Systematic screening for mutations in the 5'-regulatory region of the human dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1) gene in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder

Analysis of the Promoter Region of Human Dopamine Receptor D1

Dysregulation of dopamine receptor D1 (DRD1) is involved in multiple neuropsychiatric disorders. The 5' regulatory region of DRD1 has not been characterized fully. We applied the luciferase assay and the electrophoretic mobility shift assay to explore the activity of the 5' regulatory region of DRD1 in SH-SY5Y and 293T cells. We found that the promoter region of DRD1 corresponded to positions - 1250 to + 250 in the DNA sequence, and the putative core promoter region was from - 113 to + 250 (transcriptional start site of exon, +1). The sequence 5'-gggacgcgcgggcggggtgggctgtgccccgcgggaaccccgccggcctgtgcgcttgctg-3' was identified as a possible transcription factor-binding domain. Further research is warranted to explore the function of the 5' regulatory region of DRD1.

The catecholaminergic-cholinergic balance hypothesis of bipolar disorder revisited

Bipolar disorder is a unique illness characterized by fluctuations between mood states of depression and mania. Originally, an adrenergic-cholinergic balance hypothesis was postulated to underlie these different affective states. In this review, we update this hypothesis with recent findings from human and animal studies, suggesting that a catecholaminergic-cholinergic hypothesis may be more relevant. Evidence from neuroimaging studies, neuropharmacological interventions, and genetic associations support the notion that increased cholinergic functioning underlies depression, whereas increased activations of the catecholamines (dopamine and norepinephrine) underlie mania. Elevated functional acetylcholine during depression may affect both muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in a compensatory fashion. Increased functional dopamine and norepinephrine during mania on the other hand may affect receptor expression and functioning of dopamine reuptake transporters. Despite increasing evidence supporting this hypothesis, a relationship between these two neurotransmitter systems that could explain cycling between states of depression and mania is missing. Future studies should focus on the influence of environmental stimuli and genetic susceptibilities that may affect the catecholaminergic-cholinergic balance underlying cycling between the affective states. Overall, observations from recent studies add important data to this revised balance theory of bipolar disorder, renewing interest in this field of research.

The emerging role of dopamine-glutamate interaction and of the postsynaptic density in bipolar disorder pathophysiology: Implications for treatment

Aberrant synaptic plasticity, originating from abnormalities in dopamine and/or glutamate transduction pathways, may contribute to the complex clinical manifestations of bipolar disorder (BD). Dopamine and glutamate systems cross-talk at multiple levels, such as at the postsynaptic density (PSD). The PSD is a structural and functional protein mesh implicated in dopamine and glutamate-mediated synaptic plasticity. Proteins at PSD have been demonstrated to be involved in mood disorders pathophysiology and to be modulated by antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. On the other side, post-receptor effectors such as protein kinase B (Akt), glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) and the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk), which are implicated in both molecular abnormalities and treatment of BD, may interact with PSD proteins, and participate in the interplay of the dopamine-glutamate signalling pathway. In this review, we describe emerging evidence on the molecular cross-talk between dopamine and glutamate signalling in BD pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment, mainly focusing on dysfunctions in PSD molecules. We also aim to discuss future therapeutic strategies that could selectively target the PSD-mediated signalling cascade at the crossroads of dopamine-glutamate neurotransmission.

Polymorphisms in genes encoding dopamine signalling pathway and risk of alcohol dependence: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Alcohol dependence (AD) is one of the major elements that significantly influence drinking pattern that provoke the alcohol-induced organ damage. The structural and neurophysiologic abnormalities in the frontal lobes of chronic alcoholics were revealed by magnetic resonance imaging scans. It is well known that candidate genes involved in dopaminergic pathway are of immense interest to the researchers engaged in a wide range of addictive disorders. Dopaminergic pathway gene polymorphisms are being extensively studied with respect to addictive and behavioral disorders.

METHODS

From the broad literature available, the current review summarizes the specific polymorphisms of dopaminergic genes that play a role in alcohol dependence.

RESULTS

No evidence indicating any strong association between AD and polymorphisms of dopamine pathway genes has emerged from the literature.

DISCUSSION

Further studies are warranted, considering a range of alcohol-related traits to determine the genes that influence alcohol dependence.

DRD1 rs4532 polymorphism: a potential pharmacogenomic marker for treatment response to antipsychotic drugs

We investigated the association of dopamine receptor D1 gene (DRD1) rs4532 polymorphism with antipsychotic treatment response in schizophrenia. We have analyzed 124 patients with schizophrenia, consisting of 59 treatment resistant (TR) and 65 non-TR. We found an association between G-allele and TR schizophrenia (p=0.001; adjusted OR=2.71). Setting the common AA-genotype as reference, the GG-homozygous presented a five-fold risk compared to AA-homozygous (p=0.010; OR=5.56) with an intermediate result for AG-genotype (p=0.030; adjusted OR=2.64). The DRD1 rs4532 polymorphism showed a dose-response gradient with increased risk for treatment resistance and may be a potential pharmacogenetic marker for antipsychotic drug treatment response.

