1
|
Westerhoff JM, Lalmahomed TA, Meijers LTC, Henke L, Teunissen FR, Bruynzeel AME, Alongi F, Hall WA, Kishan AU, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM, van der Voort van Zyp JRN, Daamen LA. Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:38-48. [PMID: 38838994 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review provides an overview of literature on the impact of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with prostate cancer (PC). METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic search was performed in October 2023 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) framework was used to determine eligibility criteria. Included were studies assessing PROs following MRgRT for PC with a sample size >10. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies - of Interventions and Cochrane's risk of bias tool for randomized trials. Relevant mean differences (MDs) compared with pre-RT were interpreted using minimal important differences. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS Eleven observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial (n = 897) were included. Nine studies included patients with primary PC with MRgRT as first-line treatment (n = 813) and 3 with MRgRT as second-line treatment (n = 84). Substantial risk of bias was found in 5 studies. European Organization for Research and Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) core 30 (C30) and EORTC QLQ prostate cancer module (PR25) scores were pooled from 3 studies, and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 scores were pooled from 4 studies. Relevant MDs for the urinary domain were found with the EPIC-26 (MD, -10.0; 95% CI, -12.0 to -8.1; I2 = 0%) and the EORTC QLQ-PR25 (MD, 8.6; 95% CI, -4.7 to 22.0; I2 = 97%), both at end-RT to 1-month follow-up. Relevant MDs for the bowel domain were found with the EPIC-26 (MD, -4.7; 95% CI, -9.2 to -0.2; I2 = 82%) at end-RT or 1-month follow-up, but not with the EORTC QLQ-PR25. For both domains, no relevant MDs were found after 3 months of follow-up. No relevant MDs were found in the general quality of life domains of the EORTC QLQ C30. CONCLUSIONS MRgRT for PC results in a temporary worsening of patient-reported urinary and bowel symptoms during the first month after treatment compared with pre-RT, resolving at 3 months. No clinically relevant changes were found for general quality of life domains. These results provide important information for patient counseling and can serve as a benchmark for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmijn M Westerhoff
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tariq A Lalmahomed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke T C Meijers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lauren Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Frederik R Teunissen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC (location VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lois A Daamen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dupraz C, Ducrot C, Allignet B, Delpon G, Alexis A, Lapierre A, Supiot S, Ali D, Piffoux M. The carbon footprint of external beam radiotherapy and its impact in health technology assessment. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 48:100834. [PMID: 39211397 PMCID: PMC11359761 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The major drivers of carbon dioxide (CO2eq) emissions of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are not well known and limit our ability to initiate mitigation strategies. Material and methods We describe the carbon footprint of four typical centers. We explore direct EBRT associated factors such as the impact of fractionation and use of MRI-LINAC, as well as indirect factors (e.g. patient rides). Treatment strategy related CO2eq emissions are included in a health technology assessment analysis that takes into account CO2eq emissions. Results A typical EBRT treatment emits from 185 kgCO2eq to 2066 kgCO2eq. CO2eq emissions are mostly driven by (i) accelerator acquisition and maintenance (37.8 %), (ii) patients and workers rides (32.7 %), (iii) drugs and medical devices (7.3 %), (iv) direct energy consumption (6.1 %), and (v) building and bunker construction (5.6 %) with a substantial heterogeneity among centers. Hypofractionation has a strong impact to mitigate emissions. MRI-LINAC is associated with a substantial increase in CO2eq emissions per fraction and requires ultra hypofractionation in 5 fractions to achieve a similar carbon footprint compared to 20 fractions treatment schemes. The expected limited small increase in toxicities due to hypofractionation (when existing) are in the same range as avoided detrimental effects to future people's health thanks to CO2eq mitigation. Conclusion Carbon footprint of EBRT is not neglectable and could be mitigated. When safely feasible, hypofractionation is one of the main factors to decrease this impact. Taking into account CO2eq emissions has a substantial impact on the health technology assessment of EBRT, favoring hypofractionated regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Dupraz
- Oncologie médicale, Hospices civils de Lyon, France
| | - Coline Ducrot
- Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Benoit Allignet
- Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
- Département de radiothérapie, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Univ Lyon, INSA‐Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Laboratoire CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294 Lyon, France
| | - Gregory Delpon
- Département de Physique Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site Saint-Herblain, France
- Laboratoire SUBATECH, UMR 6457 CNRS-IN2P3, IMT Atlantique, Nantes, France
| | - Anthony Alexis
- Département de Physique Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Ariane Lapierre
- Service de radiothérapie, Hôpital lyon sud, Pierre bénite, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Département de Radiothérapie, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site Saint-Herblain, France
- Laboratoire US2B, CNRS UMR 6286, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - David Ali
- Centre de Radiothérapie de Versailles, France
| | - Max Piffoux
- Oncologie médicale, Hospices civils de Lyon, France
- Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l’Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nugent K, Das P, Ford D, Sabharwal A, Perna C, Dallas N, Lester J, Camilleri P. Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Daily Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Acute and Late Patient-Reported Toxicity Outcomes. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101574. [PMID: 39224488 PMCID: PMC11367053 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report acute and late bowel, urinary, and sexual dysfunction patient-reported outcome measures, among patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided daily adaptive radiation therapy (SMART). Methods and Materials All patients who completed a baseline 12-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events questionnaire, before undergoing SMART with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions, were subsequently followed up with the same graded questionnaire at set time points. Latest prostate-specific antigen levels were recorded. The percentage of patients who reported no change from their baseline adverse event (AE) or reported a new ≥ "frequent or almost constant" or "severe grade or higher" AE grade during follow-up was calculated. The maximum 12-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade for each item was recorded for each patient. The percentage of toxicity levels for each separate AE item at set time points was calculated. Results The total number of patients was 69 with a median follow-up of 27 months. Median age of the cohort was 73 years (range, 54-85 years). The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, T stage, and Gleason score were 7.5 mmol/L (range, 4.5-32 mmol/L), T2b (range, T2-T3b), and 7 (3 + 4; range, 6-9), respectively. No patient had biochemical failure during follow-up. Regarding bowel symptoms, >80% of men reported no change from baseline toxicity during follow-up. New ≥ frequent or almost constant diarrhea was reported in 9% of patients. "Almost constant" diarrhea peaked at 1 month but was absent at >33 months. Regarding urinary symptoms, increased urinary urgency was the most common complaint (39%). Twenty percent of men reported new ≥ frequent or almost constant urinary urgency incidence peaking at 1 month but absent at >33 months. New "severe" sexual dysfunction was seen in 26% of patients and was persistent at >33 months. Conclusions Our study is one the largest patient-reported outcomes study after prostate SMART. It shows acceptable levels of toxicity even up to 2 years after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Killian Nugent
- GenesisCare UK, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Dan Ford
- GenesisCare UK, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Philip Camilleri
- GenesisCare UK, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Swensen S, Liao JJ, Chen JJ, Kim K, Ma TM, Weg ES. The expanding role of radiation oncology across the prostate cancer continuum. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:2693-2705. [PMID: 38900319 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04408-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is used in the treatment of prostate cancer in a variety of disease states with significant reliance on imaging to guide clinical decision-making and radiation delivery. In the definitive setting, the choice of radiotherapy treatment modality, dose, and fractionation for localized prostate cancer is determined by the patient's initial risk stratification and other clinical considerations. Radiation is also an option as salvage therapy in patients with locoregionally recurrent disease after prior definitive radiation or surgery. In recent years, the role of radiation has expanded for patients with metastatic disease, including prostate-directed radiotherapy in de novo low volume metastatic disease, metastasis-directed therapy for oligorecurrent disease, and palliative management of symptomatic metastases in the advanced setting. Here we review the expanding role of radiation in the treatment of prostate cancer in the definitive, locoregionally recurrent, and metastatic settings, as well as highlight the role of imaging in clinical reasoning, radiation planning, and treatment delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasha Swensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Jonathan J Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Katherine Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Emily S Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dohopolski M, Visak J, Choi B, Meng B, Parsons D, Zhong X, Inam E, Avkshtol V, Moon D, Sher D, Lin MH. In silico evaluation and feasibility of near margin-less head and neck daily adaptive radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110178. [PMID: 38453056 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We explore the potential dosimetric benefits of reducing treatment volumes through daily adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients using the Ethos system/Intelligent Optimizer Engine (IOE). We hypothesize reducing treatment volumes afforded by daily adaption will significantly reduce the dose to adjacent organs at risk. We also explore the capability of the Ethos IOE to accommodate this highly conformal approach in HNC radiation therapy. METHODS Ten HNC patients from a phase II trial were chosen, and their cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were uploaded to the adaptive RT (ART) emulator. A new initial reference plan was generated using both a 1 mm and 5 mm planning target volume (PTV) expansion. Daily adaptive ART plans (1 mm) were simulated from the clinical CBCT taken every fifth fraction. Additionally, using physician-modified ART contours the larger 5 mm plan was recalculated on this recontoured on daily anatomy. Changes in target and OAR contours were measured using Dice coefficients as a surrogate of clinician effort. PTV coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses were statistically compared, and the robustness of each ART plan was evaluated at fractions 5 and 35 to observe if OAR doses were within 3 Gy of pre-plan. RESULTS This study involved six patients with oropharynx and four with larynx cancer, totaling 70 adaptive fractions. The primary and nodal gross tumor volumes (GTV) required the most adjustments, with median Dice scores of 0.88 (range: 0.80-0.93) and 0.83 (range: 0.66-0.91), respectively. For the 5th and 35th fraction plans, 80 % of structures met robustness criteria (quartile 1-3: 67-100 % and 70-90 %). Adaptive planning improved median PTV V100% coverage for doses of 70 Gy (96 % vs. 95.6 %), 66.5 Gy (98.5 % vs. 76.5 %), and 63 Gy (98.9 % vs. 74.9 %) (p < 0.03). Implementing ART with total volume reduction yielded median dose reductions of 7-12 Gy to key organs-at-risk (OARs) like submandibular glands, parotids, oral cavity, and constrictors (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The IOE enables feasible daily ART treatments with reduced margins while enhancing target coverage and reducing OAR doses for HNC patients. A phase II trial recently finished accrual and forthcoming analysis will determine if these dosimetric improvements correlate with improved patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Dohopolski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Justin Visak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Byongsu Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Lab, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Boyu Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Xinran Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Enobong Inam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vladimir Avkshtol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Dominic Moon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leeman JE, Han Z, Haas-Kogan DA. When Best Care Takes a Back Seat to the Bottom Line. JAMA Oncol 2024:2821926. [PMID: 39088197 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
