Association of Aspirin With Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With Other Anticoagulants: A Noninferiority Analysis

Aspirin as Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Arthroplasty Patients: An Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognized postoperative complication of hip or knee arthroplasty and incurs major morbidity and mortality. While anticoagulants are the mainstay of chemoprophylaxis, aspirin has recently emerged as a popular prophylactic agent. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence comparing aspirin to anticoagulants as a method of VTE prophylaxis, and current guidelines are conflicting regarding using aspirin as first-line chemoprophylaxis. We aimed to investigate guideline characteristics that are associated with the recommendation for or against aspirin as a first-line agent.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PubMed databases were searched from 1966 to January 2024 to identify clinical practice guidelines for VTE prophylaxis in adult hip or knee arthroplasty inpatients of average risk. The characteristics of the guideline were collected by 2 independent reviewers. Logistic regression was used to test the association between the recommendation for or against aspirin and guideline characteristics.

RESULTS

There were 26 guidelines published from February 2003 to September 2023 and included in this study. There were 5 guidelines that recommended aspirin and 11 guidelines that recommended against aspirin as first-line therapy. With a more recent year of publication, aspirin was more likely to be recommended (odds ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 2.84) and less likely to be recommended against (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.41 to 0.90). No other variables, including the level of evidence used, the composition of the guideline working group, or the objective of the guideline, were associated with the recommendation for or against aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines were inconsistent in their recommendations regarding aspirin as first-line therapy as VTE prophylaxis in arthroplasty patients. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials using modern practices, such as early postoperative mobilization, are needed to better inform clinical practice guidelines.

Low-Dose Aspirin Is the Safest Prophylaxis for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Knee Arthroplasty Across All Patient Risk Profiles

BACKGROUND

The International Consensus Meeting on Venous Thromboembolism (ICM-VTE) in 2022 proclaimed low-dose aspirin as the most effective agent in patients across all risk profiles undergoing joint arthroplasty. However, data on large patient populations assessing trends in chemoprophylactic choices and related outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain scant. The present study was designed to characterize the clinical use of various chemoprophylactic agents in patients undergoing TKA and to determine the efficacy of aspirin compared with other agents in patient groups stratified by VTE risk profiles.

METHODS

This study utilized a national database to determine the proportion of patients undergoing TKA who received low-dose aspirin versus other chemoprophylaxis between 2012 and 2022. VTE risk profiles were determined on the basis of comorbidities established in the ICM-VTE. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between various classes of thromboprophylaxis in patients with high and low risk of VTE were calculated. The odds of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolus (PE), bleeding events, infections, mortality, and hospitalizations were also assessed in the 90-day postoperative period for propensity-matched cohorts receiving low-dose (81 mg) aspirin only versus other prophylaxis, segregating patients by VTE risk profile.

RESULTS

A total of 126,692 patients undergoing TKA across 60 health-care organizations were included. The proportion of patients receiving low-dose aspirin increased from 7.65% to 55.29% between 2012 and 2022, whereas the proportion of patients receiving other chemoprophylaxis decreased from 96.25% to 42.98%. Low-dose-aspirin-only use increased to approximately 50% in both high-risk and low-risk populations but was more likely in low-risk populations (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.20) relative to high-risk populations. Both low-risk and high-risk patients in the low-dose-aspirin-only cohorts had decreased odds of DVT, PE, bleeding, infections, and hospitalizations compared with other prophylaxis regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study on a very large population of patients undergoing TKA support the recent ICM-VTE statement by showing that low-dose aspirin is a safe and effective method of prophylaxis in patients across various risk profiles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aspirin is Not for Everyone: Discharge to Non-home Facilities After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

Background

Patients discharged to non-home facilities (NHD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty experience higher rates of adverse events and may require more aggressive venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis. Our aim was to compare the rates of VTE in NHD patients and those discharged home (HD) after THA/TKA. Our secondary aim was to determine VTE rates within HD and NHD groups when stratified by chemoprophylactic regimen.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of primary THA and TKA patients were stratified into HD and NHD, then allocated into groups by chemoprophylactic regimen on discharge: aspirin alone (AA), more aggressive (MA) chemoprophylaxis, and other regimens (other). The primary outcome was VTE. Rates of VTE in HD and NHD patients, as well as AA and MA regimens, were analyzed using a generalized linear regression model.

Results

Six thousand three hundred seventy-nine patients were included with 1.03% experiencing VTE. HD had lower rates of VTE compared to NHD (0.83% vs 2.17%, P < .001). AA had similar rates of VTE compared to MA (0.99% vs 1.08%, P = .82). NHD patients had a lower VTE rate with MA vs AA prophylaxis (1.47% vs 3.83%, P = .016). HD patients treated with AA vs MA had no difference in VTE rates (0.76% vs 0.96%, P = .761).

Conclusions

NHD patients have higher rates of VTE than HD patients. However, NHD patients have significantly lower rates of VTE on MA chemoprophylaxis compared to those on AA. Providers should consider prescribing MA VTE chemoprophylaxis for NHD patients. Prospective, randomized studies are necessary to confirm these recommendations.

Aspirin or enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after primary partial, total or revision hip or knee arthroplasty: A secondary analysis from the CRISTAL cluster randomized trial

BACKGROUND

This study compares aspirin to enoxaparin for symptomatic VTE prophylaxis within 90 days of any type of hip or knee arthroplasty performed for any diagnosis, in patients enrolled in the CRISTAL trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CRISTAL was a cluster-randomised crossover, registry-nested non-inferiority trial across 31 hospitals in Australia. The primary publication was restricted to patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. This report includes all enrolled patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty procedures (partial or total, primary or revision) performed for any indication. Hospitals were randomized to administer patients aspirin (100mg daily) or enoxaparin (40mg daily), for 35 days after hip arthroplasty and 14 days after knee arthroplasty. Crossover occurred after the patient enrolment target had been met for the first group. The primary outcome was symptomatic VTE within 90 days. Analyses were performed by randomization group.

RESULTS

Between April 20, 2019 and December 18, 2020, 12384 patients were enrolled (7238 aspirin group and 5146 enoxaparin). Of these, 6901 (95.3%) given aspirin and 4827 (93.8%) given enoxaparin (total 11728, 94.7%) were included in the final analyses. Within 90 days, symptomatic VTE occurred in 226 (3.27%) aspirin patients and 85 (1.76%) enoxaparin patients, significant for the superiority of enoxaparin (estimated treatment difference 1.85%, 95% CI 0.59% to 3.10%, p = 0.004). Joint-related reoperation within 90 days was lower in the enoxaparin group (109/4827 (2.26%) vs 171/6896 (2.47%) with aspirin, estimated difference 0.77%; 95% CI 0.06% to 1.47%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty (of any type, performed for any indication) enrolled in the CRISTAL trial, aspirin compared to enoxaparin resulted in a significantly higher rate of symptomatic VTE and joint-related reoperation within 90 days. These findings extend the applicability of the CRISTAL trial results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Anzctr.org.au, identifier: ACTRN12618001879257.

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data.

METHODS

Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs.

RESULTS

One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

The role of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is a debate over the use of aspirin after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of aspirin after TKA, the authors performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared aspirin with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were last searched on 31 January 2023 for studies comparing the effect of VTE prophylaxis between aspirin and LMWH. The results of eligible studies were analyzed in terms of VTE, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding complications rates.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials including 6772 patients met the inclusion criteria. LMWH showed a statistically significant reduction in the overall VTE rate (RR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.16-1.84). No significant differences in deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding complications rates were found between aspirin and LMWH.

