Long term use of megestrol acetate by cancer survivors for the treatment of hot flashes

ESO-ESMO 4th International Consensus Guidelines for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY4)

The 4th International Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY4) took place in October 2018, in Lugano, Switzerland, organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO). Consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer in young women were updated from BCY3 with incorporation of new evidence to inform the guidelines. Areas of research priorities were also identified. This article summarizes the ESO-ESMO international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).

Management of Hormone Deprivation Symptoms After Cancer

Cancer survivors often experience symptoms related to hormone deprivation, including vasomotor symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, and sexual health concerns. These symptoms can occur due to natural menopause in midlife women, or they can be brought on by oncologic therapies in younger women or men. We searched PubMed for English-language studies from January 1990 through January 2016 to identify relevant articles on the management of hormone deprivation symptoms, including vasomotor, genitourinary, and sexual symptoms in patients with cancer. The search terms used included hormone deprivation, vasomotor symptoms, hot flash, vaginal dryness, sexual dysfunction, and breast cancer. This manuscript provides a comprehensive description of data supporting the treatment of symptoms associated with hormone deprivation.

Venlafaxine in management of hot flashes in women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Toxicity due to treatment causes a negative impact on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Hot flash symptoms, described as intense sensations of heat, sweating and flushing occur in more than 50 % of breast cancer patients taking tamoxifen. We hypothesized that venlafaxine, a selective-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor drug, was effective for reducing patient-reported hot flash scores among women treated for breast cancer compared to other non-hormonal treatments. We searched Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception till May 2015 for venlafaxine (75 mg once daily or greater) with non-hormonal comparators for the treatment of hot flashes in female breast cancer patients. The primary outcome was hot flash score (derived from patient-reported hot flash severity and frequency) in randomized controlled trials. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for each study due to variation in the outcome measures. Heterogeneity was determined using I (2) statistics, and publication bias was assessed using a contour funnel plot and Egger's tests. Pooled analyses demonstrated that venlafaxine significantly reduced hot flash scores compared to the trial comparators (overall SMD 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.40, 3.72]). There was significant heterogeneity among these studies (I (2) = 98.7%, P < 0.001). Asymmetry in the contour funnel plot suggests the presence of publication bias and a trend towards small study effects (Egger's test, P = 0.096). Venlafaxine is efficacious in managing hot flashes among women with breast cancer. This review highlights methodological issues that arise from eligible trials and recommends a collaborative approach in survivorship studies.

Cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy and physical exercise for alleviating treatment-induced menopausal symptoms in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Many breast cancer patients experience (severe) menopausal symptoms after an early onset of menopause caused by cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and physical exercise (PE), compared to a waiting list control group (WLC).

METHODS

We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from a healthcare system perspective, using a Markov model. Effectiveness data came from a recent randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy of CBT and PE. Cost data were obtained from relevant Dutch sources. Outcome measures were incremental treatment costs (ITCs) per patient with a clinically relevant improvement on a measure of endocrine symptoms, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy questionnaire (FACT-ES), and on a measure of hot flushes, the Hot Flush Rating Scale (HFRS), and costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained over a 5-year time period.

RESULTS

ITCs for achieving a clinically relevant decline on the FACT-ES for one patient were €1,051 for CBT and €1,315 for PE, compared to the WLC. The corresponding value for the HFRS was €1,067 for CBT, while PE was not more effective than the WLC. Incremental cost-utility ratios were €22,502/QALY for CBT and €28,078/QALY for PE.

CONCLUSION

CBT is likely the most cost-effective strategy for alleviating treatment-induced menopausal symptoms in this population, followed by PE. The outcomes are sensitive to a reduction of the assumed duration of the treatment effect from 5 to 3 and 1.5 years.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Patients can be prescribed CBT or, based on individual preferences, PE.

Risk factors, pathophysiology, and treatment of hot flashes in cancer

Hot flashes are prevalent and severe symptoms that can interfere with mood, sleep, and quality of life for women and men with cancer. The purpose of this article is to review existing literature on the risk factors, pathophysiology, and treatment of hot flashes in individuals with cancer. Electronic searches were conducted to identify relevant English-language literature published through June 15, 2012. Results indicated that risk factors for hot flashes in cancer include patient-related factors (eg, age, race/ethnicity, educational level, smoking history, cardiovascular risk including body mass index, and genetics) and disease-related factors (eg, cancer diagnosis and dose/type of treatment). In addition, although the pathophysiology of hot flashes has remained elusive, these symptoms are likely attributable to disruptions in thermoregulation and neurochemicals. Therapies that have been offered or tested fall into 4 broad categories: pharmacological, nutraceutical, surgical, and complementary/behavioral strategies. The evidence base for this broad range of therapies varies, with some treatments not yet having been fully tested or showing equivocal results. The evidence base surrounding all therapies is evaluated to enhance hot flash treatment decision-making by clinicians and patients.

Long-term chinese herbs decoction administration for management of hot flashes associated with endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of Chinese herbs decoction Shu-Gan-Liang-Xue on endocrine therapy- associated hot flashes symptom in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy were categorized to two groups, the control group received endocrine therapy alone, the other group is administered with Chinese herbs decoction Shu-Gan-Liang-Xue besides the endocrine therapy: Shu-Gan-Liang-Xue decoction was administered above 6 months per year for more than 2 years. Frequency of hot flashes per day was recorded, and the effect of Shu-Gan-Liang-Xue decoction on hot flashes symptom being assessed with Kupperman Scoring Index.

