université Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ken Kato
- National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Lin Shen
- Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peter Enzinger
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shu-Kui Qin
- PLA Cancer Centre of Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Paula Ferreira
- Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Do Porto Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Porto, Portugal
| | - Jia Chen
- Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanging, China
| | - Gustavo Girotto
- Hospital de Base de Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean-Philippe Metges
- CHU Brest - Institut de Cancerologie et d'Hematologie, Arpego Network, Brest, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Saeed A, Hildebrand H, Park R, Al-Jumayli M, Abbasi S, Melancon T, Saeed A, Al-Rajabi R, Kasi A, Baranda J, Williamson S, Sun W. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors versus VEGF Targeted Therapy as Second Line Regimen in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): A Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E2682. [PMID: 32824968 PMCID: PMC7563439 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Several targeted agents including multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs) and immunotherapy (IO) agents have been approved for use beyond the frontline setting in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Due to lack of prospective head-to-head comparative trials, there is no standardized way for alternating those agents beyond frontline. Therefore, we performed a retrospective review of the Kansas University (KU) cancer registry to determine whether IO may be superior to non-IO therapy. Patients with advanced HCC were divided into two groups based on the second-line systemic regimen received (IO vs. non-IO). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated under the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. No statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were found, although a non-significant delayed separation in the survival curve favoring IO was identified (median PFS 3.9 months vs. 3 months; median OS 10 months vs. 10 months respectively for IO vs. non-IO). This retrospective analysis is one of the earliest and largest studies comparing second-line IO and non-IO therapies thus far reported. Future studies should aim to define specific biomarkers for response prediction and treatment optimization based on individual patient and tumor characteristics. Furthermore, combinatorial therapeutic strategies is an evolving approach showing early promising signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anwaar Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; (H.H.); (S.A.); (T.M.); (R.A.-R.); (A.K.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Hannah Hildebrand
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; (H.H.); (S.A.); (T.M.); (R.A.-R.); (A.K.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Robin Park
- MetroWest Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Framingham, MA 02111, USA;
| | - Mohammed Al-Jumayli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of South Florida, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33620, USA;
| | - Saqib Abbasi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; (H.H.); (S.A.); (T.M.); (R.A.-R.); (A.K.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Tina Melancon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; (H.H.); (S.A.); (T.M.); (R.A.-R.); (A.K.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Azhar Saeed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA;
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; (H.H.); (S.A.); (T.M.); (R.A.-R.); (A.K.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Anup Kasi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; (H.H.); (S.A.); (T.M.); (R.A.-R.); (A.K.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Joaquina Baranda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; (H.H.); (S.A.); (T.M.); (R.A.-R.); (A.K.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Stephen Williamson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; (H.H.); (S.A.); (T.M.); (R.A.-R.); (A.K.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| | - Weijing Sun
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, Kansas University Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA; (H.H.); (S.A.); (T.M.); (R.A.-R.); (A.K.); (J.B.); (S.W.); (W.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mohyuddin GR, Aziz M, Britt A, Wade L, Sun W, Baranda J, Al-Rajabi R, Saeed A, Kasi A. Similar response rates and survival with PARP inhibitors for patients with solid tumors harboring somatic versus Germline BRCA mutations: a Meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:507. [PMID: 32493233 PMCID: PMC7267765 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06948-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have recently been approved for various malignancies based on the results of several clinical trials. However, these trials have mostly recruited patients with germline BRCA mutations, and it is unclear whether PARPi have similar efficacy in patients with somatic BRCA mutations. Our study aimed to determine the efficacy of PARPi in patients with somatic BRCA mutations. METHODS We performed a meta-analysis comparing overall response rate to PARPi in patients harboring somatic versus germline BRCA mutations. We looked at studies including somatic and germline mutations in BRCA patients that received PARPi. RESULTS After screening and removing duplicates, 18 studies met our criteria for including both somatic and germline BRCA mutations. Only 8 studies reported response rates for both somatic and germline BRCA mutations. In those studies, 24 out of 43 patients with somatic BRCA mutations (55.8%), and 69 out of 157 (43.9%) patients with germline BRCA patients had a response to therapy to PARPi. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.399). In all five studies that reported progression-free survival, there was no obvious difference in outcomes between somatic versus germline BRCA patients, however a precise statistical analysis could not be performed. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature indicates similar response rates of PARPi therapy in patients with somatic and germline BRCA mutations. Investigation of use of PARPi therapy in a broader patient population, and the inclusion of somatic BRCA mutations in further clinical trials is paramount in improving therapeutic options for our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muhammad Aziz