This Viewpoint discusses the clinical vs economic success of magnetic resonance imaging combined with linear accelerator technology and its impact on patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan E Leeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zhaohui Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Roach M, Ling S, Coleman PW. MRI-Linac-Based Radiotherapy-Promising or Hype? JAMA Oncol 2024:2821925. [PMID: 39088198 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
This Viewpoint discusses the value of magnetic resonance imaging with linear accelerator (MRI-linac) technology, given the unmet needs in its development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mack Roach
- Particle Therapy Research Program & Outreach, Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Stella Ling
- Locums Faculty, Exeter Hospital, Exeter, New Hampshire
| | - Pamela W Coleman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Noble DJ, Ramaesh R, Brothwell M, Elumalai T, Barrett T, Stillie A, Paterson C, Ajithkumar T. The Evolving Role of Novel Imaging Techniques for Radiotherapy Planning. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:514-526. [PMID: 38937188 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
The ability to visualise cancer with imaging has been crucial to the evolution of modern radiotherapy (RT) planning and delivery. And as evolving RT technologies deliver increasingly precise treatment, the importance of accurate identification and delineation of disease assumes ever greater significance. However, innovation in imaging technology has matched that seen with RT delivery platforms, and novel imaging techniques are a focus of much research activity. How these imaging modalities may alter and improve the diagnosis and staging of cancer is an important question, but already well served by the literature. What is less clear is how novel imaging techniques may influence and improve practical and technical aspects of RT planning and delivery. In this review, current gold standard approaches to integration of imaging, and potential future applications of bleeding-edge imaging technology into RT planning pathways are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Noble
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - R Ramaesh
- Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - M Brothwell
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - T Elumalai
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - T Barrett
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Stillie
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - C Paterson
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - T Ajithkumar
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Diven M, Ballman K, Marciscano A, Barbieri C, Piscopo J, Wang S, Nagar H, McClure T. Radiation therapy and IRreversible electroporation for intermediate risk prostate cancer (RTIRE). BMC Urol 2024; 24:151. [PMID: 39054460 PMCID: PMC11271032 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01506-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation Therapy and IRreversible Electroporation for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer (RTIRE) is a phase II clinical trial testing combination of radiation therapy and irreversible electroporation for intermediate risk prostate cancer BACKGROUND: PCa is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men and the second leading cause of cancer death in men. PCa treatment is associated with long term side effects including urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction. Management of PCa is based on risk stratification to prevent its overtreatment and associated treatment-related toxicity. There is increasing interest in novel treatment strategies, such as focal therapy, to minimize treatment associated morbidity. Focal therapy alone has yet to be included in mainstream guidelines, given ongoing concerns with potentially higher risk of recurrence. We hypothesize combining focal therapy with whole gland, reduced dose radiotherapy will provide acceptable oncologic efficacy with minimal treatment associated morbidity. RTIRE is a phase II single institution, investigator-initiated study combining a local ablative technique though local irreversible electroporation (IRE) with MR guided RT (MRgRT) to treat the entire prostate. The goal is to provide excellent oncologic outcomes and minimize treatment related side effects through leveraging benefits of locally ablative therapy with established radiation treatment techniques. METHODS A total of 42 men with intermediate risk PCa per NCCN guidelines and focal grade group (GG) 2 or 3, Gleason Score (GS) 3 + 4 or GS 4 + 3, cancer in an MRI target will be enrolled. Patients with MRI visible foci of GG2/GG3 will undergo focal therapy with IRE of this lesion. Following successful focal therapy, patients will then undergo a course of reduced dose, whole gland MRgRT with either 32.5 Gy in 5 Fractions or 22 Gy in 2 fractions. The primary objective of the study is to determine safety. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of oncologic efficacy (as measured by the proportion of patients free of clinically significant cancer as defined as > Grade Group 1 at 1-year follow-up biopsy), imaging characteristics of patients pre and post RTIRE, impact on quality of life (QoL), and PSA kinetics. DISCUSSION Combining IRE with a reduced dose radiotherapy may offer a new treatment paradigm for PCa by both reducing treatment effects of full dose radiotherapy and minimizing the risk of recurrence observed with focal therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05345444. Date of registration: April 25, 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION 6.0, July 7, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marshall Diven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Karla Ballman
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ariel Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Piscopo
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shu Wang
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy McClure
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tegtmeier RC, Clouser EL, Laughlin BS, Santos Toesca DA, Flakus MJ, Bashir S, Kutyreff CJ, Hobbis D, Harrington DP, Smetanick JL, Yu NY, Vargas CE, James SE, Rwigema JCM, Rong Y. Evaluation of knowledge-based planning models for male pelvic CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy on conventional linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14464. [PMID: 39031902 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the practicality of employing a commercial knowledge-based planning tool (RapidPlan) to generate adapted intact prostate and prostate bed volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans on iterative cone-beam computed tomography (iCBCT) datasets. METHODS AND MATERIALS Intact prostate and prostate bed RapidPlan models were trained utilizing planning data from 50 and 44 clinical cases, respectively. To ensure that refined models were capable of producing adequate clinical plans with a single optimization, models were tested with 50 clinical planning CT datasets by comparing dose-volume histogram (DVH) and plan quality metric (PQM) values between clinical and RapidPlan-generated plans. The RapidPlan tool was then used to retrospectively generate adapted VMAT plans on daily iCBCT images for 20 intact prostate and 15 prostate bed cases. As before, DVH and PQM metrics were utilized to dosimetrically compare scheduled (iCBCT Verify) and adapted (iCBCT RapidPlan) plans. Timing data was collected to further evaluate the feasibility of integrating this approach within an online adaptive radiotherapy workflow. RESULTS Model testing results confirmed the models were capable of producing VMAT plans within a single optimization that were overall improved upon or dosimetrically comparable to original clinical plans. Direct application of RapidPlan on iCBCT datasets produced satisfactory intact prostate and prostate bed plans with generally improved target volume coverage/conformality and rectal sparing relative to iCBCT Verify plans as indicated by DVH values, though bladder metrics were marginally increased on average. Average PQM values for iCBCT RapidPlans were significantly improved compared to iCBCT Verify plans. The average time required [in mm:ss] to generate adapted plans was 06:09 ± 02:06 (intact) and 07:12 ± 01:04 (bed). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the feasibility of leveraging RapidPlan to expeditiously generate adapted VMAT intact prostate and prostate bed plans on iCBCT datasets. In general, adapted plans were dosimetrically improved relative to scheduled plans, emphasizing the practicality of the proposed approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley C Tegtmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Edward L Clouser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Brady S Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Mattison J Flakus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Sara Bashir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Dean Hobbis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Daniel P Harrington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Sarah E James
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Patel KR, van der Heide UA, Kerkmeijer LGW, Schoots IG, Turkbey B, Citrin DE, Hall WA. Target Volume Optimization for Localized Prostate Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00148-6. [PMID: 39019208 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide a comprehensive review of the means by which to optimize target volume definition for the purposes of treatment planning for patients with intact prostate cancer with a specific emphasis on focal boost volume definition. METHODS Here we conduct a narrative review of the available literature summarizing the current state of knowledge on optimizing target volume definition for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. RESULTS Historically, the treatment of prostate cancer included a uniform prescription dose administered to the entire prostate with or without coverage of all or part of the seminal vesicles. The development of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) using prostate-specific radiotracers has ushered in an era in which radiation oncologists are able to localize and focally dose-escalate high-risk volumes in the prostate gland. Recent phase 3 data has demonstrated that incorporating focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes of the prostate improves biochemical control without significantly increasing toxicity. Still, several fundamental questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this technique. Given the remaining uncertainty, a knowledge of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the anatomic patterns of tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for the definition of clinical target volumes. CONCLUSION Advanced imaging has the ability to improve outcomes for patients with prostate cancer in multiple ways, including by enabling focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes. However, many questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this practice, and key knowledge gaps remain. A detailed understanding of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the patterns of local tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for target volume definition given the current state of uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnan R Patel
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - William A Hall
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fredman E, Moore A, Icht O, Tschernichovsky R, Shemesh D, Bragilovski D, Kindler J, Golan S, Shochet T, Limon D. Acute Toxicity and Early Prostate Specific Antigen Response After Two-Fraction Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer Using Peri-Rectal Spacing - Initial Report of the SABR-Dual Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)02947-X. [PMID: 39002849 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE SABR-Dual is a phase-III trial with an initial phase-I safety cohort, of 2-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) with optional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based focal boost, using peri-rectal spacing, for localized prostate cancer. This represents the initial report from the phase-I non-randomized cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS Subjects had favorable intermediate risk (FIR) or low risk prostate adenocarcinoma, and gland volume <80 cc. All underwent radiopaque hydrogel spacer and fiducial marker placement before simulation (computed tomography and 3-tesla T2 MRI). The clinical target volume included the entire prostate, and in FIR patients, 1-2 cm of seminal vesicle. A 2-mm expansion was applied for planning target volume (PTV), and a dose of 27 Gy was prescribed to the PTV-prostate, 23 Gy to the PTV-seminal vesicle, with an optional 30 Gy simultaneous boost to an MRI-defined dominant lesion. Primary endpoint was 3-month patient-reported changes in quality of life based on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26, International Prostate Symptom Score, and Sexual Health Inventory for Men questionnaires. Secondary endpoints were 6-month quality of life, acute toxicity (using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) and early Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response. RESULTS Among the 20 patients in the phase-I cohort, 95% had FIR disease, and 50% received a simultaneous boost. At median follow-up of 8 months, a 3-month minimally clinically important change occurred in 1/20 (5%), 6/20 (30%), 2/20 (10%), 4/20 (20%), and 5/20 (25%) in urinary incontinence, urinary obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. There was a mean increase of 1 ± 5.4 in International Prostate Symptom Score and decrease of 1.8 ± 6.5 in Sexual Health Inventory for Men scores. Rates of grade 2 urinary and bowel toxicity were 10% and 0%, respectively, with no grade ≥3 toxicities. Mean PSA decrease at last follow-up was 70.4% ± 17.7%. CONCLUSION This generalizable protocol of 2-fraction prostate SABR using peri-rectal spacing is a safe approach for ultra-hypofractionated dose-escalation, with minimal acute toxicity. Longer-term outcomes and direct comparison with standard 5-fraction SABR are being studied in the phase-III randomized portion of SABR-Dual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisha Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel.