RESULTS

Sixty cases were analyzed, 32 cases in endocrine therapy combining Chinese herbs decoction group, 28 cases in mere endocrine therapy group. For hot flashes symptom, in Chinese herbs decoction administration group, 7 cases (21.9%) reported symptom disappeared, 22 cases (68.7%) reported symptom alleviated, 3 cases (9.4%) reported symptom not changed; in endocrine therapy alone group, 5 cases (17.9%) reported symptom disappeared, 13 cases (46.4%) reported symptom alleviated, 10 cases (10/28, 35.7%) reported symptom not changed. The difference between two groups was statistically significant (P=0.013). For sleeping disorder, in Chinese herbs decoction administration group, 27 cases (84.4%) reported symptom improved, 5 cases (15.6%) reported no change; in endocrine therapy alone group, 16 cases (57.1%) symptom improved, 12 cases (42.9%) reported no change in sleeping disorder (P=0.019), the difference was also of significance statistically.

CONCLUSION

Long-term Chinese herbs decoction administration remarkably improved hot flashes symptom and sleeping disorder associated with endocrine therapy, meanwhile without definite toxicity and influence on the risk of recurrence of tumor.

Androgen deprivation therapy-associated vasomotor symptoms

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is widely used as standard therapy in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. While efficacious, ADT is associated with multiple side effects, including decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, diabetes, loss of muscle tone and altered body composition, osteoporosis, lipid changes, memory loss, gynecomastia and hot flashes. The breadth of literature for the treatment of hot flashes is much smaller in men than that in women. While hormonal therapy of hot flashes has been shown to be effective, multiple non-hormonal medications and treatment methods have also been developed. This article reviews current options for the treatment of hot flashes in patients taking ADT.

Andropause syndrome in men treated for metastatic prostate cancer: a qualitative study of the impact of symptoms

BACKGROUND

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has become the cornerstone of treatment for men with metastatic prostate cancer. However, treatments are associated with a number of adverse effects that collectively are referred to as andropause syndrome, or the male menopause.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the experience and impact of andropause symptoms, particularly hot flashes, among men undergoing ADT for metastatic prostate cancer.

METHODS

Twenty-one men receiving ADT for metastatic prostate cancer underwent a qualitative interview focusing on the adverse effects of ADT and the impact of these symptoms on daily living and coping strategies.

RESULTS

The most frequently mentioned adverse effects were hot flashes and night sweats, gynecomastia, cognitive decline, and changes in sexual function. Hot flashes did impact on everyday functioning, and night sweats regularly disturbed sleep patterns and led to participants feeling tired and irritable. Participants reported a lack of control over their hot flashes and night sweats. There was reluctance among our sample to disclose the type of symptoms experienced to others.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of andropause symptoms, including hot flashes and night sweats, was common among this sample. Participants reported a range of cognitive and behavioral responses to these symptoms. There was some reluctance about discussing a prostate cancer diagnosis or the occurrence of symptoms with others.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings have implications for a range of individual and couple interventions to manage the impact of this constellation of symptoms.

A pilot phase II trial of magnesium supplements to reduce menopausal hot flashes in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We tested if magnesium would diminish bothersome hot flashes in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients with at least 14 hot flashes a week received magnesium oxide 400 mg for 4 weeks, escalating to 800 mg if needed. Hot flash score (frequency × severity) at baseline was compared to the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Of 29 who enrolled, 25 women completed treatment. The average age was 53.5 years; six African American, the rest Caucasian; eight were on tamoxifen, nine were on aromatase inhibitors, and 14 were on anti-depressants. Seventeen patients escalated the magnesium dose. Hot flash frequency/week was reduced from 52.2 (standard error (SE), 13.7) to 27.7 (SE, 5.7), a 41.4% reduction, p = 0.02, two-sided paired t test. Hot flash score was reduced from 109.8 (SE, 40.9) to 47.8 (SE, 13.8), a 50.4% reduction, p = 0.04. Of 25 patients, 14 (56%) had a >50% reduction in hot flash score, and 19 (76%) had a >25% reduction. Fatigue, sweating, and distress were all significantly reduced. Side effects were minor: two women stopped the drug including one each with headache and nausea, and two women had grade 1 diarrhea. Compliance was excellent, and many patients continued treatment after the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral magnesium appears to have helped more than half of the patients and was well tolerated. Side effects and cost ($0.02/tablet) were minimal. A randomized placebo-controlled trial is planned.

Managing menopausal symptoms after gynecological cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the length of survival in patients with gynecological malignancies increases due to advances in early diagnosis and therapy, quality of life becomes a major issue for the survivors. These women frequently suffer symptoms following an iatrogenically induced menopause. Many gynecologists advise these patients against hormonal replacement therapy. This review attempts to provide the clinician with information based on current evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most recent two prospective studies did not find an increase in the recurrence rates in endometrial cancer patients who used hormonal replacement therapy. To date, there are few studies on hormonal replacement therapy in patients with ovarian cancer but the available data suggest that there is no detriment to overall or disease-free survival. There are no data showing an association between poorer outcome and hormonal replacement therapy use in patients with cervical or vulvar cancers.

SUMMARY

There is no evidence showing hormones negatively influence survival after treatment for epithelial ovarian, squamous cervical or vulvar cancer. Their use can be considered in symptomatic patients with endometrial cancer, after weighing the benefits against the risk of recurrence. Gynecologic cancer survivors suffering from menopausal symptoms should be supported by advice about the alternatives to hormonal replacement therapy and by giving them nonbiased information on the present knowledge on the effects of hormonal use in women with a previous cancer. It is reasonable to prescribe hormonal replacement therapy to symptomatic, well informed patients.

Efficacy of venlafaxine, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and cyproterone acetate for the treatment of vasomotor hot flushes in men taking gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for prostate cancer: a double-blind, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Hot flushes are the most common complaints reported by men undergoing androgen suppression treatment for prostate cancer. We designed a randomised double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of three drugs, each of which has proven effective for preventing hot flushes in previous studies.

