Induction of graft vs. tumor effect in a murine model of mammary adenocarcinoma

Modifying the tumour microenvironment and reverting tumour cells: New strategies for treating malignant tumours

The tumour microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in tumour fate determination. The TME acts together with the genetic material of tumour cells to determine their initiation, metastasis and drug resistance. Stromal cells in the TME promote the growth and metastasis of tumour cells by secreting soluble molecules or exosomes. The abnormal microenvironment reduces immune surveillance and tumour killing. The TME causes low anti‐tumour drug penetration and reactivity and high drug resistance. Tumour angiogenesis and microenvironmental hypoxia limit the drug concentration within the TME and enhance the stemness of tumour cells. Therefore, modifying the TME to effectively attack tumour cells could represent a comprehensive and effective anti‐tumour strategy. Normal cells, such as stem cells and immune cells, can penetrate and disrupt the abnormal TME. Reconstruction of the TME with healthy cells is an exciting new direction for tumour treatment. We will elaborate on the mechanism of the TME to support tumours and the current cell therapies for targeting tumours and the TME—such as immune cell therapies, haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation therapies, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transfer and embryonic stem cell‐based microenvironment therapies—to provide novel ideas for producing breakthroughs in tumour therapy strategies.

The Osteogenic Niche Is a Calcium Reservoir of Bone Micrometastases and Confers Unexpected Therapeutic Vulnerability

The fate of disseminated tumor cells is largely determined by microenvironment (ME) niche. The osteogenic niche promotes cancer cell proliferation and bone metastasis progression. We investigated the underlying mechanisms using pre-clinical models and analyses of clinical data. We discovered that the osteogenic niche serves as a calcium (Ca) reservoir for cancer cells through gap junctions. Cancer cells cannot efficiently absorb Ca from ME, but depend on osteogenic cells to increase intracellular Ca concentration. The Ca signaling, together with previously identified mammalian target of rapamycin signaling, promotes bone metastasis progression. Interestingly, effective inhibition of these pathways can be achieved by danusertib, or a combination of everolimus and arsenic trioxide, which provide possibilities of eliminating bone micrometastases using clinically established drugs.

Recipient and donor cells in the graft-versus-solid tumor effect: It takes two to tango

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) produces -similar to the long-established graft-versus-leukemia effect- graft-versus-solid-tumor effects. Clinical trials reported response rates of up to 53%, occurring mostly but not invariably in association with full donor chimerism and/or graft-versus-host disease. Although donor-derived T cells are considered the principal effectors of anti-tumor immunity after alloHSCT or donor leukocyte infusion (DLI), growing evidence indicate that recipient-derived immune cells may also contribute. Whereas the role of recipient-derived antigen-presenting cells in eliciting graft-versus-host reactions and priming donor T cells following DLI is well known, resulting inflammatory responses may also break tolerance of recipient effector cells towards the tumor. Additionally, mouse studies indicated that post-transplant recipient leukocyte infusion produces anti-leukemia and anti-solid-tumor effects that were exclusively mediated by recipient-type effector cells, without graft-versus-host disease. Here, we review current preclinical and clinical evidence on graft-versus-solid-tumor effects and growing evidence on the effector role of recipient-derived immune cells in the anti-tumor effect of alloHSCT.

Stem cells in cancer therapy: opportunities and challenges

Metastatic cancer cells generally cannot be eradicated using traditional surgical or chemoradiotherapeutic strategies, and disease recurrence is extremely common following treatment. On the other hand, therapies employing stem cells are showing increasing promise in the treatment of cancer. Stem cells can function as novel delivery platforms by homing to and targeting both primary and metastatic tumor foci. Stem cells engineered to stably express various cytotoxic agents decrease tumor volumes and extend survival in preclinical animal models. They have also been employed as virus and nanoparticle carriers to enhance primary therapeutic efficacies and relieve treatment side effects. Additionally, stem cells can be applied in regenerative medicine, immunotherapy, cancer stem cell-targeted therapy, and anticancer drug screening applications. However, while using stem cells to treat human cancers appears technically feasible, challenges such as treatment durability and tumorigenesis necessitate further study to improve therapeutic performance and applicability. This review focuses on recent progress toward stem cell-based cancer treatments, and summarizes treatment advantages, opportunities, and shortcomings, potentially helping to refine future trials and facilitate the translation from experimental to clinical studies.

Safety and Efficacy of Transplantation with Allogeneic Skin Tumors to Treat Chemically-Induced Skin Tumors in Mice

Background

Transplantation with allogeneic cells has become a promising modality for cancer therapy, which can induce graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect. This study was aimed at assessing the safety, efficacy, and tissue type GVT (tGVT) response of transplantation with allogeneic skin tumors to treat chemically-induced skin tumors in mice.

Material/Methods

FVB/N and ICR mice were exposed topically to chemicals to induce skin tumors. Healthy ICR mice were transplanted with allogeneic skin tumors from FVB/N mice to test the safety. The tumor-bearing ICR mice were transplanted with, or without, allogeneic skin tumors to test the efficacy. The body weights (BW), body condition scores (BCS), tumor volumes in situ, metastasis tumors, overall survival, and serum cytokines were measured longitudinally.

Results

Transplantation with no more than 0.03 g allogeneic skin tumors from FVB/N mice to healthy ICR mice was safe. After transplantation with allogeneic skin tumors to treat tumor-bearing mice, it inhibited the growth of tumors slightly at early stage, accompanied by fewer metastatic tumors at 24 days after transplantation (21.05% vs. 47.37%), while there were no statistically significant differences in the values of BW, BCS, tumor volumes in situ, metastasis tumors, and overall survival between the transplanted and non-transplanted groups. The levels of serum interleukin (IL)-2 were significantly reduced in the controls (P<0.05), but not in the recipients, which may be associated with the tGVT response.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that transplantation with allogeneic skin tumors is a safe treatment in mice, which can induce short-term tGVT response mediated by IL-2.

Immunotherapy options in metastatic renal cell cancer: where we are and where we are going

The treatment of renal cell carcinoma is rapidly changing as a result of recent evidence concerning the efficacy of biological drugs, antiangiogenetic agents and signal-transduction inhibitors. This paper will provide a critical overview of the use of immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma and review the available data concerning the efficacy of interferons, interleukin-2 and other forms of immunological treatment, particularly allogenic transplantation and vaccines. Moreover, it will focus on the new mechanisms of regulation of the immune system with a better understanding of the interaction between host and tumor, the role of T regulatory cells, heat-shock proteins and vaccines. The mechanism of action and the results obtained in renal cell carcinoma using the new molecular targeted drugs will be examined, along with the possibility of using immunotherapy combined with the new biological agents. Future research will not only need to make every effort to optimize the use of the new molecules and to define their efficacy precisely, but also to consider how to integrate these drugs with the traditional immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy in high-risk chemotherapy-resistant patients with metastatic solid tumors and hematological malignancies using intentionally mismatched donor lymphocytes activated with rIL-2: a phase I study