| | - Assaf Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Oded Icht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Roi Tschernichovsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel; Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Danielle Shemesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dimitri Bragilovski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Jonathan Kindler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Shay Golan
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Tzippora Shochet
- Department of Biostatistics, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dror Limon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Arcangeli S, Chissotti C, Ferrario F, Lucchini R, Belmonte M, Purrello G, Colciago RR, De Ponti E, Faccenda V, Panizza D. Ablative Radiation Therapy for Unfavorable Prostate Tumors (ABRUPT): Preliminary Analysis of Toxicity and Quality of Life from a Prospective Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)02539-2. [PMID: 38971384 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) side effects in patients with organ-confined unfavorable prostate cancer (PCa) treated with single-dose ablative radiation therapy (SDRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty patients enrolled in a single-arm prospective trial received 24 Gy SDRT to the whole prostate with urethra-sparing and organ motion control delivered on a Linac platform with a 10 MV flattening filter-free single partial arc. Androgen deprivation therapy was prescribed as per standard of care. Treatment-related acute and late GU and GI toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events_v5 scale) and quality of life (QoL) outcomes (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-PR25/C30, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]) were assessed at different time points. Minimal important difference (MID) was established as a change of >0.5 pooled standard deviations from baseline. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance and logistic regression. RESULTS Median follow-up was 18 months (range, 6-31 months), with no ≥G3 late side effects observed. G2 late GI and G2 late GU toxicities occurred in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. GI toxicity of any grade correlated with maximum rectal dose (P = .021). Lower baseline QoL score (P = .025), higher baseline IPSS score (P = .049), acute GU toxicity (P = .029), and acute urinary domain MID (P = .045) predicted GU toxicity of any grade. In multivariate analysis (MVA), only baseline QoL score (odds ratio [OR], 0.95, P = .031) and acute GU toxicity (OR, 8.4, P = .041) remained significant. Significant QoL change was observed only in the urinary domain (P = .005), with a median increase from 8 to 17. Late urinary MID correlated with acute urinary MID (P = .003), acute QoL MID (P = .029), acute GU toxicity (P = .030), and lower baseline urinary score (P = .033). In MVA, only acute urinary MID predicted late urinary MID (OR, 9.7, P = .035). CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide promising data on the feasibility and safety of 24 Gy whole-gland SDRT with urethra-sparing and organ motion control, in association with androgen deprivation therapy and an adequate prophylactic medication, in organ-confined unfavorable PCa. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Arcangeli
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Chissotti
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Ferrario
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Lucchini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Belmonte
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Purrello
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Elena De Ponti
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| | - Valeria Faccenda
- Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
| | - Denis Panizza
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Medical Physics Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Icht O, Schlosser S, Weinstock-Sabbah M, Rephael M, Bragilovski D, Moore A, Shochat T, Limon D, Fredman E. The role of a radiopaque peri-rectal hydrogel spacer in aiding accurate daily image-guidance for prostate stereotactic radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1386058. [PMID: 38957327 PMCID: PMC11217322 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1386058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Precise patient positioning with image guidance (IGRT) is essential for safe prostate radiotherapy. We present the first report of utilizing a CT-visible hydrogel spacer, used to decrease rectal radiation dose, as a surrogate fiducial marker to aid in daily IGRT with cone-beam CT (CBCT) in stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) for prostate cancer. Materials and methods Prior to CT simulation, patients underwent placement of three intraprostatic gold fiducial markers and radiopaque hydrogel spacer per standard practice. At treatment, after initial setup, a CBCT was acquired and fused to the planning CT based on 3-dimensional matching of the spacer. A second alignment was then performed based on the fiducial markers. The six directional shifts (three linear and three rotational) were recorded, and the differences compared. Results 140 individual fractions across 41 consecutive patients were evaluated. Mean/median differences between hydrogel spacer-based and fiducial-based alignment in linear (vertical, longitudinal, lateral) and rotational (rotation, pitch, roll) shifts were 0.9/0.6mm, 0.8/0.5mm, and 0.6/0.4mm, and 0.38/0, 0.62/0, and 0.35/0 degrees, respectively. No difference was observed in 9.9%, 22.9%, and 22.14% of linear shifts, and 65.7%, 65%, and 66.4% rotational shifts, respectively. Significantly smaller differences were observed in the latter 70 fractions vs. the former, and results were consistent across evaluators. Conclusions For precise daily IGRT with CBCT for prostate SABR, alignment using a radiopaque hydrogel spacer was highly comparable to intraprostatic fiducial markers. This represents the first report supporting an additional indication of IGRT for a CT-visible hydrogel spacer, to further enhance treatment accuracy and potentially obviate the need for the additional fiducial marker procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oded Icht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Shir Schlosser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Miriam Weinstock-Sabbah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Mor Rephael
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dimitri Bragilovski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Assaf Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Tzippora Shochat
- Department of Biostatistics, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dror Limon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Elisha Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Correia ETDO, Baydoun A, Li Q, Costa DN, Bittencourt LK. Emerging and anticipated innovations in prostate cancer MRI and their impact on patient care. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04423-4. [PMID: 38877356 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04423-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the leading malignancy affecting men, with over 3 million men living with the disease in the US, and an estimated 288,000 new cases and almost 35,000 deaths in 2023 in the United States alone. Over the last few decades, imaging has been a cornerstone in PCa care, with a crucial role in the detection, staging, and assessment of PCa recurrence or by guiding diagnostic or therapeutic interventions. To improve diagnostic accuracy and outcomes in PCa care, remarkable advancements have been made to different imaging modalities in recent years. This paper focuses on reviewing the main innovations in the field of PCa magnetic resonance imaging, including MRI protocols, MRI-guided procedural interventions, artificial intelligence algorithms and positron emission tomography, which may impact PCa care in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atallah Baydoun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Qiubai Li
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daniel N Costa
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Westley RL, Alexander SE, Goodwin E, Dunlop A, Nill S, Oelfke U, McNair HA, Tree AC. Magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy enables safe CTV-to-PTV margin reduction in prostate cancer: a cine MRI motion study. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1379596. [PMID: 38894866 PMCID: PMC11183304 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1379596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We aimed to establish if stereotactic body radiotherapy to the prostate can be delivered safely using reduced clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins on the 1.5T MR-Linac (MRL) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden), in the absence of gating. Methods Cine images taken in 3 orthogonal planes during the delivery of prostate SBRT with 36.25 Gray (Gy) in 5 fractions on the MRL were analysed. Using the data from 20 patients, the percentage of radiotherapy (RT) delivery time where the prostate position moved beyond 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP) and any direction was calculated. Results The prostate moved less than 3 mm in any direction for 90% of the monitoring period in 95% of patients. On a per-fraction basis, 93% of fractions displayed motion in all directions within 3 mm for 90% of the fraction delivery time. Recurring motion patterns were observed showing that the prostate moved with shallow drift (most common), transient excursions and persistent excursions during treatment. Conclusion A 3 mm CTV-PTV margin is safe to use for the treatment of 5 fraction prostate SBRT on the MRL, without gating. In the context of gating this work suggests that treatment time will not be extensively lengthened when an appropriate gating window is applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalyne L. Westley
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie E. Alexander
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Edmund Goodwin
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Dunlop
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Helen A. McNair
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Alison C. Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cuaron JJ, McBride S, Chino F, Parikh D, Kollmeier M, Pastrana G, Wagner K, Tamas A, Gomez D. Patient Safety and Satisfaction With Fully Remote Management of Radiation Oncology Care. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2416570. [PMID: 38865123 PMCID: PMC11170299 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.16570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Patients of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, are now offered a choice of either in-person or remote telehealth visits for radiation oncology care. However, safety and satisfaction among patients receiving treatment with fully remote physician management is unclear. Objective To analyze patient safety and satisfaction, financial implications, and environmental consequences associated with fully remote management among a cohort of patients treated with radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This single-institution retrospective cohort study was performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, with patients treated with radiation who opted for fully remote management between October 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022. Data on patient safety events were prospectively collected with an in-house quality improvement reporting system. Patient satisfaction surveys were distributed electronically before, during, and after treatment. Patient transportation costs and environmental consequences were estimated based on differences in travel distance. Data analysis was performed from March 14 through September 19, 2023. Exposure Radiotherapy with fully remote physician management. Main Outcomes and Measures Satisfaction rates among patients opting for fully remote management were analyzed via surveys administered electronically after visits with clinicians. Patient safety events, defined as staff-reported actual events and near misses that had the potential to affect patient care, were reviewed. Rates and types of safety events were analyzed and compared with patients treated by onsite clinicians. Distances between patient home zip codes and treatment site locations were compared with estimated cost savings and decreased emissions. Results This study included 2817 patients who received radiation oncology care with fully remote physician management. The median age of patients was 65 (range, 9-99) years, and more than half were men (1467 [52.1%]). Of the 764 safety events reported, 763 (99.9%) did not reach patients or caused no harm to patients. Nearly all survey respondents (451 [97.6%]) rated patient satisfaction as good to very good across all domains. For treatment with fully remote physician management, out-of-pocket cost savings totaled $612 912.71 ($466.45 per patient) and decreased carbon dioxide emissions by 174 metric tons. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, radiation oncology care provided by fully remote clinicians was safe and feasible, with no serious patient events. High patient satisfaction, substantial cost savings, and decreased environmental consequences were observed. These findings support the continuation of a fully remote management option for select patients in the post-COVID-19 era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J. Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dhwani Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marisa Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gerri Pastrana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Keri Wagner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Tamas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Le Guevelou J, Sargos P, Ferretti L, Supiot S, Pasquier D, Créhange G, Blanchard P, Hennequin C, Chapet O, Schick U, Baty M, Masson I, Ploussard G, De Crevoisier R, Latorzeff I. Sexual Structure Sparing for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:332-343. [PMID: 37640583 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Erectile dysfunction represents a major side effect of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, negatively impacting men's quality of life. While radiation therapy (RT) advances have enabled the mitigation of both genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities, no significant improvement has been showed in sexual quality of life over time. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this review was to assess sexual structures' dose-volume parameters associated with the onset of erectile dysfunction. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov until January 4, 2023. Studies reporting the impact of the dose delivered to sexual structures on sexual function or the feasibility of innovative sexual structure-sparing approaches were deemed eligible. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Sexual-sparing strategies have involved four sexual organs. The mean penile bulb doses exceeding 20 Gy are predictive of erectile dysfunction in modern PCa RT trial. Maintaining a D100% of ≤36 Gy on the internal pudendal arteries showed preservation of erectile function in 88% of patients at 5 yr. Neurovascular bundle sparing appears feasible with magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, yet its clinical impact remains unanswered. Doses delivered to the testicles during PCa RT usually remain <2 Gy and generate a decrease in testosterone levels ranging from -4.6% to -17%, unlikely to have any clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS Current data highlight the technical feasibility of sexual sparing for PCa RT. The proportion of erectile dysfunction attributable to the dose delivered to sexual structures is still largely unknown. While the ability to maintain sexual function over time is impacted by factors such as age or comorbidities, only selected patients are likely to benefit from sexual-sparing RT. PATIENT SUMMARY Technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) made it possible to significantly lower the dose delivered to sexual structures. While sexual function is known to decline with age, the preservation of sexual structures for prostate cancer RT is likely to be beneficial only in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Stephane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- CNRS, CRIStAL UMR 9189, Université de Lille & Centrale Lille, Lille, France
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, INSERM U1018 Oncostat, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Ulrike Schick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Brest, France
| | - Manon Baty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Ingrid Masson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, Clinique La Croix-du-Sud, Quint-Fonsegrives, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yu JB, DeStephano DM, Jeffers B, Horowitz DP, Soulos PR, Gross CP, Cheng SK. Updated Analysis of Comparative Toxicity of Proton and Photon Radiation for Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1943-1952. [PMID: 38507655 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous comparative effectiveness studies have not demonstrated a benefit of proton beam therapy (PBT) compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. An updated comparison of GI and genitourinary (GU) toxicity is needed. METHODS We investigated the SEER-Medicare linked database, identifying patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2017. Procedure and diagnosis codes indicative of treatment-related toxicity were identified. As a sensitivity analysis, we also identified toxicity based only on procedure codes. Patients who underwent IMRT and PBT were matched 2:1 on the basis of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. We then compared GI and GU toxicity at 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. RESULTS The final sample included 772 PBT patients matched to 1,544 IMRT patients. The frequency of GI toxicity for IMRT versus PBT was 3.5% versus 2.5% at 6 months (P = .18), 9.5% versus 10.2% at 12 months (P = .18), and 20.5% versus 23.4% at 24 months (P = .11). The frequency of only procedure codes indicative of GI toxicity for IMRT versus PBT was too low to be reported and not significantly different. The frequency of GU toxicity for IMRT versus PBT was 6.8% versus 5.7% (P = .30), 14.3% versus 12.2% (P = .13), and 28.2% versus 25.8% (P = .21) at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. When looking only at procedure codes, the frequency of GU toxicity for IMRT was 1.0% at 6 months, whereas it was too infrequent to report for PBT (P = .64). GU toxicity for IMRT versus PBT was 3.3% versus 2.1% (P = .10), and 8.7% versus 6.7% (P = .10) at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSION In this observational study, there were no statistically significant differences between PBT and IMRT in terms of GI or GU toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James B Yu
- Smilow Cancer Center at St Francis Hospital, Hartford, CT
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center at Yale, New Haven, CT
| | - David M DeStephano
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Brian Jeffers
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - David P Horowitz
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Pamela R Soulos
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center at Yale, New Haven, CT
| | - Cary P Gross
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center at Yale, New Haven, CT
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Simon K Cheng
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abdel-Wahab M, Coleman CN, Eriksen JG, Lee P, Kraus R, Harsdorf E, Lee B, Dicker A, Hahn E, Agarwal JP, Prasanna PGS, MacManus M, Keall P, Mayr NA, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Giammarile F, Kim IA, Aggarwal A, Lewison G, Lu JJ, Guedes de Castro D, Kong FMS, Afifi H, Sharp H, Vanderpuye V, Olasinde T, Atrash F, Goethals L, Corn BW. Addressing challenges in low-income and middle-income countries through novel radiotherapy research opportunities. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e270-e280. [PMID: 38821101 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00038-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
Although radiotherapy continues to evolve as a mainstay of the oncological armamentarium, research and innovation in radiotherapy in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) faces challenges. This third Series paper examines the current state of LMIC radiotherapy research and provides new data from a 2022 survey undertaken by the International Atomic Energy Agency and new data on funding. In the context of LMIC-related challenges and impediments, we explore several developments and advances-such as deep phenotyping, real-time targeting, and artificial intelligence-to flag specific opportunities with applicability and relevance for resource-constrained settings. Given the pressing nature of cancer in LMICs, we also highlight some best practices and address the broader need to develop the research workforce of the future. This Series paper thereby serves as a resource for radiation professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May Abdel-Wahab
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
| | - C Norman Coleman
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Lee
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ryan Kraus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ekaterina Harsdorf
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Becky Lee
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Summa Health, Akron, OH, USA
| | - Adam Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ezra Hahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jai Prakash Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Pataje G S Prasanna
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael MacManus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul Keall
- Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nina A Mayr
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Grant Lewison
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jiade J Lu
- Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Centre, Fudan University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Feng-Ming Spring Kong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, HKU-Shenzhen Hospital and Queen Mary Hospital, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Haidy Afifi
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hamish Sharp
- Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Verna Vanderpuye
- National Center for Radiotherapy, Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Korlebu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Fadi Atrash
- Augusta Victoria Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Luc Goethals
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Giuliani J, Mandarà M, Fiorica F. Cost Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance Versus Computed Tomography Guidance for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:634-635. [PMID: 37730527 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Giuliani
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda ULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy.