METHODS

Men with prostate cancer with an indication for androgen suppression were enrolled in the study at 106 urology centres in France between April 14, 2004, and April 20, 2007. All patients were treated for 6 months with leuprorelin (11.25 mg). At month 6, patients who spontaneously asked for treatment, or those who presented with 14 hot flushes or more during the week before the visit, were randomly assigned to either venlafaxine 75 mg daily, medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg daily, or cyproterone acetate 100 mg daily. All patients received two indistinguishable pills in the morning and one in the evening from week 1 to week 8, and one indistinguishable pill in the morning from week 9 to week 10, to comply with the double-blind design. Random assignment with a block size of three was done centrally, by fax, and each patient was given a randomisation number. The allocation sequence was stratified by centre. Assessment was done at inclusion, at randomisation, and then at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after randomisation. Participants completed a daily hot-flush diary for 1 week, and a quality of life questionnaire before each visit throughout the study. The primary outcome was the change in median daily hot-flush score between randomisation and 1 month. All patients who received at least one study treatment dose were included in the efficacy analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01011751.

FINDINGS

Of the 919 men initially enrolled, 311 were randomly assigned to one of the study treatments at 6 months: 102 to venlafaxine, 101 to cyproterone, and 108 to medroxyprogesterone. 309 patients were included in the efficacy analysis, since two were excluded for protocol deviations (one in the cyproterone and one in the medroxyprogesterone group; both were excluded because they were already undergoing treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants at randomisation). The change in median daily hot-flush score between randomisation and 1 month was -47.2% (IQR -74.3 to -2.5) in the venlafaxine group, -94.5% (-100.0 to -74.5) in the cyproterone group, and -83.7% (-98.9 to -64.3) in the medroxyprogesterone group. The decrease from baseline was significant for all three groups (p<0.0001). Pairwise comparison of treatment groups adjusted by the Bonferroni method confirmed that the decreases in hot-flush score were significantly larger in the cyproterone and medroxyprogesterone groups than in the venlafaxine group, regardless of the interval considered (p<0.0001 in all cases). There was no significant difference between the cyproterone and medroxyprogesterone groups (p>0.2 in all cases). Serious side-effects occurred in four, seven, and five patients in the venlafaxine, cyproterone, and medroxyprogesterone groups, respectively, of which none, one (dyspnoea), and one (urticaria) were considered related to the drug, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

After 6 months of treatment with leuprorelin, venlafaxine, cyproterone, and medroxyprogesterone proved to be effective in reducing hot flushes. However, the hormonal treatments cyproterone and medroxyprogesterone were significantly more effective than venlafaxine. As cyproterone is a recognised treatment in prostate cancer, and its use could interfere with hormonal therapy, medroxyprogesterone could be considered to be the standard treatment for hot flushes in men undergoing androgen suppression for prostate cancer.

FUNDING

Takeda Laboratories, Puteaux, France.

[Trazodone: a new selective approach to the treatment of hot flashes induced by androgen deprivation in prostate carcinoma?]

The growing relevance of prostate carcinoma in the developed world requires serious attention to focus on the risk-benefit relationships of the treatments used. Given the increasingly complex therapeutic approach to prostate carcinoma, an extensive range of knowledge is required. Androgen deprivation plays a central role in this disease. The management of androgen deprivation-derived toxicity in the form of hot flashes, metabolic syndrome, osteoporosis, cognitive disorders, etc., is of growing interest. The drug treatment of hot flashes involves hormone management that is not without oncological risk and moreover generates considerable toxicity. Antidepressants in turn play an important role in the non-hormone treatment of this disorder. Trazodone, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor/5-HT2A receptor antagonist affording more selective action upon the receptors implicated in hot flashes, could be of great interest. Trazodone shows great affinity for the 5-HT2A receptors and moderate affinity for the 5-HT1A receptors. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, or 5-HT) levels are known to be lowered in postmenopausal women, and normalize when replacement therapy is provided. This suggests that abrupt sexual hormone deprivation gives rise to a reduction in blood serotonin - with a subsequent increase in its hypothalamic 5-HT2A receptors. These receptors would be implicated in the physiopathology of hot flashes; as a result, the blocking of such receptors is one of the principal therapeutic measures. The use of trazodone, increasing the serotonin concentrations and blocking the 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A receptors, could be viewed as a novel management approach more in line with the physiopathology of hot flashes. Well designed comparative studies are needed to establish the efficacy of such treatment. Other issues pending clarification would be the most effective dose and duration of treatment for controlling hot flashes.

Management of complications from estrogen deprivation in breast cancer patients

In the United States today, more than 2 million women live as breast cancer survivors. As the number of cancer survivors grows, the unique long-term side effects of cancer treatment and aging play an increasingly prominent role in the routine care of these patients. Of special concern are the short- and long-term effects of sex hormone deprivation. This article reviews current issues surrounding the acute and late effects associated with hormone deprivation in breast cancer survivors and summarizes the scientific and therapeutic discoveries to date to identify optimal nonestrogenic treatments for symptom control in individual patients.

Phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial of two doses of megestrol acetate as treatment for menopausal symptoms in women with breast cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Study 9626

PURPOSE

Prior progestin studies treating hot flashes in women have been short duration and single dose. This study tests the progestin megestrol acetate (MA) at two doses versus placebo over 6 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with T1-3, N0-1, M0 breast cancer were eligible after completion of surgery and chemotherapy and at least 4 months of tamoxifen (if prescribed). Women were required to have at least 10 hot flashes of any severity or at least five severe episodes per week. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo, MA 20 mg, or MA 40 mg for 3 months. Success at 3 months was defined as completion of treatment with a >or= 75% reduction in hot flashes from baseline. If success was achieved, drug treatment for another 3 months was given on the same blinded arm; if not, open-label MA 20 mg was added to blinded study drug and continued for 3 months. Other menopausal symptoms were also assessed.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty eight eligible women were randomly assigned (286 eligible), of whom 85% were on tamoxifen, 40% had over 63 hot flashes/week, and 75% had vasomotor symptoms for >or= 6 months. Success at 3 months was 14% on placebo, 65% on 20 mg, and 48% on 40 mg (both MA doses superior to placebo; P < .0001). Most successes at 3 months were maintained at 6 months (77% on 20 mg and 81% on 40 mg).

