1
|
Rascoe AS. CORR Insights®: Can Patient-centered Education and Pain Management Delivered by Coaches Improve Pain Outcomes After Orthopaedic Trauma? A Randomized Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024; 482:1870-1872. [PMID: 38905445 PMCID: PMC11419485 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000003160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S Rascoe
- Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Archer KR. Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Physical Therapy for Improving Recovery After a Traumatic Lower-Extremity Injury: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024; 106:1300-1308. [PMID: 38781313 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.23.01234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower-extremity injuries can result in severe impairment and substantial years lived with a disability. Persistent pain and psychological distress are risk factors for poor long-term outcomes and negatively influence the recovery process following a traumatic injury. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions have the potential to address these risk factors and subsequently improve outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a telephone-delivered cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy (CBPT) program on physical function, pain, and general health at 12 months after hospital discharge following lower-extremity trauma. The CBPT program was hypothesized to improve outcomes compared with an education program. METHODS A multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 325 patients who were 18 to 60 years of age and had at least 1 acute orthopaedic injury to the lower extremity or to the pelvis or acetabulum requiring operative fixation. Patients were recruited from 6 Level-I trauma centers and were screened and randomized to the CBPT program or the education program early after hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) scale. The secondary outcomes were objective physical function tests (4-square step test, timed stair ascent test, sit-to-stand test, and self-selected walking speed test), PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference, and the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. Treatment effects were calculated using targeted maximum likelihood estimation, a robust analytical approach appropriate for causal inference with longitudinal data. RESULTS The mean treatment effect on the 12-month baseline change in PROMIS PF was 0.94 (95% confidence interval, -0.68 to 2.64; p = 0.23). There were also no observed differences in secondary outcomes between the intervention group and the control group. CONCLUSIONS The telephone-delivered CBPT did not appear to yield any benefits for patients with traumatic lower-extremity injuries in terms of physical function, pain intensity, pain interference, or general health. Improvements were observed in both groups, which questions the utility of telephone-delivered cognitive-behavioral strategies over educational programs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
|
3
|
McGiffin JN, Ehde DM, Williams RM, Bonanno GA. Heterogeneous trajectories of depression and resilience following limb amputation. PM R 2024; 16:594-604. [PMID: 37916584 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify longitudinal trajectories of depression in the first 6 months following limb loss and to explore baseline predictors of trajectories, including pain and demographic factors. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether trajectories of depression were associated with elevated symptoms of posttraumatic stress (PTS) at 6 months. DESIGN Secondary longitudinal data analysis of an inception cohort study of persons with new-onset limb loss. Participants completed assessments at three intervals (initial, 3 months, and 6 months). SETTING Hospitalized care, acute rehabilitation, ambulatory care, and community. PARTICIPANTS Participants were recruited from consecutive cases of amputation surgery in a metropolitan hospital system over a period of 4 years (2002-2007). The final sample (n = 203) was predominantly White (79.3%) and male (78.8%) with an average age of 49.4 years (standard deviation [SD] = 14.6). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Depression was assessed via the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); posttraumatic stress symptoms were measured via the PTSD checklist- Civilian Version (PCL-C). RESULTS Four trajectories of depression were identified via Latent Growth Mixture Modeling: Resilience (73.2%), Chronic Depression (11.2%), Emerging Depression (8.9%), and Recovery (6.7%). Average pain intensity significantly predicted trajectory membership. Membership in the Chronic Depression class predicted elevated 6-month PTS compared to all other classes; membership in the Resilience class predicted lower PTS than in the Chronic and Emerging Depression classes but did not differentiate from the Recovery trajectory. CONCLUSIONS Findings reveal that the course of depression post-amputation is heterogenous, with varying profiles of symptom development, maintenance, and remission. A majority of individuals were classified as Resilient, whereas a substantial minority of individuals developed clinically significant depression between 3 and 6 months (Emerging Depression), suggesting that early screening during acute care may be insufficient. We detected a significant prospective relation between depression trajectories and distal PTS, advancing the potential clinical utility of trajectory modeling as a risk surveillance tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jed N McGiffin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Dawn M Ehde
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rhonda M Williams
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division, Rehabilitation Care Services, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - George A Bonanno
- Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Birk N, Russo J, Heagerty P, Parker L, Moloney K, Bulger E, Whiteside L, Moodliar R, Engstrom A, Wang J, Palinkas L, Abu K, Zatzick D. Can Baseline Patient Clinical and Demographic Characteristics Predict Response to Early Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Interventions After Physical Injury? Psychiatry 2024; 87:134-148. [PMID: 38497603 PMCID: PMC11116057 DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2024.2323367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A growing evidence base supports stepped care interventions for the early treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after physical injury. Few investigations have examined the characteristics of patients who do and do not respond to these interventions. METHOD This investigation was a secondary analysis that used previously collected data from three randomized clinical trials of stepped care interventions (patient N = 498). The study hypothesized that a subgroup of patients would manifest persistent PTSD symptoms regardless of randomization to intervention or control conditions, and that characteristics present at the time of baseline injury hospitalization could distinguish patients who would develop persistent symptoms from potential treatment responders. Regression analyses identified baseline patient clinical and demographic characteristics that were associated with persistent PTSD symptoms over the 6-months post-injury. Additional analyses identified treatment attributes of intervention patients who were and were not likely to demonstrate persistent symptoms. RESULTS A substantial subgroup of patients (n = 222, 44.6%) demonstrated persistent PTSD symptoms over time. Greater numbers of pre-injury trauma, pre-injury PTSD symptoms, elevated early post-injury PTSD symptoms, unemployment, and non-White race identified patients with persistent symptoms. Patients with ≥3 of these baseline risk characteristics demonstrated diminished treatment responses when compared to patients with <3 characteristics. Intervention patients with ≥3 risk characteristics were less likely to engage in treatment and required greater amounts of interventionist time. CONCLUSIONS Injured trauma survivors have readily identifiable characteristics at the time of hospitalization that can distinguish responders to PTSD stepped care interventions versus patients who may be treatment refractory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navneet Birk