| | - Marta Mandarà
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda ULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiorica
- Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda ULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Westley R, Casey F, Mitchell A, Alexander S, Nill S, Murray J, Ratnakumaran R, Pathmanathan A, Oelfke U, Dunlop A, Tree AC. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) to Localised Prostate Cancer in the Era of MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy: Doses Delivered in the HERMES Trial Comparing Two- and Five-Fraction Treatments. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2073. [PMID: 38893193 PMCID: PMC11171331 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
HERMES is a phase II trial of MRI-guided daily-adaptive radiotherapy (MRIgART) randomising men with localised prostate cancer to either 2-fractions of SBRT with a boost to the tumour or 5-fraction SBRT. In the context of this highly innovative regime the dose delivered must be carefully considered. The first ten patients recruited to HERMES were analysed in order to establish the dose received by the targets and organs at risk (OARS) in the context of intrafraction motion. A regression analysis was performed to measure how the volume of air within the rectum might further impact rectal dose secondary to the electron return effect (ERE). One hundred percent of CTV target objectives were achieved on the MRI taken prior to beam-on-time. The post-delivery MRI showed that high-dose CTV coverage was achieved in 90% of sub-fractions (each fraction is delivered in two sub-fractions) in the 2-fraction cohort and in 88% of fractions the 5-fraction cohort. Rectal D1 cm3 was the most exceeded constraint; three patients exceeded the D1 cm3 < 20.8 Gy in the 2-fraction cohort and one patient exceeded the D1 cm3 < 36 Gy in the 5-fraction cohort. The volume of rectal gas within 1 cm of the prostate was directly proportional to the increase in rectal D1 cm3, with a strong (R = 0.69) and very strong (R = 0.90) correlation in the 2-fraction and 5-fraction cohort respectively. Dose delivery specified in HERMES is feasible, although for some patients delivered doses to both target and OARs may vary from those planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalyne Westley
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
- Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Francis Casey
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Adam Mitchell
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Sophie Alexander
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
- Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Julia Murray
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
- Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ragu Ratnakumaran
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
- Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Angela Pathmanathan
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
- Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Alex Dunlop
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Alison C. Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
- Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bryant JM, Cruz-Chamorro RJ, Gan A, Liveringhouse C, Weygand J, Nguyen A, Keit E, Sandoval ML, Sim AJ, Perez BA, Dilling TJ, Redler G, Andreozzi J, Nardella L, Naghavi AO, Feygelman V, Latifi K, Rosenberg SA. Structure-specific rigid dose accumulation dosimetric analysis of ablative stereotactic MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy in ultracentral lung lesions. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2024; 4:96. [PMID: 38778215 PMCID: PMC11111790 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00526-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Definitive local therapy with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for ultracentral lung lesions is associated with a high risk of toxicity, including treatment related death. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) can overcome many of the challenges associated with SABR treatment of ultracentral lesions. METHODS We retrospectively identified 14 consecutive patients who received SMART to ultracentral lung lesions from 10/2019 to 01/2021. Patients had a median distance from the proximal bronchial tree (PBT) of 0.38 cm. Tumors were most often lung primary (64.3%) and HILUS group A (85.7%). A structure-specific rigid registration approach was used for cumulative dose analysis. Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis was used for clinical outcome data and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used for dosimetric data. RESULTS Here we show that SMART dosimetric improvements in favor of delivered plans over predicted non-adapted plans for PBT, with improvements in proximal bronchial tree DMax of 5.7 Gy (p = 0.002) and gross tumor 100% prescription coverage of 7.3% (p = 0.002). The mean estimated follow-up is 17.2 months and 2-year local control and local failure free survival rates are 92.9% and 85.7%, respectively. There are no grade ≥ 3 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS SMART has dosimetric advantages and excellent clinical outcomes for ultracentral lung tumors. Daily plan adaptation reliably improves target coverage while simultaneously reducing doses to the proximal airways. These results further characterize the therapeutic window improvements for SMART. Structure-specific rigid dose accumulation dosimetric analysis provides insights that elucidate the dosimetric advantages of SMART more so than per fractional analysis alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Ruben J Cruz-Chamorro
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Alberic Gan
- University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Casey Liveringhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joseph Weygand
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ann Nguyen
- University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Emily Keit
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Maria L Sandoval
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Austin J Sim
- Department of Radiation Oncology; James Cancer Hospital, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Bradford A Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Thomas J Dilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gage Redler
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jacqueline Andreozzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Louis Nardella
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vladimir Feygelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Stephen A Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Potkrajcic V, Gani C, Fischer SG, Boeke S, Niyazi M, Thorwarth D, Voigt O, Schneider M, Mönnich D, Kübler S, Boldt J, Hoffmann E, Paulsen F, Mueller AC, Wegener D. Online Adaptive MR-Guided Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer on a 1.5 T MR-Linac: Clinical Experience and Prospective Evaluation. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2679-2688. [PMID: 38785484 PMCID: PMC11120184 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer has been increasingly evaluated, whereas accumulated evidence demonstrates comparable oncologic outcomes and toxicity rates compared to normofractionated radiotherapy. In this prospective study, we evaluate all patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated (UHF) MRI-guided radiotherapy on a 1.5 T MR-Linac within our department and report on workflow and feasibility, as well as physician-recorded and patient-reported longitudinal toxicity. A total of 23 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated on the 1.5 T MR-Linac with a dose of 42.7 Gy in seven fractions (seven MV step-and-shoot IMRT) were evaluated within the MRL-01 study (NCT04172753). The duration of each treatment step, choice of workflow (adapt to shape-ATS or adapt to position-ATP) and technical and/or patient-sided treatment failure were recorded for each fraction and patient. Acute and late toxicity were scored according to RTOG and CTC V4.0, as well as the use of patient-reported questionnaires. The median follow-up was 12.4 months. All patients completed the planned treatment. The mean duration of a treatment session was 38.2 min. In total, 165 radiotherapy fractions were delivered. ATS was performed in 150 fractions, 5 fractions were delivered using ATP, and 10 fractions were delivered using both ATS and ATP workflows. Severe acute bother (G3+) regarding IPS-score was reported in five patients (23%) at the end of radiotherapy. However, this tended to normalize and no G3+ IPS-score was observed later at any point during follow-up. Furthermore, no other severe genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) acute or late toxicity was observed. One-year biochemical-free recurrence survival was 100%. We report the excellent feasibility of UHF MR-guided radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients and acceptable toxicity rates in our preliminary study. Randomized controlled studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to detect possible advantages over current state-of-the-art RT techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlatko Potkrajcic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Georg Fischer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Esslingen, 73730 Esslingen am Neckar, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Otilia Voigt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Moritz Schneider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - David Mönnich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sarah Kübler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jessica Boldt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Elgin Hoffmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Arndt-Christian Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, RKH-Kliniken Ludwigsburg, 71640 Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alb-Fils Kliniken GmbH, 73035 Goeppingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wang H, Yang J, Lee A, Phan J, Lim TY, Fuller CD, Han EY, Rhee DJ, Salzillo T, Zhao Y, Chopra N, Pham M, Castillo P, Sobremonte A, Moreno AC, Reddy JP, Rosenthal D, Garden AS, Wang X. MR-guided stereotactic radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100760. [PMID: 38510980 PMCID: PMC10950743 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has the advantage of utilizing high soft tissue contrast imaging to track daily changes in target and critical organs throughout the entire radiation treatment course. Head and neck (HN) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been increasingly used to treat localized lesions within a shorter timeframe. The purpose of this study is to examine the dosimetric difference between the step-and-shot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans on Elekta Unity and our clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans on Varian TrueBeam for HN SBRT. Method Fourteen patients treated on TrueBeam sTx with VMAT treatment plans were re-planned in the Monaco treatment planning system for Elekta Unity MR-Linac (MRL). The plan qualities, including target coverage, conformity, homogeneity, nearby critical organ doses, gradient index and low dose bath volume, were compared between VMAT and Monaco IMRT plans. Additionally, we evaluated the Unity adaptive plans of adapt-to-position (ATP) and adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflows using simulated setup errors for five patients and assessed the outcomes of our treated patients. Results Monaco IMRT plans achieved comparable results to VMAT plans in terms of target coverage, uniformity and homogeneity, with slightly higher target maximum and mean doses. The critical organ doses in Monaco IMRT plans all met clinical goals; however, the mean doses and low dose bath volumes were higher than in VMAT plans. The adaptive plans demonstrated that the ATP workflow may result in degraded target coverage and OAR doses for HN SBRT, while the ATS workflow can maintain the plan quality. Conclusion The use of Monaco treatment planning and online adaptation can achieve dosimetric results comparable to VMAT plans, with the additional benefits of real-time tracking of target volume and nearby critical structures. This offers the potential to treat aggressive and variable tumors in HN SBRT and improve local control and treatment toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tze Yee Lim
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eun Young Han
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dong Joo Rhee
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Travis Salzillo
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yao Zhao
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nitish Chopra
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Pham
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pam Castillo
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Angela Sobremonte
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fink C, Ristau J, Buchele C, Klüter S, Liermann J, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Sandrini E, Lentz-Hommertgen A, Baumann L, Andratschke N, Baumgartl M, Li M, Reiner M, Corradini S, Hörner-Rieber J, Bonekamp D, Schlemmer HP, Belka C, Guckenberger M, Debus J, Koerber S. Stereotactic ultrahypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer - Acute toxicity and patient-reported outcomes in the prospective, multicenter SMILE phase II trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100771. [PMID: 38586081 PMCID: PMC10998039 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Due to superior image quality and daily adaptive planning, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) has the potential to further widen the therapeutic window in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. This study reports on acute toxicity rates and patient-reported outcomes after MR-guided adaptive ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer within the prospective, multicenter phase II SMILE trial. Materials and methods A total of 69 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent MRgSBRT with daily online plan adaptation. Inclusion criteria comprised a tumor stage ≤ T3a, serum PSA value ≤ 20 ng/ml, ISUP Grade group ≤ 4. A dose of 37.5 Gy was prescribed to the PTV in five fractions on alternating days with an optional simultaneous boost of 40 Gy to the dominant intraprostatic lesion defined by multiparametric MRI. Acute genitourinary (GU-) and gastrointestinal (GI-) toxicity, as defined by CTCAE v. 5.0 and RTOG as well as patient-reported outcomes according to EORTC QLQ-C30 and -PR25 scores were analyzed at completion of radiotherapy, 6 and 12 weeks after radiotherapy and compared to baseline symptoms. Results There were no toxicity-related treatment discontinuations. At the 12-week follow-up visit, no grade 3 + toxicities were reported according to CTCAE. Up until the 12-week visit, in total 16 patients (23 %) experienced a grade 2 GU or GI toxicity. Toxicity rates peaked at the end of radiation therapy and subsided within the 12-week follow-up period. At the 12-week follow-up visit, no residual grade 2 GU toxicities were reported and 1 patient (1 %) had residual grade 2 enteritic symptoms. With exception to a significant improvement in the emotional functioning score following MRgSBRT, no clinically meaningful changes in the global health status nor in relevant subscores were reported. Conclusion Daily online-adaptive MRgSBRT for localized prostate cancer resulted in an excellent overall toxicity profile without any major negative impact on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C.A. Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J. Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Hilf Hospital Mönchengladbach, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - C. Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S. Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J. Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - E. Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A. Lentz-Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L. Baumann