CONCLUSION

MA significantly reduced vasomotor symptoms with durable benefit over 6 months. MA 20 mg/d is the preferred dose. There was no significant impact on other menopausal symptoms.

Hot Flash Experience in Men With Prostate Cancer: A Concept Analysis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To provide a clear definition of the hot flash experience in men with prostate cancer receiving hormonal treatment.

DATA SOURCES

Articles, book chapters, and electronic sources.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The hot flash experience has not been explored previously in men with prostate cancer. The physiologic and psychological scopes of the phenomenon are described as a multidimensional experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The essential attributes of hot flashes in men consist of physiologic (e.g., warmth, sweating, chills) and psychological (e.g., anxiety, impaired memory, agitation) factors. Antecedents to the experience include demographics, disease, and treatment modality. Consequences include effects on sleep, cognition, and health-related quality of life.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Evaluation of the hot flash experience in men receiving hormonal ablation should include assessment of the symptoms associated with the treatment modality and nursing interventions to help ameliorate symptoms. Future research is needed to focus on providing symptom management to decrease the severity or prevent the occurrence of multiple symptoms related to androgen ablation therapy.

Therapeutic options for the management of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors: An evidence-based review

BACKGROUND

Women with breast cancer may experience treatment-induced menopausal symptoms or natural menopause. Menopausal symptoms, particularly hot flashes, are reported at a high frequency in this group and tend to be more severe, distressing, and of greater duration than in controls. Because of the contribution of sex hormones to breast cancer, the use of hormonal agents for the control of hot flashes is problematic in these women. Safer nonhormonal alternatives are recommended for this patient group.

OBJECTIVES

This was a systematic review of the therapeutic options for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched from 1990 to July 2006 using the disease-specific term breast neoplasms and the subheadings menopause and hot flashes. EMBASE was searched from 1990 to March 2006 using the disease-specific subject headings breast tumor/ breast cancer and menopause and the key word hot flashes. The reference lists of the identified articles and relevant review articles were examined for additional publications. Pertinent articles and abstracts of large randomized controlled trials focusing on the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors were selected for review. Pilot studies were excluded.

RESULTS

A number of nonpharmacologic approaches are available for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors, although they appear to be of limited effectiveness. Complementary alternative medicine therapies and vitamin E have been found to have modest effectiveness at best, and data on their long-term safety are not available. Centrally active agents such as the antidepressants venlafaxine and paroxetine and the anti seizure agent gabapentin have shown clinical effectiveness and appear to be reasonably well tolerated in this population.

CONCLUSIONS

Centrally active agents (eg, venlafaxine, paroxetine, gabapentin) are regarded as the most promising nonhormonal treatments for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors. Nonpharmacologic and complementary alternative medicine therapies have limited effectiveness.

Endocrine Effects of Breast Cancer Treatment

OBJECTIVES

To discuss long-term physical effects of treatment for breast cancer including effects on reproductive, bone, sexual health, and related women's issues.

DATA SOURCES

Research articles, abstracts, literature reviews.

CONCLUSION

Long-term effects of treatment have become increasingly prevalent in breast cancer survivors. The most common are effects on reproductive, bone, and sexual health.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Long-term effects of treatment can have a significant negative impact on the long-term health and QOL of women with breast cancer. Oncology nurses are well-positioned to anticipate and address the reproductive and endocrine consequences of breast cancer treatment.

Hot flash therapies in breast cancer survivors

More than 86% of those diagnosed with invasive breast cancer are expected to survive for >/= 5 years after their diagnosis. Approximately 75% of postmenopausal women who had breast cancer report experiencing hot flashes. More than 90% of young survivors also experience hot flashes, which can be more severe and long lasting, with iatrogenic ovarian ablation or antiestrogen therapy. There are numerous options for the treatment of hot flashes. Not one treatment fits all. Some treatments are generally more effective than others, and each has different side effects. This review is meant to provide the basic information needed to make a decision about the best treatment for a breast survivor experiencing hot flashes.

Influence of hormone replacement therapy on tamoxifen-induced vasomotor symptoms

PURPOSE

Tamoxifen is an effective drug, but its role in prevention is limited by its adverse effect profile. Non-life-threatening adverse effects, such as vasomotor symptoms, have an important influence in its use for prevention. Vasomotor symptoms were evaluated according to follow-up time, severity, and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in a retrospective analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study-I study, 7,154 women at increased risk of breast cancer were randomly assigned to either tamoxifen 20 mg/d or placebo for 5 years. Women gave detailed information on any vasomotor symptoms at each 6-month follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Hot flushes were reported more often in the tamoxifen group than in the placebo group (70.6% v 57.1%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.63 to 1.99). Severe hot flushes were more strongly related to tamoxifen. In the tamoxifen arm, more women taking HRT at entry experienced hot flushes in the first 6 months than those who did not take HRT (60.8% v 49.2%, respectively; P = .09). In contrast, women on placebo taking HRT at entry experienced fewer hot flushes than women who stopped HRT (22.9% v 34.3%, respectively; P = .03). Furthermore, for women who first began HRT in the first 6 months of the trial compared with women who did not begin HRT, HRT seemed to be much more effective in controlling hot flushes in months 6 to 12 in the placebo arm (47.9% v 20.4%, respectively) than in the tamoxifen arm (51.4% v 39.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HRT use at entry or during the trial was not effective in alleviating hot flushes for women in the tamoxifen arm. Our retrospective study suggests that estrogen-based HRT has limited effectiveness among women receiving tamoxifen.

