1
|
Kirtane AR, Bi J, Rajesh NU, Tang C, Jimenez M, Witt E, McGovern MK, Cafi AB, Hatfield SJ, Rosenstock L, Becker SL, Machado N, Venkatachalam V, Freitas D, Huang X, Chan A, Lopes A, Kim H, Kim N, Collins JE, Howard ME, Manchkanti S, Hong TS, Byrne JD, Traverso G. Radioprotection of healthy tissue via nanoparticle-delivered mRNA encoding for a damage-suppressor protein found in tardigrades. Nat Biomed Eng 2025:10.1038/s41551-025-01360-5. [PMID: 40011582 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-025-01360-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2025] [Indexed: 02/28/2025]
Abstract
Patients undergoing radiation therapy experience debilitating side effects because of toxicity arising from radiation-induced DNA strand breaks in normal peritumoural cells. Here, inspired by the ability of tardigrades to resist extreme radiation through the expression of a damage-suppressor protein that binds to DNA and reduces strand breaks, we show that the local and transient expression of the protein can reduce radiation-induced DNA damage in oral and rectal epithelial tissues (which are commonly affected during radiotherapy for head-and-neck and prostate cancers, respectively). We used ionizable lipid nanoparticles supplemented with biodegradable cationic polymers to enhance the transfection efficiency and delivery of messenger RNA encoding the damage-suppressor protein into buccal and rectal tissues. In mice with orthotopic oral cancer, messenger RNA-based radioprotection of normal tissue preserved the efficacy of radiation therapy. The strategy may be broadly applicable to the protection of healthy tissue from DNA-damaging agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameya R Kirtane
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jianling Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Netra U Rajesh
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Faculty of Applied Sciences and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chaoyang Tang
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Miguel Jimenez
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Emily Witt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Megan K McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Arielle B Cafi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Samual J Hatfield
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Lauren Rosenstock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sarah L Becker
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nicole Machado
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Veena Venkatachalam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dylan Freitas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xisha Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alvin Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Aaron Lopes
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Hyunjoon Kim
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Nayoon Kim
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joy E Collins
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Michelle E Howard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Srija Manchkanti
- Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James D Byrne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Giovanni Traverso
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nguyen DD, Wallis CJD. The impact of informed decision-making on prostate cancer survivorship. Can Urol Assoc J 2025; 19:40-41. [PMID: 39946187 PMCID: PMC11819848 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.9107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- David-Dan Nguyen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baker KM, Andersen L, McHugh M, Foxwell AM, Zhou Q, Ratcliffe SJ, Huang L, Aryal S, Grady C, Ulrich CM. Regret in Clinical Trial Participation Among Cancer Patients. J Palliat Med 2025; 28:185-192. [PMID: 39607718 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: This analysis examined regret from participation in cancer clinical trials (CCT) and explored associations between regret and symptom burden, symptom bother, therapeutic optimism, and the importance of spiritual beliefs. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from a study of American CCT patient-participants conducted from 2015 to 2019. Descriptive statistics, bivariate associations, and logistic regression were used to evaluate regret in this sample (n = 325). Results: About 10% of the sample reported regret. Younger age, increased symptom burden, increased symptom bother, increased severe symptoms, and a lower level of therapeutic optimism were significantly associated with regret (p < 0.05) compared to those who did not experience regret. The final regression model identified that younger age, symptom burden, and therapeutic optimism significantly predicted regret (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Understanding regret among research participants may improve CCT retention and ensure ethical research practices. Symptom experiences may play a key role in experiences of regret in CCT participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla M Baker
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lucy Andersen
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Molly McHugh
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anessa M Foxwell
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Clinical Practices of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Qiuping Zhou
- George Washington University School of Nursing, Ashburn, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Liming Huang
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- BECCA Lab, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Subhash Aryal
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- BECCA Lab, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christine Grady
- Department of Bioethics Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Connie M Ulrich
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dulaney C, Dover L. PROshot: Hypofractionated Postmastectomy Radiation, Palliative Liver Radiation, Celiac Plexus Radiosurgery, Perioperative Chemoradiation for Gastric Cancer, and Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Prostatectomy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2025; 15:3-7. [PMID: 39779169 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2024] [Revised: 10/08/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Caleb Dulaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Regional Cancer Center, Meridian, Mississippi.
| | - Laura Dover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ascension St. Vincent's East, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porcaro AB, Serafin E, Montanaro F, Costantino S, De Bon L, Baielli A, Artoni F, Roggero L, Brancelli C, Boldini M, Bianchi A, Veccia A, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Cerruto MA, Bertolo RG, Antonelli A. Elderly Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Robotic Surgery Are More Likely to Harbor Adverse Pathology Features and Experience Disease Progression: Analysis of the Prognostic Impact of Adverse Pathology Risk Score Patterns Using Briganti's 2012 Nomogram and EAU Risk Groups. J Clin Med 2024; 14:193. [PMID: 39797276 PMCID: PMC11721982 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2024] [Revised: 12/12/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer (PCa) is prevalent among men over 70. Treatment may involve interventions like radical prostatectomy. The objective of this study was to investigate the combination of adverse pathology patterns on PCa progression through the Briganti 2012 nomogram and EAU risk classes in elderly patients treated with robotic surgery. Methods: A cohort of 1047 patients treated from January 2013 to December 2021 was categorized as being older if aged 70 or above. The adverse pathology risk scores were ranked from zero to three. These scores were then analyzed for correlations with the Briganti 2012 nomogram via EAU risk groups and for PCa progression. Results: Overall, older age was detected in 287 patients who had higher rates of adverse pathology features combined into a pattern risk score of 3. Within each age group, the adverse pathology risk score patterns were positively predicted by the Briganti 2012 nomogram across EAU prognostic groups. After a median (95% CI) follow-up period of 95 months, PCa progression occurred in 237 patients, of whom 68 were elderly and more likely to progress as adverse pathology patterns increased, particularly for a risk score of 3 (p < 0.0001), which was almost three times higher than that in younger patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Managing PCa in elderly patients is challenging due to their increasing life expectancy. The Briganti 2012 nomogram effectively predicts disease progression in this population. Elderly prostate cancer patients have higher severe pathology rates predicted independently by the Briganti 2012 nomogram, with nearly triple the risk of progression compared to that in younger cases, necessitating tailored treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37126 Verona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (A.A.)
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Sonia Costantino
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Lorenzo De Bon
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Luca Roggero
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Claudio Brancelli
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Michele Boldini
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37126 Verona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (A.A.)
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37126 Verona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (A.A.)
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37126 Verona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (A.A.)
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Riccardo Giuseppe Bertolo
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37126 Verona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (A.A.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy; (E.S.); (F.M.); (S.C.); (L.D.B.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (L.R.); (C.B.); (M.B.); (M.B.); (M.A.C.); (R.G.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lopez AA, Awamlh BAHA, Huang LC, Zhao Z, Koyama T, Hoffman KE, Wallis CJD, Cavanaugh K, Talwar R, Morgans AK, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Wu XC, Li J, O'Neil BB, Penson DF, Barocas DA. Patient-reported functional outcomes and treatment-related regret in Hispanic and Spanish-speaking men following prostate cancer treatment. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00775-0. [PMID: 39690079 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 10/31/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Compare functional outcomes and treatment-related regret over 10 years in Spanish- and English-speaking Hispanic men compared to non-Hispanic men following treatment of localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data from a prospective cohort study of men with localized prostate cancer treated with active surveillance, radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy were used to examine the effect of survey language (Spanish speaking vs. English speaking) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic) on functional outcomes and treatment-related regret over 10 years. Outcomes were measured using validated questionaries adjusting for baseline patient and disease characteristics. RESULTS A total of 770 men were included, 12% were Spanish-speaking and 12% were English-speaking Hispanic men. Compared to non-Hispanic men, Spanish-speaking Hispanic men had clinically meaningfully better urinary incontinence scores at years 3, 5 and 10 (adjusted mean difference [aMD], 12.4, 95% CI, 4.8 to 20.0; at year 10), as well as better bowel function scores at 10 years (aMD, 5.1, 95% CI 2.3 to 8.0). English-speaking Hispanic men had clinically worse urinary incontinence at 3 and 5 years (aMD, -10.7 [95% CI, -17.6 to -3.9]; at year 5) and bowel function at 10 years (aMD, -4.3 [95% CI, -8.2 to -0.4]) compared to Spanish-speaking Hispanic men. English-speaking Hispanic men were more likely to report regret than Spanish-speaking Hispanic men at 10 years (adjusted odds ratio, 7.9, 95% CI, 1.3-46.2). CONCLUSIONS These findings underscore the importance of considering language and ethnicity when providing counseling and support for prostate cancer survivors, emphasizing the need for personalized patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea A Lopez
- Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Li-Ching Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Tatsuki Koyama
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston,Texas, USA
| | - Christopher J D Wallis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital; Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kerri Cavanaugh
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Vanderbilt Center for Effective Health Communication, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ruchika Talwar
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ann S Hamilton
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University New Orleans School of Public Health, Baton Rouge, Lousiana, USA
| | - Jie Li
- Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Brock B O'Neil
- Department of Urology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Nashville TN, USA
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu Y, Zhao L, Liu J, Wang L. Artificial intelligence-based personalized clinical decision-making for patients with localized prostate cancer: surgery versus radiotherapy. Oncologist 2024; 29:e1692-e1700. [PMID: 39083326 PMCID: PMC11630763 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery and radiotherapy are primary nonconservative treatments for prostate cancer (PCa). However, personalizing treatment options between these treatment modalities is challenging due to unclear criteria. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model that can identify patients with localized PCa who would benefit more from either radiotherapy or surgery, thereby providing personalized clinical decision-making. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from consecutive patients with localized PCa who received radiotherapy or surgery with complete records of clinicopathological variables and follow-up results in 12 registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were analyzed. Patients from 7 registries were randomly assigned to training (TD) and internal validation datasets (IVD) at a 9:1 ratio. The remaining 5 registries constituted the external validation dataset (EVD). TD was divided into training-radiotherapy (TRD) and training-surgery (TSD) datasets, and IVD was divided into internal-radiotherapy (IRD) and internal-surgery (ISD) datasets. Six models for radiotherapy and surgery were trained using TRD and TSD to predict radiotherapy survival probability (RSP) and surgery survival probability (SSP), respectively. The models with the highest concordance index (C-index) on IRD and ISD were chosen to form the final treatment recommendation model (FTR). FTR recommendations were based on the higher value between RSP and SSP. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for patients receiving recommended (consistent group) and nonrecommended treatments (inconsistent group), which were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS The study included 118 236 patients, categorized into TD (TRD: 44 621; TSD: 41 500), IVD (IRD: 4949; ISD: 4621), and EVD (22 545). Both radiotherapy and surgery models accurately predicted RSP and SSP (C-index: 0.735-0.787 and 0.769-0.797, respectively). The consistent group exhibited higher survival rates than the inconsistent group, particularly among patients not suitable for active surveillance (P < .001). CONCLUSION FTR accurately identifies patients with localized PCa who would benefit more from either radiotherapy or surgery, offering clinicians an effective AI tool to make informed choices between these 2 treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuwei Liu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Litao Zhao
- School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiangang Liu
