Mosaic tetrasomy 8q: Inverted duplication of 8q23.3qter in an analphoid marker

Neocentric X-chromosome in a girl with Turner-like syndrome

BACKGROUND

Neocentromeres are rare human chromosomal aberrations in which a new centromere has formed in a previously non-centromeric location. We report the finding of a structurally abnormal X chromosome with a neocentromere in a 15-year-old girl with clinical features suggestive of Turner syndrome, including short stature and primary amenorrhea.

RESULT

G-banded chromosome analysis revealed a mosaic female karyotype involving two abnormal cell lines. One cell line (84% of analyzed metaphases) had a structurally abnormal X chromosome (duplication of the long arm and deletion of the short arm) and a normal X chromosome. The other cell line (16% of cells) exhibited monosomy X. C-banding studies were negative for the abnormal X chromosome. FISH analysis revealed lack of hybridization of the abnormal X chromosome with both the X centromere-specific probe and the "all human centromeres" probe, a pattern consistent with lack of the X chromosome endogenous centromere. A FISH study using an XIST gene probe revealed the presence of two XIST genes, one on each long arm of the iso(Xq), required for inactivation of the abnormal X chromosome. R-banding also demonstrated inactivation of the abnormal X chromosome. An assay for centromeric protein C (CENP-C) was positive on both the normal and the abnormal X chromosomes. The position of CENP-C in the abnormal X chromosome defined a neocentromere, which explains its mitotic stability. The karyotype is thus designated as 46,X,neo(X)(qter- > q12::q12- > q21.2- > neo- > q21.2- > qter)[42]/45,X[8], which is consistent with stigmata of Turner syndrome. The mother of this patient has a normal karyotype; however, the father was not available for study.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case of mosaic Turner syndrome involving an analphoid iso(Xq) chromosome with a proven neocentromere among 90 previously described cases with a proven neocentromere.

Inverted duplications on acentric markers: mechanism of formation

Acentric inverted duplication (inv dup) markers, the largest group of chromosomal abnormalities with neocentromere formation, are found in patients both with idiopathic mental retardation and with cancer. The mechanism of their formation has been investigated by analyzing the breakpoints and the genotypes of 12 inv dup marker cases (three trisomic, six tetrasomic, two polysomic and one X chromosome derived marker) using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization, quantitative SNP array and microsatellite analysis. Inv dup markers were found to form either symmetrically with one breakpoint or asymmetrically with two distinct breakpoints. Genotype analyses revealed that all inv dup markers formed from one single chromatid end. This observation is incompatible with the previously suggested model by which the acentric inv dup markers form through inter-chromosomal U-type exchange. On the basis of the identification of DNA sequence motifs with inverted homologies within all observed breakpoint regions, a new general mechanism is proposed for the acentric inv dup marker formation: following a double-strand break an acentric fragment forms, during either meiosis or mitosis. The open DNA end of the acentric fragment is stabilized by the formation of an intra-chromosomal loop promoted by the presence of sequences with inverted homologies. Likely coinciding with the neocentromere formation, this stabilized fragment is duplicated during an early mitotic event, insuring the marker's survival during cell division and its presence in all cells.

Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution

Since the discovery of the first human neocentromere in 1993, these spontaneous, ectopic centromeres have been shown to be an astonishing example of epigenetic change within the genome. Recent research has focused on the role of neocentromeres in evolution and speciation, as well as in disease development and the understanding of the organization and epigenetic maintenance of the centromere. Here, we review recent progress in these areas of research and the significant insights gained.

Mosaic trisomy (8)(p22 --> pter) in a fetus caused by a supernumerary marker chromosome without alphoid sequences

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to characterise a marker chromosome in cultured amniocytes of a fetus with a mos 47,XX,+mar[3]/46,XX[14] karyotype.

METHODS

The indication for prenatal cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes was advanced maternal age. Classic banding techniques (GTG- and C-banding) were performed. Microdissection combined with reverse painting was used to disclose the exact origin of the marker; the result was confirmed by chromosome painting and FISH with band-specific probes.

RESULTS

Analysis of GTG-banded chromosomes showed a small marker chromosome in 3 of the 17 colonies analysed. Subsequently, C-banding showed no alphoid sequences, suggesting the presence of a neocentromere. The parent's karyotypes were normal. After normal ultrasound findings, the parents decided to continue the pregnancy. Chromosome analysis in peripheral blood after birth demonstrated that the marker chromosome was present in 50% of the lymphocytes. Using microFISH, the marker was further characterised and appeared to be derived from chromosome region (8)(p22 --> pter).

CONCLUSION

Accurate identification of the marker chromosome was very important for prenatal counselling. Combining the results of GTG- and C-banding analysis with the results of the (micro)FISH, we concluded that the patient's karyotype is: mos 47,XX,+mar.rev ish der(8)(p22 --> pter)[50]/46,XX[50].