Treatment of hot flushes in breast and prostate cancer

Hot flushes, the most common health problem reported by menopausal-age women, can lead to significant morbidity and affect the social life, ability to work and sleep pattern of the sufferer. Women treated for breast cancer and men receiving androgen ablation for prostate cancer experience hot flushes that are more frequent, severe and longer lasting than those experienced by the general menopausal population. In women with breast cancer, hot flushes can result from chemotherapy-induced menopause, hormonal therapy, or ovarian suppression. In men with prostate cancer, hot flushes occur after surgical or medical castration. Hormone replacement therapy with oestrogen-based compounds has been a mainstay of treatment for hot flushes during the perimenopausal period. However, recent studies have shown that, in healthy menopausal women, hormone replacement therapy is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, myocardial infarction, thrombo-embolic events and stroke. Thus, identifying nonhormonal agents that can control hot-flush symptoms is essential to the quality of life of a growing population of cancer survivors. The most promising agents act on the CNS and include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, as well as venlafaxine and gabapentin.

Symptoms and Treatment in Cancer Therapy‐Induced Early Menopause

Young women with breast cancer often experience early menopause as a result of the therapy for their malignant disease. The sudden occurrence of menopause resulting from chemotherapy, oophorectomy, radiation, or gonadal dysgenesis frequently results in hot flashes that begin at a younger age and may occur at a greater frequency and intensity than hot flashes associated with natural menopause. Hormone therapy relieves symptoms effectively in 80%-90% of women who initiate treatment. This therapy, however, is generally contraindicated in estrogen-dependent cancers, such as breast cancer, because of the potentially increased risk for recurrence. Many agents have been investigated as potential means for alleviating hot flashes in survivors of breast cancer, such as progestagens, clonidine, gabapentin, and anti-depressants. Several complementary and alternative medicines frequently used by patients have also been studied. These include black cohosh, phytoestrogens, homeopathy, vitamin E, acupuncture, and behavior strategies. To support the use of one of more of these nonpharmacological or pharmacological options in the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer patients, more evidence from well-controlled clinical trials is needed. In particular, soundly based scientific research with complementary and alternative medicine therapies is lacking. Pharmacological treatments appear to be more beneficial than nonpharmacological treatments. This article reviews the current literature to assess the epidemiology and diagnosis of hot flashes and the nonpharmacological and pharmacological options for the treatment of hot flashes, in breast cancer patients in particular. When specific treatment options have not been evaluated in breast cancer patients specifically, published data on the management of hot flashes with this modality in healthy postmenopausal women are described.

Hot flushes in breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

A literature search was conducted to gather information concerning the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to hot flushes, their prevalence and severity in breast cancer patients, their influence on quality of life, and the best therapeutic option.

METHODS

Relevant studies in English were selected from Medline.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to hot flushes are poorly understood. Estrogen withdrawal is considered to have a central role. Also, serotonin and norepinephrine seem to be involved in hot flush induction. Menopause induced by chemotherapy or ovarian ablation, is accompanied by an abrupt decrease in estrogen level, causing vasomotor symptoms. Hot flushes are also a side effect of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. Quality of life in breast cancer patients may be negatively influenced by hot flushes, and therefore, adequate treatment is important. Currently, of the several non-hormonal options, the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) venlafaxine is the most effective in breast cancer patients. However, studies on interaction between SSRIs and tamoxifen may influence future recommendations.

Therapeutic effects of progestins, androgens, and tibolone for menopausal symptoms

Therapeutic strategies using progestins, androgens, and synthetic steroids such as tibolone are based on the understanding that estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors are localized to reproductive target tissues, brain, and bone. Unfortunately, these sex steroid receptors are widely distributed and localized to other tissues, often resulting in unintended effects. Progestins at high doses have been shown to be effective at reducing hot flashes by approximately 80% to 90%. Side effects include weight gain, mastalgia, fluid retention, vaginal discharge, and dry mouth. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), an adrenal-derived androgen, can be considered a prohormone that is peripherally converted to more potent androgens and estrogens. In studies with small numbers of subjects, DHEA has been reported to reduce vasomotor symptoms, increase sexual arousal, and improve cognitive performance. With regard to use of other androgens, there are no current testosterone preparations approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in menopausal women. In phase 3 trials, a testosterone transdermal matrix patch has been shown to be effective in treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in menopausal women on estrogen therapy. Tibolone, a synthetic steroid with estrogenic, androgenic, and progestational properties has been shown to be effective in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms and in preserving bone density, and it may provide positive effects on sexual function. The beneficial effects of these compounds in the menopausal woman for treatment of vasomotor symptoms, general well-being, cognitive deficits, bone loss, mood disorders, and sexual function are discussed. The overall clinical trial evidence for benefits and side effects also is presented.

Parenteral medroxyprogesterone for the management of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone induced hot flashes in men with advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy for advanced prostate cancer can manifest significant side effects affecting quality of life, most notably hot flashes. This study evaluated the effectiveness of parenteral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in reducing the frequency and severity of these hot flashes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective review of hot flashes from LHRH therapy for prostate cancer was conducted. The hot flashes were quantified and the severity was graded (3-point analogue scale) before and after treatment with MPA. Two doses of MPA (400 or 150 mg intramuscularly) were administered. Statistical analysis (Student's t test) evaluated the quantity of hot flashes, the quality of hot flashes, and dose effectiveness.

RESULTS

A total of 48 men (40 at 400 mg, 8 at 150 mg) with a mean age of 71.4 years (range 54 to 87) from 3 institutions were evaluated. There were 91% with symptomatic improvement with MPA, and half (46%) had a complete response defined as total elimination of hot flashes. The median number of the hot flashes per day decreased from 4 to 1 and the median severity score decreased from 2 to 1 (p <0.05). Significance was not achieved comparing the 2 doses. Complete responders were not noted with the 150 mg dose. Anticipated response to MPA did not correlate with the number or severity of the hot flashes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first multi-institutional evaluation of hot flashes demonstrating significant reduction in quantity and severity with MPA. Based on these data we now manage hot flashes associated with LHRH analogues with 400 mg of MPA.

