Buprenorphine Dose and Time to Discontinuation Among Patients With Opioid Use Disorder in the Era of Fentanyl

Initiating buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder without prerequisite withdrawal: an updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

Withdrawal prior to buprenorphine initiation may be intolerable or create barriers to therapy. We aim to update our previous systematic review on the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine initiation strategies that aim to omit prerequisite opioid withdrawal (POW).

METHODS

We used the same search strategy for this update as in the original review with the modification of an additional term "low dose." We searched Embase and Scopus from April 11, 2020 to August 1, 2024 with searches in Google Scholar and www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov . A study was included if it described patients with opioid use disorder or chronic pain that transitioned from a full mu-opioid agonist to buprenorphine without preceding withdrawal and reported withdrawal during initiation as an outcome. Two investigators independently screened citations and articles for inclusion, collected data using a standardized data collection tool, and assessed study risk of bias.

RESULTS

Forty-four articles met our inclusion criteria; 31 were case reports/series reporting 84 cases and 13 were single-arm observational studies reporting a total of 576 cases. These studies were added to the literature from our original systematic review, totaling 59 studies and 682 patients. Sublingual buprenorphine was the most common initial formulation, comprising 55% (376/682) of cases. In case reports/series, use of a validated scale to measure withdrawal was uncommon; validated scales were only used in 36% of patients. All other patients had withdrawal assessed in a manner not utilizing a validated scale. Approximately half of these patients experienced any level of withdrawal (57/106 = 54%). The specific outcome of "any level of withdrawal" was not consistently reported in single-arm observational studies. Eight studies reported on any level of withdrawal, which occurred in 41% (177/428) of initiation attempts; some patients experienced more than one initiation attempt. Thirteen patients in case reports/series and 37 patients in the single-arm observational studies reported clinically significant withdrawal (50/682 = 7%). 81% (451/555) of patients transitioned to buprenorphine.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of buprenorphine dosing strategies that aim to omit POW has vastly increased over the past 4 years. While quality of evidence remains low, the increased quantity of publications and integration into health-system guidelines and protocols demonstrates the need for prospective, controlled studies. It is unknown how selection bias impacts current findings, further highlighting the need for prospective, randomized, controlled trials evaluating these dosing strategies.

Association Between Buprenorphine Adherence Trajectories, Health Outcomes, and Health Care Costs Among Medicaid Enrollees

OBJECTIVES

To identify distinct buprenorphine adherence trajectories among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) and evaluate their associations with health events and health care costs.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted using the Merative Multi-state Medicaid database. The study analyzed 12,244 Medicaid enrollees aged 18-64 years who were diagnosed with OUD and initiated buprenorphine treatment between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019. Group-based trajectory models were used to identify adherence patterns during the first 180 days of treatment. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the associations between adherence trajectories and time to opioid overdose, substance use disorder-related hospitalization, and all-cause hospitalization. Generalized linear models were used to compare health care costs across trajectories.

RESULTS

Four buprenorphine adherence trajectories were identified: completely adherent (50.8%), initially adherent with later decline (13.6%), increasing adherence with later decline (9.9%), and continuously declining nonadherence (25.8%). Compared to the completely adherent group, patients in other groups had a higher risk of opioid overdose, hospitalization and increased health care costs. The continuously declining nonadherent group demonstrated the highest risks, with an opioid overdose hazard ratio (HR) of 1.92 (95% CI, 1.46-2.39), all-cause hospitalization of HR of 1.71 (95% CI: 1.58-1.85), and substance use disorder (SUD)-related hospitalization HR of 2.01 (95% CI: 1.82-2.15). Additionally, healthcare costs were notably higher compared to the completely adherent group, with an increase of $1482.45 (95% CI: $745.45-$2756.01) in the increasing adherence with later decline group and $1698.46 (95% CI: $432.57-$3087.78) in the continuously declining nonadherence groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half of Medicaid beneficiaries with OUD exhibited varying degrees of nonadherence to buprenorphine within 180 days of treatment initiation. This nonadherence was associated with adverse clinical outcomes and increased health care costs. Health care providers should consider adherence challenges when designing therapeutic interventions with buprenorphine.

A humanized monoclonal antibody attenuates fentanyl self-administration and reverses and prevents fentanyl-induced ventilatory depression in rhesus monkeys

Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose have been available for decades, yet nearly 70% of fatal drug overdoses in the United States are attributed to the opioid receptor agonist fentanyl and its analogs. There is a pressing need for more and better medications that reduce fentanyl use and prevent overdose. A humanized (h) monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting fentanyl, hHY6-F9, was tested for attenuating intravenous fentanyl self-administration and reversing and preventing fentanyl-induced ventilatory depression in rhesus monkeys. A single administration of hHY6-F9 significantly decreased fentanyl, but not heroin or cocaine, self-administration. In some monkeys, fentanyl self-administration remained decreased for ~ 2 weeks. hHY6-F9 was as effective as 32 µg/kg naloxone in reversing fentanyl-induced ventilatory depression, with a single administration protecting against fentanyl-induced ventilatory depression for 2-3 weeks. Moreover, pharmacokinetic analyses indicate that hHY6-F9 continued to sequester fentanyl in the serum for 2 weeks. This study demonstrates that hHY6-F9 selectively attenuates the positive reinforcing and ventilatory depressant effects of fentanyl, indicating its possible utility for preventing relapse and overdose.

The first five years of implementing Missouri's medication first approach to opioid use disorder treatment: Plateaus, regressions, and underbellies of progress

INTRODUCTION

Missouri's Medication First ("MedFirst") approach promotes same-day and long-term low-threshold access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Since 2017, Missouri's SAMHSA-funded State Targeted and State Opioid Response (STR/SOR) grants have supported MedFirst services (both medical and psychosocial) for uninsured individuals with opioid use disorder at state-contracted treatment programs. Though MedFirst demonstrated early success, results - with attention to possible racial disparities - must be revisited after five years of implementation.

METHODS

Using state behavioral health claims, we examined four outcomes: (1) MOUD utilization, (2) time-to-medication, (3) psychosocial service volume, and (4) substance use disorder (SUD) treatment retention. Models compared four groups: (a) individuals in MedFirst during the first and fifth year of implementation (2018 vs. 2022), (b) individuals in MedFirst compared to non-MedFirst, (c) individuals prior to MedFirst (2017) compared to individuals during MedFirst's fifth year (2022), and (d) White compared to Black individuals within and outside MedFirst.

RESULTS

Overall, MedFirst outcomes were superior to non-MedFirst outcomes. Among individuals in MedFirst, however, outcomes were generally poorer in 2022 than in 2018, and Black individuals had shorter treatment episodes and were less likely to receive MOUD than White individuals. Overall, Missourians had only slightly better outcomes in 2022 than prior to STR/SOR initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Since Missouri's initial implementation of STR/SOR-funded MedFirst, select overall treatment outcomes have improved. Within MedFirst programs, however, outcomes worsened over time, and racial disparities were evident. Though fentanyl's dominance of the drug supply alongside the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to these results, fidelity drift, particularly due to financial implications of MedFirst, likely also negatively impacted sustainability.

Limited acceptance of buprenorphine in recovery residences in South Florida: A secret shopper survey

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is a first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), essential for reducing opioid overdose mortality and improving treatment retention. Despite federal policies that mandate the acceptance of buprenorphine in recovery residences, individuals in South Florida taking this medication often face significant barriers to admission. This study uses a secret shopper survey to examine whether federal policies regarding prescribed buprenorphine use are being violated in South Florida recovery residences.

