Evaluation of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Treatment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Effects on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGS) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar.

REVIEW METHODS

Five databases were reviewed to identify relevant studies that measured polysomnography parameters such as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index, as well as quality of life and functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire scores, before and after HGS.

RESULTS

In total, 44 studies involving 8670 patients met the inclusion criteria. At 12 months after treatment, approximately 47%, 72%, and 82% of patients achieved AHI values of <5, < 10, and <15, respectively. The reported clinical success rates according to Sher criteria were 80% within 12 months and 73% between 12 and 36 months. While the favorable effects exhibited a gradual reduction up to 12 months postimplantation, they generally maintained a consistent level between the 12th and 36th months, as assessed by AHI < 5, <15, and success rate according to Sher criteria.

CONCLUSION

HGS can enhance quality of life scores and polysomnography outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Although the positive effects gradually decreased until 12 months after implantation, they generally remained consistent between 12 and 36 months.

Obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis and beyond using portable monitors

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic sleep and breathing disorder with significant health complications, including cardiovascular disease and neurocognitive impairments. To ensure timely treatment, there is a need for a portable, accurate and rapid method of diagnosing OSA. This review examines the use of various physiological signals used in the detection of respiratory events and evaluates their effectiveness in portable monitors (PM) relative to gold standard polysomnography. The primary objective is to explore the relationship between these physiological parameters and OSA, their application in calculating the apnea hypopnea index (AHI), the standard metric for OSA diagnosis, and the derivation of non-AHI metrics that offer additional diagnostic value. It is found that increasing the number of parameters in PMs does not necessarily improve OSA detection. Several factors can cause performance variations among different PMs, even if they extract similar signals. The review also highlights the potential of PMs to be used beyond OSA diagnosis. These devices possess parameters that can be utilized to obtain endotypic and other non-AHI metrics, enabling improved characterization of the disorder and personalized treatment strategies. Advancements in PM technology, coupled with thorough evaluation and validation of these devices, have the potential to revolutionize OSA diagnosis, personalized treatment, and ultimately improve health outcomes for patients with OSA. By identifying the key factors influencing performance and exploring the application of PMs beyond OSA diagnosis, this review aims to contribute to the ongoing development and utilization of portable, efficient, and effective diagnostic tools for OSA.

Increased Body Mass Index Correlates with Less Favorable Postoperative Outcomes After Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with high morbidity. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has become a novel (neuro-) surgical treatment strategy for obstructive sleep apnea, demonstrating good success rates. Beyond predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, no precise data are available, enabling individual preoperative risk assessment. To improve preoperative risk stratification, this study analyzed individual patient factors that affect outcomes of HNS.

METHODS

Fourteen patients treated with unilateral HNS were analyzed retrospectively. Assessed risk factors included: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, depression, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index (BMI), and disease duration. Treatment success was defined as a reduction in the postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to ≤20 events/hour, with a relative reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in the postoperative apnea-hypopnea index was observed in all patients (P < 0.0001). BMI correlated significantly with postoperative AHI scores (95% confidence interval, 0.1519-0.8974; P = 0.018). Significant treatment success was observed in 50% of patients. Compared with the "Excellent Responder group," the "Responder group" demonstrated a significantly higher BMI (95% confidence interval, 1.174-6.226; P = 0.0078). Diabetes, hypertension, disease duration, smoking, depression, and alcohol consumption were not significantly associated with AHI reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that BMI may be an independent risk factor for the response to HNS, with patients who had less benefit from therapy having significantly higher BMI than "Excellent Responders." Therefore, carefully selecting patients is crucial in obtaining optimal outcomes with HNS therapy, especially those with a high BMI.

