Functional somatotopic organisation of motoneurons supplying the rabbit masseter muscle

Morphology and Physiology of Masticatory Muscle Motor Units

Motor unit territories in masticatory muscles appear to be smaller than territories in limb muscles, and this would suggest a more localized organization of motor control in masticatory muscles. Motor unit cross-sectional areas show a wide range of values, which explains the large variability of motor unit force output. The proportion of motor unit muscle fibers containing more than one myosin heavy-chain (MHC) isoform is considerably larger in masticatory muscles than in limb and trunk muscles. This explains the continuous range of contraction speeds found in masticatory muscle motor units. Hence, in masticatory muscles, a finer gradation of force and contraction speeds is possible than in limb and in trunk muscles. The proportion of slow-type motor units is relatively large in deep and anterior masticatory muscle regions, whereas more fast-type units are more common in the superficial and posterior muscle regions. Muscle portions with a high proportion of slow-type motor units are better equipped for a finer control of muscle force and a larger resistance to fatigue during chewing and biting than muscle portions with a high proportion of fast units. For the force modulation, masticatory muscles rely mostly on recruitment gradation at low force levels and on rate gradation at high force levels. Henneman's principle of an orderly recruitment of motor units has also been reported for various masticatory muscles. The presence of localized motor unit territories and task-specific motor unit activity facilitates differential control of separate muscle portions. This gives the masticatory muscles the capacity of producing a large diversity of mechanical actions. In this review, the properties of masticatory muscle motor units are discussed.

Botulinum neurotoxin type A in the masseter muscle: effects on incisor eruption in rabbits

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum neurotoxins are responsible for the paralytic food poisoning, botulism. Commercial formulations such as botulinum neurotoxin type A are increasingly used for various conditions, including cosmetic recontouring of the lower face by injection of the large masseter muscles. The paralysis of a major muscle of mastication lowers occlusal force and thus might affect tooth eruption. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of unilateral masseter muscle injection of botulinum neurotoxin type A on the rate of eruption of incisors in a rabbit model. We hypothesized that the teeth would overerupt in an underloaded environment.

METHODS

Forty rabbits were injected with either botulinum neurotoxin type A or saline solution in 1 masseter muscle. Mastication and muscle force production were monitored, and incisor eruption rate was assessed by caliper measurement of grooved teeth.

RESULTS

The injection of saline solution had no effect. The masseter muscle injected with botulinum neurotoxin type A showed a dramatic loss of force 3 weeks after injection despite apparently normal mastication. Incisor eruption rate was significantly decreased for the botulinum neurotoxin type A group, an effect attributed to decreased attrition.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has implications for orthodontics. Although findings from ever-growing rabbit incisors cannot be extrapolated to human teeth, it is clear that botulinum neurotoxin type A caused a decrease in bite force that could influence dental eruption.

Limb, respiratory, and masticatory muscle compartmentalization: developmental and hormonal considerations

Neuromuscular compartments are subvolumes of muscle that have unique biomechanical actions and can be activated singly or in groups to perform the necessary task. Besides unique biomechanical actions, other evidence that supports the neuromuscular compartmentalization of muscles includes segmental reflexes that preferentially excite motoneurons from the same compartment, proportions of motor unit types that differ among compartments, and a central partitioning of motoneurons that innervate each compartment. The current knowledge regarding neuromuscular compartments in representative muscles involved in locomotion, respiration, and mastication is presented to compare and contrast these different motor systems. Developmental features of neuromuscular compartment formation in these three motor systems are reviewed to identify when these compartments are formed, their innervation patterns, and the process of refinement to achieve the adult phenotype. Finally, the role of androgen modulation of neuromuscular compartment maturation in representative muscles of these motor systems is reviewed and the impact of testosterone on specific myosin heavy chain fiber types is discussed based on recent data. In summary, neuromuscular compartments are pre-patterned output elements in muscle that undergo refinement of compartment boundaries and muscle fiber phenotype during maturation. Further studies are needed to understand how these output elements are selectively controlled during locomotion, respiration, and mastication.

Transneuronal tracing of vestibulo-trigeminal pathways innervating the masseter muscle in the rat

Previous studies reported that the activity of trigeminal motoneurons innervating masseter muscles is modulated by vestibular inputs. We performed the present study to provide an anatomical substrate for these physiological observations. The transynaptic retrograde tracer pseudorabies virus-Bartha was injected into multiple sites of the lower third of the superficial layer of the masseter muscle in rats, a subset of which underwent a sympathectomy prior to virus injections, and the animals were euthanized 24-120 h later. Labeled masseteric motoneurons were first found in the ipsilateral trigeminal motor nucleus following a 24-h postinoculation period; subsequent to 72-h survival times, the number of infected motoneurons increased, and at > or =96 h many of these cells showed signs of cytopathic changes. Following 72-h survival times, a few transynaptically labeled neurons appeared bilaterally in the medial vestibular nucleus (MVe) and the caudal prepositus hypoglossi (PH) and in the ipsilateral spinal vestibular nucleus (SpVe). At survival times of 96-120 h, labeled neurons were consistently observed bilaterally in all vestibular nuclei (VN), although the highest concentration of infected cells was located in the caudal part of the MVe, the SpVe, and the caudal portion of PH. The distribution and density of labeling in the VN and PH were similar in sympathectomized and nonsympathectomized rats. These anatomical data provide the first direct evidence that neurons in the VN and PH project bilaterally to populations of motoneurons innervating the lower third of the superficial layer of the masseter muscle. The MVe, PH, and SpVe appear to play a predominant integrative role in producing vestibulo-trigeminal responses.