The feasibility and safety of immunotherapy mediated by intentionally mismatched rIL-2 activated killer lymphocytes (IMAK) with no prior stem cell engraftment was investigated in patients with advanced chemotherapy-resistant hematological malignancies and metastatic solid tumors. Our goals were to maximize anti-cancer activity by using intentionally mismatched donor lymphocytes; amplify killing of target cancer cells by rIL-2 activation of killer cells in vitro and in vivo, and avoid the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by anticipated rejection of alloreactive donor lymphocytes. Conditioning consisted of 5 days of fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) or a single dose of cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), 2 subcutaneous injections of alpha interferon (IFN) 3 x 10(6) and COX2 inhibitors, followed by administration of IMAK (65 +/- 5 CD3(+)CD56(-); 17 +/- 5 CD3(-)CD56(+)) in conjunction with low dose subcutaneous rIL-2 (6 x 10(6) IU/m(2)/day) for 5 days for continuous activation of alloreactive donor lymphocytes prior to their anticipated rejection. Here, we present our phase 1 clinical study data in a cohort of 40 high-risk patients with metastatic solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Treatment was accompanied by some malaise and occasional self-limited fever but otherwise well tolerated on an outpatient basis. Transient engraftment of donor cells was documented in two patients and only one developed self-limited grade 1 GVHD. Among patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease, long-term progression-free survival was recorded in 5 of 21 evaluable patients with metastatic solid tumors and in four of five patients with hematological malignancies. We conclude that the proposed procedure is feasible, safe, and potentially effective, with some otherwise resistant cancer patients long-term disease-free, thus justifying larger Phase II studies in patients with hematological malignancies and metastatic solid tumors, preferably at a stage of minimal residual disease with the goal in mind to eradicate all malignant cells at an early stage of the disease.

Immunotherapy by allogeneic stem cell transplantation

During the past three decades, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has developed from being an experimental therapy in patients with endstage leukemia into a well-established therapy in patients with a range of disorders of the immunohematopoietic system. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), acute or chronic, attacking host tissue is a major threat. However, donor immunocompetent T cells have a potent graft-versus-leukemia effect. A combination of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate is the standard therapy to prevent GVHD. Modulation of the immunosuppressive regimen may induce mild acute and mild chronic GVHD, reduce the risk of relapse, and improve long-term survival. Natural killer cells also play a role in this context. Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor incompatibility between recipient and donor may reduce the risk of relapse in patients with myeloid leukemia. Relapse of leukemia is a major cause of death after ASCT. Minimal residual disease and recipient leukemia lineage-specific chimerism are sensitive techniques for early detection of leukemic relapse. Donor lymphocyte infusions can enhance the antitumor effect, especially for patients with molecular relapse. The allogeneic graft-versus-cancer effect has been demonstrated in patients with metastatic breast, renal, colorectal, ovarian, prostatic, and pancreatic carcinoma. Mesenchymal stem cells have immunomodulatory properties and may be used for immunomodulation of GVHD and tissue repair. All things considered, the future looks promising for ASCT.

The allogeneic graft-versus-cancer effect

Allogeneic haematological stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has developed into immunotherapy. Donor CD4+, CD8+ and natural killer (NK) cells have been reported to mediate graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) effects, using Fas-dependent killing and perforin degranulation to eradicate malignant cells. Cytokines, such as interleukin-2, interferon-gamma and tumour necrosis factor-alpha potentiate the GVL effect. Post-transplant adoptive therapy of cytotoxic T-cells (CTL) against leukaemia-specific antigens, minor histocompatibility antigens, or T-cell receptor genes may constitute successful approaches to induce anti-tumour effects. Clinically, a significant GVL effect is induced by chronic rather than acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). An anti-tumour effect has also been reported for myeloma, lymphoma and solid tumours. Reduced intensity conditioning enables HSCT in older and disabled patients and relies on the graft-versus-tumour effect. Donor lymphocyte infusions promote the GVL effect and can be given as escalating doses with response monitored by minimal residual disease. A high CD34+ cell dose of peripheral blood stem cells increases GVL. There is a balance between effective immunosuppression, low incidence of GVHD and relapse. For instance, T-cell depletion of the graft increases the risk of relapse. This paper reviews the current knowledge in graft-versus-cancer effects. Future directions, such as immunotherapy using leukaemia-specific CTLs, allo-depleted T-cells and suicide gene manipulated T-cells, are presented.

Transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells: an emerging treatment modality for solid tumors

Allogeneic transplantation of hematopoietic cells from an HLA-compatible donor has been used to treat hematologic malignancies. Allogeneic transplantation not only replaces the marrow affected by the disease, but exerts an immune graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect mediated by donor lymphocytes. The development of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens before allogeneic transplantation has allowed this therapy to be used in elderly and disabled patients. An allogeneic GVT effect is observed in a proportion of patients with renal, breast, colorectal, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer treated with allogeneic transplantation. In general, the tumor response is associated with the development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Further improvements will depend on the identification of the antigen targets of GVT, and on reduction of the toxicity of the procedure. Targeted therapies may complement the immune effect of allogeneic transplantation. We present updated results from the literature and data recently placed on file at the European Bone Marrow Transplantation Solid Tumors Working Party.

Reduced-intensity unrelated cord blood transplantation for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: first evidence of cord-blood-versus-solid-tumor effect

We report a 69-year-old man with cytokine-resistant metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with reduced-intensity unrelated cord blood transplantation. The patient achieved durable donor engraftment with minimal graft-versus-host disease. The patient showed regression of metastatic disease, providing the first evidence of a graft-versus-tumor effect on a solid tumor resulting from cord blood graft.

Allogeneic cell-mediated immunotherapy at the stage of minimal residual disease following high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation

Cumulative clinical experience suggests that immunotherapy may be an effective tool for eradicating tumor cells resistant to maximum tolerated doses of chemotherapy and radiation. Immunotherapy is much more effective when applied at the stage of minimal residual disease, especially against slowly growing tumors because development of graft-versus-leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, or in a broader sense graft-versus-tumor effects renders immunotherapy more time consuming. Hence, eradication of rapidly growing bulky tumors may be difficult or impossible to achieve. Considering the fact that optimal immunotherapy may be accomplished in patients treated at the stage of minimal (MRD) disease, in patients with hematological malignancies and chemosensitive solid tumors a stage of MRD may be best achieved following administration of myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). Taken together, immunotherapy following autoSCT may provide an ideal combination for improving the cure rate of otherwise incurable cancers, especially if tumor cells may respond to cytokine-mediated immunotherapy or cell-mediated cytokine-activated immunotherapy. Following lymphocyte depletion in the course of autoSCT, adoptive transfer of alloreactive or tumor-reactive lymphocytes may be much more effective due to the preponderance of anticancer effector cells on the one hand, and elimination or depletion of the patient's regulatory cells that may downregulate anticancer effector mechanisms.

Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy for malignant and non-malignant diseases

The conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation was originally designed as a myeloablative conditioning, designed to eliminate malignant or genetically abnormal cells and then use the transplant procedure for rescue of the patients or to replace missing bone marrow products. However, allografts can induce effective graft vs. malignancy effects and can also eliminate undesirable hematopoietic stem cells in patients with genetic disorders and autoimmune diseases, thus documenting that alloreactive effects mediated by donor lymphocytes post-grafting can play a major role in eliminating hematopoietic cell of host origin, as well as provide effective immunotherapy for the treatment of disease recurrence. The efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) could be improved by activation with rIL-2 or by donor immunization. The cumulative experience over the years suggesting that alloreactive donor lymphocytes were most effective in eliminating tumor cells of host origin resulted in an attempt to reduce the intensity of the conditioning in preparation for the transplant procedure used for the treatment of hematological and other malignancies as well as life-threatening non-malignant disorders for which allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be indicated. Our working hypothesis proposed that the myeloablative conditioning which is hazardous and may be associated with early and late side effects, may not be required for treatment of patients with any indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Instead, nonmyeloablative conditioning based on the use of reduced intensive preparatory regimen, also known as nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation, may be sufficient for engraftment of donor stem cells while avoiding procedure-related toxicity and mortality, followed by elimination of undesirable cells of host origin by post-transplant effects mediated by alloreactive donor lymphocytes infused along with donor stem cells or administered subsequently as DLI. Improvement of the immediate outcome of stem cell transplantation using NST due to a significant decrease in transplant related mortality has broadened the spectrum of patients eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, including elderly patients and other patients with less than optimal performance status. Likewise, the safer use of stem cell transplantation prompted expanding the scope of potential indications for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, such as metastatic solid tumors and autoimmune disorders, which now are slowly becoming much more acceptable. Current strategies focus on the need to improve the capacity of donor lymphocytes to eliminate undesirable malignant and non-malignant hematopoietic cells of host origin, replacing abnormal or malignant stem cells or their products with normal hematopoietic stem cells of donor origin, while minimizing procedure-related toxicity and mortality and improving the quality of life by reducing the incidence and severity of hazardous acute and chronic GVHD.

Incidence of Human Cytomegalovirus Infection in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors Receiving Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants versus Recipients of Standard SCT for Hematologic Malignancies

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is the most frequent infectious complication after conventional allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). From December 1998 to December 2002, we prospectively monitored HCMV reactivation in 59 patients affected by solid tumors and undergoing nonmyeloablative alloSCT (NST). Patients were allografted from HLA-identical sibling donors after fludarabine/cyclophosphamide-based conditioning regimens. Seventeen (28.8%) of 59 patients presented with HCMV antigenemia, and 14 received ganciclovir, with successful HCMV clearance in all cases. No patient developed HCMV viremia or disease. The median time to HCMV reactivation was 54 days (range, 16-245 days) after NST. These patients were compared with a cohort of hematologic patients who were treated with conventional myeloablative alloSCT. Matching criteria included HCMV risk group, stem cell source, donor type, and age. In the myeloablative group, HCMV active infection was observed in 47 (85.4%) of 55 patients at a median time of 30 days (range, 13-64 days) after alloSCT, and HCMV infection occurred more frequently ( P < .001) and earlier ( P = .001) than in NST patients. Patients affected with solid tumors undergoing NST had a reduced and delayed incidence of HCMV active infection.

Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation as an immunotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT) can induce curative graft-versus-leukemia reactions for hematologic malignancies through allogeneic immunity. Because the gastrointestinal tract is a target of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), colorectal cancer might be a candidate for allo-SCT.

METHODS

Four patients with metastatic colorectal cancer underwent reduced-intensity stem-cell transplantation (RIST) in the National Cancer Center Hospital between July 2002 and February 2003. Three patients received transplants from an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical related donor, and the remaining patient received selected CD34-positive cells from a two-loci HLA-mismatched donor. The basis of preparative regimen was busulfan 4 mg/kg for 2 days and fludarabine 25 mg/kg for 6 days.

RESULTS

All the patients tolerated the preparative regimen and achieved engraftment without significant toxicities. All developed acute or chronic GvHD. Although serum levels of CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen were transiently elevated after RIST in all the patients, the levels subsequently decreased below the levels from before RIST in all but one patient. Three had measurable lesions before RIST, one achieved partial response, and the others stable disease, which was durable for 120 and 60 days. Three patients died; the causes of death were progressive disease, GvHD, and accident. Postmortem examination was obtained for two patients; in one patient, the peritoneal metastatic lesions macroscopically disappeared, and in the other patient, the supraclavicular lymph node disappeared while the other measurable lesions remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

All the patients showed some evidence suggesting the presence of a graft-versus-tumor effect for colorectal cancer, which should be confirmed in a future prospective trial.

Nonmyeloablative Transplantation

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been explored as a method to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced solid tumors. The failure of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to prolong survival in patients with metastatic solid tumors has sparked interest recently in studies exploring the potential of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for such patients. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is widely accepted as a potent form of immunotherapy capable of curing patients with chemotherapy-refractory hematologic malignancies. However, it was not until the end of the 20th century that investigators initiated trials to test the potential of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as immunotherapy in malignancies of epithelial origin. Early pilot trials have established proof-of-principle that graft-versus-tumor effects can induce complete or partial remission in some treatment-refractory metastatic solid tumors. In this review, we discuss the rationale for pilot trials investigating the potential of nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in advanced cytokine-refractory renal cancer, highlighting the preliminary success, limitations, and future clinical directions of this approach.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of advanced solid tumors

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation has emerged as a potentially curative treatment modality for patients with hematological malignancies. The graft-versus-leukemia effect, an immune mechanism mediated by the donor immune system, is an important component of the therapeutic effect of allogeneic transplantation. Recent data from experimental animal models and from preliminary clinical experience suggest that a graft-versus-tumor effect, analogous to the graft-versus-leukemia effect, may be generated against solid tumors such as renal cell cancer, breast cancer, and other malignancies. The use of non-myeloablative, immunosuppressive conditioning regimens offers the opportunity to achieve a full-donor engraftment with reduced transplant-related complications and mortality, enabling also patients of advanced age and with co-morbidities to receive an allografting. Advanced renal cell cancer, an essentially incurable disease, has emerged from pilot studies as a disease susceptible to the graft-versus-tumor effect. Future studies will demonstrate if the tumor responses observed after allografting will translate into a clinically meaningful survival advantage. Other tumors in which tumor responses have been observed are: breast cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, soft-tissue sarcoma, and others. Advanced melanoma may not be amenable to graft-versus-tumor effect. Future studies will point to the identification, isolation and cloning of target antigen(s) of graft-versus-tumor effect, to further reduce toxicities and to achieve a selective cell-mediated immunotherapy.

A novel approach for prevention of lethal GVHD by selective elimination of alloreactive donor lymphocytes prior to stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Experiments were designed to investigate a new concept aiming for induction of graft-vs-malignancy (GVM) effect prior to stem cell transplantation (SCT). Mismatched lymphocytes given pre-SCT will be followed by a selective elimination of alloreactive donor lymphocytes, thus avoiding lethal graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).

METHODS

Recipient mice treated with sublethal total-body irradiation (TBI) received a single injection of allogeneic splenocytes, either naïve or rIL-2 activated (ADL), for induction of GVHD. To prevent lethal GVHD, cyclophosphamide (Cy) (200 mg/kg) or TBI (9 Gy) were given 4 days after cell inoculation. One day later, treated mice were rescued with syngeneic bone marrow cells.