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joan Russo
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Patrick Heagerty
- Department of Biostatistics University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lea Parker
- Department of Psychology Drexel University College of Arts and Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathleen Moloney
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Eileen Bulger
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lauren Whiteside
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rddhi Moodliar
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Allison Engstrom
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lawrence Palinkas
- Department of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Khadijah Abu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Douglas Zatzick
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bulger EM. "We are in this together": The power of social connection. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024; 96:1-7. [PMID: 37853561 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen M Bulger
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Washington; Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aaron RV, Rassu FS, Wegener ST, Holley AL, Castillo RC, Osgood GM, Fisher E. Psychological treatments for the management of pain after musculoskeletal injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2024; 165:3-17. [PMID: 37490624 PMCID: PMC10808265 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Musculoskeletal injury is a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide; 35% to 75% of people experience persistent pain for months and years after injury. Psychological treatments can reduce pain, functional impairment, and psychological distress but are not widely used after injury. This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021236807) aimed to synthesize the literature testing psychological treatments for pain after musculoskeletal injury. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL from inception to May 2022. We extracted participant, treatment, and injury characteristics and primary (eg, pain intensity, functional impairment, depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms) and secondary (treatment feasibility and acceptability) outcomes. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials (N = 1966) were included. Immediately posttreatment, people who received psychological treatments (versus any control) reported lower pain intensity (standardized mean differences [SMD] = -0.25, 95% confidence interval [-0.49, -0.02]), functional impairment (SMD = -0.32 [-0.55, -0.09]), and symptoms of depression (SMD = -0.46 [-0.64, -0.29]), anxiety (SMD = -0.34 [-0.65, -0.04]), and PTSD (SMD = -0.43 [-0.70, -0.15]); at 6-month follow-up, only depression symptoms were significantly lower. Included trials varied widely in treatment and injury characteristics. The certainty of evidence was low or very low for most effects and heterogeneity moderate to substantial. Most studies had risk of bias domains judged to be high or unclear. Owing to very low certainty of results, we are unsure whether psychological therapies reduce pain and functional impairment after musculoskeletal injury; they may result in improved depression immediately posttreatment and at follow-up. More research is needed to identify treatments that result in enduring effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel V Aaron
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Fenan S Rassu
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Stephen T Wegener
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Amy L Holley
- Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health Sciences University School of Medicine, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Renan C Castillo
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Greg M Osgood
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Support Care Review Group, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gitajn IL, Werth PM, Carlini AR, Bosse MJ, Gary JL, Firoozabadi R, Obremskey W, McKinley TO, Castillo RC, O’Toole RV. Deep Surgical Site Infection after Fracture Has a Profound Effect on Functional Outcomes. JB JS Open Access 2024; 9:e23.00042. [PMID: 38196850 PMCID: PMC10773708 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.23.00042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Fracture-related infection is one of the most challenging complications in orthopaedic trauma surgery. However, the effect of infection on functional and pain-related outcomes has not been well established. The aims of this study were to evaluate functional recovery for patients with fracture and a deep surgical site infection compared with patients with fracture without infection and to evaluate whether pain severity, social support, and preinjury mental health have a moderating effect on the magnitude and direction of the relationship between deep surgical site infection and functional recovery. Methods This is a secondary retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from the VANCO trial (Local Antibiotic Therapy to Reduce Infection After Operative Treatment of Fractures at High Risk of Infection) and the OXYGEN (Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce Surgical Site Infection After High Energy Fracture Surgery) trial. In this study, 2,116 patients with tibial plateau, pilon, or calcaneal fractures at high risk for infection were included. Patients were divided into cohorts of patients who experienced a deep surgical site infection and those who did not. The primary outcome measure was the functional outcome using the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). Results After controlling for covariates, deep surgical site infection was independently associated with functional outcome, with a 3.3-point reduction in the VR-12 Physical Component Score, and pain severity was independently associated with functional outcome, with a 2.5-point reduction in the VR-12 Physical Component Score. Furthermore, the Brief Pain Inventory pain severity demonstrated an important moderating effect on the relationship between infection and functional outcome. In patients with lower pain scores, infection had a large negative impact on functional outcome, whereas, in patients with higher pain scores, infection had no significant impact on functional outcome. Furthermore, the functional outcome in the entire cohort remains at only 61% of baseline. Conclusions This study documents the negative impact of postoperative infection on functional recovery after injury, as well as the novel finding of pain severity as an important moderating factor. This study emphasizes not only the importance of developing effective interventions designed to reduce postoperative infection, but also the role that factors that moderate pain severity plays in limiting recovery of physical function. Level of evidence Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul M. Werth
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Michael J. Bosse
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Joshua L. Gary
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Reza Firoozabadi
- University of Washington Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Todd O. McKinley
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana and
| | - Renan C. Castillo