- School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Engineering Research Center of Cardiovascular Wisdom Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gartrell BA, Phalguni A, Bajko P, Mundle SD, McCarthy SA, Brookman-May SD, De Solda F, Jain R, Yu Ko W, Ploussard G, Hadaschik B. Influential Factors Impacting Treatment Decision-making and Decision Regret in Patients with Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:1216-1227. [PMID: 38744587 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Treatment decision-making (TDM) for patients with localized (LPC) or locally advanced (LAPC) prostate cancer is complex, and post-treatment decision regret (DR) is common. The factors driving TDM or predicting DR remain understudied. OBJECTIVE Two systematic literature reviews were conducted to explore the factors associated with TDM and DR. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three online databases, select congress proceedings, and gray literature were searched (September 2022). Publications on TDM and DR in LPC/LAPC were prioritized based on the following: 2012 onward, ≥100 patients, journal article, and quantitative data. The Preferred Reporting Items Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Influential factors were those with p < 0.05; for TDM, factors described as "a decision driver", "associated", "influential", or "significant" were also included. The key factors were determined by number of studies, consistency of evidence, and study quality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seventy-five publications (68 studies) reported TDM. Patient participation in TDM was reported in 34 publications; overall, patients preferred an active/shared role. Of 39 influential TDM factors, age, ethnicity, external factors (physician recommendation most common), and treatment characteristics/toxicity were key. Forty-nine publications reported DR. The proportion of patients experiencing DR varied by treatment type: 7-43% (active surveillance), 12-57% (radical prostatectomy), 1-49% (radiotherapy), 28-49% (androgen-deprivation therapy), and 21-47% (combination therapy). Of 42 significant DR factors, treatment toxicity (sexual/urinary/bowel dysfunction), patient role in TDM, and treatment type were key. CONCLUSIONS The key factors impacting TDM were physician recommendation, age, ethnicity, and treatment characteristics. Treatment toxicity and TDM approach were the key factors influencing DR. To help patients navigate factors influencing TDM and to limit DR, a shared, consensual TDM approach between patients, caregivers, and physicians is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY We looked at factors influencing treatment decision-making (TDM) and decision regret (DR) in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. The key factors influencing TDM were doctor's recommendation, patient age/ethnicity, and treatment side effects. A shared, consensual TDM approach between patients and doctors was found to limit DR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Gartrell
- Departments of Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | - Angaja Phalguni
- Evidence Synthesis, Genesis Research Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paulina Bajko
- Evidence Synthesis, Genesis Research Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Suneel D Mundle
- Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Sharon A McCarthy
- Clinical Research Oncology, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Sabine D Brookman-May
- Clinical Research Oncology, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, München, Germany
| | - Francesco De Solda
- Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Ruhee Jain
- Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Wellam Yu Ko
- University of British Columbia Men's Health Research Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alberti A, Nicoletti R, Castellani D, Yuan Y, Maggi M, Dibilio E, Resta GR, Makrides P, Sessa F, Sebastianelli A, Serni S, Gacci M, De Nunzio C, Teoh JYC, Campi R. Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Experience Measures After Active Surveillance Versus Radiation Therapy Versus Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Prospective Comparative Studies. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:1255-1266. [PMID: 38816298 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Current management options for localized prostate cancer (PCa) include radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), and active surveillance (AS). Despite comparable oncological outcomes, there is still lack of evidence on their comparative effectiveness in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing PROMs and PREMs after all recommended management options for localized PCa (RP, RT, AS). METHODS A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases in accordance with recommendations from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Office and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. All prospective clinical trials reporting PROMs and/or PREMs for comparisons of RP versus RT versus AS were included. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize the review findings. No quantitative synthesis was performed because of the heterogeneity and limitations of the studies available. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Our findings reveal that RP mostly affects urinary continence and sexual function, with better results for voiding symptoms in comparison to other treatments. RT was associated with greater impairment of bowel function and voiding symptoms. None of the treatments had a significant impact on mental or physical quality of life. Only a few studies reported PREMs, with a high rate of decision regret for all modalities (up to 23%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS All recommended treatments for localized PCa have an impact on PROMs and PREMs, but for different domains and with differing severity. We found significant heterogeneity in PROM collection, so standardization in real-world practice and clinical trials is warranted. Only a few studies have reported PREMs, highlighting an unmet need that should be explored in future studies. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed differences in patient reports of their outcomes and experiences after surgical prostate removal, radiotherapy, or active surveillance for prostate cancer. We found differences in the effects on urinary, bowel, and sexual functions among the treatments, but no difference for mental or physical quality of life. Our results can help doctors and prostate cancer patients in shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Alberti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Dibilio
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Raffaele Resta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pantelis Makrides
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Arcangelo Sebastianelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Woodle T, Quinn G, Laviana AA. Editorial Comment on "Recovery of Social Continence and Sexual Function in Men With High-risk Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Statewide Collaborative". Urology 2024; 193:134-135. [PMID: 39074592 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.07.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Tarah Woodle
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Graham Quinn
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Austin at Texas, Austin, TX
| | - Aaron A Laviana
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Austin at Texas, Austin, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Porcaro AB, Montanaro F, Baielli A, Artoni F, Brancelli C, Costantino S, Franceschini A, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Serafin E, Veccia A, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Bertolo RG, Antonelli A. Briganti's 2012 nomogram is an independent predictor of prostate cancer progression in EAU intermediate-risk class: results from 527 patients treated with robotic surgery. Asian J Androl 2024; 26:587-591. [PMID: 39075792 PMCID: PMC11614175 DOI: 10.4103/aja202439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT The study aimed to test if Briganti's 2012 nomogram could be associated with the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) progression in European Association of Urology (EAU) intermediate-risk patients treated with robotic surgery. From January 2013 to December 2021, 527 consecutive patients belonging to the EAU intermediate-risk class were selected. Briganti's 2012 nomogram, which predicts the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI), was assessed as a continuous and dichotomous variable that categorized up to the median of 3.0%. Disease progression defined as biochemical recurrence and/or metastatic progression was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards (univariate and multivariate analysis). After a median follow-up of 95.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.5-111.4), PCa progression occurred in 108 (20.5%) patients who were more likely to present with an unfavorable nomogram risk score, independently by the occurrence of unfavorable pathology including tumor upgrading and upstaging as well as PLNI. Accordingly, as Briganti's 2012 risk score increased, patients were more likely to experience disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.060; 95% CI: 1.021-1.100; P = 0.002); moreover, it also remained significant when dichotomized above a risk score of 3.0% (HR = 2.052; 95% CI: 1.298-3.243; P < 0.0001) after adjustment for clinical factors. In the studied risk population, PCa progression was independently predicted by Briganti's 2012 nomogram. Specifically, we found that patients were more likely to experience disease progression as their risk score increased. Because of the significant association between risk score and tumor behavior, the nomogram can further stratify intermediate-risk PCa patients, who represent a heterogeneous risk category for which different treatment paradigms exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Claudio Brancelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Sonia Costantino
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Andrea Franceschini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila 67100, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Triner D, Johnson K, Meah S, Daignault-Newton S, Vaishampayan N, Dhir A, Labardee C, Ferrante S, Ginsburg KB, Lane BR, George AK, Semerjian A. Recovery of Social Continence and Sexual Function in Men With High-risk Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Statewide Collaborative. Urology 2024; 193:125-132. [PMID: 38936624 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine post-operative urinary and sexual functional outcomes for men with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) within the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC). METHODS We identified patients who underwent RP for HRPCa in MUSIC between 2014 and 2023. HRPCa was defined according to American Urological Association criteria. Patients completed Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) pre-RP and 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months postoperatively. Primary outcomes included social continence, defined as 0-1 pads used daily; and recovery of sexual function, defined as the ability to achieve erections firm enough for intercourse. Multivariable and bivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with recovery of social continence and sexual function. RESULTS Around 1323 patients were included in the post-RP urinary continence analysis and 422 men in the sexual function analysis. Fifty-eight percent and 86% of patients achieved social continence at 3- and 12-months post-RP, respectively. Continence recovery was associated with higher baseline EPIC-26 urinary continence scores (OR 1.10, per 5 points, 95% CI 1.06-1.15, P <.001), and negatively associated with increasing age (OR 0.78 per 5-year increase, 95% CI 0.71-0.85 P <.001). Fifteen percent of patients had recovery of sexual function at 12-month post-RP. On bivariate analysis, recovery of sexual function was associated with nerve-sparing at time of RP, lower pre-operative PSA, and not receiving post-RP ADT/RT. CONCLUSION RP for HRPCa has acceptable rates of postoperative social continence. However, post-RP recovery of sexual function remains a challenge. This information has important implications for pre-operative counseling and post-operative follow-up for patients with HRPCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Triner
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Kyle Johnson
- Department of Urology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | - Sabir Meah
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | - Apoorv Dhir
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | - Kevin B Ginsburg
- Department of Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Brian R Lane
- Division of Urology, Corewell Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Arvin K George
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Porcaro AB. Prostate cancer biology from clinical prognostic low- to intermediate-risk groups: looking up at the multiple patterns tracking the way forward. Asian J Androl 2024; 26:557-558. [PMID: 38783616 PMCID: PMC11614168 DOI: 10.4103/aja20246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona 37124, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Porcaro AB, Orlando R, Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Baielli A, Artoni F, Brancelli C, Roggero L, Costantino S, Franceschini A, Boldini M, Treccani LP, Montanaro F, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Serafin E, Mazzucato G, Ditonno F, Finocchiaro M, Veccia A, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, De Marco V, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Bertolo R, Antonelli A. Preoperative Briganti Nomogram Score and Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression After Robotic Surgery Beyond EAU Risk Categories. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1763. [PMID: 39596948 PMCID: PMC11596480 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2024] [Revised: 10/03/2024] [Accepted: 10/25/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: We sought to investigate whether the 2012 Briganti nomogram may represent a potential prognostic factor of prostate cancer (PCa) progression after surgical treatment beyond European Association of Urology (EAU) risk categories. Materials and Methods: From January 2013 to December 2021, data on PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary referral center were extracted. The 2012 version of the Briganti nomogram assessing the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion was used. Here, the nomogram score was evaluated both as a continuous and a categorical variable. The association between variables and disease progression after surgery was evaluated through Cox regression models. Results: Overall, 1047 patients were identified. According to the EAU classification system, 297 (28.4%) patients were low-risk, 527 (50.3%) intermediate-risk, and 223 (21.3%) high-risk. The median (interquartile range) 2012 Briganti nomogram score within the investigated population was 3% (2-8%). Median (95% Confidence Interval [CI]) follow-up was 95 (91.9-112.4) months. Disease progression occurred in 237 (22.6%) patients, who were more likely to have an increasing 2012 Briganti nomogram score (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.03; 95%CI: 1.01-1.81; p = 0.015), independently of unfavorable issues at clinical presentation. Moreover, the nomogram score stratified according to tertiles (<3% vs. 3-8% vs. ≥8%) hold significance beyond EAU risk categories: accordingly, the risk of disease progression increased as the score increased from the first (reference) to the second (HR: 1.50; 95%CI: 1.67-3.72; p < 0.001) up to the third (HR: 3.26; 95%CI: 2.26-4.72; p < 0.001) tertile. Conclusions: Beyond EAU risk categories, the 2012 Briganti nomogram represented an independent predictor of PCa progression after surgery. Likewise, as the nomogram score increased so patients were more likely to experience disease progression. Accordingly, it may allow further stratification of patients within each risk category to modulate appropriate treatment paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, “Vito Fazzi” Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy; (A.P.); (A.T.)
