Trends and Disparities in Glycemic Control and Severe Hyperglycemia Among US Adults With Diabetes Using Insulin, 1988-2020

EXpanding Technology-Enabled, Nurse-Delivered Chronic Disease Care (EXTEND): Protocol and Baseline Data for a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10-15 % of individuals with type 2 diabetes have persistently poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus (PPDM) despite receiving available care, and frequently have comorbid hypertension. Mobile monitoring-enabled telehealth has the potential to improve outcomes in treatment-resistant chronic disease by supporting self-management and facilitating patient-clinician contact but must be designed in a manner amenable to real-world use.

METHODS

Expanding Technology-Enabled, Nurse-Delivered Chronic Disease Care (EXTEND) is an ongoing randomized trial comparing two 12-month interventions for comorbid PPDM and hypertension: 1) EXTEND, a mobile monitoring-enabled self-management intervention; and 2) EXTEND Plus, a comprehensive, nurse-delivered telehealth program incorporating mobile monitoring, self-management support, and pharmacist-supported medication management. Both arms leverage a novel platform that uses existing technological infrastructure to enable transmission of patient-generated health data into the electronic health record. The primary study outcome is difference in HbA1c change from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes include blood pressure, weight, implementation barriers/facilitators, and costs.

RESULTS

Enrollment concluded in June 2023 following randomization of 220 patients. Baseline characteristics are similar between arms; mean age is 54.5 years, and the cohort is predominantly female (63.6 %) and Black (68.2 %), with a baseline HbA1c of 9.81 %.

CONCLUSION

The EXTEND trial is evaluating two mobile monitoring-enabled telehealth approaches that seek to improve outcomes for patients with PPDM and hypertension. Critically, these approaches are designed around existing infrastructure, so may be amenable to implementation and scaling. This study will promote real-world use of telehealth to maximize benefits for those with high-risk chronic disease.

Diet quality in U.S. adults eating in senior and community centers: NHANES 2009-2018

BACKGROUND

With advancing age, the worsening of cognitive and physical disabilities may lead older adults to seek help in their daily living activities. Community/senior centers support older adults during aging, offering a wide variety of services, including meal programs. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (2009-2018), we aimed to examine whether community/senior center meal programs were associated with an improved nutritional exposure in U.S. adults aged 60 years or older.

METHODS

Nutrient exposure and nutrient-based dietary indexes, including the Diet Quality Score (DQS) and the Food Nutrient Index (FNI) were compared between those eating meals at community/senior centers and the general population. Nutrient intakes were contrasted to the daily nutritional goals from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

RESULTS

This study included 6261 participants aged ≥60 years, thereof n = 421 reporting community/senior center meals. The latter were predominantly female and almost 45% were widowed or divorced. Eating at community/senior centers did not result in a better diet quality in crude analyses. After adjustment for potential sociodemographic confounders as well as alcohol, smoking and energy intake, however, sex-specific differences emerged, revealing significantly higher FNI scores in males eating at community/senior centers (adjusted FNI predictions: 61.71 [CI:58.55-64.88] vs 57.64 [CI:56.86-58.41] points).

CONCLUSIONS

Eating at community/senior centers was associated with an improved nutrient exposure in older men, whereas no better diet quality was found in women. Community/senior centers may play a pivotal role when it comes to the diet quality of a particularly vulnerable group of the population.

Initiating an Insulin Safety Campaign to reduce the incidence of glycemic harm events for hospitalized adults 65 and older

BACKGROUND

During calendar years 2021 through 2023, our health system admitted 200,837 persons 18 years and older with diabetes, of which 61% (n = 123,393) were 65 years and older with orders for insulin administration. The incidence of diabetes among hospitalized persons 65 and older continues to increase in the United States, with 24 million adults 65 and older with diabetes reported in 2020. Insulin, a high-risk medication, has the potential for adverse drug events, which can cause significant harm to patients, potentially resulting in death. With the 2023 initiation of voluntary electronic clinical quality measures reporting for severe glycemic harm events from the Centers for Medicare Services, the study team saw an opportunity to evaluate and standardize insulin-related practices across the system.