METHODS

We selected recovery residences in South Florida due to the region's high opioid overdose death rate and its prominence as a recovery hub. From a list of 141 Florida Association of Recovery Residences (FARR)-certified residences in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade, we randomly surveyed 100 programs across all treatment levels (I-IV) using a standardized script. The primary outcome was whether residences accepted individuals taking buprenorphine, classified into three categories: (1) unconditional acceptance, where any person taking buprenorphine was accepted; (2) denial, where admission was refused for all individuals taking buprenorphine; and (3) conditional acceptance, where admission was granted under specific conditions. Secondary outcomes included requirements for conditional acceptance, such as dose limits or tapering policies.

RESULTS

The distribution of the 100 surveyed recovery residences was comparable to the 141 FARR-certified facilities: 67 % were in Palm Beach, 31 % in Broward, and 2 % in Miami-Dade. Most residences (55 %) were level II certified, followed by 26 % level IV, 14 % level I, and 5 % level III. Sixteen percent of residences permitted admission of individuals taking any buprenorphine dose, 31 % had conditional policies, and 53 % prohibited buprenorphine. The maximum acceptance across all counties and levels was 20 %. No significant differences were observed by county (p = 0.61) or facility level (p = 0.29). Of 31 residences with conditional policies, 25.8 % (n = 8) required a mandatory taper, 38.7 % (n = 12) allowed a maximum 8 mg daily dosage, 12.9 % (n = 4) had a maximum 12 mg daily dosage, 6.5 % (n = 2) had a maximum 16 mg daily dosage, 6.5 % (n = 2) required a provider letter, and 9.7 % (n = 3) did not provide further information.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to FARR-certified recovery residences is severely limited for individuals in South Florida taking buprenorphine. Urgent action is needed to improve access to evidence-based OUD treatments, address complexities influencing recovery residence policy and practice, and ensure appropriate allocation of public funds like State Opioid Response dollars.

Study Protocol for Pain Self-Management and Patient-Oriented Buprenorphine Dosing for Pain and Retention in Office-Based Opioid Treatment: A Hybrid Type 1, 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial

Chronic pain is a significant factor for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) contributing to suboptimal retention in buprenorphine treatment, which is a crucial predictor of long-term health outcomes. This study aims to address the critical need for effective interventions targeting chronic pain management within office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) programs. We are conducting a multisite, hybrid type 1, 2 × 2 factorial randomized clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of 2 novel interventions, pain self-management (PSM) and patient-oriented buprenorphine dosing (POD), to decrease pain interference and improve retention in buprenorphine treatment. PSM, a manualized and customizable approach delivered through individual and peer-led group sessions, aims to decrease pain-related symptoms and quality of life. POD involves split dosing of buprenorphine to extend the duration of analgesia to better match its duration of efficacy at managing OUD symptoms, leading to improved retention in buprenorphine treatment. Eligible participants will be randomized into 1 of 4 groups: (1) PSM + POD, (2) PSM + Standard Buprenorphine Dosing, (3) Usual Care + POD, or (4) Usual Care + Standard Buprenorphine Dosing. Usual Care refers to usual care for chronic pain and Standard Buprenorphine Dosing refers to the participant's current dosing regimen. Secondary objectives encompass overall pain reduction, decreased opioid use, improved pain symptom management, and exploration of implementation strategies. The supplemental approved protocol provides comprehensive insights into the procedures and variables being investigated. As part of the HEAL Initiative®-funded Integrative Management of Chronic Pain and OUD for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) network, this study aims to fill gaps in behavioral and medication treatments for individuals with co-occurring chronic pain and OUDs, improving pain management and retention in care. Successful outcomes from this trial may inform future larger trials, offering essential evidence for implementation considerations and reimbursement decisions.

Evolution of the substance use landscape: Implications for contingency management

Contingency management (CM), which involves the delivery of incentives upon meeting behavioral goals, has the potential to improve substance use treatment outcomes. The intervention allows for flexibility through numerous modifiable components including changes to incentive magnitude and schedule, target behavior, and intervention structure. Unfortunately, numerous changes in the substance use landscape have occurred in the past 10 to 15 years: Substances are more potent, overdose risk has increased, new substances and methods of use have been introduced, and substance classes are increasingly being intentionally and unintentionally mixed. These developments potentially undermine CM outcomes. We explored recent substance use changes due to legislative, regulatory, social, and economic factors for four substance classes: stimulants, opioids, tobacco, and cannabis. We discuss potential adjustments to the modifiable components of CM for future research in response to these changes. By continually adapting to the shifting substance use landscape, CM can maintain optimal efficacy.

Medications for opioid use disorder: Predictors of early discontinuation and reduction of overdose risk in US military veterans by medication type

AIM

This study: (1) estimated the effect of early discontinuation of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) on overdose probability and (2) measured the relationship between patient characteristics and early discontinuation probability for each MOUD type.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a retrospective cohort using electronic health record data from the US Veterans Healthcare Administration. Participants were veterans initiating MOUD with buprenorphine (BUP), methadone (MET) or extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) from fiscal years 2012-19. A total of 39 284 veterans met eligibility with 22 721 (57.8%) initiating BUP, 12 652 (32.2%) initiating MET and 3911 (10.0%) initiating XR-NTX.

MEASUREMENTS

Measurements (1) determined whether the veteran experienced an overdose in the 365 days after MOUD initiation (primary) and (2) early discontinuation of MOUD, defined as discontinuation before 180 days (secondary). We assumed that unobserved patient characteristics would jointly influence the probability of discontinuation and overdose. and estimated the joint distribution with a bivariate probit model.

FINDINGS

We found that 9.0% of BUP initiators who experienced an overdose above the predicted 3.9% had no veteran-discontinued BUP early; findings for XR-NTX were similar, with 12.2% of initiators overdosing above the predicted 4.5%, but this was statistically inconclusive. We found no relationship between early discontinuation and overdose for MET initiators, probably due to the high risk of both events. The patient characteristics included in our post-estimation exploratory analysis of early discontinuation varied by MOUD type, with between 14 (XR-NTX) and 25 (BUP) tested. The only characteristics with at least one level showing a statistically significant change in probability of early discontinuation for all three MOUD types were geography and prior-year exposure to psychotherapy, although direction and magnitude varied.

CONCLUSION

Early discontinuation of buprenorphine, and probably extended-release naltrexone, appears to be associated with a greater probability of experiencing a fatal or non-fatal overdose among US veterans receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD); methadone does not show the same association. There is no consistent set of characteristics among early discontinuers by MOUD type.

Commentary on Gregory et al.: Fear of precipitated opioid withdrawal should not prevent buprenorphine initiation

Provision of buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder is often stymied by clinicians’ concerns for precipitated opioid withdrawal. Gregory et al’s systematic review identified a low level of precipitated withdrawal with buprenorphine induction even among persons who reported fentanyl use. Evidence, not fear should guide treatment.

Factors affecting problem-solving court team decisions about medications for opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

Problem-solving courts (PSCs) provide alternatives to prosecution and incarceration for drug-related crimes and offer integrated support for people who have lost custody of children due to drug use. Methadone and buprenorphine are lifesaving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) but are underused by PSC clients. Even when PSCs lack a court-level prohibition against MOUD, court staff still make individualized decisions about whether a court client can use MOUD. Therefore, we sought to identify factors involved in such individualized PSC court decisions about clients' use of MOUD.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups between Summer and Fall 2022 with a convenience sample of 54 PSC staff members from 33 courts across four states. Data were analyzed using iterative categorization.

RESULTS

Interviewees indicated that their courts had eliminated blanket prohibitions against MOUD due to federal and state policy funding requirements, widespread dissemination of voluntary best practice standards, fear of lawsuits, and MOUD education targeting courts. Courts allowed MOUD if the court client accessed it through a treatment provider with whom the court collaborates. Some courts only allowed court clients to access MOUD from non-partnering treatment providers after a court-led "vetting" process of the proposed MOUD provider. MOUD provider characteristics considered during the vetting process included the provider's willingness to communicate with the court, frequent drug testing, adjustments of medication or dosage in response to aberrant results, offering of counseling, and acceptance of Medicaid or sliding scale payments. PSC staff were least comfortable with court clients using methadone treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence (or lack of) a PSC-MOUD partnership is a key factor involved in court staff decisions when a court client desires MOUD. Therefore, increasing the number of partnerships between PSCs and MOUD providers could lead to higher rates of MOUD utilization. It is unclear whether court-led vetting processes for non-partnering MOUD treatment providers are necessary or appropriate, and such vetting processes could reduce treatment choice or access in communities with few MOUD providers.