Minimally Invasive Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Enabled by ECG Sensor and WPT to Manage Obstructive Sleep Apnea

A hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) is an invasive device that is used to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) through electrical stimulation. The conventional implantable HGNS device consists of a stimuli generator, a breathing sensor, and electrodes connected to the hypoglossal nerve via leads. However, this implant is bulky and causes significant trauma. In this paper, we propose a minimally invasive HGNS based on an electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor and wireless power transfer (WPT), consisting of a wearable breathing monitor and an implantable stimulator. The breathing external monitor utilizes an ECG sensor to identify abnormal breathing patterns associated with OSA with 88.68% accuracy, achieved through the utilization of a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm. With a skin thickness of 5 mm and a receiving coil diameter of 9 mm, the power conversion efficiency was measured as 31.8%. The implantable device, on the other hand, is composed of a front-end CMOS power management module (PMM), a binary-phase-shift-keying (BPSK)-based data demodulator, and a bipolar biphasic current stimuli generator. The PMM, with a silicon area of 0.06 mm2 (excluding PADs), demonstrated a power conversion efficiency of 77.5% when operating at a receiving frequency of 2 MHz. Furthermore, it offers three-voltage options (1.2 V, 1.8 V, and 3.1 V). Within the data receiver component, a low-power BPSK demodulator was ingeniously incorporated, consuming only 42 μW when supplied with a voltage of 0.7 V. The performance was achieved through the implementation of the self-biased phase-locked-loop (PLL) technique. The stimuli generator delivers biphasic constant currents, providing a 5 bit programmable range spanning from 0 to 2.4 mA. The functionality of the proposed ECG- and WPT-based HGNS was validated, representing a highly promising solution for the effective management of OSA, all while minimizing the trauma and space requirements.

Comparison of clinical pathways for hypoglossal nerve stimulation management: in-laboratory titration polysomnography vs home-based efficacy sleep testing

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We conducted this study to evaluate whether laboratory or home-based hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) management would have equivalent objective and subjective obstructive sleep apnea outcomes 6 months after activation.

METHODS

Patients undergoing standard-of-care HNS implantation were randomly assigned in a prospective, multicenter clinical trial to either a 3-month postactivation in-laboratory titration polysomnography (tPSG) or an efficacy home sleep study (eHST) with tPSG by exception for eHST nonresponders at 5 months. Both groups underwent an eHST 6 months postactivation.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were randomly assigned. Patients experienced equivalent decreases in the apnea-hypopnea index (mean difference: -0.01 events/h [-8.75, 8.74]) across both groups with HNS; the selection of tPSG or eHST did not associate with therapy response rates (tPSG vs eHST: 63.2% vs 59.1%). The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (median of differences: 1 [-1, 3]) and device usage (median of differences: 0.0 hours [-1.3, 1.3]) outcomes were similar but did not meet a priori statistical equivalence criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial demonstrated that patients undergoing HNS implantation experienced statistically equivalent improvements in objective obstructive sleep apnea outcomes and similar improvements in daytime sleepiness regardless of whether they underwent tPSG. HNS titration with tPSG may not be required for all postoperative patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Inspire Home Study: Utilization of Home Monitoring During Therapy Optimization in Patients With an Inspire Upper Airway Stimulation System (Comparison of Home Sleep Testing vs. In-lab Polysomnography Testing) (HOME); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04416542; Identifier: NCT04416542.

CITATION

Kent D, Huyett P, Yu P, et al. Comparison of clinical pathways for hypoglossal nerve stimulation management: in-laboratory titration polysomnography vs home-based efficacy sleep testing. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(11):1905-1912.

Patient-reported outcomes with hypoglossal nerve stimulation for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has recently been introduced as an alternative treatment for patients with OSA. A large number of studies have demonstrated substantial changes in OSA with this therapy by reducing respiratory events and improving symptoms such as daytime sleepiness and quality of life. The objective of this review was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate patient-reported outcomes and experience with HNS therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science was performed to identify randomized controlled and observational studies reporting subjective outcomes with different HNS systems in patients with OSA. Abstracts of 406 articles were screened and a subset of 55 articles were reviewed for eligibility. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis using RevMan was performed when > 2 studies were identified that reported data on a specific outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty-four publications reporting data on 3785 patients with a mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 12.2 months were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed a pooled effect of 4.59 points improvement in daytime sleepiness as measured by the ESS questionnaire (Z = 42.82, p < .001), 2.84 points improvement in daytime functioning as measured by the FOSQ score (Z = 28.38, p < .001), and 1.77 points improvement in sleep quality as measured by the PSQI questionnaire (Z = 2.53, p = .010). Patient-reported experience was consistently positive and revealed additional relevant aspects from this perspective.