Association study on pathological gambling and polymorphisms of dopamine D1, D2, D3, and D4 receptor genes in a Korean population

Several studies have reported that some dopaminergic receptor polymorphisms are associated with pathological gambling (PG). Considering that there are major race and ethnic group difference in dopaminergic polymorphisms, the result of genetic association studies should be confirmed in more homogeneous population to avoid problems of population stratification. The present study aimed to investigate whether selected polymorphisms in the dopamine receptors genes (DRD1, DRD2, DRD3, and DRD4) are associated with PG in Korean population which is consisted of only Korean ancestry. Subjects were 104 men with a diagnosis of PG and 114 unrelated age-matched normal control men. Genotyping was performed for the DRD1 gene -48 A/G, DRD2 gene TaqI A, DRD3 gene Ser9Gly, and DRD4 gene exon III variable number tandem repeat polymorphisms. The method of multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) was used to analyze gene-gene interactions. There were no differences in the frequencies of any studied polymorphisms between patients with PG and normal controls. MDR analysis did not show a significant effect of the 4 dopamine receptor gene polymorphisms on susceptibility to PG (P > 0.05). The present study suggests that the analyzed polymorphisms of the dopamine receptor genes might not be associated with PG in a Korean population.

Role of dopamine receptors in ADHD: a systematic meta-analysis

The dopaminergic system plays a pivotal role in the central nervous system via its five diverse receptors (D1-D5). Dysfunction of dopaminergic system is implicated in many neuropsychological diseases, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a common mental disorder that prevalent in childhood. Understanding the relationship of five different dopamine (DA) receptors with ADHD will help us to elucidate different roles of these receptors and to develop therapeutic approaches of ADHD. This review summarized the ongoing research of DA receptor genes in ADHD pathogenesis and gathered the past published data with meta-analysis and revealed the high risk of DRD5, DRD2, and DRD4 polymorphisms in ADHD.

An association study between dopamine D1 receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of schizophrenia

Deficits in dopamine transmission at D1 receptors in the PFC are implicated in schizophrenia. Genetic polymorphisms in functional regions of DRD1 have a plausible role in modulating the risk of schizophrenia. In order to evaluate the role of DRD1 polymorphisms as a risk factor for schizophrenia, we performed a detailed analysis of possible functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in regulatory and coding regions of DRD1. Nine SNPs were identified by DNA sequencing in 20 patients with schizophrenia. Then 385 cases and 350 healthy control subjects were genotyped using the nine SNPs (rs4867798, rs686, rs1799914, rs4532 rs5326, rs265981, rs10078714, rs10063995, rs10078866). Statistically significant differences were observed in the allelic or genotypic frequencies of the rs686 and rs10063995 polymorphism in the DRD1 gene. A significantly lower risk of schizophrenia was associated with the G allele and AG+GG genotype of rs686 (OR (G allele)=0.632, 95%CI (G allele): 0.470-0.849; OR (AG+GG genotype)=0.578, 95%CI (AG+GG genotype): 0.416-0.803) compared with the A allele and AA genotype, respectively. And a significantly increased risk of schizophrenia was associated with the T allele of rs10063995 (OR=1.446, 95%CI: 1.125-1.859) compared with the G allele. The haplotype analysis indicated the G-T variant containing the T allele of rs10063995 is a risk for schizophrenia (P=0.005, OR=1.467, 95%CI: 1.123-1.917). These data suggest that DRD1 gene polymorphisms confer susceptibility to schizophrenia, and also support the notion that dysfunction of DRD1 is involved in the pathophysiological process of schizophrenia.

Analysis of genetic variations in the dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1) gene and antipsychotics-induced tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Dyskinesia is a kind of abnormal involuntary movement disorder that increases with age. The pathogenesis of dyskinesia may result from divergent changes in dopamine D1 receptors (DRD1) and dopamine D2 receptors (DRD2) in the brain while aging. Tardive dyskinesia (TD), a kind of dyskinesia, may develop after long-term antipsychotic treatment. Because the prevalence of TD also steadily increased with age, TD has been suggested to be the consequence of an imbalance between DRD1 and DRD2. We supposed that patients who develop TD may have genetic variants of DRD1 that cause the excitatory effects of DRD1 overwhelming the attenuated inhibitory effects of DRD2 after antipsychotic treatment.

METHODS

In the present study, schizophrenic inpatients receiving long-term antipsychotic treatment were first assessed using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), and only patients who were either free of any abnormal involuntary movements (non-TD group, AIMS =0) or who showed persistent TD (TD group) were enrolled. Finally, 382 patients were recruited (TD=220, non-TD=162) and three single nucleus polymorphisms (SNPs; rs5326, rs4532 and rs265975) of DRD1 were genotyped for each subject.

RESULTS

Genotype frequency (%; AA/AG/GG) of rs4532 (TD: non-TD) was 61.4/35.8/2.8: 74.2/24.5/1.3. After genetic analyses, genotype GG showed significant association with TD (if OR=2.0, power (%)=98.5; if OR=1.5, power (%)=63.7; P=0.033). Haplotype frequency (%) CGC of rs5326-rs4532-rs265975 (TD: non-TD) was 19.0:13.7; and after haplotype-based analyses, haplotype CGC also showed significant association with TD (OR=1.4, permutation P=0.027).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the genotypic variants of DRD1 might play a role in the susceptibility of TD. Further replication in other countries or other populations is highly expected.

Striatal structure and function in mood disorders: a comprehensive review

OBJECTIVES

  A large and diverse literature has implicated abnormalities of striatal structure and function in both unipolar and bipolar disorder. Recent functional imaging studies have greatly expanded this body of research. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive and critical appraisal of the relevant literature.

METHODS

  A total of 331 relevant articles were reviewed to develop an integrated overview of striatal function in mood disorders.