RESULTS

Both Cy and TBI significantly (p < 0.001) prevented GVHD in all recipients inoculated with either naïve cells or ADL and all recipients survived more than 250 days. Control mice not rescued with CY or TBI died of GVHD within 20 to 25 days. A significant proportion of recipients inoculated with 4T1 tumor cells, treated with ADL followed by TBI 9 Gy, survived more than 250 days disease-free in comparison with 22 days in untreated control mice (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Attempting to induce short, yet effective, GVM effects before rather than after SCT, thus avoiding lethal GVHD, may represent an innovative approach for more effective yet safer use of SCT for tumor immunotherapy.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic immunotherapy for solid tumors

Over the past decade, considerable advances have been made in the field of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Recognition that transplanted donor immune cells can cure patients with leukemia has led to the development of nonmyeloablative or "low-intensity" conditioning regimens, which have expanded the application of allogeneic transplantation to a growing number of hematological malignancies. The improved safety and preliminary success of this transplant approach have justified applying allogeneic immunotherapy to patients with treatment-refractory solid tumors.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation as immunotherapy for nonhematological cancers

Over the past two decades biologic therapy has played an increasing role in the treatment of cancer. While this field is still early in its development, there now exists compelling evidence that the immune system is capable of detecting and eliminating cancer cells. Although the majority of immunotherapy approaches for metastatic cancer involve strategies designed to enhance autologous immunity, most would agree that the graft-versus-leukemia reaction induced following allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents modern day's most potent form of cancer immunotherapy. While allogeneic stem cell transplantation has gained recognition as a potentially curative "immunotherapy" for a growing number of different hematological malignancies, its efficacy in inducing antimalignancy effects against nonhematological cancers has only recently begun to be investigated. The historical basis, development, and preliminary clinical results of allogeneic stem cell transplantation as a form of immunotherapy for treatment refractory solid tumors are reviewed.

Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation: reduced-intensity conditioning for cancer immunotherapy—from bench to patient bedside

Despite major progress in treating hematologic malignancies and, to a lesser extent, metastatic solid tumors, much work remains ahead. With the anticancer potential of immunotherapy not yet fully exploited, patients with leukemia, malignant lymphoma, and other hematologic malignancies for which high-dose chemoradiotherapy is frequently recommended in conjunction with stem cell transplantation (SCT) can now benefit from the advantages of immunotherapy mediated by cytokines or alloreactive donor lymphocytes, while minimizing procedure-related toxicity and mortality. The feasibility of applying allogeneic cell-mediated immunotherapy in conjunction with allogeneic SCT following reduced-intensity conditioning, with minimal toxicity and no serious transplant-related complications, makes it possible to undertake such procedures on an outpatient basis as well as to offer an option for cure to elderly individuals and patients with less than optimal performance status. Being well tolerated, reduced-intensity transplants also offer a chance for cure to patients with otherwise resistant leukemia and malignant lymphoma who have relapsed after autologous SCT. Thus, the traditional obstacle of very high transplant-related toxicity and mortality due to multiorgan failure from cumulative toxicity of multiple anticancer agents and radiation therapy is overcome. Although immunotherapy mediated by allogeneic lymphocytes can be most effective, the immune potential of donor lymphocytes should be maximized by nonspecific or specific activation in vitro or in vivo, or both, for more effective eradication of resistant tumor cells, including in patients with bulky disease. More important is the challenge to target donor lymphocytes to the tumor and minimize their capacity to induce responses against normal host tissues, which frequently results in severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Alternatively, donor lymphocytes should be eliminated as soon as tumor eradication is completed, or as soon as severe GVHD becomes prohibitive. Based on available experience, clinical application of innovative therapy, especially at the stage of minimal residual disease (MRD), may open new horizons for the treatment of malignancies considered until recently to be incurable. The feasibility of controlling cancer by targeted chemotherapy, best illustrated by the phenomenal activity of imatinib in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia and, more recently, in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (including in patients fully resistant to all known anticancer agents) suggests that in the future, tumor-specific chemotherapy may represent the ultimate goal for achieving a stage of MRD with minimal multiorgan toxicity. Together, the combination of immunotherapy and targeted chemotherapy may provide the most logical approach for making real progress in controlling resistant hematologic malignancies and metastatic solid tumors.

Tumor Vaccination after Allogeneic Bone Marrow Cell Reconstitution of the Nonmyeloablatively Conditioned Tumor-Bearing Murine Host

Allogeneic bone marrow cell reconstitution of the nonmyeloablatively conditioned host is supposed to provide an optimized platform for tumor vaccination. We recently showed that an allogeneic T cell-depleted graft was well accepted if the tumor-bearing host was NK depleted. Based on this finding, a vaccination protocol in tumor-bearing, nonmyeloablatively conditioned, allogeneically reconstituted mice was elaborated. Allogeneically reconstituted mice, bearing a renal cell carcinoma, received tumor-primed donor lymph node cells (LNC), which had or had not matured in the allogeneic host. Primed LNC were supported by tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells, which were donor or host derived. Optimal responses against the tumor were observed with host-tolerant, tumor-primed LNC in combination with host-derived dendritic cells. High frequencies of tumor-specific proliferating and CTLs were recorded; the survival time of tumor-bearing mice was significantly prolonged, and in >50% of mice the tumor was completely rejected. Notably, severe graft-vs-host disease was observed in reconstituted mice that received tumor-primed LNC, which had not matured in the allogeneic host. However, graft-vs-host was not aggravated after vaccination with tumor-primed, host-tolerant LNC. Thus, the LNC were tolerant toward the host, but not toward the tumor. The finding convincingly demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of tumor vaccination after allogeneic reconstitution of the nonmyeloablatively conditioned host.

Graft-versus-Host Disease, the Graft-versus-Leukemia Effect, and Mixed Chimerism following Nonmyeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic bone marrow or blood stem cell transplantation represents an important therapeutic tool for the treatment of otherwise incurable cancer and a large spectrum of nonmalignant diseases. Until recently, bone marrow transplantation was used primarily to eliminate malignant, genetically abnormal, or otherwise deficient stem cells; hence, highly toxic myeloablative regimens were considered mandatory for the eradication of undesirable cells of host origin. Recent data suggest that high-dose chemoradiotherapy may be successively replaced by nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST), which represents a safer biologic tool that involves the induction of host-versus-graft transplantation tolerance. NST thus provides allogeneic donor lymphocytes with the capacity to induce immune-mediated graft-versus-malignancy effects, either against mismatched minor or major histocompatibility alloantigens or against tumor-specific or tumor-associated antigens expressed by tumor or other hematologic cells of host origin. The future goals of the wider and safer clinical application of NST for the treatment of a larger number of indications and larger numbers of patients in need depend, on the one hand, on the development of more effective and safer modalities for maximizing the antitumor potential of donor lymphocytes (T-cells as well as natural killer and natural killer T-cells). On the other hand, these goals depend on using more selective approaches for targeting anticancer effector cells to their target cells. Such changes will thus set the stage for smarter rather than stronger modalities for the treatment of malignant and life-threatening nonmalignant diseases.