CONCLUSION

HNS therapy significantly improves quality of life in patients with OSA and reliably produces clinically meaningful effects on daytime sleepiness, daytime functioning, and sleep quality. Treatment regularly meets or exceeds the minimum clinically important differences defined for the respective instruments. Additional research is needed to further investigate effects on quality of life beyond improvements in daytime sleepiness and daytime functioning.

Beyond CPAP: modifying upper airway output for the treatment of OSA

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is exceedingly common but often under-treated. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has long been considered the gold standard of OSA therapy. Limitations to CPAP therapy include adherence and availability. The 2021 global CPAP shortage highlighted the need to tailor patient treatments beyond CPAP alone. Common CPAP alternative approaches include positional therapy, mandibular advancement devices, and upper airway surgery. Upper airway training consists of a variety of therapies, including exercise regimens, external neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and woodwind instruments. More invasive approaches include hypoglossal nerve stimulation devices. This review will focus on the approaches for modifying upper airway muscle behavior as a therapeutic modality in OSA.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Findings and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy Outcomes

Hypoglossal-nerve stimulation (HGNS) is an established second-line therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Existing studies investigating the effect of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopic (DISE) findings on HGNS outcomes have mainly focused on the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) among polysomnography (PSG) parameters, and have less frequently tested other PSG parameters such as the apnea index (AI), hypopnea index (HI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), snoring index, and arousal index, or patient-reported excessive daytime sleepiness. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between DISE findings and the above-mentioned metrics after HGNS therapy. We only included patients with DISE findings providing detailed information about the degree of the anteroposterior velar (APV), oropharyngeal lateral wall (OPLW), or tongue-base (BT) obstruction based on the velum, oropharynx, base of tongue, and epiglottis (VOTE) classification. The data of 25 patients (9 female (36%)) were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age at the date of implantation was 54.52 ± 9.61 years, and the mean BMI was 29.99 ± 3.97 kg/m2. Spearman’s rho correlation coefficients were calculated. Significant correlations were found between the degree of APV obstruction and postoperative HI (r = −0.5, p < 0.05), and between the degree of OPLW obstruction and postoperative snoring index (r = 0.42, p < 0.05). BT obstruction was strongly correlated with postoperative metrics such as AHI (r = −0.57, p < 0.01), AI (r = −0.5, p < 0.05), ODI (r = −0.57, p < 0.01), ∆ AHI (r = 0.58, p < 0.01), ∆ AI (r = 0.54, p < 0.01) and ∆ ODI (r = 0.54, p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found between DISE findings and postoperative Epworth Sleepiness Scale values. These findings suggest that preoperative DISE findings, especially the degree of BT obstruction, are important for predicting an HGNS therapy outcome.

Insomnia in Patients Undergoing Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with intolerance of positive airway pressure therapy. Comorbid insomnia is quite prevalent in OSA patients. We investigated the impact of insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) on polysomnography metrics after HGNS treatment. Data of 27 consecutive patients (9 female; mean age 55.52 ± 8.6 years) were retrospectively evaluated. Insomnia was assessed using the ISI (insomnia severity index) and EDS using the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). The median ISI was reduced significantly 3 months after HGNS activation (preoperative: 19; postoperative: 14; p < 0.01). Significant correlations emerged between preoperative ISI and postoperative AHI (apnea/hypopnea index; Spearman’s rho = 0.4, p < 0.05), ∆ AHI (r = −0.51, p < 0.01) and ∆ ODI (oxygen desaturation index; r = −0.48, p < 0.05). ISI correlated strongly with EES both preoperatively (r = 0.46; p < 0.02) and postoperatively (r = 0.79; p < 0.001). Therefore, HGNS therapy is associated with a significant reduction of insomnia-related symptoms, in addition to the improvement in respiratory metrics in OSA. Nonetheless, the preoperative severity of patient-reported insomnia symptoms was inversely correlated with the respiratory PSG-outcomes after HGNS. Insomnia should be considered in studies of EDS in OSA patients, especially those treated with HGNS.

