Association of Lithium Treatment With the Risk of Osteoporosis in Patients With Bipolar Disorder

Lithium use and bone health in women with bipolar disorder: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Several psychiatric disorders and medications used to treat them appear to be independently associated with skeletal deficits. As there is increasing evidence that lithium possesses skeletal protective properties, we aimed to investigate the association between lithium use and bone health in a group of women with bipolar disorder.

METHOD

Women with bipolar disorder (n = 117, 20+ years) were recruited from south-eastern Australia. Bipolar disorder was confirmed using a clinical interview (SCID-I/NP). Bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm2 ) was measured at the spine, hip and total body using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and low bone mass determined by BMD T-score of <-1.0. Weight and height were measured, socioeconomic status (SES) determined and information on medication use and lifestyle factors self-reported. Linear and logistic regression were used to test associations between lithium and (i) BMD and (ii) low bone mass, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (29.9%) women reported current lithium use. Lithium users and non-users differed in regard to SES and BMD; otherwise, groups were similar. After adjustments, mean BMD among lithium users was 5.1% greater at the spine (1.275 [95% CI 1.229-1.321] vs. 1.214 [1.183-1.244] g/cm2 , p = 0.03), 4.2% greater at the total hip (0.979 [0.942-1.016] vs. 0.938 [0.910-0.966] g/cm2 , p = 0.03) and 2.2% greater at the total body (1.176 [1.148-1.205] vs. 1.150 [1.129-1.171] g/cm2 , p = 0.08) compared to participants not receiving lithium. Lithium users were also less likely to have low bone mass (22.9% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.031). Associations persisted after adjustment for confounders.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest lithium is associated with greater BMD and reduced risk of low bone mass in women with bipolar disorder. Research into the underlying mechanisms is warranted.

Association between lithium treatment and renal, thyroid and parathyroid function: A cohort study of 6659 patients with bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES

Although potential adverse effects of lithium treatment on renal and endocrine systems have been extensively investigated, most prior studies are limited by selected populations and short follow-up.

METHODS

Within the Psychiatric Services of the Central Denmark Region, we identified all patients with bipolar disorder and ≥1 serum-lithium (se-Li) measurements between January 1, 2013, and July 20, 2022, and reference patients with bipolar disorder matched on age, sex, and baseline creatinine. Outcomes were diagnoses of renal, thyroid and parathyroid disease, and blood tests measuring creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium. Analyses included unadjusted multilevel regression to describe changes in biochemical markers, and adjusted Cox regression to compare rates of disease/biochemical outcomes between lithium users and reference patients.

RESULTS

Among 1646 lithium users (median age 36 years, 63% women) and 5013 reference patients, lithium users had decreasing TSH and eGFR, stable PTH, and increasing calcium levels over time. Lithium use was associated with increased rates of renal, thyroid and parathyroid disease, and levels of biochemical markers outside normal ranges (hazard rate ratios: 1.07-11.22), but the absolute number of severe outcomes was low (e.g., chronic kidney disease: N = 10, 0.6%). Notably, the rate of blood testing was substantially higher among lithium users than among reference patients (e.g., mean number of creatinine tests during the second year of follow-up: lithium users = 2.5, reference patients = 1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Severely adverse renal and endocrine outcomes are rare during lithium treatment. Observational studies of long-term lithium treatment are prone to detection bias.

Mortality and Lithium-Protective Effects after First-Episode Mania Diagnosis in Bipolar Disorder: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to estimate all-cause mortality in patients after a first-episode mania (FEM) and examine whether six guideline-recommended medications can reduce mortality.