- Institute of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N. Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M. Baumgartl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M. Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Reiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J. Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D. Bonekamp
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H.-P. Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C. Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J. Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S.A. Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brueder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ali D, Piffoux M. Methodological guide for assessing the carbon footprint of external beam radiotherapy: A single-center study with quantified mitigation strategies. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100768. [PMID: 38633470 PMCID: PMC11021844 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purposes Data on the carbon footprint of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) are scarce. Reliable and exhaustive data, including a detailed carbon inventory, are needed to determine effective mitigation strategies. Materials and methods This study proposes a methodology for calculating the carbon footprint of EBRT and applies it to a single center. Mitigation strategies are derived from the carbon inventory, and their potential reductions are quantified whenever possible. Results The average emission per treatment and fraction delivered was 489 kg CO₂eq and 27 kg CO₂eq, respectively. Patient transportation (43 %) and the construction and maintenance of linear accelerators (LINACs) and scanners (17 %) represented the most significant components. Electricity, the only energy source used, accounted for only 2 % of emissions.Derived mitigation strategies include a data deletion policy (reducing emissions in 30 years by 12.5 %), geographical appropriateness (-12.2 %), transportation mode appropriateness (-9.3 %), hypofractionation (-5.9 %), decrease in manufacturers' carbon footprint (-5.2 %), and an increase in machine durability (-3.5 %). Conclusion Our findings indicate that a significant reduction in the carbon footprint of a radiotherapy unit can be achieved without compromising the quality of care.This study provides a methodology and a starting point for comparison and proposes and quantifies mitigation strategies, paving the way for others to follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Ali
- Centre de Radiothérapie et de Traitement des Tumeurs, Versailles, France
| | - Max Piffoux
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CITOHL, Lyon, France
- Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l’Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Westerhoff JM, Daamen LA, Christodouleas JP, Blezer ELA, Choudhury A, Westley RL, Erickson BA, Fuller CD, Hafeez S, van der Heide UA, Intven MPW, Kirby AM, Lalondrelle S, Minsky BD, Mook S, Nowee ME, Marijnen CAM, Orrling KM, Sahgal A, Schultz CJ, Faivre-Finn C, Tersteeg RJHA, Tree AC, Tseng CL, Schytte T, Silk DM, Eggert D, Luzzara M, van der Voort van Zyp JRN, Verkooijen HM, Hall WA. Safety and Tolerability of Online Adaptive High-Field Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2410819. [PMID: 38691356 PMCID: PMC11063805 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance In 2018, the first online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) system using a 1.5-T MR-equipped linear accelerator (1.5-T MR-Linac) was clinically introduced. This system enables online adaptive radiotherapy, in which the radiation plan is adapted to size and shape changes of targets at each treatment session based on daily MR-visualized anatomy. Objective To evaluate safety, tolerability, and technical feasibility of treatment with a 1.5-T MR-Linac, specifically focusing on the subset of patients treated with an online adaptive strategy (ie, the adapt-to-shape [ATS] approach). Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included adults with solid tumors treated with a 1.5-T MR-Linac enrolled in Multi Outcome Evaluation for Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM), a large prospective international study of MRgRT between February 2019 and October 2021. Included were adults with solid tumors treated with a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Data were collected in Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, and the US. Data were analyzed in August 2023. Exposure All patients underwent MRgRT using a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Radiation prescriptions were consistent with institutional standards of care. Main Outcomes and Measures Patterns of care, tolerability, and technical feasibility (ie, treatment completed as planned). Acute high-grade radiotherapy-related toxic effects (ie, grade 3 or higher toxic effects according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) occurring within the first 3 months after treatment delivery. Results In total, 1793 treatment courses (1772 patients) were included (median patient age, 69 years [range, 22-91 years]; 1384 male [77.2%]). Among 41 different treatment sites, common sites were prostate (745 [41.6%]), metastatic lymph nodes (233 [13.0%]), and brain (189 [10.5%]). ATS was used in 1050 courses (58.6%). MRgRT was completed as planned in 1720 treatment courses (95.9%). Patient withdrawal caused 5 patients (0.3%) to discontinue treatment. The incidence of radiotherapy-related grade 3 toxic effects was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.9%-2.0%) in the entire cohort and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.0%) in the subset of patients treated with ATS. There were no radiotherapy-related grade 4 or 5 toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients treated on a 1.5-T MR-Linac, radiotherapy was safe and well tolerated. Online adaptation of the radiation plan at each treatment session to account for anatomic variations was associated with a low risk of acute grade 3 toxic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmijn M. Westerhoff
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lois A. Daamen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John P. Christodouleas
- Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Erwin L. A. Blezer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalyne L. Westley
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Beth A. Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Shaista Hafeez
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uulke A. van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P. W. Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anna M. Kirby
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Lalondrelle
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Stella Mook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies E. Nowee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie A. M. Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Arjun Sahgal
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alison C. Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Radiation Oncology, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Odette Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Dustin M. Silk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | | | | | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - William A. Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee J, Nandalur S, Hazy A, Al-Katib S, Kim K, Ye H, Kolderman N, Dhaliwal A, Krauss D, Quinn T, Marvin K, Nandalur KR. Prostatic Urethral Length on MRI Potentially Predicts Late Genitourinary Toxicity After Prostate Cancer Radiation. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:1950-1958. [PMID: 37858506 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of our study was to evaluate pretreatment prostate quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements and clinical characteristics in predicting genitourinary (GU) toxicity after radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent MRI within 6 months before completing definitive RT and follow-up information in our GU toxicity database from June 2016 to February 2023. MRI measurements included quantitative urethra, prostate, and bladder measurements. GU toxicity was physician-scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0) with acute toxicity defined as ≤180 days and late defined as >180 days. Multivariable logistic regression model was constructed for grade ≥2 acute toxicity and Cox proportional hazards regression for late toxicity, adjusted for clinical factors and RT method. RESULTS A total of 361 men (median age 68 years, interquartile range [IQR] 62-73) were included; 14.4% (50/347) men experienced grade ≥2 acute toxicity. Brachytherapy (odds ratio [OR]: 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-5.8), P < 0.01) was associated with increased odds of acute GU toxicity, and longer MUL (OR: 0.41 [95%CI: 0.18-0.92], P = 0.03) with decreased odds. Median follow-up for late toxicity was 15.0 months (IQR: 9.0-28.0) with approximately 88.7% and 72.0% patients free of toxicity at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Only longer prostatic urethral length (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6, 95%CI: 1.2-2.1, P < 0.01) was associated with increased risk of late GU toxicity, notably urinary frequency/urgency symptoms (HR: 1.7 [95%CI: 1.3-2.3], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Longer prostatic urethral length measured on prostate MRI is independently associated with higher risk of developing late grade ≥2 GU toxicity after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. This pretreatment metric may be potentially valuable in risk-stratification models for quality of life following prostate RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Sirisha Nandalur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Allison Hazy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Sayf Al-Katib
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.); Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (S.A.K., N.K., A.D., K.R.N.)
| | - Kyu Kim
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Hong Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Nathan Kolderman
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.); Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (S.A.K., N.K., A.D., K.R.N.)
| | - Abhay Dhaliwal
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.); Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (S.A.K., N.K., A.D., K.R.N.)
| | - Daniel Krauss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Thomas Quinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.); Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.)
| | - Kimberly Marvin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., H.Y., D.K., T.Q., K.M.)
| | - Kiran R Nandalur
- Medical School, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan (J.L., S.N., A.H., S.A.K., K.K., H.Y., N.K., A.D., D.K., T.Q., K.R.N.); Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan (S.A.K., N.K., A.D., K.R.N.).
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gonsalves D, Ocanto A, Meilan E, Gomez A, Dominguez J, Torres L, Pascual CF, Teja M, Linde MM, Guijarro M, Rivas D, Begara J, González JA, Andreescu J, Holgado E, Alcaraz D, López E, Dzhugashvli M, Lopez-Campos F, Alongi F, Couñago F. Feasibility and Acute Toxicity of Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy on 0.35T MR-LINAC: The First Prospective Study in Spain. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1685. [PMID: 38730637 PMCID: PMC11083553 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
This observational, descriptive, longitudinal, and prospective basket-type study (Registry #5289) prospectively evaluated the feasibility and acute toxicity of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy on the first 0.35T MR-LINAC in Spain. A total of 37 patients were included between August and December 2023, primarily with prostate tumors (59.46%), followed by pancreatic tumors (32.44%). Treatment regimens typically involved extreme hypo-fractionated radiotherapy, with precise dose delivery verified through quality assurance measures. Acute toxicity assessment at treatment completion revealed manageable cystitis, with one case persisting at the three-month follow-up. Gastrointestinal toxicity was minimal. For pancreatic tumors, daily adaptation of organ-at-risk (OAR) and gross tumor volume (GTV) was practiced, with median doses to OAR within acceptable limits. Three patients experienced gastrointestinal toxicity, mainly nausea. Overall, the study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of extreme hypo-fractionated radiotherapy on a 0.35T MR-LINAC, especially for challenging anatomical sites like prostate and pancreatic tumors. These findings support the feasibility of MR-LINAC-based radiotherapy in delivering precise treatments with minimal toxicity, highlighting its potential for optimizing cancer treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Gonsalves
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
- Facultad de Medicina Salud y Deporte, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | - Abrahams Ocanto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Eduardo Meilan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Alberto Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Jesus Dominguez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Lisselott Torres
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Castalia Fernández Pascual
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Macarena Teja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Miguel Montijano Linde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Marcos Guijarro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Daniel Rivas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Málaga, 29018 Madrid, Spain; (D.R.); (J.B.); (E.L.)
| | - Jose Begara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Málaga, 29018 Madrid, Spain; (D.R.); (J.B.); (E.L.)
| | | | - Jon Andreescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Cordoba, 14012 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Esther Holgado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (E.H.); (D.A.)
| | - Diego Alcaraz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (E.H.); (D.A.)
| | - Escarlata López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Málaga, 29018 Madrid, Spain; (D.R.); (J.B.); (E.L.)
| | - Maia Dzhugashvli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Fernando Lopez-Campos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Verona, Italy;
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (A.O.); (L.T.); (C.F.P.); (M.T.); (M.M.L.); (M.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain; (E.M.); (A.G.); (M.D.); (F.L.-C.)