Allogeneic cell-mediated immunotherapy of leukemia with immune donor lymphocytes to upregulate antitumor effects and downregulate antihost responses

Donor lymphocyte infusion mediates most effective graft- versus-leukemia (GVL) effects following induction of host-versus-graft tolerance by transplantation of donor stem cells. This study was designed to maximize GVL effects across both major (MHC) and minor (mHgs) histocompatibility barriers in recipients inoculated with murine B-cell leukemia (BCL1), using specifically immune donor lymphocytes. GVL effects were induced with donor spleen cells from mice immunized across MHC or mHgs barriers with BCL/1 cells or normal BALB/c spleen cells. Our data suggest that spleen cells from donor mice immunized against murine B-cell leukemia of BALB/c origin, or to a lesser extent against normal host alloantigens, induce better therapeutic GVL effects with less great-versus-host disease (GVHD) across both mHgs and MHC. The cytokine profile of effector cells inducing predominantly GVL effects with reduced GVHD across MHC and mHg barriers consisted preferentially of upregulated IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-10 and IL-12 in donors, implying a Th-1 to Th-2 cytokine shift. We hypothesize that immunotherapy with immune donor lymphocytes sensitized in vivo or in vitro with allogeneic tumor cells or normal host cells together with allogeneic BMT may provide an effective approach for amplifying GVL effects, while reducing procedure-related morbidity and mortality due to uncontrolled GVHD.

Present results and perspectives of allogeneic non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of human solid tumors

Several clinical observations have confirmed that a donor immune-mediated anti-malignancy effect, called graft-versus-leukemia or graft-versus-tumor, occurs following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. While the potential antitumor effect mediated by donor lymphocytes has been established in many hematological malignancies, its efficacy in inducing clinically meaningful responses in solid tumors has been largely unexplored despite evidence of its potential benefit in experimental animal models. Only in recent years has the investigational application of non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation in patients with refractory non-hematological cancers proved that a graft-versus-tumor effect can be generated in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer and possibly with other solid tumors. In the present article we review the biological basis, development and early clinical results of this novel immunotherapeutic approach for solid tumors.

Immunotherapy of cancer by active vaccination: does allogeneic bone marrow transplantation after non-myeloablative conditioning provide a new option?

The critical role of antigen-specific T cells in cancer immunotherapy has been amply demonstrated in many model systems. Though success of clinical trials still remains far behind expectation, the continuous improvement in our understanding of the biology of the immune response will provide the basis of optimized cancer vaccines and allow for new modalities of cancer treatment. This review focuses on the current status of active therapeutic vaccination and future prospects. The latter will mainly be concerned with allogeneic bone marrow cell transplantation after non-myeloablative conditioning, because it is my belief that this approach could provide a major breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy. Concerning active vaccination protocols the following aspects will be addressed: i) the targets of immunotherapeutic approaches; ii) the response elements needed for raising a therapeutically successful immune reaction; iii) ways to achieve an optimal confrontation of the immune system with the tumor and iv) supportive regimen of immunomodulation. Hazards which one is most frequently confronted with in trials to attack tumors with the inherent weapon of immune defense will only be briefly mentioned. Many question remain to be answered in the field of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation after non-myeloablative conditioning to optimize the therapeutic setting for this likely very powerful tool of cancer therapy. Current considerations to improve engraftment and to reduce graft versus host disease while strengthening graft versus tumor reactivity will be briefly reviewed. Finally, I will discuss whether tumor-reactive T cells can be "naturally" maintained during the process of T cell maturation in the allogeneic host. Provided this hypothesis can be substantiated, a T cell vaccine will meet a pool of virgin T cells in the allogeneically reconstituted host, which are tolerant towards the host, but not anergised towards tumor antigens presented by MHC molecules of the host.

Immunotherapy of hematologic malignancies and metastatic solid tumors in experimental animals and man

New approaches are needed for maximizing specific responses against tumor cells resistant to chemotherapy. While cytokine therapy may amplify natural resistance against minimal residual disease, more robust anti-leukemia reactivity can be provided by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in conjunction with myeloablative, hence hazardous, conditioning, at the cost of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Documentation of the capacity of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) given late post BMT, when patients were off immunosuppression, in early 1987, with successful reversal of relapse and cure of patients fully resistant to maximally tolerated doses of chemoradiotherapy, with many patients alive and well >10-15 years later, indicated two important facts. First, resistant tumors are unlikely to be cured with higher doses of chemoradiotherapy that may harm the patient but not eliminate all his clonogenic tumor cells. Second, that under condition of tolerance to donor alloantigens, DLI may provide a cure to otherwise resistant patients. These observations paved the road for clinical application of non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST), in the early 90s, based on a two-step procedure, first involving induction of transplantation tolerance to donor alloantigens by engraftment of donor stem cells, following safe lymphoablative rather than myeloablative conditioning. Second, use of donor lymphocytes for elimination of residual tumor or otherwise abnormal hematopoietic cells by immune-mediated graft-versus-host effects inducible by mobilized blood stem cell allografts containing larger inocula of donor T cells, or supported by post-grafting DLI when patients were off immunosuppressive modalities.

Successful therapy of metastatic cancer using tumor vaccines in mixed allogeneic bone marrow chimeras

A frequent outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in the treatment of leukemia is the destruction of the host hematolymphoid compartment and, thus, the malignancy, through the combined action of high-dose chemoradiotherapy and a T-cell-mediated graft-versus-host effect. Unfortunately, alloSCT is frequently limited by toxicity, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and has not been successful in the treatment of tumors derived from solid organs. Here we report a novel cooperation between host and donor T cells in the response to a tumor cell vaccine given after a nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (NST) protocol that achieves stable mixed bone marrow chimerism. Treatment of animals with NST, posttransplantation donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs), and a vaccine, comprising irradiated autologous tumor cells mixed with a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-producing bystander line, results in potent and specific antitumor immunity. This combined modality immunotherapy, administered after surgical removal of the primary tumor, cured metastatic mammary cancer in most animals without inducing GVHD. Cured animals contained tumor-specific T cells of both host and donor origin, but immunodeficient hosts could not be cured by NST, DLI, and vaccine administration. Thus, transfer of allogeneic donor T cells may help break functional tolerance of a host immune system to a solid tumor, thereby providing a rationale for the generation of mixed hematopoietic chimerism by NST prior to tumor cell vaccination.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Benign Hematological Disorders and Solid Tumors

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been successfully used as replacement therapy for patients with aplastic anemia and hemoglobinopathies. Both autologous and allogeneic HCT following high-dose chemotherapy can correct manifestations of autoimmune diseases. The impressive allogeneic graft-versus-tumor effects seen in patients given HCT for hematological malignancies have stimulated trials of allogeneic immunotherapy in patients with otherwise refractory metastatic solid tumors. This session will update the status of HCT in the treatment of benign hematological diseases and solid tumors.