METHODS

The cohort included population-based FEM samples and matched controls from Taiwan, spanning 2007 to 2018. The primary outcomes assessed were all-cause/suicide-related mortality, while the secondary outcome focused on mortality associated with pharmacological treatments. We compared mortality in post-FEM patients and age-/sex-matched controls without any diagnosed bipolar disorders and patients with and without psychopharmacological treatment using Cox regression analysis, respectively. Statistics were presented with time-to-event adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The study included 54,092 post-FEM patients and 270,460 controls, totaling 2,467,417 person-years of follow-up. Post-FEM patients had higher risks of all-cause mortality (AHR 2.38, 95% CI: 2.31-2.45) and suicide death (10.80, 5.88-19.84) than controls. Lithium (0.62, 0.55-0.70), divalproex (0.89, 0.83-0.95), and aripiprazole (0.81, 0.66-1.00) were associated with reduced all-cause mortality compared to non-users. There were no significant all-cause mortality differences for quetiapine (0.95, 0.89-1.01), risperidone (0.92, 0.82-1.02), and paliperidone (1.24, 0.88-1.76) users. When accounting for drug action onset times in sensitivity analyses, only lithium significantly reduced all-cause mortality (AHR range 0.65-0.72). There were 35 and 16 suicide deaths in post-FEM patients and controls, respectively. No drug had a significant effect on suicide deaths (lithium: 6; divalproex: 7; aripiprazole: 0; quetiapine: 10; risperidone: 4; paliperidone: 1).

CONCLUSION

Post-FEM patients had a higher risk of all-cause/suicide-related mortality, and lithium treatment might reduce all-cause mortality.

Facts and myths about the use of lithium for bipolar disorder in routine clinical practice: an expert consensus paper

BACKGROUND

Bipolar disorder is one of the most burdensome severe mental disorders, characterized by high levels of personal and social disability. Patients often need an integrated pharmacological and non-pharmacological approach. Lithium is one of the most effective treatments available not only in psychiatry, but in the whole medicine, and its clinical efficacy is superior to that of other mood stabilizers. However, a declining trend on lithium prescriptions has been observed worldwide in the last 20 years, supporting the notion that lithium is a 'forgotten drug' and highlighting that the majority of patients with bipolar disorder are missing out the best available pharmacological option. Based on such premises, a narrative review has been carried out on the most common "misconceptions" and "stereotypes" associated with lithium treatment; we also provide a list of "good reasons" for using lithium in ordinary clinical practice to overcome those false myths.

MAIN TEXT

A narrative search of the available literature has been performed entering the following keywords: "bipolar disorder", "lithium", "myth", "mythology", "pharmacological treatment", and "misunderstanding". The most common false myths have been critically revised and the following statements have been proposed: (1) Lithium should represent the first choice for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder; (2) lithium treatment is effective in different patients' groups suffering from bipolar disorder; (3) Drug-drug interaction risk can be easily managed during lithium treatment; (4) The optimal management of lithium treatment includes periodical laboratory tests; (5) Slow-release lithium formulation has advantages compared to immediate release formulation; (6) Lithium treatment has antisuicidal properties; (7) Lithium can be carefully managed during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

In recent years, a discrepancy between evidence-based recommendations and clinical practice in using lithium treatment for patients with bipolar disorder has been highlighted. It is time to disseminate clear and unbiased information on the clinical efficacy, effectiveness, tolerability and easiness to use of lithium treatment in patients with bipolar disorder. It is necessary to reinvigorate the clinical and academic discussion about the efficacy of lithium, to counteract the decreasing prescription trend of one of the most effective drugs available in the whole medicine.

Real-world use of pharmacological treatments for incident bipolar disorder: A Finnish nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pharmacotherapy remains crucial for treating bipolar disorder (BD), but knowledge on the treatments actually used by newly diagnosed patients in real-world settings is sparse.

METHODS

Individuals newly diagnosed with BD during 1996-2018, aged 15-65 years, were identified from national Finnish registers. The patients' use of different drug classes (mood stabilizers, antipsychotics and antidepressants) or combinations of these drug classes were followed from initial pharmacotherapy (first line) after BD diagnosis until the fifth line of treatment or until the two-year follow-up time ended. Clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with antidepressants-only as the first treatment line were assessed with logistic regression.