Addressing Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Opioid Overdose Mortality: Strategies for Equitable Interventions and Structural Change

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review synthetizes findings reflecting the increasing racial and ethnic inequities in opioid overdose mortality and emphasizes the necessity for tailored interventions as well as other policy-level and structural strategies to stem this trend.

RECENT FINDINGS

Factors contributing to inequities in overdose mortality include changes in drug supply, persistent social-structural vulnerabilities stemming from structural racism, and inequities in access to medication for opioid use disorder and harm reduction services. Key strategies to address these inequities include the cultural adaptation of evidence-based interventions within an equity-based framework, integrating social determinants of health into addiction treatment, centering anti-racism praxis in addiction research, diversifying the addiction workforce, and integrating structural competency as a tool to restructure education and inform practice. Structural racism must be recognized as a key driver of inequities in substance use outcomes, and this understanding must be integrated into existing models of substance use disorder prevention, treatment, and research.

Patient and navigator experiences with the opioid use disorder treatment system in Philadelphia, PA

BACKGROUND

In 2022, 1413 people in Philadelphia died of an unintentional drug overdose. Addressing the complex challenges within the opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment system requires a comprehensive grasp of multiple system-level siloes from the perspective of patients who are accessing services and certified recovery specialists. Identifying facilitators and barriers to treatment entry and retention are critical.

METHODS

We conducted 13 focus groups with 70 people with a history of opioid use in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The study recruited participants from non-profit organizations, OUD treatment programs, and street intercept. Certified Recovery Specialists (CRS), people with experience in residential, outpatient, methadone, and buprenorphine programs in Philadelphia, identity-specific groups with Black women, Black men, and Latino men, pregnant and parenting people, and people accessing harm reduction services participated in focus groups. Focus group guides varied by group, but the overarching focus remained on understanding participants' experiences in navigating the OUD treatment system. The research team summarized and edited CRS focus groups and coded all other focus groups for thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Most focus group participants (mean age = 45.1 years; 52.9 % men, 40 % Black) had a history with multiple treatment types and reported experiences with different modalities. Salient themes that emerged from analysis included frustrations with the assessment process; reflections on facilitators and barriers by treatment type (residential, methadone, and buprenorphine); and recommendations across treatment modalities. Assessment centers, rather than being easy points of treatment entry, were identified as a major barrier to OUD treatment initiation; issues discussed included length of assessment, limited operating hours, and inadequate withdrawal management.

DISCUSSION

The data from the present study were used to develop recommendations for policymakers and other stakeholders of OUD treatment programs to improve care across the spectrum of services. Expansion of residential programs that can support patients with complex comorbid conditions and wounds is needed to prevent delays for patients deemed ineligible for lower levels of care. Housing and income were identified as significant deterrents to initiating drug treatment and greater resources are needed. Greater investment in the OUD workforce is needed, especially expanding staff with lived experience. Findings can enhance OUD treatment programs elsewhere.

Predictors of future overdose among people who inject drugs in Baltimore, Maryland

Background

Longitudinal studies of future overdose risk among people who inject drugs (PWID) are needed to inform planning of targeted overdose preventions in the United States.

Methods

The Integrating Services to Improve Treatment and Engagement (INSITE) study followed 720 PWID between June 2018 and August 2019 to evaluate the delivery of mobilized healthcare services in Baltimore, Maryland. The present analyses used logistic regression to identify baseline characteristics predictive of non-fatal or fatal overdose during the 6-month follow-up among 507 participants with overdose information. Non-fatal overdoses were self-reported and fatal overdoses were identified through the National Death Index.

Results

At baseline, 121 (23 %) reported an overdose in the prior 6 months. Between baseline and follow-up, 66 (13 %) participants reported a non-fatal overdose and 6 (1 %) experienced a fatal overdose. Overdose during follow-up was positively associated with overdose in the 6 months prior to baseline (6.70 aOR; 95 % CI: 3.51, 12.78) and more than 6 months prior to baseline (2.49 aOR; 95 % CI: 1.52, 4.08) versus no prior overdose. Overdose during follow-up was also positively associated with buprenorphine treatment (2.37 aOR; CI: 1.08, 5.21) and negatively associated with non-prescribed methadone at baseline (0.59 aOR; 0.38, 0.93).

Conclusions

Identifying and intervening with PWID who experienced a recent overdose could reduce short-term elevated risk of future overdose. However, as other PWID reported never experiencing an overdose at baseline nonetheless experienced an overdose during follow-up, targeted approaches should be complemented with population-level interventions. Overdose risk implications of buprenorphine treatment and non-prescribed methadone are also discussed.

Improving access to buprenorphine for rural veterans in a learning health care system

OBJECTIVE

To describe a learning health care system research process designed to increase buprenorphine prescribing for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) in rural primary care settings within U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) treatment facilities.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

Using national administrative data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, we identified six rural VA health care systems that had improved their rate of buprenorphine prescribing within primary care from 2015 to 2020 (positive deviants). We conducted qualitative interviews with leaders, clinicians, and staff involved in buprenorphine prescribing within primary care from these sites to inform the design of an implementation strategy.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative interviews to inform implementation strategy development.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded by a primary coder and secondary reviewer. Analysis utilized a mixed inductive/deductive approach. To develop an implementation strategy, we matched clinical needs identified within interviews with resources and strategies participants had utilized to address these needs in their own sites.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Interview participants (n = 30) identified key clinical needs and strategies for implementing buprenorphine in rural, primary care settings. Common suggestions included the need for clinical mentorship or a consult service, buprenorphine training, and educational resources. Building upon interview findings and in partnership with a clinical team, we developed an implementation strategy composed of an engaging case-based training, an audit and feedback process, and educational resources (e.g., Buprenorphine Frequently Asked Questions, Rural Care Model Infographic).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a learning health care system research process that leveraged national administrative data, health care provider interviews, and clinical partnership to develop an implementation strategy to encourage buprenorphine prescribing in rural primary care settings.

Statewide Trends in Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Utilization in Rhode Island, United States, 2017-2023

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine and methadone are US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Although utilization of MOUD was increasing pre-COVID-19, it is not well understood how this trend shifted during and "after" the COVID-19 pandemic in Rhode Island. This analysis will consider the differential utilization of MOUD over time and by key demographic factors.

METHODS

We utilized two of Rhode Island's statewide databases to examine aggregate counts of dispensed buprenorphine and methadone from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023. Data were stratified by age group, sex assigned at birth, and race/ethnicity (where available). Counts were stratified into pre-COVID-19 (Q1 2017-Q1 2020), COVID-19 (Q2 2020-Q4 2022), and endemic COVID-19 (2023) eras. Averages and annualized percent change for each period were calculated to understand how utilization changed over time.

RESULTS

Before COVID-19, buprenorphine and methadone utilization were increasing annually. During COVID-19, utilization declined annually by 0.40% and 0.43%, respectively. In the endemic COVID-19 time period, buprenorphine and methadone utilization declined more rapidly at 2.59% and 1.77%, respectively. Declines were more dramatic for adults aged 18-34.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a decline in MOUD utilization during and after COVID-19 in Rhode Island, primarily driven by substantial decreases in MOUD use among the youngest group of adult residents. Interventions specifically tailored to youth, such as school-based or primary healthcare-based programs, may be particularly effective in engaging with youth in substance use disorder treatment.