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, “Vito Fazzi” Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy; (A.P.); (A.T.)
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Claudio Brancelli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Luca Roggero
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Sonia Costantino
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Andrea Franceschini
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Lorenzo Pierangelo Treccani
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Mariana Finocchiaro
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy;
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (R.O.); (A.B.); (F.A.); (C.B.); (L.R.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (M.B.); (L.P.T.); (F.M.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (E.S.); (G.M.); (F.D.); (M.F.); (A.V.); (R.R.); (V.D.M.); (M.A.C.); (R.B.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bahler CD, Tachibana I, Tann M, Collins K, Swensson JK, Green MA, Mathias CJ, Tong Y, Yong C, Boris RS, Brocken E, Hutchins GD, Sims JB, Hill DV, Smith N, Ferari C, Love H, Koch MO. Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography for Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer and Surgical Guidance: A Prospective Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. J Urol 2024; 212:290-298. [PMID: 38785259 PMCID: PMC11414573 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Survivors of surgically managed prostate cancer may experience urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Our aim was to determine if 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography CT (PSMA-PET) in addition to multiparametric (mp) MRI scans improved surgical decision-making for nonnerve-sparing or nerve-sparing approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS We prospectively enrolled 50 patients at risk for extraprostatic extension (EPE) who were scheduled for prostatectomy. After mpMRI and PSMA-PET images were read for EPE prediction, surgeons prospectively answered questionnaires based on mpMRI and PSMA-PET scans on the decision for nerve-sparing or nonnerve-sparing approach. Final whole-mount pathology was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated and McNemar's test was used to compare imaging modalities. RESULTS The median age and PSA were 61.5 years and 7.0 ng/dL. The sensitivity for EPE along the posterior neurovascular bundle was higher for PSMA-PET than mpMRI (86% vs 57%, P = .03). For MRI, the specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curves were 77%, 40%, 87%, and 0.67, and for PSMA-PET were 73%, 46%, 95%, and 0.80. PSMA-PET and mpMRI reads differed on 27 nerve bundles, with PSMA-PET being correct in 20 cases and MRI being correct in 7 cases. Surgeons predicted correct nerve-sparing approach 74% of the time with PSMA-PET scan in addition to mpMRI compared to 65% with mpMRI alone (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET scan was more sensitive than mpMRI for EPE along the neurovascular bundles and improved surgical decisions for nerve-sparing approach. Further study of PSMA-PET for surgical guidance is warranted in the unfavorable intermediate-risk or worse populations. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NCT04936334.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark Tann
- Indiana University, Department of Radiology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Katrina Collins
- Indiana University, Department of Pathology, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Mark A Green
- Indiana University, Department of Radiology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Carla J Mathias
- Indiana University, Department of Radiology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Yan Tong
- Indiana University, Department of Statistics, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Courtney Yong
- Indiana University, Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Ronald S Boris
- Indiana University, Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Eric Brocken
- Indiana University, Department of Pathology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Gary D Hutchins
- Indiana University, Department of Radiology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Justin B Sims
- Indiana University, Department of Radiology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Danielle V Hill
- Indiana University, Department of Radiology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nathaniel Smith
- Indiana University, Department of Radiology, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Harrison Love
- Indiana University, Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Michael O Koch
- Indiana University, Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tan N, Pollock JR, Margolis DJA, Padhani AR, Tempany C, Woo S, Gorin MA. Management of Patients With a Negative Multiparametric Prostate MRI Examination: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 223:e2329969. [PMID: 37877601 PMCID: PMC11407066 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate aids risk stratification of patients with elevated PSA levels. Although most clinically significant prostate cancers are detected by mpMRI, insignificant cancers are less evident. Thus, multiple international prostate cancer guidelines now endorse routine use of prostate MRI as a secondary screening test before prostate biopsy. Nonetheless, management of patients with negative mpMRI results (defined as PI-RADS category 1 or 2) remains unclear. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review summarizes the available literature on patients with an elevated screening PSA level and a negative prostate mpMRI result and provides guidance for these patients' management. Systematic biopsy should not be routinely performed after a negative mpMRI examination in patients at average risk but should be considered in patients at high risk. In patients who undergo PSA screening rather than systematic biopsy after negative mpMRI, clear triggers should be established for when to perform a repeat MRI examination. Patients with a negative MRI result followed by negative biopsy should follow their health care practitioners' preferred guidelines concerning subsequent PSA screening for the patient's risk level. Insufficient high-level data exist to support routine use of adjunctive serum or urine biomarkers, artificial intelligence, or PSMA PET to determine the need for prostate biopsy after a negative mpMRI examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelly Tan
- Mayo Clinic Department of Radiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Middlesex, UK
| | - Clare Tempany
- Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital Boston MA
| | - Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael A. Gorin
- Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Panunzio A, Gallina S, Serafin E, Tafuri A, Trabacchin N, Orlando R, Ornaghi PI, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D'Aietti D, Montanaro F, Brusa D, Patuzzo GM, Artoni F, Baielli A, Migliorini F, De Marco V, Veccia A, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Tumor upgrading among very favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: how can it impact the clinical course? Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:2597-2605. [PMID: 38553619 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04019-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to investigate predictors of unfavorable tumor upgrading in very favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, in addition to evaluate how it may affect the risk of disease progression. METHODS A very favorable subset of IR PCa patients presenting with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/mL, percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC) < 50%, and either International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 1 and clinical stage T2b or ISUP grade group 2 and clinical stage T1c-2b was identified. Unfavorable pathology at radical prostatectomy was defined as the presence of ISUP grade group > 2 (unfavorable tumor upgrading), extracapsular extension (ECE), and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). Disease progression was defined as the event of biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. Associations were evaluated by Cox regression and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Overall, 210 patients were identified between January 2013 and October 2020. Unfavorable tumor upgrading was detected in 71 (33.8%) cases, and adverse tumor stage, including ECE or SVI in 18 (8.6%) and 11 (5.2%) patients, respectively. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 38.5 (16-61) months. PCa progression occurred in 24 (11.4%) patients. Very favorable IR PCa patients with unfavorable tumor upgrading at final pathology showed a persistent risk of disease progression, which hold significance after adjustment for all factors (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 5.95, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.97-17.92, p = 0.002) of which PSA was an independent predictor (HR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.08, p = 0.008). Moreover, these subjects were more likely to belong to the biopsy ISUP grade group 2. CONCLUSIONS Very favorable IR PCa patients hiding unfavorable tumor upgrading were more likely to experience disease progression. Unfavorable tumor upgrading involved about one-third of cases and was less likely to occur in patients presenting with biopsy ISUP grade group 1. Tumor misclassification is an issue to discuss, when counseling this subset of patients for active surveillance because of the risk of delayed active treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Nicolò Trabacchin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Irene Ornaghi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D'Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Brusa
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Porcaro AB, Costantino S, Brancelli C, Baielli A, Artoni F, Montanaro F, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Serafin E, Veccia A, Franceschini A, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Bertolo RG, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. 2012 Briganti nomogram predict prostate cancer progression in EAU intermediate risk with unfavorable tumor grade: A single center experience. Urologia 2024; 91:531-537. [PMID: 38780183 DOI: 10.1177/03915603241252911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the potential prognostic impact of Briganti's 2012 nomogram in EAU intermediate-risk patients presenting with an unfavorable tumor grade and treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, eventually associated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2013 to December 2021, the study included 179 EAU intermediate-risk patients presenting with an unfavorable tumor grade (ISUP 3), eventually associated with a PSA of 10-20 ng/ml and/or cT-2b. Briganti's 2012 nomogram was assessed as both a continuous and dichotomous variable, categorized according to the median (risk score ⩾7% vs <7%). Disease progression, defined as biochemical recurrence and/or metastatic progression, was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards in both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Disease progression occurred in 43 (24%) patients after a median (95% CI) follow-up of 78 (65.7-88.4) months. The nomogram risk score predicted disease progression, evaluated both as a continuous variable (hazard ratio, HR = 1.064; 95% CI: 1.035-1.093; p < 0.0001) and as a categorical variable (HR = 3.399; 95% CI: 1.740-6.638; p < 0.0001). This association was confirmed in multivariate analysis, where hazard ratios remained consistent even after adjusting for clinical and pathological factors. CONCLUSIONS In EAU intermediate-risk PCa cases presenting with an unfavorable tumor grade and treated surgically, Briganti's 2012 nomogram was associated with disease progression after surgery. Consequently, as the nomogram risk score increased, patients were more likely to experience PCa progression, facilitating the stratification of the patient population into distinct prognostic subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sonia Costantino
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Brancelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Franceschini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giuseppe Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wallis CJD, Diehl C, Barocas DA, Beskow LM. The lived experience of prostate cancer: 10-year survivor perspectives following contemporary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1370-1383. [PMID: 37171717 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01381-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies relying on standardized instruments to measure patient-centered harms and benefits of cancer treatment may fail to capture important elements of the lived experience of cancer patients. Further, qualitative studies on the survivorship experience of men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) are limited. We sought to explore the early experience, long-term experience, and advice provided for others among long-term survivors of localized PCa. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews with a subset (n = 66) of respondents to a survey of 10-year PCa survivors who underwent active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, or radiotherapy. Topics included early and long-term experiences and advice to other men and physicians. RESULTS Immediately after treatment, men were mostly satisfied with radiation and active surveillance due to remaining whole and avoiding surgical removal of the prostate. Meanwhile, men treated with surgery felt relieved by the removal of cancer. Some early negative perception was related to short-term anxiety, particularly among men who underwent active surveillance. Long-term experiences included accepting the trade-offs of urinary and sexual side effects with survival. Most men fared well financially, some had strengthened relationships, and many reported greater appreciation and compassion. Men provided essential advice to other men and physicians on the importance of gathering detailed information on treatments and establishing a strong relationship with physicians. CONCLUSIONS Long-term survivors of localized PCa generally do well by accepting the long-term effects of contemporary treatments, experiencing strengthened relationships, and developing a better overall life approach. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS We provide useful perspectives and insights for men opting to use current-day treatments for localized PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh
- Department of Urology, Medical Center North, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Avenue South, A-1302, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
| | | | - Carolyn Diehl
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Medical Center North, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Avenue South, A-1302, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Laura M Beskow