METHODS

We implemented an Insulin Safety Campaign (ISC), to review, evaluate, and standardize insulin-related processes across our health system. The primary goal was to reduce severe glycemic harm events system-wide. Insulin-related practices were reviewed for best practice alignment and standardized. Outcomes were measured according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' electronic clinical quality measures reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

Comparing pre-and post-implementation results, all five medical centers achieved statistically significant reductions in sever hyper- and hypoglycemic harm events.

CONCLUSIONS

Through a collaborative effort, we were able to identify, address, and reduce insulin-related process variabilities through standardization, reducing the percentage of severe glycemic harm events and improving blood glucose management in our hospitalized persons 65 and older.

Diabetes as a risk factor for tuberculosis disease

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is amongst the leading causes of death from an infectious disease, with an estimated 1.3 million deaths from TB in 2022. Approximately 25% of the global population is estimated to be infected with the TB bacterium, giving rise to 10.6 million episodes of TB disease in 2022. The prevalence of diabetes influences TB incidence and TB mortality. It is associated not only with an increased risk of TB disease but also death during TB treatment, TB relapse after treatment completion and multidrug-resistant TB. Since 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended collaborative TB and diabetes activities as outlined in the Collaborative Framework for Care and Control of TB and Diabetes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prognostic value of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the general population of adults, adolescents and children for predicting tuberculosis disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the literature databases MEDLINE (via PubMed) and WHO Global Index Medicus, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 3 May 2023 (date of last search for all databases); we placed no restrictions on the language of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included retrospective and prospective cohort studies, irrespective of publication status or language. The target population comprised adults, adolescents and children from diverse settings, encompassing outpatient and inpatient cohorts, with varying comorbidities and risk of exposure to tuberculosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology and the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Prognostic factors assessed at enrolment/baseline included diabetes, as defined by the individual studies, encompassing patient-reported status, abstracted from medical records or claims data, or diagnosed by plasma glucose/glycosylated haemoglobin. The primary outcome was the incidence of tuberculosis disease. The secondary outcome was recurrent TB disease. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis for the adjusted hazard ratios, risk ratios, or odds ratios, employing the restricted maximum likelihood estimation. We rated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 48 cohort studies with over 61 million participants from the six WHO regions. However, the representation was variable as eight population-based studies were from South Korea and 19 from China, with overlapping study periods, and only one from the African region (Ethiopia). All studies included adults, and nine studies also included children and adolescents. Most studies diagnosed DM based on clinical records, including fasting blood glucose levels or glucose-lowering treatments. The studies did not distinguish between type 1 and type 2 DM; only one study focused on type 1 DM. Diagnosis and exclusion of TB were performed using culture or molecular WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests (mWRD) in only 12 studies, which could have biassed the effect estimate. The median follow-up time was five years (interquartile range 1.5 to 10, range 1 to 16.9), and the studies primarily reported an adjusted hazard ratio from a multivariable Cox-proportional hazard model. Hazard Ratios (HR) The HR estimates represent the highest certainty of the evidence, explored through sensitivity analyses and excluding studies at high risk of bias. We present 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals, which show between-study heterogeneity represented in measuring the variability of effect sizes (i.e. the interval within which the effect size of a new study would fall considering the same population of studies included in the meta-analysis). DM may increase the risk of tuberculosis disease (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.40; prediction interval 0.83 to 4.39; 10 studies; 11,713,023 participants). The certainty of the evidence is low, due to a moderate risk of bias across studies and inconsistency. Considering a risk without diabetes of 129 cases per 100,000 population, this represents 102 more (59 to 153 more) cases per 100,000. When stratified by follow-up time, the results are more consistent across < 10 years follow-up (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.57; prediction interval 1.45 to 1.59; 7 studies; 10,380,872 participants). This results in a moderate certainty of the evidence due to a moderate risk of bias across studies. However, at 10 or more years of follow-up, the estimates yield a wider CI and a higher HR (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.88; prediction interval 0.09 to 69.12; 3 studies; 1,332,151 participants). The certainty of the evidence is low due to the moderate risk of bias and inconsistency. Odds Ratio (OR) DM may increase the odds of tuberculosis disease (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.04; prediction interval 0.96 to 2.70; 4 studies; 167,564 participants). Stratification by follow-up time was not possible as all studies had a follow-up < 10 years. The certainty of the evidence is low due to a moderate risk of bias and inconsistency. Risk Ratio (RR) The RR estimates represent the highest certainty of the evidence, explored through sensitivity analyses and excluding studies at high risk of bias. DM probably increases the risk of tuberculosis disease (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.80; prediction interval 1.38 to 1.85; 6 studies; 44,058,675 participants). Stratification by follow-up time was not possible as all studies had a follow-up < 10 years. The certainty of the evidence is moderate due to a moderate risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes probably increases the risk of developing TB disease in the short term (< 10 years) and may also increase the risk in the long term (≥ 10 years). As glycaemic control and access to care may be potential effect modifiers of the association between diabetes and the risk of TB disease, the overall estimates should be interpreted with caution when applied locally. Policies targeted at reducing the burden of diabetes are needed to contribute to the aims of ending TB. Large population-based cohorts, including those derived from high-quality national registries of exposures (diabetes) and outcomes (TB disease), are needed to provide estimates with a high certainty of evidence of this risk across different settings and populations, including low- and middle-income countries from different WHO regions. Moreover, studies including children and adolescents and currently recommended methods for diagnosing TB would provide more up-to-date information relevant to practice and policy.