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moran ME, Canova TJ, Hicks CJ, Blecker NR. A Qualitative Study Exploring the Regional Feasibility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Data Collection for Orthopedic Trauma Patients. Cureus 2023; 15:e48906. [PMID: 38106788 PMCID: PMC10725278 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Behavioral health has been shown to impact both short- and long-term health outcomes in trauma patients. Recommendations for screening for behavioral health concerns in the acute setting exist, but longitudinal data collection is infrequently performed. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program describes the importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including behavioral health data. METHODS In this qualitative feasibility study, a multidisciplinary team participated in one-hour virtual focus groups; a semi-structured interview guide was used to ascertain feedback on a proposed PROMs study design. This study utilized a qualitative methodology to reveal thematic results from the staff feedback to determine the feasibility of the proposed study design. RESULTS Three virtual one-hour focus groups consisting of a combination of seven trauma program managers and orthopedic practice managers were asked questions related to the feasibility of a PROMs study design before thematic saturation was reached. Through the analysis, four themes emerged: barriers, possible improvements, representation and research design. Themes included subthemes as well. Noteworthy results included the impact of an integrated orthopedic practice and the technological options available for use. CONCLUSION This study revealed the barriers that would exist in the implementation of PROMs for orthopedic trauma patients, which may be useful when designing data collection procedures for PROMs. The results related to barriers may assist other trauma centers or regional trauma systems in designing an optimal methodology for PROMs data. Furthermore, the American College of Surgeons might consider these results prior to any mandated implementation of PROMs for trauma centers to avoid any possible burden on staff and systems.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bakhshaie J, Fishbein NS, Woodworth E, Liyanage N, Penn T, Elwy AR, Vranceanu AM. Health disparities in orthopedic trauma: a qualitative study examining providers' perspectives on barriers to care and recovery outcomes. SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE 2023; 62:207-227. [PMID: 37139813 PMCID: PMC10330459 DOI: 10.1080/00981389.2023.2205909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Social workers involved in interdisciplinary orthopedic trauma care can benefit from the knowledge of providers' perspectives on healthcare disparities in this field. Using qualitative data from focus groups conducted on 79 orthopedic care providers at three Level 1 trauma centers, we assessed their perspectives on orthopedic trauma healthcare disparities and discussed potential solutions. Focus groups originally aimed to detect barriers and facilitators of the implementation of a trial of a live video mind-body intervention to aid in recovery in orthopedic trauma care settings (Toolkit for Optimal Recovery-TOR). We used the Socio-Ecological Model to analyze an emerging code of "health disparities" during data analysis to determine at which levels of care these disparities occurred. We identified factors related to health disparities in orthopedic trauma care and outcomes at the Individual (Education- comprehension, health-literacy; Language Barriers; Psychological Health- emotional distress, alcohol/drug use, learned helplessness; Physical Health- obesity, smoking; and Access to Technology), Relationship (Social Support Network), Community (Transportation and Employment Security), and Societal level (Access- safe/clean housing, insurance, mental health resources; Culture). We discuss the implications of the findings and provide recommendations to address these issues, with a specific focus on their relevance to the field of social work in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jafar Bakhshaie
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA, 02114, United States
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Nathan S. Fishbein
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA, 02114, United States
| | - Emily Woodworth
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA, 02114, United States
| | - Nimesha Liyanage
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA, 02114, United States
| | - Terence Penn
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA, 02114, United States
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - A. Rani Elwy
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI, 02903, United States
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, 200 Springs Road, Bedford, MA, 01730, United States
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA, 02114, United States
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Robinson EM, Clothier PJ, Slater H, Gupta A. A scoping review on the methods of assessment and role of resilience on function and movement-evoked pain when experiencing a musculoskeletal injury. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:1097. [PMID: 36522734 PMCID: PMC9753293 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06058-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resilience refers to an individual's ability to maintain effective functioning, by resisting, withstanding or recovering from stressors or adversity, including pain associated with physical injury (J Clin Psychol Med Settings 28:518-28, 2021). The aim of this scoping review is to determine the role of resilience in the experience of movement-evoked pain (MEP) and return to functional activity following a musculoskeletal injury. METHODS This review conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews and the scoping review protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Five databases and one grey literature database were searched using predetermined key words and index terms to capture published and unpublished records on the topic. Two authors independently screened the title and abstract of each record, with the full-text of eligible records being reviewed. Papers were eligible for inclusion if they examined the population, concept and context of interest, were written in English and the full text was available. Data were extracted from each eligible record to guide discussion of the available literature on this topic. RESULTS Of 4771 records, 2695 articles underwent screening based on their title and abstract. After title and abstract screening 132 articles were eligible for full text review, with 24 articles included in the final analysis. This review identified that psychological resilience has primarily been investigated in the context of a range of age-related pathologies. The choice of functional and movement-evoked pain assessments in the included studies were often guided by the pathology of interest, with some being general or injury specific. CONCLUSION This scoping review identified inconsistent conclusions regarding the role of resilience in the experience of MEP and the ability to return to function for older adults with a musculoskeletal injury. This scoping review highlights the need for longitudinal research to be conducted that allows a broader age range, including younger adults, to determine if multidimensional resilience may promote recovery form musculoskeletal injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise M Robinson
- Western Sydney University, School of Health Sciences, PO Box 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
| | - Peter J Clothier
- Western Sydney University, School of Health Sciences, PO Box 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| | - Helen Slater
- Curtin University, Curtin School of Allied Health, enAble Institute, Bentley, Australia
| | - Amitabh Gupta
- Western Sydney University, School of Health Sciences, PO Box 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The 12-Month Effects of the Trauma Collaborative Care Intervention: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:1796-1804. [PMID: 36000769 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have suggested that patient-centered collaborative care in the early phases of recovery may assist providers and patients in managing the multifactorial consequences of injury and may lead to better outcomes. This cluster-controlled trial, conducted at 12 U.S. Level-I trauma centers, was designed to evaluate the impact of the Trauma Collaborative Care (TCC) program on 1-year outcomes following severe musculoskeletal injury. METHODS Patients with high-energy orthopaedic trauma requiring surgical fixation were prospectively enrolled. Six sites implemented the TCC intervention as well as the Trauma Survivors Network (TSN), and the other 6 sites provided the standard of care. Participants were followed for 1 year, and a composite primary outcome measure composed of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) Dysfunction Index, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) was assessed. A 2-stage, Bayesian hierarchical statistical procedure was used to characterize treatment effects. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for an error in the delivery of the intervention. RESULTS There were 378 patients enrolled at 6 trauma centers implementing the TCC program, and 344 patients enrolled at 6 trauma centers providing usual care. Patient utilization of treatment components varied across the intervention sites: 29% of patients in the intervention group received all 5 key components (TSN handbook education, peer visits, recovery assessment, and calls before and after recovery assessment). Posterior estimates of the intention-to-treat effect suggested that the intervention did not have an appreciable effect: the odds of the composite outcome for the TCC group increased by 5% (95% credible interval, -40% to 63%). The estimates of the effect of receiving all 5 key intervention components were similar. CONCLUSIONS Despite prior work showing early positive effects, this analysis suggests that the TCC program as delivered did not have positive effects on patient outcomes at 1 year. It is not known whether programs that improve compliance or target specific subgroups would better meet the psychosocial needs of trauma survivors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