Supine Pharyngeal Width Is Associated With Complete Concentric Palatal Collapse During Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) implantation in the US requires preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) screening for complete concentric palatal collapse (CCC) to establish treatment candidacy. We hypothesized that supine pharyngeal width (SPW) in awake patients is associated with CCC and HNS therapy outcomes.

METHODS

Adults with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea underwent awake measurement of SPW followed by DISE screening for CCC. Eligible patients electing for HNS implantation underwent postoperative polysomnography per standard of care.

RESULTS

SPW was measured in 73 patients. For SPW >20 mm, the positive likelihood ratio for absence of CCC was 6.67 with pre- and post-test odds of 6.3 and 42.0, respectively. Postoperative PSG data were available from 31 of 44 (70.5%) patients subsequently implanted with HNS. Patients with SPW >20 mm had a greater rate of HNS response than those with SPW ≤20 (62 vs 30%; P < .05). Only SPW and BMI were significantly associated with CCC and HNS response in regression models.

CONCLUSION

In a retrospective cohort study, SPW was significantly associated with CCC and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index following HNS implantation. SPW may be a viable screening tool for HNS candidacy.

Short-Term Outcome of Unilateral Inspiration-Coupled Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is a therapeutic option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and intolerance of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. Most reported data are based on multicentre pivotal trials with selected baseline core clinical features. Our aim was to investigate polysomnography (PSG)-based outcomes of HGNS-therapy in a patient cohort with higher average AHI and BMI than previously reported. Data of 29 consecutive patients (nine female; mean age: 55.52 ± 8.6 years, mean BMI 30.13 ± 3.93 kg/m²) were retrospectively evaluated. Numerical values of PSG- based metrics were compared before and after intervention using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. AHI (38.57/h ± 12.71, 24.43/h ± 13.3, p < 0.001), hypopnea index (24.05/h ± 9.4, 15.27/h ± 8.23, p < 0.001), apnea index (14.5/h ± 12.05, 9.17/h ± 10.86, p < 0.01), snoring index (262.68/h ± 170.35, 143.48/h ± 162.79, p < 0.001), cortical arousal index (20.8/h ± 10.34 vs. 14.9/h ± 8.36, p < 0.01) and cumulative duration of apnea and hypopnea during sleep (79.79 min ± 40.32 vs. 48.62 min ± 30.56, p < 0.001) were significantly lower after HGNS. HGNS provides an effective therapy option for selected patients not tolerating PAP-therapy with higher average AHI and BMI than usually reported. HGNS-therapy appears to suppress central nervous system arousal circuits while not eliciting peripheral autonomous sympathetic activation. Such metrics as the snoring index and the cumulative duration of respiratory events during sleep may be considered in future HGNS studies.

Quality of Life Impact of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation with Inspire® Device in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Intolerant to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) that do not tolerate/accept continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are candidates for surgical alternatives. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) through the implantation of the Inspire® device constitutes a minimally invasive operative option. The main objective of this study is to estimate, under real-world clinical practice conditions, the 3-month impact on the quality of life (IQoL) of the HNS in patients with moderate/severe OSA who do not tolerate or accept CPAP, compared to patients who did not receive HNS. As a baseline, the unadjusted EuroQol utility index was 0.764 (SD:0.190) in the intervention group (IGr) and 0.733 (SD:0.205) in the control group (CGr); three months later, the indexes were 0.935 (SD: 0.101) and 0.727 (SD:0.200), respectively. The positive impact on quality of life was estimated to be +0.177 (95% CI: 0.044−0.310; p = 0.010). All dimensions in the IGr improved compared to CGr, especially for usual activities (p < 0.001) and anxiety/depression (p > 0.001). At the end of the follow-up, there was no significant difference in the quality of life between the general Spanish population and the IGr (difference: 0.012; CI95%: −0.03 to −0.057; p = 0.0578) for the same age range; however, there was a difference concerning the CGr (difference: −0.196; CI95%: −0.257 to −0.135; p < 0.001). In conclusion, patients with moderate/severe OSA implanted with the Inspire® device showed a positive IQoL.