FUNDING

World Health Organization (203256442) REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD42023408807.

Continuous glucose monitoring among nurse practitioners in primary care: Characteristics associated with prescribing and resources needed to support use

BACKGROUND

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can improve health for people with diabetes but is limited in primary care (PC). Nurse Practitioners (NPs) in PC can improve diabetes management through CGM, but NPs' interest in CGM and support needed are unclear.

PURPOSE

We describe behaviors and attitudes related to CGM for diabetes management among NPs in PC.

METHODOLOGY

This cross-sectional web-based survey of NPs practicing in PC settings used descriptive statistics to describe CGM experience and identify resources to support prescribing. We used multivariable regression to explore characteristics predicting prescribing and confidence using CGM for diabetes.

RESULTS

Nurse practitioners in hospital-owned settings were twice as likely to have prescribed CGM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.320, 95% CI [1.097, 4.903]; p = .002) than private practice; those in academic medical centers were less likely (OR = 0.098, 95% CI [0.012, 0.799]; p = .002). Past prescribing was associated with favorability toward future prescribing (coef. = 0.7284, SE = 0.1255, p < .001) and confidence using CGM to manage diabetes (type 1: coef. = 3.57, SE = 0.51, p < .001; type 2: coef. = 3.49, SE = 0.51, p < .001). Resources to prescribe CGM included consultation with an endocrinologist (62%), educational website (61%), and endocrinological e-consultations (59%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse practitioners are open to prescribing CGM and can improve diabetes management and health outcomes for PC patients.

IMPLICATIONS

Research should explore mechanisms behind associations with CGM experience and attitudes. Efforts to advance CGM should include educational websites and endocrinology consultations for NPs in PC.

An Integrative Review of Social Determinants of Glycemic Targets Achievement in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States

Several individual social determinants of health have been identified as significant factors contributing to achieving glycemic targets (glycated hemoglobin < 7). However, it remains unclear how these social variables individually or collectively contribute to glycemic targets among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the United States (U.S.) The purpose of the current integrative review (IR) was to describe and synthesize findings from studies on social determinants of glycemic target achievement in adults with T2D in the U.S. and integrate them into the United States Department of Health and Human Services Conceptual Framework. The databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Medline with Full Text [EBSCO], Google Scholar, bibliography, and hand searching. A total of 948 records were identified. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria through title, abstract, and full-text screening, 13 studies were finally included in this IR. The results revealed that race/ethnicity, economic access and stability, educational access and quality, healthcare access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, and social and community context contribute to glycemic target achievement among adult patients with T2D in the U.S. Integrating findings from key studies on social determinants of glycemic health may contribute to developing interventions aimed at reducing and eventually eradicating health disparities for individuals with and at risk for T2D in the U.S.

Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Inadequately Controlled, Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes (Steno2tech Study): A 12-Month, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the 12-month effects of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) versus blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a single-center, parallel, open-label, randomized controlled trial including adults with inadequately controlled, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes from the outpatient clinic at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Denmark. Inclusion criteria were ≥18 years of age, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, and HbA1c ≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 12 months of either CGM or BGM. All participants received a diabetes self-management education course and were followed by their usual health care providers. Primary outcome was between-group differences in change in time in range (TIR) 3.9-10.0 mmol/L, assessed at baseline, after 6 and 12 months by blinded CGM. The prespecified secondary outcomes were differences in change in several other glycemic, metabolic, and participant-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

The 76 participants had a median baseline HbA1c of 8.3 (7.8, 9.1)% (67 [62-76] mmol/mol), and 61.8% were male. Compared with BGM, CGM usage was associated with significantly greater improvements in TIR (between-group difference 15.2%, 95% CI 4.6; 25.9), HbA1c (-0.9%, -1.4; -0.3 [-9.4 mmol/mol, -15.2; -3.5]), total daily insulin dose (-10.6 units/day, -19.9; -1.3), weight (-3.3 kg, -5.5; -1.1), and BMI (-1.1 kg/m2, -1.8; -0.3) and greater self-rated diabetes-related health, well-being, satisfaction, and health behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with inadequately controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, the 12-month impact of CGM was superior to BGM in improving glucose control and other crucial health parameters. The findings support the use of CGM in the insulin-treated subgroup of type 2 diabetes.

Clinically significant macular edema in an underserved population: Association with demographic factors and hemoglobin A1c

SIGNIFICANCE

Suspected clinically significant macular edema (SCSME) from exudates differed among ethnic groups in our underserved population. African American and Asian subjects had higher prevalence than Hispanics and non-Hispanic Caucasians, from the same clinics. Men had higher prevalence than women. Highly elevated blood glucose was frequent and associated with SCSME.

PURPOSE

We investigated the association between the presence of SCSME from exudates and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), as well as demographic factors such as age, sex, and ethnic group. Our population was underserved diabetic patients from the same geographic locations. Ethnic groups were White Hispanic, non-Hispanic Caucasian, African American, and Asian, with a high proportion of underrepresented minorities.

METHODS

In a diabetic retinopathy screening study at four community clinics in Alameda County, California, nonmydriatic 45° color fundus images were collected from underserved diabetic subjects following the EyePACS imaging protocol. Images were analyzed for SCSME from exudates by two certified graders. Logistic regression assessed the association between SCSME from exudates and age, sex, ethnic group, and HbA1c.

RESULTS

Of 1997 subjects, 147 (7.36%) had SCSME from exudates. The mean ± standard deviation age was 53.4 ± 10.5 years. The mean ± standard deviation HbA1c level was 8.26 ± 2.04. Logistic regression analysis indicated a significant association between presence of SCSME from exudates and HbA1c levels (p<0.001), sex (p=0.027), and ethnicity (p=0.030). African Americans (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 2.50; p=0.025) and Asians (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.54; p=0.029) had a higher risk than Hispanics. After adjusting for ethnicity, sex, and age, the odds of developing SCSME from exudates increased by 26.5% with every 1% increase in HbA1c level (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.36; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our underserved population, many diabetic patients had very high HbA1c values. Ethnic background (African American > Asians > Hispanics), sex (male > female), and HbA1c level were strong indicators for identifying who is at increased risk of developing SCSME from exudates.

Beneficial Effect of Remote Glucose Monitoring and Computerized Insulin Dose Adjustment Algorithms Independent of Insulin Dose Increases in Sizeable Minorities of Patients

This article describes a program through which interactions every 2-3 weeks between patients and primary care clinicians (PCCs), with recommendations based on analysis of remote glucose monitoring by computerized insulin dose adjustment algorithms, significantly improved diabetes control. Insulin doses increased by 30% in the majority of patients. A sizeable minority (36%) had a decrease or no increase in insulin doses, but still showed an improvement in diabetes control. Frequent interactions allowed PCCs the opportunity to recognize and address medication nonadherence.