CONCLUSION

Compared with LMWH, aspirin presents a higher risk of VTE after TKA. In terms of safety, aspirin and LMWH show comparable outcomes. The results do not support the role of aspirin role as an anticoagulant for preventing VTE after TKA.

An analysis of risk factors for venous thromboembolism in primary versus revision total joint arthroplasty

Background

One of the most serious complications after primary or revision lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is venous thromboembolism disease (VTE). Identifying patients at high risk for VTE allows tailoring of prophylactic anticoagulation regimens to those most vulnerable. This study aimed to identify risk factors for VTE in primary and revision lower extremity TJA.

Methods

The Electronic Medical Record was queried from a single academic institution for all patients who underwent a lower extremity TJA between 2007 and 2020. Demographics, comorbid conditions, perioperative characteristics, and postoperative complications were identified. An Elastic Net Multiple Logistic Regression Model was used to assess 49 covariates and predict those associated with a significant risk of VTE.

Results

We identified 4900 primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. There was no significant difference between primary and revision THA. Primary TKA had a higher rate of VTE than revision TKA. Significant risk factors identified for VTE in THA patients include histories of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), metastatic tumors, hemiplegia, and Hispanic ethnicity. Risk factors for VTE in TKA patients include histories of DVT, PE, metastatic tumors, and postoperative warfarin and heparin use. In all patients, age was a significant predictor of VTE risk.

Conclusion

Our work identifies many risk factors for VTE following TJA. While the increased rate of VTE in some populations may represent selection bias, it also highlights the incomplete understanding of the etiology and prevention of this complication in the joint arthroplasty population and requires further study.

Aspirin is a safe and effective thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are at high risk for thromboembolic events compared to non-surgical patients. Both anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents are used as antithrombotic prophylaxis in TKA. The aim of this review is to understand the role of aspirin in the prevention of thromboembolic events and to compare its efficacy and safety with the main anticoagulants used in antithromboembolic prophylaxis in TKA.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Registry to evaluate studies that compared aspirin with other anticoagulants, in terms of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after TKA. The meta-analysis compared the rate of complications between aspirin and other anticoagulants.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review for a total of 163,983 patients, and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences between aspirin and other anticoagulants in terms of the rate of deep venous thrombosis (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.08, p = 0.35) and pulmonary embolism (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.56-1.41, p = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

Aspirin is safe, effective, and not inferior to other main anticoagulants in preventing thromboembolic events following TKA.

Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis Adherence Rates After Major Cancer Surgery

Importance

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major source of preventable morbidity and mortality and is a leading cause of death in the US after cancer surgery. Previous research demonstrated variability in VTE chemoprophylaxis prescribing, although it is unknown how these rates compare with performance in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Objective

To determine VTE rates after cancer surgery, as well as rates of inpatient and outpatient (posthospital discharge) chemoprophylaxis adherence within the VHA.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study within 101 hospitals of the VHA health system included patients aged 41 years or older without preexisting bleeding disorders or anticoagulation usage who underwent surgical treatment for cancer with general surgery, thoracic surgery, or urology between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. The VHA Corporate Data Warehouse, Pharmacy Benefits Management database, and the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were used to identify eligible patients. Data analysis was conducted between January 2022 and July 2023.

Exposures

Inpatient surgery for cancer with general surgery, thoracic surgery, or urology.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rates of postoperative VTE events within 30 days of surgery and VTE chemoprophylaxis adherence were determined. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine incidence-rate ratios of inpatient and postdischarge chemoprophylaxis adherence by surgical specialty.

Results

Overall, 30 039 veterans (median [IQR] age, 67 [62-71] years; 29 386 men [97.8%]; 7771 African American or Black patients [25.9%]) who underwent surgery for cancer and were at highest risk for VTE were included. The overall postoperative VTE rate was 1.3% (385 patients) with 199 patients (0.7%) receiving a diagnosis during inpatient hospitalization and 186 patients (0.6%) receiving a diagnosis postdischarge. Inpatient chemoprophylaxis was ordered for 24 139 patients (80.4%). Inpatient chemoprophylaxis ordering rates were highest for patients who underwent procedures with general surgery (10 102 of 10 301 patients [98.1%]) and lowest for patients who underwent procedures with urology (11 471 of 17 089 patients [67.1%]). Overall, 3142 patients (10.5%) received postdischarge chemoprophylaxis, with notable variation by specialty.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings indicate the overall VTE rate after cancer surgery within the VHA is low, VHA inpatient chemoprophylaxis rates are high, and postdischarge VTE chemoprophylaxis prescribing is similar to that of non-VHA health systems. Specialty and procedure variation exists for chemoprophylaxis and may be justified given the low risks of overall and postdischarge VTE.

Comparative effectiveness of aspirin for symptomatic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, a cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study compares the symptomatic 90-day venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates in patients receiving aspirin to patients receiving low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Data were collected from a multi-centre cohort study, including demographics, confounders and prophylaxis type (aspirin alone, LMWH alone, aspirin and LMWH, and DOACs). The primary outcome was symptomatic 90-day VTE. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding, joint related reoperation and mortality within 90 days. Data were analysed using logistic regression, the Student's t and Fisher's exact tests (unadjusted) and multivariable regression (adjusted).

RESULTS

There were 1867 eligible patients; 365 (20%) received aspirin alone, 762 (41%) LMWH alone, 482 (26%) LMWH and aspirin and 170 (9%) DOAC. The 90-day VTE rate was 2.7%; lowest in the aspirin group (1.6%), compared to 3.6% for LMWH, 2.3% for LMWH and aspirin and 2.4% for DOACs. After adjusted analysis, predictors of VTE were prophylaxis duration < 14 days (OR = 6.7, 95% CI 3.5-13.1, p < 0.001) and history of previous VTE (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.8, p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in the primary or secondary outcomes between prophylaxis groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin may be suitable for VTE prophylaxis following THA and TKA. The comparatively low unadjusted 90-day VTE rate in the aspirin group may have been due to selective use in lower-risk patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number NCT01899443 (15/07/2013).

Effect of Aspirin vs Enoxaparin on 90-Day Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Secondary Analysis of the CRISTAL Cluster Randomized Trial

Importance

Ischemic heart disease remains the leading cause of mortality following hip and knee arthroplasty. Due to its antiplatelet and cardioprotective properties, aspirin has been proposed as an agent that could reduce mortality when used as venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following these procedures.

Objective

To compare aspirin with enoxaparin in reducing 90-day mortality for patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty procedures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was a planned secondary analysis of the CRISTAL cluster randomized, crossover, registry-nested trial performed across 31 participating hospitals in Australia between April 20, 2019, and December 18, 2020. The aim of the CRISTAL trial was to determine whether aspirin was noninferior to enoxaparin in preventing symptomatic VTE following hip or knee arthroplasty. The primary study restricted the analysis to patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis only. This study includes all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing any hip or knee arthroplasty procedure at participating sites during the course of the trial. Data were analyzed from June 1 to September 6, 2021.

Interventions

Hospitals were randomized to administer all patients oral aspirin (100 mg daily) or subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg daily) for 35 days after hip arthroplasty and 14 days after knee arthroplasty procedures.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was mortality within 90 days. The between-group difference in mortality was estimated using cluster summary methods.

Results

A total of 23 458 patients from 31 hospitals were included, with 14 156 patients allocated to aspirin (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-77] years; 7984 [56.4%] female) and 9302 patients allocated to enoxaparin (median [IQR] age, 70 [62-77] years; 5277 [56.7%] female). The mortality rate within 90 days of surgery was 1.67% in the aspirin group and 1.53% in the enoxaparin group (estimated difference, 0.04%; 95% CI, -0.05%-0.42%). For the subgroup of 21 148 patients with a nonfracture diagnosis, the mortality rate was 0.49% in the aspirin group and 0.41% in the enoxaparin group (estimated difference, 0.05%; 95% CI, -0.67% to 0.76%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial comparing aspirin with enoxaparin following hip or knee arthroplasty, there was no significant between-group difference in mortality within 90 days when either drug was used for VTE prophylaxis.