RESULTS

  There is compelling evidence from multiple studies that functional abnormalities of the striatum and greater corticostriatal circuitry exist in at least some forms of affective illness. The literature does not yet provide data to determine whether these aberrations represent primary pathology or they contribute directly to symptom expression. Finally, there is considerable evidence that bipolar disorder may be associated with striatal hyperactivity and some suggestion that unipolar illness may be associated with hypoactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

  Additional research investigating striatal function in affective disorders will be critical to the development of comprehensive models of the neurobiology of these conditions.

Sexually dimorphic interaction between the DRD1 and COMT genes in schizophrenia

Dopaminergic dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. In the PFC, dopamine signalling largely depends on the D1 receptors, which are coded by the DRD1 gene, and on the regulation of dopamine levels by the enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Here, we investigate the role of DRD1 and its interaction with the COMT gene in schizophrenic patients. In two gender-limited independent patient and control samples, we genotype five Tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs) of DRD1. The DRD1 SNP and haplotype associations, as well as interaction effects with the Val158Met COMT SNP were analyzed. In the male sample, we found the rs11746641 and rs11749676 DRD1 SNPs were associated with schizophrenia. Haplotype analyses identified the T-A-T-C-T variant related to a protective effect (P = 0.008) and the G-G-T-C-C variant that showed a tendency to be a risk factor for the disorder (P = 0.012). A logistic regression analysis revealed a significant pattern of interaction between DRD1 and COMT for both the rs11746641 (P = 0.002) and rs11749676 (P = 4.5 x 10(-5)) SNPs. DRD1-associated haplotypes were exclusively related to schizophrenia in the Val homozygous subgroup of patients (T-A-T-C-T: P = 0.003; G-G-T-C-C: P = 0.006). In females, none of the DRD1 SNPs were linked to the disorder. Our genetic data suggest that DRD1 and COMT are epistatically associated with protection against and the risk of developing schizophrenia in a gender-dependent fashion, and support the role of dopamine dysfunction at the PFC in the pathophysiology of this disorder.

The role of dopamine in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

Despite effective pharmacological treatments for bipolar disorder, we still lack a comprehensive pathophysiological model of the illness. Recent neurobiological research has implicated a number of key brain regions and neuronal components in the behavioural and cognitive manifestations of bipolar disorder. Dopamine has previously been investigated in some depth in bipolar disorder, but of late has not been a primary focus of attention. This article examines the role of dopamine in bipolar disorder, incorporating recent advances into established models where possible.

METHODS

A critical evaluation of the literature was undertaken, including a review of behavioural, neurochemical, receptor, and imaging studies, as well as genetic studies focusing on dopamine receptors and related metabolic pathways. In addition, pharmacologic manipulation of the central dopaminergic pathways and comparisons with other disease states such as schizophrenia were considered, principally as a means of exploring the hypothesised models.

RESULTS

Multiple lines of evidence, including data from pharmacological interventions and structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, suggest that the dopaminergic system may play a central role in bipolar disorder.

CONCLUSION

Future research into the pathophysiological mechanisms of bipolar disorder and the development of new treatments for bipolar disorder should focus on the dopaminergic system.

The genetics of bipolar disorder: genome 'hot regions,' genes, new potential candidates and future directions

Bipolar disorder (BP) is a complex disorder caused by a number of liability genes interacting with the environment. In recent years, a large number of linkage and association studies have been conducted producing an extremely large number of findings often not replicated or partially replicated. Further, results from linkage and association studies are not always easily comparable. Unfortunately, at present a comprehensive coverage of available evidence is still lacking. In the present paper, we summarized results obtained from both linkage and association studies in BP. Further, we indicated new potential interesting genes, located in genome 'hot regions' for BP and being expressed in the brain. We reviewed published studies on the subject till December 2007. We precisely localized regions where positive linkage has been found, by the NCBI Map viewer (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview/); further, we identified genes located in interesting areas and expressed in the brain, by the Entrez gene, Unigene databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/) and Human Protein Reference Database (http://www.hprd.org); these genes could be of interest in future investigations. The review of association studies gave interesting results, as a number of genes seem to be definitively involved in BP, such as SLC6A4, TPH2, DRD4, SLC6A3, DAOA, DTNBP1, NRG1, DISC1 and BDNF. A number of promising genes, which received independent confirmations, and genes that have to be further investigated in BP, have been also systematically listed. In conclusion, the combination of linkage and association approaches provided a number of liability genes. Nevertheless, other approaches are required to disentangle conflicting findings, such as gene interaction analyses, interaction with psychosocial and environmental factors and, finally, endophenotype investigations.

Significant association of DRD1 with nicotine dependence

Epidemiologic studies have strongly implicated genetics in smoking behavior. Genes in the dopaminergic system, which mediates the reinforcing and dependence-producing properties of nicotine, are plausible candidates for roles in nicotine dependence (ND). In this study, we examined five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within or near the dopamine D(1) receptor gene (DRD1) for their association with ND, which was assessed by smoking quantity (SQ), the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI), and the Fagerström Test for ND (FTND). The samples were obtained from 2,037 participants representing 200 European American (EA) and 402 African American (AA) families. Although we found significant associations of SNPs rs265973, rs686, and rs4532 in the AA sample; of rs4532 in the EA sample; and of rs265975, rs686, and rs4532 in the pooled sample with various ND measures, only the association of rs686 in the AA sample and of rs686 and rs4532 in the pooled sample remained significant after correction for multiple testing. Haplotype-based association analysis revealed that haplotype C-T-A, formed by rs265973, rs265975, and rs686, was significantly associated with all three ND measures in both the AA and the pooled sample. Another haplotype, T-A-T, formed by rs265975, rs686, and rs4532, showed a significant association with FTND in the pooled sample. Furthermore, in a luciferase reporter assay, rs686, located in the 3' untranslated region, caused differential luciferase activities, indicating that rs686 is a functional polymorphism affecting expression of DRD1.

