1
|
Sukniam K, Manaise HK, Popp K, Popp R, Gabriel E. Role of Surgery in Metastatic Melanoma and Review of Melanoma Molecular Characteristics. Cells 2024; 13:465. [PMID: 38534309 PMCID: PMC10969165 DOI: 10.3390/cells13060465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
We aimed to review the molecular characteristics of metastatic melanoma and the role of surgery in metastasectomy for metastatic melanoma. We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed to identify relevant studies focusing on several mutations, including NRAS, BRAF, NF1, MITF, PTEN, TP53, CDKN2A, TERT, TMB, EGFR, and c-KIT. This was performed in the context of metastatic melanoma and the role of metastasectomy in the metastatic melanoma population. A comprehensive review of these molecular characteristics is presented with a focus on their prognosis and role in surgical metastasectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kulkaew Sukniam
- Department of General Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Harsheen K. Manaise
- Department of Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh 160047, India
| | - Kyle Popp
- Department of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
| | - Reed Popp
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Emmanuel Gabriel
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koizumi S, Inozume T, Nakamura Y. Current surgical management for melanoma. J Dermatol 2024; 51:312-323. [PMID: 38149725 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.17086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Melanoma is a major malignant cutaneous neoplasm with a high mortality rate. In recent years, the treatment of melanoma has developed dramatically with the invention of new therapeutic agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular-targeted agents. These agents are available as adjuvant therapies for postoperative patients with stage IIB, IIC, and III melanomas. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy has been studied in several global clinical trials and has demonstrated promising and favorable clinical efficacy, mainly in patients with palpable regional lymph nodes. A recent large phase III clinical trial investigating early lymph node dissection for sentinel lymph node metastases demonstrated no survival benefits. Based on these data, surgery should be reconsidered as an appropriate treatment modality for melanoma. The need for invasive surgical procedures will be reduced with the invention of effective adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies and novel clinical trial data on regional lymph node dissection. However, surgery still plays an important role in treating early-stage melanoma, accurately determining the disease stage, and effective palliative treatment for advanced melanoma. In this article, we focus on surgery for primary tumors, regional lymph nodes, and metastatic sites in an era of remarkably revolutionary drug treatments for melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeru Koizumi
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
- Department of Dermatology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Yasuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fu K, Montesino B, Seetharamaiah R. Ileocecal Intussusception and Obstruction Secondary to Metastatic Melanoma: A Case Report. Cureus 2023; 15:e46036. [PMID: 37900408 PMCID: PMC10603218 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Intussusception is an uncommon cause of bowel obstruction in adults. Most cases are associated with a pathologic lead point, commonly attributable to benign or malignant tumors. Malignant skin melanoma can metastasize to the gastrointestinal tract and lead to significant morbidity and mortality if left undiagnosed or untreated. In this article, we present the case of a 43-year-old Hispanic female with a history of stage III melanoma on her neck removed four years ago who presented with three weeks of lower abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Abdominal and pelvic imaging showed a high-grade small bowel obstruction with a transition point at the mid-ileum. Diagnostic laparoscopy confirmed an ileocecal intussusception secondary to a 5 cm mass at the lead point. The patient underwent successful resection of the ileum 5 cm from the intussusception and the ascending colon due to the high risk of malignancy. Pathology of the mass was found to be malignant melanoma, but the resected lymph nodes and omentum did not contain any malignancy. The patient tolerated the procedure well and is currently undergoing chemotherapy. This case demonstrates metastatic melanoma as a rare cause of intussusceptions in adults. It emphasizes the importance of considering intussusception when evaluating adult patients with classic lower abdominal pain. Prompt surgical intervention is recommended in suspected cases to address the significant likelihood of malignancy, especially in patients with an oncological history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Fu
- General Surgery, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | - Brittany Montesino
- General Surgery, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | - Rupa Seetharamaiah
- Surgery, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA
- Surgery, Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lwin TM, Kaelberer Z, Ruan M, Molina G, Boland G. Surgical Utilization and Outcomes for Patients with Stage IV Melanoma in the Modern Immunotherapy Era. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5005-5012. [PMID: 37121988 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13543-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of surgery for patients with stage IV melanoma in the modern era of effective immunotherapy is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate trends and outcomes after surgical resection of stage IV melanoma in the modern immunotherapy era. METHODS Patients with stage IV melanoma who received surgery, immunotherapy, or both from 2012 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Demographics, facility-level characteristics, and use of immunotherapy were compared between patients who received surgery and those who did not. Multivariate Poisson regression modeling, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox regression analysis were performed. RESULTS The study identified 9800 patients with stage IV melanoma, and 2160 of these patients (22 %) underwent surgery. The patients who received surgery were more likely to be younger (P < 0.001), to have private insurance (P < 0.001), to have a higher median income (P = 0.008), and to receive treatment at academic/research programs (P < 0.001), whereas they were less likely to receive immunotherapy (33.7 % vs 36.6 %; P = 0.013). The patients who received immunotherapy had a lower likelihood of undergoing surgery (relative risk [RR], 0.82; 95 % confidence interval [CI[, 0.75-0.88; P < 0.001). The patients who received both surgery and immunotherapy had a better overall survival rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95 % CI, 0.36-0.46; P < 0.01) than the patients who received neither immunotherapy nor surgery. CONCLUSIONS The use of immunotherapy was associated with a lower use of surgery for patients with stage IV melanoma. The patients with stage IV disease who received both surgery and immunotherapy had the highest overall survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thinzar M Lwin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Zoey Kaelberer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mengyuan Ruan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - George Molina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Genevieve Boland
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meacci E, Nachira D, Congedo MT, Ibrahim M, Pariscenti G, Petrella F, Casiraghi M, De Stefani A, Del Regno L, Peris K, Triumbari EKA, Schinzari G, Rossi E, Petracca-Ciavarella L, Vita ML, Chiappetta M, Siciliani A, Peritore V, Manitto M, Morelli L, Zanfrini E, Tabacco D, Calabrese G, Bardoni C, Evangelista J, Spaggiari L, Margaritora S. Surgical Resection of Pulmonary Metastases from Melanoma in Oligometastatic Patients: Results from a Multicentric Study in the Era of Immunoncology and Targeted Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092462. [PMID: 37173927 PMCID: PMC10177250 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, the emergence of effective systemic therapies (ESTs) in the form of both targeted and immuno-based therapies has revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced stage III and stage IV melanoma. Even though lungs represent the most frequent site of melanoma metastases, only limited data are available on the role of surgery in isolated pulmonary metastases from malignant melanoma (PmMM) in the era of ESTs. The aim of this study is to describe the outcomes of patients who underwent metastasectomy of PmMM in the era of ESTs, in order to identify prognostic factors affecting survival and to provide a framework for more informed patient selection of treatmeant with lung surgery in the future. Clinical data of 183 patients who underwent metastasectomy of PmMM between June 2008 and June 2021 were collected among four Italian Thoracic Centers. The main clinical, surgical and oncological variables reviewed were: sex, comorbidities, previous oncological history, melanoma histotypes and primary site, date of primary cancer surgical treatment, melanoma growth phase, Breslow thickness, mutation pattern disease, stage at diagnosis, metastatic sites, DFI (Disease Free Interval), characteristics of lung metastases (number, side, dimension, type of resection), adjuvant therapy after lung metastasectomy, site of recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; defined as the time interval between the first melanoma resection or lung metastasectomy and death from cancer). All patients underwent surgical resection of the primary melanoma before lung metastasectomy. Twenty-six (14.2%) patients already had a synchronous lung metastasis at the time of primary melanoma diagnosis. A wedge resection was performed in 95.6% of cases to radically remove the pulmonary localizations, while an anatomical resection was necessary in the remaining cases. The incidence of major post-operative complications was null, while only 21 patients (11.5%) developed minor complications (mainly air leakage followed by atrial fibrillation). The mean in-hospital stay was 4.46 ± 2.8 days. Thirty- and sixty-day mortality were null. After lung surgery, 89.6% of the population underwent adjuvant treatments (47.0% immunotherapy, 42.6% targeted therapy). During a mean FUP of 107.2 ± 82.3 months, 69 (37.7%) patients died from melanoma disease, 11 (6.0%) from other causes. Seventy-three patients (39.9%) developed a recurrence of disease. Twenty-four (13.1%) patients developed extrapulmonary metastases after pulmonary metastasectomy. The CSS from melanoma resection was: 85% at 5 years, 71% at 10 years, 54% at 15 years, 42% at 20 years and 2% at 25 years. The 5- and 10-year CSS from lung metastasectomy were 71% and 26%, respectively. Prognostic factors negatively affecting CSS from lung metastasectomy at multivariable analysis were: melanoma vertical growth (p = 0.018), previous metastatic sites other than lung (p < 0.001) and DFI < 24 months (p = 0.007). Our results support the evidence that surgical indication confirms its important role in stage IV melanoma with resectable pulmonary metastases, and selected patients can still benefit from pulmonary metastasectomy in terms of overall cancer specific survival. Furthermore, the novel systemic therapies may contribute to prolonged survival after systemic recurrence following pulmonary metastasectomy. Patients with long DFI, radial growth melanoma phase and no site of metastatization other than lung seem to be the best candidate cases for lung metastasectomy; however, to drive stronger conclusions, further studies evaluating the role of metastasectomy in patients with iPmMM are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Meacci
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Dania Nachira
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Congedo
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Mohsen Ibrahim