Trial Registration

http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12618001879257.

Thirty day low-dose versus regular-dose aspirin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in primary total joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The optimal dosing of aspirin (ASA) monotherapy for prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty is debatable. The objective of this study was to compare two ASA regimens with regards to symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), bleeding, and infection 90 days after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 625 primary THA and TKA surgeries in 483 patients who received ASA for 4 weeks post-op. 301 patients received 325 mg once daily (QD) and 324 patients received 81 mg twice daily (BID). Patients were excluded if they were minors, had a prior venous thromboembolism (VTE), had ASA allergy, or received other VTE prophylaxis drugs.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in rate of bleeding and suture reactions between the two groups. Bleeding was 7.6% for 325 mg QD and 2.5% for 81 mg BID (p = .0029 Χ2, p = .004 on multivariate logistic regression analysis). Suture reactions were 3.3% for 325 mg QD and 1.2% for 81 mg BID (p = .010 Χ2, p = .027 on multivariate logistic regression analysis). Rates of VTE, symptomatic DVT, and PE were not significantly different. The incidence of VTE was 2.7% for 325 mg QD and 1.5% for 81 mg BID (p = .4056). Symptomatic DVT rates were 1.6% for 325 mg QD and 0.9% for 81 mg BID (p = .4139). Deep infection was 1.0% for 325 mg QD and 0.31% for 81 mg BID (p = .3564).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose ASA in patients with limited comorbidities undergoing primary THA and TKA is associated with significant lower rates of bleeding and suture reactions than high dose ASA. Low-dose ASA was not inferior to higher dose ASA for the prevention of VTE, wound complications, and infection 90 days postoperatively.

Do 'Surgeon Champions' and High-Volume Surgeons Have Lower Rates of Periprosthetic Femur Fracture? Perspective from a State-wide Quality Improvement Registry

BACKGROUND

Recently, a state-wide registry identified fracture as a major cause of total hip arthroplasty revision. There were 52.8% of revisions occurring within 6 months (fracture leading cause). Registry sites have a 'Surgeon Champion' who acts as liaison and advocate. This study evaluated the effect of surgeon volume and role of 'surgeon champion' on fracture rates.

METHODS

There were 95,948 cases from 2012 to 2019 queried with peri-implant femoral fractures identified (within 6 months). Funnel plots were generated to compare individual surgeon-specific fracture rates. Surgeons who had a fracture rate below the confidence interval were labeled 'green' (lower than mean), within were 'yellow' (no difference), and above were 'red' (significantly higher).

RESULTS

For all surgeons, 19.6% were red, 72.1% yellow, and 8.3% green. There were 17.2% 'Surgeon Champions' and 6.2% 'Non-Champions' that were green (P=0.01), while 20.7 and 19.3% were red (P=0.82). There was a significant association between volume and performance (P<0.01). No surgeons in the lower two quartiles (<84; 84 to 180 cases), while 4 and 29% of higher-volume surgeons (181 to 404; >404 cases) were green. There was no statistical difference in red status by volume (P=0.53).

CONCLUSION

'Surgeon champions' and high-volume surgeons were more likely to be high performers, but not less-likely to be low performers. Active involvement in quality improvement and/or high-volume was associated with better outcomes, but did not impart complication immunity. 'Green' surgeons should mentor colleagues to help reduce fractures by re-evaluating modifiable factors. Analyzing outcomes to promote quality and decrease complications is paramount.

Machine learning prediction of venous thromboembolism after surgeries of major sellar region tumors

PURPOSE

To describe and predict the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after surgical resection of major sellar region tumors.

METHOD

Patients with sellar region tumors were identified from a database. The outcome was VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) within 60 days after surgery. We trained regression and machine learning models to predict the outcome using baseline characteristics, surgical findings and postoperative laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Among 3818 patients included, 124 patients developed VTE after surgery. The total 60-day VTE incidence was 3.2 %, with incidence peak within ten days after the surgery. The risk increased in patients >65 years old (OR 2.96, p < 0.001), in patients with chordoma (OR 3.40, p = 0.006) or craniopharyngioma (OR 1.86, p = 0.036), in patients underwent craniotomy approach (OR 2.78, p = 0.017), in patients with high volume CSF leakage (OR 4.24, p < 0.001), and in patients with longer surgical duration (OR 1.78, p = 0.029). The linear discriminant analysis algorithm had the highest AUC (0.869, 95%CI, 0.840-0.898) in predicting the outcome. The specificity, accuracy, and sensitivity of the best model were 61.8 %, 93.6 %, and 92.8 %, respectively. Risk stratification using our best model suggested that 1.3 % and 24.5 % of the patient developed VTE in the low-risk group and in the high-risk group, respectively. We developed an online decision-support tool available on https://deepvep.shinyapps.io/VTEpred/.

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of VTE after surgical resection of major sellar region tumors was clinically significant, especially in older patients with chordoma or craniopharyngioma.

Aspirin for Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis Following Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Safety and Efficacy Accounting for Surgeon Selection Bias

BACKGROUND

Aspirin may be effective at preventing venous thromboembolism following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Current evidence is limited by bias as many surgeons who use aspirin prescribe for high-risk patients alternative chemoprophylactic agents. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients who received aspirin and warfarin while accounting for surgeon selection bias.

METHODS

A national database was queried for patients undergoing primary elective TKA or THA from 2015 to 2020. Patients whose surgeon used aspirin in >90% of their patients were compared to patients whose surgeon used warfarin in >90% of cases. Instrumental variable analyses were performed to assess for PE, DVT, and transfusion while accounting for selection bias. Among TKA patients, 26,657 (18.8%) were in the warfarin cohort and 115,005 (81.2%) were in the aspirin cohort. Among THA patients, 13,035 (17.7%) were in the warfarin cohort and 60,726 (82.3%) were in the aspirin cohort.

RESULTS

Analyses were unable to identify a difference in the risk of PE (TKA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.98, P = .659; THA: aOR = 0.93, P = .310) and DVT (TKA: aOR = 1.05, P = .188; THA: aOR = 0.96, P = .493) between the aspirin and warfarin cohorts. However, the aspirin cohort was associated with a lower risk of transfusion (TKA: aOR = 0.58, P < .001, THA: 0.84, P < .001).

DISCUSSION

After accounting for surgeon selection bias, aspirin was as effective as warfarin at preventing PE and DVT following TKA and THA. Furthermore, aspirin was associated with a lower risk of transfusion compared to warfarin.

Novel therapeutic medications for venous thromboembolism prevention in trauma patients: Findings from the Consensus Conference to Implement Optimal Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma

ABSTRACT

Trauma patients are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite evidence-based guidelines and concerted efforts in trauma centers to implement optimal chemoprophylaxis strategies, VTE remains a frequent diagnosis in trauma patients. Current chemoprophylaxis strategies largely focus on the subcutaneous injection of low-molecular-weight heparin, which is administered twice daily. Novel approaches to pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis have the potential to reduce VTE rates by improving patient compliance through oral administration or through their ability to target alternative pathways that mediate thrombosis. While novel pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis strategies have been studied in nontrauma patients, there is a paucity of literature in trauma patients where the risk of thrombosis versus hemorrhage must be carefully considered. As a component of the 2022 Consensus Conference to Implement Optimal VTE Prophylaxis in Trauma, this review provides an update of the novel chemoprophylaxis agents for potential use in trauma patients. Here, we will consider the relative risks and benefits related to the use of these drugs, evaluate the current literature in nontrauma patients, and consider future directions that could potentially improve posttrauma VTE prophylaxis.

Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MBE) are feared complications that are influenced by numerous host and surgical related factors. Using machine learning on contemporary data, our aim was to develop and validate a practical, easy-to-use algorithm to predict risk for VTE and MBE following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This was a single institutional study of 35,963 primary and revision total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients operated between 2009 and 2020. Fifty-six variables related to demographics, comorbidities, operative factors as well as chemoprophylaxis were included in the analysis. The cohort was divided to training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Four machine learning models were developed for each of the outcomes assessed (VTE and MBE). Models were created for all VTE grouped together as well as for pulmonary emboli (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) individually to examine the need for distinct algorithms. For each outcome, the model that best performed using repeated cross validation was chosen for algorithm development, and predicted versus observed incidences were evaluated. Of the 35,963 patients included, 308 (0.86%) developed VTE (170 PE's, 176 DVT's) and 293 (0.81%) developed MBE. Separate models were created for PE and DVT as they were found to outperform the prediction of VTE. Gradient boosting trees had the highest performance for both PE (AUC-ROC 0.774 [SD 0.055]) and DVT (AUC-ROC 0.759 [SD 0.039]). For MBE, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) analysis had the highest AUC (AUC-ROC 0.803 [SD 0.035]). An algorithm that provides the probability for PE, DVT and MBE for each specific patient was created. All 3 algorithms had good discriminatory capability and cross-validation showed similar probabilities comparing predicted and observed failures indicating high accuracy of the model. We successfully developed and validated an easy-to-use algorithm that accurately predicts VTE and MBE following TJA. This tool can be used in every-day clinical decision making and patient counseling.

Effectiveness of different antithrombotic agents in combination with tranexamic acid for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and blood management after total knee replacement: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely applied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to significantly reduce perioperative blood loss and improve knee function recovery in patients after surgery. The choice of antithrombotic agents for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention after TKA is controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of different antithrombotic agents on patients after primary unilateral TKA in the context of applied TXA.

METHODS

A total of 180 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA from October 2020 to December 2021 were included in this study. All patients were given an intraoperative drip of 60 mg/kg TXA. Thereafter, patients were divided into three groups (n = 60 each). Baseline data were comparable among the three groups. The average follow-up time was 3.02 ± 0.09 months. Group 1 enrolled patients receiving oral rivaroxaban (RA) at 10 mg, Group 2 included patients who received subcutaneous Dalteparin sodium at 2500 IU, while Group 3 included patients taking oral aspirin (ASA) at 100 mg. Patients in all the three groups received treatment once a day for 30 days at 12 h postoperatively. The primary outcomes in this study were post-treatment drainage volume and thrombotic complication rate. The secondary outcomes included hematologic parameters, transfusion rate, intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss (TBL), and bleeding complication rate.

RESULTS

The average drainage volume after treatment was significantly lower in Group 3 than in Group 1 and Group 2 (205.2 ± 69.0 vs 243.4 ± 72.5 vs 295.4 ± 72.5 ml, P < 0.001), and there was a significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (243.4 ± 72.5 mL vs 295.4 ± 72.5 mL, P < 0.001). The blood transfusion rate of Group 2 dramatically increased compared with Group 1 and Group 3 (20.0% vs 6.7% vs 5.0%, P = 0.01). The bleeding complication rate in Group 1 apparently increased relative to Group 2 and Group 3 (26.7% vs 10.0% vs 8.3%, P = 0.008). Besides, there was no significant difference in the thrombotic complication rate among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Under the background of TXA application, ASA, RA, and Dalteparin sodium were all effective on preventing VTE after TKA. In addition, ASA effectively reduced post-treatment Hemoglobin (Hb) loss, drainage volume, TBL, transfusion rate, and bleeding complications compared with RA and Dalteparin sodium.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200060169). Date of Registration: 21/05/2022.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of aspirin and other anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Purpose

Patients undergoing major orthopedic surgeries, such as total hip replacement (THR), total knee replacement (TKR), and trauma surgery, are at an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have investigated aspirin as a thromboprophylactic agent for arthroplasty, besides trauma surgery. Therefore, we sought to analyze the efficacy of aspirin compared to that of other anticoagulants for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgeries.

Methods

This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO register. Randomized controlled trials that investigated the use of aspirin for thromboprophylaxis in major orthopedic lower limb surgeries were included and analyzed. Quality analysis of the literature and level of evidence were assessed. The primary clinical outcome was VTE. Secondary clinical outcomes included mortality, bleeding events, and wound complications.

Results

Eight high-quality studies with level 2 evidence (published within 2006-2021) were included, comprising 6220 patients. The incidence of VTE with aspirin was not found to be more significant than other anticoagulants (risk ratio (RR) = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.89-1.58, P = 0.25). Regarding secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences between aspirin and other anticoagulants (mortality (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.27-7.23, P = 0.69), bleeding events (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.57-1.39, P = 0.61), or wound complications (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.30-1.35, P = 0.24)).

Conclusion

The current meta-analysis did not show any difference between aspirin and other anticoagulants as thromboprophylactic agents in preventing VTE in patients who underwent major orthopedic surgeries.

Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis in Knee Arthroscopy: A Break-Even Analysis of Cost

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious and costly complication after knee arthroscopy. There continues to be debate regarding the use of VTE prophylaxis after knee arthroscopy, and minimal research has explored its cost-effectiveness.

HYPOTHESIS

Both aspirin and enoxaparin would be cost-effective in preventing symptomatic VTE.

STUDY DESIGN

Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The literature was searched and the TriNetX research database was queried to determine a range of initial rates of VTE. An open-access retail database was used to determine the mean retail price for aspirin (325 mg) and enoxaparin (30 mg and 40 mg). Our institutional records were used to determine the cost of treating VTE. A "break-even" analysis was then performed to determine the absolute risk reduction necessary to make these drugs cost-effective. This value was then used to calculate the number of patients who would need to be treated (NNT) to prevent a single VTE while still breaking even on cost.

RESULTS

The cost of treating VTE was $9407 (US Dollars). Aspirin (325 mg), enoxaparin (30 mg), and enoxaparin (40 mg) were found to cost $1.86, $188.72, and $99.99, respectively. The low, TriNetX, and high rates of VTE were 0.34%, 0.86%, and 10.9%, respectively. Aspirin was cost-effective at all 3 rates if the initial rate decreased by 0.02% (NNT = 5058). Both formulations of enoxaparin were cost-effective at the high initial rate if they decreased by 2.01% (NNT = 50) and 1.06% (NNT = 94), respectively. However, at the low and TriNetX rates, the 2 doses of enoxaparin were not cost-effective because their final break-even rate exceeded the initial VTE rate.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin and, in some cases, enoxaparin are cost-effective treatments for VTE prophylaxis after knee arthroscopy.

