Medication Use for Obesity-Related Comorbidities After Sleeve Gastrectomy or Gastric Bypass

Obesity, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease: A joint expert review from the Obesity Medicine Association and the National Lipid Association 2024

Background

This joint expert review by the Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) and National Lipid Association (NLA) provides clinicians an overview of the pathophysiologic and clinical considerations regarding obesity, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

Methods

This joint expert review is based upon scientific evidence, clinical perspectives of the authors, and peer review by the OMA and NLA leadership.

Results

Among individuals with obesity, adipose tissue may store over 50% of the total body free cholesterol. Triglycerides may represent up to 99% of lipid species in adipose tissue. The potential for adipose tissue expansion accounts for the greatest weight variance among most individuals, with percent body fat ranging from less than 5% to over 60%. While population studies suggest a modest increase in blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with excess adiposity, the adiposopathic dyslipidemia pattern most often described with an increase in adiposity includes elevated triglycerides, reduced high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), increased non-HDL-C, elevated apolipoprotein B, increased LDL particle concentration, and increased small, dense LDL particles.

Conclusions

Obesity increases CVD risk, at least partially due to promotion of an adiposopathic, atherogenic lipid profile. Obesity also worsens other cardiometabolic risk factors. Among patients with obesity, interventions that reduce body weight and improve CVD outcomes are generally associated with improved lipid levels. Given the modest improvement in blood LDL-C with weight reduction in patients with overweight or obesity, early interventions to treat both excess adiposity and elevated atherogenic cholesterol (LDL-C and/or non-HDL-C) levels represent priorities in reducing the risk of CVD.

Obesity, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease: A joint expert review from the Obesity Medicine Association and the National Lipid Association 2024

BACKGROUND

This joint expert review by the Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) and National Lipid Association (NLA) provides clinicians an overview of the pathophysiologic and clinical considerations regarding obesity, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

METHODS

This joint expert review is based upon scientific evidence, clinical perspectives of the authors, and peer review by the OMA and NLA leadership.

RESULTS

Among individuals with obesity, adipose tissue may store over 50% of the total body free cholesterol. Triglycerides may represent up to 99% of lipid species in adipose tissue. The potential for adipose tissue expansion accounts for the greatest weight variance among most individuals, with percent body fat ranging from less than 5% to over 60%. While population studies suggest a modest increase in blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with excess adiposity, the adiposopathic dyslipidemia pattern most often described with an increase in adiposity includes elevated triglycerides, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), increased non-HDL-C, elevated apolipoprotein B, increased LDL particle concentration, and increased small, dense LDL particles.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity increases CVD risk, at least partially due to promotion of an adiposopathic, atherogenic lipid profile. Obesity also worsens other cardiometabolic risk factors. Among patients with obesity, interventions that reduce body weight and improve CVD outcomes are generally associated with improved lipid levels. Given the modest improvement in blood LDL-C with weight reduction in patients with overweight or obesity, early interventions to treat both excess adiposity and elevated atherogenic cholesterol (LDL-C and/or non-HDL-C) levels represent priorities in reducing the risk of CVD.

Discontinuation of blood pressure-lowering, glucose-lowering, and lipid-lowering medications after bariatric surgery in patients with morbid obesity: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence exists on the patterns of medication use for hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and dyslipidemia after bariatric surgery among Asian patients.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the patterns in the use of blood pressure-lowering, glucose-lowering, and lipid-lowering medications following BS in Korean patients with morbid obesity.

SETTING

This study is a retrospective cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assignment claims database of South Korea (from 2019 to 2021).

METHODS

We included patients who underwent BS between 2019 and 2020 in South Korea. We evaluated the treatment patterns of blood pressure-lowering, glucose-lowering, and lipid-lowering medications at 3-month intervals for 1-year following BS, including medication use, individual medication classes, and the number of medications prescribed. Furthermore, we estimated remission rates for each disorder based on patient characteristics by defining patients who discontinued their medications for at least 2 consecutive quarters as remission.

RESULTS

A total of 3810 patients were included in this study. For 1-year following BS, a marked decrease in the number of patients using blood pressure-lowering, glucose-lowering, and lipid-lowering medications was observed. The most remarkable decrease occurred in glucose-lowering medications, which decreased by approximately -75.1% compared with that at baseline. This tendency was consistently observed when analyzing both the number of medications prescribed and the specific medication classes. Regarding remission rates, patients who were female, younger, and received the biliopancreatic diversion-duodenal switch as their BS showed a relatively higher incidence of remission than other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

BS was associated with a decrease in the use of medications for hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and dyslipidemia.