The prevalence of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the overall prevalence of glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with insulin.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses from 2000 to January 2022. Cross-sectional studies were included if they were conducted on more than 292 patients with T2D and reported the number of insulin-treated patients who were justified as achieving glycemic control. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Pooled estimates of the prevalence of glycemic control were calculated and reported with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using a random-effects model. All analyses were conducted using RStudio Version 2022.02.0, Build 443 (meta package).

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies (234,345 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were classified as having a low risk of bias. The overall estimated prevalence of glycemic control to insulin therapy among patients with T2D was 26.02% (95% CI: 23.17, 29.08). A subgroup of 34 studies that set the target HbA1c <7% showed that 23.75% (95% CI: 21.47, 26.18) of patients with T2D treated with insulin were justified as achieving good glycemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided summative evidence that glycemic control among patients with T2D treated with insulin was suboptimal and should be appropriately addressed.

Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in achievement of treatment goals within a clinical trial: a secondary analysis of the ACCORD trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Clinical trial participation should theoretically reduce barriers to care by ensuring medication and healthcare access. We aimed to evaluate disparities in achieving diabetes treatment targets by race/ethnicity and educational attainment within the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000620).

METHODS

The ACCORD trial included three interventions of varying participant burden: glycaemic (high burden), blood pressure (medium burden) and triglyceride-lowering (low burden). We examined adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for achievement of glycaemic targets, blood pressure targets and a ≥25% reduction in triglyceride levels (a proxy for adherence to fenofibrate therapy) in the first year, and for hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance at any time, by treatment arm, race/ethnicity and educational attainment using multivariable models adjusted for demographics and clinical characteristics. We explored whether disparities in glycaemic goal achievement were mediated by hypoglycaemia, medication use, change in BMI or number of study visits attended.

RESULTS

Compared with White participants, participants who identified as Black, Hispanic and Other race/ethnicity were less likely to achieve glycaemic targets (aOR [95% CI]) 0.63 [0.55,0.71], 0.73 [0.61, 0.88], 0.82 [0.71, 0.96], respectively); Black participants but not Hispanic and Other race/ethnicity participants were less likely to achieve blood pressure targets (aOR [95% CI] 0.77 [0.65, 0.90], 1.01 [0.78, 1.32], 1.01 [0.81, 1.26], respectively); and Black, Hispanic and Other race/ethnicity participants were equally or more likely to achieve triglyceride reduction (aOR [95% CI] 1.77 [1.38, 2.28], 1.34 [0.98, 1.84], 1.43 [1.10, 1.85], respectively). Differences in goal achievement by educational attainment were generally not significant after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Rates of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance were highest among Black individuals and those with lower educational attainment. Associations between race/ethnicity and glycaemic control were partially mediated by differences in insulin dosing and oral medication use.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Racially/ethnically minoritised participants in the ACCORD trial were less likely to achieve high-burden (glycaemic) treatment goals but were generally similarly likely to achieve goals of less intensive interventions. Differences in glycaemic treatment goal achievement were partially mediated by differences in medication use but not mediated by hypoglycaemia, change in BMI or study visit attendance.

Glycemic outcomes of a family-focused intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: Main, mediated, and subgroup effects from the FAMS 2.0 RCT

AIMS

Family/friend Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) is a self-care support intervention delivered via mobile phones. We evaluated FAMS' effects on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and intervention targets among adults with type 2 diabetes in a 15-month RCT.

METHODS

Persons with diabetes (PWDs) were randomized to FAMS or control with their support person (family/friend, optional). FAMS included monthly phone coaching and text messages for PWDs, and text messages for support persons over a 9-month intervention period.

RESULTS

PWDs (N = 329) were 52 % male, 39 % reported minoritized race or ethnicity, with mean HbA1c 8.6 ± 1.7 %. FAMS improved HbA1c among PWDs with a non-cohabitating support person (-0.64 %; 95 % CI [-1.22 %, -0.05 %]), but overall mean effects were not significant. FAMS improved intervention targets including self-efficacy, dietary behavior, and family/friend involvement during the intervention period; these improvements mediated post-intervention HbA1c improvements (total indirect effect -0.27 %; 95 % CI [-0.49 %, -0.09 %]) and sustained HbA1c improvements at 12 months (total indirect effect -0.19 %; 95 % CI [-0.40 %, -0.01 %]).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvements in most intervention targets, HbA1c improved only among PWDs engaging non-cohabitating support persons suggesting future family interventions should emphasize inclusion of these relationships. Future work should also seek to identify intervention targets that mediate improvements in HbA1c.