RESULTS

82.6 % of all patients used BD medication during the follow-up. 33.9 % had antidepressants-only as the first, 22.9 % as the second and 19.7 % as the third treatment line. Use of combinations of mood stabilizers, antipsychotics and antidepressants increased by successive treatment lines. Factors associated with antidepressants-only as the first treatment line included older age (>45 years aOR 2.20, 95% CI: 2.01-2.40, 25-45 years: 1.55, 1.42-1.68, compared with those aged <25), diabetes (1.35, 1.17-1.55) and female sex (1.29, 1.21-1.37). BD diagnosis registered in 2016-2018 (0.48, 0.42-0.55) and substance abuse (0.77, 0.71-0.83) were associated with decreased odds.

LIMITATIONS

Due to the register-based nature of this study, not all potentially important clinical factors influencing medication use could be controlled for.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of patients with bipolar disorder are not treated according to treatment guidelines, as use of antidepressants alone is common. Reasons for not following evidence-based recommendations need to be further researched.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Review

Importance

Bipolar disorder affects approximately 8 million adults in the US and approximately 40 million individuals worldwide.

Observations

Bipolar disorder is characterized by recurrent episodes of depression and mania or hypomania. Bipolar depressive episodes are similar to major depressive episodes. Manic and hypomanic episodes are characterized by a distinct change in mood and behavior during discrete time periods. The age of onset is usually between 15 and 25 years, and depression is the most frequent initial presentation. Approximately 75% of symptomatic time consists of depressive episodes or symptoms. Early diagnosis and treatment are associated with a more favorable prognosis. Diagnosis and optimal treatment are often delayed by a mean of approximately 9 years following an initial depressive episode. Long-term treatment consists of mood stabilizers, such as lithium, valproate, and lamotrigine. Antipsychotic agents, such as quetiapine, aripiprazole, asenapine, lurasidone, and cariprazine, are recommended, but some are associated with weight gain. Antidepressants are not recommended as monotherapy. More than 50% of patients with bipolar disorder are not adherent to treatment. Life expectancy is reduced by approximately 12 to 14 years in people with bipolar disorder, with a 1.6-fold to 2-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality occurring a mean of 17 years earlier compared with the general population. Prevalence rates of metabolic syndrome (37%), obesity (21%), cigarette smoking (45%), and type 2 diabetes (14%) are higher among people with bipolar disorder, contributing to the risk of early mortality. The annual suicide rate is approximately 0.9% among individuals with bipolar disorder, compared with 0.014% in the general population. Approximately 15% to 20% of people with bipolar disorder die by suicide.

Conclusions and Relevance

Bipolar disorder affects approximately 8 million adults in the US. First-line therapy includes mood stabilizers, such as lithium, anticonvulsants, such as valproate and lamotrigine, and atypical antipsychotic drugs, such as quetiapine, aripiprazole, asenapine, lurasidone, and cariprazine.

HSPA12A controls cerebral lactate homeostasis to maintain hippocampal neurogenesis and mood stabilization

Mood instability, a subjective emotional state defined as rapid mood oscillations of up and down, is a symptom that occurs in several psychiatric disorders, particularly major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Heat shock protein A12A (HSPA12A) shows decreased expression in the brains of schizophrenia patients. However, the causal effects of HSPA12A in any psychiatric disorders are completely unknown. To investigate whether HSPA12A affects mood stability, Hspa12a-knockout mice (Hspa12a-/-) and wild-type (WT) littermates were subjected to tests of open field, forced swimming, elevated plus maze, and sucrose preference. Cerebral lactate levels were measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) was assessed by BrdU labeling. We found that acute mood stress increased hippocampal HSPA12A expression and CSF lactate levels in mice. However, Hspa12a-/- mice exhibited behaviors of mood instability (anhedonia, lower locomotor activity, antidepression, and anxiety), which were accompanied by impaired AHN, decreased CSF lactate levels, and downregulated hippocampal glycolytic enzyme expression. By contrast, HSPA12A overexpression increased lactate production and glycolytic enzyme expression of primary hippocampal neurons. Intriguingly, lactate administration alleviated the mood instability and AHN impairment in Hspa12a-/- mice. Further analyses revealed that HSPA12A was necessary for sustaining cerebral lactate homeostasis, which could be mediated by inhibiting GSK3β in hippocampal neurons, to maintain AHN and mood stabilization. Taken together, HSPA12A is defined as a novel regulator of mood stability and exerts therapeutic potential for mood disorder. Our findings establish a framework for determining mood disorder and AHN relevance of cerebral lactate homeostasis. HSPA12A is a novel mood stabilizer through inhibiting GSK3β in hippocampal neurons, thereby sustaining glycolysis-generated lactate to maintain cerebral lactate homeostasis, which ultimately leading to maintenance of hippocampal neurogenesis and mood stabilization.