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Petrella
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Casiraghi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Stefani
- Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Del Regno
- Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Ketty Peris
- Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, G-STeP Radiopharmacy Research Core Facility, Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Schinzari
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Ernesto Rossi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Petracca-Ciavarella
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Letizia Vita
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Chiappetta
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Siciliani
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Peritore
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Manitto
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Lucia Morelli
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Zanfrini
- Service de Chirurgie Thoracique et de Trasplantation Pulmonaire, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Diomira Tabacco
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Calabrese
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Bardoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Jessica Evangelista
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Margaritora
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guerra F, Coletta D, Deutsch GB, Giuliani G, Patriti A, Fischer TD, Coratti A. The role of resection for melanoma metastases to the pancreas. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:2045-2052. [PMID: 36167766 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among patients with distant metastatic melanoma, the site of metastases is the most significant predictor of survival and visceral-nonpulmonary metastases hold the highest risk of poor outcomes. However, studies demonstrate that a significant percentage of patients may be considered candidates for resection with improved survival over nonsurgical therapeutic modalities. We aimed at analyzing the results of resection in patients with melanoma metastasis to the pancreas by assessing the available evidence. METHODS The PubMed/MEDLINE, WoS, and Embase electronic databases were systematically searched for articles reporting on the surgical treatment of pancreatic metastases from melanoma. Relevant data from included studies were assessed and analyzed. Overall survival was the primary endpoint of interest. Surgical details and oncological outcomes were also appraised. RESULTS A total of 109 patients treated surgically for pancreatic metastases were included across 72 articles and considered for data extraction. Overall, patients had a mean age of 51.8 years at diagnosis of pancreatic disease. The cumulative survival was 71%, 38%, and 26% at 1, 3 and 5 years after pancreatectomy, with an estimated median survival of 24 months. Incomplete resection and concomitant extrapancreatic metastasis were the only factors which significantly affected survival. Patients in whom the pancreas was the only metastatic site who received curative resection exhibited significantly longer survival, with a 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of 76%, 43%, and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of a review of non-randomized reports, curative surgical resection confers a survival benefit in carefully selected patients with pancreatic dissemination of melanoma.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mizukoshi K, Matsumori T, Kurokawa K, Takeda H, Yamamoto S, Uza N, Seno H. Pancreatic metastasis of malignant melanoma presenting as a tumor occluding the main pancreatic duct. Clin J Gastroenterol 2022; 15:994-998. [PMID: 35727502 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-022-01655-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Metastasis to the pancreas is rare, especially for malignant melanoma. In these scarce cases, tumors normally present in the parenchyma of the pancreas. A 70-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for an asymptomatic pancreatic tumor detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). She had undergone a pneumonectomy for primary malignant melanoma (MM) of the lung approximately 3 years prior and was receiving nivolumab for recurrent intrapulmonary metastasis. CE-CT revealed a hypo-vascular lesion occluding the main pancreatic duct (MPD) which was consequently dilated. On magnetic resonance imaging, the MPD lesion had high signal intensity on T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted images. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography revealed that the low echoic tumor had heterogenous enhancement in the early phase. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) was performed for evaluation of tumor area and histological diagnosis. A contrast agent defected lesion was observed in the dilated MPD from the pancreas body to tail suggesting the tumor totally occluded the MPD. Biopsy was performed and the specimens obtained from the defect lesion were black in color. Histopathological examination of the black specimens revealed substantial growth of tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and unequal nuclei size. The tumor cells had a brownish pigmentation of melanin. From these findings, the tumor was diagnosed as pancreatic metastasis of MM. The patient underwent chemotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab. The final diagnosis was pancreatic metastasis of MM occurring as a tumor occluding the MPD. ERP was useful for histological diagnosis and could be useful for future cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenta Mizukoshi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Matsumori
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Kaede Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Himeji Medical Center, 68 Hon-Machi, Himeji, Hyogo, 670-8520, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Takeda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Shuji Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Norimitsu Uza
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Seno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mor E, Laks S, Assaf D, Asher N, Ben-Betzalel G, Grynberg S, Stoff R, Adileh M, Steinberg-Silman Y, Shapira-Frommer R, Schachter J, Nissan A, Zippel D. The increasing role of abdominal metastesectomy for malignant melanoma in the era of modern therapeutics. Surg Oncol 2022; 44:101808. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
9
|
Wankhede D, Grover S. Outcomes After Curative Metastasectomy for Patients with Malignant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3709-3723. [PMID: 35128602 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11351-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence on the role of curative metastasectomy (CM) for malignant melanoma (MM) patients is limited, especially in the current era of effective systemic therapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to ascertain the role of CM compared with incomplete or nonsurgical treatment for patients with MM. METHODS Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for studies investigating CM for MM until 30 September 2021. The review included studies that compared CM with no-CM and reported a hazard ratio (HR) after multivariate analysis for overall survival. A random-effects model with inverse variance was used to calculate pooled HR. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS For the final analysis, 40 studies including 31,282 patients (CM, 9958; no-CM, 21,324) were considered. Compared with no-CM, CM was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (HR, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.47; p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis showed that the outcome was independent of the effective systemic therapy and anatomic location of metastasis. An unfavorable prognosis was associated with advancing age, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), male gender, prior stage 3 disease, multiple metastases and organ sites, and shorter disease-free interval. CONCLUSION Curative metastasectomy for MM is associated with a lower risk of death than non-curative treatment methods. Selection bias and underlying weakness of studies reduced the strength of evidence in this review. However, CM should be a part of the multimodality treatment of MM whenever technically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durgesh Wankhede
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
| | - Sandeep Grover
- Centre for Genetic Epidemiology, Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guerra F, Marra U, Giuliani G, Coratti A. Robotic Extended Ultrasound-Guided Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Metastases from Uveal Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2469-2470. [PMID: 34839428 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11116-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isolated pancreatic metastasis from melanoma is extremely uncommon and accounts for approximately only 2% of visceral disseminations of melanoma.1-3 Interestingly, pancreatic localizations disproportionately derive from primary ocular melanoma.1,2 Despite the currently available evidence on this argument being scarce, the survival outcomes of patients receiving resection for visceral melanoma metastases are reported to be superior than those managed by non-surgical modalities.4,5 CASE PRESENTATION: A 59-year-old female with a history of uveal melanoma presented with surveillance-detected metastatic disease confined to the pancreas. Computed tomography demonstrated one lesion located in the body of the pancreas and one further lesion in the head. The presented video illustrates the details of an extended, ultrasound-guided, robotic distal pancreatectomy. DISCUSSION Metastatic ocular melanoma has a highly variable natural history, which ranges from a fulminant course to prolonged stable disease.6 In contrast to cutaneous melanoma derivation, metastases mostly occur via hematogenous spread, in the absence of lymphatic drainage of the eye.6,7 Liver is the most common site of secondary localization and is not involved by metastatic disease in <10% of cases. Interestingly, patients with extrahepatic metastases tend to have significantly better survival rates than those with hepatic disease.6,7 Fewer than 100 cases of pancreatic metastasis from malignant melanoma are reported in the medical literature, including a relatively high percentage of primary ocular malignancies.1,5 Furthermore, the prognosis of these patients is essentially unknown, although metastatic melanoma of both cutaneous and ocular origin generally indicates poor survival.1,5,6 Although no robust evidence is available, a number of reports suggest that pancreatic resection may improve survival in these patients.1-4 A large retrospective review investigating the association between treatment modalities and survival of patients with abdominal visceral melanoma metastases showed that patients receiving resection had a superior median survival compared with patients treated medically. Although patients with metastases of the gastrointestinal tract showed the best outcomes following surgery, patients with pancreas metastasis (of both cutaneous and ocular origin) undergoing resection also exhibited a significant survival advantage compared with those treated non-surgically.5 Minimally invasive pancreatectomy is gaining momentum.8 In fact, in selected patients there are distinct advantages compared with conventional surgery owing to reduced postoperative morbidity and earlier return to daily activities, while maintaining the oncological tenets of resection.8-10 Recent reports suggest that the application of robots may provide some advantages over conventional laparoscopy, especially for patients necessitating technically challenging surgeries.8,11 Such benefits are mainly in relation to the rate of conversion, length of postoperative hospital stay, and number of cases necessary to surmount the learning curve and reach optimal performance; however, no definitive conclusions can be drawn due to the lack of high-level evidence.8,10.