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, USA
| | - Alec Britt
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, USA
| | - Lee Wade
- University of Toledo Libraries, Toledo, USA
| | - Weijing Sun
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA
| | - Joaquina Baranda
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA
| | - Anwaar Saeed
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA
| | - Anup Kasi
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abou-Alfa GK, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, Vaccaro G, Melisi D, Al-Rajabi R, Paulson AS, Borad MJ, Gallinson D, Murphy AG, Oh DY, Dotan E, Catenacci DV, Van Cutsem E, Ji T, Lihou CF, Zhen H, Féliz L, Vogel A. Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:671-684. [PMID: 32203698 PMCID: PMC8461541 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30109-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 807] [Impact Index Per Article: 201.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 gene alterations are involved in the pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib is a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1, 2, and 3. This study evaluated the safety and antitumour activity of pemigatinib in patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with and without FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. METHODS In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, multicohort, phase 2 study (FIGHT-202), patients aged 18 years or older with disease progression following at least one previous treatment and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 recruited from 146 academic or community-based sites in the USA, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia were assigned to one of three cohorts: patients with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, patients with other FGF/FGFR alterations, or patients with no FGF/FGFR alterations. All enrolled patients received a starting dose of 13·5 mg oral pemigatinib once daily (21-day cycle; 2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or physician decision. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response among those with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, assessed centrally in all patients who received at least one dose of pemigatinib. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02924376, and enrolment is completed. FINDINGS Between Jan 17, 2017, and March 22, 2019, 146 patients were enrolled: 107 with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, 20 with other FGF/FGFR alterations, 18 with no FGF/FGFR alterations, and one with an undetermined FGF/FGFR alteration. The median follow-up was 17·8 months (IQR 11·6-21·3). 38 (35·5% [95% CI 26·5-45·4]) patients with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements achieved an objective response (three complete responses and 35 partial responses). Overall, hyperphosphataemia was the most common all-grade adverse event irrespective of cause (88 [60%] of 146 patients). 93 (64%) patients had a grade 3 or worse adverse event (irrespective of cause); the most frequent were hypophosphataemia (18 [12%]), arthralgia (nine [6%]), stomatitis (eight [5%]), hyponatraemia (eight [5%]), abdominal pain (seven [5%]), and fatigue (seven [5%]). 65 (45%) patients had serious adverse events; the most frequent were abdominal pain (seven [5%]), pyrexia (seven [5%]), cholangitis (five [3%]), and pleural effusion (five [3%]). Overall, 71 (49%) patients died during the study, most frequently because of disease progression (61 [42%]); no deaths were deemed to be treatment related. INTERPRETATION These data support the therapeutic potential of pemigatinib in previously treated patients with cholangiocarcinoma who have FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. FUNDING Incyte Corporation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Vaibhav Sahai
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Gina Vaccaro
- Providence Cancer Center Oncology and Hematology Care Clinic, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Davide Melisi
- Digestive Molecular Clinical Oncology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Andrew S Paulson
- Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - David Gallinson
- Morristown Memorial Hospital, Carol Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Adrian G Murphy
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Do-Youn Oh
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Eric Van Cutsem
- University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Clinical Digestive Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tao Ji
- Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Incorporation of new treatment modalities has significantly increased the complexity of the treatment and management of rectal cancer, including perioperative therapy for local advanced disease and organ preservation for those with response to the preoperative treatment. This review may help practitioners better understand the rationale and selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijing Sun
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology Division, Westwood, KS
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology Division, Westwood, KS
| | | | - Saquib Abbasi
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology Division, Westwood, KS
| | - Ryan Ash
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Kansas City, KS
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vogel A, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, Vaccaro G, Melisi D, Al-Rajabi R, Paulson A, Borad M, Gallinson D, Murphy A, Oh DY, Dotan E, Catenacci D, Van Cutsem E, Lihou C, Zhen H, Féliz L, Abou-Alfa G. FIGHT-202: A phase II study of pemigatinib in patients (pts) with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz394.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
24
|
Saeed A, Park R, Al-Jumayli M, Al-Rajabi R, Sun W. Biologics, Immunotherapy, and Future Directions in the Treatment of Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 18:81-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
25
|