Comparison of pre-and postoperative medication costs in patients who underwent bariatric surgery - a nationwide data analysis

Introduction

Bariatric surgery has known health benefits and may lower the medication-related costs. This study aimed to assess the cost of medications prior to and after bariatric surgery in the Polish nationwide registry.

Methods

The study included 2,390 adults. The analysis was conducted separately for a 12-month pre-operative period, and a 12-month postoperative period. The total costs of medication and cost per anatomical therapeutic chemical group were assessed and the mean cost per patient in the preoperative and postoperative periods was compared.

Results

The study showed a significant increase in the overall medication costs and mean costs of medications per patient in the year after bariatric surgery. This increase was related mainly to low-molecular-weight heparins used in the 1st month after surgery. Alternatively, costs of medication used in the cardiovascular system diseases and anti-infectives decreased significantly. The total costs of hypoglycemic agents were reduced by 46%, antihypertensive medications by 29%, and lipid-lowering drugs by 38.

Conclusions

In general, medication costs are higher in the first year after surgery. The increase results from the perioperative use of low-molecular-weight heparins, whereas a significant cost reduction of glucose-, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and anti-infective medications was observed.

ASMBS statement on metabolic and bariatric surgery for beneficiaries of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services with a review of the literature

This position statement is issued by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric. Surgery in response to inquiries made to the Society by patients, physicians, Society members, hospitals, health insurance payors, the media, and others regarding the access and outcomes of metabolic and bariatric surgery for beneficiaries of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This position statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. The statement is not intended to be and should not be construed as stating or establishing a local, regional, or national standard of care. This statement will be revised in the future as additional evidence becomes available.

Prescription drug usage as measure of comorbidity resolution after bariatric surgery: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a chronic and progressive disease associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. Bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention for sustainable weight loss and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities. Studies examining comorbidity resolution largely rely on individual self-reported outcomes and electronic record reviews. We present a population-based study looking at prescription medication utilization before and after bariatric surgery as a measure of comorbidity resolution.

METHODS

All patients enrolled in the Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery who underwent either gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between 2013 and 2019 in Manitoba were included. Demographic information, follow up, and outpatient prescription dispensation data were obtained from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository housed at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy for 5 years pre- and post-surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 1184 patients were included. Antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed classes, and along with thyroid medication, utilization remained stable after bariatric surgery. Proton pump inhibitors and opioid class drugs increased at 1 year after surgery then returned to baseline. Glucose and lipid-lowering medications, including statins, biguanides, sulfonylureas, and insulin, were decreased. Antihypertensives, including ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin receptors blockers, thiazides, and beta blockers, similarly decreased.

CONCLUSION

This is the first Canadian study employing a provincial-wide prescription database to measure long-term comorbidity resolution after bariatric surgery. The use of administrative data eliminates potential biases and inaccuracies in follow up and self-reported outcomes. Consistent with the literature, prescriptions for the treatment of metabolic syndrome all decreased and were sustained at long-term follow up. Further studies are needed to delineate the effects of altered pharmaceutical utilization on patient quality of life and health-care expenditures.

Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Metabolic Syndrome in Chinese Patients with Low Body Mass Index: a Propensity Score Matching Study

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery (BS) is known to improve the components of metabolic syndrome (MS) in patients with obesity. However, few studies have evaluated the effect of BS on patients with MS at low BMI levels. The study aims to assess the effect of BS on MS in patients with low BMI by comparing BS with medical therapy (MT).

METHODS

A total of 271 patients with MS who underwent BS and MT at a single institution were reviewed in this retrospective cohort study. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed for the BS and MT groups with BMI<35 kg/m2. We analyzed the 5 years effect of BS versus MT on the remission of MS, its components, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, and medication used.

RESULTS

Patients in the MT group showed a decrease in the prevalence of MS to 62% at the 1st year and 10% at the 5th year. In the BS group, MS prevalence in patients with BMI<35 kg/m2 decreased to 30% and 9% at the 1st and 5th year, whereas in patients with BMI≥35 kg/m2 was 26% and 7%, respectively. The 10-year ASCVD risk and the lifetime ASCVD were significantly decreased 5 years after BS in patients with BMI<35 kg/m2. The number and daily drug dose of hypoglycemic drugs, antihypertensive medications, and lipid-lowering drugs were reduced from baseline in both BS and MT groups.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery significantly improves MS remission rates and long-term cardiovascular risk in Chinese patients with metabolic syndrome and a BMI <35 kg/m2.

Comparison of safety and healthcare utilization following sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass among medicare beneficiaries using sex as a biologic variable

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is a common operation, but differences in outcomes between males and females are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the risk of mortality, complications, reintervention, and healthcare utilization after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass using sex as a biologic variable.