Collapse
|
11
|
Newcomer K, Robbins KJ, Perone J, Hinojosa FL, Chen D, Jones S, Kaufman CK, Weiser R, Fields RC, Tyler DS. Malignant melanoma: evolving practice management in an era of increasingly effective systemic therapies. Curr Probl Surg 2022; 59:101030. [PMID: 35033317 PMCID: PMC9798450 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.101030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Newcomer
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Jennifer Perone
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | | | - David Chen
- e. Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Susan Jones
- f. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Roi Weiser
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
A case of laparoscopic partial hepatic S7 resection for postoperative liver metastasis of rectal malignant melanoma. Surg Case Rep 2021; 7:230. [PMID: 34704187 PMCID: PMC8548484 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-021-01316-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) has an extremely poor prognosis, and there is no report of resection of liver metastases so far. We report herein a rare case of postoperative laparoscopic partial hepatic S7 resection for rectal malignant melanoma. Case presentation A 51-year-old female patient with a diagnosis of an ARMM underwent a laparoscopic rectal amputation. Eleven months later, computed tomography (CT) revealed a 14-mm nodule in liver segment 7 (S7), which was diagnosed as a hepatic recurrence of the ARMM. Because no other recurrences were found, a laparoscopic partial resection of S7 was performed. Pathological analysis found intracellular melanin deposition, and immunostaining was S-100 (+), HMB-45 (+), and SOX-10 (+). Based on these findings, a liver metastasis of malignant melanoma was diagnosed. The patient is alive 7 months after the second surgery and has so far experienced no recurrences. Conclusion We reported an extremely rare case of a laparoscopic resection of a liver metastasis following surgery for ARMM.
Collapse
|
13
|
Li AT, Vakharia K, Lo SN, Varey AHR, Carlino MS, Saw RPM, Shannon KF, Howle JR, Pennington TE, Stretch JR, Nieweg OE, Spillane AJ, Long GV, Menzies AM, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Ch'ng S. Survival Outcomes of Salvage Metastasectomy After Failure of Modern-Era Systemic Therapy for Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:6109-6123. [PMID: 34347220 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10489-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastasectomy for selected patients with melanoma was associated with improved survival in the era before effective systemic therapy. Emerging evidence shows that these benefits persist even in this era of BRAF-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of salvage metastasectomy after failure of systemic therapy. METHODS Stage 3 or 4 melanoma patients with extracranial disease progression after at least 4 weeks of systemic treatment between 2009 and 2020 were identified and categorized as resected to no evidence of disease (NED), non-progressive residual disease (NPRD), or progressive residual disease (PRD). Systemic therapy was stratified into BRAF-targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, or both. The end points of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional disease control (LRC) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression procedures were used to examine factors associated with OS, PFS and LRC. RESULTS The study enrolled 190 patients. Among all the patients, the 5-year OS from metastatectomy was 52%, the 3-year PFS was 21%, and the 5-year LRC was 61%. After resection to NED, NPRD, and PRD, the 5-year OS values were 69%, 62% and 8%, respectively. Fewer lines of preoperative therapy, use of preoperative immunotherapy, and resection to NED were predictors of improved OS. After resection to NED, NPRD, and PRD, the 3-year PFS values were 23%, 24% and 10%, and the 5-year LRC values were 61%, 72% and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Salvage metastasectomy was associated with durable survival and disease control, particularly after resection to NED, preoperative immunotherapy, and fewer lines of preoperative systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew T Li
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kavita Vakharia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Julie R Howle
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas E Pennington
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. .,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Emens LA, Adams S, Cimino-Mathews A, Disis ML, Gatti-Mays ME, Ho AY, Kalinsky K, McArthur HL, Mittendorf EA, Nanda R, Page DB, Rugo HS, Rubin KM, Soliman H, Spears PA, Tolaney SM, Litton JK. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:e002597. [PMID: 34389617 PMCID: PMC8365813 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer has historically been a disease for which immunotherapy was largely unavailable. Recently, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has demonstrated efficacy, including longer progression-free survival and increased overall survival in subsets of patients. Based on clinical benefit in randomized trials, ICIs in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of some patients with advanced/metastatic TNBC have been approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), expanding options for patients. Ongoing questions remain, however, about the optimal chemotherapy backbone for immunotherapy, appropriate biomarker-based selection of patients for treatment, the optimal strategy for immunotherapy treatment in earlier stage disease, and potential use in histological subtypes other than TNBC. To provide guidance to the oncology community on these and other important concerns, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew upon the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for breast cancer, including diagnostic testing, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leisha A Emens
- Department of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ashley Cimino-Mathews
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mary L Disis
- Cancer Vaccine Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Margaret E Gatti-Mays
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Alice Y Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rita Nanda
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Krista M Rubin
- Center for Melanoma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hatem Soliman
- Department of Breast Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Patricia A Spears
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer K Litton
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Escribano-Pons MÁ, Segura-Sampedro JJ, Pineño-Flores C, Rodriguez Pino JC, González-Argenté FX, Morales-Soriano R. Abdominal metastatic melanoma invading transverse colon and stomach. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2021; 113:848-849. [PMID: 34315217 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8052/2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal melanoma metastases are not uncommon, with jejunum and ileum being the most common locations (58%), followed by gastric (26%), colonic (22%), duodenal (12%) and rectum metastases (5%).