In Section I, Dr. Rainer Storb reviews the development of nonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with severe aplastic anemia who have HLA-matched family members. He also describes the results in patients with aplastic anemia given HCT from unrelated donors after failure of responding to immunosuppressive therapy. The importance of leuko-poor and in vitro irradiated blood product transfusions for avoiding graft rejection will be discussed.

In Section II, Dr. Guido Lucarelli reviews the status of marrow transplantation for thalassemia major and updates results obtained in children with class I and class II severity of thalassemia. He also describes results of new protocols for class III patients and efforts to extend HCT to thalassemic patients without HLA-matched family members.

In Section III, Dr. Peter McSweeney reviews the current status of HCT for severe autoimmune diseases. He summarizes the results of autologous HCT for systemic sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus, and reviews the status of planned Phase III studies for autologous HCT for these diseases in North America and Europe. He also discusses a possible role of allogeneic HCT in the treatment of these diseases.

In Section IV, Dr. Richard Childs discusses the development and application of nonmyeloablative HCT as allogeneic immunotherapy for treatment-refractory solid tumors. He reviews the results of pilot clinical trials demonstrating graft-versus-solid tumor effects in a variety of metastatic cancers and describes efforts to characterize the immune cell populations mediating these effects, as well as newer methods to target the donor immune system to the tumor.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Benign Hematological Disorders and Solid Tumors

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been successfully used as replacement therapy for patients with aplastic anemia and hemoglobinopathies. Both autologous and allogeneic HCT following high-dose chemotherapy can correct manifestations of autoimmune diseases. The impressive allogeneic graft-versus-tumor effects seen in patients given HCT for hematological malignancies have stimulated trials of allogeneic immunotherapy in patients with otherwise refractory metastatic solid tumors. This session will update the status of HCT in the treatment of benign hematological diseases and solid tumors.

In Section I, Dr. Rainer Storb reviews the development of nonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with severe aplastic anemia who have HLA-matched family members. He also describes the results in patients with aplastic anemia given HCT from unrelated donors after failure of responding to immunosuppressive therapy. The importance of leuko-poor and in vitro irradiated blood product transfusions for avoiding graft rejection will be discussed.

In Section II, Dr. Guido Lucarelli reviews the status of marrow transplantation for thalassemia major and updates results obtained in children with class I and class II severity of thalassemia. He also describes results of new protocols for class III patients and efforts to extend HCT to thalassemic patients without HLA-matched family members.

In Section III, Dr. Peter McSweeney reviews the current status of HCT for severe autoimmune diseases. He summarizes the results of autologous HCT for systemic sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus, and reviews the status of planned Phase III studies for autologous HCT for these diseases in North America and Europe. He also discusses a possible role of allogeneic HCT in the treatment of these diseases.

In Section IV, Dr. Richard Childs discusses the development and application of nonmyeloablative HCT as allogeneic immunotherapy for treatment-refractory solid tumors. He reviews the results of pilot clinical trials demonstrating graft-versus-solid tumor effects in a variety of metastatic cancers and describes efforts to characterize the immune cell populations mediating these effects, as well as newer methods to target the donor immune system to the tumor.

Human colon adenocarcinoma in the SCID/CB6 radiation chimera is susceptible to adoptive transfer of allogeneic human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

The aim of this study was to develop a murine model of human colon carcinoma (hCC) and to ascertain the potential of cellular immunotherapy in this model. Fragments of hCC obtained at surgery from 6 patients were transplanted under the kidney capsule of lethally irradiated CB6 mice radioprotected with severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice bone marrow. Tumor xenografts conserved their malignant behavior in the new environment, invading the mouse kidney parenchyma and expanding into the peritoneal cavity and adjacent tissues. Their growth was typically exponential, and they expanded to dimensions that allowed their subsequent fragmentation and passage to further preconditioned mice. Human carcinoembryonic antigen (hCEA) was detected on the implanted tumor and at occasionally spontaneous lung metastases. Most significantly, high levels of this tumor marker were detected in the sera of tumor-bearing mice, providing a useful tool, which allowed long-term experiments, monitoring of tumor progression, and its response to some treatment modalities. For instance, complete resection of the transplanted tumors, by means of nephrectomy, resulted in the disappearance of hCEA from mice sera within 2 weeks. Similarly, adoptive transfer of allogeneic human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) into the peritoneum of tumor-bearing mice, resulted in their rapid engraftment, infiltration of tumor mass, and a significant drop of hCEA levels in mice serum, accounting for inhibition of tumor growth. We suggest that this novel model of human colon carcinoma affords the opportunity for in vivo evaluation of different preclinical treatment modalities, particularly, those involving manipulation with immune effector cells.

Allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation after a reduced-intensity, preparative regimen: a pilot study in patients with refractory malignancies

BACKGROUND

The immune-mediated graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect plays a therapeutic role in the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). More recently, it was reported that a GVT effect also occurred in patients who underwent transplantation for metastatic renal carcinoma. The authors carried out a pilot trial of allogeneic transplantation after a reduced-intensity, preparative regimen in patients with refractory malignancies, including solid tumors. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the feasibility of this approach in terms of toxicity and engraftment and to document evidence of GVT effects.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with Stage IV malignancies (7 patients with renal cell carcinoma, 3 patients with sarcoma, 2 patients with breast carcinoma, 2 patients with Hodgkin disease, 1 patient with ovarian carcinoma, 1 patient with melanoma, and 1 patient with both melanoma and renal cell carcinoma) that were not amenable to further conventional treatment were enrolled. The median patient age was 43 years (range, 10-60 years). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) was 0-1 in 11 patients and 2-3 in 6 patients. Preparative treatment consisted of reduced-intensity chemotherapy with fludarabine (30 mg/m(2) per day for 4 consecutive days) and cyclophosphamide (30 mg/Kg per day for 2 consecutive days) prior to allogeneic HSCT from a human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling. The median number of CD34+ cells infused was 6.06 x 10(6)/kg (range, 1.5-14.0 x 10(6)/kg). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporin-A and short-term methotrexate.

RESULTS

Patients who had a PS of 2-3 prior to undergoing HSCT experienced Grade 4 hematologic toxicities and Grade > or = 3 organ toxicities and died of either treatment-related complications or disease progression within 100 days from transplantation. By contrast, 10 of 11 patients who had a PS of 0-1 prior to undergoing HSCT experienced only short-lasting, Grade < or = 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and no organ toxicity; 1 of 10 patients died of graft failure on Day +29 after undergoing HSCT. By Day +90, 100% donor chimerism was documented in all patients with a past history of heavy chemotherapy, whereas mixed donor chimerism was observed in the 4 patients with a past history of only 1 line of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy prior to entering the HSCT program. Grade 2-3 acute GVHD occurred in 5 patients. Among patients with a follow-up > 100 days, 2 complete responses and 3 transitory partial responses were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

With this conditioning regimen, full donor chimerism was achieved rapidly only in patients who had received previous intensive chemotherapy. In a proportion of patients with refractory malignancies, allogeneic transplantation resulted in tumor regression. This novel therapeutic strategy may provide little benefit in patients with poor PS and rapidly progressing disease.