SETTING

United States.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018 using Medicare claims data. We performed a heterogeneity of treatment effect analysis to determine the impact of sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass comparing males to females. The primary outcome was safety (mortality, complications, and reinterventions) up to 5 years after surgery. The secondary outcome was healthcare utilization (hospitalization and emergency department use).

RESULTS

Among 95,405 patients the majority (n = 71,348; 74.8%) were female and most (n = 57,008; 59.8%) underwent sleeve gastrectomy. For all patients, compared to gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy was associated with a lower risk of complications and reintervention but a higher risk of revision. Compared to gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy was associated with a lower risk of mortality for females (adjusted hazard ratio .86, 95% CI .75-.96) but not males. We found no difference in procedure treatment effect by sex for mortality, hospitalization, emergency department use, or overall reintervention when comparing sleeve to gastric bypass.

CONCLUSIONS

Females and males have similar outcomes following bariatric surgery. Females have a lower risk of complications but a higher risk of reintervention. Decisions surrounding treatment for this common procedure should be tailored to include a discussion of sex-specific differences in treatment outcome.

Temporal Changes in Obesity-Related Medication After Bariatric Surgery vs No Surgery for Obesity

IMPORTANCE

Bariatric surgery can resolve hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes, but the long-term postoperative trajectories of medications for these conditions are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the long-term use of lipid-lowering, cardiovascular, and antidiabetic medication after bariatric surgery compared with no surgery for morbid obesity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based cohort study took place in Sweden (2005-2020) and Finland (1995-2018) and included individuals diagnosed with obesity. Analysis took place between July 2021 and January 2022.

EXPOSURES

Bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) patients using lipid-lowering, cardiovascular, or antidiabetic medication were compared with 5 times as many control patients with an obesity diagnosis treated with no surgery, matched for country, age, sex, calendar year, and medication use.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Proportions with 95% CIs of lipid-lowering, cardiovascular, or antidiabetic medication.

RESULTS

A total of 26 396 patients underwent bariatric surgery (with gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) (17 521 [66.4%] women; median [IQR] age, 50 [43-56] years) and 131 980 matched control patients (87 605 [66.4%%] women; median [IQR] age, 50 [43-56] years) were included. The proportion of lipid-lowering medication after bariatric surgery decreased from 20.3% (95% CI, 20.2%-20.5%) at baseline to 12.9% (95% CI, 12.7%-13.0%) after 2 years and 17.6% (95% CI, 13.3%-21.8%) after 15 years, while it increased in the no surgery group from 21.0% (95% CI, 20.9%-21.1%) at baseline to 44.6% (95% CI, 41.7%-47.5%) after 15 years. Cardiovascular medications were used by 60.2% (95% CI, 60.0%-60.5%) of bariatric surgery patients at baseline, decreased to 43.2% (95% CI, 42.9%-43.4%) after 2 years, and increased to 74.6% (95% CI, 65.8%-83.4%) after 15 years, while it increased in the no surgery group from 54.4% (95% CI, 54.3%-54.5%) at baseline to 83.3% (95% CI, 79.3%-87.3%) after 15 years. Antidiabetic medications were used by 27.7% (95% CI, 27.6%-27.9%) in the bariatric surgery group at baseline, decreased to 10.0% (95% CI, 9.9%-10.2%) after 2 years, and increased to 23.5% (95% CI, 18.5%-28.5%) after 15 years, while it increased in the no surgery group from 27.7% (95% CI, 27.6%-27.7%) at baseline to 54.2% (95% CI, 51.0%-57.5%) after 15 years.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, undergoing bariatric surgery was associated with a substantial and long-lasting reduction in the use of lipid-lowering and antidiabetic medications compared with no surgery for obesity, while for cardiovascular medications this reduction was only transient.

Comparative Safety of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass up to 5 Years After Surgery in Patients With Medicaid

OBJECTIVE

Compare adverse outcomes up to 5 years after sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in patients with Medicaid.

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common bariatric operation among patients with Medicaid; however, its long-term safety in this population is unknown.