Gabapentin for hot flashes in 420 women with breast cancer: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Most women receiving systemic therapy for breast cancer experience hot flashes. We undertook a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-institutional trial to assess the efficacy of gabapentin in controlling hot flashes in women with breast cancer.

METHODS

420 women with breast cancer who were having two or more hot flashes per day were randomly assigned placebo, gabapentin 300 mg/day, or gabapentin 900 mg/day by mouth in three divided doses for 8 weeks. Each patient kept a 1-week, self-report diary on the frequency, severity, and duration of hot flashes before the start of the study and during weeks 4 and 8 of treatment. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Evaluable data were available on 371 participants at 4 weeks (119 placebo, 123 gabapentin 300 mg, and 129 gabapentin 900 mg) and 347 at 8 weeks (113 placebo, 114 gabapentin 300 mg, and 120 gabapentin 900 mg). The percentage decreases in hot-flash severity score between baseline and weeks 4 and 8, respectively were: 21% (95% CI 12 to 30) and 15% (1 to 29) in the placebo group; 33% (23 to 43) and 31% (16 to 46) in the group assigned gabapentin 300 mg; and 49% (42 to 56) and 46% (34 to 58) in the group assigned gabapentin 900 mg. The differences between the groups were significant (p=0.0001 at 4 weeks and p=0.007 at 8 weeks by ANCOVA for overall treatment effect, adjusted for baseline values); only the higher dose of gabapentin was associated with significant decreases in hot-flash frequency and severity.

INTERPRETATION

Gabapentin is effective in the control of hot flashes at a dose of 900 mg/day, but not at a dose of 300 mg/day. This drug should be considered for treatment of hot flashes in women with breast cancer.

State of the science: hot flashes and cancer. Part 2: management and future directions

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To critically evaluate and synthesize intervention research related to hot flashes in the context of cancer and to identify implications and future directions for policy, research, and practice.

DATA SOURCES

Published, peer-reviewed articles and textbooks; editorials; and computerized databases.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Although a variety of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments are available, they may not be appropriate or effective for all individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

The large and diverse evidence base and current national attention on hot flash treatment highlight the importance of the symptom to healthcare professionals, including oncology nurses.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Using existing research to understand, assess, and manage hot flashes in the context of cancer can prevent patient discomfort and improve the delivery of evidence-based care.

A practical guide to the management of menopausal symptoms in breast cancer patients

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in Canadian women. As a result of increased screening and improved treatment, more women are becoming long-term breast cancer survivors. However, due to either their treatment or prolonged survival, many of these women now have to face the consequences of premature menopause and prolonged estrogen deprivation. Hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy (HRT/ERT) has, in the past, been recommended to healthy women at menopause not only for relief of short-term menopausal changes, particularly hot flashes, but also for its benefits on bone density, fracture reduction, and genitourinary symptoms. Recent studies have demonstrated that not only is HRT associated with an increased risk of developing breast cancer, but it also has been shown to increase the risk of recurrence in those with a breast cancer history. Until the safety of HRT/ERT in breast cancer patients can be more fully clarified, it would be wise to develop alternative strategies for the management of menopausal symptoms in these patients. This paper will discuss nonestrogen-based therapies for hot flashes, osteoporosis, and genitourinary symptoms, with emphasis on efficacy and safety in breast cancer survivors.

Hormone replacement therapy in cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

Thousands of women are treated each year for cancer; many of these are already in menopause, while other younger patients will go into early menopause due to surgery, or chemotherapy, or the need for radiotherapy to the pelvic region. In most cases the oncologist and the gynaecologist would advise these women against the use of HRT. The purpose of this paper is to review biological and clinical evidences in favour and against HRT use in the different tumours and to propose an algorithm that can help choosing the treatment for the single woman.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review through April 2002 concerning: (1) biological basis of hormonal modulation of tumour growth; (2) epidemiological data on the impact of HRT on different cancers risk in healthy women; (3) safety of HRT use in cancer survivors; (4) alternatives to HRT.

RESULTS

With the exception of meningioma, breast and endometrial cancer, there is no biological evidence that HRT may increase recurrence risk. In women with previous breast and endometrial cancer HRT is potentially hazardous on a biological basis, even if published data do not show any worsening of prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if a cautious approach to hormonal-dependent neoplasias is fully comprehensible and the available alternative treatment should be taken into greater consideration, the reticence to prescribe HRT in women previously treated for other non hormone-related tumours has neither a biological nor a clinical basis. An algorithm based on present knowledge is proposed.

Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Failure

Thanks to improvements in treatment regimens, more and more patients are now surviving cancer. However, cancer survivors are faced with the serious long-term effects of the different modalities of cancer treatments. One of these adverse effects is chemotherapy-induced irreversible damage to the ovarian tissues, which leads to premature ovarian failure and its resulting consequences such as hot flashes, osteoporosis, sexual dysfunction and the risk of infertility. Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure (or chemotherapy-induced premature menopause) affects the quality of life of female cancer survivors. Although there is no clear definition of chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, irreversible amenorrhoea lasting for several months (>12 months) following chemotherapy and a follicle stimulating hormone level of > or = 30 MIU/mL in the presence of a negative pregnancy test seems to be an appropriate characterisation. Different chemotherapy agents, alkylating cytotoxics in particular, have the potential to cause progressive and irreversible damage to the ovaries. The result of this damage is a state of premature ovarian failure, with progressive declining of estrogen levels, decreasing bone mass and an increased risk of fractures. Historically, hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) has been used to treat menopausal problems in the general population, but concerns about the potential of estrogen to increase the risk of breast cancer in women at high-risk or increase the risk of recurrence in cancer survivors, have forced physicians to utilise alternative treatments. This review discusses some of the newer therapies that are now available to provide appropriate symptom control, avoid complications such as fractures and possibly prevent infertility by making the ovarian epithelium less susceptible to cytotoxic agents.