Polymorphisms in dopamine receptor DRD1 and DRD2 genes and psychopathological and extrapyramidal symptoms in patients on long-term antipsychotic treatment

DRD(1) and DRD(2) receptor gene variants have been associated with clinical aspects of schizophrenia; however only specific features were analyzed in different samples. To assess the complex interaction between genetic and clinical factors, we studied the possible cross-interactions between DRD1 and DRD2 dopamine receptor gene polymorphisms, symptomatology of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders, and the occurrence of treatment induced side effects taking into consideration possible clinical confounding variables. One hundred thirty one outpatients in stable remission meeting the DSMIV criteria for schizophrenia spectrum disorders and receiving long-term maintenance therapy with haloperidol, fluphenazine, zuclopenthixole, or risperidone were genotyped for DRD1 A-48G, DRD2 Ins-141CDel, and DRD2 Ser311Cys polymorphisms. Psychopathological symptoms were assessed with the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenia (PANSS). Extrapyramidal side effects were assessed with the Simpson-Angus extrapyramidal side effects scale (EPS), the Barnes Akathisia scale (BARS), and the abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS). Drug dosage was included as covariant because it was associated with the severity of symptomatology, akathisia, and parkinsonism. No association was observed for DRD1 and DRD2 polymorphisms and extrapyramidal side effects, or with the other clinical variables considered. Our study suggests that DRD1 and DRD2 variants are not liability factors for tardive dyskinesia.

Dopamine genes and schizophrenia: case closed or evidence pending?

The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia (SZ) has motivated a large number of genetic association studies but few if any dopaminergic (DA) polymorphisms are accepted as credible risk factors at present. To evaluate whether dopamine-related genes have been investigated adequately, we surveyed public genetic databases and published SZ association studies with regard to 14 conventional DA genes and 7 selected dopamine-interacting proteins. We estimate that 325 polymorphisms would be required to evaluate the impact of common variation on SZ risk among Caucasian samples. To date, 98 polymorphisms have been analyzed in published association studies. We estimate that only 19 of these variations have been evaluated in samples with at least 50% power to detect an association of the effect size commonly found in genetically complex disorders. While it is possible that DA genes do not harbor genetic risk factors for SZ, our review suggests that satisfactory conclusions for most genes cannot be drawn at present. Whole-genome association studies have begun to fill this void, but additional analyses are likely to be needed. Recommendations for future association studies include analysis of adequately powered samples, judiciously selected polymorphisms, multiple ethnic groups, and concurrent evaluation of function at associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Association of the dopamine receptor D1 gene, DRD1, with inattention symptoms in families selected for reading problems

Twin studies have provided evidence for shared genetic influences between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and specific reading disabilities (RD), with this overlap being highest for the inattentive symptom dimension of ADHD. Previously, we found evidence for association of the dopamine receptor D1 gene (DRD1) with ADHD, and with the inattentive symptom dimension in particular. This, combined with evidence for working memory (WM) deficits in individuals with RD or ADHD, and the importance of D1 receptors in attentional processes and WM function, suggests that DRD1 may be a common genetic influence underlying both disorders. Here, in a study of 232 families ascertained through probands with reading problems, we tested for association of the DRD1 gene with RD, as a categorical trait, and with quantitative measures of key reading component skills, WM ability, and inattentive symptoms. Although no associations were found with RD, or with reading component skills or verbal WM, we found evidence for association with inattentive behaviour. Specifically, DRD1 Haplotype 3, the haplotype previously found to be associated with inattentive symptoms in ADHD, is also associated with parent- and teacher-reported symptoms of inattention in this sample selected for reading problems (P=0.023 and 0.004, respectively). Together, the replicated finding of Haplotype 3 association with inattentive symptoms in two independent study samples strongly supports a role for DRD1 in attentional ability. Furthermore, the association of DRD1 with inattention, but not with RD, or the other reading and reading-related phenotypes analysed, suggests that DRD1 contributes uniquely to inattention, without overlap for reading ability.

Dopamine Genes and Pathological Gambling in Discordant Sib-Pairs

Pathological gambling (PG) is an impulse control disorder that has been considered as a behavioral addiction. Recent studies have suggested the involvement of the dopaminergic system in addictions and impulse control disorders and associations of dopamine receptor genes (DRD1, DRD2, and DRD4) and PG have been reported. In the present study, 140 sib-pairs discordant for the diagnosis of PG (70 males and 70 females on each group) were recruited through the Gambling Outpatient Unit at the Institute of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo and were assessed by trained psychiatrists. A family-based association design was chosen to prevent population stratification. All subjects were genotyped for dopamine receptor genes (DRD1 -800 T/C, DRD2 TaqIA RFLP, DRD3 Ser9Gly, DRD4 48bp exon III VNTR, DRD5 (CA) repeat) and the dopamine transporter gene (SCL6A3 40 bp VNTR). Our results suggest the association of PG with DRD1 -800 T/C allele T (P = .03).