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Porcaro AB, Panunzio A, Orlando R, Montanaro F, Baielli A, Artoni F, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Mazzucato G, Serafin E, Patuzzo GM, Veccia A, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Bertolo R, Tafuri A, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. The 2012 Briganti nomogram not only predicts lymph node involvement but also disease progression in surgically treated intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with PSA <10 ng/mL, ISUP grade group 3, and clinical stage up to cT2b. Int Braz J Urol 2024; 50:450-458. [PMID: 38743063 PMCID: PMC11262719 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We assessed the prognostic impact of the 2012 Briganti nomogram on prostate cancer (PCa) progression in intermediate-risk (IR) patients presenting with PSA <10ng/mL, ISUP grade group 3, and clinical stage up to cT2b treated with robot assisted radical prostatectomy eventually associated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2013 to December 2021, data of surgically treated IR PCa patients were retrospectively evaluated. Only patients presenting with the above-mentioned features were considered. The 2012 Briganti nomogram was assessed either as a continuous and a categorical variable (up to the median, which was detected as 6%, vs. above the median). The association with PCa progression, defined as biochemical recurrence, and/or metastatic progression, was evaluated by Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS Overall, 147 patients were included. Compared to subjects with a nomogram score up to 6%, those presenting with a score above 6% were more likely to be younger, had larger/palpable tumors, presented with higher PSA, underwent tumor upgrading, harbored non-organ confined disease, and had positive surgical margins at final pathology. PCa progression, which occurred in 32 (21.7%) cases, was independently predicted by the 2012 Briganti nomogram both considered as a continuous (Hazard Ratio [HR]:1.04, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]:1.01-1.08;p=0.021), and a categorical variable (HR:2.32; 95%CI:1.11-4.87;p=0.026), even after adjustment for tumor upgrading. CONCLUSIONS In IR PCa patients with PSA <10ng/mL, ISUP grade group 3, and clinical stage up to cT2b, the 2012 Briganti nomogram independently predicts PCa progression. In this challenging subset of patients, this tool can identify prognostic subgroups, independently by upgrading issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of UrologyVito Fazzi HospitalLecceItalyDepartment of Urology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy;
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of PathologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItalyDepartment of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of UrologyVito Fazzi HospitalLecceItalyDepartment of Urology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy;
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VeronaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria IntegrataVeronaItaly Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kim H, Bang W, Shim M, Oh CY, Cho SY, Chung MS, Cho DS, Kim SI, Lee SH, Koo KC, Lee KS, Cho JS. Decision regret after prostate biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a Korean multicenter cohort study. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1725. [PMID: 38943112 PMCID: PMC11212167 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19179-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people struggle with the choice in a series of processes, from prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis to treatment. We investigated the degree of regret after the prostate biopsy (PBx) and relevant factors in patients recommended for biopsy for suspected PCa. METHODS From 06/2020 to 05/2022, 198 people who performed PBx at three institutions were enrolled and analyzed through a questionnaire before and after biopsy. Before the biopsy, a questionnaire was conducted to evaluate the sociodemographic information, anxiety scale, and health literacy, and after PBx, another questionnaire was conducted to evaluate the decision regret scale. For patients diagnosed as PCa after biopsy, a questionnaire was conducted when additional tests were performed at PCa staging work-up. RESULTS 190 patients answered the questionnaire before and after PBx. The mean age was 66.2 ± 7.8 years. Overall, 5.5% of men regretted biopsy, but there was no significant difference between groups according to the PCa presence. Multivariate analysis, to identify predictors for regret, revealed that the case when physicians did not properly explain what the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test was like and what PSA elevation means (OR 20.57, [95% CI 2.45-172.70], p = 0.005), low media literacy (OR 10.01, [95% CI 1.09-92.29], p = 0.042), and when nobody to rely on (OR 8.49, [95% CI 1.66-43.34], p = 0.010) were significantly related. CONCLUSIONS Overall regret related to PBx was low. Decision regret was more significantly related to media literacy rather than to educational level. For patients with relatively low media literacy and fewer people to rely on in case of serious diseases, more careful attention and counseling on PBx, including a well-informed explanation on PSA test, is helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwanik Kim
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Woojin Bang
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Myungsun Shim
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Cheol Young Oh
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Sung Yong Cho
- Department of Urology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Mun Su Chung
- Department of Urology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University, Incheon, Korea
| | - Dae Sung Cho
- Department of Urology, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Sun Il Kim
- Department of Urology, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Lee
- Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyo Chul Koo
- Department of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang Suk Lee
- Department of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Seon Cho
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Serafin E, Orlando R, Mazzucato G, Ornaghi PI, Cianflone F, Montanaro F, Artoni F, Baielli A, Ditonno F, Migliorini F, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Prognostic Impact and Clinical Implications of Adverse Tumor Grade in Very Favorable Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Experience of a Single Tertiary Referral Center. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2137. [PMID: 38893256 PMCID: PMC11171498 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the prognostic impact and predictors of adverse tumor grade in very favorable low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS Data of low- and intermediate PCa risk-class patients were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Adverse tumor grade was defined as pathology ISUP grade group > 2. Disease progression was defined as a biochemical recurrence event and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. Associations were assessed by Cox's proportional hazards and logistic regression model. RESULTS Between January 2013 and October 2020, the study evaluated a population of 289 patients, including 178 low-risk cases (61.1%) and 111 intermediate-risk subjects (38.4%); unfavorable tumor grade was detected in 82 cases (28.4%). PCa progression, which occurred in 29 patients (10%), was independently predicted by adverse tumor grade and biopsy ISUP grade group 2, with the former showing stronger associations (hazard ratio, HR = 4.478; 95% CI: 1.840-10.895; p = 0.001) than the latter (HR = 2.336; 95% CI: 1.057-5.164; p = 0.036). Older age and biopsy ISUP grade group 2 were independent clinical predictors of adverse tumor grade, associated with larger tumors that eventually presented non-organ-confined disease. CONCLUSIONS In a very favorable PCa patient population, adverse tumor grade was an unfavorable prognostic factor for disease progression. Active surveillance in very favorable intermediate-risk patients is still a hazard, so molecular and genetic testing of biopsy specimens is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | | | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Paola Irene Ornaghi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesco Cianflone
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, 37129 Verona, Italy; (A.B.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (E.S.); (R.O.); (G.M.); (P.I.O.); (F.C.); (F.M.); (F.A.); (A.B.); (F.M.); (M.A.C.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Serafin E, Vidiri S, Veccia A, Rizzetto R, Ditonno F, Montanaro F, Baielli A, Artoni F, Marafioti Patuzzo G, Franceschini A, Brusa D, Princiotta A, Boldini M, Brunelli M, DE Marco V, Migliorini F, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. High-volume surgeons decrease operating time in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results in 1229 patients. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:312-319. [PMID: 38920011 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.24.05617-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim is to evaluate factors impacting operating time (OT) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for prostate cancer. METHODS Overall, 1289 patients underwent RARP from January 2013 to December 2021. ePLND was performed in 825 cases. Factors potentially associated with OT variations were assessed. Three low-volume (LVS) and two high-volume surgeons (HVS) performed the procedures. A linear regression model was computed to assess associations with OT variations. RESULTS When RARP was performed by HVS an OT decrease was observed independently by significant clinical (Body Mass Index [BMI]; prostate volume [PV]) and anatomical/perioperative features (prostate weight [PW]; intraoperative blood loss [BL]) both in clinical (change in OT: -42.979 minutes; 95% CI: -51.789; -34.169; P<0.0001) and anatomical/perioperative models (change in OT: -40.020 minutes; 95% CI: -48.494; -31.587; P<0.0001). A decreased OT was observed in clinical (change in OT: -27.656 minutes; 95% CI: -33.449; -21.864; P<0.0001) and anatomical/perioperative (change in OT: -24.935 minutes; 95% CI: -30.562; -19.308; P<0.0001) models also in case of RARP with ePLND performed by HVS, independently by BMI, PV, PSA as well as for PW, seminal vesicle invasion, positive surgical margins, and BL. CONCLUSIONS In a tertiary academic referral center, OT decreased when RARP was performed by HVS, independently of adverse clinical and anatomical/perioperative factors. Available OT loads can be planned to optimize waiting lists, teaching tasks, operative costs, and surgeon's volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy -
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Franceschini
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Brusa
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo DE Marco
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria A Cerruto
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sun N, Gu Y. Exploring the Hidden Struggles: A Qualitative Insight into Urinary Incontinence Among Prostate Cancer Survivors Post-Surgery. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:1047-1058. [PMID: 38826502 PMCID: PMC11143978 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s461027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to explore the experiences and challenges of prostate cancer patients suffering from urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Methods A descriptive qualitative research design was employed. Purposeful sampling was used to select 22 prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and experienced urinary incontinence after surgery. These patients were interviewed between August to October 2023 at a tertiary B-grade hospital's pelvic floor center in Shanghai. The data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analyzed using content analysis to identify and refine themes. Results The experiences of urinary incontinence in patients can be categorized into four main themes: (1) Daily life disturbances (including 4 sub-themes: sleep disorders, fluid intake restriction, travel inconvenience, loss of sexual life); (2) Negative emotional experiences (including 4 sub-themes: perceived discrimination, concerns about recovery, loss of confidence in life, doubts about the surgical decision); (3) Social withdrawal (including 2 sub-themes: reduced desire for social interaction, decreased ability to socialize); (4) Limited support obtained (including 4 sub-themes: reliance on personal experience, seeking help from relatives and friends, difficulty discerning online information, lack of professional guidance). Conclusion Postoperative urinary incontinence in prostate cancer patients presents a multidimensional experience. Healthcare professionals need to pay attention to these patients' daily life, psychological state, and social interactions. Integrating various resources to provide professional support and rehabilitation guidance is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Sun
- Department of Nursing, Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanhong Gu
- Department of Nursing, Shanghai Fifth People’s Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Porcaro AB, Panunzio A, Orlando R, Tafuri A, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Serafin E, Mazzucato G, Montanaro F, Baielli A, Artoni F, Ditonno F, Roggero L, Franceschini A, Boldini M, Treccani LP, Veccia A, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, De Marco V, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Bertolo R, Antonelli A. The 2012 Briganti nomogram predicts disease progression after surgery in high-risk prostate cancer patients. Arab J Urol 2024; 22:227-234. [PMID: 39355796 PMCID: PMC11441050 DOI: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2339062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives We tested whether the 2012 Briganti nomogram for the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI) may represent a predictor of disease progression after surgical management in high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients according to the European Association of Urology. Methods Between January 2013 and December 2021, HR PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) were identified. The 2012 Briganti nomogram was evaluated as a continuous and categorical variable, which was dichotomized using the median. The risk of disease progression, defined as the event of biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence/distant metastases was assessed by Cox regression models. Results Overall, 204 patients were identified. The median 2012 Briganti nomogram score resulted 12.0% (IQR: 6.0-22.0%). PLNI was detected in 57 (27.9%) cases. Compared to patients who had preoperatively a 2012 Briganti nomogram score ≤12%, those with a score >12% were more likely to present with higher percentage of biopsy positive cores, palpable tumors at digital rectal examination, high-grade cancers at prostate biopsies, and unfavorable pathology in the surgical specimen. At multivariable Cox regression analyses, disease progression, which occurred in 85 (41.7%) patients, was predicted by the 2012 Briganti nomogram score (HR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.00-1.03; p = 0.012), independently by tumors presenting as palpable (HR: 1.78; 95%CI: 1.10.2.88; p = 0.020) or the presence of PLNI in the surgical specimen (HR: 3.73; 95%CI: 2.10-5.13; p = 0.012). Conclusions The 2012 Briganti nomogram represented an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in HR PCa patients treated with RARP and ePLND. As the score increased, so patients were more likely to experience disease progression, independently by the occurrence of PLNI. The association between the nomogram, unfavorable pathology and tumor behavior might turn out to be useful for selecting a subset of patients needing different treatment paradigms in HR disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Roggero
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Franceschini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chang S, Daskivich TJ, Vasquez M, Sacks WL, Zumsteg ZS, Ho AS. Malpractice Trends Involving Active Surveillance Across Cancers. Ann Surg 2024; 279:679-683. [PMID: 37747179 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize malpractice trends related to active surveillance (AS) as a treatment strategy across cancers. BACKGROUND Active surveillance is increasingly considered a viable management strategy for low-risk cancers. Since a subset of AS cases will progress, metastasize, or exhibit cancer-related mortality, a significant barrier to implementation is the perceived risk of litigation from missing the window for cure. Data on malpractice trends across cancers are lacking. METHODS Westlaw Edge and LexisNexis Advance databases were searched from 1990 to 2022 for malpractice cases involving active surveillance in conjunction with thyroid cancer, prostate cancer, kidney cancer, breast cancer, or lymphoma. Queries included unpublished cases, trial orders, jury verdicts, and administrative decisions. Data were compiled on legal allegations, procedures performed, and verdicts or settlements rendered. RESULTS Five prostate cancer cases were identified that pertained to active surveillance. Two cases involved alleged deliberate indifference from AS as a management strategy but were ruled as following the appropriate standard of care. In contrast, 3 cases involved alleged physician negligence for not explicitly recommending AS as a treatment option after complications from surgery occurred. All cases showed documented informed consent for AS, leading to defense verdicts in favor of the physicians. No cases of AS-related malpractice were identified for other cancer types. CONCLUSIONS To date, no evidence of successful malpractice litigation for active surveillance in cancer has been identified. Given the legal precedent detailed in the identified cases and increasing support across national guidelines, active surveillance represents a sound management option in appropriate low-risk cancers, with no increased risk of medicolegal exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy J Daskivich