METHODS

Using Medicaid claims, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2018. Instrumental variables survival analysis was used to estimate the cumulative incidence and heterogeneity of outcomes up to 5 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Among 132,788 patients with Medicaid, 84,717 (63.8%) underwent sleeve gastrectomy and 48,071 (36.2%) underwent gastric bypass. A total of 69,225 (52.1%) patients were White, 33,833 (25.5%) were Black, and 29,730 (22.4%) were Hispanic. Compared with gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy was associated with a lower 5-year cumulative incidence of mortality (1.29% vs 2.15%), complications (11.5% vs 16.2%), hospitalization (43.7% vs 53.7%), emergency department (ED) use (61.6% vs 68.2%), and reoperation (18.5% vs 22.8%), but a higher cumulative incidence of revision (3.3% vs 2.0%). Compared with White patients, the magnitude of the difference between sleeve and bypass was smaller among Black patients for ED use [5-y adjusted hazard ratios: 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94-1.08 vs 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-1.00), P <0.001] and Hispanic patients for reoperation [5-y adjusted hazard ratios: 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86-1.05) vs 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69-0.83), P <0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with Medicaid undergoing bariatric surgery, sleeve gastrectomy was associated with a lower risk of mortality, complications, hospitalization, ED use, and reoperations, but a higher risk of revision compared with gastric bypass. Although the difference between sleeve and bypass was generally similar among White, Black, and Hispanic patients, the magnitude of this difference was smaller among Black patients for ED use and Hispanic patients for reoperation.

A Call to Reconceptualize Obesity Treatment in Service of Health Equity: Review of Evidence and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rates of obesity and associated comorbidities are higher among Black and Latino adults compared to white adults. We sought to provide an overview of both structural and individual factors contributing to obesity inequities and synthesize available evidence regarding treatment outcomes in Black and Latino adults, with an eye towards informing future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obesity disparities are influenced by myriad systemic issues, yet the vast majority of interventions target individual-level factors only, and most behavioral treatments fail to target drivers beyond eating and physical activity. Extant treatments are not equally accessible, affordable, or effective among Black and Latino adults compared with white counterparts. Asset-based, culturally relevant interventions that target the root causes of obesity and address intersectional stress-designed in partnership with intended beneficiaries-are urgently needed. Treatment trials must improve enrollment of Black and Latino adults and report treatment outcomes by race and ethnicity.

Independent Predictors of Discontinuation of Diabetic Medication after Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass

INTRODUCTION

Both gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy can induce diabetes remission. However, deciding which procedure to perform is challenging since remission rates and morbidity can vary depending on patient factors as well as disease severity.

METHODS

Using a state-wide bariatric-specific data registry we evaluated all patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass between 2006-2019 who reported taking either oral diabetic medication alone or who were on insulin prior to surgery and who also had 1-year follow-up (n=11,664). Multivariate regression was used to identify independent predictors for discontinuation of oral diabetic medication or insulin, respectively, and risk-adjusted complication rates were compared between procedure types among each group.

RESULTS

At 1-year after surgery, 85.7% of patients reported discontinuation of oral diabetic medication and 66.6% reported discontinuation of insulin. Gastric bypass was an independent predictor for insulin discontinuation (OR 1.17, CI 1.01-1.35, p=0.0329), however procedure type was not associated with discontinuation of oral medication alone. Risk adjusted complication rates were significantly higher after gastric bypass than sleeve gastrectomy, regardless of whether the patient was taking oral diabetic medications alone or was on insulin (11.2% vs 4.8%, p<0.0001 and 12.0% vs 7.4%, p<0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring insulin experience higher rates of insulin discontinuation after gastric bypass but also have significantly higher complication rates when compared to sleeve gastrectomy. However, if patients are on oral diabetic medication alone, rates of medication discontinuation at 1 year are greater than 85% and procedure type is not predictive. Disease severity is an important factor when deciding on the optimal procedure for diabetes.

Colorectal Cancer Risk Is Impacted by Sex and Type of Surgery After Bariatric Surgery

PURPOSE

Sex differences exist in the associations between obesity and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, limited data exist on how sex affects CRC risk after bariatric surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the 2012-2020 MarketScan database. We employed a propensity-score-matched analysis and precise coding to define CRC in this nationwide US study. Adjusted hazards ratio (HR) assessed CRC risk ≥ 6 months. In a restricted analysis, logistic regression with adjusted odds ratios (OR) examined CRC risk ≥ 3 years.

RESULTS

Our sample included 327,734 controls with severe obesity and 88,630 patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (VSG). The odds of cessation of diabetes mellitus medications, a surrogate for diabetes remission, were higher post-surgery vs. controls, especially in RYGB and males. In females, CRC risk decreased post-RYGB compared to controls (HR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.18-0.87, p = 0.02). However, VSG was not associated with lower CRC risk in females. Paradoxically, in males compared to controls, CRC risk trended toward an almost significant increase, especially after 3 years or more from surgery (OR = 2.18, 95%CI: 0.97-4.89, p = 0.06). Males had a higher risk of CRC, particularly rectosigmoid cancer, than females after bariatric surgery (HR = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.35-5.38, p < 0.001). Furthermore, diabetes remission was not associated with a lower CRC risk post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest an increased risk of CRC in males compared to females after bariatric surgery. Compared to controls, there was a decrease in CRC risk in females' post-RYGB but not VSG. Mechanistic studies are needed to explain these differences.