- Facultad de Medicina Salud y Deporte, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Trecarten S, Sunnapwar AG, Clarke GD, Liss MA. Prostate MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: Update and future directions. Adv Cancer Res 2024; 161:71-118. [PMID: 39032957 DOI: 10.1016/bs.acr.2024.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In recent decades, there has been an increasing role for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). The purpose of this review is to provide an update and outline future directions for the role of MRI in the detection of csPC. RECENT FINDINGS In diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer pre-biopsy, advances include our understanding of MRI-targeted biopsy, the role of biparametric MRI (non-contrast) and changing indications, for example the role of MRI in screening for prostate cancer. Furthermore, the role of MRI in identifying csPC is maturing, with emphasis on standardization of MRI reporting in active surveillance (PRECISE), clinical staging (EPE grading, MET-RADS-P) and recurrent disease (PI-RR, PI-FAB). Future directions of prostate MRI in detecting csPC include quality improvement, artificial intelligence and radiomics, positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI and MRI-directed therapy. SUMMARY The utility of MRI in detecting csPC has been demonstrated in many clinical scenarios, initially from simply diagnosing csPC pre-biopsy, now to screening, active surveillance, clinical staging, and detection of recurrent disease. Continued efforts should be undertaken not only to emphasize the reporting of prostate MRI quality, but to standardize reporting according to the appropriate clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Trecarten
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Abhijit G Sunnapwar
- Department of Radiology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Geoffrey D Clarke
- Department of Radiology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Michael A Liss
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fredman E, Icht O, Moore A, Bragilovski D, Kindler J, Golan S, Limon D. SABR-Dual: a phase II/III trial of two-fraction versus five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy for localized low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:431. [PMID: 38589860 PMCID: PMC11000374 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12165-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose-escalated radiotherapy is known to improve progression free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer, and recent advances have led to the standardization of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered in just 5-fractions. Based on the known effectiveness of the accepted though invasive 2-fraction treatment method of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and given the ubiquity of prostate cancer, a further reduction in the number of treatments of external-beam SABR is possible. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and non-inferiority of generalizable 2-fraction SABR compared to the current 5-fraction regimen. METHODS 502 patients will be enrolled on this phase II/III randomized control trial. Eligible patients will have previously untreated low- or favorable intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients will be randomized between standard SABR of 40 Gy in 5 fractions given every-other-day and 27 Gy in 2 fractions at least two days apart but completing within seven days. MRI-based planning, radiopaque hydrogel spacer insertion, and fiducial marker placement are required, and SABR will be delivered on either a standard CT-guided linear accelerator or MR-LINAC. The primary endpoint will be freedom from disease progression, with additional secondary clinical, toxicity, and quality of life endpoints. DISCUSSION This study will be the largest prospective randomized trial, adequately powered to demonstrate non-inferiority, comparing 2-fraction SABR to standard 5-fraction SABR for localized prostate cancer. As the protocol does not obligate use of an MRI-LINAC or other adaptive technologies, results will be broadly generalizable to the wider community. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06027892.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisha Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel.
| | - Oded Icht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Assaf Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dimitri Bragilovski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Jonathan Kindler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Shay Golan
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dror Limon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Grover J, Liu P, Dong B, Shan S, Whelan B, Keall P, Waddington DEJ. Super-resolution neural networks improve the spatiotemporal resolution of adaptive MRI-guided radiation therapy. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2024; 4:64. [PMID: 38575723 PMCID: PMC10994938 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00489-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superb non-invasive, soft tissue imaging of the human body. However, extensive data sampling requirements severely restrict the spatiotemporal resolution achievable with MRI. This limits the modality's utility in real-time guidance applications, particularly for the rapidly growing MRI-guided radiation therapy approach to cancer treatment. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) could reduce the trade-off between the spatial and the temporal resolution of MRI, thus increasing the clinical utility of the imaging modality. METHODS We trained deep learning-based super-resolution neural networks to increase the spatial resolution of real-time MRI. We developed a framework to integrate neural networks directly onto a 1.0 T MRI-linac enabling real-time super-resolution imaging. We integrated this framework with the targeting system of the MRI-linac to demonstrate real-time beam adaptation with super-resolution-based imaging. We tested the integrated system using large publicly available datasets, healthy volunteer imaging, phantom imaging, and beam tracking experiments using bicubic interpolation as a baseline comparison. RESULTS Deep learning-based super-resolution increases the spatial resolution of real-time MRI across a variety of experiments, offering measured performance benefits compared to bicubic interpolation. The temporal resolution is not compromised as measured by a real-time adaptation latency experiment. These two effects, an increase in the spatial resolution with a negligible decrease in the temporal resolution, leads to a net increase in the spatiotemporal resolution. CONCLUSIONS Deployed super-resolution neural networks can increase the spatiotemporal resolution of real-time MRI. This has applications to domains such as MRI-guided radiation therapy and interventional procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Grover
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Paul Liu
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bin Dong
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shanshan Shan
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Brendan Whelan
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Keall
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David E J Waddington
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Neylon J, Ma TM, Savjani R, Low DA, Steinberg ML, Lamb JM, Nickols NG, Kishan AU, Cao M. Quantifying Intrafraction Motion and the Impact of Gating for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Stereotactic Radiation therapy for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Arm From the MIRAGE Phase 3 Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1181-1191. [PMID: 38160916 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Real-time intrafraction tracking/gating is an integral component of magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) and may have contributed to the acute toxicity reduction during prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy observed on the MRgRT-arm of the MIRAGE (MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-GUIDED Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer) randomized trial (NCT04384770). Herein we characterized intrafraction prostate motion and assessed gating effectiveness. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventy-nine patients were treated on an MR-LINAC. Real-time cine imaging was acquired at 4Hz in a sagittal plane. If >10% of the prostate area moved outside of a 3-mm gating boundary, an automatic beam hold was initiated. An in-house tool was developed to retrospectively extract gating signal for all patients and identify the tracked prostate in each cine frame for a subgroup of 40 patients. The fraction of time the prostate was within the gating window was defined as the gating duty cycle (GDC). RESULTS A total of 391 treatments from 79 patients were analyzed. Median GDC was 0.974 (IQR, 0.916-0.983). Fifty (63.2%) and 24 (30.4%) patients had at least 1 fraction with GDC ≤0.9 and GDC ≤0.8, respectively. Incidence of low GDC fractions among patients appeared stochastic. Patients with minimum GDC <0.8 trended toward more frequent grade 2 genitourinary toxicity compared with those with minimum GDC >0.8 (38% vs 18%, P = .065). Prostate intrafraction motion was mostly along the bladder-rectum axis and predominantly in the superior-anterior direction. Motion in the inferior-posterior direction was associated with significantly higher rate of acute grade 2 genitourinary toxicity (66.7% vs 13.9%, P = .001). Gating limited mean prostate motion during treatment delivery in fractions with a GDC <0.9 (<0.8) to 2.9 mm (2.9 mm) versus 4.1 mm (4.7 mm) for ungated motion. CONCLUSIONS Fractions with large intrafraction motion were associated with increased toxicity and their occurrence among patients appears stochastic. Real-time tracking/gating effectively mitigated this motion and is likely a major contributing factor of acute toxicity reduction associated with MRgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Neylon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ricky Savjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nicholas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
van den Dobbelsteen M, Hackett SL, van Asselen B, Oolbekkink S, Raaymakers BW, de Boer JC. Treatment planning evaluation and experimental validation of the magnetic resonance-based intrafraction drift correction. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100580. [PMID: 38707627 PMCID: PMC11068926 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose MRI-guided online adaptive treatments can account for interfractional variations, however intrafraction motion reduces treatment accuracy. Intrafraction plan adaptation methods, such as the Intrafraction Drift Correction (IDC) or sub-fractionation, are needed. IDC uses real-time automatic monitoring of the tumor position to initiate plan adaptations by repositioning segments. IDC is a fast adaptation method that occurs only when necessary and this method could enable margin reduction. This research provides a treatment planning evaluation and experimental validation of the IDC. Materials and methods An in silico treatment planning evaluation was performed for 13 prostate patients mid-treatment without and with intrafraction plan adaptation (IDC and sub-fractionation). The adaptation methods were evaluated using dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics. To experimentally verify IDC a treatment was mimicked whereby a motion phantom containing an EBT3 film moved mid-treatment, followed by repositioning of segments. In addition, the delivered treatment was irradiated on a diode array phantom for plan quality assurance purposes. Results The planning study showed benefits for using intrafraction adaptation methods relative to no adaptation, where the IDC and sub-fractionation showed consistently improved target coverage with median target coverages of 100.0%. The experimental results verified the IDC with high minimum gamma passing rates of 99.1% and small mean dose deviations of maximum 0.3%. Conclusion The straightforward and fast IDC technique showed DVH metrics consistent with the sub-fractionation method using segment weight re-optimization for prostate patients. The dosimetric and geometric accuracy was shown for a full IDC workflow using film and diode array dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelon van den Dobbelsteen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sara L. Hackett
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram van Asselen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn Oolbekkink
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W. Raaymakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes C.J. de Boer
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Henke LE. Undoing the Layers: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Advanced Image Guidance and Adaptive Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1167-1171. [PMID: 38492968 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Henke
- University Hospitals, Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gao Y, Yoon S, Ma TM, Yang Y, Sheng K, Low DA, Ballas L, Steinberg ML, Kishan AU, Cao M. Intra-fractional geometric and dose/volume metric variations of magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic radiotherapy of prostate bed after radical prostatectomy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100573. [PMID: 38585371 PMCID: PMC10997948 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-guided Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment to prostate bed after radical prostatectomy has garnered growing interests. The aim of this study is to evaluate intra-fractional anatomic and dose/volume metric variations for patients receiving this treatment. Materials and methods Nineteen patients who received 30-34 Gy in 5 fractions on a 0.35T MR-Linac were included. Pre- and post-treatment MRIs were acquired for each fraction (total of 75 fractions). The Clinical Target Volume (CTV), bladder, rectum, and rectal wall were contoured on all images. Volumetric changes, Hausdorff distance, Mean Distance to Agreement (MDA), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for each structure were calculated. Median value and Interquartile range (IQR) were recorded. Changes in target coverage and Organ at Risk (OAR) constraints were compared and evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sum tests at a significant level of 0.05. Results Bladder had the largest volumetric changes, with a median volume increase of 48.9 % (IQR 28.9-76.8 %) and a median MDA of 5.1 mm (IQR 3.4-7.1 mm). Intra-fractional CTV volume remained stable with a median volume change of 1.2 % (0.0-4.8 %). DSC was 0.97 (IQR 0.94-0.99). For the dose/volume metrics, there were no statistically significant changes observed except for an increase in bladder hotspot and a decrease of bladder V32.5 Gy and mean dose. The CTV V95% changed from 99.9 % (IQR 98.8-100 %) to 99.6 % (IQR 93.9-100 %). Conclusion Despite intra-fractional variations of OARs, CTV coverage remained stable during MRI-guided SBRT treatments for the prostate bed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, China
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel A. Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Leslie Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael L. Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Disis MLN. JAMA Oncology-The Year in Review, 2023. JAMA Oncol 2024:2816794. [PMID: 38512293 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
|
39
|