Adenis A, Kulkarni A, Girotto GC, De La Fouchardiere C, Senellart H, Van Laarhoven HW, Hochhauser D, Mansoor W, Al-Rajabi R, Norquist J, Suryawanshi S, Bhagia P, Metges JP. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus physician choice single-agent paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan in subjects with advanced/metastatic adenocarcinoma (ACC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus that has progressed after first-line standard therapy (KEYNOTE-181). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.4048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4048 Background: KEYNOTE-181 (NCT02564263) is an open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial in ACC and SCC of the esophagus that evaluated IV pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 2 years vs investigator choice of single-agent paclitaxel/docetaxel/irinotecan (control). Pembro was superior to control for OS in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 (N = 222; median 9.3 vs 6.7 months; P= 0.0074). Here we present results of prespecified HRQoL analyses in this population. Methods: The EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-OES18 were administered at baseline; weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18; every 9 weeks up to 1 year/end of treatment; and 30-day safety follow-up visit. Data from patients receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment and completing ≥1 HRQoL assessment were analyzed. Least squares mean (LSM) score change from baseline to week 9, 95% CI, and nominal P values were calculated. Time to deterioration (TTD) (≥10-point decline from baseline) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. HRs, 95% CIs, and nominal P values are provided. Results: The HRQoL population included 218 PD-L1 CPS ≥10 patients (107 pembro, 111 control). QLQ-C30 compliance at week 9 was 88.9% for pembro and 83.9% for control. There was no significant difference in LSM between arms (3.68; 95% CI –2.28, 9.64; P= 0.2248) in global health status (GHS)/QoL score. Week 9 QLQ-OES18 compliance was 88.4% for pembro and 83.3% for control. QLQ-OES18 scores were not significantly different between arms. TTD for pain (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.58, 1.81; P= 0.5282), reflux (HR 1.69; 95% CI 0.83, 3.47; P= 0.9254), and dysphagia (HR 1.81; 95% CI 0.97, 3.37; P= 0.9693) subscales were not significantly different between arms. Conclusions: Over 9 weeks, patients treated with pembro had stable GHS/QoL scores similar to those of patients treated with single-agent docetaxel/paclitaxel/irinotecan. Combined with the superior OS and lower rate of treatment-related AEs seen with pembro, these data support clinically meaningful benefit of pembro in esophageal cancer patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Clinical trial information: NCT02564263.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean-Philippe Metges
- Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire (CHRU) de Brest–Hopital Morvan, Brest, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
He A, Weiss G, Falchook G, Yee N, Gil-Martin M, Shahda S, Moreno V, Brana I, Crittenden M, Formenti S, Al-Rajabi R, Papadopoulos K, Pishvaian M, Stankevich E, Feng M, Li J, Mathias M, Kroog G, Lowy I, Fury M. Cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Data from an expansion cohort (EC) in a phase I study. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy487.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
27
|
Pishvaian M, Weiss G, Falchook G, Yee N, Gil-Martin M, Shahda S, Moreno V, Brana I, Crittenden M, Formenti S, Al-Rajabi R, Papadopoulos K, Stankevich E, Feng M, Li J, Mathias M, Kroog G, Lowy I, Fury M. Cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Data from an expansion cohort in a phase I study. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy288.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Hines RB, Al-Rajabi R. Reply to the letter to the editor 'A randomized trial of intensive versus minimal surveillance of patients with resected Dukes B2-C colorectal carcinoma' by Rosati et al. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:957-8. [PMID: 26811349 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R B Hines
- Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita
| | - R Al-Rajabi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Al-Rajabi R, Patel S, Ketchum NS, Jaime NA, Lu TW, Pollock BH, Mahalingam D. Comparative dosing and efficacy of sorafenib in hepatocellular cancer patients with varying liver dysfunction. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 6:259-67. [PMID: 26029452 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sorafenib is the only FDA-approved systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In clinical practice, dose reductions are often required, although there are limited efficacy data related to dose modifications. Given the prevalence of HCC in South Texas, we assessed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib therapy in relation to dose and Child Pugh (CP) score. METHODS A retrospective analysis was done of advanced HCC patients, starting sorafenib at 400 mg twice daily, or at physician discretion at 400 mg daily, with the goal of titrating to twice daily. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed. RESULTS Among 107 patients, median OS (mOS) was 10.2 months; median PFS (mPFS) was 5.2 months. mOS for sorafenib 400 mg/day was 6.6 vs. 800 mg/day was 12.8 months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.59; P=0.04]; mPFS was 3.5 vs. 5.9 months, respectively (HR, 0.66; P=0.07). For Child Pugh A class (CP-A) patients, mOS was 15.8 months for 400 mg/day vs. 12.8 months for 800 mg/day (HR, 1.48; P=0.35); mPFS was 9.0 vs. 5.9 months, respectively (HR, 1.23; P=0.56). For Child Pugh B class (CP-B) patients, mOS was 5.0 months for 400 mg/day vs. 11.2 months for 800 mg/day (HR, 0.33; P=0.002); mPFS was 2.1 vs. 5.6 months, respectively (HR, 0.41; P=0.006). No differences in adverse events (AEs) were observed in CP-A vs. CP-B. CONCLUSIONS Patients with CP-A or CP-B advanced HCC should be offered sorafenib at 400 mg twice daily with optimal management of AEs in order to improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raed Al-Rajabi
- University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Sukeshi Patel
- University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Norma S Ketchum
- University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Nicole A Jaime
- University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Ting-Wei Lu
- University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Brad H Pollock
- University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|