Somatotopic Organization of Perioral Musculature Innervation within the Pig Facial Motor Nucleus

The orbicularis oris and buccinator muscles of mammals form an important subset of the facial musculature, the perioral muscles. In many taxa, these muscles form a robust muscular hydrostat capable of highly manipulative fine motor movements, likely accompanied by a specialized pattern of innervation. We conducted a retrograde nerve-tracing study of cranial nerve (CN) VII in pigs (Sus scrofa) to: (1) map the motor neuron pool distributions of the superior and inferior orbicularis oris, and the buccinator, to test the hypothesis that perioral muscle motor neuron pools exhibit a somatotopic organization within the facial motor nucleus; and (2) test the hypothesis that portions of the superior orbicularis oris (SOO) motor neuron pool also exhibit a somatotopic organization, reflecting a potential compartmentalization of function of the rostral, middle, and caudal segments of this muscle. Cresyl violet histological staining showed that the pig facial motor nucleus was comprised of 7 well-defined subnuclei. Neuroanatomical tracers injected into these perioral muscles transported to the motor neuron pools of the lateral 4 of the 7 subnuclei of the facial motor nucleus. The motor neuron pools of the perioral muscles were generally segregated from motoneurons innervating other facial muscles of the rostrum. However, motor neuron pools were not confined to single nuclei but instead spanned across 3-4 subnuclei. Perioral muscle motor neuron pools overlapped but were organized somatotopically. Motor neuron pools of portions of the SOO overlapped greatly with each other but exhibited a crude somatotopy within the SOO motor neuron pool. The large and somatotopically organized SOO motor neuron pool in pigs suggests that the upper lip might be more richly innervated than the other perioral muscles and functionally divided.

Synaptic control of motoneuronal excitability

Movement, the fundamental component of behavior and the principal extrinsic action of the brain, is produced when skeletal muscles contract and relax in response to patterns of action potentials generated by motoneurons. The processes that determine the firing behavior of motoneurons are therefore important in understanding the transformation of neural activity to motor behavior. Here, we review recent studies on the control of motoneuronal excitability, focusing on synaptic and cellular properties. We first present a background description of motoneurons: their development, anatomical organization, and membrane properties, both passive and active. We then describe the general anatomical organization of synaptic input to motoneurons, followed by a description of the major transmitter systems that affect motoneuronal excitability, including ligands, receptor distribution, pre- and postsynaptic actions, signal transduction, and functional role. Glutamate is the main excitatory, and GABA and glycine are the main inhibitory transmitters acting through ionotropic receptors. These amino acids signal the principal motor commands from peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal structures. Amines, such as serotonin and norepinephrine, and neuropeptides, as well as the glutamate and GABA acting at metabotropic receptors, modulate motoneuronal excitability through pre- and postsynaptic actions. Acting principally via second messenger systems, their actions converge on common effectors, e.g., leak K(+) current, cationic inward current, hyperpolarization-activated inward current, Ca(2+) channels, or presynaptic release processes. Together, these numerous inputs mediate and modify incoming motor commands, ultimately generating the coordinated firing patterns that underlie muscle contractions during motor behavior.

Force vectors of single motor units in a multipennate muscle

The masseter muscle of the rabbit has a complex architectural design. Restricted motor unit territories in the muscle provide an anatomic basis for accurate control of the force vector through selective activation. In addition, the muscle shows regional differences in fiber type composition. The main objective of the present study was to measure the force vectors of single motor units within the rabbit masseter muscle by a direct mechanical approach to test the hypothesis that: (1) motor units within the masseter muscle are capable of generating different force vectors; and (2) different motor unit types are distributed heterogeneously throughout the muscle. We used a force transducer, capable of measuring both the magnitude and the position of the line of action of a force in a single plane. Motor units in the masseter muscle showed a large range of twitch contraction times and force magnitudes. There was also a large variation in the direction and moment arm of the lines of action. The variation of the lines of action was (almost) as large as the range of fiber directions found inside the muscle. Largest forces, with relatively slow contraction velocities, were produced by motor units in the anterior masseter. Smaller forces and fastest twitch contractions were produced by motor units in the posterior deep masseter. In addition, motor units in the anterior masseter showed more variability in force production than in the posterior masseter. Our results support the idea that the masseter muscle is divided into functionally different parts.