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Missael Vasquez
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Wendy L Sacks
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Zachary S Zumsteg
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Allen S Ho
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Roberts NA, Esler R, Pearce A, Wyld D, Smith M, Woollett K, Mazariego C, Roberts MJ. Exploring Unmet Needs in Prostate Cancer Care: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 62:36-42. [PMID: 38585211 PMCID: PMC10998272 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Prostate cancer, the most common cancer among men worldwide, has significant impact on quality of life. Supportive care needs for those affected by prostate cancer are not well understood. This study aims to describe patient-reported unmet needs and explore supportive care priorities of men treated for prostate cancer. Methods A cross-sectional survey was distributed to all men who had accessed prostate cancer services (including surgical, radiation, and medical oncology treatment modalities) at a tertiary hospital. The survey included qualitative questions exploring patient experience and a validated patient-reported outcome measure (Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form 34). Clinical information was collected. Analyses included, descriptive statistics, multivariate logistic regression models and qualitative analyses using a framework method. Key findings and limitations A total of 162 participants provided survey data. Domains about information, self-management, and sexual function were the highest ranked items with unmet needs. A qualitative analysis also identified "relationships", "information", and "the value of hindsight" constructs. Participants who identified three or more unmet needs expressed treatment regret (odds ratio 5.92, 1.98-22.23, p = 0.01). Conclusions and clinical implications Understanding the unmet needs of patients may better inform supportive care interventions that address what is important to patients. Importantly, participants valued relationships. There may be opportunities to better meet the needs of patients by improving access to information and self-management resources, particularly around sexuality. Further research is warranted. Patient summary Prostate cancer and its treatment impacts are not well understood. Prioritisation of relationships and improving access to information and self-management resources are important. Further attention to prostate cancer supportive care in clinical practice is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha A. Roberts
- Centre for Clinical Research, Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Rachel Esler
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Adam Pearce
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - David Wyld
- Centre for Clinical Research, Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael Smith
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
| | - Kaylene Woollett
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Carolyn Mazariego
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Kings Cross, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew J. Roberts
- Centre for Clinical Research, Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rühle A, Wieland L, Hinz A, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Nicolay NH, Seidel C. Decision regret of cancer patients after radiotherapy: results from a cross-sectional observational study at a large tertiary cancer center in Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:167. [PMID: 38546873 PMCID: PMC10978708 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05638-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The decision-making process regarding cancer treatment is emotionally challenging for patients and families, harboring the risk of decision regret. We aimed to explore prevalence and determinants of decision regret following radiotherapy. METHODS This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center to assess decision regret following radiotherapy. The study employed the German version of the Ottawa Decision Regret Scale (DRS) which was validated in the study population. Decision regret was categorized as absent (0 points), mild (1-25 points), and strong (> 25 points). Various psychosocial outcome measures were collected using validated questionnaires to identify factors that may be associated with decision regret. RESULTS Out of 320 eligible patients, 212 participated, with 207 completing the DRS. Median age at start of radiotherapy was 64 years [interquartile range (IQR), 56-72], genders were balanced (105 female, 102 male), and the most common cancer types were breast (n = 84; 41%), prostate (n = 57; 28%), and head-and-neck cancer (n = 19; 9%). Radiotherapy was applied with curative intention in 188 patients (91%). Median time between last radiotherapy fraction and questionnaire completion was 23 months (IQR, 1-38). DRS comprehensibility was rated as good or very good by 98% (196 of 201) of patients. Decision regret was reported by 43% (n = 90) as absent, 38% (n = 78) as mild, and 18% (n = 38) as strong. In the multiple regression analysis, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, low social support, and dissatisfaction with care were independent risk factors for higher decision regret after radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The German version of the DRS could be used to assess decision regret in a diverse cohort of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Decision regret was prevalent in a considerable proportion of patients. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and obtain causal factors associated with decision regret after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central (CCCG) Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Leonie Wieland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central (CCCG) Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central (CCCG) Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central (CCCG) Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central (CCCG) Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Porcaro AB, Orlando R, Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Baielli A, Artoni F, Montanaro F, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Mazzucato G, Serafin E, Veccia A, Boldini M, Treccani LP, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Bertolo R, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. The 2012 Briganti nomogram predicts disease progression in surgically treated intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with favorable tumor grade group eventually associated with some adverse factors. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:134. [PMID: 38520651 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01886-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
To evaluate the prognostic potential of the 2012 Briganti nomogram for pelvic lymph node invasion on disease progression after surgery in intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients with favorable tumor grade (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 1 or 2), eventually associated with adverse clinical features as PSA between 10 and 20 ng/mL and/or clinical stage T2b. All IR PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and eventually extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the Department of Urology of the Integrated University Hospital of Verona between 2013 and 2021, with the abovementioned features, and available follow-up were considered. The 2012 Briganti nomogram score was assessed both as a continuous and dichotomous variable, where a mean risk score of 4% was used a threshold. The independent predictor status of the nomogram score on disease progression defined as the occurrence of biochemical recurrence and/or metastatic progression was evaluated using the Cox regression analysis. Overall, 348 patients were enrolled in the study. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 98 (83.5-112.4) months. At multivariable Cox regression analysis, PCa progression, which occurred in 65 (18.7%) cases, was independently predicted only by the 2012 Briganti nomogram score evaluated as a continuous variable, among all considered clinical features (HR 1.16; 95%CI 1.08-1.24; p < 0.001). In addition, patients presenting with a nomogram score ≥ 4% were more likely to experience disease progression even after adjustment for clinical (HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.02-4.79; p = 0.043) and pathological (HR 1.80; 95%CI 1.06-3.05; p = 0.031) factors. In the examined patient population, the 2012 Briganti nomogram predicted PCa progression after surgery. Accordingly, as the risk score increased, patients were more likely to progress, independently by the occurrence of adverse pathology in the surgical specimen. The 2012 Briganti nomogram score categorized according to the mean value allowed to identify prognostic subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Boldini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Pierangelo Treccani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
MacNevin W, Ilie G, Rendon R, Mason R, Spooner J, Chedrawe E, Patil N, Bowes D, Bailly G, Bell D, Wilke D, Zahavich JBL, MacDonald C, Rutledge RDH. PC-PEP, a Comprehensive Daily Six-Month Home-Based Patient Empowerment Program Leads to Weight Loss in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1667-1688. [PMID: 38534960 PMCID: PMC10969418 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The Prostate Cancer-Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) is a six-month daily home-based program shown to improve mental health and urinary function. This secondary analysis explores weight loss in male PC-PEP participants. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial with 128 men undergoing curative prostate cancer (PC) treatment, 66 received 'early' PC-PEP, while 62 were assigned to the 'late' waitlist-control group, receiving 6 months of standard-of-care treatment followed by 6 months of PC-PEP. PC-PEP comprised 182 daily emails with video-based exercise and dietary (predominantly plant-based) education, live online events, and 30 min strength training routines (using body weight and elastic bands). Weight and height data were collected via online surveys (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) including medical chart reviews. Adherence was tracked weekly. Results: No attrition or adverse events were reported. At 6 months, the early PC-PEP group experienced significant weight loss, averaging 2.7 kg (p < 0.001) compared to the waitlist-control group. Weight loss was noted in the late intervention group of PC-PEP, albeit less pronounced than in the early group. Early PC-PEP surgery patients lost on average 1.4 kg (SE = 0.65) from the trial's start to surgery day. High adherence to exercise and dietary recommendations was noted. Conclusions: PC-PEP led to significant weight loss in men undergoing curative prostate cancer treatment compared to standard-of-care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wyatt MacNevin
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Gabriela Ilie
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Ricardo Rendon
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Ross Mason
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Jesse Spooner
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Emily Chedrawe
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Nikhilesh Patil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - David Bowes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Greg Bailly
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - David Bell
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Derek Wilke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | | | - Cody MacDonald
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
MacAskill F, Shabbir M, Sahai A. Survivorship in prostate cancer following robotic assisted radical prostatectomy-the time to act is now! Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:46-47. [PMID: 36065059 PMCID: PMC10876470 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00589-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Findlay MacAskill
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Majed Shabbir
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - Arun Sahai
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lepor H, Rapoport E, Gogaj R, Hernandez H, Wysock JS. Patient-reported prostate cancer treatment regret following primary partial gland cryoablation. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:20.e1-20.e7. [PMID: 38065805 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer treatment-related regret (TRR) incorporates the myriad effects of diagnosis and treatment with associated behavioral, emotional, and interpersonal changes within the context of patient values and expectations. We aimed to investigate TRR following primary partial gland cryoablation (PPGCA). METHODS Men with prostate cancer undergoing PPGCA since 3/2017 enrolled in a prospective outcome registry. Between June and August 2022, a validated prostate cancer related TRR decision scale was distributed. TRR score ≥40 was considered significant TRR. Men were considered potent if they reported ability to have penetration at least half the time sexual intercourse was initiated. Associations between significant TRR and baseline characteristics and longitudinal outcomes were assessed using logistic regressions. RESULTS Of 245 men who met inclusion criteria, 163 (67%) completed the survey with median time since cryoablation 2.3 years (IQR: 1.3, 3.6). Overall, the mean composite TRR score was 12.4/100. Significant TRR was expressed by 14% of men. Among those who were potent/had erectile function at baseline, loss of potency and erectile function were associated with higher probability of significant TRR, respectively. No associations were identified between TRR and recurrence of clinically significant prostate cancer or salvage treatment. CONCLUSIONS The overwhelming majority of men do not express TRR following PPGCA. The loss of potency or development of erectile dysfunction predisposes to TRR. It is imperative to elucidate short-, intermediate- and long-term functional and oncological outcomes in order to define factors associated with TRR to improve counseling and reduce patient regret.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
| | - Eli Rapoport
- Department of Urology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Rozalba Gogaj
- Department of Urology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Hunter Hernandez
- Department of Urology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - James S Wysock