Randomised clinical trial of a 16 mg vs 24 mg maintenance daily dose of buprenorphine to increase retention in treatment among people with an opioid use disorder in Rhode Island: study protocol paper

INTRODUCTION

Buprenorphine is a highly effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, provider observations and preliminary research suggest that the current standard maintenance dose may be insufficient for suppressing withdrawal and preventing cravings among people who use or have used fentanyl. Buprenorphine dosing guidelines were based on studies among people who use heroin and have not been formally re-evaluated since fentanyl became predominant in the unregulated drug supply. We aim to compare the effectiveness of a high (24 mg) vs standard (16 mg) maintenance daily dose of buprenorphine for improving retention in treatment, decreasing the use of non-prescribed opioids, preventing cravings and reducing opioid overdose risk in patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Adults who are initiating or continuing buprenorphine for moderate to severe OUD and have a recent history of fentanyl use (n=250) will be recruited at four outpatient substance use treatment clinics in Rhode Island. Patients continuing buprenorphine must be on doses of 16 mg or less and have ongoing fentanyl use to be eligible. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a high (24 mg) or standard (16 mg) maintenance daily dose, each with usual care, and followed for 12 months to evaluate outcomes. Providers will determine the buprenorphine initiation strategy, with the requirement that participants reach the study maintenance dose within 7 days of randomisation. Providers may adjust the maintenance dose, if clinically needed, for participant safety. The primary study outcome is retention in buprenorphine treatment at 6 months postrandomisation, measured using clinical and statewide administrative data. Other outcomes include non-prescribed opioid use and opioid cravings (secondary), as well as non-fatal or fatal opioid overdose (exploratory).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol was approved by the Brown Institutional Review Board (STUDY00000075). Results will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06316830.

Efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine patch for managing withdrawal symptoms in patients with cancer physically dependent on prescription opioids

BACKGROUND

The physical dependence on prescription opioids among cancer survivors remains an under-investigated area, with a scarcity of well-designed prospective studies.

METHODS

This single-arm, phase-2 clinical trial in Korea assessed the efficacy and safety of a transdermal buprenorphine patch (TBP) in managing physical dependence on prescription opioids in cancer survivors, as confirmed through the DSM-5 criteria or psychiatric consultation for opioid withdrawal. This study involved a 4-phase treatment protocol of screening, induction/stabilization, discontinuation, and monitoring. The primary outcome was the rate of successful opioid discontinuation, as measured by a negative urine-drug screening at 8 weeks. Key secondary outcomes included the resumption of prescribed opioids, changes in both the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), and assessments related to the psychological and physiological aspects of dependence and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-one participants were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat population, the success rate of opioid discontinuation was 58%, with only 2 participants experiencing a resumption of prescribed opioids. Significant reductions were observed in MEDD, which decreased from 98 to 26 mg/day (P < .001), and COWS scores, which decreased from 5.5 to 2.8 (P < .001). Desire to use opioids reduced from 7.0 to 3.0 on a 10-point numeric rating scale (P < .001). Toxicities related to TBP were mild and manageable, without severe precipitated withdrawal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

TBP may be considered as an alternative therapeutic option in cancer survivors physically dependent on prescription opioids, especially where sublingual formulations are unavailable.

The Neurocircuitry of Substance Use Disorder, Treatment, and Change: A Resource for Clinical Psychiatrists

Substance use disorder (SUD) is common in psychiatric patients and has a negative impact on health and well-being. However, SUD often goes untreated, and there is a need for psychiatrists, of all specialties, to address this pervasive clinical problem. In this review, the authors' goal is to provide a resource that describes treatments for SUD, using neuroscience as a framework. They discuss the effect of pharmacotherapy on craving, intoxication, and withdrawal and its ability to interrupt the cycle of substance use in SUD. The neuroscience of stress is reviewed, including medications targeting neurotransmitter systems activated by alarm and fear. Neuroplasticity and promising treatments that use this mechanism, including ketamine, psilocybin, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), are discussed. The authors conclude by listing resources and practice guidelines for physicians interested in learning more about treatments for SUD.

Outpatient-Based Opioid Treatment Engagement and Attendance: A Prospective Cohort Study of Homeless-Experienced Adults

BACKGROUND

The opioid overdose epidemic disproportionately impacts people experiencing homelessness. Outpatient-based opioid treatment (OBOT) programs have been established in homeless health care settings across the USA, but little is known about the success of these programs in engaging and retaining this highly marginalized patient population in addiction care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate predictors of initial engagement and subsequent attendance in a homeless-tailored OBOT program.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study with 4 months of follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 148 homeless-experienced adults (≥18 years) who newly enrolled in the Boston Healthcare for the Homeless Program (BHCHP) OBOT program over a 1-year period (1/6/2022-1/5/2023).

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcomes were (1) initial OBOT program engagement, defined as having ≥2 additional OBOT visits within 1 month of OBOT enrollment, and (2) subsequent OBOT program attendance, measured monthly from months 2 to 4 of follow-up.

KEY RESULTS

The average age was 41.7 years (SD 10.2); 23.6% were female, 35.8% were Hispanic, 12.8% were non-Hispanic Black, and 43.9% were non-Hispanic White. Over one-half (57.4%) were initially engaged. OBOT program attendances during months 2, 3, and 4 were 60.8%, 50.0%, and 41.2%, respectively. One-quarter (24.3%) were initially engaged and then attended the OBOT program every month during the follow-up period. Participants in housing or residential treatment programs (vs. unhoused; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.17-5.44) and those who were already on or initiated a medication for opioid use disorder (OUD) (aOR = 6.53; 95% CI = 1.62-26.25) at the time of OBOT enrollment had higher odds of engagement. Older age (aOR = 1.74 per 10-year increment; 95% CI = 1.28-2.38) and initial engagement (aOR = 3.50; 95% CI = 1.86-6.59) conferred higher odds of attendance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, over half initially engaged with the OBOT program, with initial engagement emerging as a strong predictor of subsequent OBOT program attendance. Interventions aimed at enhancing initial OBOT program engagement, including those focused on housing and buprenorphine initiation, may improve longer-term outcomes in this marginalized population.

Enhancing Outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: An Economic Evaluation of Improving Medication Adherence for Buprenorphine Through Blister-Packaging

Background

The opioid epidemic has severely impacted the US over the last 15 years. Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist indicated for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) and is recognized as an effective treatment when taken as prescribed. However, adherence rates have been low in real-world settings. Blister-packaging has been shown to promote medication adherence across a variety of disease states, although it has never been studied in OUD.

Methods

An economic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of increased adherence of blister-packaged buprenorphine on health care resource utilization (HCRU) and health care costs for 10,000 patients initiating therapy for OUD. The model analyzed a commercially insured population within the US over a one-year time horizon. Medication adherence was defined in the model as proportion of days covered (PDC) of at least 80%. Literature-based references were used to inform both the impact of blister-packaging on the number of patients who became adherent as well as the impact of medication adherence on HCRU and health care costs. Model input uncertainty was assessed in one-way sensitivity analyses.

Results

With the implementation of blister-packaging buprenorphine, adherence rates increased from 37.1% of patients in the pre-intervention period to 45.3%, resulting in an additional 818 patients becoming adherent post-intervention. The increase in adherence led to a reduction of medical costs of $12,138,757 (-$1,214 per-patient (PP)). Specifically, inpatient costs decreased by $7,127,073 (-$713 PP) while outpatient costs decreased by $5,013,319 (-$501 PP). Pharmacy costs increased by $3,432,705 ($343 PP). Despite the increase in pharmacy costs, total health care costs saw a reduction of $8,559,684 (-$856 PP).

Conclusion

Blister-packaging buprenorphine for treatment of OUD has potential to improve medication adherence and health outcomes while reducing HCRU and health care costs. Future studies are necessary to assess the real-world application and impact of blister-packaging buprenorphine for OUD across various patient populations and health care settings.