Mohamad O, Zamboglou C, Zilli T, Murthy V, Aebersold DM, Loblaw A, Guckenberger M, Shelan M. Safety of Ultrahypofractionated Pelvic Nodal Irradiation in the Definitive Management of Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:998-1010. [PMID: 37863241 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence for ultrahypofractionated pelvic nodal irradiation in patients with prostate cancer, with a focus on reported acute and late toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS A comprehensive search was conducted in 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov) from inception until March 23, 2023. Eligible publications included patients with intermediate- and high-risk and node-positive prostate cancer who underwent elective or therapeutic ultrahypofractionated pelvic nodal irradiation. Primary outcomes included the presence of grade ≥2 rates of acute and late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events or Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scales. Quality assessment was performed using National Institutes of Health tools for noncontrolled beforeand after (single arm) clinical trials, as well as single-arm observational studies. Because all outcomes were categorical variables, proportion was calculated to estimate the effect size and compare the outcomes after the intervention. RESULTS We identified 16 publications that reported the use of ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy to treat the pelvis in prostate cancer. Seven publications met our criteria and were included in the meta-analysis, including 417 patients. The median total dose to the pelvic lymph nodes was 25 Gy (range, 25-28.5 Gy), with a median of 5 fractions. The prostate received a median dose of 40 Gy (range, 35-47.5 Gy). All studies used androgen deprivation therapy for a median duration of 18 months. The median follow-up period was 3 years (range, 0.5-5.6 years). The rates of acute grade ≥2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity were 8% (95% CI, 1%-15%) and 29% (95% CI, 18%-41%), respectively. For late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity, the rates were 13% (95% CI, 5%-21%) and 29% (95% CI, 17%-42%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Ultrahypofractionated pelvic nodal irradiation appears to be a safe approach in terms of acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - Uwniversity of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Neilsen BK, Ma TM, Akingbemi WO, Neylon J, Casado MC, Sharma S, Sheng K, Ruan D, Low DA, Yang Y, Valle LF, Steinberg ML, Lamb JM, Cao M, Kishan AU. Impact of Interfractional Bladder and Trigone Displacement and Deformation on Radiation Exposure and Subsequent Acute Genitourinary Toxicity: A Post Hoc Analysis of Patients Treated with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Phase 3 Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:986-997. [PMID: 37871887 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Emerging data suggest that trigone dosimetry may be more associated with poststereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) urinary toxicity than whole bladder dosimetry. We quantify the dosimetric effect of interfractional displacement and deformation of the whole bladder and trigone during prostate SBRT using on-board, pretreatment 0.35T magnetic resonance images (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventy-seven patients treated with MRI-guided prostate SBRT (40 Gy/5 fractions) on the MRI arm of a phase 3 single-center randomized trial were included. Bladder and trigone structures were contoured on images obtained from a 0.35T simulation MRI and 5 on-board pretreatment MRIs. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores and changes in volume between simulation and daily treatments were calculated. Dosimetric parameters including Dmax, D0.03 cc, Dmean, V40 Gy, V39 Gy, V38 Gy, and V20 Gy for the bladder and trigone for the simulation and daily treatments were collected. Both physician-scored (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 scale) as well as patient-reported (International Prostate Symptom Scores and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 scores) acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS The average treatment bladder volume was about 30% smaller than the simulation bladder volume; however, the trigone volume remained fairly consistent despite being positively correlated with total bladder volume. Overall, the trigone accounted for <2% of the bladder volume. Median DSC for the bladder was 0.79, whereas the median DSC of the trigone was only 0.33. No statistically significant associations between our selected bladder and trigonal dosimetric parameters and grade ≥2 GU toxicity were identified, although numerically, patients with GU toxicity (grade ≥2) had higher intermediate doses to the bladder (V20 Gy and Dmean) and larger volumes exposed to higher doses in the trigone (V40 Gy, V39 Gy, and V38 Gy). CONCLUSIONS The trigone exhibits little volume change, but considerable interfractional displacement/deformation. As a result, the relative volume of the trigone receiving high doses during prostate SBRT varies substantially between fractions, which could influence GU toxicity and may not be predicted by radiation planning dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth K Neilsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Jack Neylon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Maria C Casado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sahil Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Luca F Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ehret F. [The MIRAGE Trial (MRI-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer) - Precision at its best?]. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:255-258. [PMID: 38182832 PMCID: PMC10876491 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02194-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gao L, Wei R, Qin S, Tian Y, Xia W, Song Y, Wang S, Fang H, Tang Y, Jing H, Liu Y, Tang Y, Qi S, Chen B, Li Y, Xing N, Lu N. Adaptive ultra-hypofractionated whole-pelvic radiotherapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer on 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac: Estimated delivered dose and early toxicity results. Chronic Dis Transl Med 2024; 10:51-61. [PMID: 38450305 PMCID: PMC10914013 DOI: 10.1002/cdt3.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy with whole-pelvic irradiation (UHF-WPRT) is a novel approach to radiotherapy for patients with high-risk (HR) and very high-risk (VHR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, the inherent complexity of adaptive UHF-WPRT might inevitably result in longer on-couch time. We aimed to estimate the delivered dose, study the feasibility and safety of adaptive UHF-WPRT on a 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac. Methods Ten patients with clinical stage T3a-4N0-1M0-1c PCa, who consecutively received UHF-WPRT, were enrolled prospectively. The contours of the target and organ-at-risks on the position verification-MR (PV-MR), beam-on 3D-MR(Bn-MR), and post-MR (after radiotherapy delivery) were derived from the pre-MR data by deformable image registration. The physician then manually adjusted them, and dose recalculation was performed accordingly. GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Prism Software Inc.) was utilized for conducting statistical analyses. Results In total, we collected 188 MR scans (50 pre-MR, 50 PV-MR, 44 Bn-MR, and 44 post-MR scans). With median 59 min, the mean prostate clinical target volume (CTV)-V100% was 98.59% ± 2.74%, and the mean pelvic CTVp-V100% relative percentages of all scans was 99.60% ± 1.18%. The median V29 Gy change in the rectal wall was -2% (-18% to 20%). With a median follow-up of 9 months, no patient had acute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 2 or more severe genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities (0%). Conclusion UHF-RT to the prostate and the whole pelvis with concomitant boost to positive nodes using an Adapt-To-Shape (ATS) workflow was technically feasible for patients with HR and VHR PCa, presenting only mild GU and GI toxicities. The estimated target dose during the beam-on phase was clinically acceptable based on the 3D-MR-based dosimetry analysis. Clinical trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000033382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linrui Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Ran Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Shirui Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yuan Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Wenlong Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yongwen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Shulian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yu Tang
- GCP Center/Clinical Research Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Hao Jing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yueping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Shunan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Nianzeng Xing
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Ningning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ma TM, Ladbury C, Tran M, Keiper TD, Andraos T, Gogineni E, Mohideen N, Siva S, Loblaw A, Tree AC, Cheung P, Kresl J, Collins S, Cao M, Kishan AU. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Radiosurgery Society Guide to the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer Illustrated by Challenging Cases. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e117-e131. [PMID: 37661040 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) involved lengthy courses with low daily doses. However, advancements in radiation delivery and a better understanding of prostate radiobiology have enabled the development of shorter courses of EBRT. Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy, administering doses greater than 5 Gy per fraction, is now considered a standard of care regimen for localized PCa, particularly for intermediate-risk disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a specific type of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy employing advanced planning, imaging, and treatment technology to deliver in five or fewer fractions, is gaining prominence as a cost-effective, convenient, and safe alternative to longer radiotherapy courses. It is crucial to address practical considerations related to patient selection, fractionation scheme, target delineation, and planning objectives. This is especially important in challenging clinical situations where clear evidence for guidance may be lacking. The Radiosurgery Society endorses this case-based guide with the aim of providing a practical framework for delivering SBRT to the intact prostate, exemplified by two case studies. The article will explore common SBRT dose/fractionation schemes and dose constraints for organs-at-risk. Additionally, it will review existing evidence and expert opinions on topics such as SBRT dose escalation, the use of rectal spacers, the role of androgen deprivation therapy in the context of SBRT, SBRT in special patient populations (e.g., high-risk disease, large prostate, high baseline urinary symptom burdens, and inflammatory bowel disease), as well as new imaging-guidance techniques like Magnetic Resonance Imaging for SBRT delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Maxwell Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Timothy D Keiper
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Therese Andraos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Najeeb Mohideen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwest Community Hospital, Arlington Heights, Illinois
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Kresl
- Phoenix CyberKnife and Radiation Oncology Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sean Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Westley RL, Biscombe K, Dunlop A, Mitchell A, Oelfke U, Nill S, Murray J, Pathmanathan A, Hafeez S, Parker C, Ratnakumaran R, Alexander S, Herbert T, Hall E, Tree AC. Interim Toxicity Analysis From the Randomized HERMES Trial of 2- and 5-Fraction Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Adaptive Prostate Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:682-687. [PMID: 37776979 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy (UHRT) is an effective treatment for localized prostate cancer with an acceptable toxicity profile; boosting the visible intraprostatic tumor has been shown to improve biochemical disease-free survival with no significant effect on genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS HERMES is a single-center noncomparative randomized phase 2 trial in men with intermediate or lower high risk prostate cancer. Patients were allocated (1:1) to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions over 2 weeks or 24 Gy in 2 fractions over 8 days with an integrated boost to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) visible tumor of 27 Gy in 2 fractions. A minimization algorithm with a random element with risk group as a balancing factor was used for participant randomization. Treatment was delivered on the Unity MR-Linac (Elekta AB) with daily online adaption. The primary endpoint was acute GU Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 toxicity with the aim of excluding a doubling of the rate of acute grade 2+ GU toxicity seen in PACE. Analysis was by treatment received and included all participants who received at least 1 fraction of study treatment. This interim analysis was prespecified (stage 1 of a 2-stage Simon design) for when 10 participants in each treatment group had completed the acute toxicity monitoring period (12 weeks after radiation therapy). RESULTS Acute grade 2 GU toxicity was reported in 1 (10%) patient in the 5-fraction group and 2 (20%) patients in the 2-fraction group. No grade 3+ GU toxicities were reported. CONCLUSIONS At this interim analysis, the rate of GU toxicity in the 2-fraction and 5-fraction treatment groups was found to be below the prespecified threshold (5/10 grade 2+) and continuation of the study to complete recruitment of 23 participants per group was recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalyne Laura Westley
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Alex Dunlop
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Mitchell
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Murray
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Pathmanathan
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shaista Hafeez
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Parker
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ragu Ratnakumaran
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Alexander
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Trina Herbert
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Hall
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison C Tree
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shimomura A, Wu T, Rusu I, Kishan AU, Tree AC, Solanki AA, Liauw SL. Monitoring Intrafraction Motion of the Prostate During Radiation Therapy: Suggested Practice Points From a Focused Review. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:146-153. [PMID: 37875222 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE External beam radiation therapy to the prostate is typically delivered after verification of prostatic position with image guidance. Prostate motion can occur during the delivery of each radiation treatment between the time of localization imaging and completion of treatment. The objective of this work is to review the literature on intrafraction motion (IFM) of the prostate during radiation therapy and offer clinical recommendations on management. METHODS AND MATERIALS A comprehensive literature review was conducted on prostate motion during prostate cancer radiation therapy. Information was organized around 3 key clinical questions, followed by an evidence-based recommendation. RESULTS IFM of the prostate during radiation therapy is typically ≤3 mm and is unlikely to compromise prostate dosimetry to a clinically meaningful degree for men treated in a relatively short treatment duration with planning target volume (PTV) margins of ≥3 to 5 mm. IFM of 5 mm or more has been observed in up to ∼10% of treatment fractions, with limited dosimetric effect related to the infrequency of occurrence and longer fractionation of therapy. IFM can be monitored in continuous or discontinuous fashion with a variety of imaging platforms. Correction of IFM may have the greatest value when tighter PTV margins are desired (such as with stereotactic body radiation therapy or intraprostatic nodule boosting), ultrahypofractionated courses, or when treatment time exceeds several minutes. CONCLUSIONS This focused review summarizes literature and provides practical recommendations regarding IFM in the treatment of prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoi Shimomura