- Department of Urology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tae BS, Ahn ST, Yoo JW, Song MS, Choi H, Bae JH, Park JY. Is There a Difference in the Incidence of Depression between Radiation and Surgical Treatments in Patients with Prostate Cancer? World J Mens Health 2024; 42:237-244. [PMID: 38171378 PMCID: PMC10782121 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with cancer have a high risk of depression. However, a few studies have assessed differences in the incidence of depression among patients with prostate cancer (PC) based on whether they received radiotherapy (RTx) or surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Sharing Service database regarding the entire Korean adult population with PC (n=210,924) between 2007 and 2017. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of depression associated with treatment were estimated using propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS Our final cohort comprised 9,456 patients with PC; of which, 8,050 men underwent surgery. During a mean follow-up duration of 7.1 years, 503 (5.3%) patients were newly diagnosed with depression. A significant difference in the incidence of depression was noted between the RTx and surgery groups (RTx vs. surgery: 5.55% vs. 5.28%; p=0.011) in the unmatched cohort. In the matched cohort, older age (≥70 years, HR: 1.596, p<0.001) and poor Charlson comorbidity index scores (HR: 1.232, p=0.039) were correlated with the risk of depression. In addition, the adjusted HR for depression in the surgery group was 0.843 (p=0.221) compared with that in the RTx group. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that no significant difference in the cumulative probability of persistent depression was detected between the RTx and surgery groups in matched cohort (p=0.3386). CONCLUSIONS In this nationwide population-based study, no significant differences in the risk of depression were observed between the surgical and RTx groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bum Sik Tae
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Sun Tae Ahn
- Department of Urology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Wan Yoo
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Min Sung Song
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Hoon Choi
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Bae
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Jae Young Park
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Panunzio A, Gallina S, Tafuri A, Serafin E, Orlando R, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D’Aietti D, Montanaro F, Marafioti Patuzzo G, Artoni F, Baielli A, Ditonno F, Rizzetto R, Veccia A, Gozzo A, De Marco V, Brunelli M, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. The impact of prognostic group classification on prostate cancer progression in intermediate-risk patients according to the European Association of Urology system: results in 479 patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary referral center. Ther Adv Urol 2024; 16:17562872241229260. [PMID: 38348129 PMCID: PMC10860426 DOI: 10.1177/17562872241229260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) may be impaired by adverse pathology misclassification including tumor upgrading and upstaging. Clinical predictors of disease progression need to be improved in this category of patients. Objectives To identify PCa prognostic factors to define prognostic groups in intermediate-risk patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Design Data from 1143 patients undergoing RARP from January 2013 to October 2020 were collected: 901 subjects had available follow-up, of whom 479 were at intermediate risk. Methods PCa progression was defined as biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. Study endpoints were evaluated by statistical methods including Cox's proportional hazards, Kaplan-Meyer survival curves, and binomial and multinomial logistic regression models. Results After a median (interquartile range) of 35 months (15-57 months), 84 patients (17.5%) had disease progression, which was independently predicted by the percentage of biopsy-positive cores ⩾ 50% and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 3 for clinical factors and by ISUP > 2, positive surgical margins and pelvic lymph node invasion for pathological features. Patients were classified into clinical and pathological groups as favorable, unfavorable (one prognostic factor), and adverse (more than one prognostic factor). The risk of PCa progression increased with worsening prognosis through groups. A significant positive association was found between the two groups; consequently, as clinical prognosis worsened, the risk of detecting unfavorable and adverse pathological prognostic clusters increased in both unadjusted and adjusted models. Conclusion The study identified factors predicting disease progression that allowed the computation of highly correlated prognostic groups. As the prognosis worsened, the risk of PCa progression increased. Intermediate-risk PCa needs more prognostic stratification for appropriate management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D’Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Guan A, Santiago-Rodríguez EJ, Chung BI, Shim JK, Allen L, Kuo MC, Lau K, Loya Z, Brooks JD, Cheng I, DeRouen MC, Frosch DL, Golden T, Leppert JT, Lichtensztajn DY, Lu Q, Oh D, Sieh W, Wadhwa M, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Gomez SL, Shariff-Marco S. Patient and physician perspectives on treatments for low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1191. [PMID: 38053037 PMCID: PMC10696696 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11679-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) are confronted with a difficult decision regarding whether to undergo definitive treatment or to pursue an active surveillance protocol. This is potentially further complicated by the possibility that patients and physicians may place different value on factors that influence this decision. We conducted a qualitative investigation to better understand patient and physician perceptions of factors influencing treatment decisions for low-risk PCa. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 43 racially and ethnically diverse patients diagnosed with low-risk PCa, who were identified through a population-based cancer registry, and 15 physicians who were selected to represent a variety of practice settings in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area. RESULTS Patients and physicians both described several key individual (e.g., clinical) and interpersonal (e.g., healthcare communications) factors as important for treatment decision-making. Overall, physicians' perceptions largely mirrored patients' perceptions. First, we observed differences in treatment preferences by age and stage of life. At older ages, there was a preference for less invasive options. However, at younger ages, we found varying opinions among both patients and physicians. Second, patients and physicians both described concerns about side effects including physical functioning and non-physical considerations. Third, we observed differences in expectations and the level of difficulty for clinical conversations based on information needs and resources between patients and physicians. Finally, we discovered that patients and physicians perceived patients' prior knowledge and the support of family/friends as facilitators of clinical conversations. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that the gap between patient and physician perceptions on the influence of clinical and communication factors on treatment decision-making is not large. The consensus we observed points to the importance of developing relevant clinical communication roadmaps as well as high quality and accessible patient education materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Guan
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Eduardo J Santiago-Rodríguez
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Benjamin I Chung
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
| | - Janet K Shim
- UCSF | Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, San Francisco, United States
| | - Laura Allen
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Mei-Chin Kuo
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Kathie Lau
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Zinnia Loya
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
| | - Iona Cheng
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Mindy C DeRouen
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Dominick L Frosch
- Health Science Diligence Advisors, LLC, San Francisco, United States
| | - Todd Golden
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - John T Leppert
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
| | - Daphne Y Lichtensztajn
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Qian Lu
- Dept of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD-Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Debora Oh
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Dept of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Michelle Wadhwa
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
- UCSF | Department of Urology, San Francisco, United States
| | | | - Scarlett L Gomez
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Salma Shariff-Marco
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chao PP, Koea JB, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Du J, Hill AG, Srinivasa S. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Aotearoa New Zealand: equity, quality, and workforce. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2789-2791. [PMID: 37855379 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip Pinhao Chao
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jonathan Barnes Koea
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand
- Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Urology, Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jason Du
- Department of Urology, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrew Graham Hill
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sanket Srinivasa
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Alabousi M, Ghai S, Haider MA. MRI-guided Minimally Invasive Focal Therapies for Prostate Cancer. Radiology 2023; 309:e230431. [PMID: 38051187 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Two cases involving patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and treated with MRI-guided focal therapies are presented. Patient selection procedures, techniques, outcomes, challenges, and future directions of MRI-guided focal therapies, as well as their role in the treatment of low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer, are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Alabousi
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 1W7 (M.A., S.G., M.A.H.); and Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.)
| | - Sangeet Ghai
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 1W7 (M.A., S.G., M.A.H.); and Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.)
| | - Masoom A Haider
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 1W7 (M.A., S.G., M.A.H.); and Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Khan S, Chang SH, Wang M, Kim EH, Schoen MW, Rocuskie-Marker C, Drake BF. Local Treatment and Treatment-Related Adverse Effects Among Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2348057. [PMID: 38109113 PMCID: PMC10728764 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Recent data suggest that local treatment with radical prostatectomy or radiation may improve survival outcomes in men with advanced prostate cancer. However, evidence is lacking on treatment-related adverse effects among men with advanced prostate cancer. Objective To assess the association of local treatment on treatment-related adverse effects among men diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study assessed men diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer (defined as T4, N1, and/or M1 prostate cancer) between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2013, with follow-up through December 31, 2021, who were treated at Veterans Health Administration medical centers. Exposure Local treatment with radical prostatectomy or radiation. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes were treatment-related adverse effects, including constitutional, gastrointestinal, pain, sexual function, and urinary function conditions, at 3 intervals after initial treatment (≤1 year, >1 to ≤2 years, and >2 to ≤5 years) after initial treatment. Results This cohort study consisted of 5502 men (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [10.3] years) diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. Of the cohort, 1705 men (31.0%) received local treatment. There was a high prevalence of adverse conditions in men receiving both local and nonlocal treatment, and these adverse conditions persisted for more than 2 years to 5 years or less after initial treatment. A total of 916 men (75.2%) with initial local treatment and 897 men (67.1%) with initial nonlocal treatment reported the presence of at least 1 adverse condition for more than 2 years to 5 years or less after initial treatment. In the first year, local treatment (vs nonlocal) was associated with adverse gastrointestinal (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.08; 95% CI, 3.06-5.45), pain (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.35-1.83), sexual (AOR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.42-3.62), and urinary (AOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.90-2.66) conditions. Local treatment (without secondary treatment) remained significantly associated with adverse gastrointestinal (AOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.52-3.77), sexual (AOR, 3.36; 95% CI, 2.56-4.41), and urinary (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78) conditions at more than 2 years to 5 years or less after treatment. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of men with advanced prostate cancer, local treatment was associated with persistent treatment-related adverse effects across multiple domains. These results suggest that patients and clinicians should consider the adverse effects of local treatment when making treatment decisions in the setting of advanced prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saira Khan
- Research Service, St Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Su-Hsin Chang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Mei Wang
- Research Service, St Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Eric H. Kim
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Martin W. Schoen
- Research Service, St Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Bettina F. Drake
- Research Service, St Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nadamuni M, D'Amico AV, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC. Decision Making in Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1335-1338. [PMID: 37792620 DOI: 10.1056/nejmclde2307619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
|
40
|
Mistry NA, Sweis J, Ofori B, McKoy JM, Langford A, Psutka SP, Perazza E, Raman JD, Murphy AB. Engaging disparities in prostate cancer: Piloting an interactive, virtual workshop to educate providers on shared decision-making for underserved populations. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:430.e1-430.e7. [PMID: 37453812 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision-making (SDM) is an approach to patient-centered care that is strongly recommended when counseling patients for screening and treatment of prostate cancer. However, providers report lack of comfort with SDM and particularly in disparate populations. We report our experience designing and piloting an online workshop to educate practicing urologists on SDM in diverse populations. Our objective was to create a valued interactive SDM workshop to help urologists learn to lead SDM discussions with men form underserved populations. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that urologists would agree or strongly agree that we met our learning objectives on postcourse survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS With the support of the American Urologic Association, we developed a case-based workshop with interactive role-playing to demonstrate and teach integration of SDM into clinical care. Cases were centered around screening and treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer in diverse patients. Brief surveys were used to track success with learning objectives and urologists' satisfaction with the workshop. RESULTS The session included 14 participants from 6 countries. A postworkshop survey indicated that 100% of respondents (8 of 8) "strongly agreed" that the activity met learning objectives, and 100% rated the session as "good" (1), "very good" (1), or "excellent" (6). Participants' knowledge also improved on shared decision-making concepts and the knowledge was maintained one month after the workshop. CONCLUSION We successfully created and piloted an interactive online workshop to improve urologists' comfort using shared decision-making in caring for diverse patient populations. The course met its objectives and participant feedback for the course was positive. Sharing this process and framework for development of this intervention may inform future workshops that can be applied to medical students, residents, and providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil A Mistry