Prevention by 17β-estradiol and progesterone of calcitonin gene-related peptide-induced elevation of skin temperature in castrated male rats

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the relationship between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and ovarian hormones (17beta-estradiol and progesterone) in hot flashes in men who undergo androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, we studied the effects of ovarian hormones on CGRP-induced elevation of skin temperature in castrated male rats. The results were compared with those from rats treated with testosterone replacement.

METHODS

Adult male rats were castrated by either a single injection of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (Leuplin, 1.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) or bilateral orchiectomy. The castrated animals were subcutaneously injected daily for 14 days with ovarian hormones, testosterone, or olive oil as the vehicle. On the day after the final administration of the drug, the changes in skin temperature induced by exogenous CGRP (10 mug/kg intravenously), serum testosterone concentration, and prostate weight were measured.

RESULTS

The CGRP-induced elevation of skin temperature was significantly greater in the castrated rats than in the sham-treated rats. This potentiation was significantly inhibited by treatment with ovarian hormones, as well as by testosterone replacement. The testosterone replacement restored decreases in both the serum testosterone level and the prostate weight due to castration; the treatment with ovarian hormones did not affect them.

CONCLUSIONS

17beta-Estradiol and progesterone, which do not confer testosterone activity on serum, may be useful for the treatment of hot flashes in patients for whom testosterone replacement therapy is contraindicated, such as those with prostate carcinoma. In addition, we suggest that CGRP is closely involved in the amelioration of hot flashes by ovarian hormones in men who undergo androgen deprivation therapy.

Complications of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Androgen deprivation as a form of treatment for prostate cancer has been used for decades. Within the last decade, however, there has been a significant increase in its use. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the physician to be familiar with the side effects associated with this treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some of the side effects such as osteoporosis, changes in lipid profiles, and anemia may have significant morbidity associated with them, while other side effects such as impotence, decreased libido, fatigue, and hot flashes primarily affect the patient's quality of life. Prevention strategies and treatments exist for many of these side effects.

SUMMARY

This review will update physicians treating patients with androgen deprivation therapy on the side effects associated with this treatment. Once physicians are aware of the potential side effects, they can educate patients on what to expect when starting androgen deprivation therapy. More importantly, physicians can now prevent some of these complications prior to their occurrence, and when these complications occur they have knowledge of the latest treatments.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy before and after breast cancer: clinical experiences

Conventional oestrogen-based hormone therapy (HT) increases the incidence of breast pain and tenderness, mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer. Combined oestrogen plus progestogen therapy (EPT) increases the risk of breast cancer to a greater degree than oestrogen alone (ET). Attention must therefore be focused on identifying women at risk of breast cancer or on producing a HT that has fewer breast side effects. Randomised controlled trials have shown that while EPT induces breast tenderness or pain in up to 50% of women and increases mammographic density in up to 70% during the first year of treatment, only about as many as one-tenth women report breast tenderness or pain with tibolone and increases in mammographic density are rare, occurring with a similar incidence as seen in untreated controls. Many women with breast cancer suffer vasomotor symptoms rather than risk recurrence with conventional HT. However, in a small randomised controlled trial in women with early breast cancer undergoing adjuvant tamoxifen treatment, tibolone reduced hot flushes, night sweats and improved quality of life compared with placebo.

Can hypnosis reduce hot flashes in breast cancer survivors? A literature review

Hot flashes are a significant problem for many breast cancer survivors and can cause discomfort, insomnia, anxiety, and decreased quality of life. In the past, the standard treatment for hot flashes has been hormone replacement therapy. However, recent research has found an increased risk of breast cancer in women receiving hormone replacement therapy. As a result, many menopausal women and breast cancer survivors reject hormone replacement therapy and many women want non-pharmacological treatment. In this critical review we assess the potential use of hypnosis in reducing the frequency and intensity of hot flashes. We conclude that hypnosis is a mind-body intervention that may be of significant benefit in treatment of hot flashes and other benefits may include reduced anxiety and improved sleep. Further, hypnosis may be a preferred treatment because of the few side-effects and the preference of many women for a non-hormonal therapy. Two case studies are included to illustrate hypnosis for hot flashes. However this intervention has not been adequately studied. We discuss an NIH-funded randomized clinical trial of hypnosis for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors that is presently being conducted.

Treatment of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: position statement of The North American Menopause Society

OBJECTIVE

To create an evidence-based position statement regarding the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.

DESIGN

The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) enlisted clinicians and researchers acknowledged to be experts in the field of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms to review the evidence obtained from the medical literature and develop a document for final approval by the NAMS Board of Trustees.

RESULTS

For mild hot flashes, lifestyle-related strategies such as keeping the core body temperature cool, participating in regular exercise, and using paced respiration have shown some efficacy without adverse effects. Among nonprescription remedies, clinical trial results are insufficient to either support or refute efficacy for soy foods and isoflavone supplements (from either soy or red clover), black cohosh, or vitamin E; however, no serious side effects have been associated with short-term use of these therapies. Single clinical trials have found no benefit for dong quai, evening primrose oil, ginseng, a Chinese herbal mixture, acupuncture, or magnet therapy. Few data support the efficacy of topical progesterone cream; safety concerns should be the same as for other progestogen preparations. No clinical trials have been conducted on the use of licorice for hot flashes. Among nonhormonal prescription options, the antidepressants venlafaxine, paroxetine, and fluoxetine and the anticonvulsant gabapentin have demonstrated some efficacy for treating hot flashes and were well tolerated. Two antihypertensive agents, clonidine and methyldopa, have shown modest efficacy but with a relatively high rate of adverse effects. For moderate to severe hot flashes, systemic estrogen therapy, either alone (ET) or combined with progestogen (EPT) or in the form of estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives, has been shown to significantly reduce hot flash frequency and severity. Clinical trials have associated ET/EPT with adverse effects, including breast cancer, stroke, and thromboembolism. Several progestogens (both oral and intramuscular formulations) have shown efficacy in treating hot flashes, including women with a history of breast cancer, although no definitive data are available on long-term safety in these women.

