Effect of Neprilysin Inhibition on Alzheimer Disease Plasma Biomarkers: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease: Alzheimer's Association Workgroup

The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association convened three separate work groups in 2011 and single work groups in 2012 and 2018 to create recommendations for the diagnosis and characterization of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present document updates the 2018 research framework in response to several recent developments. Defining diseases biologically, rather than based on syndromic presentation, has long been standard in many areas of medicine (e.g., oncology), and is becoming a unifying concept common to all neurodegenerative diseases, not just AD. The present document is consistent with this principle. Our intent is to present objective criteria for diagnosis and staging AD, incorporating recent advances in biomarkers, to serve as a bridge between research and clinical care. These criteria are not intended to provide step-by-step clinical practice guidelines for clinical workflow or specific treatment protocols, but rather serve as general principles to inform diagnosis and staging of AD that reflect current science. HIGHLIGHTS: We define Alzheimer's disease (AD) to be a biological process that begins with the appearance of AD neuropathologic change (ADNPC) while people are asymptomatic. Progression of the neuropathologic burden leads to the later appearance and progression of clinical symptoms. Early-changing Core 1 biomarkers (amyloid positron emission tomography [PET], approved cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and accurate plasma biomarkers [especially phosphorylated tau 217]) map onto either the amyloid beta or AD tauopathy pathway; however, these reflect the presence of ADNPC more generally (i.e., both neuritic plaques and tangles). An abnormal Core 1 biomarker result is sufficient to establish a diagnosis of AD and to inform clinical decision making throughout the disease continuum. Later-changing Core 2 biomarkers (biofluid and tau PET) can provide prognostic information, and when abnormal, will increase confidence that AD is contributing to symptoms. An integrated biological and clinical staging scheme is described that accommodates the fact that common copathologies, cognitive reserve, and resistance may modify relationships between clinical and biological AD stages.

Alzheimer disease blood biomarkers: considerations for population-level use

In the past 5 years, we have witnessed the first approved Alzheimer disease (AD) disease-modifying therapy and the development of blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) to aid the diagnosis of AD. For many reasons, including accessibility, invasiveness and cost, BBMs are more acceptable and feasible for patients than a lumbar puncture (for cerebrospinal fluid collection) or neuroimaging. However, many questions remain regarding how best to utilize BBMs at the population level. In this Review, we outline the factors that warrant consideration for the widespread implementation and interpretation of AD BBMs. To set the scene, we review the current use of biomarkers, including BBMs, in AD. We go on to describe the characteristics of typical patients with cognitive impairment in primary care, who often differ from the patient populations used in AD BBM research studies. We also consider factors that might affect the interpretation of BBM tests, such as comorbidities, sex and race or ethnicity. We conclude by discussing broader issues such as ethics, patient and provider preference, incidental findings and dealing with indeterminate results and imperfect accuracy in implementing BBMs at the population level.

Serum Markers of Neurodegeneration Are Strongly Linked to Heart Failure Severity and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is prevalent in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), affecting self-care and outcomes. Novel blood-based biomarkers have emerged as potential diagnostic tools for neurodegeneration.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess neurodegeneration in HFrEF by measuring neurofilament light chain (NfL), total tau (t-tau), amyloid beta 40 (Aβ40), and amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42) in a large, well-characterized cohort.

METHODS

The study included 470 patients with HFrEF from a biobank-linked prospective registry at the Medical University of Vienna. High-sensitivity single-molecule assays were used for measurement. Unplanned heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause death were recorded as outcome parameters.

RESULTS

All markers, but not the Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio, correlated with HF severity, ie, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and NYHA functional class, and comorbidity burden and were significantly associated with all-cause death and HF hospitalization (crude HR: all-cause death: NfL: 4.44 [95% CI: 3.02-6.53], t-tau: 5.04 [95% CI: 2.97-8.58], Aβ40: 3.90 [95% CI: 2.27-6.72], and Aβ42: 5.14 [95% CI: 2.84-9.32]; HF hospitalization: NfL: 2.48 [95% CI: 1.60-3.85], t-tau: 3.44 [95% CI: 1.95-6.04], Aβ40: 3.13 [95% CI: 1.84-5.34], and Aβ42: 3.48 [95% CI: 1.93-6.27]; P < 0.001 for all). These associations remained statistically significant after multivariate adjustment including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. The discriminatory accuracy of NfL in predicting all-cause mortality was comparable to the well-established risk marker N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (C-index: 0.70 vs 0.72; P = 0.225), whereas the C-indices of t-tau, Aβ40, Aβ42, and the Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio were significantly lower (P < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurodegeneration is directly interwoven with the progression of HF. Biomarkers of neurodegeneration, particularly NfL, may help identify patients potentially profiting from a comprehensive neurological work-up. Further research is necessary to test whether early diagnosis or optimized HFrEF treatment can preserve cognitive function.

Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease - moving towards a new era of diagnostics

Alzheimer's disease (AD), a primary cause of dementia globally, is traditionally diagnosed via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measures and positron emission tomography (PET). The invasiveness, cost, and limited accessibility of these methods have led to exploring blood-based biomarkers as a promising alternative for AD diagnosis and monitoring. Recent advancements in sensitive immunoassays have identified potential blood-based biomarkers, such as Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) species. This paper briefly evaluates the clinical utility and reliability of these biomarkers across various AD stages, highlighting challenges like refining plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 assays and enhancing the precision of p-tau, particularly p-tau181, p-tau217, and p-tau231. The discussion also covers other plasma biomarkers like neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and synaptic biomarkers, assessing their significance in AD diagnostics. The need for ongoing research and development of robust assays to match the performance of CSF and PET biomarkers is underscored. In summary, blood-based biomarkers are increasingly crucial in AD diagnosis, follow-up, prognostication, treatment response evaluation, and population screening, particularly in primary care settings. These developments are set to revolutionize AD diagnostics, offering earlier and more accessible detection and management options.

[On the road to biological blood diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease?]

The growing number of people suffering from Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents a major public health problem. The diagnosis of AD is multidisciplinary and involves the use of amyloid and tau biomarkers measured in cerebrospinal fluid. Recent advances in analytical techniques now allow us to measure these biomarkers in blood. Blood biomarkers offer particularly promising potential for early, minimally invasive detection of AD, as well as for differential diagnosis of dementia and patient follow-up. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current and candidate blood biomarkers for AD, their informative value, and their potential to be integrated into clinical practice in the near future.

A blood-based biomarker workflow for optimal tau-PET referral in memory clinic settings

Blood-based biomarkers for screening may guide tau positrion emissition tomography (PET) scan referrals to optimize prognostic evaluation in Alzheimer's disease. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, pTau181, pTau217, pTau231, NfL, and GFAP were measured along with tau-PET in memory clinic patients with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment or dementia, in the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study (n = 548) and in the TRIAD study (n = 179). For each plasma biomarker, cutoffs were determined for 90%, 95%, or 97.5% sensitivity to detect tau-PET-positivity. We calculated the percentage of patients below the cutoffs (who would not undergo tau-PET; "saved scans") and the tau-PET-positivity rate among participants above the cutoffs (who would undergo tau-PET; "positive predictive value"). Generally, plasma pTau217 performed best. At the 95% sensitivity cutoff in both cohorts, pTau217 resulted in avoiding nearly half tau-PET scans, with a tau-PET-positivity rate among those who would be referred for a scan around 70%. And although tau-PET was strongly associated with subsequent cognitive decline, in BioFINDER-2 it predicted cognitive decline only among individuals above the referral cutoff on plasma pTau217, supporting that this workflow could reduce prognostically uninformative tau-PET scans. In conclusion, plasma pTau217 may guide selection of patients for tau-PET, when accurate prognostic information is of clinical value.

Influence of Physiological Variables and Comorbidities on Plasma Aβ40, Aβ42, and p-tau181 Levels in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals

Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are a promising tool that may help in early diagnosis. However, their levels may be influenced by physiological parameters and comorbidities that should be considered before they can be used at the population level. For this purpose, we assessed the influences of different comorbidities on AD plasma markers in 208 cognitively unimpaired subjects. We analyzed both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, and p-tau181 using the fully automated Lumipulse platform. The relationships between the different plasma markers and physiological variables were studied using linear regression models. The mean differences in plasma markers according to comorbidity groups were also studied. The glomerular filtration rate showed an influence on plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels but not on the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. The amyloid ratio was significantly lower in diabetic and hypertensive subjects, and the mean p-tau181 levels were higher in hypertensive subjects. The glomerular filtration rate may have an inverse relationship on plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels but not on the amyloid ratio, suggesting that the latter is a more stable marker to use in the general population. Cardiovascular risk factors might have a long-term effect on the amyloid ratio and plasma levels of p-tau181.

Acute Hyperglycemia Induced by Hyperglycemic Clamp Affects Plasma Amyloid-β in Type 2 Diabetes

Background

Individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have an increased risk of cognitive symptoms and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Mis-metabolism with aggregation of amyloid-β peptides (Aβ) play a key role in AD pathophysiology. Therefore, human studies on Aβ metabolism and T2D are warranted.

Objective

The objective of this study was to examine whether acute hyperglycemia affects plasma Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 concentrations in individuals with T2D and matched controls.

Methods

Ten participants with T2D and 11 controls (median age, 69 years; range, 66-72 years) underwent hyperglycemic clamp and placebo clamp (saline infusion) in a randomized order, each lasting 4 hours. Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, and insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) plasma concentrations were measured in blood samples taken at 0 and 4 hours of each clamp. Linear mixed-effect regression models were used to evaluate the 4-hour changes in Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 concentrations, adjusting for body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and 4-hour change in insulin concentration.

Results

At baseline, Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 concentrations did not differ between the two groups. During the hyperglycemic clamp, Aβ decreased in the control group, compared to the placebo clamp (Aβ1-40: p = 0.034, Aβ1-42: p = 0.020), IDE increased (p = 0.016) during the hyperglycemic clamp, whereas no significant changes in either Aβ or IDE was noted in the T2D group.

Conclusions

Clamp-induced hyperglycemia was associated with increased IDE levels and enhanced Aβ40 and Aβ42 clearance in controls, but not in individuals with T2D. We hypothesize that insulin-degrading enzyme was inhibited during hyperglycemic conditions in people with T2D.