State-Based and National U.S. Registries: The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI), California Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR), and American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR)

The concept of a total joint registry as a tool to gather and compare longitudinal clinical outcome data emerged in the early 1970s; although initially begun as a single-institution effort, it soon spread to the development of large nationwide registries, first in Scandinavia and subsequently around the world. These national registries established the value of population-wide results, large cohorts, and the importance of ongoing implant surveillance efforts, as detailed elsewhere in this series. In the United States, concerted efforts to establish a national total joint registry for the hip and knee began in earnest in the early 2000s and culminated with the incorporation of the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) in 2009. Parallel efforts soon followed to establish state-based total joint registries, either as stand-alone entities or in affiliation with the AJRR. Some of these state-based efforts succeeded, and some did not.In the first section of this article, Brian Hallstrom, MD, details the highly successful Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI). This state-based effort was made possible by a unique partnership between a single dominant statewide private payer and the Michigan orthopaedic surgery community; it has already successfully advanced the quality of care for patients in Michigan, and efforts are ongoing.The second section, by James I. Huddelston, MD, details a different path to the establishment of a focused state-based registry. The California Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) was the result of a partnership with representatives of the statewide business community and resulted in a pioneering effort to successfully collect and publicly report patient-reported outcome measures as part of the registry data set. Further discussed are the establishment, development, and status of the AJRR and its current place among the family of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) registries, which were inspired by the AJRR and span a range of orthopaedic specialties.

The rate of venous thromboembolism after knee bone marrow concentrate procedures: should we anticoagulate?

PURPOSE

Intra-articular injections of autologous, minimally manipulated, cell therapies such as bone marrow concentrate (BMC) to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA) may delay or prevent future total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Arthroplasty has the known and substantial risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and requires routine prophylaxis, whereas the VTE risk associated with knee BMC injections is unknown. We report on the rate of VTE from a large orthobiologics patient registry and assess whether knee BMC procedures require routine prophylaxis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of knee osteoarthritis cases tracked in a treatment registry and treated at 72 clinical sites with BMC from 2007 to 2020 who were not prophylactically anticoagulated was performed to identify adverse events (AEs) associated with VTE. Treating physicians were contacted to improve discovery of possible occurrences of VTE.

RESULTS

Twenty cases (0.16%) of VTE were identified from the registry of 12,780 knee BMC treatments. These events were less frequent than the published data demonstrate for anticoagulated TKA patients.

CONCLUSION

Based on the rates of VTE from our retrospective treatment registry analysis compared to the risk of medication-induced haemorrhage, routine prophylactic anticoagulation is not recommended for intra-articular knee BMC procedures. Further research into safety and efficacy of BMC treatment for knee OA is warranted.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER

NCT03011398, retrospectively registered.

What Are the Drivers of Readmission for Serious Venous Thromboembolic Events after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? An Analysis of 862,915 Patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a relatively common complication among patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This complication occurs in a spectrum of severity ranging from an incidental finding to serious readmission-requiring events. To date, the risk factors of serious VTE that require readmission have not been characterized. This study examines the patient and hospital characteristics associated with readmission for serious VTE after TKA. The National Readmission Database (NRD) from the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) was queried for patients who underwent primary TKA from January 2016-December 2018. The study population consisted of patients who were readmitted within 90 days following primary TKA with a primary diagnosis of VTE. Multivariable regression models were constructed to evaluate patient characteristics (age, sex, insurance, elective nature of procedure, hospital characteristics, discharge status, income, and comorbidities) associated with higher risk of developing readmission-requiring VTE. Readmission rates for VTE exhibited a higher incidence in patients older than 61 (compared with 40 and under), males (OR:1.08, 95%CI [1.03-1.14]), patients with nonelective procedures (OR:20.21, 95% CI [19.16-21.32]), patients at large hospitals(OR:1.17, 95% CI [1.09-1.25]), patients at private hospitals (OR:1.19, 95% CI [1.09-1.29]), and patients with non-home discharge statuses. Comorbidities of paralysis (OR:1.52, 95% CI [1.19-1.94]), neurological disorders (OR:1.12, 95% CI [1.02-1.23]), metastatic cancer (OR:1.48, 95% CI [1.01-2.17]), obesity (OR:1.11, 95% CI [1.06-1.17]), fluid and electrolyte imbalance (OR:1.28, 95% CI [1.18-1.38]), blood loss anemia (OR:1.29, 95% CI [1.02-1.64]), and iron deficiency anemia (OR:1.24, 95 % CI [1.15-1.33]) increased risk of VTE. Certain comorbidities requiring chronic anticoagulation were associated with lower risk of VTE. Insurance status and patient income did not exhibit any correlation with VTE incidence. Patient characteristics of male sex, age > 61, and baseline comorbidities (paralysis, neurological disorders, metastatic cancer, obesity, fluid and electrolyte imbalance, and blood loss/iron deficiency anemia) were at an increased risk of developing serious VTE. Patients without continued supervision at their discharge environment were at higher risk of developing serious VTE. Extra prophylaxis and special protocols may be warranted in these patients to prevent VTE complications.

Prevention of venous thromboembolic events in patients with lower leg immobilization after trauma: Systematic review and network meta-analysis with meta-epsidemiological approach

BACKGROUND

Lower limb trauma requiring immobilization is a significant contributor to overall venous thromboembolism (VTE) burden. The clinical effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis for this indication and the optimal agent strategy are still a matter of debate. Our main objective was to assess the efficacy of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients with isolated temporary lower limb immobilization after trauma. We aimed to estimate and compare the clinical efficacy and the safety of the different thromboprophylactic treatments to determine the best strategy.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a systematic review and a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) including all available randomized trials comparing a pharmacological thromboprophylactic treatment to placebo or to no treatment in patients with leg immobilization after trauma. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science until July 2021. Only RCT or observational studies with analysis of confounding factors including adult patients requiring temporary immobilization for an isolated lower limb injury treated conservatively or surgically and assessing pharmacological thromboprophylactic agents or placebo or no treatment were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major VTE (proximal deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, and pulmonary embolism-related death). We extracted data according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for NMA and appraised selected trials with the Cochrane review handbook. Fourteen studies were included (8,198 patients). Compared to the control group, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and low molecular weight heparins were associated with a significant risk reduction of major VTE with an odds ratio of 0.02 (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.00 to 0.19), 0.22 (95% CrI 0.06 to 0.65), and 0.32 (95% CrI 0.15 to 0.56), respectively. No increase of the major bleeding risk was observed with either treatment. Rivaroxaban has the highest likelihood of being ranked top in terms of efficacy and net clinical benefit. The main limitation is that the network had as many indirect comparisons as direct comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA confirms the favorable benefit/risk ratio of thromboprophylaxis for patients with leg immobilization after trauma with the highest level of evidence for rivaroxaban.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021257669.

Cost-Effectiveness of Aspirin for Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Major Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Venous thromboembolism extended prophylaxis after inflammatory bowel disease surgery remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if adopting an aspirin-based prophylaxis strategy may address current cost-effectiveness limitations.

METHODS

A decision analysis model was used to compare costs and outcomes of a reference case patient undergoing inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal surgery considered for post-discharge thromboembolism prophylaxis. Low-dose aspirin was compared to an enoxaparin regimen as well as no prophylaxis. Source estimates were obtained from aggregated existing literature. Secondary analysis included out-of-pocket costs. A 10,000-simulation Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis accounted for uncertainty in model estimates.

RESULTS

An enoxaparin-based regimen compared to aspirin demonstrated an unfavorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $908,268 per quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analysis supported this finding in > 75% of simulated cases; scenarios favoring enoxaparin included those with > 4% post-discharge event rates. Aspirin versus no prophylaxis demonstrated a favorable ratio of $106,601 per quality-adjusted life year. Findings were vulnerable to a post-discharge thromboembolism rate < 1%, aspirin-associated bleeding rate > 1%, median hospital costs of bleeding > 3 × , and decreased efficacy of aspirin (RR > 0.75). The average out-of-pocket cost of choosing an aspirin ePpx strategy increased by $54 per patient versus $708 per patient with enoxaparin.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aspirin extended prophylaxis following inflammatory bowel disease surgery has a favorable cost-safety profile and may be an attractive alternative approach.