Predicting buprenorphine adherence among patients with opioid use disorder in primary care settings

BACKGROUND

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine, are effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) and reduce risk for overdose and death. Buprenorphine can be prescribed in outpatient primary care settings to treat OUD; however, prior research suggests adherence to buprenorphine in these settings can be low. The purpose of this study was to identify the rates of and factors associated with buprenorphine adherence among patients with OUD in the first six months after a new start of buprenorphine.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) from a large integrated health system in the upper Midwest. Patients with OUD (N = 345; Mean age = 37.6 years, SD 13.2; 61.7% male; 78% White) with a new start of buprenorphine between March 2019 and July 2021 were included in the analysis. Buprenorphine adherence in the first six months was defined using medication orders; the proportion of days covered (PDC) with a standard cut-point of 80% was used to classify patients as adherent or non-adherent. Demographic (e.g., age, sex, race and ethnicity, geographic location), service (e.g., encounters, buprenorphine formulations and dosage) and clinical (e.g., diagnoses, urine toxicology screens) characteristics were examined as factors that could be related to adherence. Analyses included logistic regression with adherence group as a binary outcome.

RESULTS

Less than half of patients were classified as adherent to buprenorphine (44%). Adjusting for other factors, male sex (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20, 0.57, p < .001) and having an unexpected positive for opioids on urine toxicology (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21, 0.83, p < .014) were associated with lower likelihood of adherence to buprenorphine, whereas being a former smoker (compared to a current smoker; OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.02, 3.27, p = .014) was associated with greater likelihood of being adherent to buprenorphine.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that buprenorphine adherence in primary care settings may be low, yet male sex and smoking status are associated with adherence rates. Future research is needed to identify the mechanisms through which these factors are associated with adherence.

Fentanyl, Heroin, Methamphetamine, and Cocaine Analyte Concentrations in Urine Drug Testing Specimens

Importance

The US is experiencing a protracted drug overdose crisis primarily associated with exposure to illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF), methamphetamine, and cocaine. Overdose risk and treatment responses may be directly affected by absolute drug exposure concentrations and drug use prevalence.

Objective

To quantify changes in absolute drug exposure concentrations from 2013 to 2023.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study analyzed urine drug testing (UDT) results from urine specimens collected between January 1, 2013, and August 22, 2023, in 49 states and the District of Columbia. Urine specimens were obtained from patients aged 18 years or older who presented to substance use disorder treatment clinics. The UDT was ordered by clinicians based on medical necessity.

Exposures

Urine specimens were analyzed for the following drugs or metabolites (analytes tested in parentheses): fentanyl (fentanyl), heroin (6-monoacetylmorphine), cocaine (benzoylecgonine), and methamphetamine (methamphetamine) using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Relative concentrations of fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine. Creatinine-normalized drug concentration values were log-transformed prior to visualization and statistical analyses. The Mann-Kendall trend test was performed to examine trends over time. To estimate the geospatial and temporal patterns of drug concentration, a second series of models (1 for each drug) with an interaction effect for clinic location and collection year were fit.

Results

A total of 921 931 unique UDT samples were collected from patients (549 042 males [59.6%]; median [IQR] age, 34 [27-44] years). The adjusted fentanyl concentration in urine specimens was 38.23 (95% CI, 35.93-40.67) ng/mg creatinine in 2023 and 4.61 (95% CI, 3.59-5.91) ng/mg creatinine in 2013. The adjusted methamphetamine concentration was 3461.59 (95% CI, 3271.88-3662.30) ng/mg creatinine in 2023 and 665.27 (95% CI, 608.51-727.32) ng/mg creatinine in 2013. The adjusted cocaine concentration was 1122.23 (95% CI, 1032.41-1219.87) ng/mg creatinine in 2023 and 559.71 (95% CI, 524.69-597.06) ng/mg creatinine in 2013. The adjusted heroin concentration was 58.36 (95% CI, 48.26-70.58) ng/mg creatinine in 2023 and 146.59 (95% CI, 136.06-157.92) ng/mg creatinine in 2013. Drug concentrations varied across US Census divisions.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cross-sectional study found that absolute concentrations of fentanyl, methamphetamine, and cocaine in urine specimens increased from 2013 to 2023, with a decrease in heroin concentration during that period. The findings suggest that exposure to these substances, as well as the illicit drug supply, has fundamentally changed in many parts of the US, highlighting the need to reinforce surveillance initiatives and accelerate efforts to treat individuals with IMF and/or stimulant exposure.

Association of Daily Doses of Buprenorphine With Urgent Health Care Utilization

Importance

Higher buprenorphine doses may benefit the increasing number of individuals using fentanyl and other synthetic opioids, but there is little empirical evidence on the efficacy of such higher doses.

Objective

To examine the association between higher buprenorphine doses (above 16 mg and 24 mg) and subsequent emergency department (ED) or inpatient service use among patients diagnosed with opioid use disorder.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study was a retrospective analysis of health data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database from 2016 to 2021 for commercially insured individuals aged 18 years or older diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD). Eligible participants initiated buprenorphine after at least 90 days of enrollment and were dispensed at least a 14-day supply of buprenorphine. Data were analyzed from September 2023 through February 2024.

Exposures

Maximum buprenorphine dose received by a patient for 14 or more days: more than 24 mg, more than 16 mg to 24 mg, more than 8 mg to 16 mg, or 1 mg to 8 mg.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Days from initiation of the maximum buprenorphine dose to an ED or inpatient visit for a behavioral health diagnosis, controlling for patient demographics, comorbid conditions, time to reaching maximum dose, buprenorphine discontinuation, and pre-buprenorphine health care utilization.

Results

A total of 35 451 individuals with an OUD diagnosis who began buprenorphine treatment were identified (mean [SD] age, 46.2 [15.1] years; 20 983 male [59.2%]; 3326 Black [9.4%], 2411 Hispanic [6.8%], 26 712 White [75.3%]). The most common dose was more than 8 mg to 16 mg daily (14 802 patients [42.9%]), with 9669 patients (27.3%) in the 1 mg to 8 mg tier, 10 329 patients (29.1%) in the 8 mg to 16 mg tier, and 651 patients (1.8%) in the tier receiving more than 24 mg. Among all patients receiving buprenorphine, 12.5% experienced an ED or inpatient visit. Survival analysis shows patients receiving doses more than 24 mg and between 16 mg to 24 mg had longer times to ED or inpatient use than patients receiving from 8 mg to 16 mg (time ratio [TR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.20) and more than 24 mg (TR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.81). Findings for doses above 16 mg daily were consistent for observation windows as short as 365 days (more than 24 mg: TR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.01-2.18; more than 16 mg to 24 mg: TR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings contribute to the sparse empirical research regarding potential benefits of higher-dose buprenorphine treatment of individuals with OUD. Clinicians should be aware of the potential effects of higher buprenorphine doses on health care utilization while policymakers work to ensure equitable access to individuals who could potentially benefit from higher doses.

A Pharmacologic Evaluation of Buprenorphine in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period

BACKGROUND

The dosing regimen in the package insert for sublingual buprenorphine is similar for pregnant and nonpregnant people despite the physiologic changes seen during pregnancy.

AIMS

To compare plasma buprenorphine pharmacokinetics during and after pregnancy and relate buprenorphine concentration to the pharmacodynamic endpoints of pupil diameter, Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS), and craving scores.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort of 22 pregnant people undergoing 33 pharmacologic studies (6-8 hours each) during pregnancy or postpartum. Participants were on a stable daily dose of 2-8 mg sublingual buprenorphine every 6 or 8 hours. The dosing frequency was selected by the participant. On study day, baseline measurements of plasma buprenorphine, pupil diameter, COWS, and craving scores were obtained, then the usual morning dose was taken, and measurements were repeated several times over 1 dosing interval.