|
12
|
Van Wyngaarden JJ, Archer KR, Pennings JS, Matuszewski PE, Noehren B. Psychosocial Predictors of Chronic Pain 12 Months After Surgical Fixation for Lower Extremity Fracture: A Prospective Study. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6655886. [PMID: 35926071 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain is a common outcome after lower extremity fracture (LEF) requiring surgical fixation. Although psychosocial characteristics have meaningful associations with adverse outcomes, no studies have evaluated how psychosocial characteristics throughout recovery are associated with pain outcomes. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether psychosocial characteristics are early risk factors for pain outcomes in patients following LEF who have no history of chronic pain. METHODS Participants, 122 patients with a LEF, consented to this single-center, prospective cohort study. Measurements of depression, pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, and fear of movement were completed at 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after LEF. Chronic pain development and pain intensity were assessed at 12 months. Univariate analyses assessing the difference between means and corresponding effect sizes were evaluated between those individuals with and without chronic pain at 12 months. Separate logistic and linear regression models using psychosocial scores at each time point were used to determine the association with the development of chronic pain and pain intensity, respectively. RESULTS Of 114 patients (93.4%) who completed the study, 51 (45%) reported chronic pain at 12 months. In the univariate analysis, all psychosocial variables at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months were significantly different between those with and those without chronic pain at 12 months (Cohen d range = 0.84 to 1.65). In the multivariate regression models, all psychosocial variables at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months were associated with chronic pain development (odds ratio range = 1.04 to 1.22) and pain intensity (β range = .05 to .14) at 12 months. CONCLUSION Psychosocial scores as early as 6 weeks after surgery are associated with pain outcomes 12 months after LEF. IMPACT Physical therapists should consider adding psychosocial screening throughout recovery after LEF to identify patients at increased risk for long-term pain outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Van Wyngaarden
- Army-Baylor University, Doctoral Program of Physical Therapy, Baylor University, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Kristin R Archer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jacquelyn S Pennings
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Paul E Matuszewski
- College of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Brian Noehren
- College of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.,College of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
SUMMARY Trauma is a major public health issue. Orthopaedic trauma surgeons are skilled in the acute management of musculoskeletal injury; however, formal training and resources have not been devoted to optimizing recovery after trauma. Recovery entails addressing the biomedical aspects of injury, as well as the psychological and social factors. The purposes of this study were to describe existing programs and resources within trauma centers, developed to promote psychosocial recovery. Supporting research data will be referenced, and potential barriers to program implementation will be discussed. The American College of Surgeons has mandated screening and treatment for mental illness after trauma, which will raise the bar to highlight the importance of these social issues, likely enabling providers to develop new programs and other resources within their systems. Provider education will promote the informing of patients and families, with the intent of enhancing the efficiency and scope of recovery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Recovery from injury involves painful movement and activity, painful stretches and muscle strengthening, and adjustment to permanent impairment. Recovery is facilitated by embracing the concept that painful movement can be healthy, which is easier when one has more hope, less worry, and greater social supports and security. Evolution of one's identity to match the new physical status is a hallmark of a healthy outcome and is largely determined by mental and social health factors. When infection, loss of alignment or fixation, and nerve issues or compartment syndrome are unlikely, greater discomfort and incapability that usual for a given pathology or stage of recovery signal opportunities for improved mental and social health. Surgeons may be the clinicians most qualified to make this discernment. A surgeon who has gained a patient's trust can start to noticed despair, worry, and unhelpful thinking such as fear of painful movement. Reorienting people to greater hope and security and a healthier interpretation of the pains associated with the body's recovery can be initiated by the surgeon and facilitated by social workers, psychologist, and physical, occupational and hand therapists trained in treatments that combine mental and physical therapies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Patient Perspectives on Recovery and Information Needs After Surgery: A Qualitative Study of Veterans. J Surg Res 2022; 279:765-773. [PMID: 35944331 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Little is known about patients' postoperative emotional and social functioning and preferences for recovery settings. This qualitative study explores patients' perspectives on factors influencing postoperative recovery, including the proportion of time recovering at home (home time) and unmet information needs. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted between September and December 2020 with veteran patients aged 65 y or older who underwent surgery at a single hospital. A purposeful sampling strategy was used to identify patients with a broad representation of major operations and various amounts of home time. One-hour interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized for analysis. A rigorous team-based in-depth thematic analysis was performed. Validation techniques to enhance the quality and credibility of the study included triangulation, independent coding, and search for disconfirming evidence. RESULTS Twelve patients were interviewed (11 [91.7%] males; mean (standard deviation) age, 72.3 [4.8] y). Five factors that influenced the recovery process emerged: (1) professional support services, (2) informal caregiver support, (3) environment for recovery, (4) individual traits, and (5) physical and functional impairments. The analysis also elucidated four unmet information needs regarding recovery: (1) personalized and detailed information, (2) anticipated recovery time, (3) possible complications, and (4) comprehensive information about discharge location options. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated that patients recovering from surgery require wide-ranging levels of support to meet their unique needs and preferences. Patients value easy-to-understand and personalized information about recovery from providers. These findings may be helpful to develop strategies that better support patients in their postoperative recovery and post-acute care transition pathways.