Collapse
|
16
|
3D laparoscopic surgery as an alternative approach for the surgical management of abdominopelvic melanoma metastases. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-021-01823-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
17
|
Ch'ng S, Uyulmaz S, Carlino MS, Pennington TE, Shannon KF, Rtshiladze M, Stretch JR, Nieweg OE, Varey AHR, Hsiao E, Kapoor R, Pires da Silva I, Lo SN, Spillane AJ, Scolyer RA, Long GV, Hong AM, Saw RPM, Thompson JF, Menzies AM. Re-defining the role of surgery in the management of patients with oligometastatic stage IV melanoma in the era of effective systemic therapies. Eur J Cancer 2021; 153:8-15. [PMID: 34126335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Although previously the mainstay of treatment, the role of surgery in the management of patients with oligometastatic stage IV melanoma has changed with the advent of effective systemic therapies (most notably immunotherapy). Contemporary treatment options for patients with asymptomatic solitary or oligo-metastases include upfront surgery followed by adjuvant immunotherapy or upfront immunotherapy with salvage surgery as required. For suspected solitary or oligo-metastases, surgery serves both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Advances in radiological technology allow metastases to be detected earlier and surgery to be less morbid. Surgical morbidities are generally more tolerable than serious immune-related adverse effects, but surgery may be less effective. Upfront immunotherapy ensures that futile surgery is not offered for rapidly progressive disease. It also provides an opportunity to assess response to treatment, which predicts outcome, and may obviate the need for surgery. However, it is important not to miss a window of opportunity for surgical intervention, whereby if disease progresses on immunotherapy it becomes unresectable. In situations where local therapy is recommended but surgery is not desired, stereotactic radiosurgery may be an effective alternative. The decision-making process regarding upfront surgery versus immunotherapy needs to take place within a specialist melanoma multidisciplinary setting and be customised to individual patient and tumour factors. Ultimately, high-level clinical trial evidence is required to resolve uncertainties in the management of patients with oligometastatic stage IV melanoma but the complexity of the varying presentations may make trial design challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Head & Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Camperdown, Australia.
| | - Semra Uyulmaz
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Head & Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas E Pennington
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Head & Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Michael Rtshiladze
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rony Kapoor
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ines Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela M Hong
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ferrari A, Lopez Almaraz R, Reguerre Y, Cesen M, Bergamaschi L, Indini A, Schneider DT, Godzinski J, Bien E, Stachowicz-Stencel T, Eigentler TK, Chiaravalli S, Krawczyk MA, Pappo A, Orbach D, Bisogno G, Brecht IB. Cutaneous melanoma in children and adolescents: The EXPeRT/PARTNER diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 4:e28992. [PMID: 34174159 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is rare in children and, like other very rare pediatric tumors, it suffers from a shortage of knowledge and clinical expertise. The clinical management of pediatric melanoma is often challenging. Its clinical and pathological diagnosis may be difficult, and there is no standard treatment. In the absence of specific treatment guidelines, young patients are generally treated following the same principle as for adults, but concern remains about their access to clinical trials and new drugs, which have been shown to dramatically change the natural history of advanced melanoma. This paper presents the internationally recognized recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of children and adolescents with cutaneous melanoma, established by the European Cooperative Study Group for Pediatric Rare Tumors (EXPeRT) within the EU-funded project called PARTNER (Paediatric Rare Tumours Network - European Registry). Main recommendations for melanoma are to discuss pediatric patients in multidisciplinary teams that include both pediatric oncologists and specialists in adult melanoma; to enroll patients in prospective trials, if available; to collect data in national-international databases; and to develop an effective international collaboration between pediatric and adult melanoma groups in order to facilitate the transfer of potentially effective new agents from the adult to the pediatric setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Yves Reguerre
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Saint Denis de La Réunion, France
| | - Maja Cesen
- University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Indini
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital Policlinic, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Jan Godzinski
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Marciniak Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Ewa Bien
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Thomas K Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefano Chiaravalli
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Malgorzata A Krawczyk
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Alberto Pappo
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Daniel Orbach
- SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Hematology-Oncology Division, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Ines B Brecht
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Versluis JM, Hendriks AM, Weppler AM, Brown LJ, de Joode K, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Zimmer L, Kapiteijn EW, Allayous C, Johnson DB, Hepner A, Mangana J, Bhave P, Jansen YJL, Trojaniello C, Atkinson V, Storey L, Lorigan P, Ascierto PA, Neyns B, Haydon A, Menzies AM, Long GV, Lebbe C, van der Veldt AAM, Carlino MS, Sandhu S, van Tinteren H, de Vries EGE, Blank CU, Jalving M. The role of local therapy in the treatment of solitary melanoma progression on immune checkpoint inhibition: A multicentre retrospective analysis. Eur J Cancer 2021; 151:72-83. [PMID: 33971447 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In patients with metastatic melanoma, progression of a single tumour lesion (solitary progression) after response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is increasingly treated with local therapy. We evaluated the role of local therapy for solitary progression in melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICI between 2010 and 2019 with solitary progression as first progressive event were included from 17 centres in 9 countries. Follow-up and survival are reported from ICI initiation. RESULTS We identified 294 patients with solitary progression after stable disease in 15%, partial response in 55% and complete response in 30%. The median follow-up was 43 months; the median time to solitary progression was 13 months, and the median time to subsequent progression after treatment of solitary progression (TTSP) was 33 months. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 79%; median OS was not reached. Treatment consisted of systemic therapy (18%), local therapy (36%), both combined (42%) or active surveillance (4%). In 44% of patients treated for solitary progression, no subsequent progression occurred. For solitary progression during ICI (n = 143), the median TTSP was 29 months. Both TTSP and OS were similar for local therapy, ICI continuation and both combined. For solitary progression post ICI (n = 151), the median TTSP was 35 months. TTSP was higher for ICI recommencement plus local therapy than local therapy or ICI recommencement alone (p = 0.006), without OS differences. CONCLUSION Almost half of patients with melanoma treated for solitary progression after initial response to ICI had no subsequent progression. This study suggests that local therapy can benefit patients and is associated with favourable long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith M Versluis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Alison M Weppler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Lauren J Brown
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Karlijn de Joode
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ellen W Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 AZ, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Clara Allayous
- AP-HP Dermatology Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, United States
| | - Adriana Hepner
- Melanoma Institute Australia, 40 Rocklands Rds, Wollstonecraft, NSW 2065, Australia; Medical Oncology Service, Instituto Do Cancer Do Estado de Sao Paulo, Av Dr Amaldo, 251 Cerqueira César, Sao Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Joanna Mangana
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Prachi Bhave
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Yanina J L Jansen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium
| | - Claudia Trojaniello
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Napoli, NA, Italy
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Lucy Storey
- University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wimslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lorigan
- University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wimslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Napoli, NA, Italy
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium
| | - Andrew Haydon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, 40 Rocklands Rds, Wollstonecraft, NSW 2065, Australia; University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, 40 Rocklands Rds, Wollstonecraft, NSW 2065, Australia; University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- AP-HP Dermatology Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, 40 Rocklands Rds, Wollstonecraft, NSW 2065, Australia; University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 AZ Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mathilde Jalving
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bong CY, Smithers BM, Chua TC. Pulmonary metastasectomy in the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:2618-2627. [PMID: 34012610 PMCID: PMC8107521 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic melanoma is a fatal malignancy with a high mortality and morbidity. Since the early 1970s, available medical therapies were limited in improving survival. Surgery represented the best chance for a cure. However, surgery could only be offered to selected patients. The current landscape of treatment has radically evolved since the introduction of targeted and immunotherapies including BRAF and MEK inhibitors, and checkpoint blockers, like PD-1 and CTLA-4 antibodies. These new therapies have seen survival rates matching, and in some cases surpassing, that of surgery. Anti-PD1 and CTLA-4 combination treatments are associated with severe side effects and BRAF and MEK inhibitor combinations may trigger initial tumour responses but prolonged use have resulted in the development of resistant tumour clones and disease relapse. This review examines the role of pulmonary metastasectomy for lung metastasis from malignant melanoma in the current landscape of effective targeted therapy and immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Y Bong
- Department of Surgery, Logan Hospital, Metro South Health, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia
| | - B Mark Smithers
- Upper Gastrointestinal and Soft Tissue Unit, Department of Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Terence C Chua
- Department of Surgery, Logan Hospital, Metro South Health, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Siebert A, Deptuła M, Cichorek M, Ronowska A, Cholewiński G, Rachon J. Anticancer Properties of Amino Acid and Peptide Derivatives of Mycophenolic Acid. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2021; 21:462-467. [PMID: 32416705 DOI: 10.2174/1871520620666200516151456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) is applied as prodrugs in clinic as an immunosuppressant, it also possesses anticancer activity. MPA acts as Inosine-5'-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase (IMPDH) inhibitor, where the carboxylic group at the end of the side chain interacts with Ser 276 of the enzyme via hydrogen bonds. Therefore, MPA derivatives with other polar groups indicated high inhibition too. On the other hand, potent anticancer agents like dacarbazine and cisplatin give numerous side-effects. OBJECTIVE Based on the literature data, MPA derivatives should be explored towards anticancer properties. Conversion of the carboxylic group of MPA to amide could maintain antiproliferative activity. Therefore, we decided to investigate several amino acid and peptide derivatives of MPA against chosen cancer cell lines in vitro. METHODS Amides of MPA hold threonine and arginine amino acid unit. These amino acid derivatives were tested as L and D enantiomers and both in free acid and methyl esters forms. Additionally, MPA was modified with tuftsin or retro-tuftsin as biologically active peptides, which could act as a drug carrier. RESULTS Amino acid and peptide derivatives of MPA were investigated in vitro as potential anticancer agents on cell lines: Ab melanoma, A375 melanoma and SHSY5Y neuroblastoma. The activity of the tested compounds was compared to parent MPA and known chemotherapeutics: dacarbazine and cisplatin. CONCLUSION Amino acid moiety and the sequence of amino acids in the peptide part influenced observed activity. The most active amino acid MPA analogues occurred to be D and L-threonine derivatives as methyl esters, probably due to better cell membrane penetration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Siebert