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of two small chromosome 8 derived supernumerary mosaic markers

Two small supernumerary mosaic marker chromosomes (SMC) were identified by conventional cytogenetics, one prenatally, the other postnatally. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, including 24-color FISH, were applied to identify both SMCs and better characterize their constitution. Patient 1: a 29 year-old man, whose wife had a spontaneous abortion, was found to have a small ring of the pericentromeric region of chromosome 8 (47,XY,+r(8)(p11q11)/46,XY). Patient 2: a 37 year-old woman had amniocentesis. The fetus was found to have a SMC; its presence was confirmed postnatally. Several FISH techniques (24-color, whole chromosome paints, centromeres, telomeres, band 8p22) led to the identification of a small analphoid marker. The marker was an inversion-duplication for part of the short arm of chromosome 8 (47,XY,+inv dup (8)(p23pter)/46,XY). The 24-color FISH allowed us to conclude that both markers originated exclusively from chromosome 8. However, the structure and content of the markers were elucidated using other molecular cytogenetic techniques, showing their complementarity.

Class II neocentromeres: a putative common neocentromere site in band 4q21.2

Neocentromeres are rare functional centromeres formed within noncentromeric chromosomal regions. We report the finding of a neocentromere in a very rare class II analphoid chromosome. This neocentromere was detected prenatally in a fetus with the karyotype: 47,XY,del(4)(p15.3q21.1),+r(4)(p15.3q21.1).ish del(4)(D4S3360+,WHS+,D4Z1-,4qsubtel+),r(4)(D4S3360-,WHS-,D4Z1+,4qsubtel-)de novo. The fetus was missing one normal chromosome 4 but had a ring chromosome, consisting of the pericentromeric region of chromosome 4, and a deleted chromosome 4, the reciprocal product of the ring formation. In situ hybridization established that the chromosome 4 pericentromeric heterochromatin was located on the ring chromosome, while the Wolf-Hirschhorn critical region and chromosome 4 subtelomeric regions were present on the deleted chromosome. A C-band-negative constriction was observed in band 4q21.2 of the deleted chromosome 4, indicating that a neocentromere had been formed in this band, allowing stable segregation during cell division. This chromosome abnormality was detected in cultured amniocytes from a 20-week pregnancy presenting with intrauterine growth retardation and echogenic bowel. The pregnancy resulted in intrauterine death at 33-34 weeks. Despite the apparently balanced karyotype, the fetus is likely to have been phenotypically impaired due to disruption of genes by the neocentromere, rearrangement and ring chromosome formation. There has been one previous report of neocentromere formation in band 4q21; the observation presented here might refine a putative common neocentromeric site to sub-band 4q21.2.

Supernumerary ring chromosome 8: Clinical and molecular cytogenetic characterization in a case report

We report on a 3-year-old male with developmental delay, autistic behavior, and minor abnormalities consistent with trisomy 8 syndrome whose cytogenetic analysis revealed mosaicism for a supernumerary ring chromosome (SRC). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies, using centromeric and yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) probes, were performed to characterize further the supernumerary chromosome. The ring origin has been detected from the short arm of chromosome 8, resulting in r(8)(p10p23.1). Moreover, uniparental disomy (UPD) using microsatellite analysis was excluded. To our knowledge a total of 25 cases, confirmed by FISH, have been reported with either supernumerary marker or ring chromosome 8. We present a detailed clinical and molecular cytogenetic characterization of this additional case in order to better define the genotype-phenotype correlation.

Two new cases of analphoid marker chromosomes

Supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) without detectable alphoid DNA represent a rare and interesting class of rearranged marker chromosomes. These SMCs are predicted to have a neocentromere and have been referred to as neocentric marker chromosomes (NMCs). We report the molecular cytogenetic characterization of two new cases of neocentromere-containing chromosomes, one on 1q43-44 and one on 15q26. Both cases were examined using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with various alpha-satellite DNA probes, and no alphoid DNA was detected. In case 1, the NMC originated from the distal long arm of chromosome 1 by chromosomal microdissection and reverse painting. This marker lacked detectable chromosome 1q subtelomeric sequences, and therefore appeared to be a small ring chromosome. After genetic counseling with a high risk for a MCA/MR syndrome (trisomy 1q43 --> q44), the family continued the pregnancy. At age 6 months, the infant demonstrated no congenital or developmental anomalies. This is the first published example of a NMC derived from chromosome 1q. The marker may be one of the smallest, if not the smallest, human NMC reported to date. In case 2, fetal ultrasonography indicated a complex heart defect (abnormal return of lower vena cava, atrial septum malformation) and bilateral hydronephrosis. Molecular cytogenetic analysis showed an inverted duplication of the distal long arm of chromosome 15 (tetrasomy 15q24 --> qter). The pregnancy was terminated. Autopsy demonstrated polycystic left kidney and dysplastic right kidney. Case 2 represents the ninth report of a neocentromere on distal chromosome 15q, suggesting that this region may possibly especially support the formation of neocentromeres.