A Cohort Study on the Outcome of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) represent a significant and challenging complication of diabetes mellitus, often leading to serious morbidity and a substantial burden on healthcare systems. The study was conducted with the objectives of evaluating the outcomes of DFUs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of DFUs from May 2019 to May 2020 at a tertiary care hospital located in Chennai. The study included patients aged 18 to 90 years who were diagnosed with DFUs. Individuals with diabetic foot lesions (skin lesions such as fissures, abscess, cellulites) other than ulcers or those without diabetes were excluded. The data was collected from a total of 100 diabetic patients using systematic random sampling technique.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age of the study participants was 54.68 (6.72) years with males constituting 56% of the study population. Among 100 participants, 65% experienced healing while 35% did not. Logistic regression analysis showed that glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, age, and diabetes duration had significant effect on patient outcome. Logistic regression analysis showed that HbA1c levels, age, and diabetes duration had significant effect on patient outcome. Out of 12 patients with major amputation, seven (58.3%) survived, while out of 19 patients with minor amputations, 18 (94.7%) showed remarkably higher survival rate. Meanwhile, 100% survival rate was observed in patients with no amputation.

CONCLUSION

The study's comprehensive assessment of risk factors and their associations with healing outcomes provides essential knowledge for clinical practice. The study findings collectively support the optimization of interventions and strategies to prevent and manage DFUs, ultimately improving patient care and enhancing their quality of life. The study highlights the significance of glycemic control and limb preservation in DFU management.

Glycemic outcomes of a family-focused intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: Main, mediated, and subgroup effects from the FAMS 2.0 RCT

Aims

Family/friends Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) is a self-care support intervention delivered via mobile phones. We evaluated FAMS effects on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and intervention targets among adults with type 2 diabetes in a 15-month RCT.

Methods

Persons with diabetes (PWDs) and their support persons (family/friend, optional) were randomized to FAMS or control. FAMS included monthly phone coaching and text messages for PWDs, and text messages for support persons over a 9-month intervention period.

Results

PWDs (N=329) were 52% male, 39% from minoritized racial or ethnic groups, with mean HbA1c 8.6±1.7%. FAMS improved HbA1c among PWDs with a non-cohabitating support person (-0.64%; 95% CI [-1.22%, -0.05%]), but overall effects were not significant. FAMS improved intervention targets including self-efficacy, dietary behavior, and family/friend involvement during the intervention period; these improvements mediated post-intervention HbA1c improvements (total indirect effect -0.27%; 95% CI [-0.49%, -0.09%]) and sustained HbA1c improvements at 12 months (total indirect effect -0.19%; 95% CI [-0.40%, -0.01%]).

Conclusions

Despite improvements in most intervention targets, HbA1c improved only among PWDs engaging non-cohabitating support persons suggesting future family interventions should emphasize inclusion of these relationships. Future work should also seek to identify intervention targets that mediate improvements in HbA1c.

Insulin detection in diabetes mellitus: challenges and new prospects

Tremendous progress has been made towards achieving tight glycaemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus through the use of frequent or continuous glucose measurements. However, in patients who require insulin, accurate dosing must consider multiple factors that affect insulin sensitivity and modulate insulin bolus needs. Accordingly, an urgent need exists for frequent and real-time insulin measurements to closely track the dynamic blood concentration of insulin during insulin therapy and guide optimal insulin dosing. Nevertheless, traditional centralized insulin testing cannot offer timely measurements, which are essential to achieving this goal. This Perspective discusses the advances and challenges in moving insulin assays from traditional laboratory-based assays to frequent and continuous measurements in decentralized (point-of-care and home) settings. Technologies that hold promise for insulin testing using disposable test strips, mobile systems and wearable real-time insulin-sensing devices are discussed. We also consider future prospects for continuous insulin monitoring and for fully integrated multisensor-guided closed-loop artificial pancreas systems.