Collapse
|
16
|
Breazeale S, Conley S, Jeon S, Dorsey SG, Kearney J, Yoo B, Redeker NS. Symptom cluster profiles following traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Injury 2022; 53:2524-2532. [PMID: 35351294 PMCID: PMC9232974 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Millions of Americans experience traumatic orthopaedic injuries (TOIs) annually. Post-injury symptoms of acute stress disorder (ASD), anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep disturbance are common. Symptoms often present in clusters. Symptom cluster profiles phenotypically characterize TOI survivors' experiences with clustered symptoms. Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may contribute to the biological underpinnings of symptom cluster profile membership. METHODS We recruited hospitalized TOI survivors within 72 hours of injury. We measured symptoms of ASD with the Acute Stress Disorder Scale and symptoms of anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep disturbance with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short forms. We measured serum BDNF concentrations with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and identified rs6265 genotypes with TaqMan real-time PCR. We performed latent profile analysis to identify the symptom cluster profiles. We identified the variables associated with symptom cluster profile membership with unadjusted and adjusted multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS We identified 4 symptom cluster profiles characterized by symptom severity that we labelled Physical Symptoms Only, and Mild, Moderate, and Severe Psychological Distress. Age, self-identified Black race, resilience, and serum BDNF concentrations were associated with lower odds, and female sex with higher odds, of being in the Psychological Distress clusters. Clinical characteristics and rs6265 genotypes were not associated with symptom cluster profile membership. CONCLUSION TOI survivors experience distinct symptom cluster profiles. Sociodemographic characteristics and serum BDNF concentrations, not clinical characteristics, were associated with symptom cluster profile membership. These findings support comprehensive symptom screening and treatment for all TOI survivors and further evaluating BDNF as a biomarker of post-injury symptom burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Breazeale
- Yale School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, USA; The University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, 3500 Victoria Street, Victoria Building, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
| | - Samantha Conley
- Yale School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, USA
| | - Sangchoon Jeon
- Yale School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, USA
| | - Susan G Dorsey
- University of Maryland School of Nursing, 655 W. Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Joan Kearney
- Yale School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, USA
| | - Brad Yoo
- Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Place, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Nancy S Redeker
- Yale School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Paniagua AR, Cunningham DJ, LaRose MA, Morriss NJ, Gage MJ. Psychological resilience as a predictor of opioid consumption after orthopaedic trauma. Injury 2022; 53:2047-2052. [PMID: 35331478 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Psychological distress after orthopaedic trauma negatively affects patient outcomes. Resilience may mediate distress and therefore be associated with post-operative outcomes, including opioid use. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between resilience and post-operative opioid demand with the hypothesis that low levels of resilience are associated with increased opioid consumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients age 18 - 65 at a single, tertiary care level 1 trauma center who underwent operative treatment of pelvic and/ or extremity fractures between 3/2017 - 6/2018 were contacted by phone to complete the OSPRO-YF, a ten-item screening tool that assesses psychological distress. Participants were screened for scores in the worst quartile (i.e., yellow flag) for resilience. Baseline patient and injury characteristics and opioid demand were compared between patients with and without positive yellow flags for resilience using Wilcoxon rank-sum for continuous variables and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS A total of 117 patients were surveyed. Patients with positive yellow flag screening scores for resilience had significantly higher opioid demand, number of opioid prescriptions filled, and were more likely to refill prescriptions long-term (3-months post-discharge to one-year post-discharge). Patients with a positive yellow flag for resilience had a significantly higher number of opioid prescriptions filled in the cumulative (one-month pre-op to one-year post-discharge) time period. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION Lower long-term resilience scores were associated with higher postoperative opioid consumption, fill and refill rates. These results suggest low resilience may be a risk factor for increased long-term opioid consumption following surgical treatment for orthopaedic trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariana R Paniagua
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Daniel J Cunningham
- Section of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Micaela A LaRose
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Nicholas J Morriss
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Mark J Gage
- Section of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
DiSilvestro KJ, Bond D, Alsoof D, McDonald CL, Hartnett DA, Hogan WB, Veeramani A, Daniels AH. Preoperative Resilience and Early Postoperative Outcomes following Lumbar Spinal Fusion. World Neurosurg 2022; 163:e573-e578. [PMID: 35427792 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies identified a correlation between preoperative resilience scores and patient reported outcome measures in several surgical subspecialities. No previous studies, to our knowledge, have analyzed preoperative resilience and patient reported outcomes in lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS Patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion completed the brief resilience scale preoperatively, in addition to measures of disability (Oswestry Disability index (ODI)), quality of life (PROMIS global physical and mental health scales and EuroQOL5], and leg and back pain (VAS) at pre- and 3-months postoperatively. The 3-month follow-up was selected due to the association with return to work. Multiple linear regression evaluated relationships between resilience and postoperative changes in outcomes measures, controlling for baseline values and body mass index, age, number of levels fused, and severity of comorbidities. RESULTS Ninety-five participants (mean age = 58 years, 56% male) completed the BRS preoperatively and outcome measures before and 3-months after lumbar fusion. On average, participants reported significant postoperative improvements on all outcome measures (p<.001). Higher preoperative resilience scores related to greater postoperative improvements in back and leg pain, global mental and physical health and EuroQol scores (p<0.05), after controlling for baseline values and other covariates. Resilience scores did not significantly correlate with postoperative changes in ODI (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative resilience is associated with improvement in pain, physical and mental health quality of life during the early postoperative period following lumbar spinal fusion. Additional research is needed to determine if improvements are maintained beyond this interval and whether resilience can be modified to optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J DiSilvestro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Dale Bond