Clinical Predictors of OSA Treatment Success Following Implantation of a Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Device

OBJECTIVE

To identify prognostic indicators associated with successful hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), focusing on patients' physiologic response to awake tongue protrusion.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients with moderate-severe OSA who underwent HGNS implantation from December 2017 to December 2019. Data abstracted include standard demographics, body mass index (BMI), pre- and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and Friedman tongue position (FTP). Additionally, change in hypopharyngeal cross-sectional area on awake tongue protrusion was abstracted. Patients protruded their tongues, and the physician visualized change. Positive change in hypopharyngeal cross-sectional area was documented as +1 and a negative change as -1. Chi-square tests for independence and logistic regression analysis were performed to determine indicators of successful surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included in this study. Mean ± SD AHI decreased significantly from 43.1 ± 17.36 to 9.18 ± 8.18. Surgical success was achieved in 79.5% of patients. Variables analyzed included BMI >32, preoperative AHI, FTP, and change in hypopharyngeal cross-sectional area on awake tongue protrusion (positive, 65.8%; negative, 34.2%). Positive predictors of success were positive change in hypopharyngeal cross-sectional area (P = .0133), severe OSA (P = .0290), and FTP IIb (P < .0001). Negative predictors were BMI >32 (P = .041) and negative change in hypopharyngeal cross-sectional area (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Positive change in hypopharyngeal cross-sectional area on awake tongue protrusion and severe baseline AHI were positive predictors of successful HGNS therapy. Negative change in hypopharyngeal cross-sectional area on awake tongue protrusion and BMI >32 were negative predictors.

A Noninferiority Analysis of 3- vs 2-Incision Techniques for Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Implantation

OBJECTIVE

The only hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) device available for US clinical use is implanted through 3 incisions. A recently proposed 2-incision modification moved the respiratory sensing lead from the fifth to the second intercostal space to eliminate the third lower chest incision. This study compared perioperative data and therapeutic outcomes between the techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Noninferiority cohort analysis of a retrospective and prospective registry study.

SETTING

Tertiary care and community surgical centers.

METHODS

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea underwent HNS implantation via a modified 2-incision technique (I₂). A cohort previously implanted via the standard 3-incision technique (I₃) were 1:1 propensity score matched for a noninferiority analysis of postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 404 I₃ patients and 223 I₂ patients across 6 participating centers. Operative time decreased from 128.7 minutes (95% CI, 124.5-132.9) in I₃ patients to 86.6 minutes (95% CI, 83.7-97.6) in I₂ patients (P < .001). Postoperative sleep study data were available for 76 I₂ patients who were matched to I₃ patients. The change in apnea-hypopnea index between the cohorts was statistically noninferior (a priori noninferiority margin: 7.5 events/h; mean difference, 1.51 [97.5% CI upper bound, 5.86]). There were no significant differences between the cohorts for baseline characteristics, perioperative adverse event rates, or change in Epworth Sleepiness Score (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

In a multicenter registry, a 2-incision implant technique for a commercially available HNS device had a statistically noninferior therapeutic efficacy profile when compared with the standard 3-incision approach. The 2-incision technique is safe and effective for HNS implantation.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Non-positive Airway Pressure Treatments

Undiagnosed and untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with health comorbidities and negatively affects quality of life. Alternative treatments should be considered in patients who are unable to tolerate or benefit from positive airway pressure treatment. When properly indicated, positional devices, oral appliances, airway surgery, and hypoglossal nerve stimulation have been shown to be effective in treating OSA. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is a successful second-line treatment with low associated morbidity and complication rate.