FINDINGS

The dose-normalized area under the plasma buprenorphine concentration time curve was significantly (P = 0.036) lower during pregnancy (155 ± 52 ng × min/mL) than postpartum (218 ± 113 ng × min/mL). Buprenorphine trough concentrations were similar at the start (1.1 ± 0.7 ng/mL) and end of a dosing cycle (1.2 ± 0.8 ng/mL) regardless of dosing frequency. Pupillary diameter, COWS, and craving scores returned to baseline as buprenorphine concentrations approached ~1 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant people require a higher dose of buprenorphine to achieve concentrations comparable to nonpregnant people. There is a temporal relationship between the plasma buprenorphine concentration and the pharmacodynamic markers of pupillary diameter, COWS, and craving scores. An average plasma concentration of ~1 ng/mL was associated with the lowest level of COWS and craving scores.

High dose opioid agonist therapy for patients with opioid use disorder: a case series exploring this patient-centered approach

OBJECTIVES

Management of opioid withdrawal in the inpatient setting can vary widely depending on the patient, the physician, and the institution. Although buprenorphine and methadone are first-line therapy for withdrawal management, some patients experience barriers to those medications. In this case series, we explore high dose opioid agonist therapy (HDOAT) as a novel and effective option to bridge to recovery in this particular setting.

METHODS

This retrospective case series includes- five patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) who were treated with HDOAT while hospitalized and reports on their outcomes.

RESULTS

All five patients completed lifesaving medical therapy, engaged with community health workers for resources, and successfully transitioned to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). More importantly, none of the patients had patient directed discharges (PDDs). Furthermore, there were no inpatient drug uses or overdoses requiring naloxone administration, even with very high doses of oxycodone. None of the five patients were readmitted within thirty days.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more rigorous research is needed, HDOAT may be a viable strategy for OUD when patients continued to decline buprenorphine or methadone on admission. This case series demonstrated the successful use of this strategy toward preventing PDDs, promoting treatment completion, and allowing substance recovery and rehabilitation, in patients who elected to defer MOUD on arrival.

Addiction Consultation Services for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Initiation and Engagement: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are highly effective, but only 22% of individuals in the US with opioid use disorder receive them. Hospitalization potentially provides an opportunity to initiate MOUD and link patients to ongoing treatment.

Objective

To study the effectiveness of interprofessional hospital addiction consultation services in increasing MOUD treatment initiation and engagement.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized implementation and effectiveness (hybrid type 1) trial was conducted in 6 public hospitals in New York, New York, and included 2315 adults with hospitalizations identified in Medicaid claims data between October 2017 and January 2021. Data analysis was conducted in December 2023. Hospitals were randomized to an intervention start date, and outcomes were compared during treatment as usual (TAU) and intervention conditions. Bayesian analysis accounted for the clustering of patients within hospitals and open cohort nature of the study. The addiction consultation service intervention was compared with TAU using posterior probabilities of model parameters from hierarchical logistic regression models that were adjusted for age, sex, and study period. Eligible participants had an admission or discharge diagnosis of opioid use disorder or opioid poisoning/adverse effects, were hospitalized at least 1 night in a medical/surgical inpatient unit, and were not receiving MOUD before hospitalization.

Interventions

Hospitals implemented an addiction consultation service that provided inpatient specialty care for substance use disorders. Consultation teams comprised a medical clinician, social worker or addiction counselor, and peer counselor.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The dual primary outcomes were (1) MOUD treatment initiation during the first 14 days after hospital discharge and (2) MOUD engagement for the 30 days following initiation.

Results

Of 2315 adults, 628 (27.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 47.0 (12.4) years. Initiation of MOUD was 11.0% in the Consult for Addiction Treatment and Care in Hospitals (CATCH) program vs 6.7% in TAU, engagement was 7.4% vs 5.3%, respectively, and continuation for 6 months was 3.2% vs 2.4%. Patients hospitalized during CATCH had 7.96 times higher odds of initiating MOUD (log-odds ratio, 2.07; 95% credible interval, 0.51-4.00) and 6.90 times higher odds of MOUD engagement (log-odds ratio, 1.93; 95% credible interval, 0.09-4.18).

Conclusions

This randomized clinical trial found that interprofessional addiction consultation services significantly increased postdischarge MOUD initiation and engagement among patients with opioid use disorder. However, the observed rates of MOUD initiation and engagement were still low; further efforts are still needed to improve hospital-based and community-based services for MOUD treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03611335.

The Concept of Treatment-Refractory Addiction: A Call to the Field

ABSTRACT

Not all patients respond to effective and approved treatment interventions, and there has been growing recognition in the medical field of these "resistant" or refractory illnesses (eg, treatment-resistant depression, resistant hypertension). In the field of substance use disorders, there has not been an explicit acknowledgement of treatment-refractory addiction (TRA) despite substantial evidence that many patients do not respond to standard-of-care treatment interventions. This article provides a justification for TRA as a critically important condition to recognize and define. TRA is not conceptualized as a diagnosis, but as a signal that a current treatment approach has not worked. The article addresses areas in need of research and consensus in order to ensure the approach to TRA is uniform, thoughtfully addressed, and data-driven. By explicitly acknowledging TRA, clinicians, researchers, and patients and their families can begin to explore the unique features of this population and find ways in which substance use disorders for persons with TRA can be more effectively addressed, which in turn will help to expand remission for persons who suffer from these devastating conditions.

The Impact of High-Potency Synthetic Opioids on Pharmacotherapies for Opioid Use Disorder: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications of high potency synthetic opioids (HPSO) on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) are not well understood. Although pharmacological interactions are plausible, the clinical significance of such interaction has not been systematically elucidated. This scoping review investigates the relationship between HPSO exposure and various MOUD treatment outcomes.

METHODS

We followed PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) for scoping reviews with extensive a priori search strategy of databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane.

RESULTS

From 9149 studies, 34 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Synthesized data reveal several critical insights: First, there is a variable but high occurrence (38%-80%) of HPSO usage among individuals with MOUDs. Second, MOUDs are linked to a decreased risk of overdoses and deaths associated with HPSO. Third, HPSO consumption is correlated with the risk of precipitated withdrawal when starting buprenorphine. Fourth, low-dose buprenorphine is being recognized as one method to avoid moderate withdrawal symptoms prior to treatment. Lastly, significant gaps exist in human experimental data concerning the effects of HPSO on key factors critical for treating OUD-craving, withdrawal symptoms, and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports MOUD safety and effectiveness in reducing nonmedical opioid use. Further research is needed to explore HPSO's influence on the acute factors preceding nonmedical opioid use, such as cravings, withdrawal symptoms, and pain. This research could inform the optimization of MOUD dosing strategies. Achieving consensus and harmonizing data across clinical and research protocols could diminish variability, enhancing our understanding of HPSOs effect on MOUD treatment outcomes.

The fentanyl made me feel like I needed more methadone": changes in the role and use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) due to fentanyl

BACKGROUND

Fentanyl and fentanyl analogues have disrupted the illicit drug supply through contamination of other substances (i.e., methamphetamine and cocaine) and replacement of heroin in illicit markets. Increasingly, they are contributing to opioid-overdose related deaths. The rapid and growing presence of fentanyl has led to gaps in research on the impact of this illicit market change on people who use drugs (PWUD). We sought to examine how the changing opioid market and growing fentanyl availability influences the role and use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD).

METHODS

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a community recruited sample of PWUD (N = 22) in Los Angeles, California between September 2021 and April 2022. Interviews examined opioid use history, current opioid use behaviors and consumption patterns, and MOUD experiences and perceptions. Thematic analysis was used to systematically code and analyze textual interview data.