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Daniel Alsoof
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christopher L McDonald
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Davis A Hartnett
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - William B Hogan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Ashwin Veeramani
- Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nguyen C, Kortlever JT, Gonzalez AI, Crijns TJ, Ring D, Vagner GA, Reichel LM. Does Resiliency Mediate the Association of Psychological Adaptability with Limitations and Pain Intensity after Upper Extremity Trauma? THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY 2021; 9:686-694. [PMID: 35106334 PMCID: PMC8765205 DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2021.51098.2533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the influence of psychosocial factors on musculoskeletal symptoms and limitations, this study assessed if the ability of resilience (an individual's ability to adapt under stress) mediates the association of psychological adaptability with magnitude of physical limitations and pain intensity during recovery from an upper extremity injury. METHODS A total of 107 patients were enrolled in this prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study. Patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF), an 11-point ordinal measure of pain intensity, the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and the Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS). We used structural equation modeling to assess the mediation effect by resiliency and psychological adaptability on patient-reported disability and pain at initial assessment and after three months. RESULTS PAS and BRS were not independently associated with PROMIS PF or pain intensity at enrollment or after three months, so it was not possible to assess if resiliency mediated the association of psychological adaptability with physical function or pain. There were no factors independently associated with resilience. CONCLUSION General measures of psychological adaptability and resiliency do not correlate with symptoms and limitations as well as specific measures of adaptiveness in response to nociception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Nguyen
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care Dell Medical School – The University of Texas at Austin,1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX, 78705, USA
| | - Joost T.P. Kortlever
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care Dell Medical School – The University of Texas at Austin,1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX, 78705, USA
| | - Amanda I. Gonzalez
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care Dell Medical School – The University of Texas at Austin,1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX, 78705, USA
| | - Tom J. Crijns
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care Dell Medical School – The University of Texas at Austin,1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX, 78705, USA
| | - David Ring
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care Dell Medical School – The University of Texas at Austin,1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX, 78705, USA
| | - Gregg A. Vagner
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care Dell Medical School – The University of Texas at Austin,1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX, 78705, USA
| | - Lee M. Reichel
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care Dell Medical School – The University of Texas at Austin,1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX, 78705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Effect of Severe Distal Tibia, Ankle, and Mid- to Hindfoot Trauma on Meeting Physical Activity Guidelines 18 Months After Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 103:409-417.e2. [PMID: 34425087 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of severe lower extremity trauma on meeting Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAGA) 18 months after injury and perform an exploratory analysis to identify demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with meeting PAGA. DESIGN Secondary analysis of observational cohort study. SETTING A total of 34 United States trauma centers PARTICIPANTS: A total of 328 adults with severe distal tibia, ankle and mid- to hindfoot injuries treated with limb reconstruction (N=328). INTERVENTIONS None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to assess physical activity levels 18 months after injury. Meeting PAGA was defined as combined moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity ≥150 minutes per week or vigorous-intensity activity ≥75 minutes per week. RESULTS Fewer patients engaged in moderate- or vigorous-intensity activity after injury compared with before injury (moderate: 44% vs 66%, P<.001; vigorous: 18% vs 29%; P<.001). Patients spent 404±565 minutes per week in combined moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity before injury compared with 224±453 minutes postinjury (difference: 180min per week; 95% confidence interval [CI], 103-256). The adjusted odds of meeting PAGA were lower for patients with depression (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.73), women (AOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-1.00), and Black or Hispanic patients (AOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.85). Patients meeting PAGA prior to injury were more likely to meet PAGA after injury (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.20-3.31). CONCLUSIONS Patients spend significantly less time in moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity after injury. Patients with depression are less likely to meet PAGA. Although the causal relationship is unclear, results highlight the importance of screening for depression.
Collapse
|
21
|
The Psychological Effects of Musculoskeletal Trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29:e322-e329. [PMID: 33475305 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Musculoskeletal injuries comprise a large percentage of hospital admissions for adults and often contribute to persistent daily pain as an illness; opioid dependence; disability; and complaints of increased depression, anxiety, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. The prevalence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder after orthopaedic trauma has been found to be considerably greater than the general adult cohort. Soon after sustaining a fracture, psychological factors can predict pain and disability many months after injury, even after controlling for injury severity. Thus, early in the care of orthopaedic trauma, there exists an opportunity to improve overall health by attending to psychological and social concerns, along with physical health. Recent literature has identified clinically actionable subgroups within the orthopaedic trauma cohort that are at psychological risk after an injury. Improving positive factors such as resilience, social support, and self-efficacy via validated interventions such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, mindfulness training, and other types of mindset training has helped people return to their daily routine. Raising awareness of the psychological effects of trauma among the orthopaedic community could improve post-treatment planning, increase referrals to appropriate nonmedical professionals, and implement earlier effective interventions.