Toward countering muscle and bone loss with spaceflight: GSK3 as a potential target

We examined the effects of ∼30 days of spaceflight on glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) content and inhibitory serine phosphorylation in murine muscle and bone samples from four separate missions (BION-M1, rodent research [RR]1, RR9, and RR18). Spaceflight reduced GSK3β content across all missions, whereas its serine phosphorylation was elevated with RR18 and BION-M1. The reduction in GSK3β was linked to the reduction in type IIA fibers commonly observed with spaceflight as these fibers are particularly enriched with GSK3. We then tested the effects of inhibiting GSK3 before this fiber type shift, and we demonstrate that muscle-specific Gsk3 knockdown increased muscle mass, preserved muscle strength, and promoted the oxidative fiber type with Earth-based hindlimb unloading. In bone, GSK3 activation was enhanced after spaceflight; and strikingly, muscle-specific Gsk3 deletion increased bone mineral density in response to hindlimb unloading. Thus, future studies should test the effects of GSK3 inhibition during spaceflight.

Pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder and risk of diabetes mellitus: A nationwide study of 30,451 patients

OBJECTIVE

While treatment with antipsychotics and antiepileptics have been associated with an increased risk of diabetes mellitus (DM), lithium may have the opposite effect via inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3. The aim of this study was to investigate whether treatment of bipolar disorder with lithium, antipsychotics, or antiepileptics is associated with the risk of DM in a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

Using nationwide registers, we identified all patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder in Danish Psychiatric Services from January 1, 1996, to January 1, 2019 (N = 30,451). The risk of developing DM was operationalized via hospital diagnoses and redeemed prescriptions for glucose-lowering drugs. For lithium, antipsychotics, valproate, and lamotrigine, we calculated hazard rate ratios (HRR) for developing DM via adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Potential cumulative dose-response-like associations were examined using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

During follow-up (245,181 person-years), 2107 (6.9%) patients developed DM. Compared with non-users of the respective drugs, we found no clinically or statistically significant difference in the risk of developing DM among patients receiving lithium (n = 11,690; incidence rate of DM/1000 person-years (IR) = 8.87, 95% CI: 8.02-9.90; HRR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.84-1.06) or lamotrigine (n = 11,785; IR = 7.58, 95% CI: 6.69-8.59; HRR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.77-1.02), respectively. Conversely, for patients receiving valproate (n = 5171; IR = 12.68, 95% CI: 10.87-14.80; HRR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.14-1.58) and antipsychotics (n = 22,719; IR = 12.00, 95% CI: 11.14-12.94; HRR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.45-1.88), respectively, there was increased risk of developing DM. For antipsychotics, we observed a clear cumulative dose-response-like association with the risk of DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with valproate and antipsychotics-but not with lithium and lamotrigine-was associated with increased risk of DM in a real-world cohort of patients with bipolar disorder.