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Jamila Sweis
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Bernice Ofori
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - June M McKoy
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Aisha Langford
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Elizabeth Perazza
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Veterans Administration Caribbean Healthcare System, San Juan, PR
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA
| | - Adam B Murphy
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fanshawe JB, Wai-Shun Chan V, Asif A, Ng A, Van Hemelrijck M, Cathcart P, Challacombe B, Brown C, Popert R, Elhage O, Ahmed K, Brunckhorst O, Dasgupta P. Decision Regret in Patients with Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:456-466. [PMID: 36870852 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Treatment choice for localised prostate cancer remains a significant challenge for patients and clinicians, with uncertainty over decisions potentially leading to conflict and regret. There is a need to further understand the prevalence and prognostic factors of decision regret to improve patient quality of life. OBJECTIVE To generate the best estimates for the prevalence of significant decision regret localised prostate cancer patients, and to investigate prognostic patient, oncological, and treatment factors associated with regret. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PsychINFO databases including studies evaluating the prevalence or patient, treatment, or oncological prognostic factors in localised prostate cancer patients. A pooled prevalence of significant regret was calculated with the formal prognostic factor evaluation conducted per factor identified. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Significant decision regret was present in a pooled 20% (95% confidence interval 16-23) of patients across 14 studies and 17883 patients. This was lower in active surveillance (13%), with little difference between those who underwent radiotherapy (19%) and those who underwent prostatectomy (18%). Evaluation of individual prognostic factors demonstrated higher regret in those with poorer post-treatment bowel, sexual, and urinary function; decreased involvement in the decision-making process; and Black ethnicity. However, evidence remains conflicting, with low or moderate certainty of findings. CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion of men experience decision regret after a localised prostate cancer diagnosis. Monitoring those with increased functional symptoms and improving patient involvement in the decision-making process through education and decision aids may reduce regret. PATIENT SUMMARY We looked at how common regret in treatment decisions is after treatment for early-stage prostate cancer and factors linked with this. We found that one in five regret their decision, with those who had experienced side effects or were less involved in the decision-making process more likely to have regret. By addressing these, clinicians could reduce regret and improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vinson Wai-Shun Chan
- Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Aqua Asif
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - Alexander Ng
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Cathcart
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ben Challacombe
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christian Brown
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rick Popert
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Oussama Elhage
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Kamran Ahmed
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK; Department of Urology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Oliver Brunckhorst
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Panunzio A, Serafin E, Mazzucato G, Orlando R, Montanaro F, Patuzzo GM, Baielli A, Artoni F, Ditonno F, Vidiri S, D'Aietti D, Migliorini F, Rizzetto R, Veccia A, Gozzo A, Brunelli M, Tafuri A, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Advanced age is an independent prognostic factor of disease progression in high-risk prostate cancer: results in 180 patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in a tertiary referral center. Aging Clin Exp Res 2023; 35:1881-1889. [PMID: 37337076 PMCID: PMC10460358 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-023-02466-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess more clinical and pathological factors associated with prostate cancer (PCa) progression in high-risk PCa patients treated primarily with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in a tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a period ranging from January 2013 to October 2020, RARP and ePLND were performed on 180 high-risk patients at Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona (Italy). PCa progression was defined as biochemical recurrence/persistence and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. Statistical methods evaluated study endpoints, including Cox's proportional hazards, Kaplan-Meyer survival curves, and binomial logistic regression models. RESULTS The median age of included patients was 66.5 [62-71] years. Disease progression occurred in 55 patients (30.6%), who were more likely to have advanced age, palpable tumors, and unfavorable pathologic features, including high tumor grade, stage, and pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI). On multivariate analysis, PCa progression was predicted by advanced age (≥ 70 years) (HR = 2.183; 95% CI = 1.089-4377, p = 0.028), palpable tumors (HR = 3.113; 95% CI = 1.499-6.465), p = 0.002), and PLNI (HR = 2.945; 95% CI = 1.441-6.018, p = 0.003), which were associated with clinical standard factors defining high-risk PCa. Age had a negative prognostic impact on elderly patients, who were less likely to have palpable tumors but more likely to have high-grade tumors. CONCLUSIONS High-risk PCa progression was independently predicted by advanced age, palpable tumors, and PLNI, which is associated with standard clinical prognostic factors. Consequently, with increasing age, the prognosis is worse in elderly patients, who represent an unfavorable age group that needs extensive counseling for appropriate and personalized management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Baielli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D'Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lunger L, Meissner VH, Kopp BCG, Dinkel A, Schiele S, Ankerst DP, Gschwend JE, Herkommer K. Prevalence and determinants of decision regret in long-term prostate cancer survivors following radical prostatectomy. BMC Urol 2023; 23:139. [PMID: 37612591 PMCID: PMC10464370 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01311-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with localized prostate cancer (PC) are faced with a wide spectrum of therapeutic options at initial diagnosis. Following radical prostatectomy (RP), PC patients may experience regret regarding their initial choice of treatment, especially when oncological and functional outcomes are poor. Impacts of psychosocial factors on decision regret, especially after long-term follow-up, are not well understood. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and determinants of decision regret in long-term PC survivors following RP. METHODS 3408 PC survivors (mean age 78.8 years, SD = 6.5) from the multicenter German Familial PC Database returned questionnaires after an average of 16.5 (SD = 3.8) years following RP. The outcome of decision regret concerning the initial choice of RP was assessed with one item from the Decision Regret Scale. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), PC-anxiety, PSA-anxiety, as well as anxiety and depressive symptoms were considered for independent association with decision regret via multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS 10.9% (373/3408) of PC survivors reported decision regret. Organ-confined disease at RP (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.02-1.91), biochemical recurrence (OR 1.34, 1.00-1.80), low HRQoL (OR 1.69,1.28-2.24), depressive symptoms (OR 2.32, 1.52-3.53), and prevalent PSA anxiety (OR 1.88,1.17-3.01) were significantly associated with increased risk of decision regret. Shared decision-making reduced the odds of decision regret by 40% (OR 0.59, 0.41-0.86). CONCLUSIONS PC survivors may experience decision regret even after 16 years following RP. Promoting shared decision-making in light of both established and novel, potentially less invasive treatments at initial diagnosis may help mitigate long-term regret. Awareness regarding patients showing depressive symptoms or PSA anxiety should be encouraged to identify patients at risk of decision regret in need of additional psychological support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Lunger
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Valentin H Meissner
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt C G Kopp
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Dinkel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Schiele
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Donna P Ankerst
- Departments of Mathematics and Life Science Systems, Munich Data Science Institute, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathleen Herkommer
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tan YG, Law YM, Ngo NT, Khor LY, Tan PH, Ong EHW, Yuen JSP, Ho HSS, Tuan JKL, Kanesvaran R, Gupta RT, Rozen S, Chua MLK, Polascik TJ, Tay KJ. Patient-reported functional outcomes and oncological control after primary focal cryotherapy for clinically significant prostate cancer: A Phase II mandatory biopsy-monitored study. Prostate 2023; 83:781-791. [PMID: 36895163 PMCID: PMC10952298 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report herein the impact of focal therapy (FT) on multi-domain functional outcomes in a Phase II prospective clinical trial (NCT04138914) in focal cryotherapy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). METHODS The primary outcome was the detection of a ≥5 point deterioration in any of the four main expanded prostate index composite (EPIC) functional domains. Pretreatment multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal targeted and systematic saturation biopsy were used to select patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)≤20 ng/mL, Gleason grade group (GG) ≤4, mpMRI lesion volume ≤ 3 mL (for a single lesion) or ≤1.5 mL (where two lesions were present). Focal cryotherapy was performed with a minimum 5 mm margin around each target lesion. EPIC scores were obtained at baseline and posttreatment at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Mandatory repeat mpMRI and prostate biopsy were performed at 12 months to determine the infield and outfield recurrence. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients were recruited. The mean age was 68 years, with PSA of 7.3 ng/mL and PSA density of 0.19 ng/mL2 . No Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications occurred. Transient worsening of EPIC urinary (mean diff 16.0, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.8-23.6) and sexual function scores (mean diff 11.0, p:0.005, 95% CI: 4.0-17.7) were observed at 1-month posttreatment, with recovery by Month 3. A subgroup who had ablation extending to the neurovascular bundle had a trend to delayed recovery of sexual function to Month 6. At 12-month repeat mpMRI and biopsy, 22 patients (78.6%) had no detectable csPCa. Of the six patients (21.4%) who had csPCa recurrences, four were GG2, one GG3, and one GG4. Four patients underwent repeat FT, one underwent radical prostatectomy, while the remaining one patient with low-volume GG2 cancer opted for active surveillance. CONCLUSION FT using cryotherapy was associated with a transient deterioration of urinary and sexual function with resolution at 3 months posttreatment and with reasonable early efficacy in well-selected csPCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu G. Tan
- Department of UrologySingapore General HospitalSingapore
| | - Yan M. Law
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologySingapore General HospitalSingapore
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
| | - Nye T. Ngo
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
- Division of PathologySingapore General HospitalSingapore
| | - Li Y. Khor
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
- Division of PathologySingapore General HospitalSingapore
| | - Puay H. Tan
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
- Division of PathologySingapore General HospitalSingapore
| | - Enya H. W. Ong
- Division of Medical SciencesNational Cancer Center SingaporeSingapore
| | - John S. P. Yuen
- Department of UrologySingapore General HospitalSingapore
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
| | - Henry S. S. Ho
- Department of UrologySingapore General HospitalSingapore
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
| | - Jeffrey K. L. Tuan
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Center SingaporeSingapore
| | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
- Division of Medical OncologyNational Cancer Center SingaporeSingapore
| | | | - Steven Rozen
- Department of BioinformaticsDuke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
| | - Melvin L. K. Chua
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
- Division of Medical SciencesNational Cancer Center SingaporeSingapore
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Center SingaporeSingapore
| | | | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of UrologySingapore General HospitalSingapore
- Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingapore
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lejeune C, Bourredjem A, Binquet C, Cussenot O, Boudrant G, Papillon F, Bruyère F, Haillot O, Koutlidis N, Bassard S, Fournier G, Valeri A, Moreau JL, Pierfitte B, Moulin M, Berchi C, Cormier L. Eliciting men's preferences for decision-making relative to treatments of localized prostate cancer with a good or moderate prognosis. World J Urol 2023:10.1007/s00345-023-04416-w. [PMID: 37173454 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04416-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In diseases where there is no real consensus regarding treatment modalities, promoting shared decision-making can contribute to improving safety and quality of care. This is the case in low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer (PC) treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the preferences guiding men's decisions regarding the characteristics of the treatment strategies for PC to help physicians adopt a more patient-centered approach. METHODS This prospective multicenter study used a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The attributes and the modalities were identified from a qualitative study and a literature review. Relative preferences were estimated using a logistic regression model. Interaction terms (demographic, clinical and socio-economic characteristics) were added to the model to assess heterogeneity in preferences. RESULTS 652 men were enrolled in the study and completed a questionnaire with 12 pairs of hypothetical therapeutic alternatives between which they had to choose. Men's choices were significantly negatively influenced by the risk of impotence and urinary incontinence, death, and the length and frequency of care. They preferred treatments with a rescue possibility in case of deterioration or recurrence and the use of innovative technology. Surprisingly, the possibility of undergoing prostate ablation negatively influenced their choice. The results also highlighted differences in trade-offs according to socio-economic level. CONCLUSION This study confirmed the importance of considering patients' preferences in the decision-making process. It appears essential to better understand these preferences to allow physicians to improve communication and promote case-by-case decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Lejeune
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Inserm, Université de Bourgogne, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, 7 bd Jeanne d'Arc, BP 87900, 21000, Dijon, France.