Perioperative platelet count in peripheral blood is associated with the early stage of PND after major orthopedic surgery: a prospective observational study

Background

Perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) are common complications of major surgery among elderly patients, remarkably decreasing patients’ life quality. Platelet count has been proved to be an essential factor in inflammation. However, as far as we know, the relationship between platelet count and PND is not clear yet in the orthopedic area. PND could be a long-term disease, which sometimes lasts for several years, and it is meaningful to find a biomarker of PND at the early stage. Thus, we designed this study to find out the association between perioperative platelet count and occurrence of PND, and determine whether preoperative platelet count could be a biomarker of the early stage of PND.

Methods

A prospective observational study was performed on the patients who would take total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. Their peripheral platelets were counted by blood routine examination 1 day before and 3 days after the surgery. And we assessed their neurocognitive functions 1 day before and 3 days after the surgery. These data were recorded and analyzed to find out the relationship between platelet count and the occurrence of PND.

Results

Eventually, 70 patients finished the whole process, and 14 of them developed PND. The median preoperative platelet count in the PND group was significantly higher than that in the non-PND group (239 vs 168 × 10^9/L, p = 0.009). Preoperative platelet count was an independent risk factor for PND (odds ratio = 1.014, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.000–1.027, P = 0.043) in the logistic multivariable regression, while the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve of the prediction model was 0.796 (95% CI 0.676–0.916).

Conclusions

The higher preoperative and postoperative level of platelet count in the peripheral blood were associated with the early stage of PND, and preoperative platelet count could be a potential predictor of the early stage of PND in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgeries.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000033001, registration date: 17 May 2020.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-02899-7.

The Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium: A Novel Initiative to Improve the Quality of Radiation Oncology Care

PURPOSE

Numerous quality measures have been proposed in radiation oncology, and initiatives to improve access to high-complexity care, quality, and equity are needed. We describe the design and evaluate impact of a voluntary statewide collaboration for quality improvement in radiation oncology initiated a decade ago.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We evaluate compliance before and since implementation of annual metrics for quality improvement, using an observational dataset with information from over 20,000 patients treated in the 28 participating radiation oncology practices. At thrice-yearly meetings, experts have spoken regarding trends within the field and inspired discussions regarding potential targets for quality improvement. Blinded data on practices at various sites have been provided. Following Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines, we describe the approach and measures the program has implemented. To evaluate impact, we compare compliance at baseline and now with active measures using mixed effects regression models with site-level random effects.

RESULTS

Compliance has increased, including use of guideline-concordant hypofractionated radiotherapy, doses to targets/normal tissues, motion management, and consistency in delineating and naming contoured structures (a precondition for quality evaluation). For example, use of guideline-concordant hypofractionation for breast cancer increased from 47% to 97%, adherence to target coverage goals and heart dose limits for dose increased from 46% to 86%, motion assessment in patients with lung cancer increased from 52% to 94%, and use of standard nomenclature increased from 53% to 82% for lung patients and from 80% to 94% for breast patients (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although observational analysis cannot fully exclude secular trends, contextual data revealing slow uptake of best practices elsewhere in the US and qualitative feedback from participants suggests that this initiative has improved the consistency, efficiency, and quality of radiation oncology care in its member practices and may be a model for oncology quality improvement more generally.

Aspirin Thromboprophylaxis Is Associated With Less Major Bleeding Events Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing debate on what is optimal prophylactic agent to reduce venous thromboembolism (VTE) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although many studies assess the efficacy of these agents in VTE prevention, no attention is given to their adverse effect on major bleeding events (MBEs). This study compared the incidence of MBE in patients receiving aspirin as VTE prophylaxis vs other chemoprophylaxis.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective study of 35,860 patients undergoing TJA between 2009 and 2020 was conducted. Demographic variables, co-morbidities, type of chemoprophylaxis, and intraoperative factors were collected. MBE was defined using the 2010 criteria for major bleeding in surgical patients presented by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. To enhance capture rate, comprehensive queries utilizing MBE keywords were conducted in clinical notes, physician dictations, and phone call logs. Univariate followed by multivariate regression was performed as well as propensity score matched analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 270 patients (0.75%) in this cohort developed MBE. The MBE rate was 0.5% in the aspirin group and 1.2% in the non-aspirin group. After adjusting for confounders, multiple logistic regression and propensity score matched analysis revealed almost 2 times lower odds of MBE in patients who received aspirin. Variables independently associated with increased MBE risk included increasing age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, revision surgery, peptic ulcer disease, coagulopathy, intraoperative blood transfusion, and active smoking.

CONCLUSION

Administration of aspirin for VTE prophylaxis, compared to other chemoprophylaxis agents may have an association with lower risk of major bleeding following TJA. Future randomized controlled trials should examine these findings.

Crohn's disease in total knee arthroplasty patients correlates with increased rates of 90-day and overall postoperative complications and readmissions

BACKGROUND

Joint involvement is a common extraintestinal manifestation of Crohn's Disease (CD) that may require total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is a paucity of evidence regarding the relationship between CD and postoperative outcomes after TKA surgery. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of CD on 90-day and ≥2-year follow-up postoperative outcomes of TKA patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database (2009-2013) and isolated ICD-9 codes for TKA patients (8154), while excluding those with any revision of knee replacements (0080-0084) and split into 2 groups with or without CD (5550-5559). Patient demographics and postoperative outcomes were compared. Logistic regression analyses with covariates (sex, race, Deyo score, age, and insurance) were utilized to evaluate the association of CD with 90-day and overall postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 89,134 TKA patients were identified, 244 of whom had CD. Significant differences in age, race distribution, insurance, and Deyo score (all, p < 0.05) were found. Multivariable analysis demonstrated CD was an independent risk factor for 90-day and overall medical complications, surgical complications, and readmission. Univariate and multivariable analyses report CD had significant increased rates and was a predictor, respectively, of overall blood transfusions (OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.1-2.0] p < 0.01), acute renal failure (OR 1.7 [95% CI 1.1-2.6] p = 0.03), and pulmonary embolism (OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.3-4.6] p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with CD undergoing TKA have increased risk both 90-day and overall surgical and medication complications, as well as readmissions compared to patients without CD.

Aspirin thromboprophylaxis in joint replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

Aspirin is commonly used as the only pharmacologic agent for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after joint replacement surgery in the United States. Despite this, prospective studies investigating VTE events after aspirin-only thromboprophylaxis in joint replacement surgery are lacking in the real-world setting.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of VTE with aspirin-only pharmacologic prophylaxis following joint replacement surgery.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective observational study of 350 low-risk patients (no prior history of VTE and low cardiovascular risk factors) who underwent total knee and total hip arthroplasty and received only aspirin for thromboprophylaxis postoperatively.

RESULTS

The observed risk of symptomatic VTE was 1.7% (95% confidence interval, 0.9%-3.3%) over 3 months of follow up, with only one major bleeding event and no surgical hematomas.

CONCLUSION

The risk of VTE with aspirin monotherapy for thromboprophylaxis in joint replacement surgery in this real-world cohort was higher than previously reported.

Effect of Comorbidity Burden on the Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are common after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The rate of VTEs has improved with early mobilization, mechanical prophylaxis, and appropriate chemoprophylaxis. The aim of this study was to analyze the contribution of medical comorbidities to the risk of VTE after TKA

Method

Medicare claims from 2005 to 2014 were queried. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision (ICD-9), and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify the diagnoses, procedures, and complications. 157,200 primary TKAs were age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) matched with 157,200 osteoarthritis controls. First instances of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism were tracked at 90 days and 2 years. Odds ratios (ORs), confidence intervals, and P-values (p) were calculated and used to investigate the contribution of comorbidities.