Collapse
|
22
|
McLaughlin KH, Reider LM, Castillo RC, Ficke JR, Levy JF. Outpatient Physical Therapy Use Following Tibial Fractures: A Retrospective Commercial Claims Analysis. Phys Ther 2021; 101:6124110. [PMID: 33522593 PMCID: PMC8152919 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to characterize outpatient physical therapy (OPT) use following tibial fractures and examine the variability of OPT attendance, time of initiation, number of visits, and length of care by patient, injury, and treatment factors. In the absence of clinical guidelines, results will guide future efforts to optimize OPT following tibial fractures. METHODS This study used 2016 to 2017 claims from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Research Database. The cohort included 9079 patients with International Classification of Diseases: Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes for tibial fractures. Use in the year following initial fracture management was determined using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Differences in use were examined using χ2 tests, t tests, and Kruskal-Wallace tests. RESULTS Sixty-seven percent of patients received OPT the year following fracture. OPT attendance was higher in female patients, in patients with 1 or no major comorbidity, and in the western United States. Attendance was higher in patients with upper tibial fractures, moderate-severity injuries, and treatment with external fixation and in patients discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Patients started OPT on average [SD] 50 [52.6] days after fracture and attended 18 [16.1] visits over the course of 101 [86.4] days. The timing of OPT, the number of visits attended, and the length of OPT care varied by patient, injury, and treatment-level factors. CONCLUSIONS One-third of insured patients do not receive OPT following tibial fracture. The timing of OPT initiation, the length of OPT care, and the number of visits attended by patients with tibial fractures were highly variable. Further research is needed to standardize referral and prescription practices for OPT following tibial fractures. IMPACT OPT use varies based on patient, injury, and treatment-level factors following tibial fractures. Results from this study can be used to inform future efforts to optimize rehabilitation care for patients with tibial fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin H McLaughlin
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, Maryland, USA,Address all correspondence to Dr McLaughlin at:
| | - Lisa M Reider
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Renan C Castillo
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - James R Ficke
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Orthopaedic Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph F Levy
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Breazeale S, Dorsey SG, Kearney J, Conley S, Jeon S, Yoo B, Redeker NS. Symptom cluster profiles following traumatic orthopedic injuries: A protocol. Res Nurs Health 2020; 44:268-278. [PMID: 33368378 DOI: 10.1002/nur.22102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic injuries affect millions of Americans annually, resulting in $671 billion in healthcare costs and lost productivity. Postinjury symptoms, like pain, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, and stressor-related disorders are highly prevalent following traumatic orthopedic injuries (TOI) and may contribute to negative long-term outcomes. Symptoms rarely present in isolation, but in clusters of two or more symptoms that co-occur to affect health in aggregate. Identifying symptom cluster profiles following TOI may identify those at highest risk for negative outcomes. Dysregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a potential biological mechanism responsible for symptom cluster profile membership after TOI and may be targeted in future precision-health applications. The purpose of this paper is to present the protocol of a cross-sectional study designed to identify symptom cluster profiles and measure the extent to which the BDNF val66met mutation and serum concentration of BDNF are associated with membership in symptom cluster profiles. We plan to recruit 150 TOI survivors within the first 72 h of injury. The study aims are to (1) describe TOI survivors' membership in symptom cluster profiles, indicated by pain, sleep disturbance, and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stressor-related disorders, immediately following a TOI; (2) examine associations between demographic and clinical factors and symptom cluster profile membership among TOI survivors; (3) test the hypothesis that low serum concentrations of BDNF are associated with membership among symptom cluster profiles following TOI; and (4) test the hypothesis that the presence of the val66met mutation on one or both alleles of the BDNF gene is associated with membership among symptom cluster profiles following TOI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan G Dorsey
- University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Joan Kearney
- Yale School of Nursing, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | - Brad Yoo
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Addressing Behavioral Health Concerns in Trauma: Using Lean Six Sigma to Implement a Depression Screening Protocol in a Level I Trauma Center. Qual Manag Health Care 2020; 29:218-225. [PMID: 32991539 DOI: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with physical injuries or chronic conditions may be impacted by mental health conditions, which significantly affect their participation and progress in treatment. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) depression screening can identify patients who are at greatest risk for depression to provide better whole-person care. OBJECTIVE The quality improvement project objective was to identify and design a process that would result in the PHQ-2 depression screening for admitted trauma patients with a minimum 75% completion rate. METHODS Lean Six Sigma (LSS) process design methodology, DMADV (define, measure, analyze, design, and verify), drove process improvement. Medical records from before (December 2018 through February 2019) and after (March 2019 through May 2019) the intervention were evaluated using frequencies, percentages, χ, and multivariable logistic regression to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. RESULTS PHQ-2 document location was imperative to successful compliance, which increased from 60.74% (78 of 128) to 80.56% (87 of 108). Specifically, weekend compliance increased from 42.9% (18 of 42) to 82.8% (24 of 29). CONCLUSION LSS DMADV methodology helped health care professionals design a process to facilitate compliance with the PHQ-2 depression screening protocol in trauma patients. Adherence with this screening can help increase the number of behavioral health consultations, which in turn improves the treatment of traumatic injury survivors.