Haplotype association study between DRD1 gene and bipolar type I affective disorder in two samples from Canada and Sardinia

Based on the dopaminergic hypothesis, the dopamine D(1) receptor gene (DRD1) is considered to be a good candidate gene involved in the susceptibility of bipolar disorder (BP). Genetic association between three DRD1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (-800T/C, -48A/G, and 1403T/C) and bipolar type I (BP I) disorder was performed in a case-control sample of Sardinian origin (170 BP I and 209 controls) and in an enlarged sample (229 families) of BP I trios from Toronto. The haplotype analyses generated significant global chi-square in both samples (P-value 0.024 in Toronto and 0.00042 in Sardinian). The main representative haplotypes in both samples were the -800T/-48A/1403C and the -800C/-48G/1403T. Considering each group individually, the -800C/-48G/1403T was transmitted more frequently from parents to BP I probands in Toronto sample (nominally P-value = 0.047) and was more frequent in cases than in control subjects in Sardinian sample although showing no significant evidence of association (nominally P-value = 0.16) When the estimated haplotype counts of both samples were combined, the global chi(2) was significant (P-value = 0.00085) and the nominal P-value for the haplotype -800C/-48G/1403T was 0.01. The fact that the same haplotype shows a similar trend for association in samples originating from different ethnic backgrounds seems to imply that the -800C/-48G/1403T haplotype may be considered as a risk factor for BP I disorder.

Dopamine receptor D1 gene -48A/G polymorphism is associated with bipolar illness but not with schizophrenia in a Polish population

Dysregulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission has been implicated in the etiology of major psychoses. The dopamine D(1) receptor (DRD1) plays a role in some brain functions and mechanisms of psychotropic drugs. Therefore, the DRD1 gene makes a good candidate gene for molecular genetic studies in schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder. In the present study, the -48A/G polymorphism of the DRD1 gene was estimated in patients with schizophrenia (n=407) or bipolar affective disorder (n=380), and in healthy controls (n=399). No association was found between the polymorphism studied and schizophrenia, either in the whole group of patients or in subgroups divided by gender, age at onset or predominance of positive or negative symptoms. A statistical trend was obtained for an association between this polymorphism and bipolar affective disorder (p=0.059 for genotypes, p=0.073 for alleles). The G/G genotype and G allele were significantly more frequent in patients with bipolar disorder, type II (p=0.016 for genotypes, p=0.008 for alleles), especially in the women subgroup (p=0.054 for genotypes, p=0.024 for alleles). An association between the G/G genotype and bipolar affective disorder with disease onset after 18 years of age was also found (p=0.022). These data suggest that the -48A/G polymorphism of the DRD1 gene may be involved in the etiology of bipolar disorder in a Polish population.

Association between dopamine receptor D1 A-48G polymorphism and methamphetamine abuse

Several lines of evidence have suggested that substance abuse is mediated by the dopaminergic rewarding system, primarily through the activity of the dopamine receptor D1 (DRD1). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the association of DRD1 A-48G polymorphism with methamphetamine (MAP) abusers and MAP-induced psychosis patients. A total of 363 MAP abusers and 425 healthy normal controls were enrolled. The structural Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Study was used to evaluate all MAP abusers. The MAP abusers were classified into psychosis (n = 135) and non-psychosis (n = 228) groups. A-48G polymorphism was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The results show that male sex and a higher frequency of MAP abuse were the predisposing factors in the development of MAP psychosis. The DRD1 -48G allele frequency in the MAP psychosis group, non-psychosis group and the healthy normal controls was 0.14, 0.18 and 0.16, respectively. No association was found between DRD1 A-48G polymorphism and MAP abuse and MAP psychosis. However, the data provided additional evidence of ethnicity-related differences in the distribution of polymorphism in comparison to previous studies.

Pharmacogenomics: a path to predictive medicine for schizophrenia

A significant variability is observed among patients in response to antipsychotics, and is caused by a variety of factors. This review summarizes the available knowledge of associations between pharmacogenetics and drug response in schizophrenia. The multifactorial etiology of schizophrenia makes it a complex interaction of symptoms. Adopting a pharmacogenomics approach represents a unique opportunity for the prediction of response to antipsychotic drugs by investigating genes implicated with specific symptoms and side effects. A network model of the interaction/crosstalk between the neurotransmitter signaling systems is presented to emphasize the importance of the genes associated with the molecular mechanisms of the disease and drug response. These genes may serve as potential susceptibility genes and drug targets for schizophrenia. The crucial point for the identification of a significant biologic marker(s) will include not only the experimental validation of the genes involved in the neurotransmitter signaling systems, but also the availability of large exactly comparable phenotyped patients samples. Coupling our knowledge of genetic polymorphisms with clinical response data promises a bright future for rapid advances in personalized medicine.

Major affective disorders and schizophrenia: a common molecular signature?

Psychiatric disorders, including affective disorders (AD) and schizophrenia (SZ) are among the most common disabling brain diseases in Western populations and result in high costs in terms of morbidity as well as mortality. Although their etiology and pathophysiology is largely unknown, family-, twin-, and adoption studies argue for a strong genetic determination of these disorders. These studies indicate that there is between 40 and 85% heritability for these disorders but point also to the importance of environmental factors. Therefore, any research strategy aiming at the identification of genes involved in the development of AD and SZ should account for the complex nature (multifactorial) of these disorders. During the last decade, molecular genetic studies have contributed a great deal to the identification of genetic factors involved in complex disorders. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the most promising genes for AD and SZ, and the methods and approaches that were used for their identification. Also, we discuss the current knowledge and hypotheses that have been formulated regarding the effect of variations on protein functioning as well as recent observations that point to common molecular mechanisms.

Bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia: a 440-single-nucleotide polymorphism screen of 64 candidate genes among Ashkenazi Jewish case-parent trios

Bipolar, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorders are common, highly heritable psychiatric disorders, for which familial coaggregation, as well as epidemiological and genetic evidence, suggests overlapping etiologies. No definitive susceptibility genes have yet been identified for any of these disorders. Genetic heterogeneity, combined with phenotypic imprecision and poor marker coverage, has contributed to the difficulty in defining risk variants. We focused on families of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, to reduce genetic heterogeneity, and, as a precursor to genomewide association studies, we undertook a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping screen of 64 candidate genes (440 SNPs) chosen on the basis of previous linkage or of association and/or biological relevance. We genotyped an average of 6.9 SNPs per gene, with an average density of 1 SNP per 11.9 kb in 323 bipolar I disorder and 274 schizophrenia or schizoaffective Ashkenazi case-parent trios. Using single-SNP and haplotype-based transmission/disequilibrium tests, we ranked genes on the basis of strength of association (P<.01). Six genes (DAO, GRM3, GRM4, GRIN2B, IL2RB, and TUBA8) met this criterion for bipolar I disorder; only DAO has been previously associated with bipolar disorder. Six genes (RGS4, SCA1, GRM4, DPYSL2, NOS1, and GRID1) met this criterion for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder; five replicate previous associations, and one, GRID1, shows a novel association with schizophrenia. In addition, six genes (DPYSL2, DTNBP1, G30/G72, GRID1, GRM4, and NOS1) showed overlapping suggestive evidence of association in both disorders. These results may help to prioritize candidate genes for future study from among the many suspected/proposed for schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. They provide further support for shared genetic susceptibility between these two disorders that involve glutamate-signaling pathways.

Preferential transmission of paternal alleles at risk genes in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Family, twin, and adoption studies have demonstrated a significant genetic contribution to the etiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Pharmacological, neuroimaging, and animal-model findings suggest imbalances in monoaminergic (dopaminergic, serotonergic, and noradrenergic) neurotransmission in ADHD. We have examined monoaminergic candidate genes for possible genetic association with ADHD in the Irish population, focusing particularly on genes of the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems. We have observed that several of these genes are associated with ADHD, including DAT1, DBH, DRD4, DRD5, and 5HT1B. Here, we present what appears to be a systematic overtransmission of paternal alleles at candidate genes associated with ADHD. For the nine genes included in the analysis, the overall odds ratio for paternal transmission was 2, compared with 1.3 for maternal transmission (paternal vs. maternal chi 2=9.6; P=.0019). Transmission to females, from either parent, was significantly stronger than to males. Possible reasons for this preferential transmission include imprinting and ascertainment bias, although results of further analyses show that the latter is unlikely.

An association study of dopamine receptors polymorphisms and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in schizophrenia

Dopamine (DA), an important neurotransmitter in prefrontal cortex (PFC), is involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. The aim of the study was to test an association between common polymorphism of genes for DA receptors DRD1, DRD2, DRD3, DRD4, and performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), measuring various functions of PFC, in 138 schizophrenic patients. Patients with G/G genotype of DRD1 tended to obtain worse results in all domains of WCST compared to patients with remaining genotypes, particularly for number of completed corrected categories, and trials to set the first category. A relationship was also found in female patients between DRD2 polymorphism and number of perseverative errors, while no association between WCST results and DRD3 or DRD4 polymorphism was observed in patients studied. The results may suggest an association between DRD1 gene polymorphism and performance on PFC test in schizophrenia. Also, the gender-dependent role of DRD2 in this process may be presumed.

Normal genetic variation, cognition, and aging

This article reviews the modulation of cognitive function by normal genetic variation. Although the heritability of "g" is well established, the genes that modulate specific cognitive functions are largely unidentified. Application of the allelic association approach to individual differences in cognition has begun to reveal the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms on specific and general cognitive functions. This article proposes a framework for relating genotype to cognitive phenotype by considering the effect of genetic variation on the protein product of specific genes within the context of the neural basis of particular cognitive domains. Specificity of effects is considered, from genes controlling part of one receptor type to genes controlling agents of neuronal repair, and evidence is reviewed of cognitive modulation by polymorphisms in dopaminergic and cholinergic receptor genes, dopaminergic enzyme genes, and neurotrophic genes. Although allelic variation in certain genes can be reliably linked to cognition--specifically to components of attention, working memory, and executive function in healthy adults--the specificity, generality, and replicability of the effects are not fully known.

Linkage of the dopamine receptor D1 gene to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has a strong genetic basis, and evidence from human and animal studies suggests the dopamine receptor D1 gene, DRD1, to be a good candidate for involvement. Here, we tested for linkage of DRD1 to ADHD by examining the inheritance of four biallelic DRD1 polymorphisms [D1P.5 (-1251HaeIII), D1P.6 (-800HaeIII), D1.1 (-48DdeI) and D1.7 (+1403Bsp1286I)] in a sample of 156 ADHD families. Owing to linkage disequilibrium between alleles at the four markers, only three haplotypes are common in our sample. Using the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT), we observed a strong bias for transmission of Haplotype 3 (1.1.1.2) from heterozygous parents to their affected children (P=0.008). Furthermore, using quantitative trait TDT analyses, we found significant and positive relationships between Haplotype 3 transmission and the inattentive symptoms, but not the hyperactive/impulsive symptoms, of ADHD. These findings support the proposed involvement of DRD1 in ADHD, and implicate Haplotype 3, in particular, as containing a potential risk factor for the inattentive symptom dimension of the disorder. Since none of the four marker alleles comprising Haplotype 3 is predicted to alter DRD1 function, we hypothesize that a functional DRD1 variant, conferring susceptibility to ADHD, is on this haplotype. To search for such a variant we screened the DRD1 coding region, by sequencing, focusing on the children who showed preferential transmission of Haplotype 3. DNA from 41 children was analysed, and no sequence variations were identified, indicating that the putative DRD1 risk variant for ADHD resides outside of the coding region of the gene.