Results

90 days after TKA or OA diagnosis, comorbidities were associated with 45% of the DVT risk, 38% of the PE risk. 1 in 92 patients would be expected to be diagnosed with VTE after TKA and 1 in 136 patients after only the diagnosis of osteoarthritis. After 90 days, medical comorbidities were associated with 70% of the DVT risk, 68% of the PE risk.

Conclusion

Nearly 50% of DVTs and 40% of PEs within 90 days of TKA may be related to the baseline health of OA patients. Venous thromboembolic events after TKA are a “never” event according to Center of Medicare and services that appropriate VTE prophylaxis likely cannot be neutralized.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism with aspirin following knee surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication following orthopaedic surgery. The incidence of this complication has decreased substantially since the introduction of routine thromboprophylaxis. However, concerns have been raised about increased bleeding complications caused by aggressive thromboprophylaxis.Attention has grown for aspirin as a safer thromboprophylactic agent following orthopaedic surgery.A systematic review using MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of aspirin prophylaxis following knee surgery with the current standard prophylactic agents (low molecular weight heparin [LMWH], vitamin K antagonists and factor Xa inhibitors).No significant difference in effectiveness of VTE prevention was found between aspirin, LMWH and warfarin. Factor Xa inhibitors were more effective, but increased bleeding complications were reported.As evidence is limited and of low quality with substantial heterogeneity, further research with high-quality, adequately powered trials is needed. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:892-904. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200120.

Aspirin Compared With Other Anticoagulants for Use as Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Elective Orthopaedic Hip and Knee Operations: A Narrative Literature Review

Although total hip and knee arthroplasty are effective methods for treating arthritis, they have an associated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). To reduce this risk, prophylactic agents including aspirin, low-molecular-weight Heparin, vitamin K antagonists, and direct oral anticoagulants are employed for up to 35 days after surgery. This narrative literature review utilised a systematic approach to critically assess the current evidence surrounding the use of aspirin for VTE prophylaxis compared to anticoagulants. An advanced multistage electronic search was performed in May 2021 using the OVID/Medline and Embase online libraries to identify available studies relevant to the subject from 1974. Additional studies identified during the review process were also included. The final studies meeting the inclusion criteria were then assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. A total of 12 (60%) studies (two meta-analyses, three randomised trials, seven retrospective studies) favoured aspirin over anticoagulants for VTE prophylaxis. A total of 15 (75%) studies (two meta-analyses, three randomised trials, nine retrospective, one matched cohort) reported that aspirin had better bleeding profiles and complication rates, which was statistically significant in seven (46.7%) studies (one randomised trial, six retrospective studies). A total of eight studies (one randomised trial, six retrospective studies, one matched cohort) reported statistically significant results for aspirin. Five (62.5%) studies reported aspirin to be superior for VTE prophylaxis, while seven (87.5%) reported aspirin to be superior in terms of bleeding complications. The current evidence indicates that aspirin is superior to anticoagulants, in their various iterations, for VTE prophylaxis in terms of their bleeding profiles.

Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

➤

The selection of an agent for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a balance between efficacy and safety. The goal is to prevent symptomatic VTE while limiting the risk of bleeding.

➤

The optimal agent for VTE prophylaxis has not been identified. The American College of Chest Physicians guidelines recommend that, after total hip or total knee arthroplasty, patients receive at least 10 to 14 days of 1 of the following prophylaxis agents: aspirin, adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist, apixaban, dabigatran, fondaparinux, low-molecular-weight heparin, low-dose unfractionated heparin, rivaroxaban, or portable home mechanical compression.

➤

The use of aspirin for VTE prophylaxis has increased in popularity over the past decade because it is effective, and it is an oral agent that does not require monitoring. The true efficacy of aspirin needs to be determined in multicenter randomized clinical trials.

➤

Validated risk stratification protocols are essential to identify the safest and most effective regimen for VTE prophylaxis for individual patients. There is no consensus regarding the optimal method for risk stratification; the selection of a prophylaxis agent should be determined by shared decision-making with the patient to balance the risk of thrombosis versus bleeding.

➤

Patients with atrial fibrillation being treated with chronic warfarin therapy or direct oral anticoagulants should stop the agent 3 to 5 days prior to surgery. Patients do not typically require bridging therapy prior to surgery.

Time for an Update? A Look at Current Guidelines for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Hip Fracture

Venous thromboembolism is a well-established complication of total hip and knee arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery. Clinical practice guidelines have been proposed to help clinicians provide prophylaxis against this risk. However, most guidelines reference data that are becoming outdated because of new advances in perioperative protocols. Recent data would suggest that aspirin may be appropriate for most patients after total hip and knee replacement and a more potent chemoprophylaxis for higher risk patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin remains the recommended choice after hip fracture surgery, although there is a paucity of recent literature in this patient population. There are randomized trials currently underway in the arthroplasty population that may guide clinicians in the appropriate choice of chemoprophylaxis. These studies should inform updates to the current clinical practice guidelines.

Evaluation of Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Endothelial Biomarkers in Cirrhotic Patients With or Without Portal Venous Thrombosis

To evaluate variations in coagulation, fibrinolysis and endothelial marker expression in cirrhotic patients and to explore their clinical value and predictive performance in cirrhotic patients with or without portal vein thrombosis (PVT), we performed a case-control study with 175 cirrhotic patients and 50 healthy individuals. 99 patients had PVT and another 76 patients did not. All participants were evaluated for plasma levels of conventional hemostatic markers. Thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), thrombomodulin (TM), tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor complex (t-PAIC), von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF: Ag) and coagulation factor Ⅷ (FⅧ: c) were also assessed and the ratio of TAT/t-PAIC was calculated. We analyzed differences in these biomarkers among the three groups and constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Patients with PVT exhibited significantly higher TAT and TAT/t-PAIC than cirrhotic patients without PVT (both P < 0.001). Areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC analyses for TAT and TAT/t-PAIC were 0.68 and 0.66, the cut-off levels were 1.55 ng/ml and 0.46, with sensitivities and specificities of 78.79% and 51.32% regarding TAT, 39.8% and 90.79% regarding TAT/t-PAIC. Levels of FⅧ: c and vWF: Ag in patients with PVT were significantly lower than those without PVT (p = 0.026 and p = 0.027, respectively). The AUC^ROC, cut-off level, sensitivity and specificity of FⅧ: c were 0.64, 111.1%, 66.67% and 60%, respectively. For vWF: Ag they were 0.61, 429%, 89.66% and 38.71%, respectively. Cirrhotic patients have disorders of coagulation, fibrinolysis and the endothelial system. TAT, TAT/t-PAIC, FⅧ: c and vWF: Ag can be used as potential biomarkers for predicting PVT in cirrhotic patients.

Low-Dose vs Regular-Dose Aspirin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Consensus on whether low-dose (81 mg) or regular-dose (325 mg) aspirin (ASA) is more effective for venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in primary total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) is not reached. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose and regular-dose ASA for VTE chemoprophylaxis in primary total hip arthroplasties and total knee arthroplasties.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 3512 primary TJAs (2344 total hip arthroplasties and 1168 total knee arthroplasties) with ASA used as VTE chemoprophylaxis between 2000 and 2019. Patients received ASA twice daily for 4-6 weeks after surgery with 961 (27%) receiving low-dose ASA and 2551 (73%) receiving regular-dose ASA. The primary endpoint was 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTEs. Secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events and mortality. The mean age at index TJA was 66 years, 54% were female, and mean body mass index was 31 kg/m². The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 3.5. Mean follow-up was 3 years.