Donor lymphocyte infusion: the use of alloreactive and tumor-reactive lymphocytes for immunotherapy of malignant and nonmalignant diseases in conjunction with allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), pioneered in Jerusalem in January 1987, represents the first proof of principle of the absolute efficacy of immunotherapy as a means of curing cancer. Immunotherapy with alloreactive donor lymphocytes can eliminate "the last tumor cell" even in patients with hematological malignancies resistant to maximally tolerated doses of chemoradiotherapy. Alloreactive lymphocytes that can mediate anti-tumor effects following induction of host-versus-graft tolerance induced by transplantation of donor stem cells, can induce graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) effects which are usually accompanied by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, occasionally GVM effects may also be accomplished independently of clinically overt GVHD. Interestingly, allogeneic donor lymphocytes may also eliminate undesirable host-derived hematopoietic cells in a large number of nonmalignant indications including genetic diseases, diseases caused by deficiency of stem cell products, and autoimmune disorders mediated by self-reactive lymphocytes. The cumulative clinical experience suggests feasibility of effective induction of graft-versus-leukemia (GVL); graft-versus-lymphoma (GVLy); graft-versus-multiple myeloma, as well as graft-versus-solid tumors (GVT), well-documented in patients with renal and breast cancer, even in patients with resistant disease that have failed myeloablative chemoradiotherapy. These observations that suggested that cell therapy by donor lymphocytes is the main therapeutic benefit of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) led to development of the nonmyeloablative approach for safer allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) makes it possible to offer an option for cure to elderly patients with no upper age limit, as well as to patients with poor performance status not considered eligible for conventional BMT. Using well-tolerated NST regimen, allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be accomplished with minimal procedure-related toxicity and mortality, possibly even on an outpatient basis. Immunotherapy mediated by adoptive allogeneic cell-mediated immunotherapy can be further improved by utilizing specifically immune donor lymphocytes, thus maximizing their efficacy against undesirable target cells of host origin on the one hand, while minimizing their ontoward efficacy against normal cells of host origin that could result in GVHD on the other. Taken together, DLI and subsequently NST, may have opened new horizons for treatment of life-threatening malignant and nonmalignant disorders correctable by allogeneic stem cell transplantation. It is anticipated that further improvement of reactivity and specificity of donor lymphocytes will lead to safer clinical application of cell therapy for a larger number of indications toward improving disease-free survival in a large number of indications while minimizing immediate and late procedure-related complications.

Advances in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: directing graft-versus-leukemia at solid tumors

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was originally developed as a method to rescue hematopoietic function following high dose "myeloablative" therapy in the treatment of hematological malignancies. In the first two decades of its use, dose-intensive chemotherapy alone was credited with curing those patients who achieved sustained remission following this procedure. However, more recently investigators have come to recognize that antineoplastic effects mediated by immunocompetent donor T-cells transplanted with the stem cell allograft can be induced against hematological malignancies. Indeed, this graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) or graft-vs-tumor (GVT) effect is now felt to represent the principal modality required to sustain durable remissions of hematological malignancies following this approach. The powerful and potentially curative nature of the GVT effect in hematological cancers has recently lured oncologists into exploring the therapeutic potential of allogeneic stem cell transplantation as an investigational approach for treatment-refractory solid tumors. We review here the development and early clinical results of allogeneic stem cell transplantation as potential immunotherapy for solid tumors.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as immunotherapy for hematologic malignancies and metastatic solid tumors in preclinical models

OBJECTIVE

We previously demonstrated that a combination of mild total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) with selective depletion of the host's donor-reactive cells allows for stable and graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)-free engraftment of allogeneic bone marrow (BM). In this study, we investigated the efficacy of this nonmyeloablative strategy for BM transplantation (BMT) as immunotherapy for minimal residual disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BALB/c mice inoculated with leukemia (BCL1) or breast carcinoma (4T1) cells were conditioned for BMT with TLI (200 cGy) followed by priming with donor (C57BL/6) BM cells on day 1, and by injection with 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide on day 2. After conditioning (day 3), recipients were transplanted with BM cells from the same donor. Treated animals were monitored for 230 days for survival, development of leukemia/solid tumor, and GVHD.

RESULTS

BMT converted the mice to complete chimeras and prevented development of leukemia in 90% of recipients and locally growing breast carcinoma in 40% of the mice. Immunization of donors of the second BM with 4T1 cells prevented development of breast carcinoma in 80% of 4T1 inoculated mice. Fewer animals treated for malignancy by nonmyeloablative BMT died of GVHD than those treated by myeloablative BMT. However, late GVHD-related mortality in mice treated for leukemia was higher than after nonmyeloablative BMT to naive recipients (p < 0.00001). Infusion of host-type anti-donor immune lymphocytes 8 days after BMT improved the survival of recipients treated for leukemia without affecting engraftment and the graft-vs-leukemia potential of donor BM.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective eradication of malignant cells can be achieved following allogeneic BMT after nonmyeloablative conditioning.

Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation for solid tumors: expanding the application of allogeneic immunotherapy

In the arena of tumor immunology, there is a growing perception that the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reaction that follows allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents the most potent form of cancer immunotherapy currently in clinical use. While allogeneic stem cell transplantation has become an accepted form of "immunotherapy" for the treatment of hematological malignancies, its efficacy in inducing antitumor effects against nonhematological cancers has, until recently, been largely unexplored. The investigational application of nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (NST) in solid tumors represents the logical consequence of almost 50 years of experimental and clinical research into the immunological basis for the cure of hematological malignancies following allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT). Here we review the historical background, development, and preliminary clinical results of allogeneic stem cell transplantation as immunotherapy for solid tumors.

Immunotherapy of cancer with alloreactive lymphocytes

Immunotherapy of cancer with alloreactive lymphocytes is the mainstay of treatment, especially in haematological malignant disease. With donor lymphocyte infusion for immunotherapy, it is essential to induce host-versus-graft tolerance to ensure that the donor lymphocytes are accepted. Engraftment of haemopoietic cells of donor origin can be accomplished with reduced-intensity conditioning. Reducing transplant-related mortality by simplifing the stem-cell transplant procedure with a reduced-intensity regimen, particularly non-myeloablative conditioning, may have great potential for the treatment of malignant and non-malignant disorders.

Non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation focusing on immunotherapy of life-threatening malignant and non-malignant diseases

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) represents an important therapeutic tool for treatment of otherwise incurable malignant and non-malignant diseases. Until recently, myeloablative regimens were considered mandatory for eradication of all undesirable host-derived hematopoietic elements. Our preclinical and ongoing clinical studies indicated that much more effective eradication of host immunohematopoietic system cells could be achieved by adoptive allogeneic cell therapy with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) following BMT. Thus, eradication of blood cancer cells, especially in patients with CML can be frequently accomplished despite complete resistance of such tumor cells to maximally tolerated doses of chemoradiotherapy. Our cumulative experience suggested that graft versus leukemia (GVL) effects might be a useful tool for eradication of otherwise resistant tumor cells of host origin. The latter working hypothesis suggested that effective BMT procedures may be accomplished without lethal conditioning of the host, using new well tolerated non-myeloablative regimen, thus possibly minimizing immediate and late side effects related to myeloablative procedures considered until recently mandatory for conditioning of BMT recipients. Recent clinical data that will be presented suggests that safe non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST), with no major toxicity can replace the conventional BMT. Thus, NST may provide an option for cure for a large spectrum of clinical indications in children and elderly individuals without lower or upper age limit, while minimizing procedure-related toxicity and mortality.