- Department of Organic Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology, G. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Milena Deptuła
- Department of Embryology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 1, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Mirosława Cichorek
- Department of Embryology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 1, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Anna Ronowska
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 1, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Cholewiński
- Department of Organic Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology, G. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Janusz Rachon
- Department of Organic Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology, G. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Malignant Melanoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Current Treatment Options. Cells 2021; 10:cells10020327. [PMID: 33562484 PMCID: PMC7915313 DOI: 10.3390/cells10020327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant melanoma (MM) has become the fifth most frequent cancer in the UK. It is the most common carcinoma to metastasize to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. MM particularly has an affinity to spread to the small bowel, which is followed by the involvement of the stomach and large intestine. Excellent endoscopic options including video capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy are available for a precise diagnosis of GI involvement by a metastatic MM. The complete surgical resection of GI metastatic MM in carefully selected patients not only provides symptom control, but has also been associated with an increase in overall survival. The approval of BRAF-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed therapeutic approaches for patients with metastatic MM over the past decade. Currently, the overall survival of patients with advanced metastatic MM who have been treated with a combination of immunotherapeutic agents reaches 52% at five years. The role of surgery for patients with the metastatic involvement of the GI tract with MM is evolving in the era of effective systemic treatments.
Collapse
|
23
|
Holmberg CJ, Katsarelias D, Jespersen H, Carneiro A, Elander NO, Helgadottir H, Isaksson K, Jansson M, Wirén S, Ullenhag GJ, Ny L, Olofsson Bagge R. Surgery of metastatic melanoma after systemic therapy - the SUMMIST trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:52-55. [PMID: 33252282 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1846213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Jacob Holmberg
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Katsarelias
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Henrik Jespersen
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway
| | - Ana Carneiro
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nils O. Elander
- Department of Oncology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Hildur Helgadottir
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karolin Isaksson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Central Hospital Kristianstad, Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Malin Jansson
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University and Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Sara Wirén
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Gustav J. Ullenhag
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science of Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lars Ny
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Comito F, Leslie I, Boos L, Furness A, Pickering L, Turajlic S, Larkin J. Oligoprogression After Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Locoregional Therapy: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis. J Immunother 2020; 43:250-255. [PMID: 32796274 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have demonstrated a heterogenous spectrum of response and disease progression that may not be fully captured by conventional response criteria, such as a limited degree of progression, known as oligoprogression, which could benefit from local treatment. We retrospectively analyzed data from all patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma, who received CPI between January 2006 and March 2018 at Royal Marsden. We enrolled 36 patients who experienced progression in a maximum of 3 metastatic sites, after achieving disease control from therapy with CPI, and were radically treated with the locoregional approach. We carried out Kaplan-Meier analysis to obtain progression free-survival post-first oligoprogression (PFS-PO1), overall survival (OS) post-first oligoprogression, and OS estimates. The median time to oligoprogression from the start of CPI was 12 months. At a median follow-up of 34 months, the median PFS-PO1 was 32 months, with 50% of patients not progressed at the time of the data cutoff. The median OS-post-first oligoprogression was not reached. At a median follow-up of 52 months (from the first cycle of CPI), the median OS was not reached, with 75% of patients alive at the time of analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that baseline American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV M1a or M1b is associated with a longer PFS-PO1 compared with stage M1c or M1d. We observed that local therapy for oligoprogression after CPI can result in durable disease control, suggesting that locoregional treatment should be considered in patients being treated with immunotherapy. However, prospective evaluation, perhaps in randomized trials, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Samra Turajlic
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, the Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Okawa Y, Ebihara Y, Tanaka K, Nakanishi Y, Asano T, Noji T, Kurashima Y, Murakami S, Nakamura T, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, Shichinohe T, Hirano S. Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy and central pancreatectomy for gastric and perigastric lymph node metastases and pancreatic invasion from melanoma: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2020; 6:239. [PMID: 32990879 PMCID: PMC7524970 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-020-01027-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In melanoma, completely resectable metastases are surgically resected to expect to prolong relapse-free survival and overall survival. However, distant metastases of melanoma are rarely indicated for surgery because multiple metastases are often observed at diagnosis. We report a case of a man in his 50s who underwent laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy and central pancreatectomy for gastric metastases, lymph node metastases, and pancreatic invasion that could be completely resected. Case presentation A 50-year-old man was diagnosed with malignant melanoma of the left parietal region. After diagnosis, tumor resection and left cervical lymph node dissection were performed, and interferon-β treatment was added as adjuvant therapy. Seventeen months after adjuvant therapy, metastasis of stomach and abdominal lymph nodes from melanoma was diagnosed. And the pancreatic invasion of lymph nodes was suspected. Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy and the central pancreatectomy were performed because pancreatic invasion of melanoma was intraoperatively found. After 9 months of relapse-free survival, abdominal recurrence was observed. Nivolumab and ipilimumab were administered, and recurrent lesions are currently controlled. The patient has survived more than 3 years since metastasis resection. Conclusion In conclusion, laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy and the central pancreatectomy were performed for gastric and perigastric lymph node metastases and pancreatic invasion due to malignant melanoma, and the negative surgical margin was achieved. Although patient selection is required, the central pancreatectomy was a good indication for maintaining exocrine and endocrine function. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular-targeted agents may increase gastrointestinal surgery for metastatic melanoma in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Okawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yuma Ebihara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
| | - Kimitaka Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yoshitsugu Nakanishi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Toshimichi Asano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Takehiro Noji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yo Kurashima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Soichi Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Toru Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuchikawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Keisuke Okamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Shichinohe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Weng W, Tsai T, Chen W, Cheng J, Sun W. Malignant uveal melanoma with metastatic recurrence to the pancreas: A case report. ADVANCES IN DIGESTIVE MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/aid2.13212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wei‐Chun Weng
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
| | - Tzung‐Jiun Tsai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Wen‐Chi Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Jin‐Shiung Cheng
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
- Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Wei‐Chih Sun
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Song Y, Shannon AB, Roses RE, Fraker DL, Kelz RR, Karakousis GC. National trends in ventral hernia repairs for patients with intra-abdominal metastases. Surgery 2020; 168:509-517. [PMID: 32439207 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ventral hernias in patients with intra-abdominal metastases may not be addressed owing to other oncologic priorities, but they can affect quality of life and lead to sequelae necessitating an emergency operation. We compared the national trends and perioperative outcomes for elective and nonelective ventral hernia repairs for patients with intra-abdominal metastases. METHODS Patients were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (2003-2015). Temporal trends were described using average annual percent change. Perioperative outcomes between elective and nonelective ventral hernia repairs were compared using multivariable regressions. RESULTS An estimated 947,112 ventral hernia repairs were performed nationally, including 5,602 (0.6%) in patients with intra-abdominal metastases. Among patients with intra-abdominal metastases, 40.1% had a nonelective ventral hernia repair, mean (standard deviation) age was 64 (12) years, and 65.1% were women. Between 2003 and 2015, the total number of ventral hernia repairs performed nationally did not change (average annual percent change 0.062, P = .84). For patients with intra-abdominal metastases, although there was no change in the number of elective ventral hernia repairs (average annual percent change 0.65, P = .59), the number of nonelective ventral hernia repairs increased significantly (average annual percent change 2.7, P = .025). By multivariable analyses, patients with intra-abdominal metastases who underwent a nonelective repair were more likely to experience complications (odds ratio 1.76, P = .001), nonroutine discharge (odds ratio 1.93, P < .001), and mortality (odds ratio 2.27, P = .035). Nonelective ventral hernia repairs was also associated with a 38.5% (P < .001) longer hospital stay and 24.4% (P < .001) higher charges. CONCLUSION The number of nonelective ventral hernia repairs, which is associated with substantial perioperative morbidity, has increased significantly among patients with intra-abdominal metastases. Surgeons should consider a nonemergency operation for select patients to mitigate the burden of nonelective ventral hernia repairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Song
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA.