RESULTS

There was no difference in 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTEs between low-dose and regular-dose ASA (0% vs 0.1%, respectively; P = .79). There were no GI bleeding events in either group. There was no difference in 90-day mortality between low-dose and regular-dose ASA (0.3% vs 0.1%, respectively; P = .24).

CONCLUSION

In 3512 primary TJA patients treated with ASA, we found a cumulative incidence of VTE <1% at 90 days. Although this study is underpowered, it appears that twice daily low-dose ASA was equally effective to twice daily regular-dose ASA for VTE chemoprophylaxis, with no difference in risk of GI bleeds or mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Non-Inferiority of Aspirin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Hip Arthroplasty in a Statewide Registry

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty remains surrounding the use of aspirin as a sole chemoprophylactic agent to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) and bleeding after primary total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We performed a non-inferiority analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty from April 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018. Cases were retrieved from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative database and performed by 355 surgeons at 61 hospitals throughout Michigan. Surgical setting ranged from small community hospitals to large academic and non-academic centers. The primary outcomes were post-operative venous thromboembolism event or death and bleeding event.

RESULTS

Of the 59,747 patients included, 32,878 (55.03%) were female, and the mean age was 64.5. A total of 462 (0.77%) composite venous thromboembolism events occurred. There were 221 (0.71%) and 129 (0.80%) venous thromboembolism events in patients receiving aspirin only and anticoagulants only, respectively. Aspirin was non-inferior to anticoagulants for composite venous thromboembolism events (odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.26, P < .001). Bleeding events occurred in 767 (1.28%) patients, with 304 (0.97%) and 281 (1.74%) bleeding events in patients receiving aspirin only and anticoagulants only, respectively. Aspirin was non-inferior to anticoagulants for bleeding events (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.74, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Aspirin is not inferior to other anticoagulants as pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with regards to post-operative risk of venous thromboembolism or bleeding. Sole use of aspirin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty should be considered in the appropriate patient.

PREVENTion of CLots in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREVENT CLOT): a randomised pragmatic trial protocol comparing aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for blood clot prevention in orthopaedic trauma patients

INTRODUCTION

Patients who sustain orthopaedic trauma are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for VTE prophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma patients. However, emerging literature in total joint arthroplasty patients suggests the potential clinical benefits of VTE prophylaxis with aspirin. The primary aim of this trial is to compare aspirin with LMWH as a thromboprophylaxis in fracture patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PREVENT CLOT is a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic trial that aims to enrol 12 200 adult patients admitted to 1 of 21 participating centres with an operative extremity fracture, or any pelvis or acetabular fracture. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. We will evaluate non-inferiority by testing whether the intention-to-treat difference in the probability of dying within 90 days of randomisation between aspirin and LMWH is less than our non-inferiority margin of 0.75%. Secondary efficacy outcomes include cause-specific mortality, non-fatal PE and deep vein thrombosis. Safety outcomes include bleeding complications, wound complications and deep surgical site infections.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The PREVENT CLOT trial has been approved by the ethics board at the coordinating centre (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) and all participating sites. Recruitment began in April 2017 and will continue through 2021. As both study medications are currently in clinical use for VTE prophylaxis for orthopaedic trauma patients, the findings of this trial can be easily adopted into clinical practice. The results of this large, patient-centred pragmatic trial will help guide treatment choices to prevent VTE in fracture patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02984384.

Efficacy and safety of aspirin and rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip or knee arthroplasty: A protocol for meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of aspirin and rivaroxaban in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following either total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of several electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) was conducted to identify relevant studies. Outcomes of interest included VTE rate, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rate, pulmonary embolism rate, major bleeding events, mortality rate, blood transfusion, and wound complication. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model or random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies with 97,677 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with rivaroxaban, aspirin had a significantly higher incidence of DVT (RR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.27, 1.72; P < .001), and decreased risk of blood transfusion (RR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.93, 0.94; P < .001). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 drugs in terms of total VTE rate (RR = 1.39%, 95%CI: 0.94, 2.05; P = .101), pulmonary embolism rate (RR = 1.64, 95%CI: 0.92, 2.92; P = .094), mortality rate (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.15, 8.27; P = .907), major bleeding (RR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.44, 2.27; P = .995), and wound complication rate (RR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.07, 1.87; P = .229).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that aspirin and rivaroxaban offered similar effect in the prevention of VTE after total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. However, rivaroxaban seemed to have better effect than aspirin in reducing the risk of DVT, and aspirin was safer than rivaroxaban in decreasing the blood transfusion rate.

Venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic oncology

AIMS

Malignancy and surgery are risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We undertook a systematic review of the literature concerning the prophylactic management of VTE in orthopaedic oncology patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched focusing on VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), bleeding, or wound complication rates.

RESULTS

In all, 17 studies published from 1998 to 2018 met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. The mean incidence of all VTE events in orthopaedic oncology patients was 10.7% (1.1% to 27.7%). The rate of PE was 2.4% (0.1% to 10.6%) while the rate of lethal PE was 0.6% (0.0% to 4.3%). The overall rate of DVT was 8.8% (1.1% to 22.3%) and the rate of symptomatic DVT was 2.9% (0.0% to 6.2%). From the studies that screened all patients prior to hospital discharge, the rate of asymptomatic DVT was 10.9% (2.0% to 20.2%). The most common risk factors identified for VTE were endoprosthetic replacements, hip and pelvic resections, presence of metastases, surgical procedures taking longer than three hours, and patients having chemotherapy. Mean incidence of VTE with and without chemical prophylaxis was 7.9% (1.1% to 21.8%) and 8.7% (2.0% to 23.4%; p = 0.11), respectively. No difference in the incidence of bleeding or wound complications between prophylaxis groups was reported.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence is limited to guide clinicians. It is our consensus opinion, based upon logic and deduction, that all patients be considered for both mechanical and chemical VTE prophylaxis, particularly in high-risk patients (pelvic or hip resections, prosthetic reconstruction, malignant diagnosis, presence of metastases, or surgical procedures longer than three hours). Additionally, the surgeon must determine, in each patient, if the risk of haemorrhage outweighs the risk of VTE. No individual pharmacological agent has been identified as being superior in the prevention of VTE events. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12)1743:-1751.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism disease at 30 days than primary total knee arthroplasty

Background

While multiple studies have demonstrated a lower venous thromboembolism disease (VTED) risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared to primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), recent reports have shown that revision TKA also had a lower VTED risk compared to primary TKA, an unexpected finding because of its theoretical increased risk. Given the paucity of up-to-date comparative studies, our goal was to perform a high-powered VTED risk comparison study of UKA and revision TKA to primary TKA using recent data.

Methods

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried between 2011 and 2018, and we identified 213,234 patients for inclusion: 191,810 primary TKA, 9294 UKA, and 12,130 revision TKA. Demographics, medical comorbidities, and possible VTE risk factors were collected. Thirty-day outcomes, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause VTED were compared between knee arthroplasty types.

Results

On multivariate analysis, UKA was significantly associated with lower rates of DVT [OR 0.44 (0.31–0.61); P < 0.001], PE [OR 0.42 (0.28–0.65); P < 0.001], and all-cause VTED [OR 0.42 (0.32–0.55); P < 0.001] when compared to primary TKA. Revision TKA was significantly associated with lower rates of PE [OR 0.62 (0.47–0.83); P = 0.002], and all-cause VTED [OR 0.82 (0.70–0.98); P = 0.029] when compared to primary TKA.

Conclusions

Utilizing recent data from a nationwide patient cohort and controlling for confounding variables, our results showed that both revision TKA and UKA had a lower risk of VTED compared to primary TKA, corroborating the results of recent investigations. Additional prospective investigations are needed to explain this unexpected result.