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tianming Wu
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Iris Rusu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Abhishek A Solanki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Stanley L Liauw
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Massachi J, Singer L, Glastonbury C, Scholey J, Singhrao K, Calvin C, Yom SS, Chan JW. Incidental findings and safety events from magnetic resonance imaging simulation for head and neck radiation treatment planning: A single institution experience. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100228. [PMID: 38179087 PMCID: PMC10765101 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Having dedicated MRI scanners within radiation oncology departments may present unexpected challenges since radiation oncologists and radiation therapists are generally not trained in this modality and there are potential patient safety concerns. This study retrospectively reviews the incidental findings and safety events that were observed at a single institution during introduction of MRI sim for head and neck radiotherapy planning. Methods Consecutive patients from March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022, who were scheduled for MRI sim after having completed CT simulation for head and neck radiotherapy were included for analysis. Patients first underwent a CT simulation with a thermoplastic mask and in most cases with an intraoral stent. The same setup was then reproduced in the MRI simulator. Safety events were instances where scheduled MRI sims were not completed due to the MRI technologist identifying MRI-incompatible devices or objects at the time of sim. Incidental findings were identified during weekly quality assurance rounds as a joint enterprise of head and neck radiation oncology and neuroradiology. Categorical variables between completed and not completed MRI sims were compared using the Chi-Square test and continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test with a p-value of < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. Results 148 of 169 MRI sims (88 %) were completed as scheduled and 21 (12 %) were not completed (Table 1). Among the 21 aborted MRI sims, the most common reason was due to safety events flagged by the MRI technologist (n = 8, 38 %) because of the presence of metal or a medical device that was not noted at the time of initial screening by the administrative coordinator. Patients who did not complete MRI sim were more likely to be treated for non-squamous head and neck primary tumor (p = 0.016) and were being treated post-operatively (p < 0.001). CT and MRI sim scans each had 17 incidental findings. CT simulation detected 3 cases of new metastases in lungs, which were outside the scan parameters of MRI sim. MRI sim detected one case of dural venous thrombosis and one case of cervical spine epidural abscess, which were not detected by CT simulation. Conclusions Radiation oncology departments with dedicated MRI simulation scanners would benefit from diagnostic radiology review for incidental findings and having therapists with MRI safety credentialing to catch near-miss events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Massachi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Singer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christine Glastonbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jessica Scholey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kamal Singhrao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christina Calvin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sue S. Yom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jason W. Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kumarasiri A, Chetty IJ, Devpura S, Pradhan D, Aref I, Elshaikh MA, Movsas B. Radiation therapy margin reduction for patients with localized prostate cancer: A prospective study of the dosimetric impact and quality of life. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14198. [PMID: 37952248 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the impact of reducing Clinical Target Volume (CTV) to Planning Target Volume (PTV) margins on delivered radiation therapy (RT) dose and patient reported quality-of-life (QOL) for patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS Twenty patients were included in a single institution IRB-approved prospective study. Nine were planned with reduced margins (4 mm at prostate/rectum interface, 5 mm elsewhere), and 11 with standard margins (6/10 mm). Cumulative delivered dose was calculated using deformable dose accumulation. Each daily CBCT dataset was deformed to the planning CT (pCT), dose was computed, and accumulated on the resampled pCT using a parameter-optimized, B-spline algorithm (Elastix, ITK/VTK). EPIC-26 patient reported QOL was prospectively collected pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 2-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 36-, 48-, and 60-month follow-ups. Post -RT QOL scores were baseline corrected and standardized to a [0-100] scale using EPIC-26 methodology. Correlations between QOL scores and dosimetric parameters were investigated, and the overall QOL differences between the two groups (QOLMargin-reduced -QOLcontrol ) were calculated. RESULTS The median QOL follow-up length for the 20 patients was 48 months. Difference between delivered dose and planned dose did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.1) for both targets and organs at risk between the two groups. At 4 years post-RT, standardized mean QOLMargin-reduced -QOLcontrol were improved for Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Irritative/Obstructive, Bowel, and Sexual EPIC domains by 3.5, 14.8, 10.2, and 16.1, respectively (higher values better). The control group showed larger PTV/rectum and PTV/bladder intersection volumes (7.2 ± 5.8, 18.2 ± 8.1 cc) than the margin-reduced group (2.6 ± 1.8, 12.5 ± 8.3 cc), though the dose to these intersection volumes did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.1) between the groups. PTV/rectum intersection volume showed a moderate correlation (r = -0.56, p < 0.05) to Bowel EPIC domain. CONCLUSIONS Results of this prospective study showed that margin-reduced group exhibited clinically meaningful improvement of QOL without compromising the target dose coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akila Kumarasiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Indrin J Chetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Suneetha Devpura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Deepak Pradhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Ibrahim Aref
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Mohamed A Elshaikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Benjamin Movsas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Berchtold J, Winkler C, Karner J, Groher M, Gaisberger C, Sedlmayer F, Wolf F. Noninvasive inter- and intrafractional motion control in ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy of prostate cancer using RayPilot HypoCath™-a substitute for gold fiducial-based IGRT? Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:195-201. [PMID: 37626226 PMCID: PMC10876743 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02125-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In ultrahypofractionated radiation concepts, managing of intrafractional motion is mandatory because tighter margins are used and random errors resulting from prostate movement are not averaged out over a large number of fractions. Noninvasive live monitoring of prostate movement is a desirable asset for LINAC-based prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS We prospectively analyzed a novel live tracking device (RayPilot HypoCath™; Micropos Medical AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) where a transmitter is noninvasively positioned in the prostatic urethra using a Foley catheter in 12 patients undergoing ultrahypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of the prostate. Gold fiducials (Innovative Technology Völp, Innsbruck, Austria) were implanted to allow comparison of accuracy and positional stability of the HypoCath system and its ability to be used as a standalone IGRT method. Spatial stability of the transponder was assessed by analyzing transmitter movement in relation to gold markers (GM) in superimposed kV image pairs. Inter- and intrafractional prostate movement and the impact of its correction were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 64 fractions were analyzed. The average resulting deviation vector compared to the GM-based position was 1.2 mm and 0.7 mm for inter- and intrafractional motion, respectively. The mean intrafractional displacement vector of the prostate was 1.9 mm. Table readjustment due to exceeding the threshold of 3 mm was required in 18.8% of fractions. Repositioning reduced the time spent outside the 3‑mm margin from 7.9% to 3.8% of beam-on time. However, for individual patients, the time spent outside the 3‑mm margin was reduced from to 49% to 19%. CONCLUSION the HypoCath system allows highly accurate and robust intrafractional motion monitoring. In conjunction with cone beam CT (CBCT) for initial patient setup, it could be used as a standalone image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Berchtold
- Dpt. of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Carmen Winkler
- Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Stubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Josef Karner
- Dpt. of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael Groher
- Dpt. of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christoph Gaisberger
- Dpt. of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Felix Sedlmayer
- Dpt. of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frank Wolf
- Dpt. of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Poon DMC, Yuan J, Wong OL, Yang B, Tse MY, Lau KK, Chiu ST, Chiu PKF, Ng CF, Chui KL, Kwong YM, Ma WK, Cheung KY, Chiu G, Yu SK. One-year clinical outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy with rectal spacer for patients with localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:97. [PMID: 38393414 PMCID: PMC10891188 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04784-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This prospective study aimed to investigate adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with rectal spacer for localized prostate cancer (PC) and report 1-year clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-four consecutive patients with low- to high-risk localized PC that underwent 5-fraction adaptive MRgSBRT with rectal spacer were enrolled. The dosimetric comparison was performed on a risk- and age-matched cohort treated with MRgSBRT but without a spacer at a similar timepoint. Clinician-reported outcomes were based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Patient-reported outcomes were based on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline, acute (1-3 months), subacute (4-12 months), and late (> 12 months) phases. RESULTS The median follow-up was 390 days (range 28-823) and the median age was 70 years (range 58-82). One patient experienced rectal bleeding soon after spacer insertion that subsided before MRgSBRT. The median distance between the midline of the prostate midgland and the rectum after spacer insertion measured 7.8 mm (range 2.6-15.3), and the median length of the spacer was 45.9 mm (range 16.8-62.9) based on T2-weighted MR imaging. The use of spacer resulted in significant improvements in target coverage (V100% > 95% = 98.6% [range 93.4-99.8] for spacer vs. 97.8% [range 69.6-99.7] for non-spacer) and rectal sparing (V95% < 3 cc = 0.7 cc [range 0-4.6] for spacer vs. 4.9 cc [range 0-12.5] for non-spacer). Nine patients (26.5%) experienced grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicities, and no grade ≥ 2 toxicities were observed. During the 1-year follow-up period, EPIC scores for the bowel domain remained stable and were the highest among all other domains. CONCLUSIONS MRgSBRT with rectal spacer for localized PC showed exceptional tolerability with minimal gastrointestinal toxicities and satisfactory patient-reported outcomes. Improvements in dosimetry, rectal sparing, and target coverage were achieved with a rectal spacer. Randomized trials are warranted for further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, 11/F, HKSH Eastern Building, 3 Tung Wong Roade Road, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong SAR.
| | - Jing Yuan
- Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Oi Lei Wong
- Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Bin Yang
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Mei Yan Tse
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ka Ki Lau
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Sin Ting Chiu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Chi Fai Ng
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ka Lun Chui
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Yiu Ming Kwong
- Urology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Wai Kit Ma
- Hong Kong Urology Clinic, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kin Yin Cheung
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - George Chiu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Siu Ki Yu
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fink CA, Buchele C, Baumann L, Liermann J, Hoegen P, Ristau J, Regnery S, Sandrini E, König L, Rippke C, Bonekamp D, Schlemmer HP, Debus J, Koerber SA, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Dosimetric benefit of online treatment plan adaptation in stereotactic ultrahypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1308406. [PMID: 38425342 PMCID: PMC10902126 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1308406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Apart from superior soft tissue contrast, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers the chance for daily online plan adaptation. This study reports on the comparison of dose parameters before and after online plan adaptation in MR-guided SBRT of localized prostate cancer. Materials and methods 32 consecutive patients treated with ultrahypofractionated SBRT for localized prostate cancer within the prospective SMILE trial underwent a planning process for MR-guided radiotherapy with 37.5 Gy applied in 5 fractions. A base plan, derived from MRI simulation at an MRIdian Linac, was registered to daily MRI scans (predicted plan). Following target and OAR recontouring, the plan was reoptimized based on the daily anatomy (adapted plan). CTV and PTV coverage and doses at OAR were compared between predicted and adapted plans using linear mixed regression models. Results In 152 out of 160 fractions (95%), an adapted radiation plan was delivered. Mean CTV and PTV coverage increased by 1.4% and 4.5% after adaptation. 18% vs. 95% of the plans had a PTV coverage ≥95% before and after online adaptation, respectively. 78% vs. 100% of the plans had a CTV coverage ≥98% before and after online adaptation, respectively. The D0.2cc for both bladder and rectum were <38.5 Gy in 93% vs. 100% before and after online adaptation. The constraint at the urethra with a dose of <37.5 Gy was achieved in 59% vs. 93% before and after online adaptation. Conclusion Online adaptive plan adaptation improves target volume coverage and reduces doses to OAR in MR-guided SBRT of localized prostate cancer. Online plan adaptation could potentially further reduce acute and long-term side effects and improve local failure rates in MR-guided SBRT of localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph A. Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Baumann
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Bonekamp
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Side Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Side Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan A. Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brueder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|