Tetrasomy 15q25.3 --> qter resulting from an analphoid supernumerary marker chromosome in a patient with multiple anomalies and bilateral Wilms tumors

We describe a girl who had been followed since birth for apparent Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome (SGS), with macrosomia, long fingers and toes, and craniosynostosis, and presented at 4 years of age with bilateral Wilms tumors (also called nephroblastoma). Cytogenetic analysis of her peripheral blood revealed a de novo supernumerary marker chromosome. This stable marker chromosome is present in 19 of 20 lymphocytes analyzed, as well as in all 40 tumor cells (20 from each tumor) studied. Classical and molecular cytogenetic studies indicate that the marker is derived from an inverted duplication of chromosome 15q25.3 --> qter and contains a neocentromere. The presence of this marker chromosome in our patient results in tetrasomy 15q25.3 --> qter. The relationship between her genotype and phenotype are discussed in light of genes, including IGF1R and FES, mapped to the aneusomic segment.

Neocentromeres: role in human disease, evolution, and centromere study

The centromere is essential for the proper segregation and inheritance of genetic information. Neocentromeres are ectopic centromeres that originate occasionally from noncentromeric regions of chromosomes. Despite the complete absence of normal centromeric alpha-satellite DNA, human neocentromeres are able to form a primary constriction and assemble a functional kinetochore. Since the discovery and characterization of the first case of a human neocentromere in our laboratory a decade ago, 60 examples of constitutional human neocentromeres distributed widely across the genome have been described. Typically, these are located on marker chromosomes that have been detected in children with developmental delay or congenital abnormalities. Neocentromeres have also been detected in at least two types of human cancer and have been experimentally induced in Drosophila. Current evidence from human and fly studies indicates that neocentromere activity is acquired epigenetically rather than by any alteration to the DNA sequence. Since human neocentromere formation is generally detrimental to the individual, its biological value must lie beyond the individual level, such as in karyotype evolution and speciation.

Prenatal diagnosis: molecular genetics and cytogenetics

The technologies developed for the Human Genome Project, the recent surge of available DNA sequences resulting from it and the increasing pace of gene discoveries and characterization have all contributed to new technical platforms that have enhanced the spectrum of disorders that can be diagnosed prenatally. The importance of determining the disease-causing mutation or the informativeness of linked genetic markers before embarking upon a DNA-based prenatal diagnosis is, however, still emphasized. Different fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technologies provide increased resolution for the elucidation of structural chromosome abnormalities that cannot be resolved by more conventional cytogenetic analyses, including microdeletion syndromes, cryptic or subtle duplications and translocations, complex rearrangements involving many chromosomes, and marker chromosomes. Interphase FISH and the quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction are efficient tools for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of selected aneuploidies, the latter being considered to be most cost-effective if analyses are performed on a large scale. There is some debate surrounding whether this approach should be employed as an adjunct to karyotyping or whether it should be used as a stand-alone test in selected groups of women.

Domain organization at the centromere and neocentromere

Recent data indicate that the eukaryotic centromere and pericentromeric regions are organized into definable functional and structural domains. Studies in different organisms point to a model of conserved pattern of organization for these domains.

Mosaic inv dup(8p) marker chromosome with stable neocentromere suggests neocentromerization is a post-zygotic event

Marker chromosomes containing active human neocentromeres have been described in individuals where the chromosomes are non-mosaic, suggesting that they are mitotically stable, but also in individuals where there is mosaicism, raising the possibility of neocentromere instability. We report two independently ascertained individuals who are mosaic for a supernumerary marker chromosome, shown by reverse chromosome painting to have an 8p origin, resulting in mosaicism for tetrasomy 8p23.1-->pter in the patient. The markers have a primary constriction but show no detectable centromeric alpha-satellite DNA. The marker in Patient 1 demonstrated no centromere protein CENP-B binding, but associated with nine different functionally critical centromere proteins. Investigation of peripheral blood lymphocytes from this patient on five separate occasions over a 13-year period showed 23-46% mosaicism for the marker chromosome with no decrease in incidence. In vitro investigation of primary and secondary sub-clones of a lymphoblast cell line derived from the patient demonstrated 100% stability of the marker chromosome indicating that neocentromere instability is unlikely to be responsible for the mosaicism in the patient. This and other available data support a general model of neocentromerization as a post-zygotic event, irrespective of whether the supernumerary chromosome fragment has arisen during meiosis or post-fertilization at mitosis.