Collapse
|
25
|
How soon can we identify at-risk patients: examining initial depressive symptomology and opioid use in musculoskeletal trauma survivors? Injury 2020; 51:1543-1547. [PMID: 32430191 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study evaluates the associations between post injury depressive symptomology and opioid use from the initial time of injury in orthopedic trauma patients without pre-existing psychiatric conditions. DESIGN AND SETTING This is a prospective study following the development of symptoms after orthopedic trauma injury conducted at a Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS Orthopedic trauma patients (N=96; 43.4±16.5 yrs, 40.6% women) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS METHODS: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) was administered during index hospitalization and at 2-weeks, 6-weeks, and 3- months, and 6-months. In-hospital and out-patient opioid use were tracked. Regression analyses determined the relationship of opioid use and depressive symptoms during follow-up. RESULTS Twenty percent of patients had moderate depressive symptom levels (BDI 20-28 points) and 11% had severe depressive symptom levels (BDI ≥29) at the time of their index hospitalization. Inpatient BDI-II depressive symptom severity levels were significantly related to depressive symptomology at 2 -weeks, 6 -weeks, and 3 -months. In-hospital or discharge opioid dose was not associated with initial or persistent depressive symptomology. Patients with persistent opioid use at 6 weeks had higher depressive symptoms six months following post-discharge than those who ceased opioid use by 6 -weeks post-discharge. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that depressive symptomology immediately following musculoskeletal trauma is predictive for persistent depressive symptomology in a subset of our patient population. Inpatient BDI-II depressive symptom severity levels in the hospital were significantly related to BDI-II at 2-weeks, 6-weeks, and 3-months, and persistent opioid use, past 6-weeks, was independently associated with prolonged depressive symptomology as well. Further study into effective treatment and monitoring of mental health disturbances following trauma is needed, particularly in patients with continued need for and use of opioids after discharge.
Collapse
|
26
|
Simske NM, Breslin MA, Hendrickson SB, Vallier HA. Are we missing the mark? Relationships of psychosocial issues to outcomes after injury: A review of OTA annual meeting presentations. OTA Int 2020; 3:e070. [PMID: 33937698 PMCID: PMC8022906 DOI: 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To observe the availability of information about social, emotional, and psychological factors in abstracts presented at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) annual meeting. DATA SOURCE OTA website (https://ota.org/education/meetings-and-courses/meeting-archive/). STUDY SELECTION All abstracts selected for paper or poster presentation at the 2016 through 2018 OTA annual meetings, as published in the final program. Studies were included if they sought to measure mental illness, substance use or abuse, pain, or other psychosocial issues. If studies utilized 1 or more patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), they were also included. DATA EXTRACTION For each abstract meeting inclusion criterion, studies were assessed for interventions intended to improve outcomes in any of the listed psychosocial domains. DATA SYNTHESIS/RESULTS Nine hundred forty-two abstracts were evaluated over a 3-year period. Of these, 294 (31.2%) met inclusion criteria. Twenty-five abstracts (8.5% of 294) reported mental illness, with depression (n = 14), anxiety (n = 9), and posttraumatic stress disorder (n = 5) being the most common. Eighty-eight abstracts (29.9% of 294) reported substance-use of tobacco, alcohol, narcotics, and/or recreational drugs. Tobacco-use was most prevalent (n = 59), followed by opioid-use (n = 31). Ten abstracts reported substance abuse. Pain was measured in 95 abstracts, and 203 abstracts utilized PROMs. Thirty-five abstracts found that these psychosocial elements significantly impacted outcomes or complications. Many abstracts did not assess the influence of these factors on clinical outcomes (n = 99). Sixteen studies described an intervention aimed at mitigating these features. CONCLUSIONS This study illustrates limited attention to the impact of psychological, social, and environmental factors on outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. Substance-abuse problems and mental health concerns are not only predictors of poor clinical and PROMs of pain and quality of life after injury, but have also been implicated in subsequent recidivism. Only 3% of 942 abstracts observed mental health and 1% reported substance-abuse. Moving forward, greater understanding of psychosocial issues may enhance interventions to impact long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha M Simske
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, affiliated with Case Western Reserve University
| | - Mary A Breslin
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, affiliated with Case Western Reserve University
| | - Sarah B Hendrickson
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, affiliated with Case Western Reserve University
| | - Heather A Vallier
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, affiliated with Case Western Reserve University
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Simske NM, Rivera T, Breslin MA, Hendrickson SB, Simpson M, Kalina M, Ho VP, Vallier HA. Implementing psychosocial programming at a level 1 trauma center: results from a 5-year period. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2020; 5:e000363. [PMID: 32072016 PMCID: PMC6996789 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary goal of the present study is to describe the psychosocial support services provided at our institution and the evolution of such programming through time. This study will also report the demographics and injury patterns of patients using available resources. METHODS Trauma Recovery Services (TRS) is a social and psychological support program that provides services and resources to patients and families admitted to our hospital. It includes a number of different services such as emotional coaching from licensed counselors, educational materials, peer mentorship from trauma survivors, monthly support groups, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening and programming for victims of crime. Patients using services were prospectively recorded by hired staff, volunteers and students who engaged in distributing programming. Demographics and injury characteristics were retrospectively gathered from patient's medical records. RESULTS From May of 2013 through December 2018, a total of 4977 discrete patients used TRS at an urban level 1 trauma center. During the study period, 31.4% of the 15 640 admitted adult trauma patients were exposed to TRS and this increased from 7.2% in 2013 to 60.1% in 2018. During the period of 5.5 years, 3317 patients had 'direct contact' (coaching and/or educational materials) and 1827 patients had at least one peer visit. The average number of peer visits was 2.7 per patient (range: 2-15). Of the 114 patients who attended support groups over 4 years, 55 (48%) attended more than one session, with an average of 3.9 visits (range: 2-10) per patient. After the establishment of PTSD screening and Victims of Crime Advocacy and Recovery Program (VOCARP) services in 2017, a total of 482 patients were screened for PTSD and 974 patients used VOCARP resources during the period of 2 years, with substantial growth from 2017 to 2018. CONCLUSIONS Hospital-provided resources aimed at educating patients, expanding support networks and bolstering resiliency were popular at our institution, with nearly 5000 discrete patients accessing services during a period of 5.5 years. Moving forward, greater investigation of program usage, development, and efficacy is necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II therapeutic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Trenton Rivera
- Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mary A Breslin
- Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Megen Simpson
- Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mark Kalina
- Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Vanessa P Ho
- Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|