Endotypic Mechanisms of Successful Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Rationale: Approximately one-third of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treated with hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy are incomplete responders, despite careful patient selection based on baseline characteristics and drug-induced sleep endoscopy.Objectives: Here we use polysomnographic endotyping to assess the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying favorable versus incomplete responses to HGNS therapy.Methods: Baseline polysomnography data of the STAR (Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction) trial were included. Raw baseline polysomnographic data from 91/126 patients were available for analysis. Traits-loop gain, arousal threshold, collapsibility, and muscle compensation-were calculated from the baseline polysomnography data according to Sands and colleagues (AJRCCM 2018, SLEEP 2018). Logistic regression assessed apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)-adjusted associations between HGNS response (>50% reduction in AHI to <10/h at 1 yr) and OSA traits.Measurements and Main Results: Overall, HGNS treatment reduced AHI from 30.7 (24.9-39.9) to 8.5 (4.0-19.5) events/h (P < 0.0001; median [quartiles 1-3]); N = 53/91 were responders. In adjusted analysis, a favorable response to therapy was independently associated with higher arousal threshold (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 6.76 [2.44-23.3], P = 0.001), greater compensation (odds ratio: 4.22 [1.70-12.55] per SD, P = 0.004), and lower loop gain (in milder collapsibility, per significant interaction, P = 0.003). The higher arousal threshold was evident in responders before adjusted analysis. Predicted responders had an approximately fourfold lower treatment AHI versus predicted nonresponders (4.9 [2.7-8.5] vs. 20.7 [10.9-29.7], P < 0.0001; median [quartiles 1-3]); differences remained significant after cross-validation.Conclusions: Favorable responses to HGNS therapy are associated with the pathophysiological traits causing OSA, particularly a higher arousal threshold. Along with established criteria, individuals with favorable traits could potentially be prioritized for precision HGNS therapy.This analysis was a secondary analysis of the STAR trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01161420).

Evaluation and Management of Adults with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common and underdiagnosed medical condition characterized by recurrent sleep-dependent pauses and reductions in airflow. While a narrow, collapsible oropharynx plays a central role in the pathophysiology of OSAS, there are other equally important nonanatomic factors including sleep-stage dependent muscle tone, arousal threshold, and loop gain that drive obstructive apneas and hypopneas. Through mechanisms of intermittent hypoxemia, arousal-related sleep fragmentation, and intrathoracic pressure changes, OSAS impacts multiple organ systems. Risk factors for OSAS include obesity, male sex, age, specific craniofacial features, and ethnicity. The prevalence of OSAS is rising due to increasing obesity rates and improved sensitivity in the tools used for diagnosis. Validated questionnaires have an important but limited role in the identification of patients that would benefit from formal testing for OSA. While an in-laboratory polysomnography remains the gold standard for diagnosis, the widespread availability and accuracy of home sleep apnea testing modalities increase access and ease of OSAS diagnosis for many patients. In adults, the most common treatment involves the application of positive airway pressure (PAP), but compliance continues to be a challenge. Alternative treatments including mandibular advancement device, hypoglossal nerve stimulator, positional therapies, and surgical options coupled with weight loss and exercise offer possibilities of an individualized personal approach to OSAS. Treatment of symptomatic patients with OSAS has been found to be beneficial with regard to sleep-related quality of life, sleepiness, and motor vehicle accidents. The benefit of treating asymptomatic OSA patients, particularly with regard to cardiovascular outcomes, is controversial and more data are needed.

Clinical and Research Solutions to Manage Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a common sleep disorder disease, affects millions of people. Without appropriate treatment, this disease can provoke several health-related risks including stroke and sudden death. A variety of treatments have been introduced to relieve OSA. The main present clinical treatments and undertaken research activities to improve the success rate of OSA were covered in this paper. Additionally, guidelines on choosing a suitable treatment based on scientific evidence and objective comparison were provided. This review paper specifically elaborated the clinically offered managements as well as the research activities to better treat OSA. We analyzed the methodology of each diagnostic and treatment method, the success rate, and the economic burden on the world. This review paper provided an evidence-based comparison of each treatment to guide patients and physicians, but there are some limitations that would affect the comparison result. Future research should consider the consistent follow-up period and a sufficient number of samples. With the development of implantable medical devices, hypoglossal nerve stimulation systems will be designed to be smart and miniature and one of the potential upcoming research topics. The transcutaneous electrical stimulation as a non-invasive potential treatment would be further investigated in a clinical setting. Meanwhile, no treatment can cure OSA due to the complicated etiology. To maximize the treatment success of OSA, a multidisciplinary and integrated management would be considered in the future.