RESULTS

The following themes related to fentanyl use and MOUD emerged: (1) Use of deviated MOUD to address fentanyl contamination, (2) Changing perception of the effectiveness of MOUD on fentanyl, and (3) Regulatory limitations of MOUD for fentanyl use disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

PWUD described several repertoires for adjusting to changes in the illicit market of opioids. Clinicians treating PWUD should ask about recent fentanyl use prior to starting MOUD to account for increased tolerance to opioids. Harm reduction strategies such as naloxone kits, safe supply, and supervised consumption facilities can all prevent overdose deaths due to fentanyl.

Availability and Opportunities for Expansion of Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

There is an urgent need to expand access to treatment for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). As neurologists may frequently encounter patients with chronic pain who have developed OUD, they are in a position to serve as advocates for treatment. Buprenorphine is the most scalable medication for OUD in the United States, yet expansion has plateaued in recent years despite growing treatment needs. Reluctance of providers to establish treatment with new patients, challenges with rural expansion, stigma related to buprenorphine-based care, and pharmacy pressures that incentivize low dispensing and inventories may have stalled expansion. This review introduces these challenges before outlining actionable and evidenced-based strategies that warrant investigation, including methods to improve patient access to care (remotely delivered care, mobile delivery programs, Bridge programs) and provider retention and confidence in prescribing (expert consults, Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes, a telementoring model, hub-and-spoke services), as well as novel innovations (virtual reality, artificial intelligence, wearable technologies). Overall, fortifying existing delivery systems while developing new transformative models may be necessary to achieve more optimal levels of buprenorphine treatment expansion.

"Expected to happen": perspectives on post-release overdose from recently incarcerated people with opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

Opioid-related overdose is the leading cause of death for people recently released from incarceration, however treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during incarceration can reduce the mortality risk. This study seeks to qualitatively analyze perceptions of post-release overdose risk from the perspectives of people who received MOUD while incarcerated in one of eight Massachusetts jails during 2021-2022 using the Risk Environment Framework to guide analyses.

METHODS

N = 38 participants with lived experience of MOUD treatment during incarceration who are now living in the community were interviewed on factors that may contribute to or protect against post-release overdose risk. Themes were identified inductively and deductively using the Risk Environment Framework and its domains, which organizes themes along physical, social, economic, and policy environments on both the micro- and macro- scales.

RESULTS

The physical risk environment included loss of opioid tolerance during incarceration, polysubstance use, and the toxicity of the regional drug supply as key producers of increased risk for post-release overdose. Social drivers of risk included peer group risk norms-including peer-driven harm reduction practices and interpersonal relationships between drug sellers and buyers-as well as macro-level social determinants of health such as housing insecurity and availability of mental health services. Economic drivers of post-release overdose risk included lack of income generation during incarceration and employment challenges. Participants discussed several aspects of policy that contribute to post-release overdose risk, including availability of harm reduction supplies, public health services, and broader policy around MOUD.

CONCLUSIONS

The perspectives of people with lived experience are vital to understanding the disproportionate risks of overdose for those recently released from incarceration. Our results highlight the intersectional factors that produce and reproduce the post-release overdose risk environment, providing support for interventions across each domain of the Risk Environment Framework. By capturing perspectives from people with lived experience of OUD and incarceration during this critical period of risk, we can better identify interventions that target and mitigate overdose-related harm in this population.

Neuropsychiatric Effects Associated with Opioid-Based Management for Palliative Care Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The abundance of opioids administered in the palliative care setting that was once considered a standard of care is at present necessitating that providers evaluate patients for unintentional and deleterious symptomology related to aberrant opioid use and addiction. Polypharmacy with opioids is dynamic in affecting patients neurologically, and increased amounts of prescriptions have had inimical effects, not only for the individual, but also for their families and healthcare providers. The purpose of this review is to widen the perspective of opioid consequences and bring awareness to the numerous neuropsychiatric effects associated with the most commonly prescribed opioids for patients receiving palliative care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous clinical and research studies have found evidence in support for increased incidence of opioid usage and abuse as well as undesirable neurological outcomes. The most common and concerning effects of opioid usage in this setting are delirium and problematic drug-related behavioral changes such as deceitful behavior towards family and physicians, anger outbursts, overtaking of medications, and early prescription refill requests. Other neuropsychiatric effects detailed by recent studies include drug-seeking behavior, tolerance, dependence, addictive disorder, anxiety, substance use disorder, emotional distress, continuation of opioids to avoid opioid withdrawal syndrome, depression, and suicidal ideation. Opioid usage has detrimental and confounding effects that have been overlooked for many years by palliative care providers and patients receiving palliative care. It is necessary, even lifesaving, to be cognizant of potential neuropsychiatric effects that opioids can have on an individual, especially for those under palliative care. By having an increased understanding and awareness of potential opioid neuropsychiatric effects, patient quality of life can be improved, healthcare system costs can be decreased, and patient outcomes can be met and exceeded.

Buprenorphine prescribing and treatment accessibility in response to regulation changes due to the COVID-19 public health emergency

BACKGROUND

In 2021, over 80,000 fatal overdoses occurred in the United States. Since 2020, the federal government has enacted multiple regulatory changes around buprenorphine prescribing for opioid use disorder (OUD) to increase access to buprenorphine. This study aims to explore trends in buprenorphine treatment initiation pre- and post-public health emergency to evaluate changes in the context of X-waiver relaxations and telehealth allowances.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, all RI residents who filled a buprenorphine prescription at a pharmacy in Rhode Island (RI), Massachusetts, and Connecticut between January 2017 and December 2023 were obtained from the RI Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). The study excluded buprenorphine products not approved for OUD treatment from the analysis. Identified individuals had initiated buprenorphine for OUD during the study period if they did not have a prior prescription or if they had >30 days without buprenorphine exposure between their prescriptions. Spearman's rank correlation tests were used to identify significant associations between outcomes and regulation changes.

RESULTS

The average number of patients dispensed buprenorphine did not significantly change over the study period, however the average number of initiates significantly decreased (ρ = -0.38255, p = .0003). The average number of providers prescribing CII-CV substances in RI has increased 3.4 % over the study period. The average percentage of prescribers in the PDMP prescribing buprenorphine for OUD doubled (ρ = 0.96075, p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Though efforts have been made to increase buprenorphine initiation, buprenorphine initiates remain well below pre-PHE levels. Efforts must continue to eliminate existing barriers to treatment and improve access to individuals seeking treatment.

Fentanyl and xylazine crisis: Crafting coherent strategies for opioid overdose prevention

The United States is in the throes of a severe opioid overdose epidemic, primarily fueled by the pervasive use of fentanyl and the emerging threat of xylazine, a veterinary sedative often mixed with fentanyl. The high potency and long duration of fentanyl is compounded by the added risks from xylazine, heightening the lethal danger faced by opioid users. Measures such as enhanced surveillance, public awareness campaigns, and the distribution of fentanyl-xylazine test kits, and naloxone have been undertaken to mitigate this crisis. Fentanyl-related overdose deaths persist despite these efforts, partly due to inconsistent policies across states and resistance towards adopting harm reduction strategies. A multifaceted approach is imperative in effectively combating the opioid overdose epidemic. This approach should include expansion of treatment access, broadening the availability of medications for opioid use disorder, implementation of harm reduction strategies, and enaction of legislative reforms and diminishing stigma associated with opioid use disorder.

Trends in the Prescribing of Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder, 2019-2023

Objective

To evaluate whether access to buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) was associated with the coronavirus disease pandemic, the relaxation of training requirements to obtain an X-Waiver to prescribe buprenorphine (April 2021), and the removal of the X-Waiver (December 2022).

Patients and Methods

The OptumLabs Data Warehouse, which includes claims from Commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees, was used to evaluate trends in prescription fills from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2023. We compared fill patterns of buprenorphine for OUD with acamprosate to treat alcohol use disorder and naltrexone to treat alcohol use disorder or OUD. We evaluated trends in the rate ratio (RR) of overall fills; RR by days supply; distribution of fills by daily dose; and distribution of fills by prescriber type.