S-sulfhydration of SIRT3 combats BMSC senescence and ameliorates osteoporosis via stabilizing heterochromatic and mitochondrial homeostasis

Senescence of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) is one of the leading causes of osteoporosis. SIRT3, an essential NAD-dependent histone deacetylase, is highly correlated with BMSC senescence-mediated bone degradation and mitochondrial/heterochromatic disturbance. S-sulfhydration of cysteine residues favorably enhances SIRT3 activity by forming persulfides. Nevertheless, the underlying molecular mechanism of SIRT3 S-sulfhydration on mitochondrial/heterochromatic homeostasis involved in BMSC senescence remains unknown. Here, we demonstrated that CBS and CSE, endogenous hydrogen sulfide synthases, are downregulated with BMSC senescence. Exogenous H₂S donor NaHS-mediated SIRT3 augmentation rescued the senescent phenotypes of BMSCs. Conversely, SIRT3 deletion accelerated oxidative stress-induced BMSC senescence through mitochondrial dysfunction and the detachment of the heterochromatic protein H3K9me3 from the nuclear envelope protein Lamin B1. H₂S-mediated SIRT3 S-sulfhydration modification rescued the disorganized heterochromatin and fragmented mitochondria induced by the S-sulfhydration inhibitor dithiothreitol, thus leading to elevated osteogenic capacity and preventing BMSC senescence. The antisenescence effect of S-sulfhydration modification on BMSCs was abolished when the CXXC sites of the SIRT3 zinc finger motif were mutated. In vivo, aged mice-derived BMSCs pretreated with NaHS were orthotopically transplanted to the ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic mice, and we proved that SIRT3 ameliorates bone loss by inhibiting BMSC senescence. Overall, our study for the first time indicates a novel role of SIRT3 S-sulfhydration in stabilizing heterochromatin and mitochondrial homeostasis in counteracting BMSC senescence, providing a potential target for the treatment of degenerative bone diseases.

Long-Term Lithium Therapy: Side Effects and Interactions

Lithium remains the drug of first choice for prophylactic treatment of bipolar disorder, preventing the recurrences of manic and depressive episodes. The longitudinal experiences with lithium administration greatly exceed those with other mood stabilizers. Among the adverse side effects of lithium, renal, gastrointestinal, neurological, thyroid, metabolic, cognitive, dermatological, cardiologic, and sexual are listed. Probably, the most important negative effect of lithium, occurring mostly after 10-20 years of its administration, is interstitial nephropathy. Beneficial side-effects of long-term lithium therapy also occur such as anti-suicidal, antiviral, and anti-dementia ones. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of lithium, mostly those with other drugs, may have an impact on the success of long-term lithium treatment. This paper makes the narrative updated review of lithium-induced side-effects and interactions that may influence its prophylactic effect in bipolar disorder. Their description, mechanisms, and management strategies are provided. The papers appearing in recent years focused mainly on the long-term lithium treatment are reviewed in detail, including recent research performed at Department of Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland. Their own observations on ultra-long lithium treatment of patients with bipolar disorder are also presented. The review can help psychiatrists to perform a successful lithium prophylaxis in bipolar patients.

Licht R, P. V. Straszek S, Hansen AS, H. Young A, Duffy A, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Seemueller F, Sani G, Rubakowski J, Priller J, Vedel Kessing L, Tondo L, Alda M, Manchia M, Grof P, Ritter P, Hajek T, Lewitzka U, Bergink V, Bauer M, Nielsen RE. Lithium induced hypercalcemia: an expert opinion and management algorithm

BACKGROUND

Lithium is the gold standard prophylactic treatment for bipolar disorder. Most clinical practice guidelines recommend regular calcium assessments as part of monitoring lithium treatment, but easy-to-implement specific management strategies in the event of abnormal calcium levels are lacking.

METHODS

Based on a narrative review of the effects of lithium on calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) homeostasis and its clinical implications, experts developed a step-by-step algorithm to guide the initial management of emergent hypercalcemia during lithium treatment.