CONCLUSIONS

In women who need relief for mild vasomotor symptoms, NAMS recommends first considering lifestyle changes, either alone or combined with a nonprescription remedy, such as dietary isoflavones, black cohosh, or vitamin E. Prescription systemic estrogen-containing products remain the therapeutic standard for moderate to severe menopause-related hot flashes. Recommended options for women with concerns or contraindications relating to estrogen-containing treatments include prescription progestogens, venlafaxine, paroxetine, fluoxetine, or gabapentin. Clinicians are advised to enlist women's participation in decision making when weighing the benefits, harms, and scientific uncertainties of therapeutic options. Regardless of the management strategy adopted, treatment should be periodically reassessed as menopause-related vasomotor symptoms will abate over time without any intervention in most women.

Place des antidépresseurs sérotoninergiques dans la prise en charge des bouffées de chaleur en cancérologie

INTRODUCTION

Menopausal women or patients treated by chemotherapy or hormonotherapy for breast cancer have often disabled hot flashes. Men with prostate cancer confronted to castration can also suffer from the same problem. In both situations, many arguments go against implementation of estrogenic treatment. Albeit, many complementary therapeutics exist, they are often unsatisfying.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Since some years, anecdotal case reports and controlled studies have reported interest of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) antidepressants in this indication. These treatments often appear efficient and well tolerated.

FUTURE AND PROJECTS

Through a review of literature and clinical vignette, we will specify physiopathology and prescription modalities in this new type of indication.

Hormone replacement therapy and the breast

Increasing numbers of women are using hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in their 50s and 60s. Oestrogen alone or oestrogen and progestogen combined given in this age group increase breast density and this has the effect of reducing both the sensitivity and specificity of breast screening in HRT users. HRT significantly increases the risk of developing breast cancer with combinations of oestrogen and progestogens increasing the risk to a greater degree than oestrogen alone. The longer HRT is used the greater the risk with 5 years use being associated with risks of 1.05-1.16 for oestrogen alone and 1.24-1.45 for oestrogen and progestogen combined. No consistent effect of HRT on breast cancer mortality has been demonstrated. Two studies have reported that more than 5 years HRT use is associated with an increased risk of death from breast cancer. A variety of non-oestrogenic agents are available to control menopausal symptoms and these may be of particular value in breast cancer survivors. HRT has been used in breast cancer survivors and although published data are reassuring, none have included sufficient patient numbers to detect small effects of HRT on breast cancer outcome. Prospective randomised trials are underway but are unlikely to include sufficient numbers to exclude a small adverse influence of HRT on breast cancer mortality. Tibolone, a gonadomemetic agent which has been used to control menopausal symptoms, appears to have less direct effects on the breast and is being evaluated as an alternative to oestrogen in breast cancer survivors who develop significant menopausal symptoms resistant to non-hormonal therapies. There is clear evidence that HRT causes breast cancer and the challenge for the physician is to control the menopausal symptoms using HRT or alternatives while at the same time limiting the risks associated with this treatment.

Treating hot flashes in breast cancer survivors: a review of alternative treatments to hormone replacement therapy

As the number of breast cancer survivors continues to grow, factors associated with quality of life are receiving increased clinical and research attention. This attention is imperative given the aftermath of psychological and physiologic side effects that commonly result from a cancer diagnosis and cancer-related treatments, including menopausal symptoms. Hot flashes, the most prevalent of these symptoms, have been shown to significantly decrease quality of life in women. Although manageable with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), hot flashes often are especially problematic in breast cancer survivors, a population that typically is not treated with HRT because of controversial evidence of a relationship among estrogen and/or progesterone and breast cancer recurrence and mortality. Furthermore, hot flashes commonly are more severe in premenopausal women who experience acute menopause as a result of chemotherapy treatment. In recent years, several treatment alternatives to HRT have been investigated. Given the significant number of women affected by breast cancer and the negative impact that hot flashes can have on their quality of life, this article reviews alternatives to HRT for reducing hot flash symptoms in breast cancer survivors.

Andropause: Symptom Management for Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Hormonal Ablation

Andropause, or the age-related decline in serum testosterone, has become a popular topic in the medical literature over the past several years. Andropause includes a constellation of symptoms related to lack of androgens, including diminished libido, decreased generalized feeling of well-being, osteoporosis, and a host of other symptoms. The andropause syndrome is very prominent in men undergoing hormonal ablation therapy for prostate cancer. Most significant in this population are the side effects of hot flashes, anemia, gynecomastia, depression, cognitive decline, sarcopenia, a decreased overall quality of life, sexual dysfunction, and osteoporosis with subsequent bone fractures. The concept of andropause in prostate cancer patients is poorly represented in the literature. In this article, we review the current literature on the symptoms, signs, and possible therapies available to men who cannot take replacement testosterone.

Management of surgically hypogonadal patients unable to take sex hormone replacement therapy

Lifestyle changes in diet, exercise and the environment may help to prevent or ameliorate hot flashes and low bone density in men and women after surgical castration. Conventional medications, including megestrol acetate, SSRIs or clonidine, may improve hot flashes but may have limiting side effects. Some complementary and alternative approaches, including black cohosh, vitamin E, and soy products, work as well as placebo to decrease hot flashes and may be helpful, because they have low toxicity. Acupuncture and neurontin are promising but must be studied further. With regards to the prevention of osteoporosis and fractures in men and women, bisphosphonates are the most potent of the currently available agents; calcitonin is less effective. PTH has a large beneficial effect but is not yet available and is less well studied. In women, continued sexual intercourse and use of vaginal lubricants and moisturizers help to minimize symptoms of vaginal atrophy but do not ameliorate urinary symptoms. Low dose local estrogen treatment is a promising approach for the latter complaints.