| | - Adrienne B Shannon
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA
| | - Robert E Roses
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA
| | - Douglas L Fraker
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Molina G, Kasumova GG, Qadan M, Boland GM. Use of immunotherapy and surgery for stage IV melanoma. Cancer 2020; 126:2614-2624. [PMID: 32157676 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy for stage IV melanoma has dramatically changed the overall prognosis and treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether changes in systemic immunotherapy options have significantly altered surgical resection rates for patients with stage IV melanoma. METHODS The National Cancer Database (2004-2015) was used to perform a difference-in-difference analysis to evaluate whether the rate of surgical resection of metastatic disease for stage IV melanoma differed with the use of immunotherapy in the checkpoint inhibitor era in comparison with the use of immunotherapy in the pre-checkpoint inhibitor era. An adjusted difference-in-difference analysis stratified by facility type was performed. An adjusted Poisson regression analysis evaluated predictors of surgical resection in patients with stage IV melanoma who received immunotherapy. RESULTS There were 14,433 patients with stage IV melanoma (median age, 66 years [interquartile range, 56-76 years]; female, 31.7%), and of all patients in the checkpoint inhibitor era (n = 7,524), 25% (n = 1,879) received immunotherapy. Patients with stage IV disease who received immunotherapy in the checkpoint inhibitor era were more likely to be younger, be healthier, have private insurance, come from upper income quartiles, and be treated at academic programs. A difference-in-difference analysis revealed similar rates of surgical resection of metastatic disease with the use of immunotherapy in the checkpoint inhibitor era and the pre-checkpoint inhibitor era, regardless of facility type. CONCLUSIONS The distribution of immunotherapy was unequal among patients with stage IV melanoma. Across all facilities, the rates of surgical resection of metastatic disease for stage IV melanoma did not differ with the use of immunotherapy between the checkpoint inhibitor era and the pre-checkpoint inhibitor era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Molina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gyulnara G Kasumova
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Surgery, Newton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts
| | - Genevieve M Boland
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chikhladze S, Lederer AK, Kühlbrey CM, Hipp J, Sick O, Fichtner-Feigl S, Wittel UA. Curative-intent pancreas resection for pancreatic metastases: surgical and oncological results. Clin Exp Metastasis 2020; 37:313-324. [PMID: 32095913 PMCID: PMC7138763 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10029-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Pancreatic metastasis is a rare cause for pancreas surgery and often a sign of advanced disease no chance of curative-intent treatment. However, surgery for metastasis might be a promising approach to improve patients’ survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical and oncological outcome after pancreatic resection of pancreatic metastasis. Methods This is a retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively-managed database of patients undergoing pancreatic resection at the University of Freiburg Pancreatic Center from 2005 to 2017. Results In total, 29 of 1297 (2%) patients underwent pancreatic resection due to pancreatic metastasis. 20 (69%) patients showed metastasis of renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), followed by metastasis of melanoma (n = 5, 17%), colon cancer (n = 2, 7%), ovarian cancer (n = 1, 3%) and neuroendocrine tumor of small intestine (n = 1, 3%). Two (7%) patients died perioperatively. Median follow-up was 76.4 (range 21–132) months. 5-year and overall survival rates were 82% (mRCC 89% vs. non-mRCC 67%) and 70% (mRCC 78% vs. non-mRCC 57%), respectively. Patients with mRCC had shorter disease-free survival (14 vs. 22 months) than patients with other primary tumor entities. Conclusion Despite malignant disease, overall survival of patients after metastasectomy for pancreatic metastasis is acceptable. Better survival appears to be associated with the primary tumor entity. Further research should focus on molecular markers to elucidate the mechanisms of pancreatic metastasis to choose the suitable therapeutic approach for the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Chikhladze
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
| | - Ann-Kathrin Lederer
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,Center for Complementary Medicine, Department of Environmental Health Sciences and Hospital Infection Control, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115b, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Christian M Kühlbrey
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Julian Hipp
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Olivia Sick
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Stefan Fichtner-Feigl
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Uwe A Wittel
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bello DM, Panageas KS, Hollmann T, Shoushtari AN, Momtaz P, Chapman PB, Postow MA, Callahan MK, Wolchok JD, Brady MS, Coit DG, Ariyan CE. Survival Outcomes After Metastasectomy in Melanoma Patients Categorized by Response to Checkpoint Blockade. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:1180-1188. [PMID: 31848819 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08099-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes in metastatic melanoma, with 4-year overall survival (OS) of 46% for anti-PD-1 alone or 53% in combination with anti-CTLA-4. However, the median progression free survival is 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Many who progress have gone on to alternative treatments, including surgery, yet the outcome of patients selected for surgery after checkpoint blockade remains unclear. METHODS Patients who were treated with checkpoint blockade from 2003 to 2017, followed by metastasectomy, were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional melanoma database. Response to immunotherapy was assessed at the time of surgery. Patients were categorized as having responding, isolated progressing, or multiple progressing lesions. RESULTS Of the 237 total patients identified, 208 (88%) had stage IV disease, and 29 (12%) had unresectable stage III disease at the start of immunotherapy. Median OS following first resection was 21 months. Median follow-up among survivors was 23 months. Complete resection at the first operation (n = 87, 37%) was associated with improved survival compared with patients with incomplete resection (n = 150, 63%) [median OS not reached (NR) vs. 10.8 months, respectively; 95% CI: 7.3, 14.8; p < 0.0001]. Patients resected for an isolated progressing or responding tumor had a longer median survival compared with those with multiple progressing lesions (NR vs. 7.8 months, 95% CI: 6.2, 11.2; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Patients selected for surgical resection following checkpoint blockade have a relatively favorable survival, especially if they had a response to immunotherapy and undergo complete resection of isolated progressing or responding disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Bello
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Travis Hollmann
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Parisa Momtaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul B Chapman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael A Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaret K Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jedd D Wolchok
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary S Brady
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Daniel G Coit
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Charlotte E Ariyan
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gamboa AC, Lowe M, Yushak ML, Delman KA. Surgical Considerations and Systemic Therapy of Melanoma. Surg Clin North Am 2019; 100:141-159. [PMID: 31753109 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Recent advances in effective medical therapies have markedly improved the prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma. This article aims to highlight the current era of integrated multidisciplinary care of patients with advanced melanoma by outlining current approved therapies, including immunotherapy, targeted therapy, radiation therapy, and other strategies used in both the adjuvant and the neoadjuvant setting as well as the evolving role of surgical intervention in the changing landscape of advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana C Gamboa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B Clifton Road Northeast, Suite B4000, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Michael Lowe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B Clifton Road Northeast, Suite B4000, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Melinda L Yushak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B4 Clifton Road Northeast, Suite B4000, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Keith A Delman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B Clifton Road Northeast, Suite B4000, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Holmberg CJ, Alwan G, Ny L, Olofsson Bagge R, Katsarelias D. Surgery for gastrointestinal metastases of malignant melanoma - a retrospective exploratory study. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:123. [PMID: 31299988 PMCID: PMC6626391 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1663-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cutaneous melanoma has a rapidly increasing incidence in Sweden, and it has more than doubled in the last two decades. In recent years, new systemic treatments for patients with metastatic disease have increased overall survival. The role of surgery in the metastatic setting has been unclear, and no randomized data exist. Many surgeons still perform metastasectomies; however, the exact role probably has to be redefined. The aim of this single-institution study was to retrospectively examine the safety and efficacy of surgery in abdominal melanoma metastases and to identify prognostic and predictive factors. METHODS Retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of all patients with stage IV melanoma with gastrointestinal metastases that underwent abdominal surgery at a single center between January 2010 and December 2018. Fifteen patients who underwent in total 18 abdominal procedures, both acute and elective, were identified and included in the study. RESULTS Out of 18 laparotomies, six (33%) were emergency procedures due to ileus (n = 4), small bowel perforation (n = 1), and abdominal abscess (n = 1). Twelve procedures (66%) were elective with the most common indication being persistent anemia (58%, n = 7), abdominal pain and anemia (33%, n = 4), and abdominal pain (8%, n = 1). All procedures were performed by laparotomy. There were 19 small bowel resections, 3 partial colon resections, and 2 omental resections. Radical resection was possible in 56% (n = 10) of cases and 67% (n = 8) when only considering elective procedures. In 17 of 18 procedures (94%), there were mild or no surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 0-I). The median overall survival was 14 months with a 5-year survival of 23%. CONCLUSIONS Patients with abdominal melanoma metastases can safely undergo resection with a high grade of radical procedures when performed in the elective setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03879395 . Registered 15 March 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Jacob Holmberg
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland Sweden
| | - Gulan Alwan
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland Sweden
| | - Lars Ny
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Katsarelias
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Carboni F, Valle M, Giofrè M. Emergency Surgery for Small Bowel Metastasis from Melanoma: Report of Three Cases. Am Surg 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481908500307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Carboni
- Department of Digestive Surgery IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Valle
- Department of Digestive Surgery IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Rome, Italy
| | - Manuel Giofrè
- Department of Digestive Surgery IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bello DM. Indications for the surgical resection of stage IV disease. J Surg Oncol 2018; 119:249-261. [PMID: 30561079 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Tumor biology and careful patient selection weigh heavily in determining the appropriate role of surgical resection in stage IV melanoma. Historically, surgical resection for highly selected patients with metastatic melanoma was the only treatment modality associated with improved long-term survival and the ability to provide palliation. With the new age of effective systemic therapies, the treatment of metastatic melanoma has become more intricate and future work is needed to better define the role for surgery within the current treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Bello
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
De Roeck L, Wuyts L, Peters B, Ruppert M. 5-Year survival after splenectomy in a patient with recurrent cutaneous melanoma: a case report. Acta Chir Belg 2018; 118:384-387. [PMID: 29115903 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1399661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Splenic metastases of melanoma are uncommon and generally part of a disseminated disease with a poor prognosis. In case of solitary visceral metastasis, surgical resection often remains an effective treatment. This case describes a long-term survival after splenectomy for a recurrent melanoma. METHODS We present a 55-year-old female with a solitary splenic metastasis. Her medical history revealed a melanoma of the foot in 2007 and an in-transit metastasis in 2011. A PET-CT revealed in 2012 the presence of a small aspecific lesion in the spleen. Close follow-up was chosen. Since PET-CT and MRI showed a progressive lesion, a laparoscopic splenectomy was performed. RESULTS Histological report confirmed the diagnosis of a metastatic lesion. Sixty months after the first radiographic evidence of the splenic metastasis, follow-up revealed no signs of residual disease. CONCLUSIONS Although current systemic approaches demonstrate to provide clinically important benefit, patients with oligometastatic disease should be evaluated for surgical metastasectomy. A laparoscopic approach for splenic metastasis is shown to be a safe treatment. This disease-free survival of 60 months in a patient with a history of an in-transit metastasis has not been published before. A splenectomy for a solitary metastasis could prolong the survival, even in a recurrent melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn De Roeck
- a Department of Surgery , University Hospital Antwerp , Edegem , Belgium
| | - Laura Wuyts
- a Department of Surgery , University Hospital Antwerp , Edegem , Belgium
| | - Benjamin Peters
- a Department of Surgery , University Hospital Antwerp , Edegem , Belgium
| | - Martin Ruppert
- a Department of Surgery , University Hospital Antwerp , Edegem , Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Đokić M, Badovinac D, Petrič M, Trotovšek B. An unusual presentation of metastatic malignant melanoma causing jejuno-jejunal intussusception: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2018; 12:337. [PMID: 30419958 PMCID: PMC6233537 DOI: 10.1186/s13256-018-1887-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small bowel intussusception in adults is rarely encountered. In most cases small bowel intussusception is caused by benign neoplastic lesions, but metastasis of cutaneous malignant melanoma causing small bowel intussusception is rare. We present such a case of jejuno-jejunal intussusception with an intraluminal metastatic lesion acting as a lead point. CASE PRESENTATION We present a case of a 71-year-old Caucasian man who presented with small bowel obstruction. His medical history revealed that he had had a cutaneous malignant melanoma excised 7 years earlier and underwent total laryngectomy due to a metastasis 6 years later. The disease was classified as stage IV and he was receiving immunotherapy. An emergency abdominal computed tomography scan demonstrated small bowel obstruction, most probably caused by an intraluminal lesion. An emergency laparotomy revealed an intraluminal metastatic lesion causing jejuno-jejunal intussusception. Metastasectomy of the lesion was performed and 13 days later he was discharged. CONCLUSIONS Jejuno-jejunal intussusception with a malignant melanoma metastasis acting as a lead point is very rare. With the gastrointestinal tract being a common location of distal metastases, a medical history of malignant melanoma treatment in cases of small bowel obstruction should raise a suspicion of possible metastatic disease. A computed tomography scan is the diagnostic modality of choice and surgery still remains the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihajlo Đokić
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška c. 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - David Badovinac
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška c. 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Miha Petrič
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška c. 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Blaž Trotovšek
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška c. 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Deutsch GB. Errors in Table. JAMA Surg 2018; 153:1064. [DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
38
|
Liu X, Feng F, Wang T, Qin J, Yin X, Meng G, Yan C, Xing Z, Duan J, Liu C, Liu J. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for metastatic pancreatic melanoma: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e12940. [PMID: 30383642 PMCID: PMC6221747 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000012940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Pancreatic metastases from other malignant tumors are an uncommon clinical condition and account for approximately 2% of all pancreatic malignancies. The most common primary malignancy that metastasizes to pancreas is renal cell cancer. We reported a rare clinical case of metastatic melanoma to pancreas who underwent a successful laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) at our department. PATIENT CONCERNS A 54-year-old Chinese man complaining an unexplained jaundice was found to have a pancreatic mass and he was diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma (CM) 6 years ago. DIAGNOSES Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) revealed a solid hypovascular mass measuring about 3.1 × 2.4 cm localized at the junction of pancreatic head and uncinate process, which compressed the lower common bile duct resulting in expansion of the upstream bile ducts. INTERVENTIONS We performed an LPD and regional lymphadenectomy on this patient. OUTCOMES This patient was discharged home on postoperative day 19. Postoperative pathological results revealed a malignant melanoma with negative margins. Immunohistochemical (IHC) findings also suggested a malignant pancreatic tumor accompanied by necrosis and pigmentation, which confirmed the pathological diagnosis. Immunoreactivity was strongly positive for anti-S-100 protein (+++) and positive for anti-Vimentin (+). The cancer cells were negative for CEA, CK8/18, P53, Violin, CK19, SMA with Ki-67 over 40%. So this pancreatic mass was proved to be a metastatic pancreatic melanoma from the primary cutaneous lesion. After LPD, this patient was followed up by readmission to hospital every 2 month in the first half year. The serum bilirubin and tumor markers such as CA199 were normal. CECT and did not find any newly developed neoplasm at the pancreas or metastasis at other organs. At the last follow-up at 6 months after LPD, the patient's general condition was acceptable and the physical examination and imaging studies revealed no significant findings of melanoma. LESSONS Metastatic pancreatic tumors are often associated with well-defined margins, tumor necrosis, enhancement, and distant metastases without pancreatic duct dilatation and parenchymal atrophy. As the most common type of metastatic pancreatic tumor, renal cell cancers tend to have higher attenuation values than that of primary pancreatic cancer, while they had similar attenuation values on the portal phase. Primary pancreatic cancer was always associated with an elevated CA199, total bilirubin, and fasting plasma glucose levels. Surgical resection for metastases to pancreas should be aggressively considered in selected patients due to its unique value of providing palliation and a chance to cure. For patients with unresectable lesions, new therapeutic protocols should be recommended such as the combination of BRAF with MEK inhibitor and PD-1 blocker with or without ipilimumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueqing Liu
- Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
| | - Feng Feng
- Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
| | - Tianyang Wang
- Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
| | - Jianzhang Qin
- Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
| | | | | | - Changqing Yan
- Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
| | | | - Jiayue Duan
- Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
| | - Chen Liu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianhua Liu
- Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Errors in Table. JAMA Surg 2018; 153:1064. [DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
40
|
The impact of effective systemic therapies on surgery for stage IV melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2018; 103:24-31. [PMID: 30196107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma have significantly improved with the introduction of effective systemic therapies (ESTs). The role of surgery in the context of ESTs for stage IV melanoma is evolving. We sought to characterise the changing patterns of surgery and oncological outcomes in patients with stage IV melanoma treated before and after the establishment of ESTs. METHODS Patients undergoing surgical resection of stage IV melanoma were identified from our institutional database from 2003 to 2015. Patients were grouped into two cohorts, those referred before EST (2003-2007) and after EST (2011-2015). Clinicopathological variables, patterns of surgery and oncological outcomes in the two groups were compared. RESULTS A total of 138 patients underwent surgery for stage IV melanoma (n = 69 in each cohort). We observed no significant difference in the ratio of operations/patients performed. However, the pattern of operations altered, with a significant decrease in in-transit excisions (0.9% vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001) and an increase in abdominal metastasectomies (21.1% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001), in the after-EST cohort. Novel indications for surgical intervention were noted in the after-EST cohort, with a significant increase in potentially curative operations for residual oligometastatic disease (15.9% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.045). Survival after surgery was prolonged in the after-EST cohort (median 16 months vs. 6 months, p < 0.001), with the stage at initial metastasectomy (stage 4a, hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 (0.28-0.73), p = 0.001) and treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (HR 0.38 (0.25-0.60), p < 0.001) associated with prolonged survival. DISCUSSION Surgery remains important in the management of stage IV melanoma, with evolving indications and patterns of intervention after the introduction of ESTs. The combination of judicious surgery and EST may improve oncological outcomes.
Collapse
|
41
|
Sullivan RJ, Atkins MB, Kirkwood JM, Agarwala SS, Clark JI, Ernstoff MS, Fecher L, Gajewski TF, Gastman B, Lawson DH, Lutzky J, McDermott DF, Margolin KA, Mehnert JM, Pavlick AC, Richards JM, Rubin KM, Sharfman W, Silverstein S, Slingluff CL, Sondak VK, Tarhini AA, Thompson JA, Urba WJ, White RL, Whitman ED, Hodi FS, Kaufman HL. An update on the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on tumor immunotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma: version 2.0. J Immunother Cancer 2018; 6:44. [PMID: 29848375 PMCID: PMC5977556 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0362-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer immunotherapy has been firmly established as a standard of care for patients with advanced and metastatic melanoma. Therapeutic outcomes in clinical trials have resulted in the approval of 11 new drugs and/or combination regimens for patients with melanoma. However, prospective data to support evidence-based clinical decisions with respect to the optimal schedule and sequencing of immunotherapy and targeted agents, how best to manage emerging toxicities and when to stop treatment are not yet available. METHODS To address this knowledge gap, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Melanoma Task Force developed a process for consensus recommendations for physicians treating patients with melanoma integrating evidence-based data, where available, with best expert consensus opinion. The initial consensus statement was published in 2013, and version 2.0 of this report is an update based on a recent meeting of the Task Force and extensive subsequent discussions on new agents, contemporary peer-reviewed literature and emerging clinical data. The Academy of Medicine (formerly Institute of Medicine) clinical practice guidelines were used as a basis for consensus development with an updated literature search for important studies published between 1992 and 2017 and supplemented, as appropriate, by recommendations from Task Force participants. RESULTS The Task Force considered patients with stage II-IV melanoma and here provide consensus recommendations for how they would incorporate the many immunotherapy options into clinical pathways for patients with cutaneous melanoma. CONCLUSION These clinical guidleines provide physicians and healthcare providers with consensus recommendations for managing melanoma patients electing treatment with tumor immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J. Sullivan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | | | | | - Sanjiv S. Agarwala
- St. Luke’s Cancer Center and Temple University, Center Valley, PA 18034 USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jose Lutzky
- Mt. Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL 33140 USA
| | | | | | | | - Anna C. Pavlick
- New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY 10016 USA
| | | | - Krista M. Rubin
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - William Sharfman
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
| | | | | | - Vernon K. Sondak
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | | | | | - Walter J. Urba
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR 97213 USA
| | | | | | | | - Howard L. Kaufman
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wollina U, Brzezinski P. The value of metastasectomy in stage IV cutaneous melanoma. Wien Med Wochenschr 2018; 169:331-338. [PMID: 29511905 DOI: 10.1007/s10354-018-0630-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is an aggressive neoplasia of melanocytes. Prognosis is dependent on tumor stage. Stage IV melanoma is characterized by the occurrence of distant metastases. Response of metastases to classical chemotherapy is limited and toxicity of treatment is high. In recent years, new developments in immunotherapy and targeted therapies improved prognosis of stage IV melanoma patients with better tolerability of treatment. There is no dispute about surgical treatment of primary melanoma. But what is the value of metastasectomy in the era of new systemic treatments? This review aims to discuss available data for surgical removal of distant metastases for several organs and tissues. The available evidence suggests that for selected patients with possible complete resection of all tumor metastases, metastasectomy remains an effective treatment option with a benefit in overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Wollina
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Städtisches Klinikum Dresden, Academic Teaching Hospital, Friedrichstraße 41, 01067, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Piotr Brzezinski
- Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute of Biology and Environmental Protection, Pomeranian Academy, 76-200, Slupsk, Poland.,Department of Dermatology, 6th Military Support Unit, os. Ledowo 1N, 76-270, Ustka, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Metastasectomy following incomplete response to high-dose interleukin-2. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:572-578. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|