Pharmacogenomics and renal drug disposition in the newborn

Genetic polymorphisms in the genes coding for drug metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, and drug receptors are major determinants of an individual's response to drugs. The potential interactions of pharmacogenomics of renal drug transporters and drug receptors with renal drug disposition and the immature kidneys are briefly reviewed. Examples of gene polymorphisms seen in the RAAS (renin angiotensin system), beta-adrenergic receptors, dopamine receptors and cytochrome P450 and their potential clinical impact are discussed. The human newborn has deficient hepatic and renal drug metabolism and disposition. This immaturity in drug-handling capacity may potentially be superimposed to genetic polymorphisms determining drug metabolism and transport thereby substantially increasing interpatient variability in drug dose requirements and in drug responses in the newborn. Pharmacogenomics is a tool that can be used to individualize drug therapy in newborns to minimize adverse drug effects and to optimize efficacy.

Catalog of 178 variations in the Japanese population among eight human genes encoding G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)

We screened DNAs from 48 Japanese individuals for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in eight genes encoding G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by directly sequencing the entire relevant genomic regions except for repetitive-sequence elements. This approach identified 147 SNPs and 31 insertion/deletion polymorphisms among the eight GPCR genes. On average, we identified one SNP in every 584 nucleotides. Of the 147 SNPs, 69 were identified in AGTR1, 12 in AGTR2, nine in AGTRL1, 20 in AVPR1A, nine in AVPR2, 16 in DRD1, six in ITGA2B, and six in PTGIR. Twenty-one SNPs were located in 5' flanking regions, 76 in introns, 32 in exons, and 18 in 3' flanking regions. These variants should contribute to investigations of possible correlations between genotypes and phenotypes as regards susceptibility to disease or responsiveness to drug therapy.

Linkage disequilibrium between dopamine D1 receptor gene (DRD1) and bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Based on the dopamine hypothesis, the dopamine D1 receptor gene (DRD1) is considered to be a good candidate gene for bipolar disorder (BP).

METHODS

In our study, three polymorphisms of the DRD1 gene, -800T/C, -48A/G, and 1403T/C, were analyzed in 286 BP trios. Both the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) and haplotype TDT were performed on the genotype data to test for the presence of linkage disequilibrium between DRD1 and bipolar disorder. With the extended transmission disequilibrium test (ETDT), we also calculated the maternal transmission and paternal transmission for each allele.

RESULTS

Although no association was found for each individual polymorphism, there is a significant association between DRD1 and BP for haplotype TDT analysis (chi(2) = 16.068, df = 3, p =.0011).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that DRD1 may play a role in the etiology of bipolar disorder.

Polymorphisms in dopamine receptors: what do they tell us?

Many genetic studies have focussed on dopamine receptors and their relationship to neuropsychiatric disease. Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and substance abuse have been the most studied, but no conclusive linkage or association has been found. The possible influence of dopamine receptor variants on drug response has not received as much attention. While there is some evidence that polymorphisms and mutations in dopamine receptors can alter functional activity and pharmacological profiles, no conclusive data link these gene variants to drug response or disease. The lack of unequivocal findings may be related, in part, to the subtle changes in receptor pharmacology that these polymorphisms and mutations mediate. These subtle effects may be obscured by the influence of genes controlling drug metabolism and kinetics. Further insight into the pharmacogenetics of dopamine receptors may require not just more studies, but novel approaches to the study of complex genetic traits and diseases.

Pharmacogenomics and schizophrenia

Although antipsychotic drugs are effective in alleviating schizophrenic symptoms, individual differences in patient response suggest that genetic components play a major role, and pharmacogenetic studies have indicated the possibility for a more individually based pharmacotherapy. The new field of pharmacogenomics, which focuses on genetic determinants of drug response at the level of the entire human genome, is important for development and prescription of safer and more effective individually tailored drugs. DNA microarray (DNA chip) analysis enables genome-wide scanning, using the high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms map. Pharmacogenomics will aid in understanding how genetics influence disease development and drug response, and contribute to discovery of new treatments. The rate of discovery of those polymorphisms will depend on the quality of the drug response phenotype. Prospective genotyping of schizophrenic patients for the many genes at the level of the drug target, drug metabolism, and disease pathways will contribute to individualized therapy matching the patient's unique genetic make-up with an optimally effective drug.