Allogeneic and autologous stem-cell transplantation in advanced Ewing tumors. An update after long-term follow-up from two centers of the European Intergroup study EICESS. Stem-Cell Transplant Programs at Düsseldorf University Medical Center, Germany and St. Anna Kinderspital, Vienna, Austria

BACKGROUND

An update of results from the High Risk Protocol of the Meta-EICESS Study, conducted at the Pediatric Stem-Cell Transplant Centers of Düsseldorf and Vienna. In order to evaluate a possible therapeutic benefit after allogeneic SCT in patients with advanced Ewing tumors (AET), we compared outcome after autologous and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed 36 patients treated with the myeloablative Hyper-ME protocol (hyperfractionated total body irradiation, melphalan, etoposide +/- carboplatin) between November 1986 and December 1994. Minimal follow-up for all patients was five years. All patients underwent remission induction chemotherapy and local treatment before myeloablative therapy. Seventeen of thirty-six patients had multifocal primary Ewing's tumor, eighteen of thirty-six had early, multiple or multifocal relapse, one of thirty-six patients had unifocal late relapse. Twenty-six of thirty-six were treated with autologous and ten of thirty-six with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells. We analyzed the following risk factors, that could possibly influence the event-free survival (EFS): number of involved bones, degree of remission at time of SCT, type of graft, indication for SCT, bone marrow infiltration, bone with concomitant lung disease, age at time of diagnosis, pelvic involvement, involved compartment radiation, histopathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

EFS for the 36 patients was 0.24 (0.21) +/- 0.07. Eighteen of thirty-six patients suffered relapse or died of disease, nine of thirty-six died of treatment related toxicity (DOC). Nine of thirty-six patients are alive in CR. Age > or = 17 years at initial diagnosis (P < 0.005) significantly deteriorated outcome. According to the type of graft, EFS was 0.25 +/- 0.08 after autologous and 0.20 +/- 0.13 after allogeneic SCT. Incidence of DOC was more than twice as high after allogeneic (40%) compared to autologous (19%) SCT, even though the difference did not reach significance (P = 0.08, Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the rather short observation period. secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN) may complicate the future clinical course of some of our patients who are currently viewed as event-free survivors. EFS in AET is not improved by allogeneic SCT due to a higher complication rate. The patient group was to small to analyze for a possible graft-versus-tumor effect.

Graft vs autoimmunity following allogeneic non-myeloablative blood stem cell transplantation in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia and severe systemic psoriasis and psoriatic polyarthritis

OBJECTIVE

No specific therapy exists for autoimmune diseases caused by self-reactive lymphocytes. As shown in experimental animals, which led to pilot clinical studies, elimination of self-reactive lymphocytes can be accomplished with high-dose chemoradiotherapy, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation, by re-establishment of unresponsiveness to self antigens of newly generated lymphocytes, due to a mechanism of central clonal deletion. We hypothesized that self-reactive lymphocytes causing autoimmune disease may be successfully eliminated by highly immunosuppressive yet not necessarily myeloablative conditioning in conjunction with allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation, since immunocompetent alloreactive lymphocytes of donor origin can effectively eliminate residual host-type hematopoietic cells, self-reactive lymphocytes included, by a mechanism that resembles graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) effects. The present report is an attempt to confirm the existence of graft-vs-autoimmunity (GVA) effects in parallel with amplification of the alloreactive potential of donor lymphocytes following allogeneic non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST).

METHODS

We identified a patient with severe psoriatic arthritis who also had Philadelphia (bcr/abl) positive chronic myelogenous leukemia and therefore was fully eligible for NST. Both diseases responded initially to non-myeloablative conditioning involving fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 6, anti-T-lymphocyte globulin 10 mg/kg X 4, and busulfan 4 mg/kg x 2.

RESULTS

The initial NST procedure was uneventful and resulted in elimination of all signs of autoimmunity (psoriasis and arthritis). Recurrence of polyarthritis and exacerbation of psoriasis were observed in parallel with a significant increase in the proportion of male (host) DNA, and 5% of the mitoses were bcr/abl positive, indicating an increase in the clone of CML. Both bcr/abl-positive cells identified by RT-PCR and psoriatic arthritis were successfully eliminated following discontinuation of anti-GVHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine A (CSA), which resulted in activation of the alloreactive potential of donor T cells, accompanied by graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), suggesting the existence of GVA effects. RT-PCR for bcr/abl remains consistently negative for nearly 3 years, and all DNA remains donor type.

CONCLUSIONS

The response of autoimmune disease manifestations to GVA effects in parallel with elimination of all host-derived hematopoietic cells supports our working hypothesis that autoimmune diseases caused by self-reactive lymphocytes may be effectively treated by elimination of alloreactive self-reactive lymphocytes following induction of host-vs-graft tolerance, in analogy with replacement of malignant or genetically abnormal host cells following DLI. It is therefore suggested that intentional GVA effects may be inducible by DLI following a conventional or preferably safer non-myeloablative regimen in recipients with life-threatening autoimmune diseases resistant to conventional modalities. Adoptive immunotherapy of autoimmunity may thus involve a two-step procedure: first, inducing host-vs-graft and graft-vs-host transplantation tolerance through a transient stage of mixed chimerism; second, inducing controlled GVA effects, initially by discontinuation of CSA and then, if indicated, by late outpatient DLI to eradicate residual hematopoietic cells of host origin.

Effect of indomethacin on tumorigenicity and immunity induction in a murine model of mammary carcinoma

Indomethacin, an inhibitor of cyclo-oxygenase given orally, reduced the tumorigenicity of cancer cells in a non-immunogenic murine model of mammary adenocarcinoma (4T1). In the presence of indomethacin, a dose-dependent immune protection could be induced most effectively by immunizing mice with 1 to 3 doses of irradiated tumor cells inoculated at intervals of 7 days prior to challenge with a tumorigenic cell dose. Three immunizations given without indomethacin resulted in tumor growth in 88% of the recipients, and indomethacin treatment started 28 days prior to the challenge dose and given without immunizations led to tumor onset in 83% of mice. In contrast, tumor was documented only in 12% of mice vaccinated with 3 immunization doses and given concomitantly indomethacin. Moreover, 53% of disease-free survivors resisted a second challenge with a high tumorigenic dose. Induction of an anti-tumor immunity in indomethacin-treated mice was further studied as a therapy for tumor-bearing mice. Complete cure was induced in 50% of mice, and a significant reduction in tumor size as well as prolonged survival time were observed in the remaining animals. Immunostimulation by tumor cell vaccination given in the presence of a tolerable dose of indomethacin, therefore, may be incorporated into immunotherapy protocols to activate an anti-tumor response against residual tumor cells that escaped surgery and/or high-dose chemo/radiotherapy.