| | - Abderrahmane Bourredjem
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Inserm, Université de Bourgogne, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, 7 bd Jeanne d'Arc, BP 87900, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Christine Binquet
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Inserm, Université de Bourgogne, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, 7 bd Jeanne d'Arc, BP 87900, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Academic Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, UPMC Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Franck Bruyère
- Department of Urology, CHU-Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
- Université Francois Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Olivier Haillot
- Department of Urology, CHU-Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
- Université Francois Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Nicolas Koutlidis
- Department of Urology, William Morey Hospital, Chalon-sur-Saône, France
| | - Sébastien Bassard
- Department of Urology, William Morey Hospital, Chalon-sur-Saône, France
| | - Georges Fournier
- Department of Urology, CHU Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - Antoine Valeri
- Department of Urology, CHU Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
| | | | | | - Morgan Moulin
- Department of Urology, CHU University Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France
| | - Célia Berchi
- Normandie Univ, UniCaen, Inserm, Anticipe, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Luc Cormier
- Department of Urology, CHU University Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Daniels J, Stephenson R, Langer S, Northouse L, Odouli R, Amarasekera C, Vandeneeden S, Langston M. "Ultimately, You Realize You're on Your Own": The Impact of Prostate Cancer on Gay and Bisexual Men Couples. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:ijerph20105756. [PMID: 37239485 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
An estimated one in three gay and bisexual (GB) male couples receive a prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis over their life course with limited understanding of the impacts on their relationships. Psychological distress related to PCa diagnosis and treatment-related side effects have been shown to disrupt established GB partnership dynamics. Communication barriers often develop within GB relationships affected by PCa, further exacerbating couple tensions, isolating partners, and lowering quality of life for both patients and partners. In order to elaborate on these phenomena following a PCa diagnosis, we conducted focus group discussions with GB men in relationships. Men were recruited nationally through PCa support groups, and after completing consent procedures, they were invited to one of two focus group discussions conducted through video conference. Topics discussed included the diagnosis and medical decision making pertaining to PCa; healthcare provider experiences; the emotional, physical, and sexual impact of PCa diagnosis and treatment; sources of support and appraisal of resources; and partner involvement and communication. There were twelve GB men who participated in focus group discussions that were audio-recorded and transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic approach. GB couple experiences with PCa during and after treatment choice and recovery identified common patient-provider communication barriers. In particular, GB men reported difficulties in disclosing their sexuality and relationship to their providers, limiting conversations about treatment choice and partner engagement in care. Both patients and partners experienced times of being alone after treatment, either by choice or to give space to their partner. However, partners often did not explicitly discuss their preferences for being alone or together, which resulted in partners' disengagement in their relationship and the prostate cancer healthcare process. This disengagement could blunt the notable PCa survival benefits of partnership for GB men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Daniels
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
| | - Rob Stephenson
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Shelby Langer
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
| | - Laurel Northouse
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Roxana Odouli
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
| | - Channa Amarasekera
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Stephen Vandeneeden
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
| | - Marvin Langston
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chhatre S, Gallo JJ, Guzzo T, Morales KH, Newman DK, Vapiwala N, Van Arsdalen K, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB, Jayadevappa R. Trajectory of Depression among Prostate Cancer Patients: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072124. [PMID: 37046786 PMCID: PMC10092991 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: While psychological difficulties, such as depression, among prostate cancer patients are known, their longitudinal burden remains understudied. We assessed the burden of depression across low-, intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer groups, and the association between regret and long-term depression. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from a multi-centered randomized controlled study among localized prostate cancer patients was carried out. Assessments were performed at baseline, and at 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-up. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale. A CES-D score ≥ 16 indicates high depression. Regret was measured using the regret scale of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC). The proportion of patients with high depression was compared over time, for each risk category. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between regret, and long-term depression after adjusting for age, race, insurance, smoking status, marital status, income, education, employment, treatment, number of people in the household and study site. Results: The study had 743 localized prostate cancer patients. Median depression scores at 6, 12 and 24 months were significantly larger than the baseline median score, overall and for the three prostate cancer risk groups. The proportion of participants with high depression increased over time for all risk groups. Higher regret at 24-month follow-up was significantly associated with high depression at 24-month follow-up, after adjusting for covariates. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of localized prostate cancer patients continued to experience long-term depression. Patient-centered survivorship care strategies can help reduce depression and regret, and improve outcomes in prostate cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumedha Chhatre
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Joseph J. Gallo
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Thomas Guzzo
- Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Knashawn H. Morales
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Diane K. Newman
- Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Keith Van Arsdalen
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alan J. Wein
- Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Stanley Bruce Malkowicz
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ravishankar Jayadevappa
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sherer MV, Leonard AJ, Nelson TJ, Courtney PT, Guram K, Rodrigues De Moraes G, Javier-Desloges J, Kane C, McKay RR, Rose BS, Bagrodia A. Prognostic Value of the Intermediate-risk Feature in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 50:61-67. [PMID: 37101776 PMCID: PMC10123417 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines suggest that active surveillance (AS) may be considered for select patients with favorable intermediate-risk (fIR) prostate cancer. Objective To compare the outcomes between fIR prostate cancer patients included by Gleason score (GS) or prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Most patients are classified with fIR disease due to either a 3 + 4 = 7 GS (fIR-GS) or a PSA level of 10-20 ng/ml (fIR-PSA). Previous research suggests that inclusion by GS 7 may be associated with worse outcomes. Design setting and participants We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US veterans diagnosed with fIR prostate cancer from 2001 to 2015. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We compared the incidence of metastatic disease, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), all-cause mortality (ACM), and receipt of definitive treatment between fIR-PSA and fIR-GS patients managed with AS. Outcomes were compared with those of a previously published cohort of patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease using cumulative incidence function and Gray's test for statistical significance. Results and limitations The cohort included 663 men; 404 had fIR-GS (61%) and 249 fIR-PSA (39%). There was no evidence of difference in the incidence of metastatic disease (8.6% vs 5.8%, p = 0.77), receipt of definitive treatment (77.6% vs 81.5%, p = 0.43), PCSM (5.7% vs 2.5%, p = 0.274), and ACM (16.8% vs 19.1%, p = 0.14) between the fIR-PSA and fIR-GS groups at 10 yr. On multivariate regression, unfavorable intermediate-risk disease was associated with higher rates of metastatic disease, PCSM, and ACM. Limitations included varying surveillance protocols. Conclusions There is no evidence of difference in oncological and survival outcomes between men with fIR-PSA and fIR-GS prostate cancer undergoing AS. Thus, presence of GS 7 disease alone should not exclude patients from consideration of AS. Shared decision-making should be utilized to optimize management for each patient. Patient summary In this report, we compared the outcomes of men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer in the Veterans Health Administration. We found no significant difference between survival and oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael V. Sherer
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Austin J. Leonard
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tyler J. Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - P. Travis Courtney
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kripa Guram
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Gustavo Rodrigues De Moraes
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Christopher Kane
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Brent S. Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, Young GJ, Metcalfe C, Walsh EI, Davis M, Steuart-Feilding T, Blazeby JM, Avery KNL, Martin RM, Bollina P, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Paez E, Powell P, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Mason M, Catto JWF, Peters TJ, Wade J, Turner EL, Williams NJ, Oxley J, Staffurth J, Bryant RJ, Neal DE. Patient-Reported Outcomes 12 Years after Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment. NEJM EVIDENCE 2023; 2:EVIDoa2300018. [PMID: 38320051 DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2300018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term patient-reported outcomes are needed to inform treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Patient-reported outcomes of 1643 randomly assigned participants in the ProtecT (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment) trial were evaluated to assess the functional and quality-of-life impacts of prostatectomy, radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation, and active monitoring. This article focuses on the outcomes of the randomly assigned participants from 7 to 12 years using mixed effects linear and logistic models. RESULTS: Response rates exceeded 80% for most measures. Among the randomized groups over 7 to 12 years, generic quality-of-life scores were similar. Among those in the prostatectomy group, urinary leakage requiring pads occurred in 18 to 24% of patients over 7 to 12 years, compared with 9 to 11% in the active monitoring group and 3 to 8% in the radiotherapy group. In the prostatectomy group, 18% reported erections sufficient for intercourse at 7 years, compared with 30% in the active monitoring and 27% in the radiotherapy groups; all converged to low levels of potency by year 12. Nocturia (voiding at least twice per night) occurred in 34% in the prostatectomy group compared with 48% in the radiotherapy group and 47% in the active monitoring group at 12 years. Fecal leakage affected 12% in the radiotherapy group compared with 6% in the other groups by year 12. The active monitoring group experienced gradual age-related declines in sexual and urinary function, avoiding radical treatment effects unless they changed management. CONCLUSIONS: ProtecT provides robust evidence about continued impacts of treatments in the long term. These data allow patients newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and their clinicians to assess the trade-offs between treatment harms and benefits and enable better informed and prudent treatment decisions. (Funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme projects 96/20/06 and 96/20/99; ISRCTN number, ISRCTN20141297; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172.)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - J Athene Lane
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Grace J Young
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor I Walsh
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Davis
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Steuart-Feilding
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Kerry N L Avery
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard M Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Doble
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - David Gillatt
- Department of Urological Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Macquarie University, Sydney
| | - Vincent Gnanapragasam
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Howard Kynaston
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Phillip Powell
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Derek J Rosario
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Malcolm Mason
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Academic Urology Unit, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Tim J Peters
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Wade
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Emma L Turner
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi J Williams
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David E Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Porcaro AB, Panunzio A, Serafin E, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D'Aietti D, Orlando R, Ditonno F, Montanaro F, Marafioti Patuzzo G, Bailelli A, Artoni F, Zecchini Antoniolli S, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Tafuri A, Antonelli A. Preoperative endogenous total testosterone predicts prostate cancer progression: results in 580 consecutive patients treated with robot assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized disease. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:1139-1148. [PMID: 36943597 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03563-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the role of endogenous total testosterone (ETT) as a predictor of prostate cancer (PCa) progression in patients treated with robot assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized disease. METHODS Between November 2014 and December 2019, 580 consecutive patients were evaluated. Preoperative ETT levels were classified as ≤ 350 ng/dL vs. > 350 ng/dL. The associations between ETT levels and the risk of PCa progression, defined as any event of biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases, or other clinical and pathological factors were evaluated by regression analyses. RESULTS Preoperative ETT levels resulted ≤ 350 ng/dL in 173 (29.8%) patients. Disease progression occurred in 101 (17.1%) cases. Progressing patients were more likely to present with PSA levels > 10 ng/mL, as well as with unfavorable tumor grade (ISUP 4-5) and stage (pT3b) at final pathology, but less likely to have ETT levels ≤ 350 ng/mL. On clinical multivariable Cox regression models, ETT ≤ 350 ng/mL exhibited a statistically significant protective effect on tumor progression (hazard ratio: 0.57, p = 0.013). Subjects presenting with ETT levels ≤ 350 ng/mL were less likely to harbor ISUP 4-5 tumor grade either at biopsy (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46, p = 0.028) or final pathology (OR: 0.45, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS At PCa diagnosis, ETT, which associates with ISUP tumor grade, is an independent predictor of disease progression. Accordingly, as ETT decreases to levels ≤ 350 ng/dL, the risk of unfavorable tumor grade decreases, and a more favorable prognosis is expected. Preoperative ETT levels may allow further patient stratification along prognostic risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D'Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bailelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Artoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Di Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|