RESULTS

In the event of albumin-corrected plasma calcium levels above the upper limit, PTH and calcium levels should be measured after two weeks. Measurement of PTH and calcium levels should preferably be repeated after one month in case of normal or high PTH level, and after one week in case of low PTH level, independently of calcium levels. Calcium levels above 2.8 mmol/l may require a more acute approach. If PTH and calcium levels are normalized, repeated measurements are suggested after six months. In case of persistent PTH and calcium abnormalities, referral to an endocrinologist is suggested since further examination may be needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized consensus driven management may diminish the potential risk of clinicians avoiding the use of lithium because of uncertainties about managing side-effects and consequently hindering some patients from receiving an optimal treatment.

Bipolar Disorder and Bone Mineral Density Z-Scores in Relation to Clinical Characteristics and Lithium Medication

Bipolar disorder is associated with a long range of medical comorbidities, including migraine, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Bipolar disorder has also been associated with an increased risk of bone fractures. Osteoporosis is a reduction in bone mineral density, which leads to an increased risk for fragility fractures. Currently there is limited research on the association between bipolar disorder and osteoporosis. We aimed to study the association between high and low bone mineral density in relation to disease and treatment history in a sample of bipolar patients. We found that bipolar patients with high bone mineral density were more often on lithium medication, had a more active lifestyle and expressed lower current disease burden. Low mineral density was not associated with any of the addressed aspects of disease and treatment history. In conclusion our results support that patients on lithium treatment have higher bone mineral density; further studies are needed to address if lithium medication causes an increase in bone mineral density, and lowers the risk of bone fractures in bipolar disorder.

Why lithium should be used in patients with bipolar disorder? A scoping review and an expert opinion paper

INTRODUCTION

Lithium treatment is considered the gold standard for the long-term management of bipolar disorder and recurrent unipolar depression. It is also extremely effective in other psychiatric conditions characterized by impulsivity and aggression, and for the prevention of suicidal behaviours.

AREAS COVERED

This paper provides a scoping review and an expert commentary regarding the use of lithium in adult patients. Available information about efficacy, tolerability, dosing, and switching is analyzed, and the strategies that may be most useful in real-world clinical settings are highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

Lithium is effective on different domains of bipolar disorder, including the long-term prevention of recurrences of affective episodes, management of acute mania as well as in the prophylaxis of all affective episodes. Lithium has been defined a 'forgotten drug,' since its use in routine clinical practice has been declined over the last 20 or 30 years. Reasons for this trend include lack of adequate training on the management of lithium side effects. Considering its efficacy, use of lithium in ordinary clinical practice should be promoted. Several strategies, such as using slow-release formulations, can be easily implemented in order to minimize lithium side effects and improve its tolerability profile.

Physiological Mineralization during In Vitro Osteogenesis in a Biomimetic Spheroid Culture Model

Bone health-targeting drug development strategies still largely rely on inferior 2D in vitro screenings. We aimed at developing a scaffold-free progenitor cell-based 3D biomineralization model for more physiological high-throughput screenings. MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts were cultured in α-MEM with 10% FCS, at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ for up to 28 days, in non-adherent V-shaped plates to form uniformly sized 3D spheroids. Osteogenic differentiation was induced by 10 mM β-glycerophosphate and 50 µg/mL ascorbic acid. Mineralization stages were assessed through studying expression of marker genes, alkaline phosphatase activity, and calcium deposition by histochemistry. Mineralization quality was evaluated by Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analyses and quantified by micro-CT analyses. Expression profiles of selected early- and late-stage osteoblast differentiation markers indicated a well-developed 3D biomineralization process with strongly upregulated Col1a1, Bglap and Alpl mRNA levels and type I collagen- and osteocalcin-positive immunohistochemistry (IHC). A dynamic biomineralization process with increasing mineral densities was observed during the second half of the culture period. SEM–Energy-Dispersive X-ray analyses (EDX) and FTIR ultimately confirmed a native bone-like hydroxyapatite mineral deposition ex vivo. We thus established a robust and versatile biomimetic, and high-throughput compatible, cost-efficient spheroid culture model with a native bone-like mineralization for improved pharmacological ex vivo screenings.