Nitric oxide controls excitatory/inhibitory balance in the hypoglossal nucleus during early postnatal development

Synaptic remodeling during early postnatal development lies behind neuronal networks refinement and nervous system maturation. In particular, the respiratory system is immature at birth and is subjected to significant postnatal development. In this context, the excitatory/inhibitory balance dramatically changes in the respiratory-related hypoglossal nucleus (HN) during the 3 perinatal weeks. Since, development abnormalities of hypoglossal motor neurons (HMNs) are associated with sudden infant death syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea, deciphering molecular partners behind synaptic remodeling in the HN is of basic and clinical relevance. Interestingly, a transient expression of the neuronal isoform of nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS) occurs in HMNs at neonatal stage that disappears before postnatal day 21 (P21). NO, in turn, is a determining factor for synaptic refinement in several physiopathological conditions. Here, intracerebroventricular chronic administration (P7–P21) of the broad spectrum NOS inhibitor l-NAME (N(ω)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester) differentially affected excitatory and inhibitory rearrangement during this neonatal interval in the rat. Whilst l-NAME led to a reduction in the number of excitatory structures, inhibitory synaptic puncta were increased at P21 in comparison to administration of the inactive stereoisomer d-NAME. Finally, l-NAME decreased levels of the phosphorylated form of myosin light chain in the nucleus, which is known to regulate the actomyosin contraction apparatus. These outcomes indicate that physiologically synthesized NO modulates excitatory/inhibitory balance during early postnatal development by acting as an anti-synaptotrophic and/or synaptotoxic factor for inhibitory synapses, and as a synaptotrophin for excitatory ones. The mechanism of action could rely on the modulation of the actomyosin contraction apparatus.

The Emerging Role of Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy in the Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea is a prevalent sleep disorder characterized by partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway. Continuous positive airway pressure is the first-line therapy for most patients, but adherence is often poor. Alternative treatment options such as mandibular advancement devices, positional therapy, and surgical interventions including upper airway stimulation target different levels and patterns of obstruction with varying degrees of success. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy enables the visualization of upper airway obstruction under conditions mimicking sleep. In the era of precision medicine, this additional information may facilitate better decision-making when prescribing alternative treatment modalities, with the hope of achieving better adherence and/or success rates. This review discusses the current knowledge and evidence on the role of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in the non-positive airway pressure management of obstructive sleep apnea.

Effect of Gender, Age, and Profound Disease on Upper Airway Stimulation Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate treatment outcomes of upper airway stimulation (UAS) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients based on patient age, gender, and preoperative disease severity.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing UAS from 2014 to 2018 at a tertiary care center. Data collected included demographic information, implantation records, and pre- and postoperative polysomnography (PSG) results. Profound OSA was defined as AHI >65 and age ≥65 was considered advanced age. The primary outcome measured was initial treatment response, defined as a post-operative AHI <20 with a >50% reduction from baseline.

RESULTS

145 patients underwent UAS at our institution including 98 males and 47 females with a mean age of 61.7 ± 11.5 years, mean BMI of 29.1 ± 3.9 kg/m², and mean preoperative AHI of 34.1 ± 18.2 events/hour. After surgery, patients had a significantly lower mean AHI of 8.6 ± 15.0 events/hour (<0.001). Older patients had a lower initial treatment response rate (78%) when compared to their younger counterparts (94%) (P = 0.005). Male gender and profound disease status did not significantly impact treatment response rates; young age was the only variable found to predict early treatment response on multivariate analysis (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Although the overall OSA population showed significant postoperative AHI reduction with UAS, patients age ≥65 years were less likely to have an initial response to treatment, when compared to their younger counterparts. A larger proportion of elderly patients and patients with profound OSA had residual moderate disease (AHI > 15) after UAS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.