Results

Coronavirus disease (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11) was associated with a slightly increased rate of fills for Commercial enrollees but not overall or for Medicare Advantage enrollees. There were also no significant increases (P>0.05) associated with the change in training requirements or removal of the X-Waiver. Over the study period, there was an increasing share of fills for 16+ mg for Commercial enrollees, and buprenorphine prescribers were more likely to be advanced practice nurses or physician assistants.

Conclusion

We did not find meaningful improvement in access in response to coronavirus disease or the changes in the X-Waiver. These findings suggest that interventions beyond removing the X-Waiver may be needed to improve buprenorphine access.

Caring for Hospitalized Adults With Opioid Use Disorder in the Era of Fentanyl: A Review

Importance

The rise of fentanyl and other high-potency synthetic opioids across US and Canada has been associated with increasing hospitalizations and unprecedented overdose deaths. Hospitalization is a critical touchpoint to engage patients and offer life-saving opioid use disorder (OUD) care when admitted for OUD or other medical conditions.

Observations

Clinical best practices include managing acute withdrawal and pain, initiating medication for OUD, integrating harm reduction principles and practices, addressing in-hospital substance use, and supporting hospital-to-community care transitions. Fentanyl complicates hospital OUD care. Fentanyl's high potency intensifies pain, withdrawal, and cravings and increases the risk for overdose and other harms. Fentanyl's unique pharmacology has rendered traditional techniques for managing opioid withdrawal and initiating buprenorphine and methadone inadequate for some patients, necessitating novel strategies. Further, co-use of opioids with stimulants drugs is common, and the opioid supply is unpredictable and can be contaminated with benzodiazepines, xylazine, and other substances. To address these challenges, clinicians are increasingly relying on emerging practices, such as low-dose buprenorphine initiation with opioid continuation, rapid methadone titration, and the use of alternative opioid agonists. Hospitals must also reconsider conventional approaches to in-hospital substance use and expand clinicians' understanding and embrace of harm reduction, which is a philosophy and set of practical strategies that supports people who use drugs to be safer and healthier without judgment, coercion, or discrimination. Hospital-to-community care transitions should ensure uninterrupted access to OUD care after discharge, which requires special consideration and coordination. Finally, improving hospital-based addiction care requires dedicated infrastructure and expertise. Preparing hospitals across the US and Canada to deliver OUD best practices requires investments in clinical champions, staff education, leadership commitment, community partnerships, quality metrics, and financing.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this review indicate that fentanyl creates increased urgency and new challenges for hospital OUD care. Hospital clinicians and systems have a central role in addressing the current drug crisis.

Mapping Buprenorphine Access at Philadelphia Pharmacies

OBJECTIVES

Buprenorphine is not reliably stocked in many pharmacies, and pharmacy-level barriers may deter patients from opioid use disorder care. We surveyed all outpatient pharmacies in Philadelphia to describe variation in buprenorphine access and developed a map application to aid in identifying pharmacies that stock the medication.

METHODS

Using a dataset from the Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, we conducted a telephone survey of operating outpatient pharmacies (N = 422) about their buprenorphine stocking and dispensing practices. We used ArcGIS Pro 3.0.3 to join US Census Bureau ZIP code-level race and ethnicity data, conduct descriptive analyses, and create a map application.

RESULTS

We collected data from 351 pharmacies (83% response rate). Two hundred thirty-eight pharmacies (68%) indicated that they regularly stock buprenorphine; 6 (2%) would order it when a prescription is sent. Ninety-one (26%) said that they do not stock or order buprenorphine, and 16 (5%) were unsure. We identified 137 "easier access" pharmacies (39%), meaning they regularly stock buprenorphine, dispense to new patients, and have no dosage maximums. Zip codes with predominantly White residents had a median (interquartile range) of 3 (2-4) "easier access" pharmacies, and those with predominantly Black residents a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1-4.5). Nine zip codes had no "easier access" pharmacies, and 3 had only one; these 3 zip codes are areas with predominantly Black residents.

CONCLUSIONS

Buprenorphine access is not equitable across Philadelphia and a quarter of pharmacies choose not to carry the medication. Our map application may be used to identify pharmacies in Philadelphia that stock buprenorphine.

A Systematic Review of State Office-Based Buprenorphine Treatment Laws Effective During 2022: Counseling, Dosage, and Visit Frequency Requirements

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is among the most effective treatments for opioid use disorder. Even though the federal government recently eliminated the waiver requirement and patient limits applicable to office-based buprenorphine treatment (OBBT), among other settings, some states may still have policies imposing requirements on OBBT providers not required by federal law.

METHODS

We collected statutes and regulations from 50 US states and the District of Columbia (ie, 51 jurisdictions) between August 11 and November 30, 2022 using the Nexis Uni legal database and search terms related to OBBT counseling, dosage, and/or frequency of visits. We then used template analysis, a mixed deductive-inductive qualitative method, to analyze legal content.

RESULTS

Ten jurisdictions (20%) in 2022 had an OBBT counseling, dosage, and/or visit frequency requirement. Four jurisdictions had at least one law in each OBBT policy category examined. One-fifth of jurisdictions have OBBT policies not required under federal law. Five of these jurisdictions are among those with the highest overdose death rates per capita, according to publicly available data from 2021. Some OBBT requirements could potentially limit clinician interest in offering buprenorphine treatment or result in inadequate care (eg, if dosage limitations are too low.).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though a federal waiver is no longer required for OBBT, our results suggests that at least some jurisdictions have other OBBT requirements, such as counseling, dosage, and/or frequency requirements. Given the severity of the ongoing opioid overdose crisis, policymakers should carefully consider the extent to which OBBT requirements are evidence based.

Treatment setting and buprenorphine discontinuation: an analysis of multi-state insurance claims

BACKGROUND

Potential differences in buprenorphine treatment outcomes across various treatment settings are poorly characterized in multi-state administrative data. We thus evaluated the association of opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment setting and insurance type with risk of buprenorphine discontinuation among commercial insurance and Medicaid enrollees initiated on buprenorphine.

METHODS

In this observational, retrospective cohort study using the Merative MarketScan databases (2006-2016), we analyzed buprenorphine retention in 58,200 US adults with OUD. Predictor variables included insurance status (Medicaid vs commercial) and treatment setting, operationalized as substance use disorder (SUD) specialty treatment facility versus outpatient primary care physicians (PCPs) versus outpatient psychiatry, ascertained by linking physician visit codes to buprenorphine prescriptions. Treatment setting was inferred based on timing of prescriber visit claims preceding prescription fills. We estimated time to buprenorphine discontinuation using multivariable cox regression.

RESULTS

Among enrollees with OUD receiving buprenorphine, 26,168 (45.0%) had prescriptions from SUD facilities without outpatient buprenorphine treatment, with the remaining treated by outpatient PCPs (n = 23,899, 41.1%) and psychiatrists (n = 8133, 13.9%). Overall, 50.6% and 73.3% discontinued treatment at 180 and 365 days respectively. Buprenorphine discontinuation was higher among enrollees receiving prescriptions from SUD facilities (aHR = 1.03[1.01-1.06]) and PCPs (aHR = 1.07[1.05-1.10]). Medicaid enrollees had lower buprenorphine retention than those with commercial insurance, particularly those receiving buprenorphine from SUD facilities and PCPs (aHR = 1.24[1.20-1.29] and aHR = 1.39[1.34-1.45] respectively, relative to comparator group of commercial insurance enrollees receiving buprenorphine from outpatient psychiatry).

CONCLUSION

Buprenorphine discontinuation is high across outpatient PCP, psychiatry, and SUD treatment facility settings, with potentially lower treatment retention among Medicaid enrollees receiving care from SUD facilities and PCPs.