New dopamine receptor, D2(Longer), with unique TG splice site, in human brain

Brain dopamine receptor agonists alleviate the signs of Parkinson's disease, while dopamine receptor antagonists alleviate hallucinations and delusions in psychosis. The dopamine type 2 receptor (or D2) is blocked by antipsychotic drugs, including even the "atypical" drugs such as clozapine or remoxipride, in direct relation to their clinical potencies. Compared to the long form of the D2 receptor (D2(Long)), the short form (D2(Short)) may be three times more sensitive to benzamide antipsychotic drugs. Hence, it is essential to identify additional variants of dopamine receptors for which more selective antipsychotic drugs can be found. Although no family linkage has been found between the D2 receptor and schizophrenia, there can be brain region abnormalities in the RNA transcript expression of dopamine receptors. Therefore, in order to identify variant dopamine D2 receptors, we searched for mutations in the RNA transcripts for the dopamine D2 receptor in the striatum of post-mortem brains from individuals who died with psychosis, including schizophrenia. A new splice variant of the D2 receptor, D2(Longer), with a unique TG splice site, was found in one control brain and in two psychotic brains.

Searching high and low: a review of the genetics of bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES

To review the methodologies and findings in the genetics of bipolar disorder (BPD), and to suggest future directions for research.

METHODS

Reports of family, twin, adoption, linkage, association, cytogenetic, and animal model studies, and segregation analyses in English, were identified from multiple MEDLINE searches. Hand searches were carried out in bibliographies from review articles.

RESULTS

Family, twin, and adoption studies have provided strong evidence for a genetic etiology in BPD. Early reports of linkage of BPD to DNA markers at several chromosomal sites have not proven robust, perhaps because of the complex nature of BPD inheritance. However, linkage findings in the 1990s, on chromosomes 18, 21q, 12q, and 4p, have provided leads that are being pursued through both genetic and physical mapping. No gene has yet been definitively implicated in BPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies for increasing the power to detect BPD genes include: (1) dividing the phenotype into genetically meaningful subtypes to decrease heterogeneity: and (2) ascertaining a very large family sample--a multicenter study now in progress will collect 700 bipolar I sibling pairs. BPD may result from several genes acting in concert so that new multilocus statistical methods could enhance the capacity to detect loci involved. Family-based association studies using a very large number of newly identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may allow for more efficient screening of the genome. As the Human Genome Project approaches its goal of isolating all genes by 2003, the data generated is likely to speed identification of candidate BPD genes.

Neurotransmitter-related genes and antipsychotic response: pharmacogenetics meets psychiatric treatment

Pharmacogenetic research into neurotransmitter-related genes is helping to unravel genetic factors that determine antipsychotic response. Several genetic mutations in neurotransmitter receptors targeted by antipsychotic drugs have been found to be related to clinical response. Modern molecular genetic techniques will facilitate the identification of those mutations that determine treatment response. Future psychiatric prescription will include the genetic characterization of neurotransmitter receptors for the selection of the most beneficial drug according to the individual's pharmacogenetic profile.

Apolipoprotein E4: an allele associated with many diseases

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) was discovered as a plasma protein involved in lipoprotein metabolism. ApoE is synthesized by the liver and is also made locally in the brain. There are three common variants of apoE, resulting from common genetic variation, called E2, E3 and E4. The E3 allele is the most prevalent form, and the proportion of the three alleles differs between populations. Epidemiological studies have found that the E4 allele is associated with decreased longevity, increased plasma cholesterol levels and increased prevalence for cardiovascular disease and particularly for Alzheimer's disease. The apoE polymorphism also affects response to head trauma, cognitive decline upon ageing and several other disorders. Thus, common genetic variation in the apoE gene may be associated with successful ageing.

Dopamine D1 receptor gene polymorphism and schizophrenia in Japan

We studied the relationship between schizophrenia and the DdeI polymorphism in the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) of the dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1) gene. This polymorphism is an A (A1 allele) to G (A2 allele) transition in the 5' UTR of exon 2 at bp -48 (A-48G). One hundred forty-eight schizophrenics and 148 control subjects were investigated. No significant differences in genotypic counts and allele frequencies between schizophrenics and controls were found. Although a significant difference between the patients classified as disorganized type and the controls was discovered both in genotypic counts and allele frequencies, neither association proved significant when a Bonferroni correction was used. Moreover, there were no differences in scores of main symptoms of schizophrenia based on the Manchester Scale between patients with A1/A1 genotype and those with A1/A2 genotype. These findings suggest that this gene may not be involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia.

Support for a chromosome 18p locus conferring susceptibility to functional psychoses in families with schizophrenia, by association and linkage analysis

The action of antipsychotic drugs on dopamine receptors suggests that dopaminergic signal transmission may play a role in the development of schizophrenia. We tested eight candidate genes (coding for dopamine receptors, the dopamine transporter, and G-proteins) in 59 families from Germany and Israel, for association. A P value of .00055 (.0044 when corrected for the no. of markers tested) was obtained for the intronic CA-repeat marker G-olfalpha on chromosome 18p. The value decreased to .000088 (.0007) when nine sibs with recurrent unipolar depressive disorder were included. Linkage analysis using SSLP markers densely spaced around G-olfalpha yielded a maximum two-point LOD score of 3.1 for a marker 0.5 cM distal to G-olfalpha. Multipoint analysis under the assumption of heterogeneity supported this linkage-whether the affected pheotype was defined narrowly or broadly-as did nonparametric linkage (NPL). In 12 families with exclusively maternal transmission of the disease, the NPL value also supported linkage to this marker. In order to test for association/linkage disequilibrium in the presence of linkage, the sample was restricted to independent offspring. When this sample was combined with 65 additional simplex families (each of them comprising one schizophrenic offspring and his or her parents), the 124-bp allele of G-olfalpha was transmitted 47 times and was not transmitted 21 times (P=.009). These results suggest the existence, on chromosome 18p, of a potential susceptibility locus for functional psychoses.